Slashdot Mirror


Liquid Metal Cooling in New ATI Video Card

MellowTigger writes "Water cooling is so passe, definitely 20th-century. What's the 21st-century geek to do to keep his gaming video card cool? Try the liquid metal technology that will be included in the ATI Radeon X850 XT video card using the cooling technology from Sapphire. This material is reported to be non-flammable, non-toxic, environmentally safe... and 65 times more thermally conductive than water."

335 comments

  1. This can't be good. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 0

    Whether it's toxic mercury, or molten tin and/or lead, I'm not sure I like the idea of "liquid metal".

    1. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great mercury!!! got brain damage?

      I love how they don't tell us what chemical they are using either. It might just be mercury!

    2. Re:This can't be good. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 0

      Well, the next liquid metal ends up being 400 deg F or so, doesn't it? How can it be anything else? And heated mercury starts giving off vapor...

    3. Re:This can't be good. by yotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering they said it's environmentally safe, I doubt it's mercury. Considering it's intended to /cool/ your gpu, I doubt it's molten lead.

      Even if it were either, why couldn't it be good? 20x the cooling sounds pretty good to me, and if it's safe and environmentally friendly, what's the problem?

    4. Re:This can't be good. by glMatrixMode · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's Gallium. It's developed by NanoCoolers. I wonder if the name means it's a nano-technology. That would be exciting !

      --
      War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.
    5. Re:This can't be good. by BibelBiber · · Score: 1

      Ah, bother, it's quicksilver. Isn't it?

    6. Re:This can't be good. by MiKM · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is the midrange Toxic x700 that uses liquid mercury. I'd hate to see what Sapphire uses in the x600.

    7. Re:This can't be good. by yotto · · Score: 1

      20x

      Sorry, s/20/65/

    8. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's neither. It's basicaly a sodium alloy. (I haven't read TFA, but I"m familar with naocoolers and the technology). It has a boiling point of around 2000c and it's an absolute waste of money for somthing that probably won't as hot as 100c.. in which case water is more than sufficent.
      It's a gimmic nothing more.

    9. Re:This can't be good. by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 5, Informative

      61% Gallium
      25% Indium
      13% Tin
      1% Zinc

      Solid at 6.5C
      Liquid at 7.6C

    10. Re:This can't be good. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny
      they said it's environmentally safe
      <cynical remark goes here>
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    11. Re:This can't be good. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What state is it in between 6.6C and 7.5C????

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    12. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a dumbass. How exactly would a sodium alloy be A) Non-toxic B) Environmentally friendly and C) Non-flammable (for those who don't know - sodium isn't exactly fireproof)

    13. Re:This can't be good. by uiucmatse · · Score: 4, Informative

      It'll be between the liquidus and solidus lines, so you'll have a composition of liquid plus some small amount of alpha-phase.

    14. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's undefined, and if you dare use it at that temperature you'll just get a null pointer exception.

    15. Re:This can't be good. by HermanAB · · Score: 4, Informative

      Both liquid and solid: Recrystalizing state.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    16. Re:This can't be good. by Dahan · · Score: 4, Informative
      The same state any non-eutectic alloy is between its freezing and melting points--partly solid and partly liquid.

      Anyways, there are plenty of metal alloys that are liquid at or slightly above room temperature.

      But even discounting alloys, there's are a few other elemental metals other than mercury that are liquid at room temp (assuming your room has a computer or two to keep it warm): Gallium melts at 29.76 degrees C and Cesium at 28.44 degrees (I'd keep the latter far from my computer though). Rubidium melts at 39.31 degrees, so it'd be liquid at the temperatures today's GPUs reach (but I'd keep that far from my computer too).

    17. Re:This can't be good. by kernelfoobar · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit rusty from my thermodynamic courses, but I'll try: it's in transition state where both liquid and solid exists. So up to 6.5 it's solid, from 6.5 to 7.6 it's in transition and 7.5 and above its liquid. Can anyone refute or back this up? I'm not a chemical engineer, I only took courses way back when...
      This might help. Or This (pdf) or This (pdf)

      --
      Here we go again!
    18. Re:This can't be good. by SMitra72 · · Score: 0

      Solid

    19. Re:This can't be good. by kernelfoobar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      sodium isn't exactly fireproof
      Actually it's a cool thing to see a piece of sodium in plain, simple, pure water....(hint: google for sodium and water)

      --
      Here we go again!
    20. Re:This can't be good. by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Gallium is a fun metal. It melts at around room temperature, in fact you can hold a bit of it in your hand and it will melt right before your eyes. I havn't had the opportunity to play with it, but I've seen pictures. Very cool shit.

    21. Re:This can't be good. by CyberBill · · Score: 1

      Salt.

      (Sodium Chloride = NaCl)

      I'm not sure if Sodium is flammable or not, it probably is at very high temperatures, but usually people get it too close to water to ever find out. :) ( Na + H20 = NaO(2?) + H2 ) Basically the reaction gives off so much heat that the resulting H2 ignites, at least when exposed to water in large enough quantities.

      --
      -Bill
    22. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it was nano technology wouldent it be worth millions of dollars right now?

    23. Re:This can't be good. by gerbalblaste · · Score: 1

      sodium is extremely reactive.the comonation of pure sodium and water will result in an explosion

    24. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is made out of carbon nanotubes.

      Heck, these days, what isn't??

    25. Re:This can't be good. by jafomatic · · Score: 1
      Sodium is also caustic. Try holding some in your hand if it doesn't combust from the moisture in the air first.

      Setting all that aside, I think some poster above has discovered that the metal in question is a gallium alloy. So, y'know, we're offtopic.

      To remedy that, can anyone riddle me whether or not the better heat conductivity is related to lesser electrical resistance? If so, a leak would be considerably worse than water, if I understand things correctly.

      --
      ::jafomatic
    26. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, molten lead is better used cooling Pentium 4s anyway.

    27. Re:This can't be good. by RockWolf · · Score: 1
      IIRC, 2Na + 2H20 -> 2NaOH + H2. As you noted, though, that reaction is exothermic, which ignites the H2 when it comes into contact with free oxygen.

      Another sibling post mentioned that Na is caustic - it's not the Na that is caustic, it's the NaOH given off when the water on the surface of your skin reacts with the metal. :)

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
    28. Re:This can't be good. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Gallium melts at 29.76 degrees C

      No idea how hot your room is, but mine is normaly around 20 degrees C. That means that the metal is solid when you turn on your PC.

      When the PC is on, the metal around the CPU will start to melt, but the rest of the metal will still be solid. That seems like a bad idea. It has to be liquid when the PC starts, not when the CPU is melting.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    29. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      technical term: chunky

    30. Re:This can't be good. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      The mixture is nontoxic. Here, check out this badass website for Periodic Table information. (Damn, I love Google.)

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    31. Re:This can't be good. by Mornelithe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, it may be solid, but that doesn't mean it isn't absorbing heat. Melting typically takes significantly more energy than would be absorbed by a temperature increase, so the melting metal would probably actually cool your CPU better than the liquid result.

      In addition, metals (by definition, I believe) have good heat conduction properties (that's why some heatsinks use metal heat pipes these days), so a large portion of the metal would probably end up melting and start flowing. You probably wouldn't just get a bubble of super-heated liquid gallium frying your CPU. You'd just start off with a normal-ish metal heatsink until the gallium melted.

      Of course, there are other reasons not to use gallium, as other people have mentioned here.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    32. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What state is it in between 6.6C and 7.5C????

      New Jersey.

    33. Re:This can't be good. by Stephen+H-B · · Score: 1
      whether or not the better heat conductivity is related to lesser electrical resistance?

      Yes and no. The higher heat conductivity of metals in general compared to molecular materials (e.g., water) is a product of the closer association of atoms within the metal lattice and the higher electrical conductivity is due to the 'elctron sea' effect wherin metals tend to exist as a mass of +ve cores embedded in a 'sea' of loose electrons. (Apologies if this sounds weird, another chemist would know what I'm talking about in detail but I'm trying to make analogies)

      So, the heat and electrical conductance are related but not identical. As an extreme case, consider diamond. The best thermal conductor I know of, and an absolute insulator (when pure). High thermal conductivity due to the tight framework but no loose electrons, so no conduction band.

      Anyway, the alloy in question here is being touted as useful because of a combination of factors. Liquid metal alloys tend to have low melting points and vapour pressures (so the tube doesn't explode) along with very good liquid range (2000 degrees F in this case IIRC) and high thermal conductivity and specific heat. Specific heat is a measure of how much energy it takes to raise the temperature of a compound (the SH of water is one calorie/degree celsius/mL, this alloy is probably more). A high SH means more heat can be moved around at lower temperature, so the core never gets as hot.

      Note that this effect must be balanced against cooling efficiency. Heatsinks pump heat out best when the heatsink is much hotter than the air, so you would get the most efficient cooling at several hundred degrees. This would not be an ideal situation for the chip though (or the melted puddle of copper that is left anyway).

      BTW, since when do we need to type in some ridiculous text to post? Have I just never noticed it before?

      --
      Sick of WoW? Try the thinking man's MMORPG: EVE Online
    34. Re:This can't be good. by hansiboy · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Does that alloy have a name btw?

    35. Re:This can't be good. by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 1

      Yes, Zintinindigal.

      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
    36. Re:This can't be good. by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it stains your hands and can be annoying. It's too bad that there's no good substitute for mercury. Dang you, mercury, for being toxic! It means that people can't do stuff like this any more. :P

      --
      I believe Bird-Person can arrange that.
    37. Re:This can't be good. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Worse than that, the NaOH then reacts with the natural oil in your skin to form (blech) soap.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slurpy

    39. Re:This can't be good. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Slush.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    40. Re:This can't be good. by Stephen+H-B · · Score: 1
      My apologies, 4.184J/degree celsius/gram.

      Oh, and I'm Austalian and a chemist so I use joules normally. I was just trying not to confuse the poor Americans in the audience.

      --
      Sick of WoW? Try the thinking man's MMORPG: EVE Online
  2. new video card by Renraku · · Score: 5, Funny

    Also seeks out John Conner.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:new video card by dpilot · · Score: 4, Funny

      If we put together a Beowulf cluster of these, would they self-assemble into Skynet?

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:new video card by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Sure, until some geek tries to cool them with liquid nitrogen, at which point they'll shatter.

    3. Re:new video card by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 0

      Please keep your Fark cliches straight...it's seeks out Sarah Conner.

    4. Re:new video card by sinner0423 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhh, no. The first terminator was looking for sarah conner. The second, which looked like liquid metal, was actually looking for both John & Sarah when it went back in time.

      This IS news for nerds, you knew that right? Sorry to nitpick, but I figured you may know why the mods deemed this funny.

    5. Re:new video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, no. The second one gave no fuck about Sarah. John was already born, she meant nothing.

    6. Re:new video card by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Uhh, no. The second one gave no fuck about Sarah. John was already born, she meant nothing.

      Seeing as how I just watched T2 last week (in order to celebrate MS's DRM being cracked and the hi-def WM9 version being liberated from the stupid phone-home digital restrictions), the minutiae are still familiar.

