Slashdot Mirror


How To Store Internal Hard Drives?

mike writes "I have been ripping all my movies and TV shows for easy viewing through a media PC. Because I would rather not rip everything again I'm looking for a simple backup solution. I'm considering a hard drive dock and several internal hard drives to use as 'disks' to back things up every once in a while but I don't know what the best way to store internal drives would be in the meantime. Could they sit together in any empty box and be OK, or would a number of externals be worth the slightly higher cost with fewer worries about storing them in the meantime?"

393 comments

  1. Take your pick by TechForensics · · Score: 1

    Both methods have pros and cons. Which appeals to you and your budget more? Choose that one. Any clean, dry, vibration-free storage is good for removed internal drives.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    1. Re:Take your pick by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Any clean, dry, vibration-free storage is good for removed internal drives.

      Yeah, they come in a nice box with antistatic bag and desiccant... what's wrong with that? Certainly the manufacturer likes this setup.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Take your pick by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Informative

      And use one of these to plug them in when needed.

      Any solution that has the drives unpowered is preferable - no point in spinning a drive 24/7 when it's used for backup 5 minutes a week.

    3. Re:Take your pick by rackserverdeals · · Score: 5, Informative

      Newegg has Hard Drive Protectors http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817990010

      I've just stored drives in anti-static bags for some of my test systems when I upgrade drives and want to keep the old drives for messing around with. Haven't run into any problems.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    4. Re:Take your pick by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You could attach a metal handle and call them 'wedges' a la Dollhouse.

      The scene where he 'saves' the wedge from calling, they show the back of the drive and they're SATA. Hehe.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like those docks, but I'm afraid I'll fry the electronics on the bottom of the disk with static electricity. Why don't they make cartridge-like enclosures (ju to use with these things ?

    6. Re:Take your pick by Chief+Camel+Breeder · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have contacts at the European Southern Observatory where the security copy of their archive is on disconnected hard-drives. Based on in-house tests, they reckon that the drives last very well provided that they are spun up at least once per year. If they are left unpowered for longer than that they tend to die.

    7. Re:Take your pick by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I think the "wedge" refers to the slice of the brain contained on it and not the hard drive itself. The metal handle is there because they are hot swappable and the handle folds over to lock it in their cradle (think backplane). When they fist started talking about the wedges, they mentioned that they data blocks containing a slice of someone's life up to the time it was made.

      It's like using a windows XP box as a file server. It isn't really a server but if that's its only rule, you generally call the workstation a server even though the system is not set up like a server or running a server OS.

    8. Re:Take your pick by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      When I saw that scene, I thought "Shenanigans!". I wouldn't trust my brain contents to be stored on a single drive with no RAID. =)

    9. Re:Take your pick by linear+a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't forget to migrate to a new (set of) drives every 5 years or so. Drives get bigger and in my experience you can collapse 4-5 into 1 after that period. This assumes you end up with lots of drives. This also refreshes your copies of the data. Sidebar - watch out for your O/S silently converting long file names to 8.3 filenames if your filepathnames are too long (esp. if you lengthen the filepathname somehow).

    10. Re:Take your pick by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i spent a bit looking for a good solution to a similar problem and while testing and revwing different sata docking stations

      http://www.thermaltakeusa.com/Products.aspx?C=1346

      came out to be over all the most reliable dock i've found

      the one from think geek was annoyingly flaky

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    11. Re:Take your pick by BESTouff · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Don't use USB to connect your HD. It's way too error-prone.

    12. Re:Take your pick by Amouth · · Score: 1

      thank you for that link.. i have been looking for something exactly like that for a couple days now.. with zero luck.

      i was about to place and order from newegg anyways..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    13. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't trust my brain contents to be stored on a single drive with no RAID. =)

      Hmm. I think that's what I have built in, so to speak... ;-)

    14. Re:Take your pick by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      And use one of these [thinkgeek.com] to plug them in when needed.

      Look at that! I've got so many 20-100 gigabyte hardrives laying around here that I use them as paperweights. This could be very useful...

      Thank you, sunderland56.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:Take your pick by kms_one · · Score: 1

      Really! It's driving me crazy. They also don't have off-site backups! What the hell. Entire lives on those fucking disks and you kept the backups in the same room!

    16. Re:Take your pick by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      When I saw that scene, I thought "Shenanigans!"

      Did the fact that it's science fiction give it away?

      Maybe you could get a job looking out the window and letting us know when the sun is shining.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    17. Re:Take your pick by lefiz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use internal drives like this as backups for my server at work. After I run the backup, I put the drives back into the antistatic bag and store them in a safe deposit box in the vault at my bank. I have a piece of foam in the box so the drives don't sit directly on the metal box. The box costs ~$100 a year, and is a dry, safe, secure, off-premise storage location.

    18. Re:Take your pick by zerocool6900 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually "wedges" was coined in the book Mother of Storms by John Barnes to refer to people's extracted memories.

      --
      Some people never learn...no matter how many times something happens to them.
    19. Re:Take your pick by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

          For old drives that I pulled from servers, I just stuck them in a cardboard box on the floor of my office. When I needed an old small drive for something, I'd pull it from the box. :) I wasn't confident in wiping them to sell or dispose of, so staying in my control was safer. Hey, they were old, they weren't worth anything to sell anyways.

          Except for the drives that already had stickers that said "bad sectors" or "clicks", they usually worked years later.

          The static bag and desiccant isn't a bad idea, but it's not always necessary. Now, if they were in a very dry static or high humidity environment, I'd definitely want them stored that way.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    20. Re:Take your pick by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because clearly, I'm the only person who points these things out. Hard drive or not, it's a little far-fetched that if you're a huge evil organization storing copies of people's brains, you're not keeping backups somewhere, or you're using small, easily damaged media where horrible things happen if it's destroyed. I can suspend disbelief for scifi, but not common sense.

    21. Re:Take your pick by TurboNed · · Score: 3, Funny

      And you know that there are no backups somewhere how?

      They image someone's "mental state" onto a drive and obviously there's no backup at that moment, but then he files it into the library or whatever and then backups are made.

      I know this is what happens because I just made it up.

    22. Re:Take your pick by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the "wedge" refers to the slice of the brain contained on it and not the hard drive itself.

      As with other things, the nomenclature shifts such that the device is referred to by its content or function. For all intents and purposes, if the drive only contains the wedge, the drive becomes the wedge made manifest.

      Compare how you tell someone to "put in the movie" without regard to the medium on which it is stored (VHS tape, DVD) or the player (VCR, PS3). The storage material is immaterial; only the material stored upon it matters in casual parlance.

      There's also how we hold on to some obsolete terms such as "dialing a phone" even when it is done on a keypad instead of a spinning rotary dial (even in science fiction, you have the DHD (Dial Home Device) which only ever spun rotary style on the animated Stargate Infinity). And though "don't touch that remote" has largely supplanted "don't touch that dial" for TVs, we still talk about "rewinding" video even when there is no spool of tape to be rewound, and probably will for a very long time to come.

      The terms were coined in reference to the mechanism, but they stick around because it was never about the mechanism, only the effect.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    23. Re:Take your pick by RandoX · · Score: 1

      I have one of these:

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812161002 ...works very well for a number of disk interfaces. Good luck.

    24. Re:Take your pick by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Any clean, dry, vibration-free storage is good for removed internal drives.

      Yeah, they come in a nice box with antistatic bag and desiccant... what's wrong with that? Certainly the manufacturer likes this setup.

      Yeah, that should be good enough. The three things that are going to kill a drive are:
      1) Physical damage. Keep them in a box in a safe place where they won't be dropped or crushed.
      2) Static electricity. Especially with exposed components, and the possibility of hundreds of volts of static between two points in a room, keep it in a anti-static bag.
      3) Humidity. No brainer, just keep a dessicant in there for long periods of storage.
      As others have stated, simply running the drives occasionally will prevent the internals from having issues. As far as environmental issues, though, these should be the only three things you need to watch for in storage.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    25. Re:Take your pick by dredwolff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, if you're going to store them for a long time (years) without running them, you'll probably need to keep them cold.

      I hear (from someone that kept HD's on a shelf for years) that the oil will run out of the bearings if the drives are left sitting for years, causing the platters to freeze up when they were turned on.

      Admittedly, this is old information, and who knows what the new drives do (maybe they have better seals?) and I'm not even sure that keeping them cold will help, spinning up the platters for 15 minutes once a week might work too.

    26. Re:Take your pick by ajlitt · · Score: 2, Funny

      [citation needed]

    27. Re:Take your pick by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      They used to. My guess is the "cartridge" form factor gave people the mistaken impression that they were very portable, so you had lots of bouncing hard drives going TU...

    28. Re:Take your pick by cigawoot · · Score: 1

      Looks like a toaster!

    29. Re:Take your pick by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      not to mention the fact that backups are explicitly referenced in at least two episodes. Heck, that was a major plot point of the 2 part season finale. For one of the characters, the primary was destroyed, and the backup was stolen. Now, it would make sense to have offsite backups, and I would imagine that they do, but for purposes of the plot, it is not much of a stretch for them to need it right away.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    30. Re:Take your pick by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      There are just as many old references in cars.

      The funniest obsolete reference is the 'roll down your car window' hand signal. I don't think they've manufactured any car with manual windows in the last decade. I can just imagine young kids wondering why adults thinks circular hand motions have anything to do with car windows. (Perhaps you want them to clean it?)

      I actually wonder how long the direction will be preserved. Strictly speaking, it's 'the top moves towards the front of the car' for 'down', and the opposite for 'up', which means it's sometimes clockwise and sometimes counterclockwise, depending on where the person making the motion is. I suspect that people who grow up without window cranks will fail to grasp this distinction.

      Or maybe even the phrase itself. Maybe someday people will wonder if car windows ever 'rolled down', presumably like posters and wires get 'rolled up', and like the plastic windows on some Jeeps actually do, and why we stopped using such amazing glass that could bend like that.

      Actually, the funniest phrase is probably 'crank your car'. Yeah, I'll just go and use the crank on my car, which was apparently build 80 years ago, before electric starters.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    31. Re:Take your pick by dem0n1 · · Score: 1

      If you are truly evil, of course you don't make backups. You tell some henchmen to recreate the data and add "You've already done it once, a second time should be easier."

      --
      Why save your soul when you can sell it for a profit?
    32. Re:Take your pick by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "There's also how we hold on to some obsolete terms such as "dialing a phone" even when it is done on a keypad instead of a spinning rotary dial (even in science fiction, you have the DHD (Dial Home Device) which only ever spun rotary style on the animated Stargate Infinity). And though "don't touch that remote" has largely supplanted "don't touch that dial" for TVs, we still talk about "rewinding" video even when there is no spool of tape to be rewound, and probably will for a very long time to come."

      Yep, and artists still put out "albums".

      Ok, I know that they are putting out some vinyl again these days, and I'm glad, but, not that many people know anything but CD's, and now whatever they get online.

      *sigh*, I'm getting older, I used to take pride that I used to could have someone name a Led Zeppelin song, and I could quickly tell you which album, which side and track number.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re:Take your pick by aaandre · · Score: 1

      The NexStar appears to have bad reviews on newegg...

      This one is better.

    34. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to migrate to a new (set of) drives every 5 years or so. Drives get bigger and in my experience you can collapse 4-5 into 1 after that period. This assumes you end up with lots of drives. This also refreshes your copies of the data.

      Except that if you move multiple drives onto one, then if that new one goes, you lose more stuff at once. Instead of doing (say) 4:1, do 4:1 and replicate that 1 again (in essence 2:1). That cloned copy would also be stored in a different location.

      The most important thing to keep in mind is to have multiple, independent(-ish) copies of the data.

    35. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    36. Re:Take your pick by Natetheinfamous · · Score: 1

      I remember the first time my parents got a car with automatic windows... confused the heck out of me for weeks when I would reach for the crank and it wasn't there! Sadly, my children will probably never get to experience the same pleasure.

      --
      "To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk." - Thomas A. Edison
    37. Re:Take your pick by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      3 years ago I know for sure that you could get a chevy aveo with roll down windows (probably still can) and I would guess that cars for less wealthy markets still have features like this.

      Ultra paranoid people like them as well since you can open them under water...

      --
      Bottles.
    38. Re:Take your pick by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I know the name would work a bit against sales, but that should have been called a DriveToaster.

    39. Re:Take your pick by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      No, they'll wonder what the hell a steering wheel is as they hook up their 2029 Prius to their brain interface.

    40. Re:Take your pick by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Ive got a 2002 Nissan Sentra with roll down windows, stick shift and a cassette player!

      --
      Good-bye
    41. Re:Take your pick by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I have the Thermaltake BlackX version of that, works great.

      --
      Good-bye
    42. Re:Take your pick by Bandman · · Score: 1

      I was thinking "Man, Tofer needs to learn about offsite backups"

    43. Re:Take your pick by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Would make a kick ass product placement ad for Amazon S3: "Good enough for someone's brain, good enough for your data"

    44. Re:Take your pick by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Ultra paranoid people like them as well since you can open them under water...

      Interestingly, my grandmother made me wire then to a hot switch so they could be operated with the keys off. She was so afraid of going somewhere and waiting in the car and not being able to role the windows up if someone scary or less then respectable people started hanging around.

      I wouldn't call her ultra paranoid or crazy or anything but as a teen, her and her mom (my great grandmother) got mugged in Chicago Ill. That sort of shaped how she viewed everything as to her own protection. She pretty much already did what they tell the girls in those self defense classes and being able to put a windows up between her and a potential attacker (even if there was no threat) was one thing she insisted on.

      Anyway, I don't think she was/is alone in thinking like that. Perhaps you should add that situation to your ultra paranoid list.

    45. Re:Take your pick by djnewman · · Score: 1

      Absolutely change the drives every few years and not just to reduce the number of drives. As the drives age they will deteriorate - running or not. I had 10, 250GB and 320GB drives online with ripped movies. I left them running all the time. When I recently could not access one drive, I dumped them all into a 1.5TB RAID system. Now all of the "eggs" are in one basket, and I'm searching for a time and cost effective backup system.

    46. Re:Take your pick by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      An "album" is a collection of smaller works. Consider "photo album" (some of which are now online and only virtual), in some cases other types of media are referred to as "albums" when in groups, "album of butterflies" (dead and pressed) for example.

      So, no, "album" does not refer to only vinyl records. Only ignorant ass band members think that and started calling it a "tape" or "CD".

      That said, "rewind" is sort of funny but makes as much sense as "backtrack" or "back up", both of which refer to physical displacement not a time in a video or audio track.

    47. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should of opted for the 8-track Ãz

    48. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not newer SATA though, it still had the older 4 pin power next to the newer SATA power. Store your mind on a 60gig disk/wedge?!?

    49. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there are backups. They have referred to them in the show...on several occasions. Also, common sense is often set aside so that the plot may be advanced.

    50. Re:Take your pick by treeves · · Score: 1

      "...with antistatic bag and desiccant"

      Kind of funny, if they left out the desiccant, so the humidity were higher, it seems you could do away the anti-static bag. (I know, I know...moisture could cause corrosion to metals as well as dissipate static electricity)
      Reminds me of the Steven Wright bit about buying a humidifier and a dehumidifier and putting them together in a room and letting them fight it out.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    51. Re:Take your pick by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      Although the concept of an 'album' is dying as people tend to pick and choose which tracks to buy via iTunes / other online source of compressed music of their choice. I always make a point of buying an album rather than the individual track I've heard on the radio (unless I'm completely skint) because I usually find something I like. I've tried to explain this to friends who are a few years younger than me and they just don't get it - why would you want to pay for a track other than the specific one you've heard and liked? I've also tried to explain that lots of bands/artists try to make their albums a musical 'journey' so that ideas and moods flow from one song to another, but again this doesn't seem to be a common idea anymore.

    52. Re:Take your pick by cblack · · Score: 1

      Most recent episode talked about how Alpha came in and destroyed both their main storage and backups for some imprints. Which made me exclaim "they have offsite backups, right?". Apparently, they do not.

    53. Re:Take your pick by dotgain · · Score: 1

      And I've got 1997 Nissan Primera with dead-pixels.

    54. Re:Take your pick by dotgain · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why the windows can't normally be wound even when the key is off. I just can't see why you'd want to prevent that, surely if an occupant wants a window to move that should be able to happen regardless of the 'mode' of the car, any ideas why?

    55. Re:Take your pick by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't give you a Wiki style citation, but once upon a time the kernel included the warning (google it) "USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured" (not wanting to put too fine a point on it, I mean it's only data integrity we're talking here). A grep ran on the lastest tree a few minutes ago suggests it's been taken out, but I've a feeling it's only the warning that's gone. I've been bitten more than enough times by USB mass storage in Linux.

    56. Re:Take your pick by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The only thing I can guess would be so that it's harder to open the door from the outside without damaging anything. But most people who would be breaking into a car would either already know that there is a rod that goes from the key lock to the lock itself and the locking indicator in top of the door panel and they would likely go for that first. Well, that or they would just smash the window out.

      Maybe they are thinking that water could get into it and short it out causing the windows to open during a rain storm of something. I had one electric window that wouldn't go up or down if it rained more then an inch. It turned out to be something in the motor that was bad and the weather stripping around the windows was old and cracked.

      Truthfully, I don't know. Those are two guesses I have come up with after thinking about it myself. I'm sure people can come up with more reasons to why but I'm not sure we would ever know exactly why.

    57. Re:Take your pick by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      According to one of the mass storage maintainers, the message was to inform users that the kernel sometimes got angry if you hot-unplugged USB devices. It had nothing to do with integrity of data written to a disk.

      Besides, you should be verifying your backup media after you write to it. md5sums is your pal.

    58. Re:Take your pick by j303045 · · Score: 1

      I bought a 2002 Toyata Tacoma pickup truck primarily because I could get the "features" I wanted -- manual (crank) windows, no power door locks, five speed stick, no cruise control, rear wheel drive. I would have liked a carburetor and mechanical ignition as well, but that was the best I could do. Bias ply tires were also not an option.

    59. Re:Take your pick by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Hell, i actually search for manual windows when looking for new vehicles. (you can still get em from the manufacturer, you just have to special order the whole car to get em.)

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    60. Re:Take your pick by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      You can open a glass window underwater too, you just need to push a little harder when you try to roll it down.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    61. Re:Take your pick by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      The only time i've ever heard of cranking someone's car involved a lot of frozen shaving cream and several anatomically correct dildos.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    62. Re:Take your pick by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Ultra-stupid, you mean. By the time the power window motor would fail, the car will be full of water and you could just open the door to get out. Until the car is full of water (assuming there's water outside the window), you won't be opening it by any means other than breaking it.

