Mr. Raff Firefox. Calling him Mr. Raff made me chuckle, like Mr. Ed or Mr. Larry. Not quite sure on the Aviv prefix, other than an ear of corn in the spring. Maybe it means he's a farmer/researcher.
This is where age of consent laws come into play. In Minnesota, the age of consent is 16 with a maximum disparity of 48 months. So legal sex can occur between somebody who is 16 and somebody who is 18, 19, or even 20, depending on the month. But if you're 21 with a 16 year old, it's statutory rape.
Age of consent, while also arbitrary (and variable by state), addresses when somebody is deemed mature enough to be able to render meaningful consent, thus addressing the questions of age differences older in life versus those under 18.
Is it just me or do the first five pages of "common terms" in the PDF contain the term Excel, and then the next four pages contain the term vpn? It seems to me there were two common terms in these first nine pages with random words tacked on.
It sounds fun, but I don't understand how shaking a phone is functionally superior to simply looking at the screen to gauge battery life or messages. Not to mention shaking your expensive mobile device around may not be the smartest idea. Flying wiimotes, anyone?
I would largely agree, but when studying for the TS in configuring vista, I did find one feature that would be beneficial to businesses: The separate sets of security settings for networking depending on if you are connected to a public or private network. That would be fantastic for better protecting mobile users. Still, that hardly by itself outweighs the cons.
Additionally, it doesn't seem to compensate for systems whose system font DPI has been bumped up. The example presentation in the article looks pretty godawful at 120 DPI. Talk about having to know your audience (and the configuration of their systems)!
Violating company policies and snooping is one thing, but employees do not own their computers and staff administering machines do not need permission to access systems.
I don't care if somebody at the door asks me for a receipt. But if I'm walking through the security sensors and they go off I just keep on walking. I'm not going to turn around and look around aimlessly like a lost puppy looking for approval. I know I paid for what I'm walking out with and I have no responsibility to waste my time responding their broken security system. Just calmly walk on through.
Have you ever needed to remember something like a serial number for a short time and you can't or don't want to write it down, so you keep reading it aloud to yourself to remember it? Like "76A354T, 76A354T, 76A354T..." As long as I keep repeating it to myself, I can continue to remember it. That's what a computer's RAM is, with a helluva lot more the computer can keep repeating to itself. So to continue the analogy, the judge wants to be able to subpoena what I'm saying out loud to myself to remember. To do that there needs to be a tape recorder running at all times.
As far as I can tell, when it comes to precedent this is what the judge is mandating. A constant stream of recording so it can be subpoenaed. After all, when I'm repeating seven characters over and over again out loud, that is data storage. Sounds like a pretty worthless precedent to me. Maybe it's a creative way for this specific case to request logging to be turned on, but that's it.
"But your honor, I never said that." "Everything you say is being stored in the sound waves created by your voice, if only temporarily. Therefore, it is governed by federal discovery laws."
You do not need to install Windows Desktop Search to search in Outlook 2007 in XP. In fact, I opted against it and unticked the checkbox for it to stop asking me.
You can still use the traditional Advanced Find by visiting the Tools Menu -> Instant Search -> Advanced Find, or CTRL-SHIFT-F, or probably a whole pile of context menus.
I'm just happy to see this discussion of the changes to the tagging system showing up, revealing that many of us found the previous system more useful.
To see that enough people tagged an article even with "haha" for it to show up as a top tag on the main page was informative indeed.
It could be a fair fight if they are being hunted by cats that glow as well.
Not a bad job to get to be a screener going through a homesick businessman's girlfriend/wife pics.
n/t
Mr. Raff Firefox. Calling him Mr. Raff made me chuckle, like Mr. Ed or Mr. Larry. Not quite sure on the Aviv prefix, other than an ear of corn in the spring. Maybe it means he's a farmer/researcher.
What a coincidence that the security researcher's last name is the same as the browser he is testing!
It's in my phonebook. You can just dial 46645.
