Slashdot Mirror


How Episode IV Should Have Ended

OverNeith writes "An excellent cartoon film showing how SW:Episode IV would have ended in a non-Lucas reality. Enjoy!" From the cartoon: "Han: Boy, you said it Chewie. I was this close to going back and helping those people."

375 comments

  1. Torrent, good thinking! by ayeco · · Score: 1, Informative

    eom

  2. Episode 4 should have ended. . . by Daikiki · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . .with episode 5. Unfortunately Lucas had to make four more.

    --
    I want the fire back.
    1. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by ForumTroll · · Score: 1

      It's not over yet. I'd be willing to put money on them making more sequels within the next ten to fifteen years. The ability of the series to continuously make absurd amounts of money is too much for the studios to resist. Even if the last few have been mediocre at best in terms of quality, there is still no doubt in the eyes of the studios that they have been a massive success. The studios don't care what they're selling nearly as much as how much it makes and Star Wars has continued to show that it can rake in money by the truckload.

      --
      "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      Amen brother.

      Well I guess 2 out of 6 ain't bad. Oh wait... it is.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    3. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by ericdano · · Score: 1

      I think they should do an episode 7, 8 and 9, dealing with an Old Luke and his offspring....

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    4. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by jacen_sunstrider · · Score: 1

      well, that would pose a problem. There is so much New Republic era material out there in the form of novels, lucas would be stepping on toes unless he jumps to something like 50 years after RotJ, and even then I'd cry foul if he didn't follow strictly to everything that had happened (peace with Empire, Vong, etc.).

    5. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Luke turns to the dark side.

      Leia becomes a Jedi and kills Luke, but dies in the process.

      There's no one left to teach about the force, thus it is balanced. Prophecy fulfilled.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    6. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by Adrilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An interesting question just popped into my head. What keeps the spirits of dead Jedi from teaching their ways to others? I know they couldn't do the physical, but they could teach the philosophy, and possibly even council, even during the old Jedi council meetings, not all people were physically present, they showed up via hologram. Seems like the same thing as the spirits.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    7. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Didn't Yoda give Obiwan a task of communicating with his former master while overlooking Luke?

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    8. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by ericdano · · Score: 1, Insightful

      However, if Lucas allows OTHERS write the script, based on these novels, we might have some good movies finally.....after 20 years ;-)

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    9. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Informative
      What keeps the spirits of dead Jedi from teaching their ways to others?

      Didn't see Episode 3, did you?

      The answer is at the end of the film where Yoda talks to Obiwan before they part ways.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    10. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      Yeah I get that and all, but I mean, what about new Jedi. Obi-Wan was already a master Jedi. They let their numbers dwindle down to two. But thousands of spirits existed in the force, why couldn't they have taught new padawan.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    11. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Funny
      But thousands of spirits existed in the force, why couldn't they have taught new padawan.

      Well, the ideal padawans are children, right?

      Imagine an immaterial Jedi trying to communicate the Force to a prospective padawan. You'd end up with a bunch of kids in a psych ward...

      "I see dead people."

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    12. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      I'm really not trying to troll here, but why do Star Wars fans insist on treating novels as cannonical material? Every other tv show or movie I can think of all but ignore novels when it comes to filming new material. You don't see the Beeb trying to explain what happened to the 8th Doctor and company in the new Who TV series (amnesia, Time War vs. book destruction of Gallifrey, etc). You also don't see Trek TV trying to tie too much into their novel line. (Then again, Trek doesn't keep continuity between shows that well.) I could see if we were still dealing with the three Zahn books and a few other odd titles, but there are just way too many Star Wars books nowadays for the movie franchise to worry about keeping continuity for. IMHO, if the novels want to go off in their own direction, let the novels explain how they fit into the new continuity.

    13. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      Wait, correctly answering a question without using a spoiler gets modded, "Overrated", now? When did that change?

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    14. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by masdog · · Score: 1

      There is very little continuity in the Post-RotJ novels, although some of the books try to keep continuity with each other and the original trilogy.

      The problem with the books that came after RotJ is that there was no roadmap drawn up by Lucasfilm, so the books were not written in chronological order until the New Jedi Order series was created.

      From what I understand, there is some continuity to the books that are related to the new trilogy, although I have only read one of them.

    15. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Yoda reveals that Qui-Gon has mastered a new force power and has passed it on to him. Obi-Wan's instructions are to study this.

      >But thousands of spirits existed in the force, why couldn't they have taught new padawan.

      Because none of them trained in this particular force power. Qui-Gon, Yoda and Obi-Wan will be the only ones.

      But then the problem with that is Anakin/Vader. At the end of RotJ we see Obi-Wan, Yoda and Anakin. When/how did Anakin attain this exclusive force power? After death? If that were possible, lots of dead Jedi would be floating around giving people advice and haunting the Emperor.

      The whole thing defies logical explanation. That's the problem with taking a movie like Star Wars and trying to explain the inconsistencies.

      You can't.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    16. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm really not trying to troll here, but why do Star Wars fans insist on treating novels as cannonical material?

      You people who get real live sex shouldn't be so harsh on us Star Wars fans.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    17. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably need to learn about the force first. It's a chicken and egg situation

    18. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      Two Jedi, Two Sith.

      Balance.

      Both sides had philosophical guidance, whether from talking dead guys or otherwise. Balance was maintained when Vader tossed Palpatine down the shaft (shut yo mouth), then swung back marginally in the favor of the Jedi as Vader died. Luke, arguably, is balanced since he upholds the "good" of the Jedi while not embracing their passionless approach to the force... i.e., he's a bit like a good Sith or a loose-cannon Jedi.

      I think that all worked out by accident, Lucas has failed to inject clue into the movies too many times for it to have been on purpose, IMO ;)

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    19. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      My guess is that communicating with Jedi spirits is a trick only known by Jedi masters and some rare exceptions. Obiwan was told by Yoda that he would be taught how to do it. If even some masters do not know about this trick, how are children without mentor supposed to learn about it to tap into spiritual wisdom from Jedis past?

      This trick might also have limits such as only being able to contact spirits of Jedis one met, sort of like spread-spectrum: you need to know exactly what you are looking for, otherwise everything looks like meaningless noise.

    20. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by colmore · · Score: 1

      Question: what's with the common opinion that Episode 6 was bad?

      The Ewoks, while maybe a little obnoxious, for the most part worked very well. They were introduced carefully, given a lot of time to relate to the main characters, and worked into the plot in an important way (unlike, say, any of the alien planets / situations in the new trilogy) I'm a big fan of the long, slow, dark opening with Jabba (gutsy way to start a sci-fi action movie) it has hands down the best space battle, and the Vader / Luke / Emperor confrontation on the bridge of the Death Star is downright Shakespearian (purposefully so, the similarities between Luke in that movie and a certain black-clad Danish prince are hardly accidental) None of the Star Wars movies are great cinema, but I don't see how Jedi fails to measure up to the first two.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    21. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by machineghost · · Score: 1
      *(sort of) Episode III spoiler alert*

      "What keeps the spirits of dead Jedi from teaching their ways to others?"
      Short answer: nothing stops them, but it would be a really slow process.

      Long Answer: Qui-Gon was the first jedi to come back from the spirit realm (Yoda says something to this effect at the end of ep.3). So, at the end of ep.6 when you see Anakain/Obi-Wan/Yoda, you are seeing three of the four real-world-visiting Jedi (Qui-Gong isn't there because he didn't know Luke/because Lucas hadn't dreamt him up yet).

      But why can't those four re-teach a shattered empire the ways of the jedi? Well it seems clear that they can't just travel back and forth to the living realm willy-nilly, because otherwise Obi-Wan would have hovered behind Luke all the way to Dagobah giving directions (and complaining about how fast he was flying ...) instead of just appearing for ten seconds with a cryptic directive.

      So at the end of ep.6 you have four dead jedi who are capable of returning as spirits very occaisionally. I suppose they might be able to teach the force very slowly to someone (Hi, I'm Qui Gong, and I'm hear for your once-a-month twenty second lightsabre training ... go!), but unless they find someone with an Anakin/Luke level of natural mastery of the force, the Jedi would probably take centuries to re-grow. Which is why it's much faster to just have a near-master (Luke) teach everyone, with a little guidance from the spirits every once in awhile, which is what (I think) the Jedi Academy series of books is about.

    22. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the ideal padawans are children, right?

      Uhhh..... children? I think you mean younglings. It just wouldn't be right to have children murdered in a film, even by Darth Vader!

    23. Re:Episode 4 should have ended. . . by mink · · Score: 1

      Nah, thats just Harvey, he's a Pooka.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  3. WARNING!! by macaulay805 · · Score: 1, Troll

    The torrent file distributes a .WMV file!

    1. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      warning? wtf, its not the end of the world. linux plays wmv fine nowadays. its not the end of the world because its OMGOMGBBQ!!11one!! WMV....

    2. Re:WARNING!! by takeya · · Score: 4, Informative

      May I interest you in VideoLan?

      I believe it will play WMVs on all systems it supports.

    3. Re:WARNING!! by macaulay805 · · Score: 1

      While I personally use VideoLan (and praise its abilities), it does not allow me to view some Windows Media files, or the wmv video playback is horribly pixelated. So generally, I try to stay away from .wmv files as much as possible.

    4. Re:WARNING!! by Basehart · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about this player, it seems to play WMV files just fine!

    5. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ..but I'm from Europe!

    6. Re:WARNING!! by RyLaN · · Score: 1

      How about this player, it seems to play WMV files just fine**!

      **Hunt down the Win32 Codec pack and you're good to go

      --
      At least the war on the environment is going well
    7. Re:WARNING!! by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      MPlayer will play .wmv's, and it also won't open your browser to a bunch of ads that were embedded in the .wmv file.

    8. Re:WARNING!! by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Note that the ads comment was in general - I have no idea whether there are ads in this particular file :/

    9. Re:WARNING!! by IWK · · Score: 4, Informative
      > **Hunt down the Win32 Codec pack

      If you are running the latest Debian Stable version, Sarge, you can add the line

      ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ stable main

      to your /etc/apt/sources.list file and run

      apt-get update && apt-get install w32codecs


      --
      Once in a while, I even pass the Turing-Test
    10. Re:WARNING!! by Flounder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at least Win users can still decompress gzipped tarballs.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    11. Re:WARNING!! by ForumTroll · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm on Linux and Mplayer and Xine can play the WMV files perfectly fine. Just need to have the correct codec installed. I'm using Fedora and I even installed all the codec's through yum. If you're using an RPM based distribution Atrpms should have all the packages you need. Plenty of instructions can be found by googling on how to install the codecs you need...

      --
      "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
    12. Re:WARNING!! by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "WARNING!! The torrent file distributes a .WMV file!"

      Warning? What, are we supposed to wave our pitchforks because they chose a format that most people have a player for?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:WARNING!! by macshit · · Score: 1

      Man, windows users are so pissy...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    14. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Linux users can watch .WMVs. Whats your point?

    15. Re:WARNING!! by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Finding that out saved me the waste of bandwidth downloading a file only to find out that nothing on my Mac would play it.

      But since others in the world can play it, all must be right with the world...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    16. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're new here ? :)

    17. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VLC and MPlayer have mac versions. FFDShow work on a mac. I install quicktime alternative (because i hate the nagware that apple puts on the windows version) and i can play qt video. It really not that hard to install vlc for a mac user, sigh

      Unless the mac is actually not good at something. OMG!!!!!!

    18. Re:WARNING!! by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      I have VLC 0.83 installed on my Mac. If the .wmv is for WMP 10, I get an error message about the codec. I'm not going to waste my time trying find the magic combination of codecs just on the off-chance that I might be able to play that particular .wmv file. I've lived nearly 50 years without .wmv files in my life, I can survive quite well without them for another 50 if need be.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    19. Re:WARNING!! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      You can try Flip4Mac's WMV Player ($9,99). It can play those WMVs that even Microsoft's own (disgraceful) WiMP for Mac can't.

    20. Re:WARNING!! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      you could also download the "essential" codec pack from mplayers site (here) and install it manually either in /usr/local/lib/codecs or /usr/local/lib/win32 (simlink one to the other) and you should be good to go...

      I did it this way before I knew about marillat's repository (which btw is a great source for the various faad and faac debs, since compiling them on debian is one hell of a PITA)

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    21. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What, are we supposed to wave our pitchforks because they chose a format that most people have a player for?

      Yes. Yes, we are.

    22. Re:WARNING!! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Almost correct. It can't (AFAIK) play WMV3 or IV50 on OSX though, which is damn annoying sometimes (I refuse to install Windows Media Player on my Mac). It looks like DVD Jon got WMV3 running in VLC on Linux back in November last year, but I still haven't seen a build anywhere for Linux or OSX that's actually being distributed.

    23. Re:WARNING!! by DrLex · · Score: 2, Informative

      MPlayer nor VLC on Mac OS can benefit from the hack which is used in Linux, i.e. sending everything through the windows DLL. Therefore it can only play old WMV files for which the codec has been reverse engineered. When the switch to x86 is there, this problem will probably go away, though.
      For now the only programs I know that can play most WMV junk in OS X, are the crappy WMP from MS itself, and Flip4Mac. The latter is pretty good since it allows to play WMV in QuickTime, enabling most of the features that I expect from a decent media player like easy seeking, frame per frame, ...

