Bioshock isn't as Scary as SS2. I would argue that it's better as a shooter, and the improved tech is used to incredible effect at producing a better overall atmosphere. However, it's worse as an RPG, and I'd say the atmosphere it creates is more 'creepy' than System Shock's flat-out 'scary'.
Still, Bioshock certainly has it's moments. (Dentist.)
Second game that ever scared me was the FEAR demo. The glimpses of the little girl were already freaking me out, and then at one point I backtracked a bit, climbed a ladder, and she was STANDING RIGHT THERE!
Yes. That was the most awesome moment in the whole game.
There's a very similar part in Bioshock. Works every time!
The widescreen thing is a complete and utter non-issue. Here's the full sequence of events.
The game was designed in 16:9. The way widescreen looks right now is how the game was meant to be played. Put a 16:9 image on a 4:3 screen, and you get black bars. Your options for that is to either render what goes in the bars, or zoom the image. They chose to render what's in the bars. That's honestly what makes the most sense to do.
As for them responding to it badly, I don't know what you're talking about. They're going to make a patch that changes it to what people are clamoring for anyway. (Then, maybe, people with 4:3 can complain that their screen is zoomed in too much in comparison, and we can get an infinite loop going!)
Ken Levine (man in charge of the game) has stated that the internet activation is temporary, and at some undefined point in the future it will be removed.
In fact, I really, really want a 360. I want to own some 360 exclusives (and some games that are only for 360 and PS3) terribly badly. But I have a tiny TV! The premium wouldn't really cost me a mere $350 + tax (after price cut), but also the additional $700 (that's minimum) screen I'd need to be able to read the menu text.
Now, with the Elite (and possibly future revisions of the other packages as well) sporting HDMI, I have a reasonable way to hook it up to my DVI hi-res computer monitor, so grabbing one is becoming an affordable option. But, funny thing, I bought the Wii specifically because I AM aware of the technical issues surrounding current-gen consoles.
With the karaoke-style gameplay that Rock Band is adding to the formula, how are they going to handle a similar situation, but where many die-hard fans are going to want to scream the work "fuck" as loud as possible during that moment? Will they edit the word out and count off your points for saying it since it would be akin to a missed note?
Well, I don't know the answer, but I have heard that there are to be 'fill' sections where you can just do your own thing. Maybe they could just make all the 'naughty' parts quick fill spots, so you get points no matter what you say.
In my book, that makes us "better" than animals. I know that I, for one, would be bored out of my mind picking bugs off of others in my "group" and throwing poo.
I'm going to quote Douglas Adams now.
"For instance, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much - the wheel, New York, wars and so on - whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man - for precisely the same reasons."
As a species, we value the things that we have. We value self-improvement, because we can do it. We value culture, because we have it.
However, monkeys probably think out inability to properly groom each other is somewhat silly.
It's a problem of bias to an incredible degree. You must admit that it's a bit suspicious that every single way in which some animal is clearly superior to humans is viewed by humanity as utterly unimportant.
I wholeheartedly agree. When I read that statement, I laughed out loud.
Being knowledgeable about a system that interacts with a user generally puts you in a WORSE position to evaluate it. The perfect tester is a person with no familiarity whatsoever.
I know what you mean. It's obvious that the sole purpose of the trailer was to say, 'Look, we get it, we know what Fallout is supposed to be.' And they convinced me. And I truly did almost shed a tear of happiness.
I'm a little uncomfortable with the realization that it means that much to me, but it does. I wouldn't say that either Fallout 1 or 2 is my favorite game ever, but there is absolutely no series that I would be sadder to see messed up. (Tactics wasn't a super-great game, but I didn't feel like it 'corrupted' the series in any way. Just a sub-par entry.)
Evolution is the foundation of modern biology, but how many teachers have to tiptoe around it, along with the age of the Earth and who knows how many other subjects, because they might "offend" a subset of the religious among them?
I'm so glad I had the biology teacher that I did in high school. Once we got to the point where the stuff we were learning REALLY depended on evolution, she started a class by saying something very close to this: "Evolution is. It's a fact and it's the basis for everything we've learned so far and everything we will learn. You can disagree with me, but I'll say it one more time: evolution is."
There was no further discussion along those lines, much to the relief of most of the class...
I think people who haven't used the controller at length underestimate how nice the separation of the hands is. It makes it much more comfortable.
