I happily used PLATO thirty years ago. The thing had a touch screen, but very few of the programs used it. Those that did I recall as being made for kids for whom it was assumed the keyboard-screen relationship would be too complex. Outside of those programs, touch screens just didn't make sense for desktop work. They still don't.
So, this brokerage was set up as a flag of convenience fifteen years ago and, to all appearances, operates as a loose federation of unchecked agents. One broker is charged with defrauded his clients, assigning all profitable trades to his wife, and all losses to the client. Another gets busted in a massive Ponzi scheme involving retirees and refinancing. Only when they're on the ropes does the SEC come looking at their IT operation, outsourced, from what I can see in the article, via an obvious conflict of interest to a "see-no-evil" boss and a pathological engineer. And the SEC only finds the very tip of the problem.
And that's the only time the SEC fined anyone for IT breeches of customer confidence.
Yes, absolutely. Do these/. FPs help your stack racking?
Google+ and Gmail have had decades-long rollouts. New Mobile OS versions come out every 2 years. Well, make that a year for WP 7. Sorry to the idiots who bought that one.
Right choice or wrong, you have to wonder about a company putting out software so competitive, it kills the companies that make the hardware for it. So they have this dud, and they erect barriers to developers? Didn't The Great Chair-Thrower himself predict that the next breakthrough app will be on Windows Phone? Whom does he expect to develop that next breakthrough app?
Aye. Making the tube longer won't help muzzle velocity much if the propulsion system is magnetic instead of expanding gas.
100 m/s is 360 kph, or pretty damn low for a projectile. And this thing requires a bunch of Li-Ion batteries, and needs a recharge after 50 shots? So, in effect, it's cute toy, but the applications are going to be limited to situations where boring, smelly chemical fuels are simply not an option, but a heavy, electric beast is.
“This is Lumia, and it’s time to switch,” she said, in what felt like a possible official tagline for the device.
Isn't that what Nokia owners have been saying for the last year already? You know. "Hmm... I think I'll go see what Symbian device or Maemo/MeeGo iteration Nokia has on offer. Oh. This is Lumia, and it's time to switch."
Yes, Nokia has great hardware. They've done that well. Now they're pulling the plug entirely on WP7 upgrades. So any developers or customers who took a chance on WP7 are being told "sorry, please buy(-in) again". Maybe some customers will; but I doubt any companies will fall for the MicroLighting Stranger.
I like gadgets as much as the next geek, but look: in the West, paper came into the classroom in the early fourteenth century. Sure, you see it earlier; but once it becomes available in bulk, its first use is class notes (also because the quality was not exactly archival). Paper replaced (wax) tablets. Why do you want to revert to a tablet?
Yeah, the new ones are super-cool, and they do a lot of things really well. But handling tachygraphy ain't one of them.
Those photocopiers you remember from 8 years ago? Now they scan too. So drop the notes in the hopper, scan to PDF and load them on the tablet afterwards.
It turns out that it really helps to have a keyboard to make a post. Permit me now, with the aid of my trusty Model M, to unpack what I said above. The posting used the admittedly irritating expedient of using the title as part of the body (again, typing on a touchscreen blows). Therefore, the first sentence should read:
Don't forget the WIn 8 App store, which will be Microsoft's demonstration of how not to lock down a platform. The point, then, is that "the whole metro apps thing" will be shooting themselves in the foot, going on MS's record in the field of app stores and product support. All you need to do is look at the magnificence of MSN Music, Plays for Sure(sic), Zune Marketplace, XBLA and the Windows Phone App stores. That's the direction the App store is going in. Legacy support is important to Windows, and one of the reasons for its success and differentiation in the marketplace (cf. OSX, aka "Firewire is so 2005!"), and is critical for its enterprise sales. Microsoft's famed legacy support does not extend towards its consumer-oriented stuff. Again, Microsoft Game Zone, Games for Windows, Games for Windows Live, Win XP's killing of non-USB HOTAS setups, Vista's problems playing audio, the list goes on.