    24. Re:WARNING!! by Phyvo · · Score: 1

      You could just download Mplayer (which plays just about everything, including music), or even *gasp* windows media player, which is also free.

    25. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up.

    26. Re:WARNING!! by orta · · Score: 0
      --
      my band is more brutal techno punk than yours
    27. Re:WARNING!! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Nope, just dies if I feed it a WMV3 file. Thanks for the link anyway though. It's not all .wmv videos that are a problem, it's just the WMV3 codec (which is Windows Media Player 9 upwards), VLC can handle anything below that.

    28. Re:WARNING!! by Nf1nk · · Score: 1

      I tried your link and got this
      "Your operating system is not currently supported by Windows Media Player."

      --
      I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
    29. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Warning? What, are we supposed to wave our pitchforks because they chose a format that most people have a player for?

      You mean .mpg? Because that's what everybody has a player for, and that's what they didn't use.

    30. Re:WARNING!! by Basehart · · Score: 1

      You need to upgrade to XP then - I don't think Windows ME is supported ;-)

    31. Re:WARNING!! by NanoGator · · Score: 0

      "You mean .mpg? Because that's what everybody has a player for, and that's what they didn't use."

      I love how people on Slashdot spontaneously develop brain damage when it's time to counter a point. "I'm going to be extremely literal and win!!"

      Bandwidth, dumb ass. WMV is a lot smaller than .MPG. This is such common knowledge that I cannot believe you'd actually go to the trouble.
      Lots of silliness born out of anti-Microsoft sentiment.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    32. Re:WARNING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried that one but it kept trying to connect to the internet even when playing local content so it had to go. Reportedly, it can also run executable content which would be another showstopper.

    33. Re:WARNING!! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Gee. Overrated. Don't hit reply or anything.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    34. Re:WARNING!! by Ender_Wiggin · · Score: 1

      Why outlaw circumcision? I mean, I think we should do something about smoking first, that's far more harmful.

    35. Re:WARNING!! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      You can CHOOSE not to smoke.

    36. Re:WARNING!! by Ender_Wiggin · · Score: 1

      And I can CHOOSE to get circumcised. If I wasn't when I was a baby, I would get it performed now.

      However, I can see why you dislike the idea of having it performed as a baby. I believe certain parts of the Middle East and Africa have it done at 13, but then I imagine it's more painful.

    37. Re:WARNING!! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Since it's HARMFUL, the right age to do it is NEVER.

  4. luke... by guorbatschow · · Score: 3, Funny

    sux to be luke then. joint the force he would have :P

    1. Re:luke... by matt21811 · · Score: 1

      "joint the force he would have "

      Yes, in this ending I guess he really was "smoked".
  5. torrent by StonedRat · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
    1. Re:torrent by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      Mirror? ;/ Seems to fail for me...

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    2. Re:torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick! we need a coral cache of this humungous video file before his poor server burst into...oh, nevermind

    3. Re:torrent by CityZen · · Score: 1

      Is there an alternate tracker available anywhere? This one seems to be down.

      All hail the power of Slashdot!

    4. Re:torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is thanks to whoever had the foresight to create a torrent of this as shock horror, the original link is down.

    5. Re:torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      begin-base64 644 Star_Wars_Ep_4.wmv.torrent
      ZDg6YW5ub3VuY2UzNTpodH RwOi8vNjguMjM2LjEyNC4xNzc6Nj k2OS9hbm5vdW5jZTE4OmF6dXJl
      dXNfcHJvcGVydGllc2QxNz pkaHRfYmFja3VwX2VuYWJsZWkxZW U3OmNvbW1lbnQwOjEzOmNvbW1l
      bnQudXRmLTgwOjEwOmNyZW F0ZWQgYnkxNTpBenVyZXVzLzIuMy 4wLjQxMzpjcmVhdGlvbiBkYXRl
      aTExMjE0Nzc0MDZlNDppbm ZvZDQ6ZWQyazE2OurHqPUnafTjTd epRKvIUwc2Omxlbmd0aGk3MTQx
      ODg4ZTQ6bmFtZTE4OlN0YX JfV2Fyc19FcF80LndtdjEwOm5hbW UudXRmLTgxODpTdGFyX1dhcnNf
      RXBfNC53bXYxMjpwaWVjZS BsZW5ndGhpMzI3NjhlNjpwaWVjZX M0MzYwOud1n9Gyjq7FAv7Iy5bW /yRqKvWtsLrCBIewDzxR3n6oQUdeM2mNZZXnkYI9y0sM+cnJt9 aVghdu6V3gfHx/uQNV5C+iK+XS
      bYiZj+2FgZhqi8Fey/Ee3m FBg9/KlgkyzYjupD030VU7f+ihOe 9nvmDM6ap9KjO6UxN7mUVNlOHo /kzZCXpf0VBj7cpy5vVwphb7V8eVrHIIAfKuqELBX9ckMM28w1 IlCx4Z3lHXLPRNCvJ3K2GHxKNd
      TYZ4A/Z24FuJwah2AQvAIK 5tW64R6GeK7oY7MFa5bXpHwFrDMm EGZNWI5+G0tAf1cTgCIJd+U4gn
      j8KSScGVMmD3t66NMgNFd6 8LYG8EmqzR34hUVnzhkZSmRZuOos hgHc8oOmI3D+dustwqzP9KefSP
      QLOrcvrDWPAtD1qcvfPz+O mFA2KnfXfnRL0Y0znhPvOSMMts2k xZYvK1aDyy8oN0UP/iDmTnCFII
      dMlP9dkBkvWOZfuR5w+DRW 1dawPaiiYBN7NqoVxmdibcAiASxv 3QHYM1DbZNBm2jRzOUkv2hT56U
      0wcOCk9whO5N0iKufc9TRP QFb2vqloP9c1YjTjCf8V4q42ccVR WJamaMvQQjnRPCWlTrxY4symFI
      A1vpZhv7L1dyEj1mq5zgzA NT+35udicI/MvG3jcMasu4tJDf3A 2do5+AwS9CU1D4kWDYurOjsZTt
      T90t2sLOJ1iJGZKvfjH2HG kKIdUqDZTvOIXkvBFBv4EHoCMu8o ZltQ6O+EJMf7wJksx6uBPuxsAI
      T/VTVmd8jt6iscCKR7ymgW syBycpMQBkaU4qQD2RNkt+0+lccU MTNNOKogsnEqC81iiW7CwnCtU/
      S+euuKobqnoVg9d11MyZqX 66w7OxtMMgTuv6kMMUg60YfNRiRu gE3xNK3hzsYz/BkBrH+AYZpVD7
      qyL1VcR9UYoczo1jcGuyDU fKi43o9JPK+h8B26KSkWnqEIoFqR Fvp9MWd9FWfEOlLImm+1eyf2fy
      XktHhxXogQtfE8yGGHbW8d +cyIDF8GPRsNHi+iDu+IIcyc+nuj 9dH5QjGLjRB5LKS9pg37wnN9/z
      FzrQnwYu0g40o9DZl20xRy 3OHAY+cpsef9qgOPrzDEfM3bpDm6 y8jiufimHjIBjXNWVSkVg1y0Ef
      NYLIlWgRNXO0lu0/BPsB8r pMGpdQwmPiqdF+s19rkwnP6nf3d2 qLJph6EXLNdSEhDHBHVU/YWlo1
      G3HxYHdmg+6E0QXLagZsLT Ncmb6m9sRFFmzUPZEK652TdF/ypr qumm3ZDAM9nbeIwdjz4QZFeGln
      iM7Sjf76vVPx4d3H/OTNwT +Zua/Q/Vclsv+PsEvpCOR8Iox9IX a9c6KdlKiE3qDa69czLa4wnIly
      6ZdR3nbGXo3exq7EPiuNgW bn2RgK1kmjWzM+bA7WhZtdw7Pv6C K3Vi2owhzXWLBaIclgkzfE+Loj
      mbnR0RO2DjFwNzmVNDMrqh I37mgaJLNjVRuJnuJM/BXzBxR3aQ YPhVZNDbfH8a1CaODi5zHZO6CR
      QG3lE8mRoc4d0LNCdbhGSD YfQqsRcj9tUx43kIj6LJmFQ5OP7u /0liqAvemUHwGOImK2stICRZ42
      gR3UHjGVbRqzuP6+aFcBl8 edxYfDF889g+7U3EMmKY3IYsLDn2 6pP9Tl4fiehZX1F2yjsbECnRyO
      GRATaGyNECT2wgqR175Rah WViTzJvyw5KMduWSLtb0f1h0Y8vs S3jXyhIROpYHQFrkONorn6g+E4
      0a04sqYUolPRp/aEgIsy+S lsoGFbbI1it0UfyvWNoxVFcInPnm FbcOr1oU5rspDWYr/mFHx72SFT
      svVRnW/S48+lhMbDmm1IxL ombO7gC+iqZz9K5ICwUjkNGDSO/7 OeYKHazD98hjeW/a/NalRZYcwG
      B1nc1/1hk6vo8E6fVt6tr3 vKhtKizVHnkDTBFYq87aHQ9ljVu+ NqfmRhv+NET7zabmU6j75e13ss
      jgoEBlZV6T9lcJFkyz9VCR afXVaruUlN7C1d2X/HAzGsGvAp/l pH8rwCB2ZGO/Q0wNVobdDulig5
      0sSUoKFN8rfG4AF0FvSDH7 +8osp4Ot0iarugxEc8PgZ5Bzn81p qXdyqvHX7LflkCENyoMiWbj+rK
      yrMX4mlnAXLrk2ZhfVXW1N 2ADumTc/gZJyyKG4sFqOjX/WFnsZ AZDcTjUij2vP/sQK1CNFDQ2sRy
      XGm6sxv1BBVrb5L+LAud9Z Pc3n+6OjLjVyESVYJ0xSs/9toHT0 8VJ7K0tV8re0T0nQ5uV4gjphge
      BPj6eG28ubP18reNMNpSPG sv+A1DoDUpUvqxp4cKJby3JRCId5 IeTBltxSNaKXWXV1+jgGT5CaS+
      YtEkXyXgttF4ylHSr0bn9v 3R3vRNNL9eb0selzpqnomH2qO/45 aMxoInMprEftW4hxhGBMyx+PWu
      YsrjgVkI5zIgYpgGtlBPN3 9Xtg3uX19D1EQLHSxzPq8p7ZGjLZ 2rYd76sWlkZgfK0zjiMOBnANd/
      iVUKvStEGlS1OZYix05auT J8Gnwn1EWs2Q4a/l5ch8DKHOZFij 1f2iM0NjGPHBUsyKHLT017rYC4
      9

    6. Re:torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's uuencoded, by the way.

    7. Re:torrent by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

      Y'know, when I saw the "bandiwdth exceeded" page, I was pretty much cursing /.... but now I'm connected to the best torrent I ever have been! There were, what, at least a bajillion peers?

      --
      Do you see what I did there?
    8. Re:torrent by sdpuppy · · Score: 1

      Oooohh...I thought "Bandwidth exceeded" was how the article suggested that Star Wars Episode IV should end...guess I'm sort of clueless today...would have been a bummer if it did end that way I suppose...

  6. Re:Torrent, good thinking! by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Wow, a true test of Bittorent, 1.4% done and I'm uploading 5x as fast as I download. 1 hour estimated download :-)

  7. how do you play this by wayne606 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's a torrent file?

    1. Re:how do you play this by W-Cid · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent might help. http://www.bitlord.com/ is a good Windows BT client.

    2. Re:how do you play this by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 3, Informative

      Aww.. Ain't that cute. A newbie.

      Here you go, install the appropriate version for your OS.
      http://www.bittorrent.com/

      This will explain how the whole thing works
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrent

    3. Re:how do you play this by RowboatRobot · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's a bittorrent file?

      http://userpages.umbc.edu/~hamilton/btclientconfig .html#HowBTWorks

      After reading that page, which describes how bittorrent works, you might want to go to the following page, where you can download a bittorrent client and learn more about the system.

      http://www.bittorrent.com/

    4. Re:how do you play this by SpartanVII · · Score: 1
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bittorent

      This is probably the easiest way to explain it.

      I recommend using Azureus to download the torrent.

      http://azureus.sourceforge.net/

    5. Re:how do you play this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody modded this 'troll'? Jesus, what a waste of modpoints.

    6. Re:how do you play this by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Are you another one of those guys who bought a lower UID off eBay?

    7. Re:how do you play this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know of a Bittorrent plug-in for Firefox that works and downloads torrents and not just search for them?

    8. Re:how do you play this by werewolf1031 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's a torrent file?

      Score:-1, Sad :/

    9. Re:how do you play this by twelveinchbrain · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aww.. Ain't that cute. A newbie.

      Aww.. Ain't that cute. Somebody who has no sense of humor. Yeah, he's a newbie whose Slashdot ID is 24,894 lower than your own. Now that's funny.

      --
      Not Found
      The requested URL /signature.html was not found on this server.
    10. Re:how do you play this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An RPM and a debian package!

      This sucks! Windows people won't support Linux, and now Linux people won't support versions of linux they don't have.

      I miss the days of the TGZ.

    11. Re:how do you play this by ph43drus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jeez, if 211893 is low, make me some offers people.

