That's how there will be no cartels. Once stupid liberals are exterminated from American government, US will stop exporting liberalism to Latin America and finally let the local Latino Americans with reason and common sense take care of cartels by wiping them out, like Duterte does, or Lukashenko, or Mussollini.
Down with cartels. Make a parking lot of all their Coca plantations. Use napalm, exterminate every single person protecting them publicly.
That's all there is to it. There is absolutely no excuse for handling organized crime in XXI century when governments have unlimitedly more power than they used to in medieval times. The only medieval aspect that should be left nowadays is going medieval on the asses of protectors of organized crime and organized crime itself.
Prophet Muhammad, sal Allahu 'alaihi wa sallam, did not kill everyone who did not join him. He also did not go out with palm leaves preaching peace either.
In the war, Jews and Christians, were allowed to practice their own religion and pay Jizya (not Zakah, you ignorant imbecile) - which is indeed a tax for protection.
And that is, obviously, was a right thing to do. "Social justice" has nothing to do with the way we establish dominance. Are you some kind of complete idiot?
>Islam is tolerant of a market economy so long as everyone pays either zakat or jizyah. Otherwise, it'll simply kill you and take your stuff.
Stop. Talking. Just stop. Please stop making fool of yourself
Trump continues trolling dems very successfully by trash-tweating them into distracting pointless investigations.
Completely invisible to public is a spectacular economy jumpstart in 2017 fueled solely by a Republican winning the WH and even more in 2018 (never mind market corrections, they happen all the time). Trump could go out as the worst president in history or he could go out as OK president.
Motherboard has found that while YouTube has managed to clamp down on Islamic extremists uploading propaganda
That's because collective Western elite hivemind realizes that Islam is the only viable alternative ideology to dominating Western anti-ideology of liberalism.
During the height of Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, 40,000 volunteers from 80 countries (BBC reported it, with a map infographics - good luck finding it now) came to Iraq and Syria to fight for ideals of Islam, for the establishiment of Islamic State.
This effort is comparable to only one another campaign like that in history: Civil War in Spain in 30s, where people came to fight against fascism.
Neo-Nazism is a stupid non-ideology, glorified and ideologized xenophobia, no wonder it has zero threat to anything remotely meaningful in Western society.
In contrary, Islam, is a full-fledged ideology that covers every single aspect of human life: from the way people wipe their behind after responding to the call of nature to the comprehensive government rules. No other organized religion has it even remotely close: not Christianity, not all the pagans religions - all of them reduced to "personal religion" (basically, you invent a suitable religious modification for your personal needs).
Every single person on Earth can become a Muslim: black and white, homosexuals, women, neo-nazis, libertarians, Trump, Hitler, Putin - every single one of these people can say: Ash-hadu al-laa ilaaha il-Allah wa ash-hadu an-na Muhammadan rasulu-Allah and start from the cleanliest slates, like a newborn baby.
Nationalists and nazi of all kinds, of course, do not have this universality.
The Western response to establishment of Islamic State in Iraq and Syria was quick and un-equivocal. Despite the fact that the whole birth of this movement was a split from al-Qaeda on ideological basis of STOP ATTACKING WEST ON WESTERN TERRITORY the response of the West was much stronger than the response to Al-Qaeda - a massive media campaign to discredit Islamic State in the eyes of Western audience (which magnificiently backfired before finally Western media realized that the best and most common way of "radicalization" is watching CNN and after that it surrounded the military events with a shroud of secrecy - so we do not hear about brutal Dresden-level bombardments of Raqqa, Mosul and Kirkuk that did not leave a single building untouched, so we do not hear about extermination of Sunni population by Shia)
The sole reason for Western response to Islamic State in Iraq and Syria was Islam. Period. Real Islam, with implementation of Shariah, not some personified version of it that is promoted on every single minbar in every single American mosque - five pillars, come to the Masjid, make Wudu properly, help us build a school, etc. The Islam in Islamic State in Iraq and Syria was Islam of the first three righteous generations.
And, of course, the Azhab of modern days, the coalition between Western liberalism, deviant Islamic sects, local secularists and sell-out leaders of Arabic countries lashed at Islamic State.
