Slashdot Mirror


The iPhones of the Future May Be Wireless, Portless and Buttonless (cnet.com)

The first iPhone to shed its headphone jack was the iPhone 7, which launched in late 2016. Now it seems like the Lightning port may be the next to go. CNET reports: Apple has considered removing the Lightning port on the iPhone X, according to Bloomberg, citing unnamed "people familiar with the company's work." While earlier rumors suggested that Apple would remove the Lightning port in favor of USB-C, Apple's goal may be to remove all ports entirely.

Bloomberg's report is about the challenges that Apple faces with its AirPower wireless charger, but it also shares some details about Apple's vision for a wireless future. The report says: "Apple designers eventually hope to remove most of the external ports and buttons on the iPhone, including the charger, according to people familiar with the company's work. During the development of the iPhone X, Apple weighed removing the wired charging system entirely. That wasn't feasible at the time because wireless charging was still slower than traditional methods. Including a wireless charger with new iPhones would also significantly raise the price of the phones."

249 comments

  1. So people find their phones still usable... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and they want to fix that?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by msauve · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Apple seems to be getting more and more user hostile for the sake of "style." (or maybe "courage"?)

      "Including a wireless charger with new iPhones would also significantly raise the price of the phones."

      And not including one would still raise the price, since people would still have to buy a charger.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It gets even worse. People want to be able to repair their phones so they last more than 2 years.

      And Fairphone has arisen to meet that need.

      I realize this looks like a shameless plug, what with me being an AC and all. I thought about proving my legitimacy by insulting the intelligence of the OP, but he didn't give me enough material to work with. So I will just have to hope you believe me when I say I am a satisfied customer.

      I guess I do have an agenda in that I don't want them to go out of business, since I need them around to sell me the replacement parts, when the time comes....

    3. Re: So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up.

    4. Re: So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You continued blabbering made me forget the first two sentences (which were the âadâ(TM)) and skim over the rest to think ...

      Why did this retard keep writing. Short and sweet. Or you are trying to convince you are lagitimate instead of selling.

    5. Re: So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said the iPhone user who doesn't know to disable smart quotes.

    6. Re: So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fine as long as they don't call it Gary, or Alexis!

    7. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by stealth_finger · · Score: 0

      "Including a wireless charger with new iPhones would also significantly raise the price of the phones."

      Because heaven forbid they let it eat into their profit margin.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    8. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Fairphone 2 doesn't seem like a good deal I'm afraid.

      The price is â530, which is a lot more than flagships from companies like OnePlus and Xaomi. You get Android 6.0 and no sign of regular updates, a mediocre camera and a removable battery. So really the only major benefit is the removable battery, and in practice it's not difficult to replace the battery in a OnePlus or even most of the non-Apple flagships.

      Replacement parts are a nice idea, but you have to compare that to buying a phone that costs half as much and replacing it twice as often. Even with replacement parts this thing won't last forever.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why do you think that. Because of random slashdot comments from guys who are still pissed that the GUI overtook the command line interface.
      Or the fact that you can’t use do software development on it?
      Apple has grown by leaps and bounds from the release of the iPhone.
      Even with competition with Android who makes a really competitive and popular products apple is able to hold its own.
      I haven’t seen a new PC in a while with serial, parallel ports. I haven’t seen a tape interface port in generations.

      Why would we want ports on our phone when they are useful wireless alternatives.

      The device is useful for its intended purpose

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by DCFusor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read that title as "pointless", myself.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    11. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Delivery only in continental UK/Europe. *sigh*

      I was just about to buy one. Seems like a nice phone at a reasonable price. ~$600.

      Americans, this phone is not for you unless you have a shipping location in the EU. :(

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    12. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand where you and all the other Android shills get off. You say Apple is getting user hostile, yet Apple still has no problem selling millions upon millions of iPhones every year. Clearly iPhone owners disagree with you. If you don't like what Apple is doing with the iPhone, DON'T FUCKING BUY IT. Nobody that owns an iPhone gives a flying fuck what you think.

    13. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WAH WAH
      apple is the butt of jokes and I dont like it.
      STFU apple cultist.

    14. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The device is useful for its intended purpose

      It does make a great door stop.

    15. Re: So people find their phones still usable... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      So if the next iPhone is Wireless, portless, and buttonless, it might also be consumer less

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    16. Re: So people find their phones still usable... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually the problem is getting Apple fanboys to shut the hell up. This problem has existed since long before iPhone transformed them into iFans. Even before the Newton. Being around Apple fans is like a 24/7 gay pride event.

      Yes, you exist, I didn't say otherwise. No, I don't want you to show me your iphone, keep it in your pants.

    17. Re: So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would we want ports on our phone when they are useful wireless alternatives

      Because my $15 wired headphone have superior sound quality to a $150 Bluetooth pair, and don't need to be recharged constantly.

    18. Re: So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "upgrade"

    19. Re: So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for the US? No problem. I'll just move to where'll the British are going, Brexit and all.

    20. Re:So people find their phones still usable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like 1/4th as much. It is a nice idea but how sustainable the manufacture of a small expensive item I buy maybe once ever 5 or more years (if I'm careful) is hard to justify. I just bought a Redmi Note 4 which looks better based on the stats and cost $158.

  2. They would be more waterproof by bobstreo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess after all ports are removed, the next idea would be to remove the leading cause of repairs, if there is no screen, it won't crack... /s

    1. Re: They would be more waterproof by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Screenless but fuck it, we're doing five cameras!

    2. Re:They would be more waterproof by arth1 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You're kidding, but I am sure that someone at Samsung or Ericsson or wherever Apple steals ideas have already thought of a completely voice operated phone, as well as ones that requires wearing remote glasses or miracast to get a screen.

    3. Re:They would be more waterproof by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A voice operated phone.....operators will make a comeback.
      Then hipsters will demand actual human operators connect their calls.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    4. Re:They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who doesn't like to wear a complimentary wireless AR monocle? It will be available in numerous styles, can be separately upgraded, and it opens up your access to the finer parts of the society.

    5. Re: They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carl find arth1 and get him here at 6:30. I'd like to listen to him for a few minutes; he has a few interesting ideas.

    6. Re:They would be more waterproof by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Voice is so 2000. Pushbuttons are so 70s. REAL phones, for quality POTS use, need a rotary dial. Unless you hear the clicks and feel the spin, you're really not experiencing real phone calls...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    7. Re:They would be more waterproof by arth1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The phone we had when I grew up did not have a dial, just a small crank where the dial would normally go. Cranking it produced a current that lit up a lamp at the operator's board, and she would ask where to connect us, and tell us how many arms and legs it would cost per minute. For long distance, she would also intercept every now and then during the call to say "four minutes" or similar.
      At my father's work was a small plaque above The phone saying "Express yourself in brevity".

      A more civilized phone for a more civilized time.

    8. Re: They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no mic or speakers. Use air pods. And since you donâ(TM)t need to remove it from the box now, no need for a camera.

    9. Re: They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will save a Tom of screen space. Just master bate to youporn and the shaking will lit it up. No more cum stuck in the speakers will be nice.

    10. Re: They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple worshippers dont need a screen for porn, they turn the phone around and glaze lovingly at the precious apple logo.

    11. Re: They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you were going to say "gaze lovingly at their own reflection".

    12. Re:They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple steals ideas from other companies all the time

    13. Re:They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it will be controlled by brain waves, using an Apple headband that sends the data to Apple and NSA.. the phone itself will be without a screen or anything else, essentially it will be a brick... the phone will then require all sorts of additional Apple equipment like a set of google like glasses, invented by Apple ofc

    14. Re:They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw one of those in my great-great-grandfathers summer house he built just at the turn of the 20th century. The materials they used at that time where something different and it really opened my eyes to the phenomena of steam punk and people who party like its 1920s in Berlin still.

    15. Re:They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess after all ports are removed, the next idea would be to remove the leading cause of repairs, if there is no screen, it won't crack... /s

      A non-cracking screen is easy - it is called "plastic instead of glass". Put it in a purse or pocket, and it will accumulate scratches real fast - ensuring you buy a new one. But it will never crack - chuck it down a concrete staircase and it merely accumulate some scratches.

      With no plugs and all plastic, the cheap phone can be welded shut. No access to anything interior at all - you get the SIM card with the phone.

    16. Re:They would be more waterproof by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      At my father's work was a small plaque above The phone saying "Express yourself in brevity".

