Conclussion:
1.- Bush knew there were no WMD, so he lied.
2.- Bush was fooled to think that, so he is incompetent.
As I said, he has a brilliant mind. He is so awesome, and don't think twice about it. He managed to start a war with no reason (either being incompetent or clearly lying) AND getting re-elected. That's what I would call *impressive*.
Do not forget Kopete if you're a KDE user, it is nicely integrated with the system. You can compile it without KDE dependences (QT is needed, though) if you use another DE / WM. Not available for win32 withouth doing nasty things with cygwin.
Would somebody please explain how AOL thinks users who can't install the full AOL client on their workstations thanks to sysadmin-imposed policies will be able to get the AOL Browser installed?
Firefox already does this, at least when using the Linux installer. It simply installs to the users's home dir.
However, if the access policies include verifying the running apps in the system, and only allow certified ones, the system is useless.
I didn't know you were also commenting here, and I would like to post my post to your article at Linux Gamers:
*** START PASTING
I experienced some problems on gaming using custom kernels, specially ones running the koliva's patchset (like ck or nitro). Last time it was with Vendetta Online (low framerates and specially choppy sound). They're mostly caused by buggy task schedulers.
Keep in mind that those patchsets are often very very buggy. I remember specially huge 3D perfomance lows when running 2.6.7-nitrox (they have all the CK patchset).
Half of the issues I had with gaming went when I upgraded to 2.6.9-nitro1. The rest, when upgrading to the last nvidia drivers.
Have you tried to run hl2 against a kernel.org kernel or a 2.6.x kernel from Debian Sarge/Sid? I think that you should REALLY try that. The cedega thing is VERY sensitive to kernel issues (like any cpu intensive app).
END PASTING ***
We have both daily and scientific evidence of gravity.
We have both daily and scientific evidence of light.
We have both daily and scientific evidence of life.
We have both daily and scientific evidence of time.
We have neither daily nor scientific evidence of an all-powerful God.
I think that there're enough differences between the examples you gave and an all-powerful-god-being to render your assert untrue.
Remember that the scientific method basically stats that an unproven hypothesis is only that - an unproven hypothesis; and to become true you must provide proofs. That is to say: you must prove the existence of god, not provide a you-cannot-prove-it-doesn't-exist-so-it-certainly- exists stuff.
that changes your post hugely:). That way of thinking is what I would expect from a cristian today. And after all, I would prefer a God that managed to build the Universe that the science *knows* than the simplistic viewing of the genesis.
Long story short: Let there be light (1st day) and to the hell with the rest;)
I was raised as a Catholic and am still a firm believer in creationism...
Me too. But I ended believing such things as soon as I realized that the Wise Men were my parents. I can understand that you believe such things. But my tolerancy doesn't make you less fool.
I can understand a catholic saying "Big Bang was God stuff to create us all". Or a variation of that, that would make much more sense than all that crazy Genesis stuff. But we were NOT created on 6 days. There's enough touchable evidency of that. On the counterpart, you have an ancient book that has been proved many times to be wrong (when speaking about historical facts, not the religious content which is another business).
I am no more a catholic believer, but I know all about that (I grew for 9 years on a Jesuit boarding school) and I can say one thing about my Jesuit biology teachers: they didn't mention a single time the creationist theory. We studied deeply the current biology paradigm, as done in any other Spanish school. Things about the bible and religion had another place and another time; when speaking about science, our teachers taught us on the current scientific paradigm.
Slashdot Mirror
OMG!! they've really patented _that_?
I must be quick if I want to patent my *flesh obelisk* as a girl toy...
It can be also the imperative form of the spanish verb violar.
Nope. not water. Realize that it's yellow, so it must be *other* thing. It already tastes like *that*.
thank you man, today is like April's fools day in Spain. I am gonna laugh!!!
I, for one, welcome our new Stone Overlors
just in case...
OMG, I just visualized the goat guy computouch device, eww!
Actually you _touched_ it, which is way more scary.
Sure, man, Bush is a privileged mind:
Iraqi war reason: WMD. WMD found: nope.
Conclussion:
1.- Bush knew there were no WMD, so he lied.
2.- Bush was fooled to think that, so he is incompetent.
As I said, he has a brilliant mind. He is so awesome, and don't think twice about it. He managed to start a war with no reason (either being incompetent or clearly lying) AND getting re-elected. That's what I would call *impressive*.
