Slashdot Mirror


Google Releases Earth to Beta

Cros13 writes "Google has released a beta of it's Google Earth software to subscribers of the existing Keyhole service. New features include 3D models of buildings in selected cities, input from your gps receiver and a better search system. I have posted screenshots here and here." This product is in competition with Microsoft's Virtual Earth, as we reported earlier.

310 comments

  1. Indiana... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    looks a little boring

    1. Re:Indiana... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try looking via Google Earth, it might look more interesting.

    2. Re:Indiana... by takeya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Google Releases Earth to Beta

      Great to see the final version is out!
      Ba dum tsss

    3. Re:Indiana... by bob+zee · · Score: 0

      I guess you have never been to the Only Race In The World.

    4. Re:Indiana... by Itanshi · · Score: 1

      You needed a map to tell you that? (is a hoosier) looks nice, i wonder what that keyhole community bbs thing is about

    5. Re:Indiana... by Trevahaha · · Score: 1

      OMG No.. It's freaking awesome! A lot of new features that weren't in Keyhole, like flying a driving route. Plus it integrates with Google now and you can get streaming layers - it's really nice.

    6. Re:Indiana... by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, looks really useful for those who use a helicopter to get downtown.

    7. Re:Indiana... by Trevahaha · · Score: 1

      You don't?

  2. Slick! by caino59 · · Score: 1

    So when does John Doe get to use it?

    1. Re:Slick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to subscribers of the existing Keyhole service

    2. Re:Slick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If John Doe is a Keyhole subscriber, John Doe can use it all he wants to.

    3. Re:Slick! by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't. You think adwords is the only way Google wants to make money?

    4. Re:Slick! by caino59 · · Score: 1

      Well, then will this be replacing the keyhole service?

      or just used in conjunction with it?

      Seems kind of redundant to me...

    5. Re:Slick! by chachob · · Score: 1

      Thursday.

    6. Re:Slick! by cjwl · · Score: 1

      I have a Keyhole LT license and was invited to download Google Earth. It's not free, but pretty cheap.

    7. Re:Slick! by Strolls · · Score: 1
      So when does John Doe get to use it?
      John Doe's dead, you insensitive clod!
    8. Re:Slick! by Snard · · Score: 1

      Thursday.
      I could never get the hang of Thursdays.

      I hope this beta product is released (to the mice) before it's destroyed. Of course, I hear that a backup copy exists somewhere.

      --
      - Mike
  3. FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else think of that cool map/globe from Snow Crash?

    FP!

    1. Re:FP? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Actually, It reminds me more of a scene from Ghost in the Shell when they're tracking the vehicles through a 3D wireframe of the city. ...which, combining this with the Ride Finder, would be pretty much the exact same thing if they updated in real time!
      =Smidge=

  4. The Windypundit article by metlin · · Score: 4, Informative


    Why wasn't a link to the Windypundit article placed in the blurb?

    It's just off the page and contains a lot more information.

    1. Re:The Windypundit article by fm6 · · Score: 1

      That would require actually reading TFA. Slashdot editors who do that are summarily fired!

  5. hmm by professorhojo · · Score: 5, Funny

    i know all the words in that title, but i just can't parse that sentence.

    1. Re:hmm by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You watch Fox and CNN too much. Believe it or not, most everything can be used to commit any number of terrorist acts, but a vast majority of people just use these things for what they're intended to be used for. "X can be used for terrorism and therefore should be banned/watched/curtailed" is a recent invention of the current administration to justify pushing their agenda.

      If you ban Google Earth on the ground, then also ban Hotmail (those terrorist email communications!), keyboard (they type the emails with 'em!!), batteries (they power the bombs they describe in the emails with 'em!!!), and nail clippers (they won't be able to make the bombs if their nails are too long). etc.

      Stop being paranoid...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:hmm by whitehatlurker · · Score: 2, Funny
      i just can't parse that sentence.

      Well, it's simple: "Google" released control of Earth (our planet) [all hail our Google overlords] to the planet Beta [all hail our new Betan overlords].

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    3. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What for? Just ban the damn terrorists...

    4. Re:hmm by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      I read that as:

      Google Raises Earth to Beta

    5. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, I seem to remember lots of Democrats and Democratic administrations saying:

      "Guns can be used by criminals to KILL so we have to ban them!"

      Of course most firearms are used responsibly for defense, police work, hunting, target shooting, etc.

      This behavior is typical of all politicians that do not respect the rights of citizens - so don't put all the blame on the current administration.

    6. Re:hmm by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of an MSNBC article from Dr. Bob Arnot (sp?) where he implied that the reason the 9/11 terrorists picked the WTC was because they were the largest buildings in NYC in Flight Simulator.

      Apparently he's never seen a NYC postcard...

    7. Re:hmm by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Right now, it's the current administration that's doing it. I could care less if other administrations have done it in the past - what's going on now needs to STOP.

  6. And in related news. by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Magrathea sues for copyright infringment.

    1. Re:And in related news. by Nos. · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was going to be so clever and post a link to a google maps view of Norway and exclaiming how beautiful the Fjords were. That is until I scrolled east of NA, past the British isles, and found.... Alaska!

    2. Re:And in related news. by Rabid_Llama · · Score: 0

      rofl.

    3. Re:And in related news. by jusdisgi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try it clicked on the satelite view. That shows the whole earth, whereas the map view only has the U.S. and U.K.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    4. Re:And in related news. by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Ahh, isn't it beautiful

    5. Re:And in related news. by lostwanderer147 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how will we ever find out? For all we know, the notice will be posted in the basement of a Magrathean worker's barracks, buried in a pile of porno mags, and we'll only have one hour to register our complaint.

    6. Re:And in related news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was going to be so clever and post a link to a google maps view of Norway and exclaiming how beautiful the Fjords were. That is until I scrolled east of NA, past the British isles, and found.... Alaska!

      OMG! The fabled NorthWest passage (backwards)!

    7. Re:And in related news. by Mr.+Capris · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the "Beware of the Leopard" sign...
      And yes, the lights don't work, and the stairs are gone.
      No, I am not a direct blood relation of Genghis Khan...yet...

      --
      Have you seen the arrow?
    8. Re:And in related news. by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      And SCO too!!! Don't forget us!!! That was OUR code, and you know it!!!

      --
      I am Spartacus
    9. Re:And in related news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as you can remember someone once won a prize for them.

    10. Re:And in related news. by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should zoom in enough to see Slartibartfast's handiwork.

    11. Re:And in related news. by lostwanderer147 · · Score: 1
      No, I am not a direct blood relation of Genghis Khan...yet...

      How exactly would one become a direct blood relative of Genghis Khan if one is not already? Seriously, though, how?

    12. Re:And in related news. by Atragon · · Score: 1

      It involves retroactive birth control...

  7. Earth Beta Release by Sandbox+Conspiracy · · Score: 5, Funny

    So I've been living on the alpha version this entire time?

    --
    Why am I on Slashdot? I'm bored. Why am I bored? I'm on Slashdot.
    1. Re:Earth Beta Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, just the Open Source Version

    2. Re:Earth Beta Release by HanClinto · · Score: 1

      Ah, so the perpetually unstable release

    3. Re:Earth Beta Release by nxtr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly. It's plauged by a malfunctioning thermostat that cycles every 10000 years. It's also got a random system crash that requires a total reboot. No one's sure when next one will hit but with a 65 million year uptime, we're due for one soon.

    4. Re:Earth Beta Release by doormat · · Score: 1

      So I've been living on the alpha version this entire time?

      So that would explain all the trolls. Hmm... it neatly coincides with the introduction of CAPCHA techniques...

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    5. Re:Earth Beta Release by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      That would explain a lot.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    6. Re:Earth Beta Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So I've been living on the alpha version this entire time?"

      well, there are a lot of bugs. hundreds or even thousands per square meter.

      okay, shoot me.

    7. Re:Earth Beta Release by rovingeyes · · Score: 1

      Yeah those damn rats were satisfied. For further releases check the Hitchhiker's guide.

    8. Re:Earth Beta Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. And in Earth RC1 I am told that humans are not a bug but a feature.

    9. Re:Earth Beta Release by imroy · · Score: 1

      I think you mean *mice*... sigh... some people just aren't serious when it comes to their nerdiness.

    10. Re:Earth Beta Release by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      Do you think there is anyway to get my account transfered to the Beta and and the final version, or will there be a server wipe?