      Jeff

    12. Re:how do you play this by ferat · · Score: 5, Funny

      no kidding.

    13. Re:how do you play this by identity0 · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the link that said "Click here for source and older versions"

    14. Re:how do you play this by PeteDotNu · · Score: 1

      Dunno. I'm still trying to figure out what one of these star war things is that everyone keeps talking about.

      --
      My other processor is big-endian.
    15. Re:how do you play this by CAIMLAS · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know what's even more cute?

      His slashdot UID is lower than your's.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    16. Re:how do you play this by PabloHoffman · · Score: 1

      Certainly nothing to worry about if you use the last Opera 8.02 which has builtin bittorrent support.

      Beta versions available for Linux/Mac/Windows here

    17. Re:how do you play this by idonthack · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe... he's... uh... using his brother's account?

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    18. Re:how do you play this by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Aye aye, cap'n. Your UID is considered old when there are people getting UIDs four times the size of yours. Check out mine.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    19. Re:how do you play this by dair · · Score: 5, Funny

      Get in line people, get in line...

    20. Re:how do you play this by The+employee+can+cho · · Score: 1

      Yeah, get in line folks - err, wait, I don't think I understand this thread

    21. Re:how do you play this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last? you mean there ain't gonna be any more upgrades to to Opera? I guess I will have to finally switch to that Firethingy

    22. Re:how do you play this by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I feel so terribly inadequate right now.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    23. Re:how do you play this by cide1 · · Score: 1

      So do I, So do I

      --
      -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
    24. Re:how do you play this by Noaccess0 · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else read this and wonder who exactly is getting fitted with a Slashdot IUD?

    25. Re:how do you play this by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      $10!!

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    26. Re:how do you play this by ACNiel · · Score: 1

      I am not new here, and I have never downloaded a torrent, the software, or would even know where to start (other than using /. to find a discussion with some info).

      There are even some /. users who don't use Linux.

    27. Re:how do you play this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have UID #15, but um, I forgot my password. That's right, don't look at me that way.

      #15

    28. Re:how do you play this by JawzX · · Score: 1

      hey, I'm special too!

    29. Re:how do you play this by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Funny
      What's a torrent file?

      It is a spyware distribution system used for software, music, and movie piracy. Is this worth even trying to track down someone who is hosting this WMV file properly via a web or FTP site?

    30. Re:how do you play this by Slider · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

    31. Re:how do you play this by Erich · · Score: 1

      Get in line for what?

      --

      -- Erich

      Slashdot reader since 1997

  8. Bittorrent Rate by boingyzain · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its kinda fun to watch my bittorrent upload rate jump up from 2KB/s to 170 to 300 within seconds of the article making slashdot.

    1. Re:Bittorrent Rate by ForumTroll · · Score: 5, Funny

      Almost makes me want to start posting pr0n links here.

      --
      "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:Bittorrent Rate by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      Its even funnier to watch my download rate max out at 400kb/sec (my cable modems max) minutes after the article making slashdot. . . finished without uploading a single byte.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    3. Re:Bittorrent Rate by ForumTroll · · Score: 1

      Hate to respond to my own post, but being modded insightful wasn't really the response I was expecting...

      --
      "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
    4. Re:Bittorrent Rate by WillerZ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well yeah, I'd have modded it interesting...

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    5. Re:Bittorrent Rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well yeah, I'd have modded it interesting..."

      You must be a little "slow"...

    6. Re:Bittorrent Rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Slashdot! Check out zombie_goat_bukkake_porn.avi.torrent!

      Heh heh heh... soon my collection will be complete.

    7. Re:Bittorrent Rate by idonthack · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better than troll, eh?
      If you did post porn, you'd probably get +5 Interesting within about three seconds.


      ...Karma...

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    8. Re:Bittorrent Rate by Random_Goblin · · Score: 1

      Hey, Slashdot! Check out zombie_goat_bukkake_porn.avi.torrent!

      is that with brown goats or grey goats? I hate the ones with grey goats!

    9. Re:Bittorrent Rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please Do! 8]-^

    10. Re:Bittorrent Rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. It is rare to see a torrent smoke my entire download bandwidth. It got nudged up to 460KB/s almost immediately. Only problem is that the current upload speed will take a long time to reach 1/1.

    11. Re:Bittorrent Rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:Bittorrent Rate by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      fucking racist!

    13. Re:Bittorrent Rate by julesh · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work if you post AC. You need those two points to start with, or nobody'll try your link, out of fear of something... well... I'd rather not think about it, to be frank. Yes, yes, I got suckered into it. The mirror was new at the time.

  9. 211893? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did I read that right?

    1. Re:211893? by superdoo · · Score: 1

      That's a legitimate question. What is a torrent anyway? It only rained a little bit here this morning.

  10. Not really my thing, but... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not one for star wars humor, but damn that was funny. :) Worth a watch. The animation is real nice, too.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
    1. Re:Not really my thing, but... by antdude · · Score: 1

      I saw the SW one. I didn't think it was funny. [shrugs] I will watch the other two movie endings.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:Not really my thing, but... by falkryn · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought the Saving Private Ryan one was the funniest of the three.

    3. Re:Not really my thing, but... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Agreed, not funny. This one is much more clever, especially if you don't mind the fact that it actually has a message.

    4. Re:Not really my thing, but... by Flounder · · Score: 1
      As long as you don't mind that the message is from a bunch of granola-eating hippies.

      Sorry, but organic food is fine as a niche market. Hell, I buy organic milk all the time. But using pesticides and genetically engineered foods to increase the size of harvest per acre is the only way to feed an ever-increasing population.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    5. Re:Not really my thing, but... by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that poverty was a problem of food distribution, not lack of arable land, and genetically modified more efficient crops were mostly to make more profit, not feed more people.

    6. Re:Not really my thing, but... by danheskett · · Score: 1

      It's not just about arable land, it's about hardiness. Organically grown crops are natural - and naturally, homeogenous tracts of one type of plants get diseased or infested with pretty strident regularity. You don't hear about it much in current organically based trendiness because there aren't a lot of places growing 100 acres of organic corno or whatever.

    7. Re:Not really my thing, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Lucas announced he will remake the movie Pearl Harbor. But in this one, the US fires first.

  11. Information overload by pmazer · · Score: 1

    I can't tell if he's joking or not...

  12. Episodes I - III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sadly episodes I through III should have ended on the cutting room floor.

    1. Re:Episodes I - III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a waste of mod points.

    2. Re:Episodes I - III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing he got your $9, who got the last laugh?

    3. Re:Episodes I - III by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Sadly episodes I through III should have ended on the cutting room floor.

      Did you mean The Editing Room floor?

  13. Wrong Episodes by NeoSkink · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wait... Something is wrong...

    Episode IV was fine how it was, shouldn't this be for Episode I-III?

  14. The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by antdude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, these two movies.

    Does anyone non-Bittorrent anywhere since the company's firewall is blocking those BT ports. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by rideaurocks · · Score: 1

      Change the ports?

    2. Re:The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by paul248 · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by antdude · · Score: 1

      The only ports I can use is 80 and 22. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by antdude · · Score: 0

      Thanks!!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm...I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in excitement and were suddenly silenced while watching the D**N CARTOON!

      NOW GET BACK TO WORK, YOU LAZY BUM!

    6. Re:The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      ssh proxy to a computer that does have said ports open perhaps? It works for me at school to home...

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    7. Re:The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy molly!

      I know purdue is extremely close the the backbone due to that big server in Ohio.... but that's blazin'

    8. Re:The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by Chapium · · Score: 1

      Thank you fellow boilermaker

    9. Re:The Matrix Revolutions and Saving Private Ryan! by LordWynd · · Score: 1

      Woo! Thanks Paul.

      - 2nd other Boilermaker.

  15. Re:Torrent, good thinking! by noewun · · Score: 1

    FWIW: Took about 30 seconds to download.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  16. I'm sorry, that wasn't even remotely funny by iibbmm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great animation, very impressive visually. But I must digress, that was very dull. I am a raging SW fanboy who loves just about anything that parodies or takes from SW, but this was boring. For something more fun, see www.ultracheese.com which is what I consider a FUNNY film.

    1. Re:I'm sorry, that wasn't even remotely funny by antdude · · Score: 1

      The Matrix Revolutions (funniest to me) and Saving Private Ryan movies were funnier. Star Wars wasn't.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:I'm sorry, that wasn't even remotely funny by Rinzai · · Score: 1
      Ultracheese: When Senators Fart (or whatever that was) --

      It wasn't funny whether or not a remote was used.

      If you took Pauly Shore and put him in a movie directed by Adam Sandler and written by Tom Green (produced by Johnny Knoxville), the resulting product would still be more funny than that pastiche of a mishmash of an amalgam masquerading as "funny" at UltraCheese.

      The world's most powerful electron microscope couldn't find the funny in that.

      If you took the alleged humor in that movie, multiplied it by the number of atoms in the universe, then raised the resulting product to the power of the speed of light, squared, it still wouldn't be funny.

      "Godzilla vs. Bambi" is funny.

      The Three Stooges, bless 'em, were funny.

      Even Gallagher managed to stumble across the funny every once in awhile.

      But that stinking pile of digital regurgitation, friends and collegues, is not funny. It couldn't find funny in an empty operating room even with a flashlight, a pickax, and a forest ranger for help. It wouldn't know funny if funny crawled up its ass and laid an egg. It's so not-funny that funny itself is now less funny than it was fifteen minutes ago.

      No, in fact, I didn't think it was funny.

    3. Re:I'm sorry, that wasn't even remotely funny by h8mE · · Score: 0

      Ultracheese != funny

      --
      Look sally! Look at zonk die; die zonk die!
  17. What? by TLSPRWR · · Score: 2

    This qualifies for a front page post on Slashdot?
    The art is impressive (not the animation), but overall it's completely unimaginitive and equally unfunny.
    Score: -1 Unfunny.

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not a valid post, but it is a valid ad! slashdot seems to be doing this a lot lately. go ahead mods, do your magic ;)

    2. Re:What? by ForumTroll · · Score: 1

      If you haven't noticed Slashdot isn't really a shining gem in terms of journalism and content. You should be happy this story wasn't a dupe and be hoping that you won't see it again tomorrow and next week.

      --
      "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah its only the weekends that suck *this* bad here...

    4. Re:What? by jonabbey · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on! You have to admit, the bit where

      <spoilers>








      General Moff Tarkin says 'I say we fire.. now!' and then the Death Star just blows up the f*'ing moon was perfect.

      </spoilers>
  18. Heres a transcript in case you can't get the movie by CSMastermind · · Score: 4, Informative

    *Begin Transcript*

    [Text on screen]
    How Star Wars episode IV should have ended...
    [Inside the rebel base]
    Rebel Commander (briefing troops): Men normally with this information we would take time to make a more intricit plan of attack. However, rather than transmitting the technical readouts of the imperial battlestation and keeping our hidden loctaion safe...Princess Leia insisted on coming back, knowing full well that her ship was being tracked. In short, we have one chance to make this right and it's all Prince Leia's fault.
    [On the death star]
    Death star Piolet: Sir we have reached the planet Yavin. The rebel base is on a moon orbitting on the other side of the planet. We will be in firing range in 30 minutes.
    Death star commander: I say we're in range now. Fire.
    -Beeping noises-
    -Animation of the death star blowing up the planet-
    [Rebel base]
    Rebel commander: Well so much for that idea.
    [Millenium Falcon]
    Chewie: Raaaar.
    Han: Boy, you said it Chewie. I was this close to going back and helping those people.
    [Text on screen]
    The end.
    [Diagobah (sp?)]
    Yoda: Let him beat you you had to. What will I do now? Go crazy I will.
    Obi wan (as a ghost): Oh get over yourself.


    *End Transcrip*

    My thoughts on the subject:
    Look if you remember the first time you saw star wars...you didn't hate it. Maybe you have what it's become but what percentage of movies that were made in the 70's would even pass the giggle test if someone tried to release them today? The plot and special effects were something that had never been done before. Sure after 30 years the plot didn't turn out to be bulletproof. All a movie has to do to be a good movie is hold your attention and entertain for the duration it's on the screen. You know what? All the star wars movies (except episode 1) did that for me.

  19. Stress Test by typical · · Score: 3, Funny

    A post about (a) animation and (b) Star Wars which has been (c) posted to Slashdot.

    If this doesn't serve as a stress test of BitTorrent's scalability, nothing will.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:Stress Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now THAT is funny!

      Mod Parent Up!

    2. Re:Stress Test by Norgus · · Score: 1

      If you want to see bittorrent take a LOT of hits you should see some of the more popular unlisenced anime as it first gets released by everyones favourite subbing group.
      There are frequently over 1500 peers, this starwars torrent is unpopular in comparison.

    3. Re:Stress Test by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      The Dattebayo release of Naruto routinely breaks 15k peers.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    4. Re:Stress Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And guess what...

      The site's currently down. DESPITE it using BT. Ouch.

    5. Re:Stress Test by dave1g · · Score: 1

      Back when suprnova was around and matrix 3 was released, there were almost 100,000 on the download lists for some torrents.

      At this point the trackers became so slow. With DHT and what not though I'm willing to bet that the same thing would be much faster now.