So actually, I didn't say anything about Metro the UI (but if your UI sucks, don't expect to get many consumer sales). What I meant was that the Metro App Store, which is Microsoft's attempt to cash in on the iTunes/Google Play "locked down" app store phenomenon — and yes, like Google Play, MS is just trying to give itself a privileged position, a stamp of quality, with, no doubt, some unworkable DRM thrown in —, will be see sluggish sales, developers being exploited, until ultimately it is rebranded, cast off, and finally put out of service with no regard to the developers who tried to use the App store as their sales portal or the users who purchased apps there. You know, like every other time Microsoft has had an online store/DRM-scheme fail.
You know what they say, don't trust the Goog-lighting stranger from Redmond.
Which will be Microsoft's demonstration of how not to lock down a platform. Expect shifting requirements, app-breaking security updates, complete incompatibility with Win 9 and the endgame: MS screwing homebrewer, developer and gamer alike when they pull the plug on their ill-conceivef monstrosity.
Let's face it, there are three things keeping Microsoft's OS in business: the Office ecosystem, games and people who spent their whole lives learning one way of doing thing, and don't want to change. Everything else not only can be done better by someone else, but is being done better by someone else.
With every new OS release, Microsoft themselves screw the people who fear change. Office is still the cash cow, but between LibreOffice and the Googlighting Stranger, their desktop suite is only a few years ahead. I can't comment on Sharepoint and Exchange, so I'll concede they probably play a major role in many businesses, and that many of those same businesses have no interest in Windows 8 Metro. Finally, there's games. Games, and DirectX games, was the reason to buy Windows. Hell, it's the reason I run it. But, in the heavily politicized corporate environment of Microsoft, games have a problem, and that problem is spelled XBOX. So we get abominations like MS GameZone, Games For Windows Live and Games for Windows Marketplace, or whatever they're calling it now. The Xbox people can't have windows cannibalize their games. This is how Microsoft lost to Linux in the HTPC battle: an Xbox belongs in the living room, not a Windows Box. Things have gotten so bad, the other players in the industry have their own Microsoft-Free group to promote gaming.
So Valve brings on board a developer with demonstrated skills in making cross-platform gaming tools. If they were able to produce a set of tools that allowed games to be developed and easily ported between the various full flavors of Linux, Mac, PC and Android, worked on Chrome OS, and connected to the largest online game delivery platform in business, well, wouldn't that be cool?
Don't worry, they'll probably do something less ambitious and more profitable.
Ironically, this was the logic behind Elop's notorious Burning Platforms memo that justified junking Symbian, MeeGo, and any homegrown smartphone work (which as profitable) in favor of Windows Phone. "Adapt or Die" sounds good, but in this case it was used to adapt the bathwater for Microsoft's baby.
In truth, marginalia practicaly never make it into proper glosses. Glosses are usually assembled from authoritative texts that discuss the passage in question. And very few texts get the Gloss treatment: in the Latin world, it's the Bible, Corpus Iuris Civilis and Decretals above all. Some other texts might get glosses, but they rarely get a glossa ordinaria-class treatment.
And to the midrashim comment in TFA, I'd point out that Rashi did a bang-up job himself in Hebrew.
For the scholastic Middle Ages, criticism usually took the form of "one doctor says this..., for these reasons. I disagree, rather saying this, for these reasons. To his reasons, I reply..."
Lots of people have wanted to do space games. I've wanted to as well. A key part about doing such a thing with multiplayer (or even just the internet now) for me has been the use of computing. Folks have been building aimbots forever. What if the rules of the universe, and the ships, were only roughly (and/or inaccurately) described, and each player/ship had a limited amount of processing to figure them out and optimize the ship?
So I see Notch has a working 6502 emulator, and even a crude display system.
Boy, wouldn't that be cool if he actually built the game I've been longing to play? You know, he probably won't, but a sufficiently chaotic system with players coding things like navigation, weapons targeting, guidance, engine FADECs, that kinda stuff? As long as the failures are fun too, it'd kick ass.
