'error code 80070020' is produced by several Windows operating systems. It's afflicted some Windows Phone 10 users before.
Most solutions were either rechecking the associated Microsoft account, verifying system date/time were correct and for location, and system updates for Windows Update, which won't help phone users.
Always a chance this is final implementation of EOL for 8.1 users.
I didn't think my Levis 502s were pres-stressed, and I bought them mostly because they did not appear to be.
They have a uniform color, no edge, and if I dry them mechanically they are not stiff. Stiffness like that lasts for about a half hour anyways.
My jeans usually last me several years, which is pretty good. MY work slacks are usually worsted wool, a terribly old-fashioned fabric that wears like iron if you treat it moderately well. Most synthetics have disappointed me, and I no longer purchase them.
I'm not an environut, not do I trust the global warming gang one bit, but recycling and making prudent choices about products is good sense, not wasteful, and usually costs me very little more if at all. I have some terrible habits still, but relying on processed foods and throwing stuff away prematurely are not my particular defects.
The answer to those rural areas is 600MHZ or Band 71 wireless service. This requires some cooperation between providers and those previous users who are abandoning the bands.
OF course there is money involved, as
Note some glitches:
NYC will not get a realistic Band 71 deployment until WRNN-TV abandons the band, and now they plan to move in 2023, though that is not easily independently confirmed.
There is a perception that the money allocated to assist stations in moving won;t cover the expenses for the next 2-3 years. The cell providers are constant pressure to pay more and more to 'force' these existing users off the bands.
T-Mobile was the big winner in the auction, but they may have financial constraints also in deployment.
If you think fiber is expensive in rural areas, however, that dark fiber in metro areas is a valuable asset, and the owners, many being legacy telcos, are reluctant to even rent it. They may be waiting for the government to step in and pay gobs of money to use what has already been paid for.
LEO satellite service is the other option, but it will take time even for Elon to launch all those birds.
I'm a little shocked, shocked! the film makers want to be exempted from copyright they rely on to derive revenue from their work, so they can apparently use other film makers' work for free.
Why could this be wrong? Well, first, fair use is the proper exemption. Of course it could apply, unless of course there is profit involved. I'm guessing they want to use clips in place of stock footage, or perhaps real world event clips to fit plot, or even steal outright clever stuff.
I got the same no results for term "AR-15 lower receiver" in shopping. I get results in All and Images.
I haven't used the shopping page previously that I recall, so it may be Google has no firearm component sellers in their programs, but I doubt that id because gun part sellers don't want to.
ps - I have the screenshot, I'll post it in Google+. If you can't find it, you probably should not be looking for it.
"roughly seven times faster response rates for browsing"
What do you suppose this means? Latency dropping from 30-60 mS to 5-10? Page starts loading seven times faster? Do slow sites magically load seven times faster?
Where i work those jobs lost in 2009 were not replaced, nor were they shuffled onto someone else. We eliminated departments, functions, and nearly 2 layers of management. And so far they have not grown back. We still cut.
Yup. I wrote a script to spot those slow attackers trying to stay under the threshold and hit me every 30 seconds or so. Some did it for months, 24x7. Sort of like the old war dialers, trying not to trigger a response.
These are annoying, but also predictably using dictionary and alphabetic attacks. I'm not worried, of these attackers, 1% ever guess a nonobvious login name, much less password, and I've toyed with fiddling with scripts and trying to encourage attacks on nonexistent credentials just to keep them off track, but trying to outguess these guys is risky.
Pretty much Eastern Europe, Poland has been hitting me lately, but I'm sure these are compromised or rented hosts. Asian hosts are so bad I've got permabans on most of the.cn allocations, since I have virtually no legitimate China demand. EU hosts are random. US hosts are surprisingly infrequent, and the rest of the world seems to not even try much, 2% maybe.
I once permabanned.ru,.by,.cz,.ee,.ht,.mk,.pl,.rs,.si,.sk, and.ua. I turn these off occasionally to see what is actively obnoxious and update if needed.