That's OK, you're only a pigment of my imagination anyway :-)
... I _hate_ that color.
I hope I'm not the acetylen-blue one
Good, since I didn't even read your post ...
it's a pity, you would discover a new World of Smells, where exquisiteness is the main reason to stay.
Do not forget Kopete if you're a KDE user, it is nicely integrated with the system. You can compile it without KDE dependences (QT is needed, though) if you use another DE / WM. Not available for win32 withouth doing nasty things with cygwin.
You can take a look to Science's cover to check it out.
This means you are limiting the number of real women, who are still quite attractive, which you consider dateable.
What is that woman thing? A new kind of ubercrazy robot?
I was actually trying to make a joke. Thanks for ruining it. Now I should get on crack.
It took me 8 hours to get just 1 of the 4 OSX discs installed on my PC....
But it does because you do it the wrong way. You can start PearPC on a Win2k VMware virtual machine, so you can pause the execution at any time...
... I would download them in a heartbeat and gladly watch their commercials if they did this.
Sure.
Would somebody please explain how AOL thinks users who can't install the full AOL client on their workstations thanks to sysadmin-imposed policies will be able to get the AOL Browser installed?
Firefox already does this, at least when using the Linux installer. It simply installs to the users's home dir.
However, if the access policies include verifying the running apps in the system, and only allow certified ones, the system is useless.
It depends mostly on you having a chainsaw or not.
What if the "bad guys" tracking for bittorrenters got a provision from movie studios to upload? After all they own the cited copyright.
Oops!
I didn't know you were also commenting here, and I would like to post my post to your article at Linux Gamers:
*** START PASTING
I experienced some problems on gaming using custom kernels, specially ones running the koliva's patchset (like ck or nitro). Last time it was with Vendetta Online (low framerates and specially choppy sound). They're mostly caused by buggy task schedulers.
Keep in mind that those patchsets are often very very buggy. I remember specially huge 3D perfomance lows when running 2.6.7-nitrox (they have all the CK patchset).
Half of the issues I had with gaming went when I upgraded to 2.6.9-nitro1. The rest, when upgrading to the last nvidia drivers.
Have you tried to run hl2 against a kernel.org kernel or a 2.6.x kernel from Debian Sarge/Sid? I think that you should REALLY try that. The cedega thing is VERY sensitive to kernel issues (like any cpu intensive app).
END PASTING ***
We have both daily and scientific evidence of gravity.
- exists stuff.
We have both daily and scientific evidence of light.
We have both daily and scientific evidence of life.
We have both daily and scientific evidence of time.
We have neither daily nor scientific evidence of an all-powerful God.
I think that there're enough differences between the examples you gave and an all-powerful-god-being to render your assert untrue.
Remember that the scientific method basically stats that an unproven hypothesis is only that - an unproven hypothesis; and to become true you must provide proofs. That is to say: you must prove the existence of god, not provide a you-cannot-prove-it-doesn't-exist-so-it-certainly
that changes your post hugely :). That way of thinking is what I would expect from a cristian today. And after all, I would prefer a God that managed to build the Universe that the science *knows* than the simplistic viewing of the genesis.
;)
Long story short: Let there be light (1st day) and to the hell with the rest
I was raised as a Catholic and am still a firm believer in creationism...
Me too. But I ended believing such things as soon as I realized that the Wise Men were my parents. I can understand that you believe such things. But my tolerancy doesn't make you less fool.
I can understand a catholic saying "Big Bang was God stuff to create us all". Or a variation of that, that would make much more sense than all that crazy Genesis stuff. But we were NOT created on 6 days. There's enough touchable evidency of that. On the counterpart, you have an ancient book that has been proved many times to be wrong (when speaking about historical facts, not the religious content which is another business).
I am no more a catholic believer, but I know all about that (I grew for 9 years on a Jesuit boarding school) and I can say one thing about my Jesuit biology teachers: they didn't mention a single time the creationist theory. We studied deeply the current biology paradigm, as done in any other Spanish school. Things about the bible and religion had another place and another time; when speaking about science, our teachers taught us on the current scientific paradigm.
What added value to communication would this move provide? Annoying first users? There are ppl that simply cannot do grammar and stuff.
;)
PS: I am spanish, so please do not blame my grammar here