So why do you think that "we were meant to be the good guys that don't do this kind of thing" (I'm guessing you're from the US correct me if I'm wrong). Surely every shred of evidence in living memory and beyond points to the exact opposite?
Not at first. They did run both systems alongside each other for long enough to make an informed choice. In the end I think it's the tanks of dangerous chemicals, fire risk and waste that won the day. Not a commercial deal.
Re:Another boardgame? Big deal
on
Cracking Go
·
· Score: 1
The sad irony is that as software improves, compiler errors are easier and easier to guess. Now computers a few decades ago... they really knew how to play charades.
I don't know what typeface they used the image on for http://www.isi.edu/ant/address/ but it looks very odd. It's hard to concentrate on the whole image. I mean, look at the 'c's!
So it may not be a determinate problem, but that doesn't mean that a probable solution or set of probable solutions can't be given. There are documented ways of un-blurring images (not edge-finding). Paradigms such as relational programming could have a part to play.
The issue here wouldn't be do-ability but rather specificity and accuracy, which could give rise to some interesting computer-forensics legal questions.
I was once visiting the offices of a design firm that was doing some work for Disney. As far as I remember, the procedure for adding new content was:
- Email the admins (with password), requesting an upload opportunity giving detail of content and approval reference - Admins create FTP account on a purpose-built server - Admins send back time-sensitive FTP details - Design company uploads to FTP server - Committees review content, send authorization to admins - Admins upload content.
And this was for already-approved work. Kinda puts this level of security to shame...
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry, I thought you were being sarcastic.
So why do you think that "we were meant to be the good guys that don't do this kind of thing" (I'm guessing you're from the US correct me if I'm wrong). Surely every shred of evidence in living memory and beyond points to the exact opposite?
mod parent funny
> 'illegal' *might* could be used
Illegal might? That sounds scary.
"As long as there are un-bought Bentleys, there will be laywers"
Hm. When it's your own language being mangled it's not pedantry.
You missed a full stop.
We've never had analog TV. It's been analogue since the first transmitters came online.
Not at first. They did run both systems alongside each other for long enough to make an informed choice. In the end I think it's the tanks of dangerous chemicals, fire risk and waste that won the day. Not a commercial deal.
Surely that's a highly toxic metal (at least its compounds are)? Does that cancel out the good this will do?
bouillon de poisson?
Fish poisson?
The sad irony is that as software improves, compiler errors are easier and easier to guess. Now computers a few decades ago... they really knew how to play charades.
Is this what they forked Thunderbird for? To concentrate on this? Was it a trade?
I don't know what typeface they used the image on for http://www.isi.edu/ant/address/ but it looks very odd. It's hard to concentrate on the whole image. I mean, look at the 'c's!
Um, sir, can't you see they're the same thing? I see no problem there.
So it may not be a determinate problem, but that doesn't mean that a probable solution or set of probable solutions can't be given. There are documented ways of un-blurring images (not edge-finding). Paradigms such as relational programming could have a part to play.
The issue here wouldn't be do-ability but rather specificity and accuracy, which could give rise to some interesting computer-forensics legal questions.
From TFA: "The nearly two year-old iPod caught fire".
He kept commodity electronics more than six months! He did not consume, he is not a good citizen, he had it coming!
Berkley students are lucky to go to an American university.
In Soviet Russia, Full lectures post YOU on youtube.
Nobody in control of the process wants to know just how much the album is really worth.
Don't worry. Google won't be destroying anything...
Perhaps only in the US could a report on a vulnerability turn so quickly into dramatic eschatological nonsense.
Also, did I see nixie tubes? How old is your infrastructure?
In Soviet Russia, house stands outside YOU.
And most of the world, actually.
.... going by the sinister name of 'Anonymous Coward'...
The US has repeatedly demonstrated that such conventions mean nothing to them. International law is a complete non-issue to American authorities.
That ann ammusing websit. At lest he has a sence off humour.
I was once visiting the offices of a design firm that was doing some work for Disney. As far as I remember, the procedure for adding new content was:
- Email the admins (with password), requesting an upload opportunity giving detail of content and approval reference
- Admins create FTP account on a purpose-built server
- Admins send back time-sensitive FTP details
- Design company uploads to FTP server
- Committees review content, send authorization to admins
- Admins upload content.
And this was for already-approved work. Kinda puts this level of security to shame...