Slashdot Mirror


Exploring Firefox Extensions

Gary writes "If you haven't made the switch to Mozilla Firefox it may be because you aren't aware of the great benefits Firefox has over IE. Flexbeta has posted a nice HOWTO guide on Firefox extensions; my favorite is the Target Alert extension which displays a small graphic next to links that are not web pages. For example a mailto: link will display a small envelope, a link to a PDF file will display a small Adobe icon, etc."

484 comments

  1. names by Slashbot+Hive-Mind · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You know, I wish they would stop changing their name. I use Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox as my sole browser and absolutely enjoy it. The problem is, I am trying to get my family to use it as well, but trying to keep them straight on what it is called is getting a little ridiculous. Conversation with family: "You know that browser I gave you a link on...No, not Mozilla. Yeah, it was Firebird. No now its called Firefox. I don't know why, just use it"

    --

    --
    We are the collective Slashbot HiveMind
    1. Re:names by Quo_R · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, 2003 called, they want their joke back.

    2. Re:names by slobbargoat · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      They last changed their name ages ago, and it wasn't cos they "felt like it". I wish people would get over it and move the fuck along.

    3. Re:names by praedictus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Gets even better when you are using the Firesomething extension.
      Vanilla Moistpussy, now THERE'S a browser!

      In addition, I currently use the Download With extension in association with Prozilla, which comes in handy for those mp^h^h source file downloads, especially on unreliable dial-up connections.

      --
      Watashi wa chikyubutsurigakusha desu.
    4. Re:names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, David Spade called, he wants his lame joke back.

  2. Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Slashbot+Hive-Mind · · Score: 5, Informative

    FireFox features I can't live without:

    1. Middle click to open link in new window/tab
    2. Find as you type
    3. Themes/Skins/Chromes
    4. Customizable toolbars
    5. Plugins that allow me to put just about anything on the toolbars
    6. Great development tools - javascript console, venkman debugger, live-headers plugin

    All that boils down to:

    1. Easier to use
    2. Easier to customize
    3. Broader advanced feature set

    --

    --
    We are the collective Slashbot HiveMind
    1. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One feature I cannot work out is how to stop Animated gifs from animating.

      I've looked around and cannot find it, do I need to add a plugin to stop them, or am I just missing something really fundimental?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by nkh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Middle click to open link in new window/tab

      Someone should really change the code of this feature because it doesn't work with javascript links (you get a blank page when you middle-click on this kind of link)

    3. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by qshapadooy · · Score: 5, Informative

      about:config

      Preference Name: image.animation_mode
      Value: once

    4. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Artichoke · · Score: 1
      Go to about:config and navigate to:
      image.animation_mode
      Set its value to 'once' or 'none'.
      --
      __
      Arse
    5. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Doh! Of course it would be there!

      Extremely straightforward and easy to find and understand!

      Theres me thinking it would be on the Options/Web Features dialog in the "Load images" area.

      Sorry for being sarcastic, and I do thank you muchly for the info, it has been something thats bugged me from day one.
      I just don't think a novice user could handle changing that.
      I wonder what other gems are lurking in the depths of the config area, I shall investigate later...

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Threni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I just don't think a novice user could handle changing that.

      Novices shouldn't be using pre v1.0 software. It's not done yet.

      > it has been something thats bugged me from day one.

      So ask for your money back.

    7. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Someone should really change the code of this feature because it doesn't work with javascript links (you get a blank page when you middle-click on this kind of link)

      Unfortunately there is no way to know what to change it to so it can be "fixed." Such a wide variety of actions could occur during onClick that it would be very difficult to parse that out and do the right action.

      For example, I have used javascript in an href to do the following:

      • Open a new window
      • Open a new window to a specific width and height
      • Change the location of the current page
      • Change the source of an image on the page
      • Interact with a Flash movie
      • Interact with form elements on screen

      And even with the location and window opens, sometimes it is done with the simple

      javascript:window.open()
      and sometimes through a function.
    8. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL!

      Nicely put.

    9. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by peterprior · · Score: 1

      The DOM inspector is also quite useful...

    10. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by nkh · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking of a small hack to detect the simple redirections, not a full-featured parser. I guess I'll have to look at Firefox's source code for that :(

    11. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by otisg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To add one more concrete example of a great development tool that I regularly use for development of web apps:

      Web Developer Extension. This tool makes working with forms, CSS, images, etc. really really easy. I have been using 'View Source' or 'View Selection Source' much less often since I got this extension.

      Similarly, I like to be able to search various online resources directly from my browser. To full-text search my bookmarks stored in Simpy I use browser search plugin.

      In addition to that, you can get a number of other useful search plugins over at Mycroft (I keep typing Mycrosft - how bad is that!)

      --
      Simpy
    12. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the best way would be for webmasters to stop using javascript links. They're just not necessary. Just because something can be done doesn't mean it has to be done.

    13. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because something moves to v1.0 does it magically become stable, feature rich, simple and user friendly?

      Anyway, I must be confused.
      Internet explorer is dire, so thousands of geeks start running wildly in the Firefox direction, shouting from the rooftops about this alternative, only to discover now that Threni says we shouldn't use it.

      On the mozilla site itself, they say it can be used as a primary browser, but don't rely on it for mission critical stuff.

      No software is ever complete.
      Every piece of software has problems, bugs and niggles, I asked a group of people who were likely to know the answer :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    14. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I just don't think a novice user could handle changing that.
      I just don't think it would occur to a novice user that its something they could change. heck, most novice users dont even know how to change their homepage unless a website pops up and asks to do it for them

      --
      TIAEAE!
    15. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by otisg · · Score: 1

      Ah, it looks like one of the Simpy links requires you to be logged in. Luckily, you can use a shared demo account without registering, and see the search plugin in action.

      --
      Simpy
    16. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by ckswift · · Score: 1

      Middle click to open link in new window/tab

      Too bad it doesn't work in OSX:
      http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151249
      Two years later it finally appears a patch is in the works....

    17. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Good point :)

      I suppose I'm still holding things up against MS, where with internet explorer there is no need to delve into the registry (equivilent to about:config) to change such a simple setting.

      I think possibly my misgivings about the config is the path to open the screen more than the missing option, if the properties in the about:config screen were all available in the options area, I would most likely have found it.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    18. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's empty! You've damaged my browser!!!

    19. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by B'Trey · · Score: 1

      One thing that I would absolutely love to see is to be able to specify what program the page is opened in when you select "View Source" or some other simple, one-click way to say "I want to edit the source of the page that has the focus in my browser right now."

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    20. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by byolinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the mozilla site itself, they say it can be used as a primary browser, but don't rely on it for mission critical stuff.

      The web is mission critical?

      Relying on a public infastructure full of infected and unpatched computers operated by people who didn't realise they needed to install things on their computers to make them keep working? Ouch.

    21. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Their words: It is a pre-release product and should not be relied upon for mission-critical tasks.

      http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/releases/# download

      Worryingly now, I have visions of some Indian doctor performing invasive surgery on some poor chap in another country using nothing more than a html interface and a shared 56k modem!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    22. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Sir_Stinksalot · · Score: 1

      What I would love to see is a split-view like in konqueror to see two webpages at the same time in one window.

      --
      "We can no longer live as rats... we know too much." -Secret of NIMH
    23. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by jazman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      * Open a new window
      - with contents referenceable by a URL, presumably

      * Open a new window to a specific width and height
      - which must also contain something pointable to via some sort of URL

      * Change the location of the current page
      - to something involving a URL at some point, perhaps?

      * Change the source of an image on the page
      - that image could be displayed in another window via a URL

      * Interact with a Flash movie
      - which might be referenceable via a URL

      * Interact with form elements on screen
      - OK, probably no relevant URL for this.

      So Firefox /could/ attempt to do something sensible in the majority of cases. Or at least pop up a message saying it can't figure out what to do (maybe presenting a few options?).

      Your point that a general solution is impossible is accepted; however, simply opening a new tab with nothing in it and no indication to the user that what they /expected/ isn't going to happen is IMHO something that could be improved with just a small amount of thought.

      Even just a warning would stop me, for example, browsing through interesting adverts in Loot.com, "Open In New Tab"-ing on all the interesting ones, then looking at the tabs to see nothing but (untitled) (untitled) (untitled) (untitled) which is damn annoying.

      And the behaviour of Wanadoo's email page to a control-click is just bizarre - you get the mail you clicked on in the current window, and the mailbox in the new window. It's probably quite clever how they managed to engineer exactly the opposite behaviour of what is expected.

    24. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by HansF · · Score: 1

      The fact that it is a browser doesn't mean it's only fit for web. Suppose you have a intranet-site on a local network wich serves your business applications.

      That would qualify as "mission critical".

      --
      --> Insert Funny Sig Here
    25. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by jazman · · Score: 1

      I kept meaning to have a look at this, now I have.

      What on earth is general.config.obscure_value? (And don't say "13" - I figured that part out!)

    26. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by ioslipstream · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So.... novices would be better off using a browser that is highly susceptible to hijacking?

      I'm not trying to troll here, but c'mon, novices are just fine. Firefox has great functionality out of the box, same as IE.

      They both get the job done... for a novice.

    27. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Linknoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Simple and consistent solution: The user middle clicking on any element is doing so because they desire whatever action they clicked on to occur in a new tab. The solution is to make an exact replica of the current page and its state in a new tab, and then act as if the button had been pushed on the replica page instead. Sure, there will be things that don't work right with it, but I think most of the time that will give the correct behavior. Oh, and open in new tab should work with buttons too, not just links.

    28. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Threni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Just because something moves to v1.0 does it magically become stable, feature
      > rich, simple and user friendly?

      No - rather, it won't be released at v1.0 or above until it IS stable and more user friendly.

    29. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Internet explorer is dire, so thousands of geeks start running wildly in the
      > Firefox direction, shouting from the rooftops about this alternative, only to
      > discover now that Threni says we shouldn't use it.

      Where did I say that geeks shouldn't use it?

      > On the mozilla site itself, they say it can be used as a primary browser, but
      > don't rely on it for mission critical stuff.

      Sounds sensible to me.

      > No software is ever complete.

      What are you talking about? None of this stuff contradicts my suggestion that novices avoid beta releases of software.

    30. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Threni · · Score: 1

      > So.... novices would be better off using a browser that is highly susceptible
      > to hijacking?

      Who's suggesting that should happen?

      > Firefox has great functionality out of the box, same as IE.

      Why are people putting words in my mouth? Are you all reading the same comment I posted?

    31. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by CamTarn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thing is ... in Mozilla, if I remember right, the option to change image looping to once-only *was* actually in the options dialogue. I think the Firefox designers took a policy decision that Mozilla's prefs dialogue was too crowded, so Firefox options would be limited to things which most users would regularly want to change.

      In one way it's a step in the right direction - Open Source projects are often criticised for having too many options without enough organisation. However, I prefer the approach of other projects - instead of removing the options altogether, have a switch you can use to show or hide 'advanced user' options, which novice users wouldn't need to use.

    32. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Zemran · · Score: 1

      IE is a browser that knows what you want and dictates to you that you will have it. A bit like a Saddam Hussein of the browser world. Whereas Firefox lets you turn it into what you want it to be and does not assume that it knows what you want. More like a Democracy :) Lets send in the troops and invade Redmond...

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    33. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is, its already pretty much there. I realise there are slight problems with it, but on balance, its a very stable, and usable system.

      Whereas with other software, 1.0 status definately does not imply completion or stability.

      The problem with software is unlike a motor car, or aeroplane, problems with v1.0 isn't the end of the line.

      We have a patch ethos which follows with the "Release early, release often" thinking that bosses like.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    34. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by DigiDarkCloud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's an extension called MozEX that allows you to use an external program for View Source.

      TFA ended up describing the author's personal favourite extensions, so it kind of missed the point that there are extensions for almost everything, like what you need. Some good places to look for extensions:

      Like any other kind of software, extensions can vary in quality and stability. You might want to get other opinions of an extension you're considering before you install it. Fortunately, the new Extension Manager in Firefox 0.9 and up makes it easy to uninstall an extension. Before that came along, you had to do it manually which was tricky and easy to screw up.

      --
      SIG: 11
    35. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think we're all gettin our knickers in a twist. I read all the comments here, and your right in a way about beta software, but firefox is essentially feature rich and practically complete.

      Us geeks have been heralding Firefox as the second coming and telling everyone we can to download and use it. Your the first person I have seen that has actually put into words that maybe we shouldn't be saying this.

      To me, the version number is irrelivent, I will use any software and gladly recommend the stuff that does the required job.

      Firefox fulfills its job with flying colors, but such is life that nothing is absolutely perfect (my original config niggle).

      I would rather a novice used this almost finished piece of software than carry on polluting the web with an insecure browser.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    36. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by MikeDX · · Score: 1

      As a (mostly) happy firefox user, I have to say this:

      When the hell is the HTTP 1.1 Protocol going to be fixed in the mozilla family of browsers?

      How long has this been broken? . No I will not fix it myself, Yes I can live with the broken-ness of it. No this is not a troll :)

      As for the rest of the browser, I'm lovin' it! (Especially the extensions)

    37. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Threni · · Score: 1

      You're talking to me like I'm a novice or an idiot or something. I've been developing software for 15 years. I know what you call something doesn't affect the code. I'm saying that a good developer doesn't call something v1.0 until it's at least considered ready for use by the great unwashed. The fact that it's `pretty much there` isn't a problem. I'm sure there'll be some more work on the UI before it's done. Already there's an extension which makes more of the about:config prefs more easily fiddleable. Frankly, though, an option to turn on/off gif animation doesn't strike me as something many people - especially novices - are likely to want to do.

    38. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the goals of the Firefox project was to get rid of the 10,000 different nerd options from the dialogs. KISS.

      This has nothing to do with "pre-1.0" and everything to do with a UI design decision. The theory is that someone will provide a "Advanced Options" extention.

      (And there are IE features that are only available through the registry -- such as setting Quick Search shortcuts.)

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    39. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by mfg · · Score: 1

      Here's a bookmarklet that will display two pages side-by-side. It's a trivial change to make it display two copies of the current page without prompting.

    40. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i believe the point here is that novices SHOULD use firefox despite your recommendation.

      novices are the ones who allow every piece of malicious software to install when prompted by IE when surfing porn.

      if the novice on the other shift where i work would use firefox instead of IE, our IE browser wouldn't be hihacked by CWS right now.

      i recommend firefox ( or mozilla ) to every newbe i know. IE is just too unsafe for the novice.

      ( yes, mozilla may be a better recommendation, but firefox is a smaller download for us poor saps who 's only option is still a dial-up connection to the net. )

    41. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > I just don't think a novice user could handle changing that.

      >Novices shouldn't be using pre v1.0 software. It's not done yet.

      i believe the above phrase was posted by you.

    42. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by EvanED · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the other hand, there are a hell of a lot of options in the about:config area. Exposing every one of them to the user in the preferences window would be quite burdensome. Apparently the designers felt that turning off animated GIFs was not important to make it to the limited space of the preferences dialog.

      (Though maybe they should add an 'advanced' button that would expose more)

    43. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      Go to http://texturizer.net/firefox/tips.html#beh_locati onbar

      Won't do what you want, but it will tell you when the link you're hovering above is a Javascript one (among other things).

      --
      Beetle B.
    44. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been reading too much b3ta?

      "Why go to the doctor when you can get it online?"

    45. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Leaving options in the about:config area is no better than using ini files years ago, its good that they are there, and now I know they are there I can have a look and change whatever I need.

      Whilst I am picking up on one single option that relates to the way I want to use it, there are likely 100s of other hidden options which could be useful to others. These same options won't effect 99% of users, and your right, you can't design a system expecting everyone to use every option.

      Actually discovering the about:config screen even existed was as much an eye opener as fixing my specific problem itself.

      I notice from other replies on this subject that the full mozilla suite includes these options, would it have been *that* difficult to leave an "Advanced options" button or tab on the firefox options screen? All it would do is fire up the about:config screen in a new window.
      This entire thread would have been totally redundent if it was there.

      I realise I may sound pretty condescending in my posts, and make no apologies for it, I am merely trying to be clearly understood in what I say.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    46. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were using Mozilla (sorry, I don't have Firefox) --

      Edit | Preferences | Privacy & Security | Images

      Now click the radio button so that animated gifs loop only once.

    47. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open Source projects are often criticised for having too many options without enough organisation.

      How utterly lame and stupid. Give as many options as possible. If putting them in an orderly fashion on some dialog is too hard, what are you doing programming the stuff in the first place?

      This is exactly one of the reasons why M$ is crap and such a pain in the ass: they force decisions and choices on you instead of leaving it up to the user.

    48. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Even just a warning would stop me, for example, browsing through interesting adverts in Loot.com, "Open In New Tab"-ing on all the interesting ones, then looking at the tabs to see nothing but (untitled) (untitled) (untitled) (untitled) which is damn annoying.

      Now this seems doable. I didn't check out the target alert extension, but if it already doesn't, maybe it could be modified to show a little script icon for JS links. Or maybe we could just have the href of an anchor tag point to the page, but do any javascript stuff in the onclick, so that users who middle-clicked would get something.

    49. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by bsane · · Score: 1

      It will work with a ms mouse. Just configure it to do a command click when the middle button is pressed.

      I'm not familar with all the variations of third party mice, but I would imagine most would have software that could be configured to do a command click when firefox is open and the middle button is pressed...

    50. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems to be a common pattern when advocating OSS software:

      "Don't use that shitty commercial software, use this superior OSS alternative!"
      "OK. Wait, it doesn't even have these simple fixtures..."
      "Well, it's not 1.0 yet, you shouldn't be using it!"

      Or:

      "Don't use that shitty commercial software, use this superior OSS alternative!"
      "OK. Wait, it's broken and buggy..."
      "You didn't pay anything for it so fix it yourself!"

      If software shouldn't be used by the masses then stop advocating it to the masses. If you're going to argue that Firefox is sub 1.0 and shouldn't be used, don't complain when sites are incompatible with it or when people at work force you to use IE instead.

    51. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      -1, Asshat

    52. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't live without "Themes/Skins/Chromes". What do you do with your browser? Presentations?

      The "Find as you type" feature is a dirty whore who sleeps around. I think that the focus is in a text box (ie, where I put the damn thing by clicking) and I start typing. All of a sudden, my screen is jumping around highlighting shit I didn't want. Much easier than doing a Control-F, I say!

      I do agree on the plugins and the development tools, however. The highlighted View->Source is nice too.