      Our phones are different now but we have kept that sentiment. After all we use smileys and abbreviations or contractions like "LOL" or "ur" instead of "your" in texts.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    17. Re:They would be more waterproof by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      The phone we had when I grew up did not have a dial, just a small crank where the dial would normally go.

      A crank? You were lucky...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re: They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean they will stick it up their butthole or masturbate onto it!

    19. Re: They would be more waterproof by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      I thought you were going to say "gaze lovingly at their own reflection".

      You can if you upgrade to the piano black version

    20. Re:They would be more waterproof by sad_ · · Score: 1

      obviously this is where we are going.
      not screenless, but at least touchscreenless.
      just take those alexa or google home things, slim them way down and slap a screen on it.
      you basically have your voice controlled phone.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    21. Re:They would be more waterproof by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Ahh, operator assist and party-line phones. I remember them well (for instance, picking up, waiting for the operator, then saying "Sunset 2 3443" to call my friend about 7 blocks over. I wonder if they could make a comeback, it could be an analog analogue of Tumblr... I sense - Startup opportunity!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    22. Re:They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone we had when I grew up did not have a dial, just a small crank where the dial would normally go. Cranking it produced a current that lit up a lamp at the operator's board, and she would ask where to connect us, and tell us how many arms and legs it would cost per minute. For long distance, she would also intercept every now and then during the call to say "four minutes" or similar.
      At my father's work was a small plaque above The phone saying "Express yourself in brevity".

      A more civilized phone for a more civilized time.

      You lived in great times, I am jealous.
      I can't stand all this smartphone crap any more, in fact I've been getting pretty angry about it lately.

    23. Re:They would be more waterproof by d0rp · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you're entirely serious, but I don't see that ever happening.

      1. There are lots of places where society wouldn't allow you to control your phone via voice, such as waiting rooms

      2. People will want to be able to do things on their phones without everyone around them hearing what they're doing.

      3. If multiple people in a confined area are using their phones, things could get messy pretty quickly (at least until the technology advances enough to reliably recognize individual voices).

    24. Re:They would be more waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a push-button phone in the 90s that had a 3-way switch. One would send tones, another sent rotary-dial clicks, and the third sent fast clicks (twice as fast as a rotary phone could). It always made tones in the speaker when you pressed the buttons, but after you stopped dialing then it would send the tones or clicks all at once. I often kept it in fast click mode just to hear the unusual sound.

    25. Re:They would be more waterproof by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      You were the weird kid who ate paste and could whistle 300 baud carriers, right?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    26. Re:They would be more waterproof by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yep, so they will use flexible colour e-ink screens as soon as they are out. And then everry competitor will do exactly the same. Just like with the Macbook Pro keyboard, the iPhone itself and now the fucking nodge.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    27. Re:They would be more waterproof by tsa · · Score: 1

      You are OLD.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  3. Fantastic! by TiberiusKirk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Until a bug is introduced in firmware and a factory reset is required.
    Or you get nailed by malware that takes over your phone, and there is literally no way to reset the fucking thing!

    1. Re: Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The most visited post on my website is instructions for rebooting a crashed iPod.

      I can't imagine the iPhone is any better at not needing constant resets. Just today I had to force-reboot an iPad that had frozen on the home screen. I vaguely recall having to look up how to reboot someone's crashed iPhone X because they changed the method.

      The point being that Apple's hardware is nowhere near stable enough not to have a method to force a reboot. I guess "wait for the battery to die" is going to become standard practice in the near future. I guess we finally learned why Apple refuses to put all-day batteries in their devices.

    2. Re:Fantastic! by zlives · · Score: 1

      i am still realing from the 11.3 update the amount of DoneFudgedUp (DFU) device resets was a horrible and this after switching to iOS instead of droid because... "it just works"
      i guess the version of DFU reset will be to throw device against wall and repeat until destroyed.

    3. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When my phone or PMP had problems, USUALLY, the screen wasn't working. Eventually, I learned that by using actual buttons to RESET the thing, If I was lucky, I could get the screen working again.
      Later on, when I was checking out some older electronics I kept that had stopped working, I found that...even when it wasn't documented, I could quite often do a hard RESET by playing with a combination of buttons while powering it on and it would start working perfectly!
      Try as I might, I can't see how this can be done when all your controls are *on the screen*! The only other possibility is to remove the battery for awhile and let the unit/phone completely discharge and HOPE that it fixes it because if the screen is defective, there is no 'combination' of buttons to try as a last-ditch effort to save it.
      But, maybe that's what they are striving for so you have to send it in and pay a lot of money to get it working again?

    4. Re:Fantastic! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What about a microswitch next to the SIM slot which can be triggered by a straightened paper clip and PHYSICALLY shuts off power to the battery?

    5. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS is nowhere near stable enough for that to be an acceptable solution. iOS routinely hard crashes. Having a method to force a cold reboot is necessary and needs to be doable without having to go find a paper clip.

    6. Re: Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0, Troll

      The most visited post on my website is instructions for rebooting a crashed iPod.

      I can't imagine the iPhone is any better at not needing constant resets. Just today I had to force-reboot an iPad that had frozen on the home screen. I vaguely recall having to look up how to reboot someone's crashed iPhone X because they changed the method.

      The point being that Apple's hardware is nowhere near stable enough not to have a method to force a reboot. I guess "wait for the battery to die" is going to become standard practice in the near future. I guess we finally learned why Apple refuses to put all-day batteries in their devices.

      You're either a liar, or extremely unlucky.

    7. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      i am still realing from the 11.3 update the amount of DoneFudgedUp (DFU) device resets was a horrible and this after switching to iOS instead of droid because... "it just works"
      i guess the version of DFU reset will be to throw device against wall and repeat until destroyed.

      Never had to do a DFU Reset on either of my 2 iPhones or iPad I've had over the years.

    8. Re: Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how does one access such an area with a portless sealed phone without a heat gun?

    9. Re: Fantastic! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      With a nuke. From orbit.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    10. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 2

      When my phone or PMP had problems, USUALLY, the screen wasn't working. Eventually, I learned that by using actual buttons to RESET the thing, If I was lucky, I could get the screen working again.
      Later on, when I was checking out some older electronics I kept that had stopped working, I found that...even when it wasn't documented, I could quite often do a hard RESET by playing with a combination of buttons while powering it on and it would start working perfectly!
      Try as I might, I can't see how this can be done when all your controls are *on the screen*! The only other possibility is to remove the battery for awhile and let the unit/phone completely discharge and HOPE that it fixes it because if the screen is defective, there is no 'combination' of buttons to try as a last-ditch effort to save it.
      But, maybe that's what they are striving for so you have to send it in and pay a lot of money to get it working again?

      Just because YOU can't think of a way, doesn't mean it isn't possible.

      As an embedded Dev., a few possible methods come immediately to mind:

      1. A "system monitor" ("Watchdog"), with a long-enough timeout to not false-trigger under heavy CPU load. If the main OS or an App goes off in the weeds for too long, (say, 10 secs.), the WatchDog would trigger a hardware Reset. This method requires no user intervention whatsoever, and is SOP in a lot of embedded designs. In fact, I would be VERY surprised if Apple's SoCs don't have this already.

      2. A Hall-Effect sensor, similar to the "sleep" sensor that puts iPads to sleep when a magnet is brought in proximity to a certain location on the iPhone. This could be incorporated in the Charger. Kind of too kludgy for Apple; but there it is.

      3. A small, fixed-code microcontroller, or a section of the main SoC, that would be responsible for interpreting a single, predetermined "gesture". This gesture would the. Trigger a hardware reset of the main SoC. This nicely fits in with Apple's design-language, in that it is triggered by a "swipe" of some kind. A hard coded confirmation dialog could be used to keep accidental triggering due to random swipes. Yes, this would only work if the screen and digitizer were reasonably intact; but let's face it, if the screen and digitizer are that scrogged, likely NO Reset-method would restore the unit to usability until that was fixed.

      So, there are some methods that came to mind with about 30 seconds of thought. Think that Apple engineers can't come up with a dozen or more methods to accomplish this after a couple of weeks' working on it?

    11. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      What about a microswitch next to the SIM slot which can be triggered by a straightened paper clip and PHYSICALLY shuts off power to the battery?

      That would require an intrusion into the case, kind of defeating the "no intrusions" design goal.