      Also, the slashdot crowd tends to leave their torrents open longer. I go with a minimum of 1:1 If I really like the content or the cause (both in this case) I will seed indefinetly until I need bandwidth.

    6. Re:Stress Test by typical · · Score: 1

      I wonder whether this is just due to inefficient coding, or whether there is a legitimate justification for support in the protocol to redirect someone to a new tracker once there are a certain number of active users online (I doubt that someone is going to get better data rates on a torrent with 100,000 users than on a tracker with 10,000 users.)

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    7. Re:Stress Test by dave1g · · Score: 1

      well the data rate has more to do with avg upload ability and seed to peer ratio. 100,000 dialup seeders vs a tracker with 1000 cable users, and the cable tracker will end up with better transfer rates.

      Also there is over head on each connection. so its always better to have a few fast people seeding you than a lot of slow people.

      Coming up with the protocol and sharing algorithms that have been made so far is really amazing, they are general enough that in all of the situation I listed above, while one may be better than the others, they all work out pretty well in bittorrent.

  20. magnet mirror by fsterman · · Score: 1

    If someone could post a magnet link or tell me how to do it. The site was still up for me, but the wiki and google turned up a way that was beyond me.

    --
    Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
    1. Re:magnet mirror by Fatal · · Score: 2, Informative

      here is a magnet URI for those people using the Azureus bittorrent client:

      magnet:?xt=urn:btih:5B7JAZWZUV6O45M67UXHMXLNVOLP 3I DA

      With the magnet URI you don't need the torrent file. Simply copy it to the clipboard and in Azureus, go to File->Open->Location (ctrl-L) and paste the magnet URI.

  21. Re:Torrent, good thinking! by Fjornir · · Score: 1
    Man, something's fucked with your system. I finished the download with a .38 share rating averaging a 120kB/s down...

    You did unblock the ports used by your torrent client on your firewall, didn't you?

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  22. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

    we have one chance to make this right and it's all Prince Leia's fault.

    Minister: ...to join Princess Vespa and Princess Valium - (pause) - I'm sorry, it's the hair. Prince Valium....

  23. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    1: Agreed.

    2: Y'know, I cancelled by download 'cause of that transcript. The last thing I want is to encourage half-wits who fail to spend ten minutes thinking "why" and keep themsleves at "that's dumb."

    Case in point: the plans for the death star were being transported at the start of the movie, which implies that for some odd reason, they couldn't be sent via intersteller communication. Probably because the secret rebel base doesn't have the massive communication platform necessary for such.

    (And let's not forget the obvious time dilation you don't see in the movies--the Millenium Falcon moves fast enough that, even if the Death Star left right away, they still had a day or more to sit, plan, and decide what to do. Possibly a number of weeks.)

  24. geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Hey Zonk, thanks for ruining the funniest line, jackass. That's almost as bad as when the trailer for Men in Black II gave away the funniest joke in the whole movie. I'm still bitter about that.

    Will Smith: (pushes button on remote) Hop in.
    A car pulls up, driven by a man in a suit. Suddenly the driver deflates and is sucked into the steering wheel.
    Tommy Lee Jones: Does that come standard?
    Will Smith: Actually it came with a black dude, but he kept getting pulled over.

    Just thought I'd return the favor. You know, in case you ever see Men in Black II. Or something.

    1. Re:geez by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen Men in Black II yet you insensitive clod!!!

    2. Re:geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      swine! i have not seen that yet!

    3. Re:geez by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Oh please. He just posted the only good part of the movie and saved you a $5 rental and 2 hours of your life that you'd have wished you had back.

  25. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    Well, I agree with you completely. But it's so trendy to be darkly cynical these days that nobody lets a little thought get in the way of a passive-aggressive, mean-spirited put-down masquerading as innocent humor. Thanks so much, Jon Stewart.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  26. yah, well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for that kind of money, I'd have made a dozen more star wars flicks.

    oh noes! teh nerds will hate me!

  27. Looks like the Matrix one's more popular by mh101 · · Score: 1

    I'm helping seed both the Star Wars and Matrix torrents right now. So far I've given out 6 MB for Star Wars, and 60 MB for The Matrix and it's rising fast.

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    1. Re:Looks like the Matrix one's more popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the thing about bittorrent, you don't know how "popular" somthing is without knowing how many seeds vs downloads. You can make a case that you'd have less of a hit if it was more popular, as there would be more people to seed it.

      Either way the Matrix one is twice as big, so there's more to download.

    2. Re:Looks like the Matrix one's more popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might want to clarify that post a bit, or you might get a nice late-night visit from the MPAA ;)

    3. Re:Looks like the Matrix one's more popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Matrix is more popular because the seeder to leecher ratio is skewed. My client claims there were only three seeders for The Matrix. It then claimed there were a few hundred for Star Wars (BitLord vSomething). You've only uploaded a small amount of Star Wars traffic, because the seeder count is so much higher than the other torrents. More seeders == less work for each seeder (assuming a changing seeder count and a constant leecher count).

  28. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1
    For those non-SW people, Leia didn't know she was being tracked.

    And how would transmitting it through the enemy's communication grid keep the base secret? (the Empire could trace the origin and the endpoint of communication... think email header kinda)

    And it was mostly Chewbaca who made Han turn back, not Han. Think: Always let the Wookie win.

    This isn't a jab at the parent, but a nice manuscript to use.

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. WTF? ZonkDot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16 stories posted by Zonk and 3 by Cowboy Neal???

    Are they the only /. editors left anymore?

  31. Lame! by Bigbluejerk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wow, that was exceedingly lame.

  32. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Star Wars apologists are almost as bad as Star Trek apologists. After-the-fact justifications for continuity/script errors/mistakes/bad calls is lame.

  33. A better warning by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

    WARNING!!

    The WMV file contains widescreen video, with the black bars encoded into it, making it 4:3. Great fun when you're using a 16:9 screen :)

    1. Re:A better warning by GeekDork · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's some kind of braindead thinking I'll never understand. Why would anyone encode those stupid useless bars into the movie? All that does is swallowing an amazing amount of bandwidth.

      --

      Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

  34. Thanks for giving away the punchline, jackass by trauma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah the rest of it was funny too, but please. Hurting that bad for a clever editorial comment? Sheesh.

    1. Re:Thanks for giving away the punchline, jackass by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Yeah exactly how I felt. Next on slashdot: "Hey I found this really funny joke! The punchline is: 'This wheel is driving me nuts!' Now click here for the set up...."

  35. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > I sometimes wonder what movies would be like if logically thinking people made them.

    Lets count the ways:

    1. Flying through space would involve a crew, safety checks, and published flight plans in an advances society. So no two man smuggling teams.

    2. Effeminate robots and a beeping speech system would never have made it past the "stupidity test" thus no R2 and 3P0. Instead you'd have two very predictable and obedient automatons.

    3. No faster than light travel. So long galactic civilization.

    4. No sounds in space.

    5. Stormtroopers being professional soldiers would take careful aim, set up snipers, etc thus all gun fights end with the good guys dying and quickly.

    6. No force, no prophesies, etc. No such thing.

    7. No one acting out of stupid impulse or emotion, thus Luke never leaves tatooine.

    etc.

    Err, I'd rather not watch the Vulcan version of Star Wars. The silliness is part of its charm. Storytelling is much more an unpredictable art than a science.

  36. Here's the let-it-go sequence by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 2, Funny

    Taco Pizza
    Nap
    Taco Pizza
    2nd Nap
    beginning of the Matrix DVD
    Shower
    10 minutes of the audio commentary on Two Towers
    Begining of XMen 1
    Spiderman 1 - all
    Kevin Smith forum on Superman
    Post hate to AICN
    Slashdot xbox articles
    eat the Taco Pizza crusts
    go to Bed

  37. PRINCE?! by templest · · Score: 2, Funny
    In short, we have one chance to make this right and it's all Prince Leia's fault.
    Egad! That explains a lot...
    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  38. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    1. If intersteller travel is common, then, just like planes and boats, small teams can smuggle stuff. It's just that the required crew is two in the case of the Falcon. I'm a logical person, but I realize that not everyone is both logical and have the same safety standards. This is best possible if computerized systems can alert the crew in time for them to reach the controls and react.
    2. Agreed. I mean, how hard would it be to give R2 a speech synth? Of course, you could have a society with issues about 'speaking automatons'.
    3. All I ask for is internal consistancy. As long as they don't try to technobabble it, I have no problem with a Clark's law FTL system.
    4. Agreed.
    5. Agreed, however, I'd point out that even the insurgents in Iraq manage to kill US soldiers, and if you figure in an insurgency where the rebels have access to equal technology, asymetric warfare is quite possible.
    6. Again, suspension of disbelief. Midochloreans count as technobabble. If you're this logical, watch a freeking documentory.
    7. Happens in real life.

    I'd be happy if movie and television producers hired a couple military and science people to act as advisors. Keep KISS in mind.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  39. What Cutting Room? by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

    Eps 1 - 3 were all digital. No film to cut!

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  40. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    Case in point: the plans for the death star were being transported at the start of the movie, which implies that for some odd reason, they couldn't be sent via intersteller communication. Probably because the secret rebel base doesn't have the massive communication platform necessary for such.

    They still could've switched ships on some other planet. Not that it bothers me much.
    --
    -Dave
  41. But is it secret? Is it safe? by shmlco · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Speaking of BitTorrent, upon seeing that the "how it should have ended" site only distributed files using that method I way I fired it up to download them.

    Everything was proceeding nicely when, suddenly, my firewall started going nuts with dozens of incoming probes to ports commonly used by sql server, oracle, various license managers, and so on.

    Is it just me, or are hackers are using the ip addresses distributed by the trackers to find currently connected computers to attack?

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    1. Re:But is it secret? Is it safe? by poor_boi · · Score: 1

      My software firewall showed some intrusion attempts after connecting. Disappointing! :-( At least I'm all shored up.

    2. Re:But is it secret? Is it safe? by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No your not. I've hacked your system. Go ahead and ping 127.0.0.1 and you will see that I have knowledge of your machine's IP address. Now tell me which OS you're running so I can tell you how to connect to your shared folders. ;P

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    3. Re:But is it secret? Is it safe? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Everything was proceeding nicely when, suddenly, my firewall started going nuts with dozens of incoming probes to ports commonly used by sql server, oracle, various license managers, and so on.

      I don't know about you, but my firewall doesn't go "nuts". It just blocks all the unwanted incomming connections, and keeps on routing packets.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:But is it secret? Is it safe? by Quebec · · Score: 1, Troll

      Just a question: Are you a Microsoft turf attempting to slowly discredit Bittorrent (a technology soon to be under assimilation attacks by MS) by vaguely associating it to pirating?

      If not then you may be interested to know:
      There are ports which are commonly used by all applications to enable a server to "call back". For various reasons, pure functionality, legacy, practicality or laziness, those applications are not satisfied with the first already opened channel. Such applications use a bracket of ports which are available for that purpose. I would imagine that Bittorrent open at least a few of these ports that in other times the sql, oracle or others would have used if they were on.

      But then, since you did not provide the port numbers, the firewall type and version we can't say what problem you got.

    5. Re:But is it secret? Is it safe? by shmlco · · Score: 1
      According to Silkejr above, "Yes, they are. But they've been doing that for more than a year now."

      Be that as it may be, this is the first I've heard of people being targeted in that fashion. And not to discredit BT, but if hackers are reverse-targeting P2P machines, then the people that use such software need to know about it.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    6. Re:But is it secret? Is it safe? by julesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because the clients cache the addresses that the tracker gives them, but the tracker doesn't rescind them. They ought to be doing some kind of backoff algorithm, so each client with your address will try after 1 minute, 2 minutes, 4 minutes, and so on. They'll probably stop when they get to a few hours. Or finish downloading the file. Or whatever.

    7. Re:But is it secret? Is it safe? by si618 · · Score: 1

      Why? We're not in any more danger than anyone else on the net, as everyone gets probed, just check your logs :)

      Bittorrent is a great idea, and it's also good for people learning about ports, port-forwarding and firewalls, since if you want it to work well, you need to get your router/firewall setup correctly.

      So I think it's helping people become more aware, and bittorrent might actually increase* safety!

      * Of course, if there was a way to exploit the protocol, or a bug in particular clients, then safety would be decreased.

      --
      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion
    8. Re:But is it secret? Is it safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because everyone's out to get you. That's what makes you special.

  42. Opera now includes a bittorrent client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Thought it would be interesting to point out Opera now has support for bittorrent transfers right there in a browser alongside ftp and http transfers. take a look

    1. Re:Opera now includes a bittorrent client by JunkyardCat · · Score: 1

      I've hesitated for some time to install any kind of bittorrent, but as a longtime Opera fiend I couldn't resist trying this. Once I set the file association it worked beautifully. Now I'm even more impressed with Opera :) Thanks for the heads up.

  43. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2. Effeminate robots and a beeping speech system would never have made it past the "stupidity test" thus no R2 and 3P0. Instead you'd have two very predictable and obedient automatons.


    Well if you look at the people who have the most advanced robots so far, and examine their culture..let's just say that we shouldn't be surprised by androids with raping tentacles.

    4. No sounds in space.

    Bzzt. No sounds in a vaccuum,but space isn't one. It'd be quite possible for sound to be transmitted in the detritus from, say, an explosion.

