There is no advantage to putting a CPU in a voting machine.
Every wire or gear in the machine should be visible. Anyone who can wire a lamp should understand the circuit. Anyone who can change the air cleaner on their car should understand the mechanics.
But in the end, it's not about simplicity for people who don't know tech, it's about using low tech to thwart tampering.
I am in a real bind here, as voice recognition does not work well for me, and because I make many things with hands, as well as play guitar my thumbs feel uncomfortable texting without physical keys.
Almost everyone makes the same phone. Blackberry will likely make an otherwise flawed phone, and everyone will blame its demise on the keyboard.
Yesterday, the "California secession" searches went down by some 19,000 in one hour. Today, Bing returns twice as many results as google.com. Please try it yourself.
They really messed it up Windows Update. It has ruined my 3D prints, and has kept me from leaving places with my laptop. Taking away the user's ability to delay updates, was bull$hit.
I know this won't be popular, but I hate Trump will all of my heart. He is the least honorable politician I have ever witnessed in my life, worse even than Nixon.
Trump is a useless spoiled rotten rich kid who has always gotten his way. Everyone is trying to placate him so he and his people doesn't start a insurrection. I say, vote your consequence, and let the chips fall where they may.
The F-35 is a multi-role stealth fighter that was mostly made to destroy airplanes. The A10 is a non-stealth ground assault fighter with high survivalbility that was mostly made to destroy tanks and destroy transports and for interdiction purposes.
Financially, the F35 was a good idea: have one fighter serve all of NATO in several roll, and still retain the F22 to shoot the rouge f35s down. The problems are: we handed a company a monopoly, and we will eliminate diversity in our fleet. By putting all our our money one company, we put our head through a noose, so expect it not to be comfortable. Instead of taking the best of 2, we should have taken the best 2 of 4 fighters. During the competition, Lockeed-Martin just had to devise a cheaper F22, Boeing had to create a whole new airplane, which they did not do well at.
The A10 is a great plane that we still use a lot. We should ask Fairchild Republic if they can make a modern version, without breaking the bank, or screwing the pooch.
I am not a medical person, but why does this seem like someone is trying to shove an unverifiable theory down our throats, and have us just accept it as a fact? Why the study? Why Now? For what purpose? To dispel what? Who really was motivated to do this?
Slashdot Mirror
Know they enemy... so MS can gather all the data on the users.
Hmm, we're not quite using memsisters for much either.
There is no advantage to putting a CPU in a voting machine.
Every wire or gear in the machine should be visible.
Anyone who can wire a lamp should understand the circuit.
Anyone who can change the air cleaner on their car should understand the mechanics.
But in the end, it's not about simplicity for people who don't know tech, it's about using low tech to thwart tampering.
...and as a moron, he will likely do moronic things.
I don't think that the article is great journalism, but warning people about possible dangers is a valid function of the media.
Um does Chump even know that his VP doesn't care for queer folk, like the Apple president?
I don't think you will get used to computers built for usefulness over anything else.
Duh.
It makes sonic booms, and burns fuel like crazy. Meh.
I hope they don't think that they are going to supersonic that over my house!
So many sites have ads that look like news items or download links.
Let's do something about those, too!
I agree.
That is what I could easily do with my LG Lotus.
I am in a real bind here, as voice recognition does not work well for me, and because I make many things with hands, as well as play guitar my thumbs feel uncomfortable texting without physical keys.
Almost everyone makes the same phone. Blackberry will likely make an otherwise flawed phone, and everyone will blame its demise on the keyboard.
Yesterday, the "California secession" searches went down by some 19,000 in one hour.
Today, Bing returns twice as many results as google.com.
Please try it yourself.
Jitters?
They really messed it up Windows Update. It has ruined my 3D prints, and has kept me from leaving places with my laptop.
Taking away the user's ability to delay updates, was bull$hit.
I know this won't be popular, but I hate Trump will all of my heart. He is the least honorable politician I have ever witnessed in my life, worse even than Nixon.
Trump is a useless spoiled rotten rich kid who has always gotten his way. Everyone is trying to placate him so he and his people doesn't start a insurrection. I say, vote your consequence, and let the chips fall where they may.
I check sites several times a day with my phone, but when I want to read, I use my computer.
The F-35 is a multi-role stealth fighter that was mostly made to destroy airplanes. The A10 is a non-stealth ground assault fighter with high survivalbility that was mostly made to destroy tanks and destroy transports and for interdiction purposes.
Financially, the F35 was a good idea: have one fighter serve all of NATO in several roll, and still retain the F22 to shoot the rouge f35s down. The problems are: we handed a company a monopoly, and we will eliminate diversity in our fleet. By putting all our our money one company, we put our head through a noose, so expect it not to be comfortable. Instead of taking the best of 2, we should have taken the best 2 of 4 fighters. During the competition, Lockeed-Martin just had to devise a cheaper F22, Boeing had to create a whole new airplane, which they did not do well at.
The A10 is a great plane that we still use a lot. We should ask Fairchild Republic if they can make a modern version, without breaking the bank, or screwing the pooch.
Though, the two planes have different rolls.
I am not a medical person, but why does this seem like someone is trying to shove an unverifiable theory down our throats, and have us just accept it as a fact?
Why the study? Why Now? For what purpose? To dispel what? Who really was motivated to do this?
What other species would work so hard on its own extinction?
Lying is one of the hallmarks of a true sociopath.
Ever open a Wifi monitor, and just sit back and watch the congestion problems in city areas?
err, unreferenced.
Another referenced comparison for the pile.
Sadists, sadists would like that, like anyone would taser someone while they are already down.
Nice single point of failure : P