      The molten metal mulder replacement terminator was primarily after John, but at one point went after Sarah becase it expected John to go to Sarah too. Unfortunately for mulder replacement, he didn't get there early enough to replace sarah and instead had to fight it out and lose her and john as they sped away with Arnie in their station wagon of hope.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:new video card by Wordsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please elaborate on MS DRM being cracked. Is this something that applies to WMA files as well? The only thing that's stopped me from using online music stores is the lack of something akin to fairplay to ensure the files I purchase won't ultimately be rendered obsolete if/when I buy a new player that may or may not support the same DRM standards being used now.

    8. Re:new video card by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, it reassembles itself when the temperature rises.

    9. Re:new video card by Randy+Wang · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... only to have the crap beaten out of it by the latest GeForce.

      --
      --- Egads, I glow in the dark!
    10. Re:new video card by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Please elaborate on MS DRM being cracked.

      It was cracked in Japan and then quickly uncracked.
      Rather, any of the phone-home restricted content forced an upgrade of the decrypter that was no longer crackable by the original method. T2 was liberated before the phone-home system had started to push out the new software.

      The original method amounted to running the player under a debugger and looking for the decryption keys in a known location in memory, grabbing the keys and then using them to manually decrypt to a file. The new software checks for the presence of a debugger and refuses to run. I'm sure it is only a matter of time before that is also circumvented.

      In theory, if you have not accepted an upgrade to the windows media system in the last month or so, all of the "on disc" restricted files could still be liberated. It is reportedly a fairly tedious manual process.

      I think there is some discussion of the process on doom9.org if you want to dig deeper.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    11. Re:new video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be sooo sweet. Then he could go to the hospital just like the exploding ipod boy!

    12. Re:new video card by TravisWatkins · · Score: 2, Informative

      The checks for a debugger are in the kernel. Good luck patching that out. :)

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
    13. Re:new video card by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then you get some weird artifacts.

      (I just lost everyone who hasn't seen the director's cut, didn't I?)

    14. Re:new video card by swansmt · · Score: 0

      Yep. Consider your geek license revoked.

    15. Re:new video card by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      Sorry to nitpick even more, but it was actually John Connor the T1000 had as a primary objective. He only went after Sarah Connor so he could impersonate her in order to "Terminate" his primary objective, John Connor.
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103064/

    16. Re:new video card by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The checks for a debugger are in the kernel. Good luck patching that out.

      Do you really know that, or are you just making it up? If you do know it, how do you know it? And finally, what's so hard about patching the kernel? People have been patching live unix kernels for decades now.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    17. Re:new video card by TravisWatkins · · Score: 1

      Going on what a fellow musik developer has said for that info. Patching a unix kernel is one thing, patching an NT kernel is appearently much more of a challenge.

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
    18. Re:new video card by evanbd · · Score: 1

      That's what system emulators are for... I honestly don't know whether any are actually up to the task of being undetectable, but it's certainly (theoretically) possible, especially if you're willing to limit the amount of hardware you support.

    19. Re:new video card by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Patching a unix kernel is one thing, patching an NT kernel is appearently much more of a challenge.

      It is no harder than patching any other binary for which you do not have source code.

      You might need a specialized tool to do it, but speaking as a guy who has worked on a few device drivers, putting together such a tool isn't terribly difficult.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    20. Re:new video card by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      However, cold or hot, the drivers never seem to assemble themselves properly.

    21. Re:new video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, wussies. Why use a debugger? Run that file through IDA, and you can probably find the keys unless the .exe file is encrypted, which I doubt.

      --Coder

    22. Re:new video card by frenetic3 · · Score: 1

      Dude, the IsDebuggerPresent() call can just be NOPed out if I'm not mistaken.

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    23. Re:new video card by demongp · · Score: 1

      I can only ask why that was posted, and what MS DRM has got to do with a new ATI Video Card with liquid cooling?

    24. Re:new video card by TravisWatkins · · Score: 1

      iirc the DRM dll has more extensive checks including calls into the kernel. If you're just reading memory at a known location you might be able to get away with not patching the kernel but that isn't automated and probably changes every month (new WMP release).

      --

      "But I'm still right here, giving blood and keeping faith. And I'm still right here."
    25. Re:new video card by Tassach · · Score: 1
      The new software checks for the presence of a debugger and refuses to run. I'm sure it is only a matter of time before that is also circumvented.
      If they're doing the debugger check the same way they've done it in some of their games (EG MechCommander 2), then you won't be able to run it under VMWare.

      A virtual machine apparantly looks like a debugger to the detector.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    26. Re:new video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn how to read at score:-1 and you will open yours eyes to a whole new worlds.

    27. Re:new video card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it should *so* have been the "mimetic-poly-alloy-department"

    28. Re:new video card by Scooter's_dad · · Score: 1

      OK, if we're REALLY going to nitpick, I'm pretty sure they didn't speed away in a station wagon. Didn't the T2 latch onto the trunk of the car and try to get in through the rear window? I think they pick up the station wagon later. Anyway, what does it matter, even with all their effort the world nonetheless buys the farm in T3...

      --
      The road to hell is paved with Cat 5 cable.
  3. Liquid Metal ... by Lemurmania · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe I'm showing my age, but this really makes me think of Terminator 2, with the early CGI liquid metal cop doing all sorts of naughty things. Who knew? He could have been productively cooling computer parts instead of killing people.

    1. Re:Liquid Metal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, not a single other soul on here would ever think of that...

  4. Let me just say by lheal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool.

    * ducks *

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Let me just say by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      it's actually the same technology as previously. they just overclocked it so much that it melts down your metal case, shorts out the system, and then cools down since there's no longer any current

    2. Re:Let me just say by d474 · · Score: 1
      "Let me just say...Cool."
      Your joke was funny. But to make a point I will use another one-worder: Dirty.

      I hope ATI has a nice recycling plan for these video cards. Can't imagine it would be too good for the environment (including us humans) to have these things leaking out liquid metal everywhere.
      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    3. Re:Let me just say by lheal · · Score: 1

      >Dirty.

      Depends on the metal, doesn't it? They say in TFA that it's not Mercury. It's probably Gallium, or an allow of Gallium and Lithium or something. No, those probably don't mix.

      Gallium melts at 144F, which presents some design problems, such as what to do when it freezes.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    4. Re:Let me just say by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Gallium melts at 144F, which presents some design problems, such as what to do when it freezes.

      Oh, that's no problem. Your OS will freeze as well.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  5. 3 possible reasons for this by ross.w · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. The card runs hotter
    2. The card runs faster
    3. geek cred points.

    I'm voting for 3.

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    1. Re:3 possible reasons for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No numbered list is complete without:
      4: Profit!

  6. The uprising begins? by CCelebornn · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Liquid metal always reminds me of T1000's from Terminator 2.

    Perhaps this is just the start... what if all these liquid metal coolers all joined together in an uprising against human kind? Sapphire Technology would have a hell of a lot to answer for!

    1. Re:The uprising begins? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Please, Sapphire has one of the worst history among all 3rd party card manufacturers for overheating.

      They are notorious for cutting cost at the fan level with a $1 plastic fan instead of a $3 one.

      If they build terminators, it'd be made out of paper.

    2. Re:The uprising begins? by zor_prime · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our Skynet overlords, and their lieutenants, the T1000s.

      --
      "We all do no end of feeling, and we mistake it for thinking." -Mark Twain
  7. Dupe - sorta by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    Liquid metal computer component cooling was discussed here not to long ago. Sorry, I don't have the relavant Slashdot URL handy. I read the previous article just for the Terminator 2 jokes (pertaining liquid metal Terminator T-1000).

    1. Re:Dupe - sorta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here.

    2. Re:Dupe - sorta by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>Liquid metal computer component cooling was discussed here not to long ago.

      Indeed. link to Liquid Metal CPU Cooling 03May05

    3. Re:Dupe - sorta by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Dupe!

      A post bitching about dups has already been posted. This post is such a dupe. Don't the readers of slashdot read slashdot anymore?!?!?!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    4. Re:Dupe - sorta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, thanks for pointing out the T2 reference for us all.

      Are you aware that 10 base2 == 2 base10 !!!

  8. leakage by LittleGuernica · · Score: 5, Funny

    When your videocard starts leaking, don't mind the components being destroyed, but worry about a T1000 dripping out of your computer.. from the FAQ: Q: How will I know if my videocard is leaking? A: Ask your parents why "wolfie" is barking and if they answer you while the the dog is actually named "Max" then your videocard is leaking.

    1. Re:leakage by LittleGuernica · · Score: 2, Funny

      Darn, the T2 joke has already been made *thinks of other joke to get karma..* *hmm karmawhoring is wrong* *must say something that refers to actual content of TFA* It's ridiculous that cards need to be cooled that way. It;s a way to have faster videocards without actually making a better GPU. just turn it up another nutch and use liquid nitrogen to cool it..

    2. Re:leakage by pcmanjon · · Score: 5, Informative

      " Darn, the T2 joke has already been made *thinks of other joke to get karma..*"

      Actually, Humor karma doesn't go on your karma record. Check the faq about karma.

    3. Re:leakage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:4, Informative)

      Actually, Humor karma doesn't go on your karma record. Check the faq about karma.

      Oh the irony.

    4. Re:leakage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Darn, the T2 joke has already been made *thinks of other joke to get karma..*" Actually, Humor karma doesn't go on your karma record. Check the faq about karma.

      Anyone see the irony of pcmanjon getting karma by telling others that they will not get karma?

    5. Re:leakage by MisterMoney · · Score: 1

      gettin' the informative karma for posting how humor karma doesn't go on your karma record.

      well played. very well played.

  9. Yeah but how does it work? by ZenBearClaw · · Score: 1

    How does it work? The little brief on the phys site said that it used an electromagnetic drive suggesting that the metal itself is feromagnetic such as the fluid use in the active dampeners on the corvette but I want to know about the tech. The ue of the vide card is lame and not worth my time at all tell me about the tech. Is there an artical that actually tells me what it is made of? Geez this could be cool but right now its just an advert.

    1. Re:Yeah but how does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It uses an electormagnetic pump.
      It uses sodium.

      Here:
      http://www.nanocoolers.com/technology_liquid.php

    2. Re:Yeah but how does it work? by Dahan · · Score: 1
      It uses sodium.

      No. It doesn't.

    3. Re:Yeah but how does it work? by vanka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the electronic damping on the C6 Corvette does not depend on liquid metal in the shocks as you assert. What the shocks actually contain is oil in which are suspended tiny ball bearings (for lack of a better word). These ball bearings are coated with a special substance that not only allows them to float in the oil, but also distributes them uniformly throughout the oil. These ball bearings are then acted on by electromagnets to vary the viscosity of the oil. To quote Car and Driver:

      The dampers are filled not with standard oil but with magnetorheological (MR) fluid. This is a synthetic oil with millions of tiny iron balls suspended in it. These iron balls have a proprietary coating to make them less abrasive and help them float evenly within the shock fluid.