Same problem . My mail server sees over 99% of logins as malicious, and fail2ban is very busy. Some of the credentials move from IP to IP within milliseconds, not simultaneous attacks, but sequential from one host to another. My web server logs 8 WordPress login attempts per hour from a specific country, changing every few days. They are fairly clever with the credential tries, but I use a surprising admin login name which I thought would be discreetly obvious, and so far not. General web server attacks are easily 99% of hits.
There was once a statistic kept by some security outfit measuring how long an unprotected Linux host could survive on the Internet without being compromised, and I last remember it being 9 seconds. I suspect today that number is dependent more on the host's performance in running the exploits than it is how long it takes to whack on the IP address. Somewhere something is attacking your IP, right now, whether you know it or not, either directly or being handled at the gateway/router/firewall point. All the time. Every day.
They ought to be called out and dealt with, but true IP bans would render some countries without service.
"Islamic terrorist would refuse to eat the cocktail wiener,"
There is much about Islamic terrorists you do not know or understand. But I know you were engaging in theatre, so I'm not really concerned you are that stupid or naive. At least not about that...
Slashdot Mirror
'worth'.
I doubt that word means what you think it means.
'error code 80070020' is produced by several Windows operating systems. It's afflicted some Windows Phone 10 users before.
Most solutions were either rechecking the associated Microsoft account, verifying system date/time were correct and for location, and system updates for Windows Update, which won't help phone users.
Always a chance this is final implementation of EOL for 8.1 users.
I didn't think my Levis 502s were pres-stressed, and I bought them mostly because they did not appear to be.
They have a uniform color, no edge, and if I dry them mechanically they are not stiff. Stiffness like that lasts for about a half hour anyways.
My jeans usually last me several years, which is pretty good. MY work slacks are usually worsted wool, a terribly old-fashioned fabric that wears like iron if you treat it moderately well. Most synthetics have disappointed me, and I no longer purchase them.
I'm not an environut, not do I trust the global warming gang one bit, but recycling and making prudent choices about products is good sense, not wasteful, and usually costs me very little more if at all. I have some terrible habits still, but relying on processed foods and throwing stuff away prematurely are not my particular defects.
The answer to those rural areas is 600MHZ or Band 71 wireless service. This requires some cooperation between providers and those previous users who are abandoning the bands.
OF course there is money involved, as
Note some glitches:
NYC will not get a realistic Band 71 deployment until WRNN-TV abandons the band, and now they plan to move in 2023, though that is not easily independently confirmed.
There is a perception that the money allocated to assist stations in moving won;t cover the expenses for the next 2-3 years. The cell providers are constant pressure to pay more and more to 'force' these existing users off the bands.
T-Mobile was the big winner in the auction, but they may have financial constraints also in deployment.
If you think fiber is expensive in rural areas, however, that dark fiber in metro areas is a valuable asset, and the owners, many being legacy telcos, are reluctant to even rent it. They may be waiting for the government to step in and pay gobs of money to use what has already been paid for.
LEO satellite service is the other option, but it will take time even for Elon to launch all those birds.
Google is suppressing gun-identifies shopping results, at least in the US, even for legal products. What could be wrong with this?
I'm a little shocked, shocked! the film makers want to be exempted from copyright they rely on to derive revenue from their work, so they can apparently use other film makers' work for free.
Why could this be wrong? Well, first, fair use is the proper exemption. Of course it could apply, unless of course there is profit involved. I'm guessing they want to use clips in place of stock footage, or perhaps real world event clips to fit plot, or even steal outright clever stuff.
Let them eat cake.
If you move out of the basement your reception will improve. And not just your cell reception.
I just searched at 1641MST on Google, Shopping, for the term 'AR-15 lower receiver assembly' . The message got was:
"Your search - ar-15 lower receiver assembly - did not match any shopping results."
