Slashdot Mirror


Why Is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students?

I am a new graduate student in Computer Engineering. I would like to get my MS and possibly my Ph.D. I have learned that 90% of my department is from India and many others are from China. All the students come here to study and there are only 7 US citizens in the engineering program this year. Why is that? I have heard that many of the smarter Americans go into medicine or the law and that is why there are so few Americans in engineering. Is this true?

1,131 comments

  1. and? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    The problem is?

    The world always needs more lawyers.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:and? by delong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This actually is true. Advanced societies that are governed by the rule of law and that require complex rules will naturally require more lawyers. Most people think of Law and Order when someone says "lawyer", but that ignores the far larger practice area of corporate and commercial law that governs extremely complex commercial behavior that makes a modern capitalism economy hum. Nobody thinks about the Uniform Commercial Code as a vital piece of maintaining civilization, but it is.

      Besides that, medicine and law are recession proof. Hell, they are nuclear-war proof.

    2. Re:and? by aurispector · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a practicing dentist I can positively say that health care is NOT recession proof. I have seen lots of folks with untreated or undertreated medical conditions when they lack insurance or the resources for treatment. Health care is less and less of a good deal for Doctors of all types because of decreasing insurance payments and increasing hassle.

      Elsewhere in this discussion it is being said that the purpose of higher education is to earn more money. This may be true for some, but it's also true that education allows you to do something more interesting or fulfilling.

      Regarding the original topic, my graduating class was about 1/3 were asian immigrants with a sprinkling of middle easterners, africans and caribbean types. Of the asians the majority were Vietnamese (incidentally these folks were the most patriotic Americans you might find - they love it here) I don't know of anyone that went back to their country of origin.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    3. Re:and? by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      Law is a vital part of society, yes. The problem arises when it's practiced to the exclusion of knowledge creation, such that we have an abundance of regulations but fail to provide the benefits of living in a society that needs such laws. Thus, it's important to have sound policies governing a technological society, but not to the extent that nations cease to be involved in advancement of any other aspect of the society. Also, to put it bluntly, attempting to regulate something we had no role in producing is somewhat hypocritical.

      There shouldn't be a need to choose, though. As a society, we should be able to adequately support both science and law; societies that couldn't advance in both directions simply withered prior to globalization, leaving only the ones that could. A failure to adequately do both now using homegrown talent probably indicates a recent problem with our education or culture.

    4. Re:and? by BarkLouder · · Score: 1, Funny

      The world always needs more lawyers.

      .........at the bottom of the ocean.......

    5. Re:and? by Viraptor · · Score: 1

      What problems? It's just history repeating itself. They just trade students now, but soon they will come with magic sticks that throw fire and all that US guy will be left with, is some land for his asian-tax-free casino ;)

      Watch my karma go down, down, down...

    6. Re:and? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your sig says I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.

      The mod points seem kind of unnecessary:

      As a practicing dentist...

    7. Re:and? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Better yet, piggyback them on the penultimate stage of any orbital rocket so they burn up in the atmosphere as it comes back down. I reckon that pollution would be less harmful than corpses at the bottom of the ocean, plus it will make more work for engineers, thus encouraging more students to study engineering instead of law.

      Tow birds with one stone!

    8. Re:and? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Thus, it's important to have sound policies governing a technological society

      And lawyers create these?

      Right now a lawyer is IM'ing me asking how to sabotage a computer and make it look accidental in order to claim a warranty.

    9. Re:and? by siufish · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      What's up with kdawson today? Did some Chinese or Indian punch him in the face, kick him in the nuts, steal his girl and take his job? It has been 3 posts since yesterday that blatantly target foreigners. And he so skilfully pushed /.ers' three hot buttons: Education, offshoring and human rights.

      Seriously, he is doing a great job in pushing up the number of /. comments, which is probably one of the metrics of his performance as an editor.

    10. Re:and? by Ice+Wewe · · Score: 1

      .........at the bottom of the ocean.......

      Now, just step into these buckets of wet concrete, and I'll be back to check on you in a while...

      Five Franklins says you sink... Oh, look, $500!

    11. Re:and? by budgenator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your problem is most people don't see dental care as health care, it's seen as an elective cosmetic and vainity thing. We know the the kind of havok periodontal or endodontic infections can have on the patients health, but tell the average person on the street that a gum infection can cause inflamation that can and does lead to heart attacks and kills people and they'll look at you like your stupid. The other problem is your dental school glossed over something and that's removeables, removeables are booming right now, monday I'm going to have to order more articulators. I've got so many dentures in the lab that I've run out of articulators friday, and the complete and partials are expected to just keep growing until 2025, yet most dentists just blow off denture patients, yet they refer out almost all of their extractions to OS and the majority endo all without get a referal fee from the specialists. If you want to make money, learn removeables inside and out, start doing your own extractions and endo except the really difficult cases, and do Medical billing whjen ever possible. Medical billing gives you bigger fees, less writeoffs and saves the dental maximums for dental care.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    12. Re:and? by ericartman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah I used to say this, until I had to go to court over some serious money. I hired an ex pit bull and when the dust settled I sent her flowers and will never be able to thank her enough. Yeah the ones (lawyers) that go into government, seem to end up jerks IMO. When you just gotta have one though they are worth their weight in gold.

      Cart

    13. Re:and? by Bill+Dog · · Score: 1

      ...pushing up the number of /. comments, which is probably one of the metrics...

      Ya think?

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
    14. Re:and? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Problem is dental care is horribly overpriced. And insurance companies and other treat it as if it is a "cosmetic" service instead of a real health issue. Bad teeth = bad health yet dential insurance is the crappiest on the planet and outside of the rich you are hard pressed to find someone with good healthy teeth. I had to spend well over $10,000 on my daughters orthodontics, that is insane for a bunch of wires and superglued on blocks for the wires. at the time I was very much lower middle class ($60,000 a year) and could not even think of affording invisiline or the other upscale stuff.

      I deal with construction people daily and 7 out of 10 of them you can easily tell they have a bad infection going on in their mouth as you can smell it in their breath. (yes you can smell it, some are so bad that a mouth full of tictacs cant mask it) That is insanely high, yet the dentists and dental associations really don't seem to care about afford ability to dental care. when a patient is told, $3500.00 to save that tooth and put a crown on it or $490.00 to yank it out. Guess what the poor person ($35,000 or less) is going to do?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe you're highly mistaken that you're lower middle class at 60K / year, according to wikipedia your income is above the median of every state in the union.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States#Median_income

    16. Re:and? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Informative

      In what part of the country is $60k/yr lower middle class? Maybe in SF, but you can pull down that sort of money hauling trash there.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:and? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Advanced societies that are governed by the rule of law and that require complex rules will naturally require more lawyers.

      What a load of nonsense. You're making 2 assumptions:

      1) That advanced socities have complex law.
      2) Lawyers are needed.

      An "advanced" society will have people who have internalized the law -- they don't need others to interpret it for them. Do YOU need a law against killing? Of course not -- you know better. A civilization where people are blind to the consequences of their actions is not advanced. Advanced socities have LESS laws, because in reality there is only a few Laws: The Law of Karma, and the Law of Love, everything else springs from ignorance, greed, or power.

      Western civilization is by no means advanced. When you still have people arguing over Intellectual Property Rights which are neither Property nor Rights, you have an IMMATURE society.

      Lawyers are a necessary evil, because people don't know any better.

      --
      The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government
        -- Tacit, 56-117 AD

    18. Re:and? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      More importantly, this is America. Nobody likes a smart person. Also, who the hell can afford to go into debt a quarter million dollars?

    19. Re:and? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      In the days before travel between cities became safe, you could hire some rough looking thugs to protect against bandits.

      Personally, I feel it's best not to have a society which requires you to hire rough looking thugs in the first place, than to say "Well, the thugs you can hire are better than the thugs who attack you!".

      --
      It's been a long time.
    20. Re:and? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      As a practicing dentist I can positively say that health care is NOT recession proof.

      Dentistry might not be, but MDs might be a little luckier about that. People tend to put off going to the dentist unless it's drastically needed. Especially since dentists have a habit of finding things wrong where you didn't think there was any problem.

    21. Re:and? by johndunlop · · Score: 1

      Dental care is extremely expensive for what you get ( although I am sure the money all goes somewhere) My mouth is a disaster area - but there is now way I am paying three grand to save a tooth. What we need is open source dental care !

    22. Re:and? by irishdaze · · Score: 2

      I can't believe it took this long for someone to say that . . . College, and especially post-grad, is EXPENSIVE. I pay about $200 in tuition/fees for 3 credits at a community college. My boyfriend pays $3,000 for 3 credits to finish his Master's degree in Biotechnology. With right-out-of-college jobs paying $40,000 gross, at best, who wants to start their career that much in debt for a job with that kind of pay?

      --
      -- Dedicated Cthulhu cultist since 1982 A.C.E.
    23. Re:and? by vivian · · Score: 1

      Just because a dental problem is not causing you pain yet, doesn't mean it isn't there.
      would you rather your dentist just ignored the smaller holes and waited until they became huge holes?

    24. Re:and? by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Corpses in the ocean would be harmful? Jesus, I hope all the dead fish realize that and politely get out.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    25. Re:and? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Close, but no cigar.

      Doing grad school in any country is a low initial return operation for 95% of the scientific disciplines including CS.

      It may give you a better return on your invested time and effort in the long run, but in the short term it does not provide you with any advance on the salary ladder. In fact it is often a hindrance for finding jobs in the commercial sector.

      At the same time it is one of the very few chances given to foreign students without a rich daddy to receive an American (or other developed country) diploma. If we compare bachelor's at degrees in the USA to grad school, in the first 4 years there is practically no way for a foreign student to be 100% funded solely on the basis on his academic merit. The numbers hardly ever come out in the black. Compared to that in grad school foreign students are nearly always funded to 100% level. On top of that they are allowed and expected to teach so they get extra money in addition to their scholarships. In return they are expected to work as slaves for 3-4 and sometimes more years for their academic mentors generating all those publications needed in order to get funding. This means 12 or more hours per day, 6 or more days per week as a rule. It is not surprising that you see very few Americans (or British in the UK) doing that. In fact many places prefer to take foreigners for this exact reason. They work like slaves for pittance and do not complain.

      As far as your observation about "more lawyers" I think the more correct observation is the "The Academentia needs more slaves".

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    26. Re:and? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      'An "advanced" society will have people who have internalized the law'.

      Ah yes, we call that DRM at the moment, but in the future things will be different.

      You'll all be like the dog that chases a cat and then stops right at the invisible radio fence. You might even think it's the only way to be safe from the evil hackers and terrorists.

      A penny for your thoughts? The *AA et all will want more.

      --
    27. Re:and? by owndao · · Score: 1

      I personally wanted to continue my education toward a doctorate at Georgia Tech in Electrical Engineering or pursue a second degree in Physics (my boss in the physics dept. encouraged me to obtain an assistantship with the physics dept.) but even with the assistantship I could not afford to pay the out of state tuition.

      Georgia law stated that one must be 1) employed in state for a year (I was a physics dept. TA for 3 years and Technical Assistant concurrently for 1 year), 2) have residency in the state, and 3) not be there for the purpose of obtaining an education (Catch 22!!). I even considered dropping out for a year but I feared that something would come up in the interim to interfere with returning (marriage and a child).

      Many people that I have know from other countries that went on to graduate school were being subsidized from abroad so they could concentrate on their education rather than worry where their next meal was coming from. This, of course, was not always the case as many foreign students were able to make it by going the assistantship route and teaching labs. I don't know how they were able to make ends meet while living in downtown Atlanta.

      --
      Be as you would have the world become.
    28. Re:and? by pablochacin · · Score: 1

      This actually is true. Advanced societies that are governed by the rule of law and that require complex rules will naturally require more lawyers. Actually, trully advanced societies should require LESS laws and less lawyers.
    29. Re:and? by ranton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In what part of the country is $60k/yr lower middle class? Maybe in SF, but you can pull down that sort of money hauling trash there.

      Basically everywhere. In San Francisisco it wouldnt even be considered middle class at all. Maybe in Kentucky $60k/yr is a decent family income, but you would be hard pressed to afford a $200k house on that.

      $60k/yr is definetly middle class, but just barely. I think it is around $45k-$55k in most areas that you move out of the working class and into the middle class.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    30. Re:and? by edjs · · Score: 1

      Ouch. Those prices are whacky. A dozen years ago, I had an extraction done for less than cdn$100, then some crowns for $660 per. Two years ago a crown cost me $900 or so (the crowns were 50% covered by insurance). An implant I'm considering would cost about $3000. The price of ten years of dental neglect and fear of the cost of dentistry while I was uninsured. As an added bonus, the bad teeth are the likely source of a chronic sinus infection, which is costing more for our health system to try and fix and demonstrating the artificial distinction between basic health and dental care coverages.

    31. Re:and? by rpillala · · Score: 2, Informative

      FWIW here in Calvert County Maryland you'd have a hard time getting good housing at that rate. I think part of the perception of what's middle class and upper and lower etc has to do with the recent housing bubble. People I know bought their townhouses for $130k 6 years ago and now those houses are selling for $300k. Whereas 60k might have been pretty livable here at that time it isn't anymore, certainly not for a family.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    32. Re:and? by butlerdi · · Score: 1

      The bin men in SF would not work for that. When I lived there the private firms were doing the job and those guys all owned rental property. Not the owners, the dustmen. They all seemed to be Italian as well .....

      --
      "If the King's English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!" -- "Ma" Ferguson, Governor of Texas (circa
    33. Re:and? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      This lawyer is a divorce attorney, right?

    34. Re:and? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      So now the thugs wear gray suits with bad ties and fight a battle of attrition in the court room, to see who can wear out the judge first? This is better how? At least with the hired thugs, you knew the results before the end of the day.

    35. Re:and? by bytesex · · Score: 3, Informative

      200K * 6% per year interest is 1000$ a month, plus a bit of paying off, say 1200$ a month; 60K income per year gives you 5000$ a month, taxed at perhaps 30% makes 3500$ - 1200$ = 2300$ a month free for food, gadgets, children and repairs. Maybe it's because I live in a relatively risk-free area, but if 6% is reasonable, then your calculations are way off.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    36. Re:and? by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about everywhere else, but in the Rust Belt 60K/yr is considered solidly professional-grade, a bit above the median rate for programmers, sys admins, and other professional workers.

      I decided to look up the stats on this issue, and this is what I found: According to the US Census 60K a year would put you well into the second-highest quintile for household income, which is generally upper-middle class. Also, 60K a year is higher than the median rate for those with 4-year degrees. Ohio is close to the middle of the median income range, so I'd say the 60K/yr is a bit higher than a large number of smart people are getting.

      This sounds to me like you're suffering from the natural bias that comes from being used to a certain income level, namely thinking that you're an "average" person. You aren't, according to the statistics you're doing well above average. This isn't surprising, a lot of smart people do better than average, but don't think for a minute that's average. I've seen this sort of thing before: I had a college roommate who thought he was part of an average family, both of his parents made 6 figures.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    37. Re:and? by JrOldPhart · · Score: 1

      Health care is less and less of a good deal for Doctors of all types because of decreasing insurance payments and increasing hassle.

      The cause is more laws and more lawyers. The insurance companies are working toward laws that make it mandatory to pay them and yet another set of laws that say that they do not have to pay your medical care professionals.

      It is the insurance companies today who prescribe. Not the doctors. And the Doctors spend their money on protection insurance. Protection against the litigation.
      Shakespeare was right, We really do need to hang all of the lawyers.

      --
      Nothing is foolproof, fools are too ingenious. - Murphy
    38. Re:and? by JrOldPhart · · Score: 1

      I would rather hire "Guido" to watch my back than J.Phucket Esq. to cover my legal exposure. An exposure that he and his cronies invented in the first place.

      - Institute a bounty for lawyers!

      --
      Nothing is foolproof, fools are too ingenious. - Murphy
    39. Re:and? by houghi · · Score: 1

      As much as 10.000USD is way overpriced for a retainer, unless under very rare circimstances, having croocked teeth is not a health issue. Yes, there are situations where it might be the case, but in 99% of the cases it is a cosmetic issue.

      Also look at the prices for flights outside your country. For that money you could have take a trip abroad, pay for whatever you needed and have a nice vacation on the side.

      The reason he asked 10.000USD is because that is how captalism works. You do not pay the lowest price, you get offerd the price the majority is willing to pay. He rather has 1 customer for 10.000 then 10 for 1.000

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    40. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An "advanced" society will have people who have internalized the law -- they don't need others to interpret it for them. Do YOU need a law against killing? Of course not -- you know better.

      This utopian view has been proposed frequently through history and has, so far, always been shown wrong. Plato's republic, Marx's commune, Pullman. They just don't work because they all depend on the citizens having a common value system and common ideals, and that just won't happen, regardless of how "advanced," apparently in the Brave New World sense, a society becomes.

      YOU may know better than to kill, in all circumstances, but most people have something they value higher than the prohibition against murder-their kids, their spouse, their own person... The threshold at which it's justifiable to take another life is different for everyone; likewise the threshold at which it's justifiable to steal, lie, cheat, or otherwise step outside of the rules we've all basically internalized. The proliferation of laws reflects increasing effort to codify the "internal" value system of a heterogeneous population.

      If "advanced" cultures are so homogeneous as not to need laws, then I never want to be part of one.

    41. Re:and? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Of course simple laws are better but you'll always find people who want to bend them and then the rule lawyering starts and in some situations intuition won't cut it to find someone guilty or not guilty. What's obvious to one person isn't to another and that ends in dispute, the law shoud be capable of resolving such disputes by being clear. Unfortunately complex situations require complex laws to handle.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    42. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the Metro-DC area, especially within five miles of the I495 loop or beltway, $60k/yr as a total household income is definately lower middle class. If both parents work and make $70k/yr each, then with a total household income between $130k and $150k/yr they land in middle-middle class.

      With housing being a large cost in any family budget, and apartments being extremely scarce, families often locate further out - meaning the parents enjoy a commute of two hours or more, each way, to work. Sacrificing 4 hours per day with their families, these parents earn a middle class income but have lower middle class housing costs, thereby attaining a middle class to upper middle class lifestyle at the cost of family time, stress, car / travel costs and other costs.

      Households with less than $90k/yr total income are considered lower class, to lower middle class in the Metro-DC (mid-atlantic USA) area.

      FWIW, people in the Metro-DC area get paid $20/hr to mow yards, because lower class yard help is not available because no close-in lower class or affordable housing is available. $20/hr = $40k/yr.

      At $60k/yr, the wage earner could be a manager of lawn mowing crews, in the Metro-DC area.

      Oh, and everything costs about twice as much in the Metro-DC area as it does anywhere else. Highest prices in the nation on gas, milk, bread, restaurants, etc etc.

      Oh, and the surrounding States (MD and VA) treat the Metro-DC area as a cash-cow. They are forever increasing taxes on these counties, while reducing services delivered. The revenue raised is redistributed to the rest of the State. In Va for instance one will find 21 cash negative counties and 9 cash positive counties in terms of aggregate State Tax Revenue. So, four counties in Northern Virginia "contribute" more than half of the entire State of Virginia budget each year, yet, have the worst traffic in the State and constantly have to vote in new bonds just to get local road improvements or to keep the public schools at the same level of performance or for parks, hospitals, libraries - all the stuff these same taxpayers are already paying massive amounts of tax dollars to support.

      That's one place where $60k/year is lower middle class income.

      I would expect Manhattan to be another, San Francisco to be another, Chicago to be another, etc.

    43. Re:and? by raind · · Score: 1

      Amen to that

      --
      Get up!
    44. Re:and? by aurispector · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow. I can't get over the number of incorrect assumptions you are making.

      First, I have lots of un- or underinsured patients that can't afford perio or endo treatment; this problem gets worse during recessions.

      Second, the study proving that periodontal disease CAUSES heart disease has yet to be completed AFAIK it's due in '08. (Either that or the guys at U. Penn don't know what they're talking about) Yes, there are studies showing a CORRELATION between the two, but as we all know, correlation is NOT causation.

      Third, who says I wasn't taught about dentures? I do a TON of dentures but if you think about it, dentures indicate a failure of previous dental treatment. My practice suffers because I could earn a lot more money providing perio, endo, implant and crown & bridge services to a given patient. How much do you earn doing extractions and dentures? How much would you earn doing more complex treatments that would preserve natural dentition?

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    45. Re:and? by Glock27 · · Score: 4, Informative
      only a MORON would pay $1000 a year for a 200K home. you know the idiots that buy those creative loans. a TRADITIONAL loan thatyou do not get screwed on your $200,000 home will cost you about $2100.00 a month even at 7%

      k...looking at Quicken Loans, if you have good credit you can get a $190,000, 30 year fixed loan (you need at least a 5% down payment these days, $10,000) at 6.25% interest, which is $1,169 a month. That's with good credit of course, but that's a whole 'nother discussion. If you really want to get ahead of the curve, pay an extra $100 to $200 a month against the principle.

      You can play around with the extra payments (prepayments) at Karl's Mortgage Calculator if you want. In the example above, an extra $100 from the start shortens the loan from 30 years to 24 years, 3 months. $200 a month would shorten the loan to 20 years 7 months.

      So, in short, you're way off base. :-)

      $200k will get you a nice house in a lot of the country...and it'll get you more in a few more months. ;-)

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    46. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >completely retarted morons

      Now, there's an AC that walks the walk...

    47. Re:and? by aurispector · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately dental care IS very expensive. One of the issues is that you spend far more time in the chair than you do in a physician's office. Another is the ridiculous prices dentists get charged for virtually all instruments, materials and supplies. Overhead is a large part of the bill.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    48. Re:and? by TheMidnight · · Score: 1

      Towing birds with one stone would require a lot of rock 'n' roll.

    49. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't see dental care as superfluous. I don't even fail to realize that infection can cause death, either. I just don't have any money to pay for it.

    50. Re:and? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 3, Informative

      And if your property taxes on a $200,000 house are $3600 a year (and some places, like New Jersey, can easily hit three times that level of taxes for a $200,000 home) and you're also smart enough to have homeowner's insurance and flood insurance (where floods are a risk), and your monthly payment is around $1600.

      Still doable on a $60,000 gross income, but not by as much of a margin as you'd think.

      And property taxes are a tough one. Most parents have three choices: pay cheap property taxes in a district and send your kids to mediocre public schools, pay high property taxes and send your kids to decent public schools, or pay cheap property taxes and then spend lots of extra money sending your kids to decent private schools.

    51. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      havoc

    52. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And paying less than 20-30% usually means you get hit with major PMI.

      -- Yeah ... you go ahead and pay 5% down.

    53. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just don't work because they all depend on the citizens having a common value system and common ideals, and that just won't happen, regardless of how "advanced," I can tell you have not been to Japan. Most know about this thing called ethics. Those who fail completely are executed. It works and works well.
    54. Re:and? by IHSW · · Score: 1

      I'm a Native American to Canada and the price of dental care is not a concern to me, as it's currently a government subsidy for my people. Am I a bad person?

    55. Re:and? by Gregb05 · · Score: 1

      You're thinking normal corpses; These would be lawyer corpses, which, while better than live lawyers, still corrupt everything they touch.

      --
      --
    56. Re:and? by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      You forgot taxes ($300-500 a month), telephone+cable+internet service ($100-200 a month), clothes ($50 per month per person), car/transportation costs ($100-300 per commuter). Also, is savings a consideration? I've been told saving $200 should be a goal.

      Considering the things you mentioned... food is a requirement ($100-150 per month per person). Gadgets, extra stuff for the kids, and repairs on the house are really impossible to estimate.

      Now... if $2300 is the baseline for all this... Following the "cheap" estimates from above... 300+100+(3*50)+(2*200)+200+(3*100)=$1,450. This leaves a lower-middle class living standard for a family with one kid, with enough left over for annual unexpected costs.

      Following the "expensive" estimates from above (which are by no means "high-end" upper-middle class estimates)... 500+200+(4*50)+(2*300)+200+(4*150)=$2300.

      Bang! You've got two kids, but no money to repair the house.

      Also, it occurs to me that even with the extra considerations, things like heat/electricity and health case were not accounted for. So, YES... for the class of citizens who are buying a home with a mortgage of $200+k... $60k is lower-middle class.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    57. Re:and? by alcmena · · Score: 1

      You, like almost every who talks about mortgage payments, are forgetting the TI part of PITI (principle, interest, taxes, insurance). The TI will run you an additional $200-$500/month, depending on where you live.

    58. Re:and? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      OK my "leads to" could have been stated in a way that didn't come across as a direct causation and more like a contributory factor, still one could say that cigarette smoking doesn't cause HA if you defined causality tight enough.
      How much would you earn doing more complex treatments that would preserve natural dentition?
      if people quit tobacco, brushed, flossed, got their prophy twice a year and worn a biteguard at night half of us would be flipping burger's.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    59. Re:and? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      looking at Quicken Loans
      First mistake. Their offered rates are never what they advertise.

      , if you have good credit you can get a $190,000, 30 year fixed loan (you need at least a 5% down payment these days, $10,000) at 6.25% interest, which is $1,169 a month
      Ah, no. If you want that rate, you need a 20% down payment. This means $47.5k up front for a loan of $190k (home price of 237,500).

      Less than 20% down means you'll need to get a HELOC in order to get a 20% down payment, and rates on HELOCs are typically around 3% higher; or you'll need to get PMI, which costs a couple hundred (or more) bucks a month.

      Now, to fit this in against a person making $60,000 a year...

      Most mortgage companies will only issue a loan at their best rate (i.e., the rate quoted on the Quicken website) if their monthly PITI is less than 25% of the borrower's net monthly income. So, using the $1169/mo figure for mortgage, and assuming NO income taxes are paid by the borrower, their property taxes and insurance (or HELOC payment) must be less than $324 a month. Good luck with that.

      In short, you cannot EVER use those teaser interest rates to estimate affordability of housing.

      Also, I'd like to note that in the areas where $200k will buy you a nice house, it's unlikely that a person making $60k in, say, Chicago would be able to find employment for anything close to $60k.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    60. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Unless you come out of grad school entirely free of loan debt, single-family housing is not an option for two-earner, U.S.-Government-salaried families in the D.C./Baltimore Metro area. (It's worse in Northern Virginia; it's no longer much better north of Baltimore.) Thank God prices have been pretty flat the past 18 months: 2000-2005 saw a 300% increase in the cost of housing in Washington/Baltimore. Federal salary cost-of-living-increase during that same period was only about 25%.

      In GS (pay rank) terms, you're talking what used to take a couple GS-9s (mean entry grade for folks with a master's degree) or a single GS-13 (the mean grade for all employees, generally achieved mid-to-late-30s)...now takes two 13s or a nearly-maxed out 15 (top end of the general payscale; seldom achieved before mid-40s. Will Farrell's SNL character disrespected-dad-with-his-own-government-parking-spot would have been a GS-15).

      Imagine: being able to afford a freestanding home on a half-acre lot to raise your children just as they start finishing college.

      Unless whole federal agencies get moved to entirely other cities, or something is done to make housing affordable for the under-35 crowd (e.g. student loan forgiveness for civil service; housing assistance like the military gets), civil service in the nation's capital won't be a viable option for anyone but the upper class and singles who split apartment/townhouse costs with roommates.

      As for my then-immediate reaction to your post:

      Townhouses?! Try those $300,000-used-to-be-$130,000 condos that used to be $75,000 in 2000/2001...and $60,000 in 1999. (Remember, 300% is the average increase.)

      Granted, this is in Prince Georges County.

      By the Silver Spring metro (Montgomery County), they built a bunch of townhouses in 1998. They were selling for $200,000. Last I knew -- about four years ago -- they were going well over $600,000. Hell, new townhouses by Wheaton Metro were going close for $750,000 a couple years ago. (Remember when rent controlled apartment housing in Bethesda was limited to households with incomes under $90,000? Probably not: it was 2002. And even then I couldn't afford to live there.)

    61. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you have not been to Japan. Most know about this thing called ethics. Those who fail completely are executed.

      Yeah, the Yakuza pretty much define "advanced society." I'm definitely glad I'm not part of it.
    62. Re:and? by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      I my neighborhood, you'd spend an extra $400 per month in County taxes and $400 in School taxes. If you only put down 5%, add another $100 for mortgage insurance and you are over $2000 a month. Yes, all those number are for a $200,000 house.

      Also, a 60K IT job is pretty rare around here. Very few are making that much. However, the average garbage man makes $55K in my town and works at most 5 hours a day.

    63. Re:and? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      To a point that is true. But when the rule of law makes the jump from a body of legal principles, to the the arbitrary legislation of legal codes, then lawyers become rent seekers and collude with the legislators. They become a tax on society.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    64. Re:and? by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      I can tell you that colleges in the early 1960s were quick to vividly point out that education was not for people who wanted to earn more money. The expectation was that a college student should love learning for learnings sake. As a proof of concept poetry and astronomy were mentioned. Poets tend to starve until they rot. Job openings in astronomy are almost non-existent and are usually low paying. The only thing likely with a Ph.D. in astronomy is that one will teach others to be astronomers. Often the pay scales in universities reflect these realities. A doctorate in chemistry may earn you a good salary in the university but a doctorate in astronomy may enable far lower wages in the same school. And if you are teaching poetry you sure as heck better have published so well known works or you salary in a university may keep you eating bread crumbs.

    65. Re:and? by reanjr · · Score: 1

      No use presenting facts. People who think 60,000 is lower middle class either have no concept of money and its value or deep down believe that most of America is an unlivable wasteland of degenerates.

    66. Re:and? by architimmy · · Score: 1

      Of course doctors are making less money! There's only so much money in a system at any one point. At the moment the insurance companies have figured out how to make it all roll downhill in their direction. So while doctors used to make a lot, now insurance companies are cutting into everyone else's profits to pad their own. It's one of the whole "gut the system and screw the consequences" examples of modern golden-parachute CEO-ism prevalent in our current corporate culture.

      At least that's my completely uninformed opinion.

    67. Re:and? by shiftless · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Basically everywhere. In San Francisisco it wouldnt even be considered middle class at all. Maybe in Kentucky $60k/yr is a decent family income, but you would be hard pressed to afford a $200k house on that.

      Uh, not quite. In Alabama, which is a very nice place to live, $60k/year is damn good income. That's middle class to upper middle class living. A $200k house? That's pretty much a mansion here, or it's located on prime real estate. Most good housing in a good neighborhood is under $100k here, with plenty of decent houses available in the $40k-$50k range. A three bedroom house in a subdivision is around $130k-$140k max. Quiet, beautiful forest land is abundant and good land goes for $2500-$3000/acre.

      This is just Alabama. You're forgetting about Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina, North Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Iowa, Ohio, etc, etc, etc.

    68. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As a practicing dentist..."
      Completely OT, but, if you can get in touch with me, I'd love it.
      I know a ~30-year-old female with atypical trigeminal neuralgia sinister that manifested during/after an impacted wisdom tooth extraction four years prior. She lives in the Philadelphia, PA, USA area. She's not a candidate for any classical TN surgeries (not even balloon compression nor gamma knife); she has only had a a nerve block and mildly-successful two-point cryosurgery via entry in the oral cavity but the pain returned after five weeks with a vengeance. I was wondering if you (1) might know of any neurologists she could try (aside from the Univ of Penn, which is where she's been going), and/or (2) any dentists in the area who perform work under full anaesthesia without charging out the wazoo (she can barely open her teeth wide enough to get two fingers in her mouth, and holding her mouth open is painful... not to mention the area affected by the problematic mandibular nerve on patient's left side); she hasn't been able to get work done in several years, especially because she lost her good insurance and is now on very mediocre insurance.

      If you know anyone who could do anything for her, she would very much appreciate it. If not, don't overly trouble yourself trying to find someone; it's ok (she's still pursuing several channels for treatment and references.. just hasn't had much good luck).
      - os AT os DOT sh DOT nu

    69. Re:and? by Skreems · · Score: 1

      This leaves a lower-middle class living standard for a family with one kid, with enough left over for annual unexpected costs.
      The problem, of course, is that you're doing these calculations with the assumption that this family is going to live below their means. That's not something most people in this country do, anymore.
      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    70. Re:and? by vigmeister · · Score: 1

      "I personally wanted to continue my education toward a doctorate at Georgia Tech in Electrical Engineering or pursue a second degree in Physics (my boss in the physics dept. encouraged me to obtain an assistantship with the physics dept.) but even with the assistantship I could not afford to pay the out of state tuition."

      I am not sure if you are under some sort of misapprehension, but an assistantship pays for your out of state tuition and you pay something ridiculous like under a 100 dollars for a semester. The assistantship also generally pays you a stipend of around $1500 a month which is ample to live as a bachelor in downtown atlanta.

      I really hope that you did not put off graduate school because you were misinformed.

      FWIW, I go to Georgia Tech and hope to start graduate school in January with an assistantship.

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    71. Re:and? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The lawyer method is better, because the thug method encourages violence.

      If you prefer a place where "rule of thugs" trumps "rule of law" go to one of those thug ridden countries in Africa.

      If you don't like the laws, work to get them changed. Many "rule of law" places aren't that crap. Whereas I can't think of a "rule of thugs" place that isn't crap.

      --
    72. Re:and? by hey! · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet that societies where people have "internalized the law" are socities that simply have less visible and format methods of enforcing social norms. For example, shame is a powerful controller of behavior, but it works best in societies that have low standards for privacy. If you live crammed in with your neighbors, and work communally, say hunting or fishing, so much of what you do is visible that you can't transgress without being caught. If you live in a society where people are isolated from their neighbors, you need the sheriff to keep rogues in line.

      The problem here is the sloppy use of the word "advanced" as a synonym for "sophisticated", or perhaps "efficient".

      What the GP is talking about when he says "advanced" are technological societies in which the combination of specialization and size means that people participate in chains of activiies that depend in crucial ways on the orderly cooperation of people who are not closely tied together, either by bonds of kinship, friendship, or even direct contact.

      Such a way of organizing things is reasonable for a society like the US or Europe; it would be an inefficient and superfluous to govern a fishing village.

      The role of lawyer in our society is not only another example of specialization, it's relative importance is a reflection of our society's needs. In the US, it may also reflect the high degree of autonomy and privacy traditionally granted to individuals, along with its high degree of social and physical mobility. Individuals may violate norms because they are unfamiliar with them, have opportunity to do so relatively unobserved, can escape the consequence of violation, or simply disagree with those norms. In that case, the limits of individual freedom have to be explicitly spelled out and enforced in a more formally consistent way than they do in societies where loss of face is often irreperable harm.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    73. Re:and? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      No.

      Evictions on behalf of slum lords. :)

    74. Re:and? by EMCEngineer · · Score: 1

      I would like to hear from more foreign born students as to how they chose their career. It seems that in the US, the best and brightest are not told to go into the sciences or engineering. Students are told to do whatever they enjoy. Well most people seem to enjoy being lazy - so they go into the liberal arts. I have a very good friend who is very smart - probably smarter than I am. He doesn't really enjoy math - which would be bad for most sciences. But even with poor math skills he would be a great engineer, and an even better doctor. Instead he ended up getting a degree in PoliSci, and works in human resources for a mid-sized company. Hrmmm, makes me think of Tyler Durden's speech in Fight Club.

    75. Re:and? by mrops · · Score: 1

      "I don't know of anyone that went back to their country of origin."

      You Anwered it, I am from India, although I studied back home, I know most folks wanted to go to US because they wanted to get out of India. Grad school was one of the surest way of doing it. Even if they had to leave US, the world was open to them. This may not be entirely true anymore as India gets on the economic front, however getting out of India is still a big motivator, particularly for folks who weren't fortunate enough to get into IIT.

    76. Re:and? by StarvingSE · · Score: 2, Informative

      He can be considered lower middle class if he is supporting a wife who doesn't work and a couple of children, depending on how expensive the cost of living is in the area of course.

      If he's single an making 60K, then that's a different story.

      --
      I got nothin'
    77. Re:and? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      We're talking about Utopian societies here. Facts aren't allowed.

    78. Re:and? by Uart · · Score: 1

      ... and THANK GOD FOR THAT...

      Signed,
      1L at a top-25 law school

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    79. Re:and? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      Tell all of that to my employer who refuses to give us dental insurance.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    80. Re:and? by mstahl · · Score: 1

      I can positively say that health care is NOT recession proof.

      It could be if we get that whole national healthcare system going here in the States like it is everywhere else in the developed world (and in Cuba).... You'd get a steady paycheque and no child would suffer a cavity without adequate treatment.

    81. Re:and? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      Eh, or they're just surrounded by people who make significantly more than $60k. If you make $X and your peers and members of your social circle make $Y, which is greater than $X, you're going to feel as if $X is less than average, even if factually that may not be the case.

      Besides, even when people complain that $X is lower class, they neglect that even today's economic lower classes have significant improvements over lower classes in generations past. Today we assume things like TVs, cars, electricity, indoor plumbing, free education, and so forth are part of the "baseline." Only the poorest of the poor in America lack these "essentials."

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    82. Re:and? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't get me started on the Nova tax crap. They really should secede, especially after that $1000 traffic fee debacle last month.

      My story: I got a house in springfield in 2000 for $170k (townhouse with basement, no garage). The mortgage was $1200/mo and there was PMI. I could have done an 80/15 thing like I have now, but I was young and foolish. I made $60k starting (I assume it'd be different now) and had money for toys. I would probably be able to make 90k there, but that's a fair bit - if 90k is about the limit for middle class, then where are the middle class jobs? My perception is that 90k is a fairly well paid position and that there aren't that many people making that or more. If I'm mistaken, I'd love to know who it is making 90k and above.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    83. Re:and? by quintessentialk · · Score: 1

      Couldn't one argue that almost the entirety of the DC/NYC/etc. areas were upper class, simply by virtue of the fact they can afford to live there? In other words, why do we need define socioeconomic class as a function of location? People who truly can't afford to live in NY move to NJ, or to another city entirely.

    84. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're stupid. Not your stupid.

    85. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, when speaking of discrete objects like laws you should use "fewer," not "less," which latter is for continuous things like water. Then you sound more like you've had a real education and less like you're just another disposable programming tool.

      An excess of lawyers might indicate that too many laws are poorly written and thus allow too much interpretation and argument. So if an advanced civilization has advanced, well written laws --- meaning they're unambiguous and inarguable --- then maybe it needs fewer lawyers.

    86. Re:and? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > The thug method is better, because the lawyer method encourages lawyers.

      Here, I fixed that for you.

      While thuggery can be worse, I suggest that you watch some of the nastiness out of the thuggery that is the US court system to see where sending a battle of champions might be faster and cleaner.

    87. Re:and? by hherb · · Score: 1

      This is not so. As far as "advanced societies" goes, the US rank maybe in the upper mid field, but nowhere near the top as for example the Scandinavian societies which incidentally cope with a small fraction of the lawyers (per capita) that the US seems to think they need.

      As we speak, the US has the highest per capita ratio of prisoners of all OECD countries - that is, in no other OECD country that many people are locked away in jails - yet at the same time it is one of the unsafest countries too; sad records in homicides, gunshot wounds, rape, armed robbery, break-and-enter compared to most OECD countries again.

      Looks like the herds of lawyers in the US are not doing the population any good - I think in a free market they will do everything to "create business", even if this means they turn a high proportion of the population into criminals.

    88. Re:and? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      This is not so. As far as "advanced societies" goes, the US rank maybe in the upper mid field, but nowhere near the top as for example the Scandinavian societies which incidentally cope with a small fraction of the lawyers (per capita) that the US seems to think they need. Unlike the Scandinavian societies, the USA has more than one race, ethnicity and religion.

      We have problems because we're not all the same. That doesn't make us inferior, it makes us coping with a different situation.
    89. Re:and? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      An "advanced" society will have people who have internalized the law -- they don't need others to interpret it for them. Do YOU need a law against killing? Of course not -- you know better.

      I do, however, need a law which says that you should drive on the right side of the road. I also need the laws which regulate who goes first at crossroads, the meaning of traffick signals, etc. While I'm not a businessman, I'd imagine that it is largely the same with trade-related laws.

      The thing is, complex systems need guidelines on their operation. A complex system - such as an advanced society - is very likely to need more complex guidelines than can be reasonably memorized by one person who isn't specializing on them. That is why lawyers are needed.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    90. Re:and? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Besides that, medicine and law are recession proof. Hell, they are nuclear-war proof.

      I'll ignore medicine, but with respect to the topic of debate regarding grad school and non-us students, I would bet that approximately 0% of the law school graduate students are foreign. In fact, I would bet that approximately 0% are non-judeo/christian white people.

      Now, with respect to US vs non-us people in general, the trend seems to be that Americans are pretty comfortable in the conservative middle-class kind of lifestyle. Things like run of the mill business management, banking, etc. But in my lifetime, I have seen the technical side of things and the lower class/labor side of things being dominated by foreign people.

      Where I live, and nearby, we import seasonal workers, primarily from the former Soviet Union for tourist jobs. This is new. These jobs used to be done by American college/highschool kids and by other local people. I have no idea what that demographic is doing now. What do college and hs kids do for summer and part-time work during school? I work at a university, and I hardly see them working off campus.

      Also, the migration of workers from South America and Mexico for low paying jobs is something that is exploding as well. Many of them are "illegal", and the government pretty much looks the other way. I can say that in my area, the number of non-native English speaking people has grown exponentially over the past 10-15 years.

      Interesting.

    91. Re:and? by hherb · · Score: 1

      I did not say the US was inferior - I said it was not much advanced as society. Eventually it will get there, though your current government seems hellbound in pushing you guys back into the medieval dark ages.

      In any sufficiently advanced society attributes like race, ethnicity and religion don't matter any more.
      While the Scandinavian countries once were indeed ethnically fairly homogenous, in the past decades they have been taking in refugees from the poorest countries on Earth (many African and Asian countries) in much larger numbers (proportionally to population) than most other countries. In fact, the small arctic town I used to live in probably had more black people than the average US town would have. But we all got along just fine, and it did not lead to any situation where we would have required "more lawyers", and there certainly was no increase in crime.

      Why? Because, as societies advance, the huge gulf between the extreme rich and extreme poor vanishes. There are still differences between the wealthy and less wealthy, but nobody is poor any more - the main incentives for crime (poverty, envy) has been taken away. The biggest difference is probably the absence of fear - you don't have to fear to loose your job (because social security will take care of you), to fall sick (because health care is free and to the highest standard), what will become of your children (because all education is free including tertiary), and so forth. Once you don't have to suffer these essential fears every day any more, you can become creative, and less spiteful / hateful than those living under constant fear.

      I always find it amusing when people in the US fall for the fear mongering regarding anything "social" - in my income class in the US I would live in constant fear of people abducting my children, of people breaking into my properties etc. - how do I know? Because we briefly tried to live in Seattle. Nowadays we live in Australia - because I love the climate, the country, the lush rainforests where we have our property, scuba, sailing .... I could move here because free education provided me with sought-after skills, education I never would have been able to afford in the US.

    92. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you care to lay money on that? Enough for my kid's braces?

      I'm in London, and my child needs them. But NHS required all sorts of approval, taking so long to get them that my child's teeth were having noticeable difficulty. (It's their mother's "British upperclass" overbite.)

      The result is that it's costing far more, now, to get treatment that could have been done cheaper sooner and won't be as effective. If we didn't have my mom to keep out of the horrid excuses for nursing homes in this country, we'd have sprung for it out of our own pocket and *damn* NHS's excuse for medical care.

    93. Re:and? by owndao · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the tuition confusion. It's been 25 years. Frankly, I could not take that constant paradoxical message of "you must succeed but do it without costing me any money" that was coming from my father.

      It wasn't tuition, books, etc. but the fact that I was costing him any money, period. He could show me to the dollar how much he had "given" me. I had a student loan but no scholarship.

      Dr. Williams, my physics department mentor, told me about what would happen to me in a non-academic surrounding. He said that "They will use you like a screwdriver!" and he was absolutely right. If I had had the guts at the time I would have gone for a career in research and/or teaching.

      --
      Be as you would have the world become.
    94. Re:and? by crucini · · Score: 1

      So which societies are advanced in your view, if not western ones? Is Saudi Arabia advanced?

      Not that it matters. If you're going to paradoxically insist that the West isn't "advanced" and advocate some "noble primitives", you're just childishly switching labels. The proposition is still that to enjoy a western-style society (what everyone else means by "advanced"), we need laws and lawyers. Do you agree with that?

      And you think you can wish away the complexities of law by stating that murder is wrong? Law is complex because people's behavior is complex. Most of that behavior has to do with business and money. People have been trading for millenia, and we've accumulated some wisdom about what can go wrong in business relationships and how to preserve fairness. That is codified in our law.

      Question for your ideal society of enlightened thinkers:

      Adam borrows four dollars from Bob, and fails to repay it on time. Seeking to recover his money, Bob covertly takes Adam's cow, which Adam thinks is worth seven dollars, and sells it to Charlie for three dollars. Bob says that Adam still owes him one dollar. Adam says that Bob owes him three dollars; alternatively, that Charlie should return the cow, since Bob had no right to sell it. Who is right?

    95. Re:and? by Puls4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Putting only 5% down will make you subject to PMI. That is around $130 a month. In addition, because you have PMI and less that 20% down, mortgage companies will also force you to escrow both your insurance payment and your tax payment.

      I happen to own a $190k home, and with an interest rate of 5.25% I pay $1600 a month. You are both wrong.

    96. Re:and? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      First of all, in the USA, almost EVERYONE has good, healthy teeth.

      Second, a if you earn $60k/year, you are making about 40% MORE than the median income. That makes you upper middle class. Sorry to ruin your pity party.

      Third, if your employer doesn't offer dental insurance, you should strongly consider looking for a new job.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    97. Re:and? by elamdaly · · Score: 0

      Do you live in Montana or Idaho?

      I've camped there that last two years and when we would go into town to eat or take a shower, we noticed almost all of the restaurant workers, etc, were all foreign.

      I struck up a convo with the proprietor of one of the restaurants we ate at and he said these workers come over for the summer, work their ass off, make some decent coin( relative to Slovakia ), and return home. He said the American kids are always wanting a day off to go party.

    98. Re:and? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > So which societies are advanced in your view, if not western ones?

      At this time, there are no advanced human societies. There have been in the past, but they are long since forgotten, and better left unsaid. At best I would say every human society is a joke if they think they are advanced. More like pre-teen -- all they think about is themselves, and think the world revolves around them.

      > and advocate some "noble primitives", you're just childishly switching labels.

      If "noble primities" recognized the absurdity of owning land, then go ahead and childishly label them as such.

      > stating that murder is wrong?

      I'm not stating murder is wrong. Only that most people don't murder because of the consequences. There is a time and a place for everything.

      > we need laws and lawyers. Do you agree with that?

      Yes, I said they are a necessary evil.

      > Who is right?

      What is the definition of a paradox? Two truths, that appear to contradict one another.

      This is a similiar situtation,, except that both Adam and Bob are "wrong." Adam has failed to learn honesty, and Bob has failed to learn forgiveness. The Golden Rule applies here -- treat other people how you want to be treated. Whatever the consequences, both will be placed in opposite roles in the future, so that they will be able to view the same situation from a different perspective.

    99. Re:and? by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1
      Agreed.

      Not to mention:
      • Houses start at near $500k[1]
      • Townhouses start near $300k
      • Condos start near $200k
      • Government subsidized housing ends at $42k/yr salary, and is the only way to get a decent rent (e.g.
      • Single income families have been there for nearly two decades or more. Any one there less than that basically needs multiple incomes. (And yes, I would count gov't retirement income as a second income for this purpose.)
      • Most families that have not been there for two decades there are likely dual-income in some form, or in military housing (or military subsidized housing).
      It's not that I didn't have a bad starting salary - $50k/year - but it was unaffordable to live there. So we moved out of the area, kept our same salary, and have been able to live quite comfortably elsewhere.

      Buying a house was impossible for us - a 10% down payment, which is really what is recommended for getting a good mortgage - you could get by with 5% but it's better to have 10%, is nearly a year's salary.

      [1] By house I mean any kind of house - even a 2 bedroom ranch house. Mansions start around $750K to $1M.
      [2] At least those were the numbers when I last looked for housing in Northern VA (Fairfax County) back in June/July of 2005.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    100. Re:and? by vigmeister · · Score: 1

      w.r.t your father, I know exactly how it feels :)

      I wouldn't have pursued graduate school had I not found something that I like doing. Academia is the second best career (next only to Software development) option in today's world. However, it is fairly odd that it pays so little. I am not too worried about that though - I'm pretty sure that teaching is one of the few things I'll be happy doing for the rest of my life. Research work needs to be relevant to keep me motivated, but in a narrow band of subjects I love researching as well.

      On the brighter side - you got out of Tech in under 9 years which really is something I am craving for :)

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    101. Re:and? by hkmarks · · Score: 1

      He was clearly talking about Alex Summers.

    102. Re:and? by gl12 · · Score: 1

      You keep assuming that your morals apply to everyone. I for instance see owning land as perfectly reasonable (not that anyone is able to actually own anything as long as they have to pay taxes on it) and think that murder is perfectly fine as long as you get away with it. I CAN'T follow the golden rule because I don't have the power to give everyone else what I want them to give me, so your system would fall apart with just one person like me.

    103. Re:and? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Keep sticking your fingers in your ears if you want. There are other countries (UK, NZ, Canada?) with reasonably working court systems which appear sustainable, I haven't seen a thug-based system which works well for the general populace.

      If you don't like the US court/legal system, try to get it fixed. Using the US court/legal system as a counter example is a strawman argument.

      It's like using the US election system as an example of why we shouldn't have democracies and dictatorships are preferable.

      FWIW, thug systems tend to lead to dictatorships - because the most powerful thug gets to be the Dictator (and that's why Communist Revolutions tend to end up as Dictatorships - because Marx's Communist Manifesto makes violence as a core part of its implementation plan, and guess who rises to the top when there's lots of violence about?).

      --
    104. Re:and? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      My goodness. Do I have to smiley caption jokes about lawyers for the humor impaired?

      I do, in fact, campaign and vote and fight dangerous laws and even try to get some good ones passed. But go take a look at copyright law for what "rule by lawyers", rather than "rule of law", can lead to.

    105. Re:and? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Sure you're trying to be funny, but there are lots of stupid people around who might start thinking that violence is a preferred option. I'd rather they get things right on this issue, rather than go haha ignore same-old-same-old joke.

      If you're in the US, theoretically it's still rule via the democratically elected representatives of the citizens (the US should allow their criminals to vote though).

      Diebolding aside, despite how much the corporations pump into campaign funds, it's still the votes that decide who wins. Many politicians won't want the average voter to be too educated.

      --
    106. Re:and? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Goodness, you did watch the last 2 presidential elections in the US, didn't you? There was more than enough organized voter fraud and illegal behavior to cause a bunch of UN observers to show up in any current colony of the US or the European Union. Even Cuba and Libya offered to send observers to help straighten out the vote counting, which I thought was amazingly funny.

    107. Re:and? by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of degree.

      In a society were there is little divorce, there will still be need for divorce law, but it would not have to be so immensely comprehensive. A lot more can be settled on a case-by-case basis. It becomes safer (and more efficient) to leave things to arbiters such as judges, because they will have less influence in the big picture.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    108. Re:and? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Dental Insurance is a pain in the ass for all except the insurance company. The truth is that most people after a brief initial period have dental expenses that are as regular as clock work; a thousand people are an auctuarial certainty. Then after the initial period have expenses that are essentially a known, Then insurance starts to play games, They'll turn down 10% for just because, if they are getting too many claims that month, they will take servers off-line to slow thing up or just lose them internally.
      Frankly you'd be better off to find a reputable dentist, and just spend the money that your dental insurance would cost and save it for dental care, why pay a bunch of lawyers and MBAs to be assholes when you don't need to?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    109. Re:and? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      That's why I said theoretically. I thought that was funny too, and sad, and scary.

      It's sad that the US spends billions of dollars (and how many lives) supposedly to pick the leaders in Iraq (ok it was WMD before), but can't even implement a decent voting system for itself. I've already seen a few decent proposals by well known crypto and security people. A random pick will be fine. All of them are better than "diebold". BTW it's amazing how so many people in the USA value anonymous voting systems more than nonfraudulent voting systems. I suppose they'd rather have anonymous fraud, than risk having someone being able to prove they voted for Bush. Priorities eh?

      It's scary that most of the US people don't appear to care or they just stick to the pro-wrestling mentality - my team vs the other team, as long as my team wins it doesn't matter how dirty they are, the other side's just as dirty or dirtier.

      From the perspective of someone living in a small insignificant country (Malaysia), Saddam Hussein ruling Iraq wasn't a big problem at all. Saddam could trash talk all he wanted but his power was limited.

      evilness * power = size of problem.

      Who's in charge of the USA is of far greater consequence.

      --
    110. Re:and? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Oh my, no. That would be littering!

      Use them for bio-diesel. (Let's see if I can get any mileage out of that joke.)

    111. Re:and? by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention cost of malpractice insurance, insurance billing, and cost of managing compliance with government regulatory affairs. I work at a medical device company, and I would guess (and ONLY a guess) that damn near half of the cost of a new device goes into paying for FDA regulatory matters and liability insurance.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    112. Re:and? by mikiN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm afraid the situation is much more dark and bleak (sorry for the pun) and may ultimately lie with the health insurance companies. Where I live, many of the common procedures have no or very little coverage, even with a full dental plan. Dentures, on the other hand, are fully covered by any basic plan.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    113. Re:and? by zacronos · · Score: 1

      Maybe in Kentucky $60k/yr is a decent family income, but you would be hard pressed to afford a $200k house on that.

      Wow, you're pretty off-base, I'd say. First, let's look at median state incomes: I count 32/51 states+DC that have a median income less than $60k. Even California's median income is less than $65k. If you look here instead, you get much lower numbers -- I don't know why.

      Anyway, I live in Louisville, Kentucky. It is, according to the US Census Bureau, the 27th largest city in the US (I point that out just to make it clear I'm not in a rural area, where (I'm fairly sure) housing is much cheaper by $/sqft).

      My fiance and I have a combined income of $70k, and just bought our first home. We were approved for a mortgage of up to $300k. Granted, I thought that was a little ridiculous, but I later realized we *could* have afforded to pay it. We got our loan at 5.875% (30-year fixed) due to good credit, and we're fairly frugal people, but it would not have required much effort -- maybe a bit of attention to how often I upgrade my computer equipment, and that sort of thing. According to this, a 95% loan on a $300k house would cost less than $1,700/month. Add on property taxes and home insurance, and we'd be looking at around $2k/month. The amount of money we put into savings each month plus the amount we're actually paying for our mortgage easily tops that (well... it doesn't really stay in savings because I usually dump it back into the mortgage as additional principle payments). Now, I admit would couldn't afford that if we had 2 children, and we're making $70k instead of $60k, but on the other hand I'm talking about a $300k house, as opposed to $200k.

      But let's back up a minute -- this begs the question (yes, it really does, you grammar Nazis -- it "fails to consider the question") of whether you need a $200k house in Kentucky. I can promise that you don't. See, I don't know what $200k will get you in the San Francisco area, but with just a quick search out here you can get a 9-room ranch-style house (4-bedroom, 2-bath) with an unfinished basement on 16 acres of partially wooded land (with pond(s), a stream, a deck, and a 2-car carport) with an asking price under $180k. With a bit of effort looking around and some negotiating, I'm sure you can get more for a full $200k.

      Telecommute for the win.

    114. Re:and? by jesup · · Score: 1

      You see something similar at the Jersey Shore - most of the workers nowadays aren't kids from North Jersey or Philly/burbs, they're college-age summer workers mostly from Eastern Europe. (Not that I'm an expert, but I've seen it, and others talk about it.) They make good money (compared to home, though exchange rates haven't helped them recently), they can improve their english, and they get a relatively interesting/fun experience compared to summer jobs available at home.

      American high-school teens and sometimes college-age students used to fill those jobs; now they *seem* to be either partying, hanging out, or doing "volunteer"/extra-curricular work to spiff up their applications for college (which has become an arms-race with a combination of grade inflation and ever-increasing need to have a zillion non-classroom items to get into top schools). Now, this is a way-over-generalization; even around here (outer Main Line of Philly burbs) local teens man the counters at the local Chester Springs Creamery and at the big/fancy nursery (Waterloo Gardens). And another factor many be less families spending month-plus stints at the shore the way many used to back 20-50+ years ago; no teen there for a week or two will get a local job - and those that can spend a month-plus are well-enough off that the kids don't need to work. The other mainstay, college students, I have less visibility into - they may be working internships, or (also) hanging out, or they may be grinding shave time off graduation (I have heard from friends who visit my old college that current students are much more focused on graduation and earning money post-graduation than we were back around 1980, perhaps because of the increase in tuition).

    115. Re:and? by aurispector · · Score: 1

      If everyone did what we told them we would all be out of business. However, people being people this will never happen. How many times have you heard about a caries vaccine being right around the corner?

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    116. Re:and? by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

      Maryland! You must be thinking of Detroit.

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
    117. Re:and? by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      An annual salary of $60,000 with more than 4 kids to one family is considered poverty living by New York State Law.

    118. Re:and? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Ah, no. If you want that rate, you need a 20% down payment. This means $47.5k up front for a loan of $190k (home price of 237,500).


      Considering that the rate for a normal consumption loan is at 7.5% if you are smart enough to use a bank instead of a drug-dealer. It is not going to make a big difference even if you have to put 50% down.

    119. Re:and? by delong · · Score: 1

      I'll ignore medicine, but with respect to the topic of debate regarding grad school and non-us students, I would bet that approximately 0% of the law school graduate students are foreign. In fact, I would bet that approximately 0% are non-judeo/christian white people

      You'd lose that bet.

      And yes, IAAL (I am a lawyer)

      See: http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/usnews/edu/grad/rankings/law/brief/lawdiv_brief.php

      Also, US law schools include a significant percentage of foreign students attending for US LLM degrees.

    120. Re:and? by ranton · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why do people keep thinking that middle class has anything to do with average?

      While semantically it might sound like middle class means "people in the middle of the bell curve of family incomes". Middle class has nothing to do with median incomes, or average incomes. It has to do with how a certian class of people live their lives.

      Classes are generally broken up into six groups. First is the underclass, who live well below the poverty line and rely on the government to live. Next is the working poor, who make minimum wage and still probably rely on the government for some help. These two classes make up about 25% of our population.

      Next is the working class. They do your standard factory work and low level clerical work, and generally make around 16-30k a year (household income). In the mid to late 20th century many jobs that originally were considered working class jobs started to pay enough to be considered lower middle class. A garbage man for instance can easily make $40k-50k/yr today. They make up about 30% of the population.

      The middle class is split into Lower/Upper. There is no Middle Middle class, which is probably what is creating so much confusion on this forum. Lower Middle class are people who have very good jobs, but not necessarily overly professional jobs. They tend to have family incomes that range from $30k-75k/yr. Almost all of their income comes from their salary, but they generally have enough money to easily save for retirement. They make up about 30% of the population.

      The upper middle class are your doctors/lawyers/engineers who generally have six figure family incomes. They often hold graduate degrees or greater, and live very affluently. They still get most of their income from their salary, but they often get a decent amount of extra income from investments. They make up about 15% of the population.

      The upper class is the rich people. They tend to make at least $500k/yr, and usually most of their income comes from investments and not their job. They are your CEOs and other very successful business owners. They make up less than 1% of our population.

      Being in a large city and making $70k/yr combined income, you are most likely on the high end of Lower Middle Class. The very fact that you even have to worry about things like keeping your mortgage payment low shows that you are not in the upper middle class. That is not a bad thing though, people in the lower middle class usually live very good lives. They tend to live in nice homes and drive nice cars. They can send their kids to college and save for retirement.

      But if you have ever worried about your mortgage, you are in the lower middle class.
      If you have ever worried about how much college costs, you are in the lower middle class.
      If you have ever worried about retirement, you are in the lower middle class.

      If you are in the upper middle class and worry about any of these things, then you are drastically overspending on things like lamburghinis and million dollar homes. Even sending three kids to harvard should be a fairly easy thing for a family that is truly in the upper middle class.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    121. Re:and? by torokun · · Score: 1

      Bud, IMHO you are sorely mistaken about almost everything you're saying.

      First, you're confusing 'advanced' with some utopian ideal in your head. Advanced is a relative term.

      Second, you're confusing an advanced society with highly intelligent and ethical individuals. The first requires complex law for coordination and for many functions.

      Groups of highly intelligent and ethical individuals can get by with _fewer_ laws or rules, because they are more capable and willing to work things out between themselves. However, they would still do well to have default rules to avoid the cost of all that negotiation in certain cases. As previously noted by another poster, there are also societal protocols which require clear definitions to function properly.

      Western common law is the most amazingly intelligent system of law ever to have been developed, and you would, I think, be very glad and enriched to study it a bit more, because it's not what you think it is. It's basically an amazing system of machine learning which derives its rules from very intelligently filtered sources. It has developed slowly over more than a thousand years now, by an evolutionary process very similar to those we use in the evolutionary algorithms of AI. In particular, it is highly practical and necessary because it (referring to common law rather than statutory law) requires actual cases of conflict before changing or complicating its rules.

      If you look into it, I think you will also agree that advancement of a society requires increasingly complex law, just as advanced features of software require increasingly complex code, adding layers of abstraction and paradigms that were originally unnecessary, but are required to handle the increasing complexity.

    122. Re:and? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      When you said Detroit, the first thing I thought of was West B'more. Sorry

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    123. Re:and? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Your problem is most people don't see dental care as health care, it's seen as an elective cosmetic and vainity thing.
      Not here in the UK...
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    124. Re:and? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yeah I used to say this, until I had to go to court over some serious money. I hired an ex pit bull and when the dust settled I sent her flowers and will never be able to thank her enough. Yeah the ones (lawyers) that go into government, seem to end up jerks IMO. When you just gotta have one though they are worth their weight in gold.
      Wow, I knew they were tough, but didn't realise how smart they are.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    125. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unwittingly, you have pointed your finger indirectly to the problem -

      I have seen lots of folks with untreated or undertreated medical conditions when they lack insurance or the resources for treatment.

      The biggest reason grad schools are filled with non-US students is that only non-US students can afford it! Expect this trend to continue in the coming years with ongoing economic pressure on the middle-class.

    126. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what part of the country is $60k/yr lower middle class? Maybe in SF, but you can pull down that sort of money hauling trash there.

      In rural and near-rural parts of the South, $60k a year is mid-middle class at worst.

      A town of about 15,000 people around here was looking for a system administrator for their local government's network, and the upper limit of the salary offer was barely above $40,000 a year.
    127. Re:and? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Just because a dental problem is not causing you pain yet, doesn't mean it isn't there. would you rather your dentist just ignored the smaller holes and waited until they became huge holes?

      Do a google news search for "'dentist' AND 'unnecessary procedures'". There are plenty of honest dentists, but there are a fair number of dishonest ones. It's harder for the guy on the street to distinguish between the two, especially as compared to physicians.

    128. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends. Do you go out and protest that we're not giving you enough, yet?

    129. Re:and? by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Canada's socialized health care does not include dental. Unless you're on welfare, then we hand out everything, but that's only like 7 or 8% of the population.

    130. Re:and? by brjndr · · Score: 1

      My dad finished his medical residency in 1982. He and all his buddies made a killing in the 80's. They still do very well, but you can see the smiles creep on their faces when the glory days of the 80's come up, when insurance companies were a lot easier to deal with. They all say you can't make that kind of money anymore (likely adjusted for inflation).

      When I went into law, my dad said it was a good decision, because medicine had become a lot less profitable and a lot more headache.

    131. Re:and? by mstahl · · Score: 1

      ...which I guess goes back to the point made earlier about dental health not being seen as a major health issue. Still, my point really was meant to apply to all healthcare.

    132. Re:and? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      when a patient is told, $3500.00 to save that tooth and put a crown on it or $490.00 to yank it out. Guess what the poor person ($35,000 or less) is going to do?

      If they're smart, they'll take some vacation days and fly to Thailand. For $2000 they can have the trip of a lifetime and get an excellent root canal and crown done. Almost all of that is airfare.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    133. Re:and? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I once had a fellow engineer try to suggest that, at around $200,000 - living in Texas - he was simply "middle class." $60k in most places is a solid living salary. A lot of people live on $20k-$30k (which is still 2x-3x the US minimum wage).

      I'll be honest - I don't offer dental insurance at my small business. Heck, I can't even offer health insurance. Well, I _could_, but a group policy would cost me twice what I and my employees currently pay for individual insurance, so I offer a stipend instead. Paying group rates for my small office would cost me an additional 19% on my payroll expenses. Since my business is professional service - i.e. all labor - it would take me from being profitable to not in a single stroke. I'd charge more, but then I'd probably lose enough business that I would have to fire some of my employees, and that's not very good for them - especially since I know most of my competitors, and they don't cover the cost of insurance either.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  2. Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by LingNoi · · Score: 0

    I watched something the other day that said India was going to surpass the US by 2020.

    1. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by stevenvi · · Score: 1

      You don't need money to do graduate work in most scientific fields. I'm not sure how computer engineering is, but for me to study math I get paid by the school for it.

    2. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched something the other day that said India was going to surpass the US by 2020. Surpass the US in what? GDP? Nope, even PPP value is less than a third of the US. Median income? Yeah right!

      Are you sure that what you watched wasn't just a junkie smoking crack? India may very well surpass the US, but it will probably be in roughly 50 years.
    3. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by adatepej · · Score: 1

      "surpass"?

    4. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by delong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really this is just silly. If 9.8% of US families is considered "the majority", then you'd be right. But you're wrong. Besides that fact, US GDP per capita is several times that of India or China, so by your logic there should be no Indian or Chinese grad students because not only are a majority of Indians and Chinese truly poor, they are much poorer than the average American.

      Most Americans don't go to grad school because there is little economic incentive to do so. The US economy only supports so many technocrats. The presence of so many Indian and Chinese students in US science and technical grad programs is a natural function of those nations' evolving manufacturing and services sectors. They simply need to train more technocrats because their sectors are growing compared to those sectors in the US, which are economically mature.

      As to India or China "surpassing" the US, what does that mean? Surpassing the US in what? Manufacturing? Good! That's economic specialization that creates efficiencies for everyone. Not only is talk of "surpassing" mere economic scare-mongering (did we learn nothing from such silliness when the Japanese were supposed to "surpass us" in the 1980s? Where are the Japanese today? Economic stagnation), it makes erroneous straight-line projections that ignore very important long term considerations of demographics and other factors. The US economy will be a large and important factor in the global economy for the foreseeable future. But the global economy continues to grow and evolve and the US economy continues to change from its post-WWII dominance (unsurprising since it was the only intact industrial economy on the planet) to an important player in a dynamic specialized global economy.

    5. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Courageous · · Score: 2, Informative

      Besides that fact, US GDP per capita is several times that of India

      13X India, 5.3X China

      C//

    6. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by kramulous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nicely worded. I think you're right. From watching afar, there seems to be some unwarranted scare-mongering going on in the US (and here as well). Not only in education but in many other sectors. There is now some dynamic load balancing going on globally and panicking is not going to achieve anything. There will always be opportunities for countries to specialise (particularly the US, ie. what is wrong with education as an export? Education has been my country's second largest cash cow industry for the last twenty years). People here are bitching that the jobs are going overseas. They are, but we are also experiencing massive growth in other areas, investment in infrastructure in developed countries, etc.
       
      Nothing to see here, move on.

      --
      .
    7. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by arktemplar · · Score: 1

      yeah well, I know this is kindo offtopic and its gonna burn me but they say the same about china overtaking india. I remember my prof. giving me an hour long lecture after this particular lab session that we had fucked up for our research project, that lecture consisted basically of how china is overtaking India, the US anything else and will be ahead of any other nation that youd care to name. I actually wonder about somthing though, does democracy hinder progress ? And about the whole engineers in india thing, it is ussually that the best, the brightest and those who wish to remain engineers rather than become managers are the ones that apply to the US grad schools. I am doing the same thing, one thing I wish though is that it wasnt as damned expensive as it is.

      --
      blog plug -> The Darker Side of Light
    8. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by gordo3000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree with you, but someone needs to correct this idea that Japan's economy is still in stagnation. It has been growing far faster than the Eurozone for the last several years. The economic stagnation basically ended 3 to 4 years back. on top of the high rate of growth, prices are stable to slightly falling in the country amplifying the gains. I won't go into the structural problems that remain and social issues that still hold back this economy, but it is by no means stagnant.

    9. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      There is a false impression that a technology-heavy workforce is necessary for a strong economy. That may not be the case. Those who grow rich off of inventions tend NOT to be the inventors themselves. This about that for a while. Wheeling and dealing seems to be where the money is at for good or bad, NOT technology.

      Now it is true that a technical workforce may be necessary for military advances, but people are not going to pick a field to help the military, they pick fields to earn money, and the money may not be in tech.

      silliness when the Japanese were supposed to "surpass us" in the 1980s? Where are the Japanese today? Economic stagnation),

      Their GDP per person is about the same as ours. They "met" us.

