Slashdot Mirror


Kazakhstan's Spaceship Junkyard

Richard W.M. Jones writes "What happens to the booster stages of rockets? They fall back to earth, and in most cases into the oceans. But not in Baikonur, Kazakhstan, where the first stages fall over populated farmland. The locals have become rich dealing in the titanium-rich scrap metal as this article and this remarkable photo essay show. So far the only casualties seem to have been a few dead cows."

307 comments

  1. In Soviet Russia... by nxtr · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...rocket falls on YOU!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? Not one bit.

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Ava3ar · · Score: 1

      shouldnt that be "In mother russia, you fall on rocket" ??

      --
      ¦^)= The Vengance Will Come =(^¦
    3. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, back in Soviet times, the whole damn lot of land around the site was abandonned and cleared of all sorts of locals' activities. As USSR collapsed, no-one would care, the same way they get back to "very close around Chernobyl" area. Too bad for them.

    4. Re:In Soviet Russia... by hardcard · · Score: 2, Informative

      mirror of story/pics:

      http://www.sixflagsneworleans.com/

  2. Dead cows... by eurleif · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that's how cattle mutilations happen!

    1. Re:Dead cows... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      So that's why they couldn't find any pieces from the 1908 Tunguska blast. Industrious farmers sold it all before the 1930 expedition.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  3. Funniest story on slashdot by empaler · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    for weeks. Really, it is.

    1. Re:Funniest story on slashdot by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA "residents in the area complain of the ill effects of leftover toxic rocket fuel". Perhaps it's just me, but I don't think that's funny. And the submitter seems not ot have read it either, with his "the only casualties seem to have been a few dead cows."

    2. Re:Funniest story on slashdot by thenewcloo · · Score: 1

      Moreover, the article never mentions that there have been cattle casualties. Also, the cows (a) look like they're sleeping and (b) certainly don't look like they've been struck down by any debris.

    3. Re:Funniest story on slashdot by empaler · · Score: 1

      The site was slashdotted when I saw the summary, so RTFA was pretty hard. On the giant scale of things, however, a few dead cows isn't bad. An industry built on the blood of cows, however, is. (Yes, I am a vegetarian)

    4. Re:Funniest story on slashdot by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Moreover, the article never mentions that there have been cattle casualties.

      I came across a link in another post for the photographer's site. His captions said the cattle were thought to have died from poisoning, presumably the fuel. So there's nothing hunorous at all about this story.

    5. Re:Funniest story on slashdot by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      On the giant scale of things, however, a few dead cows isn't bad.

      It wasn't just cows. "Apart from the fear of having a spaceship crash through their roofs, residents in the area complain of the ill effects of leftover toxic rocket fuel."

    6. Re:Funniest story on slashdot by empaler · · Score: 1

      Again, I was reacting to the summary. I agree that the toxic fuel is regrettable. I have in the past flamed the US for polluting, and it is still my viewpoint that pollutance should be kept to a scraped minimum. Each year I have family from Greenland to visit Denmark because of pollution-induced cancer, and of course this has affected my view.

    7. Re:Funniest story on slashdot by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Again, I was reacting to the summary.

      Yes; that (the summary with its jokey tone) was what set me off. This is real life, not a Gary Larson cartoon.

  4. Server going down? by Lingur · · Score: 4, Funny

    I predict that the server will go down like the boosters. First, heating up, then, burning up, and finally, nothing but scrap metal.

    1. Re:Server going down? by eobanb · · Score: 5, Informative

      here, have a nice big helping of article text.

      KAZAKHSTAN'S SPACESHIP JUNKYARD
      A EurasiaNet Photo Essay by Jonas Bendiksen
      Text by Laara Matsen

      On April 16, Russia announced that it would henceforth launch military satellites at the Pletsnesk cosmodrome in northern Russia, ending the practice of launching satellites from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. This shift will deprive Kazakh children of the chance to watch some satellites take off, though Baikonur will remain the launchpad for commercial "birds" and manned missions. As these photos show, it will also spare Kazakhs the fallout, literal and otherwise, that occurs in a launch's wake.

      All space-bound rockets consist largely of fuel tanks and booster stages that fall back to earth when spent, never reaching orbit. In landlocked Baikonur, Russia's primary launching complex in Kazakhstan, these spaceships crash to earth. This photo essay visits the areas where the supporting rockets land, and shows the people living under the flight paths who contend with flaming spaceship wrecks several times each month.

      Apart from the fear of having a spaceship crash through their roofs, residents in the area complain of the ill effects of leftover toxic rocket fuel. With the relocation of Russian military launches, more than half of which currently take off from Baikonur, these people may get some relief. However, one group of people is probably sorry to see Baikonur lose business; the region's scrap metal dealers are getting rich trading metal from the rockets' titanium alloy hulls.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Server going down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It's actually a myth that servers overheat & melt down - the most that can happen is they get so overwhelmed with request they end up timing out far after an original request for page has occured, and are unable to serve current requests. That gives the illusion (an incorrect one) that the server has "died"

    3. Re:Server going down? by NoseBag · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank you!

      Since you were the first to most graciously post the article from the (so predictably) now-slashdotted server, you win.....(drum roll)....

      ONE SIDE OF KAZAKHSTANI BOOSTER-SMACKED BEEF!

      Yes good comrade...Kazakhstani beef. Not a substitute! This beef was slow-marinated in pure slavic hydrazine - no oxygen here! - after being gently but firmly caressed by a 13-ton booster moving at terminal velocity! Range-smacked! Bones and cartillage removed or pulverized in a split-instant! No abattoir farm for the Kazakhstani!

      Bon Apetite!

      --
      Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
    4. Re:Server going down? by flawedgeek · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's toast. Maybe the server farmers can make some money selling the metal for scrap?

      --
      My other Sig is .40 caliber.
    5. Re:Server going down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No shit.

    6. Re:Server going down? by PalmMP3 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but I'll just have a slice of "Roast Beef a la slashdotted-server-remains", thank you. ;-)

      --
      Laughter is the best medicine, but in certain situations the Heimlich maneuver may be more appropriate.
    7. Re:Server going down? by cluening · · Score: 4, Insightful

      After seven years of the same "the server is going to do something vaguely related to the story!" comments, you would think people would stop rating them as 'funny'...

      (apologies to the original poster; yours just happened to be the one showing up as such right now)

      --
      Posted from the wireless couch.
    8. Re:Server going down? by wronskyMan · · Score: 1

      He's a Slashdotter - he probably already has too much smacked beef...

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
    9. Re:Server going down? by Victor_Os · · Score: 0

      OK, you convinced me... now convince my server that its not dead.

    10. Re:Server going down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, it's not dead, it's sleeping.

    11. Re:Server going down? by kpansky · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its pining for the fjords.

      --

      --Kevin
    12. Re:Server going down? by daikokatana · · Score: 1

      It's resting. Beautiful casing!!

      --
      http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
    13. Re:Server going down? by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      Look, matey, I know a dead server when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now.

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
    14. Re:Server going down? by Iron+Sun · · Score: 1

      I'm more familiar with the phrase "spanking the monkey", but I much prefer "smacking the beef" now. Gives a better impression of the scale of the event.

    15. Re:Server going down? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show. Some jokes are funny, no matter how many times you tell them.

  5. Mooo! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sucks to be a cow ...

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    1. Re:Mooo! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Sucks to be a cow ..."

      Must... resist... yo mama... joke...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Mooo! by _randy_64 · · Score: 1

      Eat mor chikkin!

      --
      I mod down all the "free iPod"-sig losers.
  6. cultofthedeadcow by sentientbeing · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope this isnt the same server that is used to guide the rockets or theres gonna be a hell of a lot more dead cows

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    1. Re:cultofthedeadcow by d3m057h3n35 · · Score: 0

      Or another Chernobyl, for that matter, with the way this server is melting down.

    2. Re:cultofthedeadcow by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      Dude, that doesn't even make sense. Why does ever joke about a slashdotting get modded up no mater how lame it is?

    3. Re:cultofthedeadcow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how hard it is to hit a cow with a rocket? By shooting it straight up in the air?

      It takes good aim and a damn lot of computer power, that's for sure. I predict less dead cows when their compters go down.

    4. Re:cultofthedeadcow by Corbin+Dallas · · Score: 2

      Dude, that doesn't even make sense. Why does ever joke about a slashdotting get modded up no mater how lame it is?

      Probably because the usual barrage of In Soviet Russia, hot grits, Step #3 profit, welcomed overlords, beowulf clusters, duped articles, petrified Portman, misspelled articles, Micro$$$oft anything, Jon Katz, Slashdotter virginity, and SCO Madness seem shriveled and flaccid in comparison.

      I'm not disagreeing with you, just making a point. If Slashdotters could recycle plastics and aluminum the way we recycle old jokes, that old Indian dude on the Hootie the Owl commercial wouldn't cry anymore. "Give a hoot, don't pollute!"

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
  7. Wow.. by Renraku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These farmers, rather than demand restitution from the government got off their asses and turned lemons into lemonade.

    Of course, a certain government might turn their lemonade into military action when they decide they want a piece of the pie.

    If spent stages from a US rocket hit some home in the US, it would be removed overnight, the family would be given a check for 20% of the value of what they lost, forced to sign an NDA, and no one would ever hear about it again.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Wow.. by loqi · · Score: 1

      To be equally absurd, it would cause a media sensation, the public would freak out about the viability of space travel, and NASA would get axed.

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    2. Re:Wow.. by iammaxus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's ridiculous. A much more stereotypical response in the US would be for NASA to pay the family 200% of the value of what they lost, and the scrupulous family would still insist on suing for additional millions for the "emotional damage" resultant from the loss of their goldfish. The subsequent increase in insurance costs would push commercialization of space back a decade or two.

    3. Re:Wow.. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And if it killed someone, they could just sell the titanium, and it would be OK, right?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and no one would ever hear about it again.

      But we just did... Oh no, it's a paradox! I hope the good-looking white male time-traveller shows up soon to save us all.

    5. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the scrupulous family would still insist on suing for additional millions

      Google soverign immunity and what it means to attempt to sue the US.

    6. Re:Wow.. by dj245 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So you're saying ex-soviet Russia is more capitolistic than the US, or they have more Freedom?

      And by Freedom I mean the common definition of freedom as applied to countries; a lack of government involvement in people's day-to-day affairs.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    7. Re:Wow.. by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we really are jackasses when it comes to things like this.

      I'm sure that next time we accidentally drop a rocket stage on another country, we'll nuke the shit out of them trying to get in on the action. I mean, the whole thing makes so much sense.

      That's just how we American's think, right?

    8. Re:Wow.. by silverkz · · Score: 1, Troll

      Huh? No way. The EPA would rush in...confiscate the property and fine the owners for the clean-up costs.

    9. Re:Wow.. by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

      "And if it killed someone, they could just sell the titanium, and it would be OK, right?"

      I don't know... how much titanium is there in a human body?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    10. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yeah. Losing your freedom is what living under a fascist regime is all about.

    11. Re:Wow.. by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      That's it, NASA proposes a new flight path directly over Iraq. It would require a rocket booster drop (nuclear cough cough) somewhere over the middle east.

    12. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another decade or two? At this rate, we will be sending wagon trains to the stars.....oh wait.

    13. Re:Wow.. by idontgno · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't know... how much titanium is there in a human body?

      Hmmm...I dunno. In this situation, I'd guess several pounds, post mortem.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    14. Re:Wow.. by axonal · · Score: 1, Troll

      A more appropriate US response would be declaring the family part of a terrorist cell.

    15. Re:Wow.. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Considering that each time a volunteer crew dies in the current prototype orbiters they halt the entire program, having civilian causalities would probably get the entire program scrapped. Or at least put on hold for a decade.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    16. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that would be appropriate? You make the US look benign.

    17. Re:Wow.. by learn+fast · · Score: 3, Insightful

      NASA also wouldn't dump boosters into populated areas in the first place.

    18. Re:Wow.. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      A much more stereotypical response in the US would be for NASA to pay the family 200% of the value of what they lost, and the scrupulous family would still insist on suing for additional millions for the "emotional damage" resultant from the loss of their goldfish.

      Don't forget then selling the rights to their story to Fox in order to make it into a movie-of-the-week, where while the main stage falls in some cornfield in central Nebraska, killing three chickens in the process, some part inexplicably falls onto the Eiffel Tower, causing an explosion that levels 40 city blocks in Paris, France.