    12. Re:Fantastic! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the SIM slot already intrude into the case?

    13. Re: Fantastic! by Provocateur · · Score: 2

      Well, he even posts as the fake Tim Cook. This is a no-brainer.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    14. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the SIM slot already intrude into the case?

      For now. I heard they were going to some sort of virtualized "SIM Card".

    15. Re: Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YAWWWWWNNNNNN
      Yes we know apple is perfect.
      Fucking boring.

    16. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd forgotten about that. Right, Apple is moving to an "eSim" card, in order to help lock you in to the cell provider that subsidizes your iPhone.

    17. Re: Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. The chumps well just drop $700 for a new one anyway.

    18. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're either a liar, or extremely lucky.

    19. Re: Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iâ(TM)m drunk!

    20. Re: Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about whenever you say âresetâ(TM) or âget out of my lane you mutherfuckerâ(TM)?

    21. Re:Fantastic! by bugs2squash · · Score: 1
      --
      Nullius in verba
    22. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what age did you become so incredibly stupid?

    23. Re: Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. Nor have I hade to DFU on the 4 models I've used. These models were hand-me-downs to so I used them to physical failure, not willing/able to shell out for upgrades.

    24. Re: Fantastic! by Teckla · · Score: 2

      I have an iPhone and an iPad, and even I ignore every post by TheFakeTimCook. His tireless defense of everything Apple got really old a long time ago.

    25. Re:Fantastic! by xlsior · · Score: 1

      So, there are some methods that came to mind with about 30 seconds of thought. Think that Apple engineers can't come up with a dozen or more methods to accomplish this after a couple of weeks' working on it?

      Some phones assign functions to squeezing the bezel itself:
      https://www.theverge.com/2017/...

      Just because there isn't an external physical button doesn't mean that you can't hide a pressure-sensitive switch inside the phone.

    26. Re:Fantastic! by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the joy (not!) we had when USB replaced RS232.

      In "the old days", serial ports were pretty much idiot-proof, as long as you didn't have to screw with anything where dsr, dtr, cts, or rts actually mattered (besides maybe using a cable that connected one of them to ground). The universe of potential baudrates was small and finite (as a practical matter, nearly everything used 115200, 38400, 19200, 9600, 2400, 1200, or 300, with no parity, 8 bits, and 1 stop bit). After verifying that the cable was good, all you really had to do was iterate through the aforementioned 7 baudrates & there was a 98% chance one of them would work. Best of all, once you had the baudrate and bits/parity/stopbit settings right, the hardware literally worked the instant you connected the cable.

      Then came USB, and everything went to hell. Drivers broke catastrophically every time Microsoft did a major Windows release. Flaky cables & poorly-designed (or excessively value-engineered) ports had endless, seemingly-random disconnects and dysfunction. And the inevitable lag between connecting a USB device & having it actually be operational made matters even worse. We traded a cheap, simple communications bus that was easy to configure and generally worked well for one that used cheaper hardware, augmented by extremely complicated software drivers that were barely understood by their own developers (most of whom depended upon proprietary vendor-supplied toolchains working literal black magic behind a curtain).

    27. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      So, there are some methods that came to mind with about 30 seconds of thought. Think that Apple engineers can't come up with a dozen or more methods to accomplish this after a couple of weeks' working on it?

      Some phones assign functions to squeezing the bezel itself:

      https://www.theverge.com/2017/...

      Good point!

      I guess I should have spent a whole minute thinking about this, then, LOL!
      Just because there isn't an external physical button doesn't mean that you can't hide a pressure-sensitive switch inside the phone.

    28. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the joy (not!) we had when USB replaced RS232.

      In "the old days", serial ports were pretty much idiot-proof, as long as you didn't have to screw with anything where dsr, dtr, cts, or rts actually mattered (besides maybe using a cable that connected one of them to ground). The universe of potential baudrates was small and finite (as a practical matter, nearly everything used 115200, 38400, 19200, 9600, 2400, 1200, or 300, with no parity, 8 bits, and 1 stop bit). After verifying that the cable was good, all you really had to do was iterate through the aforementioned 7 baudrates & there was a 98% chance one of them would work. Best of all, once you had the baudrate and bits/parity/stopbit settings right, the hardware literally worked the instant you connected the cable.

      Then came USB, and everything went to hell. Drivers broke catastrophically every time Microsoft did a major Windows release. Flaky cables & poorly-designed (or excessively value-engineered) ports had endless, seemingly-random disconnects and dysfunction. And the inevitable lag between connecting a USB device & having it actually be operational made matters even worse. We traded a cheap, simple communications bus that was easy to configure and generally worked well for one that used cheaper hardware, augmented by extremely complicated software drivers that were barely understood by their own developers (most of whom depended upon proprietary vendor-supplied toolchains working literal black magic behind a curtain).

      You remember RS232 a LOT more fondly than MOST people.

      Case in Point: How many times have you seen an USB Breakout Box?

      With RS232, there is an entire UNIVERSE of cabling "fun" before you even get to software issues. With USB, it comes down to "Do you have the right Driver?" You're just forgetting. And if you were a regular person, trying to hook up some random RS-232 peripheral, FORGET IT! Even with a simple 3 wire RS-232 interface, using XON/XOFF handshaking (or no handshaking at all) there was STILL the ambiguity regarding which particular pin (2 or 3) was being used for TXD and which for RXD. Yeah, you forget, alright...

      Yes, simple serial comm. is FAR easier to implement than USB, with its book-long preamble and necessity for a Driver to get even the simplest setup going; which is why embedded Devs. Still use it for quickie Diagnostic Ports during Development; but that is in a system where the Developer already KNOWS everything about the system. Regular users typically don't have that level of insight; so for them, USB is MUCH easier (at least once they figure out which way to plug the connector in!)

      But Just because Windows couldn't get their shit together on USB for years and years, doesn't mean the USB Standard, per se, was flawed. On Macs, for example, USB almost always "Just Worked", with the rarest of exceptions. You're right that USB on Windows was always (even up through XP, at least) a hell-hole, starting with "Make sure you Install the Driver BEFORE connecting..." (another problem Macs never had with USB). But again, that isn't the fault of USB, just Microsoft's inability to write software of any kind.

    29. Re:Fantastic! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      They are going to get rid of the SIM socket too. The SIM card can be replaced by a chip SIM that can be reprogrammed to use various networks, or more likely locked to the network you bought it on with no way to ever change it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    30. Re:Fantastic! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They do already have a watchdog and use it, but that doesn't help if the kernel is still ticking over but the UI has frozen.

      Gestures are janky, a magnet would allow anyone to reset your iPhone with a magnet and would break magnetic phone holders (which are awesome by the way).

      Some phones have a squeeze sensor that works quite well now, maybe that could be used. But really you need a physical button that not only resets the phone but can put it into recovery mode. Since there is no USB^W lighting port any more it will have to have a wifi stack with TCP/IP, DHCP and some kind of bootloader, which means a brand new and much larger attack surface.

      Meanwhile everyone else just fits a waterproof USB-C connector and waterproof headphone socket.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re: Fantastic! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      He's also right. I agree that there's still a need to reboot iPhones every now and then, but my experience is that these devices hold up very well under normal use. In the past couple of years I have rebooted our iPhones and iPad several times, but in almost all cases this was a mandatory (automatic) reboot following an OS update. I have had to reboot due to a crash or some other problem maybe 2 or 3 times in years. These things are as stable as premium Android devices (of which I have a few as well), maybe more stable.

      Maybe the case is different undear heavy use, such as in a kiosk or when running a crapload of heavy apps.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    32. Re:Fantastic! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      What about a microswitch next to the SIM slot which can be triggered by a straightened paper clip and PHYSICALLY shuts off power to the battery?

      That would require an intrusion into the case, kind of defeating the "no intrusions" design goal.

      Plus they'll take the sim slot out next. It'll be embedded and you'll have to get it paired at a store. Will probably not be reversible or able to change number without a lot of time and a couple trips to the bank.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    33. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      They do already have a watchdog and use it, but that doesn't help if the kernel is still ticking over but the UI has frozen.

      Gestures are janky, a magnet would allow anyone to reset your iPhone with a magnet and would break magnetic phone holders (which are awesome by the way).

      Some phones have a squeeze sensor that works quite well now, maybe that could be used. But really you need a physical button that not only resets the phone but can put it into recovery mode. Since there is no USB^W lighting port any more it will have to have a wifi stack with TCP/IP, DHCP and some kind of bootloader, which means a brand new and much larger attack surface.

