Lazy damned Euros, not a hard working honest currency like the USD. Perhaps if they hadn't taken in all those worthless good for nothing Lyre, they wouldn't have any trouble paying for Intel's misdeeds.
Umm, Pluto is eponymous. As long as they didn't try to trademark it, there's nothing wrong. The term being many centuries old would never have fallen under IP laws of the US or pretty much any other modern state.
No, that's not correct. You're confusing limitations on enforcement with conferring of rights. The owner is restricted to asking somebody to leave or having the police eject them except in certain cases. That does not grant people the right to violate the rules, it just means that the owner is limited in response to violations of policy.
That's not the same thing as a person having the same rights as they do in public. There are a great deal of things that a private business owner can prohibit on his private property which wouldn't apply to public spaces.
That's not realistic. The employees that are doing the work need a clear line of sight around them in order to keep an eye out for possible robbers. While a curtain would prevent people from seeing in, it would greatly increase the risk to them.
Additionally when you're talking about ATMs they have to be restocked with cash on a regular basis. You can't just wait for 2 hours to do it after hours or shut down the place of business.
I realize that people think it's cool to talk smack with respect to security officers, but realistically it's pretty much just jackassery.
Wrong, that's not a public place, that's a private place of business. Based upon the biased account on the sight, it looks a bit questionable as to whether he was being honest.
I walk by the Loomis guys at work frequently and I'd never pull a stunt like the writer did. For one thing if somebody were to later on mess with or rob the machine, guess who's going to be on the list of suspects.
I've been considering getting a relatively cheap amd64 based system, and maxing out the ram. Then run something that handles ZFS.
The self healing feature is invaluable when it comes to making sure that you're not facing bit rot. Just set the thing to scrub on a periodic basis. It's not perfect and you still need to have something off site as back up, but it limits the damage to user error and major disaster. And theft.
Nice thing is that it's still probably cheaper than getting a drobo.
Why wouldn't they? Nobody in their right mind would allow the top two businesses in a market merge, which is justification in and of itself to break up Google. Sometimes a company being large enough is in and of itself an undo burden on trade.
As for Apple, it doesn't matter whether or not they're DRMed, the fact is that the format they use is nonstandard and represents a barrier to other manufacturers competing with them.
There's obviously more two it in both directions, but it's not exactly hard to see why they should be scrutinized.
Not if you've flashed the firmware with something that doesn't know the right numbers. Yes they pretty much all do, which irritates me. It means that I can receive spam messages.
I for one laud the move, assuming they actually do it rather than say that they're going to do it.
But to be fair, when the government said that they were too big to fail, they were implying that they'd do something about the credit default swaps. To this day, I don't believe anybody has actually addressed those in any sort of direct way.
We could have bailed out all of the mortgage problems for around 3-4 trillion whereas the real problem was many times larger than that due to companies buying insurance on bonds they hadn't bought.
Unlikely, the bomb squad, contrary to popular opinion, doesn't blow things up at random. They'd check it out with mirrors before even considering blowing it up. Then being professionals they'd notice that the device doesn't have any explosives attached nor any wires to hidden explosives. The only time they ever blow things up in that manner is if it's a small item that can be isolated and that they are unable to confirm is not an IED. Pretty much any other case is just too risky to blow up.
The bomb squad is not going to blow up a random vehicle there's just way too much risk of catastrophic explosion to do so. By the time they checked it out to be sure that wasn't a risk, they'd know that it wasn't anything serious.
Right, which is why I suggested a license way back. People complained that I was being elitist, but come on. The only way that we're going to be able to cut down on the spamming, scamming and other cyber crimes is through making sure people are educated and towing the line.
It doesn't do me much good to behave responsibly when so many people are not doing so. Ultimately those people that have malware and virus infected computers cost me time and money.
No woman in her right mind would trust a guy to be on the pill.
I know that I wouldn't trust a woman to be on the pill, and she's the one that would ultimately get pregnant. Assuming that my science education isn't failing me.
Bottom line, you're going to be wearing a condom either way, but this would just reduce the risk of pregnancy by a couple more order's of magnitude.
It doesn't matter why a particular guy doesn't want the surgery it's his right to decline. It really doesn't matter if the line of reasoning is that the Tidy Bowl man told him that he couldn't get any more bing cherries if he did it, it's still his choice to not mutilate his body.
The other thing is that some people change their mind later on or are willing to put up with the inconveniences of protection.
But, the bottom line is that no matter how much women might object, the fact is that it is his body not hers, and if she wants that level of security she may have to have surgery.
This isn't any different than rape, it's the right of the person declining to do so for any reason or no reason, and one has to respect the decision right or wrong.
That's too big to fail, but SCO's too fail to bail.
Totally different.
Re:This will get you shot...
on
Tactical Camera
·
· Score: 1
It doesn't look even the slightest bit like a gun. Any policeman that shoots you for carrying that would have shot you anyways.
You'd have to set aside two very important principles of using a loaded weapon in order for that sort of mistake to be made. First you're not identifying you're target and second chances are you're not checking your backstop either.
Have you actually used any of the other engines lately? There is nothing special about Google at this point, when I switched over to Google years ago it did make a difference, but that was years ago and at this point there isn't any advantage to it.
Plus if you use Google you're encouraging the same sort of bad behavior that got MS into all that trouble.
That's a good point, we might also be able to figure out when the year of Linux is going to be and have something more reliable than netcraft to confirm things.
Slashdot Mirror
Pssh, real kids know that infinity plex is somewhat less than zero, having looped around.
Lazy damned Euros, not a hard working honest currency like the USD. Perhaps if they hadn't taken in all those worthless good for nothing Lyre, they wouldn't have any trouble paying for Intel's misdeeds.
Yes, but they did actually change it to be pronounce Urine us.