      Virg

    63. Re:Take your pick by TurboNed · · Score: 1

      This is the part where I regret discussing a TV series where I haven't yet watched the Season Finale. . .

    64. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hard disk toaster! Now where's the *D burning equivalent?

    65. Re:Take your pick by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      In other words, like most IT organizations, they have recovery backups and archival backups.

      Which, however, doesn't explain the panic when all of Echo's backups were destroyed. If they had archivals, they wouldn't care.

      So they really didn't have offsite backup - which is really stupid. Especially since they have twenty Dollhouses all over the world and the easy solution would be for each Dollhouse to hold backups of one or more of the other Dollhouses.

      Not that it matters now - the show has such bad ratings that it has zero chance of being renewed for a second season. Bye-bye all those hot girls every week! Too bad.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    66. Re:Take your pick by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Should of opted for the 8-track Ãfz

      Should've opted for the UTF-8 Slashdot.

      By the way—not that you'll read this—it's should have or should've, not should of.

      --
      No existe.
    67. Re:Take your pick by babyrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ultra paranoids should watch the mythbusters episode where the water pressure prevented the manual windows from rolling down.

      Curiously enough, they submerged a battery and a door and the power windows still worked underwater.

      http://mythbustersresults.com/episode72

    68. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some OSs can spin down inactive drives. The backup drive in my Linux box powers down after 3 mins of inactivity, using hdparm.

    69. Re:Take your pick by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      [1]

    70. Re:Take your pick by berberine · · Score: 1

      Is there any chance that they make something like this for ide/pata drives? Yeah, I'm old, but I've got about 10 drives like that and each one has 75-160 GB on them. They're a real pain to swap out all the time on the 5 external enclosures that I have.

    71. Re:Take your pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you unpack them from that clean, dry, vibration-free, anti-static, dessicated shipping container, and stick them in a hot, noisy case, blowing dust and humid air on them for several years straight...

    72. Re:Take your pick by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      The NexStar appears to have bad reviews on newegg...

      This one is better.

      the problem with most of these external boxes is they have size limits, and even though you may plug in a drive and appear to be able to read and write it it doesn't work for long reliably

      to paraphrase "know your limits"

      I would really like one of these that mounts into the pc box

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    73. Re:Take your pick by dotgain · · Score: 1

      I'm not in the habit of verifying ordinary HDD writes (on the assumption that's all taken care of), shouldn't a disk behind a USB storage layer be similarly be verified?

    74. Re:Take your pick by colourmyeyes · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of quality OT comment I love slashdot for.

      Not sarcasm, either. It brings to mind my example of being a member of the last generation to use a physical card catalog.

      --
      My grandmother used anecdotal evidence all the time, and she lived to be 120 years old.
    75. Re:Take your pick by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. To me it seems like the convenience of electric windows is marginal. And more complexity tends me mean a lower MTBF. OK I don't object to electric windows per se, but they are a symptom of adding more features without much concern for the fact that each new feature decreases reliabilty.

      If some company like Tata ends up taking over it will mostly be because they have a more ruthless approach to keeping things simple. Euro, American and Japanese car manufacturers have definitely lost this skill in the quest to compete on feature sets.

      It's not just cars too. There's a Microsoft produced spoof of if Microsoft made the iPod. They start off with a plain white box and then add "minimum system version", and a load of increasingly useless detail about what features the device has. The implication is that 99% of users don't care about this stuff - the only people that care are the marketting department of the company that made it. Apple is one of the few companies that get this and that's why they ended up owning the market for MP3 players.

      Actually the best way to make a breakout product is to avoid a design cluttered by feature that most people don't care about. Keep it simple and user friendly and you're good to go. I'd say cheap too, but Apple shows you can charge a premium for this sort of design.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    76. Re:Take your pick by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Car use case 67890 - Dog punishment.

      If Rover chews your stuff again or craps on the carpet he will be left in the car on a hot day. And he knows how to operate the electric windows but he's not able to hotwire the car.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    77. Re:Take your pick by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      A cost effective backup system? Why not another 1.5Tb (offline) RAID array? 2x eSATA enclosures @ $20 each (or one of these: http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/usb-gadgets/a7ea/) and a couple 1.5Tb disks, and use them a raid1 array.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    78. Re:Take your pick by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've always just kept them in the anti-static bags. Or on my desk in the open. Or maybe under some papers, or in a stack with sharpie labels in the corner.

      I don't doubt that a drive could probably die from mistreatment. But I've never seen or heard of a drive failing from ESD, and I've never dropped one (that wasn't spinning) and had it fail subsequently.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    79. Re:Take your pick by JimFive · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why the windows can't normally be wound even when the key is off

      Because if you keep your car window cracked open to prevent it from getting 400 degrees inside then anyone with a long stick would be able to open the window and get into your car.

      I've noticed that some cars allow the window to roll up but not down with the key out.

      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    80. Re:Take your pick by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why can't they just ship the drive in a bag of water? :)

      "I lost a button-hole."

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    81. Re:Take your pick by PeekabooCaribou · · Score: 1

      I've got the eSATA/USB one sitting on the shelf next to my desk. Wish I had a hard drive to drop in. >_<

      --
      "I'll say it again for the logic-impaired." -- Larry Wall.
    82. Re:Take your pick by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i use it to move large backup files between servers and archive.. works wonders

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    83. Re:Take your pick by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      Rip off. $78 to plug in a whole (2) internal drives. You are much better off buying external USB, or simply spending the 5 minutes shutting down, plugging in and powering back up. This is for extremely lazy people, but even then, I'll take the extra internal hard drive over the price of this "convenience".

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    84. Re:Take your pick by Chuq · · Score: 1

      Apple is one of the few companies that get this and that's why they ended up owning the market for MP3 players.

      Yeah. I'm pretty sure everyone got iPods because of the box.

      --
      - Chuq
    85. Re:Take your pick by dotgain · · Score: 1

      If they could manipulate the window switch then couldn't they just unlock the door anyway? (in my car it seems no harder to operate the unlocker than the window switch). Sorry, I don't buy it. As for up, but not down? That's sounds like a nasty and very undesirable malfunction to me, and I can't imagine any manufacturer would employ this as a standard mode of operation from the factory.

  2. Why not store them Internally? by n0dna · · Score: 0

    I got nothin.

    1. Re:Why not store them Internally? by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Me neither. Mainly because the OP's question doesn't make any sense. Consider his opening sentence: "I have been ripping all my movies and TV shows for easy viewing through a media PC"

      If that's true, then he already has backups. He has the original DVDs. Those are his backups if the PC HDD dies. That's how I operate, storing-away my DVDs in a safe secure place, and the only time I backup my TV shows is when I've stolen.....er, downloaded them off the net. Otherwise the original DVDs are my primary backup.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Why not store them Internally? by TurboNed · · Score: 1

      For a couple hundred bucks, you can have enough storage to save all the ripped movies again, thus saving you the time and trouble (non-trivial amounts of both) of ripping them again if your primary storage device fails.

      Do you really place no value on your time?

    3. Re:Why not store them Internally? by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

      I've thought about whether or not to try and backup my rips of DVD's and ultimately decided against it. I figure that ripping doesn't take much time now, and it'll probably take even less time in the future as computers and drives get faster. Besides, I'll probably want to re-rip them at a higher quality setting in the future anyway when I finally get an HDTV.

      That being said, I DO think it's a good idea to back up the CD rips I've done. If only because i have so damn many of them. My wife easily ownes 20-30 CD's for every DVD we own. Ripping an individual CD takes an infinitesimal amount of time compared to a DVD, but you have to babysit the machine, swaping out disks if you want it to continue.

      With DVD's you can set it to rip and come back half an hour later to put in a new disk, with handbrake encoding previous rips the whole time.

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:Why not store them Internally? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "If that's true, then he already has backups. He has the original DVDs. "

      Not necessarily, he might be backing them up for Netflix, and sending them back.

      :)

      Who knows...they 'may' need a copy back some day.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Why not store them Internally? by Zero_DgZ · · Score: 1

      Or he may know like the rest of us preservationist nerds that even pressed optical disks are prone to having their data layers oxidize and become unreadable in 10-15 years. I already have old Playstation 1 games that are stored properly but are still flat out unreadable because the data layers have expired.

      Due to the way the plastic layers are sandwiched together, DVD's are even more prone to this than CD's are. Unless you store your disks in a vacuum in the dark they're not an archival medium unless you're regularly copying the data to new disks or a different medium anyway... just as you'd have to do with hard drives.

    6. Re:Why not store them Internally? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Do you really place no value on your time?

      No. I'm unemployed, so my current value's somewhere around $0/hour. ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Why not store them Internally? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Wow. I'd better sell my PS1 discs before they become worthless. Cash in the bank doesn't deteriorate.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:Why not store them Internally? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      If that's true, then he already has backups. He has the original DVDs. Those are his backups if the PC HDD dies.

      He knows that. He specifically said he wants to avoid ripping all his media again.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    9. Re:Why not store them Internally? by Zero_DgZ · · Score: 1

      Or buy a modchip. Backups can be burned any old time you like. CD-R's deteriorate faster than pressed CD's, but if you have your backup image on a more stable medium (or a regularly refreshed one) it only costs pennies to make a fresh, working disk.

      The kicker is, I found out that the first disk in my collection to die this way was disk TWO of Final Fantasy 8. It would have made my life a lot easier if disk one failed first.

      Note that this is important for those using burnable CD and DVD media for archival purposes. Typical burned CD-R disks, like the ones likely filled with millions of peoples' irreplaceable digital photos, routinely fail to last more than two years in storage. Many, many disks last longer but certainly enough fail in this time frame or before to make it a big issue. Data burned to CD-R and DVD-R (or whatever format of the week) should be read off and burned to new media regularly.

  3. Safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A fireproof/waterproof safe is good for that and a number of other items as well. Just make sure to also keep some moisture control in there as well (silica gel etc.). I would also keep them in an esd bag.

  4. At the very least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You should store them in the plastic containers they came in: http://www.ixbt.com/storage/scsi2005/roundup/fujitsu-pack.jpg These plastic boxes are anti-static and the bumps provide a modicum of shock absorbance. You might also want to add a (fresh) silica pack to prevent moisture from building up.

    1. Re:At the very least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, that server uses hotlinking protection. Copy-paste the url.

    2. Re:At the very least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just go to the location bar and hit return in those situations. Reload would likely work too.

      Thing is, not all drives come with those. Can they be ordered in bulk? Preferably from a site where I don't need to read Cyrillic to order?

      Actually, those have a lip around the perimeter of the drive which would make it hard to store them vertically (I would not want to stack drives on top of each other without off-loading the support from the drives below. I find some DVD storage racks work well for holding hard drives (Atlantic's Penguin and Elf work for me), and the sides of drives make for good labeling opportunities (as does the nose for installed drives or other nose-front storage).

    3. Re:At the very least... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      the bumps provide a modicum of shock absorbance.

      Ideal for when your HD storage cupboard doubles as a tumble dryer.

    4. Re:At the very least... by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      I have a BlacX Sata dock and a few disks for backup etc, so I love these things. However, I have only 2 and none of the dozen disks I have bought the last year or so has come into one, and I haven't seen them sold anywhere... If anyone knows where we can get some of these... The silicone protectors that are sold in newegg etc are not the same thing, they don't cover the entire disk for storage.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    5. Re:At the very least... by argorg · · Score: 1

      You can heat the silica gel packs to dry them out again and repeatedly reuse them.

    6. Re:At the very least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same question... anyone know where to buy these hard-drive shaped plastic boxes?

    7. Re:At the very least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies and Gentlemen: I present to you, one of the only real Slashdot postings this year! w00t!

  5. Easy solution by nhtshot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Buy a cheap used box from a local shop.

    You can get P4 class boxes for around $100.

    Stuff it full of drives, set up software raid and keep everything there.

    In addition to providing a nice place to store backups, you can also use it for primary storage. I assume since you're ripping video that this is an HT-PC.

    I prefer not to have a bunch of loud HDD's in my HT-PC. Put that crap in a closet.

    1. Re:Easy solution by yincrash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      make sure your closet doesn't overheat.

    2. Re:Easy solution by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Informative

      +1 - relatively cheap (just paid $350 for 3 1tb drives and a sata controller for a 2tb raid-5 array) and easy to do.

      Just remember to use a redundant raid - remember the 0 in raid-0 indicates how much data you'll still have if you suffer a failure

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:Easy solution by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      While that certainly is a feasible solution, I'd rather get a proper NAS from Qnap or Synology instead. They do all the work for you and offer lots of additional benefits, staying cool and being reliable among the most important ones. Not to mention iSCSI, uPNP and advanced RAID and SMART configurations that let you know when (or before) something's wrong with your disks.

    4. Re:Easy solution by cuby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Low reliability end energy inefficient. A P4 burns more or less 60w in idle. A drive easily use 15w. If the power supply has an 50% efficiency... that is perfectly normal for old cases. If you have 3 disks you use (60+3*15)*1.5= 157.5 w. Add more 20w to motherboard, memory and stuff and you get almost 180W in idle. This is a LOT after one year.

      If you are not still convinced. Try to imagine how to recover the raid array after one disk dies... Search the net and you'll find a lot of people that was unable to recover arrays because they used cheap hardware.

      Because of this I discarded NAS and similar solutions. I have external hard drives and I plug them as I need using USB. Put them away from kids, sun and humidity and they will be fine.

      --
      Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
    5. Re:Easy solution by nhtshot · · Score: 1

      Granted, this isn't pertinent to the OP...

      But, they're also SLOW. I've never found a NAS box that could even come close to a even a P4 running linux.

      Use a faster box with multiple SATA channels on PCI-E cards and we're talking real performance.

      I'm loathe to even think about how iSCSI would work off a cheap NAS box. I don't think I'd want to try it.

    6. Re:Easy solution by nhtshot · · Score: 1

      It's only energy inefficient when it's on...

      Because of this I discarded NAS and similar solutions.I have external hard drives and I plug them as I need using USB. Put them away from kids, sun and humidity and they will be fine.

      And what happens to you in a drive failure? Instead of even having the option to recover your data, you just automatically loose it.

      For the record, I've recovered lots of HW and SW raids over the years. It's been a pain in the ass a few times, but I've yet to loose data.

      Those of you that backup to single external drives can't say that, or will soon not be able to say that once one of them fails.

      I'd rather have to fight a recovery procedure then automatically know I'm going to loose data.

    7. Re:Easy solution by durval · · Score: 2, Funny

      make sure your closet doesn't overheat.

      Nope. An unpowered hard-drive has MUCH greater tolerance to temperature than a powered one. Unless you are planning on keeping them powered up in your closet, that is... :-)

      --
      Best Regards,
      Durval Menezes.
      I have never met a computer that didn't like me.
    8. Re:Easy solution by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

      But the real question is "Did you lose any data"??? I am getting better about letting the confusion of "lose" vs. "loose" slide. When I see it three times in a single post, I had to say something.

    9. Re:Easy solution by shayne321 · · Score: 0

      Just so it's pointed out: RAID != Backup

      RAID allows you to get your data back online quickly after a drive failure, and/or allows you to present multiple drives as one storage container. That is ALL. RAID does NOT protect you from:

      * Viruses running wild on the network deleting data
      * Executing "rm -rf *" in the wrong directory (and other sysadmin mistakes, like getting the arguments mixed up in a cp or mv command)
      * Your house/office from burning down and taking your data with it (maybe not a big deal for movies, but definitely a big deal for digital photos)
      * Losing all of your data when a pipe bursts in the ceiling above the server
      * Losing all of your data when the power supply shorts and sends 110v to all your drives (this actually happened to a friend of mine)
      * Losing some or all data due to a bug in the RAID controller firmware or a bug in the software implementation of RAID

      Etc, etc. I could think of 1000 examples, but those are a few. I don't have the right answer for the original question, but RAID is never an appropriate answer to backup (unless you're talking about replicating from an onsite RAID array to an offsite RAID array, but that's a whole other discussion).

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    10. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true that most commercial NAS boxes are slow, but it's not as bad as you might imagine for regular use.

      Large-scale backups and transfers are a really big pain, but realistically, there are very few situations where you transfer more than a few gigs.

      My NAS (Buffalo Terastation Live) can do around 80mbps after overhead using a Gigabit connection, and that will get me a gig to any machine on my network (inc 802.11n) in just over a minute and a half.

      All video I ever play (files and DVDs that I ISO from my collection) take far longer to play than to transfer, so I just play them directly, and the DVD masters and video that I generate for work still transfer faster than my machine can burn them.

      In the end, where do I actually need more speed?

      Besides, it's nice to have a single machine that is low power, stores everything, serves media as a uPNP server and my printers. I activated the SSH server from the stock firmware, and the Apache instance, and life is good :)

    11. Re:Easy solution by berashith · · Score: 5, Funny

      cool...
      after a failure in a RAID 0 , you have 0 copies of data.
      after a failure in a RAID 1 , you have 1 copy of your data

      no wonder RAID 50 is so good!!

    12. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'll have 5 of my data in a RAID-5 array? What if I absolutely have to have 6 or 7 of my data?

    13. Re:Easy solution by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My guess is that if the suggestion is to get a cheap used pc and stuff it full of drives, and raid them together, that the intention *is* for them to be powered on. Otherwise, why bother with the used machine? Just get a drive toaster as suggested elsewhere.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    14. Re:Easy solution by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Most people are talking about using a RAID on the backup, he would backup to a device which uses RAID. Personally I think this solution is overly complicated to the task asked about (backing up movies from a home system), but no one is suggesting that using a RAID alone will solve his problem.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    15. Re:Easy solution by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I use that exact setup to store projects in my music/video studio. The throughput is plenty good enough to stream samples to a digital audio workstation or video editing suite. Plus, it's a lot less expensive than some of the high-end pro video storage gear.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:Easy solution by Jaysu · · Score: 1

      "make sure your closet doesn't overheat"

      Yeah, 'cause then you might have to come out of it.

      --
      It has been said that 63% of all statistics are made up
    17. Re:Easy solution by dc29A · · Score: 1

      I use a DNS 323 from DLink in raid-1 mode, works like a charm. Disks are powered down when not used. Costs something like 160$ for the box. Stuff in 2 big hard drives and you are set. Even if the box fails, you can still remove drives and plug it into a linux box and recover the files.

    18. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 - relatively cheap (just paid $350 for 3 1tb drives and a sata controller for a 2tb raid-5 array) and easy to do.

