Convicted Felon Ted Stevens Fails to be Re-Elected in Alaska
Re:Please Read _Speaker_!
on
Ender in Exile
·
· Score: 1
Thank you. I tried getting into _Speaker_, but the fact that it left no positive impression on me after two full reads tells me that it's not a well-written book.
1. You may want to check your drive history, because you're mistaken. 2. It turns out links on this internet thingy can be updated, rendering that part of the conversation moot. 3. Updated dupe links are still dupes, and 4. My point stands.
After everything else that's happened in the last disastrous 8 years, I don't care who gets in office--as long as it's not a republican. And save your replies telling me how the democrats aren't much better because I already know that. The sad fact is, it's going to be one of the two.
Sure thing. Your boss sounds like the kind of ethical guy who would accept the consequences of any illegal or unethical actions, and he totally wouldn't let you take the fall for it instead.
Oh, and can I interest you in a timeshare? A bridge, perhaps? How about some prime Louisiana real estate?
So the two scammers made $500K over 3 years, from which they had to pay other trucking companies for the work. This strikes me as a massively inefficient and stupid scam.
"Yes, that's a personal ideological statement, not a supported statement of fact."
I guess my point that HPC Server 2K8 is a server OS stands, then. Whether you like it or not--and even whether it's any good at what it was designed to do--is completely irrelevant.
Convicted Felon Ted Stevens Fails to be Re-Elected in Alaska
Thank you. I tried getting into _Speaker_, but the fact that it left no positive impression on me after two full reads tells me that it's not a well-written book.
"[Citation needed]."
Try Google. It's this awesome new search engine that provides facts when you enter the right search terms.
1. You may want to check your drive history, because you're mistaken.
2. It turns out links on this internet thingy can be updated, rendering that part of the conversation moot.
3. Updated dupe links are still dupes, and
4. My point stands.
Why wouldn't they?
This link was almost as interesting as it was the first time it was posted on Slashdot, 3-4 years ago.
I predict it will play out something like similar demands have in the past:
GWB: Fuck you.
Federal judge: Yes sir. Sorry to have bothered you.
After everything else that's happened in the last disastrous 8 years, I don't care who gets in office--as long as it's not a republican. And save your replies telling me how the democrats aren't much better because I already know that. The sad fact is, it's going to be one of the two.
Sure thing. Your boss sounds like the kind of ethical guy who would accept the consequences of any illegal or unethical actions, and he totally wouldn't let you take the fall for it instead.
Oh, and can I interest you in a timeshare? A bridge, perhaps? How about some prime Louisiana real estate?
Oops. I did RTFA, but no one told me I also had to pay attention to what it said...
So the two scammers made $500K over 3 years, from which they had to pay other trucking companies for the work. This strikes me as a massively inefficient and stupid scam.
"Quite literally"
How do you go about placing freedom on an actual table?
Maybe in your area someone going 30 in a 45 zone is trying to save gas, but here it's just another idiot looking for a particular street to turn down.
US Government overstepping its authority and trampling on rights? Gasp!
Slashdot: News for people who haven't been paying attention. Stuff that surprises no one.
"Git along, little [*static*]"
The other moral of the story is "don't leave your expensive laptop unattended on the roof of your car."
But with fewer dupes.
I'd say the main difference is that a much higher percentage of digg posters are raving morons, while Slashdot has more refined trolls.
Not that I'll ever be likely to use this extension, but: *Archived*!
The court should offer to suspend his fine for as long as he prefaces everything he writes with "IANAL, but [...]"
My Inspiron 6400 running OSX 10.4 begs to differ.
Why would you want to spend $155 on a useless dongle when you can run OSX natively on your PC hardware?
Usenet has been the "new" illegal filesharing tool since the day the alt hierarchy was created, newbie.
Slashdot: News for people who enjoy Microsoft advertisements. Stuff you could see on TV instead.
Perhaps I missed it, so could someone kindly point out where the New "Scientist" article quantified "spin"? Thanks in advance.
"Yes, that's a personal ideological statement, not a supported statement of fact."
I guess my point that HPC Server 2K8 is a server OS stands, then. Whether you like it or not--and even whether it's any good at what it was designed to do--is completely irrelevant.