There is no war on terror, there is a full-fledged war on Islam.
In order to be able to choose you need means. You seem like a proponent of commie equalification. Why don't you visit North Korea and tell us how it works there?
You seem to be following a stupidly absurd notion that such complex macro phenomena like himan society somehow could be self managed by simple rules.
Any scientist worth of salt and familiar with even much simpler biological systems will tell you how stupid you are, an illiterate libertarian imbecile
One would think that comments like yours should be treated as a banality in XXI century, but, sadly, no. People would believe anything presented in a certain language.
Math is not science, math is technology of science. A tool, not an answer.
The first and formost characteristics of science is critical thinking, not use of math.
The epicycles were mathematically more sophisticated than Kepler's laws and gave more accurate predictions during the time of the greatest physical revolution in history.
People also tend to mistake scientific extrapolations, hypotheses for facts.
The perception depends only on how fresh the statement sounds.
The fact is that science is limited to repeating phenomena of nature, and the further you go to the past or the future the less repeated these phenomena are.
For example, how does Big Bang become an object of science is beyond me.
Statements like "this must be true, because according to current scientific views, there is no other possibility" are not scientific truths.
Driverless car is exactly like a bus, Uber is like a bus it's public transportation.
You want packet transportation where people are moved from one place to another in bundles. You do not need to limit yourself to buses. You can bundle self driving cars in virtual car trains
Slashdot Mirror
Propaganda technology have never been stronger in history. Whats the point of recording honestly an opinion of brainwashed imbeciles?
If child pornographers are not using your data server, your data is not private
I am not sure what to make of it.
This
https://questforparadise.files...
We desperately need these at work.
And idiot is an idiot. If you do not get my drift, I am talking about you, dumbass.
LOL, liberal butthurt detected. Get lost, imbecile.
That's how there will be no cartels. Once stupid liberals are exterminated from American government, US will stop exporting liberalism to Latin America and finally let the local Latino Americans with reason and common sense take care of cartels by wiping them out, like Duterte does, or Lukashenko, or Mussollini.
Down with cartels. Make a parking lot of all their Coca plantations. Use napalm, exterminate every single person protecting them publicly.
That's all there is to it. There is absolutely no excuse for handling organized crime in XXI century when governments have unlimitedly more power than they used to in medieval times. The only medieval aspect that should be left nowadays is going medieval on the asses of protectors of organized crime and organized crime itself.
You "knowledge" about Islam amazes me.
Prophet Muhammad, sal Allahu 'alaihi wa sallam, did not kill everyone who did not join him. He also did not go out with palm leaves preaching peace either.
In the war, Jews and Christians, were allowed to practice their own religion and pay Jizya (not Zakah, you ignorant imbecile) - which is indeed a tax for protection.
And that is, obviously, was a right thing to do. "Social justice" has nothing to do with the way we establish dominance. Are you some kind of complete idiot?
>Islam is tolerant of a market economy so long as everyone pays either zakat or jizyah. Otherwise, it'll simply kill you and take your stuff.
Stop. Talking. Just stop. Please stop making fool of yourself
China is a sesspool of all that is evil in the world. The Gog and Magog.
Keep EST/DST for north, allow to keep one T all year around for south, like in Arizona.
Right. Proto-Marxist system. Islam took hold first among elite of Quraish - noblemen and caravan owners.
The fact that there is more social justice in it than in libertarian system should not confuse you. Islam is very tolerant of market economy.
"slight"
Fox has slight liberal lean
Trump continues trolling dems very successfully by trash-tweating them into distracting pointless investigations.
Completely invisible to public is a spectacular economy jumpstart in 2017 fueled solely by a Republican winning the WH and even more in 2018 (never mind market corrections, they happen all the time). Trump could go out as the worst president in history or he could go out as OK president.
That's because collective Western elite hivemind realizes that Islam is the only viable alternative ideology to dominating Western anti-ideology of liberalism.
During the height of Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, 40,000 volunteers from 80 countries (BBC reported it, with a map infographics - good luck finding it now) came to Iraq and Syria to fight for ideals of Islam, for the establishiment of Islamic State.
