If I pay for internet i want my packets sent to me without any type of priority based on source or destination. I would be moderately interested in enabling classes of service for TYPES of traffic, but not based on their source. That would be something an ISP should do out of a best practice. My point is that if I pay for 10Mbit, give me 10 Mbit and leave my traffic alone. THAT is net neutrality. Anything else is just not neutral.
My iPad Air 2 has never been the same since iOS 10. The device, in general, is noticably slower. Querky. The mail application hangs, doesn't update properly (read/unread). Safari crashes. Split view mode provokes problems when app switching. MEH.
I find it incredible that so many people deny all the evidence relating to conspiracies!
What is harder to believe? That conspiracies dont exist, or that they do exist? conspiracy: a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful
It is literally impossible that conspiracies don't exist and the people who control the sources of power in the world have their own private agendas which include illegal activities. Really, people need to pull their heads out and grow up.
It would be interesting to see if the route of administration results in different effects. More research is needed. I would imagine that oral ingestion could have a less pronouced cerebral vasioconstricion.
Interestingly enough, a cup of Coca leaf tea will increase blood flow to the brain.
I respect the right of anyone to do whatever they want to their own bodies. There is no one single chemistry, nor one correct response regarding these issues.
HMMWV's don't have keys, you think a soldier wants a key to turn on / off the weapon that could save his life? Technical options simply aren't feasible.
That equipment was already "lost" as the cost to take it back to the US exceeded the value of the equipment. The decision was made to leave it. When it began to fall in to enemy hands, it should have been immediately destroyed.
Are rules for some and suggestions for the rest of us. The IEEE can put a standard on cleaning the toilet. If your company wants to follow it to the letter, or just use it as another reference, that's your call. I think the organization of conceptually difficult concepts is a good thing, overall. What we do with that is a whole other thing.
I live in Chile and am amazed by the deathgrip that Microsoft has here. It's amazing. When you use Microsoft software in Chile, according to the terms of use, you unconditionally agree to an inspection, in your business, by Microsoft, without warning. What happens is that a Microsoft representative arrives WITH POLICE and they are prepared to file criminal charges against END USERS and MANAGERS for the discovery of unlicensed software. They perform a scan of the network with their tools and require proof that each copy is licensed.
To me, this is simple crazy corporate control.
As a person with first hand experience on Cisco and HP Access Points, I have some disappointing news for you. There is no comparison between the Cisco and HP wireless gear. The HP stuff is repackaged Calubris Netowrk gear and it is kludgy, at best. I really, really, really have a shudder of fear when client select the HP stuff. It simply doesn't work well. The Cisco gear using a WLC (Wireless LAN Controller) is the absolute best I;ve ever seen. It's a breeze to install and performance is great.
Keep in mind that when using a mesh, the bandwidth goed down 50% at each hop. So, if you have 54Mbps at the first access point, the next access points are limites to 27Mbps and the next at down to 13.5. This is under PERFECT conditions. Your distance of 300 feet is too far. I would recommend a mesh being no more than 150 feet outdoors. Preferably 100 ft.
There are limitations to wireless LANS and in the end, your best bet is to create multiple meshes, each with a hard drop back to a switch. You can get underground CAT5 pretty cheap. Rather than running the whole mesh off one drop... have 3 or four of them out to the field and set up your access groups accordingly. But seriously... I would just lose the HP gear. It's so bad. I even yelled at the HP rep... just my $0.02.
A lot of people like to segregate themselves in to a special group called "geek". The fact is my 7 year old nephew crasked his buddies iPhone and helped him load apps from Cydia. He's seven years old. Think about what these young consumers will want in the future. These are the manufacturers future target market, not us dusty 30 somethings (soon to be 40 somethings). Easy to use won't cut it for the future consumers.
I can't imagine they could do away with much more than explorer and maybe a hand full of DLL's. So, basically, we are given an extra step to load our desktops... probably while we are inundated with news feeds or advertisements. I wonder which HKey will turn this off.
I think the quote stating that having a war video game dishonors those who have fought in real battles.... is interesting. I take issue with this for several reasons. 1) Video games serve as a tactical simulation and provide an enhanced learning experience for participants. 2) Video games will most accurately simulate the war of the future. [Remote control, camera and sensor based] 3) How can a video game dishonor war veterans? Do people really think war veterans care if you play a video game about a battle they were in? Really?
I can understand the protester trying to make a point, but let's keep it real.
If your were going to a technology based war....
on
HP is Tech's New Top Dog?
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
who would you want on your side?
HP
or
IBM?
Personally, IBM research and development puts me in a constant state of awe. I believe they have some of the most brilliant minds in the world pushing the boundries of science. Maybe thier end products don't always reflect the level of R&D invested, but don't kid yourself... the last thing HP wants is IBM's full, undivided attention at it's market share.
IBM's strength is in it's diversity. Just because they cut PC's to Lenovo doesn't mean anything about the future of the companies presence in the future technology market.
Remember when Windows 2000 initially shipped with 63000 known bugs? Microsoft has always been pretty liberal about not sweating the details and more focused on the big picture.
Slashdot Mirror
Women like sex as much or more than men.
Here's your effort, bitch.
I just logged in to shut you up.
If I pay for internet i want my packets sent to me without any type of priority based on source or destination. I would be moderately interested in enabling classes of service for TYPES of traffic, but not based on their source. That would be something an ISP should do out of a best practice. My point is that if I pay for 10Mbit, give me 10 Mbit and leave my traffic alone. THAT is net neutrality. Anything else is just not neutral.
