Many of the design decisions would have been handled differently had the engineers known where things were going even 3 or 4 years down the road.
Except 3-4 years ago, multi core 64 bit processors was already where things were. So obviously they knew because it had already happened. Them missing that boat is just typical, not something that caught anybody unaware.
His deception was so good that he pretty much fooled everyone.
That is an idiotic lie.
I never bought it, nor did millions of other people who did anything to inform themselves apart from watching the mainstream media which was full on selling the war from the start. The UN inspectors sure didn't think he had any.
In any case, we can do away with that whole "Bush lied to go to Iraq" nonsense. That was debunked long ago. Most countries agreed with the U.S. that Saddam had WMDs so the case cannot be made that, in the run-up to the war, that it was an intentional deception on Bush's part.
No, we can't do away with that since it has been proven beyond any possibility of a doubt. It was never debunked, you're just an ignorant fool parroting the fascist party line in the face of all the evidence. I know it takes courage to admit you're wrong, so I certainly don't expect to see that out of the type of scum who support this treasonous regime but at least just STFU and quit repeating repeatedly debunked lies.
The population has been misinformed by the liberal media, as I have said. The mainstream media parrots a bunch of Democratic party lines... not because the Democrats are right, but because the media is an extension of the Democratic party.
Again, what color is the sky on your planet? That particular line of bullshit is so crazy that it's not even worth trying to convince you since you have a religious belief in it and so are beyond the reach of reason.
The reason why support for the war in Iraq is so low is precisely because of the media. Consequently, Bush's low approval ratings are a direct result of the media's opposition to the war in Iraq.
Batshit insane lies and nothing besides.
The media's lukewarm support for the truth had been forced on them by the decent patriotic people who were smart enough and brave enough to stand up and call bullshit on the administration's spin which defined the media coverage of the whole Iraq debacle until very recently. My position and that of millions of other good people hasn't changed since invading Iraq in response to a bunch of Saudi Arabians based out of Afghanistan was first mentioned, and we've been proven right at every turn. That is why the media has to do at least a half ass job of dealing with the truth now after years and years of their lying bullshit which you keep repeating.
Bush's low approval ratings are due to the fact that he has consistently failed to do anything worthwhile throughout his entire administration. He has made himself one of the worst traitors this nation has ever seen. He has destroyed our integrity and our economy.
You're such a scumbag to by lying so blatantly in support of such a disaster. All because you're too cowardly to admit you were wrong. Grow up and act like a man.
Again, if you think the media is conspiring with this administration, you're blind. Or so completely out in the left-field of the political spectrum that Democrats look conservative to you. The war in Iraq does have relevancy in the war against terrorism but people as far left as you will never admit it--heck, they probably won't even understand the reasons why.
Ahh, yes, pretend that anyone who disagrees with your delusions *must* be on "the left". You would have lost all credibility as the partisan hack you proved yourself to be with that nonsense if you actually had any at this point.
I hate to break it to you, Sparky, but hatred of Bush comes from all over the political spectrum. Hell, all you need to hate Bush is to be a decent human being. The idea that invading Iraq had anything to do with terrorism is something only an ignorant fool could believe given that the PNAC documents stated flat out that their desire to invade Iraq was based purely on economic goals. Hell, you're defending people without even having bothered to read what they wrote about this very topic. That's a serious delusion.
The same could be said of the mainstream media which is, arguably, why the government under the current administration and military feel the need to counter with what some consider to be propaganda.
Wow, Dude. What color is the sky on your planet?
The current administration started with lying propaganda from the start and the mainstream media was entirely complicit with the completely bullshit selling of this war on entirely false pretenses.
So, no, it is nothing at all like "oh the poor innocent administration is just countering the evil media propaganda.
That idiocy you spewed isn't even sane, let alone correct.
It's not the government or the military fears the citizens of the United States, they fear the consequences of those citizens only being influenced by the propaganda of the mainstream media which is no more pure than that produced by the administration/military.
Bullshit. They are scared to death of an informed population which is why we've heard nothing but blatant lies out of them. Why do you think there are still morons who think this war has anything to do with terrorism or protecting America? It's due to the government and the media conspiring together against the citizens.