      Another thing - I like how Firefox lets you add bookmarks with the same title in the same folder. This is very nice for tracking Slashdot threads that I want to bookmark (especially as AC), which will have the same name (the title of the story). In IE, I'd have to change the title or add a 2.. or 3.. to the end of bookmarks that had the same name because it would bitch.

    53. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    54. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier to customize

      Is there a way to change the current keyboard bindings from the GUI like in Opera? It is very convenient to experiment with different keybindings by quickly changing them from a dialog. Is there a Firefox extension to do it?

    55. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

      The web used by the military could be mission critical. Considering they use it for EVERYTHING.

      --
      Karma: Good, or bust!
    56. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      about:config

      OK; that works for GIF animations. I learned about it a few weeks ago, and set it to "once".

      But, after a few days of watching Hurricane Frances on weather.com, I found that firefox was once again soaking up 90% of the cpu. And there were ads in the weather.com tabs that were busily showing me stupid pictures of fish swimming and butterflies flitting from flower to flower. They were flash animations.

      The "about:config" page only has one instance of the string "flash", and it doesn't seem to have anything to do with this problem. Is there a way to disable stupid flash movies like this?

      Also, I know how to use the menu item that suppresses images from a site. But with flash ads, the menu is short, and doesn't include the "Block images from ..." item that GIF and JPEG ads have. So is there a way to do this with flash ads?

      I find that I have to constantly kill firefox because it's going insane and eating the cpu. It seems a lot worse about this than mozilla (though mozilla does show a lot of the same problems). This is the main thing that's limiting my usage of firefox now. I know that if I open too many tabs or windows, the chances are great that one of them will do something that puts firefox into cpu-eating mode, and I'll have to kill it to get my machine back.

      Maybe what's needed is a per-image "speed control" that would limit how much cpu time an image can use. And a way to set the default. This would let me say something like "The default for any active images is 0%, but for this one, let it use 40%."

      It's especially annoying when there's one video that you'd like to watch, but it keeps stopping because it's competing with N animated ads that can't be stopped (or even found).

      This is mostly a problem on my Mac (PB, 10.3). On my linux box, flash is still broken in both mozilla and firefox, so it's not a problem. ;-) Actually, I can run standalone flash with several programs, so it's not the flash interpreter itself (wherever that is) that's broken; it's its interface with the browsers. I can hope that they don't fix this, I guess, and just use linux for sites like weather.com that use flash.

      Maybe it's time to get a linux laptop ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    57. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Well, the way I usually hear it is:

      "Don't use that shitty commercial software, use this superior OSS alternative!"
      "OK. Wait, it's broken and buggy..."
      "Unlike that shitty commercial software, huh?"
      "Oh, yeah ..."

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    58. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by TMOLI+42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Flashblock is an extension for the Mozilla and Firebird browsers that takes a pessemistic approach to dealing with Macromedia Flash content on a webpage and blocks ALL Flash content from loading. It then leaves a placeholder on the page that allows you to click to view the Flash content." - flashblock.mozdev.org

      Works well for me but read the notes on the Installation page about known bugs. When you mouse over the blocked flash movies my cpu still shoots up a little, but not nearly as much as without this extention.

    59. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by darkwhite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey smartass, not all HTTP traffic has to go over the web. Many HTTP servers and clients are perfectly mature enough to perform mission-critical tasks in non-embedded, human-interface applications over controlled networks.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    60. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Hast · · Score: 1

      That's because no-one using OSX uses mice with more than one button anyways... or so I've heard.

    61. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by mmortal03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a feature request filed for this at Bugzilla, however: RFE: "Open a JavaScript link in a new window"

    62. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! Cleartext passwords make baby Jesus cry.

    63. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relying on a public infastructure full of infected and unpatched computers operated by people who didn't realise they needed to install things on their computers to make them keep working? Ouch.

      Your comments betray your cynicism, reflecting a lack of real world experience. Consider intranets, where information is created internally for useful and immediate access. Then, apply that model to a place like a nuclear power plant, with a hazard information system. Then, if a browser doesn't work, information may be lost, or unavailable, and lives may be endangered. Mozilla would not want to warranty its browser to this effect.

    64. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by danila · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately there is no way to know what to change it to so it can be "fixed."
      There is an extremely simple and obvious solution to this. On middle clicking (or right clicking and selecting Add Bookmark, etc.) the javascript link the browser should execute the script with all objects and their properties set to read-only. The script will not be able to actually change anything, but as soon as there is an attempt to open a new window (or load an URL into some window), the broswer will catch the URL and then act as if this was a simple A HREF="http://..." link.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    65. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, I have used javascript in an href to do the following:

      Javascript in an href? Clueless developer alarm bells are ringing in my head. Let's see:

      Open a new window

      Presumably you'll be loading a resource into that new window. This means that the href attribute should be the URL of the resource or an adequate fallback, and the onclick attribute should be used to do your annoying Javascript stuff. That way it works with Javascript off or unavailable, rather than being a broken link.

      Open a new window to a specific width and height

      Ditto.

      Change the location of the current page

      Silly me, there I was thinking that a simple HTML link does that already.

      Change the source of an image on the page

      If you aren't linking to anything, why use a link in the first place?

      This is basic stuff. Read the comp.lang.javascript FAQ.

    66. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by j_heisenberg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mod parent down. tinyurl => "adult filth" (or sth)

    67. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by e_AltF4 · · Score: 1

      AniDisable
      FireFox 0.9 plugin that controls gif animations.

    68. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      but I think most of the time that will give the correct behavior.

      No. It'll almost never give the desired result.

      When a person middle-clicks on a link, she wants the target of that link to show up in a new tab. Frequently this doesn't work, such as when the link contains a javascript window.open() command. In that case, her new tab contains only an error message.

      Your "solution" would avoid that error message, and give her a new tab containing the exact same page she had already been looking at, plus a popup window containing the content she'd wanted in the tab. This is somewhat better, in that error messages have been avoided...

      The real correct solution is for the browser to set a flag indicating that all new windows should open as tabs, which is enabled when you middle click on a button, and lasts until all javascript called by that button has terminated.

    69. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      someone send this memo to Microsoft...they went past ver 2000 and its still fucked up

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    70. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by karniv0re · · Score: 1

      1. Middle click to open link in new window/tab

      For shame! How can you live without the EasyGestures Extention?!

    71. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by dcam · · Score: 1

      Install the preferences bar extension. There is a chaeckbox for killing flash, along with a whole stack of other stuff.

      --
      meh
    72. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Cromac · · Score: 1

      The web may not be but browers are used for mission critical applications on internal networks all the time therefore are not relying on a public infastructure full of infected and unpatched computers operated by people who didn't realise they needed to install things on their computers to make them keep working.

    73. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by at_slashdot · · Score: 1


      about:mozilla ;)

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    74. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Myen · · Score: 1

      Umm...
      There's about 15 bugs blocking 1.0 PR.
      About five don't have patches yet.

      At the moment there's about 200 blocking 1.0 (post-PR, post-l10n freeze - meaning, no UI text changes).

      Neither of those lists contain a request for animation mode UI - at least, not containg "anim" in the summary.

      You will likely need to use an extension if you want the GUI. (It was probably in Things They Left Out - not sure if that's still up-to-date though)

      For reference, the query used on bugzilla.mozilla.org was
      Status: unconfirmed | new | assigned | reopened
      Flag: contains blocking-aviary1.0PR+
      Keywords: does not contain fixed-aviary1.0
      Summary: does not contain fixed-aviary1.0
      Product: does not contain (MailNews | Thunderbird)

    75. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by Myen · · Score: 1

      (I looked this up, because it sounded interesting)

      See bug 228791 (no link - bugzilla.mozilla.org if you don't already know; they block links for /., and no point in DDOSing their server for something so trivial anyway)

      It looks like a value to be subtracted from every character of something called the MCD .cfg file. That would probably be this - something about Mission Control Desktop (looks like something for admins to apply site-wide policy).

    76. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      The web is mission critical?

      Not the public web. I think the statement on Mozilla.org meant it is usable for Internet browsing but it's not recommnded you use it for accessing accessing web-based apps on you companies intranet, ect. They wouldn't want some weird interaction between Firefox and a corporate homebrew app bringing down a customer database, for example.

    77. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by timts · · Score: 1

      no offense, following available from crappy IE:
      1.ctrl+click for new window
      2.find as you type
      3.windows theme
      4.customizable tool bar, link bar
      5.3rd party tool bar, plugin
      6.VS.net for development

      so it boils down to same thing

    78. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Also, I know how to use the menu item that suppresses images from a site. But with flash ads, the menu is short, and doesn't include the "Block images from ..." item that GIF and JPEG ads have. So is there a way to do this with flash ads?

      In addition to flashblock and other drastic measures recommended (though may be fine for you, sounds you don't like flash at all, non-ads included) Adblock does kind of what the mozilla builtin image blocker does, only it works with _any_ object, as well as supports filtering on regexp or other pattern instead of only domain.

    79. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by GimmeFuel · · Score: 1

      Another thing that'd be nice would be some sort of comment-explanation-thingy for options in about:config. "image.animation_mode" can be figured out by us geeks using Google or guessing, but very few Firefox users would be able to decipher it. Something as simple as a tooltip that said "Controls how animated GIFs are displayed. Possible options:..." when you hovered over the related setting. The next step would be implementing a search feature of the explanations, similar to the filter for setting names already in place.

    80. Re:Yet more good reasons to switch from IE by GimmeFuel · · Score: 1
  3. Tabs by frankthechicken · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tabbrowser extensions, to get the tabs reacting the way I want(i.e everything in the same browser window, middle mouse click on the tabbar opens an accidently closed tab).

    And for browsing Slashdot, this kind of helps.

    1. Re:Tabs by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Can you get it set to everything goes in one window, except when you click on the program icon in Windows (or other OS's)? When I hit it on my quicklaunch bar, I want a new window in the foreground, not a new tab in some deeply-hidden browser window I had left minimized for later perusal.

    2. Re:Tabs by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that link. I've been looking for something that makes the tabs behave more sensibly for a while.

    3. Re:Tabs by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      Does anyone kow if the are there any plugins that stop target="foo" links opening in a new window? That really annoys me.

    4. Re:Tabs by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      Go to about:config and set browser.block.target_new_window to true.

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    5. Re:Tabs by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      Yep, it should work if you set Window mode in the Startup option to use multiple browsers normally.

      Though I've only quickly experimented with it, as I tend to prefer using just the one browser.

    6. Re:Tabs by eddul · · Score: 1
      No need for an extension. Just set
      browser.block.target_new_window=true
      There is a basic UI to all config options if you type about:config in the URL-bar.
    7. Re:Tabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops, I meant the Advanced option.

    8. Re:Tabs by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Is that a new option? I don't have it in 0.9.2, evidently. (Yes, I read the sibling to this comment and still didn't find it.)

    9. Re:Tabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, perhaps I should have clarified, I meant in the tabbrowser extensions options.

    10. Re:Tabs by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      And for browsing Slashdot, this kind of helps.
      damn, I was hoping it would be something to automatically remove the "it." from it.slashdot.org urls.

      --
      TIAEAE!
    11. Re:Tabs by KernelHappy · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI you don't need to use an extension to do "linkification", you can use a bookmarklet. I somehow missed the memo on bookmarklets and only recently found out about them maybe 6 months ago. For those that don't know, bookmarklets are javascript snippets that you turn into bookmarks and then can be executed on any page you view. I use them primarily for linkification and for URL manipulation. I have one that removes all redirects from urls (if a url is present within the url it sends you directly there) which is really handy for sites like fark when the redirect system takes a dump. Other bookmarklets that I rely on are Links List, which makes a new doc with all the links on a site, top which changes the URL tot he top level of the domain, decrement and increment which decriment or increment the last number in the url (great for boobie links).

      Various bookmarklets

      --
      -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
    12. Re:Tabs by damiam · · Score: 1

      The Single Window extension will open all new window links (whether by target="foo" or JavaScript) in a new tab.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    13. Re:Tabs by DigiDarkCloud · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to love Tabbrowser Extensions, but it got bigger and slower over time until it finally became unbearable for me. I still think it's a brilliant extension, but I use Firefox instead of Mozilla specifically because I don't want one package that does everything. (:

      Piro points to a list of smaller extensions that add features from TBE on an individual basis. I use a few of those and love them. But the one thing I really miss from TBE is the coloured tabgroups. I loved having related tabs all grouped together, and being able to close the group without closing all my other tabs as well.

      I have a few years of experience writing/hacking Mozilla-and-family extensions, so I may eventually tackle this myself. But I'm quite busy (lazy) and I keep hoping someone else will miss it enough to write a tabgroup extension for me. (:

      --
      SIG: 11
    14. Re:Tabs by dspeyer · · Score: 1
      Thank you!

      On a similar topic, is there a way to get rid of the "you don't have this plugin; do you want it?" popup? I know I don't have the plugin; I don't want it! Every page with a flash banner ad now has a popup, despite popup-blocking!

    15. Re:Tabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      is there a way to get rid of the "you don't have this plugin; do you want it?" popup?

      Uninstall the "plugin downloader plugin" (you can just delete or read-protect libnullplugin.so on Linux).

    16. Re:Tabs by SoulOfMyShoe · · Score: 1

      Try using the Disable Targets For Downloads extension, I think it may be what you are after.

    17. Re:Tabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Linkification looks ok, but I like the "Super Drag and Go" extension.

      If I want to browse a plain-text link, I highlight it and drag it (anywhere on the page) and it opens in a new tab.

      If I drag a regular link, same thing (I have middle-click set to open a link in background, but have dragging configured to open it in the foreground)

      If I drag an image, it downloads it.

      If I drag regular text, it does a google search on it... this last one especially is VERY useful. :D

    18. Re:Tabs by dspeyer · · Score: 1

      Uninstall the "plugin downloader plugin" (you can just delete or read-protect libnullplugin.so on Linux). Thank you! That works.

  4. RTFA? by herrison · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Thought I might as well make the effort to read the article before commenting. But it's /.ed already. My favourite: webdeveloper.

    --
    You know what I miss? Leeches.
  5. my most used extension ever... by huphtur · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...has to be Web Developer.
    A MUST for every webnerd.
    It even lets you edit CSS live on the web.

    1. Re:my most used extension ever... by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Funny
      It even lets you edit CSS live on the web.

      ... to fix the colors on Slashdot IT once and for all?? :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:my most used extension ever... by RWerp · · Score: 1

      No, because as (almost) everyone knows, Slashdot does not use CSS :(

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    3. Re:my most used extension ever... by evronm · · Score: 1
      It even lets you edit CSS live on the web.

      I love that feature too, but you have to use it sparingly, or it will bite you in the ass. One time, I wrote like 50 lines of CSS in this things, and then hit reload by accident. Man was I pissed!

      That kind of thing never happens to me in other apps, because years of experience have taught me to save often. But when saving entails copying the entire file and pasting it over the old one, then saving, you tend to procrastinate saving.

      I imagine there's some clever way of getting around this, and I've given it some thought but haven't really come up with anything solid. Any ideas?

    4. Re:my most used extension ever... by otisg · · Score: 1

      I agree 100% (see this).
      I don't leave my home without Web Developer any more.

      --
      Simpy
    5. Re:my most used extension ever... by kwoff · · Score: 1

      That kind of thing never happens to me in other apps, because years of experience have taught me to save often. But when saving entails copying the entire file and pasting it over the old one, then saving, you tend to procrastinate saving.

      I imagine there's some clever way of getting around this, and I've given it some thought but haven't really come up with anything solid. Any ideas?

      Why not make a backup copy of the original, then edit the new one in place? Save it whenever you feel like it. Maybe I'm not understanding the situation.

    6. Re:my most used extension ever... by evronm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the situation is as follows: The "edit css" feature of the developer toolbar brings up a window with all the css of the current page loaded. You can then edit the css and see your changes on the page as you make them. This is incredibly neat because you don't have to reload the page to see your changes; they just happen.

      However, there's no way to save your changes from this window. The text in the window doesn't even necessarily represent a single file, but rather all the css in the current page. Therefore, even if you're working with a single file, you have to go back to your text editor to save your changes. If you're working with multiple css files, you have to figure out which file to modify and save. It gets to be a real hassle.

      That said, as long as you're mindful, it's still an incredibly useful tool. You just really have to watch what you're doing...

    7. Re:my most used extension ever... by discogravy · · Score: 1
      for that you just need lots of alcohol.

      Sweet, sweet whiskey: Helping take the pain away since ...fuck, too drunk to remember.

    8. Re:my most used extension ever... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes it does make that possible, because even though Slashdot does not use CSS, CSS can be used to *override* /.'s HTML formatting.

      See http://www.cc.puv.fi/~e0000274/itslash.png, css code at http://www.cc.puv.fi/~e0000274/slash.css.

      Whole thing, and especially the image swapping is a kludge, but hey, it works, and looks non-it'y. I don't know CSS worth a crap so it's all done with try-and-error method.

      Note that until http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238099 lands to Firefox (in 1.1, probably), this can and probably does affect colors of non-slashdot sites if put into userContent.css, so it's not really anything other than demonstration.

  6. adblock by seanismdotcom · · Score: 5, Informative

    adblock is one of the greatest extensions I must say. Adblock along with the following filter block 98% of ads..

    [Adblock] /[\W\d][Aa]d(server|s|remote)?[\W\d]/ /[\W\d][Bb]anner(s|id\=)?[\W\d]/ /[\W\d][Ss]ponsors?[\W\d]/ /amazon\.com.*\W(promotions|marketing|merchants|st ores|associates)\W/ /yimg\.com.*\W(a|flash)\W/

    1. Re:adblock by pacslash · · Score: 0

      I've been using Adblock for about 3 months now, and I have to say: it is amazing. The only time I have to see ads now is when I'm at someone else's house, at which point I can ask "Why aren't you using Adblock?!?". Unfortunatly, as Adblock becomes more popular, advertisers will surely find ways around it. In most cases, however, a simple right click will allow you to make a new filter and block out the rogue ad.

      Also, as a shameless plug, I have a list of the extensions I use here.
      http://www.pacslash.com/read.php?subaction=showful l&id=1092810539&archive=&start_from=&ucat=2&am p;

    2. Re:adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adblock only blocks depending on the URL of the image file itself. What I'd like to see are the blocking of ads depending on the URL the image links too. Something which blocked images that linked off-site would be extremely useful for example.

    3. Re:adblock by jdkane · · Score: 1
      What about the built-in option:
      Firefox 0.9.3 >> |Tools| >> |Options...| >> |Web Features| >> [x] Load Images >> [x] for the originating Web site only.
      It works in lower versions too, but the Options Control Panel contents may be ordered differently.