The German-speaking Cantons all had majorities against the ban. The French-speaking cantons all had majorities [i]in favor[/i] of the ban. Swiss-Germans outnumber everybody else by a wide margin, so they won.
The argument for price-fixing is the same one behind the death of record stores. Remember record stores? Turns out there are a few hits out there that most people buy, and then those interested in music have wider interests, and therefore want a broader catalog to choose from. The record store business model is built on selling those hits and using some of that revenue to pay for the space to hold a broad selection and the expertise to guide customers. Even before the internet was making dents in music sales, the big labels were already running exclusive deals with Walmart and Target, sinking the record store business model. The same thing is going on with books: the competition to worry about isn't the internet; it's the big chains that can serve 80% of the market by distributing a handful of best-sellers, and screw the rest. And it's the publishers themselves, who cut deals with the big chains on their top sellers, and in so doing, contribute to killing off the market for their own books.
And yes, it's protectionism in the same way mandating broadband to rural areas is protectionism.
Real world, my ass. Yes, it takes applications time to load. Bring up a Microsoft Office product, and that load time is pretty long. But the interface comes up immediately (thanks, no doubt, to Microsoft's unique relationship with their OS).
My cell phone is an ancient, slow turd, but when I start it up, I can access the interface almost immediately, and the log on to the network is extremely fast. Only after that does it start doing things like preparing the indices of SMS and similar stuff.
"The cloud" may not be the answer in this case, but the problem is clear: there are two ways of loading a program. The easy way (for programmers) is to throw up a splash screen, load everything, and then give the user control (as in your Angry Birds example). The right way (for usability) is to get the interface up, and keep loading. It'll usually take the user a while to get "under speed" as well, so why not use that time to load up the bloat? When someone in an office starts an application, that person wants to work on that application. Two minutes to load, every day, across a whole industry amount to more than enough billable hours to pay for optimization. Applying patches and updates at startup (or asking, "Do you want to start now, or wait 15 minutes while I patch in some completely unintelligible and probably irrelevant upgrade?") is also, in most cases, wrong. It's like telling someone at the McD's drive-thru: "Would you like to wait 15 minutes so we can deliver the same food in a bag that is 5% less likely to tear open?"
3. That's not relevant here, as the post by the Adobe employee was about load times, not EULAs, and it was not a post that portrayed Adobe positively. Besides, Adobe Flash's startup EULAs are worse.
4. If it's fast enough, you won't need a splash, or you won't care. MS Office has splash screens, but I only see them briefly. Photoshop, on the other hand, does nothing for about a minute, then writes over the middle of screen (might even steal the focus) a splash that lasts another minute. I am not impressed.
There's a lot of improvement that has to be done in interface terms, and saying "that's the way programs are" misses the point and affirms what need not be affirmed. Certainly, there are conceivable instances when long, bloated load times are required, but I suspect they're far fewer than the number of programs that are written for the benefit of programmers, and not for the users. Otherwise, why would my tools keep interrupting me?
Microsoft has never been a "cool brand". The last time anyone got excited about Microsoft's entry into hardware was when they provided BASIC for the Amiga (and maybe the Atari ST). For most non-tech people, Windows on a phone evokes images of something complicated that you swear at, fear intrusions from, and get the nerd-in-law to fix. For tech people, it calls up a bloated mass of interruption and failure that grows at cancerous rates until planned obsolescence makes it unusable six months from now.
So WP could be the coolest, slickest thing on the planet, but the Microsoft AND Windows branding is just lethal. I mean, an outstanding Windows product has always been praised by "Well, it's not as bad as the last version", clear back to the birth of the brand thirty years ago.
My understanding is that the problem with measuring conductivity on materials heated in a diamond-anvil cell is that you have a central spot that is extremely hot, and then a steep temperature gradient to the rest of the material. Measuring conductivity on a diamond-anvil cell often results in simply measuring the circuit formed in these surrounding boundary areas. It's a pity people are still breaking diamonds with these things rather than thinking about the ramifications the test setup has for their measurements.