      Just remember to use a redundant raid - remember the 0 in raid-0 indicates how much data you'll still have if you suffer a failure

      And remember - that you STILL need to find somewhere to back up 2TB of data to. RAID is NOT a replacement for backups. Controllers die, multiple drive failures are possible (though statistically unlikely), and with larger and larger drives - the bit rate error comes into play. With a 2TB array - you've got about a 1 in 50 shot that the array won't rebuild correctly due to bit rate error.

    19. Re:Easy solution by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      > If you are not still convinced. Try to imagine how to recover the raid array after one disk dies...
      > Search the net and you'll find a lot of people that was unable to recover arrays because they used cheap
      > hardware.

          I was amazed when it first happened to me. I was called to help someone with a cheap array. A single drive failure took the whole thing down. I followed the intuitive steps (pull the bad drive, put a new drive in it's place). The rebuild didn't start. I consulted the book. Then the manufacturers online documentation. And finally, we called the manufacturer. In going through the steps, they said "oh that was a bug on the firmware that shipped with the unit. Back up your data and upgrade the firmware. You'll need to wipe the array when you upgrade the firmware.

          They had backups, so it wasn't a big deal, but the idea of having a nice expensive RAID 5 is that you can survive through a single drive failure without losing anything.

          I've always made it a point to test failure scenarios. I love to bring an array up, get it really busy, and pull a drive out, just to see how it reacts. Usually putting the same drive back in, it's now out of sync, so it will rebuild.

          For anything that I have control over now, I use Linux MD devices. I had a drive failure, and through my own stupidity, I messed up. It's a machine with 6 internal drives on 2 2 port add-on controllers, plus the 2 ide ports onboard. I hadn't labeled any of them. I knew it was /dev/hdi that had failed. I mentally switched the controllers, so I replaced /dev/hde instead. Oops. Now we have a 2-drive failure of the array. Very not good.

          At this point, being that it was really late, I was tired, and I probably should have stopped working well before it got this far, I continued. :) I ended up switching a few cables, which just made it worse. Luckily through mdadm, you can find what drive belongs where, so I was able to straighten myself out over the next hour, and brought it up with 5 working drives of the array, plus one rebuilding. It took a few hours to rebuild, but it was functional. I just verified it was rebuilding, and went to sleep. In the morning, I checked in on it, and then couldn't figure out how I screwed up so badly. In many other arrays, they'll get really upset, and sometimes start attempting to rebuild over the good data, so you'd lose everything in a matter of seconds.

          So.. test your failure scenarios, and understand what the capabilites and faults are in your array before you discover that a single-drive failure of a RAID5 will actually take your array down. :) If you get a piece of crap, return it for a better unit, or just build yourself a nice little machine with a big power supply, and do it yourself with Linux MD devices.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    20. Re:Easy solution by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      Well, then it's time for you to take a closer look at this baby for example: http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=104

      It's plenty fast for most tasks and can utilize a Gigabit link up to 30% in a RAID6 setup.

      The older models (non-Pentium and non-Atom) really were slow. So slow in fact that one had to wonder why anybody would want to use anything other than JBOD, RAID0 or RAID1 on them. These new NAS boxes, however, have come a long way and are certainly suitable SMB/SOHO use.

    21. Re:Easy solution by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      When I see it three times in a single post, I had to say something.

      It's the Beetlejuice rule.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    22. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use raid in your separate backup drives, as was the apparent intent of the GP post, it's still a backup.

      The whole "raid isn't a replacement for backups" refers to people who run raided system disks INSTEAD of backing up on secondary media. But raiding that secondary media improves its durabilty and adding a secondary controller improves redundancy.

      It is probable that you understand this but I'm starting to run into young techs that actually misunderstand this point.

    23. Re:Easy solution by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "You can get P4 class boxes for around $100."

      Heck...you get get Dell P4's for like $30 or less on eBay pretty easily.

      I've been playing with the idea you had, stuffing them with drives. I wanted to raid them, but, had trouble because I needed the CD drive to boot the install disk from...so, just ended up making all the disks in the thing as LVM's...when install was done, replaced the CD rom with a last large HD. I figure I'll do that..and then just mirror with like 2 other boxes just like it maybe...?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    24. Re:Easy solution by Sandbags · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's actually far more important for the temperature to remain relatively constant (a 10F degree range or so) than it is to remain under a certain temp. your closet isn't going to get anywhere near 158 degrees, or more than 40 below zero... Even when spinning HDDs are acceptable up to quite uncomfortable for human temperatures! at idle the range increases quite a bit. However, a poorly insulared closet could fluctuate 30 degrees or more, and on a daily basis, that couold cause a lot of damage. Keeping your PC powered on helps maintain HDD life by keeping a slightly more contact temp (this used to be to avoid chip creap in the old days, but now it's about the PS and HDD).

      Also, 300G shocks are within the "normal" range for a non-spinning disk. Shock absorption is not a requirement unless you plan to ship it. I think it was Seagate who used to have a commercial where they froze a HDD in a block of ice, played hockey with it, then thawed it out and it worked...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    25. Re:Easy solution by greed · · Score: 1

      I've done the pull-a-drive-out test on Mac OS X software RAID the old fashioned way... by accidentally stepping on the power strip controlling one of the external volumes the RAID is using.

      But yes, if it isn't tested it WILL fail.

      If it is tested, it MIGHT fail.

    26. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of this I discarded NAS and similar solutions. I have external hard drives and I plug them as I need using USB.

      Agreed, but external drives with gigabit connection that offer NAS-like features are becoming common. Plus side is they can quickly Wake-on-LAN and shutdown again.

    27. Re:Easy solution by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I've been considering getting a relatively cheap amd64 based system, and maxing out the ram. Then run something that handles ZFS.

      The self healing feature is invaluable when it comes to making sure that you're not facing bit rot. Just set the thing to scrub on a periodic basis. It's not perfect and you still need to have something off site as back up, but it limits the damage to user error and major disaster. And theft.

      Nice thing is that it's still probably cheaper than getting a drobo.

    28. Re:Easy solution by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      Because of this I discarded NAS and similar solutions.
      I have external hard drives and I plug them as I need using USB. Put them away from kids, sun and humidity and they will be fine.

      according to

      http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/dlink_dns323/13.htm

      a DNS-323 NAS consumes 8w on idle with the disks powered down (goes up to 21-23 when writing to 2 drives) which is not much at all.

      As much as I agree that using a full PC as a NAS is extremely energy inefficient, the current crop of embedded linux low power devices (say, including things like wifi routers etc.) are quite ok from an environmental standpoint in my book.

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    29. Re:Easy solution by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If the point is backup, i.e. having a second copy, then where you put the drives is important. Here's the most important thing about that: don't put them in the same place you keep the drives/info for which they are the backup. Off site storage! You can rent a safety deposit box for cheap - nice, protected (very!) environmentally controlled storage. Or maybe you have a storage locker with reasonable environmental controls (mine doesn't keep it at 70F but they don't let it freeze or get boiling hot either) so put them in a Pelican storage case or something similar and then in the locker. Once a year take them home and spin them up for a while, do a surface scan and check the smart status. Bob's your uncle you've got good, high quality, safe and cheap backups.

      This is what I do. Plus the on-line storage is raided - drives are cheap and your time isn't - so unless both drives crash at once it is very unlikely that I'll need the backups in the first place... but then I think "hmmmm, I guess lightning could get past the surge arrestors and fry them both at once... better keep those backups."

      Finally, and this is obviously somewhat dependent on what you are storing, never delete anything. It's amazing how the moment you delete the last copy of some memo, note, picture, email - whatever - you suddenly need it. Or maybe it's not the moment after, maybe it's ten years after. So don't bother trying to figure out what is worth keeping or not, storage is too cheap to waste even 5 minutes thinking about that, just keep it all.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    30. Re:Easy solution by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          That's one way to do a power fail scenario. I prefer the swift yanking of the power cord, but to each his own. :)

          When I do it, I prefer to have at least someone watching.

          "Is it busy?"

          "ya."

          "Really busy?"

          "ya."

          "POWER FAILURE!"

          [YANK] :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    31. Re:Easy solution by nxtw · · Score: 1

      Large-scale backups and transfers are a really big pain, but realistically, there are very few situations where you transfer more than a few gigs.

      You might not transfer a lot of data, but others might.

      Without any special effort, my boring Core 2 Duo systems transfer 1 gigabyte in less than 20 seconds - at least 60 megabytes/sec. This is with standard 7200 rpm desktop hard drives and the standard configurations of Windows Vista, OS X, and CentOS.

    32. Re:Easy solution by nxtw · · Score: 1

      It's plenty fast for most tasks and can utilize a Gigabit link up to 30% in a RAID6 setup.

      Unremarkable. My Linux file server can utilize a gigabit ethernet link at very close to 100% in a RAID6 setup. No fancy hardware RAID, just an Intel desktop board and CPU.

      Devices like the one you linked probably use a less power than a desktop system. But at $800, I'd rather buy or build a much cheaper PC - it'll take years for the difference in electricity costs to catch up. The PC will be faster and more capable.

    33. Re:Easy solution by nxtw · · Score: 1

      Low reliability end energy inefficient. A P4 burns more or less 60w in idle. A drive easily use 15w. If the power supply has an 50% efficiency... that is perfectly normal for old cases. If you have 3 disks you use (60+3*15)*1.5= 157.5 w. Add more 20w to motherboard, memory and stuff and you get almost 180W in idle. This is a LOT after one year.

      If you are not still convinced. Try to imagine how to recover the raid array after one disk dies... Search the net and you'll find a lot of people that was unable to recover arrays because they used cheap hardware.

      Your numbers are rather arbitrary.
      Drives use nowhere near 15 W each at idle. Depending on the specific Pentium 4 model, idle power usage could be less as long as power management is functioning.
      And not all power supplies are nearly as inefficient as you suggest.

      With recent hardware: it's possible to run a Core 2 Duo system with 27(!) desktop hard drives in ~210 W at idle.

      I've recovered from drive failure or missing drives with Linux md software RAID many times and have never had a problem other than actual drive failures.

    34. Re:Easy solution by modemboy · · Score: 1

      You are off by a factor of 3 there. Newer drives run about 5w or so idle, 1-2w when spun down. Run a NAS software that supports software RAID, then there are no hardware problems to be found. I agree about the P4 though, especially when Atom based solution can be had for $80 or so and pull maybe 30 watts max. All in all you can build a NAS that pulls less than 20 watts idle and maxes at 50 or so depending on how many drives you go with...

    35. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it has fairly bad performance, but that is not such an issue for tv show backups.

      There is probably no reason for a raid if your already making 2 copies, one on the server and one stored, but I don't think there is much point in storing off system when you can raid.

    36. Re:Easy solution by cuby · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in a 20-50w consumption with an atom based system, considering all new and efficient parts. My numbers were based in the assumption he would use only old hardware.

      --
      Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
    37. Re:Easy solution by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      A drive easily use 15w.

      I call bullshit.

      My ammeter barely registered a difference between 1 drive in my computer and 4 drives in my computer with the system at idle (drives spinning). A drive might pull up to 15w at spindle spinnup, but doesn't use that much power when spinning. This statement certainly fits with my recollection.

    38. Re:Easy solution by Trixter · · Score: 1

      ...you'll find a lot of people that was unable to recover arrays because they used cheap hardware...Because of this I discarded NAS and similar solutions. I have external hard drives and I plug them as I need using USB.

      I think you missed your own point. External hard drives are the same commodity drives you would use in a cheap/homebuilt NAS. Just because they're in an external case doesn't mean their bearings won't seize up after a few years.

      If anything, any redundant array means you have a *better* chance of recovering from failures. If an array is unrecoverable, it means it wasn't set up correct, not because it was cheap.

    39. Re:Easy solution by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The way he got there might be a big off, but the final number is about right. My Athlon machine of similar vintage pulls about 155-180W from the wall, depending on what it's doing. It has 3 hard drives, 2 optical drives, dual video cards, and a bunch of fans. Of course, if he's not going to run the machine very much then it's not a big deal.

    40. Re:Easy solution by a-zA-Z0-9$_.+!*'(),x · · Score: 1
      And away from floods, tornados, and fires...

      tOM

      --
      Epitaph: At last! Root access!
    41. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after a failure in a RAID 5, you have 1 copy of your data.

      Not to mention there are calculations based on todays harddisk size, the enormous amount of read-write operations in a RAID 5 reconstruct and the MBF of todays harddisks. In simple words if you replace a failed disk in a RAID 5 build from 750GB or 1TB disks there will probably fail another disk while rebuilding.

    42. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      induction fail!

    43. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definatly don't go on the raid5 or even 6 course of action ... http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=162

      I personally bought a "high end" motherboard with 8sata ports and use my old motherboard with a pci to sata card with WHS installed for most important files. That was for the raid option. As for the offline storage solution ...

      It is worth mentioning that life expectancy of HDs are 3-5years (of "usage" at 6-8h/day) and you should also plug them in every once in a while to make sure the polarity is still OK.

      definatly use antistatic bag with the oem foam pack that those drives came in at the store. I know ncix always give me the whole foam ( 10-30 slots) when I order a few drives but I'm sure any retailer with be happy to give it to you free.

    44. Re:Easy solution by pyite · · Score: 1

      Nice thing is that it's still probably cheaper than getting a drobo.

      And not a black box...
      And not locked into one vendor...
      And not bound by the speed of USB or Firewire...

      Yea, I'd say ZFS is the way to go :-)

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  6. Do you plan on using the disks on a regular basis? by wiplash · · Score: 5, Informative

    If so, it might be smart to install/store them in inexpensive, standard USB disk enclosure caddies. That way, when you do need to go back to your archive, you can pop 'em into your USB port and they're ready to go straight away! And if you go for one of those book-style enclosures, it makes for a neat way to store them too.

  7. I use em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I use a removable chassis system (with built in fans). Hard drives have trouble catching viruses or wearing out if they are sitting in a drawer.

    I keep the chassis in one of those little plastic sets of drawers from Target. Works like a champ.

  8. How about... by rednip · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why don't you try a box and use magnets as packing peanuts? Be sure to leave them in a hot, humid place, like a shower, and never every spin them up

    Dry, cool, and individually placed in anti-static bags, just be sure to spin them up every so often.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    1. Re:How about... by goffster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget to irradiate with X-rays to remove any bacteria.

    2. Re:How about... by Barny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, you can get better density if you use the original foam packing that they come with, the only problem is if you spin them up in it you will cook the things, I solved this by lining up a big 3" drill bit and driving it down through all the drives and attaching a fan to the end, keeps em cool.

      Or (if you want a real solution) you could, I dunno, get an old army ammo case from your local disposals store (we have em called Aussie Disposals), cut the same packing foam used to ship (as joked about above) and fit about 20 drives in a nice tin safely and bullet proof :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    3. Re:How about... by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 1

      Be sure to regularly douse your drives with flame retardant chemicals - then take a blowtorch to the platters just to be sure you did it right!

    4. Re:How about... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said except using foam. I'd suggest using a material that would still protect the drive, but conduct the heat from the drives to the exterior of the ammo box quickly (a la heatpipe/sink style).

    5. Re:How about... by Barny · · Score: 1

      Foam is cheap, doesn't conduct electricity, and the original question was just how to store them safely, not how to make something to power them up in :)

      But yes, if you plan to power them up, I would suggest making up proper mounting brackets and bolting the drives into the box so it can dissipate heat through the casing.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    6. Re:How about... by berashith · · Score: 1

      I prefer iron filings to magnets for a packing peanut substitue. They are much softer and absorb vibration better.

    7. Re:How about... by yoink! · · Score: 1

      We use these: http://www.wiebetech.com/products/cases.php

      It's like having a proper hard-case for each disk, and although it won't protect them from a fall it makes it easy to line them all up on a bookshelf or in a rack/drawer system and pull them out when needed.

      We also read each drive at least once every 6 months to ensure the drive can re-new any weak magnetic sectors/blocks.

    8. Re:How about... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Two words: "drive compression"

      However, given that hard drives are already pretty solidly built, it may take a fair amount of force to compress them.

      Never trust the silly software "drive compression" that comes with Windows, or can be had for Linux. Go for the forceful, hardware solution for better drive compaction.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    9. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I solved this by lining up a big 3" drill bit and driving it down through all the drives and attaching a fan to the end, keeps em cool.

      I strongly recommend against putting holes in your hard drives. You may have heard that it increases the density but it will just break modern drives!

  9. Static bags and a cardboard box by TinBromide · · Score: 5, Informative

    At work, we would routinely have to deal with 5-10 hard drives a day and probably would order 40-60 a month. We stored them in anti-static bags in a bankers box. While that's not the exact brand we used (we bought them in 100 packs), its similar. During the few years we used those bags, we did not lose a single drive to storage loss. There were drives that were DOA or died during processing, or were dropped, but we never pulled a drive that was working the previous time only to discover that it was dead when we pulled it.

    As for hookup, you have a couple of options. If you are going to do casual use, you can get an esata dock. It doesn't have a fan, but for all but the most intense use, it should be sufficient for transfering files and weekly backups. If you're looking for more, go with sata sleds (again not the brand I used, but similar), you can screw your hard drives into those and if your sata controller supports it, hot swap the drives. You can also buy extra sleds so that you can swap out your drives without having to handle the internal drive.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    1. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by khayman80 · · Score: 1

      I do something similar, but use aluminum foil instead of the anti-static bags. Because anti-static bags are conductive (to force all charge to the outside of the bag via Gauss's law) this is just as effective, not to mention cheaper.

    2. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by greed · · Score: 1

      Probably not a big deal these days, but in the pin-through-hole era, you ran the risk of getting scraps of aluminum stuck to the pins on the circuit boards. The plastic anti-stat bags are resistant to that.

    3. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

      Aluminum foil is not a good choice for anti-static material.

      Mainly, it's too conductive. For a hard disk it's not that big of a deal, but suppose you used it on a motherboard. You'd have an exploded lithium battery.

      In a hard disk, I can imagine an unlikely scenario where a charged capacitor on the board killed another component through the foil.

      Anyway there's good reasons that anti-static material is only slightly conductive. At 1000+ volts it is plenty conductive, but at lower voltages, it's more like an insulator.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      It's could just a fluke, but I got one of those cheapo NexStar docks (the single bay, not the double) and I got a lot of write errors. I'm guessing it's because the drive is real wobbly, standing up like that and it couldn't handle the vibrations. I would suggest either getting a different brand (something that locks the drive in place better) or just get a standard enclosure. It's a shame, I really like the concept.