  44. Re:StarWars fans on LSD by Adrilla · · Score: 1

    Most. Inane. Post. Evar!

    --

    "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  45. WHINE WHINE WHINE! by DanielBisping · · Score: 0

    since the nice little tech crash i've not had a job or i've had one i've hated. at the moment i sell wine. i can't even think of how far this posting doesn't deviate from the idiots who i work for, with and because of, as in the customers.

    get your own ideas! or at least give the characters alternate names, like Nah or Bewchakka.

    if you have to harp on the story then you missed the whole point.

    it's a movie. movies are not just the story. they involve THOUSANDS of people, millions if you include yourself. George Lucas happens to be someone who will be considered a Picasso or Monet or Calder in years to come. he is an auteur, with the unfortunate film references aside. he created the "Block Buster."

    by trying to recreate that or amend it there isn't going to be a better movie that comes out of it. just as sandpaper doesn't lend itself to being better at cleaning your face than your hands are.

    quit trying to subtract from that kind of thing. it's a waste of everyone's intelligence, most of all yours. because it's boring, most of all very. get a life, as in the kind that is probably interesting to a large group of friends.

    much good has come from fan fiction, but this is far from it.

    1. Re:WHINE WHINE WHINE! by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

      Hi, I just read your post. I just thought you'd like to know that someone read it. Nice manifesto. Not much more to say here.... other than I read it. I can't quite figure out what your point is... Mickey should be called Mitchey... I don't know

    2. Re:WHINE WHINE WHINE! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      > he created the "Block Buster."

      "Gone with the Wind" was the original blockbuster.

    3. Re:WHINE WHINE WHINE! by DanielBisping · · Score: 0

      Well, the word "blockbuster" is from the 1940s.

      "Gone with the Wind" was great and from 1939. That's 2 years before the previously mentioned decade...

      Yes, I do start counting with the number "1" and I am a smartass. The next point is that I've seen me some movies, I check my facts and, yes, "Star Wars" was the first blockbuster. (Please, note the previous post for the spelling and then note that I am a "smart ass" and ontopa that, I know when to use the back of my hand and when to use a tissue)

      Mmm... parenthetical... and I don't even get to wear a collar nor especially not a habit.

      Yes, I'm hoping that you think. No, I'm hoping to not make you angry. I wouldn't like you when you are angry.

      If you are so inclined, not to mention gracious, I wrote 2 postings at once, (This remarkable feat was accomplished with only one bottle of wine in the last "more than 90 minutes but only just so" and only partially with 1 copy of legally licensed and purchased copy of Word, give or take.) so please read on.

    4. Re:WHINE WHINE WHINE! by DanielBisping · · Score: 0

      and yes, i agree with your sig...

      i want mine back!

    5. Re:WHINE WHINE WHINE! by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Gone with the Wind" was the original blockbuster."

      I was taught "For whom the bell tolls" was - it was the first full length color film (Wizard of Oz just was color and earlier but it wasn't all in color).

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    6. Re:WHINE WHINE WHINE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      frankly Stormwatch, I don't give a damn.

    7. Re:WHINE WHINE WHINE! by qzulla · · Score: 1
      I thought it was Jaws.

      "Everyone seems to agree that it was `Jaws' that started the blockbuster phenomenon,' Wasko said.

      30 Years Later, Summer Movies Still Rely on Original `Jaws' Formula

      q

  46. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Dobeln · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Two points: (I never, ever thought I'd become a SW apologist, but here goes...) 1.) Who says the Empire can't track interstellar communications? They should have some pretty impressive listening systems, methinks. 2.) As long as the recharge time of the deathstar beam-o-death is longer than 30 minutes, it makes sense to hold off firing. IIRC, that is far from impossible. There, George - do I get a check or something? Please?

  47. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by rve · · Score: 1

    Ah, but the 70's probably had more brilliant films than for example the 80's

  48. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by rve · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the horribly sentimental 90's

  49. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by XchristX · · Score: 1

    1. If computers can fly voyager, two men with even more (presumably) advanced computers can fly smuggling ships

    2. heh

    3. heh (String theorists will disagree, of course)

    4. One can say that those sounds heard in the movies are not generated in space, but inside ships when they collide or when them turbolaser thingies strike them. The gunshots are also sounds transmitted thru hull metal when the guns fire or whatever, and remember that space isn't 100% vacuum.

    5. Reminds me of a story of some guy who pointed out that bad guys in hollywood westerns would win if they just shot the horses. The director replies, 'but then we wouldn't have a movie'.

    6. Maybe it's more of a Stephen Baxter style "Vacuum Diagram" type prophecy than anything bootstrapped from Hinduism/Buddhism/Judaism.

    7. You forgot to mention the biggest damn problem. Why is there gravity in space? everybody in those ships stand upright & walk, and those ships don't have centrifuges or anything??????

    Might want to read Stephen Baxter instead. He's a bit of a racist, but a good scifi writer who doesn't deviate too far from the laws of physics or common sense.

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  50. Xine plays 'em as well as MPlayer... by ph43drus · · Score: 1

    XineHQ

    You'll need to also grab the extra codecs off the MPlayer site, check the Xine FAQ for the one about playing WMVs.

    Jeff

  51. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, because it's late and I'm tired, I'll geek a bit...

    I figure they didn't transmit the plans because it would've pinpointed how they were planning the rebel attack.

    And then the empire could've just put some chickenwire over the exhaust port.

    Then they would've failed and died. Which wouldn't have made Lucas nearly as much money.

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  52. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Nutria · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The reason I found it so funny was because I had the *exact* same discussion of this plot hole with my friends when we were last watching Star Wars

    In deep space, you have to aim the parabolic antennae at the destination. Presumably, "subspace" transmissions would behave the same way.

    Thus, all the Star Destroyer (or whatever) has to do is notice which direction the antennae was aimed, and go That Way.

    How do you miss an enormous plot hole like that?

    It's called a plot device. It's also why laser cannons aren't radar controlled, like the CIWS in service since 1979, the AMRAAM, in service since 1991, and the AGM-84 Harpoon, around since 1977.

    Oh, and don't forget heat seekers like the AIM-9 Sidewinder and IR targeters like the M1. Abrams, since 1980.

    There are more, and I've not even mentioned non-US systems, but you get the picture.

    And how can we forget Noise In Space? Just tonight on SG:Atlantis, when a ship blew up, you could hear the explosion on other ships.

    What ever happened to, "In space, no one can hear you scream."?

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  53. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by leifbk · · Score: 1

    5. Stormtroopers being professional soldiers would take careful aim, set up snipers, etc thus all gun fights end with the good guys dying and quickly.

    The Top 100 Things I'd Do If I Ever Became An Evil Overlord

    #56: "My Legions of Terror will be trained in basic marksmanship. Any who cannot learn to hit a man-sized target at 10 meters will be used for target practice."

    --
    I used to be a sceptic. These days, I'm not so certain.
  54. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by MemoryDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ahem... the plot was taken straight out of several Kurosawa movies, the special effects I agree with you.

  55. Minor Problem... by kbranch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As I recall, Yavin was a gas giant. What good is vaporising vapor going to do?

    1. Re:Minor Problem... by Nutria · · Score: 1
      As I recall, Yavin was a gas giant. What good is vaporising vapor going to do?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_giant
      Gas giants may still have a rocky or metallic core--in fact, it is expected that such a core is probably required for a gas giant to form

      Besides, think about the huge amount of superheated hydrogen that would get flung towards Yavin. As soon as it hit the atmosphere, it would explode, consuming lots and lots of oxygen.

      If the heat didn't incinerate the rebels, they might asphyxiate from lack of (enough) oxygen.
      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Minor Problem... by kbranch · · Score: 1

      Vaporising the solid core (if it can even be vaporised at all at that pressure) wouldn't change the fact that there's a massive ball of gas in your way.

      What makes you think that superheated hydrogen would be flung towards Yavin IV? Even if it were, why would the atmosphere explode? Do you see the entire planet catching on fire every time you strike a match?

      About the only thing firing at Yavin might accomplish that I can think of would be to turn it into a small star.

    3. Re:Minor Problem... by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Splash damage. Gas giants have enough mass to hold moons in place. The shock wave of such a planet being blown up, would pulverize the nearby moons. More likely, the explosion of the planet would obliterate the moons with cosmic shrapnel. At the very least, the sudden dissipation of mass and the loss of the gravitational pull, would fling the moons off into space.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    4. Re:Minor Problem... by tigga · · Score: 1
      Splash damage. Gas giants have enough mass to hold moons in place. The shock wave of such a planet being blown up, would pulverize the nearby moons. More likely, the explosion of the planet would obliterate the moons with cosmic shrapnel. At the very least, the sudden dissipation of mass and the loss of the gravitational pull, would fling the moons off into space.

      Good point!
      I could also obliterate Death Star ;)

    5. Re:Minor Problem... by Nutria · · Score: 1
      Vaporising the solid core (if it can even be vaporised at all at that pressure) wouldn't change the fact that there's a massive ball of gas in your way.
      What makes you think that superheated hydrogen would be flung towards Yavin IV?


      Presumably, the planet killer weapon has enough energy to heat the core and the liquid (since the pressures are so great down there) hydrogen so hot & so quickly that it blasts out into space in all directions, including Yavin 4. At least, that's how I imagine it.

      Even if it were, why would the atmosphere explode?

      Hmmm, let's see.
      The 3 things necessary for combustion are:
      • fuel - hydrogen, for example, being flung out from the planet, because the planet killer weapon super-heated it to such an extent
      • oxygen - like on the surface of Yavin 4
      • heat - supplied by the planet killer weapon, and transferred to the now-superheated hydrogen.

      Looks to me like a recipe for disaster.

      Do you see the entire planet catching on fire every time you strike a match?

      Don't be dense.

      But, since this is /., since a "regular" match burns some of the atmospheric oxygen, a big-enough match would consume all of the atmospheric oyygen.
      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    6. Re:Minor Problem... by BugBlatterBeast · · Score: 1

      What dissipation of mass? Unless the death star is pouring teratonnes of antimatter into the planet, the mass will be exactly the same... just scattered a bit.

      --
      If you steal this sig, the only people who will profit are professional criminals.
    7. Re:Minor Problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I recall, Cowboy Neal is also a gas giant.

    8. Re:Minor Problem... by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      But its gravitational hold on the moon would be weaker.

    9. Re:Minor Problem... by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I think that the energy released from hydrogen and oxygen combining on Yavin 4 is trivial compared to the raw kinetic energy of a cloud of gas and debris coming from Yavin that is traveling at speeds far exceeding escape velocity... temporarily triggering nuclear fusion reactions in the compression wavefront in a manner very similar to a supernova explosion, including on the surface of Yavin 4. (Do you really *want* to be on the inside of a nuclear fusion reactor?)

      The question that has to be asked is more how the Death Star could possibly have that much stored energy? A portal to an anti-matter universe?

      I always considered the reason why the Death Star didn't simply wipe out Yavin itself was mainly energy requirements (blowing up a gas giant takes an order of magnitude more energy than blowing up a terrestrial "planet" instead), and the fact they didn't consider the Rebel fleet to be that much of a threat in the first place... also the reason they didn't do a quick seris of hyperjumps to simply get to the other side of the planet (giving military surprise and destroying the X-wings when they were still on the ground).

      Of course blowing up Yavin could cause some problems with the Death Star itself, but any competant commander (Tarkin certainly seemed competant in general) would have that happen at a reasonably safe distance... or jump into hyperspace well before the shock wave front even gets close.

      P.S. I know this just fantasy... of course BS of one can be countered with more BS.

    10. Re:Minor Problem... by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Boy I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought that upon viewing the little short. I really doubt the death star's fricken laser beam could vaporize a gas giant...

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    11. Re:Minor Problem... by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      Hyperspace jumps would not work - they were too close to a large gravity source (or so we are lead to believe in the extended Universe - hyperjump near a planetary body involved lots of danger)

    12. Re:Minor Problem... by kbranch · · Score: 1

      D'oh.

      It was 4:30 AM here when I posted that, so I wasn't quite thinking as clearly as I should have been

      Of course the hydrogen would at least burn if it were superheated and came into contact with the atmosphere. I was somehow thinking you were referring to the atmosphere exploding...

    13. Re:Minor Problem... by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Well, they did a hyperspace jump to get there, and certainly a series of three or four small jumps would be trivial to get into position. This is like getting on the freeway and traveling 20 miles to get somewhere that is only 4 miles away, but doing that because it is faster than plowing through two dozen stop lights and stop signs (that are the wrong way onto major throughfares to get across easily). This happens in California quite often, particularly Los Angeles.

    14. Re:Minor Problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moon would not fling off into space. It's orbital velocity around the sun is virtually identical to the missing planet. It'd just continue in more or less the planet's orbit.

  56. opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good something to use my opera bit torrent client to use.

  57. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Bzzt. No sounds in a vaccuum,but space isn't one.

    It's enough of a vacuum that "explosion sounds", i.e., the shock wave transmitted by vibrating molecules, can't occur in space.

    It'd be quite possible for sound to be transmitted in the detritus from, say, an explosion.

    Those would be the sounds of the detritus smashing into the hull of your ship.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  58. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how would transmitting it through the enemy's communication grid keep the base secret?

    Broadcast ?