Here's the thing: Mike posted it to his blog, as a professional with a large following. From previous experience (cf. Dickwolves), he knew what the reaction would be. Hell, he even ended his initial post with the guy's full contact details.
So he basically told the internet: "Here's this asshole, have at him," knowing full well that people would engage in illegal harassment of Mr. Christoforo. And those are details you could probably convince a jury in a tort trial of.
If Mr. Christoforo weren't such an idiot, he'd have lawyers in contact with PA, working out a settlement. The Avenger folks should be working something out too, preferably (for both parties) on friendly terms.
Yes, big douchebag Mr. Christoforo, but what Mike did doesn't strike me as blameless, ethical, or even legal.
If I remember the story correctly, the ""cargo cult" part of formula corrected a problem that hadn't existed since the war, and its purpose had escaped institutional memory. Then a transcription error of the formula made that part ridiculously high, and an innocuous change somewhere else caused an interaction problem.
So, yeah, I used the term "cargo cult". Nobody new what it was, or why it was breaking.
But of course, It's been fifteen years since I read the story.
Primo Levi, "Chrome" in The Periodical Table describes a similar problem with a paint formula at his factory in the 1950s. Evidently, during the war, they had a QC problem, included some chemical to correct for that, and the formula became a cargo cult, long after anyone knew what it was for. Someone changes some other factor, and their batch of paint gets the consistency of liver. So our hero had to reverse-engineer the trade secrets of a previous generation, back when he was working in the lab at Auschwitz.
Human beings are social animals. It's natural for us to wish the best for our fellow beings. So, yes, I am not the target demographic for about anything, but that doesn't mean I don't give a damn about the well-being of those who are the target demographic. On the obverse, there's nothing less human than only caring about the target demographic. That's what companies do: Insurers target the rich and healthy, Pharmaceutical companies target the rich and chronically ill (as opposed to terminal), and Apple targets rich corporate tools who have ceased to care about anything but target demographics.
At 500 mph, the wing is going to be generating a lot of lift, and a huge pitching-up motion. The elevator trim will be pretty severely nose-down. If that tab cuts loose, the aircraft will pitch hard up, probably inducing loss of consciousness in the pilot; that might also explain the tail gear.
I'm sure he would have done everything possible to avoid hitting anyone on the ground, but he probably didn't have much say in the matter.
Someone else linked to an account of another case where a racing P-51 lost a left trim tab. In that case, the pilot came to at 7000 feet in a climb.
"Scientific" quantitative analysis is the Gay Cowboy Movie of historiography. One turns up every decade or so, it's inevitably hailed as a revolutionary breakthrough, then promptly forgotten.
The problem with historical data is that it's so far from random that the more sophisticated the analysis you subject them to, the more you end up analyzing artifacts of the selection criteria. This has been shown with every generation of quantitative data to be subjected to historical analysis. For example, let's say Google is teaming up with Harvard to digitize their library. Their library would have been built for the University's mission, which changed over the years. A Protestant Seminary will have less use for collection of nineteenth-century Catholic publications than somewhere else, and even less for those from the Jewish community. So a study of nineteenth-century book terms will reflect the world as skewed towards 19th-century WASPs. The democratization of universities after the 1950s changed considerably which books were bought and when. So, for example, the "finding" that 19th-century new tech terms took a century to enter common usage, while 20th-c tech came in 50 could also be explained by a selection bias: 19th-century universities (and then their libraries) were very different communities, with a much more conservative selection, then 20th-century ones. Or the problem could be the advent of cheap print; or even that the texts where such terms are commonly used were undated.
For that matter, selecting on a date (as they do for '1951') is following the selection bias: only dated texts are included, and, for copyrighted works, Google always includes the front matter.
It's a technique that has its utility, but the more you want to use the data to say something meaningful, the more the selection problems creep in, and the more useless it becomes.
Slashdot Mirror
So that's what Apple's going to "invent" next.