    11. Re:Earth Beta Release by varmittang · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and some how Debian Sarge is going to beat them to release.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12. Re:Earth Beta Release by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It turns out that all the Earth Alpha versions kept spitting an answer, being "42", but never saying what the question was.

    13. Re:Earth Beta Release by Meostro · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...but with a 65 million year uptime...
      Those 16-bit unsigned ints will be the death of us, literally! Y2K's got nothing on Y2^16 Millennia...
    14. Re:Earth Beta Release by zoomzit · · Score: 1

      Earth's in beta release, eh? Looks like God's release schedule is just a tad quicker than debian...

    15. Re:Earth Beta Release by atezun · · Score: 1

      You can blame the marketing department of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation for that one. I swear those mindless jerks will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.

    16. Re:Earth Beta Release by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's more important, are there going to be separate servers for the different communities? From the problems between the "USA" and "Terrorist" clans we can clearly see that split servers might be a good idea... Also, I've heard rumours about the "USA" clan trying to explore an area, called "Mars", which so far isn't available for the players. Maybe that's the second server?

      Too bad no one's heard anything from the developer for the last 2000 years. Talk about a bad information policy...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    17. Re:Earth Beta Release by mikiN · · Score: 1

      You just have to wait long enough, there'll be a question, eventually.
      Unless the Vogons hack the server and wipe the disks before Earth Alpha runs to completion, of course.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    18. Re:Earth Beta Release by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Oh no! this has already happened... never mind.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  8. Obligatory humorous post. by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Zonk, if you don't word your headlines more carefully, you're just begging people to make silly posts like this one: Earth is still in beta? After 3 billion years?

    1. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by ral315 · · Score: 1

      Earth is still in beta? After 3 billion years?

      Well, let's just say Google likes to keep its products in beta for a while.

    2. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Earth is still in beta? After 3 billion years?"

      Gmail will probably be a beta just as long.

    3. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by SlayerofGods · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because there's still several billion bugs in the system :D

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    4. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 1
      Earth is still in beta? After 3 billion years?
      Yeah, the mice never tracked down the bug introduced by the arrival of the B-Ark.
      --
      Where's the Kaboom?
      There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    5. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by bryan8m · · Score: 1

      Apparently, Google is preparing its world-wide takeover. And the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, not 3.

    6. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by dfiguero · · Score: 1

      Yeap... still a lot of bugs... err humans... err bugs to fix.

      --
      My penguin ate my sig
    7. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by cybersaga · · Score: 1

      Silly, Google doesn't rule the world yet.

    8. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by matth · · Score: 1

      Actually I think it's more like 6,000 years.. not 4.5billion.

    9. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by EddieBurkett · · Score: 1
      Earth is still in beta? After 3 billion years?
      At least it made it to beta. Imagine if it was vaporware. 3 billion years to get a planet out of Beta doesn't sound so bad when you realize that in 3 billion years Duke Nukem Forever will still be in development.
      --
      The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
    10. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by sharkey · · Score: 1

      And most of them think that digital watches are a pretty neat idea.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wasps and ants are features not bugs

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    12. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by fm6 · · Score: 1
      And the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, not 3.
      If you're going to nitpick, you should add "according to current theory"!
    13. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I'm taking bets on whether Harlan Ellison will finish "Last Dangerous Visions" before then!

    14. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Duke Nukem Forever is the clear record holder here.

    15. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      You sure? I can't think of a reason for them, and believe me I've been trying.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    16. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by HawkingMattress · · Score: 1

      Earth is still in beta? After 3 billion years?

      Sure but it's free software dude. If you want the releases to go out faster please submit a patch and stop bitchin', it's doens't help.

      Sincerely, GOD
      --
      Emacs is my editor of choice.

    17. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by Kiffer · · Score: 1
      If you're going to nitpick, you should add "according to current theory"!


      Or better yet "according to the currently available evidence, the world appears to be approximately 4.54 billion years old, however it could be even older or possibly as young as 4.3 billion years old."

      http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.html

      oldest rock = 4.03 Ga
      oldest crystals = 4.3 Ga (4.4 also reported.
    18. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Debian should be up to 5.0 by then.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    19. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Wasps and ants are nature's garbage collection. They prevent objects implementing the "organic" interface from overflowing the stack.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    20. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by mike.newton · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? It's only been 4500 years! :P

    21. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      Yes. True bugs consist only of the Hemiptera order, and do not include the Hymenoptera order, which includes the ants and wasps.

      [/bio-geek]

    22. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by aneeshm · · Score: 0

      I wonder ........

      What if Google managed Debian ? What would be the release cycles like ? A new release in he trillions of years ? ;)

    23. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that was the joke ...

    24. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If you'd clean up your source code, maybe you'd get more patches!

    25. Re:Obligatory humorous post. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      All of which assumes that current models of geology and radioactive decay are even close to accurate. I don't know enough to have an opinion, but I seem to recall a time when 3 billion was the "official" figure. I kind of resent being "corrected" for citing an number which was valid the last time I read about the topic.

  9. Pretty Good by Keystroker · · Score: 0

    I remember seeing something similar to this in a Fat Joe music video (don't ask). I was always wondering when something like this would be released. However, as Google continues to expand into software markets, they move closer and closer to an anti-trust lawsuit.

    --
    Avarus animus nullo satiatur lucro.
  10. What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Other than the "wow neat" factor, and nifty interface, what are some actual uses/features in Keyhole/Google Earth that aren't covered by things like Google Maps.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by tgd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Planning terrorist operations, didn't you read the /. article about the government passing a law to make it easier to get your records from your ISP? They want to know who downloaded Google Earth, duh!

    2. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by VAXcat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm a pilot, and it's durned handy to be able to get a satellite eye's view of an airport I haven't been to before, so's I can pick out some landmarks. It's not that easy spotting a weedpatch airstrip from the air the first time over it, and the aerial photos in Keyhole help, especially the slant view feature.

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    3. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by Reverberant · · Score: 3, Informative

      As an engineer, Google Earth (or in my case, more likely MS's Virtual Earth since MS has at least hinted at Mac compatibility via Firefox, while Google Earth seems to be Windows only), would be a godsend - I spend a lot of time looking over aerial photos to identify buildings (or 'sensitive receptors' as we call them in the noise biz) and the more detail we can get, the better we can make our estimates.

      For example, having a clearer indication of building height or terrain features can help us create better sound propagation models that accounts for shielding or diffraction. Sure, GE/VE won't give us exact values, but every little bit helps. Topo maps help a bit, but if you've ever had to model an area with complex geometry (say San Fran or Seattle) topos become unwieldy pretty quickly.

      We spend a lot of money right now sending people to certain project areas to help get a better sense of the terrain and building geometries. Having an fairly accurate 3D model of these features can save hundreds of thousands of dollars just in travel costs.

    4. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by cybersaga · · Score: 1

      I'm sure shipping companies could make good use of it.

    5. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by Jagasian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cue posts about possible uses for terrorism.

    6. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i use it to find neighbors with pools.

    7. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      So far, all of these (except the building heights one) have been uses that are easily already covered by Google maps. Having an isometric view vs. a straight-on view may help, but all of the information is still there. Is there anything that Keyhole _can_ do that Google Maps very definitely and specifically can not (other than eye-candy)?

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    8. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by rsborg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Other than the "wow neat" factor, and nifty interface, what are some actual uses/features in Keyhole/Google Earth that aren't covered by things like Google Maps.

      • don't discount the "wow neat" factor... it's great at parties :-)
      • Real Estate. I use it to look at open homes I am interested in, and to see if there are any things like trailer parks, railroads, cemetaries or other things nearby which might detract from the value/comfort of the potential location.
      Well worth $29/yr.
      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    9. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 2, Funny
      especially the slant view feature.

      You racist clod!!

      OR

      Oh, so you fly into Japan a lot?

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    10. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by philgross · · Score: 1

      Google Earth covers the entire earth, and has terrain height maps. Many cities outside the US and UK have hi-res satellite images. You can fly through the Grand Canyon, wander around Beijing's Forbidden City, stroll through Budapest, etc., all from the comfort of your desk. Highly addictive for the would-be globehopper.

    11. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by kouhoutek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I signed up for Keyhole in January, and was a little bummed when Google Maps came out, thinking I had wasted my money.

