Slashdot Mirror


How to Become A Real-World Superhero

utherdoul writes "Batman isn't from outer space and wasn't born with a mutant gene --he uses his riches, raw determination and technological know-how to equip himself to fight evil. So why couldn't the average geek do the same? I've written a story for Forbes.com that breaks down the Dark Knight's expenses and explains what it would cost to become a real-world Batman using commercially available training and technology." From the article: "Batman's suit is a modified piece of infantry armor built by the applied sciences division of Wayne Enterprises. It's waterproof, bulletproof, knife-proof and temperature-regulating. Paired with an impact-resistant, graphite-composite cowl and spiked ninja-style gauntlets, it allows Batman to protect himself against everything from swords to machine guns."

596 comments

  1. Duh. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful


    > Batman isn't from outer space and wasn't born with a mutant gene --he uses his riches, raw determination and technological know-how to equip himself to fight evil. So why couldn't the average geek do the same?

    Did you miss the part about riches?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates is Batman... oh the horror!

      Of course any geek that wealthy would be too busy spending it on blackjack and hookers.

    2. Re:Duh. by bbassage · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part about riches? Oh... I would have said determination.

    3. Re:Duh. by Dasch · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to Bill Gates robot-suit? You know, the one with the red (infrared?) goggle-thing...

      Gateman - fighting open source by enforcing software patens! You can run, but you cannot hide from his lawyer hordes!

    4. Re:Duh. by ShortBeard · · Score: 0

      It more insidious than that. This article is a dupe!

    5. Re:Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the part about not being born with a mutant gene?

    6. Re:Duh. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It was so much better for geeks in the 1980's.

      these days all the jobs are being outsourced.

      And so is the crime fighting.

  2. Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by winkydink · · Score: 5, Informative

    ans several years of your life for training.

    The Bottom Line
    Final Cost: $3,365,449

    The Training: $30,000
    The Suit: $1,585
    The Belt: $290
    The Car: $2,000,000
    The Cave: $24,000
    The Alter Ego: $1,109,574
    The Butler: $200,000

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by suineg · · Score: 1

      I wonder if I can get a government grant for something like this. I am sure it is possible just time for me to research the proper paperwork.

      --
      Courage is fear holding on a minute longer. George Patton
    2. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Recovering some old ladies $10 purse as a superhero: Priceless.

    3. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by nubbie · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Butler: $200,000
      Damn! A butler make $200,000? Why didn't my parents name me Jeeves?

      --
      'Go for the eyes, Boo, go for the eyes, aaarrrrrrrr!' -- Minsc
    4. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Girls: Priceless

    5. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by welkin · · Score: 1

      The Spare/Replacement Parts: $?
      The Repairs: $?

    6. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by cached · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ofcourse, you do have beer commercials to pay it off...

      --
      +1 funny, -2 overrated. Life isn't fair.
    7. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      The mecha suit for when you have to beat the living shit out of Superman: $?

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    8. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      The Suit: 1585$
      The Belt: 290$

      Im sure you are joking? I mean, for that money, you can get a good suit&belt, right.
      But certainly not a BULLETPROOF suite with radio transmitter in the cowl and sonar and whatsoever. And no belt with grappling hook and the other gadgets.

      IF it were possible to really create such equipment (very doubtful), i would guess for those 2:
      100-250K R&D (depending on niftyness)
      20-40K Building (its no mass production, plus it has to be confidential, you can just order batarangs at ammo'r'us)
      10-20K yearly wear&tear cost

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    9. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by welkin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I always wondered about that one, at the end of _Dark Knight Returns_...how many stocks did he liquidate for that piece? I will have to read it again...

    10. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think 3.4 million is an underestimate. That car would be wrapped around a tree in a week.

      Anyhow, fostering the presence of a superhero is not a very cost-effective way for a city to lower its overall crime figures. Legalized abortion costs the public virtually nothing and has a much greater effect on reducing crime than competing strategies such as incarceration or tax breaks to encourage millionaire superheroes to relocate.

    11. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Informative

      Had you RTFA you would see that they claim the real batsuit would cost $300,000+ (at least that's what the movie claims), but it isn't available. So they suggest a bulletproof jacket and kevlar helmet for ~$1500. Lame substitute, but there you go.

    12. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like someone's been reading Steven Levitt.

    13. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by DesertBlade · · Score: 0

      You also forgot the medical bills. You can'r run and jump around after criminals all day and not at least throw your back out sometimes.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    14. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      oh... well after the two how-stuff-works articles, i didnt want to enjoy another add disguised as article...

      Well, that really sucks as a replacement. Because we all know that cops with cevlar and helmet NEVER get hurt or killed when fighting criminals... Yeah
      Its SO hard to hit the legs or arms, and even if you insist on hitting the torso, if you use a rifle the protected guy wont be happy after a short time even if the vest can stop everything...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    15. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      As much of a fan as I am of privacy and a person's right to choose, I think that "legalized abortion reduces crime" assertion is based on pretty weak evidence.

      Bear in mind that most of the reduction in murders, from what I understand, can be attributed to better emergency practices which cause assault not to become murder because the victim doesn't die.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    16. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Looks like someone's been reading Steven Levitt.

      Nah, saw him on TV. He was talking about Batman I think.

    17. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by crankydoodle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, yeah... how much to get body-modded like Wolverine? I'd much rather have adamantium-laced bones and claws than some pansy cape and a penchant for cave-dwelling.

      --
      I'm almost certain I'm not cranky at you...
    18. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      f you use a rifle the protected guy wont be happy after a short time even if the vest can stop everything...

      Hell, even Batman would feel a .30-06 to the chest. Porbably kill him too.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    19. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know you're using this as a chance to beat your pro-legalized-abortion drum, but I have to respond.

      Anyhow, fostering the presence of a superhero is not a very cost-effective way for a city to lower its overall crime figures.

      If you've got dastardly supervillians who would otherwise regularly kill thousands it is.

      Legalized abortion costs the public virtually nothing and has a much greater effect on reducing crime than competing strategies...

      If you consider a human fetus to be worth only 1/100th of a fully-developed human being (an estimate considered too high by some and too low by most), the costs in human life FAR outweigh the benefits from reduction in homicides.

      Ever since Freakonomics came out, you ostensibly "pro-choice" people have been gleefully citing Levitt's results without bothering to take into consideration the lives of the unborn children. There is a place for debate on how many and what kinds of rights the unborn have, but each side steadfastly refuses to acknowledge it. (This is also why the debate on federally-funded stem-cell research is stalled.)

      By the way, that 1/100th analysis is in Levitt's book, at the end of the chapter on crime. I didn't make it up.

      (Go ahead mods, mod me down. You know you disagree with me. That's what moderation is all about, right?)

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    20. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Training as a barrister costs more and takes longer.
      Equipment for a particle physicist is WAAAY more expensive. Apart from not getting paid this looks like a pretty good profession.

    21. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by modecx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Legalized abortion costs the public virtually nothing and has a much greater effect on reducing crime...

      Is that kind of abortion of the postadolescent variety? Because a superhero might be able to help greatly with that, too!

      I can see it now: The Aborter. He's a mild mannered abortion clinic doctor by day, helping rid the world of unwanted babies... By night he's on par with The Punisher, except he has a custom-formulated serum that makes villians crap their intestines right out, resulting in a long, miserable (and incredibly messy) death! He also has sonar vision (don't ask how that happened, you don't want to know!) that can also detect "bad seeds", while they're in the womb!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    22. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Go ahead mods, mod me down. You know you disagree with me. That's what moderation is all about, right?)

      Why not leave the lame reverse psychology alone and concentrate on removing the trollish bits from a post that otherwise contains one insightful and one interesting bit?

      Your post isn't negative enough to mod down (looks like someone chose to anyway) but certainly doesn't deserve to be modded up (looks like someone chose to anyway).

      Maybe there is balance to the universe...

    23. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you consider a human fetus to be worth only 1/100th of a fully-developed human being


      OK, I'll feed you. Who's paying? How much is the life of the child of a crack mother worth? Someone who will grow up to be a crack addict whose only means of maintaining his habit is by selling drugs to other losers?

    24. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by ilsa · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Bottom Line
      Final Cost: $3,365,449


      The long version makes it clear that most of the goodies are made by, developed by, or otherwise courtesy of Wayne Enterprises. Now, granted, it's his company, and he can afford an accounting firm that can figure out how to write off $3.3 Million.

      But you would think somebody in R&D would at some point read the latest press on Batman say "Hey! I remember working on that project!"

      --
      -- I Am Not A Terrorist.
    25. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Diamon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow you can pull off an alter ego as a billionaire by barely spending a million dollars? I guess Wayne manor is just cardboard, duct tape and a coat of paint.

    26. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is, I saw it last night... and it's ONE HELL OF A REALLY, TRULY GOOD MOVIE!

      (Surprised the hell out of me to be honest. Great cast, how could it NOT be? Liam Neeson, & Morgan Freeman rocked...)

      PLUS, Christian Bale?

      He IS imo, THE modern "method actor" & hardworking true acting genius extraordinaire who will go to the length of the legendary Lon Chaney himself (losing what? 80 lbs. to play in "The Machinist" & gain it back SOLID muscle as Batman? You judge!)

      Yup, He does that to fit a part on a physical level, & yet has the skill to TRULY become the part he's playing!

      (Voices & Character mastery is incredible, especially since he is a brit often playing Yankees in the U.S.A.... the guy's just outright awesome!)

      I think this movie's moved him (one of my all-time favs since "Empire of the Sun" &/or "American Psycho", into the "Big Leagues"/A-list @ last!)

      *IMO, on that last note? It's about time... The man's had it coming, even breaking thru the "child-star curse" syndrome to become a great adult star of today!

      APK

      P.S.=> Go see it guys, you WON'T be let down... apk

    27. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by carninja · · Score: 1

      Talk to Matthew Lesko. I'm sure he'll know how.

      You know, the question-mark guy from the infomercials.

    28. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by r3m0 · · Score: 1

      when i read that article i got horrid thoughts of bill gates in a batman costume, hes kinda rich huh?

      --
      -r3m0
    29. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1
      Kevlar isn't able to withstand multiple hits. Even a little 9mm will be able to puncture a kevlar vest if you can get 3 or 4 shots in the same area. I've seen older kevlar vests punctured by 2 shots from a .22LR. First shot was stopped, but the second shot to the same general area got through.

      Not to mention, even if the vest stops the projectile, your body still has to absorb the energy created by the impact.

    30. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by John+Newman · · Score: 1
      Bear in mind that most of the reduction in murders, from what I understand, can be attributed to better emergency practices which cause assault not to become murder because the victim doesn't die.
      I can guarantee you that NYC emergency medicine didn't get 300% better between 1990 and 1998.

      I am curious, though, how this line of reasoning would be made to apply to the concurrent 60% drop in rapes and the 75% drop in car thefts... No one has put forth a convincing explanation for the amazing drop in all manner of crime in the 90s, but the abortion argument is as strong as any other so far, and has the added bonus of not being primae facie absurd.
    31. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by AeroIllini · · Score: 4, Funny

      But you would think somebody in R&D would at some point read the latest press on Batman say "Hey! I remember working on that project!"

      I think the people in Wayne Enterprises all work on parts and pieces of the projects, never really knowing what they were for, and I think Alfred was supposed to be the one who assembled them into their final form. (I guess that means he also gives the Batmobile a tuneup once in a while.) With that sort of divide-and-conquer strategy, the only employees you'd have to keep quiet would be those in the Bat-Shaped Black Plastic Casings Division.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    32. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by jeremymiles · · Score: 1

      There's a paper called Myths of murder and multiple regression which pretty much puts paid (IMHO) to the crime rate/abortion rate link (which I used to believe in).

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    33. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that ballistic armor (a bulletproof vest) doesn't help against stabbing or cutting weapons. You can wear two vests and slow down your movement, or just put a lot of faith in your martial arts.

      (Note: I'm not an expert. I'm sure somebody is trying to make a dual-purpose vest, if they haven't already. I just know that the standard ones are ballistic only.)

      Oh, but they do make full-body body armor. Remember how much trouble they had with that guy in the West Hollywood shootout? He had arm and leg protection, as well as a helmet.

    34. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "even if the vest can stop everything"

      Only the heaviest class of body armor will stop a rifle bullet, and even then, they have a ceramic or metal plate over your chest and that's the only place it will protect you from a rifle bullet. All other body armor is designed to only stop handgun rounds, with the heavier stuff stopping magnum slugs and the lighter stuff stopping 9mm and .22.

      Even with a vest, the blunt trauma can give you huge welts and bruises, and even crack ribs. I have seen a (car-cam) video of a vest-wearing cop taking two to the chest, and after that he was on the ground writhing in pain and quite unable to do anything but call for help on the radio.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    35. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by typical · · Score: 1

      But you would think somebody in R&D would at some point read the latest press on Batman say "Hey! I remember working on that project!"

      Nope, because Bruce Wayne got rich by outsourcing his work to cheap labor in India.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    36. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      I can guarantee you that NYC emergency medicine didn't get 300% better between 1990 and 1998.

      The dramatic drop in crime in NYC is an outlier compared to the rest of the nation, so it would be reasonable to assume that NYC had some kind of local effect which caused the deviation. In this case, I think Guiliani is the most likely cause. If you think it's somthing else, I'm open to suggestions.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    37. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Moofie · · Score: 1

      OK, this is a new one on me.

      Lay out the argument for me: What is the link between crime rate and abortion? Because it sounds pretty darn absurd to me...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    38. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by rawket.scientist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At $200k per year, they're probably underpaid. At least, it would take much more than that for me to start saying "Very good, sir."

      What's more, being a butler (butlering? butlerhood?) would not be an ideal career for most slashdotters. It takes way too much tact. For example: picture yourself working a tech support job. Imagine the calls for broken cup holders and missing "any" keys. Now consider that the caller is there in person, and the calls are for broken cups and missing car keys. He calls at 6:00 AM. He calls at lunch time. He calls when he wants a midnight snack. You can't hide; you live in his house. And he doesn't ever ask to speak to your supervisor; he is your supervisor. If you tell him to RTFM or that he has an ID ten T error, you will be held accountable.

      Now here's the question. Which happens first, your firing or your arrest for assault with a deadly weapon?

      --
      John Hancock wuz here.
    39. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 2

      Getting to kiss CatWoman....Priceless

      --
      Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
    40. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, even if the vest stops the projectile, your body still has to absorb the energy created by the impact.

      Maybe you could build a rigid shell - stop the bullet, get knocked around a bit.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    41. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Riddler would be very interested in creating his eventual nemesis. Of course, that didn't stop Mr. Glass.

      --
      -mkb
    42. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by norton_I · · Score: 1

      Gun nuts claim that there are no recorded cases of police wearing kevlar jackets dying to to failure of the jacket to stop a bullet.

      Also, the jackets that police wear are not designed to make them immune to bullets, but to prevent them from being killed by them. If you are shot in the arm, or injured by a bullet to the torso, you will likely recover. It seems reasonable that if you are willing to pay a lot and give up some flexibility (or train enough to compensate for it) you could make armor that was much better.

    43. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Dasein · · Score: 2, Informative

      The argument put forward in Freakonomics is that children brought up in poverty are more likely to commit crimes and women are remarkably good at deciding if they will be able to provide a good life for a child. Therefore, children who are likely to commit crimes are more likely to be aborted than children who are born into privileged circumstances.

      That's it -- not my theory, just what's put forward in Freakonomics.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    44. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      abortion costs society one worker in roughly twenty years time and is really irrelevant to the subject of superheroes. Superheroes should always be self-financed. Otherwise we'd call them "The Police." Why spend 4 billion dollars developing super bulletproof armor that costs a million dollars a pop for one guy when you could spend 5 billion dollars and start having the kind of economies of scale that bring it down to 30 grand a pop and useful for swat squads and later beat cops.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    45. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see it now: The Aborter. He's a mild mannered abortion clinic doctor by day, helping rid the world of unwanted babies... By night he's on par with The Punisher, except he has a custom-formulated serum that makes villians crap their intestines right out, resulting in a long, miserable (and incredibly messy) death!

      I was thinking of something more along the lines of Tom the Dancing Bug's "God Man". He prowls the streets, looking for criminals, and when he finds one, he goes back in time and either prevents the criminal's parents from meeting or induces a spontaneous abortion- and by day he poses as Stephen Levitt and promotes his book on talk shows.

    46. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took years to develop, and cost a fortune. Luckily, he had both.

    47. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the energy from a .44 magnum is about the same as a fast softball.
      Big deal.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    48. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Now, granted, it's his company, and he can afford an accounting firm that can figure out how to write off $3.3 Million.

      No need - all he has to do is to write a program that grabs all the fractions of pennies floating around the accounting software giving him an instant "black ops" budget :)

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    49. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      Add disguised to what? Disguised + ??? = ????

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    50. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry I have to ask:

      Sonar vision

      He can friggen' see sound? That had to be one heck of an incident to cause that to happen.

      Unless he just suffers from Synethesia...

    51. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      The synthetic kryptonite arrow?

    52. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      If you're shot in the torso you are likely to recover, too.
      Most people shot in the US survive, amazingly enough.
      Might shit in a bag or get a wheelchair, though.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    53. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Funny
      A fast enough softball could take out a few city blocks
      :)
      --
      English is easier said than done.
    54. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by modecx · · Score: 1

      Well, you see, there was this mutant porpoise, an x-ray machine, and, a tin of Dolphin wax, and uhm, .... Yeah.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    55. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by cgenman · · Score: 1

      3.4 million... 92% of which comes from the car and the cover lifestyle. Of the remainder, 78% goes to the butler.

      Without those three things, you're only looking at a paultry 55 grand. Take out the cave, pay for your martial arts training per year, and that's a paultry 11k.

      Of course none of this covers medical expenses or legal fees. While you may get away with buying zero-deductible coverage for 600 a month (an extra 8 grand a year), you're not going to escape making bail, or bribing your way out of dealing with the cops. Or getting sued by the estate of the Joker when you push him off a building. Or when Harley Quinn sues you for "mental anguish." Or when Warner Brothers sues you for improper use of their trademarked character. Or when you and your butler get sued under RICO. Or... well, you get the idea.

    56. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Riddlefox · · Score: 1

      Well, no recorded cases of police dying from being shot with a round the vest was designed to stop. That's a pretty important distinction. If you're only wearing a IIA vest and you get hit by a hot .44 magnum, the vest people won't be held liable - you got shot by something the vest wasn't designed to stop.

    57. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Just like Superman III ;)

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    58. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Engineers who work for the sort of military contractors that develop that sort of equipment are not just "somebody in R&D". They are persons who the federal government has trusted security clearances to after the FBI thoroughly interviews every person they have ever known and gained a very accurate picture of their character. They are instructed, and expected, never to speak about their work, not even to their families.

      Pretty much no one talked about the stealth fighter before the government acknowledged its existence five years after initial operating capability in 1983. Despite this, a large team of brilliant engineers built and tested the thing and a publicly owned US corporation managed to have a small production run of them manufactured, while the United States government managed to purchase and operate them with probably hundreds of personnel--pilots, mechanics, base personnel, security guards, flight controllers, even the guy standing out on the runway waving batons around to direct landing aircraft. Add to that a handful of commanding officers all the way up the chain of command.

      So, yes. In essence, a handful of Batsuits and any other equipment Batman needs could easily be manufactured by Wayne Industries for Batman's personal use without anyone being the wiser. And since Wayne Industries is (at least in part) a military contractor according to the film, I'm sure accounting has a line item for projects they are not allowed to publicly disclose, and I'm sure they have employees, policies, and procedures designed precisely for the purpose of keeping some of their operations secret.

      Key to this, of course, is a strict "need to know" policy, so most of the people involved would have no idea that Bruce Wayne is Batman, although probably some number of them would know or figure out that Wayne Industries was Batman's secret outfitter. But overall? Yeah, Bruce Wayne's identity can plausibly be kept a secret.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    59. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by AEton · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the people in Wayne Enterprises all work on parts and pieces of the projects, never really knowing what they were for

      And one day, they're going to wake up and find they've been transported to a mysterious, magical cave with compound numbers scribbled on the walls. One by one, they'll die to the traps until only poor confused Robin makes it out of the cave alive.

      --
      We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    60. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by apraetor · · Score: 1

      Strategic division of labor. Gov't & gov't contractor tactic, used plenty.

    61. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      The French developed combat armor capable of stopping any standard military round below .50BMG.

      (Kevlar + big metal plate on front and back of torso)

      Unfortunately, it weighs 75lbs.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    62. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by bobbozzo · · Score: 1
      Don't forget that ballistic armor (a bulletproof vest) doesn't help against stabbing or cutting weapons...
      (Note: I'm not an expert. I'm sure somebody is trying to make a dual-purpose vest, if they haven't already. I just know that the standard ones are ballistic only.)

      You can get kevlar with a thin steel or titanium "trauma plate" which will stop most knife/stabbing attacks.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    63. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it weighs 75lbs.

      That won't impede movement at all, now will it?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    64. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Why not leave the lame reverse psychology alone and concentrate on removing the trollish bits from a post that otherwise contains one insightful and one interesting bit?

      Your post isn't negative enough to mod down (looks like someone chose to anyway) but certainly doesn't deserve to be modded up (looks like someone chose to anyway).

      Maybe there is balance to the universe...


      The point is that the "Offtopic" moderation in Slashdot is totally messed, and I was trying to avoid it by lame reverse psychology. Sometimes it works. The more general idea is to confuse the moderator into taking more time with the post, giving him the possibility of discovering that I do indeed have a point.

      The GGP makes some pro-abortion statement. He's talking about Batman in his post, so he's still on-topic. (It's ever so slightly a gray area in this case, but it'll be overlooked.) Someone who wants to defend his right-of-center position has NO CHANCE against the Slashdot moderators, the majority of whom, like the entire readership of this site, lean left. Disagree? Bah! It's off-topic. And guess what? It is!

      The GGP is practicing a very subtle form of baiting, and I was trying to avoid being caught. Well, I did. "Score:0, Offtopic." Excellent.

      By the way, if someone tries the same trick with a right-of-center post, it'll get modded off-topic immediately. That's how it works around here.

      Please excuse my jaded attitude. It's been reinforced by too many down-moderations.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    65. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Now here's the question. Which happens first, your firing or your arrest for assault with a deadly weapon?
      That would depend on whether or not he saw me coming.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    66. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by kernelfoobar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and the energy from a .44 magnum is about the same as a fast softball. Big deal.

      hmmm, now i'm rusty but:

      Softball: 400g, fast pitch: 60-70mph (~105km/h~= 29m/s)
      .44 magnum bullet: let's say for a Desert Eagle: Weight - 240 Gr.; Muzzle Velocity - 1180 fps.(~259m/s); source
      Ok, if I'm not mistaken you can measure the kinetic energy with the momentum (please correct me if I am wrong) with E=(mv^2)/2

      E1=kinetic energy from ball
      E1=(0.4 kg)/2 * (29 m/s)^2=0.2 kg * 841 m2/s2= 168.2 J

      E2=kinetic energy from bullet
      E2=(0.24 kg)/2 * (259 m/s)^2=0.12kg * 67081 m2/s2 ~= 8050 J

      sorry, but 168.2 and 8050 are not 'about the same', not even the same ball park.

      --
      Here we go again!
    67. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by John+Newman · · Score: 1

      The other respondant summarized the logic, but there's also the timeframe that some folks see as suggesting a link. Abortion was legalized in 1973. Crime rates started dropping around 1990. 1990 - 1973 = ?