    5. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by maxume · · Score: 1

      There are various usb widgets that provide the same electronics without the 'cool' vertical plug in stuff:

      http://www.newegg.com/Store/SubCategory.aspx?SubCategory=353&name=Adapters-Gender-Changers

      Many of them also attach to both SATA and PATA drives (which it seems might be trickier for a bay style device).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Can you post the SATA sled brand you do use? I'm interested, but don't want to pay CDW $27/sled. =(

    7. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're looking for more, go with sata sleds (again not the brand I used, but similar), you can screw your hard drives into those and if your sata controller supports it, hot swap the drives. You can also buy extra sleds so that you can swap out your drives without having to handle the internal drive.

      Forget sleds, go trayless. There are a variety of trayless sata racks available from a couple of different manufactureres, including multi-disk designs. I have them in all of my systems, they work great in windows and linux.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      I worked on a project that simply had a long-term storage requirement. Given the amount of data and the retention they wanted, we went with a series of TB drives. We used this Hot swappable drive bay, it worked great and doesn't even require a sled to mount the drive in.

    9. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      we used to use kingwin and you can get trays for them for 14.99 a pop, but the fan gets noisy after a while, little plastic bits break off. I'm not super thrilled with the drive bays, which is why I didn't try to hard to find the ones I used. A trayless triple bay is really nice, but it takes up to 5.25" bays in the case. (I currently can't find the triple bays on cdw that we used).

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    10. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >At work, we would routinely have to deal with 5-10 hard drives a day and probably would order 40-60 a month.

      We did this too, until we realized that an LTO4 Autoloader was much less expensive and also turned out to be significantly faster.
      I didn't expect it to be faster.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by khayman80 · · Score: 1

      That makes a lot of sense. I'd ignored the charged capacitors, which probably isn't an issue for the drives I've already got in foil (they've almost certainly discharged by now) but I'll stop doing that in the future. Thanks for the correction.

    12. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      True, but we also like how some external enclosures had e-sata (as with the nexstar docks). Usb transfers at 48mbps burst speed (averages 10-25), esata is capable of 150-300mbps burst speed. If you can get a decent e-sata chipset, take that over USB any day.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    13. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      To boot, it's plausible that the foil makes contact with multiple electrodes on the drive, and a static discharge may find the path of least resistance goes through one of those circuits, blowing it out. Plus the crinkles in the foil can create little capacitance wells. Maybe not powerful enough to do any damage, but still there's a reason that anti-static bags are designed as they are.

    14. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And I don't even get that fancy -- I just store them in a cardboard box. (Make sure it's not the shiny cardboard; that can hold a static charge.) So long as the logic board components aren't touching anything conductive, which you can ensure well enough with a layer of cardboard between 'em if you're paranoid (I don't bother) all should be well. Note: my oldest working IDE HD dates to 1991. My oldest of any type dates to 1986. The only ones I've lost in storage are Conners, which have always had a problem with losing data if they sit around doing nothing for several months.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      I use the open Kingwin sledless enclosure without the fan, rather than the closed one with the fan. It gets cooling from airflow within the box. I gave one problem location its own fan, but a large one running at low speed and making no noise. If a computer breaks, I can have its hard drive in another computer within a few minutes.

  10. The olden days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the olden days of file sharing I had 2 scsi hard drive chasis that could support mulitple 9 gb hd drives daisy chained in my basement. I also had a couple of dat tape drive down there.

    1. Re:The olden days by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      daisy chained in my basement

      That's just so wrong.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
  11. Off site backup! by MathFox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Professionals keep (at least) one off-site backup. You could rent a private locker in a bank or some other organization or make an online backup deal. I do use (two) USB disks for backups. They are pretty portable, fairly robust, plug in nearly every computer, have decent speed and good capacity.

    --
    extern warranty;
    main()
    {
    (void)warranty;
    }
    1. Re:Off site backup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical slashdot gobshite, use a bank locker to store some TV shows, oh yeah! Great advice kid ! Fucking asshole...

    2. Re:Off site backup! by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      To be fair, professional aren't backing up old NCIS episodes. There is a point at which robustness is silly. I might even argue that he hit that point when he started backing up TV shows at all, but certainly rotating them in and out of a bank vault is beyond the pale.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    3. Re:Off site backup! by ca111a · · Score: 1

      >You could rent a private locker in a bank
      ... or he could get a Netflix subscription for less than the cost of renting that locker (he backs up movies). A cheaper solution would be to ask a friend to keep that drive for you.

    4. Re:Off site backup! by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I was going to say the same thing, albeit in a less inflammatory way.

      He's talking about backing up DVDs, and he's concerned about wasting time re-ripping them. I don't think that going to the bank periodically is going to be an acceptable solution. If his house burns down, he's probably not going to be worried about the time he lost ripping his discs.

    5. Re:Off site backup! by edschurr · · Score: 1

      I have a hdd for software-managed backups in my computer, so I want my next backup to be off-site to guard against fire/burglary/earthquake. The most convenient place is actually my car. But the downsides/risks include vehicle acceleration, temperature changes, and humidity. Are these manageable, anyone?

    6. Re:Off site backup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical slashdot gobshite, use a bank locker to store some TV shows, oh yeah! Great advice kid ! Fucking asshole...

      As if the OP was any better, asking /. how to backup video files that he already has DVD backups for.

      That's like the government asking Rolls-Royce if the Joint Strike Fighter needs alternate engine manufacturers in addition to Pratt & Whitney.

    7. Re:Off site backup! by adamstew · · Score: 1

      Nope. My safe deposit at the bank costs me $30 a year. It's 5 x 3 x 18. I can stack drives 3 high and 3 deep...for 9 drives in the vault...and still have room for padding on all 6 sides sides to keep them safe.

      For $10 per year more ($40 total) I can get a 10 x 3 x 18...I can now store them 2 wide, 3 high, and 3 deep for 18 drives.

      for another $15 per year more ($55 total), I can get a 10 x 5 x 18... I can now store them 2 wide, 5 high, and 3 deep for 30 drives.

      for $100 per year total, I can get a 10 x 10 x 18... I can now store them 2 wide, 10 high, and 3 deep for 60 drives.

      The cheapest netflix plan is $9/mo or $108/yr.

    8. Re:Off site backup! by MrPhilby · · Score: 1

      I have a concrete firesafe under my garage floor (away from the house) with a power line and an ethernet cable going in to a cheapo NAS unit. XXcopy on all the clients, custom BAT scripts on Task scheduler. Hasn't let me down yet.

  12. ick, softraid by Benanov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless it's one known for its ability to work on various and sundry drives (as opposed to identical ones), and probably built into whatever OS OP is running...don't recommend softraid.

    Controller card/motherboard goes, or enough drives go and all his data's gone.

    1. Re:ick, softraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Softraid is fine, you can use it with any and all combinations of onboard and outboard RAID (read: crappy) cards. The nice part is that you aren't beholden to your controller any more as the array metadata is stored in a way that any machine of that OS can read it.

    2. Re:ick, softraid by swillden · · Score: 1

      Unless it's one known for its ability to work on various and sundry drives (as opposed to identical ones), and probably built into whatever OS OP is running...don't recommend softraid.

      Is there some software raid solution that doesn't work on various and sundry drives?

      Controller card/motherboard goes [...] and all his data's gone.

      This is a reason to avoid hardware raid, not software raid. With hardware raid, if you lose your raid controller your data's toast unless you can get another that understands the same layout (not typically a huge problem, but still an issue). With software raid you can throw the drives into any old box, connected to any set of controller cards. All you need is the same OS and possibly some knowledge of the configuration, if the softraid doesn't put everything it needs on the drives themselves (as Linux md raid does).

      IMO, the only reason to favor hardware raid is to get better performance from servers whose CPUs are frequently fully utilized when I/O is also heavy.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:ick, softraid by greed · · Score: 1

      IME, the only reason to favour hardware RAID controllers is the battery-backed write-back cache. At least for mirroring modes; I don't really like parity modes, as they need too much simultaneous I/O on the disks, and disks are cheap enough today it's not worth it. (And the power consumption is WAY down from those full-height 5.25" SCSI monsters of 1993.)

      But that works in JBOD (real JBOD, not "spanning with a stupid name) mode. So you can still use software RAID (Linux MD, AIX LVM mirrors, whatever) and get the benefits of the write-back cache and none of the "damn I need another card just like this one" downsides.

      I was surprised that 2x the I/O on the PCI-X bus wasn't a problem. I really expected to have a measurable, consistent improvement from the hardware RAID controller, especially since it should have been able to drive two independent Ultra320 SCSI channels from a single PCI-X transaction. Especially given what the card cost.

      Glad I wasn't the one paying for it....

      I've done less extensive tests on other configs since then, and I can only find specific I/O patterns where the hardware card is a slight win; it's usually about the same as software RAID. You can do more by locating your hot data at the rim of the disk.

    4. Re:ick, softraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardware RAIDs provide a false sense of security, the only reason hardware RAID is used by professionals is because of performance.

      You defeat your own argument:

      Controller card/motherboard goes, or enough drives go and all his data's gone.

      Let's see what happens:

      * software raid: fine, any other computer with a compatible software RAID, Windows or Linux, can be configured to read the array. Indeed, you should use a common software RAID implementation built into a common OS to be extra safe.

      * hardware raid: not so fine, get very nervous looking for exactly the same hw RAID controller and probably motherboard too, which might be troublesome if it's an old one or the company who made them went broke. Sure, you can always find one on ebay probably, but how long will all this ordering of specific hardware take?

      Of course all this taking into account the broken controller didn't f*ck up all the data on the platters yet. Generally failing hardware does more aberrant damage than failing software, which can easily use assertions and fault-toleration techniques. Of course hardware can too, but fault-tolerant hardware is less common and more expensive.

      preemptive PS. I know, RAID is not backup, so we should only take into account the amount of time it takes to bring the RAID back up from backup, not the possibility of data loss, but software RAID seems to win on both those terrains anyway.

      Please hw RAID proponents, enlighten me, or go back to school. ;)

    5. Re:ick, softraid by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a controller/MB based controller failure cause data loss. Every controller/board I've uver used stores bits of information on the disks that help a new replacement card/board identify how the old board had mapped the disk configuration. Even plugging them into different ports on the new board/controller should not be of issue...

      I've replaced hundreds of boards in commercial servers and home computers alike. As long as the make/model is the same when replacing, you're good, otherwise backups are required.

      Naturally, you're still at risk if you loose more than 1 drive in a RAID 5 array, and storage assignment is an issue if the drives are not identical size (though some controllers will alolow you to assign partitions in the unusable RAID spaces) Plus performance can be an issue if they're not identical in spindles/speeds/cache. But most boards support RAID 6 now. If you're real concerned, RAID 1/0 is always an option on after market cards, but at that point having 2 RAID 5s, one live, one backup, may be a better way to go.

      An external NAS, running RAID5, backs up my internal RAID5 (data volume). I use RAID0 for the OS/app drives, and keep regular BareMetal images of that. I have to loose 4 drives across 2 different devices to risk data loss, and 3 drives across 2 systems to be forced to reinstall my OS. I use 2 very high speed 2.5" HDDs for the OS and 4 high performance 500GB drives for the RIAD5 for data. The NAS uses 4 el-cheapo high capacity disks. (it also backs up my Linux station and my wife's notebook). I also have a few critical folders I use SyncToy to replicate from the NAS to 2 portable drives I swap back and forth at my father's house when I see him every few weeks, giving me an offsite copy.

      My master backup is about 1.2TB...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    6. Re:ick, softraid by swillden · · Score: 1

      I've done less extensive tests on other configs since then, and I can only find specific I/O patterns where the hardware card is a slight win; it's usually about the same as software RAID.

      It sounds like you have done quite a bit more testing than I have, but in my experience there are also plenty of cases where software raid provides a non-trivial performance boost.

      My experience is primarily with RAID-5 and RAID-6, though. I haven't done so much with mirroring.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:ick, softraid by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Wait, what?

      Windows XP and any modern *nix (including OSX) have built in support for software raid on generic SATA/IDE controllers. Software raid is, IMHO, the *only* way to go for the reasons you state (controller card/motherboard goes and the data is gone). Linux's mdadm certainly works on generic drives of different sizes/makes and marks the drives location in the array at the start of the raid partition, allowing it to discover the right drives regardless of the controller/position you connect it to.

      I'd agree not to use the fakeraid controllers built into most modern motherboards in raid mode, but I see no reason against software raid. I'd recommend it over fake raid any day and over hardware raid in most cases.

    8. Re:ick, softraid by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Only failure we had on our old course delivery system was the raid controller letting the smoke out... Early 2000 vintage Dell. Fortunately part of our recovery plan includes rsyncing to an identical box, so we were up and running quick with only a few hours of data loss...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  13. If no NAS, you can DIY one out of an old PC by PenguinRadio · · Score: 1

    While trying to scrounge up the funds for a super sexy NAS, I took an old G4 Mac I got on Ebay and followed some directions to throw in some extra drives. There are plenty of 'diy' NAS instructions on the net to take advantage of old PCs that you might have floating around.

    I actually ran CAT5 to my detached garage. I think whatever your solution is (box, NAS, diy NAS) you should consider storing it 'off site' from your main house to ensure survivability if there is some fire or other disaster.

    1. Re:If no NAS, you can DIY one out of an old PC by Barny · · Score: 1

      To be honest, being semi-offsite is not the job of your NAS (which is a primary storage method), you should be backing your NAS up to something else.

      It all comes down to how much your data is worth, if its just a large collection of stuff leeched from TPP, well, I don't even bother with a redundant array for that crap, my porn collection on the other hand... :P

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:If no NAS, you can DIY one out of an old PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However much I like your idea, the only problem I see with it, is that an off-site works great if you deal with a backup or a redundant storage platform. Chances are that a NAS is used to store crap that otherwise would fill up your desktop/laptop. Therefore if your garage burnt down or got flooded that you would lose everything, just as you would if your house caught fire.

      Either-way, when your house burns down, the last thing you will think about is about your whole collection of "Bob Villa's This Old House, Season 1 - 10" on your NAS. Let's not forget that your garage most likely gets hotter during summer than your house (unless you AC your empty garage).

      Best off-site solution just might be to get a 1TB hard drive, backup all of your family albums, and critical data ("Frasier" does not count), get a safety deposit box at a bank, and store it there. Once every 4 months swap it out with another drive, and rotate them. This way you can backup your precious documents.

      Secondly safety deposit boxes are quite specious so you could easily fit in 6-8 drives there. They are usually in a dry and dark place. And if you worry you can always ESD bag them and throw in a desiccant.

      Lastly you should have thought of future expansion of your data-garage, and rigged CAT6 (for 1Gbps), CAT7 (10Gbps), or went with fiber. To this day I live with my mistakes of cabling BNC, damn Egghead sales man with his 10Base-2 being the future pitch.

    3. Re:If no NAS, you can DIY one out of an old PC by Thurmont · · Score: 1

      ... and not to forget that if a lightning strike hits your system in your house it can travel to the "data-garage" or vice-versa via the wired LAN connection. Even if you setup a wireless connection between the two, you're still powering both the system in the house and the garage from the same power main that can zap both setups with a power surge.

      --
      "If it's got a switch... it's my bitch!!"
    4. Re:If no NAS, you can DIY one out of an old PC by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      Best off-site solution just might be to get a 1TB hard drive, backup all of your family albums, and critical data ("Frasier" does not count), get a safety deposit box at a bank, and store it there. Once every 4 months swap it out with another drive, and rotate them. This way you can backup your precious documents.

      The better solution is to use a 4GB USB flash drive for absolutely critical documents. This includes copies of Mortgage Papers, Life Insurance Policies, Birth and Mariage Certificates, Naturalization Papers and Driver License/State ID cards along with Tax Records for at least the last 3 years along with bank statements. For this to work well, you want to store them in PDF format with Digital Signatures enforced and use an application such as Iris Pro to handle the scanning as it converts directly to PDF. The other advantage is that you can keep several copies of the flash drives for security/disaster purposes.

      As part of my personal disaster/evacuation plans, I have a copy in my safe deposit box and 2 in my evacuation bag. They do get updated at least once a quarter when I simply replace them. This allows for a complete recycling of the old drives and as the price continues dropping on larger capacity drives, I ensure that I've always got sufficient room for my critical documents in case of fire/earthquake or other evacuation reason.

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  14. Keep in mind by maclizard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whatever route you choose, keep in mind that hard drives as a whole have terribly high failure rate (about 1 in 8 fail in my experience). Also, regardless of your chosen media, be sure to research the lifespan of your storage. If you are looking for long term (more than a couple years) and dependability you are going to be spending more than you would on a cheap raid box.

    As much as I HATE to say it, magnetic tape is the ONLY storage media that has not failed me yet.

    1. Re:Keep in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I HATE to say it, magnetic tape is the ONLY storage media that has not failed me yet.

      Seconded!

      Mag tape can still fail. I've had plenty fail (yes, it was stored well). However, it truly is the best long term solution and if rewritten on schedule your failure rate will be very low. Just yesterday I started reading some tapes that weren't rewritten by mistake. They're 8mm Exabyte tapes from 1993. 10 good and 0 bad, so far. Current linear tapes list a 10 year shelf life (the 8mms listed 3 years). The down side to tape is price. Hard disks seems to be the cheapest. Luckily my data at work is worth many millions, so no one complains about using tape. I just wish I had a tape drive at home.

    2. Re:Keep in mind by Barny · · Score: 1

      The best rule of thumb (ahem, rule of wrist)...

      There's no such thing as permanent storage.

      That said, the interesting article from google about a year or so back in regards to consumer drive failure was a very interesting read, most failures happened in the first year and after five years of working life.

      Don't trust it in the first year
      Don't trust it out of warranty
      Don't trust it...

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    3. Re:Keep in mind by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Actually, hard disks have a 100% failure rate.

      All mechanical devices have a finite lifespan.

      But that doesn't mean you need to use tape. As long as your backup plan takes failure into account, there's no problem. I have put millions of dollars worth of data onto spinning media only, and I sleep just fine at night.

      That said, RAID alone is not a replacement for backups, as some seem to think. Your backup strategy isn't valid if "rm -rf" destroys every copy you have of something.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Keep in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I HATE to say it, magnetic tape is the ONLY storage media that has not failed me yet.

      So I take it you've never had to do a restore.

    5. Re:Keep in mind by maclizard · · Score: 1

      I guess I should clarify a couple things...