This effort is comparable to only one another campaign like that in history: Civil War in Spain in 30s, where people came to fight against fascism.
Neo-Nazism is a stupid non-ideology, glorified and ideologized xenophobia, no wonder it has zero threat to anything remotely meaningful in Western society.
In contrary, Islam, is a full-fledged ideology that covers every single aspect of human life: from the way people wipe their behind after responding to the call of nature to the comprehensive government rules. No other organized religion has it even remotely close: not Christianity, not all the pagans religions - all of them reduced to "personal religion" (basically, you invent a suitable religious modification for your personal needs).
Every single person on Earth can become a Muslim: black and white, homosexuals, women, neo-nazis, libertarians, Trump, Hitler, Putin - every single one of these people can say: Ash-hadu al-laa ilaaha il-Allah wa ash-hadu an-na Muhammadan rasulu-Allah and start from the cleanliest slates, like a newborn baby.
Nationalists and nazi of all kinds, of course, do not have this universality.
The Western response to establishment of Islamic State in Iraq and Syria was quick and un-equivocal. Despite the fact that the whole birth of this movement was a split from al-Qaeda on ideological basis of STOP ATTACKING WEST ON WESTERN TERRITORY the response of the West was much stronger than the response to Al-Qaeda - a massive media campaign to discredit Islamic State in the eyes of Western audience (which magnificiently backfired before finally Western media realized that the best and most common way of "radicalization" is watching CNN and after that it surrounded the military events with a shroud of secrecy - so we do not hear about brutal Dresden-level bombardments of Raqqa, Mosul and Kirkuk that did not leave a single building untouched, so we do not hear about extermination of Sunni population by Shia)
The sole reason for Western response to Islamic State in Iraq and Syria was Islam. Period. Real Islam, with implementation of Shariah, not some personified version of it that is promoted on every single minbar in every single American mosque - five pillars, come to the Masjid, make Wudu properly, help us build a school, etc. The Islam in Islamic State in Iraq and Syria was Islam of the first three righteous generations.
And, of course, the Azhab of modern days, the coalition between Western liberalism, deviant Islamic sects, local secularists and sell-out leaders of Arabic countries lashed at Islamic State.
There is no war on terror, there is a full-fledged war on Islam.
Any business relying on government deals is shady: construction, waste management, software programming.
Everyone knows that once you locked a government contract, you can lay back and count money.
Yeah, drive by insider trading is a bitch.
Headache for Muslims who would have otherwise enjoyed early Fajr time at tje Masjid and easy commute after that: TRUE.
In order to be able to choose you need means. You seem like a proponent of commie equalification. Why don't you visit North Korea and tell us how it works there?
You seem to be following a stupidly absurd notion that such complex macro phenomena like himan society somehow could be self managed by simple rules.
Any scientist worth of salt and familiar with even much simpler biological systems will tell you how stupid you are, an illiterate libertarian imbecile
>That being said: I think this is hilarious.
Exactly
... Artificial Stupidity would not carry such a marketing zing, would it?
> vegan doughnuts
Good idea. I always hated chicken doughnuts
One would think that comments like yours should be treated as a banality in XXI century, but, sadly, no. People would believe anything presented in a certain language.
Math is not science, math is technology of science. A tool, not an answer.
The first and formost characteristics of science is critical thinking, not use of math.
The epicycles were mathematically more sophisticated than Kepler's laws and gave more accurate predictions during the time of the greatest physical revolution in history.
People also tend to mistake scientific extrapolations, hypotheses for facts.
The perception depends only on how fresh the statement sounds.
The fact is that science is limited to repeating phenomena of nature, and the further you go to the past or the future the less repeated these phenomena are.
For example, how does Big Bang become an object of science is beyond me.
Statements like "this must be true, because according to current scientific views, there is no other possibility" are not scientific truths.
Driverless car is exactly like a bus, Uber is like a bus it's public transportation.
You want packet transportation where people are moved from one place to another in bundles. You do not need to limit yourself to buses. You can bundle self driving cars in virtual car trains