Terribly said, but true. Governments cannot afford to rely on software coming from the opposite camp. Kaspersky may be independent today, but we don't know about tomorrow. The US cannot take that risk.
Just like Russia shouldn't take the risk to rely on any US-based company's software. That's not even hostile, EU also wants its independence in terms of software and hardware, Japan does the same, China does the same... that's just obvious strategy.
That's the trick. Start with a statement that everyone should agree with. "We want to be able to take down drones which endanger the life of others !!" Sure, and I think that was already the case.
Then hide small text where the real difference lies : "so we'll grant us the right to track (Why ?), hack (WTF??), and destroy drones and this without disclosure and with no risk of being sued".
I could only find this : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p.... Had to follow a couple of links. Seriously, this Guardian article should not even be considered when it starts mentioning research and not even providing sources.
It's so easy to say "new technology will doom us all". I'm not using facebook, but I'm always cautious when reading those full-of-bullshit articles.
Nobody said all machines could move to linux. Just like today some specific jobs require a Mac or even Linux, there can be jobs requiring Windows (and a powerful workstation).
But most company computers are laptops used to do emails/web browsing/office. The reason they still run Windows is office, and with cloud services gaining traction, that may soon be no longer a good reason to stick to windows.
I thought about the same bias. However, when it comes to doctors, I have to say this study matches my perception. On average, I had much better experience with young doctors than older ones, for a simple reason : older doctors tend to think they know everything and tend to make shortcut decisions. Younger doctors seem to be more likely to question their conclusions and triple check everything, potentially asking specialist colleagues for confirmation.
Again, that's just my experience, doesn't mean it's true nor generalized. And I've seen very old doctors do their job perfectly, keeping their knowledge up-to-date, and adding their valuable experience.
Agreed in general. However, in that precise case, it is not true.
Windows has always had a model of "download whatever you find on the internet and run it". So most people only know that model and that hurts (when you download handbrake).
On Linux (and progressively MacOS), you would almost never download something from a website and execute it. You download software with yum or apt and that should make sure that (unless it is compromised, but it is much harder) :
- The software will work well with the rest of the OS / other software
- The software does not contain malware / viruses
- The software has not been modified by a man-in-the-middle.
If you live in a windows world, those are things you don't even think about, and this is a huge security problem. You can say no-one is immune to security risks, but certain software management systems are certainly more dangerous than others.
If I was a judge and anyone (defense, prosecution, cops) tried this sort of shit in my court, I would go medieval on their ass...
Fortunately you're not a judge. There isn't enough information here to prove that he really did it on purpose, especially if he really found heroin and the gun in the car. The guy is guilty in his eyes, so even if he is re-enacting, he may be perfectly honest about what happened.
Now, of course, I understand the case can be dropped because of that irregularity, but this cop may be a good and honest cop, who just did a procedural mistake.
No it's not the law that you have to make every penny and crush you partners. And it's not even wise, because companies will become more reluctant to work with you in the future, and people will also dislike you for what you do, meaning some of them will buy from another company.
So no, it's not the law that you have to be a jerk just to make more money.
It works well internationally. Signal is the other alternative. In all cases, such apps are quite needed : MMS picture quality is crap, international texting/MMS costs a lot in many countries.. or sometimes doesn't even work.
I think you're way too optimistic. 50 years, atmosphere generation, we COULD live there ???
Even the most subtle changes in our environment have huge impact on life on earth. It would take hundreds if not thousands of years for our bodies to evolve and handle life on mars. Unless we manage to force those changes into genetics, but... well, in 50 years ?
+1. Ting with 2 lines, $30-50 per month with moderate data usage, so $15-25 per line.
Not the best coverage ever though, especially when traveling across the US.
Yeah because in Europe, all cars are manual and driver tests are much harder so there are only 25% of people driving.
No, people just learn how to drive. Sure, they are more skilled drivers than the average US driver, but they're also more prone to driving like crazy. Incompetent drivers have more frequent, but less serious accidents. See also men versus women statistics. (because yeah, like it or not, men tend to be more skilled in average compared to women when it comes to driving but also more dangerous).
I'm totally with you on physical buttons. However, I wouldn't be against a fingerprint scanner on the back, it's always hard to scan my finger while holding my phone.
Also, the price for legal services is quite low compared to the average US income (and compared to -say- mobile plans). Go to almost anywhere else in the world and those same prices will be considered too much.
Slashdot Mirror
Terribly said, but true. Governments cannot afford to rely on software coming from the opposite camp. Kaspersky may be independent today, but we don't know about tomorrow. The US cannot take that risk.
Just like Russia shouldn't take the risk to rely on any US-based company's software. That's not even hostile, EU also wants its independence in terms of software and hardware, Japan does the same, China does the same ... that's just obvious strategy.
Plus, shutting down the internet may not make a huge difference. Less than 4% of the population has internet access.