    68. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by John+Newman · · Score: 1
      The dramatic drop in crime in NYC is an outlier compared to the rest of the nation, so it would be reasonable to assume that NYC had some kind of local effect which caused the deviation. In this case, I think Guiliani is the most likely cause. If you think it's somthing else, I'm open to suggestions.
      Guiliani's probably as good an explanation as any for NYC's particular success. But the real question is why crime dropped everywhere, at about the same time. Emergency medicine didn't suddenly get 200% better everywhere, either :), and anyway couldn't account for the drop in all manner of crimes.
    69. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      +1 "Cube" reference ;-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    70. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by localman · · Score: 1

      I make no claim as to the actual social outcome of legal abortion, but the freakonomics theory sounds completely stupid. Nearly all of the troubled kids I know are from families where the mommy couldn't wait to get all knocked up and have a kid of her own for fun.

      Most people I know who have the sense to abort when they don't think they can raise a child would have made better parents.

      Cheers.

    71. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      Good point. Although I'm living in a country where firearms are way less common than in the US, so that I have zero personal experience with handguns, I have some gun-geeky streaks. Enough to recognize the unit "Gr" above as "grains", which seems to be commonly used for some reason to measure the mass of bullets. Thing is, you simply converted 240 Gr into 0.24 kg, as if 1 Grain == 1 gram. This, I found dubious enough to ask Google about. The reply, for the click-lazy, was that 240 grains is about 15 grams.

      This makes sense too, since if a single bullet (not to mention cartridge and powder) of .44 Magnum weighed 240 grams (about half a pound), then a full magazine of 6 (I guess?) would weigh almost 1.5 kg, which seems like quite a lot for just part of the ammunition in a handgun. Or perhaps all users of such guns are also body-builders? :)

      With the corrected value for the mass of the bullet, the energy beecomes: 0.015/2 * 259^2 = 0.0075 * 67081 ~= 503 J, which is at least closer to your value for the softball. I'm not sure, but I think this perhaps brings them into the same ballpark. If a factor of ~3 is not too much, I'm not sure, expressions like that are vague.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    72. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      I believe there also needs to be a -1 "Hypercube" reference.

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
    73. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by mrjb · · Score: 1

      > The Cave: $24,000 Is it me or does this seem a bit too economical? Or is the problem in the hidden costs of decorating the place?

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    74. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      You got something wrong.
      Grain is NOT gramm.
      8050J is more like a high powered 0.5" rifle round.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    75. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Thing is, you simply converted 240 Gr into 0.24 kg, as if 1 Grain == 1 gram. This, I found dubious enough to ask Google about. The reply, for the click-lazy, was that 240 grains is about 15 grams.

      You should have dug a little deeper. The "240 grain" is a measure of the gunpowder charge, not the mass of the bullet. Higher-load charges use the same bullet, just different, more powerful charges, that result in the bullet traveling faster.

      I don't know what the actual mass of the bullet itself is. Maybe it turns out that it is actually close enough to 240 grains that the math works out similarly. But the "240 grain" written on the box of bullets refers to the gunpowder charge, not the bullets themselves.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    76. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Headw1nd · · Score: 1
      What you really need to be a superhero are two things, Awareness and Transportation. these traits are almost always found in fictional superheros, and would be necessary for any real life superheros to acheive.

      You need to have some sort of augumented awareness of crimes as they happen. Most fictional superheros have ome form of this or other, be it supernatural hearing, telepathy, remote sensors, ect. Otherwise you would have to roam around and just try to spot crime happening. I've spent a lot of time out at night, and I've never seen a crime being comitted. Obviously, i would not have made much of a superhero, as i would have never seen anything to stop.

      Item two is transportation: you must be able to get to the scence of the crime quickly in order to prevent it, then leave just as quickly, or you yourself will also be arrested. This is why many fictional heros fly, spiderman swings on webs, ect. Shootings and muggings happen in seconds, not much time for you to get involved. You need to be able to do more than just drive there, as this is what the police are doing.

      There you have it, if you have those two things, you can be a vigilante style superhero with little else in the way of training or equipment.

    77. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by armb · · Score: 1

      They skimp badly on most of the stuff, not just the suit. Training for example, Batman is supposed to be a detective, and has major input into his companies inventions and tech, as well as being one of the world's greatest martial artists. Some of that's just because he's a genius, but it takes training as well.

      --
      rant
    78. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Dasein · · Score: 1

      You and I are approximately the same age, so we've never seen the difference between legal and illegal abortion first hand. Roe V. Wade was 1972 -- the year before you were born and two years after I was born.

      So, it seems that our intuitive sense of the situation probably isn't a valid basis for judgement.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    79. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by harrkev · · Score: 1

      I have the feeling that I could put up with a LOT for $200K/year.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    80. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 1
      Okay, now you totally have to make this a full comic and publish it.

      That list of ingredients is almost as weird as Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged.

      I'm just burning to know!

    81. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Altus · · Score: 1


      well... to be fair, the theory isnt that it stops crime entirely.

      imagine how much worse it could be if it wasnt just the parrents that are too stupid to know that they cant provide for their children but rather all women who get knocked up and dont want or cant raise the child.

      children who are put up for adoption are at a high risk for becoming criminals. I wonder if the number of children put up for adoption has dropped dramatically since the legalization of abortion... I would assume that it has, but I dont know for sure.

      just think of how many more troubled kids you might know if the smarter parents didnt have an option.

      Just a thought.... Im not sure I really agree with the conclusions or not.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    82. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Cerberus7 · · Score: 1

      But there's the surface area factor. The bullet does more damage because it packs that energy into a tiny package that goes through you. It isn't the energy of the bullet that does damage, it's the hole it makes.

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    83. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by kernelfoobar · · Score: 1

      To all that replied, thank you, I stand corrected. This just goes to show I don't know much about handguns. However, from the page:
      Specs: Caliber - .44 Magnum; Bullet Weight - 240 Gr.; Muzzle Velocity - 1180 fps.; Muzzle Energy - 740 ft-lbs.; -

      So they DO say that it's the bullet's weight, not charge or cartidge or whatever. Unless someone DOES know about handguns/ammo, this is a mistake not to be blamed on the reader, right?

      --
      Here we go again!
    84. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Deviant+Q · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but all the really cool stuff is relatively cheap. Training + suit + belt $32,000. Car... just get yourself a black Ferrarri if you must.

      --
      "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
    85. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by ArticulateArne · · Score: 1

      Of course, that doesn't take into consideration how much more I'm going to have to pay for the Social Security benefits of the baby-boomers without having the other, oh, one-third of my generation to help.

    86. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      If you ask me, I think this whole story is just a big press release for Wayne Enterprises. They're obviously just trying to build buzz for the release of the consumer versions of these products!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    87. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      You should have dug a little deeper. The "240 grain" is a measure of the gunpowder charge, not the mass of the bullet.

      No, the parent poster is correct. In this context, "grain" refers to the weight of the bullet. "Grain" is also used for specifying the powder weight, but that information is rarely published outside reloading manuals.

      Higher-load charges use the same bullet, just different, more powerful charges, that result in the bullet traveling faster.

      For any given caliber/cartridge, there are usually many variations of bullet weight and muzzle velocity, which is why both are documented -- at least in the published specifications.

    88. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by localman · · Score: 1

      True... I guess I'm looking at it a bit wrong. I think that legal abortion probably did help by giving the option to the small subset of people who would have been lousy parents and recognized it. Seems like a small group to me, though.

      Too bad there's not much you can do about the people who probably should not have kids, but want them anyways. That's got nothing to do with the legality abortion, though.

      Cheers.

    89. Re:Cut to the chase - $3.4 million by lostguy · · Score: 1

      Or he has a hell of a commute from Ohio.

  3. It doesn't take much by miroth · · Score: 1

    ...just a fancy car and Tom Cruise's girlfriend.

  4. So why couldn't the average geek do the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you can't do it from the comfort of your terminal, it ain't worth it.

    1. Re:So why couldn't the average geek do the same? by climbon321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You might have to leave your terminal, but think about it. The dark knight fights at night. You wouldn't even have to be exposed to direct sunlight!

    2. Re:So why couldn't the average geek do the same? by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This really is the point. The way a person turns out is probably a combination of the character of the person and the challenges the person faces.

      If we take batman as an archtype, then out of perhaps 1,000,000 people in his circumstance, parents dead, police unable to do nother, perhaps 50,000 will have the personal resources to do something about it. Out fo those 50,000, perhaps 49,000 will continue with thier life of either making money or spending the money that is now thiers due to the demise of their parents. Another 900 probably offed thier parent for the inheritence.

      So of the 100 that are left, 10 are of the right age to become a badass villian hunter. Five of those turn to the profitable likfe of evil rather than the hopeless life of a hero. Four die trying. One surives.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:So why couldn't the average geek do the same? by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      Wow.
      You reinvented the Drake Equation.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  5. thus i eliminate "scifi" from my prefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let me know when you want to cater to people older than 12.

    1. Re:thus i eliminate "scifi" from my prefs by pwnage · · Score: 1

      No shit. Mod this fucker up!

      --
      Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
    2. Re:thus i eliminate "scifi" from my prefs by mcguyver · · Score: 1

      I second your motion. wtf is newsworthy about this article?

  6. What? by Daedalus-Ubergeek · · Score: 5, Funny
    Batman isn't from outer space and wasn't born with a mutant gene


    Also, Batman isn't real.
    1. Re:What? by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention this isn't STUFF THAT MATTERS.

    2. Re:What? by rjelks · · Score: 1

      You owe me a new keyboard Daedalus-Ubergeek.

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real news is that /. has lost the plot! This is front page stuff?

      Brought to you by the same people who think Linux is ready to for the desktop, and open source will save your soul.

    4. Re:What? by syousef · · Score: 1

      Also, Batman isn't real.

      Yes, they left out the cost for a weekly session with a psychiatrist, straitjacket, those nice injections and the little red pills.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    5. Re:What? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      Sure he's real!

      I see him inside my TEE VEE all the time!

    6. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah funny, "isn't real", haha! I've seen him on TV, he's real.

      -An American

    7. Re:What? by arekq · · Score: 1

      Did you ever wonder why his face changes every once in awhile? I did. ;-)

    8. Re:What? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Mod parent -1 Spoilsport!

    9. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's an obvious reason for that. There are times when he gets into such bad scuffles that he requires reconstructive surgery. These days there's more plastic in Batman than any action-figures you might find in the store. I have to say he has really good surgeons though. His face still remains so apparently malleable.

    10. Re:What? by hords · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, Batman isn't real.

      No, but Angle Grinder Man IS! And boy, does it take balls of steel to wear that outfit!

    11. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was always my problem with Batman. Fanboys would go on and on about how he does all this crap without having superpowers and I just say, "No human being could do this." Regardless of the fact that he's not real, could any human being do the things he does? Fight crime by night, run a multi-billion dollar corporation by day? When does he train? Not to mention all the regular human stuff like eat, sleep, crap. He must have an inhuman amount of stamina and an inhuman ability to heal, at the very least.

    12. Re:What? by Leif_Bloomquist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So is the Project Grizzly guy...suit and all!

      http://www.projectgrizzly.net/

    13. Re:What? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
      No, but Angle Grinder Man IS! And boy, does it take balls of steel to wear that outfit!

      I'm surprised they let him get away with that. In the US they are known to charge the person the car was registered to for the broken clamp - or boot as they call it over here. They are not cheap either.

      Balls of steel? Hardly. Try scuba diving sometime with a wetsuit. They can take a lot. Just don't move them too fast. Now taking a fencing blade down there during a bout... that would require balls of steel, or a good cup.

    14. Re:What? by hords · · Score: 1

      Balls of steel? Hardly. Try scuba diving sometime with a wetsuit. They can take a lot. Just don't move them too fast. Now taking a fencing blade down there during a bout... that would require balls of steel, or a good cup.

      What I meant by balls of steel is that it would take real guts to wear that thing because it is so ugly! :)

    15. Re:What? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
      What I meant by balls of steel is that it would take real guts to wear that thing because it is so ugly! :)

      OH! Nevermind. I bet it doesn't bother him a bit. He probably wears stuff just as bad normally. Some people have no fasion sense. It seems clear he has nothing better to do but to grind clamps/boots off.... Better that then stealing our identities I suppose or being upset at a woman wearing fur. Who knows, maybe the costume improves his looks.

  7. Batman's weakness by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why doesn't anybody aim at his chin? (no armor there)
    All it requires is a sniper.

    1. Re:Batman's weakness by nubbie · · Score: 1

      Or a good money shot! ;)

      --
      'Go for the eyes, Boo, go for the eyes, aaarrrrrrrr!' -- Minsc
    2. Re:Batman's weakness by technoextreme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sigh. Im starting to feel like a comic book nerd. It's actually quite pathetic. If I remember correctly Batman's cape is bulletproof also. All he has to do is throw up the cape and he is pretty much shielded. Also, the only major injury that Batman has had is a broken back by Bane I believe. During this time period he had to have another person replace him as Batman.

      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    3. Re:Batman's weakness by fembots · · Score: 1

      Hmm, ignorant Spiderman!

      Batman takes care of his face with L'Oreal. The powder's so thick it's tougher than the armor.

    4. Re:Batman's weakness by badman99 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hmmm I thought his only weakness was a young man named Robin.....

    5. Re:Batman's weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget chins. Some of us are lucky enough to aim for our belly buttons on occassion. ;)

    6. Re:Batman's weakness by badman99 · · Score: 0

      Hmmm and here I was thinking Batmans only weakness was young men with feminine names ie: Robin.......Plutonic relationship my arse.

    7. Re:Batman's weakness by passthecrackpipe · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      69% gave up on 1st day in iCLOD city. Can you survive there? [iclod.com]

      I would not be too proud of that statistic - it may just mean people find it boring....

      --
      People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
    8. Re:Batman's weakness by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      I would ove to see knightfall filmed, it would have to be at least two films though (3 might more sense).

    9. Re:Batman's weakness by techsoldaten · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, that depends on how you define major injury.

      - he has recevied wounds that resulted in broken ribs and broken arms (for that matter he has fallen from great heights in such a way that the reader would assume much worse);

      - he has occassionally suffered the effects of neurological toxins which rendered him incapable of normal function;

      - he suffered from a disease similar to vampirism that made him incapable of being out in the light;

      - he has drowned to the point of needing to be resuscitated;

      - he has been impaled and flailed to the point where blood poured out of his costume;

      Now, I am not enough of a comics geek to be able to point out issue / page numbers, but I fondly remember these events from the pages of the comics I read in my youth. I always thought he was the toughest superhero because of the predicaments in which he would be placed by writers.

      M

    10. Re:Batman's weakness by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Platonic", you ignorant poltroon! A "plutonic" relationship would be one you had with an igneous rock formed by solidification at considerable depth beneath the earth's surface.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    11. Re:Batman's weakness by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny
      ... gp poster ...
      "Plutonic relation my arse"
      ... parent reply ...
      "Platonic", you ignorant poltroon! A "plutonic" relationship would be one you had with an igneous rock formed by solidification at considerable depth beneath the earth's surface.
      Note the exact wording of the original - "Plutonic relation" and "my arse". Sounds like doing it doggie style, a la "Pluto the cartoon dog". Sounds about right for a Bat-"man-love"/Robin thing.
    12. Re:Batman's weakness by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1, Troll

      WHy do you think he wears a target on his chest?

      --
      All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    13. Re:Batman's weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I do love a well river-smothed igneous rock. So smooth and warm in the sun...

    14. Re:Batman's weakness by technoextreme · · Score: 1
      Well, that depends on how you define - he has occassionally suffered the effects of neurological toxins which rendered him incapable of normal function; - he suffered from a disease similar to vampirism that made him incapable of being out in the light; - he has drowned to the point of needing to be resuscitated; - he has been impaled and flailed to the point where blood poured out of his costume; Now, I am not enough of a comics geek to be able to point out issue / page numbers, but I fondly remember these events from the pages of the comics I read in my youth. I always thought he was the toughest superhero because of the predicaments in which he would be placed by writers.
      Dam. He is the Energizer bunny of crime fighters. How the hell does a person go through all that and the only injury that stops him is a broken back?
      - he has recevied wounds that resulted in broken ribs and broken arms (for that matter he has fallen from great heights in such a way that the reader would assume much worse);
      Actually you can brace yourself that you can survive a fall. I don't know how high but it is theoretically possible to do that. It aparently also helps if a canopy is there. A lady survived a fall from what usually is a fatal height after falling on top of a canopy. All she suffered was a broken arm.
      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    15. Re:Batman's weakness by coopaq · · Score: 1, Funny
      Sounds about right for a Bat-"man-love"/Robin thing.

      LOL! New Poll.

      a. Batman loves Robin
      b. Frodo loves Samwise
      c. Magneto loves The Refrigerator
      d. Tom Cruise loves Katie Holmes
      e. Joanie loves Chachie

    16. Re:Batman's weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or possibly with the Roman god of the dead and ruler of the underworld...

      http://www.answers.com/topic/pluto?method=6

    17. Re:Batman's weakness by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      'Cause he can't armor his head? And maybe something about his left arm being numb?

      Miller's DKR and Year One are my two favorite (sequential art) books.

      -Peter

    18. Re:Batman's weakness by pete-classic · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually you can brace yourself that you can survive a fall.


      I'm not sure if "brace" is the right word.

      I took Airborne school in '93. We jumped T-10 'chutes. According to some random page I found with google, the terminal velocity of a T-10 with an equipped soldier hanging off of it is 22-24 feet per second (6.7 to 7.3 m/s^2). Sadly my Physics is too rusty to figure out the height from which an unrestrained fall would produce that velocity on impact.

      Understand that this is a fall that a parachutist should be able to walk away from with some regularity. (In Jump Week twice a day on each of Monday and Tuesday.)

      The strategy for walking away from this fall was, long story short, fall over on impact.

      We were taught to make five discrete impacts with the ground, reducing the force of each. (For reference, the points are the balls of the feet, the side of one calf, the side of the upper part of that leg, the ass cheek on that same side, and the same side of the back.*)

      Anyway, "bracing" one's self is likely to end in at least one broken leg.

      -Peter

      PS: Before anyone asks, yes, I'm a five jump chump . . . but at least I'm not a leg!

      -P
    19. Re:Batman's weakness by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Which would make more sense if he still had the yellow circle. The more recent movies and comics have removed it. You can barely see it in Batman Begins.

      From what I heard, the reason they added it in the 70's was because DC couldn't trademark just the bat. This didn't sit well with Alex Ross when he was working on a Bat project (his words from an old Wizard interview I believe), so he left it off and over time the regular monthly comics dropped it. It was, however, left out in a few other key releases, namely the latter half of "The Dark Knight Returns" series.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    20. Re:Batman's weakness by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Plutonic relation" and "my arse". Sounds like doing it doggie style,
      I don't expect Slashdotters to know a lot about sex, but doggy style is still vaginal.

    21. Re:Batman's weakness by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      I don't expect Slashdotters to know a lot about sex, but doggy style is still vaginal.
      ... not necessarily, and definitely not between Batman and Robin (unless he also has a vagina as well as the usual meat and 2 potatoes, in which case he really is a "boy wonder").
    22. Re:Batman's weakness by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny
      http://www.health24.com/sex/Glossary/1253-1271,263 53.asp
      Doggie style

      Also known as rear entry. Sexual position in which a person who is on all fours is penetrated from the rear, either vaginally or anally.
      Turns out that the "other" doggie style is the most used:
      Survey says "Doggie Style" is most used sexual position:

      Husband begs for 2 hours
      Wife rolls over and plays dead
    23. Re:Batman's weakness by Elranzer · · Score: 1

      Always count on a Batman article to bring up conversations of man-on-man anal sex.

    24. Re:Batman's weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he moves around...a lot. In the dark. If he got shot in the head, while possibly not piercing the cowl (I don't care what they use in the movie, mobility is still key to the costume so he has to be able to move his head) would hurt like a mofo and probably still cause a massivly concussive head injury.

      Batman's biggest skill is that his he completely paranoid and obessive. So he plans for everything.

    25. Re:Batman's weakness by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      About head movement, I believe I read somewhere that this was the first Batman costume that did in fact allow head movement. But I didn't notice it being done much in the movie, so maybe not. There are also probably several variations of the costume (ones for closeup head shots, ones for full body camera shots, etc.) so they vary in their capabilities.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    26. Re:Batman's weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice you left off the CowboyNeal option.

      Thank god for small mercies.

    27. Re:Batman's weakness by AJWM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That speed (7 m/sec) is equivalent to a fall from about 8 feet (2.5 m). That sounds a bit high, but maybe mil chutes fall faster? (Perhaps it's the extra weight of the equipment.) Back when I learned to skydive (I forget the chute -- TU-something, although the sport chute of the day was the ParaCommander - early 70s) we were told it was about the same as a 4 foot drop, and practiced PLFs by jumping from a platform not quite that high.

      --
      -- Alastair
    28. Re:Batman's weakness by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      About head movement, I believe I read somewhere that this was the first Batman costume that did in fact allow head movement.

      I read that; but they were obviously only talking about the recent big movies. Adam West in the TV version had no problem, neither did any of the earlier (1940s) movie matinee Batmen.

      And otherwise I'd just like to comment on how pathetic it is that "How Stuff Works" and "Forbes" both cheapen themselves by doing bullshit "factual" articles on a comic movie. (As for Slashdot, also disappointed though not surprised.) Though makes a change from bullshit factual articles on Star Wars.

    29. Re:Batman's weakness by wdr1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought that was why he kept Robin around?

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    30. Re:Batman's weakness by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      That sounds a bit high, but maybe mil chutes fall faster? (Perhaps it's the extra weight of the equipment.)

      I would guess smaller parachute. You don't want to fall slowly, you're an easy target.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    31. Re:Batman's weakness by Mahler · · Score: 1

      You're probably forgetting his batsense ...
      He'll be able to jump away just in time.

    32. Re:Batman's weakness by hey! · · Score: 1

      he has recevied wounds that resulted in broken ribs and broken arms (for that matter he has fallen from great heights in such a way that the reader would assume much worse)

      Well, if you're considering a career as an urban vigilante, it really helps to be a quick healder. Just ask John "Lying bullet-ridden in a hospital bed in one scene, kicking bad guy ass or pleasuring the ladies in the next" Shaft.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    33. Re:Batman's weakness by 6031769 · · Score: 1

      v^2 = u^2 + 2gs
      or, s = (v^2 - u^2) / 2g
      So if v = 6.7, u = 0 and g = 9.8 (to 2 sig figs),
      s = 6.7^2 / (2 * 9.8) = 2.3m

      Not so high, really. NB. This is neglecting air resistance, but the drag at those velocities will not greatly affect the calculation.

      --
      Burns: We're building a casino!
      McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
    34. Re:Batman's weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lame, completely lame. If you cannot derive a person's meaning from context, & have to pick @ spelling? I wonder who the ignorant one is here??

    35. Re:Batman's weakness by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 1

      f. CowboyNeal loves breasts

      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
    36. Re:Batman's weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you know my weakness was a bullet to the face??

      -bruce

    37. Re:Batman's weakness by wastaz · · Score: 1

      f. Everybody loves CowboyNeal

    38. Re:Batman's weakness by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      Because they don't see him coming. Much of the effect of what he tries to achieve comes from attacking unexpectedly from odd angles, notably above (humans are notorious for not looking up much). If you don't know which direction he's coming from, a sniper rifle is worse than useless.

    39. Re:Batman's weakness by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In a way, Batman is one of the LEAST realistic superheros. Superman is invulnerable, and Wolverine has a healing factor, but Batman doesn't have any of that. And I don't care how good you are, you'll get injuries that will at least slow you down, and make it more likely that you'll get MORE injuries until it's humanly impossible to continue as Batman does.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    40. Re:Batman's weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Survey says "Doggie Style" is most used sexual position:

      Husband begs for 2 hours
      Wife rolls over and plays dead


      You losers, my wife doesn't play dead.

    41. Re:Batman's weakness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dam. He is the Energizer bunny of crime fighters. How the hell does a person go through all that and the only injury that stops him is a broken back?