I happily used PLATO thirty years ago. The thing had a touch screen, but very few of the programs used it. Those that did I recall as being made for kids for whom it was assumed the keyboard-screen relationship would be too complex. Outside of those programs, touch screens just didn't make sense for desktop work. They still don't.
So, this brokerage was set up as a flag of convenience fifteen years ago and, to all appearances, operates as a loose federation of unchecked agents. One broker is charged with defrauded his clients, assigning all profitable trades to his wife, and all losses to the client. Another gets busted in a massive Ponzi scheme involving retirees and refinancing. Only when they're on the ropes does the SEC come looking at their IT operation, outsourced, from what I can see in the article, via an obvious conflict of interest to a "see-no-evil" boss and a pathological engineer. And the SEC only finds the very tip of the problem.
And that's the only time the SEC fined anyone for IT breeches of customer confidence.
Sleep well, America.
Yes, absolutely. Do these /. FPs help your stack racking?
Google+ and Gmail have had decades-long rollouts. New Mobile OS versions come out every 2 years. Well, make that a year for WP 7. Sorry to the idiots who bought that one.
Right choice or wrong, you have to wonder about a company putting out software so competitive, it kills the companies that make the hardware for it. So they have this dud, and they erect barriers to developers? Didn't The Great Chair-Thrower himself predict that the next breakthrough app will be on Windows Phone? Whom does he expect to develop that next breakthrough app?
Aye. Making the tube longer won't help muzzle velocity much if the propulsion system is magnetic instead of expanding gas. 100 m/s is 360 kph, or pretty damn low for a projectile. And this thing requires a bunch of Li-Ion batteries, and needs a recharge after 50 shots? So, in effect, it's cute toy, but the applications are going to be limited to situations where boring, smelly chemical fuels are simply not an option, but a heavy, electric beast is.
Isn't that what Nokia owners have been saying for the last year already? You know. "Hmm... I think I'll go see what Symbian device or Maemo/MeeGo iteration Nokia has on offer. Oh. This is Lumia, and it's time to switch."
Yes, Nokia has great hardware. They've done that well. Now they're pulling the plug entirely on WP7 upgrades. So any developers or customers who took a chance on WP7 are being told "sorry, please buy(-in) again". Maybe some customers will; but I doubt any companies will fall for the MicroLighting Stranger.
I like gadgets as much as the next geek, but look: in the West, paper came into the classroom in the early fourteenth century. Sure, you see it earlier; but once it becomes available in bulk, its first use is class notes (also because the quality was not exactly archival). Paper replaced (wax) tablets. Why do you want to revert to a tablet?
Yeah, the new ones are super-cool, and they do a lot of things really well. But handling tachygraphy ain't one of them. Those photocopiers you remember from 8 years ago? Now they scan too. So drop the notes in the hopper, scan to PDF and load them on the tablet afterwards.
It turns out that it really helps to have a keyboard to make a post. Permit me now, with the aid of my trusty Model M, to unpack what I said above. The posting used the admittedly irritating expedient of using the title as part of the body (again, typing on a touchscreen blows). Therefore, the first sentence should read:
Don't forget the WIn 8 App store, which will be Microsoft's demonstration of how not to lock down a platform.
The point, then, is that "the whole metro apps thing" will be shooting themselves in the foot, going on MS's record in the field of app stores and product support. All you need to do is look at the magnificence of MSN Music, Plays for Sure(sic), Zune Marketplace, XBLA and the Windows Phone App stores. That's the direction the App store is going in. Legacy support is important to Windows, and one of the reasons for its success and differentiation in the marketplace (cf. OSX, aka "Firewire is so 2005!"), and is critical for its enterprise sales. Microsoft's famed legacy support does not extend towards its consumer-oriented stuff. Again, Microsoft Game Zone, Games for Windows, Games for Windows Live, Win XP's killing of non-USB HOTAS setups, Vista's problems playing audio, the list goes on.