  59. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by leifbk · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention the biggest damn problem. Why is there gravity in space? everybody in those ships stand upright & walk, and those ships don't have centrifuges or anything??????

    These ships will need some serious gravity controllers anyway, as they are accelerating at several thousand G. That kind of acceleration would leave the entire crew as a bloody pulp spread across the back wall of the ship under "normal" circumstances.

    --
    I used to be a sceptic. These days, I'm not so certain.
  60. Not very clever at all by jinushaun · · Score: 1

    Especially after watching the other movies. With so many things 'wrong' with movie endings, you'd figure fans would be able to 'fix' them. Apparently not.

  61. Re:StarWars fans on LSD by ForumTroll · · Score: 1

    You have some experience with "massive doses of LSD"? I would imagine a lot of people would freak out after a "massive dose of LSD"....

    --
    "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
  62. Star Wars: Extended Universe by SeanDuggan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    *shrug* Because when they started allowing people to write in the Star Wars universe, they decided that novels had to be canon. To publish one, you have to submit it back to the Lucas Industries where they'll check it against established history. That way, whenever you read a Star Wars novel, you know that what you're reading is actually part of the history and you won't have to juggle a half-dozen alternate realities in your head, trying to remember if in the current book, Leia's mother was an alien or not. I highly appreciate the idea, although the insistence of fans on having Jedi has led to a lot of silly plot devices for why these Jedi were not sensed by Vader in the movies.

    That said, the recent prequels don't entirely jibe with the books. *sigh* Lucas, Lucas, Lucas...

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Star Wars: Extended Universe by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative
      That said, the recent prequels don't entirely jibe with the books

      Aww, hell, the prequels don't even jibe with the original trilogy.
      Leia, do you remember your mother? Your real mother?
      Just a little bit. She died when I was very young.
      What do you remember?
      Just images really, feelings
      Tell me
      She was very beautiful, kind... but sad
      Don't even get me started...
      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Star Wars: Extended Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Leia is mistaken? When pointing out goofs in movies people seem to think that characters can be assumed to be telling the truth. They can be mistaken or lying about things just like people in real life.

    3. Re:Star Wars: Extended Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. One thing I noticed was that in The Hutt Gambit, it says that the Wookies live only in the tress of Kasshyyk (sp?). However, they lived on the ground in Star Wars:Battlefront and in RotS. The book version was better, IMO.

    4. Re:Star Wars: Extended Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obi-wan: "That boy was our last hope.."

      Yoda: "No. There is another!"

      [CUT]

      Yoda: "There you were you muppet! TWINS? Remember?"

  63. Time for being a critic... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    As it seems they are using these slashdot comments as editorial reviews of their animations :).

    (comicbookguy mode) So, while the first 5 seconds of the movie were mildly interesting due the fact that there were a volumous number of orange beings present watching the same sequential movement of the, presumed, leader of the enemy rebels, I feel that the seconds after that where highly uninspiring to me.
    Now off you go, back to ordering my collection of Battlestar Galactica Behind the Scenes Cast Character cards.
    (/comicbookguy mode)

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  64. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you would have everyone and their grandmothers building Deathstars in their backyard!

    Kindof like the internet and nuclear weapons... oh wait... ;-)

  65. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by leenoble_uk · · Score: 1

    I used to have a set of top trump cards with the Death Star in. That card was one of the best having massive weight and firepower but it's downfall was always speed. As I recall it was one of the slowest in the pack coming in at 2km/s. At that speed they surely would all have crumbled to death long before reaching the rebel base. For all intents it was pretty much stationary. Although I suppose you could use gravity to increase its speed but that would still take a long time.

  66. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by cgenman · · Score: 3, Funny

    5. Stormtroopers being professional soldiers would take careful aim, set up snipers, etc thus all gun fights end with the good guys dying and quickly.

    Not to be too straight-laced, but they could have had the storm troopers do things like that, get set up properly, make advancements, etc, and still have the main characters escape by the skin of their teeth. It would have built up excitement in a way that watching storm trooper after incompetent storm trooper being gunned down just doesn't. At least some percentage of the movie should have been devoted to the storm troopers winning, to build up tension.

    A New Hope:
    Storm troopers rule:
    killed jawas (off camera)

    Storm troopers suck:
    Took equal losses with the defences of a councelor's ship on a peaceful mission.
    Can't stop a group of rogues from escaping while they're already in prison.
    They're scared of Han.

    Empire Strikes Back:
    Storm troopers rule:
    Took over cloud city (off camera)

    Storm troopers suck:
    Giant battletanks full of the empires strongest weaponry taken down by string.
    Still can't stop a group of rogues from escaping while they're already in prison.
    Got shown up by a dwarf with a pot on his head.

    Return of the Jedi
    Storm Troopers Rule:
    Actually stopped a group of rogues from doing something, and on camera no less!

    Storm Troopers Suck:
    Death of everything they represent.
    Lost to a bunch of muppets.

  67. Episode IV should have ended... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...slashdotted?

  68. Bandwidth Limit Exceeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bandwidth Limit Exceeded
    The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to the site owner reaching his/her bandwidth limit. Please try again later."

    Even if they use torrents, that certainly didn't take too long...

  69. slashdotted .... by AllCdnBoy · · Score: 1

    "bandwidth limit exceeded" ... doh!

    1. Re:slashdotted .... by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1
      "bandwidth limit exceeded"

      It's metaphorical. He's saying the Lucas is out of ideas and you should just go to another web page.

  70. You're right except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "much good has come from fan fiction, but this is far from it."

    I agree with pretty much everything you have to say except for this.

    Fan fiction is pathetic. Aside from a handful (5) cases where the intent was to parody; even then, in those cases you still wonder about these people having no life of their own.

    Inevitably, this stuff is done by social misfits who get their life through hanging out with other social misfits, with the one common bond of being too involved in George Lucas' Life (or Gene Roddenberry or whoever...cripes, what kind of loser comes up with phrases "great white bird")

    Star Wars is a good movie, a fine series, and I watched them all in the theater when they arrived, but aside from watching them and speculating over lunch, my life is not wrapped up or around these things. And if I'm going to write fiction, its going to be my own creation. If you're writing fiction and the best you can do is to make up stories based on Star Wars, you've got to admit it shows a basic lack of creativity. After all, I don't recall Asimov writing stories that took place in Clarke's "2001 Universe". Asimov couldn't write dialog to save his life, but the guy had more ideas than you could shake a stick at, which is why people will remember his name, and will go out of their way to avoid "fan ficiton".

    I guess the best thing you can say about these people is at best they keep to themselves and at worst they give us some links on /. that amaze us the way a plane crash might horrify us.

    If this is harsh, so be it. I find its the equivalent of basket weaving at a sanitorium; I'm grateful these kinds of people have something that makes them a little happy. But lets not pretend its good, or marvelous, or useful. Its just busy-activity for the terminally nerdy.

    1. Re:You're right except for one thing... by DanielBisping · · Score: 0

      As my world turns, you get the next effluvia of my efforts. I've never posted before due to how much I was able to convulse at/about the amount I was learning.

      Here and with this subject, I'm shocked that I get to dissertate (while not manifestation-ating as was previously yet not very notably mentioned).

      That and I couldn't post as fast as I wanted so I wrote more...

      The stupid alternate endings that I wasted my bandwidth to download lack any subtle humor. I hope that mine, the subtle humor, was missed more than I forcibly dismissed the dull yet stupefying schlock that I can only rock and sob about the watching that I did!

      Heh

      Besides, they gave me those nice capsules to take care of the rocking/sobbing and "South Park" was actually done with the construction paper to start so long ago and the novelty within which one can there in truly find contentment does in no way balance the emotional damage I now have to deal with after watching that... stuff, aka new endings.

      And, then there are my convolute sentences... mu-ah ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!! (yes 5 exclamation points and the extra "ha"s)

      I hate to be harsh but... I don't. There are fan fiction movies to download and to admire on the internet. I might not love them, but I do admire the effort and the originality AND the effort. since the whole focus of my prosaic largess is the concept of alternate and cheaply unfunny endings to a finished-work-that-is-notably-rather-more-than-sig nificant-and-how-I-hate-that-kinda-thing AND how that might possibly/unfortunately be disseminated/posted-on-slashdot so why would anyone ever at any point vomit up.... errr... uh... well, that?!?!? Well, none! It's crap! And I'm harsh.

      It's kinda like this: my big mess of hoarded computers and peripherals is cute, but only because I wallow in them and actually make-believe I use them in front of people whom I socialize with while the evil hoarding of the obsessively purchased and never looked at action-figures, toy vehicles and super sized fast-food blinking beverage cups is EVIL. (Must pat self on back for being cute with the wallowing)

      My point is that working in a framework and adding/excelling to/in is cool if and only if there is a sliver or originality.

      Making a movie is original, regardless.

      Trying to change "Star Wars" is irregardless. Badum-ching!

      That means I'm agreeing.

      More parentheses...

      (This is fun for me. I get to write about something that I actually know about, more than I should. And I know more about the technicality of art more than most technically oriented folk. That and I are (Word said it was supposed to be "are") lamenting an empty bottle of wine and the mess I made with the ice bucket.)

      Mmm... concatenated or... maybe just nested parentheticalism.

    2. Re:You're right except for one thing... by DanielBisping · · Score: 0

      i blame Word for anything that is grammatically stupid. it's supposed to be "of" not "or."

      i made my convenient rule-breaking on oh-so-much purpose. Yoda is the man! i'm just a bit subtextual, self-referential and ambiguous, but only a bit.

      and have fun!

  71. Re:StarWars fans on LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I did watch episode IV when it first released while on LSD. As I recall, it was kind of intense. And the plot made a lot more sense.

  72. WHAT'S A UID? by wildchild978 · · Score: 1

    What's all this about UIDs? are they like STDs?

    1. Re:WHAT'S A UID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are in that you have one.

      (you walked right into that)

  73. I.... by TwoTailedFox · · Score: 0

    ....Sense a Disturbance in the Force

    --
    ~The TwoTailedFox posts again....
  74. Re:Torrent, good thinking! by baadger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm using Opera's inbuilt BT client. Infact, I didn't even notice it was a BitTorrent link until it was 15% here already. Very impressed with how seemless it was.

    Came in at 32KB/s at first (I'm on a 300kbps line). Averaged at 11.8 KB/s according to the transfer window. Not bad considering the circumstances.

    Opera doesn't seem to be listening on port 6881, and I have a firewall in the way. Even so i've been uploading. Which is also very impressive.

    Go Opera!

  75. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by SJ · · Score: 1

    3. No faster than light travel. So long galactic civilization.

    This really annoys me. People who say it's impossible to travel faster than light (as a blanket statement) are the modern equivalent of those who said the earth was flat. Those people also said that cars could not travel more than 50 miles per hour, because all the air would be sucked out and the occupants would suffocate.

    While I can't prove that it is possible, you can't prove that it's impossible either. So lets just say that given TODAYS TECHNOLOGY, galactic civilisations would not be possible.

  76. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    Starships scream?

  77. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Echnin · · Score: 1
    said the earth was flat

    This annoys me. No one ever said that.

    --
    Lalala
  78. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by archgoon · · Score: 1

    Leia: They're tracking us! That's the only explanation for the ease of our escape.
    I believe it can be well argued that Leia most certainly was aware that they were being tracked.

  79. Yes, they are by Silkejr · · Score: 1

    But they've been doing that for more than a year now. But IMO, if you're running a p2p app without stuff like a firewall and IP blacklist, odds are that your system is already compromised. It also might be interesting to note that the attacks are much more prevalent on the anonymous networks (freenet, ants, i2p, tor, mute)

    1. Re:Yes, they are by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      erm wtf are you smoking.

      What attacks on freenet/tor/etc? Care to prove some stats there?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  80. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by sineltor · · Score: 1
    While we're on to the topic of being pedantic...

    And how can we forget Noise In Space? Just tonight on SG:Atlantis, when a ship blew up, you could hear the explosion on other ships.


    When a ship blows up little bits of burnt ship would fly outwards in all directions, presumably hitting said other ships and vibrating their hulls, making noise.
    --
    'No publisher will ever pay you enough to successfully sue them' - Dave Sim
  81. Re:WARNING!! [OT] by DrLex · · Score: 1

    Aside from the problems with playing back WMV files in OS X (which I mosty managed to solve now), I still hate them by default because 95% of the WMV files are ugly tiny moving puddles of blocky puke with a soundtrack of people dancing in glass shards. I suspect this is due to the fact that WMV files are mostly made by users who have no idea that there are other formats, because WMV was neatly packed with their OS. They just punch some buttons in their 'wizards' which tell them that a file for the internet should have a bit rate of 56kbit/s.

  82. Re:Torrent, good thinking! by Spankophile · · Score: 1

    Just for a few more sample points.

    It took my 19s to download the file. I got an average of 516kb/s.

    So..... i'm thinking it's a user error. On your end.

  83. How Episode IV should have ended? by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    Episode IV? There's now III episodes before that so much more in need if the MST3K treatment....

    Episode I, needs a scene of JarJar being horribly killed.

    Episode II, needs a scene of JarJar being horribly killed.

    Episode III, that JarJar cameo? That should have been a scene of him being horribly killed.

    Episode IV refresh, they could have added a nice shot of a suspiciously Jar-Jar-like silhouette catching a blaster bolt.