      Well, he is a billionaire ... I assume he has one hell of a health plan :) Seriously, though, the martial arts training he went through probably also helped him learn how to take blows and fall properly in order to lessen the severity of an injury or to avoid injury completely.

      Think about Jackie Chan -- admittedly he's suffered more injuries in his career than Batman has in the comics, but he's done some stuff even the Bat hasn't, and he's survived it without the benefits of body armor, or a grappling hook, etc.

    42. Re:Batman's weakness by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Let's look at the evidence (from the comics)...
      1) A guy named "Robin" who...
      2) Wears a tight green bikini...
      Hmmm.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    43. Re:Batman's weakness by jdray · · Score: 1
      For reference, the points are the balls of the feet, the side of one calf, the side of the upper part of that leg, the ass cheek on that same side, and the same side of the back.

      Army guy, then? Former C-130 Loadmaster here. The way we heard it, Army guys used the five point system of feet, calf, thigh, hip, shoulder. Marines used a three point system of feet, knees, forehead.

      Could have been one of those "urban legends," though. We always preferred staying in the airplane. ;^)

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    44. Re:Batman's weakness by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I realize this is going to suck, posting it on /. when I've finally gotten around to downloading this myself, but here is a link to Batman comics from 1-623 plus the annuals. Comics via torrent are great -- collectors can collect, and still be able to read without opening the seals on their preciouses. Simultaneously, fans can read rare issues without having thousands of dollars.

      Let's see what happens to the torrent when /. gets wind of it. The torrent is 6.67 GB!

    45. Re:Batman's weakness by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I did my five jumps at Benning out of a C-130. A few years later I re-deployed from the Balkans and took the trip from Tazar to K-town in a C-130. After we were in flight I realized that it was my sixth trip in a C-130, but would be my first landing.

      Frankly, that was the most frightening of the six trips.

      What's the MOS of the guy that goes around making sure every bolt is 1/4 turn from tight on those things?

      -Peter

    46. Re:Batman's weakness by Lord+Dreamshaper · · Score: 1

      IIRC a person reaches terminal velocity after anything higher than a six-story fall...you don't expect to survive a fall like that very often, but you're not completely surprised when it happens, either. But by that same logic, you shouldn't be completely surprised that some survived a fall from an airplane w/ a faulty parachute...

      --
      When all of your wishes have been granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed - Marilyn Manson
    47. Re:Batman's weakness by jdray · · Score: 1

      Hehehe...

      Ask any mechanic or crew chief for those things. They'll tell you that, if they aren't leaking, they aren't running right.

      Most of the Herkys in the fleet were H-models, which they stopped producing in '69 or '71, I believe. After a few thousand combat landings on unimproved runways (gravel roads in the middle of nowhere), you'd have a few loose bolts as well.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    48. Re:Batman's weakness by cshark · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for the first post to accuse Forbes of selling out for doing a slilly article based on a movie. It was fair with howthingswork.com, why not here?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    49. Re:Batman's weakness by sanosuke76 · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it. I can't believe they cut so many corners on the body armor. I did some research last year on what a 'dream suit' of body armor would run... $4k or so should've provided full body protection. That "bulletproof jacket" they specced out was laughable. I mean, at least going with the Russian surplus body armor using segmented titanium plates is only $500ish from milsurp vendors, and it's closer to the Batman armor than what they were talking about. The plates will also stop 7.62x39mm rounds, as one of the guys on www.sksboards.com verified.

      Then of course, purchase some less protective but more flexible armor for the rest of the body. There's fancy places on the web for this, most of which won't list prices unless you're doing an actual departmental quote. But judging from what the ones that DID list prices wanted, a good superhero-esque bulletproof suit would be around $4k-$5k.

      --
      My 229 is all the Sig I need http://thegunwiki.com/
  8. By your criteria... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Batman isn't from outer space and wasn't born with a mutant gene --he uses his riches, raw determination and technological know-how to equip himself to fight evil. So why couldn't the average geek do the same?"

    Bill Gates should be bigger than Superman in that case.

    1. Re:By your criteria... by El+Gordo+Motoneta · · Score: 1

      Only he chose to be Lex Luthor.

  9. Fscking Astroturf by ewhac · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How much is Warner Bros. paying for these ads poorly masquerading as "news"?

    Schwab

    1. Re:Fscking Astroturf by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Just be grateful there isn't one of those usual half-assed 'scientific' formulas attached, like V = G/2 + 5*J/3 - K + T*13, where V is Batman's success, G is the speed of the batmobile, blah blah bullshit bullshit bullshit viral marketing, etc. etc.

    2. Re:Fscking Astroturf by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "How much is Warner Bros. paying for these ads poorly masquerading as "news"?"

      Judging from your comment, it's working. Now Slashdot has another comment + more ads served as a result of it. Good job increasing value within a business practice you despise!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  10. Main Problem: by imsabbel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even being totally l33t equipt and fit like Rambo wont give you the magic "perfect Luck" factor batman has.

    Even if your suit will stop 99% of all bullets, and your fit enough to beat thugs people into submission 95% of the time.... ... If you go crimefighting every night, after a few months youre chances of being a corpse in some alley are really really good.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Main Problem: by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      Even if your suit will stop 99% of all bullets, and your fit enough to beat thugs people into submission 95% of the time.... ... If you go crimefighting every night, after a few months youre chances of being a corpse in some alley are really really good.


      This is why I recommend the alternative approach. Supervillian. You can then pick an choose your battles, and don't forget to run away!
      --
      once more into the breach
    2. Re:Main Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the MAIN problem is that, while someone with $3 million could perhaps beat numerous people with less than $3 million, that's not how true justice is supposed to work. True justice isn't supposed to have anything to do with how much money you can spend on it personally.

      Then, there's the fact that, although most of Batmans' opponents have less than $3 million to spend, real-life opponents have much more than that -- because if you start messing with syndicates and cartels that are richer than countries, you're not going to stand much of a chance. Not to mention that the "official" forces - police, army, CIA, FBI, NSA, etc., (all of whom incidentally also have much more than $3 million to throw at their largish projects) will all be going after you too, for about the 5 hundered thousand crimes you commit in the course of dishing out private justice. Get up some bureaucrats' nose, and they'll NEVER stop looking for you.

    3. Re:Main Problem: by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      During every Batman, part of me is screaming "Shoot him in the face! Shoot him in the face!"

      Even if his armor could stop the bullets and you missed the face, it sure wouldn't feel good.

    4. Re:Main Problem: by tomlouie · · Score: 1

      > "Shoot him in the face! Shoot him in the face!"

      [paraphrased from memory]

      The Tick: Arthur! We need a battle cry! Something that'll strike fear in the hearts of our foes.
      Author: Well, how about "Not in the face, not in the face!"
      The Tick: Hmm, lacks vim, chum. How about... SPOON!!!

      Tom

  11. Warning by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

    explains what it would cost to become a real-world Batman using commercially available training and technology

    Kids....I mean Slashdotters!...Don't try this at home.

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  12. Jesus H. Christ by pwnage · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Batman is a fucking fictional character. EOT.

    --
    Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
    1. Re:Jesus H. Christ by macaulay805 · · Score: 1

      Not after this article and the geeks think they'll get someone as hot as Homes, and somehow they'll still manage to get Linux running on the car.

  13. "Average Geek"? by brockbr · · Score: 1

    AvgGeek != 3.36M - Thats why.

  14. ...also... by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny
    So why couldn't the average geek do the same?

    Furthermore, the average geek doesn't need to "count on forking over $297,000 a year on gifts, including Tiffany diamond earrings and necklaces for your lady friends."

    1. Re:...also... by TERdON · · Score: 1

      Actually, the average geek might not even have lady friends... ;-)

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    2. Re:...also... by NuShrike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With that kind of money, "lady friends" will smarm out of the dark caves they come from to mug you automatically. Even if you smell, and have the glow of bad white skin.

    3. Re:...also... by jumbledInTheHead · · Score: 1

      by "might" I think you meant "does"

      And relatives don't count, unless your from Alabama.

    4. Re:...also... by Zangief · · Score: 1

      This is good, because, if you read the "article", you can see that more than 1 million goes to the "alter ego", which is all about the girls.

      The AvgGeek would be cutting expenses fast!

  15. FTFA by not-enough-info · · Score: 2, Funny
    The Batman movie franchise is also one of the most lucrative of all time, with five movies (not counting Batman Begins) grossing nearly $1 billion.

    What is this mystical fifth film?

    1)Batman
    2)Batman Returns
    3)Batman Forever
    4)Batman & Robin
    5)???
    6)Batman Begins

    Oh I remember now.
    5)Batman My Ass
    --
    ---k--
    </stupid>
    1. Re:FTFA by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1
      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    2. Re:FTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      5)Batman My Ass

      Is THAT what they subtitled the Adam West/Burt Ward movie?! Everything makes sense now...

    3. Re:FTFA by NIK282000 · · Score: 1

      There was a really retro movie with Adam West.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    4. Re:FTFA by totoanihilation · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget the 1966 classic featuring Adam West and Burt Ward ;)

      link

    5. Re:FTFA by Guillermito · · Score: 1

      There is even one more: The Batman (1943). Of course, at that time the villain could not be other than a "japanese spy".

    6. Re:FTFA by Redwin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually there were 8:

      1. Batman (1989)
      2. "Batman" (1992)
      aka "Batman: The Animated Series" - USA (promotional title)
      aka "The Adventures of Batman & Robin" - USA (new title)
      3. Batman (1966/I)
      aka "Batman: The Movie" - USA (video box title)
      4. Batman Returns (1992)
      5. Batman Forever (1995)
      aka "Batman 3" - USA (working title)
      6. Batman & Robin (1997)
      aka "Batman and Robin" - USA (alternative spelling)
      7. Batman Begins (2005)
      aka "Batman 5" - USA (working title)
      aka "Batman Begins: The IMAX Experience" - USA (IMAX version)
      aka "Batman: Intimidation" - USA (original script title)
      aka "Batman: Intimidation Game" - USA (fake working title)
      8. Catwoman (2004)
      aka "Untitled 'Batman Returns' Spin-off" - USA (working title)

      Although IMDB does say Batman begins is called Batma 5 so u are right... kinda :-)

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    7. Re:FTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it 'profit!'?

    8. Re:FTFA by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe he means Batman: Mask of the Phantasm?

      Granted, it wasn't live-action, but it was a theatrical release, and it came out between Batman Returns and Batman Forever. It uses the Animated Series/Gotham Knights/Justice League continuity and was done by the TAS team.

      Frankly, I consider it better than the other live-action films, with the possible exception of the 1989 Batman.

      Just my $.02...

    9. Re:FTFA by hyldain · · Score: 1

      That would be Batman's first appearance on the big screen. The Batman from 1943. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0035665/

    10. Re:FTFA by OmgTEHMATRICKS · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your list is inaccurate.

      1)Batman
      2)Batman Returns
      3)Batman Forever
      4)Batman & Robin
      5)???
      6)Profit!

    11. Re:FTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are going to include TV...then you need to add:

      Batman Beyond (1999-2001 TV series)
      Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker (2000, movie)

    12. Re:FTFA by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't count Catwoman. Not because it was a bad movie, but because it didn't use the Batman comics as source material. They went out of their way at the beginning stages of the production to state it wasn't in any way tied to the comics or previous movies.

    13. Re:FTFA by Tom+Veil · · Score: 1

      #2 wasn't a movie, although several movies did come out of it. Here's a more complete list of series and movies in roughly chronological order (grouped by actor playing Batman):

      Lewis Wilson: The Batman (1943 movie serial).

      Robert Lowery: Batman and Robin (1949 movie serial).

      Adam West: "Batman" (1966 series) and Batman: The Movie (1966) .

      Jing Abalos: Batman Fights Dracula (1967).

      Olan Soule: "The Batman/Superman Hour" (1968 series) and "The Adventures of Batman" (1969 series).

      Michael Keaton: Batman (1989) and Batman Returns (1992).

      Kevin Conroy: "Batman" (1992 series), Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1993), "Batman: Gotham Knights" (1997 series), The New Batman Superman Adventures" (1997 series), Batman & Mr. Freeze: Sub-Zero (1998), The Batman/Superman Movie (1998), Batman: Mystery of the Batwoman (2003).

      Val Kilmer: Batman Forever (1995).

      George Clooney: Batman & Robin (1997).

      Kevin Conroy and Will Friedle were in Batman Beyond: The Movie (1999), "Batman Beyond" (1999 series), Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker (2000).

      Rino Romano: "The Batman" (2004 series).

      Christian Bale: Batman Begins (2005).

      And this doesn't even include Catwoman , "Justice League", "Super Friends", Batman: Dead End , etc. (Note that Batman Beyond: The Movie and The Batman/Superman Movie are actually episodes of their respective series.) However, most people do consider Batman Begins to be the fifth "modern" live-action Batman movie, although I personally consider it a separate series altogether from the previous films.

      --

      There's nothing you have that they can't take away: Absolute zero, Gentle Jack, bottom line.

    14. Re:FTFA by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Batman (1966) was a movie.

  16. Fucking Stupid Article. by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sheesh.

    I started reading it this morning, and realized they were just tallying up stuff from the movie that just came out.

    This is quite pathetic, but hey, it's Forbes.

    Duh.

    Oh, I love the truly stupid part about the "fictional forbes fifteen" list of the richest fictional retards.

    Fuckabugaloo. :p

    --
    "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
  17. Dupe by nfras · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks remarkably similar in content to:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/15/223923 1&tid=97&tid=99
    and just 6 days later.

    --
    You call me a pedant? I prefer the term "correct"
  18. Ah yes, become a superhero! by Roofus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This reminds me of a quote from Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash:

    Until a man is twenty-five, he still thinks, every so often, that under the right circumstances he could be the baddest motherfucker in the world. If I moved to a martial-arts monastery in China and studied real hard for ten years. If my family was wiped out by Colombian drug dealers and I swore myself to revenge. If I got a fatal disease, had one year to live, and devoted it to wiping out street crime. If I just dropped out and devoted my life to being bad.


    It's funny, because I used to think that exact thought. Then reality hit, and I realized I'm just a big pussy :(

    1. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      It's funny, because I used to think that exact thought. Then reality hit, and I realized I'm just a big pussy :(

      But were you 25 when reality hit?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best post of the day :-)

    3. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And why couldn't they, if they really wanted to? If they dedicated themselves to actually doing it?

      They might not be the baddest, but they could probably get close.

      Really, the difference between Bruce Wane and the most of us with that dream is that he decided it was more important than anything and everything else in his life. His life is filled with exactly two things: maintaining his cover, and being Batman. Nothing else matters, and nothing else exists.

      He never has time to watch a movie, or read a book. To try to meet a girl (outside of maintaining his cover, or another superhero). The company is run by others. He has no life.

      You may admire the choice, but admit the cost. Maybe you could have made that choice, if you had really wanted to. But could you have paid the personal cost?

      If you think it would be worth it, try it. A few have. They didn't start with the resources Bruce Wane did, but I've read articles about a few. (Sorry, can't find them at the moment.) People who dedicated themselves to being the best hero they can be.

      Most are trying to figure out how to have a normal life, how to fit in to the world.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    4. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He never has time to watch a movie, or read a book. To try to meet a girl (outside of maintaining his cover, or another superhero). The company is run by others. He has no life.

      Sounds like your average geek, all right. But instead of becoming Batman, he gets a really kickin' frame rate on Duke Nukem Forever and the coolest transparent case fan with LEDs on the block.

    5. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by slackartist · · Score: 1
      This quotation is one that comes to my mind a lot, too, and I think it strikes a chord with a lot of guys. I wonder if women ever think this way. Somehow, I doubt it.

      Nevertheless, people always underestimate what they can achieve should they set aside pointless anxieties and, worst of all, laziness in pursuit of ideals. You've admitted to being a pussy, ok, that honesty is essential, but you are already poised on the cusp of metamorphosis.

      Maybe you can't be a superhero, but you could be a hero with some work. Think of the rush you'd feel getting out of bed every morning.

    6. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by soft_guy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      They had a story on This American Life about a lady who wanted to become a superhero and worked for many years to become real bad ass like one. I don't know if she was real or made up for the story, but she ultimately became some kind of private detective.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    7. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, being a little less than 25 myself, I'm pretty sure those things are true.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    8. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you beat the shit out of the wrong guy and land in jail. That's the reality part.

    9. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      She's one of the ones I remember, though I think I read about her in Smithsonian.

      She wanted to be a spy, like James Bond. She got all the skills, but the CIA wouldn't take her. ;)

      (And the normal response she gets from guys who hear her story is a marriage proposal.)

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    10. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you work at Initech?

    11. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by PenguinRigger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn, you too?

      --
      "I need to dump them to a file and diff the whore" -JT
    12. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      He never has time to watch a movie, or read a book. To try to meet a girl

      The Phantom manages. He's a rich guy who likes to dress up in drag and fight crime too, and every member of his male line for four hundred years has managed to find a woman to move in with him and keep the dynasty going...

      rj

    13. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I studied martial arts real hard for over 10 years. Know what I learned most? Martial arts are to be used for self defense. Want to stop crime? Go become a policeman.

      So every normal day I'm just another guy on the street. It's only if you attack me or someone I care about (or have reason to help. Don't mug some old lady, for example...) that I become "the baddest motherfucker in the world."

      I don't fight crime in general, vigilante justice itself is illegal.

      Want to help the police? Make 'em cookies. It's easy and it raises their morale. Simple, and they work that much harder because of it. (Or they might just eat the cookies and forget about it, but at least you feel good about it.)

    14. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      And why couldn't they, if they really wanted to? If they dedicated themselves to actually doing it?

      And why couldn't they fly, if they'd just jump up and stop actually falling down again?

      Most people are completely unable to absolutely dedicate their entire life towards one random goal (that we weren't built for, like raising a child).

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    15. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by holiggan · · Score: 1
      > And why couldn't they, if they really wanted to? If they dedicated themselves to actually doing it?

      You're under 25, right? ;)

      --
      "A sysadmin is a cross between a detective, a police officer, a gardener, a doctor and a fireman"
    16. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm 27. Make of that what you will. :)

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    17. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by apt142 · · Score: 1

      If you think it would be worth it, try it. A few have. They didn't start with the resources Bruce Wane did, but I've read articles about a few. (Sorry, can't find them at the moment.) People who dedicated themselves to being the best hero they can be.

      Ok, I can think of a few. But, maybe they aren't bad asses in the sense that the can take on crews of gangs single handed. I don't think you have to be able to do that to be a hero.

      There are a ton of people in the community I live in who dedicate so much of their time and money volunteering in some noble causes.

      I'd definitely mark Mother Teresa as one such hero. I know, this is slashdot, poo on anything religious. But, if you get past that you are still looking at a woman who spent her entire life looking into people and seeing beyond their destitute to see the human being underneath.

      Father Greg Boyle is another such hero. Check out his story.

      Anyways, my point is that both of the above dedicated their lives to something and made a difference. It can and does happen.

    18. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by CrkHead · · Score: 1
      "He has no life."

      And that's different from the /. crowd how?

    19. Re:Ah yes, become a superhero! by austinhealey · · Score: 1

      female geek, with life( yes and that would be the doggie style thing) and still think this way.

  19. $740 a month for Shoalin training?!! by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 4, Funny
    Man whatever happened to knocking on the temple door and waiting three days without encouragement

    These Chinese keep claiming to be communists but I just don't see it.

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    1. Re:$740 a month for Shoalin training?!! by miscz · · Score: 1

      My mother got back from vacation in China and she says it's about 750$ / YEAR. Gotta love this country ;]

    2. Re:$740 a month for Shoalin training?!! by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      That's not the Chinese, that's Fight Club. And the reason you don't see it is because we're not supposed to talk about it, AND becaues we're not supposed to talk about it.

    3. Re:$740 a month for Shoalin training?!! by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      Yeah it was Fight Club, but I'm pretty sure Palniuk (or Tyler Durden) got the idea from American Shoalin which wins the no. 2 spot for goofiest movie with Shoalin in the Title.

      No. 1 spot incidently, goes to Shoalin Dolemite

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    4. Re:$740 a month for Shoalin training?!! by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      Shaolin Soccer (english title) is rather extremely goofy too. Not the sucking US cut, but the Hong Kong original is great. Characters bursting into song at random unexpected moments, Matrix style special effects, soccer, a stupid love story, in Hong Kong martial arts style. Classic.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    5. Re:$740 a month for Shoalin training?!! by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much it costs to get authentic Shaolin training in New York City. The guy is someone to be respected. If I was in New York, I'd go there to train. I don't think I'd want any Tai Chi training from Shi Yan Ming, but his Shaolin is definitely to be respected.

  20. $1500 suit? by vanyel · · Score: 1

    I think they really wimped out on the suit: the batsuit is a lot more than a bulletproof jacket and a helmet, and much of the technology is doable to some extent. While it may not be an "off the shelf" item as all the stuff they listed is, I'm sure anyone the wherewithall to do this sort of thing could get something a little more advanced than just a jacket...

    1. Re:$1500 suit? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I believe in the movie, Lucius Fox said the suit would've had a _production cost_ of $300,000. No mention of the development cost, though. :)

  21. I've got a better idea... by RaguMS · · Score: 1

    Why not just let the bad guys stand in front of a giant microwave emitter? They'll be toast in no time, then you can just sit back and relax.

    1. Re:I've got a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, I'm not alone!
      Let's build a few giant microwave emitters and wipe out crime!

      PINEL

  22. can we please get a calculation... by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    from somebody who had heard of Batman before yesterday?

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  23. What happened to the batman geek? by DoctaWatson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The batman I know and love from comics to cartoons to movies to even the hokey 60's Adam West has always been a brilliant detective and keen scientist.

    I loved Batman Begins, but I really think they missed the mark when it comes to Batman's CSI savvy.

    My head was spinning when Bruce Wayne says "Am I supposed to know what that means?"

    So if you want to be a real Batman, figure in another several hundred thousand dollars for advanced degrees in science and criminology.

    (Also... $30,000 + 3 years in China != the ability to fight like the movies, but only the keenly stupid would think otherwise, right?)

    1. Re:What happened to the batman geek? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Geez give hiom a break. it was like his first week of batmaning. I'm sure he learns those things soon enough.

      --
      Why not fork?
    2. Re:What happened to the batman geek? by aliens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Haven't seen it yet, but did he say that as Bruce Wayne? If so then it would fit rather well, Bruce Wayne was meant to just Wayne Corp's pretty faced playboy. If he acted smart it wouldn't be in character.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    3. Re:What happened to the batman geek? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that this is the "green" Batman. Perhaps over the following 20 or 30 years (or however long he's supposed to have been doing it in the comics) he learns the importance (and methods) of real forensics. Who says his training stopped when he put on the cowl?

    4. Re:What happened to the batman geek? by DoctaWatson · · Score: 1

      The context of the quote is him waking in convalescence in the company of Alfred and Morgan Freeman's character, a Wayne Industries uberscientist (who invented all the cool batman toys) who's in on the secret.

      Wayne says "Am I supposed to know what that means?" after Freeman's character explains the chemical makeup of Scarecrow's fear gas.

      So no, it really doesn't fit.

      But more than that he doesn't do any detective work at all. No examination of evidence or anything. I mean, he's sharp and catches on fast, but doesn't ever do any analytical thinking that I'd become used to with Batman.

    5. Re:What happened to the batman geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, a proper detective is supposed to know everything about everything... OK. Well, give him a break, he just spent the last seven years training in every martial arts style in the world. I doubt he had the opportunity to read about every scientific advancement in the latest journals every month.

      I'd say figuring out what the former head of Wayne Enterprises was up to, not letting on at all, then covertly buying up a majority share position was pretty damn smart.

      Not quite detective work, but still essential to continuing his existance.

    6. Re:What happened to the batman geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So, a proper detective is supposed to know everything about everything... OK."