      That would suffice for the part about
      Something which blocked images that linked off-site would be extremely useful for example

    4. Re:adblock by glpierce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't know whether anyone cares or not, but I keep my adblock settings available here. My file is a bit more complex, but does an excellent job. If you find any problems or notice any ways it could be improved, let me know (email listed in the instructions file).

      --
      G
    5. Re:adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in a bar the other night with a group of friends and we ran into another group of mutual friends. There was a girl with them I had only met a couple of times but I was drunk enough to have the courage to talk to her. When I mentioned I was a Computer Science major we started talking about computers and stuff. She seemed smart enough to be able to add her own RAM to her machine so I was interested in her. Then she mentioned that she's still using Internet Explorer with only the Google toolbar "to prevent all the pop-ups you get these days." I almost laughed in her face. Even after tell her all the problems with IE including the recent download.ject hole she still didn't care. How can I respect someone who want to remain so ignorant? I just spent the rest of the night getting drunk with my mates.

    6. Re:adblock by glpierce · · Score: 3, Informative

      Text in Regular Expressions isn't case-dependent in Adblock - you only need "a" insted of "[Aa]".

      --
      G
    7. Re:adblock by JakeThompson1 · · Score: 1

      IF YOU KEEP SHOWING YOUR IGNORANCE WITH YOUR SPELLING ERRORS, I AM GOING TO DO SOMETHING NASTY TO YOU.

      Your first "TO" is not a preposition, as it is linked with "do", which is not a noun. Also, with your correction, the AC will be ending a sentence in a preposition...

    8. Re:adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know, you could have made your post a hell of a lot shorter if you just wrote: "i have never seen a vagina in real life."

      hth.

    9. Re:adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the built-in option:
      Firefox 0.9.3 >> |Tools| >> |Options...| >> |Web Features| >> [x] Load Images >> [x] for the originating Web site only.
      It works in lower versions too, but the Options Control Panel contents may be ordered differently.


      Firefox help says:

      * for the originating Web site only
      Enabling this option will make sure that only images located at the current Web site are loaded.

      What I wanted was to be able to do was block images whose link target was off-site, not who's source url was off-site.

    10. Re:adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/to do was/to/
      s/who's/whose/

      in anticipation of the grammar nazis circling overhead. it has been a long day for me to.

    11. Re:adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, she's now loving up next to somebody who bothered to show her a better browser instead of scoffing at her lack of information.

      Good one, "mate" - I see RealDoll in your future.

    12. Re:adblock by the_riaa · · Score: 1

      Since we're all chiming in, here's one I've been editing for a while: http://www.tfn.net/~mdjordan/mozilla_adblock_filte rs.txt

  7. The best thing is not that it has extensions by Gopal.V · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The best thing I like about firefox is not that it has extensions , but that the extensions are done up in Javascript and XUL (most of them are). I can safely install most of these because I just take a peek at the code (*tinfoil hat*) to make sure there are no obvious backdoors in it.

    Thankfully most extensions are done up cleanly , so it's easy to understand that there is no "crazy" code or backdoors hidden.

    Lastly they run the same (almost) everywhere :)

    1. Re:The best thing is not that it has extensions by alphan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wouldn't bet on it.

      1)Most of firefox is in XUL/javascript, meaning XUL+javascript+chrome can be very powerful.

      2) There are binary extensions,

      The moral of the story is: Don't install anything you don't know/trust.

  8. Great features, huh? by Danj2k · · Score: 0, Troll
    "If you haven't made the switch to Mozilla Firefox it may be because you aren't aware of the great benefits Firefox has over IE."
    What, like crashing when I try to import Saved Form History and Saved Passwords from IE using Firefox's import wizard? Or maybe you mean the way that every new version is incompatible not only with the settings and profiles of the old one but the extensions too, forcing me to uninstall and delete the old version before upgrading? Yeah, those are some really cool features... hey look! It even has an Error Report thing that comes up when it crashes! Oh wait, IE has that too...
    1. Re:Great features, huh? by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      ...Or maybe you mean the way that every new version is incompatible not only with the settings and profiles of the old one but the extensions too, forcing me to uninstall and delete the old version before upgrading?...

      Yeah, if there's one thing that annoys me about Firefox, it's the really annoying hoops you got to go through when you update it. You'd think it'd be a easy thing keeping your preferences, themes and extensions when updating the browser - but na-ah, no such thing...

    2. Re:Great features, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel your pain. I mean it's so much easier to import Saved Form History and Saved Passwords from Firefox to IE.

      Oh, wait...

      And you are absolutely right, I mean it's simply unbearable to reinstall a browser extension again after upgrading a browser that is still a technology preview.

      Thanks to the mods for moding the parent informative, it clearly deserved it.

    3. Re:Great features, huh? by Brando_Calrisean · · Score: 1

      What? I've NEVER had a problem importing settings/profiles between versions of Firefox.

      --
      Don't call me a cowboy, and don't tell me to slow down!
    4. Re:Great features, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, like crashing when I try to import Saved Form History and Saved Passwords from IE using Firefox's import wizard?

      Shouldn't this read, I'm too stupid and lazy to remember my login names & passwords so I use the BUGGIEST piece of software ever written to do it for me!! Why won't Firefox let me continue to be a mindless twit who shouldn't even be allowed to LOOK at a computer let alone press the shiny buttons!

    5. Re:Great features, huh? by drmancini · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you should be aware of the fact, that Firefox is still pre 1.0 ... so you shouldn't vote against it based on such bugs...

      --

      Never underestimate the power of idiots in large groups
    6. Re:Great features, huh? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You miss the damn point. Firefox and other browsers are trying to take market share from IE, not the other way around, so it's far more important that new Firefox users can successfully import settings from IE than the other way around.

      I would have thought that that much would be obvious to even the most fanatical Firefox/Mozilla user.

      The bottom line is that a key tool used to help migrate users from IE to Firefox doesn't always work, so that's a clear minus point against Firefox. If the first thing that you try do when moving to Firefox from IE causes crash after crash wouldn't that curb your enthusiasm for carrying on with the transition? After all, switching to any new piece of software is often a leap of faith, and it's hard to make that leap successfully if you find a brick wall in your way.

      You might not see things that way, and these things might not bother you, but that doesn't make them any less frustrating to others.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:Great features, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh*

      The first rule of troll club:
      Make sure to brand anyone you don't agree with as fanatical and a zealot.

    8. Re:Great features, huh? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      I didn't brand anyone as fanatical. What I said was "I would have thought that that much would be obvious to even the most fanatical Firefox/Mozilla user".

      So stop putting words into my mouth and learn to appreciate how English works.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  9. Switch tabs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a nice extension that does shortcut keys to tabs ?
    (E.g. galeon -> Alt + 2 = Jump to window 2)
    --
    www.jmeeting.com - meet friends.

    1. Re:Switch tabs ? by Luthwyhn · · Score: 1, Informative

      No extension needed... just use Ctrl + #

    2. Re:Switch tabs ? by qshapadooy · · Score: 3, Informative

      You were so close. Control+[1-9] goes to tab 1-9.

      Then there's always Control+Tab/Shift Tab or Control+PageUp/Down to go to next/previous tabs.

    3. Re:Switch tabs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl + 2 = switch to tab 2 and so on.

    4. Re:Switch tabs ? by arcanumas · · Score: 1
      Holly shit!!
      I pressed Ctrl+1 on my Mozilla 1.6 on Linux and guess what?!
      I got a page with a huge image saying "WTF?!"
      the URL pointed to http://null/

      I,ve been using mozilla for a long time and i had never seen this before.

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    5. Re:Switch tabs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not to alarm you, but that sounds like a trojan. Not unless the developers have a strange sense of humor.

      Although, I have heard that not all Firefox keyboard shortcuts work in the Mozilla suite.

    6. Re:Switch tabs ? by julesh · · Score: 1

      You were so close. Control+[1-9] goes to tab 1-9.

      Then there's always Control+Tab/Shift Tab or Control+PageUp/Down to go to next/previous tabs.


      Problem is that when you switch tabs with the keyboard, the focus stays on the old tab if it has a form in it. This is very annoying, because it means you cannot scroll the tab you've switched to without using the mouse.

      I've reported it as a bug, but apparently this is "correct" behaviour, and the dev. team aren't going to fix it. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253228

  10. Here's one benefit... by proxy2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Firefox is the ultimate porn browser !

    1. Re:Here's one benefit... by Lord+of+Ironhand · · Score: 1

      They have some valid points too:
      What other browser has a "throbber" displaying its logo while pages loads, an image-rendering library called "libpr0n", a code name like "Seamonkey" (see monkey), or a slogan like "free the lizard"?

    2. Re:Here's one benefit... by karniv0re · · Score: 1

      I absolutely love the Pornzilla project! Not just for pr0n (though primarily for that), but for many other things as well. The zoom image button, increment page button, go to referrer button, hide visited links button... They all have non-pr0n uses too. Very cool stuff.

      The only missing extension is "download all media." Kind of like Magpie, only something that actually works. Who knows, I'm learning Java this semester, so maybe I can bang something out. Man, those were choice words...

    3. Re:Here's one benefit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amusing as that may be I prefer Konqueror. The 'copy to' menu with its expanding directory list is very handy, and I haven't found a Firefox extension that provides anything quite so useful.

  11. If you didn't like those changes, you'll hate this by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Take a look at this. From the site:
    Allows you to change the product name in various parts of the browser. Random name generation ensures perpetual humour and possible end-user confusion.
  12. Adblock by strider44 · · Score: 5, Informative

    As extensions go, nothing beats adblock.

  13. It's also a potential expoit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When one of my work mates stepped out for a bit leaving his Firefox running , we just opened Yahoo and did a "Show Passwords" in Webdeveloper :)

    That'll teach him not to leave his PC unlocked.

    If you know who I am, I'll have to kill you

    1. Re:It's also a potential expoit by Myen · · Score: 1

      Tools -> Options -> Privacy -> Saved Passwords -> View Saved Passwords -> Show (bottom right corner) -> Yes.

      Available on nightlies only - presumably will be in 1.0PR (and 1.0 when that happens).

      If on *nix, replace Tools -> Options with Edit -> Preferences.

  14. Compact Menu Extension by xaoslaad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The thing that has kept me away from Firefox and Mozilla is that each has very large menu bars when compared to IE. You have the Standard Menu bar, the back/forward/stop/etc bar, the address bar; it all adds up.

    With IE you could always throw them all up on one line with small icons and it took up very little space at the top of your window when you have the browser minimized.

    The Compact Menu extension for Firefox allows me to setup the menu bar very similarly; then just use a small icon theme and boom I have almost the same effect.

    Now that I can see the screen the way I want I have to admit firefox is indeed a very nice browser.

    1. Re:Compact Menu Extension by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I used to run firefox like that, but it doesn't seem to work anymore (0.9.3).

    2. Re:Compact Menu Extension by tfreport · · Score: 2, Informative

      You installed an extension for this? Try following these steps:

      1. Right-click on any of the icons (say the home icon) and choose 'Customize'.

      2. Choose small icons.

      3. Then drag all icons and bars (such as the URL and Search) into the top menu bar. Everything should now be along the top. And if there are any icons you do not want or need, simply drag them onto the Customize Box.

      4. But you say, there are still two bars without anything in them. Correct. Solve that by going 'View' > 'Toolbars' > and unselect both 'Navigation Toolbar' and 'Bookmark Toolbar.'

      Not that the way you did it is wrong. Just that you will want to know about the feature of Customizing for other uses.

    3. Re:Compact Menu Extension by attobyte · · Score: 1

      I do this now. I have just one bar with all my icons, menus, and address bar in one. Then my tabs are below that. Very compact and very nice. A lot nicer then IE in my opionin.

      --
      I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!

      Mike

    4. Re:Compact Menu Extension by larsoncc · · Score: 1

      That was a handy tip, thanks.

      It wasn't readily apparent, because it doesn't follow Windows "standard" of dockable/lockable toolbars where you just drag the whole toolbar where you want it.

      The extra step of opening the "customize" menu to be able to drag widgets didn't occur to me, because I just got used to the Windows meme.

    5. Re:Compact Menu Extension by glpierce · · Score: 1

      That's odd - every major Microsoft application is designed almost exactly the same way - all of Office, IE, etc. has right-click Customize for toolbars. Oh, and so do most other applications I've used in the last 5 years (Wordperfect, Paint Shop Pro, OpenOffice, etc).

      --
      G
    6. Re:Compact Menu Extension by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      More ideas about how to organize your toolbars in this handy Mozillazine forum topic:
      Post your 0.9 custom toolbars here.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    7. Re:Compact Menu Extension by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Another possibility is to mess around with the *instripe theme's spacing in userChrome.css file.

      here's some instructions regarding the thing. Personally, I just went for zero pixel padding =)

    8. Re:Compact Menu Extension by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      just use small icons. everything is fully customizable. in fact a well configured firefox uses less screen real estate than any IE

      --
      IAAL
    9. Re:Compact Menu Extension by penguinoid · · Score: 0

      Is there some way to place the (File Edit ... Help) menus into under a single master menu? Because after having done as you suggested (thanks, it is great) there is not quite enough room for the address bar (which I want to usually be able to see the entire address. Also, is there a way to merge the google search bar with the address bar?

      Thanks in advance.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    10. Re:Compact Menu Extension by mcn · · Score: 1
      This seems a general problem with OSS or other free software. It's menu bars and interface is not familiar to those Windows users, and requires lots of efforts to customize it to look like one. People (esp. the Windows users) are used to movable menu/tool bars, small icons, etc. Can Mozilla Firefox come with small icons by default?


      And on this note, Office 2003 come with bluish tool bars, new set of icons (vs Office XP). I haven't tried OpenOffice 2.0 beta (the fortnightly builds). I hope OpenOffice 2.0 will have that too, or something that looks like that, so that users that attempt to try/switch will at least find it familiar.

    11. Re:Compact Menu Extension by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

      If you right click and customize the menu bar there is an item simply called 'Menu'

      Drag it into the bar and you should be able to click on it to see File/Edit/View, etc. This gives more room to the buttons and address bar while still making them available.

      As for the google bar, I wish there was something like you could do in IE, with the help of TweakUI (or the registry if you knew the proper entries.

      There is the ability in IE to configure a prefix such that when you type it into the address bar (I used to make this the character 'g' for "Google") followed by a space and then a search string you are interested in searching for it would perform a google search.

      So, I would simply type 'g Search String' (w/o the quotes) into the address bar and results for a google search on 'Search String' would be displayed. It works with quotes to (where you can enter 'g "Search String"' and get the expected behaviour)

    12. Re:Compact Menu Extension by juhaz · · Score: 1

      As for the google bar, I wish there was something like you could do in IE, with the help of TweakUI (or the registry if you knew the proper entries.
      There is the ability in IE to configure a prefix such that when you type it into the address bar (I used to make this the character 'g' for "Google") followed by a space and then a search string you are interested in searching for it would perform a google search.


      Well, there is, and has been for a LOOOOONG time. I can't believe you haven't heard of it, especially since it sounds you've been looking for that...

      So, I would simply type 'g Search String' (w/o the quotes) into the address bar and results for a google search on 'Search String' would be displayed. It works with quotes to (where you can enter 'g "Search String"' and get the expected behaviour)

      It may not be immediately apparent because it's not related in GUI to the address bur, but it's there.

      Create a bookmark that points to "http://www.google.com/search?&q=%s", and set the keyword field to g, and it does exactly what you describe, without having to install any pesky third party tools like tweakui, or go digging in the obscure registry.

    13. Re:Compact Menu Extension by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

      Most excellent. This works perfectly. Thank you!

  15. Why people cling to IE by ptomblin · · Score: 1

    I wish somebody would port mozex to Mac OS X. (And no, I don't think I could manage it myself)

    I introduced my step-daughter's girl friend to Firefox when she was complaining about all the pop-ups in IE, but after about 5 minutes she switched back to IE. The only reason: In IE you can copy an image to the clip buffer and paste it into Photoshop or some other graphic program (she was grabbing pictures to make her Livejournal icons), but in Firefox (and Mozilla) you have to save the image and then open it in Photoshop as an extra step. Evidently managing all those little files was more effort to her than dismissing all the popups.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:Why people cling to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not true! Right Click / Copy Image -- use it all the time for Photoshop jokes I trade on IRC. If she spent more than 5 minutes using it, she would have found some of those features -- too quick to judge. Took me a while to get Firefox *just* the way I likes it.

    2. Re:Why people cling to IE by manticor24 · · Score: 1

      You better hook her up with an extension to copy images:
      http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.p hp?t=7332 4

    3. Re:Why people cling to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm confused. I just tried it using drag and drop and got an image into Photoshop w/no extra steps.

    4. Re:Why people cling to IE by the_womble · · Score: 1

      So why not install the Image Toolbar extension?

    5. Re:Why people cling to IE by SimplePaul · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. Right-click on an image
      2. Select 'Copy Image'
      3. Paste into mspaint, Photoshop, etc.

      This works fine in FireFox 0.9.3

    6. Re:Why people cling to IE by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I decided to try that, but the only copy option is 'copy image location', which copies the URL. This is for both Mozilla and Firefox. I tried dragging and dropping to two different applications. The first application only took the URL, while the second took the image.

      Maybe there is an extension to add 'copy image'.

      BTW this was under MacOS X.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    7. Re:Why people cling to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually you now can copy image directly from firefox, time to switch her back!

      I also held back for a long time for the exact same reason. There is an extension for mozilla that does it, but in Firefox 0.9 there is a "copy image" function built in when you right click on any image.

    8. Re:Why people cling to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a copy image to clipboard extension available.

    9. Re:Why people cling to IE by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Just tell her to upgrade Windows to Service Pack 2 and then explain how IE's new inbuilt popup blocker will suppress those pop up windows. Everyone's happy.

    10. Re:Why people cling to IE by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      This sounds harsh but..

      If she's that dumb don't let her use a real browser, she'll end up breaking it some how.. I'm not trying to insult anyone but if you can't give it 5 minutes to play and learn a browser you arn't worthy of using the browser.

      First time I used firefox (AKA Phoniex then), I was rather worried that it took about 10 seconds to load on my PC (IE was instant) but then everything ran fine. I played a little (slashdot and all the usual hang outs trying everything) and found tabbed browsing was just far too useful for a 56ker to even think about going back to IE. As time went by I learnt of the extentions and everything just improved (Hey I can plat tetris as I let stuff load, that alone makes it worth it). Now I refuse to use anything but Firefox and I attempt to convert anyone who says they use IE to me and have the brains to understand the benefits (AKA dont try and teach 12 year old girls who can only use AIM, it's not worth the hassle and waste of time).