    10. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Pollardito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most Americans don't go to grad school because there is little economic incentive to do so. The US economy only supports so many technocrats. The presence of so many Indian and Chinese students in US science and technical grad programs is a natural function of those nations' evolving manufacturing and services sectors. They simply need to train more technocrats because their sectors are growing compared to those sectors in the US, which are economically mature. if most students are like i was, a part of the problem is that there isn't a lot of discussion in undergraduate classes about why those students should stay for grad school, what money is available to fund those studies, and what sort of jobs one can expect to get with a graduate degree. i was lucky and made my own closer contacts with a couple of faculty who did tell me all this independently, but i bet most people probably never hear the "sales pitch". and this is coming from someone who did really well in undergrad studies, if no one at the university thought to approach me then there's no way they're approaching people that are more toward the border of graduate qualification but still might succeed there.

      two other factors that i haven't seen mentioned are the steady increase in student loan burdens and the fact that a foreign student dominated graduate culture tends to attact more of the same. students are coming out of undergrad programs with more and more debt, and it's hard for those students to think about anything but getting into the workforce and paying that off now. the fact that they can delay repayment and earn enough money in graduate assistantships to keep the debt from increasing isn't as well advertised as it could be.

      the OP stated that he's one of 7 american students in a 90% foreign class which is pretty similar to what i encountered in a CS graduate program. graduate classes are really very much harder than undergraduate classes, and i don't care who you are you're probably going to get stuck on parts of the curriculum and have to work through it with other people to fully grasp the concepts (and, no, i'm not talking about cheating on your homework). in my experience the american and non-american graduate students are two pretty disparate groups, and being a part of the larger of those two orbits has to be a huge advantage when you need to tap those resources. that's setting aside the fact that graduate students effectively live on campus in their study areas and labs, so having a large support group in that environment is huge.
    11. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by enrevanche · · Score: 1

      Most Americans end up paying for their education with massive debt. They cannot afford to go to graduate school. They are forced to find a job. Foreign students usually pay their own, either via their governments or their parents.

    12. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by redcrane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't agree with your assertion that a technology-heavy workforce is not necessary for a strong economy. That might be true for a small economy that has a strong influx of money for some other reason (Switzerland), but wealth is created by advancing technology. Why has the US economy been so strong for most of our lifetimes? Because we have the most lawyers? Or, because we had the best technology ranging from automobiles, to airplanes, to semiconductors to electronics, to some of the most efficient food production, to construction?

      Looking through history, countries were economically strong compared to the rest of the world mostly because they had better technology. Most of the time, those countries raised their own standard of living and sold the products of that technology at great profit. Sure, there were colonizing powers that leveraged internal instability of their colonies to rule and steal, but for the most part such powers also had superior military technology. Which is still better technology.

      My friends at NEC in Japan are very worried about Samsung because they are making stuff that people want to buy. Through better technology. That they originally learned from the Japanese and the US but have been refining.

      There has been a marked increase in the number of Korean graduate students in top engineering schools over the last 10 to 15 years by the way.

    13. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Wansu · · Score: 1


        They simply need to train more technocrats because their sectors are growing compared to those sectors in the US, which are economically mature.


      The manufacturing sectors in the US are in decline and have been for some time.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    14. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by castoridae · · Score: 1

      I don't think debt is a viable reason not to go to grad school. Sure, there's opportunity cost from not working, but that exists for an undergraduate education as well. Most student loans that I'm aware of don't require payments if you're a full-time student, and almost nobody pays for a graduate degree out of pocket in the tech fields (RA/TAship = tuition + stipend).

    15. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      unsurprising since it was the only intact industrial economy on the planet

      You don't consider America's Hat as being an intact industrial economy at the time?

    16. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Sj0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      US GDP is pretty badly skewed by the massive amounts of debt created by the US government.

      Take into consideration that when a bank has a dollar in savings, it can lend someone some ridiculous amount like 250, and you'll realise that the 500 billion dollars a year Americans borrow leads to some serious green moving around the economy in a very bad way.

      I wouldn't be surprised if some country out there, especially one like China, who holds tonnes of US debt, could get some amazing growth very quickly. After all, the US gained it's power by industrialization in the world wars. They became the largest arms dealer in the world, and while countries like Britain became debt ridden, the US became the largest debtor.

      Personally, given the circumstances, I'd say the US is entering the perfect storm leading to it's own demise.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    17. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      If you were in a technical class, did you bother standing up and telling him that you're not paying him to soliloquise about the state of international markets?

      Just asking. I know where I went to school, we didn't have any sermonizing in our classrooms, and it's always amazing to me that Americans seem to.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    18. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by arktemplar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ermm.. no It was after a lab session, it was an extra research project we were doing under him. I'm not from America by the way - India. We also ussually dont have sermonising in our classrooms like I said this was in his room after a particularly screwed up lab session.

      Problem is he is right, in electronics which is my field China is far ahead of us, he was just saying that we are ussually kind of confident that China will not be able to overtake us wrt software, but we shouldnt be so smug about it cause during his previous visit to China etc. etc. etc ...
      you get the general idea right. Interestingly where are you from ?

      --
      blog plug -> The Darker Side of Light
    19. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I understand now. Honestly though, judging from what I've heard about Chinese schools, I think you're safe. They're all about quotas up there, churning out X number of people with pieces of paper, not skills. That's fine for communist China, but India has to compete on the global market, so I'd assume the schools are far more skills oriented than Chinese schools.

      I'm from Canada.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    20. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by irishdaze · · Score: 1

      Allrightythen, you *have* to explain that to me. My boyfriend just received his MS in Biotech (where yes, 85% of his department was Indian or Pakistani by origin), but he is paying $6,000 for 6 credits at a Master's level this level to finish working a research project begun last semester (hoping for publication) -- i.e. he's paying to "study" more Biotech stuff (sorry, I know little about the topic). Since 6 hours at this level is considered more than full time, he's really not able to work outside of school. This is all sensible to me, and how I thought "all that kind of thing worked". You have *got* to tell me what he and I are missing here, if he should be getting paid instead of just racking up yet more debt paying them so that he can do research -- Are you still actually a student? A student being paid to study? Or is it that you got a job at a university or scored some sort of fellowship after graduation?

      --
      -- Dedicated Cthulhu cultist since 1982 A.C.E.
    21. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easily explained. He has a girlfriend. This implies that he has a life. Hence he must not be a real scholar/researcher/scientist. Which immediately tells me why he doesn't qualify for a scholarship. But don't worry, people like him will usually succeed in life: !scholar => greedy man => success.

    22. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Viv · · Score: 1

      Heh, where is he going that six credit hours is full time? It's 9 everywhere I've heard of.

    23. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      How do those Indian and Pakistani students get their fees paid? India and Pakistan are not actually known as rich countries (especially compared to the USA), yet they seem to somehow manage it. To make it worse, they manage it far away from their homes, in a culture completely different from their own. And as if it were not enough, they have to manage it while speaking a foreign language.

      Please don't get me wrong, I am not trying to dish you or your boyfriend. I'm just curious. I was also a foreign student (MS CS), in an european country pretty much different from the country I came from (language, culture, standards of living). Therefore I'm always kind of... suprised, to say the least, when I hear about people, in a position so much better than mine was, having such a hard time finishing their studies.

    24. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1
      While I agree with most of your comment, one part of it is, frankly, delusional:

      because we had the best technology ranging from automobiles[...]
      You obviously have some of the best drugs, do you have any idea where I could get some?
      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    25. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by nicklott · · Score: 1

      China, who holds tonnes of US debt

      I've being wondering why none of the media seems to have picked this up. China recently bought large stakes in a whole bunch of loan companies up to their neck in sub-prime doo-doo; they are basically propping up a portion of the US housing sector (forgetting the other sectors they're involved in) as no-one in the free markets of the west will touch these companies with a barge pole anymore. These companies and their customers will very quickly go to the wall if the Chinese were to drop, out leaving a hole in the economy that no amount of interest rate cutting will patch.

      Effectively then China has in it's hands an important and very delicate piece of the US economy; I wonder how long it will be before they feel like giving it a squeeze...

    26. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by MuffinSpawn · · Score: 1

      Usually grad students in the sciences get stipends for being either a research or teaching assistant. In fact, one school I applied to writes on their web site that a student should reconsider whether he/she should be going to grad school if he/she doesn't get accepted with an assistantship because of the expense. TAs I presume are limited by available undergrad course sessions. RAs are limited simply by funding. I don't know what school your boyfriend is attending, but usually the grad school web site has some indication whether stipends are provided.

    27. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 1

      Japan 125 million or so people US 305 million or so people China 1,305 million or so people With China having a billion more people than the US it may just be a matter of time before their entire middle class is larger than the entire US population. Yes, yes many, many poor people left out of the economic miracle. Yes, yes many problems with an overzealous and rather corrupt political system. Even so, as China continues to crank out far more college grads than the US and they continue to suck in dollars like there is no tomorrow, you better believe that by 2050 there is a good chance their total economic activity could rival the US. Don't kid yourself into thinking the US will always remain the dominant economic/military power in the world. Perhaps the US is already heading toward a slide in power. Think the Brits saw it coming when the Empire started to wane? What about the Spanish? Did the Romans know it while it was occurring? Collapse, highly unlikely... slide from #1... inevetable.

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    28. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost wish they would. THEN maybe you would be able to afford housing, instead of this ridiculous bubble we've been riding through (especially in the North East).

    29. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by c_sd_m · · Score: 1
      Debt is a reason not to go to grad school if you ever plan to have a life. Tuition + stipend will let you live through the experience and you can typically defer your undergrad loans (and grad loans if spend more than ~10/yr after tuition). Then, for a master's degree, you're 2 years older, haven't touched your debt, and are starting at pretty much the same salary you would have otherwise. Adjust that to 7 years for a PhD. Oh, and your tuition + stipend may or may not be guaranteed for anywhere near the current average completion time for your degree. I've yet to see a university admit the actual average completion time for their grad degrees openly, e.g., on average students in my department require extensions beyond the "program limits".

      A master's degree may give you more earning potential later on but my job hunting with an engineering master's degree (plus undergrad business minor) is turning up pretty much the same opportunities as my classmates had from undergrad. In a tech intensive city I've found one job at one company where it really makes any difference (project management). A friend in another field with similar credentials is finding it similar; there's one job with major relocation where it would make a difference and it's debatable whether he'd be as desirable with just a bachelor's.

      Grad school is a good experience in really working on a largely independent project and learning about a field that interests you. Marketing it as something that will pay off for North American students in the current economy is questionable but it's not an experience I'd give up.

    30. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by booch · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to claim that there was never a point in history that the USA made better cars than the rest of the world? Because that's what he said. Not that the USA currently makes better cars. Either you mis-interpreted what he said, or you fail to understand the history of automobile production, or you're the one who is delusional.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    31. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Supercooldude · · Score: 1

      People have been saying that for as long as I can remember, but the US is still here and our living standards are still as good as ever.

    32. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If China were to "call the debt" it could be construed as an Act of War IMO.

      China does not want this.

      China wants stability.

    33. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      So people can still drive around in Cadillacs paying pennies for gas, live in homes that a human being can pay off within their lifetime, and you can use the same 50 cents you could buy a magazine with to buy a magazine today?

      Are you aware that the average household savings in the US has dropped to levels we haven't seen since 1924? Are you aware that a quarter of your tax dollars go directly to China and other nations holding US debt, and that percentage increases every year because of the skyrocketing federal debt? Are you aware that the US dollar has reached lows not seen for 25 years in some markets, which will hurt US consumers because you import all your goods from China?

      I'm actually from a country that came close to having serious issues because of our debt. The Progressive Conservative Party of Canada ran the federal debt up to 500 billion from around 200 billion, and the high interest rates of the '80s hit us HARD. The next government started paying down debt through aggressive budget cuts, and in the past 10 years we've paid back about 100 billion of our debt.

      This is just the fundamentals here. "If you jam down your accelerator, eventually you'll surpass the speed limit.", and you're sitting here saying "But we're not surpassing the speed limit yet, and you've been saying that ever since we were stopped!"

      Think about it like a household. If you ran up debt, ran up debt, continued to run up debt year after year, if you were in the red hundreds or thousands or millions of dollars every year, and instead of paying down any debts, you just took out more, what would happen? It wouldn't happen right away, it wouldn't happen for years, maybe decades. Eventually though, you'd reach a point where you're absolutely fucked.

      It's pretty ignorant of you to say "It hasn't happened yet so it'll never happen" when we're just talking about basic mathematics. Either the US will have to stop deficit spending, massively cutting spending and increasing taxes, or they'll keep on deficit spending until the country's finances reach a critical mass where the country won't have the liquidity to pay for debt maintenance. The amount of money the US can take in through taxes is limited to a relatively small amount compared to the debt, and increases in debt increase the maintenance, so every year there are fewer and fewer tax dollars available to actually do things, so it's only a matter of time.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    34. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by stevenvi · · Score: 1

      Biotech, eh? My cousin is doing that, and he doesn't have to pay a dime. I believe he has a research assistanceship.

      Me? I have a teaching assistanceship, because I don't really intend to do any mathematical research after I finish here. I teach a course and they pay me and cover the costs of attending the school. So in effect I have a job on the side. To answer your question, yes, I am still a student. Yes, I am being paid to study. One of the people in charge said that I should consider 2/3 of what I'm paid money for studying. The other 1/3 is for the class I teach. Therefore homework takes priority over planning for teaching those little boogers in precalculus.

      Since it seems like it might be a little too late now, you might not want to have him investigate how he could have financed his education. But there are definitely opportunities out there. I would not have gone to grad school if I had to pay for it.

      You say that six hours is considered full time. Is he actually putting in all his time in that? Because I currently take 9 credit hours and teach 6, and I always think about how I could get a job on the side to make a little bit more money. Not that I need it, my stipend is more than enough. But it's nice watching my bank balance increase as fast as possible.

    35. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by redcrane · · Score: 1

      Right, that's what I said, that at one time the US made the best cars in the world. My point is that the US used to hold technology leadership in a variety of different areas and that's what made the US rich. One big reason why we held leadership is because we had a technology heavy workforce that could both develop new products and further refine and improve on existing products.

      If we don't have a technology-heavy workforce we must either buy the technology from someone else to resell or we get out of the market. At some point, however, the technology developers will sell directly to the customer, eliminating the reseller, or drop margins so low that resellers have a hard time making any money.

      As an aside, I have to say that American cars are quite a bit better than they were in the 70s, 80s and 90s. There are some that are worth considering if you can deal with the heckling.
    36. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Lost+my+religion · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons that Americans do not pursue graduate studies might be due to the fact that they don't need a graduate degree for a reasonably good job. (I am an Indian who got his MS in the US from a top univ). You don't need a technical graduate degree to go in fields like marketing, sales, most jobs in the financial industry etc. A bachelors can be equally successful. Hence the return of investment from a graduate degree for a person contemplating such a career is not very high. On the other hand, for an Indian or Chinese student, a graduate degree is nearly essential to be considered on the same scale as the rest of the world, in part to overcome the (perceived and actual) deficiencies in their undergraduate studies. Besides a graduate degree provides for better jobs, both here in the US and in India (maybe also in China). I do have a lot of respect for the few American grad students that I have come across as they are normally quite good - most of them are in grad school because they like what they are doing, rather than out of necessity.

    37. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by castoridae · · Score: 1

      Debt is a reason not to go to grad school if you ever plan to have a life

      A moot point for /. readers. :-)

    38. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      Debt is a reason not to go to grad school if you ever plan to have a life

      A moot point for average /. readers. :-)
      There, fixed that for you. I'm sure there are /. readers who plan for it, not everyone is ready to admit that it's hopeless that early in life.
    39. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Phurge · · Score: 1

      > while speaking a foreign language there are more english speakers in India than there are in the US

      --
      I'll see your hokum and raise you a boondoggle.
    40. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Flambergius · · Score: 1

      According to IMF's World Economic Outlook Japan's GDP has been 1.4 in 2003, 2.7% '04, 1.9% in '05 and 2.2% in '06. Although not stagnation, those are not high growth numbers by any standards. In 2004 Japan probably beat the Eurozone total as three biggest economies Germany, France and Italy were all having bad years, but even then Japan was only at the median growth of Eurozone nations. In all other years Eurozone grow faster then Japan, and in much faster in 2006 when even the weak Italy grow at anual 1.9% rate.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers - Pablo Picasso
    41. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      these are extremely high growth numbers for a country still with deflation, a shrinking workforce, and now a shrinking population. Japan is much further down the population curve than the EU is(especially as a hole).

      Now, with no inflation, let's compare this to the EU:

      Over the whole year 2006, GDP grew by 2.7% in the Eurozone and by 2.9% in the EU25, compared to +1.4% and +1.7% respectively for the year 2005.

      http://www.finfacts.com/irelandbusinessnews/publish/article_10009065.shtml

      compare to Japan:
      2.7%, 2.9%, 2.6% (real gdp, so adjusted for inflation),

      adjust for inflation. japan has had prices coming off as much as 2% per year while eurozone has had inflation for 2%-4% per year. suddenly those stellar growth numbers aren't so great and are definitely lagging behind Japan.

      this means at least for the last 2 years, japan has blown the eurozone 25 or 12 out of the water.

    42. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if most students are like i was, a part of the problem is that there isn't a lot of discussion in undergraduate classes about why those students should stay for grad school, what money is available to fund those studies, and what sort of jobs one can expect to get with a graduate degree.

      In my first engineering class, the professor told everyone "You WILL get a Master's degree." It was never presented as even an option, just an inevitability. This has proven to be quite true; at work, it is expected that you at least have a plan to get a Master's degree if you ever want to get promoted.

    43. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      It's one thing being able to speak a language other than the one one was raised on. It's something completely different to get the MS degree speaking only that other language. I know it first hand.

    44. Re:Because a majority of US citizens are poor? by Flambergius · · Score: 1

      I see nothing in those number to justify assertations like "extremely high growth numbers" or "blown out of the water". The point about Japan being very far down on the population curve is a good one to remember, but does little to change the fact that in last 2-3 years Japan (like Europe 12/25) has been a mediocre performer at best.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers - Pablo Picasso
  3. 90% of those who apply are probably from India... by stevenvi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They accept those who apply. Most Americans are probably happy with just an undergrad degree and don't want to go to grad school.

    Being an American graduate student myself, there are a lot of foreigners where I am as well. I don't have a problem with it. Why are you ranting here and not in some blog?

  4. Short answer by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I have heard that many of the smarter Americans go into medicine or the law and that is why there are so few Americans in engineering. Is this true?"

    Yes!

    I would give the long answer, but I have to get back to preparing a computer networking paper with my chinese advisor and my 3 chinese colleagues :)

    1. Re:Short answer by siufish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Longer answer:

      Because engineering speaks the universal language - Mathematics. Medicine and law requires much more English and culture-specific communication skills, and it is very difficult for foreign students to break into these professions (except British students perhaps).

      It is also one of the reasons your medical and legal bills are going through the roof, but your laptops keep dropping in price.

    2. Re:Short answer by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Because engineering speaks the universal language - Mathematics. This gave me a good laugh. There is nothing universal about math. Only the math that is well understood by now. And the only reason it's "universal" is because of historical accident of having been discovered by few people who got to name the concepts they discovered.... more like invent shortcut notation rather than "name" actually. Anyway, just about any math that came about in the 20th century (and yes, it is already trickling its way into physics, so it's not just an intellectual exercise) reads like an essay and doesn't look like "math" at all to laymen. To add to all that fun stuff, to read and understand the latest developments in math, be prepared to learn French (and if you are ambitious, German and Russian... but French is almost required at this point).
      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  5. $$chool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I have heard that many of the smarter Americans go into medicine or the law and that is why there are so few Americans in engineering. Is this true?"

    Tuition cost.

    1. Re:$$chool. by Duhavid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is a factor.

      But as long as "success" is defined by earnings, and
      lawyers and doctors are paid more than engineers,
      the smart ones will pick this way.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    2. Re:$$chool. by Belacgod · · Score: 1

      Also, engineering is hard. Law is hard too, but less hard.

    3. Re:$$chool. by Metasquares · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In academic America, graduate schools pay YOU :)

      Seriously, graduate school (at least on the doctoral level) in science and engineering is usually very well funded. Not only is it common to get free tuition, but it is also common to receive a stipend. It's less than you'd get working, but it's still something.

      Not so in medicine or law, AFAIK.

    4. Re:$$chool. by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Does that hold true based on pass/fail rates on the bar exam vs. professional engineering exams?

    5. Re:$$chool. by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

      My 180,000 worth of legal school debt support you on this point.

    6. Re:$$chool. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      That's a bad metric due to selection bias. An undergrad who struggles in his engineering classes may leave engineering. So some of the people who would fail their engineering exam end up not taking it at all. To have a better metric you would have to train the same group of people in both law and engineering, and have them take both exams. But even this would be flawed since some people might not care about one or the other. Also it's a nigh-impossible experiment that accomplishes little of value.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    7. Re:$$chool. by cduffy · · Score: 1

      You've got selection bias in both directions -- folks who decide they can't hack law school are likewise prone to changing subjects. Since it can't be cleanly accounted for and it occurs in both directions, one might as well factor it out -- the results still may have some meaning.

      Since the grandparent sees fit to state that engineering is at least somewhat harder than law, I'm curious to find the basis on which such a statement can be defended.

    8. Re:$$chool. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      folks who decide they can't hack law school are likewise prone to changing subjects

      To engineering?

      Since the grandparent sees fit to state that engineering is at least somewhat harder than law, I'm curious to find the basis on which such a statement can be defended.

      Ask someone who's studied both law and engineering. The results won't be scientific, but at least they have the additional advantage of not pretending to be scientific.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    9. Re:$$chool. by redcrane · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting cost-benefit analysis. I ran it once for a friend who was considering staying on as a biology PhD student or switching to be an MD. We computed a 17 year cross-over point. Not because she would make that much as a PhD in biology, but because the costs of med school ($200K at the time) + limited salaries during internship/residency/fellowship compared to free tuition and a graduate stipend were high.

    10. Re:$$chool. by gabebear · · Score: 1

      I have just started my MS in CSCI.

      I worked in the school library for the last 2 years of undergrad and am now a research assistant at the reference desk. That assistantship pays for my tuition plus a stipend that covers rent+utilities. Oddly, this is less then what I was making when I was in undergrad. I work more now(20hrs grad/12hours undergrad) and make about $500 less per semester. There are some awesome grants available to undergrads.

    11. Re:$$chool. by cduffy · · Score: 1

      To engineering?
      How's that matter? We were talking about self-selection bias. If folks who can't hack the exams leave the fields before they take their professional engineer's certification or their bar exam, what you've got left are the people who think they are fit for the job, in either case.

      I don't see how a person who can't think like a lawyer could think like an engineer -- or visa-versa. They're quite similar in a lot of respects (building things to be fit-to-task, reliable and resilient within a well-defined but expansive set of known best practices, rules and constraints), and I think those who refer to law as contractual engineering have the right of it. That said, law can (occasionally, but critically) require softer skills as well -- these being the reason I consider it more difficult: I'm a pretty damned good (pseudo-)engineer, and I find law to be a very interesting subject (and have occasionally considered it as a target for any eventual change of careers) -- but I'm quite certain that, while I could probably pass a bar exam with enough study and funds, I'm not quick enough on my feet or skilled enough at persuasive argument to be effective as a lawyer beyond the day-to-day work of drafting and reviewing contracts, performing analysis and giving advice, &c.

      But yes, talking to someone who's done both would be useful.
    12. Re:$$chool. by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Uhh. Are you implying that med school is easy?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    13. Re:$$chool. by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Doctors are definitely well-paid, but the average lawyer makes on-par with the average engineer.

      Don't come back and tell me, "But when you graduate law school, you make $150k/yr!" That's only the top graduates from the top law schools, and those men and women work themselves to death in BigLaw for their $150k/yr.

      The median starting salary out of law school is about $70k/yr. Which is pretty comparable to an engineer with an MS degree.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    14. Re:$$chool. by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1
      My wife is a lawyer. Contrary to popular belief perpetuated by crime dramas on TV, thrillers involving "lawyers" in the movies, and a lot of fancifully written novels about law, you don't need to be necessarily great at the "soft skills" to be a great lawyer. Being married to my wife has taught me that the best lawyers are simply those people who work hard like the rest of us who work hard, and who are kind people - with either good or bad "soft skills".


      The other trick is that you don't need to be good at math to do well in law school. Sure, you have to be intelligent and know math in a rudimentary manner as with any profession, but you can really suck at math and still do great in law school. Inversely, you can totally suck at reading and writing in Engineering and still do just fine in school, but the same is certainly not true of law school.

      The reason why tons of foreign students are in Engineering Grad schools in America, disproportionately to Americans? Our primary education system sucks the life out of 95% of all students who go through it. The "No Child Left Behind" Act has only perpetuated the problem, too. Teaching should not be the domain of our government. Our current system is far too Platonic in its thinking about educating the "youngsters of the state" for my liking, and I think we all do a disservice to ourselves to think that every child must graduate from high school to be an actively contributing and worthy member of our society. Yes, everyone should have access to do so if they wish, but to require every child to do so in the form of standardized testing at an exact age is only keeping standards for each child at every level lower than they should be in order to make sure that "no child is left behind." No child WOULD be left behind if they all weren't forced to take the same tests at the same age - children mature at different rates! And our society would continue to mature at a much faster rate if every person were given the additional freedom to achieve things at their own pace, not the pace dictated to us by state (and now federal) government.

  6. Because we can get great jobs with just a B.Sc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No text

  7. It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Insightful

    India has a billion people. China has a billion people. America has 300,000 people, which is almost an order of magnitude less than India and China combined. Consider that many of the best grad schools are in America--plenty of Indians and Chinese come to America for grad school, but you don't see as many Americans going to India or China. All in all, Americans are fortunate that we can get the same education next door that other people travel around the world for.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    1. Re:It's a numbers game by dal20402 · · Score: 4, Funny

      America has 300,000 people

      The Rapture happened? I'm still here? Wow, that's strange. I insult God all the time.

    2. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America has 300,000 people
      Epic fail. Please disconnect your tube and await pickup.
    3. Re:It's a numbers game by Tragek · · Score: 1

      I do wonder if this is why the American attitude (In a gross... disgustingly gross exaggeration) seems relatively insular compared to many other countries. Too much naval gazing because you're already the centre of the universe.

    4. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fine, 300,000,000. Which is still about an order of magnitude less than 2,000,000,000.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    5. Re:It's a numbers game by jcr · · Score: 1

      America has 300,000 people

      The USA has over three hundred million people.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I assume you really meant that America has 300,000,000 people. In any event, China and India are both attempting to extract as much advanced knowledge and skill from the United States as they can, while simultaneously preventing us from doing anything consequential. The best way to do that is to swamp our educational system with their own people, people who eventually return home with what they've learned leaving us with, well, not much.

      On the other hand, given that America seems to have less and less use for advanced training I don't suppose it will matter in the long run.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:It's a numbers game by iconoclaustic · · Score: 1

      ...and by 300,000, you mean 300,000,000?

      Multiply by another 10^3, and we'll be on track.

      --
      /* Insert Sig Here */
    8. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're like the sixth person to call me out on a typo. Who could have ever guessed that Slashdotters were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do on a Saturday night than correct a minor error? (Strangely enough, I did, correctly, say that the US population was about an order of magnitude less than 2 billion. 300,000 is about four orders of magnitude less.)

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    9. Re:It's a numbers game by Icarus1919 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's all a big conspiracy.

    10. Re:It's a numbers game by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I work for a research branch at NASA that routinely funds basic research at the Graduate level (both Master's and Ph.D.). Unfortunately, many of the students working on the projects that we fund are from foreign nations, and this is due to a lack of either qualified or willing US citizens in Graduate programs around the country studying in our area of interest (which is not space related). The issue is a major problem, and the poster and slashdot readers should be concerned. Be concerned, if for no other reason than many of your tax dollars are being spent to support foreign students studying in the US.

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    11. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're looking at the wrong numbers. You don't want to know how many people are in China vs. how many are in the U.S.; you want to know how many more engineering graduates there are in China than in the United States. It doesn't matter if you have six billion people if you only 0.0001% of those people are in a position to gain entrance to a graduate school.

    12. Re:It's a numbers game by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      The best way to do that is to swamp our educational system with their own people, people who eventually return home with what they've learned leaving us with, well, not much. This may be true with many visitors, but my experience with them has been that once they're here they want to stay here.
      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    13. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, it is. China reached the point of significant industrialization in an incredibly short time by instituting an organized knowledge transfer program (and not just the U.S., but we were the most concentrated stockpile of information around, with the fewest restrictions on foreign students.) Call it what you want, but China's people came here, educated themselves as to what a high-technology culture needs to build and maintain the required industry ... and then went home and did just that. India is now doing the same thing. Right or wrong, conspiracy or not ... that's what's going on.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    14. Re:It's a numbers game by DavidShor · · Score: 1
      "Be concerned, if for no other reason than many of your tax dollars are being spent to support foreign students studying in the US."

      So? Why exactly are domestic students better uses of taxpayer dollars then foreign students?

    15. Re:It's a numbers game by Potor · · Score: 1

      You sir are a bigot.

      I - a Canadian - earned two advanced degrees in Belgium, where tuition cost me around EUR 500 a year; Belgian taxes paid the rest. Like me, I bet more than a few of those foreign grad students in America will stick around and end up contributing back to your precious tax dollars.

      Even if they don't, they still return home to spread your way of life, which is part of the reason they are allowed to come in the first place.

    16. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shut the fsck up going on about your stupid mistake! You must be one of our moronic citizens that did do much in edumacation.

    17. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sure ... I might want to stay here as well, depending upon where I was from. That isn't necessarily what their government wants, nor is it necessarily what we want, and in any event people don't get to just enter a nation, go to school there, and just decide to stay because it suits them. Well, that's not how it's supposed to work, anyway. Generally speaking, the folks that were there first (in most places in the world, they're known as "citizens") make laws regarding who they want to have as neighbors.

      Where did the idea start that America is just some vast smorgasbord of cool stuff that anyone can just take for themselves any time they please?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    18. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Yes, forgive me for not doing detailed demographic research for a Slashdot comment. 2 billion to 300 million is enough of a differential to, in most cases, render the others negligible.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    19. Re:It's a numbers game by Aqua04 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who could have ever guessed that Slashdotters were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do on a Saturday night than correct a minor error?

      What do you mean ? What else would there be to do on a Saturday night ? By the way, its usually best to leave a space before a question mark at the end of a sentence. You said "minor error?", it should be "minor error ?". Reads better and makes the user experience of reading your sentence that much more comfortable. Thanks.

    20. Re:It's a numbers game by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Await pickup? The internet's not like a truck, you can't just dump things into it.

    21. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Who cares? What we're paying for is the research, and it's getting done. If you want a subsidy to help get Americans graduate degrees, work for that.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    22. Re:It's a numbers game by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do these foreign students pay taxes in the US? If so, how long did they or do they pay? Is it a net gain for the US or a loss? If a loss then why is it done?

      Ah questions...

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    23. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Funny

      It looks like a typo to me, and considering what happened the last time I made a typo...

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    24. Re:It's a numbers game by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 1

      For the same reason we should be concerned about exporting US jobs. The students typically do not stay in the US, and we are simply exporting our intellectual property.

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    25. Re:It's a numbers game by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1, Redundant

      yeah, the town I live in is almost 300,000.
      try 300,000,000.
      still a lot less than China, but not an order of magnitude.

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
    26. Re:It's a numbers game by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have valid points, I will admit. It is not that we are funding a few foreign students, it is that we are funding mostly foreign students. And yes, that does bother me. Call me a bigot if you wish, but I would really like to see more qualified and willing students pursuing degrees in higher education through the use of US Government research grants. Finally, I did not mean to sound elitist or bigoted, I just wanted to point out another point of view to the question posed by the poster of the article. If you think I am bigoted, look south and think fuck you.

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    27. Re:It's a numbers game by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 1

      I meant to say domestic students in my parent rant. Oops, typing too fast.

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    28. Re:It's a numbers game by pipatron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Where did the idea start that America is just some vast smorgasbord of cool stuff that anyone can just take for themselves any time they please?

      Probably around the time Christopher Colombus arrived to America.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    29. Re:It's a numbers game by Dorsai65 · · Score: 1

      How 'bout because China is one of a very limited number of Communist governments left? And that they like to abuse and oppress their own (billion-plus) people? And sell advanced weapons (can you say "Silkworm missiles"? I knew you could!) using advanced technology they got from 'open' countries to rogue nations like Iran and North Korea? And that they routinely threaten to take over the democratic nation of Taiwan? Does Tiananmen Square ring a bell? Why the fsck should we be helping them acquire technology that they'll more than likely (judging from past experience) use against us?

      --
      --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
    30. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Nah ... I think the Vikings started the whole thing off. But I think you know what I meant.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    31. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a particular reason that you're being defensive?

      I pointed out that you're comparing the wrong numbers for making the argument that you're making.
      Your response is, "No, I'm not, because I say it's good enough."

      Just look up the actual numbers and see if they support your hypothesis. If they don't then maybe you should revise it. If they do, then you should use that to support your argument.

      If you're too lazy to even see if the data fit your hypothesis, why waste our time proposing it?

    32. Re:It's a numbers game by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      What's taught in graduate school is now the US's intellectual property?

    33. Re:It's a numbers game by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1
      That does not make anybody a bigot. If Belgians do not care about how their tax dollars are spent, that is their business. My parents were happy to pay taxes because they knew it was necessary for us to go to school and the previous generation supported them in school. I am happy to pay taxes because my children will be able to go through school. No one country could possibly be expected to bear the education burden for the entire world. Belgium may have been able to fund you, because your tuition was a drop in the bucket. Imagine if countries sent 1000x as many students to Belgium for their nearly free education.... What would happen then?

      The bottom line is that education has to be paid for, and while some people may not mind paying more than their fair share because it benefits others, nobody wants to carry an overwhelming portion of the financial burden.

    34. Re:It's a numbers game by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your post. I share your sentiment.

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    35. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which part of

      almost an order of magnitude
      and

      less than India and China combined.
      don't you understand? 2 billion is almost 10 times as much as 300 million.
    36. Re:It's a numbers game by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      Modernization theory implies that societies that modernize tend to converge on the Western ideal, as they emulate already-dominant societies both technologically and culturally. If their students study here, there's a good chance they'll take some of the cultural lessons as well as skills back with them.

      One can hope, anyway.

    37. Re:It's a numbers game by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who could have ever guessed that Slashdotters were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do on a Saturday night than correct a minor error?

      You mean there are other options? What are these strange things of which you speak?

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    38. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taxes on what? They're students. They paid for the course. That's money into your economy. What more do you want off them? Blood?

    39. Re:It's a numbers game by Potor · · Score: 1

      your children can still enjoy an american education - how does funding foreigners hurt them? it sounds like that old argument about all the foreigners taking our jobs, only here, it's education.

      of course, the places are limited. so, since competition is an issue, i guess american kids simply need to be smarter.

    40. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      By the way, its usually best to leave a space before a question mark at the end of a sentence. That's true if you're French, or adopted a quirky writing style to make yourself feel superior.
    41. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to bed, Carlos Hal Mencia Turner.

    42. Re:It's a numbers game by tuxicle · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm a student in the US, and I'm from India. Yes, I do pay taxes on my stipend.

    43. Re:It's a numbers game by The+Man · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Since for the most part they can't legally work, they generally pay no income taxes. If they are allowed to work, they usually receive only a token wage as a research or teaching assistant; anyone who's ever TA'd knows you don't make enough to incur any tax liability. Such jobs are normally exempt from payroll taxes as well, though in some states they may be subject to unemployment taxes. In the rare cases in which these students do incur income tax liability, they are required to pay at the same rates as anyone else (and their earnings may or may not also be taxed by their own governments). Foreign students do, of course, pay sales taxes and those who rent property pay property taxes indirectly. Your question, if nothing else, highlights a grievous flaw in our system of taxation: it implies that one's use of government services and public resources has a strong positive correlation with one's income. In many cases, the tax structure is designed not to equitably raise revenue to cover the cost of government but rather to redistribute wealth according to some abstract ideal or to penalise, subsidise, or encourage various behaviours, most of which have nothing to do with the cost of government. So asking this question about foreign students seems a bit pointless; one could make the same set of observations about any group of people unable to work or prohibited from doing so (a group which includes foreign tourists - nearly always considered a boon). A better question might be how much public universities make (or lose) on these students' education. Hopefully they're recovering at least what it actually costs to provide education. I know when I was going to school that my state university's fee structure was something like 80% subsidised by the state; foreign students had to pay the out of state fees as well as some additional charges, but I doubt it equalled the full cost altogether. Of course, these students also brought money into the city and the university which might not otherwise have been available.

      Figuring long-term net gain or loss is almost impossible. Some of these students stay and obtain permanent visas; they would be expected to pay taxes on substantial earnings for a long time. Others, more today than ever, go home, where their new credentials enable them to take jobs that used to be done by Americans, but at large discounts due to local prices (thus putting Americans out of work or forcing them to skill up in response but also lowering the cost of Americans' insatiable consumption fetish). And some, too many, overstay, taking illegal jobs (often at or below minimum wage) and paying no income or payroll taxes. There are gains and losses for every US citizen in all three cases, and I don't pretend I could compute the overall balance. If it concerns you, you should think about the more fundamental issues in the tax code rather than singling out foreign students for a cost/benefit analysis.

      And yes, I'm a native-born US citizen.

    44. Re:It's a numbers game by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      How are foreign students being funded? Aren't the foreign students funding the university? From what I know, foreign students pay much much more to go to American schools than Americans do. At least the schools that are funded by tax dollars. You shouldn't be complaining. All those foreign students are bringing extra bucks into the school.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    45. Re:It's a numbers game by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 1

      I would agree, US kids do in fact need to be smarter. And unfortunately, our public education system is not helping. Our kids simply learn how to pass a standards of learning test at some arbitrary interval throughout k-12 grades. The system simply teaches them how to pass the test in an effort to improve average test scores for the schools. This in no way teaches them the most basic talent that is needed to be successful as a independent thinker once one enters college. The learned talent that many (or most) of our kid lack upon leaving high school is the basic understanding of how to learn on your own. I only wish that our system would address this basic flaw (how I don't know), and maybe that would make graduate school more attractive to domestic undergraduate students.

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    46. Re:It's a numbers game by Panoptes · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't blame the poor chap - he was obviously using Excel 2007 for the calculations.

    47. Re:It's a numbers game by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      International students pay full price for their education - and are not subsidized by the state in any way. And considering the lack of public health care and whatnot, they're really not sucking much money out of the American economy at all. As other posters also mentioned, they are not able to legally work in the USA except in an academic position, which we all know pays so little that it would not incur taxation anyway.

    48. Re:It's a numbers game by Assassin+bug · · Score: 1

      It isn't quite that simple. Many of the foreign students that I have had the pleasure to work with are tremendous resources and partners in research. Their interest in US universities gives opportunities for graduate training and for them to train others. It is very much a two-way street. Some of the universities they come from have superior high-school and undergraduate education programs. Speaking on behalf of science education in the US, I feel pretty confident to say it has some major problems that stem from a lack of funding. If one is really concerned about intellectual property in the US maybe we should be actually investing in our educational centers. ;-)

    49. Re:It's a numbers game by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Depends on if they work here or not on income tax. However, they do pay sales taxes like the rest of us.

      Then they take their new found knoledge back home, with no export tax involved, so they can siphon off more jobs.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    50. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of non-resident alien students are not funded by your tax dollar,go check the tuition rates, they pay significantly more than citizens and resident aliens. Some of them receives scholarship such TA or RA. Actually hosting foreign students is a big income for US colleges.

    51. Re:It's a numbers game by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 1

      When a graduate student (foreign or domestic) is funded through a US Government research grant, the grant pays for the students' tuition, an RA stipend, and research related travel costs during the period of performance of the grant. Thus, when a foreign student is working on a US government research grant, the taxpayers are footing the education bill for that time period of the students education.

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    52. Re:It's a numbers game by KevMar · · Score: 1

      I have the same issue on spelling, so I made my signature a disclaimer.

      --
      Im a gamer, not a grammer major. This post is full of spelling and grammer mistakes.
    53. Re:It's a numbers game by Smegoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm a Canadian currently doing a PhD at an US university 90 minutes south of the border and I can tell you that not only do we pay taxes, we pay more taxes than US citizens (1040-NR doesn't allow us to make all the deductions that a regular us citizen gets to put on their tax form. Namely there's a big ~5K that we can't deduct, so while my american buddy paid 80$ income tax, I paid 840$). To make matters worse the US-Canada tax treaty only kicks in if you make less than 10k. So, in other words, we pay taxes to both the US, the state we live in and Canada... And if I was a previously a Quebec resident, I'd have to pay Canadian federal and Quebec provincial tax.

      I don't know about other grad students, but I don't come to the US for the funding, I came because my department is the best in the world for my area of research, and I'm willing to take the tax shaft as a result. Still you'd think Canada and the US would have a more productive tax treaty. Many other countries do.

    54. Re:It's a numbers game by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      Yes but is it cheaper to subsidize a foreign student through grad school then to fund a child from K-12, undergrad, grad school and all the children services. If it costs X to provide someone with grad school, and 4x to provide all the child services and undergrad education, it becomes cheaper to train foreign students if only 20% of them decide to stay in US. We spend less to get highly educated person, so why worry bout the ones that go home and help their countries.

      Think of it as a means to get educated immigrants, which is a good thing. Worry more about the immigrants that will never be a gain to US, unskilled, uneducated and a drain on social services.

    55. Re:It's a numbers game by enbody · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is a net gain. Look at it this way. The US takes some of the top students from some very large countries, e.g. India and China. They get educated here and most want to stay. If we keep them here, we are taking the cream of the crop from other countries and they add to our GDP. Over their lifetimes they add more to or GDP than we have provided in educating them. Why? Because they are smart and driven to work hard.

      This is from personal observation of this field over the last twenty years. The stupidest thing we can do is pay for their education and then not allow them to stay. The second most stupid thing we can do is make it harder for them to come here. We are currently doing both of those stupid things more than we used to.

    56. Re:It's a numbers game by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      The best way to do that is to swamp our educational system with their own people, people who eventually return home with what they've learned leaving us with, well, not much. This may be true with many visitors, but my experience with them has been that once they're here they want to stay here. "Want to" is largely irrelevant when they're Chinese citizens with their tuition paid by the Chinese government. The only way they can stay is if they can continue to convince their government to continue paying them to stay in school.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    57. Re:It's a numbers game by waitasec · · Score: 1

      No no no... The Rapture takes all the Good People away. Whisks them off to their Reward. We get to stay. It's supposed to happen any day now. Please please please God - take them away. Now!

    58. Re:It's a numbers game by shanen · · Score: 1

      Who told you to put a space before the question mark? It's wrong for English, though it common in certain European languages.

      It might have been reasonable to complain about the lack of a space after the colon in the Subject: line, but that's a chronic /. problem. Look at every "Score:" line.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    59. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      My point is that I'm commenting on Slashdot, not writing a thesis. Although you bring up a good point, I don't think the difference in how much of the population gets a bachelor's degree is enough to overcome the population difference, and I'm not inclined the study the problem beyond the vague suggestions I've already made.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    60. Re:It's a numbers game by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So? Why exactly are domestic students better uses of taxpayer dollars then foreign students? Foreign nationals cannot hold jobs, and upon graduation move back to their home countries. I think the notion is that government subsidies ought to be going to improve conditions within the country, rather than to give a hand to someone who doesn't contribute to the economy.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    61. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we should get rid of those people. You first, paleface.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    62. Re:It's a numbers game by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Taxes on what? They're students. They paid for the course. That's money into your economy. What more do you want off them? Blood? No, just perhaps an economic return that's equal to or greater than the cost of educating them. Tuition doesn't cover it if you're talking about state schools. The rest is paid by tax money. A foreign national who can't legally work contributes little to the economy, and once he returns home, contributes nothing.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    63. Re:It's a numbers game by mochan_s · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since for the most part they can't legally work, they generally pay no income taxes.

      You pay no income tax only if you don't have income. TA/RA stipend is income and taxed. On campus work is taxed.

      If they are allowed to work, they usually receive only a token wage as a research or teaching assistant; anyone who's ever TA'd knows you don't make enough to incur any tax liability.

      The stipend is same for everyone and is advertised on the department website.

      Such jobs are normally exempt from payroll taxes as well, though in some states they may be subject to unemployment taxes. In the rare cases in which these students do incur income tax liability, they are required to pay at the same rates as anyone else (and their earnings may or may not also be taxed by their own governments).

      No they are not exempt!

      YOu are making stuff up.

    64. Re:It's a numbers game by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Your question, if nothing else, highlights a grievous flaw in our system of taxation: it implies that one's use of government services and public resources has a strong positive correlation with one's income.

      More a grievous flaw in your understanding of taxation. There is no such implication. If the government wanted all services to be user-pays, they could make them that way and abolish taxes. But in civilised democracies, it is considered better for society as a whole to provide some services universally, regardless of ability to pay, and that is what taxes accomplish.

    65. Re:It's a numbers game by Xonstantine · · Score: 1

      Well, if the DREAM act becomes law, illegal aliens will be subsidized with local in-state tuition, while out of state US citizens will have to pay the full out of state price. I'm sure legal aliens on student visas will probably have to pay the full out of state price too. So, the trick when going to the bursar's office is to claim that you are here illegally.

    66. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do domestic students pay taxes? Only if they have a job, which isn't directly related to the fact that they attend school. On the other hand, foreign students normally pay a premium to take classes, while local (state) residents typically pay less to take the exact same class. In the meantime, the foreign students do have to pay for rent and necessities here in the US, regardless of whether their funding originates from this economy (i.e. if they have a job here). So:

      * Foreign students pay for classes, and pay more than citizens
      * Foreign students put money into the local economy
      * Foreign students aren't given money by the school or our government

      Conclusion: it is a net gain for the US, unless you also want to bring in the question of the long-term effects of teaching people to fish for themselves, reducing their dependence on American fish. It is worth noting, however, that the Chinese and Indians do cook better fish, and perhaps that's also becoming true of their engineering skills as well.

      If you're going to bring up some silly thing like "the schools are subsidized with US tax dollars", well, those schools would be built and run regardless of whether foreign students were attending. Saying that the US is spending money for the benefit of foreign students is the exact same fallacy that piracy costs the record labels x billion dollars a year.

    67. Re:It's a numbers game by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      That's stupid. IMHO the entire purpose of the international student programs should be to recruit future American citizens. The whole country is built upon gathering the talent from all over the world, there needs to be some sort of program that will encourage excellent students (odds are if they've made it in, they are already) to settle down for good.

    68. Re:It's a numbers game by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No, he's just the product of a US education system:)

      Yes, I know, it's most likely just an amusing typo written in a hurry. The USA is infamous for the poor quality of high schools but famous for the high quality of postgraduates. The undergrads in the middle must have it fairly tough to get to be good enough to go into a postgraduate program.

    69. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same issue on spelling, so I made my signature a disclaimer.
      --
      Im a gamer, not a grammer major. This post is full of spelling and grammer mistakes.


      Nice. "I'm a gamer, so that makes it okay for me to be ignorant." And I really hope the "grammer" thing is just you attempting to be funny, but I have a funny feeling that it's not...

    70. Re:It's a numbers game by xenocide2 · · Score: 1
      Hey, if highly educated people want to stay here, I'm all for it.

      Where did the idea start that America is just some vast smorgasbord of cool stuff that anyone can just take for themselves any time they please? Probably around the time the Statue of Liberty came along with the phrase "Give me your huddled masses, yearning to breathe free." Or maybe earlier, with the idea of the Beacon on the Hill, America being an example for other nations and peoples to follow.
      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    71. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been to Silicon Valley? Most of the people there
      are foreign-born, who came to Berkeley and Stanford to do a PhD
      and stayed because the weather was good. Is Silicon Valley a net gain
      for the US?

    72. Re:It's a numbers game by Xonstantine · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the real purpose of international student programs is to fill University coffers. The reason why graduate engineering programs have difficulty recruiting natives is one of utility: what will a graduate degree in mechanical engineering do that a bachelors won't do? Will you get to work on cooler projects? Enter the corporate ladder at a high rung? Make ridiculously more money out of the gate? Unfortunately, the usual answer to all of those questions is an emphatic NO. You do get to defray your student loans for a couple more years and keep going to those college keggers, but then again if you are a graduate engineering student...chances are you aren't going to those.

      Now, contrast that with a medical degree or a law degree, which really does open doors you can't walk through with just a bachelors degree.

    73. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I suppose you felt witty and insightful for that remark, but you know as well as I that the situations are not comparable. Few people claim that what the European colonists, followed by the United States Federal Government, did to the indigenous population was anything other than "might makes right." The Gold Rush period was particularly disturbing, considering that the Native Americans were abiding by the territorial agreements. But it is what usually happens when a more powerful culture first encounters a weaker one that has something the other wants. It's happened throughout human history, it's still happening and it will continue to happen.

      Your comment is interesting. Apparently, as an American I'm not to be allowed to make legitimate commentary on activities and trends happening within the borders of my own country that I perceive as being detrimental to me and mine. Nor, as an American, am I permitted to believe that our immigration laws should be considered anything more than a minor inconvenience for anyone, from anywhere, who decides they want to live here. Tell you what: go to any other country on Earth and try that. You'll be laughed out of the room.

      What I object to (besides the fact that America is willingly training its competition in the global economy) is the fundamental hypocrisy I see in most discussions on this issue. Any person from another country that perceives any kind of a threat from the United States feels perfectly free to criticize and lambaste us for all sorts of real and imagined misdeeds: it's become a form of entertainment it appears. But let an American call a halt and say, "Now just wait a goddamned minute. What's being done to us isn't kosher either" and he is immediately called all sorts of names (someone recently called me a "paleface") and dismissed as a bigoted fool.

      I have as much right as anyone to look at what it is happening all around me, and call 'em as I see 'em. And I will ... WhiteEyes.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    74. Re:It's a numbers game by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      ""Give me your tired, your poor,
      Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
      The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
      Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
      I lift my lamp beside the golden door!""

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    75. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish some people on Slashdot would quit using the term "order of magnitude" . It's a fancy term that people who are trying to impress use. Unless you are a mathematics genius, you don't have the right to use that term. You are playing with toys you really know nothing about.

    76. Re:It's a numbers game by DavidShor · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Oh, get off it. The US supplies more dictatorships with weapons than China ever has.

      We sold weapons to Iran before and after the Shah. We just concluded a massive weapons deal with Saudi Arabia. To be honest, I don't think Saudi Arabia or 90's era Liberia are any more democratic than North Korea. Don't claim the moral high-ground unless you can justify giving 20 billion USD in advanced weaponry to a tyrannical theocracy known for sponsoring terrorism.

      And as for China's willingness to invade democracies when it suits their self interest, see what the US did in 1956 to Iran(Check out Operation Ajax on Wikipeida), and what the US did to Guatemala during the Cold war; Or what the CIA did in Chile, or the Congo, I could go on.

      Of course, every country with power and influence has black marks. See France's activities in West Africa and Rwanda, their current activities in Niger, to say nothing of their history in Indochina and Algeria; Or see the UK's actions in Uganda, Former Rhodesia, Iran, and Suez. Don't even get me started on Russia or Israel.

      The truth is, governments are rather soulless entities, which by design act in their own self-interest. To ascribe personal qualities to them like evil is idiotic and counter-productive. Instead, we have to understand the pressures a nation's leaders face.

      China is an ethnic powder keg teeming with religious and ethnic strife, Jingoism, and hyper-Nationalism. They have massive inequalities of wealth, and a population schooled in Marxism. In the meantime, rapid economic, political, and demographic trends have made most government and societal institutions irrelevant.

      Faced with this, what do you think the Chinese leaders want the most? Stability. Every single action they take, from supporting dictatorships in Burma and North Korea, to propping up the US economy with bond purchases, to refusing to float their currency. China has no urge to pick a fight with America, not now and not ever. They have their own problems to worry about, and the last thing they want to do is add another.

    77. Re:It's a numbers game by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      So either remove all taxes and welfare systems or encourage foreigners to stay here.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    78. Re:It's a numbers game by DavidShor · · Score: 1
      "No, just perhaps an economic return that's equal to or greater than the cost of educating them. Tuition doesn't cover it if you're talking about state schools. The rest is paid by tax money. A foreign national who can't legally work contributes little to the economy, and once he returns home, contributes nothing."

      I don't see how this is any different than domestic students. There are only two reasons why most foreign students would leave after school: 1) they are forced to by Visa restrictions, or 2)Wages are higher in other countries.

      The first reason is very easy to fix, give them citizenship and let them stay. The second reason applies to domestic students as much as foreign ones.

    79. Re:It's a numbers game by Reaperducer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I do wonder if this is why the American attitude (In a gross... disgustingly gross exaggeration) seems relatively insular compared to many other countries. Too much naval gazing because you're already the centre of the universe.
      Although that is a common perception, especially here on Slashdot, it is not accurate.

      There is a certain amount of fear of outsiders in every country. Americans with Mexicans. The French with north Africans. Austrians and Germans with the Turks. Hong Kongers with mainlanders.

      It's just in fashion right now to bash America, so that's why you see that stereotype more than others.
      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    80. Re:It's a numbers game by Surt · · Score: 1

      Every state school I've seen numbers for charges foreign students way more than enough more to cover their costs. Typically 4-6x the tuition rates of non-foreign students. Enough to make them have no tax consequences for the rest of us, in fact they are probably decreasing our taxes because the universities require less funding.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    81. Re:It's a numbers game by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      In my own defense for being on Slashdot on a Saturday night, nothing happens here on Saturday night because everyone is still too hungover from Friday night.

    82. Re:It's a numbers game by mikael · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ya! This is the spelling nazi weekly meeting. Please make sure that your /. armbands are facing outward on your left arm, that your pocket protector is neatly folded and that your sneaker laces are tied properly. Our supreme leader Cowboy Neal (may his servers always be online) will address you all shortly.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    83. Re:It's a numbers game by Sergeant+Pepper · · Score: 0

      That's wrong, too. You do not put a space before a colon, either.

    84. Re:It's a numbers game by JanneM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Keyword: "research grant".

      A graduate student is doing research - real, publishable research - during their training. They are doing work in other words, presumably work that is valued enough by their employer to be worth spending a chunk of money on. A lot of the gruntwork on any research project is done by graduate students and post-docs, and the money, whether a research grant, stipend or other form, is renumeration for that. Yes, they're studying as well - but on the other hand they're underpaid for the real-work part. In many countries a graduate student position really is a job, a four or five-year employment with salary, vacation days, child leave, employer evaluations and all the rest of it.

      In this sense it's no different from funding post-docs or visiting professorships, most of whom usually come from abroad as well. The funding agency is paying them to do a job, and hopefully, on average feel that the results in form of published research, skill transfer, furtherance of projects, taught classes and so on are worth it. And just like other contract work, what the worker does once the contract is up isn't really an ongoing concern anymore. Academic research is pretty much predicated on this kind of movement for spreading ideas and furthering results.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    85. Re:It's a numbers game by polyex · · Score: 1

      If you want to be mad, ask the students where they are getting the money from to pay for college in the first place.

    86. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Most grad programs are paid for by the research grants that the school gets. That's why "publish or perish" is the mentality, and research trumps academics. So, as long as there are warm bodies to do the research (and, better, if they're paying out of state/out of country tuition rates, it's not even sucking up the subsidized education) then it's a win.

      Like offshoring work to certain areas, it would actually be more expensive to do the same thing with native students.

    87. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably around the time the Statue of Liberty came along with the phrase "Give me your huddled masses, yearning to breathe free." Or maybe earlier, with the idea of the Beacon on the Hill, America being an example for other nations and peoples to follow.

      Nope. You still have it wrong, just like the poster that followed you. It's all fine and dandy for us to be an inspiration for other peoples to follow. I'm all for setting a good example. However, this situation is far more complex than you make it out to be, and your simplification may very well cost us everything we hold dear. America is no longer in a situation where we need more people, see immigration as a way to achieve that without waiting for the population to rise on its own.

      Understand what I'm trying to say here. It's not that I think American should simply close it's borders and not allow anyone in. People do come here from all over the world. Some few of those eventually earn their citizenship (my fiancee, for example, is Nigerian: she's been here for about twenty five years and became a Citizen a few years ago) and become valued members of our society. However, though she is Nigerian by birth she is an American at heart! This is vitally important for any society that accepts immigrants and naturalizes them. Do you understand our traditions, our way of life? Are you willing to become a part of us ... not a little bit, not mostly, but all the way? Do your loyalties lie with us, or with the nation of your birth? Are you just here to pig your share of the goodies? Do you truly understand what it means to be an American?

      If not ... we don't want you. There's a certain reality here that is being, so far as I can tell, completely ignored by all the pro-H1B, pro-amnesty crowd. A couple of points, 1. We have laws regarding immigration. They should be followed, because they were put into place a long, long time ago and for good reason. We ignore them at our peril and 2. We want people that have become assimilated into our culture, that are as much a part of our way of life as possible. Assimilation is a process, and is one that takes time. It's important, assimilation is, and it is why we don't just hand out citizenships to everyone that wants one. No matter how intelligent, how educated, how talented you are, we want you to be one of us. This not a uniquely American ideal either: all nations expect that their citizens be loyal to their country, whether they were born there or not. Japan, for example, is particularly concerned with those of foreign birth, whom they permit to call themselves "Japanese". The insist that those individuals be as truly Japanese as humanly possible.

      My fiancee is one of those "huddled masses" of which you speak. Let me tell you something: she earned the right to be here, to enjoy everything our great nation has to offer. She didn't just wander across the border and decide, "hey, this place is nice. I think I'll set up shop here." No ... she followed the rules, obeyed the law, and now has all the same rights that I, a natural-born citizen, have enjoyed all my life. I'll tell you something else: it absolutely pulls her cork when President Bush foams at the mouth about granting several million criminals amnesty for their crimes, and giving them many of the same rights that she worked so hard to receive.

      You really need to understand that unchecked immigration is a death sentence for any society.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    88. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a different time now than when we received that statue. Hell, I doubt even France would have that outlook, and they gave us the statue.

    89. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Given the problems that France is facing right now, I can pretty much guarantee they won't have that outlook anymore.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    90. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as how most of the electrical engineers at Northrop Grumman's Defensive Systems Division are of Indian descent, manufacturing defense systems that go directly into the hands of American warfighters, I'd have to say yes.

    91. Re:It's a numbers game by AoT · · Score: 2

      The United States is the most powerful nation on the face of the earth and you're going to sit and whine about "the foreigners" coming and invading our country. The borders of the United States are a creation of people by means of force, there's no way you can tell me that makes them morally right.

    92. Re:It's a numbers game by AxemRed · · Score: 1

      I thought that the state only covered part of your education costs if you are from that state. I'm from Indiana, and I went to Purdue. I remember seeing that out of state people had to pay quite a bit more tuition than Indiana residents.

    93. Re:It's a numbers game by The+Man · · Score: 1
      You pay no income tax only if you don't have income. TA/RA stipend is income and taxed. On campus work is taxed.

      The first statement is false. For tax year 2007, the personal exemption is $3400 and the standard deduction is $5350 for single filers. Thus, at least the first $8750 of income is effectively exempt from taxation. Your other two statements are correct, but in my personal experience it's unusual for TA/RA stipends to approach that amount.

      The stipend is same for everyone and is advertised on the department website.

      Yes, and if we're talking about universities that were anything like the one I attended, they're much less than $8750 a year - for everyone.

      No they are not exempt!

      In fact, stipends *are* exempt from Social Security taxes, provided that one works fewer than 20 hours a week, and only while regular classes are in session. See, for example, http://www.housing.wisc.edu/jobs/PDF/payroll_information.pdf. And for a canonical reference that applies specifically to nonresident aliens on student visas, see http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/international/article/0,,id=131635,00.html.

    94. Re:It's a numbers game by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably has something to do with that only a fraction of our population goes to a university for a four year program, much less longer. I think that if you look at US Citizens who go into these programs that you'll see a noticeable skew in which schools they come from.

      Remember, while our schools might be below average compared with other first world nations, it's also an extremely fragmented system - unlike how some school systems are nationally administered, you have to remember that every state has it's own school system - indeed you can frequently substitute counties and cities in there as well. This means in that while the USA has some of the worst schools in the world - we also have some of the best in the world. There are regions where public schools would be considered excellent, and areas where anybody who's anybody send their children to private institutions.

      Finally, we've been concentrating too much on mediocrity - spending too much effort on making sure everybody we can meets minimum standards, rather than trying to push students as far as they'll go.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    95. Re:It's a numbers game by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >your children can still enjoy an american education - how does funding foreigners hurt them?

      Are you *sure* that no American who is qualified does not have his spot taken by a foreigner?

      I disagree with the notion that taxes are "funding foreigners"; Foreign grad students have to compete for the same pots of research money as everyone else. American students tend to go on loans and grants, and may represent a burden on universities where foreign students represent a profit center.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    96. Re:It's a numbers game by The+Man · · Score: 1
      If the government wanted all services to be user-pays, they could make them that way and abolish taxes. But in civilised democracies, it is considered better for society as a whole to provide some services universally...

      Really? How would user-pays work for national defense, for instance? Or general law enforcement? The reason governments are allowed to tax is that there is no efficient or equitable way to assign portions of certain costs to specific individuals. So the first part of your second statement is correct, but the essence of your retort is not: taxation exists because virtually all constitutionally permissible government activities are of the unassignable-cost variety. If the government limited its activities to those, it would be entirely reasonable, as the Framers provided for, to impose a head tax on all residents and/or citizens. If the benefits are universal - as indeed they are in most of those cases - then so too should be the sharing of costs. Are a poor man's life and liberty less valuable than a wealthy man's? If not, why should he pay less for their preservation?

    97. Re:It's a numbers game by AoT · · Score: 2

      There's a certain reality here that is being, so far as I can tell, completely ignored by all the pro-H1B, pro-amnesty crowd. A couple of points, 1. We have laws regarding immigration. They should be followed, because they were put into place a long, long time ago and for good reason. We ignore them at our peril and 2. We want people that have become assimilated into our culture, that are as much a part of our way of life as possible. Assimilation is a process, and is one that takes time. It's important, assimilation is, and it is why we don't just hand out citizenships to everyone that wants one. No matter how intelligent, how educated, how talented you are, we want you to be one of us. This not a uniquely American ideal either: all nations expect that their citizens be loyal to their country, whether they were born there or not. Japan, for example, is particularly concerned with those of foreign birth, whom they permit to call themselves "Japanese". The insist that those individuals be as truly Japanese as humanly possible.


      This is wrong on so many levels. First, the laws on immigration were put into force a long, long time ago for horribly racist reasons. I assume you are ignorant of this fact for the alternative is that you approve of racist exclusionary laws. Second, what is this "culture" of which you speak? I assume you mean, as most people do when speaking of American culture, while male middle-class culture. Yes, you can all come to the U.S. as long as you act exactly like we say and believe the right things, because this is the land of freedom, where you're free to act like everyone else does! Most of all I disappointed that anyone would use the "everyone else does it" excuse. The Japanese also invaded China and slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people, does that make it OK for us to do so as well? I think not.

      You really need to understand that unchecked immigration is a death sentence for any society.

      Yes, I suppose you have some proof of that. Or just more unsupported polemic.

    98. Re:It's a numbers game by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      As a current undergrad in engineering, I totally agree. I have absolutely no intention of going for a graduate degree, and neither do the vast majority of my peers. Graduate engineers get paid marginally more (maybe 10% extra starting) here in Canada, and any competent and motivated engineer can completely outstrip that number in the years the grads spend in school.

      The only people I know who are even remotely interested in graduate engineering are the ones who were gunning for professorships and a lifetime of academia anyway. Anybody who wans to go into private sector knows it's a waste of time (if your goal is to be highly paid, and spend as little time in school as possible).

    99. Re:It's a numbers game by jcr · · Score: 1

      China reached the point of significant industrialization in an incredibly short time by instituting an organized knowledge transfer program

      China's industrialization has far more to do with their government simply allowing businesses to operate with a minimum of interference, than any active program of seeking information. Once it became possible to make money in China, people from Taiwan, Singapore, Japan, and many other countries swarmed the place.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    100. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my California State University, a quick glance shows that non-resident students have to pay $339 PER UNIT on top of the regular 1300-1700 (undergrad-graduate) base semester tuition that everyone pays. My total semester fees for full time grad school would be $2049 per semester (full time fee + misc school fees). It seems that an international student would pay $6117 for the same classes. And at the community college I used to attend - California residents pay $20 per unit, non-resident U.S. citizens pay $170, and international students pay $190 - almost ten times the price of regular students! This could vary by state, of course, but it doesn't look like the international students are getting a free ride in California.

    101. Re:It's a numbers game by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      ""Give me your tired, your poor,
      Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
      The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
      Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
      I lift my lamp beside the golden door!""

      Nothing about people who can pay $75000/year non-resident tuition???

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    102. Re:It's a numbers game by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you mention Liberia, being an American colony founded with reverse immigration...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    103. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      At one time, China had the same problem. They built a Great Wall and burned their fleet (which at that point was the greatest on Earth, centuries ahead of Europe). Ultimately they got their asses kicked by the very foreigners they dismissed, and only now are they beginning to recover.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    104. Re:It's a numbers game by HUADPE · · Score: 1

      $75,000 per year? The most expensive schools in the states tend to be private ones, and their tuition is usually closer to $35,000 per year, and no residency checks, everyone gets charged full

      --
      This sig has not been evaluated by the FDA. It is not designed to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease.
    105. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What, are you afraid we will run out of education? If they want to better themselves by learning from America, we should be honored, and humbled, that civilizations more ancient and in many ways richer than ours, consider us worthy of emulation. They do not gain at our expense--they gain at our mutual benefit.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    106. Re:It's a numbers game by StrongAxe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Japanese also invaded China and slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people, does that make it OK for us to do so as well? I think not.

      Well, Fearless Leader seems to think it was a good idea in Iraq...

    107. Re:It's a numbers game by Percy_Blakeney · · Score: 1

      International students pay full price for their education - and are not subsidized by the state in any way.

      That is, unless you receive a tuition waiver; the graduate school that I attended provided a 100% tuition waiver to all RA/TA's, most of which were international students. This is not uncommon, either.

    108. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much naval gazing

      Ja, I spend WAY too much time down at the harbor watching the ships... when instead I should be staring at me belly button!

    109. Re:It's a numbers game by StrongAxe · · Score: 1

      Who could have ever guessed that Slashdotters were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do on a Saturday night than correct a minor error?

      You apparently haven't been here very long...

    110. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not condoning anything, but I hope you realize that delegitimizing a state because its borders are "a creation of people by means of force" would mean that most countries on this planet would have no right to exist (including, I suspect, whichever country you're currently posting from).

    111. Re:It's a numbers game by trajan96 · · Score: 1

      Its more complicated than just 'training our competition'. Most of the grad students I know really want to get a job in the US and stay. Could they decide to leave after getting their degree? Of course, but if they don't, we've taken talent away from their country and made our workforce that much more attractive for businesses. Ultimately that is what makes our country strong. We constently infuse ourselves with the cream from other countries.

      Do you think its better in the long run to let that talent remain where it is?

    112. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and we're cursed by innumeracy!

    113. Re:It's a numbers game by Percy_Blakeney · · Score: 1

      Yes but is it cheaper to subsidize a foreign student through grad school then to fund a child from K-12, undergrad, grad school and all the children services.

      Huh? You're going to have to fund the K-12 and undergrad education of the native student in both cases anyways, so it's irrelevant to the calculation of grad school costs.

      If you estimate that both foreign and native students cost the same to educate at the graduate level, and you assume that only 1/5 of foreign students stay in the US afterwards, then it is obvious that it is in the best interests of the country to prefer native students. The real question is whether the output from those foreign students that stay is better than the natives, and whether it is large enough to compensate for the possibly low retention rate.

    114. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. This guy can use the term "order of magnitude" if he wants. Although, he didn't have to use it to sound smart, because obviously he is.

    115. Re:It's a numbers game by Percy_Blakeney · · Score: 1

      There are only two reasons why most foreign students would leave after school: 1) they are forced to by Visa restrictions, or 2)Wages are higher in other countries.

      I would think that there are a lot more reasons than that. For example:

      • The foreign student may not like the political situation here
      • The student may have family in their home country that they would prefer to be with
      • The student might possibly even just LIKE their home country

      Just because you throw a visa at someone doesn't mean that they'll want to stay here. Deciding where to spend your life doesn't just come down to permission and money.

    116. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you want the immigration laws to carefully distinguish between what's American and what's, I suppose, un-American. (Although on that note, I would support a law denying citizenship to avowed communists....) Of course, I am American simply because of the time and place of my birth. Preserving the equal opportunity of every human being, despite the circumstances of their birth, is a very American value, as I understand it, and so I must denounce your proposal as horrifically un-American.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    117. Re:It's a numbers game by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly the point, the govt doesn't spend that on immigrants. The government spends a ton of children and college students. Its a huge money sink for the government until they finally start producing. When an Indian student comes with an undergraduate degree and decides to stay, its a boon. They pay pennies on the dollar to get an educated person.