      More important, they react to a magnetic field generated by an electric coil on the shock piston, thereby changing the fluid's viscosity. Imagine changing your shock fluid from 5W to 100W by simply varying the current in the coil.

    4. Re:Yeah but how does it work? by MidnightPsycho · · Score: 1

      You can read about it here:
      http://www.nanocoolers.com/technology_liquid.php

      As a metal, the liquid is both highly thermally conductive and highly electrically conductive. The thermal conductivity makes it ideal for heat removal and dissipation. The electrical conductivity enables the use of electromagnetic pumps to propel the liquid.

      One unique benefit of liquid metal is the ability to pump this coolant efficiently with a silent, non-moving parts pump. The electromagnetic pump is located in-line with one of the fluid channels. It consists of magnets, a yoke and two electrodes, again ensuring the simplicity of the solution.

  10. More leaks to worry about by multi-flavor-geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now I have to worry about memory leaks, security leaks, and liquid metal video card coolant leaks, ahhhh crap, this is all getting way to confusing.
    I have enough trouble just keeping everything from blowing up everytime I get nailed by a thunderstorm, last time it was crack/fizz/is that smoke? Whats next, crack/fizz/smoke/drip?
    It also doesn't mention if it's non-conducting, when I get struck by lightning 5h1t explodes, wouldn't that be fun to watch as the entire motherboard gets sprayed with a liquid metal conductive material, gaaaaaaa!

    --
    Like arts? Like cheesy little Indie mags? Check out www.artwerkmag.com, and don't laugh at the bad coding please.
    1. Re:More leaks to worry about by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're purchasing a liquid metal cooled video card, you can afford a $50 surge protector or a $200 UPS.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:More leaks to worry about by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

      So somehow your video card explodes from lightning, but nothing else would otherwise be damaged if it wasn't for that damn liquid metal?

    3. Re:More leaks to worry about by multi-flavor-geek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actualy the last storm lit my UPS on fire, and blew out all the surge protectors also. Then it sent 1.21 gigawatts through my hub and across the entire network blowing up all of the network cards in the house. Strangest damn thing I had ever seen. It was a really good hit, the fuse in my power supply wasn't just blown, it was blown apart and even the leads were torn off the circuit board, not to mention the FETS were detonated and bent over.

      --
      Like arts? Like cheesy little Indie mags? Check out www.artwerkmag.com, and don't laugh at the bad coding please.
    4. Re:More leaks to worry about by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, what? Nothing what which you said makes sense.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:More leaks to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't undertand, because he's sending his post from the past, when computers were made of such antiquated components as resitors and capacitors. You see, when his computer was hit with 1.21 gigawatts of electricity, his post traveld forward in time, to this year 3005 AD. We all know that morern computers are all made of nano molecular chains, and indivdual components like 'capcitors' and resistors' that aren't actually a part of the molecular chain of the device are horribly antiquated ideas. Back then, computers needed massive, massive quantities of electrical power to generate minute computational operands. nowadays, with the computation being performed on a subatomic level, the power requirements to run a PC for 10,0000 years at load can be factory designed into the device that is trillion times more sophisticated than those antequated devices used as 'computers' in the early 21st century.

      So of course we understand your confusion, as not everyone understand the historical roots of early computing.

    6. Re:More leaks to worry about by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Thank god, here in the part of England I live in, the electricity comes from under the ground from the local Substation. (The only part that goes overground is the part up to the substation, so if lightning stikes, its the sub that gets blown.. hopefully)...

      But then, the telephone comes from overground.. yikes.. and i got ADSL.....

      --
      Have a nice day!
    7. Re:More leaks to worry about by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a direct or near direct hit. A ups is generally only good on sorta close hits and more normal line fluctuations.
      Consider that lightning is ALREADY arcing from between clouds and ground. Something the size of an ups is unlikely to do any good against a direct hit, nor are they intended to. Fourtunately direct hits (or close enough to fry an ups) are rather rare.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    8. Re:More leaks to worry about by multi-flavor-geek · · Score: 1

      The hit was the shared pole between my house and the neighbors, blew them off the grid to! I have had the phone hit abioout 5 times in the last year and a half though, luckily I have actually been getting good at resoldering and repairing the USR external modem I am using. Amazingly though, the modem survived this last fiasco.

      --
      Like arts? Like cheesy little Indie mags? Check out www.artwerkmag.com, and don't laugh at the bad coding please.
    9. Re:More leaks to worry about by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I'v 3 or four semi-functional modems (all internal) that've suffered line spikes durring storms.
      Usually what gives is such that you can move the line from the wall from the modems line in to it's phone out jack and use it. However sometimes the connection isn't as good and I only do this till I can run buy a new one.
      In one case the relay used to 'pick up the hook' as it were is visibly deformed from heat yet the phone out jack trick works just fine with it.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. Marketing by Detritus · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to their website, the "TOXIC X700 PRO" features "Lethal Cooling". I think they need a new marketing department.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Marketing by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man. That sounds like the most awesome card ever. I bet that would sell *tons*.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    2. Re:Marketing by High+Hat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, welcome or new liquid-metal-cooled-brains troll overlords!

  13. I can't figure out what might be in it by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They say it's not flammmable, so it's not the eutectic alloy of sodium and potassium that's liquid at room temperature. It's not toxic, so it's not mercury.

    Gallium might be possible since it melts a few degrees over room temperature. It's only mildly toxic but nobody should call it "nontoxic".

    1. Re:I can't figure out what might be in it by glMatrixMode · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nice guess, it's indeed Gallium, as a google search will confirm you.

      --
      War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.
    2. Re:I can't figure out what might be in it by quintiusc · · Score: 1

      And gallium it is. The New Scientist article doesn't state the melting temp but it does say the boiling temp is 2000 degrees so it can take a lot more than water and can be moved by quieter electromagnetic pumps.

      Hazardous fumes result from being heated to decomposition and contact to water for at least one gallium compound. I wasn't able to find out exactly which "gallium alloy" is used for cooling.

    3. Re:I can't figure out what might be in it by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes but probably not pure Ga but the GalInStan eutectic instead. Anyway though it's non toxic/non pyrophoric/non volatile is it still a METAL and a leak inside your computer would be instantly catastrophic for obvious reasons.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    4. Re:I can't figure out what might be in it by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      Isn't there an orwellian definition of non-toxic that means "It won't leak, so it's not toxic."?

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    5. Re:I can't figure out what might be in it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it depends on which type of Gallium they are using, but from my knowledge I think all Gallium is toxic even though some might be very mildly toxic. So ya I would probably say your right. If this stuff leaked and you were to touch it I suspect it would cause some damage. Maybe not to you but to the computer for sure. I doubt it is actually truly no-toxic and evironmentally safe but as long as it is contained it poses no risk to you or the environment.

    6. Re:I can't figure out what might be in it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "mildy toxic" I'm not sure what that means but I guess that anything is toxic providing you ingest enough if it (including water). For me if I touch it and I don't die a horrible death is good enough.

    7. Re:I can't figure out what might be in it by turbofisk · · Score: 1

      Kinda like a nuclear powerplant? :)

    8. Re:I can't figure out what might be in it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gallium won't harm you if you touch it. If you were to inject large amounts then you would get sick.

    9. Re:I can't figure out what might be in it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well it depends on which type of Gallium they are using
      So does it have allotropes, or do you not know what you're talking about?
  14. Non-flammable, non-toxic, environmentally safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like it could be the perfect ingredient in some high-margin trendy mixed cocktails.

  15. There are other reasons for this... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Sapphire's exciting new cooler is a compact, low-profile design using only one additional PC slot. Filled and sealed, it requires no user intervention, no reservoir or refilling and it is card resident so it requires no additional mounting space. The revolutionary use of an electromagnetic pump means no internal moving parts, low power consumption and delivers near silent operation."

    A one slot and nearly-silent top end card.

    1. Re:There are other reasons for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Text understanding not so good? What in "Sapphire's exciting new cooler is a compact, low-profile design using only one additional PC slot" is indicating that the whole card uses one slot? The cooler uses one additional slot.

    2. Re:There are other reasons for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, wow, only(!) one additional slot. are they suggesting newer cards will use two additional slots in the future?!

    3. Re:There are other reasons for this... by cnettel · · Score: 2, Informative
      only one additional PC slot

      That sure sounds like a nice way to say "two slots" to me.

    4. Re:There are other reasons for this... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Oh, duh. That's what I get for skimming the article. I didn't pay any attention after "no moving parts" anyway. Still probably takes up less space than my current 6800 with its huge heatsink, but either is much better than having a blowdryer attached...

    5. Re:There are other reasons for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If 2 SLI cards take 4 slots..

      Then that's stupid.

    6. Re:There are other reasons for this... by Stapled · · Score: 1

      The X-Bit link from this post has a good picture of the card. It looks like a monster of a 2-slot card. And its got 2 huge fans on it, to boot. Passive indeed. If they got it running with no fans then they'd have something to talk about.

  16. Liquid Metal Cooling Additional Requirements by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Funny


    1. NFPA requires NASCAR style fire extinguisher inside computer case.

    2. House wiring must be upgraded and a 440v 3 phase outlet installed next to your computer.

    3. Homeowners insurance rider for extreme fire hazard.

    4. Fire retardent metal door must be installed between computer room and rest of house.

    5. Town must grant zoning variance for indstrial scale use of power in a residence.

    6. Special monitor must be installed which notifies the Fire Department when your frame rate exceeds 250.

    1. Re:Liquid Metal Cooling Additional Requirements by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 2, Funny

      No barrier is too high when it comes to improving my Counter-Strike experience.

    2. Re:Liquid Metal Cooling Additional Requirements by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      6. Special monitor must be installed which notifies the Fire Department when your frame rate exceeds 250.

      me@here:~> glxgears
      6843 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1368.600 FPS
      7600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1520.000 FPS
      7519 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1503.800 FPS
      7593 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1518.600 FPS

      WE'RE ALL GUNNA DIE!!!!

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  17. liquid metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the sound of the article, I'd think it was some kind of 'ferrofluid' - a suspension of fine magnetic particles

  18. Re:And here I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought that liquid metal was hotter than, say, water.

    You have never seen quicksilver? One reason to use it in the thermometers instead of water is that it doesn't freeze at 0 degrees Celcius temperature like water does.

  19. Liquid Metal, Really? by lemonylimey · · Score: 0

    I wonder what kind of liquid metal they're using that is "completely non-toxic." Could it really be metal particles suspended in oil, like some kind of very dilute thermal paste? The only other application of liquid metal cooling I know of is the reactors on Soviet Alfa-Class Submarines, which used a molten lead-bismuth alloy. It allowed them to make small, high-power reactors, but unfortunately, despite attempts by the Soviets to keep the coolent molten with external superheated steam feeds, they had to keep the reactors running 24/7 or the coolent would fall below 125 degrees centigrade, freeze solid and render the reactor useless.