      Google Earth sure made up for it:
      • Maps is plenty slick, but Earth's interface is still better if you want to have a look around an area
      • you can take driving directions, and actually replay the whole route, isometrically, in 3D, looking down and where your car would be
      • you get your custom push pins, so places of interest become a permanent fixtures to your application
      • you have a greater variety of layers you can apply to your images
      • you can display maps with any conceivable orientation, and can set the altitude of your POV
      • GPS aware
      • $29/year is cheap cheap cheap
      And don't understimate wow neat. I was on a customer site, and the software I was training them on flaked out. I fired up Keyhole to look for a restuarant, "forgetting" my computer was still hooked to the projector. The class took the next hour or so looking for their houses, while I quietly worked the issue with support.
    12. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by jholzer · · Score: 1

      I use it to plan hikes. This, some topographic maps and a GPS remove a lot of unknowns from a hike I've never done before. Unfortunately, not all locations have the higher resolution imagery.

    13. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by sho222 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I recently purchased a home long distance, and using Keyhole was just about the only way I can imagine doing something like that. Being able to get a bird's eye view of a potiential house, overlaying local light rail and subways (with correct colors for the lines no less), finding nearby restaurants and shops, viewing local crime stats, and creating custom "push pins" in a folder structure to track all of the homes were just some of the indispensable features present in Keyhole that Google Maps just didn't cover adequately.

      As a Keyhole subscriber, I was given an upgrade to the Beta of Google Earth, and man... almost everything on my "wish list" that I made while using Keyhole is present in gEarth. I wish I had this when I was buying my house!

    14. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by greenstork · · Score: 3, Informative

      A friend and I were out hiking this weekend and thought about how nice it would have been to see a satellite topo image of our route ahead of time or even to be able to plan trips that way. We both conceded that it was just a matter of time, with the advent of Google Maps.

      This type of program just confirms it. I think it would be tremendously useful although it seems like a stretch at this point, that it would feature actual trails. Mapping streets has been done but inputting trails and their exact elevations and routes seems trickier.

    15. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by Lord+Haha · · Score: 1

      1. Use Google Earth
      2. Make Plan to rule the earth
      3. ???
      4. take over the world / profit (if your the business maglomaniac)

    16. Re:What would you use Keyhole / Google Earth for? by Cros13 · · Score: 1

      dude,

      i've been talking to a friend at keyhole....

      there's a linux version on the cards!!!!

      --
      --cros13
  11. It's its not it's! by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And somewhere on earth there's a special place for people who can't use the apostrophe correctly. Wish I knew where that was.

    Of course "their" might have been a better choice anyway.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:It's its not it's! by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty great subject line right there. These are like second grade mistakes.

      But, I guess we're all headed for a chatroom-English world anyway.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    2. Re:It's its not it's! by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The funny thing is that "it's" takes an extra keystroke and reflects a deliberate placement of a character. And that means that the typist thinks it should be there. I'm rarely one to bitch about typos here, and I've certainly made my share of them (no question!), but that sort of thing in the headline or summary is just sort of embarassing, and contributes to the further poor use of it by more monkey-see-monkey-do people. I mean, the apostrophe has a system! Slashdotters are all about systematic nuances, and certainly love to kvetch about things like code syntax... so, here's a bit of code that's continually misused. Let's kvetch, I say.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:It's its not it's! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Funny

      I used to live with an English major who did her darndest to help out my grammar skills and the like. "Its" and "It's" would always throw me. I'm pretty sure that you drop the apostrophe for possession, "Its Ryan's bike," and leave it there for the contraction "it is" (ie "It's Ryan's bike"). As you can see from my examples, however, it still confuses the hell out of me. So, since I figure half the time you need the apostrophe and half the time you don't, I make sure to throw the apostrophe in there about every other "It's." That way, overall, there is a roughly correct corrolation between the two.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    4. Re:It's its not it's! by codefrog · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd love to see a particular "it's" warning in the message-posting process. As in, when you submit your article or post containing that particular contraction, the system asks you if you know the difference between "it's" and "its" and if you're sure you used the right one. This particular user error is seen way, way too often around here and drags us all down.

    5. Re:It's its not it's! by eurleif · · Score: 1

      The "it's" in "it's Ryan's bike" isn't posessive: Ryan owns the bike, not the word "it". But the "its" in "the laptop drains its batteries" is posessive: the "it" stands for the laptop, which owns its batteries. As a rule of thumb, if you can sensibly replace the abreviation with "it is", the word to use is "it's". Otherwise, it's always "its".

    6. Re:It's its not it's! by teeker · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a job for...

      Bob The Angry Flower!

      --
      teeker
    7. Re:It's its not it's! by jnicholson · · Score: 1
      Simple rule: pronouns don't get apostrophes in the possessive.

      Yours / Mine / Hers / His / Its

      See? Easy!

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
    8. Re:It's its not it's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And somewhere on earth there's a special place for people who can't use the apostrophe correctly. Wish I knew where that was.
      Unfortunatly, that place is called the United States of America.
    9. Re:It's its not it's! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      See? Easy!

      Not only do I know you're right, I also know that at some fundamental level my brain will figure out a way to fcsk it up;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    10. Re:It's its not it's! by value_added · · Score: 0

      That was painful to read so I opted not to quote any part of it. ;-)

      A bit general, but what the hell ...

      Rule 1. All contractions demand apostrophes. If you're trying to fashion a contraction of "it" and "is" you need an apostrophe This yields "it's". A contraction of "what" and "is" yields "what's". If you're confused already, stop using contractions and write out your words in full like a grownup. Or maybe turn the baseball hat around and use "whassup".

      Rule 2. All possessives demand apostrophes.

      Rule 3. If you can distinguish between a possessive form and a contraction, there is no Rule 3.

      In the rare event you need a possessive for some entity referred to as "it", rewrite the bloody sentence. Go directly to Rule 2 and don't look back. Before you do, however, note that constructs like "It's big pointy teeth.", while correct, are generally better written as "Godzilla's big pointy teeth."

      BTW, it's "correlation". Syntax is important, but in language, you won't get there unless you're able to enunciate your words properly. Put another way, if you can't type worth a sh*t, the correct placement of braces won't help.

    11. Re:It's its not it's! by mph · · Score: 1
      Simple rule: pronouns don't get apostrophes in the possessive.
      Not so simple counterexample: one's.
    12. Re:It's its not it's! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      In the rare event you need a possessive for some entity referred to as "it", rewrite the bloody sentence. Go directly to Rule 2 and don't look back. Before you do, however, note that constructs like "It's big pointy teeth.", while correct, are generally better written as "Godzilla's big pointy teeth."

      Well, sure, but in practice, prose written that way tends to be, well, terrible. For example:

      "Godzilla came crashing ashore. Was Godzilla male or a female? Nobody knew. Behind Godzilla grew a wake of destruction. Beneath each of Godzilla's footsteps ended the hopes and dreams of Tokyo's merchants, monks, men, and mariners. 'Look out!' they screamed, 'here Godzilla comes!' And then they died under Godzilla's giant feet, and skewered upon Godzilla's Pointy Teeth(tm)."

      Well, other than sounding like a bad translation of the reverse translation of a secondary translation of a Norse poem, the point is that there are a couple of places in there where an "it" or maybe an "it's" would actually improve the flow of the text. In spoken English, you don't usually come across:

      "Where's the water cooler?"
      "The water cooler is down the hall."

      "Down the hall" is more likely in conversation, and it implies an understanding of the subject. "It's down the hall" works pretty well too. But repeating the name of subject is just as clunky in writing as it is when spoken, I think. But's that my take on it (so to speak).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    13. Re:It's its not it's! by jnicholson · · Score: 1

      Only if you mean one's complement. Ones own personal demons shouldn't cause one to mess this up.

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
    14. Re:It's its not it's! by mph · · Score: 1
      Only if you mean one's complement. Ones own personal demons shouldn't cause one to mess this up.
      Not according to Fowler's Modern English Usage (3rd ed.):
      [T]he impersonal one always can, and now usually does, provide its own possessive etc.--one's, oneself, and one. Thus One does not like to have one's word doubted; If one fell, one would hurt oneself badly.
      (Emphasis as published.) There is no reference to the form ones.
    15. Re:It's its not it's! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      but he's wrong. Its possessive is "its." Rule two is about as valid as "I before e except after c." Weird.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  12. Google's... Earth ? by alexhs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since when does Earth belongs to Google ?