      Meanwhile everyone else just fits a waterproof USB-C connector and waterproof headphone socket.

      I am not surprised that Apple SoCs have a WatchDog subsystem. In fact, I would be surprised if they didn't. However, all that has to change to prevent the "lights are on, but nobody's home" (UI Frozen) is to change the way the WatchDog is "Petted", to make sure ALL of the software subsystems and Apps are "ticking over". Takes some planning; but it isn't impossible.

      For example, In my early days as an embedded Dev., when dinosaurs roamed the earth, and all computers ran on kerosene, I created a system based on a small 6502-based SBC that controlled the soft-start and soft-stop of a 30 HP 480VAC "spindle" motor, plus the pneumatic "chuck" and brake, on a machine that did dynamic balancing of 4-ton (IIRC) 4 ft. diameter Flywheels for Caterpillar Earth Movers. At 1800 RPM, you simply cant afford to make a mistake about what the ACTUAL current machine-state is when a WatchDog Reset has occurred, lest you turn that flywheel into a gigantic, death-dealing frisbee!!! So yeah, you can make your WatchDog subsystem as simple, or as sophisticated, as needed. And if Apple designs a system that depends essentially exclusively on their WatchDog system being "unbreakably robust", I am confident they can step-up to that challenge without breaking a sweat.

      Also, it isn't that hard to waterproof a short-travel momentary switch, like you find on the typical phone. Just have the "actuator" push on a flexible membrane that then pushes on a physical momentary switch on the other side of the membrane. Select your membrane material and design the actuator properly, and they will last past the service life of the phone. You can also use a Hall-Effect sensor, so there is no actual "flexing" membrane between actuator and "switch". That makes the switch assembly much more robust over time, at the expense of slightly higher per-unit cost.

      Apple already has a well-developed and field-tested secure software update protocol for iOS devices that works over WiFi; so that part is a no-brainer. All you need is a permanent bootloader with a TIMEOUT, and enough Flash set-aside to hold both the old and new versions of Firmware; so that a failed Update process can be Restarted without resulting in a Bricked Device. But again, those are well-understood engineering challenges in the embedded world.

      You're right, some other manufacturers CLAIM up to IP68 water-resistance depending on connectors with simple built-in O-Rings and such; but that only gets you so far when it comes to real-world protection (which really isn't THAT much when you factor-in transient pressure spikes caused by movement of the device while underwater). IMHO, Apple is going for a nice TV Ad where someone takes their iPhone scuba diving without a case, and can provide a real-world dust and water-resistance protection down to say, 30 m, with pressure spikes to 50 m, and essentially practically infinite dust-intrusion resistance (assuming you don't aim a beadblasting nozzle at the device). That can really only be done in a consumer-level device by eliminating all intrusions through the outer-enclosure. Yes, there are dive-watches etc. that have impressive water-resistance; but a fair amount of the cost and complexity of those things is devoted to making them that water-resistant. A

    34. Re: Fantastic! by Carewolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      With a nuke. From orbit.

      It is the only way to be sure.

    35. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      What about a microswitch next to the SIM slot which can be triggered by a straightened paper clip and PHYSICALLY shuts off power to the battery?

      That would require an intrusion into the case, kind of defeating the "no intrusions" design goal.

      Plus they'll take the sim slot out next. It'll be embedded and you'll have to get it paired at a store. Will probably not be reversible or able to change number without a lot of time and a couple trips to the bank.

      Doubt it; since Apple already sells unlocked versions of their phones, and has for some time.

    36. Re:Fantastic! by stealth_finger · · Score: 0

      How is that relevant? Instead of getting your sim and popping it in easy peasy you'd have to go down to the store and probably pay $200.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    37. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great yet another innovation for apple to steal

    38. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL yes the might apple had 1 or 2 shitty computers to code for and Microsoft just had the rest of the entire worlds computers to get working. What a FUCKING idiot hater.

    39. Re:Fantastic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can do the squeeze sensor trick with just a switch. Make part of the case flexible enough to press a button hidden beneath it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    40. Re:Fantastic! by RoccamOccam · · Score: 2

      This reminds me of the joy (not!) we had when USB replaced RS232.

      ...

      You remember RS232 a LOT more fondly than MOST people.

      ...

      Yeah, I was having a hard time deciding whether he was being sarcastic or not.

    41. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple all ready has the flexible part worked out ; the 6 bent just by looking at it.

    42. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take phone to Genius center. Genius places phone on hacked wireless charging device that drains power instead of charging until battery dies. Voila! Cold restart. Or possibly destroyed battery. In the latter case you can replace the phone for 10% off full price. So sorry about your apps and data.

    43. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must have forgotten /s -- or else is in Advanced Selective Alzheimer's. Though ... I may still have the old homemade null-modem cable I built to connect my Radio Shack Model 100 to a PC. Used it to dump text files back and forth so I could work on things while on the 2-hour commute bus ride in the Bay Area (yes, they were a thing even in the 1980s). And the M100 could easily handle 19200 while the PCs of the time were barely capable of doing 9600 without errors.

    44. Re:Fantastic! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      With RS232, there is an entire UNIVERSE of cabling "fun" before you even get to software issues.

      Problems which 99% of users never encountered. Only nerds ever had to deal with those problems, and what they got in return was a simple interface which often didn't require any drivers (since the operation was handled by the BIOS) and which could be cheaply implemented on any halfway decent microcontroller.

      With USB, it comes down to "Do you have the right Driver?"

      For the average user, so does serial — except they usually didn't need a driver for a serial peripheral. For the hobbyist, USB is a total PITA. It's not cheap or easy to implement, and with most microcontrollers you need an external crystal.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    45. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      How is that relevant? Instead of getting your sim and popping it in easy peasy you'd have to go down to the store and probably pay $200.

      Why?

    46. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      He must have forgotten /s -- or else is in Advanced Selective Alzheimer's. Though ... I may still have the old homemade null-modem cable I built to connect my Radio Shack Model 100 to a PC. Used it to dump text files back and forth so I could work on things while on the 2-hour commute bus ride in the Bay Area (yes, they were a thing even in the 1980s). And the M100 could easily handle 19200 while the PCs of the time were barely capable of doing 9600 without errors.

      I still have my Model 102. Spectacular device for the time. Haven't turned it on in decades; but I can't bring myself to pitch it... Spent a LOT of damn money on Compu$erve CB on that thing, LOL!

    47. Re:Fantastic! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      With RS232, there is an entire UNIVERSE of cabling "fun" before you even get to software issues.

      Problems which 99% of users never encountered. Only nerds ever had to deal with those problems, and what they got in return was a simple interface which often didn't require any drivers (since the operation was handled by the BIOS) and which could be cheaply implemented on any halfway decent microcontroller.

      With USB, it comes down to "Do you have the right Driver?"

      For the average user, so does serial — except they usually didn't need a driver for a serial peripheral. For the hobbyist, USB is a total PITA. It's not cheap or easy to implement, and with most microcontrollers you need an external crystal.

      You're right that most users never had to deal with the problems of RS-232. That's because they just called-up their friendly neighborhood GEEK to figure it out FOR them!!!

      Yes, I will heartily agree that USB is a PITA for the average hobbyist. But that's never what the target audience was, IMHO. But aren't there FTDI chips and drivers that take care of the hardware and driver nonsense for HID devices at least? I would imagine that's what 99% of hobbyists that want to interface with some USB device do these days.

    48. Re:Fantastic! by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Well, then you just go out and buy a new one!


      Or perhaps, Apple will have a service whereby you can take it to them and pay them to make it work again.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    49. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL yes the might apple had 1 or 2 shitty computers to code for and Microsoft just had the rest of the entire worlds computers to get working. What a FUCKING idiot hater.

      Well, the IBM PC is supposedly a universal standard - unless it isn't for argument's sake, right?

    50. Re:Fantastic! by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      ... or you want to use it in your car.

    51. Re:Fantastic! by zlives · · Score: 1

      neither had I until that update, we have a few hundred iOS devices deployed, affected about 10% for what ever reasons. 90% were lucky just like you.

    52. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that relevant? Instead of getting your sim and popping it in easy peasy you'd have to go down to the store and probably pay $200.

      Yeah, exactly. It will not be like with the already existing AppleSIM in the iPad, were you can just change the contract on the machine. Because you say so.

    53. Re: Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or get the next best thing, those recent iphone boxes are so totally portless and can be dropped or thrown,and can survive a few days in the dumpster.

