When you look at it from an historical perspective, blockchain technology is merely a passing phase, to be replaced by less power-intensive methods that provide similar results.
It's kind of like the Stirling Engine, which was a thing for a while until we realized there were better ways to do things.
Blockchain will also be replaced. Think of it as early ECMAscript, or other coding languages, that have for the most part already been replaced.
This is a very useful signal detection implementation for low temperature gradients, useful in monitoring range fluctuations, and is obviously not useful for power generation beyond that needed to drive monitoring circuitry and software to communicate those gradient changes.
More like for nuclear power plants or battery cells with temperature operation limitations, or for use in industrial and commercial processes, where you need to run a resin at a specific temperature range to cure it before you apply it.
Look, if I have five companies, three of which are heavily subsidized and required by their large population nation states, and two of which have already achieved market saturation, I can't actually compare the small US market share of the non-subsidized companies to the quickly growing and underserved market share in India, China, and countries which have large populations and market dominance by very few subsidized players.
Wake me in five years and we'll talk about who will survive.
In actual impact, farmed shellfish (not shrimp or lobsters, but mussels, clams, other bivalves) in areas with farmed (and eaten, not let to degrade) seaweed beds works better at removing massive amounts of carbon from the ecosphere.
1. We can use biofuel from trees (WSU, UW research), from forestry waste (UW, UO, UBC, UCalgary) to literally cut waste. This traps emissions from burning and organic breakdown.
2. We can use biofuel from animal and vegetable waste (similar sources, many firms) that removes methane releases.
3. We can use shellfish farms and seaweed to literally trap carbon in shells, and store the shells, or use them as components to replace concrete - concrete is a MAJOR source of carbon emissions.
4. We can convert all commercial and industrial and government fleets of cars and trucks to plug-in electric or biofuel (water) from sources 1 and 2, traffic emissions are up to 50 percent of emissions in most of the US and Canada.
5. We can replace inefficient high emission suburban single family housing with wasteful lawns to local shrub and flowers and efficient multi family housing near work and transit. Cuts emissions in the residential sector by a factor of between 10 and 40 times.
6. We can literally build warehouses and buildings to generate their own energy.
Look, you just mean you don't "want" to. Not that we "can't".
Oh, and 1-6 all SAVE MONEY compared to prior tech versions.
Slashdot Mirror
Can't falsify emissions for that.
Adapt. The world cares nothing for your excuses, as we return to conditions suitable only for dinosaurs, not for humans.
When you look at it from an historical perspective, blockchain technology is merely a passing phase, to be replaced by less power-intensive methods that provide similar results.
It's kind of like the Stirling Engine, which was a thing for a while until we realized there were better ways to do things.
Blockchain will also be replaced. Think of it as early ECMAscript, or other coding languages, that have for the most part already been replaced.
This is a very useful signal detection implementation for low temperature gradients, useful in monitoring range fluctuations, and is obviously not useful for power generation beyond that needed to drive monitoring circuitry and software to communicate those gradient changes.
More like for nuclear power plants or battery cells with temperature operation limitations, or for use in industrial and commercial processes, where you need to run a resin at a specific temperature range to cure it before you apply it.
Kudos! Good job!
Trust?
What trust?
You are the Product.
Not the Customer.
They sell data and metadata and ads targeted at you based on that.
What trust?
All your West is belong to Freedom.
It's only in the Lie-over states that you are treated like Serfs.
Wait .. Serfs had rights.
Or having the budget to drink coffee on a regular basis...
Don't you live in a place where minimum wage is $15/hour?
The key thing to remember in any medical research studies, is that they all pretty much say "Do things in moderation, not to excess".
Key exception: smoking. Always bad for you.
Lesser exception: alcohol, if you're female (any) or male (more than 1-2 drinks a day).
Look, if I have five companies, three of which are heavily subsidized and required by their large population nation states, and two of which have already achieved market saturation, I can't actually compare the small US market share of the non-subsidized companies to the quickly growing and underserved market share in India, China, and countries which have large populations and market dominance by very few subsidized players.
Wake me in five years and we'll talk about who will survive.
Some of this could be ascribed to not falling asleep at the wheel, and to socialization factors, of course.
It's not the cream, it's what's added to it.
Sugar is bad. Sugar in cream is bad.
Flavor is good. Natural unprocessed fats that are not burnt are good.
Funny. I thought it was in the pumpkin.
Try the sugar free almond roca for the best results
The brew quickens the mind
The stains are a warning
It is from my mind that it speeds
All hail the spice!
In actual impact, farmed shellfish (not shrimp or lobsters, but mussels, clams, other bivalves) in areas with farmed (and eaten, not let to degrade) seaweed beds works better at removing massive amounts of carbon from the ecosphere.
Most of Earth is water.
We already made backups elsewhere.
Nice try covering up for Russia.
Hope you bought your Snickers in bulk, 'cuz you're gonna be in for a loooong wait.
You spelled Smarties wrong.
1. We can use biofuel from trees (WSU, UW research), from forestry waste (UW, UO, UBC, UCalgary) to literally cut waste. This traps emissions from burning and organic breakdown.
2. We can use biofuel from animal and vegetable waste (similar sources, many firms) that removes methane releases.
3. We can use shellfish farms and seaweed to literally trap carbon in shells, and store the shells, or use them as components to replace concrete - concrete is a MAJOR source of carbon emissions.
4. We can convert all commercial and industrial and government fleets of cars and trucks to plug-in electric or biofuel (water) from sources 1 and 2, traffic emissions are up to 50 percent of emissions in most of the US and Canada.
5. We can replace inefficient high emission suburban single family housing with wasteful lawns to local shrub and flowers and efficient multi family housing near work and transit. Cuts emissions in the residential sector by a factor of between 10 and 40 times.
6. We can literally build warehouses and buildings to generate their own energy.
Look, you just mean you don't "want" to. Not that we "can't".
Oh, and 1-6 all SAVE MONEY compared to prior tech versions.
a $10,000 plug-in electric truck with a winch, designed for the mountains, with a spare battery pack in the toolbox of the bed.
And you can buy them in Canada, so don't tell me they're not available.
next time clean out the grease traps before you toss the suns into the cooling vastness of space
That would be more fair.
And, yes, there have been replacements for plastic bags for decades.
Commies are only more logically consistent.
Well, Yanks would know, your White House is full of them
(I should point out the Canadian version of Tab is made from real maple sugar and baby seal hearts)
(and Canadians are socialists, not commies, there's a difference)
Only because the Canadian version of Tab has real sugar, not that fake corn stuff you use
RDS is not American. For that matter, other countries can sue all of these companies too.
Stop trying to protect your dying fossil fuel industry.
If my years in the Canadian Army taught me anything, it's that tab warming leads to tab fires.
Think of the poor tabs, you filthy Americans!
Don't forget, to them, we are the product they sell to corporations, not the customer.
It's only in the Western US, Canada, and the EU/UK that governments are willing to insist on privacy rights.