I consider the vast majority of what is broadcast as supposedly neutral "news" to be biased and, in many cases, the propaganda arm of the Democratic party.
Then you are an ignorant delusional fool, completely divorced from reality. Not only is there no evidence for such a ridiculous idea, there isn't even a mechanism by which it could happen. The MSM is owned by large corporations and run in the interests of those corporations. War makes cash so that's what they support.
I mean just spend a couple minutes thinking and the idiocy of your position becomes quite obvious.
If out media were anywhere near *neutral*, then this entire administration would have been executed years ago for their many blatant acts of treason. That would be the result of a clear concise unbiased reporting of their chosen actions and nothing more.
The media isn't neutral, they are far right wing as they have to be given who owns them.
Seriously, sparky, your delusional lies are decades out of touch with reality.
"To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.
Do you see where, in your own quote, it specifically backs up my statement?
Does it say to execute any powers somedumass arbitrarily decides it should have? Why no, it doesn't.
Thanks for playing, but you lose by your own words.
The fact that it has taken many more powers than it is legally entitled to (largely through the type of ignorance of our system among the populace which you have so eloquently demonstrated) is irrelevant to that point.
I have. I have never compared Clinton to Hitler. Unfortunately, it's not just the "FAR" left that does it. Take a look at MSNBC's highest rated commentator comparing [youtube.com] Bush to Hitler. At Huffington, you see comments like the following:
The fact is that there a mass of very close comparisons to be drawn between Bush and Hitler. That's called rational thought. It's also called being aware of who he is, who he's surrounded himself with, and what they've done.
Now, the first thing to keep in mind, since we both know that you will lie through your teeth and attempt to portray any reference to Hitler as a reference to the holocaust, is that our (the allies) declarations of war against Germany and our problems with Nazis had nothing at all to do with the holocaust.
So given that the holocaust was entirely irrelevant to our decision to enter WW2, it's obvious that there were plenty of other problems with Hitler than the holocaust. In almost all cases, those are the things people are referencing when comparing Bush to Hitler.
So, of course you haven't compared Hillary to Hitler because those comparisons do not exist to be made. The comparisons between Bush and Hitler are many and accurate. From the fact that his grandfather committed treason to aid the Nazis when we were at war with them to his entirely unapologetic use of Goering's philosophy to get the American people working against their own best interests:
"Why, of course, the people don't want war," Goering shrugged. "Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship."
The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."
Add in the fact that Wolfowitz got his PhD studying under the number one proponent of Nazi philosophy, especially "the big lie", and you see that not only are the comparisons to Bush valid, they're critical to understanding this administration.
So your feeble attempt to try and claim moral high ground by not making bogus comparisons while you're attacking reasonable comparisons on a basis of total nonsense is typical of the cynical contempt for honesty which has become a defining characteristic of Republicans over the last 30 years.
We're not stupid, and we're pretty sick of that sort of disgusting contempt for integrity, ethics, and morality. So just stop it already. Nobody but the dumbest of the dumb of our society buys it any more.
You're right. Maybe I should have said "far left". You can not deny the raw hatred that comes from the far left of this country. Granted, I'm sure there is just as much from the far right (the KKK for example), but Republicans tend to distance themselves from that level of politics.
That's nothing but batshit insane idiocy and lies.
The whole hatred as part of politics is the triumph of the Republican party and the defining characteristic of their campaigns.
From campaigning on a platform of gay hatred, to the redefining of "Liberal" to a meaningless slur, to comments like your nonsense about "the left" .
There is no meaning or value to any of those statements, but you almost never hear a Republican speaking publicly without calling upon one of those demonisations.
Heck, McCain lost to the most anti-American, anti-Christian coward due in large part to Bush spreading rumors about his black baby.
So, seriously, that crap is old, tired and none but the most cowardly of the fools clinging to the shattered shreds of the Republican party still buy into anything that idiotic.
So, yes, we all know you're lying. Reality is right in front of us and it's clear as crystal. Would you pull your head out of your ass, at long last, and at least shut up if you can't do anything but repeat lying propaganda?
