I am sorry for your father. We just lost my neighbor and my wife's best friend last week to colon cancer. It hit us pretty hard. Everyone I had ever lost was sudden, here one minute, gone the next, from a heart attack, car accident, or such. Watching the slow, lingering, wasting away to nothing death was one of the hardest things I have ever went through. Cancer sucks, I hope this treatment proves beneficial so others do not have to go through what she did.
This seems more to be a forum than social media to me. I don't have friends or follow anyone and post no media. Slashdot would only be considered social media in the very broadest sense. I post on a few forums but have no social media presence at all in what is generally understood to be such, like Twitter, Facebook, et al.
Vivaldi user here too. Ublock Origin uMatrix since Chromium based browsers do not have No Script like I used in Firefox I did have HTTPS Everywhere, but there is a bug in it that prevents you from seeing your Netflix DVD queue so I had to remove it. I still have a DVD plan as there are many titles I want to see that are available on streaming.
Didn't realize IMDB was that old
on
IMDb Hits 25
·
· Score: 1
I didn't realize IMDB was that old. I remember getting a CD of Microsoft Cinemania in 1994, which was the best reference that I knew of for movies at the time. I think they came out with a new one yearly, but Internet databases such as IMDB could be updated easier and more frequently so they stopped publishing Cinemania.
Any file that started with $sys$ was hidden from the OS, so it didn't take long for people to start hiding malicious files if you had the rootkit on your system.
I have had the same thing with two back to back purchases on Steam. Valve won't let you buy two of the same game in a single transaction, so during a sale I bought one copy for myself and another copy for a friend, and the card was declined on the second purchase.
We still use a lot of whiteboards at work to collaborate on ideas. It's not chalk on a blackboard, but still serves the same purpose of displaying a drawing or diagram for multiple people to view and make comments.
One problem is that how does the consumer know who are authorized resellers? Ubisoft doesn't have a list that I can find, so how do you know if a site is legitimate or not? It's hard to go by the old adage "if it looks too good to be true, it probably is" anymore, with so many sites having sales at cut rate prices on digital goods. I picked up a few "too good to be true" bargains last month during the Steam sales.
I have progressives and don't mind them after getting used to them. I actually read better with no glasses, but if I have my arm about halfway extended, then things start getting fuzzy. I use my glasses for long distance and for looking at the monitor since it is about 2 feet away, anything closer (reading distance) I take off the glasses.
And for heaven’s sake, don’t consent to a search if you are carrying a big roll of legitimate cash.
I have been pulled over twice for minor offenses such as a burned out taillight bulb and then had my vehicle searched for no cause. The police said they smelled marijuana and didn't need my consent. Basically, all they have to do is lie and the Bill of Rights is just a piece of paper as far as they are concerned. They found nothing either time.
Download 4.69
Upload 0.40
Total 5.09
This is what a typical day looks like when I check my online usage with AT&T DSL. Those totals are in GB, so they are saying that I am uploading 400 MB, which is BS. Other than the occasional picture attached to an email, I upload nothing, no torrents, no facetime/skype, nada, yet they say I do nearly 1/2 a GB a day. That's about 10% of my download ratio, so they have to be measuring network overhead. That ovehead adds up to about 12 GB a month, so my 150 GB cap is really in the 130+ range.
I don't understand why the Republican would be against municipal broadband. Aren't they always talking about job creation? Chattanooga has added hundreds of jobs, had a huge increase in start-up companies, and attracted a lot of industry to the area since they deployed a municipal gigabit broadband network, so why oppose it? The only explanation I can possibly think of is that they are too cozy with the cable and telecomm monopolies.
Trying to finish it and any other games I have in my backlog that use Games For Windows Live before Microsoft pulls the plug on it this summer. Some have had it patched out, such as Bioshock and Batman, but others have not like Dark Souls.
What I really see happening if this gets momentum is more and more publishers actually making Linux native clients for games. Once there is a large enough hardware base, the software will follow, the chicken and egg syndrome. Valve has enough weight to make this happen.
Valve is pushing Linux for gaming, and I assume that the Steambox will be a Linux OS. There is only a very small subset of the Steam catalog that has native Linux games, so I am wondering if they are planning on supporting streaming from a PC running Steam to the TV via Steambox? There might still be some latency, but on a local network it is not going to be nearly what it would be streaming over the Internet, such as On Live or Sony's Gaikai.