      In my experience, 1/8 of hard drives fail within a month

      RAID is not a valid backup method.

      I am speaking on the behalf of long-term, zero maintenance storage

    6. Re:Keep in mind by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I am speaking on the behalf of long-term, zero maintenance storage

      Such a thing does not exist. Well, maybe stone tablets.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:Keep in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? A RAID box is going to have the same hard drives in it sitting in a closet as you would with regular drives sitting in the closet, except it's going to take more.

      I hope you aren't suggesting RAID *instead* of separate backups to hard drives. RAID is not a backup.

    8. Re:Keep in mind by mike2R · · Score: 1

      In my experience, 1/8 of hard drives fail within a month

      Man, what do you do to your drives? :)

      I've sold hard drives for years and I can tell you that 1 in 8 in a month is seriously out of whack. Yes drives are orders of magnitude more likely to fail than any other component, but 1 in 8 within a month is either fantasy, terrible bad luck, or an indication that something you are doing is causing them damage.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    9. Re:Keep in mind by maclizard · · Score: 1

      We by hard about 30 hard drives a week, and the failure stats on the drives purchased reflects roughly a 12% failure rate within four weeks.

    10. Re:Keep in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tape goes bad sitting on the shelf for more than a couple of years. It loses it's contents, sometimes the tape itself becomes sticky and won't move. And once that happens, it's $300 per tape or more to try to recover them, whereas an HDD I can recover myself. Tape failures among my clients for the last 10 years are THE #1 reason I back up to HDD now.

    11. Re:Keep in mind by mike2R · · Score: 1

      Well as well as just selling drives (where the customer may just go through manufacturers' warranty and never talk to us) we also fit drives in laptops, with a promise that if the drive fails within 3 months we will make no labour charge to fit the warranty replacement - I would assume we here from nearly every failure here. Well under 1% take us up on this, so that is less than 1% failure within 3 months.

      Now these are consumer 2.5" drives, and a failure is defined as it failing to the point where the customer notices. Possibly you are using a different metric and calling a drive failed where the average user wouldn't even notice the problem? If not you really must have some sort of problem. . . The hard drive industry really couldn't survive on that sort of warranty replacement rate.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    12. Re:Keep in mind by Splab · · Score: 1

      I have never had a drive fail within a month, what kind of cheap ass hardware are you buying?

    13. Re:Keep in mind by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Seriously. We have literally hundreds of drives in our lab (Three 100 TB SAN racks and dozens of systems with local drives), we lose on average 2-3 drives a month. Out of at least 300, probably more like 500.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    14. Re:Keep in mind by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is magnetic tape practical for home backups? Last time I checked, it wasn't. Hard drives offer the best value and reliability I have found for personal backups. Certainly they are far easier and more reliable than burning DVDs.

      I would forget about RAID, and instead make your goal to have 3 separate copies of your files on 3 sets of hard drives. One set on hard drives is the live data that you use on your home server. The other two are backups, and you alternate between them, backing up with whatever frequency you deem sufficient. If at all possible, keep one set of drives off site by taking them to work or a friends' place, then swap them after each backup operation.

      Write scripts to simplify your backup process, so that it takes as little effort as possible. (I use a simple rsync command.)

    15. Re:Keep in mind by mike2R · · Score: 1

      One further point. I've never noticed that drives tend to fail within a month, or any other set period of time. They either tend to be dead on arrival or fail at some point many years or months down the line - the distribution as regards time seems to be even (I could be wrong, this is just how it feels to me, I've never actually analyzed it).

      A 12% failure rate within a month indicates that either all the drives die pretty soon, or there is some spike in failures early on. Neither of these coincides with my experience and would seem to indicate that something odd is happening. Someone at your place didn't sleep with the delivery driver's sister did he? :)

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    16. Re:Keep in mind by anagama · · Score: 1

      Stone is brittle an subject to breakage. If not well protected, erosion is an issue (think of gravestones only a couple hundred years old that can hardly be read with the unaided eye).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    17. Re:Keep in mind by interiot · · Score: 1

      They either tend to be dead on arrival or fail at some point many years or months down the line.

      The data that Google released from their server farms indicates that the "bathtub curve" isn't shaped anything like what people used to think — infant mortality isn't very significant, and drive failure is more or less random between 2 - 5 years old, during that time, drives don't fail at higher rate the older they get.

    18. Re:Keep in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's the only one that HAS failed me. Meanwhile, I've got a half rack of servers full of hard drives - never lost one.

    19. Re:Keep in mind by darrylo · · Score: 1

      That said, RAID alone is not a replacement for backups, as some seem to think. Your backup strategy isn't valid if "rm -rf" destroys every copy you have of something.

      This -- by all that is good and holy, this.

      A sane backup strategy should, at a minimum, be able to handle:

      • rm -rf
      • Fire.
      • Flood.

      And, of course, backups for businesses should also attempt to handle disgruntled employees and "accident-prone" employees. :-)

    20. Re:Keep in mind by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      I don't know about terribly high failure rates. I must have used maybe 50 hard rives (I don't know really but 50 wouldn't be an exaggeration) in my home systems over the years. I've only ever had one failure and that was a very, very long time ago when the drive actually used a piece of cork to brake against the spindle. Eventually the cork wore perfectly against the shaft and there was too much friction (stiction) to let it spin up without a rap from a screwdriver ( yeah, I know :). Eventually I took it apart and shaved some of the cork off which worked fine until I eventually retired the drive. After that I generally just left drives on all the time rather than spinning them up/down a few times a day.

      Tape can be good too... one day I woke up and realized "crap I've got data on a couple of dozen of those old dat tapes and they are 13 years old now..." so I hurriedly started searching for a scsi controller and drive that would work with my current system, and for software that would read the OS/2 backups, and went at it... only one tape was completely unreadable. Some of the rest required just letting the software keep trying to read the drive for up to 24hrs but eventually I got every bit off all but one of those old tapes, so I was kind of impressed with the retention.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    21. Re:Keep in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All types of disks have a 100% failure rate.

      It's just a matter of time.

  15. WiebeTech anti-static storage box by paulievox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like these guys: http://www.wiebetech.com/products/cases.php It's an anti-static, somewhat shock-mounted plastic case for 3.5" drives. I've got about a dozen stacked in a rubbermaid box. It eliminates the stress of the drives banging into each other, even in anti-static bags. I've never dropped a drive inside one of these, but i'll bet it'd survive a modest height.

    1. Re:WiebeTech anti-static storage box by teh*fink · · Score: 1

      Seconded. The wiebetech boxes are great for storage.

      --
      "I DARE you to make less sense!"
  16. Network Attached Storage by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you want a backup to store the drive allready in the computer, although it could be you don't have enough storage and are just storing files on external drives. (Say movies ripped from DVD or so...)

    In either case, it's probably easiest to make a network attached storage device (aka Linux server) to copy everything to.

    Computer1: Primary use computer

    OldComputer2: NAS in closet... You can get an old P3 (low heat producing) with a bunch of drive bays, and a PCI SATA card ($50). Use a junky IDE drive for the OS, and make a raid5 of several large capacity drives.

    The advantage of this is that you can synch your existing "workstation" to the NAS, and get the files you were considering on external HD's on the fly. Moving HDs around is not really recommended, as there is a good chance you will damage them. There are many guides to configuring this, which you can find via google.

    Note: a PCI SATA adaptor will limit you to about 1Gb/s throughput. Convient as a Gb Ethernet is the current networking standard.

  17. RAID 1 by Calmiche · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually had the same problem. I've got my entire 1,000+ Movie DVD and 400+ Television collection ripped to hard drive for use as streaming media to a media PC. I've been working on it for about 4 years now.

    I ended up buying and setting up a bare-bones computers with RAID capabilities. Get a big tower with plenty of cooling. I originally used your same method. I purchased hard drives and external hard drive enclosures. This was cheaper than building pre-made drives. I especially like Vantec enclosures. However, I had a couple of drives go bad over the years. After some experimentation, I found that underpowered drives tend to loose data.

    Now, I use the aforementioned RAID 1 solution. Originally I used 400gb drives but now I'm up to purchasing 1-TB drives. I've only had 1 drive go bad in the last 3 years and it was easily replaced with no loss of data. You could probably use Raid 5 just as easily, but my first setup didn't support it so I defaulted to Raid 1. The extra controller cars also used to be cheaper for RAID 1 but the costs have since equalized.

    For the moment, I would advise against the 2TB drives. Many have serious slowdown problems and the cost/storage ratio is to high. 1.5tb drives are looking better and better.

    Just remember good cooling! This may be the most important factor. Hot hard drives last a MUCH shorter time. I REALLY like Thermatake icage bays. They change 3-5.25" bays into 3-3.5" hard drive bays and have a really nice 120x120 fan on them to keep the drives cool.

    If you buy a hard drive a month you can get some enormous storage capacity really quickly without breaking the bank. I'm up to 8TB right now. (16TB of drives).

    1. Re:RAID 1 by JayAEU · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's some collection you have there...

      Anyway, in a situation like yours, I'd have opted for a proper 4+ drive NAS like the ones offered by Qnap, Synology, etc.

      Cooling is not an issue with those cases, since they're designed with cool drives in mind from the beginning. The air flow is optimized and driven by a large-diameter slow-spinning fan in the back.

      As for cool drives, I found the Western Digital RE2 GP series to be really good. They spin slower than other drives, but they also stay a lot cooler and thus consume only a fraction of the power other drives do. In addition, they're designed for 24/7 operation, so you probably won't have them die on you after a few months of usage.

    2. Re:RAID 1 by indros · · Score: 1

      I decided to go with the Drobo. It works as a JBOD raid, and you can mix and match disks and capacities. The drawback with the drobo is that it doesn't have a native networking capability. For that you need to buy a droboshare, or hook it up to a box & share it. And it has USB2, and 1394b, but not 1394a. So if you don't currently have firewire 800 capabilities, I recommend you get a card immediately if you choose to hook it up to a PC.

      http://www.drobo.com/resources/drobocalculator.php

    3. Re:RAID 1 by josath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, high drive temperature doesn't really hurt that much. Being too cold is much worse than being too hot. Google has crunched the numbers on tens of thousands of HDDs running at different temperatures, and they found that drives that were kept coolest actually had higher failure rates. The 'sweet spot' of most stable temperatures is actually 35-45 C (95-113 F). Drives running in the 15-25 C range experienced massively higher failures than even the drives running at 50C.

      --
      sig? uhh, umm, ok
    4. Re:RAID 1 by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      one gotcha with RAID 5 is that you can have data loss due to the time it takes for the system to calculate parity after an application does a write. If you go with RAID 5, you need to make sure you have a battery backup that can allow the machine to write out and shut down normally.

      Personally my storage needs have not yet gone beyond 2 Tb and I have four terabyte drives set up in a raid 10 (two mirrors of stripes across two drives). Another problem with raid 5 is there is apparently a performance hit on writes when not done with hardware, and hardware is expensive.

      Finally, it is a good idea when mirroring to use two different brands of drives across the mirror if possible. Drives of the same brand manufactured at the same time with the same activity have a slightly increased chance of breaking down at the same time or close to it.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:RAID 1 by Splab · · Score: 1

      I'm going for a QNAP raid 6 when I get the time (ahrem, money), but you need to have several boxes to store the amount GP is talking about.

    6. Re:RAID 1 by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I didn't want to go with a Drobo for the sole reason that you have to buy a new one (at, what, $400?) if it fails. I can buy a whole new computer for that much, and I'm unlikely to need to (any given component in the computer will cost much less, and will likely be the part that failed.)

    7. Re:RAID 1 by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      I'd say this baby can pull it off all by itself, if you equip it with 2TB drives:
      http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=109

      It also looks like it's got the horsepower to dish out all that data at acceptable speeds. ;)

    8. Re:RAID 1 by mprindle · · Score: 1

      One thing you need to consider with most consumer/prosumer NAS devices is they are not running a true hardware RAID. The RAID array is done in software via some flavor of Linux. While this does work very well in most cases I can say they are not flawless.

      We just has a Buffalo 2TB Terrastation Pro II that took a dump. Something in the Linux partition got corrupted to the point that the unit would not boot. We had to pull the drives wipe the boot sector and reload the NAS. We did have an identical box with everything backed up so when the original unit was backup we moved everything back to it.

    9. Re:RAID 1 by modemboy · · Score: 1

      It is not necessarily true that hot hard drives fail, in fact according to google's study over cooled drives fail more often...
      http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/18/massive-google-hard-drive-survey-turns-up-very-interesting-thing/

  18. What to do, and what not to do. by Celeste+R · · Score: 1

    The things to protect internal hard drives from:

    Heat (demagnetizes the data) Humidity (makes parts fail faster) Dust (makes parts fail faster) Static Electricity (no special explanation) Vibrations (makes parts fail faster, depending of the direction of the vibration) Wear and Tear of connecting/disconnecting

    Don't just use an old shoe box. Use non-static bags and a humidity absorber, cushion the box you do use, and make sure you handle them with care (the connectors aren't exactly heavy duty).

    External hard drives solve several problems: the wear and tear is reduced, but you'd have to find a completely airtight product to protect from humidity and such.

    IMHO, you should buy an external hard drive bay, with the option to have about a terabyte of data.

    After all, the less you move it around, the fewer problems there are. Just maintain it (clean the vents, make sure the fan is working), keep it connected to the computer, and you're golden.

    The hassle of dealing with broken parts is MUCH more expensive than just putting a little bit of money into a hard drive bay. Consider getting one of those external bays that let you mount internal hard drives (duplicate if you need to, but 1 TB should be enough) and make sure the PSU doesn't give you dirty power.

    --
    There are no perfect answers, only the right questions. More questions at http://foresightandhindsight.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:What to do, and what not to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heat (demagnetizes the data)

      Uh, if your system is hitting the Curie point I think you've got bigger problems to worry about than demagnetizing your data.

  19. my recent solution by pak9rabid · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just recently addressed this problem myself. My solution, although a little pricey compared to just stuffing an old box with hard drives, was to get one of these guys and put 5 1 TB drives into it. I have it running in a software RAID5, backing up everything from my server (media, subversion repository, etc) via a nightly cron job rsyncing between the server disks and the enclosure. So far it's been working like a charm.

    1. Re:my recent solution by Barny · · Score: 1

      Pray your raid doesn't fail.

      And then pray another drive doesn't fail while you take the many many hours needed to rebuild the array onto a new disk.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:my recent solution by nhtshot · · Score: 1

      I also bought one of those when I ran out of internal bays.

      They're a little slow compared to internal, but kick the shit out of USB.

      Awesome little boxes.

    3. Re:my recent solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or....

      Just attach a couple of extra cheap external USB/eSATA drives to the thing and rsync backups to that periodically.

      I've got a 2TB RAID 5 NAS appliance, and I just added a couple of those cheap 1TB USB externals to it. The box just rsyncs backups overnight, and I'm good.

      Eventually a drive in the box is going to fail, and then I'll have to do a rebuild, but that's not too bad. If another drive fails during the rebuild, I'll just swap it out and do a full rebuild with the data from the external backups.

      And if the backups fail too? Then I'm screwed, but it'll probably be because my house burned down, not random disk failure.

      P.S. Use a UPS for your NAS if you care for your data.

    4. Re:my recent solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got a case supporting 6 internal drives, cheap board with 6 sata plugs, and six 1.5T drives. ~9T storage (ignoring replication) for ~$1k.

    5. Re:my recent solution by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Just attach a couple of extra cheap external USB/eSATA drives to the thing and rsync backups to that periodically.

      Lol...that actually was my first backup method (using an external 1 TB drive), but my media eventually surpassed that capacity (I'm at roughly 1.5 TB now), so I needed another backup solution that was capable of holding more data that I wasn't going to run out of space on for awhile. I have 4 TB to work with now that should last me for many years.

      Eventually a drive in the box is going to fail, and then I'll have to do a rebuild, but that's not too bad. If another drive fails during the rebuild, I'll just swap it out and do a full rebuild with the data from the external backups.

      Well duh...that's why I RAID5'd them. Should one fail, I mark it failed, replace, and rebuild. In the unlikely event another drive does fail during the rebuild I still have my primary data store to create a backup from after I resolve the issue of failed drives in my backup system. Remember, this RAID5 setup is solely used for backup purposes...my primary data store runs on an entirely different volume. It's highly unlikely that 2 disks from the backup volume and another disk from my primary volume would all fail within a day.

      P.S. Use a UPS for your NAS if you care for your data.

      Everything in my server room is powered via an APC Smart-UPS 1500VA ;)

    6. Re:my recent solution by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Pray your raid doesn't fail.

      And then pray another drive doesn't fail while you take the many many hours needed to rebuild the array onto a new disk.

      This is solely for backups, as my primary data is sitting on an entirely different volume. There would have to be 3 disk failures within a 24 hour period for me to lose everything (2 disks fail in the backup RAID5 volume, and another in my primary data store), which isn't likely to happen.

    7. Re:my recent solution by RockWolf · · Score: 1

      I just got a case supporting 6 internal drives, cheap board with 6 sata plugs, and six 1.5T drives. ~9T storage (ignoring replication) for ~$1k.

      Yes, and 4 times the power consumption, while dealing with the hassle of having to back up over a network which saturates your switch/router overnight. Good plan.

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
  20. Point Missed by travisd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The OP already has the online storage covered. This is regarding using HDD's for offline (not spinning) storage. Even if they're not being accessed and are physically separate from the primary storage, you still are subject to wear (spinning platters) and things like power surges.

    Putting the dries back into their orignal enclosures, or perhaps an "OEM Pack" piece of foam (with anti-static bags) may be the best option. Better, consider putting the whole mess into a media-rated fire-safe.

  21. Rotate the backups! by wiredog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do a backup, drop it in the safe deposit box at the bank, take the other one out. Next quarter, rotate them.

    1. Re:Rotate the backups! by Barny · · Score: 1

      Or pay someone like Mozy $5 a month and not have to fuck with USB sticks, bank deposit bags/cases and the fees inherent in those.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:Rotate the backups! by Delwin · · Score: 1

      at $500/TB/Month it's not worth it for any large volume of data.

    3. Re:Rotate the backups! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or both, eggs in one basket and all that.

      Wasn't there an online back-up service that crashed and burned and lost all the people's data not long ago?

    4. Re:Rotate the backups! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      True. At that point you should be getting 1 or 2 U colo somewhere and have a NAS with 10-15TB of disk space that you can backup to, and get your data from, anywhere.