    118. Re:It's a numbers game by maxume · · Score: 1

      Why pretend high school has anything to do with it at all? The 'product' of the undergrad system is pretty huge, but the product of the high school system is even huger, so there is some room for it to simply be the people.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    119. Re:It's a numbers game by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. Doesn't it make sense that you are still here because you've pissed off God? He only takes the one he likes. . . ----Still here, too. Hail Satan!

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    120. Re:It's a numbers game by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      The Rapture happened? I'm still here? Wow, that's strange. I insult God all the time.

      Of course you're still here. The rapture only takes away the good people.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    121. Re:It's a numbers game by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      That's right. Come to America and be American. Don't come here and be Mexican and expect us to cater to you. It's our country, so you get to do as we do. Anything less is uncivilized. Or would you go do Germany and demand they speak english and get worked up over abortions and gays?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    122. Re:It's a numbers game by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Preserving the equal opportunity of every human being,

      Except for communists I gather.

    123. Re:It's a numbers game by superwiz · · Score: 1

      What is the cost of discovery? What was the profit from Columbus' voyage? From Pythagorean Theorem? And since we are talking about GRADUATE school in sciences, it's purpose is to train people for research. Ie, the life of discovery. All wealthy nations fund it. Not funding it stops the civilization. You might not like it because you think that your immediate problems deserve more immediate attention, but not investing in the future guarantees not having one.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    124. Re:It's a numbers game by divs_83 · · Score: 1

      oh yes they do.. its their money that most US universities earn from.. they graduate to be successful engg in most of the s/w companies and pay the same taxes as any other American does. the US benefits way more from skilled immigrants than they do from the US and still a bunch of decision- makers will not understand this point and create barriers for entry to US for skilled immigrants. They cry out loud that immigrants are stealing away jobs from Americans; but the truth is there are not enough US grads with higher-level degrees to satisfy the market requirements and that can be concluded also from what the person posting (and many others) have noticed at their universities.

    125. Re:It's a numbers game by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 1

      The rapture only takes away the good people.
      No, the rapture takes away the Christians.




      (We claim to be forgiven & improving, not necessarily better than others.)
    126. Re:It's a numbers game by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Where did the idea start that America is just some vast smorgasbord of cool stuff that anyone can just take for themselves any time they please?
      Probably around the time Christopher Colombus arrived to America.

      Perfect example of what is wrong with the US education system.

      Christopher Columbus never landed in what you seem to be referring to as America (as in the United States according to the quote you copied). He landed in the American continent, specifically Cuba. He never actually set foot on what is now the continental United States.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    127. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were doing pretty good until you started spouting off your lack of knowledge about China in the 2nd to last paragraph.

    128. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, all he mentioned was "the lack of a space after the colon".

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    129. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I was joking about the communists, as evil or misguided as they may be.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    130. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      No, it means that his major is not in Kelsey Grammer Studies.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    131. Re:It's a numbers game by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I would support a law denying citizenship to avowed communists
      Yes. Because the guy handing out poorly copied leaflets on the corner of $LARGE_CITY is the biggest threat to our country.

      The 1950s called. They want their scapegoat back.
    132. Re:It's a numbers game by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      The first statement is false. For tax year 2007, the personal exemption is $3400 and the standard deduction is $5350 for single filers. Thus, at least the first $8750 of income is effectively exempt from taxation. Your other two statements are correct, but in my personal experience it's unusual for TA/RA stipends to approach that amount.

      MIT stipend is "science and engineering doctoral students who have passed qualifying exams to a salary of $2121 per month and master's students to $1939 per month." ( http://www-tech.mit.edu/V126/N8/8stipends.html ) That's about $9,000-$10,000 per semester which goes over the personal exemption on a semester alone. Then, there are 3 semesters per year which a graduate student can be employed.

      In fact, stipends *are* exempt from Social Security taxes, provided that one works fewer than 20 hours a week, and only while regular classes are in session.

      You're right on that. But, federal, state and city taxes still have to be paid and the non-immigrant student is not expected to use social security in the future so it's fair I suppose. On the other hand, filing that non-resident alien form loses a few tax benefits - the one thing that pops to mind is the President Bush's tax refund wasn't available for non-resident tax filers.

    133. Re:It's a numbers game by BlueCollarCamel · · Score: 1

      The rapture only takes away the good people.

      No, the rapture takes away the Christians.

      Exactly, the good people!

      =P
      --
      1&1 - Cheap domain and web hosting.
    134. Re:It's a numbers game by mgv · · Score: 1

      There is a certain amount of fear of outsiders in every country. Americans with Mexicans. The French with north Africans. Austrians and Germans with the Turks. Hong Kongers with mainlanders.


      Any yet here in Australia, we are mostly afraid of those from within - our own indigenous people, the aborigines.

      Michael
      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    135. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have great math skills. You should become an engineer.

    136. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      So, in other words, by reducing the regulatory burden on their business, the scientific knowledge and technical capability to create a massive industrial base came out of thin air? No, I don't think so. Yes, you're right: by relaxing some of the rules they made industrialization possible, true enough, but it took a lot more than that. The American manufacturing sector was pretty much raped by China to get hold of whatever it needed to build its domestic industries: then, once they succeeded in decimating specific manufacturing operations here, they bought up all the equipment and tooling for a song. That helped jumpstart their own plants. The textile industry is a good example of that process: we hardly have one anymore.

      Honestly, as I've said before it's much the same as what Japan did to our electronics sector many years ago, just on a larger scale.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    137. Re:It's a numbers game by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1
      And this is different from every other country in the world how? Seriously, you can't possibly expect me to believe that every border between countries, except the ones the US has, were settled by mutual agreement. I'd wager my life's savings that the vast majority of national borders were decided by force, at least at some point in history.

      At any rate, the GP has every right to point out what he sees as a problem, and say, "Hey, we might want to do something about this before everyone uses our resources to surpass us!". Disagree if you will, but there's nothing wrong with being concerned for the future welfare of our country.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    138. Re:It's a numbers game by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that none of your examples really show a blind xenophobia.

      The Mexicans do immigrate into this country illegally. They have good reasons and the best motivations (better life for the wife and kids, health care for mom and dad in old age), but they still break the law.

      The French are afraid of the North Africans because they're far too arrogant to assimilate the Africans they allowed into their country in a ploy for cheap labor. French culture, for some reason, does not feel able to assimilate a minority subculture in the way that most of the English-speaking world does.

      Austrians and Germans have a nasty history of political and religious war with the Turks. The fighting only ended with the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire after WW1, and people on all sides still remember that.

      Hong Kongers, frankly, have better educations, better living conditions, and better economic prospects than nearly all mainland Chinese, and they live in a city-state on an island. Of course they don't want mainlanders arriving, bringing mainland cultural and political influence with them.

      But yeah, some people do take this whole "laugh at idiot America because they invaded Iraq" thing a bit too far sometimes.

    139. Re:It's a numbers game by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      You are making the assumption that they all will not want to stay, whereas other people have suggested that the major reason they want to study here in the first place is that they want to work in the US later. Neither viewpoint is correct I think - if foreign nationals "cannot hold jobs" then it is because the US government is preventing them from doing so, hence the argument defeats itself. You can't force them to leave then say they're not contributing to the economy. Those who stay actually contribute to the economy and to science in general more than the average American worker, who in contrast is not pressed to prove his worth in a foreign country.

    140. Re:It's a numbers game by metlin · · Score: 1

      That was a wonderful and insightful comment. Well said and hats off, sir.

    141. Re:It's a numbers game by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      First, the laws on immigration were put into force a long, long time ago for horribly racist reasons. That doesn't mean they shouldn't be upheld. If the laws are unjust, sure, change them, but don't throw the laws that we have out the window. Law is supposed to mean something.

      I can't tell if you think we should just ignore the law, but all too often, that's what the people who cry amnesty think, and I feel that they really need to start going about it the proper way.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    142. Re:It's a numbers game by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Don't even bother. Once someone claims that national borders carry no moral legitimacy at all (rather than arguing that the legitimate borders are *there* rather than *here*), you know they're shouting at you from Granola Happy Land, where the borders are as open as the hearts (because they need Mexicans to grow their weed for them).

    143. Re:It's a numbers game by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      Really? How would user-pays work for national defense, for instance? Or general law enforcement? Or for healthcare, or for anything else? The same as for anything else: the rich would pay for protection, and others would be left out. No one (except for the more extremist pro-capitalists) is saying that this would be a good idea, only that it could be like this if society wanted it to be so.
    144. Re:It's a numbers game by dmartin · · Score: 1

      In addition they have to pay a special Non-Resident Alien tax on their income (NRA tax on the paystub). It is not much -- around $30 a month -- but remember it is a tax specifically for those that have no representation.

    145. Re:It's a numbers game by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      India has a billion people. China has a billion people. America has 300,000 people

      Actually India has 1.1 billion and China has 1.3 billion and the US 0.3 billion.

      Consider that many of the best grad schools are in America--plenty of Indians and Chinese come to America for grad school

      I would hotly contest your claim that most of the best grad schools are in the US - many of the world rankings I've seen rely heavily on budget size and it is ridiculous to think that, for example, Canadian grad programs have all spontaneously improved this year because the Canadian dollar is worth a lot more.

      I suspect the real reason they are popular with Indians and Chinese are two-fold. First the US is a lot more affordable than Europe and secondly if you are going to be in business and likely have to trade with the US it helps to know about its society.

    146. Re:It's a numbers game by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      I've never met a Mexican immigrant demanding that I speak Spanish... They're not exactly trying to bring attention to themselves. They know there's bigoted freaks out there that would like nothing more than to see them all rounded up on a bus and dumped in a desert south of the border.

    147. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I would hotly contest your claim that most of the best grad schools are in the US

      You're hotly contesting something that doesn't exist. "Many" implies at least a substantial minority. "Most" implies a majority. I said "many".

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    148. Re:It's a numbers game by edcheevy · · Score: 0

      You were just a little bit off: America is willingly training its competition in the global economy FOR MONEY. Because that's how we do things. :)

    149. Re:It's a numbers game by torako · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Austrians and Germans have a nasty history of political and religious war with the Turks. The fighting only ended with the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire after WW1, and people on all sides still remember that. I don't think that's the reason. A huge number of people from Turkey were invited to come to Germany by the government to work in the mining and steel industries in the 60s and 70s (as were Italians before). Of course the incentives were decent pay, universal health care and all that, so the program was wildly popular. The tiny problem that the government didn't consider was that those people weren't going to leave after working for a few years. They were never really considered to be immigrants, so there were no requirements on languange proficiency or anything and the people were treated as foreign guest workers.

      Naturally, not feeling welcome, the families from Turkey stayed very much within their minority, building what amounts to all small economy on grocery stores etc. You didn't even have to know German to live a decent life in that minority within Germany.

      It has taken decades for the government and the public to realize that those people have, in fact, immigrated (a lot of them are German nationals by now, most of the second and third generation definitely), but nobody helped them to assimilate and the immigrants themselves, always having in mind that their stay would only be temporary, never cared to learn the language either.

      All this combined with the fact that the mining and steel industries are by now pretty much defunct and that not being able to speak German pretty much rules out getting a well-paid job has lead to the rise of ghettos and a huge number of unemployed, uneducated Turkish youths (gangs and all that).

      Strangely, Germany has also seen lots of immigrants from Poland and Italy and those groups have avoided all those problems I mentioned. The main reason is probably that they were better educated to begin with and thus able and willing to learn German (Most of the people from Turkey were from pretty backwards regions in the east).

    150. Re:It's a numbers game by biologicalunit · · Score: 0

      ScrewMaster, I have a good friend who immigrated to the US from Romania and then married a woman who had immigrated to the US from Vietnam. After several years, he was also able to get his parents here from Romania. This guy is the hardest working person I know - went to school full time while working full time. He's also the only person I know that if he says he'll do something, he will do it. 100% of the time. So he's the quintessential, ultra hard-working immigrant success story.

      He becomes incensed when the topic of illegal immigration comes up. It makes sense that he would, considering all the time, hard work, and hoops he had to jump through in order to LEGALLY get himself here and then patiently spend years LEGALLY getting his parents here while a Mexican illegally strolls across the border and is allowed to stay.

      We were talking about the illegal immigrant problem once, and he corrected me by calling it the illegal Mexican problem. He also feels that race has nothing to do with not allowing illegal immigrants to stay in the country - those who say the enforcement of immigration laws are racist are using the race card because that's all they really have.

    151. Re:It's a numbers game by pipatron · · Score: 1

      When I write America I mean America, not some small subset of it. I can't take responsibility of whatever the grand-grand-parent meant when he wrote it.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    152. Re:It's a numbers game by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      All borders of all countries are "a creation of people by means of force". I don't see how the USA are different than the rest of the world. Do you know that, while you are welcome, still you cannot simply come to my country and start working and living here with no formalities involved? Do you know that some other countries will simply not let you in at all?

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    153. Re:It's a numbers game by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Once it became possible to exploit Chinese workers with the full power of the Chinese state to back you in China [...]

      There. Fixed that for you.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    154. Re:It's a numbers game by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      There's no space after that colon, it's spewing a solid stream!

      Thanks, I'll be here until Thursday. Try the veal.

    155. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Few people claim that what the European Colonists [Asian Immigrants], followed [allowed] by the United States Federal Government, did to the indigenous [white] population was anything other than "might makes right." ["numbers get noted / money talks."] The Gold Rush [Y2K and dot-com] period was particularly disturbing, considering that the Native Americans [white folks] were abiding by the territorial agreements [kept thinking the world ended at Tijuana or Staten Island]. But it is what usually happens when a more powerful [populous, hungrier, productive] culture first encounters a weaker [excessively consumptive, wasteful, overextended] one that has something the other wants. It's happened throughout human history, it's still happening and it will continue to happen. [So Get Over It, Blue Eyes]
      There fixed those pesky polarized phrases for ya ...
    156. Re:It's a numbers game by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The American manufacturing sector was pretty much raped by China

      That is a load of xenophobic bullshit. Chinese businesses buy technology, and develop it in-house, just like businesses anywhere else in the world do. The decline of manufacturing work in the USA is due to Americans moving up the food chain to higher-value employment. Writing code (for example) pays better than turning a wrench, so people choose to pursue the better-paying, more interesting jobs.

      what Japan did to our electronics sector

      What Japan did to our electronics industry was make high-quality parts available at drastically lower cost. If we still had to get all our RAM from TI or Intel, or even worse, get our discrete transistors from Fairchild, the worldwide electronics industry would be retarded by at least a decade, maybe two.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    157. Re:It's a numbers game by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Cool! I didn't know Cuba was a "vast smorgasbord of cool stuff that anyone can just take for themselves any time they please". I'll have to visit and check it out.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    158. Re:It's a numbers game by DS-1107 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given that I share the same view, that is that the rapid development is causing huge rifts in china - and that china seems to act solely on stability when it comes to their politics towards the world at large (the expanse in their weapon program seems to be to further strengthen them by creating dependencies, and to furtherance their own military program).

      So to me China seem to be searching for stability for themselves in their foreign affairs - i.e. nor for anyone else unless they in turn gain from it.

      Now I'm only giving you my opinion, for since you seems to think it rubbish I would like to know why; given that you so aptly voiced your opinion I would like to see the logic behind it to if need to be change mine.

      Now of course anyone that believes that China, or anyone else, state or person, acts out based solely on ONE desire is of course a fool, but I do believe that I can't with my current experience/knowledge find a better grouping then "selfish stability" ~ and I would of course love to negotiate this and further refine/change it - but for that I need more then a empty opinion that could be an unicorn in disguise.

      Disclaimer: I'm humbly asking for forgiveness for my bad English, but hope that I have made myself understood.

    159. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The American manufacturing sector was pretty much raped by China

      That is a load of xenophobic bullshit.

      I'm entitled to my opinion, and that opinion has been borne out by current events and my own personal experience in the industrial sector for the past twenty five years. You probably haven't seen a lot of what goes on behind the scenes. Most people don't have firsthand experience with this, so I can understand your natural desire to whitewash the situation, given that there really is no easy solution. Perhaps there is no solution, mainly because the problem is less a matter of China as it is corruption and naked greed within our own ranks.

      This is not xenophobic bullshit either: I'm not bigoted in any particular way if that's what you mean, but I am trying to say, "look, this is a problem." I do have a pair of eyes capable of seeing what China is doing. Now, to be fair, it's exactly what Russia, Japan, the United States and a number of other countries have been doing for ages, I agree. However, China has been exceptionally persistent and pervasive in comparison, and have availed themselves of the openness of our culture, and are using it to their advantage. They're a big country, with a lot of smart people. They can afford to hit on multiple fronts.

      You can decide for yourself if what they're doing is "right" or "wrong", if you feel you can assign some arbitrary moral value to their activities. That's a waste of time: the world is full of people and countries out only for themselves and that's not going to change any time soon. My complaint is that it is not my country's best interests to allow this to continue. If you can't agree on that then we don't have much to discuss: sit back and enjoy the show. Then, when America's manufacturing sector has been completely hollowed out, and we can no longer support or defend ourselves, maybe I'll be around to exhibit some smug self-satisfaction and say, "See? I told you so." I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think I am.

      What Japan did to our electronics industry was make high-quality parts available at drastically lower cost. If we still had to get all our RAM from TI or Intel, or even worse, get our discrete transistors from Fairchild, the worldwide electronics industry would be retarded by at least a decade, maybe two.

      Perhaps you're right, perhaps the worldwide electronics industry would have been slowed for a while (then again, maybe not ... that's just your opinion) but at least we'd still have retained a large percentage of domestic manufacturing. We've lost much of that capacity. How is that good for us, again? No nation in its right mind (and ours is not in that state at the moment) sees significant dependence on other countries as a good thing, even if those countries are nominally allies. Japan is an ally, for now ... China is not and probably never will be. Yet we are acting as if we can trust them to indefinitely supply our needs at firesale prices. China is not an extension of the United States: it is a totalitarian state with its own unknown goals. We must be crazy to put so many of our collective eggs in their basket, that's all I can say.

      Where you're also wrong is in your presumption that Japan simply beat us at our own game, fair and square. It was worse than that, although I suppose you could call illegal dumping and predatory pricing as "drastically lower cost". I suggest you educate yourself a little as to what Japan actually did, and what China is doing today. When you deliberately sell your products at an artificially low price, for a sustained period (if necessary, taking a loss while you're doing it) for the express purpose of wiping out your competition, you are doing precisely what I said. That's what Japan did to a few key sectors of our domestic manufacturing, and what China is trying to do to even more of it. Maybe it is not deliberate in China's case: maybe it's jus

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    160. Re:It's a numbers game by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

      I think in happened around when Erik the Red discovered America a few hundred years before the Columbus.

      I hope it is part of american history that it was discovered by the vikings, who named in Wineland. Columbus just made the first step for colinizing and killing the native people of America.

    161. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Americas were just that, and that was what was done. There are other forms of wealth concentrating in North America, and the idea that anyone can be successful certainly flourishes there, but I don't see the contradiction you do, because I don't assume that the motivation must exist today in the same exact location to have existed then.

      However Cuba does have certain resources that are quite valuable. You might even assume that is why it was colonized and why the U.S. pissed and moaned when its citizens holdings there were nationalized.

    162. Re:It's a numbers game by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Bad news, God takes the good people in the rapture and then leaves all us sinners here to deal with the upcoming apocalypse. So still being here is actually a very bad thing. And if he thought over 300 million people in this country alone were not sinners, he obviously has very low standards...

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    163. Re:It's a numbers game by AoT · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean they shouldn't be upheld. If the laws are unjust, sure, change them, but don't throw the laws that we have out the window. Law is supposed to mean something.

      Unjust laws should certainly not be obeyed. Law only means something when it's just, not simply because it has been voted into effect.

    164. Re:It's a numbers game by TheMegalomaniac · · Score: 0

      Not only do they pay taxes - they contribute social security and medicare payments that they might never get a chance to use.

    165. Re:It's a numbers game by SuhlScroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do these foreign students pay taxes in the US? If so, how long did they or do they pay? Is it a net gain for the US or a loss? If a loss then why is it done?

      Because it provides a stream of cheap technical labor for U.S. companies who want to drive their costs (salaries) down. Also professors like to abuse grad students, and foreigners trying to immigrate from a toilet country are a lot more willing to submit to anal sex with their graduate advisor than are American students.
    166. Re:It's a numbers game by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Look, I'm Swedish, I'm well aware of this. :P

      The question was not about who "discovered" America, but when it became a smorgasbord. Something even the original poster seem to have forgotten.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    167. Re:It's a numbers game by david614 · · Score: 1

      Seldom have I agreed so much with a post. America, and Americans, have the right to expect that those who want the benefits of our citizenship will obey the basic requirements of legal citizenship. Insistence on this is not racism, xenophobia, or bigotry. It is a basic statement of the bargain you enter into when you choose to emigrate. Those who violate that bargain in my mind forfeit the right to complain when their host society loses patience. D

      --
      ELITISM: It's always lonely at the top. Uninvited company is rarely welcome.
    168. Re:It's a numbers game by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      I do wonder if this is why the American attitude (In a gross... disgustingly gross exaggeration) seems relatively insular compared to many other countries. Too much naval gazing because you're already the centre of the universe.

      If I move to the US I can sit around staring at boats? I thought the pirates were Canadian?

    169. Re:It's a numbers game by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      Same deal in Canada, except my school gives all foreign students a bursary that reduces their tuition to the same level as Canadian students. North American schools go to great lengths to attract any students at all, since students do research and write papers that get funding.

    170. Re:It's a numbers game by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      The only cure for a Saturday morning hangover is more drinking...

    171. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Flamebait, eh. Apparently there are one hell of a lot of people that don't grasp basic concepts like "sovereignty", and "property", and other basics such as "This is my land. It is not your land." I wonder how many of the people that modded me flamebait would feel if what is happening to America today started happening to their country. As a matter of fact, it is happening in a number of places around the world. From what I can tell they aren't very happy about it either.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    172. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, you pretty much made my point for me, thank you. The difference, as I see it, as that the original Native Americans didn't have much of a choice in the matter.

      We do.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    173. Re:It's a numbers game by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      And as a matter of fact I ended up in a dance club from 10 to 2.

      Then some guys got in a fight and someone was stabbed after the party got out.

      Am I going to have to resign from Slashdot or something?

    174. Re:It's a numbers game by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      So Germany pulled a France, eh?

      I can only hope America doesn't do the same with the Mexicans.

    175. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Do you know that some other countries will simply not let you in at all?

      Many of them would shoot you on the spot, or haul you off to prison and let you rot. And ... that's their right! It's their country. What angers me is that some people, for their own selfish reasons, seem to think that America should be considered exempt from the same fundamental principles by which all other nations abide. Yet I can pretty much guarantee if one of us tried to set foot in their territory without proper authorization they'd be the first ones crying foul.

      Hypocrites.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    176. Re:It's a numbers game by TheLink · · Score: 1

      My reading of Revelations is there won't be a Rapture.

      In the end times, people will go about sending good people to God the good old fashioned way (by killing them). I bet a lot of "good" people will be doing that killing too.

      I'll be happy if someone would show me where I got it wrong.

      Just because huge bunch of people appear in heaven doesn't mean there was a rapture - after all heaven ain't in the same timezone as here ;).

      --
    177. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Do you think its better in the long run to let that talent remain where it is?

      I don't know, none of us do, and that's the problem. The reality is that these are foreign nationals whose loyalties do not lie with the United States, do not lie with their employers here. Your argument is that we should encourage advanced knowledge workers to stay here in order to prevent them from serving in their home countries. An artificial brain-drain of sorts. Okay, there's some merit to that: but it is a risky proposition and we should understand those risks. The flip side of the situation is that, once we have provided them with specific skills and knowledge, if they do choose to return home (assuming they have any choice in the matter) that knowledge goes with them. Our loss, their gain.

      I'm not saying I have a solution to this issue, but what we're doing now isn't a viable long term strategy. Giving away a candy store rarely is, if you happen to be the owner.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    178. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, and who is benefiting from that training? Is the American worker gaining from this transfer of knowledge? Are American manufacturers gaining anything? Yes, you're right ... something is being sold for money. America and its people are. Sold out for money by the very people we once believed had our best interests at heart, who we once trusted to lead us.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    179. Re:It's a numbers game by starman97 · · Score: 1

      If you're younger than 30, don't count on getting anything from SS or Medicare when you hit 65.
      Right now you're paying for all the boomers in the system.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    180. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The US tax man wants a cut. I certainly paid US taxes and had paycheck witholding, etc.

    181. Re:It's a numbers game by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The concept of rapture didn't originate with the book of Revelations, it is generally considered to be from a vision by a 19th century 15 year old girl, which was then popularized by preachers of the era. Nowadays it is often taught as if it were part of Revelations in order to hide its apocryphal nature.

      In fact, contrary to modern day popular opinion, Revelations itself is not about a future apocalypse, rather it is an allegory about the fall of Rome which, at the time Revelations was authored was not exactly amenable to the Christian movement (what with the whole feeding them to lions thing and Nero using them as lampposts in his garden).

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    182. Re:It's a numbers game by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about immigrants here, I'm talking about people who come here because the money's good (usually not legally) and have no intention of speaking english because they don't have to. Anyway, what's wrong with rounding up those mexicans who haven't got the right to be here in the first place? That's better than Mexico gives by a long shot.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    183. Re:It's a numbers game by AoT · · Score: 1

      Better than racist prick land where the poster I was responding to apparently resides. That or happily accept the oppressive status-quo land where all the "reasonable" people like you are.

    184. Re:It's a numbers game by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the Vikings killed their fair share. They just didn't have as big a ship, and the natives were able to scare them off. Vikings weren't exactly that great at the whole "diplomacy" thing.

    185. Re:It's a numbers game by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      I wanna see how your back feels after spending a day kneeling over picking strawberries...

      Or how your wallet feels when produce prices triple.

      It's not like they're not doing anything over here.

    186. Re:It's a numbers game by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Double the wage given to strawberry pickers and the prices go up by what - 20%? I'm saying that I don't like poeple hopping the border and expecting to be catered to and you trot out a chestnut about tripling prices? Gimme a break. I think we can handle a 10-20% drop in the labor pool over a couple years - farmers offer more cash and the produce costs a bit more - woo woo.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    187. Re:It's a numbers game by jcr · · Score: 1

      Oh, my god! I see it now! Thanks for your stunning insight, which you probably pulled out of your ass years ago! Why, those devious little slant-eyed bastards, how DARE they sell us stuff we want at prices we're willing to pay?

      Once we've put them back in their place, maybe we can turn our ever-vigilant attention to interstate commerce. Did you know that Delaware is utterly dependent on states like Kansas and California for FOOD?

      This is not the first time in history that a nation has used its economy as a weapon,

      Oh, and what an insidious weapon it is... If tends to make the other country paranoid and stupid, as you've so brilliantly demonstrated.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    188. Re:It's a numbers game by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Who said reasonable people happily accept the status quo? I'd much rather liberalize the immigration laws so that Mexicans can immigrate to this country and become citizens without fear, which would also serve to take away the source of slave labor from agribusiness.

      However, that doesn't mean I support breaking the current law. It's a law that nobody has any moral reason or obligation to break.

    189. Re:It's a numbers game by jc42 · · Score: 1

      You do get to defray your student loans for a couple more years and keep going to those college keggers, but then again if you are a graduate engineering student...chances are you aren't going to those.

      Heh. I was a Comp Sci grad student a couple decades ago, with a lot of credits in the early bio-informatics area, and I worked for a number of biological departments as their computer geek to pay my way. I recall quite a number of parties with assorted bowls of "punch" that were spiked with significant quantities of clinical ethanol. That stuff has no flavor, so you have no idea how much ethanol you've consumed. We all understood that there are good reasons for the use of highly-purified ethanol in all sorts of research, but it was routine to (innocently) comment on how much of the stuff the department keeps on hand. Or tries to. All for research, of course.

      Somehow, I doubt that the "need" for clinical ethanol in academia has decreased since then, or will in the foreseeable future.

      But I'd agree that we didn't have "keggers". ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    190. Re:It's a numbers game by Tragek · · Score: 1

      Only on the river Saskatchewan.

    191. Re:It's a numbers game by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      You're hotly contesting something that doesn't exist. "Many" implies at least a substantial minority.

      many: "3. a large or considerable number of persons or things"

      This is not consistent with an interpretation of "a substantial minority". Educational gaps like this are one of the reasons that some of us are not convinced about the wonders of the US educational system.

    192. Re:It's a numbers game by AoT · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't break immigration law, I'm a citizen. But I see no reason for others to respect it when American immigration laws are so racist.

    193. Re:It's a numbers game by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      By the way, its usually best to leave a space before a question mark at the end of a sentence

      Your 'its' should have an apostrophe. No, I'm not a sad nerd with time to notice these things.

    194. Re:It's a numbers game by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Mods on crack! Not one, but two people moderated that insanely sarcastic comment as being Informative.

      For you sarcasm-deprived moderators, I suggest a heavy dose of Monty Python and Douglas Adams. Listening to Alanis Morrisette is also advisable.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    195. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      A minority can still be "large or considerable". "Many" does not imply "most" (although "most" does imply "many" in some cases), and the phrases "considerable minority" and "large minority" are well-attested. Even the phrase "many but not most" is attested.

      You interpreted me as claiming that "most of the best grad schools are in the US". I did not intend to claim that, and my use of the word "many" is well-attested as not necessarily being synonymous with "most". It turns out I'm adequately educated on this point, and you are a jackass.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    196. Re:It's a numbers game by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      How are American immigration laws racist? The statement makes no sense on the face of it, given who we let in legally.

    197. Re:It's a numbers game by fm6 · · Score: 1

      He was referring to adult white males. We used to be the only people in this country. No really, it's true. Why else was every single public office held by an AWM just 50 years ago? But now there are only 300,000 of us left! It's very sad.

    198. Re:It's a numbers game by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      A minority can still be "large or considerable".

      Only if you have a large quantity of the item in question. In this case I suppose it depends on where you set your threshold for "best". If you set your standards low enough then I suppose you can have "many" and still not have "most"...however then you are beginning to stretch the meaning of "best".

    199. Re:It's a numbers game by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      OK, let's see.

      You know what it's called when the supply of wages must meet the demand for wages, forcing the demand for produce to pay more for the supply of produce? A free market at work.

    200. Re:It's a numbers game by DavidShor · · Score: 1

      Really? I stand by my description, and would be glad to clarify any point you didn't get.

    201. Re:It's a numbers game by dal20402 · · Score: 1

      Apparently I showed off my American education in my rush to post something funny.

      My remaining here after the Rapture is, of course, no surprise whatsoever. But drama and chaos are OK with me, so I look forward to coming events.

    202. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      They're racist because we don't allow anyone and everyone into this country whenever and wherever they want. Gets back to the hypocritical attitudes I was referring to earlier.

      Keep in mind that this is the poster that called me a racist prick. That's interesting, actually, since I quite specifically decried what our society did to the Native Americans, and pointed out how legal immigrants have a valued place in our society. But since I'm not all for breaking down our borders completely I guess I'm a racist prick. Oh well ... some people just haven't learned to think, I guess.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    203. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I've been getting so much opposition to my commentary in this thread I've been starting to maybe I should just give it up and go have another beer. I think I might just do that anyway, I'm taking the day off tomorrow.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    204. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Please explain, in as much detail as you can muster, how our immigration laws are "racist"? We are under no obligation whatsoever to allow anyone to enter our country! None at all. Period. End-of-the-God-damned-statement. If we refuse to allow someone to enter the United States, for any reason, that is not discrimination in the sense that you are trying to make it out to be. It is because they have no right to be here and we've decided, for whatever reason, not to grant them that right. Get it through your head that this is not an issue of racism, it's an issue of sovereignty. This is OUR LAND. It is not YOUR LAND.

      I might add that ALL nations enjoy the privilege of disallowing visitors and immigrants, by any criteria they choose to set, and ALL exercise it. Some don't allow anyone in all. They don't want visitors, they don't want immigrants. Are they, in your mind, also racist? Because if you say "No" then you are a hypocrite, pure and simple. In either case, you're mistaken.

      America, however, allows many thousands of people every year from every nation in the world to enter legally. How can you possibly call that "racist"? What you object to, I assume, is the fact that we reserve the right to be selective about who we allow in. We don't want criminals, we don't want people that will be of no use to America and we especially don't want people that don't follow the GODDAMN PROPER CHANNELS. If the law says you shouldn't be here, well ... you shouldn't be here. That's not racism, it's a perfectly even-handed application of the law, because it applies to everyone on the planet.

      {sigh} sometimes I don't know why I bother.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    205. Re:It's a numbers game by AoT · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but token recognition of past atrocities doesn't get you off the hook for present inequities. The fact is that our immigration policies have always been racist, not because we don't allow everyone over the border but because we consistently discriminate against specific races. Look at the way we treat Arabs in term of immigration now, you're going to tell me that isn't racist? My description of where you were coming from wasn't suppose to mean you're a racist prick, though I don't know you so you could be, it was a comment on the racist mindset we Americans espouse. We try to convince ourselves that we're past all that racism and that there aren't any problems with it all the while killing and imprisoning and restricting people to whom we would not otherwise do these things were it not for the color of their skin.

    206. Re:It's a numbers game by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      I certainly do understand it. Two points:

      1) If you think we have anything close to a 'free market', and you truly think that that's best for our country, stop reading now. You're not my kind of person, and I stopped talking to you one sentence ago.

      2) My point was that people don't think enough about the ramifications of their desires. I don't think the people making these statements know many farmers. Perhaps the bigger producers will be able to keep in business with the loss of cheap labor, but almost all of the smaller farmers will have to switch to crops that require less labor in order to stay in business. It has deeper ramifications than just replacing Mexican workers with American workers.

      On the other hand, the left-wing liberal thinking suffers from the same problem on issues like gun control. If we take away our right to own or possess a firearm, then we have no way to protect ourselves against our own government.

      I'm not saying that there isn't a solution to the problem that involves cracking down on illegal immigration, but none of the solutions presented so far address or admit the consequences. I'm just saying that maybe it's not as big a problem as people think.

    207. Re:It's a numbers game by spicate · · Score: 1

      The 'fraction' of our population that goes to a university for a four year program is pretty high. About 50% of adolescents enter college at the expected time (18-19 years old), and there's a fair number of nontraditional students as well. Of course, many never graduate.

      About 75 percent of U.S. high school graduates enter college and about 70 percent of 9th graders go on to graduate from high school, according to one study. If you do the math, you get about 50% (I've heard this elsewhere but can't recall where.)

    208. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You're so intent on maintaining your "Americans are bigots" stance that I really don't know where else to take this. I believe I can enlighten you on a few key aspects of our current situation, though. I'm not going to get into the value of the naturalization process (it's called that for a reason, my friend) because you seem uninterested in understanding its purpose. There's plenty of information available on the subject: I suggest you Google for it.s

      Regarding the immigration issue: why don't you go live where my mother does, some fifty or so miles from the border with Mexico. Actually, a one or two day visit should suffice. You will see firsthand the folly of your words, see firsthand the effects of unchecked immigration. She can't even walk into a grocery store there and read any of the labels. She speaks more than one language but Spanish isn't one of them, and she doesn't see any reason to learn it seeing as she lives in the United States of America. You wouldn't know it to go there though: it's gaining a very Mexican flavor because the existing locals are being squeezed out by our Hispanic friends, our illegal Hispanic friends. Now, please remember that this is sovereign U.S. territory we're talking about.

      Thousands of illegals move through that territory weekly: they take everything that isn't locked up or nailed down. They cross over anywhere they can. Ranchers are constantly repairing their fences because the illegals keep tearing holes in them. In a vain attempt to reduce their losses, the ranchers tried leaving spots in the fencing where the illegals could just step through (so as to avoid the continuous maintenance and cattle-retrieval headaches) but the illegals figured they were traps and just ripped more holes anyway.

      The Mexican gangs have also been moving into the area and in fact it's getting pretty ugly. Violence is on the rise. I was getting very worried about her and was gratified when she told me they've decided to move further north: the situation is getting way out of hand and it is going to get worse.

      Believe me, an open border with Mexico is not in our best interests ... it just isn't. Go play your race card if it makes you feel better, but what's happening is very real, very bad, and at some point even people like you are going to have to sit up and take notice.

      There's a certain irony here, on my part. I use to make fun of the French (to any Frenchmen in the audience I apologize for that) because they are oh-so-concerned about their cultural purity. Not racial purity ... cultural. As I understand it, they wish to maintain a sense of who they are, and what they are. As an American, exposed on a daily basis to people of every ethnic background under the Sun, I always felt that was somewhat ... extreme. Now, I'm starting to think that maybe the French aren't so crazy after all, that maybe they have something there. I've come to realize that all those people of different races that I've encountered in my life were, for the most part, people that understood and respected this country, and believed in its fundamental principles. Wherever they were originally from they were, in a word, American.

      Many of those individuals, in fact, understood what that means better than many native born citizens, because they came from societies where our much-vaunted (and rapidly disappearing) freedoms were never more than a pipe dream. I'm not talking about "white middle class males" (I have a pretty good idea what part of your anatomy you pulled that from) and I'm not trying to say that America wants you to fit some arbitrary behavior pattern. We do, however, expect that you've learned the basics of what is expected of you as a citizen, and within those rather liberal constraints you can do as you please.

      The problem with hordes of people from a completely different culture simply taking up residence in a another country is that t

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    209. Re:It's a numbers game by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      A chunk of that 50% would be community colleges though - two year programs. That's why I specified four year programs. Then I wouldn't underestimate that there's also a whole range of college programs - ranging from almost brain-dead easy to incredibly difficult.

      As you stated, many never finish, though I'm a textbook case of why you don't close the books(first degree at 27). Heck, my mother didn't get her bachelor's until she was 40.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    210. Re:It's a numbers game by Ranten_N_Raven · · Score: 1

      The San Antonio, TX area has 19 Independent School Districts. Needless to say, the quality varies. Greatly.

      I like how Dr. Jerry Pournelle puts it: "We all know that the way to be sure that no child is left behind is to see that no child gets ahead."

      --

      READ the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the other amendments! http://lcweb2.loc.gov/const/const.html
    211. Re:It's a numbers game by mikael · · Score: 1

      It could have been much much worse - it could have been moderated as "+5 insightful"

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    212. Re:It's a numbers game by Floritard · · Score: 1

      Thank god you wiki-linked that. I hadn't the foggiest idea who you were talking about!

    213. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised that he feels that way: my fiancee has exactly the same attitude. However, I'd like to ask you (and him) some additional questions. What benefit does our society (or any society, for that matter) derive from putting potential immigrants through such hoops? Is it, as many believe, just mindless torture aimed at people because they are from another country? Is it, as some people claim, a fundamentally racist proposition?

      More importantly, when he finally earned his citizenship, was your friend more likely, or less likely, to perceive America as his country, as opposed to merely a better place to make a living? I think you know what I'm getting at, although a number of other people in this thread don't seem to have a clue. In any event, it sounds as if your friend passed his "test" with flying colors, and is the kind of person America needs and wants to have as a citizen. I'm glad he made it, really. The same cannot be said for everyone that washes up on our shores, and it takes time to find that out.

      People that call selective immigration policies "racist" are, in fact, as racist as they come. They've decided, for whatever reason, to put people of other nations before their own fellow citizens, feel that people of other nations are intrinsically more valuable. As you might imagine from my other commentary, I take great exception to that.

      I'll take one immigrant like your friend over a thousand of those others. He, at least, understands why he was put through the immigration wringer.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    214. Re:It's a numbers game by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You've evinced a calculated misunderstanding of my words and of the law itself. I made no "proposal", I simply commented on what already is, and why it was set up that way. You're welcome to disagree with me all your please, but I respectfully request that you re-read what I said, and respond to my comment as written. It would help if you made at least an attempt to grasp the purpose of naturalization before replying.

      America has never been about preserving the equal opportunity of every human being, regardless of the circumstances of their birth. It has been about preserving the equal opportunity of every American citizen, under the law, regardless of the circumstances of their birth. Not everyone has a right to be here, not everyone should be here, and we have the right to make that determination. That's pretty gosh-darned basic to any national social order, not just the United States', and I'm surprised you have a problem with that. There's a reason why every nation on Earth makes a distinction between those who are "citizens" ... and those who are not. It's why they have borders. I get modded downward every time I make this point but, God damn it, it's important.

      The American value system is what it is, billions of people on this planet don't subscribe to it, don't understand it, and we are not responsible for preserving the equality of opportunity of everyone else. When we try to do that now and then, people complain that America is being "imperialist", trying to "spread democracy" or "be the world's police force." The fact that we've made something halfway decent for ourselves, and that many of those billions would like a share is not, in and of itself, reason to simply give it to them.

      I don't know why it is so hard for many Americans to understand that. Does this country mean so little to them now?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    215. Re:It's a numbers game by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      Actually that isn't quite true, if you have children, mortgages etc, you can pay no income taxes.

      http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/542.html

      ~32% didnt pay any in 2004. Or more accurately, they were refunded it.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    216. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I have little interest in the issue citizenship, to be honest. In reality, no one is all that interested in granting citizenship to everyone who asks for it. All I really care about is allowing peaceful, law-abiding foreigners to live and work in this country, just as I would want to be able to live as an expatriate myself if I felt so inclined, and allowing them to do so without violating their human rights. If they want to become citizens, it should be possible, albeit not trivial. If they don't want to become citizens, they should be left be. The problem is that our travel and immigration regulations go far above and beyond ensuring these people are peaceful and law-abiding, and instead create restrictions for the sake of creating restrictions.

      The American value system is what it is, billions of people on this planet don't subscribe to it, don't understand it, and we are not responsible for preserving the equality of opportunity of everyone else. When we try to do that now and then, people complain that America is being "imperialist", trying to "spread democracy" or "be the world's police force."

      Are you seriously equating less restrictions on immigration to starting a war of aggression?

      The fact that we've made something halfway decent for ourselves, and that many of those billions would like a share is not, in and of itself, reason to simply give it to them.

      The essence of America is that you don't own my share. If I'm a landlord or employer and I want to hire or house an engineer who happened to be born in another country, that's my business. This isn't a communist state. We don't own everything in common, and unless this engineer is a hazard to public safety and order, his residing in my house or his work in my company is not your business. (Likewise, just being American doesn't guarantee that anyone should "give you" part of America. You may be a citizen, but I'm not morally obligated to house or employ you if you're a worse tenant or employee than the next person, regardless of the next person's citizenship.)

      I don't know why it is so hard for many Americans to understand that. Does this country mean so little to them now?

      My country means a great deal to me. What means little to me is where and when the next person was born. Peaceful people shouldn't be fired from honest jobs and thrown out of their duly-rented homes simply because they weren't born between the 49th parallel and Rio Grande. If we have to be the first country to address and fix this moral injustice, so be it. By my understanding, America was founded to address and fix the injustices of bad government. And we have a vast history of continuing to do so.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    217. Re:It's a numbers game by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      There are other things I'd be concerned about first....

      Specifically that your undergraduate tuition is going to fund the school's graduate programs. This should be alarming to people even if the graduate programs were populated by 100% local students. This is especially true in engineering schools, where the graduate projects and labs cost huge amounts of money, and the undergrads don't even get taught by the (expensive) tenured professors, but by said professor's graduate students.

    218. Re:It's a numbers game by AoT · · Score: 1

      If we refuse them entry based on racist assumptions and we have economic policies which unduly effect their countries then I think it is certainly the case that we have racist immigration policies.

    219. Re:It's a numbers game by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The USA is infamous for the poor quality of high schools but famous for the high quality of postgraduates.
      I thought that the USA was infamous for the poor quality of its high schools and graduates, and also infamous for the high number of postgraduates?

      >>Ducks for cover.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    220. Re:It's a numbers game by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      un-American. (Although on that note, I would support a law denying citizenship to avowed communists....)
      Yeah, fuck free speech if it's not what you agree with.

      I suppose you'd also support a law denying citizenship to muslims, hindus, buddhists, fascists, socialists, anarchists, jews, homosexuals, liberal intellectuals...where do you stop?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    221. Re:It's a numbers game by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Do you not know a joke when you see one?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    222. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who could have ever guessed that Slashdotters were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do on a Saturday night than correct a minor error?

      obligatory -

      You must be new here!

    223. Re:It's a numbers game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you don't see as many Americans going to India or China Yeah, you definitely won't see many Americans going to India.

      Have you ever inquired about an Indian engineering program as a foreigner?
      What I got out of it was that foreigners are welcome to come and learn about the culture, take social science classes, and pay foreigners' (increased) tuition, but engineering classes are for natives only.

      Cross registering between the liberal arts school and engineering school was also not possible; you're either in the engineering school or you're not allowed to take engineering courses.

      Now how's that for xenophobia :P
    224. Re:It's a numbers game by Sammy+Aran · · Score: 1

      I'm seventeen, and it amazes me that I know more about taxes than half of /. . If you have any sort of income, including bank account interest, coming from the US economy, you must pay taxes. I make less than a standard deduction, so I get all my federal withholding back--technically, I could claim exempt from taxes, but I still have to do the damn form. More students don't have to pay taxes unless they have a TA job, etc. I believe those with dual citizenship or foreign citizenship are required to pay that country's taxes as well.

    225. Re:It's a numbers game by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

      Of course, most of those grants are paid by the US Government though...

  8. As someone who went through med school... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...there sure aren't as many "americans" here as there used to be. Of course, I mean white anglo-saxon protestant males. A lot more minorities. A lot more first and second generation americans.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:As someone who went through med school... by dvonhand · · Score: 1

      So are you going to call those Catholics that came over to found places like Maryland not American? Last I checked, they were just as American as you or I.

    2. Re:As someone who went through med school... by Brooklynoid · · Score: 1

      A lot more minorities.

      I'm not sure I agree. While I don't have immigration/population breakdown numbers in front of me, I think that the population of the United States has pretty much always consisted of a large number of first- and second-generation Americans. Three out of four of my grandparents were first- or second- generation Americans. Where I live, in New York City (and I know this isn't a random sampling of America), I'm a bit unusual in that not ALL of my grandparents were first- or second-generation Americans.

    3. Re:As someone who went through med school... by polyex · · Score: 1

      Not to mention all the caucasions that are not Anglo's. The original poster, like any bigot, tips his hat to the idea of grouping large number of people into one innacurate group based on race.

    4. Re:As someone who went through med school... by zeroduck · · Score: 1

      I think part of being an American is being able to bitch at all the immigrants.

      My grandpa (and grandma) on my mothers side was the first generation in his family born and raised in the US. His parents barely spoke English. Nevermind they were from Belgium, he bitches about all the Mexicans.

      My dad was born in Holland. I guess that'd make me a relatively new American.

      Or maybe I'm just white so I don't count.

    5. Re:As someone who went through med school... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      ...there sure aren't as many "americans" here as there used to be. Of course, I mean white anglo-saxon protestant males.

      You think Americans are males?

      Anyway, it's only the political leaders that are predominantly anglo-saxon males. Living in the SF Bay Area I didn't know any anglo-saxon protestant males. Only an incredible rube would confuse anglo-saxon protestant with american.

      A lot more first and second generation americans.

      I seriously doubt this to be true. Immigration has been fairly consistent throughout the history of the US.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    6. Re:As someone who went through med school... by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1

      Nowhere in the original post did it say white anglo saxon males. They said Americans. As in American citizens...duh.

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
    7. Re:As someone who went through med school... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Not only Med School (and what is an american anyway? :) )

      Heck, there were classes I took in Undergrad (let alone Grad), where I was one of two people who were "native" Americans (Born here or parents born here). The teacher one day asked all those who did not have english as their first language to raise their hands (or maybe it was the other way around). Interesting thing. Now, granted the teacher was an immigrant also, so there was no bias or prejudice, she was just having amazed one day when we were discussing Europe and we realized how many people were from there. :)

      Now, a large number of people were immigrants (they moved here and planned on staying), but a small percentage of the class were international students (came for the degree, planned on returning home), and yes, most of those were from India, China and Japan.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    8. Re:As someone who went through med school... by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      Behold the sound of the shredding of Brandenburg.

      My father came here from Germany in 1954. He did not need Hart-Celler to get in. IMHO it's too late to do anything concerning border control. The problem is that there is a part of the human condition that cannot be naturalized. It is not tangible, but it is reminded every time one looks in the mirror or hears oneself speak. It is why 'community centers' are created. It is why voting blocks form. The finger that select the candidates on the voting machine is controlled by the mind that still thinks that it is overseas. It is the reason behind the statement "we want you money but not your values".

      The founders of this republic had the partiton of Poland in mind when they had crafted the citizenship clause for President in Article 2 of the USA Constitution. Political correctness has made the Constitution and the laws a suicide pact.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  9. Most people live outside the US by The-Pheon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best students in the world go to the best Universities in the world. The Universities in the United States consistently dominate the top universities in the world.[1] Thus, it isn't surprising that many people from other countries come here to study.

    [1] http://www.arwu.org/rank/2007/ARWU2007_Top100.htm

    1. Re: Most people live outside the US by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      The best students in the world go to the best Universities in the world. The Universities in the United States consistently dominate the top universities in the world. But that seems to be changing, from what I've read.
      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Most people live outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you going to bother to tell us where you read this, or do we just have to take your word for it?

    3. Re:Most people live outside the US by bjourne · · Score: 1

      All those lists of top universities are very subjective. You cant comparatively measure quality of education or of students because all faculties use different metrics and change them all the time. They are more a lists of what the most prestigious universities are and Harvard is the world leader, no question about that. It could be that credentials and prestige is much more important to Chinese and Indians than to Americans. You can acquire a "world class" education at any university in the world if you put your mind to it.

    4. Re:Most people live outside the US by highacnumber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Overall, the percentage of foriegn students in scientific graduate programs is a little over 50%. This is an extremely healthy thing for our education system and the United States in general. Many of those foreign students stay in the US, greatly strengthening our technological base. They also force the american-born 40-something percent to work harder. The heavy foriegn presence is an incontrovertable testament to the superiority of american higher education - americans should be extremely happy to see those numbers. When they start slipping, as they did under the idiotic practices of the current administration post-911, we should start to worry.

    5. Re:Most people live outside the US by interval1066 · · Score: 0

      This is true. In Japan if you don't go to one of three schools (Todai Univ., and the other two I forget what they are) there you are essentially wasting your time. Those three schools are needless to say very difficult to get into. US universities however look ok to Japanese employers.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re: Most people live outside the US by muszek · · Score: 1

      Shut up! Have you seen his UID? You're gonna get all of us killed.

  10. The U.S. is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The median income difference between an engineer with an undergraduate degree and a graduate degree is smaller than the median income difference between an engineer with an undergraduate degree and an OBGYN. Let's see corporate America outsource that job.

    1. Re:The U.S. is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see corporate America outsource that job.

      You better bet that the insurance companies are working on doing just that. Remote doctor and local cheap nursing staff for everything but actual procedures seems like a very real possibility.

      Not for the upper middle class or rich of course, but the working poor could stuck with this sort of thing very easily.

  11. Bullshit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have learned that 90% of my department is from India and many others are from China. All the students come here to study and there are only 7 US citizens in the engineering program this year.

    90% Indian? This is either bullshit, or you're going to a very strange department. Are you really saying that total percentage of Europeans, Japanese, Korean, Chinese and American students is less then 10%? I find that hard to believe. 20%-60% Indian I could believe.

  12. Two things by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

    a) an upstream problem: US public schools suck - badly, that's a bad thing
    b) American having a freer, more efficient job market than in most places realize they don't *need* to go to graduate school, that's a good thing.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  13. Easy answer by Osty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Very few Americans require anything more than a BS to get a job with a Computer Engineering or Computer Science degree. On the other hand, it's easier for a non-citizen to get a job if they have a MS from a domestic school. As well, it's generally easier for them to get into shool than get into a job (the job comes after being here a few years and getting that MS), and gives a nice ~2 year jump on the whole green card process. If they somehow fail to find a job after getting the MS, there's always the option to continue on with a PhD while looking for something that will actually pay the bills.

    The goal of college for 90% of Americans is to get a better job. Therefore 90% of Americans aren't going to spend any more time than necessary in school, and if they do go for higher degrees it's usually for something that will increase their pay. A BS in CE doesn't get paid much less than a MS in CE, but a BS in CE with an MBA who's promoted into management does get paid quite a bit more.

    1. Re:Easy answer by smurfsurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are talking about money, pay and jobs. But what about interest in knowledge and the subject matter? Is that a fringe aspect for americans?

    2. Re:Easy answer by servognome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But what about interest in knowledge and the subject matter? Is that a fringe aspect for americans?
      No, those things can be accomplished while working in industry. Work & study are not mutually exclusive.
      From personal experience, I appreciate learning in an applied engineering environment rather than the theory of academia.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    3. Re:Easy answer by xPsi · · Score: 1

      I think you are onto something. In the US, having a Ph.D. in scientific fields like physics, chemistry, etc. is really the only way you have a chance of doing cutting edge work in those areas. However, in engineering, unless you would like to be a professor (a good lifestyle, but not for everyone), there is really no reason to get an advanced degree. The BS alone is usually your ticket to the good stuff, assuming you hook up with the right company or firm. Also, as you said, the pay scales don't increase rapidly enough per degree to make the time and energy worth it for most. In other countries, these assumptions may be different. For example: they may have more rapid pay increases per degree and a higher threshold of education to get to the good engineering bits. In addition, US advanced degree programs in most fields are quite excellent and carry some worldwide prestige (although you wouldn't necessarily want to brag about getting a high school degree in the US).

      --
      i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
    4. Re:Easy answer by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You are talking about money, pay and jobs. But what about interest in knowledge and the subject matter? Is that a fringe aspect for americans?

      In my experience, yes. Most Americans go to college to "get a better job" or because they want to enter a certain field. They are, to coin a phrase, "goal oriented" -- school is a funnel into which they jump and once they get out the other end they can go back to living their lives, only now they will have been granted permission to enter into the career of their choice. So-called elite schools are desirable, not because they offer a better learning experience, but because they will "look better" to potential employers.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    5. Re:Easy answer by kimvette · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, it is. Most people want to be able to pay for food, a house, maybe a car to get around in, and so forth.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:Easy answer by dkh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really admire that you have not yet been tainted by competitive consumerism and real world cynicism. Let us know how you feel in another 5 years.

      Don't get me wrong here. I'm all for the quest for knowledge and personal growth. Unfortunately, most of U.S. society doesn't live that way.

      --
      My office has been taken over by iPod people.
    7. Re:Easy answer by zildgulf · · Score: 1
      Another reason very few Americans get advanced Science and Engineering degrees, as compared in the past, is because in today's wonderful economy.

      When the economy for new Engineers tanked around 1990, there became a big incentive was to "ride out the recession" in Grad school, not jump into an non-existent job. It was strange to find out almost half of us American student in my Master's Computer Science program were new as well. I think it was the last time us American students made up almost half of the student body in that program. When a recession hits again, watch for the number of American students entering such advanced Science and Engineering programs surge.

    8. Re:Easy answer by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1, Informative

      Who says you get that much more learning in a graduate program? It's just two more semesters of school and maybe some "project" that doesn't teach you as much real world experience as a year on the job. Yeah, school is fine because it teaches you some nice theoretical stuff, but a graduate degree in computer science doesn't buy you a whole lot.

      I can learn just as much (or more, actually) by reading a textbook as I can by listening to a professor summarize the information in a textbook. And I think you'll find that many of those foreigners who crowd our graduate programs don't actually do so well in industry. That's why they're not in industry.

      Another point of consideration is visas. The company I work for hired a new graduate from India (who had gone to one of the universities in this state), but they couldn't get the work visa for her. So, what's she going to do? Go back to school, of course.

    9. Re:Easy answer by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      "Potential Employers" don't care where you went to school, as long as you went to school. Hell, most employers don't even care about what you studied. I have a degree in German from a State college in Oregon but I make bank in San Antonio Texas making PowerPoint slides for management teams of a huge grocery chain. I knew how to make boring PowerPoint slides in 1994 and didn't need my degrees to do this job, but I have this job ONLY because of my MAEd.

    10. Re:Easy answer by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Yup. In fact, in many cases, it turns out that Ph. Ds actually have a HARDER time finding employment (at least in the corporate world) because they are too specialized. So the cost/benefit analysis for "do I go to grad school or straight to work" is rather unfavorable for obtaining an M.S., but it is even worse for a Ph. D.

      In my situation - I have an M.S., although I'm beginning to regret having spent the time obtaining it. I hardly use any of the knowledge I gained in my current job, and it basically only hurt me financially. While I had a deal where it basically cost me nothing to obtain my graduate degree, this is the basic situation:

      An M.S. typically takes two years to complete.
      At my company, an M.S. gives a new hire an automatic promotion to a "level 2" pay grade.
      At my company, the average time it takes for a new hire with only a B.S. to get promoted to a level 2 is two years.
      So at the end of two years, you are (on average) at the same pay grade regardless of whether you went to graduate school or not.
      For the duration of those two years, the grad student is lucky to break even. The B.S. holder that goes straight to work has two years of a level 1 salary (not that much, but significantly more than a graduate student.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    11. Re:Easy answer by rossifer · · Score: 1

      You are talking about money, pay and jobs. But what about interest in knowledge and the subject matter? Is that a fringe aspect for americans?
      Not fringe, but personally, I didn't go to school for subject-specific knowledge. I went to school to learn how to learn and for "foundation" knowledge. Now I am continuously learning new things, including those specifics relevant to my job. I consider myself a "lifelong learner" and I am able to continue to educate myself quite successfully with Google, Wikipedia, Amazon.com, Powells.com, two local library chains, a major university library, and what I learned 15 years ago at college.

      My abilities and my compensation do not seem to be reduced because I didn't complete another year of school. Competent developers with no degree, B.S. degree or B.S. & M.S. get about the same amount of money where I work, depending on their experience and leadership abilities. PhD's are not considered for what I do because they have decided to label themselves researchers, and we don't do significant research where I work.

      So, having lost nothing by not having the M.S., but having gained a year of full-time employment when money was tight, I'm fairly confident that I made the right decision. A foreign student, wishing to become a permanent resident of the US could see the two year jump on the Green card and the opportunity to work locally with potential employers to be a significant boost to their career. They might make a different decision based on their very different circumstances, and they would also be right.
    12. Re:Easy answer by Surt · · Score: 3

      You're very lucky if you believe that most employers don't care about where you went to school. School bias is very widespread, and will often result in the choosing of an inferior candidate with a 'superior' degree.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    13. Re:Easy answer by rm999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good explanation. Here's a cost analysis for an American engineering student:

      Typical starting salary if you have a computer engineering BS: 65K a year
      Getting a masters: (-65000*2 years) - 40000 in tuition = 170,000 net loss
      Extra salary with masters: 5-10K
      Years to recoup losses: 15-35 years

      This is why many Americans do not consider grad school. Especially those who have college loans to pay off from undergrad, or who have worked a few years and have gotten used to having money.

      There are plenty of reasons why foreigners want to go to grad school. Foreigners have to jump through more hoops to get a good job in the USA; they have to be smarter than an American to get the same job for various reasons, including: tougher communication, more red tape with the government, implicit racism, etc. A grad degree helps a lot. Being in school is less risky than a job, because if they get fired or laid off their green card may get taken away. American grad schools are generally very strong, which attracts a lot of foreigners. Remember that the combined population of India, China and Europe is several times that of the USA - there are a lot of foreigners who *want* to be in American grad schools. The best and brightest make it here, and often perform very well.

    14. Re:Easy answer by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From personal experience, I appreciate learning in an applied engineering environment rather than the theory of academia.
      From my own personal experience (having worked in several different fields of engineering, and having down a couple of stints in grad school), I've found that the learning you can do in an applied engineering environment and the theory you can get in academia are complementary. Both are valuable, and each enhances the other. I've found that the times when I've been in grad school have been much more fruitful (compared to undergrad) due to the practical insights and the context that my work experience provided. By the same token, my ability to create working solutions is enhanced by the breadth and depth of academic knowledge I can bring to bear on a problem. Undergrad gives you the engineering equivalent of a swiss-army knife - you can do a lot of stuff, and you can learn all sorts of practical tricks to make that knife do things you'd never expect it to be able to do, but it's not always the best tool for the job. Grad school allows you to add a few power tools and some precision instruments to your mental workshop. Granted, most days you can probably get by with just the swiss-army knife. But sometimes it's nice to be able to call on one of those more powerful tools for some particularly troublesome piece of work.
    15. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a degree in German from a State college in Oregon but I make bank in San Antonio Texas making PowerPoint slides for management teams of a huge grocery chain.
      Naturally. Aim for the stars and you shall surely reach them.
    16. Re:Easy answer by vbraga · · Score: 1
      Don't try to minimize the importance of formal education.

      I can learn just as much (or more, actually) by reading a textbook as I can by listening to a professor summarize the information in a textbook. Remember, people in grad school not only listen to classes, but read the textbooks too. And doing research. And constant testing by a very qualified group of professor. And networking with other people in the same area of research.

      Hands on experience is very important, but it's not, in any way, a substitute for a graduate degree. You may get better coding skills with hands on experience (or not) but don't think you know more on the subject than a grad student, at least, an average one.

      Most people without a graduate degree (and I'm one of then, since I'm still a undergrad) is not important or may be equivalent to real world experience. Yes, it's important and in no, no way, it can be substituted by experience. It's different.

      The experience of formal learning is different. The extensive testing. And so on...

      PS: English is not my first language. I'm sorry for all the possible grammar/spelling errors. Corrections are welcome.
      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    17. Re:Easy answer by CalvinTheBold · · Score: 1

      Most Americans go to college to "get a better job" or because they want to enter a certain field. They are, to coin a phrase, "goal oriented" -- school is a funnel into which they jump and once they get out the other end they can go back to living their lives, only now they will have been granted permission to enter into the career of their choice. So-called elite schools are desirable, not because they offer a better learning experience, but because they will "look better" to potential employers. I was certainly goal-oriented when I went to college, but probably not in the way you meant it here. I graduated High School in 1994 homeless and sleeping in a vacant lot out in the California desert. I made some bad choices and spent some years cleaning up the mess those choices left behind. I finally made it to college at age 27 and graduated in 4 years with a BS in Mathematics, cum laude. I spent the summer looking for work and I start my new career on Monday.

      My goal was to get as far from where I started in life as I possibly could. A lot of my foreign born peers at the University seemed to relate with this.

      I'll make it to grad school, but it'll take a while. I have a family now and have to support them while I pursue my education. Call me crazy, but I have a hunch that is also something some of my immigrant peers will be able to relate to. As for my compatriots: I suspect the reason that many of them don't seem metaphysically "hungry" enough to chase the hard goals is that they have never really experienced being the usual kind of hungry.
      --
      Try using a zero-knowledge proof to show you don't know anything!
    18. Re:Easy answer by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Who says you get that much more learning in a graduate program? It's just two more semesters of school and maybe some "project" that doesn't teach you as much real world experience as a year on the job. Yeah, school is fine because it teaches you some nice theoretical stuff, but a graduate degree in computer science doesn't buy you a whole lot.


      Sure, if you want to be a code monkey.

      If you want a job in computer science that's not one of the TWO types you can get with an undergraduate degree (code monkey and eventually code monkey manager), you get a graduate degree. If you get an MS, you're more likely to get to manage code monkeys, but you can also do research, which means working on harder and more interesting problems than implementing Business Logic Abomination #1138. If you get a PhD, you can monkey, manage monkeys, do research and also teach computer science.

      It's not about money, and it's not about learning theory, though those are nice benefits. It's about networking with lots of smart people and having tons of interesting options.
      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    19. Re:Easy answer by Osty · · Score: 1

      If you want a job in computer science that's not one of the TWO types you can get with an undergraduate degree (code monkey and eventually code monkey manager), you get a graduate degree. If you get an MS, you're more likely to get to manage code monkeys, but you can also do research, which means working on harder and more interesting problems than implementing Business Logic Abomination #1138. If you get a PhD, you can monkey, manage monkeys, do research and also teach computer science.

      While you're somewhat correct that it's difficult to get a research position with only a BS, I've known people who've done it. I would disagree that you're more likely to get a management position with a master degree, unless it's an MBA (and especially an MBA you got going to school nights while working a real job during the day). If you want to manage code monkeys, get your BS, get a code monkey position, and work your way up to managing them. Just having an MS in CS is not going to guarantee you a management position right out of school, especially since people want to see work experience for management hires (either managing other teams, or spending 3-7 years as an indivual code monkey yourself). I'd definitely disagree about getting your PhD, at least in CS. Once you've done that, you've just pigeon-holed yourself. You can get a job as a researcher or as a teacher/professor, but nobody's going to hire you as a code monkey (you're over-qualified and will want too much money) or a manager (you don't have any experience).

      I'd also like to add that code written by grad students and researchers is often very, very bad. Researchers spend so much time on esoteric problems that they forget how to do the very basic bits -- structuring code efficiently, checking error and bound conditions, commenting, formatting for readability, looking for the simplest possible solution rather than the "most elegant", etc. While I'd rather read a white paper written by researchers with an MS or PhD, I'd rather read code written by someone with "only" a BS but with actual work experience.

      It's not about money, and it's not about learning theory, though those are nice benefits. It's about networking with lots of smart people and having tons of interesting options.

      I'd argue that you're more likely to build a more useful professional network on the job than in school. It's great that you know professor so-and-so, but I'd rather use my professional contacts to get me a job making $100K+ a year rather than getting a research position paying $30k or less. As long as you keep yourself from being stereotyped (the deployment guy, the database guy, the Perl guy, etc), you can keep your options open just as easily (if not more so) in the work force as in school, and the people you meet on the job are much more likely to have a direct effect on your future work options than meeting some professors or grad students at school.

    20. Re:Easy answer by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      I'd take it further and say the only reason to get a graduate degree in CS is if you want to do research. Academic education, while fun, can only take you so far, and should only serve as a basis for real-world applications. Real world experience becomes far more valuable, even if you're talking about managing a project. If management is your goal, sign on with some company that pays for further education (this is the path I'm considering (I might even decide to take advantage of free education and get a graduate degree in CS, if I can convince them that it brings value)).

      And yes, code written by grad students is quite often horrible. My senior year, I took a class that is also offered at the graduate level, so there were a few grad students in the class. They got to write a GUI for their database implementations for their graduate credit, and I have never seen more unusable GUIs in my life. It was horrible stuff. Instead of having a drop-down, they'd have a search box where you actually enter what you're looking for.

    21. Re:Easy answer by ksheff · · Score: 1

      From personal experience, I appreciate learning in an applied engineering environment rather than the theory of academia.
      the pay is better too. :)
      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    22. Re:Easy answer by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Because life is expensive, and if I had a multi-million dollar trust fund I'll probably spend my whole life learning about whatever tickles my fancy. But life isn't like that. I need to pay the bills, have a family, and God willing, own my own house (as opposed to having a mortgage shoved up where the sun don't shine for decades). For most of us getting our butts out there and making some money is not a matter of choice.

    23. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/coin-a-phrase.html

      I hate to break this to you, but 'goal-oriented' is, to coin a phrase, 'old hat'.

    24. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What crack are you smoking? With the right IT experience, you don't even need a BS to make bank. 90K with a diploma is pretty damned good, considering 22 years of age and absolutely no education debt to repay. So WHERE is school bias widespread? It sure isn't the IT industry.

      I wouldn't be too surprised if some kind of school bias was present at very large prestigious businesses in the legal or medical fields, but is the job market so dried up in those segments that it matters to people without a "more expensive" degree? You can make far more money at a smaller company for far less work (at getting the position) than you could at a large company. Thats my experience in the IT field at least.

    25. Re:Easy answer by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      I have a degree in German from a State college in Oregon but I make bank in San Antonio Texas making PowerPoint slides for management teams of a huge grocery chain.

      Naturally. Aim for the stars and you shall surely reach them.


      sometimes life is not about that stars, it is about the family, good medical care for them and you,
      and sometimes you are limited to the jobs that are available.

      Sometimes those "star" jobs are limited in number, and have a few million "eager beavers" already in line for them.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    26. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is exactly right, and something that is mostly peculiar to computer science. I consistently notice that the MS and PhD grads in computer science are far (FAR, it's not even close) less competent than the BA grads we see. Not sure why that is, but there you go. I think americans don't typically get PhDs in Comp Sci. because they realize how worthless that really is.

      PhDs in other fields however, and that's a whole different story. Then again, the imbalance isn't really there in other fields. You get into math and physics, and it's exactly what you would expect to see for the world's best universities. Pretty good representation from a significant number of groups, waspy "american" types are not very rare. Second and third generation americans are also quite common. My experience anyway.

    27. Re:Easy answer by KnowledgeKeeper · · Score: 1

      But what about interest in knowledge and the subject matter?

      Ask creationists. If there weren't such people during the Dark Ages we'd be flying to space as often as we download porn by now.

      --
      It is always better to be a first grade version of yourself than a second grade version of someone else.
    28. Re:Easy answer by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      I don't know that people in grad school actually read the textbooks. I have only read textbooks when the professor is too horrible to do a good job teaching the material himself. And in those cases where I did read the textbook, I learned nothing from the professor. "Qualified" is also arguable when you're talking about the professors. Many of them have no knowledge whatsoever of the industry.