So actually, I didn't say anything about Metro the UI (but if your UI sucks, don't expect to get many consumer sales). What I meant was that the Metro App Store, which is Microsoft's attempt to cash in on the iTunes/Google Play "locked down" app store phenomenon — and yes, like Google Play, MS is just trying to give itself a privileged position, a stamp of quality, with, no doubt, some unworkable DRM thrown in —, will be see sluggish sales, developers being exploited, until ultimately it is rebranded, cast off, and finally put out of service with no regard to the developers who tried to use the App store as their sales portal or the users who purchased apps there. You know, like every other time Microsoft has had an online store/DRM-scheme fail.
You know what they say, don't trust the Goog-lighting stranger from Redmond.
Which will be Microsoft's demonstration of how not to lock down a platform. Expect shifting requirements, app-breaking security updates, complete incompatibility with Win 9 and the endgame: MS screwing homebrewer, developer and gamer alike when they pull the plug on their ill-conceivef monstrosity.
Let's face it, there are three things keeping Microsoft's OS in business: the Office ecosystem, games and people who spent their whole lives learning one way of doing thing, and don't want to change. Everything else not only can be done better by someone else, but is being done better by someone else.
With every new OS release, Microsoft themselves screw the people who fear change. Office is still the cash cow, but between LibreOffice and the Googlighting Stranger, their desktop suite is only a few years ahead. I can't comment on Sharepoint and Exchange, so I'll concede they probably play a major role in many businesses, and that many of those same businesses have no interest in Windows 8 Metro. Finally, there's games. Games, and DirectX games, was the reason to buy Windows. Hell, it's the reason I run it. But, in the heavily politicized corporate environment of Microsoft, games have a problem, and that problem is spelled XBOX. So we get abominations like MS GameZone, Games For Windows Live and Games for Windows Marketplace, or whatever they're calling it now. The Xbox people can't have windows cannibalize their games. This is how Microsoft lost to Linux in the HTPC battle: an Xbox belongs in the living room, not a Windows Box. Things have gotten so bad, the other players in the industry have their own Microsoft-Free group to promote gaming.
So Valve brings on board a developer with demonstrated skills in making cross-platform gaming tools. If they were able to produce a set of tools that allowed games to be developed and easily ported between the various full flavors of Linux, Mac, PC and Android, worked on Chrome OS, and connected to the largest online game delivery platform in business, well, wouldn't that be cool?
Don't worry, they'll probably do something less ambitious and more profitable.
Ironically, this was the logic behind Elop's notorious Burning Platforms memo that justified junking Symbian, MeeGo, and any homegrown smartphone work (which as profitable) in favor of Windows Phone. "Adapt or Die" sounds good, but in this case it was used to adapt the bathwater for Microsoft's baby.
In truth, marginalia practicaly never make it into proper glosses. Glosses are usually assembled from authoritative texts that discuss the passage in question. And very few texts get the Gloss treatment: in the Latin world, it's the Bible, Corpus Iuris Civilis and Decretals above all. Some other texts might get glosses, but they rarely get a glossa ordinaria-class treatment.
..., for these reasons. I disagree, rather saying this, for these reasons. To his reasons, I reply..."
And to the midrashim comment in TFA, I'd point out that Rashi did a bang-up job himself in Hebrew.
For the scholastic Middle Ages, criticism usually took the form of "one doctor says this
Same as it ever was.
Lots of people have wanted to do space games. I've wanted to as well. A key part about doing such a thing with multiplayer (or even just the internet now) for me has been the use of computing. Folks have been building aimbots forever. What if the rules of the universe, and the ships, were only roughly (and/or inaccurately) described, and each player/ship had a limited amount of processing to figure them out and optimize the ship?
So I see Notch has a working 6502 emulator, and even a crude display system.
Boy, wouldn't that be cool if he actually built the game I've been longing to play? You know, he probably won't, but a sufficiently chaotic system with players coding things like navigation, weapons targeting, guidance, engine FADECs, that kinda stuff? As long as the failures are fun too, it'd kick ass.