    5. Re:Rotate the backups! by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      A good size safety deposit box at the bank I worked at was like $30 a year. You don't need sticks, bank bags, or anything like that (though they do bang them around a bit, so a bit of padding might be wise).

      $30 ($5*12)

      You could also, well, store important documents in there.

      Of course, if you need in on the weekend...

      --
      Dan
    6. Re:Rotate the backups! by JayAEU · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Rotate the backups! by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An awful lot of effort to store (in the article in question) movies and TV shows he'll probably never watch again.
       
      I've never understood the packrat mentality with movies and TV shows... I know people with literally thousands (tens of thousands?) of hours of TV shows and movies - what's the point?

    8. Re:Rotate the backups! by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The jukebox in the sky is HERE, I have no real reason to store DVDs and non personal movies anymore, especially considering the time, effort and money involved. Netflix, hulu, youtube, OTA HDTV, PS3/360 Video stores, Apple TV the list goes on and on. If cable wasnt so good at keeping my wife out of my hair it would be gone too.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:Rotate the backups! by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Because it's easier, cheaper, and more sanitary than storing old newspapers. Why did people hoard newspapers?

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  22. eSATA and 'books' by mollog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1Tb external 'books' are enclosed, store and look like books, can be labeled like books, and can be unplugged and plugged in like they're removable media. And they're not that expensive.

    --
    Best regards.
    1. Re:eSATA and 'books' by lxs · · Score: 5, Funny

      You label your books? What are you? Some kind of librarian?

    2. Re:eSATA and 'books' by LordEd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ook!

    3. Re:eSATA and 'books' by wonderboss · · Score: 1

      For Offler's sake, don't call him a monkey!

      --
      more cowbell
    4. Re:eSATA and 'books' by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Oh look and the monk-AAAAAAAAH!

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    5. Re:eSATA and 'books' by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      That librarian... It's a monkey! *thump*

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    6. Re:eSATA and 'books' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn monke...

    7. Re:eSATA and 'books' by Forge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another point to consider. Internal hard drive connectors (ATA, SCSI and SATA) were not designed for frequent connection and disconnection. And as such can cause problems. Also the circuitry on the bottom of the drive is quite fragile, vulnerable to scratches, moisture and static.

      Even really rely cheap USB/SATA shells ($10 or less) would work well for the scenario described.

      Or you can just grab some of these bags if the budget is really tight.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  23. ask mom by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    Buy a cheap-o all-in-1 mobo/CPU/RAM/case combo. Fill it up with cheap TB sata disks in a software RAID. Add a dynamic DNS name, ssh server, and rsync. Plug it in at your mom's house, rsync your local fileserver with that one every night at 4am.

    I thought about buying a fireproof save and external hard drives, but I realized I would not have the discipline to archive to them regularly. With the solution I posted, no discipline is required after the initial setup, and it would save you even thieves empties your safe.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:ask mom by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      on top of that, the ignition point of paper is higher than data loss temperatures on a hard drive, so your documents may not burst into flames in some fireproof safes, but your data might go up in smoke. While they may make fireproof safes for hard drives, make sure you know what you're getting if you do buy one.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    2. Re:ask mom by danpritts · · Score: 1

      Better yet, ask a friend who already has a system running 24/7.

      beware, though - rsync will gladly delete files on the target system if you accidentally delete the originals on the local. Perhaps use --link-dest and the scheme described at http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/

    3. Re:ask mom by freakmn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plug it in at your mom's house, rsync your local fileserver with that one every night at 4am.

      But what happens if the fire spreads upstairs? With heat rising, that's likely to happen.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    4. Re:ask mom by Thantik · · Score: 1

      Until your mom gets her "Over 300gb/month" usage bill from comcast at $10,000. Hilarity will ensue.

    5. Re:ask mom by charliebear · · Score: 1

      Fireproof safes have a nasty habit of having little or no ventilation, so be extra careful about humidity. Store some paper in with your drives and the moisture will leech out and condensate in those static bags.

  24. Obvious by inviolet · · Score: 1

    "I have been ripping all my movies and TV shows for easy viewing through a media PC. Because I would rather not rip everything again I'm looking for a simple backup solution. I'm considering a hard drive dock and several internal hard drives to use as 'disks' to back things up every once in a while but I don't know what the best way to store internal drives would be in the meantime."

    Well, you could store them internally.

    --
    FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    1. Re:Obvious by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I'm considering a hard drive dock and several internal hard drives to use as 'disks' to back things up every once in a while but I don't know what the best way to store internal drives would be in the meantime."

      Well, you could store them internally.

      "I don't like having discs crammed into me... unless they're Oreos... and then only in the mouth."

  25. Obvious by Godman · · Score: 1

    Store em on the floor of your mom's basement like i do. Just don't step on them when you get up to get more pizza.

    --
    I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
  26. TPBB by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 5, Funny

    The pirate bay backup(tm) offers a free and easy 4 step method to backup most movies/tv shows.
    1) create .torrent of all your movies
    2) upload to TPBB(tm) trackers
    3) seed
    4) In case of catastrophic harddrive failure/house being nuked from oribt, re-download all your movies

    Advantages of TPBB over conventional backup methods
    *Off-site - the backups are held of site in multiple unsecured locations
    *Distributed - these locations are distributed across multiple contents
    *Unlimited storage - You can even backup more content than your hard drive has space for
    *Content Filtering - TPBB will filter out boring content, ensuring just worthwhile movies are kept

    **Please consult your lawyer before using TPBB as we are not responsible for any legal disputes in your jurisdiction.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    1. Re:TPBB by ianare · · Score: 2, Funny

      Real men don't use backups, they post their stuff on a public ftp server and let the rest of the world make copies.

      - Linus Torvalds

    2. Re:TPBB by Stinky+Fartface · · Score: 1

      This was modded funny, but for popular data, this is essentially what I would recommend. Why spend a fortune on big hard drives, enclosures, power supplies and all that for stuff that can be tracked down and downloaded easily? Sure, storage is cheap, but you're still talking a few hundred here. Personally, I have a decent sized drive that I store stuff until I watch it, then I just delete it. I never back the thing up and consider it's contents completely disposable. If I really want to have a permanent copy of a movie I just buy the damn thing. I do keep a mirror or two of my music collection though. But at less than 200GB it's a little easier to maintain.

    3. Re:TPBB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Parent should be modded insightful as well as funny. Because, if you take all the worthwhile data the average user produces in her or his lifetime you could probably fit it on one CD or even a floppy (1.4MB ;).

      Most data people have is just available and preserved in the cloud, which takes care of it as long as it is popular enough.

  27. Amazon S3? by plams · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They don't guarantee you don't lose your data, but it's probably more safe than what you can come up with yourself.

    1. Re:Amazon S3? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      A decent solution for smaller amounts of data. It sounds like the asker is creating lots of large files (all of his movies and TV shows on DVD.) If we assume a terabyte of storage, S3 is going to run him $150/mo, plus $170 just to transfer it all. For those prices, you could buy several terabyte hard drives, a lot of gasoline (over the course of a year) and a safety deposit box in your bank.

      That said, for smaller amounts of data, S3 seems reasonable. I've just started trying out tarsnap ( https://beta.tarsnap.com/ ). The feature list is good, and the person coding it has been working on the FreeBSD project for a while (he contributed portsnap and freebsd-update, two projects which make maintaining FreeBSD much easier.)

      Specifically, tarsnap uses a snapshot model similar to filesystem snapshots. This means that after the initial backup, you only have to save the changes, and you can delete snapshots without having to make a full backup or otherwise recreate the full set of data. It also compresses and encrypts the blocks, and it uses S3 for the back-end. Unfortunately, this means that you have to pay fees which are higher than Amazon's, which is why it isn't suitable for high volumes of data. The tarsnap client is open-source, though the server has not been released (and likely will not be.)

      Right now, the author is using a prepaid pricing model, and he charges $0.30/GB transferred and $0.30/GB/mo storage--roughly twice Amazon's rates.

      Like I said, I just started testing it to see if it will be viable for my users' home directories. The initial backup seemed to go well, though I haven't tried a full restore yet.

    2. Re:Amazon S3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be fine if you're a gambling man but I sure as hell wouldn't take my chances with some random provider without (probably not even with) a data retention clause.

      You want something done properly, you do it yourself, how many times...

  28. I'd add a couple additional comments by arete · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only big advantage of the externals is that the connectors are a bit more robust, so if you're going to plug/unplug them a LOT, you're a bit better off.

    But for maximum longevity you should take 'vibration free' seriously. That is, you shouldn't lay a drive on a hard table, because when you set it there there's a surprisingly large impact. Set it on a layer of bubblewrap or foam, instead.

    If you have humidity issues, I believe you can collect desiccant packets from other things and bake them on low heat to 'refresh' them (bake out the existing humidity) Ideally do this baking with good ventilation.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    1. Re:I'd add a couple additional comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for maximum longevity you should take 'vibration free' seriously.

      Exactly. I can't believe the flimsy plastic stands external drives come with. They don't dampen anything. I always throw them away and use foam cutouts. Two (rectangular) rings of foam will do -- don't wrap the entire drive in foam or it will get too hot.

    2. Re:I'd add a couple additional comments by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Don't waste time with the desiccant packets, if you want desiccant. That cat litter that turns blue when the cat pisses on it? (Can't remember the name right now.) Go to the store, get that - $15 for 10lb or so, probably get it in smaller alotments. Put it in an old sock, tie it off. Replace it when it starts to get blue.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  29. tape drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a tape drive.

    And store your old drives somewhere dry and protected eg. a fireproof safe with some desicant

  30. Find a friend that needs a backup too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I made a deal with a friend of mine. We each keep a backup of each others data. Its an off site fairly up to date replica of all our important data. We each have FTP servers running so everything is always available when needed. Neither of us run a RAID setup anymore. the money saved from not having to buy more disks and controllers allows us both to increase our total storage capacity as well. The chances that we will both have a drive fail or a disaster take out both servers are pretty slim too.

  31. Re:Point Missed by nhtshot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you need to back up, turn on the machine.

    When you're done, shut it down.

    Offline storage at it's finest.

  32. 6250BPI round reel and Cartridge tapes by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Then you have never used round reel tapes. Tape de-magnetizes.

    Ever seen a videotape recorded in the 80's? A lot of em look like static now.

    1. Re:6250BPI round reel and Cartridge tapes by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      All my precious classic loony toons :(

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  33. RAID5 - you're not as protected as you think by danpritts · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe not directly relevant to the OP's question but since I see a bunch of folks mentioning using RAID, i thought i'd chime in about RAID5 survivability.

    RAID5 protects you against one failure in a stripe. if you lose a drive, that's a failure. If you have a read error on a particular sector, that is another failure, and your data is gone.

    the probability of a read error *somewhere* on a 1TB drive is actually quite high.

    So, you lose a drive, you go to rebuild, you find you have a read error and can't get your data.

    This can mean a few things.

    1) lose a particular bit of data. Maybe you don't care, if you're archiving DVDs you'll probably cope just fine. If it's important data you'll be sad.

    2) can't rebuild your RAID. Some RAID controllers will just give up if they get a read error during a rebuild, so then you have to back up the recoverable portion of your data (probably the vast majority), rebuild the RAID, etc.

    I don't know how the various software RAIDs cope with this. I had this happen with a dell/lsilogic hardware raid card.

    In my case, the read error was not something i noticed when i backed up and restored the data onto a new raid, but the parity didn't match so it wouldn't rebuild. It very well may have been on an unused portion of the filesystem.

    solutions/mitigations:

    1) scrub your RAID5's regularly. this process checks everything over and fixes any errors while you still have a full RAID5 set. This will reduce your chance of failure greatly.

    2) use RAID6. it adds an extra drive's worth of redundancy.

    3) use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parchive or some similar additional layer of redundancy.

    You should also consider running an OS that supports ZFS (FreeBSD, OpenSolaris, Nexenta). It has additional data checksumming that can help. ZFS has software raid built in.

    Several good blog posts on this subject here:
    http://blogs.sun.com/relling/tags/mttdl

    He talks specifically about Solaris & ZFS, but the reliability stuff is generally applicable. RAID-Z is basically equivalent to RAID5; RAID-Z2 is basically RAID6.

  34. They make 250GB USB sticks? by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Damn. Where do I get those?

    1. Re:They make 250GB USB sticks? by Barny · · Score: 1

      Easy, get some rectangular drain pipe, stuff a bunch of hard drives in it, weld up the end and glue a usb cable to it.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:They make 250GB USB sticks? by atamido · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, I'd mod this Informative.

  35. I like externals by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    They're easy to handle and store. But if you're going to use singles then you need to get the packaging material they ship bulk drives in, and put the drives in ZIPLOC antistatic baggies with those little moisture packets. Both are readily and inexpensively available via mail order.

    External disk enclosures do little to protect hard drives.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  36. Free anti-static bags by toppavak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A great way to get free anti-static bags is to order samples from semiconductor companies like TI and Analog Devices. They'll send you free stuff wrapped up in decently sized anti-static bags. Great for if you only have a couple drives to store, but if you need 10, for example, just go ahead and buy some.

    1. Re:Free anti-static bags by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Dude. Are you really such a cheapskate as to go to the bother of mooching a phony sample and waiting days for it to turn up just to save like 50 cents on a bag?
      Frys Electronics sell packs of 10 big antistatic bags for around 5 bucks.

    2. Re:Free anti-static bags by toppavak · · Score: 1

      Alas, we don't have Fry's in my area (I'm in NC). I don't know of any places here to buy the bags directly, so I either have to buy a 10-pack online and pay shipping on it plus wait a couple days or I order the samples. I actually do use the samples, though, usually stuff like surface-mount op-amps that can still be hand-soldered. I got a couple DSPs on sample from them a while back that I've been meaning to get mounted on a PCB to play around with but haven't gotten around to doing it yet.

    3. Re:Free anti-static bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like your style. Here are some tips I find useful.

      • Reuse teabags at least three times.
      • Switch off the lights and use candles. Create new candles by melting down old candle stubs.
      • Don't waste money on fancy food. If you're too proud to dive dumpsters, sugar has all the calories you need.
      • Make your own shoes out of old car tyres and string.
      • Do your Christmas shopping in January.
      • Cut your own hair with scissors and a bowl.
      • If your girlfriend insists on eating out, bring a packed lunch. The bill will be halved!
    4. Re:Free anti-static bags by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      In my experience the bags aren't always big enough to hold hard drives. TI mails me samples via Digikey, and AD sends me little plastic boxes with foam.

  37. My favorite method by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    I prefer to store mine in the cellar. Make sure you remove the lights and the stairs. Place the hard drives in a locked filing cabinet in an unused bathroom. And put a sign "Beware of the Leopard" on the bathroom door. That's the first place people would look for it. :P

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:My favorite method by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      "Beware of the Leopard" is obviously only for Mac backups. If your backups are from Linux, better use "Beware of the Penguin".

      But be aware that even in that location, your backups are not safe. After all, there might be a Vogon constructor fleet destroying the Earth next thursday. So you better have a space-bound backup solution.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  38. My approach... by raw-sewage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have two home-built servers: one is an always-on, live NAS; the other is a backup server that I power on only to do backups (or restores if it comes to that). First rule I go by: always use the slower 5400 RPM drives, such as the Western Digital "Green" or the Samsung EcoGreen. For both media streaming and backup purposes, these hard drives are still plenty fast. The biggest benefit, though, is that they use less energy (particularly important if your system is always on), and don't get as hot, making cooling much easier (which usually also translates to quieter).

    My live server is currently 4 x 1TB drives in RAID-5, using Linux software RAID. (I know RAID is no substitute for backup, but I still consider it "quasi" backup. But I also have real backup.) This system is fairly un-interesting: it's your typical DIY NAS.

    The backup server is housed in the Norco RPC-4020. For $300, you get 24 SATA hot-swap bays. That price is hard to beat. I haven't filled this case up with drives yet, and I have plenty of physical space going forward. The hardware is just some unused spare components I had lying around. Extra SATA ports are provided by the Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 (which works fine in "regular" 32-bit PCI slots).

    This, IMO, is a pretty simple set up. I just power up the backup server whenever I need it, and turn it off when I'm done. I don't care about performance, since backups are always run as a batch job (typically over night).

    Before I bought that Norco case, I was just using individual drives with a Thermaltake BlacX SATA-to-USB hard drive docking station. This is cheaper, just slightly less convenient. I did order 50 "zip lock"-style anti-static bags for $13. I ordered them from staticbags.com ("GRC Enterprises" was listed on my invoice). After I copied data to the drive and put it in an anti-static bag, I just added it to the stack of drives I had on my bookshelf. The Norco case definitely looks better! :)

    All in all, I consider my system fairly robust. It's only semi-secure against my stupidity, and since its all housed in the apartment, does not safeguard against fire. But since the media rips are just copies of DVDs I actually own, my insurance policy becomes the ultimate backup.

    1. Re:My approach... by azav · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who runs a video codec company bragging to me about his RAID-5, until it died. I told him about my luck with the Drobo and he now has 2.

      Just FYI.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  39. RAID is not a backup solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    RAID is used as redundancy against hardware failure, not as a backup solution. If one of your drives fails in a RAID 1, sweet, you've not lost your data. However, overwriting all your data with crap will leave then you with two drives of crap. Where's your data now?

    TFA isn't asking about hardware failure in a way that RAID would be the correct answer.

    1. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      He is completely asking about protection from hardware failure. He is writing differently named shows to storage and never deleting or altering. Why would he need incremental backups?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  40. One simple word by azav · · Score: 4, Informative

    Drobo.

    Http://www.drobo.com.

    I have 2 of them and one has saved my butt.

    After losing 7 hard drives behind a cheap surge protector after a lightning strike, I now have serial APS surge protectors and a 4.5 TB Drobo.

    Format it for 8 TB and you can swap drives in and out as you need to move up in storage capacity.

    It's pretty brainless to use. You just plug it in and let it do its job. Get the fast SATA drives.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:One simple word by azav · · Score: 1

      OH. And I had one drive in the Drobo fail and it told me that all my data was safe, just replace the failed drive. I did and everything was good again.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    2. Re:One simple word by 47Ronin · · Score: 1

      Yep. We have a Drobo connected to one of our workstations via Firewire 800 and share the drive between our local users in this department using a simple gigabit ethernet switch. It's practically a no-brainer expandable, protected data solution that requires no IT assistance. We have ours formatted HFS+ (between macs) using a 16 TB volume size to maximize capacity. In the future if 16 TB isn't enough (LOL?) then we'll just chain another 16 TB Drobo to that from the other Firewire 800 port.