      Then again live journal has always been a place of annoyance for me... so I'm biast.. so I'll stick to slashdot journals where it's not all moaning about their family and 'friend (like we have them).

      --
      I like muppets.
    11. Re:Why people cling to IE by stealthv · · Score: 1

      Good Lord!!!
      IE for OS X is so incredibly broken it's not funny. Personally I think Firefox works well on OS X but if she doesn't that's fine. However, she should at least try out Safari.
      They are both better than IE anyday.

    12. Re:Why people cling to IE by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      Your elitism wouldn't sound so stupid and hypocritical if you knew how to spell "biased".

      The fact remains that she had a task to do, and IE made it easy and Firefox made it harder, so she decided to stick with IE. That doesn't make her dumb, just focused.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    13. Re:Why people cling to IE by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      in 0.10 (PR1 NOT FINAL) for win32 theres definately a "copy image" right above "copy image location" and below "view image", and im pretty sure its been there in previous versions too. its anyones guess why they're leaving it out for you mac people

      --
      TIAEAE!
    14. Re:Why people cling to IE by ryouki · · Score: 1
      I never noticed a problem of this type. I worked on a project involving the clipbord, and Drag and Drop a few months ago.

      The documnetation for D&D and Clipboard documentation

      If the clipboard does not work on your system then it is a bug and you should report it.

    15. Re:Why people cling to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes very little sense. His point was that IE had something that Firefox didn't. Exploring for a few minutes wouldn't have helped, at the time. Maybe she should have read the help file; but I don't know of a lot of people -- knowledgeable or newbie -- who read help files. And she'd need more than a few minutes to find a plug-in to do what she wanted. I notice that you yourself didn't immediately learn about extensions: "As time when by, I learnt of the extensions..."

      Also, your rant about 12 year old girls is pretty silly. For all you know, his step daughter is 28 and has a graphic artist girlfriend.

      So, I'd say that it sounds less harsh than pretentious.

    16. Re:Why people cling to IE by wagemonkey · · Score: 4, Informative
      I introduced my step-daughter's girl friend to Firefox when she was complaining about all the pop-ups in IE, but after about 5 minutes she switched back to IE. The only reason: In IE you can copy an image to the clip buffer and paste it into Photoshop or some other graphic program (she was grabbing pictures to make her Livejournal icons), but in Firefox (and Mozilla) you have to save the image and then open it in Photoshop as an extra step. Evidently managing all those little files was more effort to her than dismissing all the popups.
      Here is an extension to let her do that too.
    17. Re:Why people cling to IE by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I introduced my step-daughter's girl friend to Firefox when she was complaining about all the pop-ups in IE, but after about 5 minutes she switched back to IE. The only reason: In IE you can copy an image to the clip buffer and paste it into Photoshop or some other graphic program (she was grabbing pictures to make her Livejournal icons), but in Firefox (and Mozilla) you have to save the image and then open it in Photoshop as an extra step. Evidently managing all those little files was more effort to her than dismissing all the popups.

      Here's how a non-techie person thinks: "Damn, I can't do that thing I used to do in this Firefox. Back to Explorer, because there the thing works and I'm used to it already."

      No, thoughts like "perhaps there's a trick or a setting to do this thing in Firefox" will not cross their mind. They're not stupid, it's just not obvious to them that (or how) computer applications' functionality can be altered by the user.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    18. Re:Why people cling to IE by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Maybe there is an extension to add 'copy image'.

      There is, it's called Copy image to clipboard.
      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    19. Re:Why people cling to IE by no_space_in_time · · Score: 1

      I introduced the mother of my step-daughters girlfriends boyfriend to....oh, nevermind.

      --
      "save a cow, eat a vegetarian"
    20. Re:Why people cling to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was also an extension made for this purpose as well, look around at mozdev.

    21. Re:Why people cling to IE by scupper · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      why the HELL was this moderated as "offtopic"? God, the immature anti-microsoft "tude" pours through everything, even when it's irrational.

      The originial post, "Why people cling to IE", discussed the motivation, for recommending Firebird, being the elimination of popups while using Internet Explorer.

      Mentioning that XP2 adds a popup block feature is a relevent fact, since the discussion is about a browser feature comparison, and XP2 DID IN FACT ADD THAT FEATURE.

      How is that Offtopic?

    22. Re:Why people cling to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be using version 0.8 or less.

      In the 0.9+ builds - copy image is in the right click context menu (without the need of an extension)

    23. Re:Why people cling to IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was also an extension made for this purpose as well, look around at mozdev.

      You don't say. Is that why he said that there's an extension that does it?

      Now that you mention it, I think that there's an extension that does this.

    24. Re:Why people cling to IE by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I decided to try that, but the only copy option is 'copy image location', which copies the URL. This is for both Mozilla and Firefox. I tried dragging and dropping to two different applications. The first application only took the URL, while the second took the image.

      BTW this was under MacOS X.


      It's there, but the feature currently only exists in Windows version. See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210043 (bugzilla and slashdot, you know the drill)

      Maybe there is an extension to add 'copy image'.

      There is that too, from a time it was not a browser feature, perhaps it works in non win32-platforms, perhaps it doesn't.

    25. Re:Why people cling to IE by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      I was given the URL of CopyImage. It works under MacOS X ("works for me") and also should work on any another platform - the extension only uses Javascript that leverages what Firefox already provides.

      Would be nice if this was standard.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  16. I haven't switched...my reasons are... by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I haven't switched [from Konqueror], and will not switch anytime soon because I find that: -

    1: Mozilla Firefox had terrible fonts on Linux. I know there is the possibility of using one compiled with xft. But where is it? Whenever a new release is announced, the version producing those bad fonts is what I find.

    2: I find that it is slower than Konqueror on most sites. My only use of Mozilla Firefox is on Gmail. I wonder why Google will not support Konqueror yet.

    3: Firefox keeps some important passwords long after I have logged out of my online baking site. It is not the problem of the site but Firefox. I have confirmed this.

    Please note that I am no expert in these matters. I just download stuff and use it as such.

    Cb..

    1. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 5, Funny

      >my online baking site

      Doh! (nut)

      .

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    2. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by cloudless.net · · Score: 1
      "Mozilla Firefox had terrible fonts on Linux."

      Which Linux distro do you use? If you install Firefox in a binary format (RPM/DEB) thru APT/URPMI, you'll probably get a version of Firefox with good font support.

    3. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      1) Edit -->Preferences --> General -- Fonts and Colours.

      2) Can't answer that one. You might be right. The one thing I like about Konqueror is the status bar tells you in kb the size of the page and how much has loaded. AFAIR Opera has (or had) this feature too.

      3) Edit --> Preferences --> Privacy --> Saved Passwords. Edit away. It's probably a good idea to make sure that you never save passwords for banking sites. If you want to reset any of your password choices you can do it here.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    4. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by rincebrain · · Score: 1

      1) A lot of programs have terrible fonts if you don't take the time to set them up. If you're using a binary distro, such as RedHat or Debian, that's not the browser's fault, but the distro's. If you're using Gentoo, toy with the make flags. Otherwise, build from source manually. =) 2) Konqueror is fast because it's not as compliant as Firefox. I've seen several sites display as crap in Konq, and run perfectly in Firefox. In addition, GMail doesn't support Konq yet because they don't see a need to, IMO [Firefox runs perfectly on any OS, and IE/Safari are the primary browsers of most users of the respective OSes, so why support Konqueror?]. 3) That's your own problem, not Firefox's. I've never had that problem, and I've run Firefox on my Linux boxen for almost a year now...under whatever name it was at the time. =)

      --
      It's only an insult if it's not true.
    5. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. I don't think people using an other open source browser are the ones who should worry most about switching to firefox. ;-D

      2. Fonts: Never had any problems with firefox fonts, nor with the fonts ind konqueror. I know it's lame, but something seems to be wrong with your setup.

      3. I'm mostly using Konqueror, but I have to say I don't really notice much difference between Konqui and Firefox. They are both pretty fast.

      4. I'm pretty sure you can change firefox keeping your passwords pretty easily. If your point was, that firefox doesn't have good default setting when it comes to dealing with passwords you might be right, though I wouldn't know.

      5. You forgot a very important reason imho why people use konqueror instead of firefox. It's simply better integrated into kde. So when using kde I can't really see a reason why I shouldn't use it.

    6. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by gtaluvit · · Score: 2, Informative

      about:config will solve 1. for you. Put "about:config" in your menubar. On that page, find font.FreeType2.autohinted and set it to true. Do the same for font.FreeType2.enable. Set font.FreeType2.unhinted to false. Also, for number 3, ensure that you go to preferences and that you have Remember Passwords unchecked. You may also want to ensure that its not a cookie thats storing it. Restart Firefox and you'll have much nicer fonts.

      --
      - gtaluvit (prnc. GOT-tuh-LUV-it)
    7. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by FoboldFKY · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1. I dunno about the new site, but last time I checked the Linux binaries, it was on the "More languages/OSes/etc." page beneath the regular binary.
      2. IANAGE (I am not a Google Employee), but as far as I understand it, Gmail is built almost entirely on a little gem called XMLHttpRequest (it might be HttpXmlRequest or HtTpXmLREQUEST but that's beside the point...)

        Basically, it allows you to send requests back to the server, and get XML (Gecko and IE allow you to recieve HTML as well) back from Javascript without having to reload the whole dang page. Gmail uses this pretty much everywhere instead of doing roundtrips.

        I'm not sure if Konqueror supports XMLHttpRequest, but odds are that might be why.

      3. Ya got me on that one.
      --
      We're geeks... We're the sorcerers of the modern-day world. --
    8. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by Nimey · · Score: 4, Informative
      Mozilla Firefox had terrible fonts on Linux. I know there is the possibility of using one compiled with xft. But where is it? Whenever a new release is announced, the version producing those bad fonts is what I find.
      You'll want the version that's built with GTK2, here.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    9. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      I just set those 3 config variables, restarted Firefox and there is no change in my fonts. AFAIK, firefox for Debian Unstable (0.9.3) is compiled with freetype support...

    10. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanx a bunch. My fonts are now much better. Why on earth aren't those settings you provided made default? Who would not like better looking fonts?

    11. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      No, he doesn't. He uses Konqueror, and therefore most likely uses KDE. Why should he have to install the GNOME desktop environment just to get fonts that don't suck to work with Firefox?

      Oh, and I know he only needs the GTK2 libraries, but that's still a huge chunk of code to download and install to use for just one program.

      Do you seriously need GTK+ support to get decent fonts? That's kinda - too bad. I thought the GTK2 stuff only made Firefox/Mozilla support styling the controls based on the current GTK theme, I didn't know it did anything with the fonts.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    12. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by ticktockticktock · · Score: 1

      Odd. On my SuSE Linux 9.0 setup, if I download FireFox 0.9.3 straight from www.mozilla.org, it defaults to having anti-aliased fonts even with:
      font.FreeType2.autohinted set to "false" and font.FreeType2.enable set to "false" and font.FreeType2.unhinted set to "true" in about:config.

    13. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then he'd want to install the gtk-qt theme, to use KDE's fonts in gtk2 programs.

    14. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      3: Firefox keeps some important passwords long after I have logged out of my online baking site. It is not the problem of the site but Firefox. I have confirmed this.

      Now that it just moronic.

      Firefox PROMPTS YOU the first time it saves a password, and gives you all the info you need to disable that functionality...

      If you just click "OK" on every dialog box that pops up, you've got much more serious problems to deal with than a browser that saves your password.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I think Firefox is worth that "huge chunk of code".

      I run Gaim and GIMP on Windows 2000. I too, had to download the GT2 libraries. I didn't mind at all.

      And I have a "tiny" 20 GB hard drive.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
    16. Re:I haven't switched...my reasons are... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously need GTK+ support to get decent fonts?

      No. You need GTK+ support to get Mozilla at all, because that's what it uses on *nix. GTK2 just happens to have font support that is light years ahead GTK1 (doh).

      You wouldn't suggest someone who "just wants to run Konqueror" to use a version that links against QT1, even if there was a recent one, would you?

  17. Extensions are the Killer App by plasticmillion · · Score: 1
    Although I couldn't RTFA (slashdotted already) I feel compelled to comment on this. We are considering deploying a multiplatform version of our product developed on top of Mozilla, so I downloaded Firefox a few weeks ago to check it out. My intention was to download it, play with it and then go back to IE which I was perfectly happy with on my 2 XP boxes.

    Well guess what, I'm still using the damn thing and have become a huge evangelist for it. And 99.9% of the reason is the great extension mechanism and growing library of how-did-I-live-without-this extensions. If the browser wars really do take off, I think that XUL might have a bigger impact long term, but definitely for now extensions are the killer app that is pulling people onto the Mozilla platform.

    1. Re:Extensions are the Killer App by Yer+Mom · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe they'd be less slashdotted if they hadn't split the article across six teeny-tiny pages just to force people to view more adverts. The ads are about three times the length of the body text!

      There isn't even a link for a printable version, so if you want to print the article, you have to waste half a tree.

      Perhaps Flexbeta should whack the marketroids over the head with a clue bat?

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    2. Re:Extensions are the Killer App by Foole · · Score: 1

      Another benefit is you don't get feature bloat in the main app.

      My hope is that the GNOME people consider this as an alternative to hiding options so that the user isnt overwhelmed. They could just shift chunks of functionality into extensions (eg non-spacial browsing) that interested people could choose to install.

      --
      This is not a turnip.
  18. Wikalong by phUnBalanced · · Score: 5, Informative
    A little blatant self promotion. (I apologize)

    I've written up a little extension called Wikalong.

    Basically, it puts a wiki in your sidebar, that is indexed off the current page you are viewing. The wiki is online so anyone using the plugin, that visits a page you make notes on will see your notes, and vice versa.

    It doesn't work perfectly yet, but I'm hoping to attract some smarter people than I to help get it straightened out.

    More details on the site I linked above.

    1. Re:Wikalong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not install. Neither by clicking on the link or saving as a file and dragging and dropping it into firefox. I use 0.9.3

    2. Re:Wikalong by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Mosaic supported annotations (both personal and group) waaay back. For some reason the feature got dropped when the Netscape guys broke away into a commerical company and is only recently coming back as the in thing. No doubt someone will patent it soon.

    3. Re:Wikalong by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Downloaded, installed, and tested. It pwns.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:Wikalong by Tyreth · · Score: 1

      I've had an idea to do something like this too for a while. Great idea.

    5. Re:Wikalong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I remember something like this. As I recall, people posted lots of offensive stuff on the disney homepage thus angering their lawyers and getting it killed quick.

      You should a) stay anonymous, to avoid lawsuits and b) take steps to prevent spamming (don't ask me how).

  19. Builti-in features vs Extensions by cloudless.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am quite interested in how the Mozilla team decide what goes into the browser, and what should be left as an extension. Many built-in features of Firefox can actually made made as an extension instead, which could make the browser more lightweight and start up faster. Yes it would require the user to download more extensions, and I think it could be solved by providing extension packs with several useful extensions put into one easy-to-install package.

    1. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by jdkane · · Score: 1

      Many built-in features of Firefox can actually made made as an extension instead

      Out of curiosity, what built-in features would you consider as good extensions? (This question is to everybody, not just the parent post). I would be interested to see a discussion here about the leanness of the Firefox browser vs trade-offs by abstracting built-in functionality into extension packs.

    2. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by Epistax · · Score: 1

      My reply to this is make everything that can possibly be an extension, an extension, and then make them all default installed extensions. Users can then subtract either at install or runtime. I'd personally prefer runtime since the browser is already very lightweight and we don't want to scare people off.

    3. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by cloudless.net · · Score: 1

      my list of optional features:
      - The whole online help system (I don't need help)
      - Tab browsing (not everybody likes it)
      - Toolbar customization (most people have no clue)
      - Download manager (I love single progress dialog)
      - Search field (just visit google)
      - RSS (not every read blogs)
      - Page source viewer (Joe doesn't read source)
      - Print and print preview (I don't have a printer)
      - Import/Export (what is Netscape anyway?)
      - Themes (just give me one good theme)
      - Cooking manager
      - Password manager

    4. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree: Smallest possible browser base (perhaps just XPCOM + installer). You would use the installer to select things to include in the browser only under 'Custom' settings (Search Bar, themes, extention packs, simplified help system, new (get a nightly) anoying in browser error messages (what is the status bar for huh?)).

      Make this installer appear like a preferences dialog which just happens to download and keep up to date all of the separate components of a browser. This same system could be used to update browser security as and when problems occur.

      One area that I would say needs to be sorted to accomplish this could be packaging the browser into lots of jar files rather than having lots of cruft floating around with a few Jar files.

      To do this:

      a) why not use binary diffs to do the updates
      b) the browser must be much more highly separated into individual components.
      c) dependancies built into the extensions (one extension can build upon another)
      d) care taken to manage interdependance and the need to try to avoid compatibility issues between versions.
      e) essentially a simple gui version of portage but made for the browser.

    5. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Some of the things you listed are pretty "core". If they did this they'd have to have a dependency system, because extensions like "Tabbrowser extensions" would depend on "Tabbed browsing". Which idea may not sit well with everybody.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    6. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      Hey lets have an html viewing extension!
      Seriously why do that I want firefox to beat ie out of the box. Not after installing the help tabs etc.

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    7. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      I think that's a great idea! What could be done, is to create a few "modules" ala Morphix, and pack some of these extensions into a single package. The "Power users", could contain the DOM explorer, toolbar extender, etc.

      --
      Sig it.
    8. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by kavau · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. The best way, imho, would be to turn every possible feature into an extension, and then let the user select extensions during install. That is, you'd have a choice between a default install, which automatically installs a "standard extensions" package, or a customized install, which lets you choose exactly which extensions you want to have on your system.

    9. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there an extension which allows a google search on what is typed in the address field (as with mozilla) vs having to use the search field?

    10. Re:Builti-in features vs Extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try going to about:config and change the keyword.URL value to the main Google search URL, instead of using "I'm Feeling Lucky".

      That way, non-URLs in the address bar should go straight to a Google search..

  20. Best by far.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..is Adblock http://adblock.mozdev.org/

    Blocks all annoying ads. Highly custumisable.
    It's a pleasure to browse the web without ads!

  21. Target Alert not too useful... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    my favorite is the Target Alert extension which displays a small graphic next to links that are not web pages.