Wait, you also need to have a writable share. This should reduce the count to ... 2 ?
Calling that the "perfect tomato for your salad" is obviously a huge troll ...
That's the trick. Start with a statement that everyone should agree with. "We want to be able to take down drones which endanger the life of others !!" Sure, and I think that was already the case.
Then hide small text where the real difference lies : "so we'll grant us the right to track (Why ?), hack (WTF??), and destroy drones and this without disclosure and with no risk of being sued".
I could only find this : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p.... Had to follow a couple of links. Seriously, this Guardian article should not even be considered when it starts mentioning research and not even providing sources.
It's so easy to say "new technology will doom us all". I'm not using facebook, but I'm always cautious when reading those full-of-bullshit articles.
Nobody said all machines could move to linux. Just like today some specific jobs require a Mac or even Linux, there can be jobs requiring Windows (and a powerful workstation).
But most company computers are laptops used to do emails/web browsing/office. The reason they still run Windows is office, and with cloud services gaining traction, that may soon be no longer a good reason to stick to windows.
I thought about the same bias. However, when it comes to doctors, I have to say this study matches my perception. On average, I had much better experience with young doctors than older ones, for a simple reason : older doctors tend to think they know everything and tend to make shortcut decisions. Younger doctors seem to be more likely to question their conclusions and triple check everything, potentially asking specialist colleagues for confirmation.
Again, that's just my experience, doesn't mean it's true nor generalized. And I've seen very old doctors do their job perfectly, keeping their knowledge up-to-date, and adding their valuable experience.
Agreed in general. However, in that precise case, it is not true.
Windows has always had a model of "download whatever you find on the internet and run it". So most people only know that model and that hurts (when you download handbrake).
On Linux (and progressively MacOS), you would almost never download something from a website and execute it. You download software with yum or apt and that should make sure that (unless it is compromised, but it is much harder) :
If you live in a windows world, those are things you don't even think about, and this is a huge security problem. You can say no-one is immune to security risks, but certain software management systems are certainly more dangerous than others.
And save billions .. and give it to those who actually produce value. Like those who grow our food.
Except "lawfully causing harm" means "making the company respect the law". You can't sue someone for the "harm caused by justice against you".
Mod up +100.
If I was a judge and anyone (defense, prosecution, cops) tried this sort of shit in my court, I would go medieval on their ass...
Fortunately you're not a judge. There isn't enough information here to prove that he really did it on purpose, especially if he really found heroin and the gun in the car. The guy is guilty in his eyes, so even if he is re-enacting, he may be perfectly honest about what happened.
Now, of course, I understand the case can be dropped because of that irregularity, but this cop may be a good and honest cop, who just did a procedural mistake.
+1. Come on Slashdot editors. You're on slashdot. People know TSMC.
You can mention some of their customers in the article, but the title should be "TSMC Secrets Allegedly Stolen .."
Welcome to the US, where unlimited texting only comes with $50+/month plans.
No it's not the law that you have to make every penny and crush you partners. And it's not even wise, because companies will become more reluctant to work with you in the future, and people will also dislike you for what you do, meaning some of them will buy from another company.
So no, it's not the law that you have to be a jerk just to make more money.
+1.
It works well internationally. Signal is the other alternative. In all cases, such apps are quite needed : MMS picture quality is crap, international texting/MMS costs a lot in many countries .. or sometimes doesn't even work.
I think you're way too optimistic. 50 years, atmosphere generation, we COULD live there ???
Even the most subtle changes in our environment have huge impact on life on earth. It would take hundreds if not thousands of years for our bodies to evolve and handle life on mars. Unless we manage to force those changes into genetics, but ... well, in 50 years ?
Yeah, this post was a US-centric one.
Anyone in Europe is paying ~20€ / month to get unlimited everything.
+1. Ting with 2 lines, $30-50 per month with moderate data usage, so $15-25 per line. Not the best coverage ever though, especially when traveling across the US.
Completely oriented and clickbait title.
Yes, it's foam ... so what ? First, it's not basic foam, it is conductive foam. Second, it fixes the issue.
I call that an elegant solution.
Come on editors, it is already annoying that some news are US-centric without any mention of it, but ... UK-centric ?
Yeah because in Europe, all cars are manual and driver tests are much harder so there are only 25% of people driving.
No, people just learn how to drive. Sure, they are more skilled drivers than the average US driver, but they're also more prone to driving like crazy. Incompetent drivers have more frequent, but less serious accidents. See also men versus women statistics. (because yeah, like it or not, men tend to be more skilled in average compared to women when it comes to driving but also more dangerous).
I'm totally with you on physical buttons. However, I wouldn't be against a fingerprint scanner on the back, it's always hard to scan my finger while holding my phone.
On the other hand, edge screens are stupid.
Also, the price for legal services is quite low compared to the average US income (and compared to -say- mobile plans). Go to almost anywhere else in the world and those same prices will be considered too much.