    Moreover I'm worrying about Earth reaching release.
    Everyone knows that vogons will destroy earth before it happens, so don't let that happen !

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Google's... Earth ? by lb746 · · Score: 0

      all your earth are belong to google?

  13. Beta was already out by GaryWK · · Score: 0

    Wasn't the beta version out a long time ago? I remember getting an email about it asking me to download it about 3 weeks ago.

  14. *StarCraft stimpack sound* by KefabiMe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah, that's better. My dosage of Google news. Now I can start my day!

    1. Re:*StarCraft stimpack sound* by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      I was thinking this morning where the weekly Google new feature would be posted. I got my wish. I can live another week!

  15. Re:Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ditto. The Angry Flower would be disappointed in this news post, you illiterate buffoons.

  16. Re:Frosty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed that Google added features yet somehow managed to break features that were already working (though they clearly state this in the release).

    For example, you cannot type in cities outside the US/UK/Ca, nor can you type in a landmark (e.g. Mt. Saint Helens)

    I can only assume those features are broken now because they are improving them in some way...

  17. As seen in Snow Crash by visgoth · · Score: 1

    One step closer to the Earth program Hiro got in the book. Now if there were realtime updates of the datasets, showing things like moving cars and people, it would be cool and also very scary.

    --
    My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    1. Re:As seen in Snow Crash by torpor · · Score: 1

      I registered EarthBrowser when I first saw it .. its maybe not the right degree of detail (yet), but it sure is fun to surf webcams with ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:As seen in Snow Crash by Angostura · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly.

  18. I was wondering why... by aicrules · · Score: 1

    this world was so fucked up....it's JUST NOW being released as beta. Alpha releases are always shitty!

    Nirvana/Utopia here we come!

  19. Hello Al Qaeda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother traveling to the US or Europe to scope out targets when you can do it with this nifty new package?

  20. Crazy Hoosiers... by TylerL82 · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://photos11.flickr.com/16639588_c9da324958_o.j pg

    Um...
    Why does it look like Indiana isn't mapped?
    There are lots of worse states out there...

    1. Re:Crazy Hoosiers... by freshman_a · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too. It appears (to me anyway) that the state of Mass. is the same way.

    2. Re:Crazy Hoosiers... by TylerL82 · · Score: 1

      And New Jersey too.
      I'm left with no choice but to consider it a vast government conspiracy.

    3. Re:Crazy Hoosiers... by Webs+101 · · Score: 2, Funny
      It is mapped. They've turned the whole state into an Indy car track/parking lot/amusement park.

      Sorta like that NASCAR oval that used to be Dallas/Fort Worth and the Massachussetts Memorial Hockey Arena.

      --

      "Even for Slashdot, that was a very obscure reference!" - Anonymous Coward

    4. Re:Crazy Hoosiers... by Takyn-U-RUN · · Score: 1

      It appears to me that this is just that a different, high-res set of images has been used for Indiana (and other areas that appear the same color). For instance, check out this Google Maps image, which has New Jersey and Massachusets similarly "off-colored".

      What I want to know is, why does Indiana only have the high-res on this new service, unlike those other two states, which have it on Google Maps as well? As a Hoosier, I'd appreciate being able to see my city in greater detail than these "green-images" which transforum whole blocks into black-green smudges. It's almost like an old-school Game Boy.

    5. Re:Crazy Hoosiers... by pizen · · Score: 1

      "Garden State" my ass.

    6. Re:Crazy Hoosiers... by GabeK · · Score: 1

      It is mapped...all of Jersey and Indiana are mapped out in high res aeriel photographs, not just "default" terrain maps.

      --

      [sig] 10 + 10 = 100 [/sig]
    7. Re:Crazy Hoosiers... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      It's autumn in Massachusetts but summer everywhere else (the screenshot is clearly from last week). New Jersey's looked like that since they finished paving it. Indiana, however, is just odd.

      (The image data that Google is currently using in this and Maps is composed of the best images they could find from old data for each location, and these don't necessarily match in features like time of year, time of day, and weather; however, Indiana only seems to be grey in this screenshot, not in the data on Maps)

    8. Re:Crazy Hoosiers... by steve_bryan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The reason Indiana looks like it does in the photo is that the entire state is mapped in high resolution. The same is true of Missouri, New Jersey and Massachusetts. In general the data sets vary in resolution for various places on Earth with large cities and even not so large cities in the US being shown in much greater detail. Before Keyhole was acquired by Google there tended to be an update about once a month with more places available in higher resolution.

      It seems likely that essentially all of the Earth will be available in what we consider high resolution eventually. Anyone who has had an opportunity to use Google Earth would not ask why it is more useful than Google Maps. Being able to browse smoothly and effortlessly with personal bookmarks for repeated reference is the sort of thing that makes computers and broadband connections actually useful. For once the experience is meeting the challenge of our expectations.

    9. Re:Crazy Hoosiers... by drew · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you've never been to Indiana- that's actually what it looks like.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  21. Closed Minded by mattmentecky · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a Google user that is beyond you're planet, I take offense to the fact that Google *only* included EARTH in there initial release!

    1. Re:Closed Minded by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Note to offworlders, including the parent poster and the author of the blurb: possessive pronouns do not contain apostrophes.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    2. Re:Closed Minded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As a Google user that is beyond you're planet..."

      You must be beyond our grammar rules, also.

    3. Re:Closed Minded by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a Google user that is beyond you're planet,

      Hi. Welcome to Earth. Please study up on our language. Earthlings who can't even manage a basic comprehension of their mother tongue are frequently ridiculed as idiots. We expect no less from "supreme species" such as yours.

    4. Re:Closed Minded by coopaq · · Score: 1
      Note to offworlders, including the parent poster and the author of the blurb: possessive pronouns do not contain apostrophes.

      As a user of a language where possessive pronouns do contain apostrophes I take offense to you comment!

    5. Re:Closed Minded by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      you're planet

      Are you accusing me of something?

    6. Re:Closed Minded by msblack · · Score: 1
      As a Google user that is beyond you're planet, I take offense to the fact that Google *only* included EARTH in there initial release!

      It looks like the grammar nannies missed a second error: The highlighted word should be the pronoun "their."

      --
      signature pending slashdot approval
    7. Re:Closed Minded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says english was his mother tongue ?
      Why should the alien super species learn english ?

    8. Re:Closed Minded by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      Me - Hi. Welcome to Earth. Please study up on our language. Earthlings who can't even manage a basic comprehension of their mother tongue are frequently ridiculed as idiots. We expect no less from "supreme species" such as yours.

      Idiot - Who says english was his mother tongue?

      Nobody. Try reading it again. Maybe a couple times. Yeah, that oughta help.

      Idiot - Why should the alien super species learn english ?

      He's trying to use it. Fuck. Your name really suits you.

  22. Out the Windows by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wake me when they release one with a Total Perspective Vortex. I've got a fairycake craving.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Out the Windows by owlstead · · Score: 1

      I don't. If I read the book correctly, it was pretty old. Then again, we could not go by the script and safe a few souls by eating it early.

    2. Re:Out the Windows by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Ah, but in *my* Universe, the fairycake is fresh and tasty. Zaphod's was a beta.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  23. No, it's a backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Earth Mark 2.0"

  24. Young earther? by benhocking · · Score: 1, Informative
    After 3 billion years?
    You must be one of them "young earthers" I've heard about. (Most scientists put the earth at about 4.54 billion years old.)
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Young earther? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, before that it was in alpha...

    2. Re:Young earther? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      No, in order to qualify as a YE, you have to deny that "billion" is an actual number!

    3. Re:Young earther? by dhakbar · · Score: 1

      Find me a creationist who thinks the earth is any older than a few thousand years old...

  25. Those bastards... by Ancil · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I can't believe people just sit down and take this. WAKE UP, Google is leveraging their dominant position in search engines to corner online mapping!

    Oh wait. Providing a free, useful new service to consumers is only wrong when Microsoft does it. Sorry, I forgot.

    1. Re:Those bastards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google aren't forcing anybody to install their client, besides I assume a ff plugin that works under X is a little way off.

    2. Re:Those bastards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Oh wait. Providing a free, useful new service to consumers is only wrong when Microsoft does it.