    I came across this a while ago and thought it would be useful for helping out some novice users who don't understand helper applications and the like. Alas, it's mostly useless. It uses the 3 digit extension, not the MIME type. So it's useless for content served dynamically via CGI scripts. It would also be trivial for a malicious user to create a website, post some .doc files, which would show up as Word Documents, and instead change the MIME type and serve up JavaScript or VBScript to do something evil.

    The right way to do this is to get the HTTP Headers and see what MIME type is being returned by the server.

    I'm a FireFox user - have been since it was Phoenix - but so many of the skins and plugins have too much of a "Oooh, shiny!" factor to them. How about more flexible X.509 configuration or a harcore Kiosk mode (that's the reason most kiosks run IE) or something like that. It has the same problem as WinAMP - there are far too many skins (40% of which have UI design issues; 40% of which are identical to each other, and 20% might be useful) and not enough technical plugins.

    To pre-emptively fend off trolls, yes I know it's free, you get what you pay for, if you don't like it go code it yourself, etc, etc.

    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    1. Re:Target Alert not too useful... by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      You might fool the user with a wrong icon, but Firefox will still use the MIME type when it downloads the file, so it's hardly a major problem.

      Wouldn't getting the HTTP headers for every non-HTML file linked to on a web page be a bit bandwidth and processor intensive for an extension?

    2. Re:Target Alert not too useful... by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      I saw a kiosk last week that was running an odd looking browser. about:config did not do anything so after a few minutes I realized I could just lookup a page that did browser detection. Much to my surprise it was Mozilla 0.9 (a very stripped down, weirdly themed) running on NT 4.51.

      (For anyone who cares this what as a Casey's Bar and Grill at Yorkdale mall Toronto)

    3. Re:Target Alert not too useful... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      There is a kiosk plugin for firefox too.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Target Alert not too useful... by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Funny
      Wouldn't getting the HTTP headers for every non-HTML file linked to on a web page be a bit bandwidth and processor intensive for an extension?

      Yes, but how else can it detect and place a goat icon next to goatse.cx links?

      --
      >;k
    5. Re:Target Alert not too useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Target Alert sounds like an utter bullshit extension to me, it's trivial to achieve this with a user style sheet, I wouldn't be surprised if this is exactly what it does. That said, the MIME criticism misses the entire point of the /extension/ and takes no account of the number of misconfigured servers or that windows actually uses file extensions. Funny you mention dynamic pages, it's easy to serve dynamic MIME types. Redirects, cache control and sessions are all that would be needed to render any advantages to checking HTTP headers redundant.

      Incidently it is good form to tell people what file format and/or protocol you are linking to, the number of times I've clicked through looking for traditional contact information and had a mail client start up is unbelievable.

    6. Re:Target Alert not too useful... by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Since when is it possible to have TOO MUCH of an "Oooh, shiny!" factor? I like Oooh, Shiny!

    7. Re:Target Alert not too useful... by varebel · · Score: 1

      Right now, it would be more like a "suspended domain" icon. Go ahead. Check it out. The Goat Man is no more.

    8. Re:Target Alert not too useful... by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      Target Alert sounds like an utter bullshit extension to me, it's trivial to achieve this with a user style sheet, I wouldn't be surprised if this is exactly what it does.
      Trivial, maybe, but it saves time for most users who would want to do this, including the users who otherwise wouldn't know how. It's not like it's costing anybody money.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    9. Re:Target Alert not too useful... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      The right way to do this is to get the HTTP Headers and see what MIME type is being returned by the server.

      Which would make it, instead of "mostly useless", though it's pretty useful to me, even for just recognizing mailto and new window links, totally useless (it'd be too slow to be usable), because it would have to do HEAD for every damn href on the page.

  22. FF Extensions by wongn · · Score: 1

    I use webdeveloper - it certainly is very useful... I also use session saver, which is a bit like an extremely scaled down Tabbrowser extensions. It has in problem in that if you don't close the main browser window as the last Firefox window, it is extremely hard (well, I haven't found a way) to get Firefox back to opening in a mode that includes any toolbars, an address bar, and from a website that isn't "Sign up for Gmail" (as was the last window that I closed -.-). Oh - is it just me or doesn't the webpage the article is linked to work at the moment? :S

  23. Fav Firefox extension by kinrowan · · Score: 1
    for this inveterate /. reader is ReloadEvery. I can reload /. every minute (although that still doesn't help me get the first post).

    I also love WebDeveloper, DownThemAll, GMailCompose, SwitchProxy, and the ever-popular TabBrowser Prefs.

    OK, maybe I'm a little over-extensioned.

  24. Wanted Extension: by tratten · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Apply new extension without Firefox restart'-Extension

    1. Re:Wanted Extension: by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      If I hadn't already posted in this thread, I'd be modding you up right about now.

      Even Windows lets you change and install stuff without having to reboot every time these days...

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    2. Re:Wanted Extension: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your butt on goatse would look like this:

      /-{ }-\

    3. Re:Wanted Extension: by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      In order to install it, you have to restart Firefox.

      (Which leads to an infinite loop somehow....)

    4. Re:Wanted Extension: by mewphobia · · Score: 1

      Even if there is some architectural problem with extensions that make it require a restart, it would be nice if something like session saver: http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/more-info/sessions aver

      When you install an extension, it could automatically save your session, restart your browser and restore your session on reload.

      but yeah, having to restart your browser is a bit of a pain!

  25. What plugin is this? by leomekenkamp · · Score: 2, Funny
    There is a problem with the database that is preventing the site from working.

    An email has been sent to the administrator notifying them of the problem. Please try again later.

    Is this a direct effect of the slashddos plugin?

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    1. Re:What plugin is this? by leomekenkamp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      An email has been sent to the administrator notifying them of the problem.

      Sorry to reply to my own posting, but would this imply that the administrator is
      1. suffering from a multiple personalities disorder
      2. a siamese twin
      3. undergoing a sex-change at this very moment
      4. a monarch
      5. God
      ?
      --
      Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    2. Re:What plugin is this? by BenjyD · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Them/they is commonly used as a gender-neutral pronoun in English.

    3. Re:What plugin is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU FAIL IT TWICE (it is 1: being funny and 2: realizing that in English, "they" and "them" can be used in place of "he/she" and "him/her" in order to be gender-neutral)

    4. Re:What plugin is this? by leomekenkamp · · Score: 1

      Yet again the level of my former English teacher becomes painfully apparent...

      --
      Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    5. Re:What plugin is this? by kooshvt · · Score: 1

      "they" and "them" can be used in place of "he/she" and "him/her" in order to be gender-neutral

      Well not according to a previous English teacher I had. They/them is plural. The problem with this case is that administrator would need to change administrator to administrators to keep the same plurality through out.

      An email has been sent to the administrator notifying him of the problem.
      or
      An email has been sent to the administrators notifying them of the problem.

      I am not sure if email would need to be plural in the second case. Is it one email being sent to multiple recipients, or is it multiple emails? Is emails a word? My head is going to explode. I hate words.

      Me fail English? That's unpossible!

    6. Re:What plugin is this? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      What happens when the admin's inbox fills up? It adds a notice to the database?

    7. Re:What plugin is this? by Glenn+R-P · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own posting, but would this imply that the administrator is

      1. suffering from a multiple personalities disorder
      2. a siamese twin
      3. undergoing a sex-change at this very moment
      4. a monarch
      5. God

      ?

      6. author was using nonsexist language.

  26. Firefox Game by matrem · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Linux users can select text in a webpage and middle-click: this will take them to the first hit in Google with the selected text as search term. This is amazing!

    So I propose a new internet game. Start from a page, e.g. slashdot, and try to reach a certain other page, say somethingawful.com, by just selecting text and middle-clicking. Clicking hyperlinks is not allowed! Have fun!

    1. Re:Firefox Game by neglige · · Score: 1

      Start from a page, e.g. slashdot, and try to reach a certain other page, say somethingawful.com, by just selecting text and middle-clicking.

      Try to reach your target with no more than, say... 6 clicks? ;)

      --
      My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
    2. Re:Firefox Game by maskedbishounen · · Score: 1

      It's actually designed for loading URIs from text (ie, non-hyperlinks). If it's a valid URI, it works; if not, it pulls the first Google result (I believe?). I'm also pretty sure that it works on Windows (and OS X?), but the little auto scroll indicator when you middle click intercepts your click, causing it to not activate. The mouse gestures extension lets you enable the said auto scroll features across platforms, and also disable it.

      So, from your post, I can highlight somethingawful.com and middle click to go there, as it's a valid URI. ;-) One click win!

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
  27. OT: need an XUL developer by professorhojo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hi guys -- anyone out there an XUL expert? we're hiring! we need someone who can do some GUI work and help us set up a build system for our project. can you contact me at murray@qunu.com ? (there should be 2/3 months full time work here)

    thanks in advance...

  28. Extensions = extensive crashes by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's my installation, but every time I try to install an extension either it doesn't install or I have to reinstall firefox because it won't start anymore. I'm writing this in konqueror as I just tried to install adblocker and firefox won't start anymore after quitting.
    I'd say the extensions system needs just a bit more work. And mind you, I've seen a lot of mozilla bugs as I've been with mozilla since version 0.8.x

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    1. Re:Extensions = extensive crashes by fadir · · Score: 1

      I had a very similar problem the first time I noticed all the extensions out there. After installing the 25th extension my browser was almost unusable and I realized that installing everything is not the best idea. So for the next try I was way more careful and it worked out.
      Still alot to do for the Firefox team and the extension programmers but the idea itself is splendid, I really like it and if you are careful enough it already works quite fine.

    2. Re:Extensions = extensive crashes by DigiDarkCloud · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe it's my installation, but every time I try to install an extension either it doesn't install or I have to reinstall firefox because it won't start anymore.

      That's been a major problem for a while, because extensions are/were essentially becoming part of the main program. You could uninstall them manually, but it was a tricky, fragile practice. Fortunately, Firefox 0.9 introduced a new extension manager that makes the process much easier -- if the extension author supports it. Which leads us to the next point.

      I'd say the extensions system needs just a bit more work. And mind you, I've seen a lot of mozilla bugs as I've been with mozilla since version 0.8.x

      Not all of the problems are with the extension system itself. An extension can be well or poorly written; it can have bugs, incompatibilities, etc., just like you won't always have a success with every program you see on freshmeat and try out. It's not automatically stable just because it's an extension. If the extension author has written their extension to support the new extension manager, it's easy to uninstall if you determine it's of no use to you, but ideally, a bit of research should be done before you try an extension out. Sites like ExtensionRoom and update.mozilla.org have a place for users to put reviews and comments, so it's a good idea to glance over those, and see if lots of other people have problems, before taking the plunge.

      --
      SIG: 11
  29. Some useful links by t7 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Texturizer.net has a nice collection of extensions you may not find on mozilla's dev site.

    Some extensions I'm currently using:
    Flat Bookmark Editing
    Add Bookmark Here
    CuteMenus
    Paste and Go
    Gmail Notifier(Still works)

    Free iPods? Sure. freeipods.com

    1. Re:Some useful links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does that Free ipods link have to do with your message? Can't you keep it in your sig so that we don't have to be bombarded with pyramid schemes?

  30. Nuke Anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nuke Anything is a favorite of mine. Right click an image, table, or even a frame, select "Remove this object" and it's zapped from the page layout. Quite useful for removing images or overly large margins.

    1. Re:Nuke Anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if this extesion would save what was removed and would apply it again when i visit the site again it would be perfect

    2. Re:Nuke Anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth would you implement that? It's easy if the page hasn't changed, but otherwise the browser has to compare two versions of a page and somehow decide which object in the new version corresponds to the removed object in the old page. I can't see any general solution to the problem, but maybe a collection of ugly hacks could be made to work, most of the time... but it won't be easy.

    3. Re:Nuke Anything by Peripherus · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a version of this that removes every instance of the image from the page e.g. images in sigs (but not permanently like "block images from this site").

    4. Re:Nuke Anything by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

      My only real problem with Nuke Anything is that it's only temporary - reload the page, and any ads / annoying colors / et cetera return. Of course, this is good in case you kill something you didn't mean to - perhaps the extension needs a few enhancements: An undo option (I haven't used it in awhile, so it may already exist), a "Save Configuration" option, a and of course, just in case, a "Remove Configuration". Mind you, considering how much some pages change, the functionality of this might be a bit limited - perhaps introduce element ID wildcard blocking?

    5. Re:Nuke Anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it's intended to mainly be for re-formatting the page prior to doing a "save as" or "print" ?

  31. Re:your step-daughter's a what ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh... I can always rely on /. for a daily dose of Victorian puritanism.

  32. Flashblock by Artichoke · · Score: 4, Informative

    Flashblock replaces Macromedia Flash animations with a button you have to click to download and run the animation. Most uses of Flash are abominations to me; I like to choose when to consume it.

    Gripe wrt Macromedia: a couple of days back I installed the latest and greatest Flash player from Macromedia on my WinXP box and it uninstalled Flashblock for me.

    Better yet: it also prevents subsequent (re-)installation of Flashblock.

    Solution: download Flaskblock.xpi, unzip it, mod so that it installs under a nom de guerre, rezip and install.

    Anybody at Macromedia, if you're listening: STOP BEING NAUGHTY.

    --
    __
    Arse
    1. Re:Flashblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea that is pretty bad by Macromedia. I don't see how giving the option to download Flash or not hurts MM.

    2. Re:Flashblock by fishdan · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yea, I must agree -- macromedia employs the same tactics as most spyware companies to install stuff without your permission, and with the same excuses. I've stopped allowing Flash on our 300 workstation computers here, and I've banned Flash from the sites we host until I can see Macromedia showing higher level of ethical programming -- namely, I should not need an extension to selectively disable flash.

      I talked to a Flash evangelist about this, and he essentially told me " our real business is showing you ads that you cannot avoid. "

      --
      Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
    3. Re:Flashblock by base3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is that uninstallation addressed in the EULA (which I know no one reads) or is Macromedia engaging in violation of computer fraud and abuse statutes?

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    4. Re:Flashblock by Qwavel · · Score: 1


      Flashblock was my favorite extension, but apparently there are a number of bugs, particularly when used with 0.9, so I stopped using it when I upgraded my FireFox.

      Also, I'd be hesitant to convict MM based on just one user's experience. Flakey stuff happens and often we don't know why. I don't think you should be so quick to come to a conclusion.

    5. Re:Flashblock by Artichoke · · Score: 1


      Yes, you're quite correct wrt the unsound conclusion. As I've said elsewhere in this thread, I've investigated further and eaten my original words.

      --
      __
      Arse
  33. and hosts file. by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

    not only adblock is great. Custom hosts file greatly increases browsing sanity.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  34. stop /.-ing by ssbljk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    stop slashdoting useful web sites

    can't download anything now

    --
    /ss
  35. my extensions: by fadir · · Score: 1

    Tabbrowser Preferences - very useful, nearly everything you can dream of to configure the tab-behaviour
    ReloadEvery - the only reason why I use Firefox, autoreload is a must and just perfect for pages like /.
    Linkification - alot of boards that I use have clickable links disabled for "security reasons". This extension brings back the link.
    googlebar - not really necessary but nice to have
    Dict - not used yet, but sounds promising
    BookmarksHome - great thing, always missed it
    Autofill - not used yet, but sounds good

    Did I miss anything necessary?

    1. Re:my extensions: by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      One extension I've been looking for would allow you to search your open windows and tabs. I have the sessionsaver extension installed, so when I fire up FireFox, it brings up every window and tab that I had open during my last session. Over time, this means I have dozens of windows, and hundreds of tabs open, and it's a pain to click on every tab, looking for a bit of info that I've seen before.

      Anyone know if such an extension exists, or what you'd have to do to write one like it?

  36. Yeah great, but what about... by Begemot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...signed XPI?

    I mean before all those bells and whistles. As a plugin developer i greatly miss them
    (not this, but one that really works).

    And pleaaaaaaase before you tell me it's useless, go ahead and try to convince some Joe user to install "unsigned hence possibly dangerous" plugin.

    1. Re:Yeah great, but what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, the problem is not to get some Joe User to install some "unsinged hence possibly dangerous" plugin.

      If you had any experience with Joe you'd know that in 90% of the cases he will install anyway, even if This will destroy your computer is written all over the screen.

      The problem is that he will install signed plugins even more readily, even though, as can be seen with IE plugins, that are almost all signed even the worst ones, that a plugin is signed doesn't really mean a lot.

      On a side note, I always thought there already is a mechanism to sign plugins for mozilla and firefox. Maybe someone with more knowledge on the subject could clear this up.

    2. Re:Yeah great, but what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr signing is useless. Joe user hasnt got a clue when it comes down to it. As the larson joke goes:

      Joe: Owww prrrty icons, me download...
      What mozilla displays: "This install pack is unsigned and possibly dangerous...."
      What Joe User sees: "blah blah blah blah blah blah"
      Joe: clicks OK. OOOOOoooooooow perrrrty icons.

  37. Re:your step-daughter's a what ?? by ptomblin · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't you be getting to your "Nazis for Bush" meeting?

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  38. mouse gestures by BraveSlice · · Score: 1

    I changed recently from IE to Opera. It took one week to give up using IE by mistake. Opera is far superior for everyday use BUT I still have use IE sometimes when pages are not looking otherwise readable. Two favourite functionalities, without I can not live and well not sure if you really need anything else :) Mouse gestures and mouse zoom for pages with too small print (too common mistake).

    1. Re:mouse gestures by Hast · · Score: 1

      You can get gestures in Mozilla/Firefox with some extentions. My favourite is is Radial Menues which really is a circular menu system and not "gestures" per se. The functionality is the same though, but you get visual feedback as well as text hints. From a useability perspective I guess it's a lot better than plain gestures. (Doesn't look as magical though.)

      Increasing/decreasing font size can be done with ctrl-(+ or -).

      Besides that I personally can't live without tabbed browsing which exist in both Opera and Mozilla.

  39. I haven't switched...my reasons are... by Moderator · · Score: 0

    I haven't switched [from Mozilla Suite], and will not switch anytime soon because I find that: -

    1: Mozilla Suite has an email client.

    2: I can access the same calendar application from both the browser and the email client.

    3: For the most part, Firefox extensions work perfectly on the suite.

    4: I already have junk mail controls set on Mozilla. If I were to import mail into Thunderbird, the first time I run Junk Mail Controls on the folder about half of my emails end up in Trash.

    --
    The World is Yours.
  40. Online articles that are broken into pages... by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

    ...like this one piss me off. Why do I need to read the intro text and then click "Next" to go to page 2? And then later to go to page 3, 4, 5, etc?

    Why do people think it's cool to split articles up into pages like this, making the user click a "Next page" link? Are they aware that web browsers have a veritcal scroll bar? Do they know they could show us the whole thing at once?

