So if i were to reference in a scientific paper the idea that there is a connection between these two factors i would have to pay royalties?
The idea of patenting a thought is completely illogical, and also unenforceable. Wouldn't this render it impossible to discuss this concept unless approved by the patent holders?
It is extremely unlikely a patent on the act of thought will stand up in court. especially since this 'thought' that has been patented could be crucial in preventing heart disease in many patients. This patent is attempting to gain royalties off of a logical process based upon scientific research. If this patent were enforceable almost all industries involving some sort of problem solving or diagnosis would suffer from a surge of patent attempting to gain royalties off of someone trying to help another person and to do their job.
The patent would also be near unenforceable. Barring Orwellian thought police monitoring the doctors every action there is no way to prove that a doctor looked at a test result and thought 'Hmm... this patient has elevated homocysteine levels they might have a b-12 deficiency'. And if the doctor does act on that thought there is no way to collect royalties on the hundreds of thousands of doctors who are now aware of this concept and will act in the best interest of their patients and their practice and tell the patients to take more vitamins.
Not only is this an add, its a badly writen one at that.
There is very little information about the product other than what the manufacturer tells you on their website and several portinos are nonsensical.
I seem to recall that, before an earth quake plate stop moving or slow and then move very suddenly. the.8 inches is an average and it is relatively accurate for the next several thousand years
"A dark exciton with total angular momentum L=2 ecomes a bright exciton with L=1." Finally a practical application for decay dynamics following nongeminate excitation
Thats all that corporate bloging is good business practice. It promotes interest in the company while allowing for transparency and the chance to get to know one of the employees of the company.
Of corse its motivated by greed. When does a corporation, whose only goal is to make money, do something that is not motivated by the the want for more money?
In the advent of a snow storm and a loss of power your comp might go below the freezing point you would be out a $500 graphic card. no a good i dea if you live some where cold and blizzard prone
Slashdot Mirror
So if i were to reference in a scientific paper the idea that there is a connection between these two factors i would have to pay royalties?
The idea of patenting a thought is completely illogical, and also unenforceable. Wouldn't this render it impossible to discuss this concept unless approved by the patent holders?
It is extremely unlikely a patent on the act of thought will stand up in court. especially since this 'thought' that has been patented could be crucial in preventing heart disease in many patients. This patent is attempting to gain royalties off of a logical process based upon scientific research. If this patent were enforceable almost all industries involving some sort of problem solving or diagnosis would suffer from a surge of patent attempting to gain royalties off of someone trying to help another person and to do their job.
The patent would also be near unenforceable. Barring Orwellian thought police monitoring the doctors every action there is no way to prove that a doctor looked at a test result and thought 'Hmm... this patient has elevated homocysteine levels they might have a b-12 deficiency'. And if the doctor does act on that thought there is no way to collect royalties on the hundreds of thousands of doctors who are now aware of this concept and will act in the best interest of their patients and their practice and tell the patients to take more vitamins.
Not only is this an add, its a badly writen one at that. There is very little information about the product other than what the manufacturer tells you on their website and several portinos are nonsensical.
So long, and thanks for all the fish
http://mirrordot.org/stories/c8cb0c1f698ecf7eb1013 d9430f1d980/index.html
I was under the impression that Wheregeorge was a study of currency circulation not a webgame.
yeah... this was games released last year
You really want the 'Troll' rating bad, don't you?
I seem to recall that, before an earth quake plate stop moving or slow and then move very suddenly. the .8 inches is an average and it is relatively accurate for the next several thousand years
Mirror please Thanks
coral cache got slashdotted
well, thats exciting...
well folks as of now the link is /.ed
Slain by falling nerd news whore shrapnel
"A dark exciton with total angular momentum L=2 ecomes a bright exciton with L=1."
Finally a practical application for decay dynamics following nongeminate excitation
Thats all that corporate bloging is good business practice. It promotes interest in the company while allowing for transparency and the chance to get to know one of the employees of the company. Of corse its motivated by greed. When does a corporation, whose only goal is to make money, do something that is not motivated by the the want for more money?
or make a website about. but a five and a half hour documentary? Pass the No-Doz
sodium is extremely reactive.the comonation of pure sodium and water will result in an explosion
In the advent of a snow storm and a loss of power your comp might go below the freezing point you would be out a $500 graphic card. no a good i dea if you live some where cold and blizzard prone