I don't know about the number of buttons, though. Twilight Princess uses each and every button on that controller, including the four D-Pad directions, and it comes out to 12. On the plus side, the buttons ARE all very distinct. I do see people confusing B and Z at times, however.
My only real problem with the controller is that with my setup, I pretty much have to sit quite close to the TV -- too close for the pointer to function if I'm holding my hands out. Unfortunately there's just not that much I can do about it.
Oh, yeah, after E3 I read a ton of posts and articles by people who said it was the best thing at the show. They meant it, too. Not sarcastic or anything. I couldn't understand it then, I still can't now.
They come right out and say it's a deterrent, and that the money (at least at first) will go to a particular fund. They're not lying and calling it a cost. (At least, not this fee.)
Actually, when playing WoW, I did actually tend to feel a little uncomfortable when another character was standing too close to mine in an open space, third-person camera or not. I could be a rare case, but seeing people move to put a little 'personal space' between themselves and others was not uncommon -- unless that was just my own perception of some mostly random shifting.
That actually happened to me once. My library card was stolen, and someone borrowed books about child abuse on it. The sickening part of it was that this was a library at a teacher's college. I didn't feel virtually raped, but felt someone else might get raped fo' real.
Er, unless we're talking about how-to guides, I think you're jumping to some illogical conclusions, there.
I don't know. The bottom line is that you have two main options here.
You can have a show like Mythbusters, where they DO try to make the science as good as they can, but ultimately and in all cases side with entertainment. People will (and do) watch this show. They will probably, or hopefully, take away from it a sense of curiosity, and may be less likely to blindly accept what they're told. Some people might think that the show is an example of rigorous science. However, any passable middle or junior-high school should be teaching about the scientific method, and that is the best place for it. If a person watches the show and gets the wrong idea, frankly, that person is probably and idiot. There was little hope for them anyway.
Or you could have a show that does everything perfectly. They'll set up control groups, they'll take precise measurements, they'll work out all the math and examine all the chemistry and physics. Nobody will watch this show -- not even the people complaining that it isn't like that. The show would be one more example showing that 'science is boring.'
AFAIK, the WoW servers DON'T trust the client. This isn't about fraudulent data being sent. It's just about what exactly is controlling the client, which is, both in practice and in theory, impossible to determine. You might be able to write advanced analysis software that could guess, but it really would only be guessing.
Slashdot Mirror
Bioshock isn't as Scary as SS2. I would argue that it's better as a shooter, and the improved tech is used to incredible effect at producing a better overall atmosphere. However, it's worse as an RPG, and I'd say the atmosphere it creates is more 'creepy' than System Shock's flat-out 'scary'.
Still, Bioshock certainly has it's moments. (Dentist.)
Yes. That was the most awesome moment in the whole game.
There's a very similar part in Bioshock. Works every time!
The widescreen thing is a complete and utter non-issue. Here's the full sequence of events.
The game was designed in 16:9. The way widescreen looks right now is how the game was meant to be played. Put a 16:9 image on a 4:3 screen, and you get black bars. Your options for that is to either render what goes in the bars, or zoom the image. They chose to render what's in the bars. That's honestly what makes the most sense to do.
As for them responding to it badly, I don't know what you're talking about. They're going to make a patch that changes it to what people are clamoring for anyway. (Then, maybe, people with 4:3 can complain that their screen is zoomed in too much in comparison, and we can get an infinite loop going!)
Ken Levine (man in charge of the game) has stated that the internet activation is temporary, and at some undefined point in the future it will be removed.
I feel exactly the same as you.
In fact, I really, really want a 360. I want to own some 360 exclusives (and some games that are only for 360 and PS3) terribly badly. But I have a tiny TV! The premium wouldn't really cost me a mere $350 + tax (after price cut), but also the additional $700 (that's minimum) screen I'd need to be able to read the menu text.
Now, with the Elite (and possibly future revisions of the other packages as well) sporting HDMI, I have a reasonable way to hook it up to my DVI hi-res computer monitor, so grabbing one is becoming an affordable option. But, funny thing, I bought the Wii specifically because I AM aware of the technical issues surrounding current-gen consoles.
Well, I don't know the answer, but I have heard that there are to be 'fill' sections where you can just do your own thing. Maybe they could just make all the 'naughty' parts quick fill spots, so you get points no matter what you say.
Yeah, but, Gamestop's numbers are actually less reliable than actual random numbers.
Random numbers are right SOMETIMES.