    54. Re:Fantastic! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Because idiots will pay anything for their iThing

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  4. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wireless, Portless and Buttonless or in a word ... very Useless

  5. That's nothing by Patent+Lover · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're also going to be screenless. It's going to be a huge breakthrough.

    1. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the headline as "wireless, pointless and buttonless" - first thought was: well, they've already sorted points 1 and 2, third seems trivial, what's the big deal?

    2. Re:That's nothing by H3lldr0p · · Score: 2

      Not only that but it's been discovered that there's a slight current in normal, everyday phone lines. Utilizing this, Apple engineers have come up with a phone you never have to charge again! In fact, it's completely immobile allowing you to never lose. It will be packed with a handy, easy to use interface. It doesn't even have one. All it has is a "receiving unit" that's directly connected to the immobile part which is a single purpose unit. All it does is listen to your voice and recreates the voice of the person you are talking with. The only interface to speak of is a set of standard numbers from zero to nine. You enter someone's phone number and it will take care of everything else!

    3. Re:That's nothing by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 2

      And since it's completely immobile you have to buy one for each location you want to use it in!
      More money for Apple!

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    4. Re:That's nothing by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Maybe just a speaker and a microphone?

    5. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh they will get screenless. The iphone will transform into inmersive augmented reality glasses.

    6. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great joke, grandpa! It's hard to believe you're already in your 50s!

    7. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It goes better still : owing to their experience with Siri you only have to pick the phone up and ask a female voice on the other end to connect you to the phone or person you need to talk with!

    8. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nono, the whole thing will be a screen, but you need to wear special gloves so you can hold the phone and still use it. They'll be 100 bucks.

  6. Charging when you're not at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And exactly WTF are you supposed to do when you're on a plane with only a USB-A port? Such a device will never grace my pocket!

  7. Wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless charging isn't just slower right now - it's also less efficient, and that's something I don't really see changing any time soon. Wasting additional power just for the sake of being "hip" just doesn't seem wise to me. Then again, the only Apple device I still have is a Mac Mini from 2011 so I'm probably not their target demo.

    1. Re:Wasteful by arth1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only Apple product I own is the White Album.

    2. Re:Wasteful by Yaztromo · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only Apple product I own is the White Album.

      Whoa -- talk about being way behind the times there grandpa!

      You should totally check out Abbey Road. Best. B Side. Ever.

      Yaz

    3. Re:Wasteful by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      The only Apple product I own is the White Album.

      Careful! You'll trigger Yoko to file another decades-long frivolous lawsuit!

    4. Re:Wasteful by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Further, if they want to be hip - they never let the apple logo on the back get covered up. Even case makers leave it exposed. Why not make the apple and stem the electrodes of a cradle charging system? Still a sealed unit. But we've moved beyond two pin charging, I guess.

  8. What about charging away from home/office? by mfearby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It might be good to have wireless charging ability at home but what about when you're "on the go" and just need to connect to a cable somewhere to charge your phone, and there's no special Apple wireless charger?

    Sorry, Apple, but my Samsung Galaxy S8 (which I bought to replace an iPhone last year) is far superior to your feature-stripped strait jackets.

    1. Re:What about charging away from home/office? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It might be good to have wireless charging ability at home but what about when you're "on the go" and just need to connect to a cable somewhere to charge your phone, and there's no special Apple wireless charger?

      Important places will install wireless charging stations for important people.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:What about charging away from home/office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you never heard of mobile battery packs that can charge an iPhone wirelessly?

      And the mobile charging benches in malls where people stood around charging their phones with wires that need to be replaced all the time? Switching to wireless charging would save them so much trouble.

      Soon after I got my 8+, I bought a couple wireless chargers and now I almost never use the port for charging anymore.

    3. Re:What about charging away from home/office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the mobile charging benches in malls where people stood around charging their phones with wires that need to be replaced all the time? Switching to wireless charging would save them so much trouble.

      I don't think I've ever seen a mobile wireless charging pad. I've seen plenty of charging spots that offer both iPhone and standard charging cables but never a mobile wireless charging pad that works with iCharge or whatever they call their version of wireless charging.

      I have, however, seen a place that offered wireless charging and also offered special "Apple" charging coils, converting the wireless charger into a Lightning port, presumably because that was cheaper than buying an iWirelessCharger.

    4. Re:What about charging away from home/office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be good to have wireless charging ability at home but what about when you're "on the go" and just need to connect to a cable somewhere to charge your phone, and there's no special Apple wireless charger?

      Don't worry, Apple will happily sell you a charging station for 7 times the price of the charging cable and 30 times the weight so you can conveniently charge everywhere.

    5. Re:What about charging away from home/office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be good to have wireless charging ability at home but what about when you're "on the go" and just need to connect to a cable somewhere to charge your phone, and there's no special Apple wireless charger?

      Important places will install wireless charging stations for important people.

      With the the overwhelming majority of men, women, and children owning a smartphone, we're well beyond the point if creating solutions for just the "important" people.

      And besides, a smartphone without a screen? Fucking thing should last a week on a single charge. You know, like cell phones used to do.

    6. Re:What about charging away from home/office? by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      Important places will install wireless charging stations for important people.

      The purpose of having an iPhone is to indicate you are important!

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    7. Re:What about charging away from home/office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be good to have wireless charging ability at home but what about when you're "on the go" and just need to connect to a cable somewhere to charge your phone, and there's no special Apple wireless charger?

      Yeah, no shit ... I refuse to have things which don't charge from standard USB, which allows me to bring a small number of cables to cover all of my devices. It lets me have a multi-port USB charging tower, as well as USB batteries to charge stuff when I'm in transit.

      I have no idea why Apple is on this idiotic quest to remove buttons and cables. It's removing utility to achieve some pointless design aesthetic (and jack up costs, apparently).

      I just don't see this obsessive desire to remove ports as adding any actual value to the consumer. Taking out headphone jacks was stupid, taking out cable jacks to charge and sync is idiotic.

    8. Re:What about charging away from home/office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just take a USB charging back with you, it can be designed to be very thin.

  9. wireless? by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Is it really news that mobile phones will be wireless?
    I mean, there were probably wired mobile phones in the trenches during WWII, Korean war and Viet Nam war, but since the 90s at least, I think most mobile phones have been wireless.

    What I miss the most are tactile buttons, allowing me to call without looking at the phone. And, of course, the times when people actually picked up the phone when there was a call, because calls were expensive and telemarketers and Indian scammers non-existent.

    1. Re:wireless? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      I mean, there were probably wired mobile phones in the trenches during WWII, Korean war and Viet Nam war, but since the 90s at least, I think most mobile phones have been wireless.

      I don't know about you but I still have to give my mobile phone a couple of good cranks before making a call. I suppose I should upgrade.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:wireless? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You sure that's your phone?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    3. Re:wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure when it comes to a couple of good cranks, your household has a corner on the market.

  10. iCloud Lol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, one vicariously touches the button through the iCloud? Thatâ(TM)s courageous... cook will enjoys all these iCloud fingers up his bu...t...

  11. Next step.. by Z80a · · Score: 1

    Potting the whole thing, so it is literally impossible to open or repair it, as the phone is a solid block of resin.

    1. Re:Next step.. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      No, the resin will be beneath a layer of glass and metal. To make it seem like it's not just a bunch of components glued together. Apple is fairly good at the appearance-design aspect of their product.

  12. the singularity by AlexanKulbashian · · Score: 1

    If they remove the screen as well they will have a fairly rugged device

    1. Re:the singularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty much a scaled down version of the monolith from 2001. No rounded edges though.

  13. Go ALL the way, Apple by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    How about also rid the screen: just shove your iSuppository up your rump, and learn to "read" vibrations.

    A simple shiny little sphere: the ultimate in Apple Design.

    1. Re:Go ALL the way, Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iSuppository...simple shiny little sphere

      Metallic? More likely Apple would make it translucent. Or, was that a 90's thing? Apple didn't lose their marbles, they gained them. Actually, both at the same time with this product. Schrodinger's Marble.

  14. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wireless, Portless and Buttonless or in a word ... very Useless

    Watching tens of millions of people line up to buy this hardware, or in a word from the CFO....very Priceless.

  15. Good news by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    All the better to sell you proprietary charging pads and AirPods!

  16. Wireless, Portless, Buttonless... by Trogre · · Score: 1

    You forgot "Userless".