      Yaz.

    19. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascism = Italian national(istic) socialistic corporativism. It died in 1945. Get over it already.

    20. Re:Wow.. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      These farmers, rather than demand restitution from the government got off their asses and turned lemons into lemonade.
      I would call this Russian Roulette on a large scale. Intentionally crashing tons of scrap metal from high altitude onto neighborhoods is just plain bad policy. Anyone who tolerates this just to make a pittance in the scrap business is an utter fool (and no, I don't believe the claim this was making anybody "rich.")
    21. Re:Wow.. by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      A much more stereotypical response in the US would be for NASA to pay the family 200% of the value of what they lost, and the scrupulous family would still insist on suing for additional millions for the "emotional damage" resultant from the loss of their goldfish.

      And then somehow manage to be back in the poorhouse within two years...

    22. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure, let me rip this plate out of my neck and weigh it!

    23. Re:Wow.. by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Citizens sue the U.S. all the time. According to West's Legal Environment of Business, Fifth Edition, sovereign immunity "exempts foreign nations from the jurisdiction of the U.S. Courts." (page 169) Looks like you're the one who needs to Google sovereign immunity.

      PS: Taco, you REALLY need to change the images used in these captchas. I couldn't even begin to read the first one, I had to start over.

    24. Re:Wow.. by Felinoid · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your both wrong.

      Nasa would offer 20% of losses in exchange for a signature on a long contract that would make the typical NDA look like "Please don't tell anyone ok?"
      They'd show up with MIBish lawyers that make it sound like if they don't sign they'll go to jail as trators.

      Over time rummors will leak and a famaly will move in exclusively to get hit.
      The Nasa MIB legal team shows up only to meet the famalys layer carrying a heavy lawsute.

      The MIB quickly offer 200% of losses and forget the NDA. No go. They want emotional damages for the loss of guppy the gold fish famaly pet (for a whole 10 seconds even).

      The MIB legal team is at a loss. They rely entirely on scaring the piss out of people with fake threats and this famaly is countering with REAL threats.

      They plan and are ready to cast this famaly in the light of con artists when the news media already has the famalys version of the story.

      Eventualy Nasa has to fork it over (but only to this one famaly and not to the others with REAL damages.)

      Nasa is about to close it's doors forever when the fedral government comes it to save the day.

      And that timmy is why Daddy has to pay most of his paycheck to the fedral government.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    25. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not neighbourhoods, farmland. Low enough population desity makes the risk worthwhile. ...and just because a few thousand dollars means little to you, it's a small fortune to some people.

    26. Re:Wow.. by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 1

      Laern too speel. it's incadibly detramantal too your psot

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    27. Re:Wow.. by masdog · · Score: 1

      So that is how they got the idea for Armageddon.

    28. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Idiot. It has not only use in reference to what Mussolini preferred to be called Corporatism but also a meaning as it applies to classification of governments.


      fascism
      n : a political theory advocating an authoritarian hierarchical
      government (as opposed to democracy or liberalism)

    29. Re:Wow.. by Renraku · · Score: 1

      This is so very very very true.

      Somewhere in my family, someone was awarded about $100,000 in medical damages for gross negligence when their doctor did some really stupid shit.

      And you know? They kept their job (they had been living about the middle-low range of middle class before) and after they spent the $100,000, they ended up in the middle range of poor.

      They still can't explain how it happened. Only thing they have to show for it is a cheap fishing boat tht cost all of 2% of their winnings.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    30. Re:Wow.. by zerbot · · Score: 1

      Once, it somehow became knowledge within my extended family that someone had come by a lot of money (the story I heard was some antique that was sold for a lot of cash). Certain relatives that most of us hadn't heard from in years suddenly popped up and began spending a lot of time with the wealthy person. When the supposedly wealthy person died a few years later, the executor (not a member of the family) discovered that she was barely more than peniless and surviving only on Social Security. The only real asset she had was her house.

      We all know what happened to the money, but nobody can prove it.

    31. Re:Wow.. by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      And if one of these does kill someone? A whole family? A busload of children? Nuns?

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    32. Re:Wow.. by Paperkirin · · Score: 1

      There's about 700 mg present naturally in the human body... after being hit by a titanium plate? Well, I suppose it depends how much it mixes.

    33. Re:Wow.. by Petersson · · Score: 1

      I don't know... how much titanium is there in a human body?

      A lot, if you've got hip joint replacement. And there also comes some PTFE with it...

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    34. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well? What happened to it?

      damn captchas are getting harder to read every time.

    35. Re:Wow.. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      These farmers, rather than demand restitution from the government got off their asses and turned lemons into lemonade.
      As if they had a choice. These farmers spent most of thier lives under a goverments that not only was not likely to pay restitution, it openly was contemptous of the 'rights' of it's population.
      If spent stages from a US rocket hit some home in the US, it would be removed overnight, the family would be given a check for 20% of the value of what they lost, forced to sign an NDA, and no one would ever hear about it again.
      In the extremely unlikely event this happened [1] I imagine it would be all over the TV in the same way an airplane crash is.

      [1] The US launches over water as you will recall...
    36. Re:Wow.. by zerbot · · Score: 1

      Well, duh, the black sheep of the family who showed up leeched it out of her. She'd willed most of her estate to a charity she'd spent her life supporting, and there was almost nothing left after her house was sold and expenses paid. Before it became apparent there was nothing left, said black sheep were making noises about contesting her will.

      It has been a major consideration for us in ensuring that our children are cared for should we die before they reach adulthood. It's difficult to ensure that there is no way that blood relatives can override our wishes by petitioning the court. Our best defense is to make sure the leeches never find out how much money is involved in the first place.

    37. Re:Wow.. by mikeage · · Score: 1

      "And if it killed someone, they could just sell the titanium, and it would be OK, right?"

      I don't know... how much titanium is there in a human body?


      I suppose that depends on how hard of an impact it was...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    38. Re:Wow.. by daikokatana · · Score: 1
      A whole family?
      Compensation.

      A busload of children?
      More compensation.

      Nuns?
      Hurraaaah! Religion lost again!

      --
      http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
    39. Re:Wow.. by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I'm 40% titanium!

    40. Re:Wow.. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The subsequent increase in insurance costs would push commercialization of space back a decade or two.

      Nah, it would push the USA's commercialisation of space back a decade or two. Other countries might be a bit behind the US currently, but they *are* going into space sooner or later, commercially or non-commercially.

      Don't get me wrong; if the US was willing to go for space the way some other countries are, they'd probably be ahead for quite some time. But with the delays in the space programme, it looks like (e.g.) India and China (China in both a commercial and military sense) will start to catch up.

      Rightly or wrongly, the Chinese government would not let a few deaths stop them from their attempted domination^w^w exploration of space, and it's my opinion that China will force the US back into serious space exploration in the same way that the USSR did in the 1960s.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    41. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would call this Russian Roulette on a large scale.

      Ha ha ha ha! (Everyone starts laughing like they do at the end of a cheaply-animated 1980s cartoon for the latest Japanese toy).

      Kazakhstan isn't even in Russia, but that was such a great joke, I'll forgive you anyway.

      Russian Roulette! Ha ha ha! You rule, dude.

    42. Re:Wow.. by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      Ah... is that another Post-Mortem Mark Twain?

      --
      Sig
    43. Re:Wow.. by srw · · Score: 1

      Um, no?
      http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/04/30 /titan-missile050430.html

      The above story shows the nice conclusion, but there were tense moments in the weeks leading up to the successful launch -- and, probably, right up until the booster was safely in the water.

    44. Re:Wow.. by Renraku · · Score: 1

      If I ever get filthy rich, I'm not going to tell anyone.

      My lifestyle is going to remain virtually the same. Its just that I'll be able to do things I wasn't able to before.

      Like travel. I'd travel occasionally, but I doubt anyone would know. If they got nosy, I'd just tell them that I got a grand promotion at my job and a big bonus.

      Because no one needs to know that I'd be unbelievably rich. The only way it would affect their lives is if they were going to try to get a piece of the money.

      What would I do with the money if I were rich? I'd get out. I'd see the world. I'd invest the majority of it and probably donate about a third of the returns on those investments into various research institutions.

      In no part of my plan is 'giving large sums of money to the rest of my family so they can use it on cigarettes, alcohol, and possibly drugs'. If someone really needed the money, I might give it to them as a loan.

      Its not about being generous, its about getting people to leave you the fuck alone about it. A lottery winner is like a person carrying a loaf of bread down at the duck pond. They'll soon be surrounded and possibly killed by said ducks, because they know where the food comes from!

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    45. Re:Wow.. by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      Mark Twain's Notebook, 1902-1903.
      See http://www.twainquotes.com/Copyright.html

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    46. Re:Wow.. by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      My 'pologies. It just seems that there are an awful lot of Mark Twain quotes that just don't fit within his lifetime.

      --
      Sig
    47. Re:Wow.. by optimusNauta · · Score: 1

      Actually, when we deorbited Skylab, we rained debris over Australia, killing a cow. We had to play for the cow, in addition to international littering fees to the Australian government. The Russians did better with Mir.

    48. Re:Wow.. by dbIII · · Score: 1
      I don't know... how much titanium is there in a human body?
      A couple of tonnes more than before the booster hit.
    49. Re:Wow.. by Jivecat · · Score: 1

      We didn't deorbit Skylab, it deorbited itself. We had no control over the situation, and it could just have easily hit Perth, Melbourne, or Sydney as that mostly-empty stretch of outback.

      --
      "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."--Feynman
    50. Re:Wow.. by mary_will_grow · · Score: 1

      yeah!! Those frivolous lawsuits make me sick! I cant believe anyone would get bent out of shape over a 1 ton hunk of metal landing on their house.... by design.

      --
      Why stick up for big business?
  8. /.ed already? by ChePibe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wow... they can handle an assault from huge rockets upon their land, but they have no chance against a vicious /.ing...

  9. Slashdot posts this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But won't post a story on Chernobyl's mutant super-children?

    1. Re:Slashdot posts this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it's from The Sun.

      They probabably wouldn't post an Elvis sighting story either.

    2. Re:Slashdot posts this... by Roofus · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not a story, it's seven sentences.

      Of course, /. has posted stories based off nothing but a "my sister's boyfriend's best friend's uncle's janitor's hairdress told him that some unknown Microsoft VP told the guy in the stall next to him..."

    3. Re:Slashdot posts this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding, especially considering that Slashdot's turned into as much a tabloid as The Sun.

    4. Re:Slashdot posts this... by jtogel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Kids growing up in areas damaged by radiation from the plant have a higher IQ and faster reaction times, say Russian doctors." Note: say Russian doctors, says The Sun! Do the two layers on untrustworthyness somehow cancel each other out, so as to make the statement trustworthy?

    5. Re:Slashdot posts this... by darkewolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even funnier, I read the article about the mutant Chernobyl children and the in-page-advert was from Microsoft and included dinosaured headed people in shirts-and-tie talking around the office. I thought it was a spoof article at first with pictures of Godzilla like kids ;)

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    6. Re:Slashdot posts this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chernobyl incident was a coverup. The high IQ's are only the beginning of the coming of Midwich Cuckoos

    7. Re:Slashdot posts this... by Ours · · Score: 1

      Wow, sounds a like a Hunter Thomson flashback.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    8. Re:Slashdot posts this... by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      And even more flashback like, I was just reading an article on abc.net.au about Johnny Depp paying for HST's remains to be shot out of a cannon. That's it, I don't trust the tea in the breakroom any more ;)

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
  10. Article Text by joey.dale · · Score: 0, Informative



    On April 16, Russia announced that it would henceforth launch military satellites at the Pletsnesk cosmodrome in northern Russia, ending the practice of launching satellites from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. This shift will deprive Kazakh children of the chance to watch some satellites take off, though Baikonur will remain the launchpad for commercial "birds" and manned missions. As these photos show, it will also spare Kazakhs the fallout, literal and otherwise, that occurs in a launch's wake.

    All space-bound rockets consist largely of fuel tanks and booster stages that fall back to earth when spent, never reaching orbit. In landlocked Baikonur, Russia's primary launching complex in Kazakhstan, these spaceships crash to earth. This photo essay visits the areas where the supporting rockets land, and shows the people living under the flight paths who contend with flaming spaceship wrecks several times each month.

