Hiding or destroying evidence is contempt of court. When the chips are down, very few employees are willing to risk prosecution and jail in order to help their employer.
For several years I've found it useful, when wondering what the most immoral approach to any business issue is, to ask "What would Uber do?".
It's reassuring to learn that this rule-of-thumb works as well for data protection as it does in so many other areas (employment practices, tax avoidance, setting fares, etc.)
What I miss about the demise of these beasts is the the essentially unlimited supply of fan-fold paper that could be used for everything from drawing really long diagrams that went round all four walls of the office to making paper hats for kids' birthday parties. It had to be very high quality to avoid getting shredded as it flew through the printer.
They were indeed v. noisy but anyone in the same room as them went deaf so the problem was sorta self-limiting.
C.
I don't understand why a potential advertiser would not want to promote their product in front of any audience.
It's not that the advertisers care who watches their adverts; the more the merrier no doubt. The issue here is that the producers of unsavoury content are being supported by income provided by the advertisers.
The police asked for the photographs. The photographer said no. The police went away and asked a judge for a warrant. The judge agreed that a warrant was jusified and issued it.
Scotland is not a police state. It's legal system does have some strange names for things though...
Photographer refuses request to assist police but gives them cause to worry that he'll hide or destroy evidence in the process. Cops get warrant. Photographers' union tells him to stop being an idiot. Photographer posts his version of the story on Slashdot because that'll really teach the cops a lesson and show them whose boss...
I think the idea was that one finds an MD5 collision for document A by adding a block of data B to the end of it creating a new documents C. The SHA hash of document C, SHA(C) will not, in general, match SHA(A).
FInding B such that both MD5(C)==MD5(A) and SHA(C) ==SAH(A) is still unfeasible.
Slashdot Mirror
When was it not?
Oh dear, some clown has reinvented Clippy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
If there one useless annoyance that the WWW does *not* need, it's ****ing Clippy.
If you dig down through to the source it seems this was a trial in a UK court.
A list of people with a lot more money than sense.
The EPA tell Apple why dropping Intel in favor of ARM processors will be a bad idea...
Hiding or destroying evidence is contempt of court. When the chips are down, very few employees are willing to risk prosecution and jail in order to help their employer.
If only Apple had enough money to pay the 911 service to employ a couple of extra dispatchers as compensation for dealing with their nuisance calls.
Nope, I've been taken for a ride several times by Sony in the past.
I goes: "Oh please Brer Fox, whatever you do, please don't throw me into the briar patch."
For several years I've found it useful, when wondering what the most immoral approach to any business issue is, to ask "What would Uber do?".
It's reassuring to learn that this rule-of-thumb works as well for data protection as it does in so many other areas (employment practices, tax avoidance, setting fares, etc.)
Why bother? They belong to your ex employer anyway.
One Bitcoin is still only about 10% of the value of a single tulip bullb in 1636/7. Got someway to go yet.
People are weird.
Nope.
In England that's known as 'joint enterprise'.
The standard Preview.app in the current macOS 10.12.4 opens and displays .pict files just fine.
I find Uber useful because whenever I am confronted with an ethical dilemna I can make the right decision by asking myself "What wouldn't Uber do?"
What I miss about the demise of these beasts is the the essentially unlimited supply of fan-fold paper that could be used for everything from drawing really long diagrams that went round all four walls of the office to making paper hats for kids' birthday parties. It had to be very high quality to avoid getting shredded as it flew through the printer. They were indeed v. noisy but anyone in the same room as them went deaf so the problem was sorta self-limiting. C.
Whoosh!
A predecessor to Twitter was the 'telephone tree'. The leader phoned N supporters, who each phoned N supporters, etc.
I don't understand why a potential advertiser would not want to promote their product in front of any audience.
It's not that the advertisers care who watches their adverts; the more the merrier no doubt. The issue here is that the producers of unsavoury content are being supported by income provided by the advertisers.
The police asked for the photographs. The photographer said no. The police went away and asked a judge for a warrant. The judge agreed that a warrant was jusified and issued it. Scotland is not a police state. It's legal system does have some strange names for things though...
Photographer refuses request to assist police but gives them cause to worry that he'll hide or destroy evidence in the process. Cops get warrant. Photographers' union tells him to stop being an idiot. Photographer posts his version of the story on Slashdot because that'll really teach the cops a lesson and show them whose boss...
I think the idea was that one finds an MD5 collision for document A by adding a block of data B to the end of it creating a new documents C. The SHA hash of document C, SHA(C) will not, in general, match SHA(A).
FInding B such that both MD5(C)==MD5(A) and SHA(C) ==SAH(A) is still unfeasible.
Does it include a root kit?