      No. Batman is.

    7. Re: What happened to the batman geek? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > So if you want to be a real Batman, figure in another several hundred thousand dollars for advanced degrees in science and criminology.

      Or he could just watch CSI:Gotham instead of downloading porn every night.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:What happened to the batman geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who says his training stopped when he put on the cowl?


      Indeed.. he even studied "Mad Cow" style..

      Mooo motherfucker, MOOOOO!
    9. Re: What happened to the batman geek? by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Or he could just watch CSI:Gotham..."

      Which Who song does that one use?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    10. Re:What happened to the batman geek? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      He said it to someone who knew his secret.

      Really, in the movie they tone down his abilities quite a bit in an attempt (I think) to make it more realistic.

      It isn't Batman the World's Greatest Detective - it's Batman the guy who learned how to kick the shit out of people and who has the money to hire experts to handle the stuff that he isn't able to spend time on or just couldn't do himself.

      Personally, I like it this way better.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    11. Re: What happened to the batman geek? by batlock666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Behind Blue Eyes:

      No one knows what it's like
      to be the Batman
  24. GOD DAMN IT by kenp2002 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well it's good to see yet another spot for a crappy movie. I am glad to see that while there is so much going on in the world in technology and geekdom in general we need to beat a 4 times already dead horse. Wow this is almost as bad as the last Batman commercial... speaking of which....

    I AM GETTING REAL FUCKING SICK OF THE FUCKING COMMERICALS ON SLASHDOT THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO BE DISGUISED AS ARTICLES!! FIX THIS SHIT TACO YOUR SMARTER THEN THIS CRAP!

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:GOD DAMN IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's "YOU'RE SMARTER THAN THIS CRAP!" (and the stupid lameness filter wouldn't allow me to just quote you like that because it said i was shouting....)

    2. Re:GOD DAMN IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Come on, you know you want a batsuit of your own. And /. has enough room for these silly articles as well as the more "intellectual" ones. Just think of it as TACO SAUCE. Plus, I haven't see Batman Begins yet, so I need the ./ comments to know how bad I should expect it to be. Keep up the good work /. Commander Taco, I salute you.

    3. Re:GOD DAMN IT by kwerle · · Score: 0, Troll

      I have to include this sentence because slashdot thinks I'm yelling.

      Here is another sentence. Slashdot can be so pedantic.

      FIX THIS SHIT TACO YOUR SMARTER THEN THIS CRAP!

      FIX THIS SHIT, TACO; YOU'RE SMARTER THAN THIS CRAP!

      But maybe you're not? :-)

    4. Re:GOD DAMN IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Create your own news site, you seem to know what going on in the world. Put the URL in your sig.

  25. The average geek by sxltrex · · Score: 1
    So why couldn't the average geek do the same?


    Because if the average geek tried to be the next Batman, they'd end up more like this guy.

  26. don't mean to sound trite but... by AhuraMazda · · Score: 0

    for god's sake the emphasis is on "hero" (besides, why would I wanna walk around in a costume at the 1st place). My pennyless granpa gave me swift kick in the head the first time he caught me smoking... have never lighted one since. That sure didn't cost much!

  27. One important thing is missing: by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    We have no supervillains and we aren't awash in the kind of crime it would take to support this so you need to add the cost of creating an enemy to fight in the first place.

    The crime would be more lucretive until the government came after you essentially because they don't like competition in crime (not crime fighting, they rarely do this much it seems where I live).

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:One important thing is missing: by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      [sarcasm] Well, THANK YOU Captain Amazing. [/sarcasm]

      (So says Casanova Frankenstein. Rawk!)

    2. Re:One important thing is missing: by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      We have no supervillains? Since when?

    3. Re:One important thing is missing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have no supervillains and we aren't awash in the kind of crime it would take to support this so you need to add the cost of creating an enemy to fight in the first place.

      If you need an accurate figure on that cost just ask GW Bush. He'll know.

  28. I wonder one thing... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Why did nobody thought to shoot Batman in the chin. Through throat, into neck section of the spine. Unshielded area, quick death, easier shot than aiming at the eye. Also shooting the jaw off from the side would pretty much neutralize him.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:I wonder one thing... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Just aiming in the general direction with a sawed off shotgun or a tec10 on full auto would hit SOMETHING that hurts...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:I wonder one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, one shot from an AR50 anywhere on his torso or head would pretty much obliterate him, Batsuit and all.

    3. Re:I wonder one thing... by AEton · · Score: 1

      According to one of the books in "The Dark Knight Returns", this is exactly why he wears that huge target on his chest.

      Don't look at me like that - I just read it for the first time yesterday.

      --
      We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    4. Re:I wonder one thing... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Through throat, into neck section of the spin"

      HAHAHAHAhahaha... it's hard enough to hit a moving target in the chest, much less the throat. Maybe thats why it's unprotected, so people can take a shot at something there not likly to hit?

      he is quicker, faster, smarter then us.

      You know a sure way to die in combat? don't move when you see a weapon pointed at you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:I wonder one thing... by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      Man I'm tired of morons who think a shotgun is a cone of death.
      It's easy to illustrate - buy a tape measure, marker, sheet of cardboard, shotgun, shells, and find a safe place to experiment.
      Shoot the cardboard at a known distance.
      Draw and label the hit pattern.
      Move the cardboard.
      Repeat as neeeded.

      Take a look at the little holes.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    6. Re:I wonder one thing... by despik · · Score: 1

      Love your signature, Ezr.

      --
      "I seem to have mastered a certain amount of control over physical reality."
  29. come to the ghetto if you can real world batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BATMAN and KING KONG ain't got nothing on me. :)

  30. "Secret" Batcave by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always wondered how nobody knew about him being batman, where he's got all this high tech stuff that sometimes gets blown up (the batmobile in Batman and robin). Do they kill the contractors after they're done? There's gotta be one guy who gets drunk in a bar and says "you think you're job is cool, i just fixed the anti-lock brakes on the batmoboile at wayne manor"

    1. Re:"Secret" Batcave by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Well after having read some Dean Koontz today, i got two words for ya: "memory wipe".

      --
      Why not fork?
    2. Re:"Secret" Batcave by One+Louder · · Score: 1

      There was an episode of the animated series that dealt with this - Batman rescues a mechanic who then fixes the early Batmobile, then goes on to make all the later versions. The Penguin figures it out by seeing all the weird parts this mechanic is ordering and kidnaps his kid to force him to install a remote control in the Batmobile. Much to everyone's surprise, Batman prevails.

    3. Re:"Secret" Batcave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ^^^ The new movie deals with this too.

      A family friend at Wayne Corp who does research and development (often for military purposes) has years worth of stuff that that the company didn't want to devote further time to sell.

      Also, Bruce and the Family Friend are techy so they can order parts and fix things themselves.

    4. Re:"Secret" Batcave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, it's Morgan Freeman in "Driving Miss Batman"...

    5. Re:"Secret" Batcave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you could try reading the comic if its something you've always wondered about. In the past, he did what he did in the movie, made purchases of parts through dummy corps and built it himself. He has had, at various points, someone he trusted to construct equipment. Batman trusting someone is a pretty big deal so its not going to be someone who gets drunk in a bar and mouths off. Until recently, it was a physically deformed mechanical genius named Harold who Bruce set up a state of the art private workshop and living space for in the cave. Unfortunately, Harold ended up actually betraying Batman to (and was subsequently killed by) Hush.

      One other thing, in current continuity, Batman never named himself or any of this stuff. All the "Bat" item names were coined by Dick Grayson (Robin 1) because, well, he was a kid and he got the name the same way Superman got his--from the press, criminals, and cops that heard stories about him. People started calling him that and he just stuck with it. Because, when you think about it, Batman is a pretty stupid name and, when you are planning to wage a one-man war on crime, why on earth would you need a name for people to call you by. "I'm Batman" is a good line in a movie (I guess), but its pretty silly.

    6. Re:"Secret" Batcave by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      Because, when you think about it, Batman is a pretty stupid name and, when you are planning to wage a one-man war on crime, why on earth would you need a name for people to call you by.
      Ask The Punisher.
    7. Re:"Secret" Batcave by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      In short: Wayne Industries, in the movie, is shown to be a defense contractor. They design these things for the government, but the government ends up not using them in many cases. If stealth bombers can remains secret for over a decade while being speculated upon, designed, manufactured, deployed, and used in combat operations without anyone being the wiser, I don't think it's any more difficult for a single company, unbeknownst to anyone else, to outfit a single Batman. I have a more in-depth post about that here.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  31. Irritating website by Fallingcow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They made the content a pop-up that auto advances to the next page after a set amount of time.

    Dumbest. Thing. Ever.

    1. Re:Irritating website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dumbest. Thing. Ever.

      Is that you comic-shop guy?

  32. Riiiight... by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

    Because in the real world rich people want to seriously risk their lives... why??

    This would be much more dangerous than flying into space or something. If you honestly look at things humans are really fragile. All it would take it pissing off the right people, they create a setup to entrap you and sorry no miracle escape for you.

    It would be so easy for someone to take you out, "super" equipment or not (the Forbes equipment list is lame anyway). For instance, there are many sniper rounds that will go straight through any body armor you can create. Not to mention poison gases and all sorts of stuff.

    There is a reason why law enforcement and the military is made up of many people dispite access to the best equipment available. One person can't do jack shit against many enemies.

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
    1. Re:Riiiight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that might work is using all that cash to start your own vigilante group. You could equip them with the best training and tools available.Good luck with that as official law enforcement and government would never let something like that stand for very long. Power corrupts and this would have no checks. I know I would not want a group like that running around.

  33. An alternative by funny-jack · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Sure, you could use riches to become a crime-fighting super hero. Alternatively, you could use your fabulous wealth to spend your entire adult life living as a 2-year-old girl.

    I wish I were making this up.

    -Skor

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
    1. Re:An alternative by flosofl · · Score: 1

      I... I... Wha?

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
  34. Contrast by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Funny
    City of Heroes account: $14.95/month

    It's a no-brainer. Also, we are geeks, right? Real life is a bit too ... real. Especially when it comes to engaging in violence with unsavory characters.

    Now, a badass remote-controlled robot to roam the streets, beating the crap out of the bad guys, that would be something else ...

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Contrast by ryusen · · Score: 1

      ~$40 for the 5th edition Hero Systems rule book... make what you want, when you want, how you want it.. w/o stupid law suit threats from Marvel.

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    2. Re:Contrast by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 1

      I know, off topic but that game rocks. BUT, you can't actually make Batman or they rename you GenericHero9873

      --
      - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
    3. Re:Contrast by wft_rtfa · · Score: 1
      Now, a badass remote-controlled robot to roam the streets, beating the crap out of the bad guys, that would be something else .

      I guess you've never seen the movie RoboCop. The scene with the huge robot not recognizing the guy dropping his gun and shooting him anyways is classic.

      --
      :-] :0 :-> :-| :->
    4. Re:Contrast by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1
      You mean like this? Add titanium teeth, adamantine claws and it should be ready.

      Oh, and better battery life - to avoid embarrassment!

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    5. Re:Contrast by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Now, a badass remote-controlled robot to roam the streets, beating the crap out of the bad guys, that would be something else ...
      Hmm.
      root@killbot5000:~# killall lawyers jehovahs_witnesses insurance_salesmen
      Neat idea.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  35. Uh, no. . . Sort of. by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean Tom Cruise's fiancee! (Don't you follow the celebrity gossip?)

  36. Newton's laws don't apply by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in comics, but they do in real life. That is the real secret of Batman's success.

    If your average doughnut fattened geek would try it, he would be in for a rude awakening and would come down to earth rather quickly at 9.8m/s/s...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Newton's laws don't apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      If your average doughnut fattened geek would try it...

      I hear ya. A more realistic superhero for us to emulate would be Pieman.

      No trap can hold Homer Simpson! Uh, but I'm not Homer Simpson... I'm the Pieman! Homer Simpson away! I mean, the Pieman.
  37. Wayne Enterprises; hmm there COULD be a connection by wernst · · Score: 4, Funny

    ALL this guy's stuff is from the Whatever-Whatever division of Wayne Enterprises. You'd think this "Batman" fellow owned the freaking company or something... ;-)

  38. ARE YE DAFT, SIR? by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    Most of these villains will indeed die from their radar-ranging, but if comics have taught me anything a small percentage will develop mutant powers and become a far worse menace to society.

    Stefan

  39. Legal costs will kill him by kmahan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's not forget the legal costs here. He'll need a fulltime team of lawyers.

    - copyright/trademark infringement (obvious) - *BIFF* *BAM* *POW* must all have TM after 'em
    - defense attorneys to get him out of jail/represent him for all of his speeding tickets
    - civil attorneys to handle all the lawsuits from the criminals he "wrongly assaulted"
    - insert obvious comments about riaa/mpaa/gitmo

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
  40. Like most average guys by jaymzter · · Score: 1

    I have a couple million to spare. Where do I apply to be a Super Friend??

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    1. Re:Like most average guys by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be with me.
      Here are the procedures for application:
      1) Give me the million in cash.
      2) Take superhero test*.

      *super hero test is a two parter.
      a) drug yourself heavly
      b) jump off Empire state building. If you survive, congratulations, you're now a super friend.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  41. oh boy... by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    Does the author REALLY need a girlfriend, or at the very least, a life!

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  42. 'Ninja style gauntlets' by LowbrowDeluxe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Says it all, really.

  43. You could have the riches... by Macgyveric · · Score: 0

    But honestly, how many Slashdotters do you think could pull off a Batman look?

  44. BUMMER by hurfy · · Score: 1

    they spent $3 million to turn you into batman

    BUT

    they forgot the wings (and grappling stuff, and anything else close)

    Get back to me when i can fly please.

    And i better get more than an plain off-the-rack kevlar suit!

    So i am just a poorly dressed nerd in a 5-ton Hummer :(

  45. Easier/Cheaper to get a dose of Gamma Rays ... by Hulkster · · Score: 1

    BAH, Hulk wonder why this is "Stuff that matters" ... definately "News for Nerds"
    Hulk suggest maybe Puny Human submitter utherdoul trying being UnderDog
    Hulk say lotta work/money to be Puny Human Batman
    Hulk a lot stronger than Batman anyway

    Hulk go back to SMASHING and Blogging

  46. One other thing! by Nemo+Black · · Score: 1

    Batman has his Bat Cave while the most that any geek who would be into this stuff would have would be his parents basement.

  47. Re:Uh, no. . . Sort of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you mean Scientology's next abductee!

    (Posted AC for obvious reasons)

  48. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a beowulf cluster of batmobiles

  49. SuperHero by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    Batman was more of a vigilante than a super-Hero . He just gets thrown in with all the other Super-Heros.
    to make a rough short list.

    Superman ..Super strength , flight , x-ray vision , Heat vision , near indestructible , bit of a mummies boy
    Spiderman , Walk on walls , super athletic abilities , irritating teeny bopper
    Wolverine, Regeneration , adamantium skeleton , Cool claws , Hard ass cool guy( rare in being a bad ass super hero with actual super powers)
    Captain America., um he had a shield he could throw , super athlete , proto-super hero and all around irritating goit
    Batman , No super powers , Cool tech , Rather dark and likeable nut-case

    Batman comes second only to Wolverine , being that both are actually cool non mothers-boys but wolverine wins out because he actually has super powers.

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:SuperHero by Mant · · Score: 1

      In the Batman comics he is portrayed more as a vigilante, most of his enemies are just people, albeit crazy ones. The way out tech, magic and other DC world wackiness is dialled right down. It is much more dark and gritty.

      In things like JLA and Superman Batman he is much more the superhero, dealing with aliens, magic, time travel, super villains with superpowers and the like. Sure he doesn't have superpowers, but neither does Green Arrow, or the original Black Canary. There are quite a few non-powered heroes (and villains) in DC.

      I'm not sure I agree with you hero assessment either, the whole "cool bad ass" thing is very 90s with all the antiheroes and is getting (to me) pretty cliched now. Partly I'm just sick of Wolverine who marvel feels compelled to put in everything these days.

    2. Re:SuperHero by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      I haven't really read comics for years , so I've missed out on the over-use of Bad ass thankfully .
      When i was reading comics it was overload of über good guys and characters like wolverine and Batman were a breath of fresh air.
      I just can't stand characters like Spiderman (the movie version more , he was less annoying in the comics) or superman (really really dislike superman )
      The main problems i had with superman was that he was basically indestructible and such a goodie goodie, so it was very easy to figure out the course of plots
      *Civilian in danger* *Kryptonite* blah blah

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  50. Even if fiction became fact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and stuff like batman worked in real life, you wouldn't be able to go superheroing. Superheros cause a lot of collateral damage, and there's the part where you're running around beating people up.
    You'd be the wanted person in a day or two.

  51. The obvious geek arch enemy is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Bill Gates, of course, with his money and megalomania. I'm sure he could buy some badass tech. Of course, the Gatesmobile would always have a CPU crash during the getaway...

  52. Batman... by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1
    Doesn't Batman sleep standing up?

    If I'm correct, that isn't something considered generally feasible for regular people.

    Not to mention some of his grappling hook stunts...

  53. Real Life Superhero by bartle · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Anyone who's interested in whether it would actually be possible to become a superhero would probably enjoy this episode of This American Life.

    The second act discusses the life of a woman who named herself Zora and decided to, from an early age, learn all the skills needed to become a comic book style superhero. She achieves her goals but then learns that there are very few job opportunities that require all the skills that she now possesses. It's well worth listening to.

    1. Re:Real Life Superhero by geekoid · · Score: 1

      do you know how to get copy thats not in .ra format?

      Interesting that she had a run in with the CIA.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Real Life Superhero by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Go to iTunes Music Store and buy it.

      (or Audible.)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    3. Re:Real Life Superhero by NegativeOneUserID · · Score: 2, Interesting

      also there is Angle-grinder Man http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/3112670.stm

    4. Re:Real Life Superhero by onida · · Score: 0

      Apparantly Jennifer Aniston is looking to star in a movie version of Zora. It's quite an extraordinary story that this lady went through really. After reading the transcript I felt quite sorry for her, but also quite amazed.

      You can read about Jennifer Aniston's bit here and the transcript of the audio file is here

  54. A better plan... by sterno · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You could spend $3.4 million on the batman shtick, or you could spend that money on hiring a vigilante army.

    Think about it, what are they paying contractors in Iraq to do protection and security jobs where they are getting hsot at constantly. So pay for them, and then the equipment to arm them, and you'd have a wrecking crew far superior to you on your own.

    Figure $250K/vigilante/year for salary and benefits and you could hire 10 of these guys for $2.5 million. Then you'd have about $1 million/year to spend on equipment for them. Body armor, assault rifles, etc.

    Then whenever you want justice to be done, you give them a call and they crack some skulls for you. If you want, you can even give them bat ears to put on their helmet so they can keep with the theme.

    The best part is, you don't have to worry about getting bruised or scarred. You can go to your rich parties, party it up and know that you've kept the streets safe without personally lifting a finger.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:A better plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but what if the person in question actually wants to get bruised and scarred while caving some POS' head in?

    2. Re:A better plan... by epiphani · · Score: 4, Funny

      yes, but this is the logic of most of batmans' opponents, and everyone knows that they always loose.

      --
      .
    3. Re:A better plan... by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      Already done, see Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns and sequel.

    4. Re:A better plan... by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      Yeah... 'cos chicks dig scars, right?

      Personally I reckon the "billionaire" status would get them moist enough without having to get beat up by some junky on the street.

    5. Re:A better plan... by harvardslacker · · Score: 1

      Or you could pay the salaries of 5 or 10 times as many police officers. Or you could invest in the impoverished communities that produce the conditions that create the thugs that Batman beats up.

      While becoming Batman doesn't seem like the best option, I'm not sure yours is that much better, unless you want the person control over the thugs in case you want to turn to evil or just beat up some fellow rich guy who crossed you.

    6. Re:A better plan... by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

      Or you could just buy some SRAW-MPVs and be your own army.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    7. Re:A better plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More police... hah hah... you kill me. No really.

      1. In Gotham, the police are half the problem

      2. In the Real World(TM), the police are half the problem too.

    8. Re:A better plan... by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Ah yes...
      "the personal touch of hired goons".
      -- Homer J Simpson

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    9. Re:A better plan... by patio11 · · Score: 1

      And, empirically, $250,000 a year doesn't buy a lot of talent in Gotham. *bang* *crash* "What was that?" "I don't know, probably a cat. Lets not bother alerting the security detail to the fact we're about to get dropped with one punch to the face."

    10. Re:A better plan... by dangitman · · Score: 1
      You could spend $3.4 million on the batman shtick, or you could spend that money on hiring a vigilante army.

      Yeah, or you could spend it on blackjack. And hookers.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    11. Re:A better plan... by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 1
      Think about it

      Oh, I have....

      --

      _____

      Thank you.

    12. Re:A better plan... by Danathar · · Score: 1

      This already happens...it's called "organized crime" and their racket is "protection"

    13. Re:A better plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, or you could spend it on blackjack. And hookers.

      And... eh... screw the whole thing.

    14. Re:A better plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      ...they always loose.

      You ignoramus, don't know you about grammar and spelling?

      That should be "...they are always loose."

      Sheesh, some people.

  55. how rich are shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is part of a nice PR campaign where the batman begins ppl are pimping "oh batman is just a normal guy" to journalists to help hype the movie.

    For example http://www.howstuffworks.com/batsuit.htm

    which is actually better than this forbes piece of trash article.

    God the state of journalism today makes the state of democracy today a small wonder.

    I hope to god "teh internets" will put an end to this madness by creating 20 times as many trolls as current journalism, 10 times as much good commentary and some new ways of filtering between them.

    ACs confirm it, slashdot is going downhill.

  56. Armor ? by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real Batman doesn't have, want or need armor. The real Batman (the one in the comic book) uses the arcane fighting techniques known as "dodging" and "hiding" and a psychological trick called "FUD" to protect himself.

    The idea behind "hiding" is simple. It is based on never letting your foe to know that you're there, therefore not giving them a chance to strike back. It helps a lot to wear black and operate at night when it's dark - just like the Batman does.

    The idea behind "dodging" is somewhat more complex, but not tremendously so. It is based on never occupying the same point in time-space as anything that might harm you. In practice, you observe your opponent, and when you see him aiming at you with a gun, you move away from the line of fire. Obviously, this becomes exponentially more difficult the more people you fight at once, so it is recommended that you use "hiding" to find lone targets.

    The last tactic, "FUD", stands for "Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt". It's idea is to strike fear to the hearts of your opponents, so that they stop thinking clearly and start making stupid mistakes (such as spreading out, buying Windows, or paying SCO for Linux licenses).

    Ironically enough, there was a pretender Batman in the comic books once - a guy the real Batman had appointed to stand in for him while he healed from wounds given to him by Bane. That pretender Batman wore armor, and went mad, and got soundly beaten by the real Batman.

    The point of all this is that this particular article makes me less, not more, likely to see "Batman Begins". Dear advertiser, please make sure you understand what you are advertising before you design your advertisement. Batman is not Terminator or Robocop, he's closer to a ninja.

    But then again, if they cast Batman as a martial arts expert, they'd need an actor who actually knows martial arts to make it look believable. Just compare Darth Maul to Count Dooku - which one has better fight scenes ?

    Maybe whatever school actors go to should include martial arts lessons in its curriculum ? They might become handy even outside the movies, once the actor becomes famous and starts attracting mentally unbalanced fans.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    1. Re:Armor ? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "The real Batman doesn't have, want or need armor. "
      wrong. Batman uses the tool neccessary for the job. Sometimes that means armor, see Dark Knight Returns.

      dark grays with a broken patterns works a lot better then a black suit for hiding at knight. Even better then that is a disguise.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Armor ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Just compare Darth Maul to Count Dooku - which one has better fight scenes ?"