      It's not free. It's only available to Keyhole subscribers.

      Yet another uninformed post that intends to take a shot at the Anti-MS crowd.

      Hint: It helps to RTFA.

    3. Re:Those bastards... by oever · · Score: 1

      In future news:
      2005-05-31 18:47:05 Google tracks browsing behavior (Your Rights Online,Google) (pending)

      also observed here

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    4. Re:Those bastards... by Ancil · · Score: 1

      Google aren't forcing anybody to install their client
      Ahhh yes, I remember the day when Bill Gates and his thugs "forced" me to install Windows. I certainly didn't choose between Windows, MacOS, and Linux. Definitely not.
  26. Like Google Maps as a local application by willith · · Score: 4, Informative

    Take the functionality of Google Maps and make it into a local application, and that's what you get here. Instead of JAvascript-powered click-n-drag scrolling, it's OpenGL or Direct3D buttery-smooth, with texture filtering to ease some of the pixelation on the imagery.

    The most amazing part is the driving directions--they're plotted out in front of you on the zoomable and scrollable earth, like Streets and Trips on steroids.

    The ability to measure arbitrary lines and paths, carried over from the previous version of Keyhole, adds a nifty dimension. Instead of staring at a feature in the satellite imagery and wondering, "How big is that, anyway?", you can measure it and find out. I used it to definitively settle which of the two routes I can take home from work is shorter.

    For $29, this app delivers, per dollar, more fun and utility combined than anything else I've ever purchased. You can use the layering features to do extremely useful stuff, like highlight the locations of ATMs, school district boundaries, golf courses, parks, show crime statistics, and even show placemarks set by people on the Keyhole web forum ("Look! I found a cool thing here!").

    Sounds a bit like I'm babbling, but this thing is seriously hella-cool.

    1. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Funny

      The question is when are they going to add a GPS link to this?
      Just imagine how cool it would be to tell it what model and color of car you have and get a real time display of your car driving on the road:)
      Okay this would best be used by your passenger/navigator.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by jusdisgi · · Score: 4, Funny

      For $29, this app delivers, per dollar, more fun and utility combined than anything else I've ever purchased.

      I suggest you take a quick look at two products: beer and condoms.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    3. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      show placemarks set by people on the Keyhole web forum ("Look! I found a cool thing here!")

      That was the feature I was hoping for after I checked out Keyhole. Now you can have stringers uploading data to your Globe. Some day we'll be able to do GPS mapping of photographs so that they can be plastered on those 3D projections of buildings.

      Like Snow Crash. Next they just have to build the Librarian.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by moranar · · Score: 1
      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    5. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by Snaller · · Score: 1

      For $29, this app delivers, per dollar, more fun and utility combined than anything else I've ever purchased.

      Yeah, but surely you have to keep paying. its not just a pay once use forever.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    6. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by telstar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suggest you take a quick look at two products: beer and condoms.

      Dude, the guy just got excited over school district boundaries and ATM locations. Please don't encourage him to reproduce.

    7. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by Trimbo2 · · Score: 1

      The most interesting thing about this story is that this tool isn't implemented as a web application. Just goes to show that even the might google are constrained by the limitations of the web browser.

      Forget proper CSS support / transparent images / etc and all the other trivial rubbish people bitch about on slashdot as to the way forward for web applications, they are *nowhere near* good enough.

      Roll on Avalon et. al. integrated into IE.

    8. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I suggest you take a quick look at two products: beer and condoms.
      Dude, the guy just got excited over school district boundaries and ATM locations. Please don't encourage him to reproduce.
      Not real familiar with condoms, are we?
    9. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by hyfe · · Score: 1
      I suggest you take a quick look at two products: beer and condoms.

      Hey, I bought condoms once.

      Boring buggers if you ask me, I'm still trying to figure at what to use them for.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    10. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's going to do with that... fill them up with beer and toss them off the roof?

    11. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Ugh - I just tried your suggestion and it sucks. It makes the beer taste horrible.

    12. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Not real familiar with condoms, are we?

      "I know, but y'know condoms only work like 97% of the time."
      "What? What? What?! Well they should put that on the box!"
      "They do!"
      "No they don't...well they should put it in huge black letters!"

    13. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Something tells me you aren't following the recommended procedure here.....use the beer *first* ....then follow the instructions on the condom.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    14. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because Keyhole was made LONG before google even had the thought of getting into maping numbnuts

    15. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, use of the former sometimes precludes use of the latter.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    16. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      It's all about dosage...

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    17. Re:Like Google Maps as a local application by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      That depends on the individual's physical attractiveness, surely?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  27. Free data sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Are there any free sources for the data used in these products? I'm thinking some kind of open source project, but without the data it'd be useless.

  28. geekier than thou by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    No, I thought of the cool map/ribbon from The Ringworld Engineers.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  29. I can't wait for the final release by lxs · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the last 4.5bn years we have struggled with an alpha version of the Earth.

    We can all remember Earth 0.1 , which was flat.

    Earth 0.2 was spherical but still lodged in the center of the universe.

    Earth 0.3 has served us well for over 200 years, but is still buggy as hell. The tectonics engine constantly crashes, causing massive earthquakes.

    I have good hopes for the beta of Earth, but for the final release I, and many users like me would like a bigger planet.

    1. Re:I can't wait for the final release by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      1,097,509,500,000,000,000,000 cubic meteres ought to be enough for anybody.
      Billus Gatos

    2. Re:I can't wait for the final release by marsvin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I wish they'd done Africa with glaciers.

    3. Re:I can't wait for the final release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Version 3 should be a lot better, but it's not until 3.11 that things will really start getting usable.

      I'll get me coat.

    4. Re:I can't wait for the final release by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Lovely fjords in Norway though. Nice crinkly coastline...

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    5. Re:I can't wait for the final release by evillorddan · · Score: 1

      There are definitely problems, but I must say I am very impressed by the graphics and physics. The real time raytracing in particular must require some hefty processing. I wonder if it runs linux...

    6. Re:I can't wait for the final release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I have good hopes for the beta of Earth, but for the final release I, and many users like me would like a bigger planet.


      You wouldn't be able to stand the gravity of Earth 1.0.

    7. Re:I can't wait for the final release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wi nøt trei a holiday in Sweden this yer?

  30. Wait a second... by mogrify · · Score: 1

    ... what's that out there in the Pacific Ocean? It looks like a conglomeration of floating debris centered around a couple of larger ships. And... is that a kayak? Wow, the resolution on this thing is amazing!

    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
    1. Re:Wait a second... by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

      Haven't you checked Google Labs recently? There's a project there called REASON.

      Microsoft will listen to REASON, I'm sure.

      --
      -EvilMagnus
    2. Re:Wait a second... by execute85 · · Score: 0

      Come on man, you really think Snow Crash references are going to be picked up?

  31. Sweet new game? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    Can't wait 'til there is a GTA mod.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  32. Big Diffence by joschm0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This product is in competition with Microsoft's Virtual Earth, as we reported earlier.

    Note: Google now has screenshots and Microsoft has only stated that MSN Virtual Earth service is to debut in the summer.

    --
    01/20/09
    1. Re:Big Diffence by Deviate_X · · Score: 2, Informative


      MSN have more than a screenshot, they have video. And unlike the google keyhole (google earth), msn virtual earth runs on Linux and OSX!


      Virtual Earth: MSN's answer to Google Maps


    2. Re:Big Diffence by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      MSN have more than a screenshot, they have video

      errr. so does Keyhole. Google Earth is just a beta. They don't need marketing material yet. They're not done.

  33. the Earth is still in Beta....? by mestreBimba · · Score: 1

    and here I'd though we had gone to gold years ago with the release of Adam 1.0...... they must have been debugging some of the problems with associated Eve software for all of these last few millenia.

    I will now duck and cover.

    --
    Fly Fish? Participate in our forum
  34. Can anyone comment on whether "Earth"... by rokzy · · Score: 1

    ...means "mostly USA" as with other Google services? would this be worth looking at for someone from the UK?

    1. Re:Can anyone comment on whether "Earth"... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Sure, I would think this program at least cover all 51 states.

    2. Re:Can anyone comment on whether "Earth"... by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      I downloaded Keyhole, the software, and I managed to zoom in on my many key cities in Europe, Paris and Rome. I suspect they will have Europe done as well.