      --
      Those who laugh at you for you having a Mac.. are the people who constantly call you to fix their PC.
    3. Re:One simple word by Rantastic · · Score: 1
      Drobos are nice for brainless storage. However, the cost of letting the drobo do all the "thinking" is that they have *really* slow transfer rates.

      If you need high performance storage, forget drobo.

      --
      Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
    4. Re:One simple word by 47Ronin · · Score: 1

      Actually, fast is a relative term. Our local LAN workstations work fine with a Drobo as a shared active storage system for 1080p high-definition raw video projects which we all can edit from _simultaneously_. That's the key... there's enough throughput for multiple users to push heavy live data without hiccups, even in a bandwidth-hogging setup like workgroup video editing.

      --
      Those who laugh at you for you having a Mac.. are the people who constantly call you to fix their PC.
    5. Re:One simple word by idobi · · Score: 1

      For media center storage, the Drobo is plenty fast to allow a dozen different computers to stream hd hd content. Using it to edit HD or as a scratch disk, i wouldn't recommend it - but for watching shows and movies, it's a no brainer.

    6. Re:One simple word by RedBear · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard of the Drobo unit itself having a slow transfer rate. Some people even use them as boot drives. But the DroboShare, the separate unit that turns it into a NAS, has some major issues. I have personally experienced some unbelievably slow transfer rates from a DroboShare unit. We're talking dial-up Internet speeds, kilobytes per second over the local gigabit network from the DroboShare, which is supposed to have a gigabit connection also. No exaggeration. That doesn't work well when you're trying to preview hundreds of 12-megapixel digital photos in a folder, for instance.

      Direct connection to the Drobo itself seems to work great and sharing the drive from a computer directly connected to the drive should also work well. I really don't know how they screwed up the DroboShare so badly.

    7. Re:One simple word by azav · · Score: 1

      Why is this? When I first used my Drobo, I was getting 50 MBpS from the internal drive in my iMac to the Drobo. 13 MBpS is common. Yet, I have seen data transfer rates that drop down to 200 KBpS at times.

      Do you have any idea why?

      Be this as it is, my data is backed up and that's mainly what matters, though I would like to know what contributes to the occasional slowness.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  41. You don't need to shuffle drives by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Just get one of these.

  42. Bare Drives + Quick Install eSata Enclosure(s) by woboyle · · Score: 3, Informative

    My solution to this is to store my stuff on bare sata-2 drives (1 - 1.5TB @ $0.10USD / GB). I have a couple of eSata enclosures which offer tool-less installation - just a thumb-latch, and slide the drive in/out (about $50USD). So, I keep the bare drives organized on a shelf, and can plug one in as desired in about 30 seconds. Cheaper than tape, and just about as cheap as single-layer DVD-R discs, plus each 1TB drive will hold about 250 SL or 125 DL DVD's worth of data. Since the cost / GB is about the same for the newer 1.5TB discs as for 1TB discs of the same speed, I am getting the bigger drives these days. Each drive is about the size of a small paperback book.

    If you want to back up one of these, with the eSata connection to the computer you can back up a TB from disc to disc in about 4 hours. That's a collection of a couple hundred feature-length movies.

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
    1. Re:Bare Drives + Quick Install eSata Enclosure(s) by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > a couple of eSata enclosures which offer tool-less installation
      > - just a thumb-latch, and slide the drive in/out (about $50USD)

      Which model did you get? Am looking myself for assembly-less (as i screws etc.) external USB and/or SATA enclosures...

    2. Re:Bare Drives + Quick Install eSata Enclosure(s) by woboyle · · Score: 1

      I got a StarTech InfoSafe enclosure. Has both eSata and USB 2.0 external connections. Don't know off hand if it handles both sata and ide drives. I'm using sata-2 drives.

      --
      Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  43. Simple, use - http://freenas.org/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://freenas.org/

  44. Buy a Drobo by myxiplx · · Score: 1

    The biggest concern I'd have with single disks is that disk fail. Regularly.

    I can see the point of wanting to store to disk - plenty of space, easy to use, and fast. But I'd really want some kind of redundancy. Have you thought about buying an external raid array? Possibly the easiest to use is the Drobo - just fill it with as many disks as you want, and it'll ensure your data is protected:

    http://www.drobo.com/

    They're more expensive than just buying disks (£300 empty), but that's well worth it if you'd like your data to still be accessible when you come back to use it.

    1. Re:Buy a Drobo by dc29A · · Score: 1

      If your Drobo breaks down, can you recover your files without buying another Drobo?

  45. How paranoid are you? by pilot-programmer · · Score: 1
    When I lived in an area prone to a lot of lightning storms, I got into the habit of putting my backups into anti static bags, then into a cardboard lined steel ammo can with a desiccant pack.

    Steel ammo cans can be purchased at any surplus store and many outdoor/hunting stores. They will protect from lightning as well as electromagnetic pulse. They come with a rubber gasket making them waterproof, but they are not fireproof - if your house burns down around the ammo can, the heat will destroy your drives.

    So, if you are really paranoid, get a fireproof safe big enough to store the ammo can...

    1. Re:How paranoid are you? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Most fireproof safes allow heat to get above recommended storage temps for drives (they're usually designed to keep paper or cloth from burning). Offsite storage is best for fire-paranoia.

  46. Re:Point Missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And spin up every single drive through a boot cycle. Not even decent offline storage.

    Also, you would have to unplug the entire rig when you're not using it to get even a comparable level of hardware integrity. You would still be causing n times as much wear on your drives, where n = (number of drives) / (average number of drives you want to use at once.)

    Also be using probably 2n+k times as much power, since if you buy a cheap refurbished box off the 'net, it probably has some very large constant k power usage next to which the hard drive dock is effectively zero.

  47. Using hard drives as removable cartridges by dlapine · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you'd just like to store your data off the PC, and you need "unlimited" storage, get a sata hot-swap mobile rack, a bunch of drives and presto!

    Specifically, this is what I use.

    Get one of these - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817994057 and install it. Its' hot swap, and tray-less, so it treats the sata drives like cartridges. It's about $25.

    Find out if your motherboard supports sata hot swap - if not, you'll need one of sate card that can do hotplug, try this - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132003. It works and it's about $25 as well.

    Then determine your storage needs- 1TB drives can be had for as low as $75, but that's for relatively cheap drives. The better ones are about $100. 1.5TB drives are available for $130. The 2 TB still command a premium price at $280.

    I'd recommend the 1.5's.

    Buy a few of them, just like you would buy tape cartridges. Geek tip- if you buy several(4-5) drives at once from Newegg, they ship them in a styrofoam shipping thing, that has slots for 3.5" drives and works wonderfully as shelf container. You keep the anti-static bags the drives are shipped in, and put them on the drives before stowing them in the styrofoam form.

    There, you now have the equivalent of a tape drive and cartridges, for all of $50 for the "drive" and cartridges at the price point you want. Unlike cheap tape, you get sata speeds, no vendor lock-in, and your data on a medium that is universal.

    All that being said, you have do your backups as if the drives were tape cartridges- that implies a cartridge (drive) rotation system, data stored redundantly on multiple cartridges, regular backups and verification, etc. It won't do you much good if you don't follow the proper backup steps. Here's a guide to doing it properly- http://www.structuredsolutions.net/whitepapers/Tape%20Backup%20Procedure.htm

    It is a nice piece of kit, however. It's up to you to use it properly.

    --
    The Internet has no garbage collection
    1. Re:Using hard drives as removable cartridges by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      Think Geek's dard drive dock sounds good, but it limits you to one hard drive interface standard.

      Depending on how long your "long term" backups are, I'd favor something with a wider standard - like USB.

      Your MB/$ ratio is going to be a lot worse, and you are limited to 500gb today for USB-powered models. On the plus side you get a platform independent interface that doesn't involve opening up a case. Something like these:
      http://freeagent.seagate.com/en-us/hard-drive/Free-Agent.html?showIntro=false

      Imagine trying to track down an MFM controller today - you'll have the same problem with SATA & IDE in the future. I expect USB to be supported a lot longer than today's generation of HD interfaces.

    2. Re:Using hard drives as removable cartridges by dlapine · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't recommend using rotating-platter drives for "long term" archival storage, if by "long-term", you are talking more than 5 years. The lifespan of modern drives is such that 5 years is possible, but no guarantee.

      The choice of format certainly won't be a factor in the ease of retrieval in the next 5 years, and probably won't in the next 10. ATA 1 was approved as standard back in 1994, and most motherboards today still have an onboard connector that supports it. That's what, 15 years of complete support? Any reason to believe that they will stop selling usb adapters for ide anytime soon? If you're concerned with sata's lifespan, just buy the $20 usb-to-sata adaptor now and you're covered. And realistically, what other drive interface would you suggest for home backup? SAS? Sata is the cheap, reliable and fast option these days.

      The big issue with USB is that it is too slow for practical backups when the data involved approaches 1TB. With most USB external drives, you'd be lucky to break 20MB/s for sustained transfers. That's 50 seconds per GB, or almost 2 hours to backup the lot. The original poster was describing his effort to backup his media collection, so assuming that his backup needs involved hundreds of gigabytes of data is not too far fetched. Sata transfer rates on modern drives should be 50-60MB/s sustained, and quite possibly higher. This gives you a backup time of less than an hour, which is a lot more practical.

      The external usb drive option also has a higher cost. The Freeagent unit adds about a $50 premium for each extra drive, not reasonable for a single unit, but quite expensive for a good swap set of 4 or 5 drives, and an unnecessary duplication of equipment. I'm not knocking the concept, but in practice, the external USB units are not as cheap or fast as a mobile tray and standard sata drives.

      One could make a case for external drives with esata support, but you'd still be looking at an extra cost of $50 per drive, and a duplication of hardware. No thanks.

      The great thing about this concept is that once solid state drives get to the point where they are cheap enough, they are a drop in replacement for the rotating platter drives you used to use. Instant upgrade in both reliability and speed. Assuming of course, that some manufacturer gets a clue and releases said drives in the 3.5" form factor. Don't get me started...

      --
      The Internet has no garbage collection
  48. Good FS by zdzichu · · Score: 1

    Store them in plastic boxes in sets. You don't want just RAID1, 5 or 6. You need filesystem which will actually correct errors as they appear. Use ZFS or btrfs.

    --
    :wq
  49. huh? by Skizmo · · Score: 0

    aXXo ?? Is that you ?

  50. not just bare drives by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I'd be concerned about having backups on just bare internal drives rattling around in a storage box.

    Apart from the environmental (static/moisture etc) issues, I've found out the hard way how fragile SATA connectors really are. In 2 years of owning a system with SATA I've accidentally broke 2 connectors on drives. In decades of messing with PC's before that I never once broke an IDE connector.

    Consequently I have a theory that drive manufacturers make SATA connectors so feeble on purpose just to sell more drives. I now use these things:

    http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/search.asp?keywords=MRK-200ST-BK

    The only annoying thing about these is the need to keep a key around to swap the drives in and out as they get mechanically locked in the bay. If you dont like that maybe you can 'modify' it (like I did) or find similar product that doesnt use a key.

  51. I'm using FreeAgent Go by steveha · · Score: 1

    This is what I decided to use for backup and offline storage:

    http://freeagent.seagate.com/en-us/hard-drive/portable-hard-drive/Free-Agent.html

    They are a convenient size, they come in colors, and all you need to plug one in is a USB cable. I haven't bought the dock yet, but I'm planning to buy a couple.

    I love using a 500 GB FreeAgent drive with my netbook... it hardly adds any weight to my carrying bag, and then I have all this storage. And yes, it's just USB bus-powered, and my Acer Aspire One has no trouble powering it. (You don't need one of those two-headed USB cables, to draw power from two USB ports, either. Just one USB cable.)

    These aren't too expensive, but they aren't as cheap as just using internal drives with some sort of dock. The ultimate in density/price will always be boring internal drives... but these aren't bad. Around $110 on Newegg for the 500 GB one; compare to $90 for a 3.5" 7200 RPM internal SATA hard drive on Newegg. If you don't need the speed of the internal drive, the convenience of the external may be worth it.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  52. raid? lvm? backup? optical? answers here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people already mentioned Raid - please remember that raid is primarily for high availability and it is not a reliable solution to backup. A raid will not save you from power supply blowing and taking out mobo+hard_drives, it will not help you when your raid-5 suffers a second failure while rebuilding with a fresh drive or hot-standby, nor will it help you when your house is involved in a destructive act of "mother nature".

    As a side note, I would stay away from volume managers as well - just follow the KISS (keep it simple stupid) principle.

    Here is my setup at home - not high availability, but cheap and reliable:

    A Linux/FreeBSD file server setup with individual mountpoints, no raid, no volume manager. You get all the capacity purchased, a single modern SATA drive can basically fill a 1Gbit link (so speed is not limiting) and if one drive fails, you only loose that mountpoint (as opposed to one huge linear/append volume being affected).

    A Linux/FreeBSD backup server (identical drives to the first machine - mine is a low end PII/400 with 384MB ram). Same simple mountpoints and a nightly cron job doing incremental rsync with multiple directories full of hard-links to non-changed files (lookup dirvish - http://www.dirvish.org/, I'm actually using my own rsync wrapper based on the same idea).

    Structure your storage on the file server so that you have archive and newstuff directories. Anything that you create/generate goes into newstuff, once you have enough to fill a DVD_or_blueray, burn it, deposit it into your security box at the bank and move to 'archive' (never touch anything in archive - make it RO).

    You now have a robust, cheap and simple file server, a backup server with 30-90 days of incremental backups in case you need to restore files, and a stack of optical media in the bank. In case of a disaster, just copy the optical media into replacement server's archive directory. Just remember to start a fresh optical media dump every ~5 years - they don't last much longer than that.

    I have a 1.75TB file server, a 1.75TB backup server, a security box full of DVD+Rs and the "system" is hands-off (other than burning a few DVDs every 1-2 months).

    Good Luck!

    M.

    ps. make sure to put your machines on UPS and use XFS for best overall performance with large filesystems with tons of hard-links where rsync is stat-ing everything each night...

  53. Up to date storage by Demonantis · · Score: 1

    Remember to update your method of storage after a couple years. Even if the media lasts a decade doesn't mean you will have a machine that reads it.

  54. lifespan by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind: by the time you need any backups for the purposes of convenience, new technologies may have come around which will be far easier or far faster than the encoding process you went through previously.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  55. Uhh, the DVD's they came on? by tylersoze · · Score: 1

    How about you use the DVD's you ripped them from as backup? Of course, I'm assuming this is the source you're ripping them from and not, say, illegal torrents or DVR recordings. I know that DVD's don't last forever, but do you really care if you still have your copy of Beverly Hills Chiuaua 20 years from now? This doesn't seem like the most important of data to back up. Oh I lost movie X, oh well so what or if I care enough I'll just buy another copy is probably a lot cheaper than buying an enormous collection or hard drives.

    Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I have very, very little personal data I care enough about to backup. Mostly stuff that's irreplaceable, family photos, personal source code, etc.

  56. Do you know anywhere that builds computers...? by Peet42 · · Score: 1

    If you ask nicely they'll be able to give you large cardboard boxes with foam dividers inside intended for transporting large quantities of uncased drives.

    I've got one I use for storing "spare" drives; it holds two rows of 10.

  57. My solution: Drobo + BlacX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a similar setup. 1500+ movies, 2600+ TV shows stored on disk, and streamed via iTunes to my AppleTV. All of these were ripped by myself from DVD, over the period of about 8 years. Needless to say, this represents a lot of my time so I'm keen to not see all that work lost in a disk failure or fire.

    My storage solution was to use two Drobo units, each with (4) 1TB drives, giving me a total of 5.4GB of usable online storage. These are connected via FW800 to my workstation, which runs iTunes and shares out my media to the network.

    For data protection, I don't backup. I ARCHIVE. Using a Thermaltake BlacX docking station and my collection of old, cheap SATA drives (250-500GB), I have a simple procedure for data protection: when I write a new movie or season of shows to the online storage, I also write it to one of my archive disks. The archive disks are then stored in a fire-proof, water-proof document safe, itself stored inside a larger theft-resistant home safe.

    This gives me disk-level fault-tolerance provided by the Drobos, as well as restore capability in the event of a catastrophic event, at what I consider to be a reasonable price-point.

    1. Re:My solution: Drobo + BlacX by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      I also write it to one of my archive disks. The archive disks are then stored in a fire-proof, water-proof document safe, itself stored inside a larger theft-resistant home safe...

      But wait, there's more. We then take your hard drive and wrap it in a French crepe which is then rolled in a corn husk and deep fried. We then take that and wrap it in a Chicago style pizza....Taco Town! http://www.hulu.com/watch/1447/saturday-night-live-taco-town

  58. Anyone know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of hard drive configuration Drobo uses?

    My guess is MAID (Massive array of idle disks), but I don't know for sure.

    Has anyone seen any tutorials on how to setup a MAID or Drobo-like hard drive array under Linux?

    Drobo is very nice, but as a NAS solution it's very pricey.

  59. Re:on a related note... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

    AutoGK default settings work fine over here (~70 rips so far)...

  60. Hudzee hard drive case... by hudzee · · Score: 0

    Try this. http://www.hudzee.com/ We make a plastic hard drive case designed specifically for your needs. Features: Professional Labeling System for keeping organized. Can be stored on a shelf vertically or stacked horizontally. Specialized anti-static foam padding and liner to protect the hard drive components. Textured surface for easy handling. Secure latch. I hope this is what you are looking for! ~hudzee

    1. Re:Hudzee hard drive case... by dbotta · · Score: 1

      I've used this product and love it! I especially love the option to store the case vertically.

  61. Backblaze by midmopub · · Score: 1

    I have been using encrypted Backblaze $5/mo backup for my home system for a few months now. I think in the end it will save me way more money on the bottom line then a dedicated system that will periodically need updated and maintained. It is uses 2048-bit RSA public/private key system that makes me feel warm and fuzzy. For the first time I feel pretty good about my backup of all my family photos and movies. http://www.backblaze.com/

  62. I'm thinking of getting by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking of getting a WD ShareSpace, it's a four bay enclosure that has USB and network ports, RAID, comes populated with 2 to 8 TB of space.
    Then I'd replace the drives individually as I run out of space an larger ones come along.

    Right now I'm using three WD (I'm loyal to the brand even though I have no data to support that it's any better than any of the others) My Books connected to my second computer which I use as a download and content sever.

    The reason I want the ShareSpace is because sometimes I'd like to have access to the data while needing to reboot the server and the My Books each require their own power cable.
    Though if you wanted just to fill one up and put it in storage they would probably be a good solution.