Stricter enforcement, of course. A professor at the University of Utah law college describes how everybody infringes. It's a veritable goldmine!
The good stuff starts at the bottom of page 7 of the PDF.
I don't want my wang anywhere near a power source strong enough to power a robot.
This is where age of consent laws come into play. In Minnesota, the age of consent is 16 with a maximum disparity of 48 months. So legal sex can occur between somebody who is 16 and somebody who is 18, 19, or even 20, depending on the month. But if you're 21 with a 16 year old, it's statutory rape.
Age of consent, while also arbitrary (and variable by state), addresses when somebody is deemed mature enough to be able to render meaningful consent, thus addressing the questions of age differences older in life versus those under 18.
Is it just me or do the first five pages of "common terms" in the PDF contain the term Excel, and then the next four pages contain the term vpn? It seems to me there were two common terms in these first nine pages with random words tacked on.
It sounds fun, but I don't understand how shaking a phone is functionally superior to simply looking at the screen to gauge battery life or messages. Not to mention shaking your expensive mobile device around may not be the smartest idea. Flying wiimotes, anyone?
Expert or not, I will not be using Google Sexchange before it's out of beta.
I would largely agree, but when studying for the TS in configuring vista, I did find one feature that would be beneficial to businesses: The separate sets of security settings for networking depending on if you are connected to a public or private network. That would be fantastic for better protecting mobile users. Still, that hardly by itself outweighs the cons.
I'm still trying to figure out, will it include video?
Here's the actual release from the source, rather than a Network World recap.
We were at 95% spam back in June. September and October so far are 98%. Meanwhile, November 2006 was 89%.
Additionally, it doesn't seem to compensate for systems whose system font DPI has been bumped up. The example presentation in the article looks pretty godawful at 120 DPI. Talk about having to know your audience (and the configuration of their systems)!
Violating company policies and snooping is one thing, but employees do not own their computers and staff administering machines do not need permission to access systems.
I don't care if somebody at the door asks me for a receipt. But if I'm walking through the security sensors and they go off I just keep on walking. I'm not going to turn around and look around aimlessly like a lost puppy looking for approval. I know I paid for what I'm walking out with and I have no responsibility to waste my time responding their broken security system. Just calmly walk on through.
The leader of your terrorist cell has sent you an e-card! Double-click the attachment to view it!
[Attached: ecard.exe]
Have you ever needed to remember something like a serial number for a short time and you can't or don't want to write it down, so you keep reading it aloud to yourself to remember it? Like "76A354T, 76A354T, 76A354T..." As long as I keep repeating it to myself, I can continue to remember it. That's what a computer's RAM is, with a helluva lot more the computer can keep repeating to itself. So to continue the analogy, the judge wants to be able to subpoena what I'm saying out loud to myself to remember. To do that there needs to be a tape recorder running at all times.
As far as I can tell, when it comes to precedent this is what the judge is mandating. A constant stream of recording so it can be subpoenaed. After all, when I'm repeating seven characters over and over again out loud, that is data storage. Sounds like a pretty worthless precedent to me. Maybe it's a creative way for this specific case to request logging to be turned on, but that's it.
"But your honor, I never said that."
"Everything you say is being stored in the sound waves created by your voice, if only temporarily. Therefore, it is governed by federal discovery laws."
It's hard, to read submissions, when there, are so, many, commas.
You do not need to install Windows Desktop Search to search in Outlook 2007 in XP. In fact, I opted against it and unticked the checkbox for it to stop asking me.
You can still use the traditional Advanced Find by visiting the Tools Menu -> Instant Search -> Advanced Find, or CTRL-SHIFT-F, or probably a whole pile of context menus.
I'm just happy to see this discussion of the changes to the tagging system showing up, revealing that many of us found the previous system more useful.
To see that enough people tagged an article even with "haha" for it to show up as a top tag on the main page was informative indeed.
So they're thickly veiled threats?