My biggest question would be how are they going to handle the shared Steam account? What if the wife or kids wants to play a game on the Steambox and I want to play on my PC at the same time? The only way you can do that with the current system on multiple devices is to have one of them in offline mode, which means only one can play an online game at once. What about multiple profiles so that that each user can have their own friends lists and own achievements such as the PS3/360 do on their consoles? Currently there are not any separate profiles on a single account, you need separate Steam accounts, and separate game purchases on each account to do so.
But they would not have their own achievements or own list of friends - doesn't matter so much to me, but it does to the kids. To do that, you need separate xblg accounts else the one account would be all you could play with online. Microsoft used to have a family plan for $100 for 4 members, but they discontinued that last spring.
They are also putting OneGuide and Skype behind the Xbox Live Gold paywall. It looks like most of the new features they have added to Xbox One will require XBL Gold.The PS4 will let you record gameplay without a PS+ account.
The main difference I see in PS+ and Xbox Live Gold is that PS+ is per PS3/PS4 where Xbox Live Gold is per account. For those of us with families, that is a substantial difference. Both of my kids and myself would be able to play under the single PS+ account for $50, where for XBL Gold each of us would require our own account, bringing the total to $180.
I am just wondering if the Internet echo chamber has blew this way out of proportion. What if they are referring to always online in another sense?
Downloading updates, games, or movies when the console is in standby mode
The ability to use it as a Media Center when it is in standby
That's just a couple examples, but I am sure there could be many other benefits of having a console that is always online that has nothing to do with DRM. After the highly visible fiascoes such as the Sim City launch and the lack of Internet availability or stability in many parts of the country, much less the world, I can't see them writing off a large percentage of potential buyers by requiring to be online to play every game, even in single player. I still have a few friends in rural areas that are on dialup that do not have access to broadband, or one on satellite with it's 500 ms ping times on a good day.
Slashdot Mirror
I am sorry for your father. We just lost my neighbor and my wife's best friend last week to colon cancer. It hit us pretty hard. Everyone I had ever lost was sudden, here one minute, gone the next, from a heart attack, car accident, or such. Watching the slow, lingering, wasting away to nothing death was one of the hardest things I have ever went through. Cancer sucks, I hope this treatment proves beneficial so others do not have to go through what she did.
This seems more to be a forum than social media to me. I don't have friends or follow anyone and post no media. Slashdot would only be considered social media in the very broadest sense. I post on a few forums but have no social media presence at all in what is generally understood to be such, like Twitter, Facebook, et al.
Vivaldi user here too.
Ublock Origin
uMatrix since Chromium based browsers do not have No Script like I used in Firefox
I did have HTTPS Everywhere, but there is a bug in it that prevents you from seeing your Netflix DVD queue so I had to remove it. I still have a DVD plan as there are many titles I want to see that are available on streaming.
I didn't realize IMDB was that old. I remember getting a CD of Microsoft Cinemania in 1994, which was the best reference that I knew of for movies at the time. I think they came out with a new one yearly, but Internet databases such as IMDB could be updated easier and more frequently so they stopped publishing Cinemania.
Any file that started with $sys$ was hidden from the OS, so it didn't take long for people to start hiding malicious files if you had the rootkit on your system.
I have had the same thing with two back to back purchases on Steam. Valve won't let you buy two of the same game in a single transaction, so during a sale I bought one copy for myself and another copy for a friend, and the card was declined on the second purchase.
I do the same but get the DVD or Blu-Ray set instead of buying from iTunes. I can rip them to my Plex Media Sever and watch them on all of my devices.
But bacon-wrapped kiwi is soooooo delicious...
We still use a lot of whiteboards at work to collaborate on ideas. It's not chalk on a blackboard, but still serves the same purpose of displaying a drawing or diagram for multiple people to view and make comments.
The problem with giving out a fake password would be that the real user ends up locked out of sites or systems due to too many bad password attempts.
One problem is that how does the consumer know who are authorized resellers? Ubisoft doesn't have a list that I can find, so how do you know if a site is legitimate or not? It's hard to go by the old adage "if it looks too good to be true, it probably is" anymore, with so many sites having sales at cut rate prices on digital goods. I picked up a few "too good to be true" bargains last month during the Steam sales.