    1. Re:Liquid Metal, Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's an alloy of gallium and indium

      http://nwc.serverpipeline.com/news/54200844

  20. Re:And here I thought... by TEMM · · Score: 1

    Heh... Liquid metal in the sense of say steel or some other normally solid metal is only hotter than water in the sense that it must absorb a certain amount of heat before it liquifies. There are however some metals that are liquid at low/room temperatures. That being said even though the substance may need to be heated to liquify, the process of heating the substance will draw heat from the source, thus cooling it.

  21. heat capacity by N3TW4LK3R · · Score: 1, Informative

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't heat capacity more important than heat conductivity in this case?

    The article mentions a special kind of pump with no moving parts, so I assume the liquid is moving around from some sort of radiator to the GPU and back.

    Water has the highest value of heat capacity if I'm not mistaken (4186J/KgK), so in case of a moving cooling liquid, the higher the liquid's heat capacity, the less water will have to be moved to move a specific amount of heat.

    What does heat conductivity matter, then?

  22. a little bit more info... by bumptehjambox · · Score: 4, Informative
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/display/2005051 9225638.html

    Here's a little bit more info, no word on T1000's involvement.

    However, I wouldn't be surprised to hear that owners of this new "metal liquid cooling" at a LAN party ending quite horribly.
    I can see it start with a few leaks, the liquid metal all joins together... T1000 lives again...

  23. Gallium by nickptar · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm pretty sure they're using gallium. It melts at 85F, is nontoxic (unlike mercury), and is nonflammable (unlike rubidium, cesium, sodium, and potassium, the only other metals I know of that melt at reasonable temperatures for a graphics card). Gallium also has almost exactly 65 times the thermal conductivity of water.

    1. Re:Gallium by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Gallium metal expands by 3.1 percent when it solidifies, and therefore should not be stored in either glass or metal containers. Gallium also corrodes most other metals by diffusing into their metal lattice"

      Doesn't sound very easy to store.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Gallium by nickptar · · Score: 1

      Hmm... they could use glass or plastic tubing, and attach an air-filled chamber to allow for expansion. This still leaves the problem of melting it initially throughout the whole system to allow it to flow. Maybe there are heating coils around the parts that aren't directly on the GPU?

    3. Re:Gallium by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you may be right.

      I just found an article in new scientist:


      And now, NanoCoolers, based in Texas, US, has developed a liquid metal cooling system that promises to be even quieter and more efficient. The system draws heat away from a circuit by pumping liquid gallium alloy through a series of pipes. The temperature of the liquid is brought back down to normal within an ambient air-cooled chamber.

      link here

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Gallium by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      If it's pure gallium, I'd think it being solid at room temperature would be a real problem (since it freezes at 85F). The entire circuit of gallium would have to melt before it starts circulating. That would cause the CPU to start to get awfully hot before that happened.

      It seems more likely that they're using something that's liquid in room temperature. That could still mean some kind of gallium amalgram. Solder for instance has a lower melting point than either of the metals that constitute it.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:Gallium by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      It will most likely be a Gallium Alloy , as gallium is mildly toxic and has expansive propertys

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    6. Re:Gallium by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      And what about a heatsink? Going to use plastic? It would have to be copper, or what's the point?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    7. Re:Gallium by afaiktoit · · Score: 1

      Make sure you dont confuse thermal capacity with conductivity. Thats why water coolers work so well, water can contain a large amount of heat and move it away from the cpu.

    8. Re:Gallium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could store it in the condoms the catholics don't use.

    9. Re:Gallium by Rolfje · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, I've looked at wikipedia and some other links from there on, but all state that Gallium's toxicity isn't established, and should be handled with care. I sure hope they've checked their facts, before some kid takes it apart and starts playing with the T-1000 inside his videocard.

    10. Re:Gallium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I sure hope they've checked their facts, before some kid takes it apart and starts playing with the T-1000 inside his videocard."

      Anyone who decides to take his functioning videocard apart to drink the contents isn't going to live long anyway.

  24. Chemically... by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As it's a liquid metal.. and the only one liquid at temperatures around room temperature to 100 degrees C are lead, mercury and maby a lead tin amalgam.. it's got to be some new thing.

    I'm curious about the chemical composistion of this new amalgam, as it must be (unless they're using highly reactive cesium, which I really doubt).

    Anyone know any chemical details ?

    1. Re:Chemically... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "and the only one liquid at temperatures around room temperature to 100 degrees C are lead, mercury and maby a lead tin amalgam"

      Room temperature liquids aren't required, as the card likely operates in the 50C-80C range.

    2. Re:Chemically... by puppet10 · · Score: 1
      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    3. Re:Chemically... by MasterDirk · · Score: 1

      Forgetting about mercury, are we?

      At least a transition-metal, and liquid at room temperature...

      --

      "Programming is like sex: one mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life."

    4. Re:Chemically... by MasterDirk · · Score: 1

      bah!

      Memo to self: read post once, twice, three times before spurning so as not to make fool of self again, and again.

      --

      "Programming is like sex: one mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life."

    5. Re:Chemically... by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

      Yea, but what happens when we're at a cold start?

    6. Re:Chemically... by sydb · · Score: 1

      The poster said "room temperature to 100 degrees C,", which comfortably straddles your 50C-80C range.

      I could write you off as a normal idiot, but you actually fucking quoted that in your reply.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    7. Re:Chemically... by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

      I'm a chemist, so i'd never forget Hg... I did almost forget Ga tho.. melts in your hand, and not particularly toxic either I hear.

    8. Re:Chemically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      around room temperature to 100 degrees C are lead

      You loose some geek points. Just ask google what the melting point of lead is and you'll find it is 327 deg C.

      Perhaps you like running your processors at 621 deg F?

    9. Re:Chemically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Room temperature is about 22C, which you'll notice is well below 50C. If the set of metals that are liquid in a given temperature range shrinks as the temperature range increases on the left and grows as the temperature ranges shrinks on the left, then you can easily read a range of 50C-80C as values for the left specified in order to maximize the set of metals that are liquid for the expected range of operation.

      I could write you off as a normal idiot, which is what I'm going to do. Idiot.

    10. Re:Chemically... by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

      i'm confused.. are you yelling at me or him ?

    11. Re:Chemically... by sydb · · Score: 1

      If I could make sense from your incoherent post I would provide a cogent argument against it.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    12. Re:Chemically... by sydb · · Score: 1

      Him. Not you. He completely missed your point even while quoting it.

      Although you've got to admit your point was invalid.

      Anyway I'm not yelling, just scowling.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    13. Re:Chemically... by brettper · · Score: 1

      Yeah but is "not particularly toxic" actually the same as safe?

    14. Re:Chemically... by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

      yes it was, but it was also graduation here, and i had 6+ beers in me while posting.. so... I forgive myself.. ;)

    15. Re:Chemically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For you to provide a cogent argument against it, presumably you would first need to be intelligent-enough to read simple English. If you were that intelligent, presumably you wouldn't have posted such a stupid response.

    16. Re:Chemically... by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

      Everythings' toxic in the right amount.

      Water, for instance, will drown you.

    17. Re:Chemically... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      xbitlabs.com says:
      "NanoCoolers insist that the fluid it uses is non-toxic, non-flammable and environmentally safe. The company says boiling point of the substance is over 2000C in a low vapor pressure environment (for the most substances, except water, the rule is that the boiling point gets lower as the pressure gets lower), which is very high: for instance, iron becomes a liquid when it is heat a temperature of 1535C at normal atmospheric pressure. NanoCoolers does not disclose a type of the fluid it uses."

      Boiling point over 2000C, so it must really be metallic, not a solution as I was thinking. Hopefully someone will crack one open and find out what it really is soon.

    18. Re:Chemically... by sydb · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, I hope you had a good time but not too good a time...

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    19. Re:Chemically... by ahecht · · Score: 1

      Woah, xbitlabs should check a chemistry textbook. The boiling point of water does get lower as the pressure gets lower (which is why it takes longer to cook pasta on top of a mountain).

  25. Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by quakeroatz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is this possible?

    Last time I checked molten metal (burning death) and Mercury (deadly poison) was toxic.

    AHHH, Nothing like a warm sip of heatsink juice to warm you up on a cold winter night.

    1. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more than four elements on the periodic table. :)

    2. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by John+Meacham · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, galinstan is liquid at room temperature and quite safe (compared to mercury). I have a vial of it on my desk. fun stuff.

      make your own, it is 68.5% Ga, 21.5% In, 10% Sn or you can buy it online.

      A cool application is to make a _perfect_ parabolic mirror. You do this by spinning a puddle of it. The centrifugal force pulls it against the sides and is countered by gravity pulling down the center making a perfect mirror for a tesescope always pointing exactly straight up.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    3. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Zorplex · · Score: 1

      Sweet! A perfect mirror you say? This sounds like just the thing I need for my brand new 20 incher I'm making this summer!

      Oh, wait... I have to use centrifugal force?

      Dang it! And I was so close too! Too bad I don't believe in imaginary forces...

    4. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      I guarantee you centrifugal force is real... From the POV of someone standing on the rotating object :) It's all relative.

    5. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice idea for a parabolic gallium alloy (gallistan) reflecting telescope. There is a mercury one in Canada, maybe a couple or three meters diameter. But gallistan would work nicely for a forty inch scope in the back yard.

    6. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by John+Meacham · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Umm.. Centrifugal force is quite real and describes exactly the effect I am talking about. You are probably thinking of centripetal force, which is exerted on the galinstan by the walls of its container, which would be another accurate but less useful in this context way of putting things since you probably want to think of the mirror as stationary for doing the math and intuitively thinking about the shape of the mirror.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_force

      I am not sure where the persistant myth that centrifugal does not exist came from, but it is quite bothersome. It is a well established term with a precise meaning. I mean, it exists due to a coordinate transform, but that doesn't make the math and results any less valid!

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    7. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It comes from people who have learned a tiny bit of anti-establishment science trivia, formed an inflated opinion of their own depth of knowledge in physics, and now wish to impress others by lobbing said trivia bits about in conversation, figuring they'll be safe doing so most of the time because nearly noone with whom they converse day-to-day will be sufficiently educated to call their bluff.

      Tabloid Science!

    8. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Zorplex · · Score: 1

      Alright... before I get flamed any more...

      I intended my prior statement to be a somewhat witty and funny comment, and apparently failed miserably. (I tend to do that a lot...) I understand centrifugal force is still widely applied in calculations and that many consider it a "normal" force. (normal as in it isn't imaginary, not as in it being a "normal force")

      Since you insist on making this a serious discussion. I'll humor you by using your own source.

      From the Centrifugal force article on Wikipedia:

      This force term is a "fictitious" force because it only appears due to a coordinate transformation. The true non-rotating reference frame can always be discerned by an observer as the one in which there is no centrifugal force.

      Somehow I knew someone would try to cite the "Almighty Wiki," so I checked up on it before I made my first comment. Of course, you could go and edit the article if you truly believe it to be incorrect.

      (Once again: this isn't a flame. It is merely a rebuttal to defend myself and declare that my first post was intended to be comical in nature... you shisno.) ^^

    9. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 1

      Too bad I don't believe in imaginary forces...