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Wireless, Portless, Buttonless... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      You better also add "pointless".

  17. More money by Venona2018 · · Score: 2

    I will love spending the extra money for a wireless charger at home, at work and in the car. Assuming I can find a place to put the wireless charger in the car.

    1. Re:More money by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

      apple will build in DRM so only an apple one will work or non apple will limited to low speed mode.

    2. Re:More money by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      To be fair, you can get Qi chargers for less than the typical Lightning cable, so this might be a net win for iPhone users.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    3. Re:More money by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      You'll need to buy a new car, with the wireless charging dashboard. Which will be obsolete in two years when Apple comes out with a new wireless charging protocol and the screen on your gadget reads 'unsupported device'.

    4. Re:More money by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Also, wireless chargers are BIG -- they're a flat plate a few inches in diameter. One more thing to carry when traveling by public transport (and planes/trains likely won't have them embedded in tables for the next few years, whereas they DO currently have 120V or 14V outlets).

    5. Re:More money by green1 · · Score: 1

      It's cute that you think Apple would allow their devices to be compatible with someone else's hardware....

      Most likely, they will have a proprietary charging pad that authenticates with the phone before being allowed to be used. That pad will connect by lightning cable (or maybe even a whole new connector that doesn't exist yet just so you have to re-buy all your cables) to it's power source so as to also eliminate the possibility of non-apple cords being used.

    6. Re:More money by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Uh... The iPhone 8 and iPhone X both use Qi, actually. My wife uses my Samsung Qi charger with her iPhone all the time. Try again, maybe?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    7. Re: More money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And iPhones used to recharge without a proprietary chip in the cable. You're assuming they won't ditch Qi for a proprietary standard.

    8. Re: More money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my last iPhone had a headphone jack. What was your point?

    9. Re:More money by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      While true, it's much easier to plug in a lightning cable than use a Qi charger. And to keep it plugged in. Especially as the device slips around in a car/on a plane/etc.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    10. Re:More money by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Funny, I set my phone on the charger on my night stand at night and take it off in the morning; the battery lasts me a full day (or two, it's rarely below 50% by the end of the night) and I don't have to worry about charging it in a car or on a plane. Of course, it's helpful during a long drive if I do put my phone in the dash mount I installed that has a Qi charger built in and holds the phone in place quite nicely. If I recall correctly, I bought it in early 2014 along with my LG G3, so this isn't a new development.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    11. Re:More money by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I find I have to be really nudgy to get it in the right spot to charge. Which means I cannot use it, then slam it down and roll over to sleep. With a cord, I can.

      Obviously, battery life is unrelated to charging tech. But the popularity of "charge-on-the-go" devices suggest a lot of people are unhappy with their battery life.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    12. Re:More money by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I find I have to be really nudgy to get it in the right spot to charge.

      I've found that with shitty chargers, as well. Spend the extra dollar on a good one and that problem disappears.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    13. Re:More money by Teckla · · Score: 1

      Try the Anker wireless charger that sits upright. I use mine daily, and placing the phone correctly is virtually effortless, even when not looking.

    14. Re:More money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wait until apples charge pad clone comes out and then the next os update adds the proprietary charging code for "security" reasons. Why do you think its taking apple over a year to make a charging pad that is a copy of someone elses.

    15. Re:More money by tgeek · · Score: 1

      For Apple, something costing "more money" isn't a problem, it's a FEATURE!!!!

    16. Re:More money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is much easier to use a Qi charger. I just put the phone down (have to do that ayway) and no plug to plug in.

      In a car: there are cars that have a Qi charger built-in. Of course it is in a phone-sized pocket, so the phone do not slip around. (Huyndai Ionic have this, surely some competitors too)

    17. Re:More money by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      To be fair, you can get Qi chargers for less than the typical Lightning cable, so this might be a net win for iPhone users.

      Do you really think Apple will allow that to happen? They will have to come up with some reason for you to buy the $150 Apple Wireless Charger.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:More money by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Why should the phone be more expensive? They couldn't keep it at the same price point and not make such a high percentage of profit?

      My first thought is that most teardowns put the cost of materials somewhere around 1/3 to 1/2 the cost of the phone. Lets assume 1/6 of the cost is R&D - it really doesn't take that much development to use the same shape, same processor, up the RAM, remove and replace some hardware. That's still half profit on *every* phone. Greedy bastards.

    19. Re:More money by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Without their proprietary extensions - so it will charge very slowly if at all.

    20. Re:More money by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      What proprietary extensions? It works just fine.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    21. Re:More money by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Do you really not realize that the current generation of iPhone already use Qi flawlessly? Yes, I do really think Apple would allow that to happen, because they already did. Now, go look through my post history and realize I'm certainly no Apple apologist or fanboi, I call them out on a lot of bullshit, but one must give credit where it is due lest they lose any and all credibility as many who are replying to my comment above seem to be trying to do.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    22. Re:More money by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Well, OK. Their current wireless charging maxes out at 7.5W, while the wired charging supports up to 29W. And any details of what's in Apple's AirPower standard are still not released, so I don't know if it includes anything over 7.5W. It takes over 3 times as long to charge this way - so I doubt they're leaving it as-is.

    23. Re:More money by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Apple's 29 watt charger will charge the phone fully in 2 hours, while heating the battery and reducing its overall lifespan. 7.5 watts will charge it fully in about 8 hours, with much less heat; that's more than adequate for overnight charging and the lower temperatures mean a longer lifespan for the battery.

      The current version of the Qi Low Power standard supports up to 15 watts. Apple could implement that with no problems. 15 Watts is plenty to charge my current S9+, which has a larger battery, overnight; it also keeps it charged while using maps, playing music, and acting as an informational display (map in a window in the corner) attached to an OBD-II reader in my truck on long trips. Now, the S9+ has a 3,000mAh battery, compared to the iPhone 8+'s 2,675mAh, so I'm confident it would do the same for the iPhone; especially as I keep hearing the claim that the iPhone sips power compared to an Android device. Mind you, most of that confidence comes from the fact that my wife charges her iPhone 8+ on my Qi charger all the time, so I'm speaking from real world experience.

      For the record, the S9+ supports 12v 2.6A charging (Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0, 31.2 watts), yet Qi charging is still more than adequate. The standard actually goes up to 22v, though the included charger caps out at 12v; I haven't tried plugging in to one that hits 22v yet, but my understanding is that it would charge at 57.2 watts. The battery, of course, would get a lot hotter during that charge cycle, further reducing its life, which is why I don't use Quick Charge in the first place.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    24. Re:More money by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      They are designed to be alignment immune, one designed especially for the iphone would be much smaller. The standards are just a giant pile of compromises too. Assuming Apple can get a patent license, a custom wireless charger would probably significantly more efficient than the existing standards too.

    25. Re:More money by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      The charger was a gift (I was still using a charging cable.) I'm disappointed to hear it was a cheap one.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    26. Re: More money by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Did Apple introduce the headphone jack in the 12th generation of the iPhone, 6 generations after everyone else had one? Because that's what they did with Qi charging.

      Historically, we can expect it to last 12 generations. After all, it's not a data port; if it were, we could expect it to last 5-7 generations at best.

      P.S. I love it when people approach me as though I'm an Apple hater, because I can point them to my post history to see where I've supported Apple when they've actually done the right thing (or post something like the 2nd paragraph above to make the same point). I also quite enjoy when someone approaches me as though I'm an Apple fanboi, because I can point them to my post history to see where I've torn Apple down over their bullshit (or post something like the 2nd paragraph above to make the same point). In truth, I'm a realist; I use the products of theirs that work for me, and I voice the issues I have with the products of theirs which do not (in the hope that my voice will be loud enough, when added to many others, for Apple to hear), because they're the only vendor right now who could potentially create an end-to-end platform I might actually want to use. Microsoft was another contender until they released Windows 10 and killed their mobile platform; Samsung could be in the running if they had a desktop OS.

      Going single-vendor generally simplifies business purchasing; for a lot of us, though, Apple needs to fix quite a few things before we can justify pulling that trigger. The iPhone's wireless charging, really and truly, is not one of those things.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    27. Re: More money by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It'll be at least 12 generations (how long it took them to adopt a wireless charging standard in the first place) before they do that. If you want to be truly pessimistic, but still within the realm or reality, maybe 5-7 generations like the 30 pin connector.