He is an avid supporter of the policies of Bush who is one of if not the worst traitor in out nation's history. That makes him the enemy of America.
America has many enemies. Osama Bin Laden would be a fine example of one. John McCain is not an enemy of America.
Osama bin Laden and Bush/McCain are on the same side against us. However, Osama hasn't done much of anything to us compared to the damage Bush has caused and McCain has stated his intention to continue.
don't take an American hero and call him the "enemy". That's just hateful, partisan rhetoric. Enough of the hate speech already.
Save it, Sparky. That's just nonsense.
McCain isn't a hero and never was. Were he a hero, he would have refused to go to Vietnam. Quit trying to play the crap emotional ploys and deal with reality.
Notice he didn't say that he WANTED to be in Iraq for 100 years. He said he would do what it takes to protect America.
Ahhh, that's the thing though. Going into Iraq was a complete disaster form the perspective of "protecting America". There was no reason to go in nad there is no reason to stay.
So, obviously, he does want to stay there for a hundred years since he has no legitimate reason to even be there, let alone remain there.
So please, stop lying about McCain. I didn't even finish the rest of your McCain rant. If you can't be honest about what he said in the first two sentences, you've lost all credibility over the rest.
No, he stated a clear, obvious fact.
His credibility is solid.
Yours is nonexistent after years of defending every insane treasonous policy of Bush over the last many years. Given that you've repeatedly proven yourself incapable of developing a sane opinion you should probably stop flinging mud at your betters.
Do you see life liberty or the pursuit of happiness listed anywhere in the constitution? If it is a right, it isn't a protected one.
Never has your name been more fitting. Your understanding of what the constitution is and what it does couldn't be more wrong if you tried.
If it doesn't specifically give the federal government the power to prevent you from doing something, then you have that right (subject to state or local legislation against it).
The constitution does not grant rights to the people. *All* rights are assumed from the start.
If you can think of it, it doesn't hurt others, and the power isn't specifically given to the government to restrict it, then it's your right.
The FACT is that you're a loser Star Wars fanboy who attacked me after I pointed out what a useless piece of shit you are.
That's amusing.
I don't remember a Lorn in Star Wars. And I didn't attack you. Heck, I don't believe I've ever even said anything to you. Maybe you just don't even have a clue what you're talking about?
I always thought the law was dry and boring. Judge Kent's courtroom must be a fun place indeed (as long as you're not an idiot, like the plaintiff's lawyer)
I was in court once for a speeding ticket, and there was some guy in there for a noise violation (playing his car stereo too loud). The judge had him walk to the back of the courtroom with a measuring tape, said "can you hear me?". The guy said, "yes" and the judge said, "that's too loud" (based on the law and the distance).
So the guy comes back to the stand, the judge tells him that since it's his first offense that if he pleads guilty he'll most likely just get the charges dropped. So after a few times of the judge leading him along that course he finally said "guilty".
The judge banged his gavel and said, "30 days in jail".
The kid's face dropped, a wave of "holy shit" went across the courtroom and then the judge started laughing and said "just kidding, charges dropped".
I think actually that you should be building a statue to my genius, and worshipping me.
If you want that, you first need to demonstrate some sort of worth. The fact is that all you've demonstrated is cowardice, idiocy and treason. There is no other possible set of qualities you could possess that would cause you to be a Bush supporter long time or short time.
Try using facts next time and stay within the bounds of reality.
Or just do the only decent thing left to you after the massive damage you've willfully aided and kill yourself.
Have you seriously considered taking the only possible course open to you to gain a scrap of integrity and put a bullet in your cowardly, deluded traitor's brain?
I wonder how many decades it will be IF we are ever able to recover our national integrity.
The only way it would ever even be possible is if we execute the whole pack of traitors. Anything short of that is an explicit admission that we are not a nation of laws and that integrity is beyond us.
Ce Bian and Andrew Booker (and their computer) should at least win SOME prize and may need to practice their Sweedish.....
They might win some prize, but certainly not one that would involve any Swedish. There is no Nobel prize for mathematics. The Fields medal is the closest equivalent.
Many right wing groups like Amish or others seem just as crazy to regular people.
Did you just call the Amish, one of the most left wing religious groups in the country, "right wing"?
