I've always viewed multiple inheritance as the hallmark of duct-tape programming. Being (correctly) forced to do single inheritance forces you to do proper architecture (but not architecture for architecture's sake), abstraction (within reason), and seriously think about the structure of your program.
There's nothing more duct tape then slamming a bunch of random classes together into one class.
Moblin uses Clutter to create exciting, efficient, and intuitive user interfaces.
Worthy competitor to Android, let alone Apple? Not a chance, and you can tell just by looking at the name that was chosen for the UI. But they'd probably have a good shot at Failblog.
If you tell everyong about it, the liberals will try to interfere with our right to bear doomsday devices by either adding a 3 day waiting-period for mad scientists or by classifying them as "assault rifles".
Using well-tested, modular women who can easily make extensible and interchangeable baby parts, you might be able to add a several women and grow a baby up to 40% faster. Of course, you'd have diminishing returns due to communication overhead once you get past four women.
Slashdot Mirror
No need to worry yet. Perhaps the categories will be
1. Boobies
2. Extra Boobies
3. Mediocre girl-girl
4. Wicked Awesome girl-girl
5. Why would you pay 99 cents for that boring thing, mate?
Upon reading the headline, my first thought was "dammit, now Tom Lehrer's Elements Song is even further behind."
True audiophiles know that it's only past 120kbps that Bob Dylan speaks coherent English.
"Cause if we find we're in a bind we just make some shit up"
It will recognize threats to society like terrorists, illegal aliens, and UNC fans.
An African or a European pumpkin?
By holding for ransom my plans to release an app named
iPhoneiPhoneBoBiPhoneBananaFanaFoFiPhoneMeMiMoMifoneiPhone
Even the chance of an apocalypse is being downsized.
Because then you'd need to spend some $$$ on asteroid cream.
"Bursting Dam, Flying Dutch Boy"
Objective-C, actually. Were I a Java programmer, there wouldn't have been the second and third qualifiers between parentheses in my original post.
I've always viewed multiple inheritance as the hallmark of duct-tape programming. Being (correctly) forced to do single inheritance forces you to do proper architecture (but not architecture for architecture's sake), abstraction (within reason), and seriously think about the structure of your program.
There's nothing more duct tape then slamming a bunch of random classes together into one class.
Not really. I've seen way too much duct tape python and ruby code.
From Moblin's site:
Worthy competitor to Android, let alone Apple? Not a chance, and you can tell just by looking at the name that was chosen for the UI. But they'd probably have a good shot at Failblog.
If you tell everyong about it, the liberals will try to interfere with our right to bear doomsday devices by either adding a 3 day waiting-period for mad scientists or by classifying them as "assault rifles".
The real story in the article should be "CTO of world's largest Windows security software company uses a mac."
The phobia doesn't extend to frat boys, bikers, and republican congressmen.
According to this article your lifetime chance of dying in a car crash is 1 in 83.
Per-person odds, I'd take a one-time shuttle ride over a lifetime of driving.
Slashdot is infringing on my patent of encoding information about people, places in a binary format that uses the numbers 1 and 0.
They might have gotten 112,076 "fans of teenage girls trapped in wells."
Let 3rd party apps disable 911 functionality?
Let 3rd party apps make the keypad 5 pixels high and completely destroy the ability to use it as a phone?
Run background tasks that interfere with your ability to receive an important business call?
I've got the patent on fart noises made by six year-olds, beyotches!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbows_End
I deeply fear an Elmo belief circle.
Using well-tested, modular women who can easily make extensible and interchangeable baby parts, you might be able to add a several women and grow a baby up to 40% faster. Of course, you'd have diminishing returns due to communication overhead once you get past four women.
It's only a model.