    Apart from the fear of having a spaceship crash through their roofs, residents in the area complain of the ill effects of leftover toxic rocket fuel. With the relocation of Russian military launches, more than half of which currently take off from Baikonur, these people may get some relief. However, one group of people is probably sorry to see Baikonur lose business; the region's scrap metal dealers are getting rich trading metal from the rockets' titanium alloy hulls.

  11. cow tipping by antiaktiv · · Score: 2, Funny

    damn, those russians are hardcore cow tippers. who'd have thought?

    1. Re:cow tipping by Tweak232 · · Score: 1

      actually in russia, cows tip you. But sometimes the people get up from eating their boots to go tip cows for fun.

      btw. wtf is with these anti script conformation images, it it impossible to tell between an i, I, or l when there is a line going straight through the character!!

    2. Re:cow tipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't cha know? Its how all those physicists get cheap thrills!

    3. Re:cow tipping by lordofthechia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only a machine could not determine the difference between an I or a 1 with a line through it! Hmm... Maybe they need to add a question for each post instead of the images:

      "Which of the following would you prefer: a puppy, a flower from your sweetie, or a large, properly formatted data disk."

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    4. Re:cow tipping by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Which of the following would you prefer: a puppy, a flower from your sweetie, or a large, properly formatted data disk."

      This is Slashdot. Exactly how do you propose that question would help? We have no use for puppies unless accompanied by large amounts of duct tape and we have never seen a "sweetie" in real life unless a Mars bar counts so gimme that disk and let me post, dammit!

      A large disssk, my preciousss.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  12. In Soviet Russia by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, people don't seek rocket; Rocket seek people.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean rocket seek cows?

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll go ahead and say what we all know is on the majority of the readers minds of the parents post:

      Dude, I hate to be the one to break it to you BUT those 'In Soviet Russia' jokes are just too played out these days

    3. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what about Soviet Kazakhstan?

    4. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I hate to be the one to break it to you BUT those 'In Soviet Russia' jokes are just too played out these days

      In Soviet Russia, the 'In Soviet Russia' jokes play you out!!!!!!! LOLOLOLOL!!!

      Damn, that was seriously unfunny.

  13. Sounds like... by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The junkers from Asimov's stories =)

    1. Re:Sounds like... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      The titanium, if allowed to "rust" and mix with the soil, would make crops tasty to H. Beam Piper's Zarathustran Fuzzies. Yeek!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Sounds like... by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      Arkady and Boris Strugatsky's The Stalker

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
  14. /.ed by gerbalblaste · · Score: 1

    Slain by falling nerd news whore shrapnel

  15. Re:just wait by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since these parts start on earth, you're not going to catch anything that the flight control team doesn't already have. Frankly, Skylab fell on the aussies, and nobody there caught any extraterrestrial bug that anybody outside Oz noticed.

    Since the article is slashdotted, I hope they at least take care to plot where the villages are, before letting parts fall everywhere.

    I wonder what Borat has to say about this?

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  16. Slashdotted, already by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Interesting

    4 comments as I view, and it's down.

    How's this for the ultimate conundrum: the combination of "Nobody RTFA here" and "the Slashdot Effect" taking down sites?

    Maybe some people actually DO RTFA besides myself?

    (sigh

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Slashdotted, already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes sense. Those who don't RTFA post. Or at least get the earlier posts while the RTFAers are still RTFA.

    2. Re:Slashdotted, already by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "How's this for the ultimate conundrum: the combination of "Nobody RTFA here" and "the Slashdot Effect" taking down sites?"

      Just act as though you're an expert on the topic like a bunch of other +5 loud mouthes.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Slashdotted, already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is just almost no intersection between the set of "people who RFTA" and "people who comment on the story" Only a tiny percentage of /. readers leave comments.

    4. Re:Slashdotted, already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit I majored in Kazakhstan Falling Space Junk and for once I actually get to use my degree, so back off!

    5. Re:Slashdotted, already by flawedgeek · · Score: 1

      Maybe some people actually DO RTFA besides myself?

      Nope, we don't. The server got turned into a pile of slag before us mere mortals could get to it.

      --
      My other Sig is .40 caliber.
    6. Re:Slashdotted, already by dalutong · · Score: 1

      I think people open the links up in new tabs and get to posting.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    7. Re:Slashdotted, already by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      You'd think enough /.ers would be using Google Web Accelerator for a cached copy to be available to those of us that found this article a little late.

    8. Re:Slashdotted, already by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
      4 comments as I view, and it's down.
      How's this for the ultimate conundrum: the combination of "Nobody RTFA here" and "the Slashdot Effect" taking down sites?

      Simple. The world of Slashdot is divided into two unequal subsets: those who RTFA, and those who post. The intersection between these two subsets is null.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    9. Re:Slashdotted, already by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      How's this for the ultimate conundrum: the combination of "Nobody RTFA here" and "the Slashdot Effect" taking down sites?


      Why is this so hard to understand for most /. users?
      The answer is very simple: most people read the articles and don't post. And the few people that do post , mostly do without reading.

  17. Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house. by NRAdude · · Score: 5, Informative

    Needs about 1,668 degrees Celsius to melt. That's all they can do with it...sell it. I can vouch for one thing, more jewelry is being made of titanium. Strange choice, but consider that 1,000 years ago aluminum was a hundred times more valuable than gold. I melt aluminum into ingots to save when I complete a mold for a tool I need to build. That's the only way to be certain somthing is made in America today, it seems. More power to Our Kazakhstan neighbors.

    --
    without prejudice
  18. In soviet russia, waste manages you! by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    7 replies and photo essay is already slow as hell...

    Ex-Soviet Russia is famous for *not* managing its nuclear waste (hundreds of nuclear submarines slowly rotting away in Barents Sea, pissing off Finns and Swedes) ; nuclear weapons out of hand or simply "missing" ; some famous fuckups (Tchernobyl; that bio-warfare incident about 20 years ago, when a lab leaked a killer virus over a village) ; etc...

    So nobody should be surprised that they let booster rockets fall on populated areas...

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    1. Re:In soviet russia, waste manages you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm amazed that you missed the biggest ecological disaster in the world, caused by the Soviets: The Aral Sea disaster.

    2. Re:In soviet russia, waste manages you! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Boosters have to land somewhere. (The top picture renders in IE, but not Firefox.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:In soviet russia, waste manages you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again maybe it is the Norwegians who are pissed off, since its the Barents Sea. If it were the Baltic Sea then the Finns and Swedes might be pissed off. :)

    4. Re:In soviet russia, waste manages you! by asbjxrn · · Score: 1
      Ex-Soviet Russia is famous for *not* managing its nuclear waste (hundreds of nuclear submarines slowly rotting away in Barents Sea, pissing off Finns and Swedes)

      Which is a bit funny since neither Finland nor Sweden has a coastline along the Barents Sea.

    5. Re:In soviet russia, waste manages you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're talking about Chernobyl http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_accident, that was a nuclear accident not a "killer virus".. sheesh..

    6. Re:In soviet russia, waste manages you! by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

      Woops, my bad : I meant the Baltic sea.

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    7. Re:In soviet russia, waste manages you! by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

      Woops, you're right. I meant the Baltic sea, not Barents (although there also are, supposedly, nuclear warships rotting in the Barents sea).

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    8. Re:In soviet russia, waste manages you! by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1


      No, I'm talking about two separate incidents.

      Chernobyl was the nuclear meltdown. Another incident involved a bio-warfare lab leaking anthrax in the city of Sverdlosk located next to it, killing 68 people, in 1979:

      Linkie...

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  19. Thank you! by firepacket · · Score: 3, Funny

    So far the only casualties seem to have been a few dead cows

    Thank you SO MUCH. I have found my new background.

  20. Priceless by ChePibe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rocket hitting your barn full of cows, sheep, and Soviet Bloc farm equipment - 677912345234621 Rubles (roughly $20 US). Reselling the rocket to random scrap metal dealers - priceless, or at least 76790823485724429234 rubles (roughly $45 US).

    1. Re:Priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hate to tell yea, but the exchange rate is only 30:1 w/ credit card and 27ish:1 with cash. I just got back from russia month ago.

    2. Re:Priceless by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny
      at least 76790823485724429234 rubles (roughly $45 US)

      ... or about 1.5 euros

    3. Re:Priceless by Skippy_kangaroo · · Score: 1
      Another clear problem from the data you quote is the rate of inflation. Between the time the first stage hits your cows to the time you sell it the Rouble has depreciated by about 50,000 times (i.e. 50,000 Roubles when you sell the first stage buys as much as 1 rouble did when it hit your cows).

      Presuming that they manage to sell these parts within a year, that sort of inflation is extraordinary. I'm sure it means something. I plan on doing my PhD on this effect to try to discover "the inflationary consequences of near-earth suborbital heavy metal bombardment of bovine targets". I plan to get a grant from the US govenment. God bless America!

      ...or did you just make those numbers up? Nevermind, I'm sure I can get my paper published all over the place and earn lots of money from the talk show circuit before it gets discovered. God bless America!

      ...and then I can make even more money on the talk show circuit talking about how I mislead the public and it all came down to one poorly attributed posting on Slashdot. God bless America!

    4. Re:Priceless by ChePibe · · Score: 1

      I did make those numbers up, but as someone who has spent a fair amount of time in Latin America, I can say that your inflation figures aren't entirely out of the realm of possibility ;-)

    5. Re:Priceless by ceeam · · Score: 1

      ...or at least 76790823485724429234 rubles (roughly $45 US)

      (Roughly 3 Euro)

  21. Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Cache by Garrett+Combs · · Score: 1

      Still agonizingly slow. Oh well, I'll wait for a mirror.

      Anyone?

      --
      Insert witty Slashdot sig here.
    2. Re:Cache by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      I like number 9 photo - beautiful pic. Like a frame from some sci-fi classic that has not been shot yet ;-)

  22. What killed the cows? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I realize there are obvious answers (toxic fuel, fire, etc...) but I'm often surprised when asking these questions.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:What killed the cows? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Funny
      The cows were killed by a booster falling into a river, damming the river and creating a lake. The lake provided habitat for fowl, which hosted a particularly insidious bird flu. This caused the Russian authorities to kill all birds, people and cows in a 10 mile radius.

      One cow was almost killed by a direct impact, but managed to pull through after weeks of intensive care.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:What killed the cows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or more obvious answers like giant pieces of falling metal?

    3. Re:What killed the cows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cows in the pic are whole carcasses, looking totally undamaged.

      If they were hit directly by rocket boosters falling from kilometers up, I don't think you'd be able to see that the reddish gunk on the bottom of the craters once had been cows.

    4. Re:What killed the cows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative?

      ROFLFMAO

      And I can't read the fscking human authentication thingy-ma-bob. It needs to be enhanced.

  23. I cringed by saskboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    First I cringed about locals harvesting space junk. Then I cringed at the words, " this remarkable photo essay show," knowing that meant I wouldn't get to see the photos, and there will be some server junk for the locals to harvest next.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  24. Worth a thousand words! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    How's this for the ultimate conundrum: the combination of "Nobody RTFA here" and "the Slashdot Effect" taking down sites?

    We don't read the articles, we look at the pretty pictures.
    Incidentally, pictures use up way more bandwith than text.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  25. Talk about odd jobs to have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about scraping dead cows off of rocket boosters for a living.

  26. Gimme Back My Bullets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the scene in Farenheit 9/11 where the kid, shot with Walmart bullets still lodged in his body, gets Walmart to refund their purchase price when he shows up to turn them in.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was in Bowling for Columbine, and it was bullets from K-Mart. Wrong on 2 counts, bucko.

    2. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yep, you're right. Thanks for pointing that out, and for not shooting me :).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? you folks worry about accuracy and fact checking when you are referring to the putrid stinking piles of misinformation produced by Micael Moore?

      If I had mod points I give you +.5 hysterically funny.

    4. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is to be implied from this? If a psycho stabs me, is the knife's manufacturer or seller to blame?

    5. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends on the circumstances. Of course the psycho you mention is responsible for their action. In the case of the bullets, the store (actually K-Mart, as another poster corrected), helped get those bullets into the kid. Bullets are dangerous - did the store do everything it could to make sure the bullets weren't sold to a psycho? Guns, more than bullets, have some contribution by their manufacturers to the responsibility for people shot by them. So many people are shot by other people who claim, often proveably, that they did not expect the gun to shoot, though it did. That's an unsafe product, like a car with bad brakes, which manufacturers should know could be safer, and could redesign for greater safety, but don't. So they're responsible - though that doesn't detract from the responsiblity of any person who uses any such device, expecting to hurt another person, who succeeds.

      In the case of the rockets, the launching people know their falling stages could kill someone. When they do sometime, they'll be responsible for causing their death. The people are also somewhat responsible for not moving out of Kazakhstan, but that's hardly an option, is it? Their responsibility for not destroying their lives to save them from bombing is minimal. The launching people are mostly responsible.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by member57 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Michael Moore is a slobbering idiot with 0% creativity. He is a fat arrogant jack-off that spews lies from every putrid orifice in his greasy,obese,slug-like body. Traitors like him are the reasons we need sedition laws re-enacted. Go back to Canada, Mr. Moore you asshat.

      --
      If Kerry was the answer, it must have been a stupid question.
      The UN - The largest "political" cause of death.
    7. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was the psycho put to death as he ought to be, or was he given a nice room to sleep in and then let out?

    8. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Traitor?

      Sometimes I think that the only reason America has freedom of speech is because it's written in the constitution. The population sure doesn't seem to respect it.

    9. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by abirdman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but did you like his movies?

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    10. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      Have you ever given money to a stranger? Ever been mugged? Ever had anything that belonged to you stolen? Well then, by sheer virtue of making the money/items-to-be-sold-for-money available to be purloined by a miscreant, YOU are responsible for the next person the miscreant shoots/stabs/bludgeons with the gun/knife/object he acquired using the money/goods you so carelsssly provided!

      All this garbage about avoiding personal responsibility for one's own actions really is disgusting.

      The blame for any (current/future/potential) deaths caused by this falls squarely on the shoulders of the people launching the rockets.

    11. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by j-beda · · Score: 1
      What is to be implied from this? If a psycho stabs me, is the knife's manufacturer or seller to blame?

      I see that some doctors in the UK are calling for limited sales of long pointed kitchen knives (suggesting that a long blunt ended knife is as useful in the kitchen.) Suposedly, smaller pointed kitchen knives do not pose as much stabbing danger but provide the cook all needed food-stabbing potential. They say that long pointed kitchen knives make up a significant fraction of dangerous wounds and are often the result of crimes of opportunity/passion so eliminating the easy availability of the weapon would have significant benifit.

      I wonder if studies such as this might increase potential liability claims for knife makers.

    12. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, showing the vice president plotting with Saudis to invade Iraq, violating the classified document laws, and getting a deal for the right oil prices to win the next election.. treason. With the White House policies based entirely on lies and cheating the American people, anyone telling the truth is a traitor. And, of course, anyone who freely speaks should go to Canada, because they respect that right. Not Bush's America, and not yours. Too bad you want sex with him so bad - you're going to miss him.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      All of the transactions I described were voluntary. I explicitly noted that the giver of the item later used to harm had the option of doing something to decrease the probability that that harm would be done. Your example is totally different - the giver does not have any choice. However, there is an ethical argument to be made that one should not give an obviously murderous psychopath a weapon of mass destruction, even when threatened with bodily harm. But I don't expect many people to pay that kind of personal price for others' protection, though the overall ratio of harm says they should. But that's not the case with either of our examples.

      You and I both agree that the launchers are responsible for the risks they are taking, and therefore the harm they cause. In equal measure to the credit they earn for successful launches - both credit and blame come from their actions, and their responsibility for them.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You tell me - it's your fantasy. You're kinda creepy, you know that?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You overlooked the first example. Regardless, it's a small matter. My point was that people are not mind readers. Unless the store had WANTED posters up with the perpetrator's face on it at every entrance, then how could anyone at the store possibly know anything about anyone they sold anything to?
      If they resorted to a big, privacy-invading database to sell things like ammo (which is pretty much worthless without a matching firearm), then folks such as myself wouldn't shop there.

      If I had been the PR person at K-Mart, if I had talked to them at all, which it may have been wiser not to do, I would have told them to piss off. The whole concept of a store being responsible for what someone does with the perfectly legal products another buys from there is ludicrous. Should K-Mart stop selling fertilizer because someone could use it to make a bomb? Should they stop selling pocketknives because they could be used to stab someone? Should they stop selling bats because they could be used to hit another human? Gee, we better burn all the rocks...

      Personal responsibility is the only way to have a sustainable society that endures. That is, K-Mart and the inhabitants of Kazakhstan are in no way responsible for the actions of a potentially murderous bastard nor irresponsible rocket launchers.
      -
      SK

    16. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you're debating the possible responsibility of individual Kazakhs for the rockets falling on them - I haven't asserted any, nor have I seen anyone else.

      There is a difference between giving money to a stranger, and giving money to someone you know spends money on hurting people. Or giving a weapon to someone. The former has only a tiny possibility of enabling harm to someone. The latter two have a significant probability, and the giver to the harmer has some responsibility to ensure they're not participating in the harm.

      Of course the harmer has full responsibility for their own actions. But the person who could have stopped them, by exercising restraint in the face of known, significant probability of harm, has some additional responsibility. The degree depends on the certainty that their act will be followed by harm.

      Pakistan gives a nuclear bomb to Osama bin Laden tomorrow, then bin Laden blows up Washington DC. Of course bin Laden is responsible - no contribution by anyone else reduces his responsiblity. But Pakistan is also responsible for the results - less than bin Laden, but not without responsibility.

      I agree with your stance on personal responsibility. Where people have a choice, and choose to harm, they are responsible for their choice, their act. But just as relevant is those who contributed. The flip side is obvious everywhere in our society: I invest money in your business, it succeeds, I get a return on my investment. Personal responsibility does not make collusion without consequences. In fact, collusion is another form of personal responsibility, which is just as essential as primary responsibility.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by syukton · · Score: 1
      So many people are shot by other people who claim, often proveably, that they did not expect the gun to shoot, though it did. That's an unsafe product, like a car with bad brakes, which manufacturers should know could be safer, and could redesign for greater safety, but don't.


      Actually, no, guns are neither unsafe nor are they anything like cars with bad brakes. New gun operators, however, are a lot like unlicensed automobile drivers. People who don't know how to operate a weapon, handling a weapon, and discharging it by accident--this is much more easily paralelled with people who don't know how to operate a motor vehicle driving it into a wall, by accident.

      I say "unlicensed" because, before getting behind the wheel of a car to drive on a federal, state, county, or city road, you must be licensed and in most states, this requires taking a driver training course and passing both a written and a driving test. There are no such requirements for firearms in my own state, though I don't know about the others. This fact serves to reinforce my belief that operator error is responsible for most handgun-related accidents. And operator error is not some new phenomenon that has never plagued gun-using society before; accidental firearm discharges were a top killer among those traveling the Oregon Trail.

      It has nothing to do with the safety of the device, it has to do with the device operator's lack of cognizant understanding of the device's function and functionality.

      Translated: ignorance may be bliss, but it also tends to be deadly.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    18. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest problem with guns is the people who get them, then never shoot them until they are in a confrontation they didn't expect. They think having a gun is like having a "get out of jail free" card: all they have to do is declare they have it, and everything bad ends. Of course, there's no guarantee that the owner will be the one to use the gun, if anyone. And shooting someone is bad, even if not shooting them is worse.

      Every gun owner should have to pass a shooting test at least once a year. They should have to prove accuracy, as well as their ability just to use the weapon. Part of the test should test their ability to make quick decisions with the gun in hand, including decisions not to fire when a threat isn't real. And they should have to demonstrate regular practice with the gun throughout the year. Also, the practice supervisors should report mishandling, including guns that show up without a triggerlock, for license revocation. That would separate the people who accept their responsibility from those who are just looking for a magic wand to protect them, without understanding it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    19. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people are also somewhat responsible for not moving out of Kazakhstan, but that's hardly an option, is it?

      I took that seriously when perhaps I should not have. The main reason I jumped on this is because I cannot see how a reasonable person would expect a large retail store to know anything of significance regarding an average customer, therefore the store could in no way be held responsible for the actions of the customer.
      It has another parallel that bothers me to no end: in the place where I live, if one locks a firearm in the trunk of a car and someone steals the car (or otherwise acquires the firearm) then commits a, say, murder with that firearm, the firearm owner is criminally liable for the actions of the actual criminal. There is indeed a teensy bit of conventional wisdom that could back that up in an extreme case (left loaded on the seat in plain sight, etc., etc.), but that would already be covered under negligence laws.
      -
      SK

    20. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      People buying bullets aren't "average" customers at K-Mart. The consequences of their purchase are more often hurting someone than the consequences of most customers. Bullets are different from other products: we know that people use bullets to hurt people.

      People know that cars get stolen. Leaving a gun in a car that can be stolen is negligent. But people try to treat guns as if they weren't different from other objects left in cars. They are different: we know that people use guns to hurt people, that criminals (like people who steal cars).

      People don't exist, or act, alone in a vacuum. When you know that your actions increase risk, you are responsible for taking extra measures to mitigate it. Guns and bullets are used in actions with increased risk: increased probability of harm, increased damage when the risk materializes. Launching a rocket over populations is risky, even when the outcome is uncertain, and when the launchers don't expect it to hurt someone. If they launch enough times, they should expect to hurt someone - they are responsible for doing what they can to minimize that risk. When people send guns and bullets into people's hands, they are responsible for doing what they can to minimize that risk. Like background checks, checking permits, looking to see that the person isn't obviously psychopathic. If they can't handle the responsiblity, they shouldn't be launching rockets, or selling guns or bullets.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    21. Re:Gimme Back My Bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please define 'unable to handle the responsibility'. What would you have retail stores do to "minimize that risk"? (Permits and background checks are not required for purchasing ammunition.) Should each K-Mart have a psychiatrist on staff, and require a mandatory thirty minute session with each prospective customer?

      As for being responsible for the contents of stolen cars: houses can be broken into. What, you didn't have a firearm? It doesn't matter, because you had a TV/computer/jewelry/other valubles which were sold or traded for a firearm which was then used blah blah blah, ad nauseum.

      Holding someone else responsible for the illegal actions of another is, at its core, dangerous, destructive, irrational, and irresponsible - especially when circumstances dictate that reasonable measures were taken. (E.g., firearm locked in box in car trunk, customer wasn't drunk or obviously enraged, doors to the house were locked, etc.)

  27. So far the only casualties... by jazzman251 · · Score: 0

    So far the only casualties seem to have been a few dead cows.

    And their server....

  28. Not a bad investment, titanium is great. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    It's properties are no less difficult than aluminum, but it is being used much more. The medical industry uses it most for reinforcing the skeleton when there is a break; it isn't rejected as eagerly as say a steel plate in the head :D.

    Honestly, I think silver and aluminum are the most amazing metals I have ever worked with. What with silver sitting in water, it cures. And aluminum being plentiful for sandcasting use.

    Counting a nearby titanium purchaser and reseller, it looks as if the American steel industry disintegrated and was replaced by the only last prospect of more valuable metal arts. Ask any career steelmill worker that was layed off, to compare Chinese steel to American steel, and the first thing you'll hear is a French verb followed by "quality" and a sucking noise. Perhaps it is always meant to be; America can't be a leader in an industry for long and must pioneer ahead; now it's titanium, soon that'll move overseas and we'll know when to dump stock if somthing in the market starts to stink.

    --
    without prejudice
    1. Re:Not a bad investment, titanium is great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's properties are no less difficult than aluminum

      "Its".

  29. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  30. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1000 years aluminum wasn't even heard of or dreamt of. I'm sure you meant 100 years ago, in which case you are more or less correct. Aluminum was used to make jewellry and high-end cutlery, and even bikes 100 years ago.

  31. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More power to Our Kazakhstan neighbors.

    Um, Kazakhstan is nowhere near USA... Oh wait, you're American so you probably wouldn't know that, sorry. :-] And what's with capitalizing "Our"? Don't mean to troll, but you Americans are getting weirder by the minute.

  32. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whereever two or three gather in the name of the Lord, I will be there in the midst. -Jesus the Christ

  33. I liked Kazakhstan by peter+hoffman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I went to Almaty (aka "Alma Ata", the old capital of Kazakhstan) back in about 1994. I really enjoyed it and found the people to be very friendly and enthusiastic.

    I did find the food to be somewhat unique. Breakfast was usually a kind of roll filled with either finely chopped vegetables and/or finely ground meat. I don't know what sort of meat it was and it wasn't even always clear which buns had meat as everything was so finely ground up. It was all tasty though.

    Lunch was fairly straight forward but the dessert was a peculiar electric green sweet foam. I couldn't identify the flavor but it was also pretty good.

    Supper was quite interesting as, although the menu had a variety of items, it turned out what was actually available was either steak or spaghetti. No worry though, both were quite good as was the company!

    The architecture, furnishings, and decor of Almaty were very interesting. For me, it was like an instant trip to the 1950s but in a parallel universe where everything was slightly unfamiliar.

    The name of the hotel I stayed at escapes me right now but it was something like "The Cosmo". I think it has been renamed "Kazakhstan Hotel" based on the pictures I can find. There was a very impressive and very large tapestry commemorating the Soviet space program in the lobby.

    The main thing about my trip was my time in Kazakhstan was far too short. It took ~48 hours to get there, I had ~48 hours there, and then it was ~48 hours to come home. I wish I had time to visit Baikonur Cosmodrome (we were invited to visit by our hosts) but we didn't have time. I'll always regret that.

    Anyway, if you get a chance to go to Kazakhstan, you really should take it.

    1. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I did find the food to be somewhat unique. Breakfast was usually a kind of roll filled with either finely chopped vegetables and/or finely ground meat. I don't know what sort of meat it was and it wasn't even always clear which buns had meat as everything was so finely ground up. It was all tasty though.

      After getting hit with a 20 ton chink of metal the meat would be finely ground wouldn't it.

    2. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by natrius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lunch was fairly straight forward but the dessert was a peculiar electric green sweet foam.

      Falling space junk and electric green food don't sound like that great of a combination.

      Especially if it's during an air raid in 1941.

      Are you my mummy?

    3. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes? And? What's that got to do with anything? Don't you know of a travel site or have a blog where you can post your travel stories?

    4. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by Manchot · · Score: 1

      It's probably best that you don't know where the meat came from.

    5. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by Garrett+Combs · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, I found your (Score:5, Interesting modded) post interesting enough to comment on it.

      As for the Kazakhstan cousine and your post, what was the basis for you being in the country?

      And most importantly, did they have a McDonalds?

      --
      Insert witty Slashdot sig here.
    6. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by eufaula · · Score: 1

      i have a friend from that part of the world and according to him they eat a lot of horse meat. if you were in almaty in a restaurant, chances are it was mutton or beef, but he said its not uncommon to find horse on the menu as well.

    7. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Breakfast was usually a kind of roll filled with either finely chopped vegetables and/or finely ground meat. I don't know what sort of meat it was [...]

      You could just have said "Breakfast was a Big Mac."

    8. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by peter+hoffman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was there as part of a team from ICL (now part of Fujitsu) presenting some banking software to a group of about a dozen different banks. I was responsible for the technical end of the presentation (i.e., make sure the all the hardware / software / networking functioned properly) and to answer any technical questions the banks might have.

      Most of the other Westerners I met as a result of this trip were there because of oil and other mineral interests. This was relatively soon after Kazakhstan had become independent and the Kazakhs were very interested in development and self-sufficiency.

      I didn't see any sign of a McDonald's or other Western storefront while I was there but my time there was limited and there was a lot I didn't see. Almaty is quite a large city, somewhat reminiscent of Denver, so I didn't see most of it.

      Almaty is right next to some large mountains and although our hotel was definitely in the city, there was a ski-lift only a few blocks away that would take you up the side of the mountains. It couldn't be more convenient for visitors to go skiing for the afternoon.

      I would love the opportunity to go back there. The countries in that part of the world (the "stans") and their people are often portrayed negatively. I just wanted to let the people here at Slashdot, who probably haven't had a chance to visit KZ, know that it is very much worth doing.

      There is a website at http://www.almadf.kz.nyud.net:8090/english/index.h tml that I found this morning which has a lot of photos showing how beautiful Almaty and its people are. I have no connection with that site and I have tried to avoid having it Slashdotted by using using Coral. Therefore I inserted ".nyud.net:8090" into the actual URL above.

      I would like to know if there are there are any people from Kazakhstan reading Slashdot? I would have thought there should be. If you are from Kazakhstan and would like to make a friend in the U.S., please feel free to contact me at mailto:southcarolina1860-kazakhstan@yahoo.com

    9. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by caluml · · Score: 1

      I never went as far as Almaty - I just stayed in the North, close to the safety of the Russian and Chineses borders. :) Ust-Kamenogorosk.

    10. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by peter+hoffman · · Score: 1

      I just visited your site. I really liked the pictures and getting to see what some of the rest of Kazakhstan looks like (not to mention your other pictures).

      I've also been reading about this history of Kazakhstan this morning. I find it so sad to think about what the people have had to endure in these places. Everyone I met was so nice; it is hard to picture them having to live under a totalitarian government. I really hope their future goes much better.

    11. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by caluml · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I've been to other parts of the former Soviet Union, and I find that they had excellent healthcare, education, and a general standard of life under the USSR. Of course, there were downsides - but it all comes down to quality of life at the end of the day, and Russian beer, Russian people, and Russian girls go a long way towards it. :)

    12. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...especially all the weed they grow their;)

    13. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

      Your experience must differ radically from mine, of all the russian people I have met (my wife is, unfortunately, russian) they are bitter, depressed, fatalistic and whiney.

      Esp. my wife, you are more than welcome to have the bitch, and all her neurotic russian friends.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    14. Re:I liked Kazakhstan by houghi · · Score: 1

      the dessert was a peculiar electric green sweet foam. I couldn't identify the flavor but it was also pretty good.

      It's people. The peculiar electric green sweet foam is made out of people!

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  34. old-world chemists (alchemists) by NRAdude · · Score: 1, Informative
    Not to detract, but there has been sparse evidence and documentation of the Kings and Queens around the Years 1100 had their crowns casted in aluminum. I can't find the documentation at the moment, but in this dire circumstance of quoting from memory doesn't prevail the certain names of those royal families, I quote from a google'd source,

    HOW ALUMINIUM WAS DISCOVERED
    The art of pottery making was developed in northern Iraq about 5300 B.C. The clay used for making the best pottery consisted largely of a hydrated silicate of aluminium. Certain other aluminium compounds such as "alums" were widely used by the Egyptians and Babylonians as early as 2000 B.C. In vegetable dyes, various chemical processes and for medicinal purposes. But it was generally known as the "metal of clay" and for thousands of years could not be separated by any known method from its link with other elements.

    In historical terms aluminium is a relatively new metal which was isolated early in the 19th century. In 1782 the great French chemist, Lavoisier, said it was the oxide of an unknown metal. This opinion was repeated by Sir Humphrey Davy in 1808, and Sir Humphrey gave it the name "aluminum" which he felt sounded more scientific than "metal of clay". His spelling is still used in North America but elsewhere in the world the spelling "aluminium", following the suggestion of Henri Sainte-Clair Deville, is used. In 1809 Davy fused iron in contact with alumina in an electric arc to produce an iron aluminium alloy; for a split instant, before it joined the iron, aluminium existed in its free metallic state for perhaps the first time since the world was formed.

    In 1825 H.C. Oerstedt, a Dane, produced a tiny sample of aluminium in the laboratory by chemical means. Twenty years later the German scientist, Frederick Wohler, produced aluminium lumps as big as pinheads. In 1854 Sainte-Clair Deville had made improvements in Wohler's method and produced aluminium globules the size of marbles. He was encouraged by Napoleon lll to produce aluminium commercially and at the Paris exhibition in 1855 aluminium bars were exhibited next to the crown jewels. It was not until 31 years later, however, that an economical way of commercial production was discovered.

    On February 23, 1886, a 22-year-old American, Charles Martin Hall, worked out the basic electrolytic process still in use today. Hall had begun his experiments while still a student at Oberlin College, Ohio. He achieved his success, after graduation, with home-made apparatus in the family wood shed. He separated aluminium from the oxygen with which it is chemically combined in nature by passing an electric current through a solution of cryolite and alumina.

    Almost simultaneously, Paul L.T. Heroult arrived at the same process in France. However, he did not at first recognise its importance. He worked along another line in the development of aluminium alloys. In 1888 the German chemist, Karl Joseph Bayer, was issued a German patent for an improved process for making Bayer aluminium oxide (alumina). The foundation of the aluminium age was complete. The Bayer & Hall-Heroult processes freed the world's most plentiful and versatile structural element for the use of man.


    Certainly, without the speculation I tried to reference towards old-world chemists forging aluminum merchandise for a Royal prices, according to today's public records it may date to no less than 150 years of use; clearly a far contraction from the 900 more years I uncovered in a College Library's religious manuscripts.
    --
    without prejudice
    1. Re:old-world chemists (alchemists) by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      The first mention of Aluminum in modern history, is 77 AD, according to wikipedia.com.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  35. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
    From Pliny the Elder's Naturalis Historia:

    One day a goldsmith in Rome was allowed to show the Emperor Tiberius a dinner plate of a new metal. The plate was very light, and almost as bright as silver. The goldsmith told the Emperor that he had made the metal from plain clay. He also assured the Emperor that only he, himself, and the Gods knew how to produce this metal from clay. The Emperor became very interested, and as a financial expert he was also a little concerned. The Emperor felt immediately, however, that all his treasures of gold and silver would fall in value if people started to produce this bright metal of clay. Therefore, instead of giving the goldsmith the regard expected, he ordered him to be beheaded.

    From the wikipedia article

    If it was aluminium, that is...

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  36. Uhh.. by Coolnat2004 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Kazaghawhatchimacallit?

  37. The great leap ... again! by neonenergy · · Score: 1

    At least they could sell them metals

    If you didnt make that iron (in our backyards of course) back in China, youd be part of that iron slurry if you know what i mean.

    and we couldnt even sell that crappy stuff =/

  38. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by quacking+duck · · Score: 2, Interesting
    more jewelry is being made of titanium

    A couple friends recently got engaged, and they had an artisan who specialized in jewelry design and make her engagement ring.

    Of all the exotic materials they can make rings out of, one thing she would not do was make rings out of titanium. The reason? In case of certain medical emergencies (snagged in a machine, or crashed car, or whatever), they'd need to cut the ring off to free the finger (and ultimately the entire person). But no paramedic or even hospital ward is routinely equipped with tools to cut through titanium. If they encountered a titanium ring in a time-critical emergency, they could well be forced to cut the finger off instead.

  39. Hmmmm... by jpellino · · Score: 3, Funny

    The object the woman's hiolding in photo essay pic #8 looks suspiciously like the things Arthur, Ford, & Zaphod were getting slapped in the face with enroute to rescue Trillian...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  40. Borat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my country there is problem. And that problem is transport...

    1. Re:Borat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wah wah wee wah

  41. Hold on a second. See a movie: "The Abyss" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This movie proves that people should be buying eachother body armor for their marriage bands. I mean, the man and woman in that movie were divorced, and still being partners he wore his ring anyway. And in that scene where the door was about to close, he stuck his hand in there between a rubber-less water seal and it kept the door from closing long enough for his co-worker to get a crow-bar in there and leverage the door open. Titanium jewelry saves the day! I met a woman that once had to use her diamond-studded wedding ring on a bulletproof window when she became trapped; she remembered her mentor, Mr. Miyagi, and with about 5,000 waves of the hand she carved a 1 inch depth oval cut large enough for her body to squeeze through! Hard stuff saves lives! I'm sure even a man would find a use for a diamond ring on a titanium band when he pulls out that disk-sander that son Jimmy gave him as a birthday present!

    I suggest everyone to invest in Titanium(TM) wedding bands from ABC corporation. And coming soon to a child near you, from the re-hired makers of Log(TM) we have Tities(TM) the metal that makes you appear larger-chested. For men or women, Titanium Breasts (Titties) has helpded remove the gap between deformed pectoral muscles, removed silicone breast implants, removed cancers, and no less natural unfirmness from eating too much goddam chocolate! Titties(TM) is for you, buy now!

  42. It could have been worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So far the only casualties seem to have been a few dead cows.