And that's why you use MAC authentication on switches. Fucking noobs.
My iPad Air 2 has never been the same since iOS 10. The device, in general, is noticably slower. Querky. The mail application hangs, doesn't update properly (read/unread). Safari crashes. Split view mode provokes problems when app switching. MEH.
I find it incredible that so many people deny all the evidence relating to conspiracies!
What is harder to believe? That conspiracies dont exist, or that they do exist? conspiracy: a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful
It is literally impossible that conspiracies don't exist and the people who control the sources of power in the world have their own private agendas which include illegal activities. Really, people need to pull their heads out and grow up.
...until they realize that public opinion does not correspond to their agenda.
It would be interesting to see if the route of administration results in different effects. More research is needed. I would imagine that oral ingestion could have a less pronouced cerebral vasioconstricion.
Interestingly enough, a cup of Coca leaf tea will increase blood flow to the brain.
I respect the right of anyone to do whatever they want to their own bodies. There is no one single chemistry, nor one correct response regarding these issues.
Peace.
Not with that ID number, you don't.
...and put their penis in your butt. Why does the world need to know?
I think this enters the arena of Enterprise Architecture. It's a point well observed.
HMMWV's don't have keys, you think a soldier wants a key to turn on / off the weapon that could save his life? Technical options simply aren't feasible. That equipment was already "lost" as the cost to take it back to the US exceeded the value of the equipment. The decision was made to leave it. When it began to fall in to enemy hands, it should have been immediately destroyed.
Are rules for some and suggestions for the rest of us. The IEEE can put a standard on cleaning the toilet. If your company wants to follow it to the letter, or just use it as another reference, that's your call. I think the organization of conceptually difficult concepts is a good thing, overall. What we do with that is a whole other thing.
I live in Chile and am amazed by the deathgrip that Microsoft has here. It's amazing. When you use Microsoft software in Chile, according to the terms of use, you unconditionally agree to an inspection, in your business, by Microsoft, without warning. What happens is that a Microsoft representative arrives WITH POLICE and they are prepared to file criminal charges against END USERS and MANAGERS for the discovery of unlicensed software. They perform a scan of the network with their tools and require proof that each copy is licensed. To me, this is simple crazy corporate control.
Get yourself a VPN to your workstation and do it from home, in bed. If you can get a quicky while you're at it, good on you.
Me too. :)
As a person with first hand experience on Cisco and HP Access Points, I have some disappointing news for you. There is no comparison between the Cisco and HP wireless gear. The HP stuff is repackaged Calubris Netowrk gear and it is kludgy, at best. I really, really, really have a shudder of fear when client select the HP stuff. It simply doesn't work well. The Cisco gear using a WLC (Wireless LAN Controller) is the absolute best I;ve ever seen. It's a breeze to install and performance is great. Keep in mind that when using a mesh, the bandwidth goed down 50% at each hop. So, if you have 54Mbps at the first access point, the next access points are limites to 27Mbps and the next at down to 13.5. This is under PERFECT conditions. Your distance of 300 feet is too far. I would recommend a mesh being no more than 150 feet outdoors. Preferably 100 ft. There are limitations to wireless LANS and in the end, your best bet is to create multiple meshes, each with a hard drop back to a switch. You can get underground CAT5 pretty cheap. Rather than running the whole mesh off one drop... have 3 or four of them out to the field and set up your access groups accordingly. But seriously... I would just lose the HP gear. It's so bad. I even yelled at the HP rep... just my $0.02.
A lot of people like to segregate themselves in to a special group called "geek". The fact is my 7 year old nephew crasked his buddies iPhone and helped him load apps from Cydia. He's seven years old. Think about what these young consumers will want in the future. These are the manufacturers future target market, not us dusty 30 somethings (soon to be 40 somethings). Easy to use won't cut it for the future consumers.
I can't imagine they could do away with much more than explorer and maybe a hand full of DLL's. So, basically, we are given an extra step to load our desktops... probably while we are inundated with news feeds or advertisements. I wonder which HKey will turn this off.
I think the quote stating that having a war video game dishonors those who have fought in real battles.... is interesting. I take issue with this for several reasons. 1) Video games serve as a tactical simulation and provide an enhanced learning experience for participants. 2) Video games will most accurately simulate the war of the future. [Remote control, camera and sensor based] 3) How can a video game dishonor war veterans? Do people really think war veterans care if you play a video game about a battle they were in? Really? I can understand the protester trying to make a point, but let's keep it real.
HP or IBM?
Personally, IBM research and development puts me in a constant state of awe. I believe they have some of the most brilliant minds in the world pushing the boundries of science. Maybe thier end products don't always reflect the level of R&D invested, but don't kid yourself... the last thing HP wants is IBM's full, undivided attention at it's market share.
IBM's strength is in it's diversity. Just because they cut PC's to Lenovo doesn't mean anything about the future of the companies presence in the future technology market.
Remember this little gem?..... http://www.research.ibm.com/quantuminfo/teleportat ion/index.html
Attornies.... a double edged sword if there ever was one. But God I love this guy.
Zango dango bo-bango, banana fana fo-fango fe-fi mo-mango, Zaaaango.
Remember when Windows 2000 initially shipped with 63000 known bugs? Microsoft has always been pretty liberal about not sweating the details and more focused on the big picture.