That is a somewhat suspicious result. The link.
I got the same no results for term "AR-15 lower receiver" in shopping. I get results in All and Images.
I haven't used the shopping page previously that I recall, so it may be Google has no firearm component sellers in their programs, but I doubt that id because gun part sellers don't want to.
ps - I have the screenshot, I'll post it in Google+. If you can't find it, you probably should not be looking for it.
Were there real Demos in the 50s? 1880s?
"roughly seven times faster response rates for browsing"
What do you suppose this means? Latency dropping from 30-60 mS to 5-10? Page starts loading seven times faster? Do slow sites magically load seven times faster?
Not unambiguous.
Where i work those jobs lost in 2009 were not replaced, nor were they shuffled onto someone else. We eliminated departments, functions, and nearly 2 layers of management. And so far they have not grown back. We still cut.
That's not a Trump supporter.
And they will be replaced.
These 11 million plus were not replaced.
Yup. I wrote a script to spot those slow attackers trying to stay under the threshold and hit me every 30 seconds or so. Some did it for months, 24x7. Sort of like the old war dialers, trying not to trigger a response.
These are annoying, but also predictably using dictionary and alphabetic attacks. I'm not worried, of these attackers, 1% ever guess a nonobvious login name, much less password, and I've toyed with fiddling with scripts and trying to encourage attacks on nonexistent credentials just to keep them off track, but trying to outguess these guys is risky.
Pretty much Eastern Europe, Poland has been hitting me lately, but I'm sure these are compromised or rented hosts. Asian hosts are so bad I've got permabans on most of the .cn allocations, since I have virtually no legitimate China demand. EU hosts are random. US hosts are surprisingly infrequent, and the rest of the world seems to not even try much, 2% maybe.
I once permabanned .ru, .by, .cz, .ee, .ht, .mk, .pl, .rs, .si, .sk, and .ua. I turn these off occasionally to see what is actively obnoxious and update if needed.
Same problem . My mail server sees over 99% of logins as malicious, and fail2ban is very busy. Some of the credentials move from IP to IP within milliseconds, not simultaneous attacks, but sequential from one host to another. My web server logs 8 WordPress login attempts per hour from a specific country, changing every few days. They are fairly clever with the credential tries, but I use a surprising admin login name which I thought would be discreetly obvious, and so far not. General web server attacks are easily 99% of hits.
There was once a statistic kept by some security outfit measuring how long an unprotected Linux host could survive on the Internet without being compromised, and I last remember it being 9 seconds. I suspect today that number is dependent more on the host's performance in running the exploits than it is how long it takes to whack on the IP address. Somewhere something is attacking your IP, right now, whether you know it or not, either directly or being handled at the gateway/router/firewall point. All the time. Every day.
They ought to be called out and dealt with, but true IP bans would render some countries without service.
"Islamic terrorist would refuse to eat the cocktail wiener,"
There is much about Islamic terrorists you do not know or understand. But I know you were engaging in theatre, so I'm not really concerned you are that stupid or naive. At least not about that...
"automatically and implicitly trusting package maintainers to do the right thing is awful security policy and awful from a reliability standpoint."
And this is why this, 2018, is the year of Linux as THE desktop.
*whoosh*
Probably not
"And it's perfectly OK to profit & prosper from their crimes."
So, how do we deal with the slavers in Africa, both then and now?
"Americans can not even deal with brown skin"
No, you, sir, can not even deal with Americans that are unconcerned with skin color.
"eating fish which are contaminated with micro-plastics"
Eating fish gut isn't a common event for me. Now, fish meal is a problem, but so far as I know I don't get that in my diet either.
Do I now avoid buying fish based food for my dog? Maybe not. He's a dog.
And all this time I've been warned against eating tuna especially, because they accumulated mercury... Wow. the future IS plastic.
You think there is any good reason for them to do this without disclosure?
It's the failed Windows 10 upgrade that is the dick move.