      It's good that you at least don't really follow that line of thought to its conclusion. You'd have to throw all inertial forces off the window (oops! there goes mechanics!) unless, of course, you were one of them zero-mass humans.

      Pay attention next time you're moving with changing velocity. And be thankful that whoever invented seatbelts did not share that particular belief of yours.

    10. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

      Your post was appropriatly witty and funny. It is I who have been awake too long. I apologize :)

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    11. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Otto · · Score: 1
      From the Centrifugal force article on Wikipedia:

      This force term is a "fictitious" force because it only appears due to a coordinate transformation. The true non-rotating reference frame can always be discerned by an observer as the one in which there is no centrifugal force.


      Somehow I knew someone would try to cite the "Almighty Wiki," so I checked up on it before I made my first comment. Of course, you could go and edit the article if you truly believe it to be incorrect.

      It's not that it's incorrect so much as it is incomplete, or rather, not very well defined. The most incorrect thing I see there is the words "true non-rotating reference frame". What does "true" mean there? Any frame of reference is as valid as any other. The fact that we don't usually use rotating frames of reference doesn't make them any less valid, nor does it make them any less real. Recalculate the laws of physics in a rotating frame of reference and you'll get an internally consistent structure, just as you do in a non-rotating one. Saying one is "true" is like asking the question "Which one is real?". The question makes no sense. Both are equally real, it all depends on your point of view.
      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    12. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt you'd get a perfect mirror (I do know that telescopes like this exsist, I'm just saying that this isn't an ATM project). Spining the pool smoothly enough to avoid vibrations larger than a fraction of a wavelength of visible light is not as trivial as it first seems.

      Also, a paraboloid is not a perfect shape. It suffers from coma.

    13. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So just how safe is "quite safe (compared to mercury)"?

      Assuming it's fairly safe, where might I buy some? I checked Google, but all I found were galinstan thermometers.

    14. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by LadyLucky · · Score: 1

      Interestingly one of the problems with large parabolic surfaces is keeping them parabolic under the influence of gravity. When you tip your telescope to a different angle, you get different stresses in different places which causes a deformation, and loss of perfection. I would have thought that this deformation could be calibrated for and corrected in software, but people spend big bucks to make it perfect so I guess not.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    15. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by hawk · · Score: 1
      I am not sure where the persistant myth that centrifugal does not exist came from, but it is quite bothersome.

      Damn that Newton and his FUD.

      He's been unbearably cranky ever since Leibnitz stole the Calculus from him.



      hawk

    16. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by Gorffy · · Score: 1

      To make a relitively useful one (still not perfect, but fun for the backyard) you could probably use a high quality phonograph setup. They're designed with limiting vibrations in mind. Might take some tweaking to get it right, but a record player powered liquid mirror sound has gotta be worth geek points ;)

    17. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by srleffler · · Score: 1
      The whole point of General Relativity is that all reference frames are equally good, and physics has to work correctly in all of them. The rotating reference frame is no less 'true' than the rotating one, and centrifugal force is just as 'real' as gravity.

      Note that I picked gravity as an example for a good reason here. The apparent downward force you feel in an accelerating reference frame is indistinguishable from gravity in GR. In classical physics, this force would be considered 'fictitious' for the same reason the centrifugal force is--it's just a manifestation of your inertia, viewed from a non-stationary reference frame. Einstein showed that in fact this 'fictitious' force actually is gravity--there is no difference between this force and the more familiar force we feel due to the pull of massive objects.

    18. Re:Non Toxic Liquid Metal? by srleffler · · Score: 1

      Oops, never mind. It turns out I'm wrong. Rotating frames are not completely relative in GR, unlike linearly-accelerated frames. So, my comments on inertia vs. gravity are true, but the argument does not apply to centrifugal force.

  26. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now my graphics card can finally help me use my power line to it's full potential!

  27. Think of it as an improved heat sink by Greg+Hullender · · Score: 5, Informative
    Several metals or alloys are liquid below the boiling point of water. My favorite is "Wood's Metal," which is used to make gag teaspoons. (They melt in your coffee -- but don't drink it!) http://ptcl.chem.ox.ac.uk/MSDS/WO/woods_metal.html Gallium melts at an even lower point, but looks to be harder to handle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallium None of these, though, has a higher specific heat than water, but, of course, they're claiming superior heat conduction, so perhaps the best way to think of it (whatever metal they chose) is as a very, very elaborate heat sink.

    --Greg

    1. Re:Think of it as an improved heat sink by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      I understand this Gallium-based "Liquid Metal" is highly conductive, but that does no good if the heat isn't being taken away from the chip. So my question is: Where does the heat go? Is there a radiator that's away from the chip somewhere that the hot Gallium is pumped to?

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    2. Re:Think of it as an improved heat sink by argent · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the metal wouldn't need to actually be liquid to work, then, and the electromagnetic pumps are redundant.

    3. Re:Think of it as an improved heat sink by Greg+Hullender · · Score: 1
      I understand this Gallium-based "Liquid Metal" is highly conductive, but that does no good if the heat isn't being taken away from the chip. So my question is: Where does the heat go? Is there a radiator that's away from the chip somewhere that the hot Gallium is pumped to?

      Actually this is beautifully illustrated in the slides on this page http://www.techpowerup.com/?3105

      The basic idea is that circulating the metal gets the heat out to the exchanger much faster. You've still got to blow air or something over the cooling fins.

      --Greg

    4. Re:Think of it as an improved heat sink by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      None of these, though, has a higher specific heat than water
      Specific heat is per unit mass[1], though, and metals are (usually) denser. Thus even if it holds less per gram, it could hold more per cubic centimetre, which is probably more important considering the constraints of pipe sizes etc.

      [1] I'm sure there's a term for the volume related equivalent, I just can't remember it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  28. It's metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as much as there's molten rock in lava lamps...

  29. You begin to wonder... by RemovableBait · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First in the Blizzard range will be the SAPPHIRE Blizzard RADEON X850 XT and Blizzard RADEON X850 XT Platinum Editions. Blizzard delivers the future of gaming with the ability to push blistering frame rates and deliver environments erupting with vibrant colours and highly detailed textures rendered in High-Definition clarity.

    Combining Sapphire innovations with game developers' creations, users won't miss a single feature of today's gaming titles. This hardware boasts 16 parallel pixel pipelines, 256MB of GDDR3 memory, and PCI Express interface. From innovative minds working to deliver to users who demand the peak of performance in every aspect of their graphics card, the Sapphire Blizzard RADEON X850 XT Turns the Ordinary into Extraordinary.


    Is all this not a little overkill? I mean, really, isn't water-cooling cool enough for people? Certainly, I have a GPU cooled with the good 'ol fan & heatsink combo -- I get damn good performance, pretty close to what they're describing and it didn't cost me the Earth. The noise isn't bad either: it's drowned out many times over by the fans on the PSU.

    The other interesting thing to note -- while this may be really useful for the up and coming mini-PCs (think Mac Mini) that need a well cooled (to prevent overheating) and quiet solution -- it'll take up too much space. An extra PCI slot is just a no go when space is at a premium. I'd also love to see this type of technology implemented on mini-PCI slots, where the extra cooling is essential for performance. Now that would be useful.

    1. Re:You begin to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it overkill? If anything these seems better than water cooling for a variety of reasons. Nothing will grow in it if sits unused, it doesn't require a mechanical pump, it doesn't have a large reservoir, it doesn't require a large waterblock, it can be applied effectively on multiple components without networking them together, etc.

    2. Re:You begin to wonder... by RemovableBait · · Score: 1

      I believe it is overkill from performance and cooling point of view. I don't believe that 'liquid metal' cooling will provide any better performance than other (likely less expensive) options such as fans/heatsinks and water cooling.

      Also, anyone who has a water-cooled GPU that sits unused doesn't really need to fork out lots of money for 'liquid metal' cooling do they?

      Granted, it doesn't need mechanical pumps, waterblocks, but we've been told precious little about the specifications and technology behind it.

      It may well need a bigger reservoir than we think, or it may well have a tiny reservior, with the potential to be scaled down for use in mini-PCI and onboard chips -- that still reach ludicrous temperatures. If the latter is true, then i've underrated it and misunderstood entirely.

      At this stage, we can only speculate, but thats my humble opinion. Whether it is correct or not (most likely not) is beside the point :D

  30. Great Idea. by Mantus · · Score: 1

    Maybe if some Nvidia cards start to use this cooler the 6800 Ultra won't need a cooler that blocks the adjacent slot.

    1. Re:Great Idea. by __aasmho4525 · · Score: 1

      hm....

      this technique (as purportedly implemented per the article) uses an adjacent slot for the self-contained, sealed cooling module.

      net sum zero.

      cheers.

      Peter

  31. Why would you buy this? by quickbasicguru · · Score: 1

    Where did the simple video cards go to? (You know, the ones that could be air cooled)

    You know John Doe likes gamming too much when they buy a liquid metal cooled video card.


    John: Hey Bill, I just bought a liquid metal cooled video card! Now I can play the good games I always wanted to buy!

    Bill: But can you buy the games you always wanted?

    John: Oops...

    1. Re:Why would you buy this? by lheal · · Score: 1

      I don't buy any computer hardware. Not for myself, anyway. I have engineer clients who need good video for CAD, but they don't need liquid-metal coolant, particularly.

      Maybe this will become the standard technology. If it allows for quieter fans to keep the decibel level down to double digits, it might catch on.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    2. Re:Why would you buy this? by SeventyBang · · Score: 1

      just remember: decibel levels depend upon how close you are to the source of the noise.

      That's why the noise threshold so many cities & towns cite is laughable. The decibel level at 1' isn't the same as 2' which isn't the same as 3', and so on. With a car's stereo, the decibel level at 10' and 100' aren't the same.

      Wikepedia's Decibel & Acoustics info

      I guess they don't teach this in high-school physics any more?

      (or was this an attempt to make a quick joke with inaccurate information?)

    3. Re:Why would you buy this? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Perhaps it was a joke? Lets see.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke

      A joke is a short story or short series of words spoken or communicated with the intent of being laughed at or found humorous by the listener or reader.

      It is concievable that the user intended his 'short story' to be funny. But how do we know? The description oes on...

      Most jokes contain two components: joke setup (for example, "A man walks into a bar...") and a punchline, which when juxtaposed with the setup provides the necessary irony to elicit laughter from the audience.

      I don't see an obvious setup, but I *do* detect a bit of irony towards the end. It would seem to me that "decibels in the double digits", though flawed, is implying that anything with Db in double digits is quite loud. And that keeping something *down* to something so *high* is ironic, is it not?

      So yes. it would appear to actually be humor. You can now feel free to laugh at it.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    4. Re:Why would you buy this? by lheal · · Score: 1

      >or was this an attempt to make a quick joke
      >with inaccurate information?

      I just didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    5. Re:Why would you buy this? by VeryProfessional · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

  32. Real Information by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Geeze, why does /. keep on linking to physorg, which has crappy articles and no links to real information about stuff.