    It's not as though simple text will take too long to transfer. Do they just want us to see a wider array of their ads?

    --

    One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
    1. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "Why do I need to read the intro text and then click "Next" to go to page 2?"

      More room for advertising.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    2. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1
      Do they just want us to see a wider array of their ads?

      Yes?

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    3. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by Bagels · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mostly to avoid bandwidth problems - if someone starts reading an article and decides that he/she doesn't like it or isn't interested, the site hasn't already served up the entire article to them (usually just a fourth or a sixth). Also, it gives them an opportunity to flash different ads at you on every page. Finally, if you're in the middle of the article, it makes it harder for you to back out (which is a pain for you, but marketing people would love it).

      --
      --- Bwah?
    4. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      Two reasons, actually. You guessed the "more ads" reason already. A book I read about web design some years ago said that user studies proved that many users either don't like to or don't know how to use scroll bars, and won't scroll down to read more, but will click a "next page" link. That's why MS-NBC (I think it's them) has an opening paragraph and then an advertising graphic but a link at the bottom of the opening paragraph to the rest of the article that just jumps down to the rest of the page below the advertisement.

      I don't know if this reluctance/inability to use scroll bars still true - I suspect it's not, and that web users have gotten a tiny bit more sophisticated, but these big companies have web design guidelines that haven't kept up.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    5. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      They want us to view the ads as many times as possible, but the nicer sites will have a link to a "printer friendly" page where the article is all on one page.

    6. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      "Do they just want us to see a wider array of their ads?" Of course it is about ads. Website content is there for no reason other than to get you to visit the site. The site exists solely as a venue for ads, period. The ads pay the costs associated with operating the site, and make the owners sufficient profit to make it worthwhile to keep the site up. In short, capitalism at work. Gotta love it.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    7. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      Finally, if you're in the middle of the article, it makes it harder for you to back out (which is a pain for you, but marketing people would love it).

      Heh. Whenever I find an article like that linked from /. I always cause page 2 to open in a new tab, then send the first one back to wherever I linked from (unless I'd already opened in a new tab).
      I guess if I was browsing Slashdot from IE then I'd do a similar thing opening into a new window instead.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    8. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1
      "Why do I need to read the intro text and then click "Next" to go to page 2?"

      More room for advertising.

      True, but to be fair most such articles have a "print" mode which displays the entire article in one page, with most of the bells and whistles gone. So look for the printer icon and use it, I sure do.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    9. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The smallest part of the bandwidth is the actuall article you are looking for. Do a "view source" on some of theses sites, and you will see that the navagation bars and ads have more, going by html alone, not their images. If bandwidth had something to do with it, you wouldn't see previous incarnations of the navagation sidebar commented out in the source, but still being downloaded in every page.

    10. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by Hast · · Score: 1

      I believe that was Jakob Nielsen who presented that. Furthermore he has presented new data that show that people now know how to use the scroll bar on his site.

      So those designing WWW pages should know they can't use that excuse any longer. ;-)

    11. Re:Online articles that are broken into pages... by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      From an aesthetic point of view, multiple pages look better.

      But I agree with you. This is one thing I like about The New York Times. Each of their stories has a "view as one page" link, which I often take advantage of.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  41. like thirdvoice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it was thirdvoice back in '99 that had something similar which had lawsuits aflyin'. Amazing how things have settled down. :)

  42. Re:adblock I have a question .... by jdkane · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Advertisers seem to be finding a way around AdBlock by using those floating DHTML ads that fly across your screen and land in the middle of the screen and block the story you're trying to read. (Wow, that's annoying).

    Does anyone know of a way to stop this kind of advertising besides turning off JavaScript in the browser?
    Are there any Firefox extensions in place that can recognize these types of adverts and squash them? There are often enough DHTML layes in a page these days that I assume it's hard to tell the difference between one meant for advertising and another meant to hold helpful content to support the page.

  43. Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea's nice, but for those of us who don't like having a sidebar open all the time, a useful feature to have would be having the information in some kind of drop down box that can be opened/closed depending on when it's wanted.

  44. MOD PARENT DOWN by bani · · Score: 2

    it's a link to yet another 'Gay Nigger Association of America' domain.

  45. Open link in next available tab by gini_ · · Score: 1

    Well since everyone is asking something in this thread I'll ask too :)
    Is it possible to open link in next available tab in mozilla? You see, I may have tabs 1 and 2 reserved for browsing slashdot, 1:st tab for main level comments and 2:nd tab for comment threads. I would like to open threads to 2:nd tab just by clicking a link, not by drag & drop.

    I know its possible to open a link into a new tab but I dont want that because I may have tabs 3,4,5 etc. reserved for something else.

    1. Re:Open link in next available tab by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      If you mean something like, Website A currently in tab 1 website B currently in tab 2. If you click on a link in A, the link appears in tab 2, moving B to tab 3. Click a link on tab 2, link appears in tab 3, moving B to 4 etc.

      Then yes, in the tabbrowser extension preferences, look at the option Open new tab at etc in the Advanced Startup and New tab and change it to Rightside of current tab, or whatever.

      There is another neat little option of colour coding grouped tabs, in the TabGroups option of the tabbrowser extension, which could be useful for you.

  46. Re:technewslive by silverz · · Score: 0

    Better turn down your speaker volume before clicking this one.

  47. MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uses a raial slur towards people of African-American descent. Very offensive.

    1. Re:MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by Mant · · Score: 1

      Uses a raial slur towards people of African-American descent. Very offensive.

      That is what the group is called. It isn't the parent posters fault they called themselves that. They (the parent poster) aren't trolling, just warning users.

      Try this Wikipedia link explaining it.

    2. Re:MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is wrong, wrong wrong!

      You never, ever use a racial slur, even just to repeat the words of others. The poster could have used asterisks or put N-word, but it was horrible to use the word itself!

      We do not need to relive the horrible past of slavery and discrimination, so please have some respect and concern here.

    3. Re:MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I find the use of asterisks or referring to a word by it's first letter HIGHLY OFFENSIVE!!!

      But you didn't consider my feelings before posting did you? I feel positively enslaved by your careless use of offensive language. I hope you're happy now you goddamn facist.

    4. Re:MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by Mant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Getting way off topic here but...

      You never, ever use a racial slur, even just to repeat the words of others.

      You may never, but the rest of the world is generally aware of something called "context". If the poster was using it as an insult, it would be bad. They weren't though.

      Tell me, do you get offended when one black person calls another "nigger" not as an insult? Or even themselves? Or if someone repeated such a conversation to you? It is quite common for minority groups to take insulting terms and reclaim them.

      The poster could have used asterisks or put N-word, but it was horrible to use the word itself!

      Surely it is the concept of slavery and discrimination that is horrible, not the word in a context of a non-insult? If someone wrote "n****r", from context your brain is just going to subsitiute "nigger" anyway. Asteriks and euphamisms are pointless, either you completely obscure what you are trying to say, so why say it, or everyone know what you are saying, so why hide it?

      If you are really that easily offended (and not just trolling as I suspect) then I suggest you avoid Slashdot, and webforums in general, and definately stay clear of usenet.

    5. Re:MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by bani · · Score: 1

      you do realize it was the original AC desperately trying to avoid getting his original post modded down.

      he still failed miserably.

    6. Re:MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't fail miserably, I got several hundreds of hits from that link being posted ans sitting at -1.

      What you don't understand is by creating controversy and being questioning people's logic and forcing them to reply and defend themselves draws even more hits.

      This is the basic premise for trolling. Something that I keep repeating year after year after year yet no one ever catches on to. I guess its human nature. You all want to dutifully "Save the Day" from people like me but you do not realize that you are putting fuel into the fire, not taking it out. I actually got way more hits when my post was at -1 from people wanting to know why there are 10+ replies to it than when it sat at +3 for 10 minutes.

      You want the "secret" to stopping trolls like me? Ignore me. Don't give me what I want - which is tons of controversy and people wasting their time thinking they are somehow stopping me when they really are doing quite the opposite.

      PS, YHBT, YHL, HAND.

    7. Re:MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just wasted your breath on a troll. Good job!

      I bet you feel proud of yourself.

    8. Re:MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, *you* were the one that got trolled there, idiot.

    9. Re:MOD DOWN PARENT - RACIST TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope sorry, I trolled first. You're just mad 'cuz you lost big time.

  48. Re: as opposed to by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    simply surfing to websites to compromise your machine? I agree, there's lots more hoops to jump through to compromise your box with firefox.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  49. Ssshhhhhhh. (Have you tried AdBlock?) by ubiquitin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pssssst. What really revolutionized my browsing and will make it very hard for me to switch away from FireFox is AdBlock. Right-click on any image, flash animation, or iframe, and you can permanently add it to a block list. (Sshhhhh Don't tell anyone, but I don't see ads on slashdot, CNN, NYTimes, or any of my favorite periodicals any more.) If there was a way to keep a centralized list of blocked sites or an easy way to import and export the lists, then you'd have a real-time distributed content-blocking system.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
  50. My extensions by Sunspire · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's some extensions I like that I haven't seen mentioned yet:

    Magpie. Those who've used FlashGet with IE will love this little thing. It'll snatch all the files pointed to by links from a page according to some pattern, for example *jpg, and save them to disk or open them up as tabs. Great for collecting "nature pictures".

    Firefox's bookmark dialog's "Create in" feature pisses me off. It never, ever, has the folders you need in it's puny little drop down. OpenBook removes it and replaces it with the full bookmarks folder tree.

    You can reorder tabs with MiniT using simple drag and drop on the tab bar. I think this should maybe be added to Firefox itself, it's pretty basic functionality.

    --
    It's like deja vu all over again.
    1. Re:My extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox's bookmark dialog's "Create in" feature pisses me off. It never, ever, has the folders you need in it's puny little drop down.

      That's what the little down-arrow button next to the drop-down box is for. It displays the complete tree of bookmark folders.

    2. Re:My extensions by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      MinIT conflicts with another extension I have that I find more useful (I forget what it is now) so I got rid of it.

      I've never seen Maggpie before. Thanks to you, I just installed it. :-)

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  51. WARNING Link in parent fake, non-work safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

    1. Re:WARNING Link in parent fake, non-work safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last two posts just explained that, you redundant dipshit.

      PS, whenver people declare my links to be NSFW/gay porno/etc., my hits usually increase by about 20-40% (I guess people want to see how bad it is!), so all I can say is thanks!

    2. Re:WARNING Link in parent fake, non-work safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they weren't visible when I was posting, go look at the timestamps.

    3. Re:WARNING Link in parent fake, non-work safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you denying that I got more hits when the post sat at -1 with lots of replies from idiots repeating NSFW several times than when it just sat by itself at +3?

      I guess my logs lie to me.

  52. niche markets by soliptic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I like the way it allows the creation of things for niche markets. For example, tarzan.spoox.org is the most comprehensive online discography for drumnbass, and you can get things which let you search tarzan by track/artist/label, from where the google search is.

  53. Re:technewslive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    INTERESTING - Fucking tossers, dont even click on links before modding them up

    MOD PARENT DOWN goatse

  54. Re:technewslive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you so stupid that you can't even read the other replies that have already said that?

    Fucking dimbulb.

  55. While we're on the topic of extensions by jdkane · · Score: 1

    ... does an extension exist that can be used to target the contents of Firefox dialogue boxes elsewhere?

    For example, the Alert box that appears when you type an invalid address like this which brings up the dialogue [xyz could not be found. Please check the name and try again.]

    I would like to have all those types of dialogue messages appear inside one of those seamless alert notice thingies that a lot of software uses nowadays -- the one that appears in the bottom right-hand side of the desktop of application and displays the message (much like some IM programs, the latest Norton AV -- "Automatic updates are complete", etc, etc) and then disappears (usually scrolls off the screen) automatically after a few seconds without any user interaction required.

    1. Re:While we're on the topic of extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just check the about:config option to bring up alerts as web pages instead of dialogues.

    2. Re:While we're on the topic of extensions by jdkane · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip, that's great. For anybody else readin this, the setting to target Firefox error messages into web pages (that normally would appear in dialogue boxes) is

      browser.xul.error_pages.enabled = true

      by accessing the URL: about:config

  56. Warning Parent link is to Goat.sec! and Scat pic! by spineboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    just a warning, if you look at it wash your eyes with gasoline.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  57. Annoying forum bug prevents me... by sracer · · Score: 1

    ...from using Firefox. When posting to forums, Firefox's input text box is way too narrow. FF Developers have said that it is a bug in the html generated by forum software. Both MSIE and Opera handle this "bug" just fine. It is one thing to adhere to a standard, but when it impacts usability, a little flexibility is needed.

    If it weren't for that annoyance, I'd use FF.

    1. Re:Annoying forum bug prevents me... by iamsure · · Score: 1

      Which forum software?

      I regularly post on phpbb, invision, postnuke, phpnuke, slash (like right now), and other forum software's just fine.

      If you mention the forum software, perhaps some coders could help fix the bug where it exists - in the forum software, not in the browser.

    2. Re:Annoying forum bug prevents me... by sracer · · Score: 1

      vBulletin Version 2.3.0, and vBulletin Version 2.3.2 (at least) are two of the culprits. People who follow the FF/Moz support forums suggested to contact the forum owner to upgrade their software to newer versions (that supposedly fix the problem).

      The problem is that the sites that use these versions of software are pretty big, DVDTalk and Brighthand. They're not likely to disrupt service to upgrade in order to provide a fix for the handful of people who use FF/Moz

  58. Re:Warning Parent link is to Goat.sec! and Scat pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey idiotboy, did you fail basic reading comprehension? Four posters just said the same thing before you did.

    How dumb are you? Do you ride the short bus to school? Apparently even retards are given computers and access to Slashdot.

  59. I suspect... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    you'd have to create an "environment value" indicating you used the middle button instead, and all javascript functions triggered by that event should be tabbed.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  60. hardcore kiosk mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "harcore Kiosk mode (that's the reason most kiosks run IE)"

    I have yet to see a IE-based kiosk that I would call secure. The ones in my university library removed all the menus, so you can supposedly only go to sites on their page. If you just hit Ctrl-N you get a new window with all the menus, and an address bar so you can go anywhere you want. Of course you can't actually close that window because it's in kiosk mode, so I usually fix the history, point it to an innocuous site, and minimize it.

  61. Can't get extentions to work by Peale · · Score: 1

    Try as I might, I can't get the bloody things to work! Is there some secret to these?

  62. Re:adblock I have a question .... by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Advertisers seem to be finding a way around AdBlock by using those floating DHTML ads that fly across your screen and land in the middle of the screen and block the story you're trying to read. (Wow, that's annoying).
    Does anyone know of a way to stop this kind of advertising besides turning off JavaScript in the browser?


    You can block the individual JS files that load. Try blocking http://www.tek-tips.com/jsource.js

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
  63. OT I know, but how do you.... by acebone · · Score: 1

    Prevent pop-up windows from being not-resizable ?

    I often use the 'print this page' link - because when reading news it's often a far better layout for reading. Some sites pops up the printer page in a non-resizable puny little window. I'd like to be able to override the non-resizability ?

    --
    Check out my PHP Url Validator
    1. Re:OT I know, but how do you.... by tr3y · · Score: 1

      Create a user.js file inside your profile directory, add this:
      // Make sure all pop-up windows are resizable:
      user_pref("dom.disable_window_open_feature.resiz able", true);

      // Make sure all pop-up windows are minimizable:
      user_pref("dom.disable_window_open_feature.minim izable", true);

    2. Re:OT I know, but how do you.... by acebone · · Score: 1

      Thnx a bundle - u just gotta love Firefox :)

      BTW. I did it thru about:config instead.

      Is there an overview over all these settings somewhere ?

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
  64. Re:If you didn't like those changes, you'll hate t by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

    I love Firesomething ... it really is fun for those who are moderately easy to amuse. Seeing Mozilla Megachinchilla or Mozilla Powerlemur always cracks me up... you can add your own prefixes and animals, too.

  65. The waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is it possiple to have Firefox logging how much time I spend on Slashdot?

  66. Use Firefox "AllOnOnePage" plugin. by Bazman · · Score: 1

    except I haven't written it yet.

    Baz

  67. Extensions in the Default Installation by Phoinix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be much better if they can include at least a couple of the top rated/popular extensions as an option in the custom installation of Firefox's new RC/release?

    As a start, I would like to suggest:
    - "All-in-One Gestures" (very similar to the Opera interface)
    - "Adblock"
    - Target Alert (mentioned above).

    The included extensions should customizable during setup.

    Later, it would be nice if the installer could offer a (dynamically retrieved) list of available extensions.

    Please also post your comments in the Mozillazine forum:
    http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.ph p?f=8

  68. Coral cached link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  69. Target Alert - yuk! by troon · · Score: 1

    File extensions are so 1990s. My site doesn't use them, so TA would be useless there unless it does a HEAD request for every link and looks at the returned media type.

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    1. Re:Target Alert - yuk! by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      That's nice. But most sites aren't yours.....

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  70. Macromedia goes onto the NEVER AGAIN list by obtuse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uninstalling user-installed software? That's unforgivable. Too bad. I used to think Flash was annoying. I guess it's not just flash that sucks, but all of Macromedia.

    Here's a rule of thumb: How much can you afford to annoy your customers? That's exactly how much flash you want to inflict on visitors to your site.

    What proportion of people sit through a flash movie, versus the number who click "skip intro?" I've asked that question a lot, and never gotten an answer. Web developers aren't tracking it. They aren't about to point out that an expensive feature only drives customers away. Nobody is actually looking at those statistics. These irritating time wasters are just put up without any concern for whether they are an asset or a liability.

    Only a few people are so dumb that they are impressed with an online movie that they didn't choose to watch. "Ooh! Looky! Stuff on the screen is MOVING!" Maybe those people are the ideal targets for marketing.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  71. Re:adblock I have a question .... by Ayrehtek · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is also the tried-and-true trick of null-routing the advertisers' domain name(s) to your local host. Just add the following to your hosts file:
    127.0.0.1 server.that.you.are.blocking.com

  72. BugMeNot by Takkuri · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm surprised no one's mentioned BugMeNot yet. It connects to a database of usernames and passwords, allowing you to log in as the public BugMeNot account.

    This is especially useful for a one-time posting on a site, or to read members-only newspapers and things like IGN Insider.

    1. Re:BugMeNot by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      bugMeNot is the proverbial shizznit. Anyone I've shown this to has been impressed.

    2. Re:BugMeNot by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I think it would be better not to mention it...

      Does it hurt members-only sites if people log-in with common usernames? No.