      Ehh, you're aware that Dooku was played by a martial arts expert, right? You didn't really think Christopher Lee was wielding that Lightsaber, did you? They comped his head onto someone who actually knew how to fight.

    3. Re:Armor ? by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 1
      But then again, if they cast Batman as a martial arts expert, they'd need an actor who actually knows martial arts to make it look believable. Just compare Darth Maul to Count Dooku - which one has better fight scenes?

      While I'll grant that Maul's fight scenes look better than Dooku's... Christopher Lee does a pretty good job for an 80-year-old guy. And yeah, he did a lot of his fighting himself. He's old-school.

      --
      stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
    4. Re:Armor ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Ehh, you're aware that Dooku was played by a martial arts expert, right? You didn't really think Christopher Lee was wielding
      >> that Lightsaber, did you? They comped his head onto someone who actually knew how to fight.

      And it's also pretty funny that they covered Ray Park in makeup, horns and contact lenses because despite the fact that he's a real martial artist, he looks about as threatening as Steve Guttenberg!

    5. Re:Armor ? by glwtta · · Score: 1
      Maybe whatever school actors go to should include martial arts lessons in its curriculum ? They might become handy even outside the movies, once the actor becomes famous and starts attracting mentally unbalanced fans.

      From what I heard, most do. Or at least they have classes in convincing simulation of various martial arts - real martial arts look like crap on screen.

      Batman is not Terminator or Robocop, he's closer to a ninja.

      I don't believe anyone has ever uttered a sentence that made them sound more like a 13 year old geek, overly invested in his comic books :)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    6. Re:Armor ? by mixonic · · Score: 1

      Sorry I dont have a link for this, but if I recall Batman had only one peice of armor, it was the yellow batman logo on this shirt. Figured that if you could only afford to have one place on your body properly armored, you should make it the most likely targets.

      May have been from the origonil TV series now that I think of it, but I first thought it was from a Frank Miller so......

      -mix

    7. Re:Armor ? by sabot99 · · Score: 1

      I recall that "The Dark Knight Returns" makes a reference to this. Batman makes a comment (while falling, after taking one in the chest) that deliberately made the bat logo a highly visible target. Thus it would draw the enemies' fire to a protected region, rather than to his less- or unarmored body parts.

    8. Re:Armor ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What i enjoy about Dooku is the fact that he actually fights like he had modern sword. All the others are using their light-sabre as a medieval long sword.

      Granted, it does look cool, but a light-sabre would be much more effectively wielded using rapier techniques. These techniques were the most effective when the use of armor became obsolete, and when blades became light enough while still being strong.

      The light-sabre should have the same advantages: Armor doesn't matter as the sabre will go through meters of armor plating.
      It is made of light and should therefore be weigthless.
      The sabre only have to touch to hurt. There is no need to actually hit the opponent with any force.

      It would therefore be much more effective to use modern fencing techniques.

      Instead of woooooosh woooooosh woooooosh bzzzzzzz wooooosh
      a simple: stab...die. would suffice.

    9. Re:Armor ? by Mant · · Score: 1

      The real Batman doesn't have, want or need armor.

      Bollocks. In the comics at least some versions of his costume are body armour. No Man's Land springs to mind as an example of him getting shot and the body armour stopping it.

      As it is a comic they draw the costume as cloth (unless it is one of his special ones) but that doesn't change the fact it is protective.

      Oh yeah, these days they often train actors in martial arts if they need them for the film. In Batman Begins he certainly is a marital arts expert, in one scene he goes through a whole bunch of fighting styles.

      In fact they play up the whole ninja trainning thing, using fear, stealth and misdirection very heavily in the movie. He just has a protective suit as well because sometimes all that stuff doesn't work and you are going to get hit.

  57. Batmans most powerful piece of equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that it always seems to be night time when he's needed

  58. Incredibles' Syndrome by j0ris · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is basically the story of the evil Syndrome character from the Pixar movie The Incredibles: a geek so obsessed by super heroes that he invents his own super gear to beat them at their own game.

    1. Re:Incredibles' Syndrome by atomm1024 · · Score: 1
      Holy shit, that's an awesome idea! Instead of using one's riches and geek skills to become a sissy hero, become a super-villain! That would be so much more fun than being a superhero in real life, because if you were a superhero, you'd just be fighting mundane street crime. Whereas if you became a super-villain, you could mug people, rob banks, kidnap people for ransoms... all with ultimate technological power, and reasonable anonymity, getting richer all the while! Oh god, I am totally going to do that if I ever get rich.

      (Message to any cops or FBI agents reading this: I'm kidding, I swear.)

      --
      Signature.
    2. Re:Incredibles' Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm kidding, I swear.

      Oh. How disappointing. You sounded like the perfect candidate for The Illuminati's new urban outreach project.
      Helping disadvantaged non-villains become more sinister than they could possibly imagine.

      Nevermind - we'll find someone else then.
      Sincerely, #37

    3. Re:Incredibles' Syndrome by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      You sounded like the perfect candidate for The Illuminati's new urban outreach project.

      Suburban, no doubt.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  59. But if one becomes a superhero like Batman by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    does that mean we have to be depressed about everything all the time like him?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  60. Terrible ommisions in the article? by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1
    I'll only list one; the grappling hook or grappling gun, an old Batman standby, used in almost every comic book, and many of his encounters in single books.
    The answer, unfortunately, is from Wayne Enterprises. Batman's utility belt is a one-of-a kind prototype climbing harness, paired with a magnetic grappling gun with a monofilament decelerator climbing line. Fortunately, you've got other options. A decent nylon utility belt can be procured for about $10 from any martial arts supply store. You can also equip yourself with: Climbing spikes: $70 (Black Diamond Spectre Ice Beak Ice Piton) Small digital cell phone: $150 (Motorola RAZR, with cellular contract) Ninja spikes: $10 (Set of three) Throwing stars: $30 (Set of four) Medical kit: $20
    I'm not even going to address the other missing items; gas masks, underwater breathing apparatus, etc...
    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
    1. Re:Terrible ommisions in the article? by Noaccess0 · · Score: 1
      Not to mention the Bat-Shark Repelent.

      Tune in tomorrow - same Bat-time, same Bat-channel!

    2. Re:Terrible ommisions in the article? by FTDFTD · · Score: 1

      And how can one forget the cost of training to learn the Dark Knight's greatest skill:

      The Batusi!

  61. More likely to have a guy with superpowers than... by AtlanticCarbon · · Score: 1

    ... a noble vigilante. Vigilantes and justice just don't go together, unlike in the movies and comics. So even if you had all the equipment and training and could pay off the authorities to allow you to create your own justice, the abuse of your power would stop most people from thinking of you as a superhero.

  62. Gotham is not New York by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Metropolis is the fictional version of New York. Gotham is a fictional version of Chicago. In saying that New York is the "real" Gotham, the writer exposes a vast ignorance of Batman lore. Comic Book Guy would mock him relentlessly.

    1. Re:Gotham is not New York by kaptron · · Score: 1

      In Batman Begins, Gotham City actually looks quite like New York (city is divided with bridges connecting to various boroughs). "Longtime Batman writer and editor Dennis O'Neil has also said figuratively that Metropolis is New York above 14th St., and that Gotham City is New York below 14th St. Within the comics themselves, however, New York, Metropolis and Gotham City all exist as separate cities." good ol' wikipedia!

    2. Re:Gotham is not New York by Mant · · Score: 1

      I rememeber reading that Gotham was New York at night time, while Metropolis was New York during the day. Also that Metropolis was based partially based on some Canadian city the Superman creators were familair with (Vancouver? can't remeber now).

      In the DC universe New York and Chicago actually exist anyway, as well as Gotham and Metropolis.

      Whatever, it certainly is more complex than saying just DC City X is fictionalsed Real City Y. In your attempt to look superior you just come across as being ignorant.

  63. New tagline needed? by dcali001 · · Score: 1

    Stuff that matters to nerds.

  64. Doc Savage... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...is more probable and possible, IMO. The tech is more realistic, the training is just training. For instance you can get good personal ballistic armor now,but none of it defends against the actual kinetic force of getting slammed with multiple high speed projectiles, it will still knock you down violently even if it doesn't penetrate the armor. People are frequently hospitalized after they are shot wearing armor. So that Batman stuff is still sorta impossible the way it is portrayed. A "Doc Savage" type superheraux* on the other hand is quite possible, for a large,smart,fast, strong,rich and extraordinarily well trained hoo-mann.

    *Yayyy! Crawfish Man!

    1. Re:Doc Savage... by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      No no no.
      Every action has an equal...you know the rest.

      You don't see someone fall over after triggering a full-auto burst, do you?

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  65. Their costing is just as fictional by syousef · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Training: $30,000
    The Suit: $1,585
    The Belt: $290
    The Car: $2,000,000
    The Cave: $24,000
    The Alter Ego: $1,109,574
    The Butler: $200,000


    I'd love to see some rich twit spend under 32k on martial arts training, a belt, and a poor excuse for an armoured suit, then spend over 3 mill on jewelry, a car and a butler. Better yet I'd like to see the first time they take on a drug dealer and get shot in the head. This is obviously a fluff piece but what's the bet some idiot takes it seriously.

    Someone's been smoking a bit too much weed and Forbes.com paid them for their rantings.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  66. Does that factor in the cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of getting sued after touching some kid's junk liberally?

  67. License your likeness by Fastball · · Score: 1

    Seems to work for every friggin' Marvel character.

  68. Re:Uh, no. . . Sort of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh he follows the gossip... he's just a geek in denial.

    (Can someone nip round, take the posters down and tell him there are other women? Ta.)

  69. save $224,000 by mojoNYC · · Score: 2, Funny
    The Cave =parents' basement
    The Butler =mom or dad

    you could probably save a significant part of the $1,109,574 by sticking with 'local geek' or 'comic book guy' as an alter ego...

  70. It's a mental disorder. by khasim · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's called "monomania". It's a type of paranoia.

    1. Re:It's a mental disorder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be a mental disorder, but one person in the entire world must be right.

  71. Re:Uh, no. . . Sort of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, and you think that makes you safe. Who do you think really runs Slashdot?

  72. Don't forget what would really happen... by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

    the first "superhero" would be shot in the face.

    Common criminals know to aim where there isn't any armor.

  73. Omission by cgreuter · · Score: 1

    He missed Batman's real super powers:

    1. A huge fortune.
    2. A well-funded R&D department.

    The new movie (which r0xx0rz, IMHO) touches on that a bit, unlike the others.

  74. even if the vest can stop everything... by mangu · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...have you seen any bullet-proof vest that extends below the belt? Is there nothing important to protect there, or do they think snipers play by boxing rules?

    1. Re:even if the vest can stop everything... by AnObfuscator · · Score: 1
      ...have you seen any bullet-proof vest that extends below the belt?

      Why, yes, I have: http://www.bulletproofme.com/PHOTO%20pages/Arm-Pro tectors.htm .

      Is there nothing important to protect there, or do they think snipers play by boxing rules?

      Nothing a sniper would shoot at. firing randomly into someone's crotch is a *stupid* sniper tactic. Snipers don't just shoot for the hell of it, they shoot to kill. Firing into the crotch area would only wound the enemy, even in a *best* case scenerio. It also alerts the enemy to the presence of the sniper, and thus the enemy can now take cover. This means the sniper just wasted his oppertunity to kill the target.

      So protection for below the waist, while useful in general, is not really helpful for defense against snipers.

      --
      multifariam.net -- yet another nerd blog
    2. Re:even if the vest can stop everything... by BDZ · · Score: 1

      If remember my long ago anatomy classes correctly I believe there is a main artery off to either side of the 'family jewels'. Wouldn't kill you outright, but you'd be down and would bleed out. Not that I think your point about snipers preferring the drop 'em dead shot to head or heart is invalid.

    3. Re:even if the vest can stop everything... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      It depends on where they are deployed, in some situations shooting to wound is a tactically better option.

    4. Re:even if the vest can stop everything... by mliikset · · Score: 1

      Even with body armor, you can be hurt quite badly, organ damage, broken ribs and serious bruising are common. I'm thinking if you are hit there (below the belt) with extended body protection, dating will be out of the question for a while.

  75. It just takes money to be Batman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wish someone had told me before I got bit by a radioactive bat.

  76. note to self.... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ....this is Slashdot, I should have used "The Lone Gunmen" instead of "Doc Savage" as a more probable reference....

  77. Chill out by jangobongo · · Score: 1

    Not everyone has the sames tastes that you do. If all there was to see here was Linux/Unix/MS/Apple/open source articles and rants, people would get bored and no longer visit Slashdot (including me).

    If you don't like an article, do like I do: just ignore it. Skip over it. Why are you even reading this article if it offends you so?

    Taco has already said that he posts stories that he finds interesting. Now for some required reading/homework:
    Taco's response to "That's not News For Nerds!"
    Taco's "Omelette" rant"

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    1. Re:Chill out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >people would get bored and no longer visit Slashdot (including me)
      You say that as though it were a bad thing. I'd be pleased if that happened.

    2. Re:Chill out by jangobongo · · Score: 1

      Do you really want to live in such a boring, monotone world?

      Oh, silly me, since you played it safe and posted as an 'Anonymous Coward', I guess I have my answer.

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  78. Forget 3.4 Mill by kassemi · · Score: 1

    You don't have to worry about too much of the pricey equipment when you are a master of sinanju :)

    --
    What the hell's a "gewie?"
    1. Re:Forget 3.4 Mill by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      No? How much did the annual sub trip cost, and then add the actual gold bars? Not to mention the uber-secret computer information network, and the cover of Folcroft Sanitarium, even in 1960's era dollars?
      sigh.
      Naw, I didn't love losing myself in the cheesy pulp known as "The Destroyer", not a bit...

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    2. Re:Forget 3.4 Mill by tjlsmith · · Score: 1

      I loved those books! Of all the tough guy books out there only two survived - the Destroyer and The Executioner - which spawned Marvel's rip-off The Punisher (which has eclipsed the original!)

      Too bad the Destroyer movie dropped the ball.. :-(

      --
      Mumia Abu-Jamal is *laughably guilty*. Check the evidence.
  79. Fetal Emancipation - Finacial and Life Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I find your post tangental, in the very least, I do find it interesting.

    "There is a place for debate on how many and what kinds of rights the unborn have, but each side steadfastly refuses to acknowledge it."

    Still, I doubt that fetal emancipation would be any more humane, without first guaranteeing universal health care or achieving a 100% quick adoption rate, which is seems more than a little unlikely, especially for minority fetuses.

  80. Batman my arse by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    All the new batman needs is are repulsors, unibean, and boot jet, and we have gone from Batman to Iron-man


    • waterproof Check
    • bulletproof Check
    • knife-proof Check
    • temperature-regulating Check
    • impact-resistant, graphite-composite cowl Check Sorta Chell head had his helment
    • spiked ninja-style gauntlets Check So they not spiked, shellhead still has his primary weapon, his repulsors, in his gaultlets
    • against everything from swords to machine guns Check We're starting light, but I'm not sure the original grey suit bounced missils either
    • a specially designed nylon-derivative fabric that stiffens when hit with an electric charge Check Shell head's armor is flexible when its not activated, just a short step from the shellhead's armor
    • allowing Batman to use it as a glider. CheckOkay Iron-man flies.

    As for me, screw the superhero business, I'll take the alter ego and move to Southbeach.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  81. riches wont do you any good by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and if you had the riches what would you do?

    There are no cartoonish supervillians. "Street crime" is usually taken care of by the police and is really none of your business. Imagine some moron busting the heads of the local pot dealer out of respect for "justice." If someone is really concerned about the safety of their streets and trains then they can always get a Guardian Angels' t-shirt and the little matching beret and play vigilante.

    Big crime happens all the time by power structures like governments, organized religions, corporations, etc. The tools for fighting these nasties don't involve tights. They involve activism, raising awareness, getting others involved in politics, and other things that don't look real cool in graphic novels.

    Not to mention if you had insane wealth, you're probably part of the problem. Check the holdings of some wealthy people, they sometimes fund some very shady companies or governments which do some fairly nasty things. Real world problems are rarely fixed with just a punch in the face and a snazzy batmobile.

    I'm sure the editors of Forbes magazine have no problem with the worldview that if we just beat up some low level street criminals then everything would be fine.

    1. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big crime happens all the time by power structures like governments, organized religions, corporations, etc. The tools for fighting these nasties don't involve tights. They involve activism, raising awareness, getting others involved in politics, and other things that don't look real cool in graphic novels.

      Ahem - some times real-life activism can look good in graphic novels.

    2. Re:riches wont do you any good by Planesdragon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Street crime" is usually taken care of by the police and is really none of your business. Imagine some moron busting the heads of the local pot dealer out of respect for "justice."

      You say that second part like it's a bad thing.

      Just because you want to get high doens't mean that it's not illegal.

    3. Re:riches wont do you any good by Some_Llama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Just because you want to get high doens't mean that it's not illegal."

      And just because something is illegal, doesn't mean it is "wrong" or deserves a head bashing...

    4. Re:riches wont do you any good by Sven+The+Space+Monke · · Score: 1
      Yeah, a real life superhero could write letters to the editor and stuff! I can picture it now - "Quick, to the Bat-Fax!"

      (sorry Bill)

      --
      A man who can't pronouce "nuclear arsenal" shouldn't have one -sig ends here.
    5. Re:riches wont do you any good by deacon · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Street crime" is usually taken care of by the police and is really none of your business.

      Not only is this bullshit, it is also the cause of much of the casual crime that goes on today. If you see an old lady being kicked on the ground by someone trying to rob her, that's everybodys business. Obviously, the police are not on the spot when crime happens. They just show up later to collect the bodies.

      If, however, you prefer no one helps you when you get mugged, I guess I'll respect your wishes.

      The rest of your "class warfare" rant is too foolish to bother responding to.

    6. Re:riches wont do you any good by atomm1024 · · Score: 1
      Who cares? That's what the police are for. The last thing this country needs is a bunch of vigilantes running around in stupid outfits for "justice."

      Want to fight street crime? Become a cop. Want to fight real crime? See paragraphs 3 and 4 of the grandparent comment.

      --
      Signature.
    7. Re:riches wont do you any good by yasth · · Score: 1

      But you need neither suit nor fancy bat-darts (tm) to stop that, generally just screaming you called the cops with cell phone in hand works. (actually not generally this has never happened to me. What sort of neighborhood do you live in?).

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    8. Re:riches wont do you any good by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >If you see an old lady being kicked on the ground by someone trying to rob her, that's everybodys business.

      Oh please, there's an obvious difference between being proactive and reactive. Most people engage in altruism everyday without body armor and a super cool secret identity. You're talking about reacting to something that happens to you; the comic-book superhero is the opposite: a vigilante that seeks out and prevents or thwarts trouble.

      So what are you going to do to *prevent* this little old lady from being robbed? Profile certain people? Illegally spy on others? Knock a few heads around to get some information? A bit of street torture? Maybe a lynching to teach bad guys a lesson?

      Wanna really help on the small scale? Become a cop.

      >If, however, you prefer no one helps you when you get mugged, I guess I'll respect your wishes.

      Sigh. Again, you're failing to understand the context of the grandparent post. Nice way to take things personally too.

    9. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And just because something is illegal, doesn't mean it is "wrong" or deserves a head bashing...

      And just because some people can do it in moderation doesn't mean the majority would use a substance safely, in terms of puting themselves and/or others in danger.

    10. Re:riches wont do you any good by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Just because you want to get high doens't mean that it's not illegal.

      Just because Christians in ancient Rome wanted to worship Jesus didn't mean that it wasn't illegal.

      Just because black people in 1860 wanted to be free didn't mean that helping escaped slaves wasn't illegal.

      Just because women before the 1960s wanted to control their own bodies didn't mean that contraception and abortion weren't illegal.

      Anyone who attempts to live by any reasonable code of ethics is going to find themselves quite often rooting for, actively assisting, or even becoming, "criminals".

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    11. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we should lock up all the drinkers then.

    12. Re:riches wont do you any good by willisbueller · · Score: 0

      you are a self righteous pansy. last summer in my neighbourhood two guys jumped a man and beat him while he was on the ground. the newspaper report said many onlookers at a pizza parlour stood by and just watched. If one guy could have lead the crowd and the other people weren't so self interested, they could have prevented the man on the ground from taking a huge beating and sent a message to the criminals that we will not tolerate their violence.
      A verbal warning will not stop them.
      How can you be so disconnected from your fellow man that you do not wish to help someone in need? How can you honestly feel it is not our business to help those in need?
      I hope that one day, God forbid, you don't find yourself on the receiving end of a public jumping where your fellow citizens feel it is not their business to get involved.
      'Cause plain and simple, we tolerate violent criminals behaviour, and the violence will continue.

      You don't have to go it alone. You don't have to risk your own safety. But you'd be surprised of how one leader can motivate a crowd of conscientious onlookers.

    13. Re:riches wont do you any good by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Anyone who attempts to live by any reasonable code of ethics is going to find themselves quite often rooting for, actively assisting, or even becoming, "criminals".

      Not so.

      You forget the utmost important first step--petitioning ones governmetn for a redress of grievences.

      And that very important second step--attempting to change the government through peaceful means.

      And since you mentioned doing things that are illegal, let's not forget the first rule of civil disobedience, as taught by Ghandi and King--you NEED the other side to be seen to carry out the law onto you. Nothing gets steps 1 and 2 moving better than publicly, ethically, and purposefully violating an unjust law.

      "I want to get high" is not, not, NOT a good reason to break the law. "I want to be ABLE to get high" is, and the moral difference between the two is enormous.

      But if you're furthering the second option, I expect to see (1) a copy of your letter to your two senators, house representative, 2-3 state represenatives, governor, and president asking them to legalize your drug of choice, (2) a record of you politically supporting candidates that would legalize your drug, inclusive of mobilization efforts on seemingly unrelated issues, and finally (3) that you publicly and without guile or deciet violate the law and accept the consequences thereof.

      While it's quite possible that infamous.net is based in some horrible third-world regime where you aren't allowed to vote to call your nation's leader an illeterate putz, if you're comparing drug use to Christian Martyrdom, the Underground Railroad, and Women's lib you're almost certainly right here in the US of A.

    14. Re:riches wont do you any good by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I don't use drugs at all, but in fact, I *will* compare drug use to those three things, because they are all about your right to do what you will with your own body - I'm hard-pressed to think how other rights can reasonably be defended without that right being protected first. Insofar as drug use is about doing what you will about your mind and body, I don't see how it is different from religious belief, forced work, or the right to control your reproduction.

    15. Re:riches wont do you any good by mi · · Score: 1
      Big crime happens all the time by power structures like governments, organized religions, corporations, etc.
      Are NGOs part of the "etc."?..
      activism, raising awareness, getting others involved in politics
      Yes, sounds like they are...
      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:riches wont do you any good by kz45 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just because Christians in ancient Rome wanted to worship Jesus didn't mean that it wasn't illegal.

      Just because black people in 1860 wanted to be free didn't mean that helping escaped slaves wasn't illegal.

      Just because women before the 1960s wanted to control their own bodies didn't mean that contraception and abortion weren't illegal.

      Anyone who attempts to live by any reasonable code of ethics is going to find themselves quite often rooting for, actively assisting, or even becoming, "criminals


      I hardly consider getting high even comparable to the things that you listed.

    17. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what are you going to do to *prevent* this little old lady from being robbed?

      Well, if you React enough, you Proact.

      You see, if you call the cops, or chase the bad guys enough, thenthe bad guys will not hang around. You have therefore prevented any more crimes by them (at least in your area).

      Illegally spy on others? Knock a few heads around to get some information? A bit of street torture? Maybe a lynching to teach bad guys a lesson?

      I'm sure Francis Castiglione would agree.

      Oh, you're not sure who he is? Comic Books were written about him. Recently, a movie was made about him. He was the Hero. People looke dup to him. People cheered him on.