      Networking? Ha. The only people you network with are those in academia, and unless that's your goal, it's useless. If you apply for a job and list some professor or student as a reference, they're going to say "So what? Can you work on a project? Are you familiar with any of the development tools of there?" You get a far more valuable network for working in industry by working in industry.

      You're absolutely correct that real-world experience is no substitute for a graduate degree though. If you're looking for a job, it's better than a graduate degree. If a career outside of academia is your goal, in most cases, graduate school is just a waste of time. The undergraduate degree with give you a foundation and teach you how to learn, but formal education doesn't teach you practical applications, and sometimes doesn't even translate well to actual practical ability.

    29. Re:Easy answer by br4nd0nh3at · · Score: 0

      Between you and VIV posts, I cannot add anything else; you two hit the nail on the head. I praise the other great answers here in this topic also, case closed.

    30. Re:Easy answer by Bytal · · Score: 1

      In my experience so do most Indians and Chinese. So does 80-90% of the entire world population. I work in a world famous company's IT department surrounded by foreign workers who couldn't care less about computer science. If their parents said, a miner makes more money with less labor, they would have become miners. Most of them, in private, admit that they would rather be designers, financial analysts or anything else. They only went into comp sci because "it was the thing to do". I would say a scientific/engineering inclination is about 10% of any population. The reason we had so many "comp sci" people in the 90s is because that's where the money was, not because all of a sudden people became interested in learning about the intricacies of enterprise customer relationship software. Just like right now every single smart kid in America is studying to become a doctor, lawyer or a wall street analyst. If you don't have a real passion in one field, and you're smart enough, it's only logical that you will go into the highest paid profession you can manage. The only reason there are more foreigners in IT then in, say MBA programs, is because it's a lot easier to program without great English communication skills then to do a business presentation. The foreign It professionals I work with don't want their kids to be programmers, they want them to be earning hundreds of thousands of dollars on Wall Street or in a law firm.

    31. Re:Easy answer by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      When I interview someone, I don't look at their school or what degree they have.

      I grill them. I grill them on what they know, what they think they know, and how they've applied what they know. I ask hard questions. I'm usually just one in a series of people that interview candidates, but I'm known as the griller (sometimes well over an hour or two).

      I will end up working with th person at some point and I want to know if they are going to measure up (or if thy can be trained to). I don't care if you've got a Ph. D from Stanford. If you can't answer questions related to the field or the position you aren't going to be recommended. If you can't show how you've applied you're skills, you aren't going to be recommended. If you've got the social skills of a guano festooned rock, you aren't going to be recommended.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
  14. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by j35ter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why are you ranting here and not in some blog?

    'cause he's wondering how the next gen of american CS's will cope with the un-american competition. Imagine a future where most U.S. tech-companies outsource R&D and production to India and china...oh...never mind
    --
    Delta-Mike November Bravo Tango
  15. You have asked and answered your own question by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You have fundamentally asked and answered your own question and don't even realize it. The fundamental reason is very simple, grad students are coming from the countries that will be able to provide meaningful employment to those grads. In other words, outsourcing, or at the very least the prospect of outsourcing has scared away your potential fellow American students.

    It's a matter of economics, are you going to invest that much money and time in something when significant portions of the grad level work is being exported out of the country? With major corporations from the likes of Microsoft to IBM hiring principally outside the US in China and India, this is where the jobs will be and thus, where the grad students are coming from.

    The real slap in the face of the whole thing is that said companies than have the audacity to complain that we don't have enough educated workers to provide a workforce here in America.

    1. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by servognome · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of economics, are you going to invest that much money and time in something when significant portions of the grad level work is being exported out of the country?
      The problem with your logic is that many foreign grad students want to remain in the US to work after graduation. There are many excellent technical colleges outside of the US for students looking to earn degrees and remain in their country. Foreign workers who want to work in the US find it easier to get an H1B with a US graduate degree.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by PhoenixOne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work in a traditionally underpaid part of the tech-industry (entertainment software), and I can still make a good living at it. Not "rock star" good, but "new car and house" good.

      I use to think that the Microsoft's of the industry were just trying to save some cash by hiring workers overseas, until I had to interview for a co-worker. I'm surprised at a)the limited number of people in the US looking for a programming job and b)the almost complete lack of skill by those who did.

      Long story short, after a year of looking we couldn't fill the position at any price.

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    3. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      In Europe, we too hear the argument that outsourcing killed the domestic market for engineers. It's a gross oversimplification. Outsourcing may have scared off a few prospective students, but it has a lot more to do with the general image of the engineering profession.

      If you go to technical uni, you're a sucker. The study is long and difficult, has little prestige, and the jobs pay crap. That is the image of ordinary people... how often have we heard some dad in a movie lament to his son: "you could have been a doctor or a lawyer"? Never "an engineer". And it is this image that contributes to the crap pay, actually. I've met plenty of manager who were aghast at the realisation that some engineers, even experienced ones, actually made more than they did, mid level project managers.

      The result is that enrollment is down, shockingly so. In my old department at uni, there are no postgrad students from my own country. And companies are indeed complaining about the lack of engineers, and they are right. What with all this outsourcing and lowish pay (compared to other graduate employees), the prospects of actually landing a job have rarely been better than they are today.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure you could- pay me twice what I'm paying now, and I'll leave my job in a heartbeat. If I don't have the required experience, I know a dozen or so people happy to work on the same terms, all of them strong programmers and problem solvers.

      What, your company doesn't want to pay well over 200K/year? Oh so it is about the money after all.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    5. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting that brilliant people have studied mathematics, the sciences, and even engineering against the protestation of their parents since at least the time since Europe crawled out of the dark ages. It used to be joining the clergy or being an attorney. Now it's going to business school, law school, or medical school. There was a brief period during the Cold War where being a scientist or engineer was valued, but it's obviously not that important to a world completely fixated on buying the latest gadget and gizmo, no matter the cost. How that works is beyond me.

    6. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by Stradivarius · · Score: 1

      You may be right that the fear of outsourcing is why Americans are staying away. The media certainly make it seem like all the computer jobs are disappearing. But the actual data show an increasing demand for Americans in software engineering.

      That's been borne out by my own experience interviewing software engineering applicants. We have a lot of demand, but there just aren't that many good engineers looking to switch jobs. Thus the competition for those few engineers is pretty intense, and companies in our area work hard to retain the people they have.

    7. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by sjelkjd · · Score: 1

      >>With major corporations from the likes of Microsoft to IBM hiring principally outside the US in China and India, this is where the jobs will be and thus, where the grad students are coming from.

      This is misleading. Microsoft has research centers in India and China, but the majority of the software engineering happens in Redmond. Windows, Office, SQL Server, Visual Studio, XBox, Live.com, MSN, are all in the US, and they're not going anywhere. Many of the new overseas jobs are in sales.
      Here's an article with some more info.

      http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoft/2003836681_microsoftjobs15.html

      >>The real slap in the face of the whole thing is that said companies than have the audacity to complain that we don't have enough educated workers to provide a workforce here in America.

      And how do you know that there aren't enough educated workers? Have you tried hiring thousands of software developers and testers? Microsoft is looking for the best talent in the world. Guess what - people born in the US are not magically smarter than the rest of the world. Statistically, you would expect that there would be many top software engineer applicants from non-US countries, especially since they tend to come to the US for their education.

      That H1B issue may be true for some companies, but Microsoft is not one of them.

    8. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      If you'd been paying attention, servognome, which you obviously haven't, you would know that recent studies by the GAO have plainly stated that the vast majority of applicants for those H1-B positions don't have advanced degrees. In fact, a number of them have no degrees.....

    9. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by megaditto · · Score: 1

      No shit, Sherlock. The whole point of running a company is to make money, not lose it.

      What I would like to know is why the fresh-out-of-college graduates demand a starting salary of over $100,000/year...

      Yes, I am talking about the people applying for a programmer position whose "Hello World" app in a language of their choice would not compile

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    10. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Thank you, Good Citizen onyxruby, for providing the first intelligent answer to the main post. This should be obvious, but of course isn't, to anyone who has been paying attention. But far too many Americans are profoundly ignorant and profoundly stupid. Guess that "dumbing down thing" has been entirely successful.....

      Yup, Korporate Amerika claims there aren't enough highschool dropouts - so bring on the undocumented (formerly known as illegal) workers. And they claim there aren't enough college grads - so bring on the dramatic increases in H1-B (and all the other visa programs) and offshoring. Guess we just don't have enough of ANYTHING anymore.....[Gee, I remember when Americans could discuss something other than TV stuff and didn't blindly worship the CORPORATION.]

    11. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Long story short, after a year of looking we couldn't fill the position at any price. At any price? Bullshit. You simply couldn't fill the position at the kind of wages you were offering. If you had credibly offered (say) $20 millon a year for the position, you'd have 'em lined up around the block. The problem is that you work in a sector that everyone knows underpays for the work they demand, so they don't even bother to send a resume.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not just that a US graduate degree helps foreign workers get an H1-B visa. It's that a student visa is the only way for these people to live in the US, and while they're here they have time to learn English, get accultured to America, and make connections that'll help them find employment later. Because of that, foreign students are more motivated to overlook the sacrifices of a PhD grad student's life, the long hours, low pay, and the professor getting the credit for the research. A US citizen doesn't need the visa.

    13. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1

      Depends, do you think you are worth 200K a year? We considered applicants who asked for over 100K who couldn't do simple 3D math.

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    14. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1

      And if we promised unicorns and cocaine, the line would be twice as long. ;)

      But it would of been more accurate for me to say "Price wasn't a factor because not a single applicate could answer even basic questions (like 'what is a stack')."

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    15. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I'm worth what the market will bear. If you can't find a qualified applicant for $X and the qualifications don't eliminate every applicant (500 years experience in .NET, for example) then you aren't offering enough. Simple economics, it applies to the labor pool as well.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    16. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1

      Smart answer. 100% true. It's the same economics that makes it cheaper to hire overseas than in the US.

      I work for a bit of a strange case. Our parent company was overseas to start with and they "in sourced" to the US to get skill labor. Now the skilled labor here is in short supply, they can no longer afford to "buy American".

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    17. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by Courageous · · Score: 1

      I have known a lot of very competent software people in the six figure range. Very few of them would respond to a game company job ad, even if the pay was advertised as something that they would accept, on the grounds that there is a perception that the games business would be a poor overall career choice for them. True or not true, the industry has a perception of paying peanuts, demanding long hours of work, and being hard particularly on the older worker. While this perception may not be your fault, you are nevertheless a cog in this overall machine. See to thine own house.

      C//

    18. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by dezert_fox · · Score: 1

      "The real slap in the face of the whole thing is that said companies than have the audacity to complain that we don't have enough educated workers to provide a workforce here in America." Major companies in the US are digging deeper into the US recruiting pool than they would like to. They used to be hiring from the top 5%, now they're hiring from the top 20%, and the quality of their employees is demonstrably worse. What's so audacious about their complaints?

    19. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1

      I'm looking after my own house nicely (good hours, fair pay, excellent work environment, a workforce that is old enough to have kids in college), thank you. :) But I know the industry in general has a bit of a bad rep to work on, which is why we have organizations like the IGDA.

      The comment about older workers did bring up a good point that (sort of) ties back to the original topic. It's hard to find younger tech-workers here in the US at least those with skills. Yes, you learn a lot more "on the job" then you ever will in school but, the few people I interviewed, didn't have the basic knowledge that (IMHO) should be taught in entry level classes (how memory is managed, how function calls work on a low level, what the ".." in printf actually means).

      Are they not teaching this in school anymore?

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    20. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      No, they're not teaching that anymore, because a lot of that stuff is either OS(and even sometimes OS version) or language specific.

      I got my CS degree a few years back, and while I had to take a machine language course(MIPS RISC btw, not IA32) and could probably answer most of those questions(I'm not actually that sort of programmer), they weren't really a core part of the curriculum, and shouldn't be.

      What you're looking for is an experienced C progammer, and if that's what you want find a local tech school that's churning them out. The knowledge you're asking for has nothing to do with being a good programmer and a lot to do with having a lot of experience with machine code and older C conventions.

    21. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by trajan96 · · Score: 1

      You're argument isn't consistent. You say that corporations are hiring outside the US in China, India etc. and thats where the grad students are coming from. Think about that. If the grad students are coming to school in the US, why would they want to go back to a 5x lower wage job in India or China when they can get one in the US? The populations are mutually exclusive. The best universities in the world are in the US. Until that changes, foreigners are going to continue to come to school here, and be employed here. You can't ship talent to a cheaper location, you have to go where the talent already is. How many cities have tried to become the next silicon valley? How many actually succeeded? Its harder building that environment than you think. Outsourcing in itself hasn't scared away American students from technical jobs. They've just realized that they can make a ton of money in consulting, i-banking, and management track careers. Thats fine by me, career fair was last week and you wouldn't believe how many companies fawn over a Ph.D. with US citizenship.

    22. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      This is misleading. Microsoft has research centers in India and China, but the majority of the software engineering happens in Redmond. Windows, Office, SQL Server, Visual Studio, XBox, Live.com, MSN, are all in the US, and they're not going anywhere. Many of the new overseas jobs are in sales.

      Agreed, at MSFT, our outsourced China and India work was, for the large part, menial and tedious (complete browser passes for CSS changes, etc). The actual nuts and bolts? Redmond. My parents recently visited from overseas, and I took them for a drive around most of the campus (well, the various areas off 148th and 156th) - it is a city. The "principally hiring ... in China and India" for the core work? So far from the truth.

    23. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      They could just offer money and they'd have no trouble hiring the top 5%.

      There are lots of good programmers out there. There just aren't that many willing to work for $60k, or willing to relocate for $80k. And a lot of companies probably resent paying over $50k...

      And of course the best and brightest won't enter the field out of college with that kind of salary situation - from birth they'll get steered to find other areas of work more interesting.

      Like anything - you get what you pay for...

    24. Re:You have asked and answered your own question by Courageous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other poster is correct. Many universities have started glossing that sort of stuff over. It's a shame really. It all dates back to the .COM era, where the universities accepted industry opinion that they should be churning out Java "just a programmers". While I don't disagree with this, really, it went a bit too far in the glossing. Where'd all the computer scientists go?

      I suppose I can accept a programmer that knows the specific purpose of each container in the container classes library, even if the skill of implementing them properly is forgotten. But that's not computer science, and I'd just as soon have more computer scientists -cum- software engineers than boiler plate workers.

      BTW, you're going to find that when you look into the most recent generation of computer people, the true "black belts" are not where you'd expect. They are not the computer scientists, but the mashers. These are the kids who born into the net, and are Zen masters of the process of rip, burn and play in coding. While their answer "I'd just look that up" happens to coincide with an old stodgy lame interview defense, they take this to an entirely new level. You might want to probe around there and see what you can turn up.

      As for your graphics programmers who can't handle trig, linear algebra, and quats, well. Not sure what to say about that.

      Finally. You've gotta have employees. So. Use this approach:

      1. Try to determine their work ethic.
      2. Try to determine their IQ.
      3. Train where needed.

      By and large a highly intelligent hard worker won't need much of #3.

      C//

  16. come on... SAY it... by seven+of+five · · Score: 2, Insightful

    no market for engineers in US. Market for engineers in India & China.

    Next month, no market for lawyers, doctors in US... we'll all flip burgers.

    1. Re:come on... SAY it... by Courageous · · Score: 2, Informative


      Doctors and lawyers are protected by guilds, with barriers to entry and such, requiring local certification to practice, ad nauseum, ad nauseum.

      C//

    2. Re:come on... SAY it... by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      the USMLE is simply just easy for most foreign grads
      well maybe the step 1 is a little bit difficult for those who've been in their clinical years/have graduated but it is still a tad bit easier than the certification exam in most other countries...

    3. Re:come on... SAY it... by Courageous · · Score: 1

      One word: residency.

      C//

  17. Foreign students pay more by FooBarBlatDing · · Score: 1

    Could it be that foreign students pay higher tuitions, so there is an incentive for the schools to accept them in preference to American students?

    1. Re:Foreign students pay more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes they pay higher tuitions, but generally that's because they aren't receiving any of the funding that OUR governments put towards post-secondary education. The reason many of us can afford to go to university (Canada/Britain) or College (U.S.A.) is because our government helps to subsidize the cost.

      I would actually say that it's probably illegal for them to charge more for foreign students once they've been accepted.

    2. Re:Foreign students pay more by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      They don't charge "more", they charge "less" for you. As you said, your education is subsidized in all manner of ways. In Australia, it is worded to make it more demonstrable - "full-fee paying student". They pay the full rate. You just get discounts for things they're not eligible for.

      The direct practical result may be the same for the end customer, the student, but the methods used in deriving their bill as presented are all-important.

    3. Re:Foreign students pay more by Stalus · · Score: 1

      Not for any school that I looked at. Out of state students usually pay more, but almost all of the grad students at the major universities are from out of state. This is because students are encouraged to go somewhere other than their undergrad institution for grad school.

      In either case, most PhD's in CS/Engineering degrees have their tuition covered by the university so it often doesn't make a difference. Maybe they can milk a little more out of a fellowship if a student gets one, but I doubt it's enough of a difference for a department to make admission decisions based on this. They're more interesting in the million dollar grants and not the 12k difference in tuition.

  18. Depends on the place by btavshan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is probably going to be modded flamebait, but I'm going to share my observations anyway. There is generally a large percentage of foreign students in graduate programs in general in the U.S. (e.g. 3 or 4 or so of 12 in my biophysics graduate program). However, I've found that the percentage of foreign students increases the more...easy the graduate school is to get in to. I have friends attending less selective graduate programs, and they have many more peers that are foreign students, mostly because there are many more graduate schools in the U.S. than in foreign countries, meaning the competition to get into graduate school is overall much lower in the U.S. Don't believe the hype industries put out--the U.S. already produces far more science/engineering PhDs than it can reasonably employ. This is in large part due to the sheer number of graduate programs. Foreign students are simply taking advantage of this fact to become trained in a field that would be difficult ot get into in their home country.

  19. Quite simple by Rinikusu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A lot of foreign students are here on a foreign student visa. If they fuck up in school, they get sent back. So, by accepting a foreign student, the department has a very good idea that that student will be putting in 110% into the degree program, doing shit work for no money, whatever, when a domestic student is more likely to just tell an abusive department to fuck off and die and move to another school. It may also be that the student is less likely to be partying on the weekends (social stigma), and so grades won't be much of an issue if they made it that far.

    I thought about going to grad school for Biology as I have a keen interest in various fish and some local rivers & streams ecology that I picked up on my own. I had a sit down with the Dean of the Biology department where we basically shot the shit for an hour or two, talking about various subjects, including programs at other schools. He seemed surprised that not only did I know who the "big names" in my relatively obscure interests, but that I was also reading their papers and applying them. He looked at me and asked me point blank: Why the hell aren't you in my department? And I didn't have a good answer. He went on to explain that there's a ton of people in Biology grad school, but none of them were actually biologists. Instead, they were padding grades and trying to get into med school. While he was most certainly happy that they were going on with their lives, he said finding people actually interested in Biology was like pulling teeth. Basically: he'd pick someone like me, regardless of my GRE scores for the most part, over a mountain of med school hopefuls because it was his job, as far as he was concerned, to educate biologists. It was an interesting conversation. "Man, you could get your doctorate just doing what you're doing now at home on your own dime..." :P

    And no, I didn't go to grad school. Not yet, anyway. :)

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:Quite simple by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      And no, I didn't go to grad school. Not yet, anyway. :) After that long anecdote, you didn't even supply an answer to the question!
      --
      Beetle B.
    2. Re:Quite simple by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Sounds absolutely perfect for academia.

      For my $.02 (OK, well, $40,000), I'd rather learn by doing. I have more opportunity to make and to do in industry than I did in college. If somebody else wants to pay for an advanced degree, I'm game...but I'm certainly not going to foot another bill.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Quite simple by Beetle+B. · · Score: 3, Informative

      I see this attitude often, and it baffles me.

      Depending on your major, you shouldn't foot the bill. In engineering, it is rare to find someone paying for his advanced degree. They usually have a teaching or research assistantship. At most, the ill informed come and pay for the first semester themselves, and then get some sort of funding after that.

      Same goes for science (in fact, often science departments don't admit if they don't have funding).

      In humanities/social science, things are more competitive. Harder to get funding there, but a lot of people still find away.

      When I was graduating with my BS, most of my fellow grads used the "can't afford grad school because I've got enough debts already" excuse. Pity they never bothered asking the grad students in their departments how they were being funded...

      When I was applying to grad school, my plan was that if I can obtain funding prior to starting, I'd go. Otherwise, I'd get a job. Paying for grad school was a no-no, as it should be.

      --
      Beetle B.
    4. Re:Quite simple by BerntB · · Score: 1

      That sounds really strange.

      At least here in my local Sweden, medical people doesn't need to study biology before becoming doctors.

      But the biology departments here have lots more students than there are jobs for biologists. It is something people study out of interest -- more or less like music. (I did some (bio)chemistry out of interest and it was not at all as popular as biology.)

      The difference, I'd guess, is that it is more expensive to study in the US? Unless you're wealthy, it is harder to study a couple of years just from love of a subject?

      --
      Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    5. Re:Quite simple by megaditto · · Score: 1

      I second that. Funding is not a concern at all since the grad schools pay YOU. Most average stipends are always high enough for food, rent, and some entertainment. And there are always ways to get more money (up to 80k a year extra) if you are very good and can apply for outside fellowships (though afterwards you are usually obligated to spend several years working for the Govt after graduation; citizenship required in all cases).

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    6. Re:Quite simple by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Huh. Maybe I'm just too dumb for grad school. Somehow, I'll have to find a way to live with the shame.

      My experience in undergrad work was sufficiently negative that I have no desire to continue in academia. If there are others who percieve the cost/benefit analysis differently than I do, then I'm sure they draw different conclusions.

      Long ago, I concluded that I didn't like school for school's sake. I don't like the rat race, and I don't like jumping through arbitrary hoops. It's not a good fit for me. I'm certainly not going to pay for the "privilege" of continuing. I needed an undergrad degree to get the career I wanted, but I see no need to go further on my own hook.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Quite simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When I was graduating with my BS, most of my fellow grads used the "can't afford grad school because I've got enough debts already" excuse.

      It's not even the cost of grad school they're complaining about, though, is it? They probably mean the *undergrad* debts, which they have to start paying as soon as they graduate.

    8. Re:Quite simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you are so wrong!

      I was an MS student in a physics department. Run by Chinese professors. the chinese grad students would cheat on anything and everything... We had an Iraqi grad student who used to go out of his way to find the chinese cheating, and whenever he raised an issue (like the time we were all taking the qualifying exam, meant to be taken individually BTW, and the chinese waited until the prof left, honor system don't you know, then pulled out little note books from their pockets and began working together on all the problems.) he was told that if he didn't read, write, and speak cantonese and mandarin, then he couldn't prove anything. BY THE FUCKING GRAD DIRECTOR!

      We had 5 americans, 4 germans, 1 iraqi, and 40 chinese grad students. Those chinese would do ANY-FUCKING-THING to stay here in the US. I knew one gal that kept getting degree after degree, while trying to find a job here, so she wouldn't have to go back... They come here for opportunity (MORE SCHOOLS than in China), education (their best schools and ours are on par with each other but we have a lot more top schools), and because there are 3 times as many of them as us, so their top grad students should outnumber ours by a factor of 3 to one, by simple numbers, if all else is equal.

      And let's not even talk about the issue that someone else raised... Starting salary in the US government (my line) for a Physics PhD fresh out of school is about $70k. Starting salary for a Medical PhD is something like $300,000 , so do the math, which is a better investment? To get ANY physics guys like me to go on to any grad school other than med or MBA requires us to not give a shit about money but love the subject... Try getting a gal with that mindset!

    9. Re:Quite simple by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      I didn't have debts, so I can't comment.

      However, my understanding was that most of those debts can be deferred: Interest free - if you go to grad school. I certainly haven't met anyone in grad school who's paying back loans.

      --
      Beetle B.
    10. Re:Quite simple by nasor · · Score: 1

      Same goes for science (in fact, often science departments don't admit if they don't have funding).
      This is true. Most science departments determine how many grad students they accept in a given year by figuring out how many they can afford to pay. You generally wouldn't be allowed to attend science grad school on your own dime even if you wanted to.
    11. Re:Quite simple by quintessentialk · · Score: 1

      As you said, depending on your major. In some fields in the humanities, for example, you can at best hope for partial support -- maybe a stipend or a partial tuition waiver, but not both (as I enjoyed in physics). People do find a way because it is absolutely what they want to do. Time to degree might be longer, though, since they have to raise some of their own money. In the hard sciences, you're absolutely right. If a school didn't offer you money, you really didn't get in. Now, the ideal case would be to win a grant from the government or something like that. Then you can go wherever you want, since you incur little additional cost to the school you choose.

  20. Chinese and Indians are still relatively poor by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    But they still make the majority of science/engineering grad students in the US? ... Where education is renowned for being expensive.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Chinese and Indians are still relatively poor by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      But they still make the majority of science/engineering grad students in the US? ... Where education is renowned for being expensive.

      It is indeed expensive. Chinese students have their education paid for by the Chinese government. Indian parents will eat dirt and wear old potato sacks to send a child to engineering school.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  21. Too busy working for a living. by gbutler69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mostly I think it is because we're all too busy working for a living. Those who can afford college without having to work, do go into medicine and law as you said. Especially law. If you control the law you can control the money.

    Most Americans, even if they are really smart and work hard in high-school, still have to work while attending college and have little time for serious study. By the time they've finished four years of University, they have between $60,000.00 and $100,000.00 in debt. They look around and realize that if they go to graduate school, they will probably double that debt.

    Now, they've worked for most of the time they've been at University, and haven't truly been able to get all the benefits of dedicated study, and they are faced with more of the same. More debt, etc.

    Because they have work experience and because they can take jobs that pay reasonably well, they do so, figuring it is best to cut their losses.

    This is somewhat short-sighted, but, it is inevitable.

    A foreign student in the U.S. usually (from my experience) attended non-graduate school in their home country and it was a free-ride one way or another (I'm not saying they aren't smart and didn't have to work really hard). They are now in the U.S. attending graduate school, usually on some sort of scholarship (not saying they didn't earn it).

    They don't need to work to pay for school. They are not accruing massive debt. They can't just take a reasonable paying job in the U.S. because their student visa doesn't allow it. In their home country, reasonable paying jobs (without an advanced degree) aren't as plentiful. Their choices are, continue in graduate school while not accruing massive debts and yet being able to dedicate 100% of their efforts to learning and mastering the material, or return to their home nation and compete for jobs without and advanced degree. It's a pretty easy choice.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Too busy working for a living. by frisket · · Score: 1

      By the time they've finished four years of University, they have between $60,000.00 and $100,000.00 in debt.

      Roughly when did this pattern start? 60s? 70s? 80s? And how long does it take them to pay it off (mean and sd)?

    2. Re:Too busy working for a living. by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      This is why I'm rather happy to be in Ireland where we do not have to pay tuition fees for third level for either undergraduate or postgraduate (albeit there are "administration" fees now of about 600 pa). Those whose parents are on low to medium incomes can get grants too that cover maybe a third of what a year of college living costs. Also postgraduate research for a Masters or PhD is usually funded by the University, government, EU or private industry (if you are *really* desperate to do work for a postgrad degree you can theoretically fund yourself and just find a willing supervisor). Sure the stipend is lower than a real salary (maybe €12,000/~$17,000 pa. for masters) - but it's luxury for living as a student, especially better funded research (i.e. not just Uni department funding).

      Unfortunately for any US readers, only EU citizens enjoy the free fees benefits. Still probably works out pretty good for postgraduate research here, although cost-of-living is higher than say in the US. Another reason to study here is if you don't like sun during the summer. I can guarantee you won't have problems with that here. You won't have problems with dry skin from lack of humidity either.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    3. Re:Too busy working for a living. by EMB+Numbers · · Score: 1

      While you certainly can spend $60,000 to $100,000 on four years at a university, that is hardly the norm. I am currently (until last term) putting a niece through a four year program at a state university for approximately $7500 per year. I begged her not to work while in school, but she does anyway. Meanwhile, my wife is getting her MBA a the same school, and that also costs about $7500 per year (but pays for fewer courses per year). If I was getting an MBA, my employer would pay for it.

      My other niece apparently did it the "right" way. She got married, had a baby, and graduated from high school all in one year in that order. As a mother with no income, she receives enough financial aid (grants) and other benefits to pay her full tuition, subsidize her child's day care, and have enough left over to put gas in her car. Her student health insurance (included in the tuition grant) even covers the baby. When combined with "gifts" from family members, I think she is better off than the other niece who works.

    4. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They look around and realize that if they go to graduate school, they will probably double that debt."

      Only goes to show how little you know about graduate school funding. The vast majority of students in a PhD program in the sciences, engineering or mathematics have their tuition covered and a stipend with health insurance in exchange for teaching or research. You do not have to pay for graduate school. Moreover, your student loans will continue to be deferred as long as you are a student, allowing you to wait to pay them off.

    5. Re:Too busy working for a living. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Well stated! People who blow thousands of dollars on prestigious, expensive schools are only fooling themselves. I went to a State school and it hasn't kept me from having great jobs, just because I went to Oregon, instead of Stanford (or some stupid expensive private school) doesn't make me any less employable. And for those saying a Grad degree is too expensive, I haven't seen a job in the past 10 years that doesn't have 100% tuition reimbursement for grad programs.

    6. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Getting married, even without the kid, helps a ton.

      My wife and I are in our last year of undergrad, and just got married last summer. Now, instead of looking at our parents' income and assets the government just looks at ours, so the retirement funds of my long-retired parents and her just-retired parents no longer knock us out of the running for aid.

      We went from getting $0 ("but here are some nice loans you might like") to having ~%60 of our tuition paid for. Not bad. Should have done it Freshman year, we'd be so far ahead now.

    7. Re:Too busy working for a living. by synthespian · · Score: 1

      They don't need to work to pay for school. They are not accruing massive debt.

      Blame it on the American elitist system. In Europe and Latin America (don't know about Asia), most universities - in fact, I think the best ones - are publicly funded. Supposedly, that's what you pay taxes for (to have something in return). In the US, it's almost every man for himself. They hate paying taxes (well, who doesn't), but you see where it backlashes...

      What really should be worrying the US is why graduates are actually going back, and not staying like the used to. Maybe it's got something to do with the current political climate (with all the hostility towards immigrants and whatnot).

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    8. Re:Too busy working for a living. by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 1

      Now, they've worked for most of the time they've been at University, and haven't truly been able to get all the benefits of dedicated study, and they are faced with more of the same.

      I can't speak for other disciplines, but the majority of engineering students get funding that covers tuition (and sometimes fees) and provides a stipend. You still need a roommate, but it's manageable. The wisdom that I have heard is that you shouldn't do graduate school in engineering unless you can do it on someone else's money.

      Interestingly, American graduate students often find more funding opportunities that international students. In fact, Americans qualify as underrepresented minorities in some graduate programs. My first three years of Ph.D. were funded by a minority fellowship, despite being a white male.

      Disclaimer: I'm a Ph.D. student in computer engineering, so this advice may not be useful for other degree programs.

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    9. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      @gbutler69

      I have to object to that bigtime. Being an international student let me tell you we dont make jack shit working our part time jobs which are by the way the only employement we can seek in this country while we're studying. I make 6.56 an hour and work for 19 hours a week. Do the math and you will see that barely comes upto 500 a month. Oh and in case you're wondering working 19-20 hours a week is all we're supposed to work according to immigration rules. Any other kind of work is not possible for us. i.e they have been deemed illegal. A couple of years ago a student from this university was deported because he was caught by INS while he was working in a motel. Neat huh?

      You wanna know the difference, then just take a look at the scenario in the nearest reputed University which offers a grad program. You will find most of the International(read:Indian) students staying as 3-4 people in a 1 bedroom apartment or 6-7 people in a 2 bedroom apartment. This works out in such a way that your average Indian student doesnt have to shell out 50% or so of his meager monthly salary on just rent alone. He doesnt have worries over sharing closet space, practically having zero privacy and all other things which at the same time an American tenant might give a lot of precedence for. Its not that the Indian student doesnt want it. Its just that he doesnt want such desires to take priority in his life just then.

      As for your inisinuation that Americans are the ones who dont commit themselves to a Masters Program or so because of fears of sinking deeper in debt and that we just sail through college with a scholarship of sorts, I scoff at you. Let me speak for my university first. The only kind of scholarship International Students can get here is earn 1000$ a semester and have their tuition reduced to instate? Oh f'n Yea!!! We're just riding the gravy train arent we? I am sure a lot of Indians do get better scholarships in other Universities. But as long as those INS laws are still in place they are not going to be making any sort of savings during their run as student.

      Sorry if I came off a little too strong, but this whole misconception of us International Students having the easy life here is unfounded. If anything we have to slog harder than American Students

    10. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Londovir · · Score: 1

      I agree 100% with your opinion!

      I am a teacher at a public high school. I teach three Advanced Placement courses: AP Calculus, BC Calculus, and AP Computer Science. I love my job, plain and simple. And, no, I'm not going to rant about the pay for teachers.

      I love teaching advanced mathematics, and my ambition would be to some day teach that subject matter in a college atmosphere, whether it is a community college or university. Of course, to be able to do so one must have a Master's degree at a minimum. I've been looking into that for almost 2 years now and every time I reconsider the issue, I give up.

      I give up, of course, because of the outrageous cost involved. It will be up to $200 or more per credit hour for me to begin the coursework. I doubt I'd have any problems being accepted, as I had some professors trying to get me into the graduate program at my alma mater. The problem was I was living on my own, my parents had long since lost the ability to assist me with my educational costs, and I had a full-time job at a retail sales outlet. I was already up to almost $30,000 in debt just to get my B.A. The thought of putting myself so far into debt to get a M.A. that I would have to work 40 years to recoup the costs just wasn't appealing.

      On top of it, I'm now married with a new home and a baby on the way. My fiscal priorities have become fairly well-set in my mind. Teaching doesn't pay well, but it does pay, and I'm slowly trying to dig myself out from my educational debt. I had the misfortune to have lived in a state as a high schooler that did not offer decent scholarships based upon academic merit at the time I was graduating.

      The political candidates want to make big news by trumpeting new programs right before the election. They talk about how our country is losing its edge in the technological world to foreign countries, and they try to come up with ideas on how to regain the edge. Well, how about this: Find a way to help smart, hard-working Americans pay their way through college without losing an arm and a leg. Let me take the GREs, score high enough, and get a full-ride academic scholarship to a state university. Get me in the door, let me prove I can perform at a high enough level, and keep paying for me to go so long as I keep scoring high enough. Maybe then when I get my M.A. I'll contribute more to society and the wheel of life will turn some more.

      --
      Londovir
    11. Re:Too busy working for a living. by thogard · · Score: 1

      It started about 1990. In 1985 tuition was on the order of $45 per class at state schools and you were expected to take 8 to 10 a year. Then a bunch of federal programs got introduced and the size of administration got larger than the teaching staff and then the bigger loans were needed so the schools needed larger loan processing groups so they could get paid and with larger loans the could build newer buildings and the cycle keeps going. The student loans were fixed at 7 years max in 1989 but now they go on forever with 20 year terms not uncommon. The debt figures even get worse when you consider that once your out of school with your 1st job, there isn't enough cash flow to cover the start up costs so things like work suits get put on a credit card. Add in the poorer economic situation and home loans are for higher and longer amounts. The net result is that the extra administration is putting people in debt for decades. When my father went to school, he had to show up a week before classes to work on maintenance of the buildings.

    12. Re:Too busy working for a living. by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      The same thing (not looking at parents' finances) is true in all professional/graduate programs as well, at least as per the federal government. Whether the school and private donors will look at your parents' incomes or not varies, but you'll be pretty assured of getting $8500/year in subsidized no-payments, no-accruing-interest-until-you-graduate loans from the federal government. Of course that's beans compared to what some programs cost, especially medical or law school, even if you are going to a public one in your home state. But it's something.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    13. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Chase+Husky · · Score: 1

      Plane ticket to Boston - $239
      Sweater vest and bow tie - $72
      Hahvahd tuition - $40,450
      Realizing that an education isn't included. Priceless.

      Of course, not everyone can get into MIT. IHTP, though.

    14. Re:Too busy working for a living. by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      The social and political climate (here) has little to nothing to do with why many of the foreign students simply go to school here and go back, at least not from the reasons that the multitude of foreign students in my classes (engineering) said. The vast majority wanted to stay over there in the first place and came over here because it is easier and less expensive to go to a good school in the U.S. than in their home countries. If they'd been able to go to school back in their home countries, many never would have come over here in the first place. It sure sounded like the changes in the social and political climate where they came from are much, much more responsible for this behavior than anything with U.S. social and political climate- they aren't itching to escape their home country like their older compatriots were. This is good as it means that the country where the student was from has improved quite a bit and become much more livable between the time that most of the grads had stayed here and now.

      However, two things about this scenario are bad. One is that we're subsidizing the education of people who won't end up repaying our contribution to their education, let along contribute to our society above and beyond that. The second part is that it means that there is a greater demand for jobs over there and that doesn't give the brightest outlook on the U.S. economy.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    15. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Stanford (or some stupid expensive private school) Top schools (now) have very nice financial aid programs, essentially if you can't pay then they'll pay for you. After all top universities really don't care about tuition that much, their endowment fund is where the money comes from in the end. Then there are also external scholarships and so on that can help pay off your costs. I finished Stanford with 0 debt and I knew someone who essentially paid no tuition due to financial aid alone.

      And yes going to a prestigious school does make you more employable for a variety of reasons.
    16. Re:Too busy working for a living. by pikine · · Score: 1

      I nowadays see more Ph.D. scholarships dedicated to US citizens than ever, particularly in science and engineering. Maybe a post-bachelor Ph.D. program would suit you well.

      --
      I once had a signature.
    17. Re:Too busy working for a living. by trajan96 · · Score: 1

      You should make a distinction between Masters and PhD. If you are in the PhD program you are paid a (small) stipend and tuition is waved. Masters students have to pay for themselves. There just isn't enough money to go around, and PhDs produce more 'prestige' for the faculty buck. There are the dishonorable types who start on Ph.D. then bail after a free masters but thats the exception.

      There isn't a huge financial return on a PhD because of lost opportunity costs, but it isn't as dire a situation as you make it out. Undergrad loans can be deferred until you graduate.

      If you're careful you can save about 5k a year (~$25k total) on the stipend to pay down the loans at the end. Being a poor grad student makes you appreciate money more imho.

      Not all foreigners have scholarships, but if not they definitely will have the financial resources not to take out loans. Your point about dedicated study vs having to work is spot on.

      Another point to make is that a lot of engineering companies these days will pay for their employees to get a masters given a promise they will stay x years with the company. That was my original plan until I was guaranteed PhD funding by my advisor.

    18. Re:Too busy working for a living. by nikhilvgs · · Score: 1

      "Most Americans, even if they are really smart and work hard in high-school, still have to work while attending college and have little time for serious study. By the time they've finished four years of University, they have between $60,000.00 and $100,000.00 in debt. They look around and realize that if they go to graduate school, they will probably double that debt." No, they would not. They can get support too. In fact it is easier to get fellowships (there are more choices) for American students than foreign students. "They don't need to work to pay for school. They are not accruing massive debt. They can't just take a reasonable paying job in the U.S. because their student visa doesn't allow it. In their home country, reasonable paying jobs (without an advanced degree) aren't as plentiful." Not true. Please refer to the outsourcing phenomenon. So, paying jobs are plentiful. Perhaps, higher-quality jobs are not available, which may have continued to remain in the US and they are here to do those kinds of jobs.

    19. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      To steal from Good Will Hunting:

      You wasted $150,000 on an education you coulda got for a buck fifty in late charges at the public library.
    20. Re:Too busy working for a living. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      And yes going to a prestigious school does make you more employable for a variety of reasons.
      Says somebody with a vested interest in this belief, having gone to STANFORD! I didn't mean to infer that Stanford was over the top expensive. It was an option for me, but the costs related to moving away to go to college and paying out of state tuition wouldn't have been worth it compared to going ot Oregon. Stanford was a bad example, because it is obviously an ELITE school and not just a top school.
    21. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Huh? Well someone sounds bitter.

      As for being more employable, there are numerous reasons. Since people are petty the name alone makes them more likely to hire you. Likewise a large number of local companies were started by Stanford graduates (google, yahoo, etc.) which creates ties to the university. When your resume goes through a vice president (as I said, they come and give talks once in a while) it's probably more likely to be taken seriously then if it goes through the normal hr process. Many professors also have ties to various companies which means, if you work with them or take a class with them, they may be able to get you a job. Plain old networking and so on with students is also good for future employability.

      As you may notice none of this has anything to do with what they teach you at Stanford but then again the most important thing for getting a job is not what you know but who you know. The second most important one is what you can make them think you know even if you don't really know it. You may not like that but that's life.

      Also Stanford has no in-state tuition being a private school and most top schools not provide a lot of financial aid, apparently Princeton started it (trying to make it so no one needs to take out loans to graduate).

    22. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People work while taking classes? Full-time? That's a one-way trip to straight F's. Part-time, sure. But full-time? You must be at an easy university, or taking easy classes.

    23. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Apply to a place that will give out Master's degrees as a "consolation" prize. Then apply for a PhD program. Don't mention that you only want the Masters degree. That way they'll pay for you. You can even go ahead and get the PhD if you like.

      Before you do any of that, I'd look into if having that Masters would price you out of the high school job market. ie, they can't afford to pay you what you have to be paid under the teacher's union or something. Also, teaching at the university level? You'd better get into a really good PhD program, and get the Phd. And then if it's like physics, you'll do a postdoc or two. And then maybe get a tenure-track position somewhere. Maybe.

      Do some serious research, and talk to the department at where you got your BA. You'll have to get letters of rec from them anyway, so you might as well get some good advice and some realistic stats on your chances of getting a teaching position at the university level. They'll probably tell you that prestige matters. Apply high. Those second string universities want their professors to all have name brand schools on their CVs.

    24. Re:Too busy working for a living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did it for a year, and it sucked. I luckily had a flexible schedule at work, so I wove classes and lab time into a 40 hour work week, and then did homework after my wife was asleep at night. The 2nd year of my master's program I worked half-time instead and actually got to see her at times. TV was gone, computer games were gone, and I learned quickly to carry all my books with me throughout the day, using those 15 minutes waiting for the bus or 30 minutes between lectures to get stuff done.

      Also keep in mind that at my University, "full-time" for a masters student is 9 credit hours, rather than the 12 for a bachelor's program, so "full-time" student can mean two things. They also have a plateau tuition schedule to try and encourage people to graduate in 4 years rather than the 5 that many technical-types were seeming to take. It works like this: you pay per credit-hour up to 12 credits, then additional credits up to 18 were at no extra cost. Above 18 begins costing again.

      It's amazing what you can accomplish when you have to. I hear stories about my grandfather, who worked in a mine during the day and ran a farm in the evenings and weekends, and I feel pretty lazy. Of course he died early of emphasema caused by smoking and said mine...

    25. Re:Too busy working for a living. by quintessentialk · · Score: 1

      Some states (NY as an example) require a master's degree just for teaching high school (well, to secure permanent certification anyway).

    26. Re:Too busy working for a living. by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      ...BC Calculus...

      There was calculus Before Christ?

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

  22. Cash ! Get Rich ! Make it ! by unity100 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You americans are so pumped up with "making it out in the big world, big time" that, jumping into the foray to make cash as soon as you can.

    its cultural.

    1. Re:Cash ! Get Rich ! Make it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, this kind of elitist bullshit from a guy who has unity in his nick? amazing, simply amazing.
       
      this fucktard probably thinks that he's insightful and a friend to all but the reality is that he's just as much a nationalist, racist and sexist as anyone else.

    2. Re:Cash ! Get Rich ! Make it ! by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Dear moron,

      Learn to read and analyze before swearing about people.

      Yours truly,
      "United in slashdot"

  23. Ob Simpsons by servognome · · Score: 1

    The Rapture happened? I'm still here? Wow, that's strange. I insult God all the time.
    That is why you were LEFT BELOW
    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  24. Anti-intellectualism in the US by Gothmolly · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How many times are the nerd, the handyman, and the car mechanic ridiculed as uncool, oafish lugs, while the wall street weenies, the lawyers and the "environmental education" majors held as paragons of success? Despite Feminism, girls are still taught that they "aren't good in math", and now with the emasculating of boy students (no running, no recess, no physical sports), the same extends. When a kid can claim "body by Warcraft" as a reason for not doing physical chores and get away with it, you know that practical, hard, rigorous work is a thing of the past. The foreign families know that hard work and high education matter, thats why their kids get good grades and come here to study in English.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Anti-intellectualism in the US by metlin · · Score: 1

      while the wall street weenies, the lawyers and the "environmental education" majors held as paragons of success?
      To be fair, doing any kind of serious economics/finance requires a sound knowledge of math. As someone who is in R&D with a more than a passing interest in applied math and the markets, one thing I have learnt is that a lot of people out there on Wall Street are nerds and geeks in their own right. In fact, a lot of people that I know in top i-banks and trading houses are folks who are mostly math, physics or engineering PhDs. I mean, even doing a program like Quantitative Computational Finance or Quantitative Analysis is hard enough.

      Secondly, a tonne of good lawyers that I know of are also not dumb - most of them have impressive tech credentials and end up going to law school after getting at least graduate degrees in engineering or the sciences.

      I mean, generalizations and stereotypes only go so far. If anything, I've renewed respect for a lot of people in those areas. Now, there may be weasels and idiots with BA History degrees who work at Joe Law Firm (and whose Dad's contacts helped get that Yale degree), but most top schools are very picky about who they accept for law, MBA and other fields.
    2. Re:Anti-intellectualism in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why are they (people with engineering qualifications) doing lawyering or quant finance rather than actual engineering? Because the lawyers and financiers have set up a system where they are the rulers and the engineers the ruled. People capable of handling engineering are indeed not dumb, but the system is sick - patents and copyrights mean engineers are shackled in servitude.

    3. Re:Anti-intellectualism in the US by metlin · · Score: 1

      So why are they (people with engineering qualifications) doing lawyering or quant finance rather than actual engineering?
      Because, believe it or not, a lot of people find this to be rather interesting and quite fascinating.

      Because the lawyers and financiers have set up a system where they are the rulers and the engineers the ruled.
      Not really. It is just the outcome of any sufficiently complex civilization. Any suitably complex civilization needs a lot of rules that keeps it in shape, and a suitable exchange mechanism that keeps it going. The former is law and the latter is currency. Do not believe me? Look at any of the ancient cultures, and you can draw similar analogies. Law-makers have always had control because they decide and control the rules that govern a society and finance and economics people control the fundamental entity that allows for the exchange of things - tangible and intangible (intellectual property, physical property, immovable property etc).

      People capable of handling engineering are indeed not dumb, but the system is sick - patents and copyrights mean engineers are shackled in servitude.
      How the hell did you jump to that conclusion? Talk of non sequitur. There has always been something that societies have valued more than others - precious metals, land, artificial constructs etc. Today in the age of information, intellectual property is one of those things. For all you know, it may be something else. Believe it or not, such constraints (evolved, artificial or otherwise) are actually good for society because it lets people work towards that goal and enables people to work in a society with those factors as the central key.

      In our society today, ideas and intellectual property are in high demand, and there is a supply system for those. Now, the only way to get tangible benefits from them is by converting them into something for which people can exchange something in the society with - i.e., monetizing them. Now, IP laws (copyright, patents etc) are as good a solution as any to that end.

      If you have any better, practical and pragmatic ones that you think would work, please enlighten the rest of us.
  25. I blame the internet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No really, stick with me.

    I'm an engineer. I've done hardware, software, and systems design for over 20 years. I make things that work.

    When I was a kid there wasn't any internet. If you wanted information you went to the library. You had to WANT to know something bad enough to invest more than 20 keystrokes to find it out. So you thought about things.

    Also, when I was a kid, there weren't computers. There was one (an IBM 1130) in the regional high school. So if I wanted to CREATE something I had to do it with sticks and wires and glue and batteries and switches and light bulbs and motors and things. Physical objects. Not clickety-dragety nice pictures to look at, real physical artifacts.

    So kids these days don't value information, and they don't see the point of building things. So our country is loosing out to indians and chinese who DO see the point, and work hard enough to get sent half-way across the world when our kids sit in their basements with engineering schools in the same town, clicking away at their idiotic video games.

    I fear for our country.

  26. Simple by VonSkippy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    American Public Education SUCKS.

    If the top grad schools had to stick to American only students, they'd go bankrupt in just a few years.

    Thanks to "no moron left behind" and "teachers unions" and our dumbass politicians that let myths (aka intelligent design) be taught as science, the number of potential grad students coming from America gets slimmer every year.

    I'd rant more, but I'm too busy learning Mandarin.

    1. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >American Public Education SUCKS.
      You get what you pay for. Feel free to donate more of your pay to improve your school board's standards.

      >If the top grad schools had to stick to American only students, they'd go bankrupt in just a few years.
      From drop-outs? Do you have statistics on foreign drop-outs compared to American drop-outs? I'm curious, it might be interesting to see.

      >Thanks to "no moron left behind" and "teachers unions" and our dumbass politicians[...]
      Please write to said politicians (in English) and share your views. Expose the issue to more people (friends, family) and encourage them to vote for politicians who will fix the problems you mentioned.

      >I'd rant more, but I'm too busy learning Mandarin.
      Thanks.

    2. Re:Simple by hazem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      American Public Education SUCKS.

      I JUST had a conversation yesterday with a feisty physics professor I used to work with, and about this subject. The kids he gets for his freshman physics classes are so woefully unprepared and are unable to think very creatively.

      As an example, he throws out questions like "what is the square root of 3 times the square root of 3 divided by two", and they start pulling out their calculators - and they're amazed that it can be solved so easily without one.

      He wrote a simple problem on the board and told the students he wanted them to work on it for the next class. The question he got right away was, "Is this graded". It wasn't. The next class came and nobody had done it - because it wasn't graded. So he gave them 10 minutes to write a solution and told them it was "for a grade". Several of the students were outraged and told him, "you can't do that!"

      He said you basically have to walk them through everything you want them to do with very explicit instructions otherwise they simply won't do anything. "They're not dumb.", he said, "They just have no motivation or creative spark to do anything they're told explicitly to do."

      So, I agree with you (as would this prof) that the American education system is failing our kids.

    3. Re:Simple by adrianmonk · · Score: 1

      He wrote a simple problem on the board and told the students he wanted them to work on it for the next class. The question he got right away was, "Is this graded".

      One of the best teachers I ever had was a calculus teacher. Someone in the class asked him if an upcoming test would be just over the material since the last test or it if would cover stuff before that as well. So the teacher picks up the book and says basically, "See this section? This is the section we just covered. You should know that stuff if you want to do well on the test. Also, the stuff we covered recently builds on everything else before that, so if you want to do well on the test, you should also know the stuff in chapters 1 through 10 as well. And most of you in the room took trigonometry before calculus, at least I hope you did, and you should know that for the test as well, if you want to get a good grade. Also, being strong in algebra would be a very good idea, as would being strong in basic arithmetic. In fact, pretty much any math class you took before this you should remember. And it would help if you can read and understand the questions and write your name at the top of the piece of paper."

      Basically, the student was being an asshole and trying to get the teacher to tell him in excruciating detail what material he did not need to worry about, so that he could be maximally lazy, and the teacher refused to place that stupid game. He gave the student an answer that was slightly embarrassing for the student, although he didn't say it in a harsh way, more of "here's the truth, and if you don't like it, it's not my fault, because it's the truth" sort of way.

      He did this because he was an awesome teacher. The problem is, most teachers are not like this. Most of them, let's be honest, don't have the guts to give an answer like that. And in doing so, they are letting down their students.

    4. Re:Simple by scruffy · · Score: 1

      Amen to the "no moron left behind". This puts the focus of education on the 10th percentile, with no incentive on the 90th.

    5. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must have been teaching at an institution with very low standards of acceptance. I know, from experience, that there are colleges nowadays in which freshmen are introduced to partial derivatives and other such concepts within their first week of math class. There is A LOT of variation.

    6. Re:Simple by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      So, I agree with you (as would this prof) that the American education system is failing our kids.
      No it isn't; this is a case of our kids failing the American education system. (Bias Alert: I have taught college courses at several places.) This is, I surmise, a result of the anti-intellectualism prevalent in American culture. This is by no means a new phenomenon in the US, but it has been on the rise after a brief post-Sputnik lull. Here it's money, not academic achievement, that is largely equated with success, and the big money is not in engineering. And hell, you can be a C-student who can't find oil in Texas and still become president. (Then again, Herbert Hoover was an engineer, so that degree is not always the mark of quality.) Students from places that are not anti-intellectual are drawn here: the quality of the graduate programs here is quite high, it's generally a freer society here (so far), and let's face it, an American engineer's salary seems quite appealing compared to the standard of living from whence they came.

      Admittedly a simplistic argument, but it seeme a bit more to the point than "Blergh, our schools suck". You reap what you sow.
      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    7. Re:Simple by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I JUST had a conversation yesterday with a feisty physics professor I used to work with

      Ah, so the new iteration of Ubuntu has already been named, huh?
      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    8. Re:Simple by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1

      I would have at least tried. No shame in trying even if I'm wrong, I would have at least given it a shot.

    9. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further from that, the powers that run the country (ie big business - yes I know I sound like a kook, but its true *restraining myself from raving here*) have no interest in the vast majority of Americans being well educated. If they did, you would be amazed by how fast political policy would change.

      Their interested is in keeping America powerless, and uninterested in politics, diverting attention via WildOn, Summer break, Football Hockey, sex and eating.

      I am raving now. Just glad I don't live there (anymore).

    10. Re:Simple by Swampash · · Score: 1

      the American education system is failing our kids

      "Childrens". The word is "childrens".

    11. Re:Simple by chuckymonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, for instance when I was in highschool (not that many years ago) I was considered an average student by my grades. This was mostly because I was bored and could think circles around my teachers. Case in point, in my AP chemistry class we were discussing some of the math and theory behind absolute zero. While all the other students were furiously taking notes I was taking it in and thinking about it, which lead me at the end of the lecture to ask my teacher the following question "So, since absolute zero has no energy what would keep the electrons from falling into the proton/neutron nucleus? If that happened would there be a huge release of energy from a breakdown of the strong force or would it essentially become a very large neutral chuck of matter?", so on and so forth. My teacher just gave me a blank stare like a deer in the headlights and the other students started to snicker because their 4.0 GPA brains couldn't comprehend independent thought processes or asking questions beyond the scope of the lecture. I later learned on my own that what I was asking is a question that has been around for a long time and there are some good mathematical models that show possibilities. But that ladies and gentlemen is why I was bored to tears in formal education, burned out on it, and have forgone it for self education. Now I'm starting to get interested in going to Uni because I'm rapidly approaching a wall for what I can learn on my own.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    12. Re:Simple by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      They just have no motivation or creative spark to do anything they're told explicitly to do,

      It is not clear to me that this is something that schools are even capable of 'teaching'. It's all about bread and circuses now.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    13. Re:Simple by MarkAyen · · Score: 1

      So, I agree with you (as would this prof) that the American education system is failing our kids.
      I am a parent. It's not the responsibility of our educational system to teach my daughter a work ethic; it's mine. Our kids have not been failed by their teachers (or at least, not entirely). They have been failed by their parents.
    14. Re:Simple by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1
      I can see getting stumped by this. English is pretty vague, and those words might mean sqrt(3 * sqrt(3/2)). I need a calculator for that!

      If he meant (sqrt(3) * sqrt(3)) / 2... well, that's easy. But I had to write it down to see it, so I could at least arrange it into something easily solvable. Just hearing it or reading the words, wasn't immediately obvious.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  27. Show me the money by rivenmyst137 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I have heard that many of the smarter Americans go into medicine or the law and that is why there are so few Americans in engineering. Is this true?"

    No. It's not that the smart ones are, in particular, not going into science and engineering. It's that more _people in general_ are going into things like law, the financial sector, etc., which means that statistically more of the really good people will go in those directions as well (although we can, of course, point out that someone who is good at law or finance might not be good at engineering or science, and vice versa). Science and engineering no longer have the draw they used to, particularly after the tech bubble burst.

    I don't really know why this is. Could be a lot of things. Could be that we're more materialistic, and that yes, you can ultimately make more money in those sectors (although most of the people I know who graduated from law school are fleeing the practice of law like rats from a sinking ship). Could be that people used to go into science because it was more prestigious and indeed patriotic to do so after Sputnik scared the living shit out of us. Nothing like a hostile nation launching something over your heads for the first time to convince you that falling behind technologically could leave you in the middle of mushroom cloud, momentarily wishing you'd studied more math before you vaporize.

    Combine that with the fact that tech is the best way to get out of India and China and come to the US, and maybe that explains the disparity.

    Regardless, it says very bad things about our future as a country.

    1. Re:Show me the money by tom's+a-cold · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. It's not that the smart ones are, in particular, not going into science and engineering.

      I don't really know why this is.
      Because engineering salaries are depressed by H1-B visa holders who went to grad school in the US. For them, the depressed salaries still look good. For Americans, they don't. People with the intelligence to be good engineers can make a lot more money in a small business, or in some other profession where the labor market isn't so distorted.

      I work with H1-B holders: lots of them. On the whole, they work hard and are smart. As for ability, they've got the bell curve just like everyone else has. I won't venture to guess where the H1-B mean is compared to the American mean. The differences between educational systems and cultural norms are too great, but in terms of job performance, I couldn't say either group is consistently better. Depends on what you're trying to do. But the employers' assertion that they're more qualified than Americans to do that work is a self-serving lie. The real "qualification" is their greater willingness to put up with exploitation than a local. So, as a grad student, why would I bust my ass to go into an artificially saturated market?

      --
      Get your teeth into a small slice: the cake of liberty
  28. Unprepared by Original+Replica · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Because Engineering is hard. Our precious little snowflakes are growing up so pampered from real difficulty or challenge that something like a Masters in Engineering is out of their league. Our school systems can't flunk anyone because it would cause the child to feel bad. They also can't strongly encourage the truly bright students, because then the other children will feel less special. The overall result is that our childhood education doesn't prepare our young students for difficult college majors. This is mostly the parents (as a whole) fault. Students from countries where struggling past difficulty is just part of life have been outshining tender American kids for decades now. The proof from Futurama: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recurring_human_characters_from_Futurama#Professor_Ogden_Wernstrom "[Professor] Wernstrom demands and receives tenure, a big research grant, a lab, and five graduate students (at least three of them Chinese by his request)."

    --
    We are all just people.
    1. Re:Unprepared by servognome · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because Engineering is hard. Our precious little snowflakes are growing up so pampered from real difficulty or challenge that something like a Masters in Engineering is out of their league.
      It's not difficulty its opportunity. Most Americans who get undergraduate engineering degrees don't continue their education because there are plenty of entry level jobs available.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:Unprepared by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      Because Engineering is hard. Med school hard?

      Residency hard?
    3. Re:Unprepared by Surt · · Score: 1

      Harder, by quite a bit. Med school and residency is all about memorizing and working long hours. You can work all the hours you want in engineering and it won't give you the kind of brain that can handle those challenges.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  29. One last American degree to validate the others by interiot · · Score: 1

    It's simple: For economic reasons, many people complete their schooling outside the U.S., often where they grew up. But since many employers don't know whether a given school somewhere else in the world is reputable or not, many people get one last American degree, to "validate" their education elsewhere (both to U.S. employers, as well as anyone else who thinks American unis are the best). And the Master's degree is one of the shorter ones to get here.

  30. Comps? by SoapBox17 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I recently finished my Master's Degree in computer science. Shortly after I started my program completely dropped the comprehensive examinations to get into the PhD program.

    The reason?

    Comps require months of heavy studying of material from prior classes to do well, and it was severely biased against US students. Most students from other countries are here on Student Visas which forbid them from working (except as TAs/RAs). US Citizens, on the other hand, usually have jobs and sometimes families and cannot devote the same level of time to such a vigorous set of exams.

    I hope to see more colleges considering what they can do to make sure their programs aren't biased against US citizens.

    1. Re:Comps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean professors should like those who don't study hard? I feel that's a little bit weired.

    2. Re:Comps? by ComradeSnarky · · Score: 1

      You have a choice whether or not to have jobs/devote time to your family. They don't. You may claim that you are forced to take a job because of your financial circumstances, and hence you don't have a choice, but what about them? Those who are cash strapped can't even go to university because they can't pick up jobs to pay their way through. You seem to be suffering from a case of selection bias, foreign students appear to be favoured because those who *aren't* don't go to college and aren't covered by your survey.

  31. Here are a couple of reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First universities can get a lot more money through foreign students since they often pay the full tuition so the universities actively recruit them. Secondly, the students who come here are the people with the drive to succeed since they had to take the risk to make it happen. Lastly coming on a student visa is probably the simplest way to transition to permanent residency if they desire to stay here.

  32. Engineering only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some reason, Indians are crazy about engineering. Everyone competes to get into the best schools, where they all work very hard. The engineering schools (the IITs and others) are really top-notch. Finally, from what I've heard the engineering degree is so common in India that you need a graduate degree to get a good job. So it's not surprising that there are lots of Indian students in your engineering department. The same factors are at work, albeit to a lesser extent, with the Chinese students.

    On the other hand, I have seen very few Indian students in math, which is my field. There are a fair number of Chinese students though. Of course, I go to a public school, and we don't have as much money for international students, which may skew things somewhat.

  33. med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have heard that many of the smarter Americans go into medicine or the law

    Medicine is not the place to go - there is an insane glut of grad students and postdocs. Competition is extremely fierce. If you're thinking of going for any sort of specialty practice- forget it. Everyone wants to be a *insert narrow specialty* doctor; nobody wants to be a general practitioner or go into pediatrics where we really need doctors. So, we have 50 zillion hand surgeons, and a line a mile out the doors of all the family docs.

    As for medical research - our lab is chock full of foreign students. The lab director prefers them because they're basically slaves- they want desperately to be in the US, and the lab holds their visa. They'll put up with shit pay, no/little credit for their work, insane hours, and unreasonable demands. They're just happy to be on US soil.

    Someone told me once that the lab couldn't attract US candidates because said candidates were going for higher profile, better paying positions.

    If you want to be successful coming out of grad school- go for engineering, either mechanical or electrical. Big shortages predicted in both fields, from what I've heard.

    Whatever you do, skip research - unless you look forward to flushing several years of your life down the drain to help some professor reel in a research grant, who'll barely care to list your name on the paper. And that's *if* the research isn't scooped by another lab...

  34. A way to stay in the USA by iknownuttin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In grad school, many of my foreign classmates were in grad school because that was the easiest way to stay here in the country - according to them.

    Also, as an American who has a graduate degree, all I can say is, unless you're going to teach at the college level, do research, or need a graduate degree for some professional certification (Law, Medicine, Psychotherapy, etc...), a graduate degree is completely worthless and a waste of time. Want to learn more in a field that you are truly passionate about? Learn on your own. Grad school will just stifle your interest and creativity (playing to professors BS games, is one way they do it) and they'll make you do a lot of BS busy work becuase some bureaucrat with a Ph.D. somewhere thinks that's what you "must" do.

    Just my bitter opinion.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:A way to stay in the USA by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      a graduate degree is completely worthless and a waste of time.
      Wow...so wrong in so many ways. I got a $13,000/year raise doing the exact same job as soon as I finished my Masters. Not only that, I know qualify for a myriad of higher paying jobs.
  35. why waste 7 years of your life by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    .. only to get outsourced by cheaper foreign labor and be unemployed? MBA's are teh big thing to get and law degrees. These jobs are staying in the us because they are valued more.

    Simple economics.

    1. Re:why waste 7 years of your life by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      MBA's are teh big thing to get and law degrees. These jobs are staying in the us because they are valued more.

      Simple economics.

      If those MBA's actually produce something of value, then they'll be valued in the future. If not, at some point those hard-working techie people in other countries will realize there's no reason American MBA's should make so much money off their work. They'll find management locally or in other countries that won't skim so much off the top, and American MBAs will be looking for new jobs.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    2. Re:why waste 7 years of your life by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Apparently in corporate america they are valued more and are likely never to be outsourced. People do not mind outsourcing their IT operations and even design to foreign firms. But if you are watching someones money they want to know who you are so they are willing to pay more money for someone here. After all returns returns returns are important and the CFO and CEO doesn't want to talk to some guy named Shamil in banglore to do it.

      Accounting jobs are barely going offshore for this reason. Also like the article said foreign students are more interested in engineering since demand for foreign MBA's is there but lower.

      In the .com era the producers meaning the developers called the shots and changed business. Now the pendulum has swung back and its all about the suites running the business and your a peon if your not a suit. Maybe it maybe it may swing back in the future.

  36. The payoff probably isn't worth it by zullnero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know a lot of guys with grad degrees in the tech field who are making as much as guys with BA's (or less in some cases). It looks impressive on a resume, but there isn't an automatic payoff like with the medical or legal professions. Unless someone wants to develop their own product or do research for a major corporation, there's little reason to spend 3-4 more years and come out. Guys with BA's have been out for a few years and already have industry experience under their belts, and that's worth a whole lot more in the consulting business than a thesis paper on "the practical applications of sight tracking optics in regards to voice activated GUI systems", unless that's the main product of the company you're trying to get in with.

    But I know a few companies offhand that will hire a PhD on the spot...but those companies don't really make anything nor do they pay very much. They are patent houses.

  37. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see where he had a problem with it, either. The difference between you and him isn't that you don't have a problem with it--it's that you aren't curious about why it is. As an academic, it's rather odd for you to assume that curiosity implies anything more sinister.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  38. It's economics by SashaMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Philip Greenspun has a very good article on why becoming a scientist doesn't make sense for most people:

    http://philip.greenspun.com/careers/women-in-science

    The article is titled "Women in Science," but it basically argues that the preparation costs for becoming a scientist (college, grad school, post doc) are so high, and the economic rewards so low and uncertain, that intelligent people are more likely to be drawn to other fields like medicine.

    1. Re:It's economics by superskippy · · Score: 1

      This is so, so true. The reason there aren't more women in science is because they've got more sense. This is even more true in the UK

    2. Re:It's economics by SomeRandomWag · · Score: 1

      You are making a false assumption: that "intelligent people" are only attracted to money or the guarantee of economic stability. That may be true for some, but not all (or I would suggest most) of the top "intelligence" percentile. Interest in your work matters.

    3. Re:It's economics by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      Very good point. I'm nearing completion of an EE PhD. The key thing for me is that I do something that moves humanity forward, so I'd like to continue doing research after I finish, to increase human knowledge. Could I make a lot of money doing something else, like corporate law or real estate? Sure, but if I was forced to make a living doing either of these things I'd probably shoot myself in the face.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  39. Re: Why Is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students? by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hard to get a job in programming these days unless you are Indian, from India, or planning to move there. :P

    YMMV

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  40. Why is that? by djupedal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "All the students come here to study and there are only 7 US citizens in the engineering program this year. Why is that?"

    Less than 20% of the MBA's in India are employable. They skate thru school, sharing test answers and learning little. The system there makes no effort except to get them out the door. The educational system only wants to say how many have been produced, happy to ignore that the certificates are worthless.

    The individuals that recognize the travesty and know that the system in the USA is legitimate by comparison, spread the word. The ones that can come over do it for the legitimacy and the true value of an educational system rooted in honesty, hard work and individual betterment.

    The scale of the Indian & Chinese populations means that what is a small number over there seems large in comparison here.

    1. Re:Why is that? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I think he's talking about a serious postgraduate degree and not an MBA. The "skate through" description applies to an MBA in nearly every country in the english speaking part of the world.

    2. Re:Why is that? by djupedal · · Score: 1

      "Why Is US Grad School..."

      I don't see the word 'post', sorry :)

      "The "skate through" description applies to an MBA in nearly every country in the english speaking part of the world."

      I don't think so - not to the degree that I am describing.

      Unless you are directly familiar with the situation in India, as an example, you are simply not aware of the specifics there... I'm talking idiots that couldn't survive a week in a US HS - my experience is direct and not anecdotal, by the way, after interviewing nearly 3,000 in 2006, just to glean 50 (Indian Engineers) to bring to China. And even the 50 'fininalists' were a stretch...

    3. Re:Why is that? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      I've never been to India, but in Australia an MBA is almost a joke course. Two of my siblings did them after doing other degrees and found they only had to put in small amounts of effort to lead the class.

      As for the 'post' bit - in other parts of the english speaking world a degree after the initial undergraduate degree is called a "postgraduate" degree - what you call "graduate school" I assume. A little difference in the language just like it seems nearly everybody in US universities is called "Professor" and not the guys that take turns to run the entire department.

    4. Re:Why is that? by schiefaw · · Score: 1

      I am currently in grad school for Software Engineering and it has become painfully apparent that the undergraduate programs in India focus on how many degrees they can issue and not the quality of the graduates. The grad students from India seem to expect to school to accommodate then in a hundred way to ensure that they get a good grade. I have been shocked and embarrassed by having classmates ask to delay an assignment due date because they will be too busy studying for a test to complete the assignment. I am pretty sure I would have lost a letter grade just for asking such a thing as an undergraduate. I also had the displeasure of evaluating a paper from a group students from India. I would never have expected a graduate level paper to be a book report reviewing what we just covered in class. Pathetic!