I have progressives and don't mind them after getting used to them. I actually read better with no glasses, but if I have my arm about halfway extended, then things start getting fuzzy. I use my glasses for long distance and for looking at the monitor since it is about 2 feet away, anything closer (reading distance) I take off the glasses.
And for heaven’s sake, don’t consent to a search if you are carrying a big roll of legitimate cash.
I have been pulled over twice for minor offenses such as a burned out taillight bulb and then had my vehicle searched for no cause. The police said they smelled marijuana and didn't need my consent. Basically, all they have to do is lie and the Bill of Rights is just a piece of paper as far as they are concerned. They found nothing either time.
Download 4.69
Upload 0.40
Total 5.09
This is what a typical day looks like when I check my online usage with AT&T DSL. Those totals are in GB, so they are saying that I am uploading 400 MB, which is BS. Other than the occasional picture attached to an email, I upload nothing, no torrents, no facetime/skype, nada, yet they say I do nearly 1/2 a GB a day. That's about 10% of my download ratio, so they have to be measuring network overhead. That ovehead adds up to about 12 GB a month, so my 150 GB cap is really in the 130+ range.
I don't understand why the Republican would be against municipal broadband. Aren't they always talking about job creation? Chattanooga has added hundreds of jobs, had a huge increase in start-up companies, and attracted a lot of industry to the area since they deployed a municipal gigabit broadband network, so why oppose it? The only explanation I can possibly think of is that they are too cozy with the cable and telecomm monopolies.
The first thing I thought of was that they would sell off the areas that were recently announced to have Google Fiber coming.
Trying to finish it and any other games I have in my backlog that use Games For Windows Live before Microsoft pulls the plug on it this summer. Some have had it patched out, such as Bioshock and Batman, but others have not like Dark Souls.
What I really see happening if this gets momentum is more and more publishers actually making Linux native clients for games. Once there is a large enough hardware base, the software will follow, the chicken and egg syndrome. Valve has enough weight to make this happen.
Just imagine if the Beowulf game http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beowulf:_The_Game came to Steam and ran on a Beowulf cluster!
Valve is pushing Linux for gaming, and I assume that the Steambox will be a Linux OS. There is only a very small subset of the Steam catalog that has native Linux games, so I am wondering if they are planning on supporting streaming from a PC running Steam to the TV via Steambox? There might still be some latency, but on a local network it is not going to be nearly what it would be streaming over the Internet, such as On Live or Sony's Gaikai.
My biggest question would be how are they going to handle the shared Steam account? What if the wife or kids wants to play a game on the Steambox and I want to play on my PC at the same time? The only way you can do that with the current system on multiple devices is to have one of them in offline mode, which means only one can play an online game at once. What about multiple profiles so that that each user can have their own friends lists and own achievements such as the PS3/360 do on their consoles? Currently there are not any separate profiles on a single account, you need separate Steam accounts, and separate game purchases on each account to do so.
But they would not have their own achievements or own list of friends - doesn't matter so much to me, but it does to the kids. To do that, you need separate xblg accounts else the one account would be all you could play with online. Microsoft used to have a family plan for $100 for 4 members, but they discontinued that last spring.
They are also putting OneGuide and Skype behind the Xbox Live Gold paywall. It looks like most of the new features they have added to Xbox One will require XBL Gold.The PS4 will let you record gameplay without a PS+ account.
The main difference I see in PS+ and Xbox Live Gold is that PS+ is per PS3/PS4 where Xbox Live Gold is per account. For those of us with families, that is a substantial difference. Both of my kids and myself would be able to play under the single PS+ account for $50, where for XBL Gold each of us would require our own account, bringing the total to $180.
Postal was another that did something similar. After about a minute of play you would catch on fire when using a crack.
I am just wondering if the Internet echo chamber has blew this way out of proportion. What if they are referring to always online in another sense?
Downloading updates, games, or movies when the console is in standby mode
The ability to use it as a Media Center when it is in standby
That's just a couple examples, but I am sure there could be many other benefits of having a console that is always online that has nothing to do with DRM. After the highly visible fiascoes such as the Sim City launch and the lack of Internet availability or stability in many parts of the country, much less the world, I can't see them writing off a large percentage of potential buyers by requiring to be online to play every game, even in single player. I still have a few friends in rural areas that are on dialup that do not have access to broadband, or one on satellite with it's 500 ms ping times on a good day.
Boycotts don't usually work and even if they did, they will just blame slow sales on some other cause - piracy is always an easy target.