    Then we need a shot of George Lucas being killed horribly for turning the Jedi into a bunch of stupid steroid^Wmidiclorian-pumped jocks and light-saber ricers.

    1. Re:How Episode IV should have ended? by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally thought episode III should have ended with a scene of JarJar walking away, reaching up, pulling off a mask and it being Sideous underneath... Would also conveniently explain why the guy didn't appear at all in the later 3 films...

      --
      Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
    2. Re:How Episode IV should have ended? by tuffy · · Score: 1

      No no. Clearly Episode III should've had Jar Jar becoming the new ambassador to Alderaan.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  84. sarcasm? by kypper · · Score: 1

    Hell no; he's just avoiding the MPAA

    1. Re:sarcasm? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      What's the MPAA?

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  85. Is it safe? That is more of a question of .... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    your system. Quite honestly, it does not matter that they probed you. Even when on line, you are being probed. Shoots, I have found that I am under constant hits (all of my neighbors infected PCs on comcast). So be it from a site that is run by crackers or by your neighbors, it does not matter. Now, the question is, is your system safe?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Is it safe? That is more of a question of .... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      I have av, a firewall, and am current on updates, so I'm about as "safe" as one can be. However, my system shows NO probes over the past week, up until the point where I fired up BT and hit a tracker. Suddenly I'm hit with over two dozen probes to ports other than 6881, the BT port.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    2. Re:Is it safe? That is more of a question of .... by rayde · · Score: 1

      a whole heck of a lot of people change the port their BT client uses from 6881 to just about anything else. Quite likely many of these "attacks" are just people who set their BT client to use a port that just so happens to normally be reserved for a different protocol. not necessarily anything malicious.

    3. Re:Is it safe? That is more of a question of .... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Since the tracker "tracks" the ip addresses of BT clients that are interested in the file, would it not also need to save and track the port number? Or is anyone that hits my machine for a portion of the file expected to scan all of the ports first looking for the one used by the BT client?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  86. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    While I can't prove that it is possible, you can't prove that it's impossible either.

    Perhaps not, but what we can prove is that if you have some magic means of travelling faster than light, you also have the means to travel back in time. You may not be prepared to accept what that does to the universe.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  87. Episode IV is Just Fine by agentfive · · Score: 1

    Just leave it alone. I'm tired of Lucas messing with them - now this?

    --
    -- Jay Brewer -- http://www.blogpire.com
    1. Re:Episode IV is Just Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? There are morons out there who want Star Wars redone with Bullet Time.

      (I would describe these morons as "the loads their mothers should have swallowed.")

  88. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by daVinci1980 · · Score: 1

    Whoo. Definitely.

    Both are almost as bad as spending effort thinking about continuity/script errors/mistakes/bad calls in the first place. (Unless they're really glaring)

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
  89. Mirrordot has all the torrents by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    ... and they're all seeding pretty fast :)

    http://mirrordot.org/stories/e7a20892b9ea15d168c50 105de704f25/index.html

    Now before all you AC's come whining about karma whoring - my karma is already at excellent so spare those comments...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  90. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Would bits of former spaceship hitting your hull sound like an explosion?

  91. That page sucks! by lanced · · Score: 0

    I am going to go write a new plugin for apache. It will be a simple plugin. The sole purpose of the plugin will be to replace the typical 509 bandwidth exceeded error response with a much more descriptive error response. It could even be as simple as a 2 charachter response, which would be much easier to serve.
    The new error page: /.

    Nothing more, nothing less. Just right.

  92. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by drxray · · Score: 1

    The light speed limit is a prediction of relativity, a theory that works extremely well in the many situations it's applied. People who think it's fundamental are on vastly stronger ground than flat-Earthers or people who claimed high-speed travel was impossible for humans.
    Just for fun, note also that the Fermi paradox argues against it somewhat.

    It still might be wrong, of course (and the problems with reconciling relativity and quantum mechanics means that it probably is wrong, at least in some details), but many scientists today who are understand the history and philosophy of science and are aware of all the times people have been bitten by stupid statements in the past are still often convinced that faster than light spaceships is impossible.

    And of course the "you can't prove that it's impossible" argument applies to everything; by that argument I could be a sentient bowl of cinammon custard, but it's not productive to consider that idea.

    One more point: slower than light galactic civilisations would be totally possible for lifeforms who live for tens of thousands of years and don't mind the odd century of lightspeed delay.

    --
    Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
  93. Re:Torrent, good thinking! by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    A lot changes in 40 minutes.

  94. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by wfberg · · Score: 1


    And of course the "you can't prove that it's impossible" argument applies to everything; by that argument I could be a sentient bowl of cinammon custard, but it's not productive to consider that idea.


    Actually, falsifiability is a core concept in scientific endeavor. Also, it can be quite easily disproved that you're not a bowl of cinnamon custard; for one, I'm sure you don't taste as nice.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  95. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Took equal losses with the defences of a councelor's ship on a peaceful mission.

    "Peaceful mission"? That's bulldrek. You saw how heavily armed the crew was. The entire ship was on a highly illegal mission for the rebellion, and was equipped appropriately.

  96. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by evilviper · · Score: 1
    the plot was taken straight out of several Kurosawa movies

    I've heard this a lot. Lucas even said Star Wars was based on The Hidden Fortress. After watching several Kurosawa movies, guess what? I don't see much resemblance. Lucas said Hidden Fortress, and except for having a "Princess", there's almost no similarity. And even there, it's vastly different.
    In Hidden Fortress, she's actually a princess. What was Leia princess of again?
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  97. InterStella by jjiizxr · · Score: 1

    Yeh... I had to break off with her after I found out all the entire death star had done her.

  98. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that the 'noise' of the explosion coincides with the flash of the explosion, the debris would take time to reach your ship since its not travelling at the speed of light (eg the delay beween seeing lightning and hearing thunder)

  99. Oh yeah? by Medievalist · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...my firewall doesn't go "nuts". It just blocks all the unwanted incomming connections, and keeps on routing packets.
    Mine runs screaming through the room and into the garage, fires up the old Buick, and roars off into the night scattering beer cans and half-smoked cigarettes in its wake.

    Your firewall is very boring.

    1. Re:Oh yeah? by Darby · · Score: 1

      Damn dude.
      That's why you shouldn't hack your AIBO to be a firewall.

    2. Re:Oh yeah? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Hack up a backhoe to be your firewall. Then when it roars off into the night, you'll know that it's off to firewall the attacks at the source.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  100. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by stuffisgood · · Score: 1

    You may be right, and I'm certainly no physicist, but I've always imagined a large oxygen-filled vessel (for instance a starship) exploding would send the oxygen flying in all directions (a gas fills its container right...) therefore if the sound could travel through the oxygen anyone in that oxygen could hear it?
    Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but that's just how I imagined it.

  101. I bet... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    You hang around just waiting for "my UID is so low!" threads so you can bitch-slap everyone, don't you.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:I bet... by jacrawf · · Score: 3, Funny

      What else is there to do around here? Have an intelligent conversation? *snort*

  102. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends on what part of the ship and how hard they hit.

  103. soureforge link please by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Could someone post the link to the project for episode 7?

  104. Re:Torrent, good thinking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very impressed with how seemless it was.

    SEAMLESS. Seamless, seamless, seamless, seamless, seamless.

    Without a seam! Smooth! SEAMLESS!!

  105. weeelllll.... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    I know this has been mentioned a few times already. I know this is just a parody, and it doesn't matter...

    But the original death star could only fire it's main weapon once a day. The second version was able to fire it every few hours or so, can't remember off-hand, but the point being that if they blew up the planet, it would have been a while before they could have done anything to the moon :)

    1. Re:weeelllll.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Moon orbits planet. Planet gets blown up. Moon no longer orbits planet, tidal forces suddenly released, massive "moonquakes", gale winds, pieces of blown up planet rain down like meteors on moon, yeah, I think the rebel base would have been screwed.

  106. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by drxray · · Score: 1

    Yes - under the doctrine of falsifiability you shouldn't invite someone to prove something impossible. You can only prove something is possible, by providing an example.
    You can't prove it's impossible that custard wrote the previous drxray post. I can't prove it's possible, though that doesn't mean it's not. So, as science, it's not very useful.

    --
    Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
  107. DIRECT LINK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I realize that all us open-source zealots are supposed to be promoting bittorrent as much as possible but when the site hosting the torrent gets slashdotted then we're in a bit of a pickle. This file is only 7 MB in size so I don't see why no one could have shared it. Well, I'm going to go the right thing and do it anonymously so I'm not seen as karma whoring: link

    I'm not sure I'm really doing you guys that much of a favor because the humor is pretty childish. In fact, I feel so guilty about wasting your time that I'm going to post a bonus clip that most of you will get more enjoyment out of.

  108. Found the attacker!. Damm the Torpedoes full speed by WarmNoodles · · Score: 1

    His IP was 127.63.232.12

    Also his C share is Wideee open with no firewall at \\127.63.232.12\C$

    Some one with l33t hacking skills and no clue should hack the living hell out of this guy!.

    An MBSA scan shows a blank administratrs password and lots of missing critical patches, and port 80, 21, 5000, 8001, 137, 138, 139 wide open.

    Boy, isn't hacking fun. now if some one can only bring him down we'd all be much happier wouldn't we?
    Huge collection of credit cards and porn, lots of hacking tools.

    Even has the newest Camerion Diaz topless flick ready for download. Man Cameron looks good with a whip!

  109. Jealousy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Girls really do prefer "cut" guys.

    We get head more than you, we get laid more than you.

    I think some of you guys are cheesed off (no pun intended) that most chicks think an uncut guy is disgusting.

    Oh, maybe some hairy chick thinks you're hot, but lets get real here.

    1. Re:Jealousy by DanielBisping · · Score: 0

      since i don't have sex with women, i don't see your point. nor how that might have been a pun.

      although, i know of one with feathers who would REALLY like you.

      more bad karma for me!

  110. low 5 digits by Smallest · · Score: 1

    this # could be yours !

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
  111. Re:Found the attacker!. Damm the Torpedoes full sp by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    His IP was 127.63.232.12

    Also his C share is Wideee open with no firewall at \\127.63.232.12\C$

    Some one with l33t hacking skills and no clue should hack the living hell out of this guy!.


    Since you're already in anyway, DEL *.*


    Or is that not l33t enough for a wide-open share?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  112. Re:Episodes I - III -- Just JJB by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Sadly episodes I through III should have ended on the cutting room floor.

    I would have settled just for Jar-Jar Binks on the cutting room floor. Then Episodes I and II could have been combined into a single, remaining film.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  113. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Ramze · · Score: 1

    I thought she was Princess of Alderan -- the planet the Death Star blew up that was her home world. Of course, that was just my take on it. With the new pre-trilogy movies, you could say she was princess because her mother was a queen -- Amidala. Lucas totally screwed up the whole Queen thing by making the queen elected, thus making Amidala a former queen and senator, though. He also screwed up the continuity because Leia supposedly actually knew her mother and remembered her, but with the new movies, it would have had to have been a stepmother -- who I presume was also a queen. The queen of Alderan. I'd be interested to hear other opinions, though.

  114. Re:How Episode IV should have ended? Kenny by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Episode I, needs a scene of JarJar being horribly killed.

    Oh my God! They killed Jar-Jar -- you Bastards!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  115. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    2. Effeminate robots and a beeping speech system would never have made it past the "stupidity test" thus no R2 and 3P0. Instead you'd have two very predictable and obedient automatons.

    That also just happen to look and act like two gorgeous, incredibly sexy, and willing women. After all, what other kind of advanced obedient robot would any sane race build?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  116. Bandwidth Limit Exceeded by synaptiv · · Score: 1

    Bandwidth Limit Exceeded The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to the site owner reaching his/her bandwidth limit. Please try again later. Apache/1.3.33 Server at www.howitshouldhaveended.com Port 80 :(

  117. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by runswithd6s · · Score: 1
    6. No force, no prophesies, etc. No such thing.

    Lucas tried to remove the fantasy element by introducing a biological symbiot to "all living things in the universe". This, of course, is simply hogwash, because eventually we see that ghosts of passed Jedi are allowed to walk appear anywhere they wish. Some geekoid will try to defend ghosts as some "singular expression of a personality though the omnipresent matrix of medaclorians," which so happen to communicate over vast amounts of space instantaneously. This ties together nicely Luke's ability to feel Han's torture and Darth Vadar and the Emperor's ability to coordinate tactical command of vast starfleets.

    Hey, it's sci-fi/fantasy; a space opera. If it wasn't, it would be Battle Star Galactica. Suspend disbelief and enjoy.

    --
    assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
  118. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by JahToasted · · Score: 1
    Oh come on. I loved Star Wars, but I also found the video funny. Are you telling me that you take star wars so seriously that it upsets you when someone pokes a little fun at it.

    And I also find it hard to believe that you never once saw that scene where princess leia says "They're tracking us that's the only explanation for the ease of our escape" and wonder why she wouldn't arrange a rendevous with a rebel ship to transfer R2D2 to. But the whole idea of the death star is pretty silly when you think about it. I realised that a long time ago, but I still enjoy the movie because its entertaining. And I'm sure the people who made that clip are fans of starwars too.

    It's a movie dude, not a religion. You can make fun of it and still like it.