      --
      Angleyne: You can't bend that girder - it's unbendable! Bender: Well I don't know anything about lifting, so that ju
    5. Re:Why is that? by Viv · · Score: 1

      Heh, it certainly doesn't seem to be the case here in the USA.

      I'm in an MBA program at the University of Oklahoma, and while I wouldn't say that the coursework is difficult (although it's harder for most people than it is for me -- I'm pretty good at reading, writing and math where most people are good at one or two of those at most), there sheer volume of work getting thrown at us makes it impossible to "skate through."

  41. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    Another example of "Race to the Bottom".

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  42. Re:my take by delong · · Score: 1

    For one thing, Americans generally don't want to work that hard. They just want the money, like you say the doctors or lawyers

    MWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah, that's it. People that don't want to work that hard go into the two hardest grad programs for the two professions that put in the longest hours. I'm sure you hit it right on the head there, friend.

  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. It is worth more to them in practical terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a cultural and job-market difference. In America the most direct path to the top of your profession is to get an undergraduate degree, land an entry-level job at a good company and start climbing the ladder. Unless your industry is academia or medicine, grad school is unlikely to be an efficient part of your career path. There's a good reason for that too: only in academia and medicine are people hired specifically for the content of their academic experience. You don't learn brain surgery on the job, you learn it in school. Same with literary criticism. But the vast majority of high-level, knowledge-specific technical and professional jobs cannot be learned in school. Another part of this is that grad school is usually much more specific than a technologist's career will be. Again, that's not true for academia and medicine. You study exactly the specialty you plan to work in. Technology and most other fields are not so strictly divvied up. In business, programming, engineering, etc. you are going to have a widely varied career. No graduate degree is really going to mean a lot in terms of knowledge or job effectiveness.

    For Indian and Chinese students it is different. A US company isn't going to give a rip about your PhD in software engineering when they want to hire a good programmer; they're going to care about your job experience, references and code samples. But an Indian or Chinese firm *is* going to care about the education. The pedigree is respected there, probably to a fault. There is more of a rote ladder system, and education is accepted currency. So your doctorate programs in computer science are going to be filled by foreigners... the Americans are on the job and have little use for specialized, academic knowledge in a highly dynamic, practical profession.

  45. Short vs Long-term expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that many Americans don't see much benefit in going to graduate school and it's more of a cultural phenomenon than anything else. The long-term benefits don't quite outweigh the short term ones in today's market. One can make up the salary difference in a relatively small period of time. Plus, by the time you're finished with with a graduate degree, you're either too old or the industry has erased your knowledge gains.

    Above all, there has been a push towards a management paradigm. Delegation rules the day. Many Americans are unwilling to become cogs in the machine and want to find themselves in a position to manage the machine - even engineers. This is achieved much easily by securing a good job and moving up the ranks than leaving school in late 20's and starting anew. China and India are similar to what America used to be in 40's to 70's - deep specialization. Their students want to assume a single role and do it well. The attention span of American students is somewhat shortened in this regard.

    That's my understanding of the problem, if you could call it such.

  46. Immigrant nation by ahbi · · Score: 1

    The US is a nation of immigrants. Even those of us (or more accurately our families) who have been here since it was New Amsterdam have that sense of being immigrants.
    Which, on tangential note, is why the closing of the frontier hurt the character of this country.

    Now what the US does (and used to do better, but we are still good at it) is brain drain the rest of the world. Immigration is a filtering process. It is hard. You have to have a high level of ambition, "get-up and go" to even make it from your continent to ours (even make it to Canada, which is easier).

    The typical 3 generation scheme for immigration is (and you can see this clearly in the Mexican/Latino/Chicano/Hispanic immigrants) 1st generation, works shitting menial jobs, and works them hard & speaks little English; 2nd generation makes soundly into the middle class, proud to go college, speaks both English & their ancestral tongue; 3rd generation fully assimilated, expects to go to college as a right, is kind of comfortable and lazy, wonders why Grandma speaks that funny language.

    In the 19th century Europe used to go out and bring resources from the rest of the world back to Europe (the Belgian Congo being the most brutal, IIRC). Now, the US leaves the physical resources (or pays a pretty good amount for them, relatively) but takes the best people.

    So, what gets into the US is some of the best and brightest the foreign country has to offer. They of course can out compete the US students. Especially, when Grad School is their ticket into the country and jobs.

    Now, what used to happen was that these people stayed in the US. Now with easy air travel and globalization, they are returning to their countries of origin.

    1. Re:Immigrant nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is a nation of immigrants. Even those of us (or more accurately our families) who have been here since it was New Amsterdam have that sense of being immigrants.

      You are so full of shit. If you did not go through the process you are not a fucking immigrant. You have no sense of what its like to be an immigrant, that sense of being an immigrant is just a figmant of your imagination, its just a fantasy.

      By your standards even the British Royal family are immigrants because their ancestors landed on the island in 1066.

  47. because... by tavita · · Score: 1

    US graduate school is not mainly US students because all the bases is belong to us.

  48. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by sayfawa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah but, to be fair, this is slashdot. Everything has an element of complaining. If I were just curious about grad school stats I'd ask in a grad forum. I'd only ask here if I wanted a bunch of cynical worst-case-scenario answers, some complaints about the American school system, and a side dish of thinly veiled racism/xenophobia.

    --
    Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
  49. TV for one. by xigxag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's very rare to see a fictional TV show revolving around an engineer, mathematician, physicist or hard science major of any kind. The only counterexample I can think of offhand is Ross from Friends, but to the extent that his job was mentioned at all it was usually in some ridiculous context. Contrast that with the hundreds of shows there have been about doctors, lawyers, judges, financiers and reporters. Hence, those professions are considered sexy and lucrative, even when they aren't particularly so (public defenders and beat reporters), whereas scientists are considered obscure and arcane at best, geeky and borderline irresponsible at worst. The one looming exception is the astronaut/astrophysicist type on sci-fi shows, but what they tend to do, blast through galaxies and meet aliens, is something so unrealistic that it doesn't lend itself to employment aspirations.

    Of course, it's not just Americans who watch TV but the problem particular to Americans is that their real-life experience seems to parallel what they see on TV, they deal with plenty of brokers, doctors and lawyers in real life and have little contact with engineers and scientists. Americans also pay their doctors and lawyers extremely highly. In other countries doctors and lawyers are not quite so highly compensated and engineers have higher social status overall.

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    1. Re:TV for one. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Numb3rs.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:TV for one. by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Haha, I've never seen Numb3rs. Well, I didn't say it never happened, just that it's rare. Thanks for the pointer though, now I'm curious about the show.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    3. Re:TV for one. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0

      Season four premiered last night. It's actually a decent show.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:TV for one. by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      The various incarnations of CSI feature and glorify various sciences, although not necessarily to the extent that numb3rs does for math.

      Also, while to a lesser extent, some of the spy shows such as Alias and 24, use technology heavily and frequently talk about various computer network and programming related things in the show and attempt to make them "cool". Of course, while the characters involved in that stuff are in nearly every show, they are still minor characters. They also tend to stick to the "computer and science people are geeks lacking in social skills" stereotype, which probably hurts as much as having the "cool" programming/networking/hacking helps.

      These also are still not doing the same level of promotion (I guess is the best word) for various technical and science related fields as something like ER or Boston Legal (just a guess as I've never actually watched this or any other lawyer oriented show) might be doing for medical and law industries.

    5. Re:TV for one. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      In contrast to the CSI series which take liberties with the science and technology they portray, Numb3rs makes an impressive effort to get the math and science right. I understand that there are several mathematicians who work as consultants for the show. Much of what they show is way over my head, but it's like reading works by Arthur C. Clarke and other hard-science-fiction authors: it's nice to know that the math presented is real.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:TV for one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sliders had like all those characters

      same with ghost busters

    7. Re:TV for one. by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'll have to look into it again. I watched the first season.... maybe second season, too, I don't remember. Much of the math use seemed pretty weak to me, although I did enjoy the show. Not weak as in inaccurate but that the ways it was used were very contrived and from what I remember frequently made assumptions that I didn't see as a given to make the math work in solving the crime.

      I'll definitely have another look at it, though. Like I said, I did enjoy it, and that the math is accurate is rather interesting. Whenever it went into math that was above my head, I figured that just like with all the other science/computer/technical stuff, they started just tossing some numbers and buzzwords out and figure most people won't know the difference and those who do are expecting made up crap anyway and so won't care. Knowing that they aren't doing that makes it more interesting to me.

    8. Re:TV for one. by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      John Cleese: Shut up!

    9. Re:TV for one. by VanessaE · · Score: 1

      ...and Mythbusters (for science content as well as just plain cool stuff).

    10. Re:TV for one. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      So we can draw an inference here: Americans value a profession in direct correlation to the amount of "people work" (interaction with other people) involved in the profession, and in inverse correlation to the amount of "inhuman work" involved.

    11. Re:TV for one. by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      So we can draw an inference here: Americans value a profession in direct correlation to the amount of "people work" (interaction with other people) involved in the profession, and in inverse correlation to the amount of "inhuman work" involved.

      In TV shows and movies, that's often true, it makes for more entertaining storylines. To be fair, living in China and being a huge Bollywood fan, I can tell you that Chinese and Indian entertainments also don't concentrate on people using math.

      I'd say math and science is actually much more prevalent in US culture - science-fiction is a popular genre. In the meantime sci-fi novels and movies barely exist in China, and in India (with a huge film industry), the first science fiction movie didn't come out until 2003, and was mostly a re-creation of ET with lots of dancing.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    12. Re:TV for one. by rantdepot · · Score: 1

      Prison Break showcases the main character as a Structural Engineer =P

    13. Re:TV for one. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I wasn't talking about entertainment. Entertainment will always be about what the majority of people find interesting to do (read: sex, music, supernatural phenomena, war, or some combination of the above), but people value professions according to:

      1) How well they pay.
      2) How they contribute to society.

      In American society, the perception of both of those factors appears correlated with the amount of "people work" one does, which explains the horrendous overvaluing of management (because they do nothing but people work).

    14. Re:TV for one. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I don't count any film whose major characters refer to "Tobin's Spirit Guide", and a "focused, non-terminal repeating phantasm, or a Class Five full roaming vapor" as particularly scientific. There was a thin, shiny patina of technical jargon overlaid upon a movie that was anything but science fiction. Don't misunderstand me: I loved Ghostbusters ("Yes. It's true. This man has no dick") but I wouldn't hold it up as an example of the proper portrayal of modern science in cinema.

      Sliders is a much better choice. Sure, Quinn's great discovery, as he put it "crossing the Einstein-Rosen Bridge" is something of a gimme, but the series saw a lot of problems being solved a rather scientific manner, at least for a TV show. Of course, with the Professor along it could hardly be otherwise, could it?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    15. Re:TV for one. by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      Chan, dean of physical sciences at UCLA and a member of the SIAM [Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics] Board of Trustees, was the math consultant for the NUMB3RS pilot.

      (from http://www.siam.org/news/news.php?id=926)

      In the same article they discuss how they work to get Numb3rs integrated into high school curricula:

      About three weeks before an episode airs, CBS sends a synopsis of the mathematical topics involved to three NCTM teams (writers and reviewers, from both the high school and the university level). How large a part a topic will play is a matter of guesswork, says Karen Longhart, who coordinates the preparation of materials for NCTM; the actual plot is a closely guarded secret. The teams parcel out the themes and then go to work preparing materials for use by igh school teachers (see www.cbs.com/primetime/numb3rs/ti/activities.shtml). An estimated 20,000 teachers have worked the materials into lesson plans, says NCTM president Cathy Seeley, who expresses delight that this "wonderful opportunity" arose during her term.

      I'll agree that the math seems overly simplified but it's done to a reasonable level for high school or early undergrad motivation for the topics. Certainly anyone with a good background in math can come up with better approaches than they use but judging from the half hour conference presentations I've seen they'd be hard pressed to present the solution plus the plot in an hour. It's also nice to see mapping work done that's more analytical than Google Maps and most commercial GIS.

    16. Re:TV for one. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      It's very rare to see a fictional TV show revolving around an engineer, mathematician, physicist or hard science major of any kind.

      What about Abbey from NCIS? Bad example I know...

  50. True The smarter ones are not in school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The smarter ones are not in school.
    They learn on their own, on the job and in the real world.

    1. Re:True The smarter ones are not in school. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Because drop-outs never accomplish anything. Oh wait.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:True The smarter ones are not in school. by perkr · · Score: 1

      And except for these individuals most who succeed went to college... so what's your point?

    3. Re:True The smarter ones are not in school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which one are you? Bill?

  51. It's simple... by HexaByte · · Score: 1
    Those are the jobs that will be outsourced to China and India next! You really can't outsource doctors and lawyers.

    --
    HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
    1. Re:It's simple... by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you've never been under an HMO. Nurse Practitioners and physician assistants are primarily used now by GPs. My last GP told me as his hospital owned office was forced to close that there was 'no money in being a general practitioner' and out of every 100 graduates, 98% were not doing GP.

      They all want to specialize in surgery, or other things that make big bucks.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    2. Re:It's simple... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I don't see why you can't outsource lawyers. Just outsource the rest of the legal system as well. If all U.S. courts are in India, there's no problem with all the lawyers being in India as well.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:It's simple... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      You really can't outsource doctors and lawyers.

            Wanna bet? I have news for you. A lot of medical jobs are ALREADY being outsourced. I can zap your CT scan to India this evening and have the radiology report back in a few hours - definitely by tomorrow morning, for cheaper than waking up the local radiology attending.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:It's simple... by Grym · · Score: 1

      Wanna bet? I have news for you. A lot of medical jobs are ALREADY being outsourced. I can zap your CT scan to India this evening and have the radiology report back in a few hours - definitely by tomorrow morning, for cheaper than waking up the local radiology attending.

      Okay... but who's going to perform the surgical procedure if something bad shows up?

      I'm not an economist and slashdot is a bad place to find education, but here's the simplified gist of it: You can't outsource services. Now, that being said, some things that were traditionally considered services (like accounting, for instance) can be managed and digitized such a way that they are, for all intents and purposes, a product and subsequently outsourced. BUT, don't mistake this trend to include the general practice of medicine. Even in the example you bring up, the X-ray is, in all likelihood, read again by the radiology attending once he comes in the next morning.

      There will always be local markets for doctors, because it would be impossible to remove the the doctor from the equation without losing something. How could you do a physical exam without being physically present? How could you establish beside report if you're not even on the same continent? It just wouldn't work, and no technological innovation in the foreseeable future will make it so (no matter how so people would like to try).

      -Grym

    5. Re:It's simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A surgeon in India or China will perform the surgery using robots controlled through either the Internet or a dedicated link.

    6. Re:It's simple... by TerryOutOfWork · · Score: 0

      I agree - I was told by a doctor once that an MD used to be a big ticket - now it's just the first step to further training...

    7. Re:It's simple... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      How could you do a physical exam without being physically present?

            With today's technology it's not possible. But maybe one day it WILL be possible to do even THAT. The drive towards "cheaper" is indirectly pushing us to develop something that lets us do just that. That's why no one knows what the future holds. Who would have guessed 20 years ago that we could send video anywhere in the world for basically no charge?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  52. The professors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from any other reason, one thing that I learned while working at a university is that professors tend to have graduate students who are from the same racial and cultural background as themselves. This doesn't necessarily mean that they're racists; it could just be a simple matter of seeing themselves in these students and thus caring more for their academic progress.

    For whatever reason, Turkish professors had Turkish grad students; the same went for Chinese, Japanese, and others. Beyond that, these professors seemed to organize themselves along cultural lines, and only approve new professor candidates who shared their background. Thus propagating this way of doing things into the future.

    1. Re:The professors by antirename · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this as well, and to be honest, I really don't have a problem with it. Isn't this human nature? For the record, I'm a white american male.

  53. smart is lame. by White+Shade · · Score: 1

    The way I see it, it might be answered by the fact (based loosely on your assertions about public school sucking) that to most young people over the last 10 years or so, being smart is not "cool".

    It's way cooler to sit around playing video games, or to be the jock, or to slack off in school and sit with your buddies and disrupt the class, and to generally not succeed in education. The people who care enough to learn and aren't weak minded enough to give in to "cool" and hence actually try and succeed and advance their learning, get bullied and made fun of and harrassed for being nerds or geeks or weird.

    The end result is that you get a ton of people who, when you talk to them, clearly had some brains up there, but they've been so dumbed down by their 'friends' that they have no chance of succeeding.

    So... going through life thinking that being smart sucks, you're gonna end up probably not going to grad school.

    --
    ìì!
    1. Re:smart is lame. by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      And wait until you see what it's like if you do! :)

      Seriously, doing a Ph. D. is depressing. My experience is that it's essentially a source of cheap labor for your professors, usually involving tasks that are rather devoid of original thought, such as running the experiments and writing the papers. It's training in every aspect of science except actual science. The workload is heavy, the days are long, and you frequently don't get credit for your work. In a challenging school, the work would probably be difficult too; if you're not so fortunate, it will simply be mind-numbing. And forget it if you want to study something that isn't "hot" or well-funded! At best you'll be rejected in admissions since no one can match a faculty member to you, but if your credentials are too good for that, you'll be dragged into a well-funded field that doesn't interest you... but only after you've gone too far to turn back. It's not an enviable position under any circumstance, and only the hope of an end to it keeps most students going.

      Being smart can indeed suck.

    2. Re:smart is lame. by Chase+Husky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You couldn't be farther from the truth.

      I've got around another year of coursework, and possibly another year after that to finish out a dissertation. When I started my PhD programme, the work I did for the first month was somewhat bland and didn't challenge me. After that initial period, I had the chance to work on some interesting research in medical engineering, authored a few conference papers with my adviser, finished up a journal publication and took a few courses in my discipline. Once I started to touch on the interesting subjects, like pattern recognition, neural networks, machine vision, computational microbiology, etc., I started to really enjoy being a student and yearned for more knowledge. Of course, I also wanted to have a firm background in my area of focus, so I could venture forth into industry once I finally graduate.

      Yes, the days were long, and there were plenty of times I thought that I wouldn't have everything done, that I'd do poorly on my exams, etc., but everything just boils down to your perseverance and your adviser's willingness to work with you. Since I'm an RA, I'm expected to work a certain number of hours per week, but often my adviser allows me to work on my publications instead. Whenever I need to bounce some ideas off of him, or just get his approval, I sit down with the guy for at least half an hour. Considering we meet two or three times per week, and the fact that he's heavily knowledgeable and respected in his field, I walk out of his office with a very good insight into a particular problem. Of course, had my adviser not been so willing to work with me, provided me with some fun and engaging research projects, let alone take a chance and fund me, I honestly wouldn't have stayed past a Masters degree.

  54. Same thing happens in Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I took some courses this past year at Uppsala University (35k students, been around since 1477), Parallel Computing, High Performance Computing and Analysis of numerical methods. More than 50% of the students on those courses was Chinese. Well now of course, foreigners study for free at Swedish universities, exactly like Sweidsh students, so I understand why people would go here. But still the amount of Chinese people are really surprising. And they all speak bad english and amongst themselves only Chinese. (Btw most upper level courses in Sweden are given in English, so it is mostly in those courses you find the Chinese people, they don't know Swedish). (I guess the university could attract even more chinese students (and thus get more money from the swedish government) if they just gave the courses in chinese to begin with. ;) )

    Anyhow, when they return to China, because most of them do that, they bring a lot of skills back into their country. It is fascinating what China will be capable of in 50 years or so, with all that engineering talent they are cultivating. It is not only the amount of educated people they are producing now, but also what the current generation will be able to teach the next, etc.

    But I think it is also a good thing, more educated people in the world means better lives for everyone, especially in China. Pretty soon people will also probably demand more democracy and so on..

  55. Same problem in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    At my university, the vast majority of the grad students are Chinese as well. I suspect a survey would reveal that the story in the same for nearly every university in North America (at least). It is stupid and short-sighted on our part, but most of our policies towards (especially) China are stupid and short-sighted. To dare and state the obvious, China is simply not to be trusted. I know -- where the USA is concerned: kettle, pot, black ... but quite frankly I'll still take my chances with American world domination over Chinese any day thank you very much. And yet we also can't seem to give them our money and jobs fast enough.

    Some of the problem, is that North American youth -- like our parents -- have become spoiled and lazy (in addition to politically stupid). The universities are taking students from where they can to keep enrollment up and the money flowing.

  56. Smart graduates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I have heard that many of the smarter Americans go into medicine or the law and that is why there are so few Americans in engineering. Is this true?"

    Yes, and dumb ones go to engineering. :-)

  57. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by WrongMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm going to second this with a caveat: don't go into research if the only you're interested in is money. If you really love research for its own sake, then there are still plenty of opportunities. Get a good PhD adviser and do a bit of work to prove yourself, then you can pretty much work on whatever projects interest you. If you can work on things you find rewarding, travel to conferences and have the respect of your peers, what more do you want in life?

    Spending your time chasing the next Big Thing that going to make Lots Of Money is the fast track for a mid-life crisis.

  58. Oh yes you can. by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
    You really can't outsource doctors and lawyers.

    Doctors: Thanks to the Internet, x-rays, MRIs, etc... can be sent overseas for a doc there to look at them and make a diagnosis and then email or call it in. And of course, there's medical tourism - which sounds really good!

    Lawyers: Guess what? India is also based on English common law, so many of our legal stuff can go over there too, which it is - especially contract law. And in India, lawyers don't have the prestige that they have here, meaning, they're not paid as much in relation to the rest of the population.

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:Oh yes you can. by HexaByte · · Score: 1
      "Lawyers: Guess what? India is also based on English common law, so many of our legal stuff can go over there too, which it is - especially contract law."

      1) You must be a member of the Bar to practice law.

      2) To be a member of the Bar, you have to pass the exam in the jurisdiction you want to practice in.

      3) English Common Law is the basis of our courts/law system, but most of our law is really based on interpretations of the Constitution and laws by previous court decisions, "precedent".

      4) Lawyers are sure to make sure it's illegal to outsource them!

      --
      HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
    2. Re:Oh yes you can. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      And in India, lawyers don't have the prestige that they have here
      Ah yes, low esteem for Indian lawyers. Ghandi was a lawyer, Motilala Nehru was a lawyer, Jawaharlal Nehru was a lawyer, Pratibha Patil was a lawyer, why even Konakuppakatil Gopinathan Balakrishnan was a lawyer.

      Looks like you can't get anywhere in India without being a lawyer.
      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  59. The answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 90% Indian because you're obviously at the University of Bombay.

  60. Co-ops and internships by TheOctapickle · · Score: 1

    In my experience, most foreign born undergrads studying engineering in the US are unable or unwilling to take advantage of co-op or summer internship programs. Classes at my university can consist of up to 50% foreign born students, but those who co-op are almost exclusively US natives. Without work experience, you're much less employable. Not employable? Go to grad school.

    1. Re:Co-ops and internships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US citizenship or permanent residency was a requirement in most of the co-ops that were offered in or around the university I attended, not sure if this is the norm... A friend of mine got an internship at NASA for some UAV-related stuff, for various reasons I ended up doing most of her work remotely -- not only I couldn't get the internship because I wasn't from the US, it was also a big mess to get my work recognized at all after it was done. They told me it was easier all around to have her and her advisor sign it, so there's a UAV somewhere that displays my email address every time you turn it on but was officially put together by someone else.

  61. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by frisket · · Score: 1

    Competition is extremely fierce.

    Good. If someone is going to cut a hole in me to fix bits that have gone wrong, I want them to be seriously good at it.

    Equally if someone is going to build a bridge or drill a tunnel or design a chip or write a program or defend me in court, I want them to know what they are doing. I don't give a gnat's fart what nationality they are, but I do want to know that they have been properly taught and trained. That particularly applies to whoever ends up teaching my kids.

    This means that some of the people who get into college, whether for a BS/BA, MS/MA, or a PhD, are going to fail -- either in the degree, or in making their career. They won't make the grades or they won't get the job, and they will have to drop out of the field and do something else. It's unpleasant for the individual (and it's happened to me), but it's called the survival of the fittest, and it's the way life works. OK, so a few slimeballs make it to the top by greasing the right palm or kissing the right ass, but statistically we have to live with that long tail.

    So what's with this idea that you have to try and re-engineer the human race between the ages of five and 18 by not allowing failure? Why have the educational psychologists who dreamed up this Utopia, the dickheads of politicians who funded it, and the lameass school boards who implemented it, not been re-settled off-planet? Because parents don't like to be told their kid is thick, basically. Nor does the kid, especially if it's repeated. In the past, this was handled by funnelling the kids into different ability streams, which is now considered sacrilege by the same classes of bottom-feeders as in the preceding argument.

    Competition is good: it keeps us alive and kicking, and ultimately the weakest go to the wall. In a normal modern society there are safety-nets to prevent them getting hurt (except in the US of A, where a deeply unpleasant spirit of "let 'em rot" persists). So when foreign students sign up for graduate school, let them compete and let US students compete against them. Time will tell which ones rise to the surface and which ones sink.

  62. Teachers don't teach by Ticklemonster · · Score: 0

    Our problem here in the US is that (a lot of) our teachers don't teach. And what they do teach doesn't prepare the students to be competitive in today's world.

    --
    Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
    1. Re:Teachers don't teach by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Our problem here in the US is that (a lot of) our teachers don't teach.

      Ah yes, that explains why so many foreign students are coming here to study....
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    2. Re:Teachers don't teach by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Is it still fashionable to bash Americans? Because the last time I checked when Americans bashed anyone else we were called xenophobes, racists, and ignorant.

      Also, fun fact: The "wast" majority of Americans aren't anything like you describe.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:Teachers don't teach by Pooua · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you are saying that evolutionary theory is a fundamental part computer science? If not, then what difference does it make if someone is a Creationist?

      FYI, many Creationists have graduate degrees. I personally know several scientists who are Creationists.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    4. Re:Teachers don't teach by richieb · · Score: 1
      Oh, so you are saying that evolutionary theory is a fundamental part computer science? If not, then what difference does it make if someone is a Creationist?

      Well, not exactly. But if evolution is wrong then computers would not be possible (all that chemistry and physics that supports evolution would be wrong).

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    5. Re:Teachers don't teach by be-fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Teachers, not professors ;)

      The US K-12 system blows. The US university system is pretty much the best in the world. This leads to lots of foreign students taking advantage of the quality of American higher education. Entertainingly enough, it also leads to lots of professors having to undo the brain-damage the K-12 system inflicted on students.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:Teachers don't teach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the problem is that the wast majority of Americans are dumb religious morons who think creationism is a great way to explain how the universe and eventually humans came to be. And then goes on to claim that almost everything can be explained by reading a 2000+ year old goat herder and camel driver scifi book.
      Maybe not, maybe they just think that even the writings of 2000+ year old sheep herders sound more plausible than the "whoops, what do you know" theory. I think you'd have to be pretty dumb to just accept that it was all just an accident, an uber highly unlikely course of events that just happened to go our way, so that we could marvel at our incredible luck. Dumb religious Luck God worshipper.
    7. Re:Teachers don't teach by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1

      Gotta wonder how greypoopon got a score of 3 for being so far off base, yet you only got a one. What's up with the moderators around here?

      --
      Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
    8. Re:Teachers don't teach by kklein · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think that this is exactly why students come to US universities. Whether profs teach or not, there definitely is teaching involved (GTAs were some of my best teachers as an undergrad--what's wrong with that?--and at the graduate level, of course you're dealing with real profs). I will bash the US K-12 system day and night. It's a joke. But our university system is fantastic. We let just about anyone in, but make sure you work hard to get out. This is the opposite of most countries' systems. US university is a place where anyone can prove themselves. A US diploma means something around the world. I work with people who have at least master's degrees from all over. The US graduates had to do much, much more to get them, and it shows in their level of professionalism and knowledge.

      There are a lot of things to bash the US for. But our university system is top-notch. (Granted, I am a product of it, so you may want to factor out some bias.)

    9. Re:Teachers don't teach by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Funny

      the wast majority of Americans are dumb religious morons

      Thank you, Ensign Chekov.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    10. Re:Teachers don't teach by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      The problem with creationists is that they take the bible literally and expect the rest of us to weigh their myth equally against good science. Any scientist who is a creationist should be viewed with deepest suspicion.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:Teachers don't teach by sarathmenon · · Score: 1

      While you may be right in parts and places about why asian students flock to the american higher degrees, you are missing the vital point. There are 60K H1Bs available for the general quota, and around 20K for those who do their MS in america. The tech industry has very much warmed to the concept of foreign labour, and it is way easier for these people to break even on their investment in 3 - 4 years. Any extra amount of period they work is a bonus, and is especially so comparing the salaries in the US to what it is elsewhere.

      Quality of education might be one of minor points they consider; give them a facility like those one-week MS crap retaining the same benefits (the ones that you get regularly as spam), and you'll see them frantically trying to grab one. I am not saying that the quality is irrelevant, but its all a matter of money. Most of them are betting on a significant investment of their lives; they hell as sure want to recover the money that they sink in for their degrees.

      --
      Microsoft: "You've got questions. We've got dancing paperclips."
    12. Re:Teachers don't teach by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference in believing in God and believing that the world is only 8000 years old. God and evolution for the vast majority of the people on the planet are not mutually exclusive.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    13. Re:Teachers don't teach by SpaceballsTheUserNam · · Score: 0

      alternatively it could be said that our universitys are giant day-care centers where college kids can run around without asking mommy and daddy getting fucked up and studying as an afterthough

      --
      \.
    14. Re:Teachers don't teach by Pooua · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      (all that chemistry and physics that supports evolution would be wrong).

      What chemistry and physics would that be?

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    15. Re:Teachers don't teach by burntsigil · · Score: 0

      THANK YOU! I've been waiting and waiting for someone to say that. I identify myself as being Christian but I have very little trouble incorporating my religion and science.

    16. Re:Teachers don't teach by megaditto · · Score: 2, Funny

      Moderators? Why, they are the product of the American k-12 system.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    17. Re:Teachers don't teach by Pooua · · Score: 1

      (all that chemistry and physics that supports evolution would be wrong).

      Biological evolution is not based on chemistry and physics. At all. It is based on zoology, paleontology, comparative anatomy, comparative genetics and other aspects of biology, and, to some degree, on geology. But, chemistry and physics have nothing to do with evolutionary theory (unless you want to include abiogenesis, but evolutionists insist that abiogenesis is not evolution--it just isn't!).

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    18. Re:Teachers don't teach by Pooua · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll admit that dating methods are based on chemistry and physics, and dating methods are important to figuring out the age of rocks, from which we get the age of fossils, from which we derive our evolutionary lineages in paleontology (though the results sometimes disagree with the results from genetic analysis). In that sense, chemistry and physics are used in evolutionary theory. Even so, none of that has anything to do with computer science.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    19. Re:Teachers don't teach by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      unless you want to include abiogenesis, but evolutionists insist that abiogenesis is not evolution--it just isn't!

      Abiogenesis is an unsolved problem. But it wouldn't surprise me at all if some sort of evolutionary mechanism wasn't involved somehow. E.g. some primitive form of life which has a primitive mechanism for heredity instead of DNA and which would act as sort of bootstrap between chemistry and biology by synthesizing lots of organic chemicals.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    20. Re:Teachers don't teach by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Me either. Creationist 'Christians' that believe the world is only 8000 yars old actually constitute only a very small percentage (like maybe 1%) of Christians worldwide, although they are quite vocal and seem much larger. They typically reside in the southern US.

      In fact their beliefs are so far removed from mainstream Christianity that I don' really consider them Christians but just a misguided cult.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    21. Re:Teachers don't teach by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

      Scientists don't "just-accept" anything, which is what makes them different from the followers of the 2000 year-old sheep herders... but rational statements like this probably mean nothing to someone who implies that physicists are as dumb as creationists and call them "luck-worshiping". I'm sure you're just as smart and have studied and critiqued these theories just as much as your average professor, right?

      By the way, what is so strange about the whole luck theory anyway? You have to take into account the likelyhood that you would be observing life on any planet other than the one that happened to support it. The chances of that are zero, so if any of the potentially infinite expanse of the universe may be some luck of the draw produce life, that's the one you'll be on. Now the odds are not "what are the chances of life spontaneously forming on earth", but rather "what are the chances of life spontaneously forming somewhere in the universe. Of course, the theory gets more complicated and beyond anything I've learned from there and I have no idea how plausible this might be, but it's a lot more plausible than your "whoops, what do you know" characterization.

      Better yet, if you can rigorously show that you have a better idea, the scientific community will adopt that instead. However, that's a "whoops, what do you know" proposition that I wouldn't bet on.

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    22. Re:Teachers don't teach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They typically reside in the southern US.
      Ew, that's where all those backwater people reside, right? People you're superior too.

      I don' really consider them Christians but just a misguided cult.
      You don't sound like a Christian either. Does it really matter what people believe how long it took? I'm cool with it being literally 7 days, or 8000 years, or billions of years, doesn't matter. The point from the Christian perspective is not how long it took God to create everything, but that He did. Heck, I'm even cool with that happening through what people refer to as evolution.
    23. Re:Teachers don't teach by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Ew, that's where all those backwater people reside, right? People you're superior too.

      The geographic location I specified is accurate. The predudice you are implying is not mine, so must be your own.

      You don't sound like a Christian either.

      Why would you say that (you are wrong, btw)

      Does it really matter what people believe how long it took?

      No, of course not. People can believe whatever they like. But I stll maintain that their beliefs are so different from mainstream Christians that it should be considered a different religion.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    24. Re:Teachers don't teach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your denying fellow brothers in Christ to keep one foot planted in the world of unbelievers and their good graces indicates that you aren't much of a Christian, if any. You place the god of "some degree of acceptability on Slashdot" above your Creator. You're also dishonest, and the very natural way in which you maliciously react when called on it is chilling and telling.

    25. Re:Teachers don't teach by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Teachers, not professors ;)

      Yeah, I knew what you meant. It's just that even with the context, there was just enough ambiguity to make it mildly amusing, so I jumped on it. I'm glad you got a chance to clarify, and I totally agree with you. Although, I'm not completely sure that it's the system (as built) itself that is at fault so much as it is the way we are running it. I'm seeing people graduate from high school with no ability to write properly or spell properly, and no way to think critically. Yet I know the schools _teach_ these skills. They just don't force you to _learn_ them in order to graduate. It would have been completely impossible for me to graduate with the low level of knowledge that students require today in order to earn their diploma. When I was in school, people got held back when they did not demonstrate sufficient knowledge in what they were supposed to be learning. Does that not happen anymore? It doesn't seem like it. Perhaps the schools are too afraid of litigation.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    26. Re:Teachers don't teach by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I knew what you meant.

      And next time I'll pay more attention which person I'm replying to. ;)
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    27. Re:Teachers don't teach by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Gotta wonder how greypoopon got a score of 3 for being so far off base, yet you only got a one.
      What's fantastically amazing is that I was modded as "interesting" and "insightful". I was being deliberately obtuse when I responded to your statement for the sake of humor. There was just enough ambiguity in it (even when taken in context) to be mildly amusing. I actually agreed with what you wrote, but I had to think about it for a second to realize that you meant pre-University. I thought others would get a smile out of my quip. Apparently, some of the moderators needed a second cup of coffee.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    28. Re:Teachers don't teach by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1

      In light of this, I have decided to smile after all. :) (I wonder about these moderators some times. Do they screen who moderates? I don't think so, because even I have mod points...)

      --
      Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
    29. Re:Teachers don't teach by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Do they screen who moderates?

      In a manner of speaking, yes. At least, that's what the whole meta-moderation process is about. People get to go back after the fact and rate the performance of the moderators. Those who, in the public consensus, perform poorly will be given less opportunities to moderate. So, there is no immediate screening, but over time the buffoons get weeded out. ;)
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    30. Re:Teachers don't teach by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Your denying fellow brothers in Christ to keep one foot planted in the world of unbelievers and their good graces indicates that you aren't much of a Christian, if any. You place the god of "some degree of acceptability on Slashdot" above your Creator. You're also dishonest, and the very natural way in which you maliciously react when called on it is chilling and telling.

      What the hell are you talking about? That made no sense to me whatsoever.

      To paraphrase, take the log out of your own eye before you complain about the splinter in someone elses.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  63. The problem is intellectual "property" law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While patents and copyrights exist, lawyers, not engineers, ultimately determine the direction engineering is permitted to take, what can and cannot get built. They are the rulers, engineers the ruled. You have to really, really like engineering, or have some sort of societal-obliviousness blinkers on, to go into engineering. Patent monopolies inherently destroy any semblance of a free market in engineering services - and engineers provide engineering services. Engineering school is pretty soul-destroying for Westerners in the West - basically, it consists of "here's how to build cool, world-saving device X, oh, and you can't build it because of patents".

    Indians these days come over, learn what they can from the once-great west (before the lawyers killed it), and go back home.

  64. Cold war thoughts, get them young by AHuxley · · Score: 1
    The US government hopes to tap the next generation of possible leaders around the world.
    Huge drift net, but it works well.

    Gloria_Macapagal-Arroyo the 14th President of the Philippines did two years at Georgetown University's Walsh School of Foreign Service.
    Mikheil_Saakashvili 3rd President of Georgia went to Columbia Law School and The George Washington University Law School.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  65. Not in my experience by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Both masters degrees - one at Johns Hopkins the other at U Maryland, both technical fields (Math and Computer Science), most of my fellow students were American.

    There were lots of ethnic Chinese and Indians - ABC and the Indian equivalent - but well under half were not citizens as far as I could tell.

    Not that I was performing a census or really gave a rats ass.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  66. Intel and your grad/payscale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This info is a few years old, but probably hasn't changed.
    Intel Corp, works on a pay grade approch. Below is the incoming no-experience pay grades per degree. The degrees are BS (Eng or Sci) unless otherwise stated.

    Grade 03 - BS
    Grade 05 - MS (BTW, there is not Grade 4; don't ask why)
    Grade 06 - BS & MBA
    Grade 07 - Phd
    Grade 08 - JD, regardless of any other degree.

    So, at Intel, you can make Grade 5 from 3 within the time it takes you to get a MS. Plus you have earned a salary during that time.
    The Grade 6 is a toss up. The money is worth it, but if all they want is an engineer you'll have priced yourself out of the competition. It is really for finance and marketing.
    The Grade 7 is the big payoff. Definitely worth the effort.
    The Grade 8 shouldn't even be on the list as Intel doesn't hire lawyers right out of law school. But it is there.

    So there is your data point.

    1. Re:Intel and your grad/payscale by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      It isn't just money, though. I like doing research. It's something very few people would let me touch without a Ph. D.

      (The nice thing about mathematically-derived fields is that no one can deny me the resources necessary to do it, however, Ph. D. or no).

  67. Irony by SwedishChef · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We educate the people who will eventually cripple this country economically. The next thing you know we'll be giving weapons to people who will eventually attack us.

    Oh, wait....

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  68. Maybe its because by hawleyg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Most Americans can't afford that much education because they are caught up with materialism and are saddled with taxes (either directly or on the goods they buy or the companies that make them). So now American higher educational institutions are only able to maintain their "high standards" with the money that is more and more going to be available from outside of the country. At least some Americans can afford it. I mean - when you put that much of a country's money into stuff like the military,or the interest on US' massive debt - how much of the money can come from within for things like education?

    --
    Cheers, Glen
    1. Re:Maybe its because by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      What a horrible, patronizing, ignorant post.

    2. Re:Maybe its because by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Most Americans can't afford that much education because they are caught up with materialism

      Why on earth do you think so many foreign students come here for graduate studies? You think even a modest number are doing it out personal interest?

      Let's be honest here, it's a lot more likely for any individual American student to be in engineering because he or she is interested in it, in comparison to foreign students. There are of course exceptions (I'm sure plenty of them are reading this right now), but for the vast majority of Indian students studying here, for example, that whole IIT undergrad-American grad path is about money, prestige, and upward mobility, not personal interest in the subject.

  69. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by antirename · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm an engineer. I only hold an undergrad ME degree. However, I was helping my advisor (who was from Pakistan, by the way... he fled the purge of the educated in the 70s... great guy) with graduate level research my last two years. The reason was that there were no American grad students in the department, and those that were there didn't know english well enough to help write papers and, well, research other papers that were written in english. I don't know what those foreign grad students actually did, but I suspect that I wasn't the only person who found them to be relatively useless as TAs or research assistants because you couldn't talk to them without an interpreter. Schools do strange things for money... mine hired a Chinese laser expert hoping to get research grants. Problem: not only could he not teach, he couldn't speak English. Makes for an interesting physics class. I don't mean he had an accent problem; he couldn't speak the language. On the other hand, I had another Chinese physics prof who was great, brilliant optics guy. He had this weird fetish for US warplanes, though. I remember a lecture about the speed of sound including "You have gun... F15 coming... F15 going mach 1.2, launches missile, missing accelerating at whatever, whole building blow up, you never hear plane". Actually, that was part of every lecture now that I think about it. Still, I managed to get a good education even if I do kick myself from time to time for not going to law school. See, engineers get billed out, a lawyer gets the money or at least a cut.

  70. Flip-Burgers vs Doing-Each-Other's-Wash by pg--az · · Score: 1

    IIRC it was the the lady from Mobile, Alabama who remarked for-the-record that her city's economy consisted in "doing each other's wash", in perhaps the second segment of Ken Burns' "The War". Computer-wise this is a great phrase because it captures the notion of self-referencing, which not only gets your program chasing its tail but is central to the notion of mania-driven-boom-and-bust, folks value something because other folks value something.... Nothing intrinsically wrong with medicine, except that its "value" is so artificially boosted by our creeping enslavement to the welfare-state-concept. So you study law, to conclude that government has become obsessed with routing wealth to doctors, not to mention "home"-builders, sigh...

  71. You think all the smart Americans... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

    ...go into Medicine or Law?

    Then you haven't been to a major hospital recently, or the big law offices that cluster around them.

  72. Education as an export by wandm · · Score: 1

    For both US and the UK, the education sector is a big source of revenue. It could be interpreted as a service, that is traded internationally. There is simply lots of demand for English language education in the world, and the English speaking countries are in the best position to supply.

    The reason they study computer science, sciences, engineering and so forth is that they get a highly transferable skill.

    The wrong conclusion that too many are ready to draw is that US citizen are dumb and lazy and don't want to do anything hard. I would imagine that the absolute numbers of US citizens getting computer science PhD has remained fairly constant or even increased. Perhaps someone can prove me wrong..

  73. In US interest by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    It's my understanding that most of the rulers of poor countries--particularly those who sign off on IMF/World Bank schemes that guarantee the impoverishment of their countries--were educated in the US.

    I haven't looked myself recently, but I know this used to be the case during the so-called "green revolution" of the '70s.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  74. That tag... by afabbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If someone used a tag called "becauseindiansaredumb" or "becausemexicansaredumb", everyone here would be up in arms.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:That tag... by AHarrison · · Score: 1

      I will tell you the difference, because I am an American.

      On the whole, Americans are dumb.

    2. Re:That tag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone used a tag called "becauseindiansaredumb" or "becausemexicansaredumb", everyone here would be up in arms.

      The joke wouldn't even make sense with those tags. Man, you're dumb.
    3. Re:That tag... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just hard to give a shit what people say when you're a citizen of the wealthiest and most powerful nation in the world. If the day comes that my average purchase at a convenience store is no longer more than people in some countries make in a week, I might join you in your bizarre sense of injustice. Until then, could you pipe down with the whining? It's embarrassing.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    4. Re:That tag... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think what you're experiencing is the same as when you hear a Jew disparage Jews. Or a black person say "nigger." "Because I'm part of X group, I am allowed to make disparaging comments about members of X group."

      And since Slashdot skews American...

    5. Re:That tag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause most people on Slashdot, or al least a large percentage of them, are Americans. And no one would blink an eye if this was an Indian site and someone said tagged something as toomanyindians simply because it was probably an Indian who did it. It's generally considered a-ok to rag on your own ethnicity :P

    6. Re:That tag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racism is still racism.

    7. Re:That tag... by afabbro · · Score: 1

      Thank you for demonstrating, far better than I ever could, that politics is purely fashion. Yes, let's hate Americans. All the cool kids are doing it!

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    8. Re:That tag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it's true: the rich get different justice than the poor.

  75. Becuz Globalist Radicals have taken over the U.S. by Zapped.Info · · Score: 1

    Foreign students immediately quality for in-state tuition rates while U.S. Citizens must either live in that state (somtimes up to 5 years) or pay almost twice what foreign students pay. I know it sounds crazy, but that is how the system presently is: So yeah...it's crazy. Additionlly: Students now realize that there are people living in India with Masters degrees that will work for the same wage as a Wal-Mart Cashier. When choosing a career path, logic tells them that they will not be able to compete in an the unfair, unbalance arena of Global outsourcing, because the U.S. Govt taxes U.S. businesses higher than any other nation in the world. Presently it practically makes no sense to run a large business in the United States, but somehow our economy is still standing: Well...more like has fallen to one knee as it is puking it's guts out. Choosing a field that cannot be outsourced IS the smartest thing to do, but I'm sure they'll think of a way to start outsourcing hospitals and doctors...research is already cheaper and as I'm sure you're aware alot of it is done abroad, not only because of the reduced cost, but because other Government's are smart not to restrict things such as stem-cell research and when they do, it is usually because of pressure from that big crazy guy in that red, white and blue stripped suit with the tall hat. Thus research that a corporation would normally fund at a University, might just end up being done in a Malaysian basement. What exacerbates this is a very large percentage (>70% ??) of the foreign students will return home rather than remaining in the United States and becoming citizens, thus further weakening the intellectual strength of our economy. Interestingly enough certain research, such as "Defense," that cannot leave the United States, is highly funded and limited to U.S. citizens with a flawless criminal record. Don't expect to do research on the weekends at Area 51 if you were busted for smoking a joint in your Firebird, driving down Sterling Boulevard. What you then find is that AFTER the research has been declassified, that the technology trickles down to the citizens and in this manner the Government can control which companies get what first, handing out patents to the Good ole boys. Just take a look at CACI, Haliburtun, Raytheon...the list goes on and on. The big picture is Globalization and a secret society seeking a new world order, with one world Government where the freedoms we have today will be unthinkable tomorrow (because of security concerns of course) and freedom of speech won't even be thought of because there won't even be freedom of thought AND if you think such a thing as "Thought crime" is out there??? It already exists! I have witnessed the media brand people as a criminals, simply for what they think and not at all based on their actions. These thought criminals are then sought out by the police for harassment, such as constant surveillance, being pulled over every time you go out, being arrested as a "suspect" every other week. This things are happening with great frequency, but we don't here about them on TV, but occasionally site like Slashdot will bring us the truth, but I suspect the whole Internet will come crashing down soon, much like the World-Trade center, because it threatens the powers that be. Of course the news will report something like, "Radical VWX hackers broke into key TU control facilities and disabled all master VWX routers with the YZ virus." Experts claim it will take months to rebuild the internet." During which time we all all be blind AND the Internet as we know it will be no longer as its doppleganger will be under the complete control of the Globalists' secret society bent on one world order and World Domination with it. So that is why there are only 7% of the students in your class room are americans. Foreign students immediately quality for in-state tuition rates while U.S. Citizens must either live in that state (sometimes up to 5 years) or pay almost twice what foreign students pay. I know it sounds crazy, but that is

    --
    It's important to know that I forgot what I thought I knew when I thought I knew it all:Now I don't even know whatIknow.
  76. Because manufacturing is mainly non-US by Animats · · Score: 1

    Engineering goes where the manufacturing is. The early phase of "manufacturing outsourcing", where the design was done in the home country and manufacturing was done in some low wage area. But, over time, the engineering follows the manufacturing. And, eventually, so does ownership. IBM sold their PC business to Leonovo. 3Com is being sold to a Chinese company. That's the future.

    1. Re:Because manufacturing is mainly non-US by evilviper · · Score: 1

      But, over time, the engineering follows the manufacturing.

      Good, because the US is by far #1 in manufacturing, far ahead of China, many times over...

      IBM sold their PC business to Leonovo. 3Com is being sold to a Chinese company. That's the future.

      Good. I hope China buys up as many of our unprofitable business as possible. It's free money to us. An idiot tax in China, if you will.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  77. what?? by iriki · · Score: 0

    smarter Americans??? what smarter Americans?? the ones who elected a lobotomized man trading lives for oil? ah yes... those very smart americans, idd..

  78. CS Degree is transferable across the globe. by mario_grgic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Medical degrees are useless outside the country they were obtained in, because you need a license to practice medicine (and law). US in particular has a very strict and somewhat unfair licensing exam for all foreign doctors/foreign school graduates that requires them to pretty much re-take the last 2 - 3 years of their undergrad degree, regardless of how long they practiced medicine anywhere else in the world.

    So, you may see less foreign students at medical and law schools unless those students plan on actually working in the US later.

    On the other hand you can take your CS degree earned anywhere in the world and take it with you and get jobs.

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  79. Chemistry PhD Required by baby_robots · · Score: 1

    I am currently studying for a PhD in chemistry, and have found that most of the students are American. However, from talking to people who previously worked in industry, it seems that you really need a PhD to climb the corporate ladder. From what I understand of engineering degrees, it is very easy to get a good job with a BS, making a PhD unnecessary unless you want to go into academia. So yes, it does feel like PhD positions are being filled by foreign students, because most Americans do not need nor want to get a PhD in engineering, but please don't assume it is the same across all the sciences.

  80. College Greed Theory by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    there are only 7 US citizens in the engineering program this year. Why is that? An engineering grad student friend of mine has a theory about this:

    Engineering education is in high demand. Medicine, you can learn anywhere, as evidenced by the hordes of doctors in the US HMO medical system who only barely speak or understand English. Law? What would a Chinese or Indian national do with a US law degree? Engineering, though.... the US is the place to get an engineering degree. Subsequently, there is a lot of competition to get into the limited space available. The reason colleges are so willing to fill their slots with foreigners even though their supposed purpose is to educate residents of the state (which supports the school with tax money) is that foreigners are considered "out of state students". Out of state students pay extremely high tuition compared to state residents, originally under the theory that this would limit the number of outsiders coming in to take advantage of a state-supported school and then leave the state to go home after. But over the last few decades, state universities have turned from state subsidized places of higher learning intended to increase the education level of state residents, into state subsidized businesses trying to maximize their tuition, grant, investment, and patent income. They are required to take a certain number of state resident students, but they strive to maximize their profit by taking as few as possible. This is the "greed" motivation.

    As a side note, he adds that Indian immigrants are usually under enormous pressure from their parents to succeed in school, and that the Chinese students are scared to death of failing because that means it's right back to China where they'll end up assigned as the Third Assistant Injection Molding Technician in a plastic bucket factory in Shanghai. Subsequently, they have a tendency to vastly outperform "locals" and make up the majority of students.
    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    1. Re:College Greed Theory by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Medicine, you can learn anywhere, as evidenced by the hordes of doctors in the US HMO medical system who only barely speak or understand English.

      It would seem, then, that "the hordes" learn the same Medicine as the WASPs, because they have to take stringent board examinations in order to "invade" your emergency departments.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    2. Re:College Greed Theory by Zapped.Info · · Score: 1

      You make these assinine statements that clearly have no basis in fact and are clearly just the ramblings of a clueless person. That's ok...I'll be glad to meet you when you ask me, "Would you like fries with that?"

      --
      It's important to know that I forgot what I thought I knew when I thought I knew it all:Now I don't even know whatIknow.
    3. Re:College Greed Theory by selda_tx · · Score: 1

      I don't think that is a good theory because at my school all international phd students don't have to pay out of state tuition and in state tuition is covered by a stipend.

    4. Re:College Greed Theory by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      Chinese students are scared to death of failing because that means it's right back to China where they'll end up assigned as the Third Assistant Injection Molding Technician in a plastic bucket factory in Shanghai. I've often wondered what I would consider a perfect hell to be. Thank you for articulating it.
      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  81. You forgot one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I'd only ask here if I wanted a bunch of cynical worst-case-scenario answers, some complaints about the American school system, and a side dish of thinly veiled racism/xenophobia"

    and the most common one... a bunch of jerkoffs complaining about what people on slashdot post.

  82. Easy by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    We are slowly slipping into 3rd world status due to shortsightedness and greed.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll have to agree with you, it's all a question of perspective.

      ;)

    2. Re:Easy by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Never been to the third world, have you? What a stupid thing to say.

    3. Re:Easy by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Actually, i have. And that is the direction we are headed. Scary, isnt it?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Easy by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Apparently we live in different USs. I lived in the developing world for nearly 5 years, and the US I live in is nothing like the third world. The corruption we complain about is laughably small and inconsequential compared to the third world. The poorest among us have a better lifestyle than many of the most wealthy there, there are no shanty towns, no open sewers, and 25% of the population is not dying of HIV. Painful but easily treatable conditions (assuming access to modern medicine) like cleft palate do not affect anything resembling a substantial percentage of our population. Even if the tap water in some places in the US doesn't taste wonderful, it is always potable and so clean drinking water is accessible to everyone. And by developed nation standards, we aren't even anywhere near the healthiest.

      The US's tertiary education system is still by far and away the best in the world: everyone comes to our universities to be educated — you don't see anyone moving to Vientiane or Ouagadougou to get their engineering degrees.

      You say you've been to the third world, but privately I doubt it. No one who has seen the misery and poverty that I've seen could claim with a straight face that the US is anything remotely resembling the third world. If you're unhappy with the direction this country is headed, then by all means, be critical — we grow through criticism. But hyperbole that makes light of the very real squalor that most of the world lives in not only makes you — and by extension your criticisms, which might otherwise have merit — look stupid, it also makes you look small and mean-spirited.

      Thomas Hobbes wrote in 1651 that "the life of man [is] solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." This still describes the lives of most of the people on this planet. You really should get out more.

    5. Re:Easy by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I said we are HEADING IN THAT DIRECTION, not that we are there yet. I agree we arent like a 3rd world nation, today, but momentum is pulling us in that direction, and in 2 or 3 generations i think it will be hard to tell the difference.

      Again, i didn't say TODAY...

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    6. Re:Easy by 808140 · · Score: 1

      You make this correction as if it substantially alters my perceptions of you or of the ridiculousness of your analogy.

  83. I'm an engineer and I'll tell you why by ballmerfud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a masters in chemical engineering. I come from a family of engineers: my dad's an engineer, his dad was one, and my father in law is one -- altogether we cover electrical, civil, chemical, and industrial.

    Here's my take on why so few Americans are going into engineering:

    1. Engineers are treated like shit.
    2. While the starting salaries are okay, long term growth sucks (unless you go into management)

    I worked for Lockheed and several other major corporations as an engineer, and the standard practice is to hire 'em, and fire 'em. One Christmas they corralled us all together and told us they were going to lay off 110 engineers. Being the youngest in the group, I thought I would be going. But no! It was the guys with 20+ years that got the ax. Guys with kids in college, with mortgages, who'd been loyal to the company. I saw my future and got the hell out. I'm in IT now, and even though things have been a little rough since dot bomb, they worst year in IT is better than the best year in engineering.

    Why go to school for fours years in a very difficult subject only to get treated like cattle? Engineers make the world run, they make things that absolutely cannot ever break, live up to impossible standards, spend years in training, and get absolutely not gratitude whatsoever in return, either in salary or respect. I think its time they unionize.

    I think this has become clear even to the kids. I remember my wife was offered a full ride to a very prestigious school for engineering. She went to a couple of companies in high school to see what engineers do, and turned it down. She paid to go to a state school, got a degree in communications, and is much happier for it.

    When engineers start getting treated better, then more people will do it.
    --
    http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Steve_Ballmer
    1. Re:I'm an engineer and I'll tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When engineers start standing up for themselves, maybe they'll start getting treated better. Stop being so fucking servile, people!

    2. Re:I'm an engineer and I'll tell you why by will_die · · Score: 1

      Lockheed has a history of doing stuff like this.
      In the contracting arena they also have history of firing everyone after a contract is over and telling them to resubmit their resumes for the next contract. I figured something like that was not happening, until I worked with someone who had been a subcontractor to Lockheed.
      According to him they had contract to build a system and then a new contract would take over to run the production and future development, for the technical people they would have more technical people under the production system but less management, security, etc type people. Because of funding and delays of development everything got pushed back and there was going turn over and when the production contract would take over, a few system admin people were funded to provide support during that time. Lockheed went and told all their people they were gone at the end of first contract and they could submit resume for next one, subcontractors just kept their people put them some weeks of unpaid leave and then transfered the people into the new jobs.
      I guess the Lockheed people could get unemployment support but that kind of treatment sucks.

    3. Re:I'm an engineer and I'll tell you why by 808140 · · Score: 1

      I think its time they unionize.

      Engineers and programmers tend both to be liberterians, and as all libertarians know, unions are evil.

      Nothing like taking one for the market, eh?

    4. Re:I'm an engineer and I'll tell you why by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      Having worked for Lockheed as well, I can tell you that they're an extreme case. There's a stark and clear difference between the defense contractors and real companies that actually have to compete in the commercial market. Companies like Apple, Intel, AMD, etc. The engineering field may be worse nowadays because of the massive growth of the defense sector over the past 7 or so years.

      The good news is that the international market for engineers has really increased drastically. This isn't just good for those willing to move but it also means that more competition to hire talented engineers (including Chinese and Indian engineers) will increase and companies will have to provide better incentives to keep them.

      It's really a matter of supply and demand and I don't think unions are ever the answer.

      Don't confuse the corporate-welfare-fed, cartel-like defense contractors (or telecoms) with real engineering companies.

  84. If I were being cynical by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    I'd reflect that there are a number of TV shows and films showing high-powered, highly-paid lawyers or doctors, or that show law or medicine as a dynamic, interesting, even adventurous and sexy job.

    Engineering? Well, I guess there's the odd engineer in war films (though never the hero, often dies setting a bomb or fixing something), and of course there's Scottie and Geordie.

    Nope, I can't imagine why so many people are going into medicine and law, and so few into engineering. Complete mystery.

  85. Plus you have to do cost benefit analysis when by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

    tuition is so frickin' expensive, unless you come from a wealthy family or have a government paying for your degree. If you've heard that IT jobs are being shipped overseas en masse because the million dollar executive idiots say that "IT isn't a core competency" then a sane person who isn't seriously into the subject (IT, CompSci, etc) is going to look elsewhere. The jobs are coming back but I expect prospective students to be skittish for quite a while longer. Accounting is hot right now, what with the Sarbanes-Oxley idiocy that literally doubled the workload for auditors, if you can stomach the tedium.

    The wastefulness of the modern American university bureaucracy is a wonder to behold. There's not much pressure to streamline when students can just keep loading up on government-sponsored debt.

  86. Let's not ignore the fact of admissions by gelfling · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Colleges aren't blind to the nationality of their admissions either, nor are they blind to their fully funded no financial aid checks being waved in their faces.

    But yes, American students find hard sciences 'hard'. They'd rather flip real estate or be the bankruptcy lawyer for the people who do. Soon we will be a nation of people who do nothing but sell insurance to each other.

  87. the cost and value of a grad student by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know about taxes, but given an average grad student stipend, that's insignificant compared to both the cost of the education and the value of their research. In a grad school I attended, our stipend was about $20,000 a year, and I was told the cost per grad student per year to the institution was about $60,000 a year. (Where does that other $40,000 go? Advisor's salaries, class tuition, IT costs, buildings maintenance, etc...)

    PhD programs are not like undergrad, where you learn a bunch of stuff and work on mostly contrived problems and you aren't expected to contribute anything new to the field. It's more like a job where you solve hard problems for the people funding your education in exchange for grant money. Typical funding sources are NSF, DARPA, NIH, and sometimes corporations (IBM, Microsoft, and Intel all fund quite a bit of research).

    What the US government gets out of the grant money it spends is better solutions to hard research problems, some of which have significant economic value. In that respect, individual students are a bit of a gamble, but overall I'd say it's a net gain. If it's a Chinese or Indian that does the actual work, who cares? The real idiocy of the program though is that we often don't allow them to stay once they've completed their degree. Oh no, we can't have highly educated foreigners in our country competing for valuable US jobs! Never mind that there really aren't enough PhDs in the world to make any significant difference to the employment statistics.

  88. Back up your data! by Assassin+bug · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Through a very painful experience during my Ph.D. work I can say from experience that you should be less concerned about the demographics of your department and concentrate on finding a reliable way to back up your data in triplicate.

  89. I was in the system, hrm by Triode · · Score: 1

    Well, as someone who has a B.S. in EE and an M.S. in Physics and then took all of the course work to
    get a Ph.D. in EE but left before I wrote my dissertation, I think I could comment on all of this.

    First off, the stats that people give could be correct, and it could just be a population thing.
    What perhaps amazes me is that this person is in the program, obviously surrounded by indians
    and chinese people and he feels that he should not ask them? I talked to countless people
    from China, India, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Turkey, Russia, etc about why they chose to study here.
    Interestingly, the Chinese told me it was "for their country". They literally wanted to learn
    more and go back to China and better their country in any way they could (build better computers,
    electronics, etc). The people that I talked to from India were half and half... half of them wanted
    a job in the US, half of them wanted a job _anywhere_ to send the cash back home. Most people from
    other countries told me it was due to either fierce competition back home, or the prestige that
    the rest of the world still thinks the US has good schools. (this can not be for long as China
    will soon have more Ph.D. hodlers than anyone, if they do not already).

    So why did I, a native born white american leave the program? After our second summer of me
    not getting a job and _all_ of my indian counterparts getting interns at Intel, AMD, IBM, etc,
    (we all had the same classes and education, and in fact I had some prior experience to boot)
    I had a realization that US companies just want cheap labor. Literally, I had a Ph.D. student from
    Lebanon get hired on by Intel for $40k a year. _$40k_ a year for a Ph.D. in Comp. Eng!! What's more this
    guy knew his stuff, but he thought $40k was great as he would never get that back home. Me,
    they would not even talk to me. Why go on and spend two years writing a book when you will
    not get hired on anyway??

    US, you keep complaining about US students not going into grad EE or ME or Physics... its
    because your corporate america companies will not hire us. Not when Student X from India will
    do the job for $30k a year and you claim to congress that you can find no good help.

    1. Re:I was in the system, hrm by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      this can not be for long as China
      will soon have more Ph.D. hodlers than anyone, if they do not already China probably already has the highest absolute number of Ph.D holders, but they don't have the highest number of Ph.D's per capita.

      That honor, surprisingly, goes to someone who isn't even mentioned in TFA or the responses (despite being a major place to send American tech jobs to -- Intel's Core and Core 2 lines were designed there).
  90. Excellent article on that very subject by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unemployment Training: The Ideology of Non-Work Learned in Urban Schools

    Insightful, if a little depressing. He gives some pointers on how to counter the trend though.

  91. It's simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On average, who is more hungry and will work harder in grad school? Us spoiled americans or foriegn students who want to escape a crappy existence for a better life? As an Americans, I have to say the current generation is being told the wrong message. Instead of being told to work hard and push oneself, what do we tell them? Based on what popular culture presents, we have people like paris hilton and nicole richie, who have no talent and don't work their ass off. Kids are being told they don't have to work hard to be famous or rich, so why would young people slave away? If America wants to survive in this century, we'd better fix the culture and get things in the right direction. to put it bluntly, Americans are getting beat because of desire. It's not because of talent or genetics. It's the culture!

  92. Get the MS, Ditch the PhD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The financials of a PhD don't pay off. Do a 1 years Masters and get your 20-25% premium salary. You'll make more then the starting Ph.D.s by the time they graduate. You'll work less in the mean time. You won't be pigeonholed into PhD type jobs. And you will have started your life 3-4 years earlier then you would have otherwize. Meanwhile those foreign students don't have the same options. You win, they lose.

  93. Same applies to Google, IBM, Enginnering at Banks. by yomerito · · Score: 1

    I worked at a University for a long time and now I work for a bank with friends at all the major engineering companies around, from Microsoft and Google to IBM. The pattern is the same over and over, you see more foreign workers doing engineering in the US anywhere you go.

  94. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by siufish · · Score: 1

    They accept those who apply
    Are you talking about schools like MIT and Berkeley? They seem to have similar (if not higher) % of foreign graduate students.
  95. Who cares??? Let's Try to Keep Them! by bdemchak · · Score: 1

    I'm an American grad student in a top US CS department.

    It's true, there are lots of non-US grad students here, but there are also lots of US grad students here. In my group of 10, though, I'm the only American-born and native English speaker.

    But for all of the grad students in my department, US or not, I'm hoping that we can entice them to stay as long as possible. And I'm hoping they'll be happy and productive in our field. They're often great minds and great people with lots to offer here in the US -- isn't immigration what has propelled our country for decades!?

    So, think about it. Considering that we taxpayers are footing the bill for these awesome educations, why wouldn't we go out of our way to see these grad students put down roots here?

    As to why there are so many here, I promise that it's because the admission committees focus on recruiting the best of the best. They have to ... research and ratings depend on this! Now, as to why the best one isn't always an American ... consider that non-US school systems can be excellent, too ... why should the US school system have a monopoly on greatness?? IT DOESN'T ... and sometimes woefully not. WAKE UP!

    In the end, we Americans get what we deserve ... excellent transplants (hopefully) ... excellent American-born PhDs (if we prepare well) ... or no jobs (if we're lazy and uncompetitive). Believe me, good computer scientists and programmers can always find jobs ... it's the uncompetitive ones that can't.

    And by the way, the economic argument is mostly wrong. Were the decision about money, there would be very few PhDs. WAKE UP ... it's what we like to do, what makes us happy, and what fills our lives. AND the money is probably better.

    Jeez, guys ... get some values!

  96. American priorities... by zildgulf · · Score: 1
    Great point. We seem to be more materialistic in a big dumb way nowadays. After have the biggest crisis happening for most Americans, 9/11, and the President tells you "Let's Mobilize! We need people that know Arabic, Russian, and Chinese! Start recycling and energy conservation! Let's be energy independent! Give tax breaks for those actually investing in Colleges, Universities, and R&D!", then we become motivated to get up off our butts, go to grad school, and do breath-taking achievements.

    Wait a minute, he didn't tell us that! He told us to just carry on like normal. No rallying the troops. No telling us what we can do. Just carry on. Who needs to go to Grad school for that?

    That shows the current priorities of this country as opposed to the time of Pearl Harbor, Sputnik, the 1960's assassinations, and the Energy Crisis. Neither most of the government nor most of the people give a flying flip about little Johnny being much of anything anymore, they just want him to go shopping.

    I postulate that even the very long term survival of the United States is now in question, whether we remain a relevant power or not. Can a Republic survive when you have sheep^H^H^H^H^HConsumers instead of Citizens? I think not.

  97. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technical grad schools like computer engineering and computer science are money making enterprises for universities. They aren't handing out multimillion dollar grants for Eastern European Literature. They're handing them out for nanotechnology, chip design, software optimization, computer security (big money!), and computer graphics. Something like 80% of graduate students at good universities are paid for by the university. Many also get a pretty decent stipend. Even for being a teaching assistant at many colleges because it frees up faculty to work on research grants. Some successful programs actually have to turn down grants because they do not have enough staff to dedicate to them.

    Sure, you'd be sitting on your undergraduate debt for a little longer, but for engineering graduate school you are not going to lose any more money. There are countless programs that will pay everything and give you spending money to boot. If you want to join a program that makes you pay your own way then you're either rich or a sucker.

  98. The sad reality: Smart Doesn't Pay by popo · · Score: 1

    We've all heard the saying "Those who can't do, teach", but there's a far darker reality in corporate America: "Those who can do, don't 'manage'".

    "Do'ers" might as well be defined as "That lowly breed of people who actually work". As a result it is far more profitable in corporate America to have a vague, cursory knowledge of a subject rather than a deep, applicable knowledge.

    When I was in college people used to say "English major? What are you going to do with that?"

    Today, I imagine the question goes: "Engineering major? What are you going to do with that?"
    ie: "be a worker?" ("worker" should be read with deep disdain).

    Some have said that in the US we "don't reward skill". But it's worse than that. In the modern information economy, skill has become the modern equivalent of "labor".

    Now consider this: Who wants to shell out six figures for the right to be a laborer?

    And sadder yet: Golf is a better skill than math.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  99. You have asked and answered about age bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's been borne out by my own experience interviewing software engineering applicants. We have a lot of demand, but there just aren't that many good engineers looking to switch jobs. Thus the competition for those few engineers is pretty intense, and companies in our area work hard to retain the people they have."

    How many of the applicants were over fourty, and how many were young?

  100. Religion versus science by shanen · · Score: 1

    Quite a hot topic, eh? Yet I see over 200 comments and searching says that the word "religion" apparently hasn't been mentioned once? Amazing. It is *NOT* a coincidence that America is the most religious of the rich nations and also the very same one that is finding itself with increasing problems in finding enough people who want to pursue "anti-religious" scientific careers. What the OP is noticing and reporting is that other nations are not unwilling to pick our brains and get the knowledge that is still present in our universities. However, in a few years I doubt we'll have much to offer them in that regard.