    Here's a more in depth article on X-bit. NanoCoolers has a pretty in depth description of the product. It's basically a watercooling loop but using a molten metal. The really cool part is that because the metal is obviously electrically conductive, they're using a DC current combined with some magnets to take advantage of Lorentz force to propel the fluid.

    1. Re:Real Information by argent · · Score: 1

      Thank you for lookingthat up for us, I'm also getting really tired of the way Physorg is using Slashdot to drive clicks into their sandtrap.

  33. Old story, new again. by gordguide · · Score: 2, Informative

    The liquid metal cooling topic was covered on /. before, eg:
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/ 03/1421243&tid=222/

    The technology probably derives from http://www.nanocoolers.com/products_cooling.php/

    Sapphire is just the OEM manufacturer of ATi cards. For quite a while you could only get ATi branded cards but now you can get them from ATi or Sapphire. I doubt they have much to do with the technology besides licensing it.

  34. Near-silent by Rxke · · Score: 3, Funny

    From TFA
    "The revolutionary use of an electromagnetic pump means no internal moving parts, low power consumption and delivers near silent operation. "

    Near-silent? What is making the noise then?

    1. Re:Near-silent by Zagar · · Score: 1
      Near-silent? What is making the noise then?
      The non-silent fans.
      --
      YAFIRL (Yet another Free iPods referral link)
    2. Re:Near-silent by ahecht · · Score: 1

      Liquid metal rushign through the pipes.

  35. Re:And here I thought... by cnettel · · Score: 1

    Nah, it will have to reach a temperature close to the melting point to actually absorb heat in any other way than an ice cube may absorb heat when its -5 centigrades. You can't get a higher temperature in the coolant than in the "colee", so to cool by the phase transition itself, you'll need the colee to reach the melting point of the metal. That will also be needed if one is going to get a pump going by magnetic forces, which seems to be the idea here. If it stays solid, it will only be a fancy, encased, heatsink.

  36. What state is it in between 6.6C and 7.5C???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plasmavania.

  37. Russian submarines with liquid metal cooling by Yay+Frogs · · Score: 1

    I remember that Russian nuclear submarines used to use liquid metal instead of water to cool their reactors which was a really bad idea because the metal would become much more radioactive than water and because the metal could cool and solidify, causing a clog.

    1. Re:Russian submarines with liquid metal cooling by acey72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'll be thinking of the Alfa class attack boats?

      The ones which used the BM-40A reactor. A lead-bismuth cooled design, making 150MW(th), which could push these boats to 43 knots - faster than any NATO torpedo when they were introduced. They could also dive to 600m due to their titanium hulls, and had a crew of about 30 - engineering and ordinance being automated from the the control room.

      On the downside, they were fairly noisy, at least when they were at full power; and there were problems with the coolant freezing when the reactor was shutdown, which lead to the reactors never being shutdown. (On the other hand, they were much safer in a coolant loss incident than a water cooled reactor).

      All in all, a very impressive boat.

    2. Re:Russian submarines with liquid metal cooling by rentedflowers · · Score: 1

      Liquid sodium is often used for reactor cooling in power plants; personally, I'm going to stay away from that in my video card...

  38. Mandatory T2 Joke by Dexter.M · · Score: 1

    "And in other news, nVidia announced that their upcomming 8000 series is going to feature a NeuralNet CPU, which is a learning processor. Finally, gamers can get their cards to behave exactly the way they want to..."

    1. Re:Mandatory T2 Joke by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Im sorry Bob, you are playing too much World Of Warcraft and cannot pay your electric bills. I cannot run that program.

      --
  39. Patent by nickptar · · Score: 1

    The X-bit link says that the "metal" used is patented, so it's not pure gallium like I thought - it must be an alloy, probably the gallium-indium mentioned in a couple other posts.

  40. Liquid Metal info by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Did some research, found the following two patents:

    http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PT O2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r =1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ptxt&s1=nanocoolers&OS=nanoc oolers&RS=nanocoolers

    And

    http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PT O2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r =2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ptxt&s1=nanocoolers&OS=nanoc oolers&RS=nanocoolers

    It looks like they're using a Gallium/Indium (rare elements) alloy. This is certainly not environmentally safe from a chemical point of view as these are toxic heavy metals. I think by environmentally safe they are pointing to the "sealed" system that they are advertising. That is, they dont exepect the systems to leak, as they do not require any refilling.

    Basically, their argument appears to be that it's safe because it cant get out, just like coolant in a nuclear reactor. This is actually a reasonable claim, however, we shouldnt take it to mean that the liquid metal coolant itself is evironmentally sound, just that the system, while in operation, is.

    P.S. it appears they've also experimented w/ Lead/Bismuth, mercury, and Sodium/Potassium alloys.

    1. Re:Liquid Metal info by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm. According to material safety data sheets I've Googled at, Indium has and LD50 in rats of 4200mg/Kg (4.2grams/kilogram), What I see for Gallium is "Chronic Effects: Intravenous administration to humans caused metallic taste, skin rashes and bone marrow depression as well as anorexia, nausea and vomiting. May cause damage to kidneys."

      So "Do not mainline". Otherwise, s'ok.

    2. Re:Liquid Metal info by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Interesting

      so what happens when you're *gasp* upgrading to the next video card and want to dispose of this one? there's already a disposal problem with a lot of computer parts, is this comparable or worse and will the companies that dispose of parts now be ready to accept this new one?

    3. Re:Liquid Metal info by nallen · · Score: 1

      Sodium-potassium alloy aka Nak is fun stuff. It's a liquid at roomtemperature, looks like mercury. Ever see teflon burn under an argon atmosphere? Yeah, NaK fun stuff. Good times good times.

    4. Re:Liquid Metal info by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      This is actually a reasonable claim, however, we shouldnt take it to mean that the liquid metal coolant itself is evironmentally sound, just that the system, while in operation, is.

      "While in operation" is the key phrase here. When it gets tossed in the trash when it's replaced by next years model, crushed in the garbage truck, and dumped into the landfill, it's another story altogether. In the sense that ATI is using the term, "environmentally safe" could apply equally well to nuclear fuel rods.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    5. Re:Liquid Metal info by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

      This isn't the sort of thing you throw away. This is the sort of thing you collect to extract the liquid-poly-metal-alloy to make robots that take over the world.

    6. Re:Liquid Metal info by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      They actually injected this shit into people and said 'so, how you feeling, bub?'?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    7. Re:Liquid Metal info by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      This is certainly not environmentally safe from a chemical point of view as these are toxic heavy metals.

      Heavy metals??? You need to look at the periodic table, my friend. Their atomic numbers are 31 and 49, right under aluminum and just as safe.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    8. Re:Liquid Metal info by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Obviously they didn't throw out all of the Nazi medical experiments data when the war ended.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    9. Re:Liquid Metal info by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

      I wouldnt put them in the same saftey profile as iron, zinc or copper, would you ?

  41. PhysOrg == PR Central by jonabbey · · Score: 1

    Yeah, PhysOrg is clearly a marketing front for PR releases with any sort of science-y edge to them.

    See Paul Graham's already classic The Submarine for details on how this crap works.

  42. Metal?! Ah, I see why... I think? by TerranFury · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I first saw that they were using liquid metal, my first thought was "Why?!" Water has a gigantic heat capacity, and is in may ways the Ideal Coolant.

    But then I saw: "Electromagnetic pump with no moving parts." So it looks like they're sacrificing some of the coolant properties of water so that they can use something very electrically-conductive, and gain the advantage of silent operation.

    That said, IIRC there are no-moving-parts water pumps that use electrochemical effects (something with electrolysis and dragging ions through the water), but I've always assumed that they're limited to small flow rates.

    Now I want to know how this no-moving-parts liquid-metal-pump works. Maybe use a square-cross-sectioned pipe with an insulating top and bottom and conductive sides; pass a current between the sides, and put large permanent magnets above and below? Or do it linear-induction-motor style? Hmmm...

  43. Near silent by Man+of+E · · Score: 1
    I think my favorite bit from the blurb is the statement that it "delivers near silent operation". Using an electromagnetic pump might do away with the enormous fans that make current cards sound like a hovercraft.

    Based on the earbursting noise produced by my current computer, I've pretty much decided that the next one I build is going to be as silent as possible. Maybe we won't have to give up graphics power for silence.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig
    1. Re:Near silent by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      You have never had to give up power for silence.

      You have just had to purchase longer cables in the past.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Near silent by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yeah, finding quiet/silent parts for a PC is difficult... here's a few that I'm using if anyone is interested:

      Antec Phantom 350 PSU
      Gigabyte 6800 fanless (only 12 pipes, but not a big sacrifice...though if this liquid metal stuff works it should make things easier the next time I upgrade)
      Thermalright CPU heatsink with a 120mm fan on a Zalman fan bracket and set at minimum on a Zalman fanmate control.
      All in an Antec 3700BQE case with quiet 120mm exhaust fan.

      The annoying thing was that as soon as I got rid of one whining or droning noise I'd notice a slightly quieter one... Now, it's inaubible except in dead silence.

    3. Re:Near silent by _|()|\| · · Score: 1
      Thanks for that list. I've tried a few power supplies that were advertised as quiet, but I've suspected that I need to go fanless. As I read the Phantom review, I was reminded that I neglected to install the AMD Cool 'n' Quiet driver after my last Windows reinstall. That was good for about ten degrees C, at idle.

      I have the 3700BQE, which has four convenient drive trays. However, if I use more than one drive, the case resonates.

    4. Re:Near silent by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I tried a Zalman "Silent" PSU before... at any reasonable wattage/temp it wasn't that much better than regular PSUs. I was a bit concerned how stable the Phantom would be, but I've had it for months with no issues.

      I only have the one drive in my 3700BQE, but that's a bummer. The Nexus Breeze is the only other one I could find with some attempt at noise reduction and without (useless) holes in the sides, but it doesn't have the drives isolated by rubber - I'm not sure if it would rattle more, or if the soundproofing material would dampen any vibrations. (Well, there's also that several thousand dollar heatpipe case...)

    5. Re:Near silent by dukerobillard · · Score: 1

      I've got the Gigabyte 6800, and had no trouble unlocking the other 4 pipes (via some software called "RivaTuner"). It's still not a 6800 GT, though, because of the slower RAM.

  44. Note ads always mention the UP side: by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yep, Gallium does indeed conduct heat many times better than water. Too bad that's not a relevant parameter here.

    With a cooling loop, you'd like a liquid that can carry a lot of heat per trip and doesnt get too hot in doing so. Water gobbles up a whole kilocalorie per cc for each degree. gallium is dreadful by comparison-- it has a FIFTEEN times poorer specific heat, so it either goes up 15 degrees per cc as it passes the GPU, or the pump has to put out 15 times the flow rate to give the same cooling rate as plain old H20.

    Good old H20.

    1. Re:Note ads always mention the UP side: by ikeleib · · Score: 2, Informative

      Water takes one calorie of energy input per degree Centigrade raise in temperature.

    2. Re:Note ads always mention the UP side: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Two words: relative density.

      Specific heat is measured in J/KgK, you multiply by density and divide by a 1x10**6 to get J/cm**3K, which is what you're talking about.

    3. Re:Note ads always mention the UP side: by Bloater · · Score: 1

      The OP is correct. One kilo calorie is one Calorie (with the capital C), that is a thousand times more than one calorie.

    4. Re:Note ads always mention the UP side: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water gobbles up a whole kilocalorie per cc for each degree.

      I'm afraid not, it only gobbles a regular calorie. That's still a lot. The word "gobble" is appropriate, because the usual use of kilocalories (each equal to one thousand of the "raise a cc of water by one degree" kind) is in measuring food energy values.

    5. Re:Note ads always mention the UP side: by Mornelithe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right, and the specific heat of water is 1 calorie/(gram*degree C) which is approximately 1 calorie/(cc*degree C), depending on the density of your water. That's little-c calorie.

      Therefore, the original poster is wrong. Water only absorbs one calorie for each degree, not a kilocalorie. However, he is correct that gallium has a poorer specific heat:

      Gallium: 370 J/(kg*K)
      Water: 4184 J/(kg*K)

      And it's, apparently, only about 6 times as dense (if Google hasn't failed me). So the same volume of gallium would heat up about twice as fast as water (correct me if I'm wrong).

      Then again, things like heat transfer are probably better with gallium, and it might be easier to cool than water, so who knows?

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

  45. Thermal expansion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about the thermal properties of metals? All metals and alloys (except invar) expand upon heating. Wouldn't that cause problems if the interior temperature became excessively hot?

  46. oh yeah? ... .. by stevenm86 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    cooling a video card? Oh yeah? Well, can it find Sarah Connor?

    1. Re:oh yeah? ... .. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Score -1: *WAY* too late with the terminator jokes/

  47. Both are important by arete · · Score: 1

    Transfering heat over a short distance conductivity is more important than capacity - because getting the heat IN and OUT of the coolant is the bigger issue.

    Transfering heat over a long distance capacity is more important than conductivity, because you're physically moving the coolant far away. What you really want in this case is high capacity and low viscosity - for a cooling setup like this "how much work the pump has to do" is probably more important than "what volume of coolant does it use" In very small spaces water has a very high viscosity due to surface tension related effects. (IIRC, basically because it's bipolar) That's why you should always have antifreeze in your car, even in the summer - the water pump can't handle pure water.

    While I'm not sure, I doubt water has the highest heat capacity bar none. This application certainly qualifies as a "short distance"

    Water is usually used so prevalently for industrial heat transfer for the combination of high capacity, low toxicity and extremely low coolant cost.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  48. Captain Ramius to the bridge.. by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    A silent magnetic pump.

    Gee, does this mean we could take this and put it on a submarine and have our own Red October?

    No, wait.. We need our own sub-launched ballistic missiles....

    Shucks.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  49. about time by Illserve · · Score: 1

    This opens the door for cooling systems based on knives and stabbing weapons.

  50. Not new tech! by Mac+Nazgul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has been used inside aircraft engine exhaust valves since the 1930's. Liquid Sodium would be sealed inside the valve. It's non-toxic and is still used today.

    1. Re:Not new tech! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      problem is, liquid sodium is reactive when exposed to air or water. some special nlear reactors use liqius sodium for cooling, and if something goes wrong it can lead to bad things

    2. Re:Not new tech! by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Non-toxic doesn't mean non-hazardous. Sure, sodium may not be biologically toxic, but have you ever thrown a chunk of it into water?

    3. Re:Not new tech! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything is hazardous. Water is non-toxic, but have you ever had 9,000 tons of it crash down on you at once?

    4. Re:Not new tech! by Mikeydude750 · · Score: 1

      Especially when 9000 tons of water crashes down on a ton of sodium metal. /ducks

    5. Re:Not new tech! by ahecht · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, sodium is non-toxic until it comes in contact with any living thing, where it will combine with water to form sodium hydroxide (aka Liquid Plummer). It's like the tree falling in the forest question, but in my book, sodium is toxic.

  51. Buzz. by Moocowsia · · Score: 1

    The buzz of the high voltage lines powering it.

    --
    Moo!
  52. Liquid at 20 degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I know, it's only in liquid form when above 20' degrees celcius.

  53. This brings up an interesting question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was this modded as flamebait because there is no "-1 stupid" option, or because mod points are only given to idiots?

  54. Night mare by gerbalblaste · · Score: 1

    In the advent of a snow storm and a loss of power your comp might go below the freezing point you would be out a $500 graphic card. no a good i dea if you live some where cold and blizzard prone

    1. Re:Night mare by argent · · Score: 1

      your comp might go below the freezing point

      Depends on what the metal does when it freezes. Gallium is one of those funny substances that expands when it freezes (another reason pure gallium is an unlikely candidate for the metal), but most metals just stop flowing. When it warms up again it should be fine.

  55. Environmentally safe, but not friendly by ThreeDayMonk · · Score: 1

    Although it might be "environmentally safe" insofar as the leaked metal is not toxic, it's still far from being environmentally friendly. The fact that a graphics card needs liquid metal cooling is cause for concern.

    Efficient cooling just means transferring the heat generated away from the card more rapidly - the energy input is still high, with all the negative consequences of that (cost, pollution, geopolitical instability, etc.). What we should really be demanding is more efficient systems that don't waste so much energy in the first place. Still, the Mac mini is a step forward in that regard (although not in the same graphics league, I concede).

    --
    If your comment title says 'Re: Foo', I'm not likely to read it.
  56. environmentally safe? Too short a history.... by davidwr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    non-flammable, non-toxic, environmentally safe

    Yeah, they said that about water too but stupid college students die from it every few years anyways.

    Seriously, this is cool stuff but any new substance should be considered at least slightly suspect until long-term dangers are known. That's not to say we shouldn't use it, only that we should be intellectually honest with ourselves.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  57. Useless or unintended use. by bayerwerke · · Score: 1

    Please give an example of something that is absolutely without use.

    1. Re:Useless or unintended use. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Please give an example of something that is absolutely without use.

      A slashdot editor.

      Do I get my cookie now?

    2. Re:Useless or unintended use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot post #12607032 comes to mind...

  58. Using an alloy? by Phong · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would assume that they're using some kind of an alloy that has a lower freezing temperature. One possibility is an alloy of gallium, indium, and tin (also known as Galinstan) which has a freezing point of -20 degrees centigrade.

    --
    ..wayne..
    1. Re:Using an alloy? by nickptar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe, based on other posts, that they are indeed using that.

    2. Re:Using an alloy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freezes at -20 C? A good reason not to leave your computer in the car in January if you live in Alberta Canada.

    3. Re:Using an alloy? by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
      Freezes at -20 C? A good reason not to leave your computer in the car in January if you live in Alberta Canada.

      It wouldn't even be worth risking in Southern Ontario. I wonder how they'd deal with shipping these things during the winter months -- in heated trucks?

  59. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How Cool!

  60. Question by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they focus more on producing chips that DON'T generate so much heat?

    That way we wouldn't need to spend another N bucks on the cooling system.

    1. Re:Question by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      They could have one ready by the end of the day, but it'll only run half as fast.

    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as of now, more processing power generally means more transistors. More transistors generally means more heat being dissipated.

      What we should be doing is finding ways to minimize the leakage current in transistors even more, or find ways to do the same job with a different tech, such as maybe optical transistors, if those exist already in miniturized form. Or even come up with a more efficient way of doing the same thing, with the same or better performance, at lower clock frequencies. Lower clock frequency means lower power consumption means less power dissipated means cooler running chip.

      All else fails, we can always wait for quantum chips to make their presence. but that'll take a while longer.

      In any case, they're working on it.

  61. Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the lamest comment section, that I have seen in a long time.

    Sorry, /.ers but its true. No one read the article much less the comments. Is slashdot sinking? Is it dead? Or just the mentality of the posters.

    Love,
    Fellow Poster

  62. You need conduction, not specific heat, I think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Specific Heat is the amount of thermal energy a certain material can absorb, per mass, whilst raising by a certain temperature. A material with a low specific heat will become hotter, quicker, especially if coupled with improved conduction.

    This means that the coolant will be hotter, which will give improved transfer at the heatsink. All round, a good deal.

    I think. I'm failing my degree at the moment, so I wouldn't take this as gospel.

  63. am I the only person... by unfunk · · Score: 1

    ...that would rather see this technology in a CPU cooler (and maybe also in my PSU, as that's damned loud) than in a videocard?

    1. Re:am I the only person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no you're not, i would love that, besides, who needs ati's crappy cards anyway?? (i have a 9600xt , and the linuxdrivers are FUBAR)

    2. Re:am I the only person... by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      Well, there are already heat sinks that will keep even a powerful CPU cool with *VERY* low noise. It's not hard, because you have lots of room, which allows you to use heat sinks with tons of surface area, and large-diameter fans that move good amounts of air without much noise.

      Even power supplies can come awfully quiet in actively-cooled models, and completely passively-cooled models are available.

      Video cards, on the other hand, are to the point where they are drawing as much - and sometimes MORE - power than the host CPUs. (100+ watts in some cases). However, if the heat sink extends more than about 1/2" from the PCB (which makes it what, 3/16" above the GPU?), then people whine and moan because they lose an adjacent PCI(-E) slot. There's vastly less room for heat sink surface and fan size, so higher RPMs need to be employed.

      Overall, I think that video cards are a perfect place for this to be introduced. Maybe we'll even see it make it's way to the CPU heat sinks eventually. Personally, I think that Intel would *love* to be able to suck 200+ watts out of a CPU.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  64. I want this stuff in my radiator by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    Then I could run a turbo without a heavy intercooler.

    1. Re:I want this stuff in my radiator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you couldnt.....a radiator has nothing to do with a intercooler.

    2. Re:I want this stuff in my radiator by AnFraX · · Score: 1

      Umm....unless you can find some way to ignite this stuff in your cylinders you are out of luck.

      For those who are not gearheads, an intercooler cools the hot air coming out of a turbocharger to increase effeciency (cold air burns better). A radiator cools the water cooling the rest of the engine so that it doesn't heat up an break stuff.

  65. Coming soon... by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Funny

    Overclocked PCs as lava lamps using real lava...

    "So Dave, any idea if you can knock your cpu down a few cycles? The tremors are rattling my windows and keeping my kids up at night and the pyroclastic flow last week incinerated the fence, my garage, and my fishing boat. I know that building a Doom 3 terminal server capable of hosting five million players in real time is important to you, but..."

    Speaking of which, go read Eric K. Drexler's Engines of Creation regarding the kind of cooling that some nanocomputers would require. Pipes with flows of many gallons per minute, superheated high pressure steam being output...

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:Coming soon... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      And the server goes in a puff of smoke and flame when somebody goes to the bathroom!