    3. Re:Can anyone comment on whether "Earth"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK is more important than USA according to google. "UK" search gives about 628.000.000 hits, while "USA" -- 603.000.000.

      France -- 333.000.000 hits
      Italy -- 183.000.000.
      Russia is half as important as Italy -- about 83.900.000 hits
      and Lithuania is half as important as Russia -- 36.900.000 hits, however size/importance ratio is much better!

  35. 5 billion years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and stil in beta. This evolution design methodology is not all that its cracked up to be... I mean really... trial and error?

    The users of Earth must be mad. I wont be surprised if they cancel the project. Then what?

  36. Next in Google Land.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're going to launch a bunch of satellites that will take maps every so often.. probably with the same frequency that GoogleBot crawls the web. ;)

    Now *that* would be pretty cool. Hey, Google is here in Mountain View.. and Moffett Field & Lockheed are right down the street, they could get some stuff goin' on with NASA...

    Real time satellite imaging! Imagine being able to zoom in on a baseball game that's in progress. Suh-weeeeet!

    Actually, I bet that the "topless beaches in France" would become an immensely popular search...

    1. Re:Next in Google Land.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Actually, I bet that the "topless beaches in France" would become an immensely popular search...

      but only once per user....

    2. Re:Next in Google Land.. by Junta · · Score: 1

      > Actually, I bet that the "topless beaches in France" would become an immensely popular search...

      Oh yeah, those pixels are slightly more flesh/nipple colored than similar pixels on other beaches, I'm really excited here...

      I guess maybe it is exciting, since on the internet it is so hard to find detailed, close up pictures of topless or naked people....

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Next in Google Land.. by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Actually, I bet that the "topless beaches in France" would become an immensely popular search...

      You'd be wrong.

    4. Re:Next in Google Land.. by alphax45 · · Score: 1

      Why did I click on that link? WHY!!
      The only thing that would have been worse is tubgirl
      Shudder

      --
      K Man
  37. Well hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    We didn't need Google to tell us that

  38. All your earth are belong to us by hydroxy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "All your earth are belong to us" - Google's new war cry.

  39. Microsoft in competition with Google. by augustz · · Score: 1

    Google's product has been out for a period of time already.

    Virtual Earth still appears to be unavailable to users.

    1. Re:Microsoft in competition with Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google's product has been out for a period of time already.

      Virtual Earth still appears to be unavailable to users.


      Surely a case of Longhornitis? But don't knock Microsoft. Their new console is half-finished, which actually puts it ahead of the competition. Of course, next christmas we could be hearing how far xbox 360 will be ahead of the PS4 when it comes out.

  40. I got a better one... by alexandreracine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looking at this picture gave me some idears... So, how about putting all this data in a new game?
    Behold! I present to you... (drum roll)

    Grand Theft Auto : New York!

    Humor note : Try our new live edition ;)

    --
    No sig for now.
    1. Re:I got a better one... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      The screenshots look a lot like the 3D map of NYC in the Spider-Man 2 game.

    2. Re:I got a better one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grand Theft Auto New York.

      Spend half of your time looking for a parking space.

      Grand Theft Auto New York.

      The first GTA game with so many cars on the road that it's actually faster to walk everywhere!

      Grand Theft Auto New York.

      In stores whenever...

    3. Re:I got a better one... by alexhs · · Score: 1

      I present to you... (drum roll)

      Grand Theft Auto : New York!


      Huh ? But... It looks like Flight Simulator 5.0 !

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  41. Simpsons quote by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Marge: Grandpa, this flag only has 49 stars on it.
    Grandpa: I'll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I recognize Missourah!

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  42. Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the problem with your post is that you're relying on the moderators to have clicked on the links (unlikely), and to know some basic geography (unlikely).

  43. USA only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this also USA only, or is Europe included?

    1. Re:USA only by eluusive · · Score: 1

      Europe isn't part of Earth, so obviously it wouldn't be included in Virtual Earth. Duh!

  44. Google by DeathOverlord3 · · Score: 1

    My God gets more powerful everyday.

  45. Beta by jusdisgi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, piss. I've only got a VHS deck.

    --
    Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  46. In other news, Duke Nukem Forever team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...proudly announces Beta Test Invitations will be sent out within 4.5 billion years.

  47. NYC Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The virtual NYC image is Copyright 2005 State of New Jersey???

    1. Re:NYC Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The virtual NYC image is Copyright 2005 State of New Jersey???"

      That's right! We're takin' over the world. Next stop ... Connecticut!

  48. its by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its: possessive
    it's: a contraction of "it is"

    It's not hard for someone with the intellect to pass third grade to get its form right.

  49. Another short (p)review by sgarrity · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Another short (p)review by pizen · · Score: 1

      Land Rendering
      This was in Keyhole but it's still amazing. Screenshots really can't capture how amazing it is to freely move around a 3D world.


      Freely moving around a 3D world? Is that anything like what I do all the time?

  50. Does it cover the whole world like google maps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this application cover the whole world just like google maps?

    Its good to see that all those small towns in yurope and dusty mexico were not included. Hopefully the new Google Earth will be the same, covering the whole earth or the 50 unique and only United States.

  51. Next GTA? by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to have a world-wide GTA version. Kill some mariachis, then go to exile in Japan to gas some guys in a subway station, then to do an italian job in Sicilia etc.

  52. Google Earth vs. NASA Worldwind by branchingfactor · · Score: 1

    How does Google EArth compare to NASA's excellent Worldwind application http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/ ?

    1. Re:Google Earth vs. NASA Worldwind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has 3D Buildings, NASA'a program does not.

  53. Export? by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

    Can they export to SimCity format?

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    1. Re:Export? by Ninwa · · Score: 1

      That's what I wanted to know! Who says Aliens in New York are just myth?

  54. users like me would like a bigger planet. by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Chronic complainer...
    I'm absolutely SURE that if we gave you a bigger planet, say Jupitor 0.25, that you'd complain about THAT, too. You'd probably gripe about the gravity or thick atmosphere, or excess radiation, or something.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  55. Some theorize there was a code branch between... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...0.2 and 0.3 which resulted in the moon.

  56. Angry flower... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google has released a beta of it's Google Earth software[...]

    Submitter, please read this important memo.

    //Is this really one of the most difficult aspects of the written English language?

    1. Re:Angry flower... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the 5th guy I've seen so far (probably missed a few too) who was too stupid to understand an otherwise perfectly legible sentence because of something as trivial as a misplaced apostrophe. And modded up no less! I don't mind dupes, I don't mind slashbot groupthink, I don't mind MS apologists, and I don't mind trolls, but please, spare me the grammar nazis! It's petty, it's off-topic, and considering how a lot of the grammar nazis make plenty of error themselves, it's also hypocritical.

      Mod this and parent down, please.

    2. Re:Angry flower... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      You're the 5th guy I've seen so far (probably missed a few too) who was too stupid to understand an otherwise perfectly legible sentence because of something as trivial as a misplaced apostrophe.

      Understood it just fine. Are you too stupid to realize that?

      And modded up no less!

      Because by and large, the intelligent people here are rewarded for their intelligence by being modded up. Eventually they get moderator powers. If the people modding are by and large intelligent, and they mod up a post that jokingly poitns out a stupid mistake, then you are most likely not intelligent if you disagree. But there are always exceptions.

      but please, spare me the grammar nazis!

      This is a written medium. To intelligent people, stupid mistakes are like holding a conversation with a retard. Painfully annoying. Some day, when you're intelligent, you'll understand.

      It's petty

      If nothing was done that was petty, very few things would be accomplished.

      considering how a lot of the grammar nazis make plenty of error themselves, it's also hypocritical.

      They are raked over the coals. How is that hypocritical?

      Yawn.

    3. Re:Angry flower... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Understood it just fine. Are you too stupid to realize that?

      If you understood it, why didn't you comment on the article itself? Why did you chose to take something completely irrelevant to comment on? You might as well have started bashing Bush.

      >> Because by and large, the intelligent people here are rewarded for their intelligence by being modded up.

      Yes, and you didn't say anything even remotely intelligent, so why were you modded up?

      >> Eventually they get moderator powers. If the people modding are by and large intelligent, and they mod up a post that jokingly poitns out a stupid mistake, then you are most likely not intelligent if you disagree. But there are always exceptions.

