I was able to test the first DVD beta in Oct 2003 (and in fact installed it to HD, and still running fine!) using Vmware Workstation 3. Didn't have a DVD drive at the time, but *did* have broadband.
Just mount the ISO image as a drive, create a virtual HD disk to store your stuff, and have at it. You should also be able to do the same with qemu (but the last version I tested, a few months back, suffered from crashes.)
Recently upgraded to VMware WS5 (which handles kernel 2.6) and has better GUI. Not a bad deal, as long as you have plenty of RAM (384-512MB recomended) and HD space for your virtual machines -- it's somewhat addictive.;-)
There is no discernible difference between the two - they are one and the same.
However, I would argue that for freedom-of-speech purposes, some photos of abuse should be cleared for news publications, so that people can see the horror that happens in real life. But some sicko will still doubtless use the published photos in the news for their own twisted purposes.
Don't be an asshat. When you publish a photo of someone on the internet, SOMEbody will eventually use it for self-gratification. Bad enough when it's a woman - much, much worse when it's a child that has been victimized.
Slashdot Mirror
+1 Mothercombuster
;-b
( Mirror site )
Yah; the article's author is just a little (WAY) TOO much into the game and its Deep Philosophical Consequences, for my taste.
Nonono, j00 have it all wrong!
:P
Hermione gets pregnant(!);
Ron is the father(!!);
Harry Potter dies(-- !!! --);
And they all live happily ever after!
PEBCAK; FUBAR.
:b
That is all, movealongnothingtoseeherefolks...
Heh; I got what you were saying but was unsure how to "mentally mod" it; is "Subtle nuanced troll" -1 or +1...
:b
+1 Funny
No choice but to accept? You don't live in the US, do you... If my company tried to do this, I'd _quit._
Animal: "WANT WOMAN!!!"
( Wild Muppet sex ensues )
We get signal!
;-b
Main screen turn on!
CAT5: How are you gentlemen!! You have no Monster cables, make your time!
--"We set you up the Bomb!" == Monster Cables INC
"Ah-One, ah-too-hoo, ah-three" ( Owl crunches down on lollipop )
http://www.tootsie.com/howmany-sb.html
Ah, that would be Chinese Battle Chess. When the pawn got shot by the cannon, he turned black and drifted to the ground in a pile of dust.
MS/DOS, man; good times, good times.
Yah... I'm really at a loss for words; reanimating Man's Best Friend into a zombie is just... Evil.
Try different kernel parms at boot, or shuffle your PCI cards around. At any rate, you're lucky - my IRQ only goes up to 15. ;-)
a tcodes.txt
Try boot: parm " pci=bios " (? IIRC) to see if it will boot; then you can DL the source, recompile the kernel and test at your leisure.
--See this for more info:
ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/knoppix/knoppix-che
I was able to test the first DVD beta in Oct 2003 (and in fact installed it to HD, and still running fine!) using Vmware Workstation 3. Didn't have a DVD drive at the time, but *did* have broadband.
;-)
Just mount the ISO image as a drive, create a virtual HD disk to store your stuff, and have at it. You should also be able to do the same with qemu (but the last version I tested, a few months back, suffered from crashes.)
Recently upgraded to VMware WS5 (which handles kernel 2.6) and has better GUI. Not a bad deal, as long as you have plenty of RAM (384-512MB recomended) and HD space for your virtual machines -- it's somewhat addictive.
*gasp* ROTFLMAO
I don't know exactly why, but that joke made me spit popcorn outta my nose.
~:b
+1 "Cube" reference ;-)
Meh. ...the point was? ;-)
For me, Stargate SG-1 / Atlantis, and Battlestar Galactica have completely supplanted "modern" Star Trek.
:)
Altho my favorite Star Trek is still TOS; and Diane Duane is one of my favorite Trek-book authors.
Mod parent up!
"Do you _really_ think that's _air_ you're breathing, right now? Hmm."
Brilliant! Do you have a link to a detailed HOWTO for that? ;-)
[ semi-serious ]
"Walk softly, but carry a Damn Big ClueBat Just In Case."
Wolfrider
There is no discernible difference between the two - they are one and the same.
However, I would argue that for freedom-of-speech purposes, some photos of abuse should be cleared for news publications, so that people can see the horror that happens in real life. But some sicko will still doubtless use the published photos in the news for their own twisted purposes.
Don't be an asshat. When you publish a photo of someone on the internet, SOMEbody will eventually use it for self-gratification. Bad enough when it's a woman - much, much worse when it's a child that has been victimized.