    At least immigration was mentioned in the discussion. A lot of America's wealth was created by science and technology--and a whole lot of that was created by first and second generation immigrants. Yeah, the same kind of immigrants the current politicians are increasingly determined to keep out of the country. Speaking as a grandchild of immigrants and as an immigrant myself, I believe the experience of moving to and living in a different society is extremely thought-provoking and educational all by itself. No wonder so many ambitious immigrants and their inspired-by-their-parents children have been technical leaders and innovators.

    My deeper theory is that the real story of the wealth of America is mostly that land is wealth. That was a great thing for 'creating wealth' when all you had to do was kick a few injuns off the land, but those days are long gone. Now pretty much all of the wealth has been converted, and there isn't any more free land. No 'new wealth' coming from that source. Right now the Americans are mostly just selling their wealth off to clever foreigners, including a lot of the best land.

    Or maybe those foreigners aren't so clever after all? They're taking the payments in dollars...

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Religion versus science by synthespian · · Score: 1

      At least immigration was mentioned in the discussion. A lot of America's wealth was created by science and technology--and a whole lot of that was created by first and second generation immigrants.

      This because of the two World Wars, which got the USA the opportunity to import the very best of European science and - I have the impression - a subsequent generation of immigrants with a hard-working Confucian ethos, mainly, who pushed their kids to excel in school.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  101. If by almost you mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... 1 BILLION OFF.

    "Almost" used to mean something a lot different than it does now apparently.

    1. Re:If by almost you mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2000000000/300000000 = 6.666666666666666666666666666666... and it goes on like this? That's weird.

      Just another thing I didn't learn in my crumby American highschool.. if 6 2/3x is "almost" 10x. If it were 1.5x bigger, it'd be exactly an order of magnitude. That is a billion people tho as parent pointed out...

      So what, another 3 years if Moore's Law works out for the Indians and Chinese til they hit 3 billion?

    2. Re:If by almost you mean... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 3, Informative

      Orders of magnitude are based on a log-10 scale. When one says "x is an order of magnitude greater than y", one means "log x is 1 greater than log y". For instance, 1000 is an order of magnitude greater than 100 because log 100 is 3 and log 1000 is 4. Likewise, log 2 billion is 9.3, and log 300 million is 8.4. As you may have gathered by now, 9.3 is almost one more than 8.4.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    3. Re:If by almost you mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (log 2e9 10)
      9.30103

      (log 300e6 10)
      8.477121

      It's 9.3 vs 8.5, not 8.4, please round, don't truncate. It's 80% of an order of magnitude.

      (log 3e9 10)
      9.477121

      2e9 vs 3e9. A billion humans here, a billion humans there, pretty soon, you're talking about a significant number of humans.

    4. Re:If by almost you mean... by raehl · · Score: 1

      because log 100 is 3 and log 1000 is 4

      Hate to break it to you, but you're off by an order of magnitude.

      (10^2 = 100)

    5. Re:If by almost you mean... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      So, more simply put, an "order of magnitude" means X is at least 10 times greater than Y.
      Why use log to explain this?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:If by almost you mean... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Because they're fundamentally related concepts.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  102. ...graduate degrees are worthless for americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...grad school is prohibitively expensive if you stay in the 'states - outside of medicine or law, your return on that investment is negligible in acutal salary or career prospects...such are the spoils of american rubber-stamp education inflation, like it or not, and our economy is mostly driven by middlemen scamming for other people's money...

    ...abroad, however, advanced degrees in technical or academic fields are quite respectable, and offer perfectly viable prospects for paying off one's student loans...

  103. They just follow the money by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Be sensible. Where is the money? In IT? Don't make me laugh. Look at what you earn as an MD or lawyer, then look at your salary. Oh, don't get me wrong, you do earn quite a bit of money as a master of CS, but compare it to a lawyer and you'll see that the top paying job is certainly not in engineering, it's not even in administration (even though even there you make a lot more), it's in law and medicine.

    Now, in the far east it's different. You can't ship your sick to India. You can't ship your legal problems to the court of New Delhi. But you can ship your engineering jobs there.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:They just follow the money by arktemplar · · Score: 1

      actually you can ship your sick to India, and with the cost of health care there you will most probably end up spending less shipping in, getting the operation and shipping out than you would had you just stuck to America. Yes, you wouldnt get the best doctors there, but then you also dont get the best doctors at each hospital in America so its just about the same.

      --
      blog plug -> The Darker Side of Light
  104. engineering by 2ms · · Score: 1

    My personal experience is that the Americans in engineering graduate school are extremely smart -- "frighteningly smart" even, is how I would describe. The thing is that engineering graduate school is so difficult and so much work for the relatively small payoff compared to law school and medical school that engagement in it is discouraged by the fact that most people that would consider it could just as easily go be a doctor or something and make 2 or 3 times as much money.

    In countries like China and India (most of the rest of the world, for that matter), engineering is about the highest paid and most admired field out there. This is in stark contrast to the USA where people have lived with advanced technology for so long that they take it for granted and seem to be oblivious to where it comes from.

    Basically, maybe similarly to math and physics, the brightest minds are as highly concentrated in advanced engineering education as anywhere, but those who do not find as much fulfillment directly in their accomplishment within these kinds of fields itself, are going to be drawn to fields where, one could say, the more easily appreciatable rewards of money and recognition by general public are in greater abundance.

    Maybe you could say it goes back to how American mommies and daddies stereotypically want to be able to tell everyone their daughter's becoming a doctor or lawyer. What impresses mommy and daddy has a lot of weight at the age where young adults enter college and determine their career paths (loathe as they may be to admit it). It kind of takes the [i]really[/i] talented ones that stand out as something different and also able to find the kind of intellectual fulfillment in these other fields great enough to offset the lure of America's more obviously rewarding careers, to get through an advanced engineering education.

  105. Not for long, not for long... by poliopteragriseoapte · · Score: 1
    The US used to be a huge attraction to all students worldwide interested in computer science. The US job market was great, the US graduate programs were head and shoulders above the rest of the world. Now, however, things are changing, and I see fewer and fewer applicants from India -- the number of top IIT students applying is decreasing. There are three main reasons:
    • The India tech industry is picking up fast, and top graduates from top school can now command very good salaries in India itself. For a country like India, where family ties matter and people, other things being equal, would be happy to stay where they are, this matters a lot.
    • The post-9/11 US visa and immigration policy is a hindrance -- other things being equal, it is easier for Indians to study in the UK or Continental Europe, for instance. Getting the permanent resident status to work after a PhD is also easier in many other countries now.
    • There have always been top-quality graduate programs outside of the US, but these programs did not use to cater to foreigners -- instruction was in the local language rather than English, and the application process for foreigners was not straightforward. Both factors are changing fast. Universities in many countries (The Netherlands, Switzerland, of course the UK, places across Scandinavia, etc) are now catering to foreign students with graduate courses in English, scholarships, and feasible application process.
    Taken together, these things mean that the US graduate programs are slowly losing their worldwide pre-eminence and appeal, and the US will more and more be just one player among many. I do not think that US people should be happy of this, but in a sense, it will lead to a more pluralist and democratic world...
  106. Why is /. always the pessimist? by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 1

    This is beneficial for to the United States. Do you honestly think all of those foreigners come to school here, get a degree, and then leave? Of course not! A good amount, of course, stay here and enrich the US in many ways, but especially economically. It's called brain drain, and right now it's in our favor.

  107. greed is good by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Because Americans are going into Business School or Law School, because they want to be rich. They want to be Gordon Gekko.

    Americans don't want to make anything concrete anymore, they only want to make money.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  108. American Employers want Experience, Ability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found that American Employers don't really care how much education you have. They care about your skills and experience. I have been programming for 11 years in the SF/East Bay Area and am rarely asked how much education I have. (a two-year AA degree)

    (usually it comes up in conversation after I am hired)

    Regardless of how educated you are, I still think you need to know someone to get that first job. After you have been working 2+ years nobody really cares as long as you can do the job.

    1. Re:American Employers want Experience, Ability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh and I haven't worked with a recent graduate in about 5 years... unless they were an unpaid intern or started the company themselves... I see lots of recent graduates working at starbucks though... (at least here in SF)

  109. the problem is that they usually don't stay by r00t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We make it hard for them to become citizens. These are the people we should want most.

    Having them leave, then compete with us, is not good.

    1. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not hard to become a citizen. I've done it. Twice. Within five years of getting here... Just kidding.

    2. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen that firsthand myself. I'm working on my PhD in biochemistry, and I know another student in my department who is months away from his defense. He came here from China, and speaks excellent English. But yet he has not been able to obtain citizenship. This actually has larger problems than just retention, because non-citizens cannot apply for grant money from most federal agencies, which of course makes a career in academia unlikely.

      As the previous post said, these are the very people we should want most.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by eli+pabst · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen most foreign students have little problem getting student visas if they can show that they're going to be funded. Getting a postdoc is significantly harder because you're now an "employee" rather than a trainee or student. That seems to be the criteria...can you show that you can pay your way through and are you potentially taking away a position that an American could fill.

    4. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Ah but it is the same case for Europe... or at least for the UK where I am doing my PhD... because it is quite difficult to get a proper job in your area after you finish a postgraduate, as, if you want to get a job, companies ask you for a work permit... but the only way to provide a work permit is if the same company sponsors you, thus is a catch-22. Mainly because if companies want to hire a foreigner (non EU citizen) they must prove that the position you are to get can not be fulfilled by anyone in a) the UK and b) the rest of EU. Therefore they have to advertise such position along the EU and if there is no one available THEN you get the job. But again as I said, none of the companies wants to get in all those problems, so they will get anyone from inside the EU even if he is not as good as you.

      I saw that first hand, as my girlfriend finished her masters and tried to apply for a job (she had 1 year of work permission available) but as she would need to get a work permit after that year, she was rejected by all of the companies where she applied and could only find a job as a telephonist ... she has master in Advanced Manufacturing... of course, after a year working answering telephones the company did not processed her a work permit (and she did not want too as it is not her area). She is now working in Mexico as a warehouse manager for an American company (Hanes brnds).

      I think it is possible to see several problems from this approach, as the government makes more and more difficult to hire people from outside the country, all those brains will return to their homeland and thus companies will opt to outsource their operations to those places because a) They can pay less and b) They will have similar (if not better sometimes) professionals.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    5. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by SuhlScroll · · Score: 1

      We make it hard for them to become citizens. These are the people we should want most. The people we should want most are the citizens of this country who've paid taxes to support the public universities and who support the companies and economy that allow the private universities a context to survive and thrive. It should be impossible for foreigners to come and study here. Let them be educated in their own countries after their own economies make the investment in institutions of higher learning. That way if those countries want to compete with us let them compete completely rather than using our own system to educate their people.

      Having them leave, then compete with us, is not good.
      Having them stay here and underbid Americans for jobs is worse. The reason there's such a stream of foreigners in engineering and the sciences is that American companies have lobbied the government to allow a steady stream of cheap, imported labor. They shouldn't be allowed in the door in the first place.
    6. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      once foreigners are allowed in and get jobs, they will be paying taxes just like you and will be supporting schools, building freeways, and whatever the government decides to do with tax money.

      how are they then taking away from you? in fact, most international students in u.s. colleges have to pay full tuition, sometimes 7 or 8 times higher than what what americans pay. in other words, they are subsidizing *your* education. again, how is this bad for americans?

    7. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be of native american heritage then..?

    8. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by SuhlScroll · · Score: 1

      once foreigners are allowed in and get jobs, they will be paying taxes just like you and will be supporting schools, building freeways, and whatever the government decides to do with tax money.
      The basic fact that they're allowed in and get jobs that means that people who are already here will either be a) unemployed or, b) paid at lower wages. That means that for every foreigner who's allowed in someone here is either not paying taxes or is paying less because they're getting paid less. (Keep in mind also that the income tax curve bends sharply at higher wages, so by dropping a professional salary even 20-25% you lose a great deal in income tax revenue.) That's simply the law of supply and demand, and it does not add up to the same thing in a tax-revenue sense. The only people who really benefit are the a) foreigners who want to get out of their own countries and b) the companies who get to pay less to get people to work for them.

      how are they then taking away from you?
      See above. Better yet, have a conversation with someone in the IT business who was working (or trying to be) in the 2000-2002 dot-com post-crash. For every foreigner that comes here that's lower demand (and resulting compensation) for someone who's already here.

      in fact, most international students in u.s. colleges have to pay full tuition, sometimes 7 or 8 times higher than what what americans pay.
      Even at that ratio they pay nowhere near the fixed costs that had to be paid to establish and staff the school over its collective history. If you add up all the contributions that native taxpayers make over the course of their working careers to fund education, at a 7x-8x ratio or more that's still a very good deal for foreigners.

      in other words, they are subsidizing *your* education. again, how is this bad for americans?
      Again, see above. Americans already have paid all the taxes/funds required to establish/operate American university centers in the first place. If foreigners want the education, let them do likewise in their own countries.
    9. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by SuhlScroll · · Score: 1

      You must be of native american heritage then..?
      There are no "native" Americans ... only some people who've been here longer than others. I was born here from parents who were born here (and were legal citizens, unlike some) and that's native enough to make immigration policy. Like it or not, us "natives" who are already here have the right to determine who else gets to come here or not and for what reasons.
    10. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      I love these arguments. "We can't let smart people in, Americans will have to compete with them!"

      Guess what: there is no fixed pool of jobs that these foreigners are taking jobs from. More people in your country means more jobs, whether the extra people are immigrants or native-born. Your argument is especially invalid when you consider that these grad students are the cream of the crop. How fucking stupid can you be to think that having more smart people in your country will affect the economy in a bad way?

      You know what, I give up. Maybe you're right - let's just all avoid having children, since they'll obviously take jobs from this imaginary pool of jobs that are only for middle-class white Americans who can't bear the thought of having to compete with someone for a job. You're as bad as the people who deride Asian-American immigrants for "stealing our jobs" by actually trying hard in school, and yet complain about "them lazy niggers".

    11. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      my understanding is that there is no cap for educational institutions and as such it is a bit easier to get a visa for a postdoc compared to industry.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    12. Re:the problem is that they usually don't stay by SuhlScroll · · Score: 1

      I love these arguments. "We can't let smart people in, Americans will have to compete with them!"

      I love people who make simplistic arguments like this (typically liberals or foreigners who are here in the U.S. and desperately want to stay without wanting to say so publicly). The point is that American citizens of all types should not have to deal with their standards of living being pushed down by imported foreign labor, legal or not, regardless of whether they're smart or not. That's part of the rights of being a citizen. Nobody has a problem competing with other smart people, so long as they're American.

      The fact is that a lot of people from countries like India or Bangladesh will work at much lower wages in much worse conditions here in the U.S. simply to escape their home countries (I've seen this many times first-hand; my neighbor is from Bangladesh and he'll tell you this very openly). Again, American citizens should not be forced to compete in the workplace with these kinds of people (despite the fact that corporate America loves people who are desperate for their jobs).

      Guess what: there is no fixed pool of jobs that these foreigners are taking jobs from. More people in your country means more jobs, whether the extra people are immigrants or native-born.

      Guess what: your absolutely incorrect (and you provide nothing to prove otherwise) according to both basic economics and recent history. Ask someone who was in the IT business in 2000-2002 how many "more jobs" there were after the government allowed an ever-expanding number of H1B visa holders into the country to work in the IT business during the late 90's (and what Uncle Bill Gates is pushing again for now). It's all about corporate profit, not immigration.

      At any point in time in ANY industry there are typically a certain number of jobs to be had. It's all part of supply and demand: more supply of labor, less demand (read less compensation). You might want to take a basic course in Economics.

      Your argument is especially invalid when you consider that these grad students are the cream of the crop.

      And what 'crop' would that be exactly? In fact, foreign grad students are typically not the "cream of the crop" in their own countries, because those people get educated there. It's the also-rans who typically have to leave the country to go for a graduate degree. The real "cream of the (American) crop" leave college after a BS degree because they typically want to make money rather than deal with 1-3 more years of university nonsense, plus the fact that monetarily a grad degree doesn't really always make sense. (So how do you fix that? You get corporate America to PAY MORE for grad degrees, which they don't currently have to do with a steady stream of foreign grad students coming out of American universities.)

      When I was a senior the EE department used to send people around to the senior classes and practically beg people to consider becoming grad students. Everyone I know said pretty much the same thing: "Let's see ... go and make money or stick around school and live like a pauper and have to sniff some professor's rear end to get a grad degree? SEE YA!".

      My experience was that grad students are typically people who, while bright, are uniquely willing to submit to a professor's demands and are nearly always unqualified to TA or teach because of a very, VERY poor mastery of the English language.

      How fucking stupid can you be to think that having more smart people in your country will affect the economy in a bad way?

      About as stupid (and uninformed) as you are, I'd say. Just for your further education, the use of vulgarities in argument is a dead giveaway sign that you have nothing of substance to use to support your assertions. Are you a foreigner here in the U.S. on a visa or a liberal by chance?

  110. Globalization by greeneggs2000 · · Score: 1

    I think the poster answered his own question. Why would you want to be a scientist when 90% of your competitors are from China and India? Science has been globalized. American research scientists have no job security and are poorly paid.

  111. Re:The sad reality: Smart Doesn't Pay by synthespian · · Score: 1

    As a result it is far more profitable in corporate America to have a vague, cursory knowledge of a subject rather than a deep, applicable knowledge.

    I really don't think so. I think the US of A is still the land of opportunity for the highly-skilled. It's a place where the niche markets are huge. You can sell robots, you can create highly specialized software - by domain specialists - and practically dominate the world market if you make it in the huge American market. Etc. I mean, the EU still has a tough time creating a nurturing entrepreneurial environment.

    OTOH, yes, the US environment actually is a safe haven for the mediocre. One gets the impression that the opportunities are so huge even the mediocre survive, whereas on other spots of the world to merely survive with a business involves a very skilled and savvy type of person. But the mediocre are everywhere. In fact, not every business branch needs a genius. Sometimes, all you need is a bakery, and it's just perfect (not demeaning bakers, ok? - check the etimology for mediocre, if in doubt).

    I watch flummoxed the current myopic debate about immigration in the U.S. If anything, the U.S. should make it extremely easy for highly-skilled workers. Yes, this will have an impact on your elite, because then you compete with the elite from other countries (and contrary to popular redneck opinion, other countries have smart people, too).

    Globalization. Tough it out.

    --
    Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  112. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part might be expected salary discrepancies. And part might be the movement of jobs to other countries, where labor is much cheaper. Many students aren't interested in a career that includes decreasing salaries, and them having to move out of the US to make a living.

  113. as usual, follow the money by ridgecritter · · Score: 1

    It may be that a larger fraction of foreign students than domestic students come here paying the full non-resident college fees (no scholarships, loans, etc.). This brings more $ to the schools.

  114. Ticket to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grad school is a ticket for the Indian students to come to the US.

  115. The Key is Lack of Need by FreeKill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The reason is truly lack of need. For an Engineer or Programmer, there really is no reason to pursue anything higher then a bachelor degree unless you are interested in becoming a faculty member or going after government funding for your research. Take computer science for example and compare it to Biology. In Biology, you really don't get into the practical aspects of biological work until you hit grad school. Only big research labs have the equipment, money, and expertise to give you experience in things like Mass Spectrometry, Microarrays, etc. Computer Science, on the other hand, your PhD level work is no different then your undergrad work except that you are working on something you're interested in and you get to dedicate your time at it. You're definitely not learning how to be a better programmer anymore than someone who takes a job is learning how to become a better programmer...That's why engineers and programmers can get a Bachelor's degree and have very successful careers while Biologists on average require significant graduate studies to reach the same opportunities...

  116. Re:Becuz Globalist Radicals have taken over the U. by synthespian · · Score: 1

    Clearly in dire need of psychiatric help...No health insurance, huh, dude?
    Yeah, I know, "the globalists"...

    --
    Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  117. Re: Why Is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students? by rossifer · · Score: 1

    YMMV indeed! Where I live and work, I know of three local companies in desperate searches for skilled software developers. Area is Santa Monica California (it's a sane part of the greater Los Angeles area), pay is $100k+, relocation covered. Indian, Chinese, USian, Canadian, European, doesn't matter (they'll sponsor H1B for foreign nationals). But you have to be able to demonstrate that you're way above average and do so in the interview.

    All three companies have been searching for months. They get lots of resumes, but almost nobody who can pass a basic phone screen (Know what polymorphic means? What's ACID mean re: databases?). The issue isn't a lack of jobs. My theory: anyone with brains is already in a job and isn't looking right now.

  118. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by XopherMV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most Americans are probably happy with just an undergrad degree and don't want to go to grad school.

    Exactly. Americans find perfectly good engineering jobs with "just" a bachelor's degree. There aren't enough jobs which require advanced degrees in engineering to make it worth the time to give up 2-3 years of engineering paychecks, pay for college, pay for books, pay for living expenses, and earn those advanced degrees. More than likely, you'd graduate with a master's or a PhD and work at the same job you could get with a bachelor's degree.

    On the other hand, foreigners looking to immigrate to the United States work under the assumption that if they go to school here and earn one of our advanced degrees, then we'd be more likely to allow them to stay once their studies are complete. THAT is why foreigners outnumber Americans in these topics. It's not because they're smarter, not because they love engineering more, and not because education is better in their country. It's because they want to immigrate here.

  119. Crappy school by Jack+Greenbaum · · Score: 1

    My observation is that the percentage of American students in graduate engineering programs is directly proportional to the quality of the school. You will find the American students at Berkeley, MIT, and the like.

    1. Re:Crappy school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please speak with conviction. I will be glad to walk you around the Stanford Engineering Quad, and then you can count how many Americans and Asians you see.

    2. Re:Crappy school by 808140 · · Score: 1

      This may come as a surprise to you, but many Asians are in fact American. Yes, even the ones with accents.

  120. Consider this by EriDay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My niece and I both go to the same Big 10 university. I'm a PhD. CS, she's a law student. The university gave her a full ride scholarship that does not require that she work. I am required to work 20 hours a week for my stipend. The university gave me a desk in an office. I am the only English speaker in the office. There is a computer on my desk (one that nobody else wants anymore), just no display, keyboard, or mouse. If I want to work in my office I must bring my own personally purchased laptop. So I work from home where I have dual monitors, a mouse and keyboard. The university gave my niece a new laptop when she began law school. The question should be why do universities treat their domestic engineering grad students like crap.

    1. Re:Consider this by tmiller51 · · Score: 1

      I think it's to better prepare them to be treated like crap from their employers once they graduate.

    2. Re:Consider this by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet that it's because when your neice graduates, she'll start pulling in $130K+ a year. Combine this with the fact that lawyers are much more often alumnus donors than other professions, and we see that universities have a huge financial stake in making sure their law students really, really love their alma mater.

      How many CS students donate large sums to their alma mater? I also remember reading that, among professions, doctors are the worst about donating to their former schools.

      However, when I walk through my university's MBA and law buildings, I see wall after wall of plaques listing endowed chairs and scholarships named after alumni.

    3. Re:Consider this by Hrodgare · · Score: 1

      That is absolutely not typical. Most of the law students I know are taking out huge loans, and the engineering school I'm in has the highest stipends of the entire university. It sounds like you have an advisor problem.

    4. Re:Consider this by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      she's a law student. The university gave her a full ride scholarship that does not require that she work. There must be some outside reason for this, because this is not the norm at all. Free ride to law school? That's 1 in a million.

      Is the part of a "scholars" program? I know the University of Wisconsin has a "med scholars" program where if you meet certain academic thresholds, you get a free ride to med school. Is she part of that type of program? Or is she benefiting from some affirmative action scholarship?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    5. Re:Consider this by woolio · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you mean by "Big 10"? Isn't that a football division?

      What exactly are you researching? Is it a hot/warm area or something purely academic?

      I was in one of the "Top 10" (or maybe "Top 11") ranked Universities for Electrical Engineering. We had brand-new computers, desk with fully adjustable chairs (the really good kind), and even VOIP phones. But yes, 95% of the EE grad students were NOT from the United States.

      Then again, the deptartment had strong industrial ties. A fair amount of research done was actually directly useful and rewarded as such.

      The question should be why do universities treat their domestic engineering grad students like crap.
      Probably because of your advisor. He needs to either convince others that his research area is important for find a new area.

  121. Is this phenomenon all bad? by PAKnightPA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am an undergrad math major here at UC Berkeley. While I havent checked enrollment numbers it seems to me that a high percentage of the graduate students in my field are from other countries. But is this all bad? I wonder how many of them stay in the US and join our workforce. Anecdotally, I know alot of people whose parents were born somewhere else and came over to the United States for school and liked it enough to stay. It would seem to me that the strength of the United States' universities allows us to "steal" some of the best and brightest from India and China and all the rest. I think this is a huge advantage for the US and reason for much of the innovation done in the last century in America.

    1. Re:Is this phenomenon all bad? by 808140 · · Score: 1

      This has historically been the case. Unfortunately, Americans these days seem to have largely forgotten that we are a country of immigrants, and are constantly worrying about "foreigners" coming in a stealing "our jobs". Hell, if you're in California you know they even worry about Mexican field workers — as if anyone in Orange County or SF desperately needs a job picking fruit.

      I used to live in China, and for the Chinese, "brain drain" is a huge problem. Historically, their best and brightest have moved elsewhere, often the US, to pursue better prospects. The government has been complaining loudly about how unfair this is for some time. They've accused the Chinese who move to the US or Europe as having no national pride, of being completely motivated by money without recognizing that as a developing economy China simply cannot afford to pay the same salaries and afford them the same standard of living as the US — effectively asking them to "take one for the team." They used to have propaganda segments on TV about brilliant students who graduated at the top of their class at Qinghua University and who, after their 5 year PhD programs at Harvard or MIT, promptly came back to China because "life in the US just couldn't compare to life in the PRC."

      What's more likely is that they couldn't get a visa, because we Americans have apparently forgotten how valuable these sorts of people are.

  122. Nurses make can make as much by LM741N · · Score: 1

    as engineers and CS types, like $40/hr and define their own shifts/flextime/etc. As far as doctors go, I understand there is a real need for family physicians in rural areas. In the cities they are a dime a dozen.

    1. Re:Nurses make can make as much by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      massive demand. my family works in medicine in the rural community and we can't hire Americans to come work out here for a 30 to 40% increase in pay(and we are only 80 minutes from 2 large cities and COLA is probably -35 to 40% vs. the cities).

      So what do we do? we hire foreign doctors and lock them in for 6 years. We get a hard working, dedicated doctor for 6 years, they make great money(better than they were offered in cities), and because the rural areas are under-served, we can guarantee them citizenship for their family. this is in pediatrics but very similar situation as family practitioners. Foreigners will live in a boring quiet town for 6 years to work hard to get started. Fresh grads out of med school who are american just won't. I'm not saying it's a bad thing that they care about quality of life far beyond their work, but it's why we have almost completely given up on hiring americans.

    2. Re:Nurses make can make as much by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      It's not surprising that a big pay package will fail to recruit people to work out in small towns and rural areas. I am currently a medical student and my classmates are almost all from urban areas. Ironically, even though my institution is a state one, about half of my classmates did their undergrad in out-of-state private schools (but applied here because they went to high school in-state and our med school is a good one.) They have about as high of an opinion of working or living in an area of less than 100,000 people ("the sticks") as the average /.er has of the RIAA or Steve Ballmer. So you could try to pay them five million a year to be a GP in a small town and they'd still not come- there are too many "rifle-toting, pickup-truck driving rednecks" (actual quote from one of my classmates) in those areas for them to even consider such a lucrative offer.

      I don't know the best way to approach this other than to give greater preference in admissions to well-qualified applicants that come from small towns and rural areas over those who came from urban areas in hopes that they return. There have been small programs that do just this and they have been rather successful, so expanding it to the entire class should work as well. Some might cry foul over this- particularly the media in the two big urban areas- but minting physicians to care for the ENTIRE state is clearly stated in the mission of the medical school and I can't see how that policy would be anything but in accordance with the mission.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  123. no brainer by lingoman · · Score: 0

    An American-born student has an automatic legal right to live here and work, and enjoy the richest economy ever seen in history without expending any effort. Oh, don't bore us with a few numbers about some little place somewhere else. It is indeed the richest country in the world and you know it. A foreign born student needs a pretty good excuse to get a visa and stay here.

    And even though it's fun to trash our politics, this place offers the closest thing to freedom, economic, social and political, than anywhere else. We have no political police and no religious police. And our ethnic rivalries are punk compared to anywhere else.

  124. what crap is that by keeboo · · Score: 1

    The best students in the world go to the best Universities in the world. The Universities in the United States consistently dominate the top universities in the world.

    Considering that graduation in the USA is a big business, any claim that universities from that country are the best should be treated with suspicion.

    Now what is this site you're linking to? I've never heard about that.

    That thing looks like made by someone who just learned to create html pages.
    The about page is hosted in what looks like being from a Chinese university.

    If you want such argument to be taken seriously, try at least to provide some reliable sources.

    1. Re:what crap is that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points I'd mod you up.

  125. Training Cheap Labor? by polyex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With all the outsourcing, especially in engineering I can't help suspect that is a contributing factor (all the Indians is a clue). We also live in a country that is full of religous nuts (40 some odd percent or something think the world is a few thousand years old). Science is probably not high on the list for these ignorant folks. Another factor is with all the outsourcing, we have developed an attitude in the industry that somehow its better to get an MBA or be a manager than an engineer. They actually think they are smarter (this was always the way). The fact the business programs in university are far simpler than science makes it more tempting for the lazy. Americans are going to pay in the long run for this, especially when we see the Chinese land on Mars or something first.

  126. My department is mostly American by HyperBlazer · · Score: 1

    I'm a grad student in the chemistry dept at UC Berkeley (arguably the best school in the world for my field). My department is mostly American; it's much harder to get in as an international student.

    For public schools, US citizens are cheaper to pay for (since, in the sciences at least, the dept/your advisor pays your tuition. US citizens can get resident tuition, while international students can't). This is one of the major reasons that UC Berkeley has so many American students, followed by the top of the top among international students.

    Undergraduate research is also really important in the admission process in Berkeley's chem dept. It's assumed that you have done research before coming here, and a lot of international schools don't push their undergraduates toward research experience. So again, US students have an advantage in the admissions process.

    Anyway, this probably varies from school to school. Public/private is one divide to consider. Top 5/not top 5 is another.

  127. US Grad Schools are mostly full of Americans by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the humanities grad school departments are full of citizens of the USA. In my department there are as many people from Europe as there are from Asia and combined they make up less than 10% of the department's graduate students. There are just as many from Korea as there are from China (one each at the moment I think) and there aren't any from India. In my Master's program at a different school the only international graduate students I ran into were from Canada and that was mainly because the school was something like 3 hours away from the Canadian border.

    Just because there are a lot of non-US citizens in some departments doesn't mean that there are in every department. Now why certain departments are more likely to have international students than others is a different question.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    1. Re:US Grad Schools are mostly full of Americans by Hrodgare · · Score: 1

      Exactly-- why is the premise of the poster's question assumed to be true? There are a lot of foreign students in my graduate engineering school, but they're not a majority. What reason is there to believe that this is actually true? Oh, slashdot, land of rumors and wild speculation.

  128. Because... by Cantus · · Score: 1

    Because Americans are masters at self-whoring and self-promotion. And people believe the hype!

  129. The worst part by gizmo_mathboy · · Score: 1

    The worst part of having about 50% of our grad students being international is that our immigration and labor laws make it very difficult for them to get jobs in the US.

    I work for a major Midwestern university and I know lots of grad students. Of the international students, maybe half can get jobs in the US, but a lot more would like to work in the US.

    This means about 25% of our best educated students, their knowledge and expertise are leaving this country.

    That's huge.

    We have a great university system but for how long? We keep kicking out the best we educate because they are foreigners and I don't know how we can keep the top schools here.

    Yes, my "evidence" is anecdotal but the trends are clear.

    1. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Christ, save me from sanctimonious liberals.

      How is it good to drain the whole 3rd world of its brains?

      Any decent American would want these bright foreign students to go back to the tapped-out, overpopulated, disease-ridden shit holes they came from so that they can improve them, rather than spend the rest of their lives importing their giant families and tribes to the US. What hope is there for any benighted Asian or African hellhole if every talented person immigrates to the U.S.?

      Currently we're buying MDs, teachers and nurses for our small towns with sacks of grain.

  130. Who would you want your daughter to marry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone once told me that the easiest way to cut through the BS and find out what a society really values is just to ask the question, "Who would you want your daughter to marry?" (flip it if you are interested in what society values in women)

    If the answer comes back an educated scholarly PhD scientist with a love of learning, then trust me, you will find a lot of men clamoring to be PhDs.

    If the answer comes back a doctor with lots of disposable income and spare time to spend with his family, then that is what men are going to aim for.

    1. Re:Who would you want your daughter to marry? by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      ...a doctor with lots of disposable income and spare time to spend with his family... Most doctors would argue that these two things are mutually exclusive. I've heard tales of some departments of surgery boasting a 100% divorce rate.
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:Who would you want your daughter to marry? by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      a doctor with lots of disposable income and spare time to spend with his family

      One of my uncles is a radiologist, and I can pretty guarantee that this is absolutely false. The "doctor with lots of disposable income" and the "spare time to spend with his family" just don't work well together,...

  131. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by zeroduck · · Score: 1

    I'm an undergrad working on my CE degree. I really don't want to go for my masters or PhD. Why? I've got an internship, and I know the things that I need to know to be successful in the industry that I want to work in.

    Part of my schools program (Kettering University, formerly General Motors Institute for Engineering and Management) requires us to have a co-op job, and work that 6 months out of the year. All the theory is great, but I'd rather be out doing something. Staying in school isn't going to get me my BMW.

    That being said, finished finals today. It's time to get the fuck out of Flint, and back to the real world.

  132. Wanting to immigrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just engineers. I'm a PhD student in the Animal Sciences Department at Purdue University and for a while I was the only American in my lab. My department is roughly half internationals students. They are a mix of Nigerian, Korean, Chinese, Indian, and others. All of the one's I've spoken with intend to stay in the US if they can. I'm sure others can correct me if I'm wrong (be gentle) but I think after graduation international students have 12-18 mo to find a job in the US or else their Visa expires and they need to return to their country of origin.

  133. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly. Americans find perfectly good engineering jobs with "just" a bachelor's degree. There aren't enough jobs which require advanced degrees in engineering to make it worth the time to give up 2-3 years of engineering paychecks, pay for college, pay for books, pay for living expenses, and earn those advanced degrees. More than likely, you'd graduate with a master's or a PhD and work at the same job you could get with a bachelor's degree.
    Actually, a Master's degree in an engineering field does generally correlate to an increase in pay and position. It's the Ph.D. that's not really useful unless you are going into academia or into some very specialized sort of field. In Chemistry, it's actually one step above that. You usually need a master's degree to get a decent job (though you can get by with just a bachelors), and a Ph.D. does really help since you can be a senior scientist in a lab. Although, from what I have heard, there are actually not enough BS/MS chemists to fill the bench work positions at a lot of chemical and pharmaceutical companies.


    Plus, in a lot of jobs, especially with bigger companies, you can get a job with a BS or MS degree and then go on to study later with the company's help. That's probably the best way to go about getting an advanced degree and getting decently paid at the same time. Unless you study physics. Then, you absolutely need a Ph.D. and you should get used to poverty :-p

  134. Ohio State by prestomation · · Score: 1

    I'm a freshman at Ohio State(one of the largest uni's in the country), and of the 6,075 first year student, 1,500 are enrolled in the college of engineering. I'd say a good 90% are american. Actually, I'd say about 75% of the university is from the great state of ohio.

  135. There's a lot of truth to that.. by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    Back in the 60's when I graduated from high school, I had two interests, electronics and archaeology. It didn't take a lot of head scratching to figure out where the money was... Engineering. I don't regret the choice I made. I did take some elective anthropology courses and now I'm involved in archaeology as part of a foundation that my wife and I helped get off the ground to support some archeological work that wouldn't get funding otherwise.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  136. Because most of them are probably getting MBAs by Yold · · Score: 1

    I am assuming the poster is refering to a technical trade. My mom is back in school for a M.A. of Management, and I doubt there are (m)any non-americans.

    I am going to use this opportunity to rant a bit. I am currently a Junior studying compsci at a very large university (2nd-4th largest depending on the year), I'd say that around 40% of my classmates are from Asian countries, including Russia and India.

    It really pisses me off to see the "becauseamericansaredumb" tag on this article... I'm american and I'm not dumb. I work hard too. This article is fucking flamebait. America has some of the best public Universities in the world. Not THE best, SOME of the best. Education has often been a metropolitian type institution, attracting scholars from all over the world. So why is it shocking for a country that represents like what, 3% of the world's population, to have a lot of people from countries with a billion people?

  137. Status-Based Workforce by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I've heard from Asian friends that Asian countries value formal education much more so than the US. A big degree is a status symbol in Asia, and people flock to those with such status. The US is more concerned with raw merit regardless of degree. A PhD is not an automatic ticket to status. Also, the US tends to specialize in cutting-edge technology because commodity technology tends to go overseas. University knowledge is often too out-of-date for the cutting edge. My courses (4-year-degree) were about 7 years behind industry practice. Getting yet more stale knowledge by staying in school wouldn't be of much help, but it may be in other countries where they keep old technologies a bit longer because the cost of living differences make them harder to replace and cheaper to pay for repairs instead of replace.

  138. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Informative

    More importantly, 90% of American engineering students realize that the only reason for getting an MS in engineering is to teach. I'm yet to find someone who thinks he learned something worthwhile in post-grad engineering school.

    Getting an MBA has actual value. Working and gaining real-world experience has actual value. Meaningful research is a noble task, but... there isn't that much of it going on in most programs from what I can tell.

    Contrast that with India or Germany, where you basically need a PhD to get a job flipping burgers (yes, sarcasm), and it is easy to understand why Americans are a minority.

    Also, it isn't a recent change; it's been true for the past 20 years.

  139. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that and the fact foreigners get all kinds of incentives, scholarships, etc. Especially if they stay in the US and work for a US company.

    It's not very fair though because we are leaving our own people behind.

  140. The most famous engineer in the US by InterGuru · · Score: 2, Funny

    The most famous engineer in the US is Dilbert.

  141. CS/CE versus Mechanical/Aerospace by everphilski · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my mechanical/Aerospace engineering classes (I'm working on my Ph.D.) they are dominated by white students.

    I believe a big part of that is due to the fact that most aerospace jobs - in defense, virtually all, some (not many) at NASA - require security clearances. So why start what you can't begin? There were a lot more indian students in particular at the undergraduate level.

    I'm taking a CFD class right now, 8 students, 1 Indian student, 1 oriental student. Don't know citizenship status. Rest of us are caucasian. The semester before, Hypersonic Aerodynamics, all caucasian and african-american. Semester before, Aerothermodynamics, all caucasian and african-american. The same trend was readily apparent for my graduate work as well.

    I know there are a lot more foreign students in the CS department. I don't think its an american vs. foreigner thing, I think it is a type of engineering thing.

    1. Re:CS/CE versus Mechanical/Aerospace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this informative? You went from race to nationality. How does being white grant you security clearance, unless the field is racist?

      And why do you say African American (you used white, instead of Euro American, yet you say African American instead of black?), while still using an outdated term like oriental?

    2. Re:CS/CE versus Mechanical/Aerospace by recharged95 · · Score: 1
      I think what you are talking about is the previous generation. Today, most foreigners in technical MS/PhD programs are to either use the advance degree by: go home, start their own business and profit! where the degree is worth something (credentials).



      Or use the adv. degree as a great sales tool to raise VC/Investor money in the US--cause when a brainless US MBA sees you're a PhD in Astrophysics and have a solution to nanomolecularmediallegal DRM.... he's give you money by the buckets, no questions asked. In the end, it's all about the Benjamin's...

    3. Re:CS/CE versus Mechanical/Aerospace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not "white students" but Euro-American students, You, racist pig!

    4. Re:CS/CE versus Mechanical/Aerospace by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In my mechanical/Aerospace engineering classes (I'm working on my Ph.D.) they are dominated by white students.

      I believe a big part of that is due to the fact that most aerospace jobs - in defense, virtually all, some (not many) at NASA - require security clearances.

      Hold on, you think that only white students can get security clearance? Or by "white" do you mean "US citizen"?

      You don't make sense.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:CS/CE versus Mechanical/Aerospace by everphilski · · Score: 1

      No, not at all, but only US citizens can get a security clearance. The college is known for having a high percentile of Indian students here on student visa, and in this part of the country (Alabama) you don't have many citizens of Indian descent. It also happen to be a smaller engineering college so you tend to get to know people... what I was saying was, since immigrants/foreign workers cannot acquire a security clearance, there are far less of them in Aerospace. Hope that came out clearer, and apologize for any confusion.

  142. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

    They accept those who apply. Most Americans are probably happy with just an undergrad degree and don't want to go to grad school.

    Part of the problem with an college education has always been working on something which will allow you to earn a decent living after graduation...as well as doing something which will make you personally satisfied.

    For instance...thought about working on a Master's in education to become an elementary school teacher. After talking with several teachers & doing quite a bit of research...found out working 50+ hours a week with no financial reward to make the Master's degree worth going into debt for. The worst part with being an elementary teacher is having to deal with parents who have no idea their little angels are actually the exact opposite. On the other hand...also found out that working as a sub...you will usually work around 30-35 hours a week...don't usually deal with the parents...& able to go home at the end of the day. The drawback...dealing with students who have no business being in school...administration & teachers who will leave you hanging when the class gets out of control or you need some help/guidance & having days you may not work nor are paid benefits or holidays.

    Being that many of the jobs in the US are service related...don't need an education to work at many of the slave jobs at slave wages which are becoming the norm for many people. With many teachers leaving the field after three years...why would a Master's degree be worth the hassle of spending the time & money on?

    --
    Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
  143. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Zartog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a current PhD student (and an American studying in America), I learn with dozens of colleagues from abroad. Not necessarily 90%, but certainly close to 60%. (I'm also in humanities, so that may change the experience.) However, in watching the drive and the commitment that so many of these students have, I see a huge chasm between them and the American students. The American students often (though not always) have an aura of entitlement about them, while the internationals really fight to achieve. I think the biggest difference between emigrant students and domestics isn't ability, but willingness to see something through that requires that much diligence and commitment.

  144. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by confused_demon · · Score: 1

    It used to be true that foreign students that completed advanced degrees in the US would stay in the US. Now more and more of them want to go back to their home countries after completing their training (which usually includes 2-4 years of post-graduate work). In my experience many foreign students are here with their governments support and have jobs waiting for them at home after they successfully complete their US-based training. The US actually has a long track record of recruiting bright people from other countries. We've done very well importing brain power. What's changing now is that foreigners are going back to their home countries and taking our training with them.

  145. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by redcrane · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can't teach with a masters. At least, not at the university level. A masters of computer or electrical engineer is useful. You can't learn everything you need to know to be a practicing engineer in a 4 undergraduate program. Most of the engineering recruiters I talk with are looking for masters grads. An average bachelors degree gets you essentially a technician job.

  146. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    First, a PhD will enter a company at a much higher level than someone with a BS, and generally will have far more advancement opportunities than someone with a BS. I work at a major chemical company, where I would guess we have eight BS-holders for each PhD, yet nearly half of the management has a PhD, including the CEO. PhDs generally have more respect, more flexibility, and more independance. They also have the opportunity to switch to academia full or part time, which BS-holders generally do not.

    That being said, it is a hard road. A BS engineer entering my company at 22 has a HUGE financial head start on someone like me, who entered at age 31 after PhD/post-doc. I have estimated that I will be around 50 years old by the time that I have the same sort of assets as that hypothetical engineer of my same age cohort. Yes, I will RETIRE richer than that engineer, but I had to spend my mid-to-late 20's working 70h/week for $20,000 a year to achieve this. Many people rightfully choose not to make this trade-off.

    Additionally, MD's have similar training periods with a higher payoff, and lawyers and MBAs have a shorter training period with a similar payoff (and are more likely to hit the big-time upside). Since it is more difficult for a foreign student to enter these fields, their wages can stay a bit higher due to the lack of competition.

  147. It's a Worldwide Economy by mscherotter · · Score: 1

    I saw this as well when I was in graduate in the mid 1990s in a technical field (CAD software development). I would attribute this to the fact that we are now in a worldwide economy and that economy recognizes that the United States is where you go for a technical graduate degree. I think that this says much more about the quality of U.S. graduate degrees.

    --
    Work as if you might live forever, Live as if you might die tomorrow.
  148. Industry & Visas by centuren · · Score: 1

    Without reading through all the responses, I would venture that a factor in this is student visas may be easier to come by than companies that will pay for work Visas. Many foreigners I know in the US are here on their student visas, and are comfortably riding them while they earn their graduate degrees. It's win-win: they get to stay in the US and enhance their labor value at the same time, without yet tackling the hassle of switching to a new type of visa. American students, on the other hand, are able to go into industry with no entry hassles, and will tend to choose it over more school when in demand by industry.

  149. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

    God forbid! If enough foreign grad students go back home, we might run out of education!

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  150. 'Cause burger flipping doesn't pay well enough by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Clearly, most of the American students have already figured out that spending 4 years to get a degree in Engineering and then trying to pay down the study debt with a burger flipping job a McDonalds just doesn't work in practice.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  151. John Adams might have something to say about this by megazork · · Score: 1

    I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. My sons ought to study mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history, naval architecture, navigation, commerce, and agriculture, in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry, and porcelain.
    - John Adams

  152. It's not just graduate school! by You+Don't+Know+Me · · Score: 1

    The number of US students going into Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) careers dropped in the 1994-2004 period ( http://www.gao.gov/docsearch/abstract.php?rptno=GAO-06-114 ).

    It's time to wake up and do something! Help pre-college kids have fun with technology - the USFIRST program has kids in Kindergarten-High School building things that move, from simple machines up through 25 kilo semi-autonomous robots. Team oriented so the kids learn more than just technology - teamwork, competition and professionalism to name a few. See http://www.usfirst.org/ for details.

  153. Because a U.S. undergrad degree is enough by UninvitedCompany · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's easy. Anyone with a modicum of talent and an undergraduate engineering degree from a U.S. college or university can find just as good a job as they would with a graduate degree.

    With an engineering degree from a non-U.S. institution, that's not true, especially for jobs in the U.S. Hence, people from many other countries come to the United States to get a graduate degree so they can open the door that a U.S. undergrad degree would open.

    The only jobs where a graduate engineering degree is required or will help are teaching positions and very high-level technical jobs which also require unusual talent and decades of experience.

  154. Our schools suck... thats why. by JRHelgeson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In a study of the seven leading industrialized nations, the United States scored dead last in mathematics. However, the students involved in the study ranked first place in how confident they FELT about their mathematic skills.

    They keep lowering the educational standards in order to keep kids passing through the system. This system, however, keeps focusing on making sure the kids feel good without ever having them accomplish anything. Compounding the problem is that everyone gets an award, so the ninth place trophy winner is just as good as the first place trophy winner. You take the kids that really do have talent and try hard and tell them that they're just as much a no-talent bozo as the kids who ride the short bus to school. They learn nothing, but damn if they don't feel good about themselves. The education system's modern bubble-wrap mentality of no losing, no disappointments, no harsh reality checks has provided a surplus of of girls who think dressing like a slut somehow empowers them, guys who have been beaten down into spineless wimps and that the whole world stops if any of them are ever offended.

    I'm seeing these kids enter into college where their brains are mush. They're not stupid - they've just never been challenged. They expect to get a C grade for simply turning in the assignment, and an A for effort.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
    1. Re:Our schools suck... thats why. by Lorean · · Score: 1

      Although North American high school are a waste of time, we make up for it in University. China has the opposite problem. Chinese high schools are very demanding, and students grind hard for entrance exams. But once in University, graduation is virtually guaranteed.

  155. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to flame you, but instead I'll just say dude, you need to get some friends. No one is particularly interested that some random dude on Slashdot goes to such-and-such school in whatever degree program and what the requirements are for it, that you finished finals today, what car you want, and ohmyfuckinggod any other mundane details about your personal life right now. This is not Myspacebook.

  156. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    I agree. Americans on the east coast will gladly take up a DoD contractor's job and work around DC (where I'm at) rather than go for another 2-5 years of studies on a stipend, because we live in the culture of cars and houses and hot dates. Other students from countries abroad will on the other hand clearly see the benefit of being able to enroll - for free i.e scholarship - in some of the worlds top schools of higher education. You need MAs to work if you're a humanities person, but any 16-year old today can get a website up and get paid for it.

    In secondary school and even college, schools abroad can compete quite easily with a strong teaching staff. When it comes to research and worldwide academic reputation, however, the US rocks. Here at Georgetown most of the American students in CS grad school are doing it part time, the internationals are actually a minority (it's a small program anyway), and science and math are on the rise in developing nations.. it should come as no surprise that given the scarcity of interest in technical/math oriented research, the worldwide supply of students would find their way here.

  157. Re:Becuz Globalist Radicals have taken over the U. by Zapped.Info · · Score: 1

    At least support your statement by alluding to what you feel is mentally unsuitable.

    --
    It's important to know that I forgot what I thought I knew when I thought I knew it all:Now I don't even know whatIknow.
  158. But do they learn anything? by BanjoBob · · Score: 1

    I was a manager of a VLSI lab in California many years ago. I hired this MIT graduate with a Masters in Semiconductor Engineering. I fired her a week later because he had no clue how a FET worked! How can MIT graduate a person with a degree in semiconductors that doesn't know how a basic semiconductor works?!? I had asked her to put some probes on a chip test circuit and to measure the rise/fall times of the transistor. She didn''t know how. Bye Bye. I never hired a graduate from another top university after that and my teams achieved some outstanding designs and concepts. That was in the 80s and 90s. I guess things are still bad when it comes to the quality of education in US graduates.

    --
    Banjo - The more I know about Windoze, the more I love *nix
    1. Re:But do they learn anything? by toddhisattva · · Score: 1

      I fired her a week later because he had no clue how a FET worked! Golly, I knew that in fifth grade. Because FETs are like tubes and I understood tubes. Of course, the math was above my head, I was only about four foot tall.

      Ain't it fun teaching graduates with technical degrees from allegedly decent schools? Things like what "ground" is, and where to look up RS-232 signaling.

      Time to tear down the schools and go back to guilds and apprenticeships.
  159. Being a lawyer is a better deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can be harder for engineers and scientists to get into a highly-rated law school, since admission is based on a combination of grades (engineers and scientists' tend to be lower) and the "LSAT," which is partly like the verbal section of the SAT and partly logic puzzles. Once in, though, the classes are MUCH easier than anything an engineer or scientist would have before, mostly open-ended discussion in class and studying summaries of old court cases for exams, and one can earn $180,000+ right out of school at many big firms. The work is not very exciting, mostly preparing documents, but the hours are not as bad as rumored - 50 - 55 or so hours per week actually at the office. The legislatures allow the courts to regulate admission to practice law. The courts generally require a *US* law degree to practice law - lawyers tend not to have their jobs outsourced or face much competition from outsourcing.

  160. In the US... by beckerist · · Score: 1

    Because in the US, we prioritize sports, history and "english" before math and science. Check the "regents" requirements (I don't have a link because I just lived through it:)
    Math: 2 years
    Science: 2 years
    History: 4 years
    English: 4 years
    PE: 2 years (4 years, half time)
    Art / Foreign Language / Music: 4 years.

    Don't get me wrong, we're a country full of obese, non-creative people...but THAT'S why. We don't stress it's importance, EVER.

  161. American Grad Students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you talked to many CE or CS Masters (or even PhDs)? Most of them can't code - or at least not like guys who have been galvanized in the fortune 500s. Now if you have both - more power to you.

  162. Because US citizens see what happens to PhDs by Wansu · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Most US citizens with PhDs are underemployed.

    The Ph.D. Glut Revisited

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    1. Re:Because US citizens see what happens to PhDs by scottyokim · · Score: 1

      Great link, thanks!

    2. Re:Because US citizens see what happens to PhDs by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      Important detail: Gary North is neither a scientist nor engineer, and he isn't talking about that subset of PhDs (as he points out implicitly in various places).

      Insight: The Parkinson's Law aspect to this may be part of why MIT is so good:

      Getting tenure at MIT requires two things: in the eyes of the department and especially its Visiting Committee (the various ones keep all parts of MIT on the straight and narrow), you've got to be #1 or 2 in your field. Maybe #3. This is of course hard.

      But then you have to pass the gantlet of your School, Engineering or Science (there are of course others, but I simply don't know much about them, and they aren't large). At this level, the Institute has an obsession about keeping departments from getting too large, especially in a new booming field. Anyone who remembers the early '70s aerospace crash, and who can measure the size of current aero/astro departments will understand why ... and this looks to have been wise WRT EECS.

      Case in point, one of my classmates was 100% MIT from undergraduate to untenured professor. He passed the department's cut---but not the School of Engineering. He's now teaching at Olin and quite bitter about MIT in general. (On the other hand, karma's a bitch, but that's a matter between me, him, and the universe. :-)

  163. More right wing Ostriching by Travoltus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As to India or China "surpassing" the US, what does that mean? Surpassing the US in what? Manufacturing? Good! That's economic specialization that creates efficiencies for everyone. Not only is talk of "surpassing" mere economic scare-mongering (did we learn nothing from such silliness when the Japanese were supposed to "surpass us" in the 1980s? Where are the Japanese today? Economic stagnation), it makes erroneous straight-line projections that ignore very important long term considerations of demographics and other factors. The US economy will be a large and important factor in the global economy for the foreseeable future. But the global economy continues to grow and evolve and the US economy continues to change from its post-WWII dominance (unsurprising since it was the only intact industrial economy on the planet) to an important player in a dynamic specialized global economy.

    1) China is already attacking the United States electronically. They're hacking into our military systems and developing anti-satellite weaponry. An anti-democratic hyperfascist dictatorship that harvests its own prisoners for involuntary organ donations is not the kind of country any sensible person wants to surpass us technologically. Especially when they're attacking us on the sly. Documentation: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9dba9ba2-5a3b-11dc-9bcd-0000779fd2ac.html

    2) Japan has surpassed us. Have you seen the high tech gadgets they have, as compared to us? Hello, bullet train? If Japan were to militarize right now, we'd be in a heap of it up to our necks. Oh and let us not also discuss how Japan has utterly gutted America's automobile industry. Japan, surpass America? They did that long ago, economic stagnation or not. Do you need me to provide you documentation on the superiority of the Japanese automobile industry, and the insolvency of America's once dominant counterpart?

    3) Go look up China and "sterilization accounts". In short, they are preparing to be able to sell off US debt and dollars without themselves being harmed (whether they'll actually do it or not is another issue). In fact, China has threatened to do just that to America.
    Documentation: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/08/07/bcnchina107a.xml&site=1&page=0

    If China surpasses the US, they clearly intend to wield their power over us in a very hostile way.

    But you being a greedy capitalism-at-all-cost fanatic cannot grasp the concept of national security. Just wait until oil is traded on the Euro. Then you'll understand.. the hard way.
    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:More right wing Ostriching by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      You are researching too hard for a reason to explain why India and China students go to grad schools. How about our society haven't entirely given them the benefit of the doubt. And they need More education to get the same pay as the normal American.

      I am not much for an school/university supporter as I see them as a cash vaccuum. But at least they take the curriculum seriously. Unlike most people here that takes it for granted.

    2. Re:More right wing Ostriching by Travoltus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was debunking the claim that rising Chinese technology and economic dominance is not something to be afraid of.

      The reason why more Indian and Chinese students go to grad school is fairly simple, at least in any tech-related (IT, Biotech, etc.): fewer Americans are taking up those majors to begin with, because they know these jobs are going overseas.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  164. BEng is a Professional Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's because, in Computer Engineering, a BEng is a professional degree. Whereas some people have to get a PhD+postdoc in biology to call themselves a biologist, engineering (or law, or medicine, or nursing, or pharmacy) is an undergraduate affair.

    Most North American students in Computer Engineering go to work straight out of university; most of those who go to grad school are looking to become academics.

    As for folks from elsewhere: some value education for education's sake, some want to become academics, and some may just want to get a Western degree, which could make it easier to get a job in the West.

  165. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by xgerman · · Score: 1

    > They accept those who apply. That's not true when I applied for a PhD program in CS a few years back my entry was denied because I didn't have all the points in the GRE (like 600 - 600 - and whatever). Interestingly the same year association administering the tests pulled out of India and China because there was some cheating. Any correlation? The next year I lost my job and started working in the lab of an Indian professor -- I applied again for the program but after three months of not getting paid I found a paying job outside the lab. Interestingly I never got an acceptance letter nor a rejection letter. So when the program was about to start I inquired about my status and was told no decision had been made yet. The next day I got a rejection letter. I learned later that this was due to me abandoning the lab because I actually couldn't work longer for free. However the industry partner I worked with during this time was pretty mad at the department that they didn't accept me because my work was PhD quality (and I think consequently pulled funding). The school is one of the Top 10 computer science programs in the US (it's an excellent school!) and my wife was enrolled in an MD/PhD program at the same school so another school was not really an option (unlike you enjoy distance relationships:-) Ok, to be honest, I am pretty happy with my job... so it was probably ok for me not to attend the program but it leaves a bad after taste...

  166. Engineering jobs going to India/China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the major reason is that jobs in this area are going to India and China. I worked for a large fortune 500 company. I am an American born citizen. More than half of our team was located in India and China. When contracts were bid, American companies were not even allowed to bid on the projects. I experienced active discrimation from my manager from India. I received less interesting jobs and less pay than the Indian counterparts in my group. I was also told by HR that it was OK to discrimate against non-minorities. Or another way of saying this: You will experience the same thing in the real world that you are experiencing in graduate school in the engineering and computer science areas.

  167. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by XopherMV · · Score: 1

    First, a PhD will enter a company at a much higher level than someone with a BS, and generally will have far more advancement opportunities than someone with a BS.

    Most companies are not looking for PhDs. So, if you find a company that you want to work for and their only requirement is a bachelor's, they're not going to pay more just because you have an advanced degree. You'll come in at the level of the posted position for the amount of the posted position, depending on experience. Considering you have no real-world experience, you're not going to be making more than the engineer with the bachelor's degree who earned nine years of experience while you were in school. In fact, the company may see your zero years of experience, consider you underqualified, and not hire you at all. Or, you may run into a company that actually values your PhD and they'll consider you overqualified for anything less than research - and heaven forbid you actually want to do something other than research.

    Either way, getting a PhD in engineering these days is just plain stupid. You give up years of earnings while spending a small fortune for a degree in a field where every employer wants to give your position to a foreigner, either here or overseas. You don't necessarily get to do what you want to do any more than if you had only the bachelor's. And if you enter technology, you're still considered old and over the hill at 50, far before you make up the opportunity cost and monetary loss for those degrees.

  168. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by castoridae · · Score: 1

    Actually, I don't know that a master's is really that useful either. When I hire (software) engineers for my company, 2 years of real-world engineering experience far outweighs 2 years of academic experience in terms of performance and ability. But I'm not a recruiter. A recruiter can use the Master's degree as a nice checklist item to screen for. More degrees = better engineer, right?

  169. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by tknd · · Score: 1

    MBAs are not cheap. They are not really a good investment for the engineer undergrad who can get around a 60k starting salary with just an undergraduate engineering degree. Of all my engineer friends who have gone off to get MBAs, they've all done it in order to facilitate a career change out of engineering not to simply increase their salary. I did the calculations for myself and found that if I went and got an MBA without working for 2 years, it would take more than 10 years for the degree to start paying off assuming my salary as an software engineer will not increase. There are MBA programs that allow you to work 30 hours a week and take night classes but I'm not so sure I'm up for that sort of torture.

    Engineers in the US are actually paid really well for their degrees. I also find that most of my social science major friends need to seek other forms of education (real estate license, tax license, MBAs) in order to even come close to engineer salaries.

  170. Depends on subject matter by Fnordulicious · · Score: 1

    I think the real reason is that engineering is boring for most Americans, they'd rather take something either "harder" like physics, chemistry, meterology, etc., or "softer" like biology, psychology, or linguistics, or into an abstract field like mathematics or computer science. This is particularly true for someone interested in research - why would they want to do research in engineering when they could have a much more significant impact in one of the other fields?

  171. What field? by etnu · · Score: 1

    Honestly, the only graduate degrees that are really worth it are law, medicine, an MBA, and people who want to be professors. A master's or PhD in Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, or the related does not yield enough additional income to justify the cost (both tuition and opportunity cost) of getting the degrees. Most companies view each extra year of school as being worth about a half a year of experience. If you're going to be making $100k regardless of the degree you attained, the only reason to get the advanced degree is for personal satisfaction, and personal satisfaction just isn't a driving force for most people. Of course, another thing to consider is that many american companies won't hire students from China or India who only have a BS (unless it comes from a really great school like IIT). These students wind up having to go to a master's program in order to have any hope of being hired.

  172. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by etnu · · Score: 1

    You sure as hell can teach with just a masters. You won't get tenure or anything, but most major universities suck in people from industry to teach. I know at least 2 people who have a masters that teach part-time. One of them even published a text book on security.

  173. The Reason by MahGu · · Score: 1

    I know of two reasons. First, foreign students are drilled and drilled on problems. Undergraduate education in the US is not as intense. Foreign students work together and build up problem books to cram with,(I know I have seen them and they are available from China on Amazon).Also all the solutions manuals to the basic texts in my field, Physics, are easily available in India and China, (once more I have seen them).US students compete in a rigged game. But who cares? If you are good you'll do fine, if you are average you will not advance beyond an MA.
      Another reason is that foreign professors actively recruit their own nationals for US schools. American professors couldn't give a rat's ass. Research assistants reflect the nationality of the professors (as well as their sexism). US grad students get relegated to teaching physics 101 to 300 freshman because they speak comprehensible English.As far as I am concerned who cares how Harvard or MIT spends their money on graduate assistantships, but for state schools to fund foreign nationals at the expense of their own residents betrays their very charters as public institutions.

  174. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Medicine is not the place to go - there is an insane glut of grad students and postdocs. Competition is extremely fierce. If you're thinking of going for any sort of specialty practice- forget it. Everyone wants to be a *insert narrow specialty* doctor; nobody wants to be a general practitioner or go into pediatrics where we really need doctors. So, we have 50 zillion hand surgeons, and a line a mile out the doors of all the family docs.

    As for medical research - our lab is chock full of foreign students. The lab director prefers them because they're basically slaves- they want desperately to be in the US, and the lab holds their visa. They'll put up with shit pay, no/little credit for their work, insane hours, and unreasonable demands.


    This is a good thing, right? Simple economic theory should state having medical care being as cheap as your pet's veterinarian or hair stylist. So just why is it so damn expensive?
    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  175. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by redcrane · · Score: 1

    I guess it depends on what you are doing. I'm a professor of computer engineering, specializing in computer architecture. Most bachelors that go directly into industry would have a very difficult time getting anywhere close to an architecture job. In fact, they would have trouble getting a position as an RTL designer. A good student from a ranked 5-10 school and an average student from a top 5 school might get a verification position.

    The people from top processor/system companies who come to me looking for students are almost always looking for masters students, sometimes PhD students.
  176. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by redcrane · · Score: 1

    I guess it depends on the school. At my university, we have a couple of adjuncts with masters but they are all very senior, either having taught for a long time or headed up major projects in industry. A senior person doesn't require any degree. Bill Gates doesn't have a bachelors, but do you think there is a business school anywhere that would not give him a full professorship if he asked for it?

    I have not seen a new adjunct who does not have a PhD. And, I have never met anyone who got their masters with the intention to teach at the university level (I'm a professor, so I've met a lot of masters students.)

  177. hello? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American retard culture.

    "Look at me and how useless I am!" only guarantees you a future with similar idiots.

    1. Re:hello? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more with you. This retard doubts his own decision to get into engineering. Look at Silicon Valley man - its powering the US - grow up and stop asking such stupid questions. You ain't fit to go to grad school.

  178. Deplorable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the very fact that you are asking such a question ("Do the smarter ones really choose medicine or law?") shows how misplaced your perceptions are. What someone chooses to study has nothing to do with how smart they are. It's a matter of what you like. Having gotten a graduate degree myself here in the US, I cannot just imagine myself in any other profession. I think your questions stems from the lack of exposure or a distaste that you have had to the engineering field. Some of the most brilliant minds choose science and technology - because it is so intensive and math and logic.

    If getting some extra money can make people go either way (engineering or medicine/law) then I can only regret that they don't really like what they are doing - they are doing it just for the money. Education is a matter of self-advancement, the very fact that this has some up in such a question as the above, is deplorable.

    Stop asking such questions and enjoy your work - otherwise the smarter ones will overtake you.

  179. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pulled out of China and India on some cheating?

    You got your facts totally screwed up; While you big-talk about PhD, your obnoxious trumpet blowing identifies you as only eligible for some burger flipping.
    (quote: my work was PhD quality)

    For your kind information, There is NO PhD quality 'work', only PhD quality 'RESEARCH'. And the difference is huge.

    The New Computerised testing methods were put on hold and paper based examination system for GRE in India and China was brought temporarily to ease TIME DIFFERENCE glinches when students taking examination in US could be easily tipped by CHinese students taking the same examination way ahead in time due to the obvious time zone difference.. Now its all synchronised and the exams are On in China and India.

  180. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Aw great. More chowderheads complaining about complaining.

    You know, I come to Slashdot hoping to read about the latest tech news, and all I get to hear are a bunch of slackers complaining about all the bitching going on.

    Thanks a lot. You've ruined my evening. Ass.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  181. Percentage of foreign S&E grad students by TheSync · · Score: 1

    http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf07312/

    Foreign graduate students make up 29% of all enrolled graduate students in science and engineering (S&E) fields.

    First-time, full-time enrollment of Computer Science is 56% foreign, Engineering is 51% foreign, Math is 39% foreign, Biology is 23% foreign, Social Sciences are only 21% foreign.

  182. Your expectations are wrong by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    The purpose of public education is to create good citizens. Good citizens are patriotic and believe that their country is the best country in the world and if anyone attacks them, then they are willing to join the army and defend their country. Good citizens think the same things other citizens think. Independent thought is discouraged. Good citizens can read well enough to follow the newspaper headlines and read a ballot paper.

    Consider that thinking the same things others think is simply parroting the headlines from the newspaper and 'independent thought' is simply thought and you will realize why what your professor wants children to learn and what the state wants the children to learn are incompatible.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  183. As a recent foreign grad student, .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I can lay down three reasons - 1. Higher education institutions are modern America's Ellis Island - the calling and promise of a new land to young future immigrants. 2. Higher education usually works out to be a mutually acceptable financial proposition for smart, enterprising students. Through financial aid, schools get students that are willing to sweat it out and most students do not perceive any drop in living standards. Sometimes, there may even be an elevation in the standards. 3. For many students, American education followed by employment and eventual naturalization is a irresistible mix of professional fulfillment, wealth and living standards with a good dose of nerd factor thrown in.

  184. The smartest people know to stay away from Science by umass2ucr · · Score: 1

    I'm a PhD life scientist. None of my colleagues are Americans. Heck, at conferences people automatically assume that I'm a sales rep, not a scientist. The really bright Americans know that they will never be able to buy a home with a scientist's pay. They would rather divide wealth rather than build it, because it is easier and more profitable to do so.

  185. old doctors and old lawyers by technoCon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To answer your question, ask how many old engineers you've met. Generally, an Engineering career lasts how long? When I got my Masters' in Computer Science people were talking about "structured programming" and things like OO and XP didn't exist. If you're going to go into Engineering, you'll have to spend a lot of thought keeping current. This probably true of medicine and law, too, but it seems that the human body and human nature are pretty much the same as they were a thousand years ago.

    You don't hear as much about age discrimination, but I figure it's real in Engineering (illegality notwithstanding) more so than other professions. Given this, it makes more sense to invest the extra time and money of post-graduate education in something that'll pay back in a longer career.

    1. Re:old doctors and old lawyers by etnu · · Score: 1

      Software is a bad comparison. Due to the rapid growth of this industry over the last few decades, a disproportionate percentage of software engineers have been able to retire in their early 40s. Think about how many millionaires came from MS, Oracle, Adobe, etc. in the last few years. There are plenty of "old timer" engineers in traditional engineering fields, such as aerospace, chemical, and civil engineering. 20 or 30 years from now there will be a lot of "old timer" software engineers, too.

  186. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by try_anything · · Score: 1

    Imagine a future where most U.S. tech-companies outsource R&D and production to India and china...oh...never mind

    Having a great university system is the main force slowing outsourcing. Many of the most talented foreigners come to the US for education, and most who can stay, stay. Imagine how outsourcing would be galloping along if all the foreign workers and foreign professors in the US had stayed home and built up the tech industries in their home countries instead of coming here.
  187. ESL Departments by MMaestro · · Score: 1
    A lot of foreign students are here on a foreign student visa. If they fuck up in school, they get sent back.