I'm going to quote Douglas Adams now.
"For instance, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much - the wheel, New York, wars and so on - whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man - for precisely the same reasons."
As a species, we value the things that we have. We value self-improvement, because we can do it. We value culture, because we have it.
However, monkeys probably think out inability to properly groom each other is somewhat silly.
It's a problem of bias to an incredible degree. You must admit that it's a bit suspicious that every single way in which some animal is clearly superior to humans is viewed by humanity as utterly unimportant.
And, I've found, a good place to stop understanding quantum mechanics is looking into more advanced variations of the experiment.
So, 'as far as you can tell' doesn't even include reading the summary?
Anyway, they said it would be coming out for PC about 10 months ago.
Why would you say that? They haven't even mentioned it. Anywhere. Not a single word. All information about this occurrence is from JT.
I wholeheartedly agree. When I read that statement, I laughed out loud.
Being knowledgeable about a system that interacts with a user generally puts you in a WORSE position to evaluate it. The perfect tester is a person with no familiarity whatsoever.
I know what you mean. It's obvious that the sole purpose of the trailer was to say, 'Look, we get it, we know what Fallout is supposed to be.' And they convinced me. And I truly did almost shed a tear of happiness.
I'm a little uncomfortable with the realization that it means that much to me, but it does. I wouldn't say that either Fallout 1 or 2 is my favorite game ever, but there is absolutely no series that I would be sadder to see messed up. (Tactics wasn't a super-great game, but I didn't feel like it 'corrupted' the series in any way. Just a sub-par entry.)
Considering the company that's making it, I would definitely say that limited freedom should be the least of your worries.
If the complaint isn't true, though, the only one wronged would be the person you fired.
I'm so glad I had the biology teacher that I did in high school. Once we got to the point where the stuff we were learning REALLY depended on evolution, she started a class by saying something very close to this: "Evolution is. It's a fact and it's the basis for everything we've learned so far and everything we will learn. You can disagree with me, but I'll say it one more time: evolution is."
There was no further discussion along those lines, much to the relief of most of the class...
I think people who haven't used the controller at length underestimate how nice the separation of the hands is. It makes it much more comfortable.
I don't know about the number of buttons, though. Twilight Princess uses each and every button on that controller, including the four D-Pad directions, and it comes out to 12. On the plus side, the buttons ARE all very distinct. I do see people confusing B and Z at times, however.
My only real problem with the controller is that with my setup, I pretty much have to sit quite close to the TV -- too close for the pointer to function if I'm holding my hands out. Unfortunately there's just not that much I can do about it.
Oh, yeah, after E3 I read a ton of posts and articles by people who said it was the best thing at the show. They meant it, too. Not sarcastic or anything. I couldn't understand it then, I still can't now.
It's definitely full 3D. The camera can even be rotated.
They come right out and say it's a deterrent, and that the money (at least at first) will go to a particular fund. They're not lying and calling it a cost. (At least, not this fee.)
Actually, when playing WoW, I did actually tend to feel a little uncomfortable when another character was standing too close to mine in an open space, third-person camera or not. I could be a rare case, but seeing people move to put a little 'personal space' between themselves and others was not uncommon -- unless that was just my own perception of some mostly random shifting.
Er, unless we're talking about how-to guides, I think you're jumping to some illogical conclusions, there.
I don't know. The bottom line is that you have two main options here.
You can have a show like Mythbusters, where they DO try to make the science as good as they can, but ultimately and in all cases side with entertainment. People will (and do) watch this show. They will probably, or hopefully, take away from it a sense of curiosity, and may be less likely to blindly accept what they're told. Some people might think that the show is an example of rigorous science. However, any passable middle or junior-high school should be teaching about the scientific method, and that is the best place for it. If a person watches the show and gets the wrong idea, frankly, that person is probably and idiot. There was little hope for them anyway.
Or you could have a show that does everything perfectly. They'll set up control groups, they'll take precise measurements, they'll work out all the math and examine all the chemistry and physics. Nobody will watch this show -- not even the people complaining that it isn't like that. The show would be one more example showing that 'science is boring.'
AFAIK, the WoW servers DON'T trust the client. This isn't about fraudulent data being sent. It's just about what exactly is controlling the client, which is, both in practice and in theory, impossible to determine. You might be able to write advanced analysis software that could guess, but it really would only be guessing.
Like it's really hard to remember what happens in each of a stunning 14 episodes.
I know I can.