      He's better known as Frank Castle, or 'The Punisher'.

      AND he's not the only one. There are PLENTY of movies out there- popular movies, movies that make big money because they depict what people want to see- that have a hero who breaks the law to get the bad guys.

      Lethal Weapon
      Death Wish
      Beverly Hills Cop
      Die Hard ...and tons more.

      Not to mention the topic of this article- Batman. He is not a cop. He's a vigilante! And people love him.

      Same with Spiderman.
      Superman.
      The X-men. ...in fact most Comic Book Heros.

      So, how can vigilantes be so popular, so loved, yet be illegal??

      Wanna really help on the small scale? Become a cop.

      No thanks. Firstly, I'm much too smart to be a cop. No, really- there is at lease one case where a man was not hired as a cop because he was too smart!! Check out: www.libertocracy.com/Webessays/police/dumbcops.htm , or google for 'too smart to be a cop'.

      Secondly, Cops don't really help stop crime! It's true. All they do is show up later to take a report. Oh, sure, sometimes they are present when a crime happens, but not often. Besides, the courts have held that police have no duty to protect people!! See publicrights.org/Kennesaw/PoliceResponsibility.htm l or google for 'police have no duty to protect'.

      Lastly, I don't have the overwhelming need to control others that all cops seem to have.

    18. Re:riches wont do you any good by russotto · · Score: 1

      No cartoonish supervillians? I can think of one. He's got a long beard and a penchant for knocking down occupied buildings.

      Besides, wouldn't you really want to sock it to Carey Sherman, Bill Gates, Michael Eisner, or the like? OK, so this may technically make YOU a cartoonish supervillian, but hey, that's just a matter of perspective, right?

      As for activism, raising awareness, getting others involved in politics, etc... you'll have better luck with the batsuit and cape. The system has had years to figure out ways to neutralize and co-opt THOSE methods of change.

    19. Re:riches wont do you any good by yasth · · Score: 1

      Eh, so you never actually have seen this?

      I mean how do you know a verbal warning can not stop them?

      And screaming that you have called the cops is not a warning it is a (false) statement of fact. It is certainly more likely to stop the violence then trying to take them all out by your lonesome. It stops the violence faster then running into a phone booth and changing would too.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    20. Re:riches wont do you any good by ky11x · · Score: 1

      This is not "insightful."

      "Street crime" is not dealing in pot -- way to confuse the issue there. We are talking about rape, muggings, gang warfare. If you think the police are effective at dealing with these issues, you are welcome to live in Miami.

    21. Re:riches wont do you any good by russotto · · Score: 1

      Your "civil disobedience" is equivalent to a pre-Constantine Christian making a date with the authorities to be fed to a lion. The lion is happy to be fed, the rulers are happy there's one less Christian, and any onlookers enjoy the spectacle.

      No matter what the unjust law nowadays, no one cares if you rot in jail for breaking it. If you break it openly and notoriously, you simply are assured of rotting in jail (and enjoy all the comforts and servicing the other prisoners provide). Those who are against you or apathetic just see you as another criminal. Many of those who even sympathize with your cause will see you as a criminal and figure you deserve what you got. Those who don't see you that way will see your cause as trivial compared to some other cause civil disobedience has been used for (usually civil rights), and figure you still deserve what you got.

      Civil disobedience is obselete. The system has adapted to it.

    22. Re:riches wont do you any good by petitgars · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Parent obviously does not know the difference between Justice and Law. Look it up.

    23. Re:riches wont do you any good by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And just because some people can do it in moderation doesn't mean the majority would use a substance safely, in terms of puting themselves and/or others in danger.


      Ok, so if someone on drugs puts someone in danger, just do the same thing we do to anyone else who puts someone in danger. The drugs are completely irrelevant.

    24. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't mean it isn't wrong either...

      Many people have a "if it makes you happy, it can't be that bad" philosophy, which IMO is very dangerous to society. In any case, it's never what you want to say (it leaves obvious loopholes), and even farther from what is usually meant (usually "it makes me happy, I don't care if it's bad").

      Combine that with strong feelings on both sides of obeying or rebuking authority (not any specific authority, just authority in general) and the anti-intellectualism... This world worries me.

      Not that I intend to make any judgements on drug use in general, where to draw the line is a very hard call.

    25. Re:riches wont do you any good by way2trivial · · Score: 3, Funny

      religon vs. being high?

      to an agnostic, there is a WHOLE LOTTA things running in parallel

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    26. Re:riches wont do you any good by surelyserious · · Score: 1

      There are no cartoonish supervillians. Big crime happens all the time by power structures like governments, organized religions, corporations, etc. The tools for fighting these nasties don't involve tights.

      Yep, they just don't make villains like they used to.

      --
      "We're millions of miles from earth, inside a giant white face, what's impossible?"
    27. Re:riches wont do you any good by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But unfortunately, sometimes the masses are so dumb that they don't know what is good for them. This is where the government steps in, more or less protecting the people from their own stupidity. At least someone is. (I am in no way saying that the government is always in the right)
      Regards,
      Steve

    28. Re:riches wont do you any good by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "They involve activism, raising awareness, getting others involved in politics, and other things that don't look real cool in graphic novels."

      No - they involve pocket nukes - and those you don't want to hang around seeing if they look cool or not. Once nanotech is adequately developed, that will be the better way to go. You don't like the way someone runs a country? Kill them. That's what THEY do.

      The rest of that list is a total waste of time.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    29. Re:riches wont do you any good by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I hardly consider getting high even comparable to the things that you listed.

      The choice to control one's own nervous system is as fundamental as the right to control one's own reproductive system, perhaps even more so.

      The use of drugs as religious sacrements is well-established; religious freedom cases involving the use of peyote and cannabis have come before the courts. And many people have gotten more of a divine experience out of cannabis or other psychoactive drugs than out of Christianity.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    30. Re:riches wont do you any good by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You forget the utmost important first step--petitioning ones governmetn for a redress of grievences. And that very important second step--attempting to change the government through peaceful means.

      So when the government makes immoral and unconstitutional laws, I'm supposed to follow them until my congresscritter gets around to reading my mail? It's only ok to help fugitive slaves escape if you write your legislators first? Pardon me, but I must disagree.

      Yes, I've written a letters to my congresscritters over the years, and have donated money to NORML and the ACLU, and my vote is certainly influenced by candidates stances on the War on (some) Drugs and other abuses of state power. But it's pissing in the wind.

      And since you mentioned doing things that are illegal, let's not forget the first rule of civil disobedience, as taught by Ghandi and King--you NEED the other side to be seen to carry out the law onto you.

      I never mentioned civil disobedience. I'm certainly not talking here about civil disobedience as a social movement as practiced by Ghandi and King. If the term "civil disobedience" applies at all, it is in the original sense as used by Thoreau:

      Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? WHy has every man a conscience then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right.

      ...

      If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth--certainly the machine will wear out. If the injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself, then perhaps you may consider whether the remedy will not be worse than the evil; but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter-friction to stop the machine. What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn.

      But I'm not, a priori, limiting the options to civil disobedience; I'm willing to consider the use of justifiable defensive force against violent actions by agents of the state.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    31. Re:riches wont do you any good by crazyeddie740 · · Score: 1

      Amen! I'm not much of a comic book geek (they being too expensive for too little material, IMO, I'd rather get a paperback scifi novel), but of the lineup on Justice League Unlimited, Green Latern is my fave - because it's his *job* to be a superhero - he's a member of an intergalactic police force. If he screws up, he'll get arrested. Which happened in one episode. If Superman screws up, who can arrest him? Batman is an outright criminal.

      I understand why the fictional US government is so nervous about the Justice League. Remember, they've wargammed scenarios where the US military goes up against the Justice League - and the US military gets its butt kicked every time. The US (at least in our universe) spends almost as much on military as the rest of the world does combined.

      No matter what you think about the current leaders of the US, they *were* elected - Superman wasn't.

      Am I the only one who wonders why the Batmobile never gets stuck in traffic? Fat lot of good a jet turbine engine is going to do you in real-world Gotham during rush hour!

    32. Re:riches wont do you any good by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      There are no cartoonish supervillians.

      Haven't read the news since August 2001, have we, sir?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    33. Re:riches wont do you any good by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The thing about that is, if someone's being beaten up and you step in and help them, the police will probably arrest YOU for assauling the poor criminals. If you don't step in, the police will probably just let them go. Believe me I've seen it happen before.

      Your house gets broken into? Ring up the police, they say they're busy. Attack the intruders, six police cars are round in 10 minutes. The police are interested in looking after the welfare of criminals, nothing else. If we want to stop crime we have to do it ourselves.

    34. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention if you had insane wealth, you're probably part of the problem. Check the holdings of some wealthy people, they sometimes fund some very shady companies or governments which do some fairly nasty things

      I was just about to flame you for your non-sequiteur (a sweeping "probably" is justified by a vague "sometimes") then I realized you're talking about fucking Batman.

    35. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Marijuana is a part of the Rastafari religion, so it's incredibly comparable.

    36. Re:riches wont do you any good by rpozz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I assume you are referring to UK law about defending your property on the second paragraph. It has actually been clarified - if someone is in your house and threatens you, you can do pretty much what the fuck you want to them until they start to run away. If they run away, you can chase them down and subdue them, but at that point you can't use unnecessary force, such as stabbing them repeatedly with a knife.

      The court case with the farmer who shot the burglars was because he basically shot them with a shotgun as they were running away.

    37. Re:riches wont do you any good by stup · · Score: 1

      Surely you mean "November 2000"?

    38. Re:riches wont do you any good by aug24 · · Score: 1
      My changes:

      And just because some people can drive safely doesn't mean the majority would drive safely, in terms of puting themselves and/or others in danger.

      Time to outlaw those dangerous cars folks! Some people may drive badly, so no-one can drive.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    39. Re:riches wont do you any good by greenpanda · · Score: 1

      The court case with the farmer who shot the burglars was because he basically shot them with a shotgun as they were running away.

      The other part of that case that people and the press like to forget is that the shotgun was illegal, he had no shotgun licence, and that 12 months of his original sentence was for this reason.

      Personally, I think Tony Martin would make a lousy super hero.

      --
      PHP
    40. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The simple reason why vigilantiism is generally not allowed is that, historically speaking, it has always led to more violence and even more situations where the innocent are wrongly accused than we have with cops.

      People who roam the streets looking for trouble will generally find it - whether or not it was there in the first place. At least with police officers they have a uniform and a badge and a set of processes you can use to complain about them if they stuff up.

    41. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine some moron busting the heads of the local pot dealer out of respect for "justice."

      We have them; they're called "cops".

    42. Re:riches wont do you any good by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, for cars, the applied solution is the driving license. You have to proof that you are able to drive safely to get it, and if you are caught to drive dangerously, the police can take it away. So going by your analogy, maybe there should be a drug license? (And BTW, drinking too much alcoholics can be dangerous, too, so maybe there should be a drinking license. However, this could cause problems with drunken driving: Should they take away the driving license, the drinking license, or both? :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    43. Re:riches wont do you any good by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this is not the case.

      I have personally been involved in multiple situations requiring police intervention. While not always on time, and not always helpful, most police officers do *try* to do the right thing. I know for a fact that when I reported a suspected 'assault in progress' ( I think that was what the dispatcher at 911 called it ) on a woman at my apt, there were two squad cars there in less than 5 minutes. They were actually there in time to help, and the people involved had a lot of explaining to do. Fortunately, it was just a domestic dispute (despite looking and sounding extremely bad).

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    44. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hardly consider getting high even comparable to the things that you listed.

      How about the controlling one's own body?

      If you're going to take the society approach and argue about the effects on society then wouldn't alcohol be a bigger target than cannabis?

      And even assuming the law is genuinely enacted and enforced for the benefit of society, where do we draw the line on the best interests of society taking priority over the individual? When I grew up, communism was demonized for putting the community above the individual and democracy was praised for individual freedoms.

    45. Re:riches wont do you any good by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      I would argue that, as pointed out in your link, everyone has a responsibility to know what is right.

      I would also argue that many people don't.

      Furthermore, I would say that there is no comparison between drug use and causing active harm to other people. Acting on compassion to save lives, even when it is a crime, is an action worth taking. Being stoned has no parallel to being sold as property. People are not dying for a lack of pot. Therefore it has no comparison to the underground railroad.

      Women's liberation/equal rights/etc is a closer parallel, but what you're really looking for is prohibition. I would say that those who broke prohibition were most certainly not doing society any favors. I understand that the reason the "noble experiment" was ended was due to outstanding popular demand (and the tons enforcement issues). If pot was all that vital to our way of life, the situation would be the same.

      I suspect that a "million pothead march" would be an effective lobbying tool, however. I highly suggest you try to organize it. Things like that are excellent ways of getting media attention to correct wrongs and perceived wrongs.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    46. Re:riches wont do you any good by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      I've been in the security business for a long time now. And if there's one out crying bit of training that I can remember in an "old lady's purse is being snatched," it's that our system is shit.
      See, legally, assholes like that can get away with it if they have some amount of riches. "He hit me," or "She humiliated me," works just fine if court when the thief is counter-suing you because they fell flat on their nose when you grabbed the purse they just nabbed and they tripped on the curb. Mind you, I'm talking about a shopping-mall setting. Problem is, security guards aren't really paid to do that. They are paid to assist in keeping the environment safe. If someone is smart enough and/or has that extra lump of cash for a sharp legal rep. Then (typically) they ruin the life of a would-be everyday hero who simply stopped a thief in the act by taking them for everything they are worth, and will be worth. Emotional damages pay up big.
      Now, I'm still going to grab the theoretical purse-snatcher and help out however I can. There's a lot one can do to defend against that kind of attack (the court kind). Mostly what you need to do is stick to your guns, don't be sorry for anything, it was all deliberate.
      If I could, I'd go vigilante, but I'm gonna get caught. I'm going to be prosecuted by a criminal (who has stepped outside of the bounds and protections of the law, like me) because I hurt his feeling. And the law is going to protect the other guy and ruin me.
      I'm not that much of a pessimist, but I've heard so much that it left a bad taste in my mouth.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    47. Re:riches wont do you any good by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      People are not dying for a lack of pot. Therefore it has no comparison to the underground railroad.

      Dying? No. Suffering? Yes, sometimes enormously; suffering from the inability to get a medicine that works well for them; suffering from the inability to follow their religious practices without risking prosecution.

      Merely lighting up a fatty may not have parallels with the Underground Railroad, but operating "medical marijuana" clubs, or helping to shield fugitives fleeing procesution for drug possession, would.

      I would say that those who broke prohibition were most certainly not doing society any favors

      Then I would say you're...well, "a fool" is too strong. "Naive", perhaps. There's no difference between the state telling you what you can put into your body and into what states you can engage your nervous system, and telling you what gods you can worship, what books you can read, or what music you can play. Freedom is worth fighting for.

      For the sake of argument, let's assume that recreational smoking of cannabis may be no more "vital to our way of life" that reading comic books. (Of course that ignores medical and religious uses, and who am I to decide what's vital to someone else's life?) But the right to choose to read comics - or to smoke weed - is vital, worth fighting for.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    48. Re:riches wont do you any good by Altus · · Score: 1


      People are not dying for a lack of pot.

      the defendants in a recent supreme court case might disagree with you.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    49. Re:riches wont do you any good by Altus · · Score: 2, Informative



      Ive seen this myself.

      a few years ago I was at an international house of pancakes late at night... the place was pretty busy and I was waiting for a table when 3 guys... each at least twice my size burst into the place and out another door... two of them were kicking the crap out of the third who was in bad shape at this point.

      I looked around the room and there were maybe 25 able bodied men standing around watching.... at least on of the waitstaff called the cops (state police barracks up the street... half an hour later and an off duty cop would have been working security) but nobody made a move to stop them from repeatedly kicking the guy on the ground.

      the only two people to react were my friend and I... we were both totally outclassed and Im not sure what would have happened if they had attempted physical violence against us (id like to think my other friends would have helped us). I burst in and screamed at the two at the top of my lungs... yelled at them to get off of the guy... it didnt stop them, but it slowed them down and one of them came over to try to keep us out of it.

      I didnt escalate to violence to save this guy from the few extra kicks he took, because I probably would have been hurt rather badly, but I was willing to risk them turning on me to keep them from kicking the crap out of this guy.

      why were my friend and I the only ones willing to take that risk... with 10 of us there would be no risk.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    50. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm... Batman works late nights...

    51. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The simple reason why vigilantiism is generally not allowed is that, historically speaking, it has always led to more violence and even more situations where the innocent are wrongly accused than we have with cops.

      You are walking down the street and a guy comes out of the alley, shows you a knife and demands your wallet. You reach behind you and...pull out a gun instead of your wallet. The guy lunges at you, you shoot him.

      How is there ANY POSSIBILITY WHATSOEVER that the guy was "wrongfully accused"?!? He's the same guy who demanded your wallet 4 seconds ago.

      At least with police officers they have a uniform and a badge ..which do what, exactly??

      and a set of processes you can use to complain about them if they stuff up.

      Oh, please. Go to one cop, and tell him another cops broke the law? They cover for each other.

    52. Re:riches wont do you any good by kz45 · · Score: 1

      How about the controlling one's own body?

      If you're going to take the society approach and argue about the effects on society then wouldn't alcohol be a bigger target than cannabis?

      And even assuming the law is genuinely enacted and enforced for the benefit of society, where do we draw the line on the best interests of society taking priority over the individual? When I grew up, communism was demonized for putting the community above the individual and democracy was praised for individual freedoms


      open up a history book and show me one communist nation that has ever worked successfully.

      I am all for allowing society to do whatever they want with drugs as long as addiction is not considered a disease (and healthcare/insurance doesn't cover you if they find out you are a regular drug user).

    53. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      People are not dying for a lack of pot.

      Peter McWilliams, a very entertaining and insightful writer, died as a direct result of the courts taking away his medical marijuana.

      Granted, he was suffering from AIDS and lymphoma, and would have died eventually anyway, but he could have lived long enough to make a bigger difference in this world. Not to mention that the people who knew him and loved him didn't want him to die as he did.

      Who knows how many non-famous people out there have suffered similarly?

    54. Re:riches wont do you any good by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " "Street crime" is usually taken care of by the police and is really none of your business. Imagine some moron busting the heads of the local pot dealer out of respect for "justice.""

      Well, street crime is everybodies business, however it is the police's job to handle it.

      You could very well end up in jail yourself depending on how you went about being a "superhero", or more likely, in court given how litigious we are here. Welcome to the land where burglars successfully sue houseowners when they've sustained injuries robbing the persons house.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    55. Re:riches wont do you any good by runderwo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, putting people in jail in most cases does more harm to them than the drugs ever would. Furthermore, not everyone demonstrates self-harm through the use of illegal drugs; it is simply assumed - while we largely ignore the self-harm due to legal drugs, or at least we don't put people in jail simply for being alcoholics.

    56. Re:riches wont do you any good by runderwo · · Score: 1

      No, more like "If it makes you happy AND DOES NOT HARM OR ENDANGER ANYONE ELSE, then it can't be that bad."

    57. Re:riches wont do you any good by runderwo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, drugs = BAD, alcohol = OKAY. Don't you see the difference? That's why we lock up drug users.

    58. Re:riches wont do you any good by runderwo · · Score: 1
      as long as addiction is not considered a disease
      Addiction is not a disease. "Addiction" as commonly used in the media these days is a habit, a psychological compulsion. Addiction is used to label all sorts of behavior which is either seen as immoral or driven by a desire which others cannot understand. Sometimes what is labeled addiction is harmful, but frequently it is just differences between folks.

      Drug dependence most definitely is a disease. When someone wants to quit, but being physically sick or threatened with death every time they try (see heroin and alcohol among others), that condition is a disease because it requires medical intervention to resolve it.

      Obviously, I don't care if my taxes or insurance go up as people must be treated for drug dependence. Why? You could say that knowing there is a safety net would increase the use of harmful dependence-forming drugs, but the rates of drug abuse have not measurably gone up in any country which has legalized drugs (correcting for individuals who would have lied about their drug use at a time when they could be imprisoned for it). And the cost of treating an individual for dependence is something like 1/10 the cost of housing them in a prison cell for a given period of time. I think it's a far better investment, especially when combined with taxation to fix the price as high as possible to discourage consumption yet still below the point where it would attract a black market. You'd make all the money back and then some to be spent on things that are actually useful.

    59. Re:riches wont do you any good by runderwo · · Score: 1
      People are not dying for a lack of pot.
      Correction: People are not dying for a lack of RECREATIONAL/RELIGIOUS pot. (However, people are dying because prohibition enforcement occasionally kills them. That is perceived to be a cost of doing business in prohibition, and thus acceptable somehow because prohibition is assumed to be necessary.)

      The medical debate is completely separate, and isn't really even a debate anymore. No one can construct a reasonable argument that at once respects the rights of sick people, the rights of doctors to practice reasonable medicine, and respects the foundations of federalism in the US, and yet continues to criminalize and potentially jail people who have found symptomatic relief through a non-toxic plant, used for thousands of years for medical purposes and recommended by the AMA even after its prohibition was enacted.

    60. Re:riches wont do you any good by runderwo · · Score: 1

      I've always thought this might be a good idea, and certain OTC drugs and alcohol should be included in it since it is as much a mind-altering and addictive drug as any other. To obtain this license you must show proof of either employment or disability and it will simply be added as a field on the driver's license to avoid additional administrative overhead. If you are found to be using drugs or drinking in unauthorized places or if you demonstrate an impaired condition while driving or operating machinery, the intoxication license is suspended for a minimum period (perhaps along with the driver's license in the latter case).

    61. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been in the security business for a long time now. And if there's one out crying bit of training that I can remember in an "old lady's purse is being snatched," it's that our system is shit.

      Purse snatching is an interesting situation where I live. It's only legal for a citizen to arrest someone (and to use force to do so) if they witness someone commiting a crime, or if that person is running from the police at the time spotted. A police officer may arrest someone if they have "reasonable and probably grounds" to believe the person is guilty.

      Now, if I see a man grab an old lady's purse, can I arrest him? NO! I don't know that the purse belongs to the old lady. It might belong to the man, in which case he is quite within his rights to take it. It's not reasonable or probable, but it's possible. So, I can't arrest him, but the police can. All I can legally do is call the police.

      On the other hand, if I go to the mall, and my grandmother buys a purse, and a strange man grabs it, can I arrest him? YES! I know that she owns the purse, and if she complains, I know that she didn't consent, so I KNOW a theft has taken place, and I can act to arrest the man myself (and deliver him into police custody).

      Now, during the arrest, I can only use "reasonable force": I can't break someone's teeth for stealing a purse, just because I'm angry with the criminal. I can use as much force is necessary to stop him getting away, but no more.

      So if the criminal trips, well, too bad: as long as I didn't deliberately cause him to trip, I'm fine. If I tripped him on purpose, without needing to, that's an assault, just like smashing his teeth in for fun is an assault. Who gets to decide what was necessary? Some judge, working on hearsay and speculation, months or years after the fact.

      So, while the laws are all written for good reasons, they really boil down to one conclusion: dial 911, call the police. If someone isn't gettting hurt, you probably can't do much legally, and if they are, you'll want an ambulance on the way before you wade into a serious knife or gun fight.

    62. Re:riches wont do you any good by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Peter McWilliams, a very entertaining and insightful writer, died as a direct result of the courts taking away his medical marijuana.

      Damn. I didn't know he had passed.

      Everyone should read his book Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do: The Absurdity of Consensual Crimes in a Free Country (available on-line at the link, or at the usual dead trees vendors).

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    63. Re:riches wont do you any good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!!!

      If you live you're life with a code of ethics, and you live in Alabama, then you will go to jail. I'm not saying that you'll stay in jail, but you'll definately see the place for a night or two.

      ...generally the people of Alabama do not like any type of codes, or anything that falls outside the rhelm of "JESUS" or "SCIENCE".

