How about adding both 4 GiB of Flash for those start-up times (good for laptops) and 4 GiB RAM for the hard drive cache? That would scream to say the least. However at that point I don't know if it would be even more expensive and less reliable (controller for efficient use of three types of storage?) than simply going with 100% SSD.
Slashdot Mirror
<cover style="font-size: large; font-family: friendly_letters;">DON'T PANIC!</cover>
There, fixed that for you.
In the end, the last war on earth is going to be FSM followers vs IPU followers.
No control over it?
Safari -> Preferences -> Security -> Database Storage (Set to "None")
Can Javascript really access other tabs or windows? Shouldn't it be restricted to its own page/tab/window?
Not yet, it's still printing!
Bhey alfo burn your mouf.
How about adding both 4 GiB of Flash for those start-up times (good for laptops) and 4 GiB RAM for the hard drive cache? That would scream to say the least. However at that point I don't know if it would be even more expensive and less reliable (controller for efficient use of three types of storage?) than simply going with 100% SSD.
Most laptops, netbooks and all Macs except the Mac Pro have very limited RAM upgrade capabilities. You can't "just add an additional 4 GiB of memory".
Please leave your nerd card on the desk on your way out.
May we suggest the name "KipDrordy" for the bug?
Reverse the first and last name and you get this instead.
24-bit PNG for the screen captures.
Great, robots are vulnerable to solar flares too?
Mod parent to 11 for that link.
Mod parent up! Screenshots should have been 24-bit PNGs.
GIF images renamed to JPEG? Seriously? What was that guy thinking?
Did it came back as a blue box?
In this case, it's splash!
As long as you got 1 bit of communication, you can do anything.
I thought it was a musician who plays any type of organ.
And mines go "Boom!".
You mean they don't want imagelogr@gmail.com harvested by bots?
Why wouldn't they want imagelogr@gmail.com harvested by bots?
What's so wrong about imagelogr@gmail.com being harvested by bots?
I really don't understand why they don't want imagelogr@gmail.com harvested by bots.
Can someone explain to me what's so bad about imagelogr@gmail.com being harvested by bots?
Maybe I should write them, at imagelogr@gmail.com, to ask why they don't want imagelogr@gmail.com to be harvested by bots.
imagelogr@gmail.com !
Quite another challenge to play both Pac-Man and Ms. Pac-Man at once, though.
To the shopmobile!
Compared to recent Hollywood movies? Hell yes!
Help! Help! I'm being repressed!