      Does it hurt members-only sites if people see the log-in page and leave? YES!

      This is a case where a little extra convience in the beginning leads to a BIG inconvience later.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:BugMeNot by uncoolcentral · · Score: 1

      My pal used the bugmenot extension, and it automatically posted his web email login and password to the bugmenot site. He only found out about it when alerted by a thorough friend. I'm sure there're some settings with which to screw around, but it's unfortunate that some don't bother. Great extension - if you're careful.

  73. mozilla suite by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    --the browser component, has the animated images turn on or off or adjust times directly in easy for joe user to find preferences where it should be. I don't know why it isn't in firefox, have to ask them boys about that. I want a browser and email and editor, so I run the suite, and will continue to do so as long as mozilla keeps offering it. I always preferred the full netscape communicator over the stand alone navigator anyway... The chat client in Mozilla, ehh, tried it, I still prefer x-chat though, although I'll retry it with every new release, maybe it will get better.

  74. Consider going further by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    There have been too many buffer overflows and exploits in the Flash player for my professional comfort. Policy on my own network is to uninstall Flash from Windows machines. If something comes along like the howstuffworks.com animation of the Prius transmission that justifies running Flash, then it has to be good enough to justify installing Flash.

    >it uninstalled Flashblock for me
    My network policy may get stricter because of this news.

  75. extensions and upgrades by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Informative
    One thing to be careful with...Firefox doesn't handle upgrades well when you have extensions. For example, if you had the Flash blocker (which makes it so you have to explicitly click to play Flash) installed in 0.8x, and upgraded to 0.9x, and let it import your settings, it also imports whatever it is that tells it that Flash is handled by that extension. But you no longer have that extension, so you simply cannot see Flash.

    And since you don't have that externsion...you can't conveniently uninstall it to restore Flash, and since that externsion wasn't available for 0.9x you could not reinstall it (it may have since become available). What you had to do was poke around in Firefox's files and figure out what to delete to remove the extension. Yuck!

    So, before doing a major upgrade, uninstall all extensions.

    1. Re:extensions and upgrades by typhoonius · · Score: 3, Informative

      it also imports whatever it is that tells it that Flash is handled by that extension

      That'd be userChrome.css, in the chrome directory of your profile directory. Just remove it.

      The Weatherfox extension is pretty neat. It shows you your local weather in your status bar. I showed it to my sister so she wouldn't have to use crappy programs like WeatherBug.

    2. Re:extensions and upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I consider upgrades a good time to start from scratch with a new profile. This avoids possible problems with extensions. All I do is move my old profile (I keep it for a backup), run the new version to get a default profile, then copy a few things over from my old profile (bookmarks, cookies, host permissions). I do have to manually set a lot of options, though. I could copy them over from the old profile, but I don't -- I worry that the settings might have changed in some ways, and it's nice to explore the options in a new version anyway.

    3. Re:extensions and upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shows you your local weather in your status bar.

      Yet another thing done better by windows :).

    4. Re:extensions and upgrades by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      What makes weatherbug "crappy"? I like it. I checked out the Weatherfox extension. It's nice, but you get no where near the detail you get from Weatherbug.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
    5. Re:extensions and upgrades by Jon_Aquino · · Score: 1

      That's why I skimp on extensions and go for *bookmarklets*. Here are my bookmarks and bookmarklets: http://www.geocities.com/jonathan_aquino/bookmarks .html. Firefox has a load-bookmark-as-sidebar feature that is perfect for this narrow page. (Some of the cooler bookmarklets here are text-to-speech on the selected text, and highlighting all occurrences of a regular expression).

  76. Re:Flashblock-ahem by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    ahem why not just not install the player browser plugin?

    or is that somehow too easy?

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  77. Hmm, yes... well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you haven't made the switch to Mozilla Firefox it may be because you aren't aware of the great benefits Firefox has over IE." Insensitive clod! I use Safari, over which Firefox has NO benefits for me whatsoever. IE? What's that?

  78. Re:Warning Parent link is to Goat.sec! and Scat pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently even retards are given computers and access to Slashdot.

    You can spot them by how they feel compelled to reply to redundant posts insulting the posters, without realising there is a short time delay between them and it is easy to make a redundant post becuase you never saw the previous ones.

  79. Better version of miniT by superyooser · · Score: 2, Informative
    I like miniT, which lets you rearrange the tabs. There's an improved version of the original.
    miniT (drag+indicator) is a modification of Dorando's miniT (drag) which adds an indicator to where the tab will be inserted when you drop it. Installing it will replace the original miniT (drag).
  80. Extension manager still has problems by jeti · · Score: 1

    The new extension manager was rushed out with Firefox 0.9, and had a number of major bugs. While most of those have been fixed, some problems seem to persist.

    This is really frustrating. I am the developer of a Firefox extension. Problems with installing and uninstalling get blamed on it. However, extensions for Firefox 0.9+ no longer contain any installer or uinstaller code.

  81. Are you sure about that? by bogie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Flashblock has received a ton of complaints about it not working or Flash sites stopping working etc. Many people seem to think its a buggy extension. Plus considering 90%+ of users use IE I'm surprised they would go to that length for a minority used browser and an even more minority used extension.

    Anyway if what you said is true that's aweful and probably illegal to boot. I'd verify what you think is happening is really happening or at least get someone else to verify it. Then file complaints with Macromedia and then spread the word to the big tech sites. Start with the Mozillazine forums first though and make sure that you can get others to reproduce this.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Are you sure about that? by Artichoke · · Score: 1

      The sequence of events was:

      1) Flashblock was installed and working
      2) I installed Flash Player from the Macromedia site
      3) Flashblock no longer functioned or showed up in Firefox's Extensions window
      4) I tried re-installing Flashblock. The installation process appeared to ruyn okay, but resulted in the same situation as (3).
      5) I downloaded the XPI file, modded it to install under a <i>nom de guerre</i>
      6) It installed and functions okay
      If anyone can try replicating this I'd be grateful. Any ideas on uninstalling Flash Player 7?
      --
      __
      Arse
    2. Re:Are you sure about that? by Pausanias · · Score: 1

      I've been using Flashblock on Mozilla since it first came out a few years ago. I have never had any problems with it. The most important thing to remember about flashblock is that it doesn't block flash---it was originally named "Flash Click to View," and that's just what it does. For example, I like to view the New York Times's multimedia specials, which are done in flash. I can block most garbage flash content with Flashblock but still view the NYT materials.

      The only issue I've ever had with flashblock is that under some systems (Mozilla 1.7 Mac user here), it doesn't want to install under the user's profile. It will only work when installed while running Mozilla as root. No big deal---just do a sudo open -a /Application/Mozilla.app, install Flashblock, and then quit. It will then work for most users running as themselves.

      I love Flashblock. And yes, Macromedia is evil for disallowing selective viewing of Flash content. And even more evil for uninstalling Flashblock, if that's true. May they join their buddies at MS in a very, very hot place.

    3. Re:Are you sure about that? by Artichoke · · Score: 1
      > And even more evil for uninstalling Flashblock, if that's true. I am ashamed to discover that it is not true. Abject apologies to Macromedia.

      I've failed to entirely recreate my previous findings. My best guess is that Flashblock lets some through its net and I mistook this for Flash Player circumventing Flashblock. Yes, Flash Click To View is a better name, if more unwieldy.

      --
      __
      Arse
    4. Re:Are you sure about that? by Artichoke · · Score: 3, Informative
      > And even more evil for uninstalling Flashblock, if that's true.

      I am ashamed to discover that it is not true. Abject apologies to Macromedia.

      I've failed to entirely recreate my previous findings. My best guess is that Flashblock lets some through its net and I mistook this for Flash Player circumventing Flashblock.

      Yes, Flash Click To View is a better name, if more unwieldy.

      --
      __
      Arse
    5. Re:Are you sure about that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is one of those posts that few people will see because it'll never get modded up and the story is already low on the front page, but anyway...

      My experience with this extension was that the first version was decent, but couldn't block all flash (I've heard that this is due to a bug in Firefox itself) and lacked some features that would have been nice (especially white-listing). The second version blocked more things (some kind of work-around, I guess), and had a nicer looking replacement button, but overall it was a big step down. It would display the flash animation briefly before replacing it, so I guess it didn't block downloading like the first one did. But the biggest problem was that it made it impossible to view a flash animation locally. If I had a .swf file that I had downloaded, and I opened it in the browser, it would be replaced with the Flashblock button, and clicking it didn't do any good.

      I stopped using Flashblock at this point and went to Adblock instead. It's better in some ways, worse in others, but they are considering adding Flashblock-like functionality down the road, and I expect they'll do it right.

  82. Re:adblock I have a question .... by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a way to stop this kind of advertising besides turning off JavaScript in the browser?

    Try emailing them and telling them. Then stop visiting their site. Websites depend on traffic and ads like that and the ones that happen during a page transition are the kind of thing that make my blood boil.

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  83. Page Down Problems? by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

    I use the PageUp/PageDown keys a lot on my notebook...but it seems the cursor always gets hung up in a frame or on a graphic.

    Any way to fix that?

  84. Flash as DOS by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Flash plug-in on Mac is such that under Mozilla it causes high CPU usage. A webpage with several Flash ads on a G3-class Mac will peg the CPU at 100% effectively DOS-ing your browser. You lose any browser context you have, hence dataloss.

    So, flashblock is mandatory on these computers.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  85. Some more good ones by Fredge · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's some more extensions I use that I haven't seen mentioned.

    Dictionary Search: Lets you set up various online encyclopedias and dictionaries (e.g. Wikipedia, M-W.com) so you can highlight any word in a website, right click and get a definition for it.

    Allow Right-Click: Allows you to right click on sites/objects that have that option disabled.

    IEView: Adds the option to open the page in IE to the right-click context menu for those few sites who won't come out of the stone ages and believe MS is the end-all, be-all of browsers.

    Basics: Adds a button to the tab bar to open new tabs. This was available in Mozilla and I missed it when I first moved to Firefox.

    Unclose Tab: Sometimes I'll close the wrong tab by mistake. This extension allows you to right click the tab bar and re-open a tab you just closed.

  86. Re:Flashblock-ahem by Artichoke · · Score: 1

    Sometimes Flash is either useful or necessary. Mostly it's neither.

    --
    __
    Arse
  87. *cough* ShowOldExtensions *cough* by Azureflare · · Score: 1
    You will love this extension then:

    Show Old Extensions 0.1.6

  88. Money back? by Etone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >> it has been something thats bugged me from day one.
    >So ask for your money back.

    Yeah, and since IE came to me free of charge too, I guess I can't complain about that either, huh?

    It's this kind of "the-software-was-free-so-love-it-or-else" attitude that impedes FOSS progress. Making something free doesn't make it bulletproof or impervious to critique.

    -E-

    1. Re:Money back? by tonyr60 · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, and since IE came to me free of charge too"

      IE cannot come to anyone free of chage now. It sort of used to when it was available for Solaris and a few people could get Solaris for nix. But now you cannot legitimately be using IE without having paid money to Microsoft.

  89. Prepositions can end sentences too by uptownguy · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the tip on the infinitive. I hadn't had my morning coffee yet and it showed. You are correct. The "to" that went with "to do" was part of an infinitive. If I had been sharper, I would have included infinitives in my post to the AC. As for ending sentences with a preposition: there is nothing in English that prevents sentences from ending in a preposition. I would invite you to google at your leisure. You will discover that your high school english teacher was wrong and/or a snob. I am too lazy to do more than include these two links which I now point you to:

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/words/prepositions. html

    http://www.grammartips.homestead.com/prepositions2 .html

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  90. Target Altert Extension by cuban321 · · Score: 1

    This target alert extension looks really cool. Too bad I just installed it in Linux, restarted and see nothing.

    I gave up on extensions a long time ago in
    Linux, I don't know if they work in Windows or what but 90% do not work right in Linux. Right now the only one I use that works is the bugmenot extension.

    1. Re:Target Altert Extension by cuban321 · · Score: 1

      In fact, now it won't let me uninstall! Not only does it not work, but it won't remove from my extensions list!

    2. Re:Target Altert Extension by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      I'm running Windows 2000 and 90% of the extensions I've tried, work (like they are supposed to).

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  91. No, I haven't switched because Firefox is Broke!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason I personally have not switched is because I can't view most of the sites I want to frequent - at least not with Active X enabled, which is quite a pain.

    And I don't like little boxes with X's in them because my extension is incompatible.

    Stop assuming that the reason why Firefox isn't used is because we're all stupid.

  92. A good idea - But by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

    Extensions are a great idea - in theory. However, in reality there is a serious problem.

    The Mozilla/Firefox developers keep changing basic structures in the program and as a result, each new release tends to break many themes/extensions. This problem is further compounded when the creator of an extension doesn't constantly release new versions of their extension (because they have a life, or just lost interest or whatever).

    As a long time Mozilla user this is becoming quite annoying.

  93. Who mourns for Flash? by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was one of those people that installed Firefox over a version with Adblock and Flash Click to View installed. Now, my Firefox can't see Flash files and I have to fire up Mozilla 1.31 when I want to play Defend Your Castle or something.

    At first, I was kind of annoyed about this, but then I began to realize how many ads aren't showing up. There are all kinds of stupid flash things out there, and I don't have to see them anymore. Now, I just tell people that I broke my Flash on purpose.

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to fire up Moz. 1.31 and go fling some stick figures so hard that they go splat behind my castle.

    --

    Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
    1. Re:Who mourns for Flash? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem when moving from Mozilla 1.6 w/ 'Flash Click to View' installed to Firefox. Try deleting (or renaming) the UserContent.css file in the ~/.mozilla/default/$RANDOM.slt/chrome directory.

  94. No It's Not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you want to tell that to Samuel Clemens aka Mark Twain? Ask him to rewrite The Adventures of Tom Sawyer because you're hyper-sensitive. Mark Twain only used racial slurs because he was writing a period book and like it or not, that was the status quo.

    Aren't you the same type of jerk that nagged everyone not to depict the Twin Towers after 9/11, even to change pre-shot scenes. I was enraged when people got upset at the fact the title of "Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers" could be compared with the Sears Twin Towers and tried to have the name changed.

    Art is art and you may not agree with it, but you should respect an artists ability to express themselves how they wish. I don't say "nigger" in regular conversation but if I was writing a period piece of literature, I wouldn't mind saying it because readers should respect my freedom to express myself.

  95. Firefox is *missing* some key functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its missing that part where people can take over your computer through exploits that seem to be inherent in IE.

    I really miss that feature. I really miss the weekly security patches to keep IE from eating my system alive.

    And ActiveX. Oh my, its so wonderful, html is so limiting, but with ActiveX, my browser can do anything to my computer that anybody else wants it to. Isn't that really really cool?

    So I can see why you miss IE.

  96. Why don't most of these work on Mozilla? by mbourgon · · Score: 1

    For work I use Firefox. But on my home machine I use Mozilla, since I actually like having browsing and mail handy. But several of these that I tried to install said "no install script found". What gives?

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    1. Re:Why don't most of these work on Mozilla? by Hast · · Score: 1

      AFAIK Firefox uses the new plug-in engine and will replace Mozilla in the future. Because of this many extention makers do only a Firefox version since that is what "power users" have anyways.

      I'm not sure in what version the Mozilla browser will be completely replaced with Firefox.

  97. Re:your step-daughter's a what ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you know, homosexuals are morally superior to those hetros?
    As a Democrat I can honeslty say Hetroes are Der Juden.

  98. I use Opera you insensitove clod by Shinglor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you haven't made the switch to Mozilla Firefox it may be because you aren't aware of the great benefits Firefox has over IE

    Or because you use Opera, Safari, Mozilla, Konqueror, Camino or OmniWeb. IE and Firefox are not the only two browsers out there.

  99. Firefox switch. by bob+beta · · Score: 1

    What I haven't done is make the switch to Firefox from Mozilla. Because I like the ability to do things like cut/paste/save formatted web content, and casually compose web pages.

    Why did they remove the Composer component of Mozilla in Firefox? Why is Firefox being heralded, when it's just another consumer-grade browser engineered to discourage content creation.

    Here's to the full Mozilla suite, forever.

    1. Re:Firefox switch. by Pausanias · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely... I've been running Mozilla since 0.9? and I'll never switch. I use all parts of it frequently, except chatzilla. Long live the (monstrously) big gecko!

    2. Re:Firefox switch. by zarpa11 · · Score: 1

      yeah, I like the suite better than firefox

      --
      "In America, you can always find a party. In Russia, party always finds you."
    3. Re:Firefox switch. by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      Eventually you'll be left in the dust from a technology standpoint. Mozilla plans to stop developing the suite and focus on individual components. They will maintain it, but not develop it

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
    4. Re:Firefox switch. by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      Why did they remove composer from Firefox? They didn't. It was never there to begin with.

      Thew whole point of Firefox, Thunderbird, Sunbird and (standalone) Composer is that less bulk is better.

      Personally I've never liked having to load an email program, and html editor when all I wanted to do was look at a web site. I never liked that about Netscape years ago and I don't like it about Netscape (and Mozilla) now.

      I was thrilled when Firefox came out. Played with all the major players on Windows recently (Mozilla Suite, Firefox, Opera and IE) and the bottom line is, Firefox boasts the best feature/bloat balance of the bunch.

      And the Mozilla swuite will be around forever, it just won't be developed (just maintained).

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  100. Standards? What standards? by isomeme · · Score: 1

    And how precisely does Firefox know that a given link leads to a PDF file (or doesn't lead to one, for that matter)? Content type is determined by examining the response header, not the URL. Failing to obey this rule is the cause of endless browser woes.

    It may be the case that guessing based on extension gives the right answer often enough to make this extension useful, but users should beware of trusting it completely.

    (Note that the mailto: check *is* entirely safe, since that's a protocol check on the URL itself.)

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  101. Why switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you haven't made the switch to Mozilla Firefox it may be because you aren't aware of the great benefits Firefox has over IE.

    No, it is because I'm not aware of the great benefits Firefox has over Opera.

    Opera is small and self-contained. I don't have to download anything else to have features like mouse gestures, custom searches, opening selected text as a link, or autorefresh, nor do I have to worry about a browser upgrade breaking half of my third-party extensions.

    Sure, there are plenty of extensions that do things Opera doesn't, but I don't need a Wiki in my sidebar; I don't need to Nuke Anything; and I certainly don't need to play interactive fiction games in my browser.

  102. Too bad... by Crouching+Turbo · · Score: 1

    ... almost every extension I've tried had produced unstable behavior from Mozilla. Now I stick to the default, although admittedly I miss the extension behavior.