  63. I use three HD's... by kurfu · · Score: 1

    For backup, I use three HD's and rotate them:

    1-Caddy (unposered) - will be used on next backup, then moved off-site.

    2-Closet - will be moved to caddy after next backup

    3-OFFSITE (locked in my desk at work) - this is the most recent back up, and will be moved to closet after next backup.

    After a backup, the rotation looks like this:

    1 goes to 3
    2 goes to 1
    3 goes to 2

  64. Shouldn't I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't I be getting paid to give this advice?
    I feel like saying "hi, My name is john Thank you for contacting Info Avenue tech services. Whats your problem sir?

  65. Storage cases from WeibeTech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WeibeTech makes cases designed specifically for offline storage of internal drives:

          http://www.wiebetech.com/products/cases.php

  66. The Fire Sale by westlake · · Score: 1

    A fireproof/waterproof safe is good for that and a number of other items as well.

    The home fire safe is UL rated for paper documents and currency. Internal temperatures rising to around 400 degrees F.

    The media-rated safe, 125. Expect to spend $200 for a small 30 pound box. Sentry Fire-Safe Media Chest

  67. Try this for long term storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Print out each frame on papyrus and fashion flip books then store in clay jars berried in the desert. Inscribe the sound tracks on gold records attach to deep space probes and shot out of the solar system. Line drawings on naked humans optional

    1. Re:Try this for long term storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inscribe the sound tracks on gold records attach to deep space probes and shot out of the solar system. Line drawings on naked humans optional

      That's all well and good until one of the probes gets picked up by a Psychlo recon and they gas us and loot the planet.

  68. anti-static bag by kai6novice · · Score: 2, Informative
  69. Protektive Pak by milesw · · Score: 1

    I recently had the exact same question. After an exhaustive search, I found these guys who specialize in ESD control packaging:

    http://www.protektivepak.com/

    I ordered their 37305 In-Plant Handler (which accommodates up to forty 3.5" hard drives and PCI cards beautifully) from these guys (the only ones I could find who would ship outside the continental U.S.):

    http://oemmaterials.com/

    I swap hard drives / PCI cards regularly and am very happy with this solution.

  70. Re:Do you plan on using the disks on a regular bas by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1
    Where are these inexpensive USB caddies?

    I have been looking for a while as I have 6x 160GB IDE drives here from my old file server, after I realised that spending £75 on a 1TB drive would save me and be a whole lot quieter and easier than a noisy file server running 24/7 eating ~180W. I think I calculated about 6 months or so to break even in costs.

    Anyway, I was interested in the idea of reusing the drives in usb enclosures for back up, but basically once I factor in the cost of 6x enclosures, I'm better off buying a single new drive which are even cheaper now than they were back then (end of last year).

    I'm thinking £5 or less per enclosure would be suitable, I think the best I could find was somewhere between £10 and £15 (x 6 = £60-£90!) I can get a 1.5TB drive for that these days.

    If I were to do that I'd probably then have to move my 2x 500GB sata drives outs, and then I'd be faced with the same situation again. For the cost of £40-£50 can get a brand new 500GB external drive...

  71. Simple solution with hard drives. by Embolism · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a CentOS 5 Server running Web, email, and video server for my house. For backups I bought a USB external enclose that holds 4 drives. It automatically spins them down after (IIRC) about 20 minutes of non-use. Backups run on cron, I check it once every six months.

  72. works for me by drpt · · Score: 0

    I keep backup drives in the antistatic bags with desiccant. in an old 8-track case which fits nicely in a portable firebox.

    --
    Proudly Butchering code for 20 years
  73. Re:Point Missed by nizo · · Score: 1

    I use one of these:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811998021 in a crapbox (and bought a few extra trays). The nice feature this one has is a power switch; I simply leave it off most of the time, but when I want to do a backup I turn it on (BEFORE powering on). This way I don't have to worry about removing the drive all the time (though I should get better about that, and I will once I get a media safe).

  74. Re:Do you plan on using the disks on a regular bas by nizo · · Score: 1

    If you plan on getting more than one, try to get all the same model. It is really convenient to not have to hunt for a specific power cord (or even a specific USB cord) if they all use the same cables.

  75. SSD by Plekto · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been dealing with this for clients for several years now - most of whom deal with AV and photography. Stuff that absolutely must remain intact at any cost.

    For a while we used RAID - and RAID 1 and similar redundant options do work well enough. And we debated Blu-Ray. But the final solution seems to be solid state drives. They look to be stable enough once written to actually qualify as suitable for archival purposes. This comes as all hard drives seem to be suffering from poor quality lately. I just know that some of the companies are flat out lying to us in their white sheets based upon how many data failures I have witnessed in the last couple of years.

    They aren't exactly inexpensive, but they do work better for this than a hard drive.

    1. Re:SSD by SinShiva · · Score: 1

      What FS are you using?

      i'm personally too scared to use SSD for anything semi-permanent until btrfs moves to the stable branch. i suppose ssd is fast enough to just use ext2, though.

  76. I prefer addin to my hdds by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Internal or external, there lies the question, internal has speed advantages, but space disadvantages, and storing too. I prefer using externals, double up (bkups for each drive )
    so 1 500gb, = 2 in reality, 1 for stuff, and one for the bckup of that drive.

    Each time you need to add, another 500gb, then keep adding, the problem is no one sees the importance of keeping the drives small enough, as 2tb drives come out, people will rush to replace their 4 500gb with 1 2tb....wrong! Keeping the files separate means less possibility of corruption.

    If 1 2tb drive conks out, its a bugger to get back a full 2tb of data, where as 500gb although large, is a little easier. I prefer this way anyways....plus externals can be easily shared , where as
    internals are tougher to lug around, if no one has proper set up to connect to.

  77. Do a by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

    RAID 6, RAID cards have really gone down in rpice and you just throw 5 1TB drives together and not worry...

    now if you want it to be so backed up that if your house catches in fire your data will be fine, get a couple of 1TB hard drives, put them in $10 external cases, and throw them in a storage locker.

    Also as an added bonus if the world ever comes to an end and the whole internet goes down in smolderines you can just take your box of hard drives to the fallout shelter along with a netbook and you will be the guy who keeps our culture alive.

    People will discover these lost drives and view world changing films such as Beverly hills chihuahua, wolverine orgins, jumper, and twilight.

    You know what ....just throw the drives in acid, we don't want historians looking at those xD

  78. mixed feelings on SansDigital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have several hard drives in a SansDigital external USB chassis. It's not anywhere near as cheap as stacking up the drives in an anti-static bag.

    Also it's not fast enough to stream ALL my DVDs. I think some of them are really high bit rate (two 30 minute episodes on one DVD). Then again, it could be the crazy way I use RAID and LVM: http://www.purplefrog.com/~thoth/philosophy/raid.html

  79. Re:Do you plan on using the disks on a regular bas by MoreDruid · · Score: 0, Redundant
    If you plan to use them now and then get one of these puppies.

    store them in their original packing material (anti-static bag/plastic box with a silica pad in it) and pop 'em in whenever you need to. No need for all kinds of different USB caddies, power supplies and whathaveyou anymore.

    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  80. Hudzee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use these:

    http://www.hudzee.com/

    A bit pricey, but they work well.

  81. Do not use new Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I my experience new drives have failed within 1 -2 weeks. I would suggest to get a new disk and use it for couple of weeks (atleast) and then use it for backup.

    just my 2 cents.

  82. Here is what one pro photography shop does... by drouse · · Score: 1

    This is a post from "Image Mechanics," a business that apparently manages tons of image files, on their blog:

    http://www.deathtofilm.com/2006/11/12/image-mechanics-off-line-archiving-system/

    Long story short, they write to an external removable hard drive and then store the raw drives in blocks of anti-static foam cut to hold the drives that then fits into a filing cabinet.

    --
    -- I browse at +5 with stripped sigs ... Ha! Ha!
  83. Do it Snuggie style! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When it comes to computer hardware, it is all a matter of rolling the dice. Some hardware will fail under the most ideal conditions, while other hardware will survive years upon years of gross negligence under unbearably hot and humid conditions. You, as the user, only have so much say in the matter. Srsly though, if you need an inexpensive interim solution, just get yourself some hard drive enclosures.

  84. Hard Drive Mobile Racks by vwjeff · · Score: 1

    Buy one of these:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817121172
    Buy one of these for each of your drives:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817121175
    Store the drives in a secure place between backups.

  85. Whoa! 300 comments and nobody mentions BackupPC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To answer your question anti static bags in a safe are FINE but if you want to know the RIGHT way to backup, for free mind you, read my post. :)

    In your case I would expect these to be your main concern.

    * Data Integrity
    * Automatic Backups
    * Cheap
    * Easy to setup backup
    * Easy to restore

    But the question is.. If linux could provide all these things in your backup solution would you consider it?

    Yes, BackupPC is FREE backup software for linux and is by far hands down the best way and easiest way to back up all your computers on your network automatically. (please knowledgable people comment and back me up)

    What you need is any running computer (not too old you want it to have SATA capability on the board at least). Throw in all your drives, Install Linux (Ubuntu is the one everyone is talking about), install backuppc (a few button clicks in the OS) Then configure BackupPC to check your computers at night for changes and you are done! Backups are done automatically and you can just go to the website to view/access your files.

    ** BackupPC running on a linux machine is like sex and candy. The ultimate set it and forget it solution. **
    I'll be honest, SETUP is the only problem with backup BackupPC. However, It is a small price to pay though for having a free, enterprise class solution running in your home that you NEVER have to worry about. It would probably take me 30 minutes once linux was up and running to get backuppc installed and starting its first backup. For you, being your first time, it would take longer. But it's worth it!

    Once it's running though you don't have to worry about a thing! You can periodically check BackupPC's status by going to a web browser and typing in the address of the machine that you set up. You can retrieve a file in a matter of two clicks. Much easier than going to your closet or safe and plugging in drives.

    ** If a drive fails on one of your machines (usually they fail slowly giving you some notice it is going to die) after you replace the drive you can quickly get the files off of backuppc back onto your main pc. ** If a backuppc drive dies then you *DO* have a backup which is on your main computer. Set backuppc back up with a new drive and have it run a full backup again.

    * Having your files in two places all the time will ensure no data loss.

    Seriously though, a backup should be a set it and forget it type of deal. Not something where every time you get a new file have to think "oh I have to back that up..."

    No, you want something automatic.

    If you really need a backup solution and you know how to install linux and edit some files (this is actually quite a task on command line if you don't know vi or bash(but it's ok you can use graphical vim editor)) you would be interested to know about the FREE backup solution called BackupPC.

    Wow, after reading this I realize I wrote this like an advertisement. lol People please comment and tell everyone that I am sincere in my presentation of backuppc. It really is one of the best... thanx

  86. Trayless Hotswap by benow · · Score: 1

    I recently went for a trayless hotswap solution, and it's worked out well. NVidia SATA hotswap doesn't seem supported in linux, but it works fine with a promise sata pci card. The trayless enclosure means there are no trays lying around or keys to get lost. I brewed up a tool to auto-mount on insert, and unmount after removal and big drives now work like floppies. The only downside is that the enclosure fans are low quality and start making noise after a couple weeks. I ripped the fans out and placed a slow quiet big fan behind the unit. Drives are cool enough and little fan noise. When unused, I stash the drives in a cupboard. Another idea would be to do a find of the removable drive to an online text file, so as to make finding stuff easier.

  87. You filthy pirate by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    Stealing caviar out of the mouths of those poor executives!

  88. crystalline cat litter = very cheap silica gel by turing_m · · Score: 1

    Get a bag of crystalline kitty litter. Cut the top off the bag. Place in cupboard or box with your HDDs. Close cupboard or box. Problem solved.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  89. "digibeta video tape box" for hard drives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have 20 of these from Hudzee, and we like them a lot. http://www.hudzee.com

  90. Ammo cans... by eth1 · · Score: 1

    Buy some .50 caliber ammo cans in good condition (about $5 ea + shipping) and some dessicant packs (also cheap).

    The ammo cans are built like a tank and air/watertight. Glue some foam to the inside, put your drives in and toss in some silica gel.

  91. Drobo by raguirre · · Score: 1

    Perhaps a Drobo could be a good solution for you?

  92. RAID 5 by javamann · · Score: 1

    I had the same problem and after I lost over 80 hours (my time to rip) of work I setup a Server the has 4 one terabyte (low power) drives in a RAID 5 setup. I use a hardware RAID controller (3Ware) since software RAID 5 is REALLY slow and you are usually moving several hundred megabytes per ripped file to the system. I setup the server to be low power and it uses around 65Watts when its idle, which is most of the time.

  93. Cheap SATA caddies are also an option by James+Youngman · · Score: 1

    Personally, I just bought myself a bunch of (well, 6) removable SATA caddies. But I'm using them for offsite backups, so I have slightly different needs to you I guess.

  94. KVM for drives by slaingod · · Score: 1

    This is the 'prior art' post for my switched drive idea. The main issues I have with all of the 'raid' and 8 bay systems I see is that a) the drives are always on, sucking power, b) while raid is certainly safer, it is much more expensive currently than it is worth. Ideally you want to keep you costs below $1 per movie for storage, which the 1.5TB drives approach assuming an average of 7GB per movie. The 8 bay drives seem to cost at minimum $500 which is a lot of overhead.

    I would rather see a simple box with slots for say 24 drives. These drives would then be wired to a switched sata controller ala a KVM. By switched I mean that pressing a physical radio style button, that drive would become the active drive, would power up and mount automatically. Ideally the system would allow 2 drives to be powered at the same time for ease of transferring between drives. Also ideally it would be possible to switch from one drive to another by signal from the computer in addition to the physical buttons.

    --
    http://blog.slaingod.com
  95. Oh dear by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    http://www.icydock.com/product/mb454spf.html Under linux, umount the drive before removal.

  96. Easy and cheap solution by really? · · Score: 1

    Get one of these
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856167032

    Get a couple 1.5 TB drives and a CF card to run the OS from.

    Get an adaptor/rails to mount the second HD in the CD space and you're set.

    The OS will put the two HD to sleep and the box by itself only uses a "couple" watts of power.

    Small, fast, cheap ... no need to only pick two.

    --

    "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  97. Safe and secure HD storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get any a standard bookshelf. Then use a strong adhesive to secure industrial strength magnets to the shelves.

    Then, you can just set the harddrives on the magnets. They won't slide around and get scratched up, and will never accidentally fall out. You can even use the undersides of the shelves as well to double the capacity. Safe, secure, simple!

  98. Re:eSATA and 'books' Rack'em and by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Stack'em. Get some array gear and just keep 'em near-term on-line. You could make your own unimatrix/tertiary adjunct (or, primary/secondary, etc...). Set up a few re-entertainment alcoves, and a vinculum, and you can gorge like a Borg on data... But, don't take a byte (or bite) out of Data's hide... (hidden cache of little nuggets and jewels of seedy information...) he might have some interesting tales he decided to crypt there....

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  99. SD cards? by volkris · · Score: 1

    Since storing movies tends to be a write once activity, would using the various flash options be reliable?

    A full season of a TV show or a few movies could fit on a single 4GB card, and the things are small enough to sort and stack just about anywhere. No need to worry about spinning them up once a year, either.

    Does anyone know where to get cheap SD cards in bulk?

  100. A nice solution, though not free.... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    I'd say have a look at the ICY DOCK MB559US (Or really anything from ICY DOCK, it all seems to be pretty good stuff.) it's an external enclosure that has USB 2.0 and eSATA, and supports SATA II 3gb/s drives. It's barely bigger than the drive itself, costs between $50 and $75, and additional drive trays can be had for $20. (Not as cheap as I'd like.) It's worth noting that they have several different versions to cover a range of different connection types. eSATA, USB 2.0, Firewire 400, Firewire 800... And the trays will also fit in their multibay internal enclosures, just in case you later decide you want one of those big media server jobbers to feed your screens.

    I will admit I have no experience with the devices, but I seriously considered getting one a while back. For now I'm sticking with mass internal storage.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  101. Just dump the stuff by lostinmadnez · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone store TV-shows? As if there is not enough new stuff coming out all the time. What happened to your VCR collection? You probably havent watched one of em and just tossed em years back. What happened to your DVD backups? i havent pulled one of mine out in the last, mhhm, 5 years. I have TBs on my server, and finally realized that I just delete everything older than 2 years because I wont be coming around to watching the old stuff anyway. Not far in the future u can save all ur itunes stuff, movies, vcr on a little pill and swallow it, and soon after that it will be in a cloud anyway and u can, hopefully, search and access it all.

  102. Bury them... by raaisma · · Score: 1

    Bury them underground. It's cool and it won't catch fire.

  103. Irony? by kubaZA · · Score: 1

    Only on /. can you find two threads side by side containing the following:
    - a thread on data management where the data mainly consists of ripped videos and tv shows, and
    - a thread on the legality of cable companies storing said tv shows for the later use by their customers and the MPAA getting on their case.

    And anyway, with the internet being as fast as it is these days, why would you want to keep any movie/tv show data at home when you can just download it again?

    I'd hazard a guess that downloading the data when you need it might actually be *more* convenient then any other data storage system (unless it is always on and connected to your machine)

  104. Re:Do you plan on using the disks on a regular bas by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

    If you plan on getting more than one, try to get all the same model. It is really convenient to not have to hunt for a specific power cord (or even a specific USB cord) if they all use the same cables.

    Or go for the units that have built in PSUs and take a standard PC power cord.

    Rosewill RX82-U (JBOD)

    BYTECC ME-835SU-SL

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  105. Some basic recommendations from a storage guy by Servo · · Score: 1

    1) Don't leave them turned on, especially not in the original system. If the system gets hit by lightning/surge/etc you don't want it to take your backup with it.

    2) Rotate your backups. Assuming you have more than one removable media, swap them out in a rotating fashion.. That gives you multiple restore points in case you have one of the backup media volumes go bad.

    3) If you use an internal drive dock, get one that encloses the drive so it has basic physical protection from handling. Store them in the plastic (usually antistatic) bag they came in somewhere away from the main system.

    4) Instead of using an internal dock with multiple internal drives that all need their own dock sled, consider an external USB/Firewire/eSATA drive instead. You can even get ethernet based drives too, so they can be used on your home network. You can buy an external drive enclosure for pretty cheap and use the same internal drives saving a bit of money, making it about the same cost as using an internal drive docking solution with the bonus that you can then access your backup from ANY system, not just the one that has the dock.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin