In Capitalist Russia RD-181 rocket engines are exported to you.
In USA RD-180 and RD-181 rocket engines lift U.S. Air Force secret heavy payload up for you.
thought an internet shut down would only be for natural disasters and security emergencies.
Recall the "Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions" and the way the US internet would be "regulated". https://www.cnet.com/news/obam... (July 10, 2012) (not an EU link)
Find a state that has low cost power, fast internet and nice, safe, clean housing.
Take a person who has an idea in the USA and welcome them to your state.
Show them the nice housing. The fast internet. The educated locals.
What their investment in your state gets. A house, a workplace. Services that support a productive community, roads for transport. Not tent cities and people living in parked RV.
That they can grow their new idea in your state.
The startup problem is a problem for a few states that need more tax money to cover their spending.
Take the good ideas and move to a better state. A city gov that welcomes investment rather than welcomes new taxes.
A US gov worker, contractor at a US mil site, camp, fort, port, station will drive home from work.
Their own network devices will be made in China. Every movement to base and all the content they consume off base will be collected on by a Communist nation.
China will surround every US camp, fort, base, port with digital collection networks. Much like the NSA and GCHQ do globally.
Log every officer and their interests. Collect on the moments of every contractor and see their full digital lifestyles.
Encryption will do nothing as the device supports the same keys and updates.
What the NSA and GCHQ had to spend billions and decades on, China will get given for free by US mil and contractors enjoying low cost networking products from China.
The EU tried that "allow partnerships with Japanese companies". The results did not sell.
EU car company worker quality made good design from Japan totally fail when that was attempted.
Re " subsidized to a degree regardless of their country of origin.
All the UK tax payers money that was lost into 1970's UK production lines?
People wanted good cars from Japan. With real quality control and working electrical systems.
Data plans would have a data cap. The consumer would have to pay for a set cap so the provider can make money?
Profits that go back to the company so they can expand their network into other profitable areas of the state?
Are NN supporters suggesting no data caps and free fast internet for all? Even if the consumer can never pay back for the network provided?
Why should every part of the state or city get "free" internet services that they the NN plans wont pay for?
No company can keep networking poor area dwellings under NN that will never pay back the cost of connection.
Re "privileged content"?
Wealthy parts of a city, state could pay back new networks and get fast new tech. Poor areas stay on paper insulated wireline as they cannot pay for new plans to cover the new network costs.
Different new networks will offer 4K and faster plans beyond what paper insulated wireline can support. Once a part of the city gets less poor they too can enjoy privileged content on a new network.
Re "'affecting everyone trying to access it." That is due to a paper insulated wireline network not doing the "internet" so good in 2018.
Want fast internet all over a city and state? Pay for plans that support a new network all over the city, state.
Federal NN rules kept everyone at paper insulated wireline network speeds under a monopoly telco.
With federal NN rules removed different telco products and services can be used all over the state and city. No more federal telco NN monopoly.
Communities can find innovative telcos and create their own advanced networks.
Exisiting telcos can price and offer new products consumers want and use without federal NN rules blocking them.
Innovation and competition is allowed networking city wide to support what consumers will pay for.
Re "be able to make money off their content."
Did the big internet make EU publishers move to the net from paper publication AC?
To have content outside their own pay sites?
EU sites can select to not be part of the net. Not be searched. Not be linked into.
Every demographic in the city needs equal access to new networks to replace the paper insulated wireline.
Internet will allow all communities to get educated and then have more people from different demographics around the city attend university.
The university system will then take on the same demographics of the educated and university ready city population.
Internet will make all the city smart so everyone can pass university entrance exams.
No internet was the one thing that was holding back entire generations in some parts of city from doing exam and book study.
In the past only wealthy people had internet and that is why they could study with the internet and then pass university entrance exams.
Once the internet is free the IQ will go up all over the city and every community will get into university
Internet all over the city and university for everyone.
Social media will get a real time list of accounts to ban. An EU ban on social media will prevent EU wide copyright legal action. Globally.
For a lot of people social media is the internet so EU social media law could shape the rules of digital publication globally.
Say a US artist makes a funny cartoon about Spanish or French politics. Really funny and it gets shared a lot in France.