    64. Re:riches wont do you any good by sanosuke76 · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've always felt they should suspend drivers' licenses on the *first* DUI for any kind of substance abuse... for at least a couple weeks. Enough to possibly cost them their job, humiliate them to their peers and family by having to bum rides from everyone, and make them seriously reconsider repeat offenses. A THIRD time, in my book, should constitute grounds for lifelong revocation. You NEVER get it back, no matter how many counselling sessions you've been to. I've got a cousin who's gone the DUI route 3x, friends of friends who have - they may not be constant offenders, but they're repeat offenders who will continue drinking and driving until they're killed. In my book, that's worth revoking their driving privileges for life.

      I'm fine with folks drinking - but the conscious choice to abdicate responsibility by getting behind the wheel is, to me, unforgiveable. I don't care if they're "happy go lucky folks" with their "whole lives ahead of them" - so are the folks they plow into.

      --
      My 229 is all the Sig I need http://thegunwiki.com/
    65. Re:riches wont do you any good by littlejess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ouch. Yay to spoil my fun, you big grown-up. You have a point though, in that - unlike in comics - the "supervillains" aren't really one lone man, but whole corporations / governments / etc. It takes two (hundred) to tango (in this case).

  82. 200k for a butler.. holy shite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that for real? Was I the only one to rethink the whole line of work thing?

    1. Re:200k for a butler.. holy shite by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he's an exceptionally good butler. And mechanic. And medic.

      I bet Alfred could whoop ass at CS.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  83. Real world crime-fighting superheroes by DrFalkyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're called the police. They patrol the steets at night looking for the bad guys. They are equipped with pistols, fast cars, body armor and even sometimes heavier weaponry and stun gas. Doesn't stop them from getting severely hurt and sometimes killed.

  84. Where??? by Decameron81 · · Score: 1
    "Batman's suit is a modified piece of infantry armor built by the applied sciences division of Wayne Enterprises. It's waterproof, bulletproof, knife-proof and temperature-regulating. Paired with an impact-resistant, graphite-composite cowl and spiked ninja-style gauntlets, it allows Batman to protect himself against everything from swords to machine guns."


    Well, you can't get that kind of stuff on ebay can you?
    --
    diegoT
  85. Check this out... by spankey51 · · Score: 1

    Ira Glass is the man... NPR show on superheroes

    --
    -ubuntu others as you would have others ubuntu you.
  86. You are not the contents of your wallet by Toxygen · · Score: 1

    You are not the car you drive. You are not how much money you have in the bank. You are not your fucking khakis.

    1. Re:You are not the contents of your wallet by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Nor, I hope, are you a paranoid schizophrenic who punches himself and thinks it's a buddy.

    2. Re:You are not the contents of your wallet by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the ladies. Oh, forgot, you probably don't see many (intact) in your parents basement.

  87. Only for the kids. by khasim · · Score: 1

    Us old guys remember the old Doc Savage books (and The Avenger ones, too).

  88. Vigilante Millionare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you miss the part about riches?

    No longer necessary! Thanks in part to the hit new Reality TV Show, where Richard Branson looks for his new Virgin Mobile VP of Crimefighting in "Vigilante Millionare"!

  89. Scary articles... very scary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This better not inspire some /. guy who RTFA to go out and buy a costume thinking he can beat up bad guys!

    1. Re:Scary articles... very scary! by LupusUF · · Score: 1

      "This better not inspire some /. guy who RTFA to go out and buy a costume thinking he can beat up bad guys!"

      Its a good thing that people on slashdot don't actually RTFA, so we don't have to worry about that happening.

  90. Batman and other superheroes by coolmaniac · · Score: 1

    I loved batman for he is a real hero . The other superheroes,superman and others are really no match for batman for his wits and survival skills. Also another character who compares to batman in his abilities without many gadjets is Phantom who is also very cool.. The other superheroes should learn from batman and be "men" without powers.

  91. Average geek by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the average geek would have a better chance of being Rorschach for the Watchmen. A black and white mask and a mind that divides everything into black and white.

  92. The average geek ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... will get his fat arse thrown into jail if he tries to be a superhero.

  93. New York is Gotham by rufusdufus · · Score: 1

    Dictionary definition of Gotham.

    Vast ignorance indeed.

    1. Re:New York is Gotham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, New York is not Gotham. Chicago is Gotham, as evidenced by the fact that Batman Begins was filmed on location in Chicago.

  94. The Watchmen by sabot99 · · Score: 1

    If you want examples of normal people becoming superheroes, I wonder if the more "realistic" scenario is Alan Moore's "Watchmen".

    With the exception of Dr. Manhattan, all of those characters were physically normal.

    1. Re:The Watchmen by Blowfishie · · Score: 1
      Realistic, except the good guys seemed to have been born with the ability to kick arse.

      Loved Nite Owl's paunch, though.

  95. Gotham is New York? by joe_adk · · Score: 1
    ...according to the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, there are no natural caves or caverns of any size in New York City, the real-world "Gotham."
    I always thought that New York was Metropolis and Chicago was Gotham. The architecture fits better that way. Live and learn (useless trivia).
    1. Re:Gotham is New York? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, gothem and metropolis are both new york

      thats why superman and batman are sometimes together

    2. Re:Gotham is New York? by Formula420 · · Score: 0

      Gotham is definitely Chicago. If you look at the license plates on the cars in Batman Begins, they all say "Illinois" Plus, the mob rule and all that good stuff, and the architecture as the parent poster pointed out. Gotham=Chicago.

  96. Forbes article annoying by chickanmonkey · · Score: 1
    I'm sure all of us at slashdot are quick readers and after finishing each page of the forbes artical you quickly hit the next button without noticeing that a bit of javascript on the page would advance the page automaticaly after a set amount of time. Which is ok if you don't happen to be multitasking or drinking. But as many of us, inclooding myself, are infacty doing both thoose things...

    No you are not spinning... the room is...

    Plainly you can see that this is an annoying use of javascript and I hope I don't see more of it on the internet.

  97. You ignorant, ignorant little dude.... by r_jensen11 · · Score: 0
    [Batman's Suit] waterproof, bulletproof, knife-proof and temperature-regulating

    Wrong, it's bullet resistent. They even say so in the movie, that it probably won't stop bullets head-on. So forget about taking on snipers with .50cal rifles with that suit.

  98. But, now that I think about it by Solr_Flare · · Score: 1

    George Lucas does all the same things with his Star Wars movies.....Could Lucas be a real life Batman? .

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
  99. Cheaper to out-source? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    1) set up eVigilante.org

    2) visitors can suggest worthy targets, subject to "star-chamber" review.

    3) Solicit bids from "contractors".

    Of course, this would all have to be hosted some place that doesn't have laws against this sort of thing, etc.

    Certainly a sucessful businessman like Bruce Wayne would appreciate the power of franchising!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  100. Mr. Period Returns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is your remedial English lesson for the day:

    1. your - possessive form of you. example: Your English sucks.
    2. you're - contraction of the words you and are, or possibly you and were, etc... Example: You're retarded.

  101. Unless you know your target is armoured. by khasim · · Score: 2, Informative

    Real world snipers aim for the center of mass. Right in the middle of your chest.

    Now, in a comic book world, where the sniper knows that the action hero is heavily armoured, the sniper COULD aim for the crotch area and hope to sever a main artery that supplies the leg.

    Or said sniper could shoot for the buttocks and hope to hit the sciatic nerve and end said action hero's action days.

    In fact, it's very difficult to armour the hips without limiting mobility.

    But such stories wouldn't be as interesting as the ones where the bad guys never think or learn.

  102. 30000 for the fscking Martial Arts Training? by sag_ich_nicht · · Score: 1

    INSANE. It's cheaper to travel to NYC and learn it there. And there is no corrupt Abbot there.

  103. It's simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I loved Batman Begins, but I really think they missed the mark when it comes to Batman's CSI savvy.

    My head was spinning when Bruce Wayne says "Am I supposed to know what that means?"

    So if you want to be a real Batman, figure in another several hundred thousand dollars for advanced degrees in science and criminology."

    Yeah, but advance degrees in science and criminology don't action figures.

  104. are you serious? by deviator · · Score: 1

    "So why couldn't the average geek do the same?"

    umm, because he's a FICTIONAL character in unlikely FICTIONAL situations?

    (just being a realist.)

  105. Re:Batman... by Fjornir · · Score: 1

    I think anyone can sleep standing up eyes open with enough practice. Just about everyone who goes through bootcamp gets busted for it at least once.

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  106. Sound feasible by DRobson · · Score: 1
    Right, 14.95 a month.
    Assuming 180000 subscribers thats (ripped from some random webpage) $2,691,000 a month.

    Since this is comparable to the cost of an actual superhero a month why dont we all band together and buy slashdot an enforcer of justice or evil, whatever your personal preference. Hell, for just one more month you could have both. Combine that with the recent craze for reality tv and you have something a little more exciting...

  107. The real reasonwhy.. by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    -he uses his riches, raw determination and technological know-how to equip himself to fight evil. So why couldn't the average geek do the same?

    Atomic wedgies..

  108. machine gun protection???? by vapor22 · · Score: 1

    Paired with an impact-resistant, graphite-composite cowl and spiked ninja-style gauntlets, it allows Batman to protect himself against everything from swords to machine guns.

    Yeah right, just wait until batman takes his first 7.62x39mm round to his chest.

    get real people. You have to wear very heavy vests for pistol protection. Call it III-A for safety in case you're fighting people that routinely carry magnum pistols.

    Ok great, you can defeat most handguns. Now what about the AK clones that you can buy everywhere for $300 bucks.

    Well if you want to go against that, better start buying rifle plates.

    Level III or level IV if you're gonna be facing 30-06 deer rifles which hmm, are not that uncommon.

    So there you go. 30 layers of kevlar and at least 2 plates for your back and your front.

    And guess what. there is NO SUCH THING AS A 100% bulletproof vest. so everytime you go out and stalk around with all your gear you risk having your vest defeated at any time by the golden BB.

    not including the fact that all that shit is heavy as hell and not very quiet, AND your mobility is limited.

    TFA recommends the ProMax OTV which is III-A rated for most pistols. Of course you have to add the rifle plates which TFA didn't mention or include in the cost.

    Call me when batman gets his first automatic burst in the chest from the thousands of NFA weapons ready to be stolen from private citizens or automatic weapons smuggled in from Mexico or overseas.

    I know this article was written in jest but there are truly dumb people in America...

    --
    -- Believe your Justice!
    1. Re:machine gun protection???? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      7.62x39 isn't even a machine gun, it is only an assault rifle.

      7.62x51 or 7.62x54R are current standard machine gun calibers, steel core of course. there's no way of making a human-wearable bulletproof vest against a machine gun. and this bat suit is also knife proof.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    2. Re:machine gun protection???? by vapor22 · · Score: 1

      depends on how you define machine gun

      In the US, any automatic weapon is legally considered a machine gun.

      but technically, machine gun covers a lot of ground. What would you call RPKs or M249s?

      also, level III rifle plates will defeat 7.62x51

      --
      -- Believe your Justice!
    3. Re:machine gun protection???? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      excuse me but even an old pistol (except such things like liberator) is an automatic weapon

      if you mean full automatic then there are quite a lot possibilities

      1) full automatic pistols (stechkin)
      2) submachine guns
      3) assault rifles
      4) light machine guns
      5) machine guns
      6) heavy machine guns
      7) machine cannons

      rpk is a light machine gun (lmg), actually a modified assault rifle. m249 (fn minimi) is also a light machine gun.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    4. Re:machine gun protection???? by vapor22 · · Score: 1

      perhaps it's the difference in terminology.

      When I say automatic weapon I mean when the trigger is pulled, the sear is disengaged as long as the trigger is held or until engaged by some type of burst fire mechanism. Probably this is what you mean by full-automatic.

      When you say automatic pistols, you are probably referring to single-action or double-action self-loading pistols. We usually call those semi-automatic pistols in the US.

      whereas what you call full automatic pistols, we just simply call them automatic pistols or machine pistols.

      all the types of weapons you listed in your comment would be considered machineguns in the US as long as there are fully automatic

      --
      -- Believe your Justice!
  109. Wonderful, another lame piece of movie advertising by Beatlebum · · Score: 1

    masquerading as a story. Even 60 Minutes is doing it. Sad. Very sad.

  110. Screw the butler; invest in an accountant by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 1
    The article fails to mention that Bruce Wayne must have a really amazing accountant. Think about it -- the guy's pretty much an embezzler. All that Wayne Industries equipment and capital that has to "disappear" every year with no one being the wiser. Also, where in a town as corrupt as Gotham are you going to find a contractor discreet enough to trust with the job of turning the cave under Wayne manor into a crimefighting lair. Or is the construction industry the one part of Gotham that isn't mobbed up?

    Once you get past those obstacles -- someone to build it and someone to cover up the fact that you paid for it -- you're in business. Oh, and Alfred (in the comics) is trained in battlefield surgery. Most real butlers aren't, so you probably want a pretty good (and tight-lipped) doctor too.

    --
    stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
    1. Re:Screw the butler; invest in an accountant by vspazv · · Score: 1

      In the movie Wayne Enterprises went public and he sold his stock. He ended up with a few billion dollars in cash. He also orders all his equipment in batches of 10,000 through fake companies to make the purchases look like either novelty items for sale or military usage. The other items like the suit were models from mothballed research projects that had been sitting forgotten in a warehouse.

  111. That depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the sniper is just trying to slow down or impede that target, they might just shoot a leg. IE (in this context): Joker's up to no good... Batman's on his way... Joker's sniper shoots Batman in the leg... Batman has to go back to the batcave for medical attention, and Joker has time to finish his plan.

  112. Another school and yes its just business now.. by slashmojo · · Score: 1
    There's loads of 'authentic shaolin' schools in the area and for less than $740.. tagou is a vast place and not the cheapest by far.. its also not actually the temple.. just a school nearby, one of dozens.

    It is possible to find a monk in the temple to teach you if you have the money and are able to haggle in chinese since nobody speaks english.. but there's no guarantee you will find a monk that is any good or even if he is good, who will teach you 'the good shit'.

    There are some good schools around though with top notch warrior monks and coaches and can be had for $500/month or less depending on how grim the conditions.

    Unforutunately most westerners would probably die from dysentery long before becoming l33t shaolin masters or superheros..

    1. Re:Another school and yes its just business now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spent 7 months training in a school in DengFeng, about 11km from Shaolin Si. Probably cost about 100USD a month once everything settled down and I knew the system. And yep, getting a serious dose of the shits every now and then is just part of it. As for the "the good shit", a few months hard work just teaches you that there's not about secret new ways to kick people in the neck, but about hard work and generally being stubborn. You might not end up a super-badass, you won't learn to throw fireballs and you won't learn to fly, but it's still a great to experience to have had. Beats coding for a living, anyway.

    2. Re:Another school and yes its just business now.. by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      And what works in one environment doesn't always work in another

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  113. Re:Wayne Enterprises; hmm there COULD be a connect by arekq · · Score: 1

    When I looked at your subject I actually thought you were going to show us the connection. ;-)

  114. Sounds expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a better idea: just roll around in some toxic waste for a while. Surely, you'll get some kind of super power. Or maybe lymphoma, but let's not dwell on that.

  115. y'all cheap bastards can be Catwoman instead by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    some black leather: I dunno, $20?
    some black thread: $1

    Or if you can't sew, you can buy a costume online.

    1. Re:y'all cheap bastards can be Catwoman instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      picture pale skinny geek (maybe slight belly) in tight leather suit.

      ewww

  116. New York City? by poppen_fresh · · Score: 1
    New York City, the real-world "Gotham."

    I thought that Chicago was the real world Gotham?...
    1. Re:New York City? by NightWulf · · Score: 1

      No NYC is Gotham, I think Chicago is supposed to be Metropolis.

    2. Re:New York City? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Gotham and Metropolis are BOTH NYC. Sorry, no comic book settings for Chicago - unless that is the Flash's "Central City" (hmmm could be....)

    3. Re:New York City? by Formula420 · · Score: 0

      I already posted this once, but Gotham IS Chicago. At least in the new movie, check out the license plates, every last one reads "Illinois" booyakasha!

    4. Re:New York City? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Sorry to break it to you, but Gotham has been a nickname of NYC for many, many years, even before the batman comic book. From Wikipedia: "Gotham" is also a nickname for New York City, New York, first used by Washington Irving in the Salmagundi Papers (1807) referencing The Wise Men of Gotham tale.

    5. Re:New York City? by Formula420 · · Score: 0

      Yes, but that is in the real world, and I am referring to the fictional world of Batman, in which, Gotham City is Cicago. Thank You.

  117. How about the price... by sweetnjguy29 · · Score: 1

    ...of the expensive attorney to get you out of jail and all of the infrastructure you've destroyed?

  118. Surviving a fall by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Actually you can brace yourself that you can survive a fall. I don't know how high but it is theoretically possible to do that. It aparently also helps if a canopy is there. A lady survived a fall from what usually is a fatal height after falling on top of a canopy. All she suffered was a broken arm.

    If you're talking about surviving falls, the good news is that an adult human being can survive a fall even at terminal velocity, as long as they land on something reasonably soft. There are documented cases of pilots bailing out of their planes during the Second World War without parachutes, and surviving with only relatively minor injuries after something like a tree broke their fall.

    The bad news, of course, is that they were the lucky ones. If you've ever been parachuting, you'll know that even with all that drag to slow you down, you still hit the ground pretty hard. People do suffer injuries from not getting it right, even after training in how to land correctly.

    If you land more-or-less on your feet, you have a much better chance, too. If you look at the training martial artists do in how to break a fall when thrown on their back/side/front, they can take a fair impact as well, but nowhere near as much as a parachutist's roll. As for coming straight down in just about any position when your feet are much above your head -- well, sorry, but you're pretty much toast if you've got any speed behind you. Trust me, best give that one a miss...

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Surviving a fall by hypnoticstoat · · Score: 1

      I saw a program on tv (something like "When Good Stunts Go Fcked Up") where a guy jumps out of a plane with a camera on his helmet then his parachute doesn't open and all you can hear is him going "oh fuck oh fuck I'm gonna die" then you see the ground come rushing up as he impacts. Then the guy realises he's not dead but in fact completely okay. He gets up and starts dancing around the field he'd just landed face down in. Not very often you manage to get shit like that on video. Thinking about it he problably survived because of the amount of crap he'd filled his suit with on the way down.

  119. "gathered"? by The+trees · · Score: 1

    This article begins:
    "Dark clouds have gathered over Gotham."
    I think they meant:
    "Dark clouds permanently exist over Gotham."

    --
    $ make work
    make: *** No rule to make target `work'. Stop.
  120. I picked the wrong line of work by Synn · · Score: 1

    Inexperienced butlers just out of school earn annual salaries of around $50,000 to $60,000, says McPherson. But experienced help can easily pull in $125,000 to $150,000 a year, and a gentleman's gentleman like Alfred might earn $200,000 or more.

    50-60k out of school and 125k-150k as experienced help???

  121. Big assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Because in the real world rich people want to seriously risk their lives... why??

    Yeah, I often wondered about that... Bruce Wayne is driven to fight criminals because of his childhood trauma. Most of us geeks didn't have that, the most we ever had to deal with was Dad taking away our Micronauts(TM) because we didn't mow the lawn.

    And the motivation to save people from crime is what, again? That's assuming that most people are worth saving, which hasn't exactly been my experience. Most people are jerks, and they deserve all the karmic kicks in the nuts that they get! :-P

  122. How a Geek Can Become Batman by AnonymousKev · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Suspend the laws of probability.
    Seriously. How long can you expect to attack violent thugs before receiving a mortal wound?
    Step 2: There is no step 2. You pretty much have it made once you get past step 1.

    --
    Anonymous Kev
    Proudly posting as AC since 1997
    (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
  123. But you really CAN become a superhero by bratboy · · Score: 1
    Just check out the "Superpowers" episode (#178) at This American Life, and you'll see that it actually IS within your reach. This is one of their best episodes of all time.

    daniel

  124. Different solution by adyus · · Score: 0

    He freezes the workers in carbonite after they're done.

    Oh wait, wrong movie...

  125. because there is a bright yellow target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because there is a bright yellow target on his chest to draw the aim of the evil doers...

    dUH!!!!

  126. If it is that easy... by mi · · Score: 1

    Why can't they come up with something effective against IEDs?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:If it is that easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should tell the cia to stop supplying them with IED's in the first place

    2. Re:If it is that easy... by mi · · Score: 1
      you should tell the cia to stop supplying them with IED's in the first place
      Yeah, as in: "CIA, why do you hate American soldiers?" :-)
      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  127. Heroes Unlimited by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    If you see an old lady being kicked on the ground by someone trying to rob her, that's everybodys business.

    If you help that lady, you're a hero. You don't need a cape or a mask to do good in the world. You don't even need to be bulletproof, as long as you choose the right way to help ("Hey! I just called the police!") and don't run in swinging.

    The cape and mask just make you look cooler while doing it.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  128. Obvious missing item... by isny · · Score: 1

    Every superhero needs a catchy theme song.
    Na na na na na na na na na na na na Batman!!
    P.s. I may be wrong on the number of "na"s above.

    1. Re:Obvious missing item... by isny · · Score: 1

      Even though it may be considered bad form to reply to your own post, I wanted to make it clear that the above song sample is a sample from an original work, and that the character referred to as "Batman!!" has no relationship, resemblance, or anything else to the comic book/motion picture "Batman" (no double exclamation points).
      Man, this world sucks nowadays. The law doesn't allow anyone to have fun anymore.

  129. How about being a super nemesis by Blowfishie · · Score: 1
    The costs could be about the same:
    • You don't need to be super-strong, just hire lackeys that don't mind getting bumped off
    • You need lots of gadgets
    • You need a lair packed with gadgets that nobody understands
    • You need a mad plan to take over the world
    Sounds like Bill Gates beat us to it.
  130. The Therapy by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

    He saw his parents die apparently. Don't forget the psychologist/scientologist bill. Otherwise he might cease up everytime a crook enters the room.

  131. Inefficient by tezbobobo · · Score: 1
    This has made me not want to become a super hero. It's not cost effective. For example, faor all the expense he goes to, he just doesn't make up for natural ability. Like, think about Batman Vs. Darth Vader. Come on, who do you think would win. Or look at a cost comaprison between Batman and Neo. Sure they needed that once off cost of the brain teaching thingy (being the technical term), but apart from that, it was predominantly reliant on Neo's inate ability.

    lets suppose for a moment that superman decided to go evil. Is that bodyarmour going to protect you now? No.

    Batman is only good at fighting intellectual criminals. Lets face it, X million dollars is a big expense for beating up nerds - any preschooler could do it.

    Here is a cheaper option. Batman, go for a holiday at Chernobyl. I hear it on good authority that radiation will give you superpowers, a la The Hulk. At the moment you are blowing you money on crap that isn't going to help when they up the ante. Also, get a gun, like a sniper rifle. Think how much time you could save if you'd just picked off the Penguin from the top of a post office. Instead, you're into all this hand to hand kung-fu bullshit. Neo, you could get a gun to. Darth Vader, you do that chokey thing and can do it over visi-phone - you're cool.

  132. Tony Stark by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

    ...that's the true identity of Batman these days. The Ironman, complete with invulnerable eletronic super suit and lots of cash to toast in his obsessive crime prosecution...

    I enjoyed Batman best when he was just a tormented man with some cash, cunning and a utility belt. Some rather good detective action rather than Superman-style action...

    --
    I don't feel like it...
    1. Re:Tony Stark by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I'm probly the only other one here who saw the name Tony Stark and knew who it was.

      God I need to get out more.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  133. Don't need physical presence by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Rather than a super-belt and super-fists, there is plenty of good deeds to do behind the keyboard, such as hunting down #@$! spammers and zombie hackers, looking for prior art on bad patents, etc.