    Thats nothing, I once worked at the ESL (English as a Second Language) department at my college for a semester and the restrictions were ungodly. The students were REQUIRED to be sponsored by a full-time working U.S. citizen family member, was NOT allowed to work even part-time themselves, and subjected to weekly reviews which would result in his expulsion from the program if his grades slipped too much. This was for green card students already in the U.S., not foreign students applying while still out of the country. Oh and naturally, if you get leave the program for any reason, you don't get your money back.

  188. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Only a fool of an engineering undergrad goes straight to business school. You need a few years under your belt to get more than the "duh" factor out of it.

    Starting grads in engineering are paid amazingly well for the work they produce. It used to be that an employer would need them to stay for 1-2 years to break even on the investment in them; today it is closer to three years unless you get someone exceptionally committed. Too many people don't stick around or in the industry to make the equation work for the long term.

    A new grad we hired for a bargain that is smart and puts in more effort than he should have to produces only 65% of his actual salary (including O&P), and he is really doing well!

    Per

  189. I know why? by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    First-world students don't have to kill to get their education.

    In most non first-world countries, education is the domain of the wealthy. The most education your child can get in 75% of the world either comes from the School of Hard Knocks, or some form of education mated to religion.

    All those commercials you see on TV showing those little kids in schools sponsored by charities usually come with a substantial does of some kind of religious indoctrination, with all the subsequent hang-ups that engenders. Just look at what comes out of many Massadras?

    And even if they don't come from some religious group, or don't have an agenda of some sort, most children can only attend school until they're old enough to either work in the fields or in the factory. When was the last time a 5th grader in the US had to make a choice between learning or supporting their family?

    So when some Indian/Asian/African/South American kid's parents spend 90 hours a week, killing themselves by scrimping and starving to put their kid through a PRIVATE school, you can bet your sweet bippy that child is going to do everything in their power to get those good grades and excel in every way. Because if they succeed, then they can eventually bring mom & dad to live with them, along with the rest of the family.

    My friend from Colombia taught me that. He grew up on the streets of Bogotá, fighting for every peso, beating up other kids so he could take their jobs as a runner for the Cartels. He spent every bit he could spare on school for himself and his sisters. When his sisters became eligible for adoption, he was educated enough to bargain with the agency to not only get his sisters adopted, but himself as well.

    They are now living the American Dream that most of America has forgotten.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  190. I Feel Ill. by bottlerocket · · Score: 0

    You made $60,000 a year and considered yourself lower middle-class? I feel ill.

    My parents are both ex-military, currently working as civil service (well, my mother's still in the Reserves), and make a little more than that, combined. I'm twenty-five and am pulling in around $10,000. My girl asked me to marry her, and I told her that I couldn't do it because I can't financially support her. What planet do you live on?

    --
    where the comment ends and sig begins
    1. Re:I Feel Ill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10,000? So, you're making less than federal minimum wage? Maybe you should lose the Internet connection, first.

    2. Re:I Feel Ill. by Dramacrat · · Score: 0

      ... and drop the 20GB iPod. ;)

      --
      There are over 36 million lines of COBOL code in the world, and they are all raping children.
    3. Re:I Feel Ill. by irishdaze · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's so hard to believe about his income If he's not employed full-time, he could easily make $10,xxx a year without being a complete slacker. 35 hours a weeks will get him $10,xxx gross, and that's damned close to full-time. If he's an adult student, and therefore trying to better himself, then it's *really* likely he's not working full-time. Regarding the comment about his internet connection, I did the math some 20-odd ways when I was in between contracts: buck-for-buck, my internet connection was the cheapest way to research/apply for jobs, be reachable by contract agencies, and also have enough entertainment that I didn't completely lose my mind.

      --
      -- Dedicated Cthulhu cultist since 1982 A.C.E.
    4. Re:I Feel Ill. by cHiphead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If he is smart enough to contribute to slashdot comments then he must be smart enough to get a job making more than minimum wage. /sarcasm

      Seriously, pulling $10k/year is, frankly, retarded. In fact, if you DO have the mental capacity to post to slashdot (and as a result can likely browse and search the internet and use a word processor), you can make, minimum, $12/hour even with a dinky receptionist type job. Get off your ass and get a real job, its really not that hard.

      Sorry to sound so harsh but even at my lowest paid total crap jobs I still pulled in $18-24K/year.

      If the original poster has some sort of outstanding reasons (handicapped, mental health, etc), then perhaps theres some level of excuse, but GODDAMN.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    5. Re:I Feel Ill. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      It's all relative. Most people compare themselves with others.

      USD10K/year is not bad starting pay for a fresh graduate in a 3rd world country ;). But if you're living in a city in the USA, USD10k/year isn't going to go far.

      There are some people who don't earn a lot, but can afford to buy _almost_ everything they want - they just don't want that much.

      Whereas there are some people who have a lot of money but can't afford to buy almost everything they want, and are miserable as a result.

      Of course if you want to get married, then the "contentment zone" is different, the wife and kids might not be as easily contented. And the in-laws...

      --
    6. Re:I Feel Ill. by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      You feel ill? thnk how we feel.

      As you might guess, WHERE you live is more important than the amount you make, for the most part. Just as a point of reference:

      If your parents are making $60k a year, where ever they live, it is they can likely afford to buy a house. Here,in the bay area, they likely could not afford a morgage on a condo. A house, a median priced home will be be around $700,000. Yes, a normal house like we see on TV means paying $4500 a month, or more, to own. Renting just a room in SF will almost certainly cost you $700 a month or $8500 a year. For a ROOM.

      Cost of living is what it is all about, which yearly income is a part of but far from the only thing.

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    7. Re:I Feel Ill. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      New York, San Francisco, LA, and many cities have a monthly rent of more than $1200 for a decent one-bedroom apartment within commuting distance of downtown, or for a cheap small house (if you can find one!). Add a small family, and it becomes unaffordable for someone even making $60,000/year.

      Yes, I'm afraid it's lower middle class in those urban areas.

    8. Re:I Feel Ill. by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get off your ass and get a real job, its really not that hard.

      Actually, it really depends on where you live. In a rural area, you might be lucky to get $20,000 for a high end job with a degree in some areas. From a personal experience I grew up in a place where the furniture and textile markets had collapsed due to foreign imports and there was massive unemployment due to factory closures. However, it was a big government town (3 major state facilities in the county... 1 being a prison) so I was lucky and got a job as a computer tech early on. However, I will admit I got paid more as a temp job as a grocery bagger in a major metropolitan area 5 years later.

      Anyways... I did my best to get out of that hell hole and pretty much for the sheer fact I knew people living in a metro city in another state who I could sleep on their couch for 6 months unemployed and doing crappy jobs let me have the ability to search work in that area that helped me start a career in technology which eventually netted me a job that paid more than my dad got in our home town (considering he had a masters degree and I dropped out of college has to say something).

      Of course this is anecdotal but so is your observation. It really depends on where you live on your job prospects and income.

      That said... Living expenses make me wonder if I really make more here than I would be had I never moved. Of course, if I moved to NYC I'd even get paid more but I'd make less due to rent.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    9. Re:I Feel Ill. by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      50% of the people in the US have an IQ of less than 100. It behooves us to make sure that our less intelligent brethren are cared for.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    10. Re:I Feel Ill. by scoot80 · · Score: 1

      USD10k / year sounds terrible. If I convert that to AUD, that would be maybe about 15k (very roughly). I dont know what the costs of living in the US are, but here that would barely pay for the rent (depending where you live of course). If that was a full time job, that would probably be illegal here..

    11. Re:I Feel Ill. by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      10K/year is retarded. I live in Central Florida and attend the major university here (UCF). My part-time internship pays more than 10,xxx/year while I attend school full-time. Really. 17 hours/week at $12/hour (17*52*12=10608).

      If you work as a pizza delivery person for 40 hours/week making $5.50/hour (less than minimum wage), you make 11,440/year.

      No one that is trying is making 10,xxx.

    12. Re:I Feel Ill. by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      South Florida also would ruin most families with a 60K annual income. They would be cheating or stealing or cutting costs in desperate ways trying to stay above water. Things like car insurance, medical insurance or annual checkups tend to go first. A large part of the crime issue relates to one simple fact. Many minority types or people who have some problem with appearance or function have no way out other than crime. Selling dope and the like are normal consequences of people who live under too much economic pressure.

    13. Re:I Feel Ill. by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      No, you are wrong. Median household income for New York City is $38,293. In San Francisco, median household income is $55,221 (higher because San Fran proper has few low-income areas unlike NYC). So assuming that OP is married and OP's spouse brings any any income at all (even something like 10k a year) OP is very much not lower-middle class, even in those expensive cities.

    14. Re:I Feel Ill. by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      As other posters have pointed out, it depends on where you live. I live in a rural area (student) and work full time making $8/hr which works out to about 1k a month. I can support myself just fine with that, but to live my same cheap lifestyle in a city I would have to earn much more. So depending on where he lives and what he's doing in life that is definitely not ridiculous. Remember, there *are* people that make the minimum wage. At 40 hours a week that is only $12k a year. In many places your $12/hr shitty receptionist job would be nearly twice the average wage.

    15. Re:I Feel Ill. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. My experience of New York is admittedly in the high rent districts, Manhattan and Wall Street, and among technical people supporting the businesses there. I'll accept that it is skewed that way: the rents are outlandish near their workplaces and within easy commutes of them. I'll even accept that the numerical definition of "lower middle class" matches your numbers, you've provided reasonable cites.

      But a spouse in those neighborhoods bringing in $10,000/year isn't even enough to pay for day care and baby sitters for 1 kid for them to work part time, much less 2. Figure child care with a well equipped Manhattan day care at roughly $50/day/kid, figure 2 days of work a week, that's $100/week or easily $5,000/year. And that's after taxes, not counting food and transportation and medical and the extra bedroom. Have a second kid, and there are some economies, but it's still a lot of money.

    16. Re:I Feel Ill. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Actually, the tests have been seriously skewed for many, many years. The median the last time I looked was about 117: I think the test creators inflate them deliberately to make their clients feel better, like publishing a "suggested retail price" that is 33% over what anyone actually charges so stores can mark it as "25% off" and actually match everyone else's price. We've certainly seen "re-normalization" of tests as well, which make comparing them between years difficult.

    17. Re:I Feel Ill. by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      Actually thats $16K+ per year, and at that income you will receive some (or all) federal income tax paid back at the end of the year (if you are not a contract 1099 that didn't pay any taxes at all during the year).

      $12/hr receptionist job was low balling, if you do such work and get less than $12, its your own inability to recognize the value of your skills and abilities (lazy, incompetent f'kers notwithstanding) that lets you convince yourself to accept any lower pay for the work. I can understand being in a pinch of having some specific hardship that requires you to take a job, but from my own experience and first hand witnessing, if you get off your ass, you can get a job that pays enough to pay rent and food and even some internets for slashdot ranting.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    18. Re:I Feel Ill. by i_b_don · · Score: 1

      What? you think people in the lower 50% actively go out and look to take an IQ test? Unless your "median" is from a randomly sampled pool of people, I would have every expectation the IQ test results would be biased high.

      don

      --
      all language nazi's will burne in heil!
    19. Re:I Feel Ill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only somebody NOT actually from any of these areas would write this. First, just because a lot of people make X dollars doesn't make X dollars middle class. Middle class is not defined by the number of people making the same amount of money. In Los Angeles, less than 20% of households can afford to purchase a median-priced home. 8% of city residents have some of their housing costs subsidized (how do you like the corporate welfare where the taxpayers foot the bill for worker housing so Wal-Mart can get away with paying less?). Hell, 43% of renters are paying MORE than 30% of their income towards rent. I make just barely over $60k and I can't even afford RENT any where near my job. I have to commute for an hour each way every day. The worse part is that I make much more than my friends. Lastly, no you cannot "pull down" $60k being a garbage collector in Los Angeles despite the common urban legend.

    20. Re:I Feel Ill. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Your expectation does not match mine. Entire school districts, and especially people looking for educational assistance, take IQ tests as part of their testing procedures. In a number of ways, slow kids are more likely to be tested, although not necessarily likely to be shown the IQ ratings. The games schools and psychologiests play to sculpt the results to make sure the kids get the treatment or resources the schools have, and not resources the schools can't afford or consider awkward to provide, are pretty amazing.

      This is partly how the IQ tests wound up skewed so high in their rankings. No one liked to hear that a kid had a 98, but that's not so bad. So instead they've renormalized the tests at, say, 117, they say the kid has a 112 and that's reasonable.

    21. Re:I Feel Ill. by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      For a city like New York, the median income statistics can be heavily unreliable, since these measurements include areas like the Upper East Side, the pearls and diamonds of the city, as well as several of its opposites.

    22. Re:I Feel Ill. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Yes, I'm afraid it's lower middle class in those urban areas."

      Which is the reason to do everything you can to not live there. I can FULLY retire at 30K GROSS a year and live comfortably in South Carolina. I own my own home(s), three small fixed-up "fixer uppers" and 16 acres of decent land.

      NOT living in Bergen County NJ (where I was raised) is a money (and personal freedom) multiplier.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    23. Re:I Feel Ill. by photomonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I agree. If the HOUSEHOLD income is $60,000/year in Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose, San Diego (actually, basically ALL of California), or D.C., It's lower middle class.

      But it is also entirely livable. People tend to make very poor credit and purchasing decisions which makes already tight cashflow even tighter. That's the real killer.

      --
      Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
    24. Re:I Feel Ill. by brjndr · · Score: 1

      NOT living in Bergen County NJ (where I was raised) is a money (and personal freedom) multiplier.

      It's also health +1, hygiene +1, scenery +1, likelihood of getting robbed -1, and Guys who pretend to be mobsters just because they're Italian -1.

    25. Re:I Feel Ill. by bottlerocket · · Score: 1

      Do you know what a felony is? No, really, you may be familiar with the term as a sort of crime, but do you know what it does with your life?

      I got a felony drug conviction when I was twenty. I was using, not selling. I was young, dumb, in college and thought I had everything figured out. One night, one mistake, and I'm fucked for the rest of my life.

      I can no longer rent an apartment under my own name. Landlords do background checks. Decent jobs do background checks. Hell, I live next the building that housed the first Family Dollar, applied, was hired, showed up for work my first scheduled shift, and the manager told me I couldn't work because he'd gotten a letter from corporate saying I could not work for them because of some report their hiring computer spit out. I can't get student loans to finish the two semesters of college education I have left. I've tried various internships and work-study programs. The best thing I've found is taking the General Civil Service Exam, but that's an $890 program, which is almost three months pay. I can barely make rent, let alone feed myself. (Yes, that's where I work.)

      Buddy, if your company is hiring, I'd gladly relocate (yay, Greyhound!) to work for ya. I have three-quarters of a degree in graphic design, know Cold Fusion fairly well, and code a mean website in W3C-compliant code in a text editor.

      --
      where the comment ends and sig begins
  191. Depends on where you are by AnonymousCactus · · Score: 1

    I'm a grad student at a well-known school. International students account for maybe 20-30% of my class. I would argue that it should be more. The U.S. has some of the best schools, yet great people exist everywhere.

  192. Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at your professors! Most of mine were foreigners with what appeared to be severe commitments to bringing their "little buddies" from the "homeland" over here... Gotta bring them all!

  193. Call them aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call them aliens; it sounds even creepier

  194. Same in Music and Medicine by Kreisler · · Score: 0

    I have a doctorate in music, my wife is finishing her medical degree. Both of our experiences are similar - mostly foreign grads in our graduate programs. Having been a college professor, I've seen a bit of a paradigm shift in the last 10 years. Several years back, universities were actually pushing foreign admissions to make their campuses more "multicultural." Nowadays, many have changed their tune, realizing that the American workforce is having a bit of a brain drain problem. Of course, in the big picture it may not be as troublesome as it first appears. If we look at it from a Kurzweilian sense, maybe these are the growing pains towards some kind of singularity or world government situation. Or maybe it's because the natives are lazy. I taught at a Big 12 school that was 90% white during the daytime Monday through Thursday. Evenings and weekends and the library were about 20% white, most of whom were just using the facilities to check Facebook.

  195. Enormous side effects of processes described here by beachdog · · Score: 1

    The political strategist Thomas P.M. Barnett suggested that "side effects" of American policies with respect to the rest of the world in many cases may dwarf the explicitly observed and worried over effects of an explicitly defined problem like Al Quaeda or the resolution of the conflict in Iraq.

    It looks to me like the foreign graduate student influx into the US graduate study system is one of those "side effect" processes. Question: how many foreign graduate students become permanent US Residents or immigrants every year? What is the net flow of people into the US?

    The slashdot postings here have brought out an anecdotal explanation of why the grad student influx exists and what are the effects it causes within the US.

    The recently proposed and rejected Immigration Bill in the US Congress explicitly favored providing immigration preference for graduates holding advanced degrees.

    As reported here: We are pulling bright well educated people from around the world into American employment.

    I have been recently trying to understand: Why does the US continue to be "wealthy"? How does the influx of bright well educated people contribute to the "wealth" of the USA?

    There are factors like the US trade deficit and US military spending that suggest "wealth" (as cash flow to overseas destinations) is flowing out of the country.

    Any suggestions for further reading on this "wealth" and "influx of grad students" issue?

  196. You answered your own question..... by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

    ....because Americans don't care enough to use the proper part of speech, speaks volumes.

    Your query SHOULD have read....

    "Why ARE US Grad Schools mainly non-US Students?"

    The fact that someone such as yourself, hasn't learned when to use IS vs. ARE, is absolutely inexcusable. You can't even form a sentence properly, and you've been going to school for how many years?!?.

    People who learned English as a second language may not be able to speak it as well as you or I....but they must be doing something on their application that makes them look like a more attractive education prospect that you. I wonder what that could be?

    --
    There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
    1. Re:You answered your own question..... by Xuranova · · Score: 1

      ACTUALLY...

      His question was "Why is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students?"

      Notice the lack of "s" at the end of school?

      You used ARE and then added the "S" to school to make your question gramatically correct.

      Should he have probably said "Why is MY US grad school mainly non US students?" ? Probably.

      But he was referring to one school, his school, and used "is" correctly.

      --
      "There is no real right or wrong, just what the majority accepts at the time."
    2. Re:You answered your own question..... by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

      Wrong, because that implies only one grad school is like that, and we know that it's not just a problem with one grad school.

      "Why ARE US grad schools......"

      Sorry, I'm going to have to refute your claim.

      --
      There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
  197. Sounds shortsighted by Johku · · Score: 1

    That sounds terribly shortsighted by the insurance companies. I have understood that dental care is one of those areas where you can save a lot by early treatment before the problems grow bigger. Or do they not cover even serious dental problems?

    It is way too easy to let your teeth go unchecked even if it does not cost you that much to visit a dentist. Last year I finally visited a dentist after 7 years since the last visit so I know that from personal experience. And that did not cost me more than a nominal price (12 EUR or 17 US$) in public dental care (I live in Finland). At that time I promised to myself that I would get my teeth checked yearly, but this was year and a half ago...

  198. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by DeadChobi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The question you have to ask yourself is how much more money you'd be making if you got that master's degree, and if the extra cost is equal to the additional amount of money you'd make over the course of your life.

    That said, I think the reason a lot of us avoid going to school for additional degrees is because of the substantial debt we accrue while in college. I, for one, am going to be in the hole 17k when I'm finished.

    How do the foreign students pay for their schooling?

    --
    SRSLY.
  199. China pays, not all Indians are poor by huckamania · · Score: 1

    I still graduated with honors. CS was in the Natural Sciences so the GPA for honors was inflated by all the idiots taking Interior Design and other cruft.

    When I worked at a startup in Silicon Valley, one of my Chinese co-workers gave me the back handed compliment that I was pretty smart for an American.

    The truth is that for CS, you are more likely to learn out-dated information rather then cutting edge stuff. When you get out into the real world, you pretty much have to stay on the cutting edge or start working on a career in management.

    It's just a piece of paper and mine is framed and hanging in the garage.

  200. money money money by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    Grad school costs way too much.

    Living in the US costs too much.

    Non-US students are getting a better primary education.

    They teach their children math and science, while we argue about god.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  201. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

    You most certainly can, one of my comp sci profs in college had a master's in CS as his highest degree.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  202. supply and demand by mathfeel · · Score: 1

    Simple as that I think.

    In US, there's a huge demand for undergraduate degree because basically everyone's expected to have a college degree in the US now a day. Many come out of high school are expected to go to college. So university don't actively look for applicants oversea, except for few exceptional cases (I know a single case of a prodigy from China that was recruited, having demonstrated his ability in international high school competition). Most non-US undergraduate student I know are short-term exchange student (just like you can go oversea to some other country).

    For graduate advanced degree, the at-home demand is a lot lower. Most US students don't want an advanced degree because they think they'll be making more money with a real jobs few years down the road. But professors still need phd students to do their research, so graduate department actively seeks foreign applicant to fill the spaces. As for why a particular country/ethnicity, I think it's just global economy. China, India, Korea, Japan has huge CS/EE industry, so many study the subjects as undergraduate, so naturally they will apply to graduate school in the same field.

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  203. Did you know... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    ... that there is only one story on Slashdot since tagging was introduced that relates to becauseamericansaredumb? Fascinating stuff.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  204. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by stapedium · · Score: 1

    The reason that most medschool grads want to specialize is that the pay is much better. HMO's have shifted most of the risk of being an insurance company onto the primary care physician (internist, family doc and pediatricians). Most specialties are procedure based and have been able to avoid things like capitation, staying funded mostly of a fee for service basis.
    The good news for patients is that most medical specialties require 3 years of training in internal medicine before applying for a specialty fellowship. And the surgical specialties...lets just say you are better off not having most surgeons as you primary care physician.
    The shortage of primary care physicians would dry up in less than five years if the reimbursement for primary care actually paid the bills. Most medicine specialists can do primary care, it just doesn't pay for them to spend their time on it.

  205. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I wanted to answer retarded rhetorical questions and debate on pointless things, I'd go to http://answers.yahoo.com/

  206. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

    So, you could say that a Ph.D. at Immigration Services is equivalent to a +5 Insightful on Slashdot...

  207. The collapse of the Computer Science Degree in US by sashley · · Score: 1

    The collapse of the Computer Science Degree in the U.S. via H-1B.
    I suggest you look at a couple articles that tackle the same issue from different view points. First, Half Sigma has a post called Why a career in computer programming sucks he describes:

    The foreignization of computer programming

    I'm sorry about using a word that doesn't exist in the dictionary, but foreignization best explains what's happening in the computer programming industry.

    First of all, there is the familiar outsourcing of jobs to foreign countries, mostly India. Because of this, the computer programming industry within the United States is an industry with a shrinking number of jobs, although as a worldwide phenomenon I'm sure computer programming will grow at a brisk rate. Would outsourcing of computer programming and other IT jobs be such a big trend if the industry were more prestigious? I think not. You don't see lawyers being outsourced. In fact, by law, only members of the bar are allowed to practice law, so it would be illegal for foreigners to do American legal work.

    The other half of foreignization is the near abandonment of the domestic IT market to foreigners. This is a trend that is accelerated by the issuance of special H1-B visas that allow extra computer programmers to come here and take jobs away from American programmers. Computer programming (along with nursing) has been specially targeted by our government for foreignization.

    Foreignization creates a vicious circle effect with the low prestige of the profession. Because the profession has low prestige, employers balk at the idea of having to pay high salaries (while it seems perfectly appropriate if a lawyer or investment banker is making a lot of money). Thus the demand for more H1-B visas so that salaries can be decreased. In turn, Americans see an industry full of brown people speaking barely intelligible English, and this further lowers the industry's prestige. Computer programming and IT in general is now seen as the foreigner's industry and not a proper profession for upwardly mobile white Americans. [The Indian and Asian people I've known in the IT industry are nice people, and normally I don't pay attention to their different appearance, so this should not be taken as a racist dislike of non-white people. I am only accurately describing the fact that the typical white American thinks negatively of a profession that's predominately non-white. And I stand by my belief that people born in this country have more rights to the money being created here than foreigners. Asian countries feel the same way about foreigners. Asian countries are, typically, a lot less open to foreign worker immigrants than is the U.S.]

    Because there is no reason to think that the trend of foreignization will reverse, this will ensure that the future of the industry will be lower salaries.

    And Bill Gates himself has noticed the problem within the Computer Science programs within the United States, though he places the blame not on the H-1B process, of which he is a strong supporter but upon the Computer Science programs themselves. In a article from the American called Revenge of the Frosh-Seeking Robots, Bill is quoted when asked who is his greatest competitor:

    "Goldman Sachs," was Gates's surprising reply.

    Gates went on to explain that he was in the "IQ business." Microsoft needed the best brains available to make top-shelf software. His primary rivals for the smartest kids in America were elite investment banks such as Goldman or Morgan Stanley.

    "Microsoft must win the IQ war," Gates said, "or we won't have a future."

    The article continues on discussing the current trends in U.S. Universities:

    Recent enrollment figures are o

  208. My results of obtaining a MS in CS 13 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in 1992-1994, we had 75 Computer Science graduate students. 85% were from China (mainly), India and Vietnam. They were in graduate school to land a job in the USA. Over the next 13 years, my CS graduate degree has:

    - helped me get a few corporate interviews I would have missed
    - cost me about $35,000 in forgone earnings (1992 dollars - $70k today)
    - initially made it harder to get a job. I had 2 years commercial software development experience after the BS in CS then 2.5 years in grad school. Once out of graduate school, I was classified as having 2 years professional experience instead of 5 had I not gone for a MS

    I'd skip the graduate degree if I had to do it all over again.

    A corollary is that I will not get a law degree, medical degree or MBA because I'm gambling $120,000 in lost money (40,000+ in school expenses and at least $30,000 in lost income after taxes for each year) plus losing out on the investment from it compounding for the next 40 years.

    At some point, with the US college graduate competing with lowest cost 3rd world labor, an undergraduate degree may not be worth it (forgoing 4 years of income, the expense of school, plus the forgone compounding of investments made in those 4 years).

    1. Re:My results of obtaining a MS in CS 13 years ago by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      At some point, with the US college graduate competing with lowest cost 3rd world labor, an undergraduate degree may not be worth it (forgoing 4 years of income, the expense of school, plus the forgone compounding of investments made in those 4 years).

      I don't think that's going to happen, because it assumes that the US Dollar will remain more valuable than those other nations' currencies, and that the cost of living here will remain much higher than in those other countries. I'm pretty sure our currency is going to devalue, and our entire economy possibly collapse, before we get to the point where it's not financially worthwhile to go to college. Our currency has already fallen below the Canadian Dollar, and is still headed down.

  209. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by polyex · · Score: 1

    How come racism/xenophobia are mixed together so much when it comes to developing other nations technological base VS the United States? If you want to help stop racism, at least identify it correctly. I mean you are talking about foreign nationals here, many of which are on a U.S. taxpayer grant. All Americans, regardless of race have to pay these taxes yet there are very few American citizens in graduate school for engineering and science. It is alarming to see folks trained to compete with the United States using our very own homegrown technologies. If the idea was that the foreign national was applying to be a U.S. citizen, most Americans would have no problem with it and your thinly veiled accusations of racism and xenophobia do not carry any weight, but instead your lumping everyone who is concerned with this trend of America losing out in the long run, with racists. America is a melting pot, not a place for someone to be trained in to take back home with them, a place that looks nothing like a melting pot in man cases.

  210. on paranoia by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    Any scientist who is a creationist should be viewed with deepest suspicion.

    Why, because they don't believe the same thing you do? I have found that religious beliefs generally don't affect the quality of a scientist's research. It doesn't matter if they believe in higher truths as long as they do good science and don't try to use faith-based arguments to justify their research results.

    If you don't agree, you can vote one it.

    1. Re:on paranoia by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      The reason for the claim that creationist scientists should be viewed with a suspicion is probably more of a moral one (funny thing you don't see it!)

      Creationism, just like any other form of religion, stands for principles and the way of thinking completely opposed to the scientific principles and way of thinking. On the one side, we have dogmas, arguments by authorities one is not allowed to question, and generaly a totalitaristic system with the uber-authority standing on top of it. On the other hand, we have the scientific method, which is just the opposite of that.

      In the eyes of the most scientists that I know (and I happen to know quite a few of them), those two worlds are fundamentally incompatible. This doesn't mean that a creationist can't produce a good scientific paper. It means when having to chose between a dogma and the science, a true creationist will turn his back to science just like this (snaps with fingers) and resort to his personal beliefs instead, regardless of what that could mean to the team he is currently working with.

    2. Re:on paranoia by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

      The reason for the claim that creationist scientists should be viewed with a suspicion is probably more of a moral one (funny thing you don't see it!)
      Is religious intolerance a moral reason?

      Creationism, just like any other form of religion, stands for principles and the way of thinking completely opposed to the scientific principles and way of thinking.
      Not a problem if you consider biblical and scientific authority to govern separate non-overlapping domains. If you're trying to understand the universe, it doesn't matter if you think it was created by God or not. If you're a young-earth creationist you might have some trouble with evolutionary biology or astrophysics, depending on your point of view. Also, there's been a lot of phony science in the name of intelligent design (there's even a museum now), but ID is a political movement, not a scientific or religious one, and I prefer to ignore them.

      The grandparent post wasn't talking about young-earth creationism or ID, but just creationism. The idea that God made the universe. To me, this is what the post appears to be saying:

      "The belief that God created the universe disqualifies one from being a good scientist."

      or perhaps

      "Science needs to be protected from people who have personal beliefs that aren't testable and that I don't agree with."

      The scientific method was designed to work regardless of the individual biases of it's practitioners. Science doesn't need to be defended from creationists, it can take care of itself.

    3. Re:on paranoia by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      > Is religious intolerance a moral reason?

      No. In this context, it's more of a "you can't press your ass together and yet fart" kind of thing. Either you accept a scientific method and LIVE by it, or you don't. There's no point in pretending to be a scientist while actually believing universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster or some similar creature.

      As we are speaking of tolerance (or the lack thereof), it's actually the religions of the world which are the incorporated intolerance. You can't cry for religious tolerance if you (respectively the vast majority of people sharing your religious oppinions) don't provide ANY in return. Just as a recent example, you might want to check this pope Benedict's blurb. And no, I don't buy the vicious back-pedalling which started shortly after he gave that speech of his.

      > Not a problem if you consider biblical and scientific authority to govern separate non-overlapping domains.

      It's not about domains, which are not non-overlapping btw. It's about the stance one takes at life and logic. The viewpoints of religion and science are not compatible. Period.

      > The scientific method was designed to work regardless of the individual biases of it's practitioners.

      Luckily, yes. However, the scientific method being rather robust changes nothing with regard to the original statement we are discussing here. The ID crowd has managed quite successfully to mud the waters good enough in order to seduce quite a lot "poor souls" by pretending to be science. It's in the responsibility of every true scientist to defend science against such missappropriation - regardless of whether this missappropriation can actually do any *real* harm or not.

    4. Re:on paranoia by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Is religious intolerance a moral reason?

      There's religious tolerance and then there's suffering fools. If you want to go claim that god created the earth in 6 days, go right ahead. I won't throw stones or anything. You could even be one of those screwballs that thinks there's a war on christianity (as the pres and most of the legislature is christian). I won't try to get you silenced. What I won't do is take you seriously as a scientist. Bible literalism makes me doubt your objectivity - it also gets in the way of the scientific method, as that requires you to consider only what you can observe.

      We really are too indulgent with the religious fringe over here - they shout about how we're a christian nation and how we should have god everywhere and we respond calmly as if these were sensible people. Really, when you make your arguments with volume and bombast, all you deserve is mockery.

      ID is a political movement, not a scientific or religious one, and I prefer to ignore them.

      What you're leaving out is that ID is apolitical movement masquerading as a scientific theory. This is a direct assault on science. Don't ignore it, fight it.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:on paranoia by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no point in pretending to be a scientist while actually believing universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster or some similar creature.

      Being a scientist does not preclude one from believing things that are outside the domain of science. It's important to know what fits inside the domain of science and what doesn't, and not to confuse those things (especially when attempting to convince other scientists of the correctness of one's own research). However, there is no requirement whatsoever that a person has to believe that science is the only form of truth in order to be a scientist. Science is powerful but is also quite limiting. Science only provides insight into how the world works, it does not tell you what to do about it, or provide distinctions like good or bad or right or wrong. We need other belief systems for that.

      As we are speaking of tolerance (or the lack thereof), it's actually the religions of the world which are the incorporated intolerance. You can't cry for religious tolerance if you (respectively the vast majority of people sharing your religious oppinions) don't provide ANY in return. Just as a recent example, you might want to check this pope Benedict's blurb. And no, I don't buy the vicious back-pedalling which started shortly after he gave that speech of his.

      You are attacking a straw man. I am not Catholic, I don't pay much attention to the pope, and I don't approve of religious intolerance, whether it is done by Christians, atheists, muslims, agnostics, whoever. I don't agree with the pope (in fact if I correctly understand what he is saying I think he's being intolerant) but if he wants to say I'm not part of the real church, that's his business. He's entitled to his opinions. And you and I are free to criticize them. But please don't make the mistake of thinking he speaks for all religious people, or all Christians. I don't even think it's safe to assume he speaks for all Catholics.

      The viewpoints of religion and science are not compatible. Period.

      I don't really see why that has to be the case. Some religions may be incompatible with science. Many practice religion in a way that is not incompatible. If I believe that Jesus died for my sins, what difference does that make to my scientific beliefs? None at all, as far as I can tell.

      The ID crowd has managed quite successfully to mud the waters good enough in order to seduce quite a lot "poor souls" by pretending to be science.

      So, this really isn't about science at all, it's about the perception of science within popular culture. I agree that most people don't understand science very well, and if they are unable to recognize that non-falsifiable theories (such as that the universe was made by an intelligent creator) are not real science, then we really need a better understanding of science in this country. The solution is better education, not telling religious people they aren't welcome in the sciences.

    6. Re:on paranoia by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

      What I won't do is take you seriously as a scientist. Bible literalism makes me doubt your objectivity - it also gets in the way of the scientific method, as that requires you to consider only what you can observe.

      There's a huge difference between rejecting a theory because it isn't scientifically sound, and rejecting a theory because the people who hold that theory happen to hold religious beliefs that you don't agree with. I have no problem with the former. The phrase "because the Bible says so" does not belong in a research paper (unless one is researching the Bible specifically). The latter is intolerance. If you refuse to take a scientist seriously not because of the merits of his/her research but because you can't fathom that a religious person is capable of rational thought, then you are letting your own personal biases interfere with your own scientific objectivity.

      What you're leaving out is that ID is apolitical movement masquerading as a scientific theory. This is a direct assault on science. Don't ignore it, fight it.
      It isn't an assault on science. ID generally doesn't affect science because it isn't taken seriously as a scientific theory within the scientific community (because it is untestable). It is an attack on the mainstream public perception of science. That's a big problem, but not one I can really do much about, other than to educate the people around me on the proper role of science. Telling people that their religious beliefs automatically disqualify them from being scientists is not helpful or productive; it merely encourages them to form new scientific or pseudoscientific movements where they won't be treated like imbeciles on account of their faith.
    7. Re:on paranoia by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      It's a pleasure talking to you - not many are in a posession of such a fine rhetoric weapons as you are. ;-)

      I'm afraid, though, that this discussion, however interesting it may be, could go on forever, without any of us coming nearer the other.

      Please be asured, that I don't disrespect you or your religion. After all, my wife is - kind of - religious too, and yet we're together for 20 years now (+3 kids). Being religious or not is one's personal decision which - you are correct - does not necessarily have to have any influence on the quality of work exibited by the said person.

      My stance, which I don't claim to be "the only correct stance possible", is that for a real scientist, such thing as the origin of the universe definitely *is* within the realm of science. A *scientist*, as I understand the word, is somebody who is firmly attached to the scientific way of thinking, not only during the working hours, but also in the day-to-day life.

      This probably does NOT mean that a religious person can not do the work of a scientist. However, "just" doing the scientist's job does not qualify one to really *be* a scientist, in the full meaning of that word.

      Have you read "The Dragon in my Garage" from Carl Sagan? In that book, he shows the passion for science and for the scientific way of thinking. One can say about him what one wants, but he definitely proved his devotion towards critical thinking and promoting the knowledge instead of supersition. This is not enough to be a scientist, but in my eyes, it's a necessary prerequisite.

      I hope my broken english was good enough to make my point clear. :-)

  211. Almost surely wrong numbers in post by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 1

    While I wouldn't be at all surprised for graduate departments in the USA to be majority non-USA citizens, it sounds rather off for any given department to be 90% Indian. There are certainly many very bright Indian computer science students who attend USA universities (as well as many in other departments, probably more in technical than humanities areas), but it's not *that* skewed towards India only. Many other nations also provide excellent candidates to USAian graduate programs as well; making most a healthy mixture of national origins.

    As to the question itself: my reaction is *so what*?! It's great for the USA to have the best and brightest from other nations study here. Many of them will choose to stay in the USA longer term; those who don't will contribute to the intellectual development of the rest of the world, which is an equally excellent thing. Students who happen to be USA citizens are hardly being rejected on those grounds from US universities (though the lackluster quality of US education at lower levels than grad school certainly contributes to an underrepresentation of USA citizens at the top of intellectual achievement.

  212. Re:Becuz Globalist Radicals have taken over the U. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A non-deranged mind would have the sense to break things up into paragraphs. QED.

  213. So what Americans HAVE to go to grad school? by trygstad · · Score: 1

    A little known--nay, virtually unknown--fact is that career officers in the U.S. Armed Forces cannot advance beyond Major/Lieutenant Commander (O-4) without a graduate degree. And there are just not enough slots in the graduate schools run by the Department of Defense to meet the need, so many officers do their grad school in the "real world"; I certainly did--on my own time, while working as an aviation squadron department head. My MS in Systems Management qualified me to be a Computer Systems Management Subspecialist. I have many friends and acquaintances who are now Colonels or Captains (0-6) who have two or even three graduate degrees; one my classmates, who is an astronaut, has 2 Masters, an MD and a PhD (but he is a bit of an overachiever).

    But look, if you want to go somewhere for grad school in a computing field where you won't be in classes with a slew of foreign students, take a look at the Civilian Master's Degree Scholarship offered by the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. Go to school in one of America's most beautiful cities, get a $34,000/year salary while enrolled in the program, with guaranteed employment upon graduation for a two year payback working in a civilian position for the Federal Government. And while in that job, you normally will get a security clearance, which is worth $10-30,000/year in additional pay in industry. But only U.S. citizens need apply.

    No, I'm not a shill for the Naval Postgraduate School; yes, I am an alumni, but I teach information technology somewhere else--where 70% of my students ARE from India. I'm just trying to make a point and advance the discussion.

  214. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by redcrane · · Score: 1

    From my experience on both sides of the academic hiring fence, it is very difficult to get a teaching job today, even a part-time one, at a major university if all you have is a masters degree. It's tough even with a PhD. The last adjunct we approved to teach a single class has a PhD from a top university and is a well known researcher in the field he would teach. Obviously, my experience only covers the universities I know about, but I am quite familiar with several and expect that many others are similar.

    With a masters and a stellar industry record, you might be able to get a adjunct position teaching what you do in industry. But, then I would argue its your industry experience and not your masters getting you the job.

    I agree there are faculty at major universities that only have masters. But, they tend to have been hired many years ago when the academic climate was different.

    Thus, getting a masters with the intention to teach in the near future at a major university is a long shot proposition and not what I would recommend to a student who wants to teach in such an environment.

  215. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by theuedimaster · · Score: 1

    "There aren't enough jobs which require advanced degrees in engineering to make it worth the time to give up 2-3 years of engineering paychecks, pay for college, pay for books, pay for living expenses, and earn those advanced degrees."

    My dad works at Ford in the science and research department, and every single engineer there has a phd or ms. There are lots of positions to fill for people that continue higher eduction.

    "More than likely, you'd graduate with a master's or a PhD and work at the same job you could get with a bachelor's degree."

    Um.... no.

  216. Americans aren't science oriented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An important factor that I don't see mentioned.

    Even at the undergrad level, very few Americans tend to get science and engineering degrees. IIRC the fraction is something like 15% if not less. Most of them get various pseudo degrees like liberal arts, african american studies, etc.

    On the other hand, half of all Chinese or Indian bachelor degrees are in science or engineering.
    Unsurprisingly, foreigners will be highly concentrated in physics, math, and CS departments and absent elsewhere.

    The other reason is that the grad school is a path to immigration and better life for many of them. An Indian student who gets a Ph.D. and then lands a post-doc job will easily make 2 times more than a well-paid professional in the same field back in India. Besides, he will apply for a green card as soon as he gets that job. By the time he's 30 he will be a permanent resident with a professional degree that pretty much guarantees him a $60,000+ job. 60,000 may be not much for an American, but for an Indian it's vastly more than anything he can earn legally back in his country.

  217. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by abaweja · · Score: 1

    Contrary to your belief, a Masters in Engineering in India, from India, even from IIT is considered a disqualification instead of qualification. Generally (not always) those who couldn't find job after Bachelors or didn't complete bachelors from say top 20 institutes go for a Masters.
    In the Internet age once you've been initiated through a bachelors degree, you can easily learn advance topics on job as and when required.

  218. Lawyers are not as Smart as You!! by roninamano · · Score: 1

    Dear Grad student, Please do not think that the legal profession is draining away smart people from your area of study. It most likely is not. People. People. Please, don't assume that lawyers are smarter than you because they speak secret squirrel pig latin. It has been my mission of late to explain to everyone why law should not be a graduate course of study. It should be taught to everyone in high school or undergrad at the latest. In most states you aren't required to go to law school to be a lawyer anyway. It is a scammmm. A scammmm. The lawyers got jealous that doctors were doctors so they simply changed their degree from the LLB, or bachelor of laws degree, to the JD, or Juris Doctorate degree overnight. The three years are spent basically goofing off, and most lawyers are privileged slackers who could afford the outrageous expense of law school. There are of course exceptions. But most of the lawyers you meet, and over 90% of the lawyers licensed know less about law than high school student with a good social studies teacher. What looks so complicated is only the "fizbin" element of law (ala Captain Kirk), it's not intelligence beyond yours, just intellectual dishonesty. The average thirteen year-old playing Magic the Gathering or any RPG is using a system of rules more complex than our real legal rules. If they taught law to kids the kids would wonder what the big deal is. By teaching it to post-grads, particularly post-grads with degrees in soft majors, the Bar maintains the smoke and mirrors illusion that their discipline is necessary. Just as we don't need scribes to write for us, we don't need (most*) lawyers either. But for the fact that their team controls the judiciary, they would be an obsolete profession. And don't forget, law is the only subject where a student is encouraged to BS the answer. Here is one of the examples I posted on Rent Wars about bankruptcy law: "What if a firm of CPA's had never heard of taxes? What if a carpenter had never heard of wood? Or a plumber, pipes? What would you think if you went to the doctors office for a check up and the doctor didn't know what a heart was? Or had never heard of aspirin? Would the term "Gross incompetence" even begin to describe that doctor? That CPA firm? That carpenter? Or that plumber? Incompetence of this level is routine for modern attorneys and judges." Full article with examples at: http://www.rentwars.com/discus/messages/136/382.html?sd Ronin Amano, Court Monitoring Scorecards.

  219. Competition at home by Fuzuli · · Score: 1

    I think the importance and power of a PhD in USA is different in USA and India. India is just an example here, you can easily say that the same argument goes for Turkey, Hungary, etc.. When you get back from USA with a PhD, you certainly have an advantage compared to others at your own country. If you can find a good position as a researcher or a developer etc in USA, that's probably better than your lifestyle in your own country. If it does not work out after the PhD, just go back, and your PhD will provide you a substantially better life at home.
    For well developed economies, the competition for various fields is relatively at a different level. I'd like to hear comments about the difference in the quality of life of an American engineer who goes all the way to the PhD, and one that does not bother to do so. Believe me, in some parts of the world, that grad degree creates huge advantages, which may not be true for USA.

  220. So you still don't get it... by arehnius · · Score: 1

    It's not about the quality of education (I had the chance to compare grad school in my home country and grad school in US, I'm an alumni of Georgia Tech, and I can tell you they can compare in every point)
    The point is how do you find a job in the US, if you're diploma is not known outside your country/continent and you're not from US.
    Besides, from my point of view, having a diploma from a US grad school is just to show that I'm able to tackle issues like working in a foreign environment, being able to adapt a new culture, ... And it was also an occasion to discover and visit USA.
    Stop thinking people are coming to US university because they are better, and try to understand it's because USA are the lead economical and cultural power in the world.

  221. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by SocratesJedi · · Score: 1

    Whatever you do, skip research - unless you look forward to flushing several years of your life down the drain to help some professor reel in a research grant, who'll barely care to list your name on the paper. I can't help but feel that this is overly cynical. I'm an undergraduate science and engineering major and spent the summer working at a medical center as a undergraduate researcher. My experience, as well as those of my peers, was largely positive with my principle investigator being insightful, thoughtful and fully willing to give credit where it was due. His graduate students and postdocs seemed similarly happy in their positions in the lab. I think it's true that the life of a graduate student is likely to be one of long hours, but if you're really passionate about your field it's probably not that difficult to allocate a lot of time to it. And sure, there are definitely bad heads of laboratories out there who need to be avoided, but it's not unreasonable to find a good professor to serve as a mentor and a guide if you're willing to look for one.

    If you want to be successful coming out of grad school- go for engineering, either mechanical or electrical. Big shortages predicted in both fields, from what I've heard. Not that I'm against graduate school in electrical engineering (part of my undergraduate training is in it), but it doesn't seem like a safe life strategy to choose a field based on where shortages in the job market are when choosing a career. A shortage today could well translate into a saturated field in 10 years. Fields should be chosen based on where passion is. I really don't want someone who just loves biology and would make important contributions to that field if there were able to follow their passion to go off and become an uninspired electrical engineer (not to say that there aren't inspired electrical engineers!).

    Just some thoughts though.
  222. Killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most the brilliant get killed in Iraq :-)

  223. Economics. by Viv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This question keeps coming up on Slashdot, in one form or another, and my answer is always the same: Economics.

    For most students who intend to enter the commercial sector, getting the "one up" degree just doesn't pay that well. Speaking about engineering specifically:

    1. Graduate with a BS/BA. Get a job, work for two years, and you'll be on just about even ground (salary-wise) with the guy who got his MS/MA. And you won't have picked up the debt/costs associated with getting the MS/MA. I ran the numbers for me, and the payback on this is about 6-7 years.

    2. Graduate with an MS/MA. Get a job, work for three years, and you'll be on even ground -- or often better -- with the guy who got his PhD. And you won't have picked up the debt/costs associated with the MS/MA. I ran the numbers for me, and the payback on this is about 15-20 years.

    And the kicker: Anyone smart enough to get a graduate degree can run those numbers. This doesn't even include the opportunity cost of delaying starting a family while you pursue the degree.

    However, foreign students have an added sweetener in the pot: it's easier to stay in America to make the big bucks if you have a graduate degree. And this tips the equation significantly.

    I just want to puke whenever I hear US firms bitching and moaning about how there aren't enough American graduate scientists/engineers. It's simple economics, you bunch of whining douche bags. You understand them, because when demand for your products goes up, you're quite happy to raise the price. But when the shoe is on the other foot? You whine, bitch and moan about how employment costs are out of hand.

    Again, it's simple economics, supply and demand. Supply short? Pay more. If it doesn't, don't be surprised when supply stays low.

    1. Re:Economics. by Ironpoint · · Score: 1


      Some points I would contend:

      1. You assume the person who got the MS/MA applied for the same BS/BA job and did not look for a MS/MA required job that paid significantly more. Any MS/MA graduate that takes a BS/'some college required' job is doing themselves a disservice.

      2. The assumption that after 2 years the BS will be on the same ground with the MS is wrong in my opinion. Companies like to carrot-stick employees into thinking this, but it is not unreasonable to think that the BS person will remain within 10k of the starting after 2 years. At my school, the starting difference between BS and MS is $13k on average. No intelligent MS graduate is going to start below or equal to what a BS + 2 years is making.

      Companies also like to "award" 2 years of experience for a MS degree, to get MS people to work BS level jobs at a discount. This scam short changes employees into thinking their MS is worth a flat 2 years of BS level work (which it is if they are dumb enough to buy that).

      3. Every dollar beyond living expenses is huge from an investment standpoint. The person who makes $55k (BS guy) and spends $55k invests nothing. The person who makes $68k (MS guy) and spends $55k invests $13k per year. After 25 years, the difference will outstrip the opportunity cost and tuition saved by BS guy. Why? Because, presumably, the MS guy is getting cost of living raises and so, the $13k difference never suffers from inflation year after year. The BS guy's tuition savings and 2 years of increased income are constantly fighting against inflation when invested.

      4. Companies will be more reluctant to downsize employees with an MS. On average, someone with a BS will be sidelined more during their career (perhaps more than 2 years).

      5. Most graduate students are also working either professionally or as an assistant, so the opportunity cost is more like $20k per year. Missing out on 'family' living or living in college conditions for an extra 2 years is not an opportunity cost to everybody because they would have preferred to live the same (single and cheap) even after receiving their BS.

    2. Re:Economics. by Viv · · Score: 1

      A few things:

      1. Your numbers are different than mine. That's not unexpected, which is why I specifically qualified it as "I ran the numbers for me."

      2. If I'm the hiring manager (and I've been one), I'll pay my top tier bachelors + 2 years exp guys more than a new guy with a master's degree + 0 years exp, all other things being equal. Sorry, that's just the way it is. I'm going to reward known performance more than future potential.

      3. Your point about the $13k difference and inflation is silly. Both of them will be fighting inflation, it's just that one will have a $13k/yr head start, and the other will have two years experience with the company head start. Which one wins has more to do with individual ability to get the raises than where they started.

      4. Depends on the company and situation. An electrical contractor that works with the government is going to downsize the guy with the MS before the guy with the BS who spent those two years getting his PE, for example. The MS degree gives you some extra consideration when downsizing, but it's not the only one. (... and sometimes, it can even work against you...)

      5. Try again. You yourself identified the BS Eng starting salary at about $55k. At an opportunity cost of $20k or so per year, you're saying that the grad student with a assistantship is earning $35k. Bunk. IIRC, typical research assistantships run on the order of $15k/yr stipend. Yearly opportunity cost is probably double what you put it at.

      And all that aside, IMO, the MS degree actually makes sense, if you're willing to delay payoff by 6-7 years. In fact, I'm currently working on my second master's degree (MS ECE already, MBA soon). But a PhD at 15-20, not so much.

    3. Re:Economics. by Ironpoint · · Score: 1


      2. Using this strategy you will only be able to hire misinformed MS candidates. It sounds like your strategy is based on the "familiarity breeds liking" effect. Your bias doesn't accomplish anything other than keep higher educated people out of the company. Since you are considering BS and MS for the same positions, I think the true situation is that your hypothetical jobs don't really need MS degrees, but you would hire MS people anyways at near BS salaries. Seniority based pay may make sense in engineering because the skill requirements plateau after an initial period, but for science jobs I don't think this is the case.

      3. When there is a salary difference and the employer is paying COLA increases, the salary difference isn't lessened year after year. 100k in the bank at 0% is losing value year after year. So, receiving a higher salary and investing the difference grows larger than 100k invested over the long term.

      4. Maybe. If a BS is ever kept over a MS, the MS wasn't required for the job, industry, or company in the first place.

      5. You are not including tuition/fee waivers or internships.

    4. Re:Economics. by Viv · · Score: 1

      1. "familiarity breeds liking". You could call it that. Or I could call it, "I know what I'm getting with this guy who's been working for me for two years, so I know how to value him. New guy, not so much. Once I know what I'm getting, if he's worth it, I'll make sure he'll get a raise."

      2. And as far as jobs in engineering NEEDING MS degrees goes, there isn't a job in engineering that truly needs an MS degree when you're comparing to BS + 2yrs exp. Why? An MS is just a BS with 2yrs extra educational experience. You can learn what I need you to know at school, or you can have learned it on the job. As long as you deliver what I need you to deliver it, in the time frame I need it delivered, I don't give a rats ass either way.

      3. Unless you work for a union or the government, you usually can't take COLA adjustments for granted. You either get a raise or you don't, and whether you get a raise usually has more to do with performance and politics than your degree.

      4. And you are not including health insurance, which itself may be as valuable as the stipend. Nor are you including vacation or other fringe benefits. If you want to include those, go ahead, but they're usually just going to increase the opportunity cost. If you want to include internships, go ahead, but you don't gain as much ground as you might think, as the $15k figure is for a 12 month appointment.

      Really, you're barking up the wrong tree here. I've put some thought into these, and yes, the payback on the MS degree for me is about 6-7 years. If you believe otherwise, you're wrong. But YMMV.

      After that, it starts to slowly pull away. Where it really starts to shine is if I ever want to move into an upper level corporation at a major corporation where there is often a glass ceiling that is a total bitch to break through without a graduate degree of some kind.

    5. Re:Economics. by Viv · · Score: 1

      Bah, damn editing. s/upper level corporation/upper level management position/

    6. Re:Economics. by SoopahMan · · Score: 1

      I wish Slashdot had a feature to move this reply to the top of the list, so it's the first response.

      This is really the issue. Let's break down the issue specific to Computer Science a little:

      1) US Computer Science education is really bad. The drop-off in quality from the top 5 schools to the top 30 is SHARP.

      2) Unlike countries who take education seriously, college is very expensive in the US for most students - even the crappy colleges are.

      3) Most job requirements demand a degree, and experience. Some just admit that 2 years experience trumps a degree. The truth is that 5 years of experience trumps a degree for 99% of jobs. High school + 5 years experience = college is irrelevant on your resume.

      4) Even the best colleges can't compete with what you can learn in a couple years working for a big software firm. You'll learn to work in a development team and with newer technology and methods that industry won't pass on to the educational realm for years. A great example of this is "Golden Code" which I've mentioned here in the past.

      So why would someone smart enough to recognize all of this go to college? In 5 years would you like to have the magic number of years of experience to get any job you like, with money in your pocket, or would you like to have a degree with $150,000 in debt?

      It's a decision that's only made difficult by status quo thinking. A lot of Americans assume colleges are generally doing a good job and that going to ANY college, even the 95% or so that are woefully behind with their curriculum, is better than just working. The only thing complicating one's decision on this is the pressure you inevitably receive from your high school teachers, parents, and peers.

  224. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by pablochacin · · Score: 1

    THAT is why foreigners outnumber Americans in these topics. It's not because they're smarter, not because they love engineering more, and not because education is better in their country. It's because they want to immigrate here That's not totally true. Of course that we foregneirs are not in general smarter than americans,BUT people who apply to a scholarship to study in USA or Europe are generally the SMARTER guys in their countries, not the "average Joe".

    Also they outnumber americans by a factor of almost 10 (if you add the population from India and China alone), so all those guys you see are just an insignificant number of the engineers there, but the best one probably.

    Finally, education is different in these countries and children learn to work really hard (too hard, actually) and be very competitive since they are in the basic school. So the hard work of a PhD will not prevent them to apply.

    With respect of the possibility to stay in USA as the ONLY reason, I don't agree. Maybe then years ago that was true, but nowdays people form China and India want to go back home a start their own companies.

  225. US folks simply not smart enough ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its really just that US folks are not smart enough. As this one US senator keeps telling on CNN: "US people are getting fatter and dummer".

  226. Americans moved there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Università della svizzera italiana - Lugano, Switzerland
    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=lugano+CH&ie=UTF8&z=12&iwloc=addr&om=1

    composition of the faculty of informatics (Professors + P.h.D)
    50% USA
    20% Italy
    5% Switzerland
    25% Rest of the world (mainly East europe, Brazil and India)

  227. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    Simple economic theory should state having medical care being as cheap as your pet's veterinarian or hair stylist. So just why is it so damn expensive?

    There still aren't nearly enough doctors to properly serve the population. When you look at medical school application records and see 250 people applying for one seat, what should that tell you? Probably that we need more medical schools.

    The problem is that a smart guy with lots of money can't just start up a new medical school to start raking in the cash - there are all kinds of barriers to entry. Essentially the medical profession has worked to ensure that there remains a shortage of good doctors in order to prevent a total collapse in pricing (you can't charge $100k for medical school if people only make $50k/yr as doctors).

    I was told elsewhere on this site that doctors are essentially forced to see people every 10 minutes to keep costs down. However, that is only one way of looking at it. Doctors get paid by the patient. Insurance company cuts amount of reimbursement per patient. Doctor has a choice: He can continue to give the same quality of care and get a paycut, or he can turn his practice into a body shop and see 10 people an hour and make just as much as before the cut. Now, part of the problem is that the doctor sunk huge costs like medical school thinking that he'd be making $200k/yr and now he is faced with making $80k, and malpractice bills don't get smaller just because the doctor chooses to take his time with patients. So his choice is essentially made up for him.

    Medical education doesn't HAVE to be so expensive though. Having more schools would automatically lower prices (supply/demand). You can also tailor your classes and modernize - a general practitioner probably doesn't need to know how to use a scalpel, but probably could stand about 4 more semesters worth of pharmaceutics and related coursework. A few courses on bedside manner probably wouldn't hurt either. A less traditional approach could probably greatly reduce the time spent in unproductive classwork and at least get doctors into intern positions where they can offset their costs with productivity (ie pay). The intern program could probably be greatly reformed as well (for starters get rid of the long shifts - there is no reason that doctors should have to work more than 8 hours per day except for long procedures - and reducing hours will probably greatly increase safety - it seems like we regulate truckers more strictly in this regard).

    If you turn medicine into a profession that pays reasonably well but without the huge recipe for burnout you'll get a lot more people to go into it. And I'm talking about qualified people who otherwise end up doing something else. Tort reform of some kind would probably be good as well (to go along with procedural improvements that actually fix the medical quality issues). Any time I hear about a doctor's lifestyle the first thing I think is that you couldn't pay me enough to live it - you work yourself to death and then reward yourself with a very nice vacation. I think most normal folks would prefer to simply live a decent life year-round.

  228. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Karthikkito · · Score: 1

    work around DC ... hot dates

    Mod parent funny. DC is locally known as "Hollywood for ugly people."

    I kid, I kid. The trend towards graduate school really depends on the school which you attend. I presume that the pressure to do so at G-town is not so much since a number of students go into banking/finance/accounting, where an MBA might come in handy but only after a few years of work. Even at engineering programs at, say, Maryland and Hopkins, a good number of students do want to at least get masters degrees. Some of the more advanced R&D work does require advanced degrees, regardless of job experience (mostly heavily theoretical stuff which it's hard to get trained for while doing design work). Not everyone wants to go into R&D, though, just as not every finance major at G-town wants to become an IBanker (probably a terrible analogy since I'm sure the vast majority do), so there's a pressure keeping some people away from grad school.

    Internationals are a minority at G-town since many international students go to grad school in the US to be hired and then get sponsored for a Green Card. Many of the positions requiring very specific skills (the ones where it's easy to show that just any American citizen wouldn't do) are recruited from schools like Cal, MIT, CMU, etc, so the small department makes it less attractive to foreign students.
  229. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    Mod parent funny. DC is locally known as "Hollywood for ugly people." Ha! You must mean ugly-on-the-inside, because they honestly are, at least the white girls. I'm talking about Caucasian females of ages between 19-25 years. Many of them should be shot. They have this high-pitched-voise, high-nosed attitude to life that immediately lets you know they haven't got the foggiest idea what they're talking about, and as soon as they open their mouths open to say something you feel an urgent need to punch them in the face. Just *BAM*. No questions.

    The subset of those who happen to be grad students are sometimes even MORE stuck up, you'll be surprised to know. I thought knowledge humbled the spirit and cleared the mind.. not with these dixies. Also, no matter how much they exercise they can't seem to get their bodies in attractive shape. You can be fit as hell, babe, but genes are a blessing you *haven't* got. It's pretty sad really. An incredible number of grad students here work out/jog/exercise in some way though and internationals are almost always genetically superior without all that. I don't know if it's the water, or the ugliness of politics in the air (we're a breeze away from ground zero after all), but despite all the pretty faces in academia here, you are somewhat correct.
  230. Or your boss pays for you. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    In my graduate CompSci program, it is older white guys (late 20's and up) part-time on the company's dollar and younger indians full time on whatever they can scrounge up.

    Personally, I wouldn't bother getting a graduate CompSci degree if my company wasn't paying for it.

    --
    Blar.
  231. The entry exam includes a grammar test by optilude · · Score: 1

    If you ask a question like this, you're unlikely to make it:

        "Why Is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students?"

    But in all seriousness: why not? They come, they pay, they want to learn and they've picked the best schools they can get into and afford. In fact, they put up with ridiculous visa regulations and bureaurcracy just to get there, and when they do, they probably realise the value of the eduction they're getting, study hard and do well. Ideally, selection should be on merit only (I know in practice it isn't always, but I suspect in the US it's better than in many other countries), in which case no-one should have the right to complain. Having bright students around you is likely to further the quality of your own education as well.

    --
    Author of `Professional Plone Development`, available from Packt Publishing.
  232. Education benifits are more rare by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    and, of course, education is more expensive.

    From what I have seen, companies used to offer education benefits all the time. Now, it is unusual.

  233. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be expected to be paid more because of my PhD if I applied at McDonald's, either. If a PhD, out of some sort of desparation, applies for a BS level job, than that is exactly what he or she will get.

    That being said, most of us do not apply for BS-level jobs. We apply for PhD level jobs, which have starting salaries higher than those that a typical 30-year-old engineer will make, with more upside potential and more inroads into management, where the real money is. We are expected to have zero "real-world-experience" but instead have expertise in some particular technical area, for which we are hired. Guess what? After a couple of years, we have that "real-world-experience" as well. PhD hiring is generally quite different than BS level. For the latter, large companies just hire a cohort of smart kids and then sort them into various openings. For PhDs, particular people with particular skills are hired to fill particular critical needs of the company.

    Oh, and most engineers are paid to go to grad school. There is a huge opportunity cost, but you need not spend "a small fortune" or even run up any debt at all.

  234. Perhaps this is speculation by tacocat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But when I went to college to be an engineer it was preceded by decades of emphasis on science. The Apollo missions where number one on the TV. And it was considered cool to be an engineer. You could actually get dates!

    Fast forward to my teenage kids. Being someone which technical knowledge about anything gets you labeled a Nerd and Ghey. This negative peer pressure, combined with the complete lack of any emphasis on people actually learning technology does little to encourage students to even pursue a BS degree in Engineering or any of the Sciences (except for psychology which might be considered a soft science).

    There's no emphasis for it. Look at computers and computer technology. People don't have any clue what anything actually does and they have an absolute aversion towards learning about it. Why? Because Marketing has told them it's all so difficult and dangerous that you should buy their product to take care of all your computer needs. Marketing leads to fear and fear leads to hate and hate leads to the dark side.

  235. Why not do some research? by supercrisp · · Score: 1

    Do you really expect a useful answer here? I'd start answering that question with searches at the Chronicle of Higher Education website and move out from there to other education journals, especially engineering ones. Now I'll take off my faculty hat and put on my /. hat to say: the foreign students I've met--in general--work harder. It's easier to get more motivated students if you're drawing from a global pool. I'll also add that basic skills levels of entering college students are declining in many states, so it may be that international students are getting more competitive in relation.

  236. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    MBAs are not cheap. They are not really a good investment for the engineer undergrad who can get around a 60k starting salary with just an undergraduate engineering degree. Of all my engineer friends who have gone off to get MBAs, they've all done it in order to facilitate a career change out of engineering not to simply increase their salary. I did the calculations for myself and found that if I went and got an MBA without working for 2 years, it would take more than 10 years for the degree to start paying off assuming my salary as an software engineer will not increase. There are MBA programs that allow you to work 30 hours a week and take night classes but I'm not so sure I'm up for that sort of torture.

    There are several things to consider:

    1) If the programs you are looking at have 10 year paybacks you're looking at the wrong ones and your math is off. Let's assume you are making 7K/month by the time you start school. For 20 months of school that is 140k of lost salary, plus lets add in another 8k for a pay raise forgone during school. Next is tuition - 40 to 80k at the high end for two school years. Add in another 2k for books and you are at 230k of costs - then take out the internship salary of say 10k so you have a nice round 220k investment. That's a 22k per year salary differential for a 10 year payback, or a starting salary of about 100k. Considering that is the average starting salary and you can tack on another 15k or so in bonus the payback is less than 10 years, probably more like 6 or 7 before you factor in raises. For some schools (To[ schools with salaries+bonus in the 140 - 160 k range) the payback is more like 3-5 years. You may notice I did not include living expenses - you'd pay them in either case so they are irrelevant.

    2) The differential is life long - you get the extra cash over a career, which is a significant financial gain.

    3) The salary potential is much higher for an MBA than an engineer - your plateau is higher and you have the opportunity to move into fields that would be difficult to enter with just an engineering degree.

    While I realize there are exceptions to every case (Gates, the founders of Google, the many people who run successful small business and only have a high school education) in most cases an MBA (from a decent school) will result in a lifelong salary differential that more than makes up for the investment, especially if you get the degree at 26 years of age rather than 40.

    You can argue the true value of an MBA, but the fact remains it is a powerful signal to employers which results in them being paid high salaries out of school and significant pay increases relative to their pre-degree salaries (44% per GMAC). In the end, the MBA degree can be viewed as an annuity rather than a bond.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  237. Sorry, your late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, It seems that you are just late. You should have went to Europe where you could have gotten a better education. America is now where the poor Asian go. The rich ones head for Europe for the quaility education. So why you ask are there only a small number of Americans in you class? Simple. 60% of Americans are "illiterate". Yes, that is correct. 60% of all Americans can barly write their name and say hello in the English language. 99.9% of the U.S. population has zero education in culture. That is why you should have went to Europe. Unless of course, you are a poor Asian. So, you are late. You missed all the smart Americans. So you have to deal with the dumb ones. Why is this? Because over the past 50 years the educational system in the United States has been trashed by every single President and Congress that has existed since that time. This is OK though. Because what you are witnessing first hand is the disintegration of the most powerful nation on earth. Fun isn't it. Being a part of history. Observing the last days of a great nation. You should be proud of that. It is like watching the disintigration of the Roman Empire. Exciting. So you should enjoy it. Have a nice day!

  238. Not flipping burgers... pizza delivery is the wtg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not flipping burgers... pizza delivery (in 30 minutes or less) is the way to go!

  239. and?-The moral and the profane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A simple example of this. Compare the Ten Commandments and how simple and clear they are. Now compare the human laws covering the same situations.

    If everyone wanted to be governed by laws? Then the world wouldn't have the problems and inefficiencies it does.

    1. Re:and?-The moral and the profane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, the Ten Commandments.

      Do they cover self-defense or defense of others? Do they cover accidents, carelessness, euthanasia or anything?

      The problem is, the world is complex. And while we can create simple laws, we can't force the world to be simple.

    2. Re:and?-The moral and the profane. by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Come now, the ten commandments are the end of the mosaic law, they're just the general guidelines. Leviticus would be more comparable to todays laws, and it's really interesting to read how much detail it goes into (specifying which family relationships you can and can't have a "relationship" with and when it's okay and not okay to murder). That makes for a much more interesting comparison.

    3. Re:and?-The moral and the profane. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Bah. Leviticus is bloody trivial. Have you seen the Talmud lately, or the Shulchan Aruch?

    4. Re:and?-The moral and the profane. by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      My apologies. My Christian background somehow failed to cover those books ;)

  240. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by pla · · Score: 1

    Getting an MBA has actual value.

    C'mon, quit trolling. You almost made me spit my coffee on the keyboard! An MBA has value in the same way that a pre-1982 US penny has value - Society may view it as worth something, but you'd get a lot more out of it if you melt it down and recycle it for its base.


    Okay, anti-beancounter comments aside, I can answer the FP. Why don't more Americans get higher degrees? Because not only don't they don't pay off, they often harm your job prospects in a weak market. We have an amazingly anti-intellectual attitude here in the US, compounded with a pro-cog view that all drones must have interchangeable skill-sets. If you can do more than your replacement, your corporate masters will view you as a liability rather than an asset.

    After the tech crash, I spent some time unemployed. Of all the jobs I applied for, I can't even count the number that rejected me for overqualification (I had a BS (two, actually) and about 10 years (if you include interning) experience in software engineering at that point). Now, obviously, companies don't really object to hiring someone "too good" for the position. They care about having to pay for that experience (or education). And even if you would gladly accept a low-paying tech position out of desperation to make your next car payment, they would still rather pay an idiot-cog to do the job, since no one wants an underling capable of eating their way up the food chain.

    So, if you want to find yourself unemployable, by all means get a higher engineering degree. If you just want to put in your 40 and retire (the American Dream - Give a company your best years, then go home and die when you have no more to give), stick with a BS in a practical field, perhaps go for the fluff MBA halfway through if you feel inclined to go over to the dark side.


    As for why people in other countries want them - Some cultures value education for its own sake. In India or China, whether employed or not, people will treat you with deference simply for having a PhD. In the US, it will more likely get you spit on as an academic elitist than treated deferentially.

  241. Because we have to afford health care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, American's are the wealthiest, but we are also the most wasteful and least efficient, which likely is an attribute of long term wealth itself for most people.

    The majority of budding minds (if they are still that way after our embarrassing k12 school system or our equally useless private school system) cannot afford education no less extended eduction.