  103. You young whippersnappers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my day, we used Mosaic, had to slough uphill thru 3 feet of snow to reach the computer, and liked it!

  104. needed extension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One to block any line of text containing the phrase "free ipod".

    p.s. if you can't read the line above, can you tell me what extensions you're using...

  105. Why drag an Indian Doctor in to this?? by raj2569 · · Score: 0, Troll

    You might have lost a job due to outsourcing, but blame it on your president/congress/CEO and spare the poor Indians!

    raj

    --
    Sarovar.org Hosting for open source projects in Indi
    1. Re:Why drag an Indian Doctor in to this?? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I wasn't actually thinking about the job side of it.

      It was an extreme example of "mission critical" - We don't have the infrastructure, skills or technology to deal with local surgery by IP, let alone internationally.

      There are a remarkable amount of jobs where offsite working is a tremendous benefit, there are also jobs which work better with local knowledge, and I do blame the management for moving the wrong ones.

      On that subject, how would management react if the outsourcing happened to them? :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  106. So now it's as insecure as IE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " 5. Plugins that allow me to put just about anything on the toolbars "

    Excuse me, but has everyone gone quite mad!? If we were talking about IE, everyone here would be tearing strips off them for the way BHOs are a terrible vulnerability, are full of spyware and trojans, and one of the worst mistakes since ActiveX. So why isn't everyone saying the same? It's the same situation and the same mistake, and you're all acting like a bunch of M$ users talking about the wonderful toolbar they've just downloaded for their browser that tells the time / checks the weather / pops up useful offers and adverts whenever you do a search.

  107. A database which prevents the site from working? by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

    Good thing the database has a problem so we can visit a working site.

  108. RETRACTION by Artichoke · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've investigated this further and can't reproduce my results.

    My best guess is that Flashblock is not hooking all the possible ways of triggering a Flash object, and I mistook this for untoward behaviour by the latest Flash Player.

    Abject apologies to Macromedia.

    --
    __
    Arse
    1. Re:RETRACTION by base3 · · Score: 1

      Noted--thanks for being honest enough to post the later results. Now I can put away my pitchforks and torches, too :).

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    2. Re:RETRACTION by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Well that's good.

      One would hope that any kind of plugin installer that's built into Firefox wouldn't allow that plugin to kill extensions. Now if it's an OS native installer, that's another story.

  109. That's cool by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    I haven't switched [from Konqueror], and will not switch anytime soon

    That's perfectly KO--the main thing is, you haven't gone back to Windows and IE.

    I think all of these intra-OSS browser wars, while perhaps useful for creating a bit of competition, ultimately can do greater harm to browser development. Instead of poaching users from other non-IE browsers, one purpose of these OSS browsers should be to get enough people off IE that Microsoft no longer has a browser monopoly. Gecko-based browsers are good. KHTML-based browsers are good. I personally use the latest version of Galeon; many others here use Firefox on Windows. Ultimately, the pages we look at should all look close to the same, and not require the use of proprietary, OS-specific extensions or allowances for bad coding practices, like IE often does.

    If the new browsers can become widespread enough that the IE monopoly is cracked, webpage writers will have to write standards-compliant pages that don't require MS-only functionality, lest they lock out, say, 20% of their potential market. Once that happens, there will be fewer IE-only coders going into corporate settings to design intranets, fewer people growing up on writing VB apps for their own uses before going into the corporate world, presenting an even greater threat to the other MS monopoly--the desktop.

    I use Galeon, you use Konq--neither of us use IE, and that's a good thing.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  110. I once saw a plugin to solve this somewhat by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

    I often find myself using keyboard for everything else than clicking "next page" when I read a long article split across multiple pages. Having to use the mouse for navigation to next page is really an annoyance.

    Around version 0.5, I saw a plugin to solve this somewhat. I have been searching for it ever since without any luck.

    This plugin was able to recognize typical variations of links leading to "next page", and then you could go to that page with a keyboard shortcut.

    Anyone who knows what happened to that plugin?

    1. Re:I once saw a plugin to solve this somewhat by juhaz · · Score: 1

      It's not quite as handy as what you're describing, but extensions that have (mostly) been designed for pr0n also work somewhat for that with the most common format that has numbered pages in url.

      For example magpie lets you specify a part of url (numeric) that changes and go to next/previous with ctrl+shift+x/z

  111. What about search engines? by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    Customizable search plugins are another really great feature. How come nobody has mentioned them?

    If you're a power user and you want a bunch of extensions that put you in immediate browser heaven try these :

    1) Adblock (block ads) from update.mozilla.org
    2) Tabbrowser Extensions (supercharged tabbed browsing) from extensionroom.mozdev.org
    3) Mousegestures (mouse & rocker gestures) from update.mozilla.org
    4) WebDeveloper (a must for anyone curious about a web page's construction) from update.mozilla.org
    5) Bug Me Not (no need to register with those pesky sites like NY Times - requires Java tho)
    6) Foxytunes (control Winamp/XMMS/Noatun/Windows Media Player/RealPlayer or any other Linux/Win media player from Firefox) from update.mozilla.org
    7) PasteAndGo (no more pasting a URL and then hitting "Go" or hitting Enter) from update.mozilla.org

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    1. Re:What about search engines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you don't want to install Java to have a convenient link to Bugmenot, there's always the bookmarklet, to be found in the Bugmenot FAQ. I haven't used the extension, but the bookmarklet more than suffices for my needs.

  112. A very good extension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be Stumble Upon. You get a community of like minded users AND discover pages that they like.

  113. How about an easy way to save your configuration? by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like how I have everything set up in Firefox. All of my favorite extensions, rss feeds, booksmarks, etc. Is there an easy way to back this all up? I'd also like to configure a single install package that install all of the extensions I want. Possibly by saving the extension files in subfolders?

  114. Re:Ssshhhhhhh. (Have you tried AdBlock?) by OneFix · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try the filters listed here. They block most ads for most people and very little else. The only one I've found a problem with is IMP...it has a "redirect.php" script that it runs on login which triggers one of the filters. I think there should be an adblock exclution list. It's actually interesting how popular adblock has remained even though there hasn't been a major update since at least Firefox 0.7...

    I would think someone would have designed a new extention with more bells and whistles.

  115. Reason I won't switch to Firefox... by rtilghman · · Score: 0


    1. Freezes periodically (more frequently than acceptable) on NYT.com.

    For me its a showstopper since I read the Times online everyday. what happens is that a single window will freeze and then all windows will subsequently freeze and I'll have to kill the entire program to recover the browser. Absolutely HORID to loose all your windows on a regular basis, especially when you open 20 articles ahead of time to read them.

    I think it has something to do the ads that NYT runs and Firefox tries to kill (pop-ups, etc). Anyway, Windows XP/Firefox 0.9.1/p4 2.4 512mb.

    -rt

    1. Re:Reason I won't switch to Firefox... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you should certainly try upgrading to FireFox 0.9.3. That could end up fixing whatever is wrong.

  116. My favorite by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    And one I never see mentioned, spellbound. It allows one to right click on a webpages text entry box, and do a spellcheck on what has been typed.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
    1. Re:My favorite by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      AMEN! That has got to be my #1, most used extension. Especially since Usenet seems to be on it's last legs these days...

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  117. I will use it regularily when.. by HumanTorch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They fix the memory usage problem in Windows. You know, when Firefox hasn't been in focus for a while, its virtual memory is really large compared to the mem usage (in Taskbar) and when you switch to it it sits there for a few dozen seconds slooooowly increasing its mem usage. I KNOW Windows is capable of allocating a GB of memory in a few seconds, so what the heck is the problem?

    1. Re:I will use it regularily when.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Windows requires 512MB of ram at entry level for the average desktop, atleast 1GB is best if you want to open more then a couple of of windows at once. Now that memory is cheap Windows finally runs decently for every-day use. At work i sometimes use an old win95 machine with about 32MB of ram (which was a shit load back then) - loading IE is painful on that :(

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:I will use it regularily when.. by Rassendyll · · Score: 1

      I'll add my bit here. Firefox is great on my Linux box with 768MB of RAM, but when running it on my old decrepit win2000 laptop, I find the memory usage renders it useless. The laptop only has 64MB of RAM and Firefox uses ~33MB even when I only have one simple text based page loaded. Mozilla 1.7.2 runs much faster on the same machine as it's memory usage runs from ~5MB to ~16MB depending on how many tabs I have open and how complicated the pages are. I haven't had time to experiment to try to find the cause. Has anyone else noticed this?

      --
      An eye for an eye... leaves the whole world blind.
    3. Re:I will use it regularily when.. by HumanTorch · · Score: 1

      I have 1GB of physical memory on my W2K box.. and there is always lots of free memory when this happens. It seems the rate at which Firefox reclaims memory is artificially low.

      Having said that the overall memory use is quite good - certainly less than the same number of IE windows open.

  118. Ssshhhhhhh. ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite is the "ad blocker" blocker :-)
    http://www.blue.lu/other/blocker/ or http://www.adblock.org/

  119. What about a tiny goat icon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or a nuke icon, btw?

    A virus icon for those intelligent M$ users? Or, maybe, a "click here if you're a man" icon for malignant links... >;-P

  120. scrolling in thinkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone figured out how to get their thinkpad's middlebutton/scrollbutton to do horizontal scrolling with their trackpoint (just like the vertical scrolling)?

  121. Bigups by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Extensions rock! but unfortunately allot of them arn't all in one place - you gotta look! :( what im missing from opera is tabs that depress when you click them (yeah i know its stupid but its an interface thing - you need to make it look like somethings happening the instant you click) and what i really loved about opera is that if it crashed it would save the session automatically! any ideas?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  122. MOD PARENT DOWN by danila · · Score: 1

    Mode parent down, he is a free ipod spammer.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  123. Sage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the best way to stay current with the slashdot rss feed

  124. Mission Critical by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    One could be using Firefox on a corporate intranet for some web-based accounting software, could one not?

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  125. Subscribe to SlashDot FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my favorite extention is AdBlock, it's like having a subscription to SlashDot, only it's FREE!

  126. Re:Warning Parent link is to Goat.sec! and Scat pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, several minutes is a "short time delay". I always tell my boss that when I arrive to work 17 minutes late. For some reason, he doesn't agree with you and me on that issue.

  127. Re:your step-daughter's a what ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a look in your Bible. God is completely fine with lesbians, it only says that 'a man lying with a man is an abomination'.

    Strange that a book written by a bunch of men is A-OK with lesbians.

  128. "If you haven't made the switch to Mozilla Firefox it may be because you aren't aware of the great benefits Firefox has over IE."

    It's because I'm not aware of any great benefits over Opera.

    And yes, I use the ad-supported version.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  129. We're Too Lazy to Mouse Over? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    "my favorite is the Target Alert extension which displays a small graphic next to links that are not web pages. For example a mailto: link will display a small envelope, a link to a PDF file will display a small Adobe icon, etc."

    Although I will admit I get caught by the PDF links sometimes. It would be better if the site designer carefully noted in his text which links are to non-Web pages. That works in ANY browser.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:We're Too Lazy to Mouse Over? by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the fact is they usually don't. Therefore, that extension rocks.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  130. Security, lightweight, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am kind of amazed by the fact nobody seems to mention those two issues (quick search on 3 pages at +2). Granted those are not features.

  131. I like it by wldkos · · Score: 1

    Hell yeah, it works great. Long live firefox

  132. I love Firefox by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    I just don't like the fact that every time I upgrade Firefox to a new version, I lose all my extensions and I have to download them all over again. Fbog!

    Will it kill them to have a feature to download the latest version of extensions during an upgrade?

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:I love Firefox by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      I've only had that happen once. When I went from .09 to 0.9. But then they said they'd changed the extension manager so this would be necessary.

      Otherwise prior to that and since then I've never lost (most of) my extensions. That generally only happens if you install the extension in the application instead of the (a) user profile.

      Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040803 Firefox/0.9.3

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  133. Re:polls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chances are, your not rich enough for a tax break anyway, asshole

  134. Moji and Toolbar Enhancements by jarsyl · · Score: 1
    Two more great extensions I haven't seen mentioned.
    • Toolbar Enhancements adds many features to the toolbar. My favorite is that it allows me to put my navigation buttons in the tab bar, conserving valuable screen space.
    • Moji is a Japanese->English lookup sidebar
  135. OT: alternatives to weather.com by varebel · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to think Weather.com was the coolest thing since sliced bread. Of course, it took Firefox's popup blocking along with the Adblock extension to make browsing it tolerable.

    However, since discovering the following resources, I don't even bother with Weather.com anymore.

    http://www.weather.gov/
    http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/
    http://weather.unisys.com/

    These sites offer much more in-depth technical information and are not funded by ad revenue.

    1. Re:OT: alternatives to weather.com by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

      Let's compare for my town... weather.com: Fremont, CA will be 90F tommorow... cooling down a bit. weather.gov forwards me to the noaa.gov site... it says it'll be 102F tomorrow. Finally unisys... 68F. Wow!

      Somewhere between weather.com and weather.gov the local thermometers agreed, for todays high.

    2. Re:OT: alternatives to weather.com by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      While it's not free-as-in-beer, wunderground.com is more than worth the $5 a year I pay to a) dispense with the ads, and b) get full-on animations of radar images. It's the most in-depth, technical, detailed weather site I have ever seen. Granted, different regions have different levels of detail (here in NC I get forecast of the humidity in three hours blocks, while my mom in Waikiki gets just temp for the day I think), but for my needs, it's unbeatable. A friend is a flight instructor and says that while his more technical charts and forecasts are a bit better in theory, wunderground.com does the job for him, too.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  136. Re:Ssshhhhhhh. (Have you tried AdBlock?) by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

    It uses regular expressions. Very little (If anything, you can always just add &&!site to the end of the math parts of the regexes to "whitelist") needs to be ubdated.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  137. Re:Ssshhhhhhh. (Have you tried AdBlock?) by OneFix · · Score: 1

    While writing a regex for most ppl here isn't a problem, it isn't easy for the majority of the general public. The point is that making AdBlock easier to use would make it an option for more mainstream users.

  138. Re:adblock I have a question .... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a way to stop this kind of advertising besides turning off JavaScript in the browser?

    Yeah, don't visit the site and send the feedback department a nasty letter. Float-over ads like that should be considered a traffic killer and avoided.

  139. Re:Standards? What standards? by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

    You're right thate. That extension sees a word ending in "doc" and if that word is hyperlinked it assumes it's a Word Document and adds the "W" logo.

    So, it's not perfect, but then, you get what you pay for.

    --
    Scott

    ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  140. Re:Ssshhhhhhh. (Have you tried AdBlock?) by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

    As usual, I'm in the minority. But of all the extensions you can get for Firefox, Adblock is not one that I bother with.

    I really don't mind ads. As long as they are not popups (and Firefox's built-in popup blocker kills most of those) I'm cool.

    --
    Scott

    ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  141. Re:Standards? What standards? by Hast · · Score: 1

    As has been mentioned before the extention is only used to give the user a hint on what link it is. Mozilla/Firefox will naturally do a proper determination if the link is hit.

    It would be possible to do a real MIME lookup but that would cause unnecessary load on the receiving WWW server. I guess HTTP1.1 allows multiple requests so coupled with only headers it wouldn't be that bad. Still since it's not exactly critical I don't see the point in doing that.

  142. Mozilla as a window manager? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Has anybody seriously considered this? Does anyone know what would be involved in creating it? A window manager that's as easily extensible as Firefox would be great... does it exist and I just dont know what to google for? Seems like the kind of thing somebody would have at least tried and given up on by now. Only reference I've found is somebody else saying it would be neat, and doing nothing about it. (guys like me are everywhere, I guess :)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  143. Google's PageRank extension by zboubi · · Score: 1

    That's my favorite extension for firefox : Google Pagerank extension.

  144. Re:Ssshhhhhhh. (Have you tried AdBlock?) by ubiquitin · · Score: 1

    You may not be in the minority - it could be me. With a 400mghz laptop as my primary machine, if a web page loads one of those damned .swf ads, then my whole web experience slows to a crawl. Being able to effectively kill off those ads makes web browsing enjoyable again.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
  145. Plugin to save your tabs when you exit or crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using a combination of Avant and Opera for a while now, and i love the idea of firefox (web dev tools especially) but until i can find a plugin that keeps my tabs i can't switch over to it as my main browser.

    Avant and Opera both remember which pages you had open, so if you exit (or better yet if it crashes) when you restart the browser they give you an option of continuing where you left off.

    I just can't live without this these days, and i'm sure there must be aplugin that does it. Anyone?

  146. More sweet extensions by JPyObjC+Dude · · Score: 1
    Some more unmentioned nice extensions:
  147. innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is always saying that open source projects only copy and never innovate. Well, I guess Foxfire extensions pretty well disprove that claim.

  148. Re:Ssshhhhhhh. (Have you tried AdBlock?) by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

    You say I may not be?

    --
    Scott

    ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  149. Slashdot can't code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot can't code worth shit, it's an article about firefox, and it doesn't even load right!

    shame on you slashdot!

  150. No problem in Mozilla 1.7 by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I gave up on Firefox around 0.8 because it was crashing too often the same week Mozilla 1.7 came out. Moz's been pretty reliable, though of course Slashdot and a few other web sites often render incorrectly because somebody's playing games with vertical spacing, but a redraw usually fixes that.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  151. Firefox vs. Mozilla 1.7 - Why Switch? by billstewart · · Score: 1
    I'm currently running Mozilla 1.7, because Firefox was too flaky around 0.8. Is there any reason I should switch back? (Of course it's worth switching from IE to Moz or FF whenever possible - I'm trying to ask the harder question here.)

    Firefox was a bit faster, but not really that much, and it would occasionally crash, losing all my tabs and windows, which very seldom happens on Mozilla. It was nice to have extensions (most of the Firefox extensions don't work on Mozilla), but very few of them were that important compared to not crashing.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  152. My Favorite Extensions by shantanuo · · Score: 1
    • Session Saver: remembers all the open tabs and opens them all next time.
    • Clone Window: When you use Ctrl + t for new tab you can copy the current URL
    • Nuke Anything: Remove a paragraph before printing or saving.
    • Nuke Image: Remove image before printing.
    • UndoClosetab: Recover the closed tab
    • QuickNote: Select the text from web, right click and select "Send to Quicknote" or use Ctrl F7 to activate quicknote
    • deskCut: The 'Create Shortcut' context menu item like IE
    • Deepest Sender: Post to Live Journal blog.
    • StockTicker: Display the current stock price in the status bar!