  134. you'd love the new movie then.. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Because Batman spends months in Tibet or China or something basically in ninja school. He wears the ninja mask and everything.

    Honestly, I find this terrible. In my book, Batman is NOT a ninja. He learned to kick ass in the good ole U.S. of A.

    I don't know why every hero has to be a martial artist now. Even the computer hackers.

    I'm gonna go watch Fight Club.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:you'd love the new movie then.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah tyler durden doest use martial art kung fu techniques fighting jack and is not seen using nun'chakau[how we pronounce it. its a foreign word to us. we have swords , sabres and grappling in my world. my dad has a set. bruce lee was popular when he was my age , i guess.] at one point.
      or rice flails.

      oh wait you grow rice in the usa too.
      and erm here it is..
      theose aren't nun'chakau but Freedom Flails.
      my mistake!#

      oh and by the way. you yankee are big.

      big pussies.

    2. Re:you'd love the new movie then.. by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I find this terrible. In my book, Batman is NOT a ninja. He learned to kick ass in the good ole U.S. of A.

      Bruce Wayne traveling the world and learning different skills from different masters has been in the comic books for a loooong time. The details of the training are very different from the movie, but the idea of traveling to a remote location in Asia and studying martial arts for years has been part of his backstory for many decades.

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  135. REAL ULTIMATE POWER by mpaon · · Score: 0

    As i remember from the movie, his training didn't cost him $30,000....
    It only cost a walk up a mountain, a spiny blue flower, and a serious ass whipping

    ninjas!

  136. Re:Uh, no. . . Sort of. by unitron · · Score: 1
    "Don't you follow the celebrity gossip?"

    No need, it follows us. I think the only channels that haven't covered the Tom Cruise saga are PBS and C-SPAN and I'm not sure how long they can hold out.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  137. And... by presidentbeef · · Score: 2, Interesting

    something being legal doesn't make it right, either...

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  138. Batman's real weakness . . . Robin! by surelyserious · · Score: 1

    I thought the target on his chest was to distract criminals from noticing how fantasticly gay a grown man looks in a cape and latex face mask designed to look like a doberman and which brings emphasis to his lips.

    Maybe deep in the heart of all comic book bad guys lurks a paralyzing case of Bat-gaynoia(TM).

    --
    "We're millions of miles from earth, inside a giant white face, what's impossible?"
    1. Re:Batman's real weakness . . . Robin! by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      Everything is relative. Batman has a relatively conservative costume. Look at someone like The Flash. You either accept the style of superhero costumes or you don't. Turning all costumes into black latex/leather for the movies is a real copout.

  139. This Article Is Stupid by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    $30,000 for Shaolin Temple martial arts training? Get serious.

    There are plenty of legit Togakure-ryu ninjutsu teachers in the US and they don't charge you that kind of money. And it's legit ninjutsu, not Chinese martial arts (not to say anything against those forms, of course - but Chinese martial arts is not what Batman learned.)

    Then he says get a kevlar jacket? Right, uh huh. You'd at LEAST need a full SWAT outfit and preferably something more extensive than that to match Batman's costume. $300,000 - that's a little pricey - you could probably do very well for a third or less than that. (Of course, if you'd rather be Iron Man than Batman, add on some more zeros.)

    I stopped reading this crap after that page.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:This Article Is Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      You're forgetting that despite the claims of oh-so-many martial arts teachers, you aren't a master in a year, two years, or five years. In fact, where I trained, I never heard of ANYONE becoming a black belt in less than five years, and the person that made it in five was an exceptional case. None of this "Rex Kwan Do" stuff, you had to earn that belt.

      Besides, the article isn't stupid because the prices are off, the article is stupid because it's based on the premise that many of these things are even possible.

      Flying cars have been promised for decades. They've even been technologically feasable for decades: Just not economical. Bulletproof, temperature-controlled body suits that are even wearable just aren't possible at all with today's technology, or any technology that's even on the radar, so to speak.

  140. Not the point. by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

    The problem is that Batman's motivation isn't feeling good about helping out everyone, it's revenge. He wants to punish those responsible for killing his parents.

    Unfortunately, he has no idea who did it, and he could very well already be dead. So instead of a single person, he's generalized his parents' murderer into all criminals, everywhere.

    And revenge just isn't as satisfying if you hire somebody to do it for you.

  141. Batman isn't real by Mo+B.+Dick · · Score: 0

    When will people realize that this is a cartoon and you can't compare it to reality. I don't care what kind of armor you have. You would have to have unhuman strength to take on lots of guys with guns.

  142. I think they forgot the motorcycle... by Barkmullz · · Score: 1


    If I was batman, I would have to ride one of these.

    --
    Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
  143. I used to think that way, and I'm a woman by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

    "This quotation is one that comes to my mind a lot, too, and I think it strikes a chord with a lot of guys. I wonder if women ever think this way. Somehow, I doubt it."

    I used to think that with sufficient effort, I could put myself into the position where I could go around busting heads, driving cool cars, and saving the world, but then I realized, I have no coordination and that's kind of an important thing for your average superhero. I inherited my dad's math skills, not his athletic ability, so there's no way I'm going to be able to go kung fu on anybody. And therein lies the problem--there's a reason that we're geeks and not jocks.

    Plus, I figured out that if you really want the power to change the world, the job to try for isn't superhero, it's either Secretary of State or Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Which is why I want either Condi Rice or Alan Greenspan's job.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  144. Ollie? by IInventedTheInternet · · Score: 1

    Oliver North? Is that you?

  145. A lethal height "dose" is.... by spineboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The generally regarded LD50 (lethal dose where 50% of the involved die) for height is about 4-5 stories. I do a lot of trauma orthopaedic surgery, and I have to say that we don't get many people alive who've fallen more than 50 feet. We do get some exceptions, but just remember the good old E=1/2MV^2 rule - survivability falls off sharply at height greater than 50 ft (roughly 40 MPH).

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:A lethal height "dose" is.... by aug24 · · Score: 1
      ...survivability falls off sharply at ... roughly 40 MPH

      Hmm... just like for car accidents. I love doing equations/scenarios in energy terms, they give such neat answers.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:A lethal height "dose" is.... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      [The AC cites sources that say at 11' or more, 50% of victims will die.]

      But in those studies, they're talking about industrial accidents where people have fallen off a ladder or some such. I imagine that the number of people who land particularly awkwardly or with heavy things falling around them is rather higher in those cases that most. As I noted in my comment above (why was it Redundant, BTW?!) the nature of your landing makes a huge difference to what your body can take.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:A lethal height "dose" is.... by Deviant+Q · · Score: 1

      Actually a better formulation of the physics would take into account the impulse (J), or change in momentum. Neglecting air resistance (which is very significant, actually)

      • a(t) = 9.80655
      • v(t) = integral(a(t)dt) = 9.80665t
      • h(t) = integral(v(t)dt) = 4.90333t^2
      • t = sqrt(h/4.90333)
      • v(h) = 4.42869*sqrt(h)
      • p(h) = m*v(h) = 4.42869*m*sqrt(h)
      • J(h) = delta(p(h)) = p_i - p_f = 4.42869*m*sqrt(h) - 0 = 4.42869*m*sqrt(h)

      As impulse also equals integral(F*dt)[1] for constant mass, i.e. the sum of all forces applied over a length of time---in this case a very short one as the impact is quick---you can see that it hurts a lot, but increases with the square root of the height.

      [1] integral(F*dt) = integral(dp/dt*dt) = integral(dp) = delta(p) = J

      --
      "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
    4. Re:A lethal height "dose" is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The generally regarded LD50 (lethal dose where 50% of the involved die) for height is about 4-5 stories.

      That must be sampled from people landing on their feet. If all possible impact angles are collected, the LD50 is about 2 stories. Many lower height falls get labelled as other kinds of trauma, however.

      I have to say that we don't get many people alive who've fallen more than 50 feet.

      Since you don't recieve DOAs, your personal experience has little statistical applicability. But consider this: have you seen patients die from falls of 3-5 feet? It happens! I call it "trip on a shoelace and crack your skull on the curb".

  146. Duh, duh by rozz · · Score: 1
    Did you miss the part about riches?

    no he did not ... i guess you missed the fact he was writing for FORBES! :)

    --
    "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  147. Don't forget: by Domini · · Score: 1

    You also need to eat properly, exercise and have an overdeveloped sense of vengeance.

  148. Mod Parent UP ! by Greg@UF · · Score: 1

    Damn !
    No mod points when someone finally said something funny enough to make me laugh out loud on /.

    --
    -- You can't give it, you can't even buy it, and you just don't get it!
    1. Re:Mod Parent UP ! by unitron · · Score: 1

      And, having already posted, I couldn't use any of my mod points either. :-(

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  149. The article assumes that the batcave is "natural" by mark-t · · Score: 1
    I never got that impression. Although I haven't seen the new Batman movie yet... maybe that's the route they are taking.

    I had always gathered that it was artificial, either excavated out of the huge hill on which Wayne Manor is situated, or perhaps the cave was built first out of concrete, and then enough rock and soil was brought in to build a hill on top of it.

    IIRC, Wayne manor was located approximately 14 miles outside the city limits, so it's not like he'd be having to try and keep it quiet in the middle of downtown Gotham while getting the batcave built.

  150. The most important thing about Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if anyone mentioned this, I didn't feel like reading every comment.

    Batman's gadgets and money and cars and martial arts training all make him cool.

    What makes Batman special, what makes him an absolute threat to crime is that he is one of the greatest detectives that exist. Batman is supposed to be a genius rivalling his enemies intelligence. He's also one step away from becoming that which he fights against: the insanely intelligent Joker or Riddler. I think it's the battle that rages inside that is the truly engaging part of Batman.

  151. So, MMORPG player = SuperHero! by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Dedicated, Check.
    No Time for Movies, Check.
    No Time for Books, Check.
    No Time for Girls, DUH, uh, Check.
    The Company is run by others, meaning Mom's house, Check.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  152. Well, like the real estate people say by hey! · · Score: 1

    the three most important factors are: location, location and location.

    You can set heroes along a scale super-ness running from Shane (for you young 'uns, Shane was a mysterious wandererrwho turns out to be the fastest gunslinger around), James Bond, and Batman on left, and Superman on the right. Now, consider a second axis which represents the degree of order of the society that they operate in, with low being dystopic, criminal and anarchic and high being utopic, civil and orderly.

    Notice anything interesting?

    Shane operates in the Wild West, where decent folks are at the mercy of the ruthless and law comes out of the barrel of a revolver. Specirically Colt .45 appropriately nicknamed the "Peacemaker", because that's what Shane uses it for: he restores the balance (precarious though it may be) of society so decent folk can live out their humdrum lives in peace.

    James Bond operates in the shadowy world of spies and assassins, against a backdrop of an amoral global struggle between the stable, dull, bourgeois nations whose ideology boils down to "just get on with the business of creating wealth and don't think anything that upsets the status quo" and the nations driven by an ideology of change and who leave a trail of anarchy and disruption in their wake. Bond restores the balance (precarious though it may be) of society so decent folk can live out their humdrum lives in peace.

    Batman -- well, it's obvious isn't it? He lives in a city whose very architecture is fiendishly designed to seep into an ordinary person's unconscious mind, grab his Superego and hold it down so his Id can kick the shit out of it. Batman restores the balance (precarious though it may be) of society so decent folk can live out their humdrum lives in peace.

    Now, take the most super of the super: Superman. He lives in clean, well lighted, orderly Metropolis. The citizens of Metropolis are, compared to Gotham, shockingly competent. They don't need some jackass in tights running around to catch ordinary criminals, or even criminals in colorful make-up. They're shrewd enough to hire city planners and architects whose ideal urban landscape is not inspired H.P. Lovecraft's R'lyeh. A guy like Batman would be a public nuisance, tearing through red lights and causing traffic incidents and affecting insurance rates. No, they undoubtedly have a highly competent police force, conveniently deployed across the city and equipped with radios. The denizens of Gotham probably are murdered in droves as Batman rushes from emergency to emergency, but Metropolites can quickly summon a response team consisting of a police, fire and paramedics. The rare crime victim is quickly whisked to one of Metropolis' many fine teaching hospitals, where trauma teams await, fairly itching to put their world class surgical skills to the test. Metropolis is so orderly that they have surplus policemen; to give them something to do they're sent to elementary schools where they teach children how to avoid being victimized by crime. This of course is a tremendous waste of energy;what they really need is more school nurses to deal with a rampant epidemic of peanut allergies.

    Granted, the tax rates in Metropolis are probably a form of murder.

    They'd have it all under control, if it werent' for those pesky aliens/supenatural beings/radioactive nightmare monsters who are attracted to all that order like a small child is to a field of untrammeled snow. Unlike Gotham, where the potential force of entropy is continually dissipated through acts of personal crime and terror, entropic forces accumulate the wall of order the Metropolis has built, finding no outlet. Inevitably they overtop the dam and rush down on the city like a raging flood. When that happens, orderly and efficient public safety forces aren't enough. You need somebody who can change the alter of mighty rivers. Superman restores the balance (precarious though it may be) of society so decent folk can live ou

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Well, like the real estate people say by mlk · · Score: 1

      That post was way to enjoyable to be on slashdot.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:Well, like the real estate people say by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Fucking A, that rocked.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  153. wrong - not everyone is built right by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    I used to complain about not being able to run fast - and it didn't matter how much I worked at it, I'd picked the wrong parents.

    Not everyone has the brains to write computer programs - I'm continually surprised by people who just don't "get it" no matter how easy I try to make it for them.

    Not everyone has the head for business - although I like to think this can be learned. For me it means fighting against countless impulses that make me want to avoid doing accounting sums and accurate data entry.

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
    1. Re:wrong - not everyone is built right by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      If they were to want it badly enough, they would look for a way to make what they are good at enough.

      Can't run fast? Work on range weapons. Can't see well? Work on other senses. Etc.

      The magnitude of difficulty has not really changed.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    2. Re:wrong - not everyone is built right by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      There's more than one way to skin a bat, er, cat. Maybe you don't have the physical skills of a Batman, but you could build Iron Man armor. Or maybe you could be a behind the scenes hero like Oracle. Or, if you lack brains, brawn, or money, you can eat a lot of pizza, learn to roll downhill, and bowl criminals over like bowling pins.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  154. There's no real secret to martial arts like Karate by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    If you read the article (did you?), he's right. Karate, Kung Fu, Jujitsu etc etc techniques don't just work like magic. The idea that you can go to any self defense classes, martial arts classes, "real" fighting classes for a few months or even a few years and learn to defend yourself or fight is a false idea and misses the point.

    It's simply the application of force. Someone who knows "The real shit" is just a person who's practiced regularly for a long, long time to the point that the application of force is damned near automatic. It's like changing gear in a stick shift, you don't think, you don't look, you just do it. That can't be taught, it has to be practiced.

    Excellent site BTW, bookmarked.

    --
    Deleted
  155. I was just wondering by MoThugz · · Score: 1

    It used to be that becoming a hero is just doing a heroic deed.

    Since when do heroes need fancy schfancy stuff and megabucks?

  156. Real-world Superhero. by BeProf · · Score: 1

    Call me old fashioned, but...

    Maybe you could stop sitting at your computer wondering about how much it would cost to be Batman and go actually do something worthwhile. Like volunteer to work with kids or the homeless.

    Heck, you could even, I don't know. Go be a *cop* or a soldier if you want to fight crime and villiany. If for some reason you can't do that, you can always go down to the local VA Hospital (or suitable equivalent) and just talk to these guys who left the best years of their lives and maybe a few limbs in some hellhole protecting your life and freedom.

    If you really want to wear a silly costume while doing it, I don't think anyone will mind.

    --
    You are attempting to read sigs. Cancel or Allow?
  157. maybe entertaining, but it's kid stuff and absurd by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    When I watched spiderman-2, I couldn't help but think that Doc-Occ could have been just as effecive if he just had an ordinary hand gun, instead of sci-fi mechanical arms.

    Think about it, he could have used a hand gun to rob the bank, a hand gun could also kill spiderman. For that matter, a gun-shot to the head would kill doc occ, as well.

    If somebody like bruce wayne existed, he could do 100X more good by donating to established law enforcement, or other charities.

    Could batman have prevented 9/11? How about msft's patent abuse? What are the big problems today that could be fixed by an armored suit?

    Commic book super-heros are only good for fighting comic book super-villians.

  158. What's wrong with America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amongst this set of humorous reparte can be found a set of messages from people who seem to really think that being a 'superhero' is a credible possibility.

    I know of no other country where this amazing delusion would take hold. What nutters do in America is their own business - the trouble is that American foreign policy is based on a similar set of premises. A little while ago the US air force was bidding for money to develop a large ground-penetration bomb (though the technology had been completely worked out by the Brits in 1942), so they could attack the 'underground lair' of the head baddie, Bin Laden.

    What is it with these people? Are they right off their heads?

    1. Re:What's wrong with America by russotto · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're talking about a guy who came up with a diabolical plan involving taking over commercial airplanes to knock down several large, occupied buildings, successfully executed said plan, and you're objecting to the idea that he has an underground lair? The man's certainly supervillian material (though more Bond than comic book, I'll grant you).

  159. Words are more powerful than weapons to a geek by adzoox · · Score: 1

    A while back I had a journal entry (since deleted) called Crimefighting: SuperZOOX style

    In it I describe how I fight crime (or injustice) on a regular basis.

    There are a number of modern day super heros in my opinion and they all use Media as their weapon.

    I started my website specifically to root out the evils in the Mac world.

    I've been reasonably sucessful with the main target : Jack Campbell - he's the guy that tried to start a "write a virus contest" a few months back

    Many BLOGS popped up during the election that from a perspective were crimefighting/justice seeking.

    I think modern super heros are everywhere!

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  160. Re:maybe entertaining, but it's kid stuff and absu by Kombat · · Score: 1

    If somebody like bruce wayne existed, he could do 100X more good by donating to established law enforcement

    WTFM. In the movie, Gotham was being ravaged in the grips of corruption. Everyone from the DA all the way up to the mayor (including the police) were being paid off by crime bosses. Wayne's money would have simply fed the very sharks he was trying to eliminate.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  161. Or... by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    Alternatively, a relationship based on money, which I think describes most marriages out there.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  162. Batman and levels of crime by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    Big crime happens all the time by power structures like governments, organized religions, corporations, etc. The tools for fighting these nasties don't involve tights. They involve activism, raising awareness, getting others involved in politics, and other things that don't look real cool in graphic novels.

    I forget exactly which set of books it was from -- it was the one where there was the sonic-based bad guy who turned out to be a mind-controlled soldier and Batman was using a blonde-haired guy who'd been involved in the mind control as a stand-in because Bruce was injured and Ducard was investigating him -- but there was a bit where Ducard was monologuing about Batman and essentially stated that Batman existed because the people who really committed crimes, big business and politicians, realized that Batman, by taking on small crime, distracted people from the true crimes.

    Not to mention if you had insane wealth, you're probably part of the problem. Check the holdings of some wealthy people, they sometimes fund some very shady companies or governments which do some fairly nasty things. Real world problems are rarely fixed with just a punch in the face and a snazzy batmobile.

    Again, it's been covered in the comics. There've been numerous issues where Bruce has had to face where his money's coming from or found that Wayne Industries has some unsavory ties, either in the present or in the past.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  163. saw thjis article a week ago - it's still stupid by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Come *on*, ->neoprene- under the Batsuit? He'd collapse from heat prostration in the first hour.

    It would have helped if this turkey that wrote it hadn't learned his pseudo-science from bad comic books, and maybe "Science Made Stupid".

    mark

  164. Yeah, so what!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is amazing how the slashdot crowd has gotten spoiled. "We talked about this very topic 2 weeks ago, why are we talking about it again".. for fucks sake! Have you ever said "its a nice day" 2 times in one day? " That was a good shot" at a sporting event more than once? Those are nice boobies twice at the same nudie bar? (Or at the same website)

    Those who talked about it before are aware it is a "DUPE!!", those who did not talk about it get a chance to. LET. IT. GO. Go make some other smarta$$ comment on another story and get your karma there.

  165. What we really wonder about the Batcave. by Sans_A_Cause · · Score: 1

    Does the Batcomputer run Linux?

    1. Re:What we really wonder about the Batcave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Does the Batcomputer run Linux?

      Yes, I believe it runs "Red Bat" Linux.

  166. No Batsense by LKM · · Score: 1

    You're confusing Spiderman with Batman :-)

  167. Already Been Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just go ask Troy how much it's cost him so far...

  168. The day-to-day is the downside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read a quote once (can't remember who by, unfortunately) where it was said that many people think they want to be writers, when they really want to be authors. They don't want to write a book, they want to have written a book.

    Same thing with superheros -- a lot of people think it would be _really_cool_ to be a superhero, but they don't want to actually live the day-to-day.

    And what's worse, you'd have to be fictional. :-)

  169. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Score:-1, Whiny-ass Bitch)

  170. The main problem would be FINDING crime to fight by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    No, Batman's (or just about any other superhero's) main problem would be finding the crime in the first place. Most of the crime that superheroes end up fighting in comic books is the kind of random crime that you don't just STUMBLE onto (and which happens so fast that it would be over by the time you heard about it).

    Basically a superhero would have three options

    1. Aquire god-like powers of prescience
    2. Hang out in a bad neighborhood busting minority crack-dealers, hookers, and pimps engaged in very non-random crime
    3. Buy a police scanner, show up after-the-fact, and track the bad guys down by investigation (just like the cops, only with even less resources and support).

    Of course, number 1 is fantasy, number 2 would get you killed very quickly, and number 3 would make you less effective than even the lowliest police detective.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  171. what riches? by juan2074 · · Score: 1
    So why couldn't the average geek do the same?

    Maybe it is the 'riches' that we lack.

  172. Re:The main problem would be FINDING crime to figh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> No, Batman's (or just about any other superhero's) main problem would be finding the crime in the first place.
    >> Most of the crime that superheroes end up fighting in comic books is the kind of random crime that you don't
    >> just STUMBLE onto (and which happens so fast that it would be over by the time you heard about it).

    I always assumed that Batman went out of his way to keep tabs on previous offenders and suspicious types. They don't really explain it in the comics or movies, but he must have surveillance devices all over the city. He does, after all, have the Bat-Computer and the Giant Lighted Lucite Map of Gotham City!

    Since he's already operating outside the law, he probably has no compunction placing bugs in homes and businesses that would be tough for the police to justify to a judge. Commissioner Gordon, of course, just looks the other way as long as Batman keeps catching bad guys.

  173. Supers are like tanks by edraven · · Score: 1

    You only need them if the other guy has them. Outfitting a single individual with $200M worth of equipment is simply not cost effective unless there's another individual out there [s]he can personally face who poses a $200M threat all by h(im|er)self. Then there's always the reality factor. You can trust Batman because he's a comic book character. Trustworthiness is part of the definition of the character. You outfit a single individual with more and better hardware than not only the local police but the National Guard... that's going to turn a guy's head. He's going to start thinking about what he could get away with.

  174. That really tells about your mindset by mikefe · · Score: 1

    You settle for moist when good 'ol Mr Wayne get them dripping wet.

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
  175. That really tells about your mindset by mikefe · · Score: 1

    You settle for moist when good 'ol Mr Wayne gets them dripping wet.

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
  176. Correction about the suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you watched the movie, you would know that the suit that Batman wears is not "bullet proof", but is only somewhat bullet proof. It cannot deflect a direct shot, but can handle an indirect shot.

    Holy shit! I sound like a treki. I don't even like Batman. I just went to the movies cause I was bored. Then I ate some pop-corn that gave me the shits for 2 days!

    Fuck Batman and his wanna-be suit of armor.... I have to go shit again

  177. WHo was the fucking idiot who modded this troll?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was almost direct quote form "the dark knight returns". Jackass.