    Just think about it, American's are pressed more than anyone to hurry up and get educated so we can start paying back a small fortune. Where is there time for grad school, demanding science careers, high end medical careers. All that amounts to lower return on your educational investment by extending your education or reducing the chances you'll get your degree.

    I'm all for cheap education, but what we are getting expensive education of low quality. Between no competition private markets and government regulation we are the least efficiency of the major industrialized countries.

  242. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm studying for the GREs as we speak so I can go back for my MS on my employer's dime.

    But a couple other things to take in consideration, the fact that perspective employees with a Masters or Doctorate usually are asking for more money means its often harder for them to find those first jobs. Its not enough to just get that sheepskin, you need to be able to prove that you deserve the additional pay your employer will be giving you. Otherwise you won't be stuck with the low paying job that BS grads get, you will be stuck with no job at all and a lot of student loans.

    In addition, its not fair to compare the starting salaries of someone with a Masters with someone with a Bachelors, as by the time the MS student graduates the BS grad will have two or three years of work experience under his belt. Its very likely that a BS grad with 2 years of work experience will make more than a MS new grad. From an employers view, which would you rather have? Someone with 6 years experience in academia or someone with 4 years experience in academia and 2 years experience in the workplace?

    In short, don't get the advanced degree because you want more money, do it because you love the field.

    BTW, many of the Indians and Chinese immigrants I know in the field got their BS in their home country and then came here to get their MS. I'm guessing that often they need those Bachelor degrees in order to immigrate here, so that would help explain why you see so many foreigners going for advanced degrees.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  243. US over-representation? by Soylent+Mauve · · Score: 1

    The US accounts for less than 5% of the world's population, yet accounts for ~10% of this graduate program. Sounds to me like US representation is very healthy indeed.

  244. Lost in the details by theolein · · Score: 1

    I am usually highly skeptical of the USA, but this "Americans r dum" business is simply wrong,and ignores the complexity of the problem.

    Firstly, American universities are usually regarded as the world's best. They are expensive and are funded to a degree with fees paid by students and to a degree by government and public grants for research. As far as I understand it, a lot of American students thus take loans to get through University with the goal of using that degree to earn a good salary and make a decent living afterwards. The system tends to discourage students studying purely for the love of learning, I would think, at the best universities at any rate. The universities, dependent as they are on student fees and government grants, will therefore tend to be very competitive in order to raise their standing in oder to attract the best students to produce the best results in both exams and research. I might be somewhat off here - I don't really know - but judging by the way universities are ranked (Nobel and other prizes and research papers published), this setting seems to support that kind of setup.

    The result, however, of this system seems to be that fewer American students will study for advanced degrees in fields which offer a lower financial return afterwards, since the cost is so high to get to an advanced degree. Foreign students, mainly from somewhat less well off countries like China and India, see the advanced fields exactly the same way as their American counterparts do, but the degree of perceived wealth is different for them, as earning 40% less than a Lawyer or Doctor is still extremely wealthy for them and worth the burden of having to go highly into debt to pay off their studies. In addition to this, a lot of foreign students will want to study in English which is the current lingua franca or international language.

    This contrasts with the general European (which is changing towards the American system, btw) which tends to favour free or cheap higher education. Firstly, the level of competitiveness amongst uiversities obviously drops off in this system which can be seen in their rankings, coming nowhere near American universities. However, the system encourages more young people to study, and, more young people to study in fields which are less financially rewarding. (Note that this is an utter generalisation, and should be treated as such). So, in general, the European system might favour the mean level of education and the US system seems to favour the most competitive (this is of course, totally ignoring all the state universities and colleges in the US). Not only that, but the fact that most Europeans universities do not teach in English means that Indian or Chinese students will probabaly be less inclined to study there, and, since tuittion is not free for foreigners, they get more value for their money at a major US university than they do in a European model one.

    1. Re:Lost in the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't look at Europe as a good example. Each European country only has 3-5 good schools, the rest are either specialized (DeVry Deluxe), or provide a very poor education.

      A non-Ivy American university, on the other hand, has the technology/curriculum resources available for first-rate education if one chooses to persevere.

    2. Re:Lost in the details by theolein · · Score: 1

      I didn't want to portray European universities as any better or worse, just that the system is different.

  245. Health sciences perspective by DrBobcf · · Score: 1

    In the medical field, it's always been "cut-throat" competition to get in. The "Conventional Wisdom" is that those that can't make it into medical school go to dental school. The reality is that the hardest school to get into is veterinary school. Those that don't make the grade there try med school.

    Any health science school is going to have steep requirements to get in. I know that some engineering schools are tough to get into, but I haven't heard the stories that I've heard and SEEN about things pre-med students do to each other.

    And no, I didn't want to get into vet. school, I chose my career when I was in first grade - that alone makes me suspect!

    --
    Don't mind me, I have more fun this way!
  246. Grad School by CaptainAnalog · · Score: 1

    I was a electrical engineering grad student recently.. The grad schools are dominated by foreign students, because the schools have bias for them. It's very difficult for a US citizen to gain admittance. The program I was in ran the minimum required number of US residents required by state law. It's not because of law or medical school. There are plenty of US applicants to the programs. Unlike undergraduate programs, individual professors get to choose the students in the program. The real reason is foreign students are more profitable to the grad school program. 1. If they are not RA/TA they pay more tution. The Chinese students I did research with paid more than I did. 2. They are like indentured servants to the professors they are working for (Profs love this). 3. Most of the Profs are foreign and tend to accept students who are of their nationality. 4. There is no quota on student visas. If there was the Grad schools would have to accept more US citizens. 5. A masters degree in engineering is globally portable.. A medical/law degree is only good in US. 6. There are provisions in US visa law that allow graduates of advanced degrees from US schools to get h1b/green cards easier. An ms/phd is a faster ticket to a US green card. If US corporations would like to end the shortage of tech talent they should be asking congress for a quota on student visas.

  247. US Graduate programs are the best by kmweber · · Score: 1

    Quite simply, US postgraduate education programs are the best in the world--so much so that their pool of applicants is representative of the ethnic makeup of the entire world, rather than of just the United States.

    --
    "Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"
  248. Re:It's a numbers game (More than Money) by tfiedler · · Score: 1

    Its not a money game. Students who come to the US are exposed to our society and get a different view of the way this country works (or doesn't) and learn a lot about the real people who live here versus what they see in their local state sponsored media outlets. That is the real value to Americans, because knowing each other engenders respect and that is the best foreign policy result you can get. Of course, this assumes that the student here comes from a society that respects the rule of law over the rule of religion.

    --
    Democrats and Republicans are like AIDS and Cancer, I want neither!
  249. Lawyers... and programmers both by Archtech · · Score: 1

    "Advanced societies that are governed by the rule of law and that require complex rules will naturally require more lawyers".

    Advanced societies are also governed by vast numbers of computers, and they require even more rules that are even more complex. That means we need large numbers of very highly skilled programmers - but do we get them? Hell, no.

    So much for the market. Sure, it does allocate resources to some extent. But if every manager in the land is convinced that lawyers should be paid five times as much as programmers, why, that is how it is going to be.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  250. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post should not be "4: Informative" -- everything this person says is wrong.

    A real MS in Engineering, where you actually have to complete a thesis, is probably 4 times more educating than everything you learn in your undergraduate curriculum. That is assuming you don't retake all the graduate-versions of the introductory courses. If you got an undergraduate degree in Computer Engineering, for example, you should not take the analogous introductory courses in the Computer Engineering graduate program because you should already know that material. Instead, you are supposed to skip ahead and take the really advanced courses. The introductory graduate courses are there for people who have a BS degree in some other discipline. Sadly, most people don't want to challenge themselves and take the advanced courses, they just want the credits so they can get a diploma.

    Secondly, an MBA does not have actual value. People with MBA's are a dime-a-dozen. There are business consulting firms out there that hire PhDs and teach them everything they would have learned in an MBA program in 2-3 weeks. Why? Because MBA material isn't what you and everyone else cracks it up to be, and because someone who is intelligent enough, and mentally rigorous enough to earn a PhD can learn MBA material as if it was no different than reading the back of a cereal box while eating breakfast.

  251. Insight from former cs grad student by srussell2 · · Score: 1

    As a former CS grad student at the University of Central Florida (UCF), you are asking a very loaded question. In the engineering areas you will be dealing with a very diverse environment. It can be very difficult because of the high expectations placed upon you. Therein lies the problem (for US individuals as a whole). From what I have seen, a lot of Americans want the quick and easy answer to work/life/money. Unfortunately, they do not want to work for it. This is not to say that all Americans are lazy, just the vocal ones pushing you to take the easy way out. Thankfully, I did not listen to them.

    Now that I am working in the commercial industry, those individuals that took the easy way out are easy to spot. It is not that they are bad at what they are doing, you just realize that they will never do anything else that what they are currently doing. In general they forgot the most import thing while getting an education: the ability to learn on their own. This can apply to individuals with a bachelors degree, but I have not seen an definite trend. However, it is definitely preferred that that an engineer obtain a MS degree. The reasons are varied, but a 'good' MS degree usually shows commitment to excellence. That is the individual wants to do the best that he/she can.

    Pay wise, you probably will not be rich as an engineer. However, with a commitment to excellence and a drive to succeed, you will not be barely surviving in most areas. And I must say, if you feel that you cannot make enough to live comfortably, move to a market in which you can earn a comfortable living. I did, and I rejoice each and every time that I think about where I would be if I had not moved (half way across the country) to better myself.

    I also have relatives working in law and medicine. I do not agree with most of the previous comments as to why individuals go into these fields. Yes, some individuals do go into it for the money, and some go into it because they feel it is easier than some of the more manual intensive occupations. But let me tell you, that a layer or a medical doctor will VERY VERY RARELY do well in engineering. It is not that they cannot, it is just that they are not very good at it. From what I have seen, the best engineers are ones that have always wanted to do something engineering like (for me it was work with computers), and have the drive to make it happen.

    Now as for the individuals from other countries that you will meet. Talk to them, get to know them. Do not view them as wrong just because they are different. Take this opportunity to expand your view of the world. Now expanding this view does not mean throwing away your current view, it means taking the positive things that you learn from them (ex. different ways of accomplishing tasks) and altering your current view. Diversity is a very good thing.

  252. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students? Would it instead cost the oriental governments too much to conscript all their lead paint sniffin' 18th Century factory serfs to build a bit of a reputation of their own damned universities, or is this just another method of allowing all 'em Cold War era Grads to come spy on our military secrets, & sending the operations & maintenance bills to the local taxpayers?

    Help out with this punch-line, by closing down the borders today!

  253. Stop with selectivity and expense for citizens. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If funding and spots are the troubling parts of higher education, why do we continue to penalize our own citizens in obtaining it?

    Before we allow these people in, we need to first build our own by getting every single citizen that wishes to have such an education to be able to work towards attaining it. That means removing the ability to refuse citizens by any means that possess any desire to further their education; even if it means it takes a generation or two to restore what has been lost by selectivity and expense.

    Nationality does matter when we end up paying for it in some form. Holding citizens back with funding games (MIT for example) and prestige building (the usual New England suspects) is what is holding the US back. When the complaints are in the other direction, then we can start seeing if there is any surplus - if there is some, then we can start importing as long as the surplus exists.

    There are some things that have value beyond exorbitant cost, and education is one of them. Remove the obstacle for citizens, remove the problem.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Stop with selectivity and expense for citizens. by megaditto · · Score: 1

      And yet the other day you bitched about that nice Negro boy getting his affirmative action scholarship...

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:Stop with selectivity and expense for citizens. by triffidsting · · Score: 1

      And you think AA is a good thing? Telling people that they cannot possibly compete on an equal footing because they are disadvantaged (due to their race) is just plain offensive. That AA is wholly ingrained in our society is a very legitimate cause for the dumbing-down of American institutions.

      --
      Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
    3. Re:Stop with selectivity and expense for citizens. by megaditto · · Score: 1

      I am not disagreeing with you. I merely pointed out that the GP was a bigot (the dude wanted affirmative action for the whites only)

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  254. Dude, you are SPOT on! by SuhlScroll · · Score: 1

    Dude, you are SPOT on!

  255. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

    The Canadian government released a report a few years ago concluding that we train more PhDs than we "get" in a year. More of the foreign students that we train go home than students finishing degrees elsewhere come in to replace. They also noted that if foreign students apply to become a landed immigrant they're likely to stick around. In response to the outcry from industry (which is funny since they don't seem to hire all that many the grad students...) there's a funding initiative based on the number of Canadian and landed immigrant students at a university. Apparently if we pay the Canadian students more the foreign students won't leave...

  256. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by psuAndy · · Score: 1

    I think you're right on the money with this. I spent this summer interning at a top tech corporation where a white, US-citizen was a minority. Nearly, everyone came from India or China and earned a grad degree here. From time to time I would here them say things like, "I could go back home and live in a much larger house with a maid, but then I would still be in India." I got the feeling they like it hear. Also, one of my friends, working on their undergrad, was greatly limited in their job search due to citizenship. They knew that with a graduate level degree several companies would be much more inclined to sponsor them for a work visa (or however that works). Further, among my friends, I agree that Americans are "satisfied" with an undergrad degree, at least to start. Companies will hire them at a good starting salary, and then the company may pay for their grad school.

  257. Easy answer by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    China and India account for billions of people. The US counts for mere millions. Since we offer our excellent graduate level education on the global market, it is not surprising that there are ten foreign students for every one domestic. I see nothing wrong with this.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  258. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by juniorbird · · Score: 1

    Not only do most Americans with bachelors' *not* go to grad school, many don't go to school for engineering. My MBA program was mostly-American. My girlfriend's Masters of Professional Writing program was mostly-American. My ex-girlfriends' JD program was all-American. My friend's PhD in Psychology program was all-American. My other friend's Master's of Education program was all-American.

    The interesting question is not "why are there so many non-Americans in grad school," but "why don't engineering programs want/appeal to Americans?

  259. Lawyers are a drag on the economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lawyers should NEVER be allowed into any legislature, nor in any position where they administer law, nor in a position to judge the law.

    In all of these positions, they are positioned in a conflict of interest. As legislators and administrators, any law they pass or rule they create carves off a slice of the GDP for their profession.

    As judges, any decision they make that increases the complexity of the law does the same.

    These forces account for the very great increase in the size, scope and complexity of the law during the last 100 years. This increases the "Total Government Burden' of taxes and regulations, and inevitably results in lower economic growth. (The London Economist publishes a big review of this literature every few years.)

    As for the Uniform Commercial Code, we need neither legislators nor lawyers to handle this. In fact, more and more companies are writing contracts that move such disputes into private courts and arbitration precisely to avoid lawyers and the standard legal system's high costs and long delays.

    Lew

  260. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Mecanico · · Score: 1

    THAT is why foreigners outnumber Americans in these topics. It's not because they're smarter, not because they love engineering more, and not because education is better in their country. It's because they want to immigrate here. I heard from one of the people that reviews applications at MIT that the school has the commitment of keeping at least a 60% (or something like that) of american students (no government involvement, its just school commitment to their country which is great!). She said that if they didn't have that commitment and only based their applications on merits/capabilities there would be no american students at all because of the enormous amount of quality applications they receive, and she even went to say they even have a hard time keeping the 60% sometimes because there are not enough good applicants in the US.

    Interesting indeed.
    --
    UgaBuga!
  261. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by 3p1ph4ny · · Score: 1

    Graduate students in engineering are usually paid to go to school, not the other way around (whether you're from the US or not). I don't know where you're going to school, but I'm going to come out ahead after undergrad... but I work =)

  262. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would add to this and suggest at least in the programming and coding side of engineering there isn't a lot you're going to learn in a grad program that you can not learn on your own. I remember hearing a student at my current college telling me how developing AI programs would be something a grad student would do...I almost laughed since the school I goto now only does an overview of AI programming and no actual coding! I had already written several AI programs including a genetic algo by then...and these guys were telling me I have to wait until I get into grad school to do that kinda stuff.

    It makes sense in other fields to require a masters or higher level degrees because you are limited in your resources to research those other fields...but in programming and some hardware development...as long as you have PC...you can do it on your own time. Why pay someone to give you permission to do something you can already do yourself?

  263. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

    Good. If someone is going to cut a hole in me to fix bits that have gone wrong, I want them to be seriously good at it.
    Would you prefer someone who is a bit less than seriously good at it, or someone who is seriously good at it, but who has already worked 10 hours that day and could really use some rest?
  264. The fact is... by iggiebee · · Score: 1

    You're all missing the point. The fact is that the careers of MOST foreign students are heavily subsidized by their respective governments. In contrast, in the US the careers of most students are heavily financed by banking institutions and parents.

  265. Tell them to come to Bosnia... by denzacar · · Score: 0

    ...for their next vacation.

    Here a filling is around $20, extraction about the same, removables from $150 to $250 and implants are around $1000 per tooth.

    That is what most dental-conscious-abroad-living Bosnians do during their summer vacations. Have their teeth fixed and pulled.

    No wonder they only come to visit their family once a year.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  266. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Explodo · · Score: 1

    I have a BS in math, and am nearly done with my MS in CS. I had 8 years of experience writing software before starting grad school and I can tell you a couple of things:

    An MS doesn't mean you know how to write code at all, but it can help you get a job.
    I had several graduate classes with a guy who couldn't write code for anything, but got a great high-paying job right out of getting his MS.

    I haven't learned anything in my MS classes that I wouldn't have learned getting a BS in CS.

    I learned much more by actually working in my field than by going to grad school.

    Am I going to get paid more when I have an MS degree? I sure am. Do I feel that value has been added to me as an employee? Nope.

    All of this experience is from CS grad school. I have no comment on engineering grad school.

  267. It's more legit than the website would imply by Captain+Tripps · · Score: 1

    The study in question is Shanghai Jiao Tong University's Academic Ranking of World Universities. The Wikipedia page notes it's been cited by The Economist, and that the authors have presented the methodology in international academic forums. I first heard of the study when a European university I was looking applying to cited it.

  268. Cost! by TheMCP · · Score: 1

    The problem is that you're going to start seeing shortages of professionals in certain fields in the US. When there's a shortage of good programmers we programmers think that's a great idea because it means our salary goes up, but when there's a severe shortage of pharmacists or obstetricians, that's more of a problem.

    I worked for a small medical university a few years ago, and it also had a very high percentage of foreign students. Why? The answer is simple: they could afford it. With tuition over $45,000 a year, few Americans can just cough up that kind of cash. On the other hand, there's a whole world out there to search for people who want to go to medical school and can afford it and qualify to get in.

    If the US wants to continue to have high numbers of qualified professionals available to fill societal needs, we're going to have to start doing something about cost of education.

  269. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand, foreigners looking to immigrate to the United States work under the assumption that if they go to school here and earn one of our advanced degrees, then we'd be more likely to allow them to stay once their studies are complete It's not just an assumption; it's the way the immigration rules are set up in your country. Acquiring an advanced degree (PhD, MS ) in science and engineering is one of the most common ways to legally immigrate into the US from countries like India and China. The Green card system in the US is a "priority-queue" approach - you get put in a much shorter waiting queue ( typically less than a year) if you have a PhD. Result: America skims off of the gene pool, while the foreigner is granted the right to become a permanent resident.
  270. Only have to ask Old Engineers why law and medicin by richardlvance · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I graduated with a BSE in 1973 and later received an MBA. In my wide experience an engineer has about 15 good years before the $ increases cease and the juicy assignments start flowing to new grads. The terminal phase of an engineer is management and he will never equal his law and medicine alumni in wages earned. There is no respect for engineering in America, you will never see a 'Marcus Welby, PE" show on TV. Until one actually has to have a PE license to practice engineering this will not change. Corporate America has always controlled the engineering salaries by manipulating supply and demand. Now there is unlimited supply from India, China, and the like. So the "smarter" Americans go into Law and Medicine so they can make money from those newly minted foreign born engineers. As an aside I would recommend that the new grads go into international finance and move to London.

    Cheers,
    Old Engineer

    --
    cursethedarkness
  271. Go now, or you'll get used to having money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My professors advice, and its definately true.

  272. Openly Hostile Environment for White Males? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a White Christian Male, I find the higher education environment to be not only openly hostile but also stacked to benefit minorities and foreigners - money, positions, and opportunities are all set aside and reserved. No matter how talented you are or how hard you work - it doesn't matter, those are not for you.

    I did my time in higher ed and was basically just glad to get my degrees and get out onto a more fair and level playing field where race and gender didn't matter. By the end of it I was just so tired of being told I was responsible for most of the world's problems, an oppressor, and inherently bad person because I was a white male that I started to feel the whole system and culture of higher ed. was too absurd to even participate in.

    Affirmative action in free software is basically side projects I can just ignore (Linux Chix, etc...) and focus on working on making useful contributions. It's not that I don't want projects like Linux Chix to be successful - I wish them the best of luck. I just don't want to be distracted by forced participation or suffer disadvantage because of them, and thankfully I don't. In graduate school for CIS - there's a different story.

  273. US Grad students/Phd candidates by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    My two cents worth is that with American schools increasing their fees and tuition, fewer people can afford to go on to grad school. Maybe China and India Finance the tuition of their citizens, America doesn't!

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  274. Apparently the slashdot mods didn't go to grad sch by nasor · · Score: 2, Informative

    By the time they've finished four years of University, they have between $60,000.00 and $100,000.00 in debt. They look around and realize that if they go to graduate school, they will probably double that debt. I'll take the fact that this got +5 insightful as proof that slashdot's moderators never went to grad school, or even seriously looked into grad school. You don't pay to go to grad school in the United States. Or at least, you don't pay if you go to any sort of science or engineering grad school. The school pays you. Most hard science or engineering programs pay grad students around $20k-$30k/year to attend grad school, and wave your tuition.
  275. Industry-specific by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    This is very industry-specific. When I'm looking at a resume for an IT candidate, I don't pay too much attention to the education section. If there is no college degree, then I want to see some real stand-out work experience. But I don't even look at where the degree came from.

    I have some friends who look at more business-type resumes, and for them the schools matters.

    So, yeah. Industry-specific.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  276. The answer is simple economics by Ironpoint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The opportunity cost is much higher for US students who can directly enter the high paying US workforce after a Bachelors. The opportunity cost for overseas students is lower. Graduate school is a ticket to get into the US and stay in the US for some foreign students.

  277. Government sponsorship? by xot · · Score: 1
    I saw a lot of comments which say that foreign governments spend on education. I am from India and currently in a masters program in the United States. The Indian government does NOT sponsor any part of your foreign education. The truth of the matter is that the US government sponsors a lot of us. All my friends in engineering programs have scholarships which are full tuition waivers.

    As a thumb of rule most engineering students get scholarships. I am in a business program where scholarships are less and we pay way more than American in state students. But its students like me (no scholarship) that the university makes money from. If they put a cap on student visas as some dumb wits have suggested, the American government will be losing millions of dollars a year. Go figure.

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  278. Re:The sad reality: Smart Doesn't Pay by 808140 · · Score: 1

    Your jaded cynicism betrays a lack of experience with the people you deride. I've worked in engineering, computer science, and finance — I studied math in university — and in every one of those fields the concentration of intelligent people has been overwhelming.

    The stark difference, though, is one of respect. I work in finance now, but I spent almost 10 years programming professionally. My current coworkers, who are no less dumb than my previous coworkers — often smarter, in fact — never talk about how dumb CS people are. In fact, they greatly respect my background, because a lot of what we do is algorithmic in nature. But when I worked in IT, I constantly heard self-important blowhard programmers bemoan the stupidity of anyone who wears a suit.

    The funny thing about all this — or maybe the sad thing, depending on your perspective — is that really, programming is not that complex. Engineers are perhaps better deserving of their arrogance, but let's face it, doing software development doesn't require a whole lot of smarts for 90% of projects. Despite this, nearly every programmer thinks he is the smartest person on the whole entire planet. He has somehow deluded himself into thinking that management doesn't do "real" work, that it's all golfing and rides in private jets.

    The reality of course is that managing people is very difficult, and that most people do not do it well. And when you work at a software company — even one that sells software as its core competency — writing the code is only a small part of what needs to be done to make the company run. How exactly programmers justify their self-important attitudes is beyond me. Perhaps it's because they've never tried their hand at accounting, for example, and seen how difficult it is? Or capital budgeting? Or marketing, for that matter? A great product isn't going to make you any money if you can't convince people to buy it. What about sales, since we're on the subject? How many of you have worked in sales? It's bust-ass work, and it requires a great deal of talent (talent that I know from experience I do not have).

    Sitting in your cubicle reading Slashdot and thinking about how much smarter math and science types are than anyone else is all well and good until you actually go out into the world and meet some people from other fields. America is filled with smart people, and many of them opt to go into other careers. But that doesn't make them any less smart, it just means they don't know the same things you know.

    At my job every day I interact with people from tier-1 universities, many of them with advanced degrees in mathematical finance, economics, business, and management. 90% of my coworkers are ivy-league and graduated at or near the top of their class. They are smart as hell and we rely on their smarts to beat the market and generate returns for our clients. We rely on the people in marketing to make sure our instruments get into the right funds, because not every portfolio is right for what we sell. Our marketing people use advanced calculus and statistics in their day-to-day work. When was the last time the average programmer used calculus for anything?

    I never hear them say "CS people are nerdy, stupid, cubicle-drones who can't get dates." Maybe that's because they're smart enough to know a stereotype when they see one. But I constantly hear techies who, let's face it, do most of their coding in PHP or VB and went to DeVry for their education talk about how stupid suits are.

    It's pathetic, really.

  279. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    There still aren't nearly enough doctors to properly serve the population. And even worse, we way overconsume doctor time in this country.

    For instance, let's say my daughter is complaining about her ears. Please explain why it's necessary to have someone who went to college for 12 years say, "yup. ear infection." Personally, I don't think it is. What's worse, because doctor time is so valuable, I have to wait in a goddamn waiting room for an hour, and then a goddamn doctor office for another half an hour, just so he can deign to see me.

    But the public is starting to wake up to this problem. Convenient Care Clinics, where all appointments are walk-in and you see a nurse practitioner instead of a doc, are starting to sprout up to handle routine health matters. That way, you have someone who can say, "Yup, ear infection", "no, not ear infection", or "this looks weird. Go see a doctor." and you can get that answer at 1/3 the cost and in 1/4 the time.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  280. Correction by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
    Correction: People leaving out on opportunities to study what they want, just to get a higher salary, are too busy living for their work, instead of working for a living.

    I probably earn way less now than I would if I had chosen to do an MBA directly after my BSc degree (not really BSc, we had a bit different system back then). For that in return, as an academic you get the flexibility to follow your (changing) interests, as long as you keep the output going of course. If your heart tells you to be a manager or consultant, then do it. If you're only following your current path because of the money, think it over. You will be spending most of your conscious hours in life working, better make it an enjoyable time. Money will buy you a bigger car and a bigger house, but how often do you get to enjoy them?

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  281. Nobody needs PhDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an European immigrant myself. US guys are smarter, they go for an MBA,MD or a law degree and cash in afterwards.

    A PhD in science/engineering takes time, tremendous work and dedication. And if your PhD is not in computer science you will be very likely have difficulties to find a job.
    Nice comics:
    http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd090707s.gif
    http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd091207s.gif
    I have a biotech/nanotech engineering background (MS, PhD) and was not able to find a job and now I took a low paying job. Years of my life, wasted for nothing. My current plan: Since I won't be able to afford a house here and save for retirement I will just try to pay off my debts and then go for the pacific region. In the long run I will have better options there.


    PhD? Waste of time!

  282. I take a different outlook by codingmasters · · Score: 1

    There are tonnes of (as we are told to call them) "International Students" at my school (here in Melbourne Australia), and we are not alone. They all come from Asia, and it begs the question: why do they come over to Australia to complete Year 12 and University? Is it because they can't afford it back home? Is it because it's not up to scratch? What's wrong, and why are our schools clogged with International students?

  283. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by megaditto · · Score: 1

    At best, they only get the same incentives as the Americans. How is that leaving our people behind?

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  284. This is not nationwide and more field specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A professor (from China) in my grad school program (who holds a PhD in library science degree in China AND in the US) once told us (3 years ago) that about 8% of minorities go beyond an undergraduate degree. I have to disagree with your numbers nationwide. Plus, you're talking about an engineering program, which tends to attract a lot of minorities. Math+Science tend to be fields minorities go into because nobody gives a crap if you're yellow, brown or black as long as you can apply math into practical fields. But a minority (including women) lawyer, exec, or a predominantly white America field? Some consider it more trouble than it is worth, while others are just nagged to death by our relatives to do something more practical.

    Major Tangent:
    I believe this is a great thing. Foreigners come here, and make connections here. Then they take these business connections back home and start businesses. China and India and these US/European connections to build world trade industry. Russia is in a huge stale slump. Great educational system, but no world connections. Heck, they don't even treat their foreign students very nice either... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_modern_Russia

  285. The reason is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason our grad schools are filled with non-american students is that ethnic groups from other coutries work together and cheat off of each other ALL THE F'N TIME - thereby keeping their GPAs high without having to learn a lick of English. Also, most come from other countries where their grades have been bloated and their undergrad work can't remotely stand toe-to-toe with American undergrad programs. But mostly, its the cheating.

  286. You've got MOST of the answer. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    You've got most of the answer. Here's the missing piece:

    At many universities, when it comes to handing out financial aid, the grants, research and teaching assistantships are only given to foreign students and the US citizens can only get loans.

    This is apparently because the faculty administering the departments have a set idea of people from other countries as poor and the US citizens as rich. They hold to this fixed idea even when the US citizens applying are actually living hand-to-mouth with no help from the family while the foreign applicants are the children of the the upper classes (especially the royals or the dictators' inner circle and the owners of the major industries - often the same families). The latter may be wearing rolexes and driving sports cars. Yet they get the paid positions, while the US citizens who aren't already independently wealthy must accumulate a crushing debt load - to be paid off, with interest, once they've left school and found a job.

    The result is that such US students tend to leave school once they have enough credentials to start paying off the loans, rather than stay for grad school and accumulate more debt.

    The issue is particularly accute in engineering schools. Students rich enough to afford to pay their own way gravitate to law, medicine, and business. Those in engineering tend to come from middle and lower income backgrounds.

    Phil: You might want to check whether your school is one of those with such informal discrimination in hiring.

    Further, engineering students tend to come from families with certain cultural biases. These often lead the parents to expect the children to work their way through college - which means they may not provide much support even if they could. Financial aid qualifications take into account how much the parents COULD pay, not how much they WILL. So they get little or no aid from the parents, yet are ineligible for most aid programs.

    Meanwhile the children tend to feel responsible for their debts, which means they avoid accumulating them and try to pay them off as soon as possible.

    So it's hardly surprising to find an engineering school where the graduate student population is composed almost entirely of foreign students.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:You've got MOST of the answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Most scholarships from the government are for us citizens only. Maybe for an undergrad department a school will pay for a few international students to make their stats look good, but not an entire department worth!

      And to say that only forigen students feel responsible for their parent's debt? That's crazy!

    2. Re:You've got MOST of the answer. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Huh? Most scholarships from the government are for us citizens only. Maybe for an undergrad department a school will pay for a few international students to make their stats look good, but not an entire department worth!

      We're not talking "scholarships" and we're not talking "undergrad". We're talking "teaching assistantships" and "grad school".

      And if you'll reread my posting you'll see that the students I said "feel responsible for ... debt" are US students who feel responsible for their OWN debts - i.e. the student loans that are all they can get - and thus minimize their size and start paying them off sooner by dropping out at Bachelors' and going to work, rather than going on to grad school.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:You've got MOST of the answer. by Kupek · · Score: 1

      At many universities, when it comes to handing out financial aid, the grants, research and teaching assistantships are only given to foreign students and the US citizens can only get loans.

      Have you actually been to graduate school? I have never heard of a program that favored giving assistanceships to foreign students.

  287. no incentive for US engineering grad students by pbegley · · Score: 1

    I have a degree in Chemical Engineering. The difference between a BS and MS (or PhD for that matter) was 2-3 thousand per year in the late 70's and early 80's. I don't believe anything has changed.

    At that time, many of the foreign nationals were 'sponsored' by their respective countries. They have the foresight to determine how many engineers they need and sponsor them accordingly.

    The US, particularly the current administration, are retarded. They don't have a Plan (i.e. Clue). Energy, infrastructure, you name it, they don't have it.

    Why do I get the feeling George W. Bush was one of the guys making fun of the nerds/geeks and that nothing has changed since his undergrad years.

    Just FYI, I'm particularly bitter because my oldest daughter is in Chemical Engineering (Go, Yellow Jackets!) and will graduate with more debt than is reasonable. I don't need to get into a discussion about why we need more Chemical Engineers (energy, plastics, food, clothing, just about everything you use on a daily basis)...

    -Paul

  288. Ya - Ja by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You meant 'Ja!', right?

  289. Its sad, but look at it this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, its sad, but look at it this way. You can go to school for years and years. A PhD. will cost you at least 8 hard years of university, or more likely 10. You then work hard, build your reputation, save money, then start a company with a great product called blackberry. Along comes a group of lawyers. They don't know anything about technology. They went to university for 6 years max. They spot your invention, sue, and get $700,000,000- of your money. For what? Being lawyers of course! Do they know what to do with it? Advance it? No! But they will sit on it and stifle innovation with it till they have wrung every last penny out of it. Fuck society, become a lawyer and get rich! ...and so they have (oh, and to be fair, a hundred thousand other lawyers did too).

  290. Education bias? Not in technical fields by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    My experience has been that in engineering, people only resort to using your education as a metric to measure you by if you have no relevant experience to use instead.

    3 years out of school, and nobody cares where you went to school. They want to see the results of your last 3 years of /work/.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  291. Show me the money by nontrad · · Score: 1

    I started grad school in a Computer Science department and switched over to the Computer Engineering department to finish my degree. I went for a specialized MS computer degree and that program was still relatively US citizens - although we had many foreign students attend some of the classes.

    Yes, the CS departmen had two non-foreign graduate students, including myself. The reasons I think there weren't more US citizens were:

    1) The MS program was geared towards the PhD program and was mostly theory. Very little could be applied to the workforce.

    2) Students who were there just for the MS were treated like dirt. They got the assistantships that no one wanted - if they got one at all.

    3) Many students with a BSCS /CE have the potential to make more than professors within 3-4 years. So, unless they really want to teach, there's no monetary incentive to stay for advanced degrees. (BTW, I'm 2 years out of MS classes and I make about 40K more than an Assoc prof.) I guess I should get off my butt and finish that MS degree also.

    4) Some foreign CS students go to grad school to be able to be in the US and look for jobs. They can stay on a student visa and then start sending out resumes. I knew of one students who said he was going to the PhD but left after 2 years with his MS to work for Microsoft. (of course, many say they are going for the PhD so they get the assistanships they want and then leave with the MS - which was their goal anyway)

    5) Many grad schools seem to rely heavily on the GRE and it appeared that some foreign students spent extra time learning how to pass these tests - even if they did not have the practical skills to back them up. I knew of many who had perfect 800's in the necessary sections. So, if a department bases admissions on the GRE scores, they may select a higher percentage of students who are good at passing tests.

    6) Plus, people in the workforce may actually be going for their MSCS / CE degree but you just don't see them because they are taking their courses online, distance, etc.

  292. Very simple to answer by iLoveYoyo · · Score: 1

    you stupid americans are too fool to study engineering. Look at your math and physics level, a 6th grade elementary school student in china or india can beat a high school white trash in math contest. america is a dying country, believe or not...

  293. My responce by ls354 · · Score: 0

    One word to all of you "BULLSHIT"

  294. Smarter Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smarter Americans stop after their Bachelors, because they can get out in the real world and make good money. Its these "Intellectual Morons" that inhabit our Liberal Universities.

  295. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    Makes perfect sense to me - as long as they can prescribe medication.

    In the US it is illegal to trade in most medications without a prescription from a doctor. Hence, even if you're very confident you know what is wrong you still end up seeing a doctor just to get a piece of paper saying its OK to buy some ear drops.

    A tiered system seems like a decent compromise.

  296. Re:med school has fewer? Hahahaahaa... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Yes. That's the best part. These Convenient Care Clinics are attached to pharmacies. The NPs can prescribe antibiotics for your ear infection, and you pick it up right then and there. No separate trip to the pharmacy.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  297. First Class Moron by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Take into consideration that when a bank has a dollar in savings, it can lend someone some ridiculous amount like 250 Jumpin' Jesus H. Christ on a pogo stick.

    If you want people to read what you write, don't write something so fucking stupid in the second sentence. Slightly oversimplified, the current Reserve Requirement is 10%. That means for every $1 in liabilities, a bank can lend out $0.90.

    I'm sure you wrote something brilliant in your comment, but when I see something like that, how can I assume anything other than that you are a first class moron?
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:First Class Moron by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Never heard of Fractional Reserve Banking, eh?

      How a bank can lend more than it has

      I'm sure you wrote something brilliant in your comment, but when I see something like that, how can I assume anything other than that you are a first class moron?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    2. Re:First Class Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you fail to notice that he described fractional reserve banking exactly?
      It literally means, if the bank owes $1, they can lend out $.90. That's fractional reserve banking described as simply as possible. What's your rebuttal or counterpoint or additional insight?

  298. As a smarter American who went into law... by Pendersempai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...yes, I can confirm that is true. Market rate at top law firms these days is $160,000 plus a $30,000 bonus for a first-year associate. Three years of law school, heavily subsidized by government grants and payed with government loans locked in at a sub-3% interest rate via a loophole that has since closed, made it an exceptionally good deal for me. It would be a good deal even if I paid with credit card debt.

    1. Re:As a smarter American who went into law... by Steve+Hamlin · · Score: 1

      Your numbers are correct, but without context, they paint an unrealistic portrait.

      $160k for first-years, at premier firms in NYC, Chicago, LA, DC, or San Fran./Silicon Valley. Maybe Boston. $120-140k in Miami, Houston, Atlanta, NorthWest.

      Talent at that level is probably 500-1000 people a year nationwide. Top graduates of top law schools. Very smart, focused and they produce.

      How much do top grad-level engineering graduates from MIT and Stanford make at the highest-paying jobs those schools place graduates in?

      ---

      In most of those big cities with ridiculous housing costs, that salary doesn't go as far as you'd think it would. A nice life, sure, lots of spending money, but equivalent to $100k/year for a more reasonable metropolitan area - Charlotte, Phoenix, Kansas City.

      Plus they often work 80-hour weeks so they can bill 2300 hours/year in order to earn the bonus and stay on the partner track they dangle in front of you.

      Opportunity cost:
      -3 years of salary given up (for people that would still have gotten a good job out of undergrad)
      PLUS
      -$120k in debt = $20k per year in pre-tax salary dollars in order pay that off in a reasonable time.

      So, yes, it a lot of money, but all things considered, it might not be a comparable position to the work a graduate-degree'd engineer might do. And so just looking at cash comp. is not enough.

      BTW - the average starting salary of my law school graduating class (1999, well regarded state school) ? Around $40,000. For every person making $100k starting out of my law school (the $160k of the day, and that part of the country), there were 10 making less than $60k working for the government, public policy groups, for family businesses, or not practicing at all (useful for their current career).

    2. Re:As a smarter American who went into law... by Pendersempai · · Score: 1

      I have the good fortune to attend an excellent law school -- one of Harvard, Yale, or Stanford -- from which literally anyone in the class who wants to get a job that pays market rate can, and in the market of his choice. I agree that the calculation can be substantially different for lower-ranked law schools -- but it's also true that each year, probably ten thousand students or more gain entry to this law firm market tier. Granted, the cost of living is higher in New York and other primary markets, but nothing stops a law graduate from working in, say, Cleveland and making close to the same salary -- we're talking around $120-140k instead of $190k. The hours are also substantially less in those markets. It's really good money.

      Since you mention MIT engineers, this site quotes a starting salary of low sixties for people with no work experience. I don't know if this is up to date or if it represents engineers generally, but my understanding is that engineers' salaries peak, for the very best of the profession, at or less than where big firm lawyers' salaries start. (Obviously this does not account for entrepreneurs like Larry Page and Sergey Brin -- but then, they were PhD students, and enjoyed a degree of success so rare as to be insubstantial from an ex ante point of view. Similarly, it does not account for engineers who move into management, since the skill sets are nearly disjoint and the engineering degree is probably a poor way to pursue that career path.)

      You're also quoting 1999 salaries. Law firm starting salaries shot upwards during the dot-com bubble and never came back down. In the past two years alone, they climbed from $155k (including bonus) to $190k. It's a different profession now than it was even a decade ago: longer hours, yes, but also a lot more money.

      Finally, your debt calculation needs serious work, at least in my case. First, I received about half of my law school education for free, because top law schools give out a fair amount of grant money and my family isn't all that wealthy. What remained, I covered with government loans. There was a loophole in the government loan laws that let you lock in low interest rates on Stafford loans by consolidating. I did so, and all $40k or so of my loans are locked in at an interest rate that is below 2% when you account for the reductions for on-time payments and automatic online payments. I am also going to drag repayment out over 30 years. Using a conservative rate of return of about 8% for an investment in an S&P 500 index fund, accounting for the way inflation (say, 2%) nearly perfectly counters the interest, the amount I will actually need to pay in 2007 dollars is $16,211.17, less than the price of a new Honda Civic.

      Yes, I still spend three years in law school, but these are damn nice years, during which I probably work less than 30-35 hours per week and spend the rest of the time drinking/playing video games with friends, traveling to nearby state parks, and generally enjoying an awesome life. Also, I could not have gotten a high-paying job out of law school. Working long hours in a high cost-of-living city at a job with potential for advancement, I'd have been lucky to gross $40-50k per year. After all, I have no work experience and no marketable job skills. By comparison, last summer alone I worked 17 weeks at a law firm and grossed $52,700 -- more than the total cost of this year's tuition.

      The fact is that I have an awesome deal. I'm not saying this to be smug, but to make the point that yes, it is very much in the economic interest of America's smartest college graduates to choose law over engineering or even medicine. Firms are throwing money at me in quantities that are obscene for a 24-year-old. It shouldn't be at all surprising if there is substantial brain drain in other disciplines with this as the alternative. For me, it was not an academic concern: I come from a family without a lot of money, and I was a math majo

    3. Re:As a smarter American who went into law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered how many fellow lawyers were reading slashdot. Just for informational purposes, what are you primary practice areas?

      mine = tax.

  299. Curry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder the engineering department always smells of currry

  300. Optional Practical Training by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 0

    It's 12 months, AKA "Optional Practical Training", and if you can't get a job in that time, you'll get kicked out. In reality, though, you'd need to get the job before or at the very beginning of that period, or the employer won't even consider you. I was so lucky that the Department of Homeland Security messed up and didn't get me my work permit until about half the time was over; no chance of getting a job in the US then.

    --
    The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
  301. Post-lawyer by crucini · · Score: 1
    OK, great. You've burned up all the lawyers. Now you get into a dispute with your employer/employee/partner over money. You're both convinced that you're right. Do you settle it with:
    1. Daggers at dawn.
    2. Car analogies.
    3. An exchange of mudslinging videos on youtube.
    1. Re:Post-lawyer by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I'm 37. The only times I have ever needed a lawyer are when I need to protect myself from other lawyers. I'm pretty sure most people would say the same.

      Stop fooling yourself that your job is so important. Most societies function just fine with a tiny percentage of the lawyers currently infesting America.

    2. Re:Post-lawyer by crucini · · Score: 1

      Even though you don't personally hire a lawyer, you still benefit from living in a society of laws. Every time you deal with a large corporation, they take advantage as much as their lawyers will allow. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. To be reasonably safe from violent criminals, and also from over-zealous polic officers, requires a body of case law created by intelligent and hard-working lawyers over centuries.

      Where there is law, there are lawyers. The alternative is the rule of brute force. Despite its refreshing simplicity, that approach has been proven not to produce wealth, freedom or happiness for the majority.

  302. Justify by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    Justify the following claim that you made with actual numbers:

    Take into consideration that when a bank has a dollar in savings, it can lend someone some ridiculous amount like 250 I'll be waiting.
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  303. The Real Answer by BobSutan · · Score: 1

    The simplest reason people in that field are from those countries is because unlike Americans when they finish school they'll have a job waiting for them.

    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  304. Yeah, because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the system that everyone comes to America to enjoy, including the educational system in question, was founded by Native Americans. Oh wait no it wasn't.

  305. Absolutely True! Don't drink the cool-aid by enmane · · Score: 1

    It's true! The U.S. despite their rhetoric does NOT value scientific degrees - heck, this admin doesn't even respect science - in any form.

    Here's the most accurate response you'll get...

    Most of these other countries TRULY value science/engineering. They don't have a huge salary disparity between engineers, doctors, and lawyers. From what I'm told, an MD in India or Asia "might" make about 50% more than an engineer. It's more like 500% in this country.

    If you are bright and could handle a scientific degree, medicine, or law then why not take the profession that will pay more, especially if you have a valid interest in the other disciplines. I find that many engineers like medicine so why NOT head there. I find many engineers like patents so why NOT become a patent lawyer. The salary difference is ridiculous!

    I have family members in medicine making 5-6x what I will in engineering. I hope to get my PhD in M.E. very shortly. I _almost_ became a doctor and sometimes regret not going to med school. All nighters have NEVER been a problem...even in my 30s.

    I'm still waiting for ASME to create an IP department whereby they provide lawyers for ME members for IP reasons. That way, we'll get paid for our ideas and ASME can license the ideas to the corporations - like the universities are doing. Why work for a corporation if you're the creative type?

    Anyhow, just about anyone makes more than an engineer with a PhD (where you cap out around $100k)
    The following START at about that...
    - Doctors
    - Lawyers
    - MBAs

  306. Fact of the matter by madbawa · · Score: 1

    Being an Indian myself, here are some reasons why Indian students enroll for grad courses in US univs:
    1) To get a job in the US so that they can make more money than similar job profiles in India.
    2) To actually study Computer Science because they love the subject (quite rare)
    3) Because entering India's premier technical institute - the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) is very difficult and the GRE/GMAT and TOEFL are almost childs play compared to the JEE (Joint Entrance Exams for IIT).
    4) Some women simply enroll because their husbands are working in the states and they have nothing much to do at home (I have seen more than one such case while at university myself).

    I actually studied for a good 2 years in a US university. But I had absolutely no intention of settling down there. So I returned to India immediately after my studies whereas some of my friends, in an attempt to linger on and preserve the validity of their visas, actually took on a Ph.D. program. Dunno how many of them actually completed it and how many ran away as soon as they got their work permit.

    And in many communities, its a matter of pride to say "my son is working in america". It helps further the boy's or girl's matrimonial prospects.

  307. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by enmane · · Score: 1

    More importantly, 90% of American engineering students realize that the only reason for getting an MS in engineering is to teach. I'm yet to find someone who thinks he learned something worthwhile in post-grad engineering school.

    Well, then - I'll be the first. Grad school has DEFINITELY made me a better engineer!

    I actually have gotten a chance to DIGEST the material; the usually rigorous engineering undergraduate curriculum hardly allows time for that.
  308. Well... by TaleSpinner · · Score: 1

    Let's see...we're managed by idiots with MBAs, we are underpaid by idiots with MBAs, our jobs are outsourced by idiots with MBAs, our deadlines are set by idiots with MBAs. Gee, I dunno why no one wants to be an engineer any more.

  309. re: TV for one by dghcasp · · Score: 1

    Coming this fall, on NBC!

    He's a Ph.D. student in accounting; she's a Ph.D. student in molecular biology.

    They find love while struggling to publish an interdisciplenary paper in an obscure journal about unexpected correlations between asset valuation in 1934-era companies and the production of azurophilic lysosome granules.

  310. Engineers by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    1. Pick something to design.

    2. Each side chooses an engineer and comes up with a design.

    3. Jury of engineers picks the best solution.

    4. Profit!

  311. not like an H1B visa by r00t · · Score: 1

    H1B visa holders do push wages down. These people are nearly slaves.

    I'm saying offer citizenship to the best and brightest.

    Some of these people will create start-up companies. They might even hire you.

    1. Re:not like an H1B visa by SuhlScroll · · Score: 1

      H1B visa holders do push wages down. These people are nearly slaves.
      The worst thing is that, from my experience, they're nearly always incompetent or certainly less competent as Americans ... they just cost a lot less, so the companies still rather hire three of them than one American, hoping that one of the three (or four or five) has a clue.

      I'm saying offer citizenship to the best and brightest.
      I'm saying let immigrants play the lottery and come that way so that we don't discriminate against anyone wanting to come here. Let's save the best and brightest Americans from business and law schools by allowing engineering salaries to come up to demand without any foreign labor subsidies.

      Some of these people will create start-up companies. They might even hire you.
      I'd rather we leave starting companies in America to Americans; you know, like me. I've had my own business since 1995 and would like to see colleagues who are as talented have the opportunity to do likewise.

      You're right though, certainly a lot of Indian immigrants do start companies. According to Lou Dobbs, 75+% of H1B visas go to Indian companies here in America who are looking to then sub the H1B visa holders out to American companies here in America. A very good reason NOT to allow what you're advocating.
  312. Doctor? by zhrinze · · Score: 1

    What self-respecting Time Lord *wouldn't* be a doctor?

  313. It comes down to IQ. by larrypatrickmaloney · · Score: 1

    It's as simple as IQ & Numbers. The Chinese and Indians have 10x more than our population. They have 1.2 Billion plus 1 Billion. We have 300 Million. (OK, maybe 9x) Out of our population, maybe only 1% - 10% of our society is intelligent enough to go into engineering. So, 1% of 300 Million is 3 Million. IQ distribution is about the same in any population. So the same goes for Indians and Chinese. So, 1% of 2.2 Billion is 22 Million. We have 3 Million, they have 22 Million. Simple math. Also, since they have so many more to compete, with they are more aggressive at their education.

  314. Hear's a thought by Veretax · · Score: 0

    It could be possible that most Engineering graduates are so sick and tired of the Bachelors system in college, that they feel they must go and work for a bit before they waste any more of their money on a potential Master or Ph.D. path on which they would not want to actually work at. That's what happened with me, by the time I attained my BS, I was sick of school and eager to get applying. I still hope to go back to school at some point, once I figure out a niche that is worth pursuing.

  315. We don't have to. by utoddl · · Score: 1

    We (Americans) don't have to apply to grad school to keep up the rate of higher-ed citizens, because half of all those foreign students will end up being Americans anyway.

    American isn't an ethnicity. We are the Borg. You are assimilating yourselves.

  316. Why Is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students? by geezenslaw · · Score: 1

    IMHO, you better go-for that Phd. and hope you get tenure somewhere. The reason these students are in engineering and C.S. is because your local University recruits them. Reason: these students are usually from a higher if not better caste and/or their social and economic status. And, they are usually from the more upper crust of their host country. This means revenue for your Universities that are pressured by American corporations and business to enroll such foreign students into their respective engineering and science programs. The American companies win with this arrangement because ultimately the American corporate management does not have to compete with brainy techies that could endanger their jobs. Additionally, the language differences are such that it is much easier to control and manipulate engineers and techies that do not have a very good command of the American language. The entire: foreign-student-to-employee-cycle is at a minimum a symbiotic relationship. If you are wondering why there are so many foreign (middle-east to far east) students in the University engineering departments just look at the number of I.T. and engineering departments of a very many American companies employing majority numbers of foreign workers!

  317. Whites can't be native or welcome here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's part of counter culture dogma. If you're mexican though, and speak a european language, have european laws and culture largely european, then you can be native. Also, if you're white and feel a tremendous amount of racial guilt for things you never personally did, you can be accepted, but your skin color will always mark you by many.

    Ain't political correctness grand?

  318. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But a couple other things to take in consideration, the fact that perspective employees with a Masters or Doctorate usually are asking for more money means its often harder for them to find those first jobs. Its not enough to just get that sheepskin, you need to be able to prove that you deserve the additional pay your employer will be giving you. Otherwise you won't be stuck with the low paying job that BS grads get, you will be stuck with no job at all and a lot of student loans.

    BS (no pun intended). If the company can't afford to pay the going rate, they'll just lowball you and hope they get lucky. Having a Master's degree in hand means the company won't have to pay for you to go back to school and means you should be productive faster than someone without one. More than that though, it is insurance against someone who is incapable of progressing beyond a Bachelor's understanding of the material. If anyone is going to be stuck flipping burgers, it will be the bottom of the crop of BS grads and the guy with the Doctorate in Practical Application of Heated Meat Dynamics in an Accelerated Serving Environment.

    In addition, its not fair to compare the starting salaries of someone with a Masters with someone with a Bachelors, as by the time the MS student graduates the BS grad will have two or three years of work experience under his belt. Its very likely that a BS grad with 2 years of work experience will make more than a MS new grad. From an employers view, which would you rather have? Someone with 6 years experience in academia or someone with 4 years experience in academia and 2 years experience in the workplace?

    Of course, you're ignoring the impact that a Master's degree has on raises and promotions. A two year difference in experience (which is largely imaginary to begin with because most Master's programs involve a good deal of "real" work) quickly becomes irrelevant. The Master's degree is always a factor and, more importantly, not having a Master's degree can prevent you from getting promoted.

  319. Re:Apparently the slashdot mods didn't go to grad by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    That might be true for grad school tuition, but out of curiousity, do they pay for their accrued undergraduate debt?

    My GF's phd canidate (in biochem) stipdend wouldnt nearly cover her cost of living in addition to 60-100k in student debt. For example 10 year loan at 5% on 60k of debt runs $636.39.

    I think that is the point the parent poster was trying to make.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  320. you are right on by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    You hit it on the money. I have had job offers in the past based simply off I went to school and these offers werent from fellow alumni, rather people in industry who recognized the rigorous education.

    People totally forget the networking factor as well.

    What one actually learns might be exteremely similiar between a public/private institution, but the other factors in terms of networking/name recognition are invaluable.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  321. Visa Students = Big $$$ by Dretep · · Score: 0

    I assume it's the same in the US but that's how it is in Canada. The university I work at has seen a drastic increase in the number of asian students. Considering foreign tuition brings in about 3x more than domestic students (due to government subsidies and tuition freezes) is it any wonder we're seeing such an increase? Then our graduates (yes, I know a few personally) go over there for a year to teach them English. Only thing is they should teach them BEFORE they come here to study...

  322. Old Engineers by MarkAyen · · Score: 1

    It depends on the discipline.

    My dad is a PhD chemical engineer. He "retired" about a decade back. However, there's more demand for his consulting time than he's willing or able to provide. (He'd rather spend time with his wife and grandkids.) He regularly does work for the National Research Council on the safe disposal of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons -- hell, I don't have the background to understand most of what he does. He's not doing as much work for the private sector, but it's not for lack of demand. He just doesn't have the time.

  323. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe not in mechanical engineering, but in software engineering what he says is true. Most SEs, who go straight to grad school will be working for a guy who got his BS and has 4 years of real world experience. Classroom doesn't translate that well to the real world for computers. The only place the grad school degree matters is in those companies who mistakenly think that people with a MS or Ph.D. are "smarter". More school does not mean smarter. It means someone who spent more time in class and less time solving real world problems.

    As for your dad... sounds like a top-heavy department... another reason why US automakers are failing.

  324. Engineering Jobs are going to India and China by American+Citizen · · Score: 1

    One of the major reason is that jobs in this area are going to India and China. I worked for a large fortune 500 company. I am an American born citizen. More than half of our team was located in India and China. When contracts were bid, American companies were not even allowed to bid on the projects. I experienced active discrimation from my manager from India. I received less interesting jobs and less pay than the Indian counterparts in my group. I was also told by HR that it was OK to discrimate against non-minorities. Or another way of saying this: You will experience the same thing in the real world that you are experiencing in graduate school in the engineering and computer science areas.

  325. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    "BS (no pun intended). If the company can't afford to pay the going rate, they'll just lowball you and hope they get lucky."

    Oh no, companies really do avoid hiring "overqualified" employees. Even if they get lucky by hiring them for a lower wage than they would normally get, they know you will leave for a higher wage as soon as you can, and they usually want to be able to keep whoever they hire instead of having to hire a replacement every year or so.

    "Having a Master's degree in hand means the company won't have to pay for you to go back to school "

    They don't have pay you to go back to school even if you just have a BS. You might want to go back, but they are not in an obligation to pay for it. And hell, you might want to go back even with that MS, there are plenty of people who go back again, either for an PhD, MBA, or even another technical Masters.

    "and means you should be productive faster than someone without one"

    I would like to see how you intend to back up that assertion.

    "More than that though, it is insurance against someone who is incapable of progressing beyond a Bachelor's understanding of the material."

    Now thats just being naive. There are plenty of incompetent fools with a Masters degree out there. In fact, they may make up an even higher percentage of MS grads than BS grads because of all the people who go to graduate school because they can't get a job with just a BS.

    "Of course, you're ignoring the impact that a Master's degree has on raises and promotions. "

    No, I'm not ignoring it, it is just virtually nonexistent. Once you get in your career, the thing your employer is looking at is your performance at your last job; your education quickly becomes irrelevant (just as your BS becomes irrelevant once you get your Masters). Employers are looking at your most recent activity, not what you did decades ago.

    "A two year difference in experience (which is largely imaginary to begin with because most Master's programs involve a good deal of "real" work) quickly becomes irrelevant."

    I'm not saying you are not working in a MS program, but the work you do there is fundamentally different from the work you do in your job.

    "The Master's degree is always a factor and, more importantly, not having a Master's degree can prevent you from getting promoted."

    Not in most engineering fields. The only degrees that you might need to move up in our discipline would be a MBA (if you want to move in the business side of things) and a PhD (if you want to move in the research side of things). And neither of those are absolutely necessary; I've met rising execs without an MBA and stars in research departments with nothing more than a BS (though all of them would suggest you get those degrees if you want to do what they do).

    And this isn't coming from someone who hates academia and thinks its useless. As I said, I'm planning to go back for my Master's myself. I have nothing against people continuing their education. But do it for the right reasons, not because you think that piece of sheepskin will automatically make you more money. And if you are puzzled as to what those "right reasons" could be, graduate school is not for you.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  326. As Thomas Friedman said... by shaggy0798 · · Score: 1

    We'll all be making our money by selling houses to each other. We'll keep the bubble going until the sun explodes or the vehicles are left unmanned. Either way, it'll be a good run.

  327. Why Is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students? by Eggalious · · Score: 1

    I'm not really sure. Maybe they feel that they can make a better living over here than in their country. Smarter people want to be lawyers and doctors. We definitely need smart people for that.

  328. Why Is US Grad School Mainly Non-US Students? by MimiRuru · · Score: 1

    Everyone says that computers is the future and that is where the money is, but I figure not everyone is made to deal with a machine all day. I guess that the smater Americans can do something else. We can leave that to those without personality.

  329. It's a visa kinda thang ... by RileyDeWiley · · Score: 1

    Because for non-US born, graduate skool is a ticket to an H-1b visa and then a green card, or perhaps an American wife (bonaza!). In other words it's a way out of the turd world and into the US. For the rest of us, it's just a way to do some professor's scut work and pay tuition for the privelege. Riley

  330. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Can't teach with a masters. At least, not at the university level.
    Who said anything about university level? Most teaching is done at schools.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  331. Don't let your kids grow up to be... by EDinNY · · Score: 1

    Don't let your kids grow up to be cowboys...I mean programmers. Think about law

    Unfortunately the career length of a programmer is about the same as a major league baseball player, but as a rule the programmer does not get the multi-million dollar contract.

    Programmers need to transition to management, or maybe sales, to continue to be of any value after their low to mid 40s.

    Doctors work well into their 60's or 70's. Of course with looming threats of socialized medicine in the air, the next generation of doctors might come entirely from 3rd world countries.

    Go into law. Our congresscritters are lawyers. Don't expect socialized law anytime soon.

  332. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by redcrane · · Score: 1

    You can't teach at most public K-12 schools with a masters of engineering. Or even a PhD in engineering for that matter. You need a masters of education and a teaching certificate.

  333. Well said! by SuhlScroll · · Score: 1

    A very good point! ;)

  334. the role of science by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    It's a pleasure talking to you - not many are in a posession of such a fine rhetoric weapons as you are. ;-)

    thank you.

    I'm afraid, though, that this discussion, however interesting it may be, could go on forever, without any of us coming nearer the other.

    It is likely that neither of us can convince the other regardless of how much we type. However, we can understand each other's point of view. It may be that our disagreement is less strong than it appears. I am sorry if I am prolonging this discussion past its useful conclusion.

    My stance, which I don't claim to be "the only correct stance possible", is that for a real scientist, such thing as the origin of the universe definitely *is* within the realm of science. A *scientist*, as I understand the word, is somebody who is firmly attached to the scientific way of thinking, not only during the working hours, but also in the day-to-day life.

    The history of the universe seems to be within the realm of science. I'm not so sure about the origin. Suppose the universe was created six thousand years ago, but it was created as an old universe, dinosaur bones and all. We would have no way of knowing. The universe may have been created fifteen minutes ago, and we wouldn't necessarily know it. In that case, it may be less true but more useful to say that the universe is, for all practical purposes, 13.7 billion years old and move on. Also, keep in mind that the big bang theory doesn't say much about why the universe even exists in the first place, or what (if anything) preceded the big bang. Maybe someday we'll know what came before, but that won't tell us much about why the universe exists or what exactly we're doing here. Those are metaphysical questions, not scientific ones.

    To me, a scientist is someone who uses the scientific method when it's appropriate. In daily life, science can be useful to understand some things (such as trying to figure out why a car won't start), but it won't tell you what to do. It won't tell you that a working car is better than one that doesn't work, and it won't tell you where to drive when you get it fixed. If you already have some goal in mind, science will help you get there, but it won't tell you what that goal should be. For this reason, I don't think anyone can truly live exclusively by the scientific method, and if they think they are, they're fooling themselves.

    Have you read "The Dragon in my Garage" from Carl Sagan? In that book, he shows the passion for science and for the scientific way of thinking. One can say about him what one wants, but he definitely proved his devotion towards critical thinking and promoting the knowledge instead of supersition. This is not enough to be a scientist, but in my eyes, it's a necessary prerequisite.

    No, I haven't read that one. I think it's great that he's enthusiastic about science and has been able to share that enthusiasm with others, and misplaced superstition can be (and has historically been) more destructive than misplaced science. To be a scientist, you need to believe the scientific method is useful, and that implies that you believe the universe is at least mostly predictable (you don't look for miracles around every corner). I don't think being a scientist means you believe that universal truth can only be revealed by science.

    Sometimes, science and religion overlap in unfortunate ways. Before orbital mechanics were understood, the rising of the sun every morning seemed miraculous, and before fusion was understood we didn't know where all that light came from. But it's important to realize that just because the world seems less miraculous than it did in the past, does not mean that religion can be completely replaced by science.

  335. As you said, it is not a "problem". by xtracto · · Score: 1

    They accept those who apply. Most Americans are probably happy with just an undergrad degree and don't want to go to grad school.

    When I was finishing my Undergrad.in Mexico and started looking for information for a postgraduate degree I went to see a professor at my university which I estimate a lot to ask him about his point of view on the different post-graduate possibilities (studying the post in the same Uni, studying in another Uni in Mexico or studying abroad). He told me something which I believe is one of the best pieces of advice I got about the postgraduate. Paraphrasing him it was something like this:

    "When you go to the postgraduate, you usually do not go just for the 'quality' of education, but you go for the cultural baggage that the place where you study can provide you. If all you want is 'good' education, you can go the Mexico's UNAM, which is very prestigious and has really good quality. However, what you want is a combination of good prestige [for a PhD], a completely different culture in which you can learn and a different place which you can know. Therefore, if you can go to Japan [figuratively, the other side of the world] you should do it"

    And hence, this is partly why I am doing my PhD in the UK and as he said, I have learned quite a lot in the 3 years I have been here. I have met a lot of interesting people and I have seen places and known issues I would have never known if I had stayed in Mexico.

    Therefore, I would suggest any of the USA postgraduates to try and go to another country to study their postgraduate, even a Master. There are some countries where the postgraduate studies are cheaper than in the USA (for example, France). And if they do not speak English, you could even learn a new language.

    Overall I think it is not a bug, but a feature (as we like to say), even in my department in the UK for example, in my office we are about 7 persons (big office =o)) there are Syrians, Chinese, Americans, Sudanians, etc. And there are very few English PhD students in the Department (I believe the rate is about 70%-30%).

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  336. Easy one by Thundercleets · · Score: 0

    The problem is that American higher education favors minority and foreign students becuase they can get more government subsidy from minority status students.
    Those from Indian and China are granted minority status ( historical minority not actual, actually there are more Indians and Chinese then there are on any other "kind" of people ) and thus favorable treatment with regards to quotas and access to financial aid. Furthermore India and China among others have huge subsidized lobbies in Washington that maintain access to free education for their people and they have financial aid programs in addition to those footed by the US taxpayer.
    If you really care to look up EOP, Equal Opportunity Professional, INAPAC, the list goes on.

  337. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by kidcharles · · Score: 1

    I'm with you on this one. I've been working on a PhD in EE for the last 5 years, hoping to finish early next year. I'm intellectually way beyond where I was when I finished my BS. I'm hoping to eventually get a faculty position at a decent institution. The grandparent post was way off base.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  338. WTF? by woolio · · Score: 1

    More importantly, 90% of American engineering students realize that the only reason for getting an MS in engineering is to teach. I'm yet to find someone who thinks he learned something worthwhile in post-grad engineering school.

    I'm going to guess that you don't know anyone who studied Electrical Engineering. A BS degree means someone knows how to integrate a function and what truth table is. How to apply these things to do complex stuff is NOT taught in undergrad classes. (At least not to the level where someone could go and fully create the thing on their own).

    Frankly I think people from the United States (I'm one) expect too much to be handed to them. Yes, ~4 years of college is not always easy, but it is not exactly always enough in industry. We're too content to start making the big bucks and buy that first nice car.

    Others come from other countries and fought much harder to get where they are. They faced more competition. They know what they need to do. And many actually do it. Others learn to how game the system and do extremely well.

    Yes, most academic research is bogus. But the techniques in use are extremely useful to know. The understanding gained of a topic/field is extremely valueable. It allows once to technically be more versatile.

  339. Re:The sad reality: Smart Doesn't Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (laugh. why aren't you an engineer anymore?)

  340. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by bdog375 · · Score: 1

    I think it is a perfectly valid question as well. I am CS grad student and I notice the same thing. I am along the same lines of not being concerned about the having a lot of foreign students, but instead about having too few American students. The worth of a Bachelor's degree today is the same as a High School diploma in 1950. Too many people do not see college as an opportunity learn, and see it as more of an opportunity to escape life at home. As soon as their four years are done they take an often meaningless job when they are capable of more productive work. The fact that people do not graduate in four year regularly anymore means that people should not go straight into college from high school either, and instead should work some form of service job, e.g. military, foreign relation, etc.

  341. I'll Raise You One... by bottlerocket · · Score: 1

    I'll respond to your glib comment frankly:

    Good detective work. Seriously. Is your company hiring people with three-quarters of BFA in Graphic Design?

    I mean, I would've sold the iPod if I thought it could've bought myself out the situation I am in. But it was my most valuable possession, and, anyway, it died the other week. Not a scratch on it, I might add, but the HDD lost its will to live.

    Further Information: I won the iPod in a drawing at the school cafeteria. It only cost me eight bowls of soup to enter, I could live off a bowl of soup in the morning and a small snack at night for eight days for my chance to win. I love music and really wanted an iPod. I justified eating only two (small) meals a day with the hope that I would win.

    In the end, I only won because I was the last person to turn in my ticket. The cafeteria workers didn't shuffle the tickets, and drawing from the top, I was the lucky(?) winner. Now that my 20Gb iPod is dead (it's been my constant companion for over four years), I'm forced to further narrow my musical selection down on my (five year old) laptop.

    [Continued discourse.]

    --
    where the comment ends and sig begins
  342. Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our government keeps letting all these foreigners in.

  343. i for one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our better-educated overlords.

  344. 90% seems high by LukeCrawford · · Score: 0
    but in industry, (I'm a UNIX janitor) maybe 50% of my coleauges are US born. I'm cool with it; I have several (US born) friends who could do what I do but would rather take easier, lower-stress and lower-paying jobs. Understandable; between pager and off-duty training, I spend a lot more time working than they do.

    Now, I have no education to speak of, and this is not particularly unusual for the US born; Nearly all the H1B holders I work with have a masters. Many of them are really, really good. (others, of course, prove that holding a masters doesn't neccisairly mean you are educated.)

    Personally, I think that if the US wants to maintain it's economic dominance, we need to offer everyone graduating above a certain level from US accredited universities a path to citizenship. Right now, we are siphoning off the best people in the world, but many of them are on temporary visas- for many of them gaining citizenship is quite difficult (assuming they want to be honest about the marrage laws) If the dollar continues to fall against other currencies, the work required to work here might not be worth it anymore.

  345. Re:90% of those who apply are probably from India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how you take the phrase "teach at a university" and automatically inflict your snooty prejudices on it, altering it to "teach at a MAJOR university" and further go on to espouse an elitist ivy-league approach to selecting professors as though it were the standard way of doing things.

    Way to go, sparky. Good job!