      I'm all for giving Apple shit where it's due (and there is a lot of it due) but really?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  18. Wireless by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    In other news, Apple makes 100% more profit on wireless accessories. And the sheep just keep on buying it.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  19. Re:jmod 0p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    xxx_m4x1mum_3dg3l0rd_xxx

  20. Futurama predicted this!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No charging ports, no buttons, no cables... even no screen!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uASUHbFEhWY

  21. Re:And thusly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better listen to this guy, he studied the blade.

  22. Re:And thusly by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    The fact of 'caught using' being a thing shows the real problem. Who cares what we use? Why it it so important to visibly be using a particular companies gadget?

  23. This is Crasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is insane.... are Apple finally moving into the 21st century by joining every other phone manufacturer with a wireless charger?!?!?
    I never thought I'd see this day. Just like when Apple finally upgraded and got a phone-tap payment service.
    There is hope.

  24. Fixed it.. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    The iPhones of the future will be crippled -- fixed that for y'all.

    1. Re:Fixed it.. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      iPhones are crippled

      Fixed that for you.

  25. voicemail export by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only way to get clear audio exports of voicemail on an iphone (verizon) is through the headphone jack -- all other export options sound too compressed

    1. Re:voicemail export by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Apple will allow you to add iClown Export for only $5 per month :)

  26. There’s a term for this by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Form over function.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:There’s a term for this by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      No, the word you're looking for is:

      COURAGE.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:There’s a term for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple is doubling up on courage this year!!

  27. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Do it. I just want the lol's that will ensue, after all the gaping holes in Apple's logic. Kinda like when they released Apple Maps because it worked good around Cupertino.

    See? lol's

    1. Re:PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL and the one button mouse. HAHAHA
      And that God awful puck mouse.
      And the stupid "charge it upside-down" mouse

      World "best" tech company and they cant make a simple mouse; no wonder they dont want to give ios mouse support.

  28. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they even need screens? Those fanbois should know what Apple wants to tell them without looking.

  29. Re:And thusly by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    We can begin to see the death of a brand and company.

    In honesty, I'd love to see Apple fall back into obscurity. Their products suck and are over priced.

    Then don't buy them. Simple as that.

  30. Re:And thusly by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    The fact of 'caught using' being a thing shows the real problem. Who cares what we use? Why it it so important to visibly be using a particular companies gadget?

    Awww! Sounds like somebody's jealous...

  31. and useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuff said.

  32. Wireless, Portless, and Buttonless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't be the only person who read that as "worthless, pointless, and bottomless".

  33. cases & wireless charging by oneiros27 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Apple's been telling people that to protect their smaller devices, they basically need to put *something* around it. (remember the sock? or that band to deal with antenna issues?)

    But wireless charging uses induction, and the further apart the induction pads are, the worse the charging performance (which might be related to their overheating problems, as they need to use move power). So if Apple's really serious about this, they need to come up with a phone that doesn't need a case ... which might piss off other companies in the accessory ecosystem.

    I'd love to use wireless charging again ... but I'm not giving up a headphone port for it. I went from a Palm Pre (with the replaced back for wireless charging) and Pre3 to an iphone SE ... because it had a headphone jack. But even as a 30+ year apple user, I doubt I'll be getting another iphone, as the OS just pisses me off too much.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:cases & wireless charging by Teckla · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, my iPhone with a thick OtterBox Defender case charges as fast as wired when I use my Anker wireless charger. I do REALLY miss the headphone jack, though. :(

  34. Re:And thusly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awwww Sounds like someone bases their self worth on defending a soulless corporation.

  35. Re:And thusly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people don't but thanks for the advice.

  36. Re:And thusly by vlad30 · · Score: 1

    The entire tech industry will surge ahead into true innovation when apple is finally gone.

    Actually they will have no one to copy from Apple may not have been first with many products but the way they are copied proves they get the user, better than others, and get the basics right. Also Apple tends not to release a product in a rush look up Knowledge Navigator to see how long the iphone idea has been in the works. Racking up feature count doesn't mean much if its difficult to use. And for most users the quality of phone cameras etc. is good enough

    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
  37. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless, Portlessb, Buttonless.
    iPhoneless.

  38. Just like Apple Watch by Lando17 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I'm surprised they haven't removed the lightning port yet. At this point its just another back door.

  39. Well streamed Sir by seoras · · Score: 1

    Steam punks will be retro-fitting brass head phone jacks to iPhones next.

  40. Don't drop this one... by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    It's molded from a single piece of glass. Front, back, sides.. ALL GLASS!

  41. What about people with "bad screen fingers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a "dumb" phone with a real keyboard because these stupid touch screens do not work for me!

    Don't know why, but about 50% of my "touches" are NOT recognized by the various devices (iPad, iPod...)

    This is very frustrating, especially in public places like gas station where they are starting to use touch screens. Not only can you barely see what is on them in full daylight, but in addition, they do not react to my touches...

    Does this mean that I am handicaped for the future! and will be forever a paria?

    Cyrille

    1. Re:What about people with "bad screen fingers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try licking you finger and then use the touch screen (you can have dry fingertips)

  42. An issue I see by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

    Music apps are relatively popular in iOS... even Apple has one (Garage Band) and there are even MIDI interfaces that allow connecting instruments to an iPhone. ... But you can't really use Bluetooth for music (and I say that as the happy owner of a couple of Apple Airpods) because it has too much latency (noticeable / annoying delay between touching something on screen and hearing the sound).

    --
    As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    1. Re:An issue I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to use their proprietary Airplay, over Wifi. This might work much better if less than ideal?

    2. Re: An issue I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that has even more latency... itâ(TM)s not for interactive audio... just for streaming music or video.

  43. But the GUI by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    will have to be hand coded around the bigger and bigger notch. Enjoy notch drift that takes over more and more of your app.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  44. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless, Portless and Buttonless or in a word ... very Useless

    Exactly!

    Also.. ANY wireless communication in and out of the device, WILL of COURSE, ONLY be possible by using hardware made ONLY by Apple, that utilizes propietary formats for everything, so that NO piece of non-Apple equipment will be able to function with it. The device must actively shun any non-Apple device!

    Maybe it will even have a subscription service, such that you must pay a monthly fee in order to use the Apple App Store AND if your subscription runs out, then the phone will no longer let you DO anything BUT renewing your subscription! We can NOT have all these users just using the iDevices without paying fees!

  45. What about forgetting your charger? by Tomahawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many times have you gone on holiday, opened your case, and found you didn't pack your charger? If you were lucky, you packed a spare cable, so all you needed was something with a USB connection and you could charge your phone. At worst, a trip to a shop that sold cables.

    Remove cable charging, and now you're needed to buy a full wireless charger. Or visit Starbucks every morning for 2 hours while you slowly sip away at a long-gone-cold coffee.

    And then what about those people who still use wired headphones using the adapter that comes in the box... oh yeah, sorry, I forgot that you sell expensive wireless headphones that you want to force people to have to buy also. Silly me.

    Copying data to your PC? Or another phone? Getting a charge boost from another phone (like you can [seemingly] on USB-C devices)? In-car adapters? Peripherals?

    My last few phones all had wireless charging. I rarely used it. Lately I was even thinking about why this tech is added to phones as it just increases the cost and provides, at least to me, no benefit. I'm not sure I'd like being forced to have to only use wireless charging. Plus you know that they'll change the wireless charging technology in 2 iterations time, making those 2 spare charges you bought when on holidays useless.

    At least you can buy another one on your next trip away...

    1. Re:What about forgetting your charger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I use wireless charging all the time, I'll only use wired (fast) charging if I absolutely need battery power in a hurry before running out the door.

      It is great for being able to drop the phone on the puck without worry of my kids yanking the cable out, I can blindly grab it off the nightstand without having to disconnect it and also drop it back on without rolling over, just make sure I hear the charging tones. Not worrying about wearing out or damaging the port or fumbling with getting the cable oriented correctly is very nice.

    2. Re:What about forgetting your charger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't beat a dumb phone with micro USB on this. I have had it for 5 years now. It's not power hungry and with a 800mAH or 900mAh battery, that makes 500mA charging very practical and in fact, the only option on this one.

  46. people will go iphone less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If iphone wants to make money less by giving people lesser stuff with every release, soon people will go iphone less.

  47. Forgot one "less" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPhones of the Future May Be Wireless, Portless and Buttonless

    Forgot useless.

  48. It's so ... black! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    "It's so... black!" said Ford Prefect. "You can hardly make out its shape... light just seems to fall into it!"