      What a load of crap. If a post tells you something you already knew, you're not going to mod it informative. If a post tells you something you didn't already know, you mod it informative. Thus, the stuff that gets modded informative is necessarily that which is the most average, and thus most likely to be informative to the most people. That you got modded funny just proves your form of humor appeals to the lowest common denominator.

      >> This is a written medium. To intelligent people, stupid mistakes are like holding a conversation with a retard.

      That's a faulty analogy. The reason it's difficult to told conversations with retards is because the subject of conversation is very limited. You probably couldn't talk about, say, linux, with a retard. It is, however, perfectly possible to talk about linux with a person with a speech impediment. You'd just have to pay extra attention, just like you'd have to actually use your brain (sounds scary, eh?) when reading an article by someone who is more concerned with getting a message across, than getting hung up in grammar.

      >> Painfully annoying. Some day, when you're intelligent, you'll understand.

      That's a nice ad hominem, dipshit.

      >> If nothing was done that was petty, very few things would be accomplished.

      WTF? That doesn't even make any sense. You're just trying to justify your petty behavior.

      >> They are raked over the coals. How is that hypocritical?

      Don't throw stones if you're living in a glass house.

    4. Re:Angry flower... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      If you stop crying right now, I'll throw in a free snoopy alarm clock!

      There there...

    5. Re:Angry flower... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, the old "I've lost, so I'm going to try to save face using satire".

      Hey, here's a thought: If you haven't got any valid counterarguments, maybe you should shut up. If you want to chicken out by refusing to do a proper reply, go ahead.

    6. Re:Angry flower... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      If you posted something interesting, it would have been replied to. I think it's time you stopped embarassing yourself. I made all the points I needed to in my very first post, somthing you obviously can't.

    7. Re:Angry flower... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I made all the points I needed to in my very first post

      No you didn't. In your first post, you got modded up for nothing more than posting a link to something you didn't even make, not to mention that had already been pointed out by several other people.

      In your second post, you came up with some points, counterarguments, but I refuted them all. Then you tried to ditch the discussion with a childish insult.

      Here's the questions you still haven't answered:

      * Why did you feel it was necessary to make yet another thread when there were already several discussing the same trivial and off-topic observation?

      * Why is it not hypocritical of you to point out errors in people's spelling, punctuation, or grammar, when you yourself make plenty? ("embarassing"? Oh the irony!)

      * Which things would not be accomplished if people stopped doing petty things? Do you even understand what "petty" means?

      * How do minor errors in punctuation stop you from understanding sentences in otherwise perfect english?

      * If you did understand, why didn't you comment on the actual story? Do you feel at all bad that, objectively speaking, "off-topic" would really have been the only proper score for your post?

      >> I think it's time you stopped embarassing yourself

      I don't mind at all. Why do you want me to stop? Could it be you're having second thoughts about having gotten modded up for posting an off-topic link to something you didn't create, in response to a triviality?

    8. Re:Angry flower... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      Really, an anonymous coward telling me about how to debate... :-P

      Go cower in your anonymous corner...

    9. Re:Angry flower... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I was wondering when the "you're anonymous, so your opinion doesn't count"-excuse would show up. It's part of why I've never registered an account on any forum that allowed anon posting. It's like Godwin's Law, except instead of the losing party accusing the other guy of being a nazi, he tries to invalidate his arguments by pointing out his anonymity.

      And at the risk of repeating myself, you still haven't answered any of my questions. As a matter of fact, you've raised several new ones.

      * Why is my user status relevant to the situation? How does being anonymous invalidate any of my questions or arguments? Would it make you feel better if I gave you my home address or phone number?

      * Why, exactly, would I "cower" anywhere? Have you given me a single argument that I have not rebutted so far? Any questions I have not answered? Or were you using your sense of humor (and we all know how brilliant that is, don't we? Why, you're so funny, you even posted a link!) to make a lame pun on "Anonymous coward"? If anyone is scampering away from the issues, it seems to be you. :-P

    10. Re:Angry flower... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      I am rackin' up karma like mad for this!

      Bla bla bla :-P

    11. Re:Angry flower... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity.

  57. Windows app not an internet app? by acomj · · Score: 1

    The link is down but from the screenshots and other things I've read about this, it looks like a windows only application. Like picassa (googles photo program). I hope they integrate this into a browswer app because they've done a great job with mail and maps as internet apps.

    Also I have this sneaking suspission the competetion will only run on ie.

  58. Nasa has one also by thr2k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nasa has a pretty cool mapping program as well.
    World Wind 1.3
    http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/

    The servers are a little slow but its still a handy program.

    1. Re:Nasa has one also by thr2k · · Score: 1

      Note to self:

      It should be NASA not Nasa

    2. Re:Nasa has one also by ChrisTower · · Score: 1

      If you pronounce it EN-AH-ES-AH, like engineers who were around before it's formation, you'll always remember that it's an acronym. That's what works for me, anyway.

    3. Re:Nasa has one also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save their servers! Don't tell people about this!

      There's a 2D mapping app out there provided by the govt that has overlays of all the freely available data (e.g., street maps, topo maps, hydrology, hi-res orthoimagery, etc) and lots of useful tools (e.g., measure distances (which I use to plan runs), but I'd never publish that URL on /., either. :P

      -Map Hog

    4. Re:Nasa has one also by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      True, I've used both this and the Keyhole/Google Earth version and the NASA one is pretty inferior.

      Now, it's perfectly acceptable for freeware, don't get me wrong, but the Google one is much better (more responsive, smoother, better controls, better bounder handling, integrating with Google maps, and location searches, plus the ability to integrate other people's location sets. It's also virtually free, less than $20/yr.

      So save the NASA servers and splurge. If you have kids, I don't think there is anything better you could spend $20/year on.

    5. Re:Nasa has one also by Raztus · · Score: 1

      However, if you are curious and want to try out the NASA version, there is a torrent available from their server.

      http://opensource.arc.nasa.gov/torrents/ww131.torr ent

  59. Keyhole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is only $30/year for their basic subscription. It is way worth it for the entertainment value alone.

    Google Earth is a replacement for Keyhole's dedicated client software. The Keyhole client gave you a much-improved interface to the online-browsable satellite imagery, albeit one that still kinda sucked.

    Google Earth is a much-improved version of the Keyhole client, but it still isn't perfect. They could stand to hire a few programmers with 3D human-interface experience (e.g., game industry vets.)

  60. Mars sure to follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, Microsoft will be releasing it's competing product "Mars" in a few short weeks, with a much smaller set of features. We all of course remember their previous work with "Venus", and how that completely bombed.

  61. Screw Earth by Ecko7889 · · Score: 0

    Screw Earth.....I want Google to start doing free web hosting. Maybe if I bitch enough they will take over the world.

    --
    $sig$
  62. Error: by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    Reality Corrupt.

    Reboot Universe? [Y/N]

    |

    1. Re:Error: by jackcarter · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's happened before; it took an incredible amount of time to do though (something like 40 days, I think).

    2. Re:Error: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reality Corrupt.

      Reboot Universe? [Y/N]

      |


      I like how YES is the default action... c'mon some one, just hit enter for me PLEASE.

      Inject.

  63. I notice two things missing... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    ...support for Linux and support for OSX.

    I would understand the loony level of support for Google from the anti-MS crowd more if these were supported as well as Google supports everything else.

    I tried the prior version of this on Windows with the appropriate drivers and it was hobbled by Windows resource contention and choppy and paused. I'd like to see a Linux version. Gnome or KDE, either way.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  64. Flight Simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like they licensed the technology they're using to render the buildings from Microsoft.

  65. Google's and Microsoft's "earths" by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Is this really Google Earth and Virtual Earth and not Google USA and Virtual USA?

    I haven't really found any information about their coverage goals with these tools. I personally know my neighborhood well, and there are good national resources for my country in my own language too, so I imagine it's when I travel I'd find it would be nice to have a virtual Earth for this, but at the same time I can't imagine Google making this effort seen in the screenshots on more than a fraction of the actual Earth.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  66. Open Source by gr8_phk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    For those wishing there was an open source equivalent, the flightgear simulator has worldwide scenery produced by the terragear project. Currently the terrain is based on the SRTM stuff from NASA, but I think there are some areas with higher resolution DEMs. Not sure, check it out. I'm also not sure how much geopolitical stuff or roads have been incorporated - their main purpose has been to feed the flight sim. Anyway, people interested a Free Software implementation have something to build on.