    Thank god they were already dead!

  43. rockets falling in a populated area is an outrage by Odocoileus · · Score: 1

    And what about thair health, and their land? Aren't their some pretty bad chemicals involved with this?

    --
    ...
  44. Link seems slashdotted... by 64nDh1 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I can't get to the link for the Photo essay, but try the following URL to get to the jpegs directly instead of the Slide show page.

    http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/culture/imag es/sj2.jpg [eurasianet.org]

    That's the second image, a smoking hunk of what must be a fallen rocket casing I guess.

    There's 12 images in all, I've only seen the first two, but they seem to follow simple numeric order, so the others would end

    .../sj3.jpg

    and so on.

    If anyone wants to send me a zip of the pictures if they can access them by email, I'll rehost and post the link. But as I say, right now I've only got two images.

    1. Re:Link seems slashdotted... by 64nDh1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know now. See mirrored files rehosted in my subsequent comment. Images from original site timed out often. I'm only using college supplied webspace, so maybe a temporary fix, but should be faster in the short term.

  45. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by onya · · Score: 1

    I don't see what your point is. Steel is a "pain to weld or melt in the house" unless you know what you're doing. It's scrap metal. They sell it to scrap dealers.

    Oh, and Titanium can be TIG welded. It's only a pain if you don't know what you're doing. Kind of like all welding really.

  46. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I know CNN's taught you bad geography but... > Why make something in America if it can be made elsewhere better and cheaper?

  47. Rehosted images. by 64nDh1 · · Score: 5, Informative
    An open directory of jpegs 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11 and 12. If anyone wants to fill in the gaps, forward the files to my e-mail and I'll add them later.

    http://matrix.netsoc.tcd.ie/~64ndhi/SlashdotKazakh stan/

    1. Re:Rehosted images. by 64nDh1 · · Score: 1

      Directory now full. Please do not mail images. 1-12 available at above link until slashdotting reoccurs.

    2. Re:Rehosted images. by caluml · · Score: 1

      Wow - I like this pic: sj9.jpg. Anyone got a larger version of it?

    3. Re:Rehosted images. by character+sequence · · Score: 1

      If you're in London during the next week or so, get on down to the (free) World Press Photo exhibition at the Royal Festival Hall. You can see some of these same images in poster size, along with a whole lot more thought-provoking images.

      --
      Karma: Nonnegative
  48. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Zackbass · · Score: 1

    It's not even wildly different from any other TIG welding process, it just has its quirks like any other metal. If you can TIG weld steel and have some cardboard to rig up extra argon shielding then you can do titanium.

    --
    You gotta find first gear in your giant robot car
  49. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From Pliny the Elder's Naturalis Historia:
    One day a goldsmith in Rome was allowed to show the Emperor Tiberius a dinner plate of a new metal...


    Myth. See "Ancient aluminum? Flexible glass?: looking for the real heart of a legend", Skeptical Inquirer, May-June, 1995 by Gerhard Eggert
    http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2843/is _n3_v19/ai_16836663

  50. In other news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia and Kazakhstan are set to complete construction on a new unmanned spacecraft launch complex by 2008-2009.link.

  51. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by jizmonkey · · Score: 1

    It is highly unlikely that the Tiberius plate was aluminum, given the enormous temperatures required for reducing aluminum ore in the absence of electricity. We have no idea what this metal might have been -- perhaps tin?

    --
    With great power comes great fan noise.
  52. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by keraneuology · · Score: 5, Informative
    Of all the exotic materials they can make rings out of, one thing she would not do was make rings out of titanium. The reason? In case of certain medical emergencies (snagged in a machine, or crashed car, or whatever), they'd need to cut the ring off to free the finger (and ultimately the entire person). But no paramedic or even hospital ward is routinely equipped with tools to cut through titanium.

    Counter we contacted our local hospital emergency room and asked if they were equipped to cut off a titanium ring in an emergency. Most hospital emergency rooms are prepared to handle almost anything, and ours assured us that it would be no problem for them. During our 30+ years of jewelry repair experience, we've only seen a dozen or so rings that have been cut off in hospital emergency rooms, and in most of those cases the rings had been bent out-of-round and were putting painful pressure on the finger. Titanium rings are less likely to crush or bend out-of-round, so if you shut your hand in a car door or drop a heavy object on it, it might be safer to be wearing a titanium ring than a precious metal band!

    Counter 2 In case of an emergency, such as an injured finger, Emergency Medical Technicians, Fire Departments, and Hospital Emergency Rooms can quickly remove titanium rings. Several non-destructive methods for ring removal are available before resorting to cutting a ring. In the rare event it becomes necessary to cut off a titanium ring, emergency medical professionals carry ring cutters or rotary cut-off tools that cut through metals, including our CP and Aerospace Grade Titanium. In our testing, we found that tools that will cut through steel will also cut through titanium rings.

    Counter 3 Titanium rings are created with safety in mind, as there is always the possibility that a ring will need to be removed in an emergency. Tests by various manufacturers have shown that titanium rings can be manually cut with a ring cutter within a matter of minutes, and much faster using an electric ring cutting device, such as those that many paramedics use.

    Counter 4 I had heard that there is a "medical emergency" issue (i.e. they can't cut the ring off of your finger with regular ring snippers) but my friend's hubby, who is an EMT, assured me that this isn't something to be concerned about, since they have different types of cutters they can use should the need arise.

    --
    If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
  53. liars by icepick72 · · Score: 1

    Those cows are just sleeping soundly.

    1. Re:liars by bsquizzato · · Score: 1

      Brings a whole new meaning to the act of cow tipping...

  54. Wrong by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 1
    Ha, google a bit more.

    Sovereign immunity applies to suits against the US as well. It also applies to suits against the states, for that matter.

    People do in fact sue the US all the time, but that suit will only be successful if the US has waived its sovereign immunity in that area.

    1. Re:Wrong by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're thinking of the 11th Amendment. SCOTUS interpreted it to mean that states can be found "immune from lawsuits brought by private individuals in federal court, unless the state consents to the suit." (page 500, same source) That's only preventing the federal courts from looking at it, not the state's own courts (but what are your chances there). Do you have any sources to quote, because I'm finding nothing to confirm your claim.

    2. Re:Wrong by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 1
      By Blackstones beard . . .

      First, 11th amendment: The eleventh amendment is a jurisdictional bar to suit (aka a 'prevention') against a federal court hearing an action by a private party or foreign government against a state. This means that you cannot sue a state in federal court unless the state has consented. See, e.g., Hans v. Lousiana, 134 US 1 (1890). There are more nuances to it (e.g. federal gov't can sue a state in federal court), but that is enough for this conversation. As for suing the state in its own courts...

      Next, sovereign immunity: Okay, severely generalizing, sovereign immunity dates back to when states/nations were run by kings, and the theory that kings could theoretically do no wrong. To avoid embarrassing your own or foreign governments, this generally meant that you could not sue a state without its permission. In present day, this has been somewhat relaxed where foreign governments are engaging in commercial activities, and you can sue them in the US if certain conditions are met. Whether or not the defendant country will allow you to enforce the judgment in their own courts is another matter, so hopefully you can find some assets to seize that are outside of their borders (if you want to have a fun time, go read the "Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act").

      In terms of how this has worked out in the US, well, first things first, we have two sets of sovereigns here: the individual states, and the federal government. The states, through the constitution, have surrenderred some aspects of their sovereignty to the the federal government (such as regulation of interstate trade and foreign relations), the rest, they retain for themselves. Part of sovereignty, again, is that you cannot be sued without permission. Try reading the "Federal Tort Claims Act" for actions you can bring against the US or read about the federal court of claims, which has jurisdiction over contract suits between whoever and the US government. For a good summary of sovereign immunity in the US in general, go check out the recent opinion of Alden v. Maine, 527 US 706 (1999).

    3. Re:Wrong by erlenic · · Score: 1

      You've really just proven my point.

      First, the original argument was about an individual v. the U.S. Your second paragraph is exactly what I've found, and says nothing about U.S. Citizens suing the U.S. Government, just suits against state governments. You did explain it much better than I did though.

      In your third paragraph, you directly mention looking up tort claims that can be brought against the U.S. That's exactly what would happen in the scenario we were originally discussing, and you directly claim it can be done. You also mention contract suits. Both these show that you can indeed sue the U.S. As for Alden v. Maine, it makes no mention that I can find of suits brought against the U.S. Government, just the governments of the several states.

      The only reason I brought the 11th Amendment into this is because I thought perhaps you were mistakenly thinking of it. I didn't mean for this to turn into an argument about all forms of sovereign immunity in the U.S.

    4. Re:Wrong by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      This has most likely been the most educating debate on Slashdot that I've seen this year.

      Congrats, and Natalie Portmans (Portmen?) to all.

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
    5. Re:Wrong by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 1
      Look, let me remind you what discussion we were having - I never said you couldn't sue the US, just that you could only sue it in certain situations. That is, where it has waived its sovereign right to not be sued.

      If you want to have more fun with case law, or would just like to get to the point, try grabbing a legal dictionary and looking up sovereign immunity. Alternatively, you could try reading the Federalist Papers (esp. #'s 15 and 39).

      Here is the deal with suing the US: the federal tort claims act I mentioned lists the tort areas that can be brought against the US - i.e. the areas in which the US has voluntarily waived sovereign immunity. (oh yeah, and Congress could also pass something by statute giving a right to sue).

      We got into this discussion because we were talking about suing the hell out of the US if they dropped a rocket booster on you. Can you sue? I don't know, I haven't memorized the FTCA.

      Historically, people who were accidentally killed in the name of 'progress' (i.e. astronauts, even factory workers killed by exploding boilers and what not back during the industrial revolution) did not have an action even against private parties. Here, we are dealing with a pretty dangerous activity being done in the name of science and the technological advancement of the nation and it may be that Congress doesn't want the US to be financially accountable for collateral damage. Can you sue if they drop a booster on your house? I don't know, but it will only happen if they have waived sovereign immunity.

    6. Re:Wrong by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 1
      I am enjoying the back and forth, but I don't have much time today. This case may help with understanding the federal tort claims act and how it relates to US sovereignty: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?c ourt=us&vol=346&invol=15

      Again, main point being that the US cannot be sued unless it has waived sovereign immunity.

    7. Re:Wrong by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Your point that the US has to waive its sovereign immunity is exactly what I'm challenging, and I also don't have time to argue it, so we should probably leave it as is. When I get the time I'll look at the links you've provided, so thanks for posting them. As for your other reply, I do agree that the government would find a way out of being help liable, I just don't think they'd use sovereign immunity.

  55. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by erlenic · · Score: 1

    Bikes are still made out of it, at least as of 10 years ago. I have one. Sturdy because it's hollow, which also helps make it very light. That's why it was used in the first place.

  56. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 2, Funny
    People do seem to think that titanium is some kind of indestructable super-metal

    I recall one time I saw AC/DC, a fellow next to me in front of the stage (read mosh pit) lost his glasses. Normally, one would be concerned - but not this guy. "My glasses have titanium frames, they will be fine!" We found them at the end of the show.

    I still remember the look on his face when we found them - he just stared slack-jawed at the twisted ball of metal in his palm.

  57. recipe for disappointment by veg_all · · Score: 1

    A slashdot article that includes a link labled "this remarkable photo essay."

    Ah, well.

    --
    grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
  58. That's a "spade" by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    (I always call them that)

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  59. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    I wonder when they started substituting it for use in tin-foil hats?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  60. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by HansieC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Counter 5 Heat the ring up to 1338 degrees so that it can then be easily worked off the finger without needing to worry about injuring the finger with ungainly 'ring cutters'.

  61. Finally... by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

    Alright!!!
    My dream has come true. A direct link on slashdot to a picture of dead cows against a beutiful backdrop.
    Now I can die happy! Wait... Those cows look very peaceful. Maybe they're just resting.

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    1. Re:Finally... by TERdON · · Score: 1
      Cows that lie flat resting are either dead or very, very ill. Cows normally lie like this.

      PS. Damn damn image texts. They are going to kill off /. if they're going to stop people from posting every second time!

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    2. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are pining for the fjords.

    3. Re:Finally... by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

      It actually reminded me of the Monty Python dead parrot sketch.
      Anywaze, Death from above dude...