Umm, Pluto is eponymous. As long as they didn't try to trademark it, there's nothing wrong. The term being many centuries old would never have fallen under IP laws of the US or pretty much any other modern state.
They changed that name to end that stupid joke years ago. Now we call it you're in us.
No, that's not correct. You're confusing limitations on enforcement with conferring of rights. The owner is restricted to asking somebody to leave or having the police eject them except in certain cases. That does not grant people the right to violate the rules, it just means that the owner is limited in response to violations of policy.
That's not the same thing as a person having the same rights as they do in public. There are a great deal of things that a private business owner can prohibit on his private property which wouldn't apply to public spaces.
That's not realistic. The employees that are doing the work need a clear line of sight around them in order to keep an eye out for possible robbers. While a curtain would prevent people from seeing in, it would greatly increase the risk to them.
Additionally when you're talking about ATMs they have to be restocked with cash on a regular basis. You can't just wait for 2 hours to do it after hours or shut down the place of business.
I realize that people think it's cool to talk smack with respect to security officers, but realistically it's pretty much just jackassery.
Wrong, that's not a public place, that's a private place of business. Based upon the biased account on the sight, it looks a bit questionable as to whether he was being honest.
I walk by the Loomis guys at work frequently and I'd never pull a stunt like the writer did. For one thing if somebody were to later on mess with or rob the machine, guess who's going to be on the list of suspects.
Probably because NYCL is into civil law, not criminal law.
I've been considering getting a relatively cheap amd64 based system, and maxing out the ram. Then run something that handles ZFS.
The self healing feature is invaluable when it comes to making sure that you're not facing bit rot. Just set the thing to scrub on a periodic basis. It's not perfect and you still need to have something off site as back up, but it limits the damage to user error and major disaster. And theft.
Nice thing is that it's still probably cheaper than getting a drobo.
Why wouldn't they? Nobody in their right mind would allow the top two businesses in a market merge, which is justification in and of itself to break up Google. Sometimes a company being large enough is in and of itself an undo burden on trade.
As for Apple, it doesn't matter whether or not they're DRMed, the fact is that the format they use is nonstandard and represents a barrier to other manufacturers competing with them.
There's obviously more two it in both directions, but it's not exactly hard to see why they should be scrutinized.
Not if you've flashed the firmware with something that doesn't know the right numbers. Yes they pretty much all do, which irritates me. It means that I can receive spam messages.
I for one laud the move, assuming they actually do it rather than say that they're going to do it.
But to be fair, when the government said that they were too big to fail, they were implying that they'd do something about the credit default swaps. To this day, I don't believe anybody has actually addressed those in any sort of direct way.
We could have bailed out all of the mortgage problems for around 3-4 trillion whereas the real problem was many times larger than that due to companies buying insurance on bonds they hadn't bought.
We're playing it right now, didn't you notice the one up at the strip club? I think if you search the fountain at the mall you'll find a shot gun...
Unlikely, the bomb squad, contrary to popular opinion, doesn't blow things up at random. They'd check it out with mirrors before even considering blowing it up. Then being professionals they'd notice that the device doesn't have any explosives attached nor any wires to hidden explosives. The only time they ever blow things up in that manner is if it's a small item that can be isolated and that they are unable to confirm is not an IED. Pretty much any other case is just too risky to blow up.
The bomb squad is not going to blow up a random vehicle there's just way too much risk of catastrophic explosion to do so. By the time they checked it out to be sure that wasn't a risk, they'd know that it wasn't anything serious.
That's all well and good if you have SMS, but some of us didn't bother to set it up again after unlocking our cell phones.
Plus SMS costs money for many people and encouraging the phone companies to keep the price up is not good.
Hey don't badmouth Cretin, he was probably my favorite character on Red Dwarf.
Right, which is why I suggested a license way back. People complained that I was being elitist, but come on. The only way that we're going to be able to cut down on the spamming, scamming and other cyber crimes is through making sure people are educated and towing the line.
It doesn't do me much good to behave responsibly when so many people are not doing so. Ultimately those people that have malware and virus infected computers cost me time and money.
No woman in her right mind would trust a guy to be on the pill.
I know that I wouldn't trust a woman to be on the pill, and she's the one that would ultimately get pregnant. Assuming that my science education isn't failing me.
Bottom line, you're going to be wearing a condom either way, but this would just reduce the risk of pregnancy by a couple more order's of magnitude.
Nice trolling.
It doesn't matter why a particular guy doesn't want the surgery it's his right to decline. It really doesn't matter if the line of reasoning is that the Tidy Bowl man told him that he couldn't get any more bing cherries if he did it, it's still his choice to not mutilate his body.
The other thing is that some people change their mind later on or are willing to put up with the inconveniences of protection.
But, the bottom line is that no matter how much women might object, the fact is that it is his body not hers, and if she wants that level of security she may have to have surgery.
This isn't any different than rape, it's the right of the person declining to do so for any reason or no reason, and one has to respect the decision right or wrong.
That's too big to fail, but SCO's too fail to bail.
Totally different.
It doesn't look even the slightest bit like a gun. Any policeman that shoots you for carrying that would have shot you anyways.
You'd have to set aside two very important principles of using a loaded weapon in order for that sort of mistake to be made. First you're not identifying you're target and second chances are you're not checking your backstop either.
They told him that every time you use the competition they kill dumbledore with kittens.
Have you actually used any of the other engines lately? There is nothing special about Google at this point, when I switched over to Google years ago it did make a difference, but that was years ago and at this point there isn't any advantage to it.
Plus if you use Google you're encouraging the same sort of bad behavior that got MS into all that trouble.
That's a good point, we might also be able to figure out when the year of Linux is going to be and have something more reliable than netcraft to confirm things.