An EU nation will have that image reported and banned by social media in the EU in real time.
The social media account wont work in the EU. No further uploads and downloads will be allowed. No comments. No links to the art.
Any person in the EU will be reported for trying to link, interact with that banned image.
Police investigations for people in the EU who get reported for trying to upload banned content again.
Social media will have to ensure that image will not be seen in the EU after a EU nation demands the cartoon is removed.
Make too many political cartoons and the EU bans result in a social media account getting banned globally.
The how is very easy. Report the image in the EU and social media bans the image. Attempts to upload banned content again result in the loss of a social media account globally.
Social media will have to show they banned the cartoon quickly and fully from all EU users. When social media shows that ban was in real time, the EU will not fine the social media company per image per hour.
Re "just how are they going to do that?"
Never use an image from any nation in the EU. Never mention any author from the EU. No images from content created in the EU. No cartoons about EU politics. Any line of text from any nation in the EU is a legal risk.
No links into EU nations.
Anything EU or related to any nation in the EU is not worth the risk of publication and a later EU tax.
A new movie gets made in the EU? Is the review worth using a frame from that movie in the review and getting an EU fine for the copyright "image"?
Another nation makes a movie and sends out a press kit full of images ready for print, web, blog publication with movie clips.
Put the effort into nations that support a publications freedom to publish and do reviews. With images. Support nations that support freedom of speech.
Avoid EU that will use copyright laws to fine publications.
For any EU movie just fill the review with big white spaces where images for a movie would go.
Surrender to EU laws and ensure the review does not contain any images.
For movie reviews from normal nations enjoy the press kit and all the included media to publish.
Slashdot Mirror
A big brain lesion? With the swelling and the short term memory.
Russian sat phone with big data plan for the day?
with skilled pathologists and get testing.
In Capitalist Russia RD-181 rocket engines are exported to you.
In USA RD-180 and RD-181 rocket engines lift U.S. Air Force secret heavy payload up for you.
will have to be hand coded around the bigger and bigger notch. Enjoy notch drift that takes over more and more of your app.
thought an internet shut down would only be for natural disasters and security emergencies.
Recall the "Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions" and the way the US internet would be "regulated".
https://www.cnet.com/news/obam... (July 10, 2012) (not an EU link)
Find a state that has low cost power, fast internet and nice, safe, clean housing.
Take a person who has an idea in the USA and welcome them to your state.
Show them the nice housing. The fast internet. The educated locals.
What their investment in your state gets. A house, a workplace. Services that support a productive community, roads for transport. Not tent cities and people living in parked RV.
That they can grow their new idea in your state.
The startup problem is a problem for a few states that need more tax money to cover their spending.
Take the good ideas and move to a better state. A city gov that welcomes investment rather than welcomes new taxes.
systemd
Think of all the fun ways only a Microsoft can make simple networking more work.
In Soviet Union no in line tax for you.
In Capitalist USA double online tax for you.
Think of what your state will do with your net tax.
All the new off the street hires for your gov.
the more other brands can welcome content.
A US gov worker, contractor at a US mil site, camp, fort, port, station will drive home from work.
Their own network devices will be made in China. Every movement to base and all the content they consume off base will be collected on by a Communist nation.
China will surround every US camp, fort, base, port with digital collection networks. Much like the NSA and GCHQ do globally.
Log every officer and their interests. Collect on the moments of every contractor and see their full digital lifestyles.
Encryption will do nothing as the device supports the same keys and updates.
What the NSA and GCHQ had to spend billions and decades on, China will get given for free by US mil and contractors enjoying low cost networking products from China.
Its MindDrive for robots. Just like on your PC.
The EU tried that "allow partnerships with Japanese companies". The results did not sell.
EU car company worker quality made good design from Japan totally fail when that was attempted.
Re " subsidized to a degree regardless of their country of origin.
All the UK tax payers money that was lost into 1970's UK production lines?
People wanted good cars from Japan. With real quality control and working electrical systems.
Data plans would have a data cap. The consumer would have to pay for a set cap so the provider can make money?
Profits that go back to the company so they can expand their network into other profitable areas of the state?