The German-speaking Cantons all had majorities against the ban. The French-speaking cantons all had majorities [i]in favor[/i] of the ban. Swiss-Germans outnumber everybody else by a wide margin, so they won.
The argument for price-fixing is the same one behind the death of record stores. Remember record stores? Turns out there are a few hits out there that most people buy, and then those interested in music have wider interests, and therefore want a broader catalog to choose from. The record store business model is built on selling those hits and using some of that revenue to pay for the space to hold a broad selection and the expertise to guide customers. Even before the internet was making dents in music sales, the big labels were already running exclusive deals with Walmart and Target, sinking the record store business model. The same thing is going on with books: the competition to worry about isn't the internet; it's the big chains that can serve 80% of the market by distributing a handful of best-sellers, and screw the rest. And it's the publishers themselves, who cut deals with the big chains on their top sellers, and in so doing, contribute to killing off the market for their own books.
And yes, it's protectionism in the same way mandating broadband to rural areas is protectionism.
Real world, my ass. Yes, it takes applications time to load. Bring up a Microsoft Office product, and that load time is pretty long. But the interface comes up immediately (thanks, no doubt, to Microsoft's unique relationship with their OS).
My cell phone is an ancient, slow turd, but when I start it up, I can access the interface almost immediately, and the log on to the network is extremely fast. Only after that does it start doing things like preparing the indices of SMS and similar stuff.
"The cloud" may not be the answer in this case, but the problem is clear: there are two ways of loading a program. The easy way (for programmers) is to throw up a splash screen, load everything, and then give the user control (as in your Angry Birds example). The right way (for usability) is to get the interface up, and keep loading. It'll usually take the user a while to get "under speed" as well, so why not use that time to load up the bloat?
When someone in an office starts an application, that person wants to work on that application. Two minutes to load, every day, across a whole industry amount to more than enough billable hours to pay for optimization. Applying patches and updates at startup (or asking, "Do you want to start now, or wait 15 minutes while I patch in some completely unintelligible and probably irrelevant upgrade?") is also, in most cases, wrong. It's like telling someone at the McD's drive-thru: "Would you like to wait 15 minutes so we can deliver the same food in a bag that is 5% less likely to tear open?"
3. That's not relevant here, as the post by the Adobe employee was about load times, not EULAs, and it was not a post that portrayed Adobe positively. Besides, Adobe Flash's startup EULAs are worse.
4. If it's fast enough, you won't need a splash, or you won't care. MS Office has splash screens, but I only see them briefly. Photoshop, on the other hand, does nothing for about a minute, then writes over the middle of screen (might even steal the focus) a splash that lasts another minute. I am not impressed.
There's a lot of improvement that has to be done in interface terms, and saying "that's the way programs are" misses the point and affirms what need not be affirmed. Certainly, there are conceivable instances when long, bloated load times are required, but I suspect they're far fewer than the number of programs that are written for the benefit of programmers, and not for the users. Otherwise, why would my tools keep interrupting me?
They gave it a registry hive? I see they're porting all the best parts of Windows.
Microsoft has never been a "cool brand". The last time anyone got excited about Microsoft's entry into hardware was when they provided BASIC for the Amiga (and maybe the Atari ST). For most non-tech people, Windows on a phone evokes images of something complicated that you swear at, fear intrusions from, and get the nerd-in-law to fix. For tech people, it calls up a bloated mass of interruption and failure that grows at cancerous rates until planned obsolescence makes it unusable six months from now.
So WP could be the coolest, slickest thing on the planet, but the Microsoft AND Windows branding is just lethal. I mean, an outstanding Windows product has always been praised by "Well, it's not as bad as the last version", clear back to the birth of the brand thirty years ago.
I still use my 2007 N800.
My understanding is that the problem with measuring conductivity on materials heated in a diamond-anvil cell is that you have a central spot that is extremely hot, and then a steep temperature gradient to the rest of the material. Measuring conductivity on a diamond-anvil cell often results in simply measuring the circuit formed in these surrounding boundary areas. It's a pity people are still breaking diamonds with these things rather than thinking about the ramifications the test setup has for their measurements.