You don't actually have the foggiest idea what left and right are, do you?
I mean it's frightening to hear political discussions in America anyhow given the disgusting level of ignorance of most people here, but you have gone way beyond blatant ignorance into a whole new realm with that insane babbling.
My theory IS within the realm of reason. Unless you are willing to say something like "Hey, we know the people that live in that area are backward, lack skills, and have no resources."
No, the idea that such people *could* have done it is well within the realm of reason.
Your idea, that they are the most likely candidate, is not.
Nobody says it is, but we're far and away the mosy likely suspect.
The most likely suspect would be an Islamic nutbag, or group of nutbags that want to cut primarily Islamic states from western influence.
Wow, that's a pretty far out conspiracy theory. How exactly would one of those groups top the US on a list of suspects for something like this? They're not exactly known for having the equipment necessary to do something like this. The US, however is known for that. We're also very well known for agitating against Iran in order to keep up our constant war mentality that does so much to suppress liberty at home, and increase profits for well connected groups.
So where you get the extremely bizarre idea that a small group with limited resources and little reason to do such a thing is more likely to have done it than a large group with massive resources and plenty of reason to do so?
Who actually did it is, obviously, unknown, but try to keep your theories within the realm of reason, ok?
Slashdot Mirror
You haven't been to England recently, have you?
;-)
I was there last Christmas. We were walking through Soho and had to dodge 5 different puddles of puke on the sidewalk at 2:00 in the afternoon
What is "If" by Pink Floyd?/i
Well played Sir!
Don't forget the tired but reliable 1-5-6m-4 for emo songs that need at least one minor chord to project all that angst... oh my.. how angsty...
;-)
What would E-B7-E-D-E-D-E-C#7-F#-B7-E be on that scale? Bonus points if you can name the song
This deal has the same disturbing sense as the single mother unable to find a job and forced to *uck the ugly fat landlord to pay rent.
More like the single-handed ex-bowler forced to go down on the ugly nasty scrawny landlord to pay rent if you ask me.
Many of the design decisions would have been handled differently had the engineers known where things were going even 3 or 4 years down the road.
Except 3-4 years ago, multi core 64 bit processors was already where things were. So obviously they knew because it had already happened. Them missing that boat is just typical, not something that caught anybody unaware.
His deception was so good that he pretty much fooled everyone.
That is an idiotic lie.
I never bought it, nor did millions of other people who did anything to inform themselves apart from watching the mainstream media which was full on selling the war from the start. The UN inspectors sure didn't think he had any.
In any case, we can do away with that whole "Bush lied to go to Iraq" nonsense. That was debunked long ago. Most countries agreed with the U.S. that Saddam had WMDs so the case cannot be made that, in the run-up to the war, that it was an intentional deception on Bush's part.
No, we can't do away with that since it has been proven beyond any possibility of a doubt. It was never debunked, you're just an ignorant fool parroting the fascist party line in the face of all the evidence. I know it takes courage to admit you're wrong, so I certainly don't expect to see that out of the type of scum who support this treasonous regime but at least just STFU and quit repeating repeatedly debunked lies.
The population has been misinformed by the liberal media, as I have said. The mainstream media parrots a bunch of Democratic party lines... not because the Democrats are right, but because the media is an extension of the Democratic party.
Again, what color is the sky on your planet? That particular line of bullshit is so crazy that it's not even worth trying to convince you since you have a religious belief in it and so are beyond the reach of reason.
The reason why support for the war in Iraq is so low is precisely because of the media. Consequently, Bush's low approval ratings are a direct result of the media's opposition to the war in Iraq.
Batshit insane lies and nothing besides.
The media's lukewarm support for the truth had been forced on them by the decent patriotic people who were smart enough and brave enough to stand up and call bullshit on the administration's spin which defined the media coverage of the whole Iraq debacle until very recently. My position and that of millions of other good people hasn't changed since invading Iraq in response to a bunch of Saudi Arabians based out of Afghanistan was first mentioned, and we've been proven right at every turn. That is why the media has to do at least a half ass job of dealing with the truth now after years and years of their lying bullshit which you keep repeating.
Bush's low approval ratings are due to the fact that he has consistently failed to do anything worthwhile throughout his entire administration. He has made himself one of the worst traitors this nation has ever seen. He has destroyed our integrity and our economy.
You're such a scumbag to by lying so blatantly in support of such a disaster. All because you're too cowardly to admit you were wrong. Grow up and act like a man.
Again, if you think the media is conspiring with this administration, you're blind. Or so completely out in the left-field of the political spectrum that Democrats look conservative to you. The war in Iraq does have relevancy in the war against terrorism but people as far left as you will never admit it--heck, they probably won't even understand the reasons why.
Ahh, yes, pretend that anyone who disagrees with your delusions *must* be on "the left". You would have lost all credibility as the partisan hack you proved yourself to be with that nonsense if you actually had any at this point.
I hate to break it to you, Sparky, but hatred of Bush comes from all over the political spectrum. Hell, all you need to hate Bush is to be a decent human being.
The idea that invading Iraq had anything to do with terrorism is something only an ignorant fool could believe given that the PNAC documents stated flat out that their desire to invade Iraq was based purely on economic goals. Hell, you're defending people without even having bothered to read what they wrote about this very topic. That's a serious delusion.
Of course there is. I would think that you
The same could be said of the mainstream media which is, arguably, why the government under the current administration and military feel the need to counter with what some consider to be propaganda.
Wow, Dude. What color is the sky on your planet?
The current administration started with lying propaganda from the start and the mainstream media was entirely complicit with the completely bullshit selling of this war on entirely false pretenses.
So, no, it is nothing at all like "oh the poor innocent administration is just countering the evil media propaganda.
That idiocy you spewed isn't even sane, let alone correct.
It's not the government or the military fears the citizens of the United States, they fear the consequences of those citizens only being influenced by the propaganda of the mainstream media which is no more pure than that produced by the administration/military.
Bullshit. They are scared to death of an informed population which is why we've heard nothing but blatant lies out of them. Why do you think there are still morons who think this war has anything to do with terrorism or protecting America? It's due to the government and the media conspiring together against the citizens.
I consider the vast majority of what is broadcast as supposedly neutral "news" to be biased and, in many cases, the propaganda arm of the Democratic party.
Then you are an ignorant delusional fool, completely divorced from reality. Not only is there no evidence for such a ridiculous idea, there isn't even a mechanism by which it could happen. The MSM is owned by large corporations and run in the interests of those corporations. War makes cash so that's what they support.
I mean just spend a couple minutes thinking and the idiocy of your position becomes quite obvious.
If out media were anywhere near *neutral*, then this entire administration would have been executed years ago for their many blatant acts of treason. That would be the result of a clear concise unbiased reporting of their chosen actions and nothing more.
The media isn't neutral, they are far right wing as they have to be given who owns them.
Seriously, sparky, your delusional lies are decades out of touch with reality.
"To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.
Do you see where, in your own quote, it specifically backs up my statement?
Does it say to execute any powers somedumass arbitrarily decides it should have?
Why no, it doesn't.
Thanks for playing, but you lose by your own words.
The fact that it has taken many more powers than it is legally entitled to (largely through the type of ignorance of our system among the populace which you have so eloquently demonstrated) is irrelevant to that point.
I have. I have never compared Clinton to Hitler. Unfortunately, it's not just the "FAR" left that does it. Take a look at MSNBC's highest rated commentator comparing [youtube.com] Bush to Hitler. At Huffington, you see comments like the following:
The fact is that there a mass of very close comparisons to be drawn between Bush and Hitler.
That's called rational thought. It's also called being aware of who he is, who he's surrounded himself with, and what they've done.
Now, the first thing to keep in mind, since we both know that you will lie through your teeth and attempt to portray any reference to Hitler as a reference to the holocaust, is that our (the allies) declarations of war against Germany and our problems with Nazis had nothing at all to do with the holocaust.
So given that the holocaust was entirely irrelevant to our decision to enter WW2, it's obvious that there were plenty of other problems with Hitler than the holocaust.
In almost all cases, those are the things people are referencing when comparing Bush to Hitler.
So, of course you haven't compared Hillary to Hitler because those comparisons do not exist to be made.
The comparisons between Bush and Hitler are many and accurate. From the fact that his grandfather committed treason to aid the Nazis when we were at war with them to his entirely unapologetic use of Goering's philosophy to get the American people working against their own best interests:
"Why, of course, the people don't want war," Goering shrugged. "Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship."
The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."
Add in the fact that Wolfowitz got his PhD studying under the number one proponent of Nazi philosophy, especially "the big lie", and you see that not only are the comparisons to Bush valid, they're critical to understanding this administration.
So your feeble attempt to try and claim moral high ground by not making bogus comparisons while you're attacking reasonable comparisons on a basis of total nonsense is typical of the cynical contempt for honesty which has become a defining characteristic of Republicans over the last 30 years.
We're not stupid, and we're pretty sick of that sort of disgusting contempt for integrity, ethics, and morality. So just stop it already. Nobody but the dumbest of the dumb of our society buys it any more.
You're right. Maybe I should have said "far left". You can not deny the raw hatred that comes from the far left of this country. Granted, I'm sure there is just as much from the far right (the KKK for example), but Republicans tend to distance themselves from that level of politics.
That's nothing but batshit insane idiocy and lies.
The whole hatred as part of politics is the triumph of the Republican party and the defining characteristic of their campaigns.
From campaigning on a platform of gay hatred, to the redefining of "Liberal" to a meaningless slur, to comments like your nonsense about "the left" .
There is no meaning or value to any of those statements, but you almost never hear a Republican speaking publicly without calling upon one of those demonisations.
Heck, McCain lost to the most anti-American, anti-Christian coward due in large part to Bush spreading rumors about his black baby.
So, seriously, that crap is old, tired and none but the most cowardly of the fools clinging to the shattered shreds of the Republican party still buy into anything that idiotic.
So, yes, we all know you're lying. Reality is right in front of us and it's clear as crystal.
Would you pull your head out of your ass, at long last, and at least shut up if you can't do anything but repeat lying propaganda?
First, John McCain is not the enemy.
Sure he is.
He is an avid supporter of the policies of Bush who is one of if not the worst traitor in out nation's history. That makes him the enemy of America.
America has many enemies. Osama Bin Laden would be a fine example of one. John McCain is not an enemy of America.
Osama bin Laden and Bush/McCain are on the same side against us. However, Osama hasn't done much of anything to us compared to the damage Bush has caused and McCain has stated his intention to continue.
don't take an American hero and call him the "enemy". That's just hateful, partisan rhetoric. Enough of the hate speech already.
Save it, Sparky. That's just nonsense.
McCain isn't a hero and never was. Were he a hero, he would have refused to go to Vietnam. Quit trying to play the crap emotional ploys and deal with reality.
Notice he didn't say that he WANTED to be in Iraq for 100 years. He said he would do what it takes to protect America.
Ahhh, that's the thing though. Going into Iraq was a complete disaster form the perspective of "protecting America". There was no reason to go in nad there is no reason to stay.
So, obviously, he does want to stay there for a hundred years since he has no legitimate reason to even be there, let alone remain there.
So please, stop lying about McCain. I didn't even finish the rest of your McCain rant. If you can't be honest about what he said in the first two sentences, you've lost all credibility over the rest.
No, he stated a clear, obvious fact.
His credibility is solid.
Yours is nonexistent after years of defending every insane treasonous policy of Bush over the last many years.
Given that you've repeatedly proven yourself incapable of developing a sane opinion you should probably stop flinging mud at your betters.
Do you see life liberty or the pursuit of happiness listed anywhere in the constitution? If it is a right, it isn't a protected one.
Never has your name been more fitting.
Your understanding of what the constitution is and what it does couldn't be more wrong if you tried.
If it doesn't specifically give the federal government the power to prevent you from doing something, then you have that right (subject to state or local legislation against it).
The constitution does not grant rights to the people. *All* rights are assumed from the start.
If you can think of it, it doesn't hurt others, and the power isn't specifically given to the government to restrict it, then it's your right.
Please quit repeating that dead wrong crap.
Even worse when I tried to watch it said 'sorry england' now im pissed cause im Scottish and in Scotland :( lol
Whatever, Frenchie.
Lorn shot first."
The FACT is that you're a loser Star Wars fanboy who attacked me after I pointed out what a useless piece of shit you are.
That's amusing.
I don't remember a Lorn in Star Wars. And I didn't attack you. Heck, I don't believe I've ever even said anything to you.
Maybe you just don't even have a clue what you're talking about?
Yep, much more likely.
I always thought the law was dry and boring. Judge Kent's courtroom must be a fun place indeed (as long as you're not an idiot, like the plaintiff's lawyer)
I was in court once for a speeding ticket, and there was some guy in there for a noise violation (playing his car stereo too loud). The judge had him walk to the back of the courtroom with a measuring tape, said "can you hear me?". The guy said, "yes" and the judge said, "that's too loud" (based on the law and the distance).
So the guy comes back to the stand, the judge tells him that since it's his first offense that if he pleads guilty he'll most likely just get the charges dropped. So after a few times of the judge leading him along that course he finally said "guilty".
The judge banged his gavel and said, "30 days in jail".
The kid's face dropped, a wave of "holy shit" went across the courtroom and then the judge started laughing and said "just kidding, charges dropped".
I think actually that you should be building a statue to my genius, and worshipping me.
If you want that, you first need to demonstrate some sort of worth. The fact is that all you've demonstrated is cowardice, idiocy and treason.
There is no other possible set of qualities you could possess that would cause you to be a Bush supporter long time or short time.
Try using facts next time and stay within the bounds of reality.
Or just do the only decent thing left to you after the massive damage you've willfully aided and kill yourself.
I'm a long time Bush supporter
Have you seriously considered taking the only possible course open to you to gain a scrap of integrity and put a bullet in your cowardly, deluded traitor's brain?
Hello, my name is Nobody. You know, the one that's prefect. Same dude.
I thought that was Ford
I wonder how many decades it will be IF we are ever able to recover our national integrity.
The only way it would ever even be possible is if we execute the whole pack of traitors.
Anything short of that is an explicit admission that we are not a nation of laws and that integrity is beyond us.
Ce Bian and Andrew Booker (and their computer) should at least win SOME prize and may need to practice their Sweedish.....
They might win some prize, but certainly not one that would involve any Swedish.
There is no Nobel prize for mathematics. The Fields medal is the closest equivalent.
I think they would be hard pressed to convince anyone that the junky plastic toy used in GH is comparable to a Les Paul...
Although I would find it totally amusing to watch *Gibson's* lawyers try and convince a court that they are comparable.
Gibson is a bunch of litigious bastards, and that is why I will never purchase a Gibson guitar.
;-)
What about Martin or Taylor? (I'm in the market for a steel string
Many right wing groups like Amish or others seem just as crazy to regular people.
Did you just call the Amish, one of the most left wing religious groups in the country, "right wing"?
You don't actually have the foggiest idea what left and right are, do you?
I mean it's frightening to hear political discussions in America anyhow given the disgusting level of ignorance of most people here, but you have gone way beyond blatant ignorance into a whole new realm with that insane babbling.
My theory IS within the realm of reason. Unless you are willing to say something like "Hey, we know the people that live in that area are backward, lack skills, and have no resources."
No, the idea that such people *could* have done it is well within the realm of reason.
Your idea, that they are the most likely candidate, is not.
Who says that it's America?
Nobody says it is, but we're far and away the mosy likely suspect.
The most likely suspect would be an Islamic nutbag, or group of nutbags that want to cut primarily Islamic states from western influence.
Wow, that's a pretty far out conspiracy theory. How exactly would one of those groups top the US on a list of suspects for something like this?
They're not exactly known for having the equipment necessary to do something like this.
The US, however is known for that. We're also very well known for agitating against Iran in order to keep up our constant war mentality that does so much to suppress liberty at home, and increase profits for well connected groups.
So where you get the extremely bizarre idea that a small group with limited resources and little reason to do such a thing is more likely to have done it than a large group with massive resources and plenty of reason to do so?
Who actually did it is, obviously, unknown, but try to keep your theories within the realm of reason, ok?