That is because it is too obvious. You see, in science you need to find the most complex way to solve a problem (it makes you sound smarter and you sounds like you know what you are talking about)
I have to agree with you there. Unless they have some sort of complex system for when you lose your phone. That is the only problem with all this technology. If you lose one device, someone has access to everything about you and you are fairly screwed.
I downloaded Keyhole, the software, and I managed to zoom in on my many key cities in Europe, Paris and Rome. I suspect they will have Europe done as well.
New to Cross-Galaxy Channel "Humans". In this episode, we watch how these pathetic little humans debate between religion and science and how one is better then the other.
I agree. It is pathetic. If you cannot find a reason for an attack or cause of something bad, it is linked to terrosists / terrorism. I mean, those terrorists must be busy doing all their "evil" things to fund their operations aganist America.
While I was driving home from the movie, I was talking with my friends on how freaking sweet it would be if they had used tech from the first three movies. I really enjoy that old-style look compared to the CGI crap they got nowadays. I mean look at Yoda. He was so fake and I just wouldn't believe it. In the original triology, he looked a lot better, albeit kinda cheesy. But that is what made it so good. They really messed up on that aspect.
That site is amazing. I don't even know what a "ad" is anymore.
However, I would like to see somebody figure out how to open links in tabs. That would be so much easier then making it open in a new window.
I agree with you there. I really liked when I was in Europe and knowing that the price on the price tag is the price I will pay, including GST, PST, and whatever other tax the government wants.
I completely agree! I would have loved to see some puppet-magic with Yoda. That would have really made the movie awesome, but they did not. Most movies these days are screwing puppetery and going with CG scenes. CG scenes are good, but they just look so fake. I mean Yoda did not look real. In the original triology, he looked real. I think they failed in that aspect, they could have used more puppet magic. However, on the whole the movie was okay.
I have to say why not just spend $11 CDN and go see the bloody movie in a theatre. Its quality is better in every aspect. I find it rather pathetic that people don't even want to see a good movie (yah, I liked it) in theatres.
I thought that as well. I just found out that you can even drag the boxes around the page. I find this a nifty feature. I do like the classic-google better though.
I have to agree. I would love to be able access all that information on my homepage. I visit Slashdot, GMail, and Google about 100000 times a day so it would be nice with them all in one little place.
I hail the Google-Overlords.
That would be nice to see. I assume that they would release an open source type OS if they did make one. I would most likely not use it because I lose all the stuff that is compatiable with Windows (Plus I am just too damn lazy to back-up everything).
I think if Google really wanted to stab Microsoft would be to make the software open-source and be able to run all windows-based products. I do not believe that this will ever happen, but I would find it neat and would switch to it ASAP.
I honestly don't think they would make it suck. They most likely realize that it is better then what they have. If they were to buy it, I would say they would just take all the algorithms and just use them in their own searchs. Think of it more as taking the enemy and stealing everything they own. Then killing it.
Not being in the recording industry I don't know. But yah, I have to agree with you, most of what is out there today is pure crap. I mean seriously, it is so phony and fake it's pathetic. That is why I prefer smaller more local bands. Normally it is better then whatever 'mainstream' crap you can get. (Just look at American Idol stars)
Britney Spears is sure as hell not an artist. She is just given stuff to sing, then everyone else makes it better through digital re-enhancment.
CDs are so damn expensive it's pathetic. Just for a simple 20-track CD cost me about $22 CDN. I mean seriously, this is just a guess, it takes maybe a few million at most to produce an album? (Anyone who records CDs can correct me). A CD costs a good $30ish for 100. Why should we pay so much for an album. I mean if we here that they sell a couple million, they have now made back their money and a profit. I think this is a good thing buisness-wise, but you would still make a profit, and probably get more people to buy CDs, if you just lowered the damn price!
-semi-rant off-
I rarely buy music, but when I do, it sure is a hell of a lot of money.
I have no clue what the situtation is like here in Canada, but it is not as bad as the states.
I will continue to buy CDs regardless if they are funding the lawsuits. The reason I buy CDs is because the music I listen to is hard to find on the net. I've search bittorrent, e-mule, and limewire for the same songs and they rarely come up with anything.
Of course, if you stop buying CDs, how will you get new music?
Slashdot Mirror
is that no one thought of this before now.
That is because it is too obvious. You see, in science you need to find the most complex way to solve a problem (it makes you sound smarter and you sounds like you know what you are talking about)
Excellent. I really need to find the disk and re-install that game.
Hmm.. I know at our public library, you can walk right in and sit down at a desk and just access a high-speed wireless internet. It's great.