      --
  66. Or a Gallium alloy... see scitoys.com by Animaether · · Score: 1

    ...which melts at an even lower temperature

    See also:
    http://www.scitoys.com/scitoys/scitoys/thermo/liqu id_metal/liquid_metal.html
    ( kudos to venkeroz on tweakers.net for that link in a post on this story 4 days ago )

  67. Re:But thats not all! by unfunk · · Score: 1

    you're posting on slashdot... you can't have a girlfriend, as it's against the rules!

  68. Gallium Indium Alloys are quite widely used... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....in many areas of science. We use it to connect electrodes to oxide ceramics for high temperature impedance testing, effectively applying it as a type of solder.

    The reason we use it is because it has as a very strong "wetting" action (it will even wet glass) and so forms an electrical connection with almost anything, and its stable over an enormous temperature range. And if it doesn't evaporate at the temperatures we use (>500C) then you definitely don't need to worry about poisonous fumes from your graphics card.

    The thing i'm confused about is why its not being used in place of the bloody awful heatsink gunk we religiously spread over our CPU's. A suitably thin layer of GaIn alloy would give much better heat transfer properties and wouldn't dry out like thermal paste does. And unless you poured buckets of the stuff on the cpu there wouldn't be any problem with leakage onto your motherboard cos the surface tension would hold it in place (a redesign of the H/S would solve this anyway).

    Oh, and it really isn't that toxic - those safety sheets are a sad reflection of an increasingly stupid and litigious US society. As an example - take Titanium Dioxide (TiO2). A "suspected carcinogen" which is used in household paint pigments, toothpaste and is even the "icing sugar" on really cheap cakes...

    1. Re:Gallium Indium Alloys are quite widely used... by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      It won't be used for heat sinks because heat sinks are made for idiots - stick it on with a phase-change pad, power up machines, and be done with it.

      The integral heat spreaders are a good example of how things are engineered for the lowest common denominator. You can achieve significantly better cooling by prying off the heat spreader, lapping your heat sink (and in some cases, the CPU) and properly applying a thermal compound, because the thermal transfer between the die and the heat spreader isn't that good. However, in the *worst* scenario, where some idiot has screwed up the interface between the CPU and the heat sink, the greater surface area of the heat spreader makes it a significantly better design. Fewer returns = higher profits.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  69. The real explanation... ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please elaborate on MS DRM being cracked.
    It's no longer possible - since they put the programmable Mimetic Poly-Alloy technology on these cards (known from T2, now disguised as a coolant): Via the patented HDCP STAB (TM) Media Industry Self-Defense Interface, it creeps along the video lead and terminates any insubordinate viewing with a terminal peek in the eye (or similar, as seen on TV: this picture showing a guy who tried tell a friend about the latest blockbuster torrent URL) if the system suspects you of watching pirated content.

    So the First Post's author is scared for a reason:

    Whether it's toxic mercury, or molten tin and/or lead, I'm not sure I like the idea of "liquid metal".
    --
    Do not look directly into laser with remaining good eye.
  70. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  71. NEAR silent, but has a fan somewhere... by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    What I wonder is where the fan is... They are moving the heat away from the core silently, but that heat has to go somewhere, and in general, that means a fan.

    All in all, isn't this just a heatpump with some new marketing-driven name for the liquid inside?

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  72. Clarification... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this cooling system is not going to be included with the X850 XT. The company that makes the cooling system will be offering a modded version of the X850 XT called the Blizzard X850 XT that will incorporate this technology. Similar to how BFG has made custom cooled GeForce cards for a while now.

  73. google for gallium cooling by Fudge.Org · · Score: 1

    There is a slide deck on this website

    http://www.techpowerup.com/?3105

    --
    http://fudge.org
  74. Is there something wrong? by Alioth · · Score: 1

    I dunno, it just seems somewhat ...wrong...when our computers are running SO HOT they need liquid cooling of any type. This is not the way it's meant to be.

    1. Re:Is there something wrong? by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Informative


      Buy an Eden-based machine if that's what you like, but I don't see how it's "wrong" for a computer to have liquid cooling.

      For most of the history of computing, liquid cooling has been associated with the ultra-high-end computing. I once saw a picture of the pipes that carry the liquid to cool one of the NSA's supercomputers, they were 8" or 10" pipes, if I recall.

      Besides, cars get faster and more powerful, televisions get larger, stereos get more powerful, houses get bigger, and cometic surgeons use more and more implants. I don't see anything atypical about computers competing for insanity, either. =)

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  75. now just for the processor. by mike518 · · Score: 0

    i mean if liquid cooling is 20th century, what about fans. sure would love to ditch the noisy pronged spinning devices in favorite of this liquid metal stuff for the cpu.

    --
    Mike
    I heart the RIAA & MPAA, im sure its mutual...
  76. Re:Metal?! Ah, I see why... I think? by TerranFury · · Score: 1

    I saw that but didn't buy it, since when you're actively pumping coolant, I was under the impression that you didn't really need a ton of conductivity in anything but the heat exchangers.

  77. Submarines by stinkjones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Russians used liquid metal cooling in their nuclear subs. It was efficient, but unfortunately the liquid metal carried the radiation well, and all cooling tubes had to bne coated in lead along with the reactor itse;f

  78. Re:Metal?! Ah, I see why... I think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    See "Hunt for Red October". This is the Catipillar drive.

    Also look for Magnetohydrodynamics for a better explanation of the physics.

  79. Fix it with a screwdriver? by rfunches · · Score: 1

    Say something's wrong with the card and in my infinite wisdom I decide to take a screwdriver to it, pry it open, and fix it. Will it try to defend itself like other hardware?

  80. Because it had to be said... by rentedflowers · · Score: 1

    Note that this uses electromagnetic induction to move the coolant. Caterpillar drive, anyone? "Are those torpedo doors?"

  81. Powerbook G5 solution? by inblosam · · Score: 1

    Is this something that could potentially be used by Apple for the PowerBook G5? They are going to have to do something different to make it all work inside the 1" case.

    1. Re:Powerbook G5 solution? by QueenOfSwords · · Score: 1

      Sweet! I could see Apple marketing this in shiny new badass Powerbooks, with ultra-shiny metal hardware on the case to match.

      --
      -- INTX Grouch. http://www.midnightblue.net
  82. Re:Metal?! Ah, I see why... I think? by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

    There seem to be a lot of "WTF?? electromagnetic pump w/no moving parts?!?" posts here and while I do not know the intricate details of this particuar implementation I STRONGLY suspect that a casual perusal of the science behind the Einstein-Szilard refrigerators would prove highly informative.... Its a bizarre and almost unknown chapter in the history of safe refrigeration techniques.... and Einstein's life for that matter!

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  83. So... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ...the fucking article is light on details. It just says it's non-toxic, non-flammable and environmentally friendly, but it's not water. Hmmm... that rules out Mercury because that's certainly toxic and not environmentally friendly. But it's the only "liquid metal" I could think of. They've either discovered new matter, or it's just a marketroid name for some other chemical. The only other thing I can think of that is liquid, non-toxic (by some accounts anyway although I have my doubts), and environmentally friendly is, well... um... piss. Holy cow, I hope that's not what Liquid Metal is. ;p

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, smartass. You're forgetting that the chips are not running at room temperature, so other metals besides mercury might be in the liquid phase (ie, gallium).

  84. Future applications? by NoTitleLater · · Score: 0

    I think it would be awesome if that instead of internal pumps, all heat producing parts of your computer were connected by tubes to a big freakin radiator, and this stuff was used. I reliaze that to accomplish this, a standard way of connecting would have to be used, and ALL manufacturs would have to think that everyone had a case like this. Given I don't know the viscosity of this stuff, it could change computer cooling forever. Espicaly if your computer was was a double hull design and no fans were needed at all...... just fins.....

    --
    Screw my karma.
  85. Making computer crashes much more FUN by macraig · · Score: 1

    A computer crash would be so much more entertaining if it were traced to a pinhole leak in a liquid-sodium-cooled video card.

  86. Molten metal meltdown madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Molten metal thermal conduction has been used for nuclear submarine propulsion for decades:
    Sister ship to the USN SSN Nautilus in the mid-50's (used liquid hot sodium) and the soviet Alpha class of titanium submarines (used liquid lead-bizmuth).

    Boht occasions were major failures, big pain in the ass with unreliable and dangerous equipment.

    "Where do you want your computer to melt down today?"
    or
    "China syndrome" now playing in a PC near you!

    (which would be just right, because all PC are now made in China).

  87. Is that really a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who thinks an electromagnetic pump sounds like a really bad idea inside a PC?

  88. Re:Liquid FP by pv2b · · Score: 1

    First post seems to have slipped through your fingers.

  89. Any tie this in with.... by nry · · Score: 1

    The potential cooling of the Nintendo Revolution which will be using an ATI video chip? Small and quiet......

  90. DC bus by hawk · · Score: 1

    I've wanted a DB bus about the house, particularly the kitchen counter and bathroom, for eons. So many little appliances that would be useful.

    I could extend this to the whole house for computers . . .

    hawk

  91. BISMUTH ALLOYS by pyrofx · · Score: 1

    Why wouldn't be something easily available like this Bismuth Alloy available at Small Parts. They have the greatest stuff for building things.

  92. Its called Jelly state! by sr1nath · · Score: 1

    Jelly state.

  93. Re:Metal?! Ah, I see why... I think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link.

    You mentioned Einstein, and for a second I thought you were referreing to Bose-Eienstein and refrigeration. Talk about freezer-burn.

  94. doesn't sound single phase to me... by Barbarian · · Score: 1

    I wonder how the cooling will be while the gallium is still solid in parts of the system that are still below 85 F, like right after you switch on...

  95. It Still Isn't Better by vostok4 · · Score: 1

    Than H2O.

    First of all the substance is Gallinstan, if it was pure Gallium it would corrode away whatever they put it in unless it was teflon coated, but then you can kiss your head conductivity goodbye.

    Water has the highest heat capacity of any natural substance, there are others that serve different purposes (I use Dowfrost in my loop), but water is still the best in most cases.

    Just because the head conductivity is 65x (Sapphire-speak) its thermal capacity is horrible (12x less than water). Now whoever said that capacity is not very important is wrong. These cards pump out heat like there is no tomorrow, and you would have to 1) Pump 12x as fast to get to WATER-comparable temperatures EXTRACTED from the core, and you would have to have a fan running fast in order to cool that liquid as its flying through the loop (we are talking over a 1000gph is necessary for effective cooling of Ga).

    Also, this cooling is not that much "better" than water because you will still never acheive below ambient temperatures, it is a physical impossibility, so whats the point on spending so much on this junk (it would cost you in the realm of 500$ to fill a loop with it) when water will work JUST as well, even better, and you still have silent cooling available (MCP 350 anyone?) and its dirt cheap (200$ will get you an entire quality loop, easy!).

    These are just heatpipes on steroids, you can't use a pelt because it would freeze the metal, the pump is expensive and needs rare earth metals in order to create enough of a field to actually spin and pump this stuff through...

    All in all its just marketing. Gallium is a super cool metal to play with, but cooling with substances other than water or water based products is still pointless, as water has the highest natural heat capacity.