      PS: These fucking confirmion characters are getting harder and harder to read! It sucks!

      --
      "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  62. Exactly how much is that worth monetarily? by DigiMan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was just curious, I was only able to see a few of the photos before the server got too bogged down..., but from the looks of the one where the guy is standing on the "space junk", I was shocked by the shear size of that thing!

    Does anyone have a rough guess about how much metal is in one of those things? Also, what do you think THEY get in Kazakhstan for the Ti? compared to what we could get here in the US??? Last I checked, Ti was going for around $1 or $1.25 / lb and that is IF you can find a buyer. Acording to RecyclyingToday.com there seems to be a surplus...

    Just wondering if anyone has a rough idea for us scrap geeks :)

    I'd hate to have one of those puppies fall in my back yard and have to say, "Yeah, I know I didn't get the best price on my scrap booster rocket, but AT LEAST I GOT A GREAT PRICE ON CAR INSURANCE!"

    1. Re:Exactly how much is that worth monetarily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check this site for an indication of prices: http://www.titaniumjoe.com/

      I'm involved in building fighting robots, where titanium is a popular choice for armour. If you happen to have some plates of quality grade titanium collecting dust, there are probably some robot builders that would be happy to take them off your hands if your price is reasonable.

  63. Aluminum is verry low melting point. Here is how. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    You can do it with no more than USD 10.00 in materials cost; charcoal briquettes, an old coffee can (crucible), a coat-hangar, a sack of stomped aluminum soda cans, fire logs, fire kindling to get it going, and a reversed cannister vacuum machine or leif blower. Aluminum is quite an amazing metal; it's only disability is being brittle. Aeroplane engines are the first ever to use aluminum, obviously because it is strong enough and lightweight; but consider the first predicament whereas the combustion is a thousand or so degrees greater than the melting point of the aluminum block! It's all in the cooling design. Most cars use aluminum engine blocks now, although ask anyone and they'll prefer steel engine blocks any day for reliability purposes.

    To the sandcasting! First, it is good to decide what you may want to sandcast with your aluminum soda cans; let's make a coin! You will enjoy the feeling of a coin, whereas should be worth no less than the soda cans redemption value; a 26 cent peice? Carve an indentation into a small peice of wood, or make a mold from ceramic. It is easire to just get a peice of wood, a drill, a 1-inch wide drill bit, and just drill a cigar shape deep enough into the wood block. You can cut your coins on a metal saw; aluminum slugs, as some food vending machine personell fear.

    First, lay a foundation of charcoal briquettes covering the surface area of the bottom of the tin coffee can (we'll call it a crucible). I suggest you make the foundation of two layers of charcoal briquettes. Second, put a hole in the lip of the crucible that can be used to hold with a coat-hanger; put the crucible ontop the briquettes. Third, stack the fire wood logs around the crucible so also to help guid and support the can when it is being tampered with. Fourth, momentarily lift the crucible up to throw the lit fire kindling in there and then replace the crucible; get the briquettes burning; billow with your lungs or somthing at the heap just to give enough air movement to get the fire going. Fourth, put crushed can in there and point the reversed vacuum or blower at the base of the fire; it must get about 2500 degrees Fahrenheit to easily poor; keep an eye on that first soda can that if it deforms into a puddle you can add as much to the matter as you need. Fifth, when you are ready to poor into your mold, attach the coat hanger carefully to the lip and direct the pooring action with a nearby stick or somthing other than your bare hands.

    There you have it. Just don't earn yourself a Darwin award. When I was up at Yosemit last year in the eighth Month of the Year of Our Lord two-thousand-and-four, I had done all this without a reverse vacuum/blower and using storage lids in the hands of three slave children; they were shortly liberated by their mothers when they returned to see a glowing red fireball in a firepit that couldn't be approached within three feet. Just one note: keep foreign matter like marshmallows out of the crucible or you'll be liable to splatter.

    --
    without prejudice
  64. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    That's okay, I bought my wife a brass ring to avoid all those problems. Just hope she doesn't find out...

  65. Re:Aluminum is verry low melting point. Here is ho by jonored · · Score: 2, Informative

    And that's perfectly fine for doing aluminum casting; now let's see you get aluminum from clay with it. Nobody was saying that you can't work aluminum with normal heats; it's quite a bit easier to heat than steel is, and that's perfectly doable with a little bit of air and some chunk charcoal.
    BTW, the whole setup would function better if you had something like a brake drum from a car (or just about any other sort of fire-resistant pot with a hole in the bottom) and some piping to get the air coming up through the hole in the bottom. It's actually fairly easy to soften, melt, and burn steel in such an arrangement, using either chunk charcoal or coal. (real charcoal burns quite noticeably hotter, albeit faster, than briquettes.)

    But anyways, enough of me ranting about the forge in my backyard.

  66. Borat says... by Invalid+Character · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yek She Mesh!
    I am Borat and I come from Kazshakstan. I have beeg hhhram, it is beeg like ze booster rockets. Do you want to touch my hhhram? It izsh naice.
    No? Can I touch youaz?

    --

    --

    Registered .sig quotient : 1337

  67. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome our new scrap metal overlords.
    Come on guys, it was obvious.

  68. Looks like.... by Yehtmae · · Score: 0

    ... a booster rocket fell on the server.

  69. Too many thoughts, aaaggghhh by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 3, Informative


    A couple of things came to mind reading the parent.

    I'd have to say welding titanium is no more difficult than welding aluminum or stainless steel. They're all tricky and it takes practice.

    Titanium can be difficult to work with (especially if you're not set up to do so) but you'll notice that most titanium jewelry is either formed (from wire, rod or sheet) or machined. Titanium rings/bands are machined- not cast.

    Because Ti rings are machined, your local jeweler is likely unable to resize your ring. You can't size it down the way you would common alloy rings (which are cut and soldered to make smaller, stretched to make bigger) so you've got to either go back to the retailer or in some cases the manufacturer.

    Aluminum was more expensive than gold, but its value is subjective, gold has been desired more than any other metal since its discovery. Side note- aluminum used to cost more because until relatively recently it was extremely expensive to extract from bauxite. (If you're interested, it's called the Bayer Process)

    Unlike gold and other precious metals and alloys, I don't think titanium and other industrial metals are sold on market exchanges. There's no spot or fix for the industrial metals (that I know of.)

    And lastly, my local scrap metal dealer buys Ti at $.18/pound and sells at $.24/pound. I think this is much lower than it's market value, but even o it's no wonder these farmer guys are making $$$- they have tonnage. Well, and, it's probably hard to find in that market.

    --
    R(k)
  70. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

    Well, first you coat the finger in oil to make it all slippery, THEN you heat the ring.

  71. Redundant? by ChePibe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm one of the first to have posted saying this, and I'm marked as "Redundant"?

    That word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

    1. Re:Redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll meta-moderate the parent as unfair... That okay with you????

  72. Wow - the photos are VERY nice by plampione · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I am VERY impressed by the photos - certainly better, artistically, of what Reuters/ANSA or the like usually produces!

    As for the dead cows, I bet they ate grass contaminated with rocket fuel - it can be very poisonous. I am not sure what they use, but hydrazine, for instance, is very poisonous.

  73. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by khallow · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, given your name any recommendations on what oil to use? I don't have an automobile at the moment (though I plan to get better!) so I'm thinking a light oil suitable for oiling door latches or cooking or a very heavy oil which could double as roofing tar.

  74. The Photographer by richie2000 · · Score: 1

    The photographer has a few more photos online as well as captions to all of them. The cows apparently die due to rocket fuel poisoned soil, not by being hit by the spent booster stages.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  75. Hmph. by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 1

    I come from Kyrgyzstan (just south of Kazakhstan) and why couldn't have some cool stuff like this fall on my cow?

  76. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by SEE · · Score: 4, Informative

    but consider that 1,000 years ago aluminum was a hundred times more valuable than gold

    Aluminum was not known as a metal 1,000 years ago, having been discovered in 1825 and purified enough to really test its properties in 1827. But yes, until the electolytic process was developed in 1886, it was quite vaulable because it was so hard to purify.

    (There were, in fact, only seven pure metals known a thousand years ago -- iron, copper, tin, gold, silver, lead, and mercury. The isolation of zinc and its recognition as a metal dates to c.1200 AD in India, and arsenic was isolated around that time in Europe.)

  77. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're off by 1 degree.

  78. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by member57 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No, were're perfectly normal, everyone else is wierd, or just stupid, we haven't decided yet. Bitch some more and we'll stick an Aircraft Carrier, and a Marine division off your coast, then we'll see how your socialist/ communist/ terrorist government capitulates then. Either lead or get the hell outta the way. This America bashing shit was mildly funny at first, kinda like watching your kids. Europeans seem to forget the rouglhly 1 million Americans that died saving you from yourselves. We fought your asses outta a hole for 4 years first, we even did this twice in 20 years, then finished another war in the Pacific. If we had kept our same policy of isolationism most of Europe would be speaking German as their primary language, and saying heil Hitler. How about after WW2? Let's see Berlin Airlift, maybe? How many Americans died so that West Berliners could stay warm and eat? How much did that cost, who did we bill? NOBODY, we footed the bill, along with billions used to rebuild European cities. Have we ever been paid back? Hell no, especailly the French, who kindly asked us to leave during the 50's and defaulted on their payments. Who had the balls and determination to face down Soviet Russia? What if we said FU during the 60's,70's, 80's and 90's, we are tired of paying and left Europe? Would Europe be speaking Rusky? Waht about the numerous technological inovations we have developed and dispensed thoughout the world. We have done all of this through hard work, blood sweat and tears. Who is the first to offer assistance when disasters happen throughout the world? Yeah, we have made mistakes, but name one country that hasn't. I believe that we have done more good than bad, our record stands on it's own. Sorry if we offend you so much, maybe next time we'll let you all handle the next one by yourselves.

    --
    If Kerry was the answer, it must have been a stupid question.
    The UN - The largest "political" cause of death.
  79. In Soviet Russia... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    Titan was just another material.
    An airplane factory didn't have orders for planes. But the production must go on, and order sizes for materials should be preserved, otherwise the supply will be cut and renewing the supply channel for given material will be very hard. So they produced shovels. Of titan. For sale, for common people. Costing about as much as a common shovel (and being "common goods", not "luxury", pennies by American standards.) Lighter, a bit more durable, but just a normal shovel. A friend visiting Soviet Union bought one.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  80. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need Olive Oil:

    burn it as a fuel, fry potatoes, spray under your arms as frangrance, or smear some on your dick for added performance in the anal hallways.
  81. Falling..... by Francis85 · · Score: 1

    Hmm... ohh I know! There where Gentoo's Larry the Cow comes from! :-)

  82. Very dissapointed by B747SP · · Score: 2, Funny
    The cows apparently die due to rocket fuel poisoned soil, not by being hit by the spent booster stages.

    Am I the only one who is really very dissapointed by that? I was really looking forward to some pics of some very flat cows.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  83. Ahaha by YeEntrancemperium · · Score: 1

    ThereIsNoCowLevel

  84. Selling nukes to Iran... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    "If a psycho stabs me, is the knife's manufacturer or seller to blame?"

    Probably not, but let's try the opposite extreme: If I sell nukes to Iran do I bear some responsibility for what they do with them? If the Pentagon or IDF caught me in the act what would be my defense against being executed as an "obvious terrorist"?

    A knife has many uses and can be easily made with stuff lying around the average garden shed. Guns, (the non-hunting variety), and nukes are designed with the sole purpose of killing people from a safe distance. To make either requires stuff not generally found in the average garden shed.

    Dafur is a glaring example of how much arms dealers care about people killed by thier products. Convincing the security council members to put an arms embargo on Sudan would go a long way towards curtailing the violence but this will not happen because at least one of the veto wielding members also happens to be the main arms supplier. I thought continuing to sell arms to people who are known to be actively involved in genocide would make the sellers accessories to genocide. Apparently it has nothing to do it, they are just honest bussiness men trying to make a buck.

    IIRC: In Bowling for Columbine, (I know the GPP said F.9/11), K-Mart pledged to stop selling munitions. I don't live in the US but would be interested to know if they kept thier pledge, anyone?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  85. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by dario_moreno · · Score: 1

    if memory serves, aluminium was isolated in the 1850's only and not a thousand year ago. You are right however to point out that it was expensive at the time, since it was extracted by chemical means and not electrical as later on, from 1880. Napoleon III had aluminium "silverware" for instance.