I have to agree with you there. Unless they have some sort of complex system for when you lose your phone. That is the only problem with all this technology. If you lose one device, someone has access to everything about you and you are fairly screwed.
I downloaded Keyhole, the software, and I managed to zoom in on my many key cities in Europe, Paris and Rome. I suspect they will have Europe done as well.
I was thinking this morning where the weekly Google new feature would be posted. I got my wish. I can live another week!
New to Cross-Galaxy Channel "Humans". In this episode, we watch how these pathetic little humans debate between religion and science and how one is better then the other.
I agree. It is pathetic. If you cannot find a reason for an attack or cause of something bad, it is linked to terrosists / terrorism. I mean, those terrorists must be busy doing all their "evil" things to fund their operations aganist America.
While I was driving home from the movie, I was talking with my friends on how freaking sweet it would be if they had used tech from the first three movies. I really enjoy that old-style look compared to the CGI crap they got nowadays. I mean look at Yoda. He was so fake and I just wouldn't believe it. In the original triology, he looked a lot better, albeit kinda cheesy. But that is what made it so good. They really messed up on that aspect.
I agree. What is an ad?
I know that. I think my poorly worded phrase ment to open it via HTML, like target="_new"
That site is amazing. I don't even know what a "ad" is anymore. However, I would like to see somebody figure out how to open links in tabs. That would be so much easier then making it open in a new window.
I have to agree with you there. They must be hiding something up their sleeves that is "revolutionary". Or it just sucks.
I agree with you there. I really liked when I was in Europe and knowing that the price on the price tag is the price I will pay, including GST, PST, and whatever other tax the government wants.
I completely agree! I would have loved to see some puppet-magic with Yoda. That would have really made the movie awesome, but they did not. Most movies these days are screwing puppetery and going with CG scenes. CG scenes are good, but they just look so fake. I mean Yoda did not look real. In the original triology, he looked real. I think they failed in that aspect, they could have used more puppet magic. However, on the whole the movie was okay.
I agree. I happen to like the extra features. If I didn't I would simply switch it off. I don't get why people are complaining
I have to say why not just spend $11 CDN and go see the bloody movie in a theatre. Its quality is better in every aspect. I find it rather pathetic that people don't even want to see a good movie (yah, I liked it) in theatres.
I thought that as well. I just found out that you can even drag the boxes around the page. I find this a nifty feature. I do like the classic-google better though.
I have to agree. I would love to be able access all that information on my homepage. I visit Slashdot, GMail, and Google about 100000 times a day so it would be nice with them all in one little place. I hail the Google-Overlords.
That would be nice to see. I assume that they would release an open source type OS if they did make one. I would most likely not use it because I lose all the stuff that is compatiable with Windows (Plus I am just too damn lazy to back-up everything). I think if Google really wanted to stab Microsoft would be to make the software open-source and be able to run all windows-based products. I do not believe that this will ever happen, but I would find it neat and would switch to it ASAP.
I honestly don't think they would make it suck. They most likely realize that it is better then what they have. If they were to buy it, I would say they would just take all the algorithms and just use them in their own searchs. Think of it more as taking the enemy and stealing everything they own. Then killing it.
Not being in the recording industry I don't know. But yah, I have to agree with you, most of what is out there today is pure crap. I mean seriously, it is so phony and fake it's pathetic. That is why I prefer smaller more local bands. Normally it is better then whatever 'mainstream' crap you can get. (Just look at American Idol stars)
Britney Spears is sure as hell not an artist. She is just given stuff to sing, then everyone else makes it better through digital re-enhancment.
I agree!
CDs are so damn expensive it's pathetic. Just for a simple 20-track CD cost me about $22 CDN. I mean seriously, this is just a guess, it takes maybe a few million at most to produce an album? (Anyone who records CDs can correct me). A CD costs a good $30ish for 100. Why should we pay so much for an album. I mean if we here that they sell a couple million, they have now made back their money and a profit. I think this is a good thing buisness-wise, but you would still make a profit, and probably get more people to buy CDs, if you just lowered the damn price!
-semi-rant off-
I rarely buy music, but when I do, it sure is a hell of a lot of money.
My friend tried to convince me he was real.
I have no clue what the situtation is like here in Canada, but it is not as bad as the states.
I will continue to buy CDs regardless if they are funding the lawsuits. The reason I buy CDs is because the music I listen to is hard to find on the net. I've search bittorrent, e-mule, and limewire for the same songs and they rarely come up with anything.
Of course, if you stop buying CDs, how will you get new music?