  119. Howitshouldhaveended.com mirror(s) by OverNeith · · Score: 1

    For those of you who would like to see Daniel's ninja website design skills, I've setup a round robin mirror since the origional site has been slashdotted.

    Mirror

  120. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by JahToasted · · Score: 1
    Nah, the only thing from hidden fortress was the idea of telling the story from the POV of the lowest characters in the story. In Star Wars it was the Droids, in Hidden Fortress it was the two greedy peasants. The personalities of these characters are similar, constantly bickering and complaining.

    Star Wars basically combines the general plot of Dune (desert planet, twin brother and sister, prescience), the swashbuckling action of Buck Rogers (Han Solo, X-Wing fighters, blasters), with a little bit of the samurai films thrown in (Swordsmen losing power to armies with guns).

  121. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    Are you telling me that you take star wars so seriously that it upsets you when someone pokes a little fun at it.

    It's not Star Wars. It's art in general -- even intentinally campy art like Star Wars.

    The equivalent is if someone read Tolkien, and said "why didn't they just invent gunpowder? This is stoopid."

    Art is meant to entertain. When you come to something that doesn't seem to make sense, your second thought should be "what could explain that?"

    Doing otherwise is lazy reading, poor thinking, and just plain rude.

  122. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by JahToasted · · Score: 1
    Well, she could have been remembering amidala. The force is strong with her, so maybe she could have the ability to remember her mother from when she was a newborn. Since Luke's abilities have more to do with more conventional Jedi powers maybe that is why he couldn't remember.

    Or, yeah, she might have been talking about her stepmother.

  123. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by JahToasted · · Score: 1
    Ummm... well I was under the impression that Saruman did use gunpowder at helm's deep... Better example would be why didn't they get the eagles to fly Frodo to mount doom?

    Anyway, it seems like you're protesting people having a good laugh at the expense of a campy movie. Isn't the whole point of making a campy movie is to make people laugh? I know I laughed when Leia says she knows the Imperials are being tracked. And then I saw this cartoon and I laughed even more (though it was too bad that they posted Han's line here, kinda spoiled the punchline).

    And "what could explain that?" Well, a rushed and overworked scriptwriter made a mistake. Should have cut the part about the Millenium Falcon being tracked and just had a scene when they arrived at Yavin with someone saying "You've arrived just in time! Bothans have informed us that the Imperials know of the location of our base here and they're on their way now!".

    But it doesn't really matter, it was just a flaw. All movies have them and some of us have accepted this and are able to laugh at them while still enoying the movie. Seems to me that you can't accept that the movie isn't perfect.

    Have a laugh at it and don't be so sensitive. It's not like SW is a mentally challenged child that you have to leap to the defense of. George Lucas, on the other hand...

  124. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Datafage · · Score: 1

    Except whoever wrote it either didn't watch the original enough or is very sexist since after Leia said they were certainly being tracked Han went "Not this ship, sister." The blame lands at his feet, not hers.

    --

    Nicotine free Amish .sig.

  125. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    But it doesn't really matter, it was just a flaw.

    Y'see, this is my assertion. Stories don't have flaws--they have parts that folk call flaws, but really are just "part of the story."

    If it's any consolation, I've gotten irate at folk who mindlessly point out "plot holes" in just about any medium I've seen. Sometimes they're just assumptions for the sake of story (language is usually the biggest here), and other times they're things that expose a deeper story than a casual reading implies. (Novels are full of instances of this second one, btw.)

    I know the movie isn't perfect--heck, there are things in the movie that bug me. I just can't stand the busybody "hey, you messed up" crowd, about Star Wars or about anything.

  126. This is funny? by op00to · · Score: 1

    Did I miss, oh, 30 minutes of funny from the .wmv?

  127. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the destination doesn't have to be in the direction of the antenna.
    A relay satellite could be positioned there, ready to transmit info in yet another direction. They talk about this in the Star Wars books.

  128. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  129. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nice, but:

    > 1. Flying through space would involve a crew, safety checks, and published flight plans in an advances society. So no two man smuggling teams.

    Sailing the oceans of the world needed navigatory tools, navigators, doctors and other skilled workers, along with supplies (did you forget your vitamin C?), maps, plans, etc. But you still had small groups of people, either sailing areas which (I think) would be easier to navigate (e.g. the Carribean, British channel, etc.). I think you can extend the same to ships. I might be wrong.

    > 2. Effeminate robots and a beeping speech system would never have made it past the "stupidity test" thus no R2 and 3P0. Instead you'd have two very predictable and obedient automatons.
    I am typing this from an operating system which LOOKS LIKE FISHER PRICE DESIGNED IT, and was pretty darn un-predictable and dis-obedient for its first two decades of existance. So really, no, products don't have to face stupidity tests in the real world.

    > 3. No faster than light travel. So long galactic civilization.
    As somebody else pointed out, no faster than light travel *now*. It might happen. Be optimistic :). Also, it's a movie, a story, a work of fiction: Peter Pan would have been pretty disappointing if Peter climbed up the drainpipe. And think of the Little Mermaid as the story of a Prince with a crush on a dugong ...

    > 4. No sounds in space.
    Also, every psycho has a small orchestra which walks around behind him everywhere he goes and plays creepy music every time he kills someone. See point 3.

    > 5. Stormtroopers being professional soldiers would take careful aim, set up snipers, etc thus all gun fights end with the good guys dying and quickly.
    Hmmmm ... I definitely agree that if they can make a spaceship that can do all the complex stuff the Death Star does, with just two people at the helm, they *should* be able to come up with hunting. You could argue that hunting is more complex, but they are dealing with lasers, so the shot isn't going to get pulled around by gravity or something ... but see this post about what would have made the Stormtroopers COOL.

    > 6. No force, no prophesies, etc. No such thing.
    Every time somebody says they don't believe in fairies, somewhere a fairy falls down dead. You remember that, boy-yo :). Then again, maybe it's just the oh-my-dear-god-isn't-Luthien-the-hottest-EVER?! fantasy fanboi talking.

    > 7. No one acting out of stupid impulse or emotion, thus Luke never leaves tatooine.
    I've wrecked FRIENDSHIPS out of "stupid impulse or emotion", let alone doing a tichy little thing like leave a planet! You could replace this one with "nobody ever leaves friends, family and girl-you-have-a-crush-on-but-is-really-your-sister and wander off to a random corner of the universe because a GHOST TOLD HIM TOO. Not when they're in dire need of friends. But oh well, Lucas knows best :).

  130. I was such a fool by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    I read this site for about six months before I registered.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:I was such a fool by 16384 · · Score: 1

      I started reading this site about a year before registrations existed, but only registered when having an account permited doing anything. At first being registred didn't do anything, no customization, nothing. If only I knew back then...

  131. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Would bits of former spaceship hitting your hull sound like an explosion?

    I don't think so.

    An explosion is more of a BOOM, whereas something hitting your hull would be impact (BAM! CLANG!) sounds.

    Besides, when the Daedalus blew up the hive ships, it's Asgard shields were at full force, and many dozens of meters from the hull.

    Thus, the debris couldn't get to the hull in the 1st place.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  132. BZZZT...sorry by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

    "...Leia, tell me about your mother... your real mother..."

    We have some lovely parting gifts though...

  133. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by Nutria · · Score: 1
    I've always imagined a large oxygen-filled vessel (for instance a starship) exploding would send the oxygen flying in all directions (a gas fills its container right...) therefore if the sound could travel through the oxygen anyone in that oxygen could hear it?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound

    sound "is an alternation in pressure, particle displacement, or particle velocity propagated in an elastic material"

    The atmosphere at sea-level (and presumably also in the [miniscule, compared to the volume of space] spaceship) is 14.7 psi. There are enough molecules in a cubic meter for it to be considered an elastic material

    While the oxygen is being vented into space, there will be (lots of!) noise, but once it's in the never-ending expanse of space, the psi will drop so low that the molecules won't be in close enough proximity to pass on their vibrations.
    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  134. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    Actually, have a look at some of the early drafts of the script, you can see how heavily based on the Hidden Fortress it was. Sure, after it had been kicking around in his brain for 3 years, it became a very different story, but just as clearly it owes a lot to Kurosawa. The fight between Vader and Obi Wan, with Stormtroopers gathered around, is straight out of Hidden Fortress for example, as are the characters of C-3PO and R2-D2. Leia is princess of Alderaan, which is destroyed, making her the last surviving leader of her "clan," just like in HF.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  135. See? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I bet there's like fifty, no, six hundred and ninety-one of you guys just waiting to mock the newbies like me...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  136. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by JahToasted · · Score: 1
    hmmm... well if stories don't have flaws, then what's your explanation for things like director's cuts, special editions and reduxes of movies? isn't that an admission that there were mistakes in the originals?

    Tolkien went back and changed the hobbit because it wouldn't fit with Lord of the Rings if he didn't. Writers aren't perfect, and what they put down on paper isn't sacred.

    I remember in Don Quixote, his horse gets stolen, then in the next chapter he has the horse again then a few paragraphs later he's complaining about having to walk because a thief stole his horse. How the hell do you explain that, other than just by saying "Cervantes fucked up"?

  137. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by JahToasted · · Score: 1

    So are you saying that a woman has to automatically accept everything that a man says?

  138. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    well if stories don't have flaws, then what's your explanation for things like director's cuts, special editions and reduxes of movies?

    Why does a musician not always play a song the exact same way?

    I remember in Don Quixote, his horse gets stolen, then in the next chapter he has the horse again then a few paragraphs later he's complaining about having to walk because a thief stole his horse. How the hell do you explain that, other than just by saying "Cervantes fucked up"?

    Well, not having read the story that closely, I'd hazard (1) it's a case of Don being rather addle-brained -- could his "horse" have only been in his mind? or (2) a translation error.

    If I can't find a plausible explanation for a story in about an hour of thinking about it--which is a fairly long time to spend, btw -- then I'd call it a "mistake" or an "error." Not a "flaw."

    What's the difference? Make-up jumping from one side to the next on a movie is a mistake. Leia & co not switching ships is what folk would call "flaws."

  139. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by JahToasted · · Score: 1

    mistakes, flaws, whatever. Either way if you want to make a joke about it I think its fair game.

  140. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    Well, yes. They have the right to joke about anything and everything, and just about any joke that's funny and doesn't cross into sociopathy -- including every part of Star Wars, btw -- is fine.

    I also have the right to say "that's dumb" and walk away, as publicly as I care to. ;)

  141. Other Star Wars Videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to see some Star Wars Videos that don't require any special downloads, try Joking.com

    General Order 69
    The Emperor orders the elimination of all annoying Star Wars characters.
    http://www.joking.com/videos.asp?video=69.swf

    Darth Vader tries online dating
    After he lost Padme, watch how Darth Vader searched for love, using online dating to get matched with female tuscan raiders, stormtroopers, and other Imperial Women from Imperialdate.com.
    http://www.joking.com/videos.asp?video=vaderdating .swf

    Clone Trooper Girlfriends
    Obi Wan Kenobi and Yoda discover that the Clone Troopers need some backup.
    http://www.joking.com/videos.asp?video=ctgirlfrien ds.swf

  142. Mod Parent Up by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    ( Mirror site )

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  143. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Excelsior · · Score: 1

    All a movie has to do to be a good movie is hold your attention and entertain for the duration it's on the screen.

    For all the bitching about Star Wars around here, you might almost forget that Star Wars has held many people's interest for three decades. Perhaps we forget all the movies we've been crapped out of the Hollywood bowels over the years.

    When it comes to keeping my attention, many movies these days have their hands full competing with a tub of popcorn.

  144. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
    hmmm... well if stories don't have flaws, then what's your explanation for things like director's cuts, special editions and reduxes of movies? isn't that an admission that there were mistakes in the originals?

    Because the storyteller doesn't always get to tell the story the way he wants to tell it. Just look at, for instance, Close Encounters of the Third Kind (with the exception of the going into the spaceship bit). There were big bits that Spielberg had to take out because of running time or because the studio didn't want it. Also look at Star Trek II's Director's Cut, or the Directors Cut of ST:TMP (which has alot of effects shots done that the director wanted to do, but just didn't have the time when the movie was first made). While sometimes the Studio's preferred version of the film has it's own merits over the director's vision (for instance, the beginning of "Pitch Black"), sometimes it doesn't (compare and contrast the Director's Cuts of "Chronicles of Riddick" and "Daredevil").

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  145. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by Rysc · · Score: 1

    He did screw up the continuity. The reason Leia was a princess had nothing to do with her birth mother, it had to do with the fact that she was the adopted daughter of the royal family of Alderaan. The fact that she was adopted was a secret to all but the Jedi and her step father and mother. Nobody else had a clue where she came from.

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
  146. Re:Heres a transcript in case you can't get the mo by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Looking through those early scripts, I'm very, very surprised that Star Wars eventually turned-out to be a good movie.

    Perhaps this is really a case where the notes from the studio, and test audiences, can do good things for a movie.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  147. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by mink · · Score: 1

    Having encountered an actual flat earther in todays day and age (Well about 20 years ago) I can say you are wrong and some people do actually say that.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  148. Re:I've had this exact same discussion! by mikefe · · Score: 1

    And monitoring the relays doesn't work because...?

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
  149. Re:Torrent, good thinking! by mikefe · · Score: 1

    It seems like your seams are coming undone, Miss Portman.

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.