  49. So... actually hermetically sealed now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Beginning..._Was_the_Command_Line

    Here's hoping Apple can finally figure out how to make something water resistant.

  50. Is Apple thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it will make the phone more secure?

  51. Speechless by Laxator2 · · Score: 1, Troll

    I am left speechless and powerless by their decisions to go portless, buttonless.

    - They will surely go speakerless and mic-less (this will make the phones analog hole-less)
    - Battery-less (no more battery fires, hurrah !)
    - Use-less
    - Price-less (how much does it cost? How much have you got? Or as they prefer in England, how much can you afford to pay ?)
    - Screen-less was already mentioned.
    - Case-less (the most lightweight phone, lighter than air)

    This reminds me of a story about trains:
    "When a train derails it is usually the last carriage that causes the derailment. Therefore, to address this problem we will remove the last carriage from all trains."
    Problem solved.

    1. Re:Speechless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be 100% Waterproof down to 900 meters. So you'll still be able to see your alerts on your watch as you watch your phone sink to the bottom of the ocean.

  52. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the iBrick?

  53. No ass port? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Apple can't fuck you over anymore?

  54. You = The "SiDeWaLk-ShRiNk of /.", lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject (lol) & the viral hit by "The SoyBoyz": ''If you're going to TransManCisco? Be sure you wear your jimmyhats + bring Preparation H there. If you're going, to TransManCisco... You're going to meet a lot of transtesticle monsters and soyboy not men there. All across the nation: Surgical sawblade vibrations! Surgeons in motion, Sawing peckers + ball off tossing them into the SF Bay Ocean...'

    * They're playing YOUR SONG again - hahahaha classic!

    (Only way "your kind" would EVER get any notice &/or notoriety...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Quit projecting your own mental issues onto me... apk

  55. Time to see you SQUIRM "lil' JOWIE" (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to see you SQUIRM "lil' JOWIE" (lol) YES or NO here "JOWIE" (hahaha) https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    * Yes, I know that others WILL agree it's FUN to see "Jealous JOWIES" that STALK ME by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts SQUIRM!

    (Like the WORMS you are beneath MY BOOT!)

    Toxic?

    Freak - get a clue - you're f'ing STALKING me HIDING in fear of me too behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts (worms like you HAVE to fear guys like me & yes, that IS fear, you hiding).

    APK

    P.S.=> Every SINGLE time you give me SUCH A LAUGH as I box you into THIS VERY CORNER & you SQUIRM, worm, hahahaha... apk

  56. FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great, completely fucking useless then, even worse than they are now!

  57. Luddite Service Calling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, you don't HAVE to buy it. My cell phone still works pretty well. Lumia 635, Windows 10. Phone could use a bit more RAM for some apps, but it works fine for my needs: phone calls, texts, email mostly. With a standard micro-USB port, headphone jack, and a replaceable battery. Not waterproof - so don't drop it in the toilet! Olde is Good again! Unfortunately, Cortana has lost her snark - did she and Siri have a fight?

  58. Eliminating the hole, not the port by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

    Wow, lots of snark and sarcasm in the posts and responses...but letâ(TM)s think about who whoâ(TM)s could work.

    What about changing the port from a male/female configuration (insert plug into receptacle) to the smart port where the connection is held magnetically? Intrusion points in the case are eliminated yet there is a means of a physical connection to the outside.

    As has been mentioned elsewhere, change out the home and volume buttons from a operator that goes through the case to some sort of membrane button or Hall effect button with no opening in the case (or at most a sealed seam), and those intrusion points are gone.

    Audio? That can go through Bluetooth as it is now, or the smart port for wired connections.

    SIM card? ESim, but Iâ(TM)m not wild about it due to the lack of ability to swap SIM cards at-will. Wasnâ(TM)t the whole point of the SIM card the ability to swap cards and phones as desired?

    Speaker and microphone, no problem, sealed membranes to transmit the sound waves, probably no change from the present design (except maybe for better sealing methods and materials).

    There was a lot of bitching and decrying the loss of the 30 pin connector to Lightning, and loss of the audio jack...but the world kept turning, iPhones kept selling. I bet the same will happen if/when Apple does achieve a hole-less case design.

    And I for for one look forward to that.

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  59. Calm down by elohssa · · Score: 1

    I don't get all the apple hate on this. Going port-less seems _obvious_ to me. I'm sure the major flagship android phones will do this as well.

    The primary arguments against this idea seem to be:

    1) It will be inconvenient to charge away from home.
    2) It will be impossible to reset in the case of an error.
    3) It will be impossible to use existing wired headphones.
    4) It will be difficult to copy data off the phone.

    However, IMO...

    1) Qi charging is becoming ubiquitous; Cars, restraunts, hotels, will have wireless chargers. Battery life is getting better, my iPhone X can easily go 2 days between charges if I use the battery saver mode from the start, probably 3 if I turned it off while sleeping. Wireless chargers are cheep, $20 on amazon, plugs in anywhere you have USB.

    2) I haven't had to hold buttons to reset my iPhone in over 3 years. Still, it's very likely they'll come up with a way to do this. If not, it'll be valid criticism, until then, its FUD.

    3) You already need an adapter to use wired headphones. Now the adapter will have to be bluetooth enabled. It's really not much of a loss. 1st gen AirPods work great and are selling well, so I would expect that sort of wirelessness to be the future anyway.

    4) Between iCloud and airdrop, this is a solved problem.

    Do I think apple is above criticism? No, the current Mac line is in shambles.

    Would such a device be of less use to some people? Sure, and they may be able to use androids for a while, but such folks will have to adapt eventually.

    Could apple screw this up? Sure, especially in the 1st generation. Bendgate, you're holding it wrong, plenty of examples here. But they usually learn from their mistakes.

    Am I overlooking something?

  60. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny that you call Apple users fanbois when the likes of Samsung and LG and every other large Android phone manufacturer is certain to follow suit. I guess that makes Android users Apple fanbois.

  61. Stupid by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    So if I'm low on battery, I still have to have a clunky device wired to the wall that I sit my phone on. I STILL SEE THE MOTHERFUCKING WIRE!

    And now all cars have to have some Apple branded wireless charging SPOT?!?! Guess what, I have NO additional room in my car for something like that. What if I want to charge my phone and my wife's?

  62. Re: HaHa... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    I think this strategy is pointless.

  63. Why Stop There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why stop there? I have a concept in mind, a revolutionary, mind-blowing, world altering vision.

    I call it the iBillet. It's just a machined billet of aluminum, with rounded corners (oooh!) and mirror polished (aaaaah!). There are no ports, no interfaces, nothing to go wrong. It is 100% waterproof (eeeee!), warm to the touch when kept in your pocket. Yet it can be cool to the touch if you keep it in your fridge, perfect for those hot summer days, just hold it against your forehead!

    It costs just $999 and comes with an iCover included. A constellation of dongles is available to attach to your other iDevices, for extra cost of course.

    Courage, vision, insanity. Who can say which is better? The Apple iBillet, where the only holes are the ones the customers already have.

  64. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is why I hate Apple. They do stupid stuff to appeal to up-to-the-minute in-style crowd and then all their competitors thinks that they have to follow suit.

  65. Wireless, portless, buttonless.... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    ...and pointless!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  66. Buttonless? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Don't they need at least 1 hardware button to turn the damn thing on? Or are they going to keep the touchscreen active 24/7 even when it's powered off?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  67. I just got the latest iPhone by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 3, Funny

    "It's so advanced... you don't even need it." -Stephen Wright

  68. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I like Android. Not everyone agrees and not everyone follows suit.

    Posting this on a shock proof, waterproof, dustproof phone with a headphone jack, an SD card slot, and a removable battery. The free market can be a winner!

  69. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which phone has a removable battery and is waterproof?

  70. Re: HaHa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AGM A8. Inexpensive too.

  71. Re:And thusly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people don't but thanks for the advice.

    Most people don't buy from any specific other company either.

  72. Re: HaHa... by tsa · · Score: 1

    It's not Apple's fault that everybody copies them.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  73. Good for security. by d.w.mitchell.55 · · Score: 1

    AFAIK The present break in methods employed by LEO all use the data port. At least that would make them chase down the JTAGs or something. You know old fashion police work.

  74. If Apple was very couragious.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they would remove the screen, battery, and electronics and just sell a useless slab of whatever

      I would like to see them actually do this, as a public social experiment.