I've always loved those commercials; that guy and everyone else on the regular staff got a paycheck for their work long before the movie came out. If they actually made a percentage of the film's profits, which I guarantee none of them do, then they'd have a right to complain. I guess the point I'm trying to make is moot since that guy wasn't really a carpenter anyway, but an actor.
The definition of the word "censorship" says nothing about the Government. Just because those text messages don't get first amendment protection here doesn't mean they're not being censored.
The best part is that the ads aren't even titillating, and I can't think of a single person who would go watch their "UNRATED" stuff when there's probably nothing going on that can't be shown on TV (I don't know, I've never wasted my time checking). Whoever is in charge of the marketing is either a man who has a low opinion of other guys or a woman who doesn't really understand what we find erotic.
How can it be an "UNKNOWN" game if over 60,000 people bought it in that period of time? You seem to be pretty angry that other people have heard of something you haven't.
There's a lot of material (particularly certain types fetish material or things starring specific actresses) that you just can't find on streaming sites. Other people like to hoard porn (guilty). Though I have to admit I've been drawn to streaming videos and live webcams a lot more recently.
I think you underestimate just how many of us there are. Aside from that, any HP product is probably going to be 2/3 to half the price of the competing Apple product, and likely be more open as well.
I agree with the sentiment, but look at it this way: if a project is going to be funded with federal money, it's far more likely to be greenlit than something that might cost the company millions without the possibility of making them rich.
I don't usually trust corporations (big pharm especially) to do anything other than protect their bottom line, but stem cell research is vital and without that money it's going to take that much longer for potential miracle cures to start happening.
Those assholes have had it coming for a long time. And by "had it coming" I mean that the show isn't funny or insightful in the slightest and just rehashes jokes that a lot of other shows do better. I'm not really for censorship but it sure would be great if they'd stir up more bad publicity for Comedy Central and get taken off the air.
First off, you wrote a terrible wall of text that made my eyes unfocus because it was incoherent and poorly-formatted. Secondly, where did you get the impression I think cigarettes should be banned because TV told me to? There's a big difference between dealing with nuisances and dealing with idiots putting cancer-causing chemicals into the air around us and then leeching our tax dollars to be cared for (and, better yet, acting like it's the end of the world when anyone calls them on it). Pulling the "life's not fair" card is stupid, because it's something that could be taken care of easily if smokers had any kind of self-control. Again, there's a big difference between something that's beyond our control that we have to accept, and something that is really and truly unfair that we shouldn't have to deal with. Society is based upon people having a baseline of civil conduct towards each other, and I don't know why we should have to shrug our shoulders and go "Oh well!" when we could be doing something about it instead.
I'm not addicted to ice cream, nor has it been proven to cause cancer. If I was overweight I could easily do something about it, but lung cancer is hard to "walk off". Nice fallacy, though.
I don't really know what you're saying, calm down and try not typing in a blind rage next time. P.S. if you use the term "sheep" unironically, you're a huge tool.
Where did I say this was voluntary? My premiums are higher due to smokers, my taxes are higher due to smokers, and I get little no no say in the matter. But please, go ahead and feel like I'm the one trampling on your rights.
Or maybe it's people who are fed up with an unhealthy society and having to pay for the mistakes of idiots who ruin their bodies with no regards to the larger picture.
Seth Green being involved means the entire show is going to consist of YELLING REALLY LOUD because the louder you say something the funnier it is! Oh, and swearing is a great replacement for actual humor!
Slashdot Mirror
Would it be libel to say "Dr. Ann De Wees Allen has been raping and killing children for the last 20 years"?
I've always loved those commercials; that guy and everyone else on the regular staff got a paycheck for their work long before the movie came out. If they actually made a percentage of the film's profits, which I guarantee none of them do, then they'd have a right to complain. I guess the point I'm trying to make is moot since that guy wasn't really a carpenter anyway, but an actor.