Here's the thing:
Mike posted it to his blog, as a professional with a large following. From previous experience (cf. Dickwolves), he knew what the reaction would be. Hell, he even ended his initial post with the guy's full contact details.
So he basically told the internet: "Here's this asshole, have at him," knowing full well that people would engage in illegal harassment of Mr. Christoforo. And those are details you could probably convince a jury in a tort trial of.
If Mr. Christoforo weren't such an idiot, he'd have lawyers in contact with PA, working out a settlement. The Avenger folks should be working something out too, preferably (for both parties) on friendly terms.
Yes, big douchebag Mr. Christoforo, but what Mike did doesn't strike me as blameless, ethical, or even legal.
If I remember the story correctly, the ""cargo cult" part of formula corrected a problem that hadn't existed since the war, and its purpose had escaped institutional memory. Then a transcription error of the formula made that part ridiculously high, and an innocuous change somewhere else caused an interaction problem.
So, yeah, I used the term "cargo cult". Nobody new what it was, or why it was breaking.
But of course, It's been fifteen years since I read the story.
Primo Levi, "Chrome" in The Periodical Table describes a similar problem with a paint formula at his factory in the 1950s. Evidently, during the war, they had a QC problem, included some chemical to correct for that, and the formula became a cargo cult, long after anyone knew what it was for. Someone changes some other factor, and their batch of paint gets the consistency of liver. So our hero had to reverse-engineer the trade secrets of a previous generation, back when he was working in the lab at Auschwitz.
Human beings are social animals. It's natural for us to wish the best for our fellow beings. So, yes, I am not the target demographic for about anything, but that doesn't mean I don't give a damn about the well-being of those who are the target demographic. On the obverse, there's nothing less human than only caring about the target demographic. That's what companies do: Insurers target the rich and healthy, Pharmaceutical companies target the rich and chronically ill (as opposed to terminal), and Apple targets rich corporate tools who have ceased to care about anything but target demographics.
At 500 mph, the wing is going to be generating a lot of lift, and a huge pitching-up motion. The elevator trim will be pretty severely nose-down. If that tab cuts loose, the aircraft will pitch hard up, probably inducing loss of consciousness in the pilot; that might also explain the tail gear.
I'm sure he would have done everything possible to avoid hitting anyone on the ground, but he probably didn't have much say in the matter.
Someone else linked to an account of another case where a racing P-51 lost a left trim tab. In that case, the pilot came to at 7000 feet in a climb.
"Scientific" quantitative analysis is the Gay Cowboy Movie of historiography. One turns up every decade or so, it's inevitably hailed as a revolutionary breakthrough, then promptly forgotten.
The problem with historical data is that it's so far from random that the more sophisticated the analysis you subject them to, the more you end up analyzing artifacts of the selection criteria. This has been shown with every generation of quantitative data to be subjected to historical analysis. For example, let's say Google is teaming up with Harvard to digitize their library. Their library would have been built for the University's mission, which changed over the years. A Protestant Seminary will have less use for collection of nineteenth-century Catholic publications than somewhere else, and even less for those from the Jewish community. So a study of nineteenth-century book terms will reflect the world as skewed towards 19th-century WASPs. The democratization of universities after the 1950s changed considerably which books were bought and when. So, for example, the "finding" that 19th-century new tech terms took a century to enter common usage, while 20th-c tech came in 50 could also be explained by a selection bias: 19th-century universities (and then their libraries) were very different communities, with a much more conservative selection, then 20th-century ones. Or the problem could be the advent of cheap print; or even that the texts where such terms are commonly used were undated.
For that matter, selecting on a date (as they do for '1951') is following the selection bias: only dated texts are included, and, for copyrighted works, Google always includes the front matter.
It's a technique that has its utility, but the more you want to use the data to say something meaningful, the more the selection problems creep in, and the more useless it becomes.
It's management thinking that customers are big fat whales in need of opportunities to depense large and small sums of cash.