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
  86. Re: We need sedition laws re-enacted? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the input, but we're already aware of the Whitehouse's response to Mr. Moore.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  87. Another mirror by NowakPL · · Score: 1

    Another mirror (just in case ;) http://www.worldwindcentral.com/ksjpe/page.html

  88. Iron Eyes Cody was NOT an Indian by core+plexus · · Score: 1
    "If Slashdotters could recycle plastics and aluminum the way we recycle old jokes, that old Indian dude on the Hootie the Owl commercial wouldn't cry anymore. "Give a hoot, don't pollute!""

    The actor who posed as an Indian, and claimed to be of Cree/Cherokee descent, was in reality a Sicilian. And the tears were fake.

    -cp-

    1. Re:Iron Eyes Cody was NOT an Indian by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      The actor who posed as an Indian, and claimed to be of Cree/Cherokee descent, was in reality a Sicilian. And the tears were fake.

      No, really?

      Next you are going to be telling me Al Pacino isn't really Cuban, doesn't sniff 3 feet high mounds of cocaine, and can't stand up while shooting an assault rifle after being shot by 100 shotgun shells.

  89. You Will Burn In Heckla... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    It's actually a myth that servers overheat & melt down - the most that can happen is they get so overwhelmed with request they end up timing out far after an original request for page has occured, and are unable to serve current requests.

    HERETIC! You'll be telling us that Cowboy Neal isn't Cmdr Taco's earthly incarnation next, or that the "Natalie Portman covered in hot grits" meme wasn't originally carved into the face of the earth by divine lightning. Or that the original 3 Star Wars films are no more than entertaining space flicks. (*)

    Do NOT mess with /. mythology; they'll burn you at the stake for talk like that.

    (*) Oh no! I think I already said that elsewhere... err, no I didn't, only, uh.. kidding ... get away from me. No... No! NOOOOOOOO!

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  90. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

    it was quite vaulable because it was so hard to purify

    I believe the queen of England has various pieces of aluminium jewelery in the crown jewels...

  91. Re:rockets falling in a populated area is an outra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't their some pretty bad chemicals involved with this?

    Yes there is. I remember an article about this is National Geographic, I think, which put this in a much darker light - the space junk fell on farmlands, ruining crops, and leaked fuel and other chemicals, polluting their water and making people sick.

  92. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
    I believe the queen of England has various pieces of aluminium jewelery in the crown jewels...

    Errrmmm... no. But Napoleon III did have an aluminium dinner service.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  93. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... welcome our rapidly descending, titanium shell, cow-smashing overlords.

  94. mirror by hardcard · · Score: 1

    another mirror up at

    www.sixflagsneworleans.com

  95. IMHO by fbartho · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about this the other day and I would postulate that slashdot has reached critical nerd acquisition mass, where the rate at which slashdot acquires new readers/moderators is high enough that new members haven't spent enough time on the site to be bored with the same jokes...

    Of course your ID number has 4 digits so you think they're really unfunny now but these newbies probably have only seen 4 identical posts as of yet.

    --
    Gravity Sucks
  96. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by drew · · Score: 1

    more likely she just didn't have the capability to work the titanium herself. titanium has a very high melting point, and is extremely difficult to machine safely. the place i bought my wife's and my wedding bands offered titanium rings, but unlike the rest of the rings they sold, which they custom made themselves, the titanium rings were ordered from another manufacturer, and the selection was specifically limited to the designs they had in the catalog- no custom modifications were possible.

    most likely the artisan just didn't want to sell something she couldn't make herself, or was ill-informed. i've heard this claim from a variety of places (always second or third hand) but if you actually bother to do even the smallest bit of research, it's pretty easy to show that it's false.

    one interesting comment i found when looking for information on this myself (i have a titanium wedding band):

    During our 30+ years of jewelry repair experience, we've only seen a dozen or so rings that have been cut off in hospital emergency rooms, and in most of those cases the rings had been bent out-of-round and were putting painful pressure on the finger. Titanium rings are less likely to crush or bend out-of-round, so if you shut your hand in a car door or drop a heavy object on it, it might be safer to be wearing a titanium ring than a precious metal band!

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  97. NASA without faults? Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Replace the word "rockets" with "satellites".
    Replace the word "Kazakhstan" with "Australia".
    Finally replace "toxic rocket fuel" with "atomic radiation", and only then do you begin to see how incompetant NASA really is!

  98. Roubles in Kazakhstan? by Slashamatic · · Score: 1

    The currency in Kazakhstan is the Tenge with about 140 or so to the dollar.

  99. Re:You actually watched that piece of crap by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Well, you're probably about to admit you voted for Bush, after what you saw in that movie, and on TV every day, and the newspapers. Of course, everyone else is wrong, and you and monkeyboy are right. Iraq is a cakewalk! The economy is booming! We've got Osama! His siamese twin, Saddam, coughed up the WMD! Our buddies, the Saudis, opened up that extra oilfield, and gas is too cheap to meter! North Korea really just wanted China to love them, so they merged back with South Korea for the extra rice! Where's my second round of kool-aid?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  100. Dead cows.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    As anyone who has ever lived in the country knows, those cows weren't killed by rockets. No, sir, that was good old fashioned cow tippin' what killed them cows. Killed 'em but good.

  101. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by js7a · · Score: 1

    Are those titanium rings plated or clad with some other metal? I thought titanium was significantly grayer and duller, even when polished. Is it just good photography?

  102. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Scorillo47 · · Score: 1

    >>> Aluminum was not known as a metal 1,000 years ago

    You will be surprised to hear that aluminum metal was found in a metal ornament found in a 1700 year old tomb in China.

    http://www.metkos.com/aluminum.htm

    --
    Don't try to use the force. Do or do not, there is no try.
  103. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by Altus · · Score: 1


    It is duller... one of my friends had a titanium wedding ring (he is allergic to most precious metals). It is a dull grey and has a second band of a different colored metal in the center that is nicely etched... very nice, but definitely not shiny.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  104. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by js7a · · Score: 1

    Yeah, all the titanium I've ever seen looks only slightly lighter than lead. Those rings pictured must be plated with stainless steel, except for this one

  105. Re:You actually watched that piece of crap by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Yeah, why should you believe your eyes, when you can believe Rush Limbaugh instead? After all, Bush's America is doing so well. With the highest >6 month unemployment since WWII, the catastrophe in Iraq, Osama on the loose, $2.50 gallons of gas, Christian conversion of government, $45T in committed debt...

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  106. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
    but consider that 1,000 years ago aluminum was a hundred times more valuable than gold.

    Um, Aluminum (aluminium, for you purists, though aluminum is the older form of the name) was isolated in 1825.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  107. Wake Up by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    No, actually I was busy earning millions of dollars making and selling quality information systems, while we lived off the "Peace Dividend". Remember that?

    Let's compare now and then, just on the few items I mentioned:

    highest >6 month unemployment since WWII
    vs
    highest employment, near the American theoretical maximum

    the catastrophe in Iraq
    vs
    peace (except for Serbia, where we stopped a genocide, then left)

    Osama on the loose
    vs
    Osama on the run (until he saw his chance after Bush took over)

    $2.50 gallons of gas
    vs
    $1.10 gallons of gas, and higher income

    Christian conversion of government
    vs
    Rhodes scholar in the White House

    $45T in committed debt
    vs
    turning the (Reagan/Bush) debt into a surplus

    But so what? The past is over. Why are you whining? You've got your boys in the White House for 5 years now, controlling Congress for 10, 6 of 9 Supreme Court Justices. Where's the conservative worker's paradise? Are your boys such pussies that one bad day in 2001 can paralyze their ability to grow the country for a decade? Oh yeah, WHERE'S OSAMA?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  108. Want a clean environment? Promote capitalism. by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1
    Your post is a great demonstration of the fact that capitalist countries are much better stewards of the environment than communist countries -- mainly because they have the means to be. Many environmentalists lean towards Marxism, and that's exactly the wrong approach if your goal is truly a clean environment.


    Ex-Soviet Russia is famous for *not* managing its nuclear waste (hundreds of nuclear submarines slowly rotting away in Barents Sea, pissing off Finns and Swedes) ; nuclear weapons out of hand or simply "missing" ; some famous fuckups (Tchernobyl; that bio-warfare incident about 20 years ago, when a lab leaked a killer virus over a village) ; etc...

    So nobody should be surprised that they let booster rockets fall on populated areas...

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  109. Re:Want a clean environment? Promote capitalism. by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

    What a load of crap.

    Environment awareness has nothing to do with political regimes.

    Capitalist countries (Germany and France) fucked up the Rhine river so badly it didn't have fish in it for more than 30 years. Fish had to be reintroduced by man some years ago. This is no better or worse than what happened in Russia or other communist regimes.

    France's industrialized, capitalistic, intensive agriculture is so dependent on nitrates and fertilizers they messed up phreatic reserves of whole regions, making tap water non-drinkable. There are countless examples of land, resource and energy overutilization in capitalist economies.

    I would go further and say that the overconsumption model capitalism promotes (and depends on for steady growth) helps making resource-overutilization and pollution even worse, but this is just my uninformed opinion.

    Capitalism doesn't even prevent huge accidents from happening:
    Does Three Mile Island ring a bell? Okay, this one wasn't too bad. What about Bhopal, India (linkie).
    (short version : 5000 died on the spot, 15000 more from mid-long term consequences, and 120 000 still suffer from diseases and disorders related to the accident.)

    Look, man, the country that produces 25% of all CO2 on the planet and is most dependent on oil and other non-renewable, polluting energy sources is NOT a communist regime : it's the US. Closely followed by China (BTW do you count China as communist or capitalist?)

    In short: environmental awareness has to do with political will, not political regimes.
    You could argue that communism does not let the people express their political will, and evidence tends to fit that theory.
    but you could also argue that capitalism sees environmental protection as a cost that has to be reduced, and evidence also tends to fit that theory. Capitalist industries constantly tend to cut corners when it comes to environment protection. Example: Texas refineries prefer to illegally release sulfur (sp?) in the atmosphere and pay huge fines, instead of retrofitting their factories with proper filters, because it costs more. But no-one will put higher fines on them because it would be "anticapitalist" to do so.

    I have to ask : are you one of those guys who stick Greenpeace bumper stickers on your SUV to feel better about it?

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  110. Re:Titanium is a pain to weld or melt in the house by richie2000 · · Score: 1
    rouglhly 1 million Americans that died saving you from yourselves.

    That's some rough math considering we're looking at 116,516 in WWI and 405,399 in WWII. And that's total deaths with the European and Pacific theatres combined, the American losses in Europe in WWII number just under 300,000. In contrast, the Soviets lost a total of over 21 million people in WWII. By your logic, we should then first thank Stalin for helping us avoid speaking German and then thank Eisenhower, Kennedy et al for not speaking Russian. Maybe you should thank us Europeans for not speaking Navajo...

    How much did that cost, who did we bill?

    It's all about the money, isn't it? Never mind the lofty ideals of freedom, democracy and good will towards man, whenever this topic comes up it's always about the money. The US didn't setup the Marshall Plan to be helpful or kind, it did so to influence European policy and build a bulkhead against the Soviet Union, much like they did with the Eastern bloc countries.

    Have we ever been paid back?

    Yes. The loans have been paid back, as stipulated in the European Recovery Program. The grants ($11.8 billion from 1948 to 1952) have been paid back indirectly many times over, as designed. At the end of WWII, the US had an unsustainable trade imbalance and urgently needed to get dollars out into the world so American companies could convert to civilian production and find markets for their goods abroad. I'd say this plan worked admirably and everyone won out until the Bretton Woods trade triangle collapsed in the 70's. We don't owe you jack shit.

    Who is the first to offer assistance when disasters happen throughout the world?

    That would be the UN. The US must generally be dragged kicking and screaming into anything that can't easily be used to promote American national interests. Oh, there's a famine in Sudan? Tough luck. In the last 20+ years, the US has intervened globally exactly once without having any ulterior motives and that time you were so uninterested and unable to follow-through that it turned into a bit of a disaster. I'm referring to Somalia, in case you hadn't figured it out.

    maybe next time we'll let you all handle the next one by yourselves.

    Promises, promises...

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free