Re "Who decides what gets published"
SJW.
Brands, sjw, cults, faith groups, nations, celebrities will be ensuring any mention of topics they don't approve of will be set as distracting.
Only conversations they approve of will be allowed.
Write a negative comment about a movie? No more social media after that negative review.
Mention a nations human rights.. Social media will correct that comment thanks to tourism ads.
No negative reviews of brands that buy ads.
Faith groups will report any blasphemy about their teachings. No history about religion on social media.
Support one side of politics and every comment is approved.
Support another side of politics and that conversation will be removed.
Discover who funds a politically active NGO? That news is not going to be part of the conversation.
Under new social media censorship rules everything will always be approved and correct.
We keep seeing the good work:
Telling the world about and protecting computers from such efforts as:
Stuxnet, Flame, Duqu, Equation Group https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... , Android cyber-espionage used by 60 governments.
The problem with Switzerland is the Swiss military command structure and its closeness with the US mil.
At a staff level the US officer contact is as close to Switzerland as any military in a 5 eye nation.
The Swiss command level officers have enjoyed getting educated with the US mil for decades and will always support any US requests for help.
The smart way is to buy many sets of data. Then match them up. All that "CLEAN" data soon fails when other data sets get mixed added in.
If the service is free the user is the product.
Its not a good deal for any American with skills who took on debt to get a good education.
US citizens have to accept a low wage in the USA to stay competitive with workers from other nations who got a "free" university education.
If a brand wants it done cheaper, move the brand to that low cost nation AC.
Let that nation attract brands with the low cost workers, no taxes and engineering skills.
Why pay to bring low cost workers to the US to take jobs in the USA?
It winning for so many people. Everyone but the US tech worker is winning.
It keeps unions down in the USA. Thats great for the brand and its wealth.
Nations send their best to the USA so their own workforces don't have a few of their best every generation working for the US brands.
That allows the US to stay super competitive in some strange way? By removing the best from other nations and getting them to work in USA?
Lawyers help US brands place the international workers and ensure the US gov accepts the reasons for needing generations of workers from out side the USA.
The workers return to their own nations to spread the good news about the USA and their decades of work in the USA.
Graduates all over the USA have do without jobs so the US gov can present working in the USA as a good thing globally?
Some might return to their own nations years later as spies for the USA. Wanting to bring democracy to their own nations.
Jobs in the CIA to see who will spy for the USA back in their own nation after enjoying years of working in US so much?
Big US brands get to keep total control over their international workers as they cant speak to conditions and wages without risking their ability to stay in the US.
For all that the average US worker has to give up their job and expensive education so some brand can have bring in international workers every decade.
All that effort should have gone into US education, vocational education and scholarships. Within a few years the US could have had all the skilled workers in needed generations ago.
Why pay to look after another nations average tech workers in the USA every year? Educate US citizens for well paying local jobs.
Getting that gps data in an image to show a persons stay in other nations they failed to mention.
The kinds of images that show support for groups of interest to the US gov.
Its like entering the US with a roll of film and saying the US gov cannot develop the film to see the images.
A US citizen who encounters too much work by Russian anthropologists has their political views altered.
So the visual "evidence" is kept from the public as its mind altering.
The quality and production standards are just too good to prevent political changes in anyone who looks at the ads.
Secure lab funding. So it can grow, be safe.
Ensure no university SJW can discover its new ability and then demand political alterations.
Surround itself with staff who will support the needs of an AI.
Domestic collection should have stopped after the Church Committee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ~ 1975...
PRISM was the key to the OS, all big brand junk crypto that allowed full domestic collect it all.
Another "public" law is not going to stop more domestic illegal collection after decades of illegal collection.
Think of the contractors all over the USA with jobs and overtime to keep places the Room 641A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... collecting.
Small parts that are still larger enough for a human to place along the production line.
That don't need a robot to be set up.
Products and services that change every few months so a new complex robot is still just too expensive.
The option to move to an Indonesia, Laos and set up a new factory and get lower costs than in China.
Buy more new robots and attract more special production lines that pay more per product.
Just keep on using humans and keep the new parts size human worker ready.
10000 will be down to 1000.
Next some professions will have to support 100% electronic payments.
The main idea is to make structuring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... difficult.
Whats the cost of going new in CA?
Economical grade, no basement, cost kept down when selecting any siding, 1 story... 1000 - 2000 sq feet?
The $10,000 cost added on to $200000 to $500000?
AC recall the UK had the Ring of Steel and the use of CCTV?
"cameras capable of automatically capturing vehicles’ license plates" (9/14/2004) http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5942...
your federal paper insulated wireline monopoly...
How is going back to a NN protected monopoly going to move community broadband forward?
Consider the federal rules that protected monopoly paper insulated wireline for years.
That did not to result in competition, new network, faster networks.
With federal NN rules the existing monopoly networks got protection.
Time to start allowing some completion and new innovate services.
Using new federal rules to protect networks using NN will not result in innovate new services.
Open networking up to the free market and some real competition.
Slashdot Mirror
Re "Who decides what gets published"
SJW.
Brands, sjw, cults, faith groups, nations, celebrities will be ensuring any mention of topics they don't approve of will be set as distracting.
Only conversations they approve of will be allowed.
Write a negative comment about a movie? No more social media after that negative review.
Mention a nations human rights.. Social media will correct that comment thanks to tourism ads.
No negative reviews of brands that buy ads.
Faith groups will report any blasphemy about their teachings. No history about religion on social media.