The definition of the word "censorship" says nothing about the Government. Just because those text messages don't get first amendment protection here doesn't mean they're not being censored.
On top of that, if you snort it you'll become super buff and unstoppable.
The best part is that the ads aren't even titillating, and I can't think of a single person who would go watch their "UNRATED" stuff when there's probably nothing going on that can't be shown on TV (I don't know, I've never wasted my time checking). Whoever is in charge of the marketing is either a man who has a low opinion of other guys or a woman who doesn't really understand what we find erotic.
Wait, you're saying a world without private property is a plus? Guess you don't mind if I come over and borrow your car for a while.
How can it be an "UNKNOWN" game if over 60,000 people bought it in that period of time? You seem to be pretty angry that other people have heard of something you haven't.
And it only happened 15 years ago!
There's a lot of material (particularly certain types fetish material or things starring specific actresses) that you just can't find on streaming sites. Other people like to hoard porn (guilty). Though I have to admit I've been drawn to streaming videos and live webcams a lot more recently.
"people who just do not like Apple"
I think you underestimate just how many of us there are. Aside from that, any HP product is probably going to be 2/3 to half the price of the competing Apple product, and likely be more open as well.
What, you're suggesting he didn't?
I agree with the sentiment, but look at it this way: if a project is going to be funded with federal money, it's far more likely to be greenlit than something that might cost the company millions without the possibility of making them rich.
I don't usually trust corporations (big pharm especially) to do anything other than protect their bottom line, but stem cell research is vital and without that money it's going to take that much longer for potential miracle cures to start happening.
What a delightfully condescending post. "Negrospeak"? Seriously?
Why does case B seem unlikely to you? This is the same company that made you pay $2 to enable an existing wireless connection on their laptops.
Hahaha, what?
The one my Dad got a year and a half ago had it, I remember because it was the first thing I had to disable for him.
That, or 16_year_old_boobs_50_cent_Doggy_Style_jailbait_World_of_Warcraft_crack.avi.exe.
Those assholes have had it coming for a long time. And by "had it coming" I mean that the show isn't funny or insightful in the slightest and just rehashes jokes that a lot of other shows do better. I'm not really for censorship but it sure would be great if they'd stir up more bad publicity for Comedy Central and get taken off the air.
First off, you wrote a terrible wall of text that made my eyes unfocus because it was incoherent and poorly-formatted. Secondly, where did you get the impression I think cigarettes should be banned because TV told me to? There's a big difference between dealing with nuisances and dealing with idiots putting cancer-causing chemicals into the air around us and then leeching our tax dollars to be cared for (and, better yet, acting like it's the end of the world when anyone calls them on it). Pulling the "life's not fair" card is stupid, because it's something that could be taken care of easily if smokers had any kind of self-control. Again, there's a big difference between something that's beyond our control that we have to accept, and something that is really and truly unfair that we shouldn't have to deal with. Society is based upon people having a baseline of civil conduct towards each other, and I don't know why we should have to shrug our shoulders and go "Oh well!" when we could be doing something about it instead.
I'm not addicted to ice cream, nor has it been proven to cause cancer. If I was overweight I could easily do something about it, but lung cancer is hard to "walk off". Nice fallacy, though.
I don't really know what you're saying, calm down and try not typing in a blind rage next time. P.S. if you use the term "sheep" unironically, you're a huge tool.
Where did I say this was voluntary? My premiums are higher due to smokers, my taxes are higher due to smokers, and I get little no no say in the matter. But please, go ahead and feel like I'm the one trampling on your rights.
Or maybe it's people who are fed up with an unhealthy society and having to pay for the mistakes of idiots who ruin their bodies with no regards to the larger picture.
Seth Green being involved means the entire show is going to consist of YELLING REALLY LOUD because the louder you say something the funnier it is! Oh, and swearing is a great replacement for actual humor!
Why does anyone watch this retard's shows?
I wonder how often the developers groped the robot as they were building it.