Are NN supporters suggesting no data caps and free fast internet for all? Even if the consumer can never pay back for the network provided?
Why should every part of the state or city get "free" internet services that they the NN plans wont pay for?
No company can keep networking poor area dwellings under NN that will never pay back the cost of connection.
Re "privileged content"?
Wealthy parts of a city, state could pay back new networks and get fast new tech. Poor areas stay on paper insulated wireline as they cannot pay for new plans to cover the new network costs.
Different new networks will offer 4K and faster plans beyond what paper insulated wireline can support. Once a part of the city gets less poor they too can enjoy privileged content on a new network.
Re "'affecting everyone trying to access it." That is due to a paper insulated wireline network not doing the "internet" so good in 2018.
Want fast internet all over a city and state? Pay for plans that support a new network all over the city, state.
Federal NN rules kept everyone at paper insulated wireline network speeds under a monopoly telco.
With federal NN rules removed different telco products and services can be used all over the state and city. No more federal telco NN monopoly.
Communities can find innovative telcos and create their own advanced networks.
Exisiting telcos can price and offer new products consumers want and use without federal NN rules blocking them.
Innovation and competition is allowed networking city wide to support what consumers will pay for.
Welcome to social media.
Imported at a port or along a pipeline :)
Re "be able to make money off their content."
Did the big internet make EU publishers move to the net from paper publication AC?
To have content outside their own pay sites?
EU sites can select to not be part of the net. Not be searched. Not be linked into.
Fiber internet to the parked RV and the tent?
Every demographic in the city needs equal access to new networks to replace the paper insulated wireline.
Internet will allow all communities to get educated and then have more people from different demographics around the city attend university.
The university system will then take on the same demographics of the educated and university ready city population.
Internet will make all the city smart so everyone can pass university entrance exams.
No internet was the one thing that was holding back entire generations in some parts of city from doing exam and book study.
In the past only wealthy people had internet and that is why they could study with the internet and then pass university entrance exams.
Once the internet is free the IQ will go up all over the city and every community will get into university
Internet all over the city and university for everyone.
Social media will get a real time list of accounts to ban. An EU ban on social media will prevent EU wide copyright legal action. Globally.
For a lot of people social media is the internet so EU social media law could shape the rules of digital publication globally.
Say a US artist makes a funny cartoon about Spanish or French politics. Really funny and it gets shared a lot in France.
An EU nation will have that image reported and banned by social media in the EU in real time.
The social media account wont work in the EU. No further uploads and downloads will be allowed. No comments. No links to the art.
Any person in the EU will be reported for trying to link, interact with that banned image.
Police investigations for people in the EU who get reported for trying to upload banned content again.
Social media will have to ensure that image will not be seen in the EU after a EU nation demands the cartoon is removed.
Make too many political cartoons and the EU bans result in a social media account getting banned globally.
The how is very easy. Report the image in the EU and social media bans the image. Attempts to upload banned content again result in the loss of a social media account globally.
Social media will have to show they banned the cartoon quickly and fully from all EU users. When social media shows that ban was in real time, the EU will not fine the social media company per image per hour.
Re "just how are they going to do that?"
Never use an image from any nation in the EU. Never mention any author from the EU. No images from content created in the EU. No cartoons about EU politics. Any line of text from any nation in the EU is a legal risk.
No links into EU nations.
Anything EU or related to any nation in the EU is not worth the risk of publication and a later EU tax.
A new movie gets made in the EU? Is the review worth using a frame from that movie in the review and getting an EU fine for the copyright "image"?
Another nation makes a movie and sends out a press kit full of images ready for print, web, blog publication with movie clips.
Put the effort into nations that support a publications freedom to publish and do reviews. With images. Support nations that support freedom of speech.
Avoid EU that will use copyright laws to fine publications.
Use a studio in Canada and save. Try a New Zealand. Ireland? They welcome movie making and support new TV shows and movies.
For any EU movie just fill the review with big white spaces where images for a movie would go.
Surrender to EU laws and ensure the review does not contain any images.
For movie reviews from normal nations enjoy the press kit and all the included media to publish.
Think of the fun the EU could have had with the letter N and T in US trade deals.