    Oh, and the guy over at vterrain.org has some ambitious goals related to this type of thing too with lots of links to sources etc...

    1. Re:Open Source by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      But nowadays NASA has World Wind which is open source too.

      C# open source running on DirectX, yes, but open source. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Open Source by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
      "C# open source running on DirectX, yes, but open source. :-)"

      I was trying to be informative. Mentioning World Wind just opens a whole can of worms. I should have said "free software" not "open source". I don't recall the license on World Wind, but it doesn't really matter because it won't run on my Linux box, and they haven't been able to port it yet because of their language/tool choice.

      It's a valuable lesson, if you want EVERYONE to be able to use your software (and those guys are kinda bummed out now) you can not use certain things to develop it.

  67. Re:Closed Minded - The Moonities Have Cometh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inignot: We are Mooninites from the inner core of the moon.
    Err: You said it right.
    Inignot: Our race is hundred of years beyond yours.
    Err: Man, you hear what he's saying?
    Inignot: Some would say that the Earth is our moon.
    Err: We're the moon.
    Inignot: But that would belittle the name of our moon, which is: The Moon. ....
    Inignot: You and your third dimension.
    Frylock: What about it?
    Inignot: Oh, nothing, it's cute. We have five.
    [pause]
    Err: Thousand.
    Inignot: Yes, five thousand.
    Err: Don't question it.

  68. Will it run under OS X? by Deslock · · Score: 1

    RTFA and googled, but I didn't find anything to indicate that they'll offer non-Windows clients :-(

  69. More interesting is Google's Code For Summer by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    where they pay university students $3500 to write open source code over the summer.

    But, hey, that's just my opinion.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  70. You're in luck! by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have good hopes for the beta of Earth, but for the final release I, and many users like me would like a bigger planet.

    E--N--L--A--R--G--E YOUR PLAN3T!

    All-natura1 technique! No pi||s, no purnps, no mass drivers! Get a thick, firm K@ne band like your pr1mary always wanted!

    Hav1ng tr0uble getting it up? Try our new sp@ce el3vat0r! V!@GRA C!AL!5, and nan0tube cable5 to GEO only $1 a d0se!

    C@11 now! 1irnited t1me 0ffer!!!

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  71. SimCITY by paronomasia5 · · Score: 1

    I smell a new series of real-world-based SIM-games.. Sim-EARTH. Sim-New-York ...

    1. Re:SimCITY by gkearney · · Score: 1

      While few remeber it there really was a game called SimEarth.

  72. snow crash. by EngMedic · · Score: 1

    YOU ARE HERE.

    that would be awesome.

    --
    filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
  73. Google FlightGear by endoplasmicMessenger · · Score: 1

    So when does a Google version of FlightGear come out? Instead of driving directions, you could get flying directions. And then fly there!

    --
    Evolution is a fact. Darwinism is a joke.
  74. the new earth by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.

    2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

    3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

    4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

    (Revelation 21:1-4)

    Theologians are unsure of the release schedule of this new earth, and what it's exact feature set and space requirements will be. Detractors of the new earth claim it is merely vaporware, or a superficial modification of the old earth, to which it's supporters accuse its detractors of spreading FUD. Jesus, lead developer of the new earth, has in prior interviews (Luke 13:31-32) stated that the release schedule is a closely guarded secret, unknown even to him. Those upset at griefers for explointing bugs in the current system cry "How long, O Lord?" (Rev 6:10)

  75. Sightseeing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guys over at Google Sightseeing need to get a copy of this - I want to see the empire state building in 3d!

  76. NASA's World Wind is another alternative by netjeff · · Score: 1

    Check out NASA's World Wind software (Windows only). From their main page:

    World Wind lets you zoom from satellite altitude into any place on Earth. Leveraging Landsat satellite imagery and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission data, World Wind lets you experience Earth terrain in visually rich 3D, just as if you were really there.

    Virtually visit any place in the world. Look across the Andes, into the Grand Canyon, over the Alps, or along the African Sahara.

    Be nice and use the BitTorrent link for the download if you are interested.

  77. I gotta say... by improbable · · Score: 1

    I showed this to people last year (when it was still Keyhole) as a "Technology Associate" of a county fair. I do have to say that Google has improved the interface a bit, and I like the 3D buildings.

  78. ..."noise biz" ... sound propagation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you in charge of the ice cream trucks?

    1. Re:..."noise biz" ... sound propagation... by Reverberant · · Score: 1

      Nope - why, do you wonder why they sound they way they do?

  79. Screw Google Earth by Dasch · · Score: 1

    All I want to know is when I can use Google Maps here in Denmark...

    1. Re:Screw Google Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean Denmark Tennessee, or Denmark Wisconsin? I believe both are already on the map.

    2. Re:Screw Google Earth by Dasch · · Score: 1

      I mean Denmark, Scandinavia, Europe, you redneck!

      Damn Americans...

  80. Just what I needed by mattcoz · · Score: 0

    a 3D model of Soldier Field under construction. neato

  81. Stop that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you are simply trying to get rid of GWB abnd his admin.

  82. Try Wold Wind by nobody102 · · Score: 1

    http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/ it's free and comes w/source

  83. Yes, it is the entire earth by KeyholeSeer · · Score: 1

    Lowest resolution data is 15m-per-pixel worldwide with 18" to 12" per pixel data for thousands and thousands of cities. Coverage map: http://www.keyhole.com/data Free trial: http://www.keyhole.com/ 20000 places described: http://bbs.keyhole.com/

    --
    Be seeing you, Seer
    1. Re:Yes, it is the entire earth by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Seer, many of us have Keyhole subscriptions, but haven't heard from Google about this. I've been told that there's a "Google Earth Board" I need to log in to, but I haven't been able to find it at the Keyhole BBS or anywhere on the Keyhole site. If you can help me out, e-mail me at bensch@gmail.com - I think I just need to be pointed in the right direction.

    2. Re:Yes, it is the entire earth by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      So you get nothing of what Google is planning for the rest of the earth?

      I mean, regular *maps* with location names can I get for free with NASA World Wind, my question is basically if I get anything extra for what I'd pay for, and if Google is planning to add anything extra when introducing this new version of Keyhole as Google Earth.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  84. TFA is VF inaccurate by ink_polaroid · · Score: 1

    No, Google Earth is not in competition with MSN Virtual Earth. That's the dumbest thing I've heard for a while.

    MSN VE is clearly positioned to be a compeititor with Google Maps. A blind man on a galloping horse can see that.

  85. I can't wait for Earth Mark II by simonbp · · Score: 1

    I hear it's dolphin- (and Arthur Dent)-free...

    The glaciers in Africa are a bit much, though...

    Simon ;)

  86. Linux and OSX by vhogemann · · Score: 1

    I can understand the lack of a Linux version, because of the reduced user base...

    And I can understand the lack of a OSX, due the competition with similar software from Apple, like iPhoto X Picasa, and Google Destop Search x Spotlight.

    Still, I must ask: why? Why!?

    --
    ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
  87. Not trying to troll, but ... by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

    I really don't understand why this (or, more particularly the NASA sorta-similar app) aren't java-based. It would go a long way toward opening it up to other OS's. OK, so I can understand not having a Mac version (I don't have to like it, but I can understand it) but not having a UNIX version? I don't get it. For now, we're limited to something like 3D Weather Globe and Atlas (http://www.mackiev.com/) which is cool, but nothing like Keyhole. *sigh*

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  88. Re:Airstrips by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

    You should know that terrorists don't care about landing the plane.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  89. Don't feed that title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to the attempted universal translator. It will totally ruin its function. I'm an actual human (I passed the image test, so I'm not a script at least) and I still can't parse the damn thing.

  90. How did they do the buildings? by Renesis · · Score: 1

    Do you think they created all the buildings manually for all those 39 cities?

    Or do they have a clever system for doing it?

  91. Keyhole Community and Google Earth by KeyholeSeer · · Score: 1

    The Google Earth forum is there on the Keyhole Community, but you need to be logged in to see it. Just create and account at bbs.keyhole.com, login, and you will be shown the "Google Earth Discussion Forum" as part of the Support area. There are hundreds of posts in interesting placemarks.

    --
    Be seeing you, Seer
  92. What about... by sepluv · · Score: 1

    NASA's FLOSS World Wind (which I've used and looks really good).

    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]