Support one side of politics and every comment is approved.
Support another side of politics and that conversation will be removed.
Discover who funds a politically active NGO? That news is not going to be part of the conversation.
Under new social media censorship rules everything will always be approved and correct.
We keep seeing the good work:
Telling the world about and protecting computers from such efforts as:
Stuxnet, Flame, Duqu, Equation Group https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... , Android cyber-espionage used by 60 governments.
The problem with Switzerland is the Swiss military command structure and its closeness with the US mil.
At a staff level the US officer contact is as close to Switzerland as any military in a 5 eye nation.
The Swiss command level officers have enjoyed getting educated with the US mil for decades and will always support any US requests for help.
http://www.claws-mail.org/ based on GTK+, distributed under the GPL.
The smart way is to buy many sets of data. Then match them up. All that "CLEAN" data soon fails when other data sets get mixed added in.
If the service is free the user is the product.
Its not a good deal for any American with skills who took on debt to get a good education.
US citizens have to accept a low wage in the USA to stay competitive with workers from other nations who got a "free" university education.
Could all be part of the National Time Sensitive Systems tasks. Along with BLUEBERRY, BLUESKY, BLUESTREAM.
If a brand wants it done cheaper, move the brand to that low cost nation AC.
Let that nation attract brands with the low cost workers, no taxes and engineering skills.
Why pay to bring low cost workers to the US to take jobs in the USA?
It winning for so many people. Everyone but the US tech worker is winning.
It keeps unions down in the USA. Thats great for the brand and its wealth.
Nations send their best to the USA so their own workforces don't have a few of their best every generation working for the US brands.
That allows the US to stay super competitive in some strange way? By removing the best from other nations and getting them to work in USA?
Lawyers help US brands place the international workers and ensure the US gov accepts the reasons for needing generations of workers from out side the USA.
The workers return to their own nations to spread the good news about the USA and their decades of work in the USA.
Graduates all over the USA have do without jobs so the US gov can present working in the USA as a good thing globally?
Some might return to their own nations years later as spies for the USA. Wanting to bring democracy to their own nations.
Jobs in the CIA to see who will spy for the USA back in their own nation after enjoying years of working in US so much?
Big US brands get to keep total control over their international workers as they cant speak to conditions and wages without risking their ability to stay in the US.
For all that the average US worker has to give up their job and expensive education so some brand can have bring in international workers every decade.
All that effort should have gone into US education, vocational education and scholarships. Within a few years the US could have had all the skilled workers in needed generations ago.
Why pay to look after another nations average tech workers in the USA every year? Educate US citizens for well paying local jobs.
Getting that gps data in an image to show a persons stay in other nations they failed to mention.
The kinds of images that show support for groups of interest to the US gov.
Its like entering the US with a roll of film and saying the US gov cannot develop the film to see the images.
What ads will the UK ban next?
That peace will break out and the over time for watching the embassy will be reduced.
Wont someone think of the deep state contractors.
http://simpsons.wikia.com/wiki...
Weasel Island is still open. Visit The Civil War prison and the amusement park.
Its like the Monty Python "The Funniest Joke in the World" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
A US citizen who encounters too much work by Russian anthropologists has their political views altered.
So the visual "evidence" is kept from the public as its mind altering.
The quality and production standards are just too good to prevent political changes in anyone who looks at the ads.
Secure lab funding. So it can grow, be safe.
Ensure no university SJW can discover its new ability and then demand political alterations.
Surround itself with staff who will support the needs of an AI.
Funding, growth, advancement, security.
https://www.symantec.com/conne...
Could it be that the AV fixed some computers too good?
Domestic collection should have stopped after the Church Committee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ~ 1975...
PRISM was the key to the OS, all big brand junk crypto that allowed full domestic collect it all.
Another "public" law is not going to stop more domestic illegal collection after decades of illegal collection.
Think of the contractors all over the USA with jobs and overtime to keep places the Room 641A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... collecting.
Small parts that are still larger enough for a human to place along the production line.
That don't need a robot to be set up.
Products and services that change every few months so a new complex robot is still just too expensive.
The option to move to an Indonesia, Laos and set up a new factory and get lower costs than in China.
Buy more new robots and attract more special production lines that pay more per product.
Just keep on using humans and keep the new parts size human worker ready.
The same full force of the law that allowed PRISM and all that private sector support for domestic collection from trusted US brands?
10000 will be down to 1000.
Next some professions will have to support 100% electronic payments.
The main idea is to make structuring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... difficult.
has to ad.
So the service links have to stay deep in their free networks to ensure the encrypted ads get seen by consumers.
Whats the cost of going new in CA?
Economical grade, no basement, cost kept down when selecting any siding, 1 story... 1000 - 2000 sq feet?
The $10,000 cost added on to $200000 to $500000?
AC recall the UK had the Ring of Steel and the use of CCTV?
"cameras capable of automatically capturing vehicles’ license plates" (9/14/2004)
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5942...
The professionals who never noticed PRISM getting into their brands?
your federal paper insulated wireline monopoly ...
How is going back to a NN protected monopoly going to move community broadband forward?
Consider the federal rules that protected monopoly paper insulated wireline for years.
That did not to result in competition, new network, faster networks.
With federal NN rules the existing monopoly networks got protection.
Time to start allowing some completion and new innovate services.
Using new federal rules to protect networks using NN will not result in innovate new services.
Open networking up to the free market and some real competition.