Let's suppose the standard will shape the qualification process for instructors, leading to instructors who spend far too much time in their own careers learning a standard instead of learning real math and how to teach it. This may lead to a circumstance where the instructor can't understand a method that the student used to solve a math problem. I fear an overall decline in teaching quality. I hope this isn't happening, but when it comes to children's education you can't blame people for speculating. Based on my pre-common core public school math experience it's always hit or miss with instructors. Common core shapes the metrics that they use to evaluate instructors as well as students. Not every instructor is great and I can imagine that the poor ones may depend on common core as a crutch.
Then again everything might work out fine. Maybe it will actually improve teaching quality. Nothing has been proven either way. It's a grand experiment that may take decades to yield any meaningful results.
That kind of capital is chump change for the Fed. For these foreign banks it's a lot of money. You'd expect that kind of money transfer to trigger some sort of alert before it goes through, but the Fed isn't in the business of bailing out foreign banks. I'm sure domestic banks is another story.
There is always some engineer or IT guy with the keys to the kingdom at these banks with potentially more power than Janet Yellen.
There ain't shit to do when you're broke. Paris Hilton is a result of what happens when you remove the incentive to work. People work hard so they can play hard, but the balance is essential.
Buy your robot from Amazon.com which will run on aws. It will put millions of service workers out of work and that will further reducing the size of the middle class which only hurts Amazon. Amazon needs to grow the middle class to grow themselves and some of their tech may cannibalize their ecomerce business by shrinking the middle class.
Just in: Amazon retrains thousands of truck drivers to be drone mechanics.
I find it sad that we still write software for mission critical systems that isn't formally verifiable. You can build a software system where you can prove it won't leak. It amazes me developers forget how to write a proof after they get their degree. This isn't just for fighter jets though. If your cloud goes down your company can lose billions. It makes sense to write software you can formally prove won't fail because the stakes are high.
Umm....maybe this isn't obvious to everyone, but to me it's clearly a bad idea to publish publicly on the internet a perfect covert entrance to a nuclear power plant.
All those cheaters who graduate from universities without getting caught care. Now they know where they can get a job.
If you own a copyright, modify your original work and then sell the derived work as something new that's shady. Maybe illegal, but I'd need to talk to a lawyer about that one.
If you don't own the copyright, modify someone else's original work and then sell it as something new then that's clearly illegal.
There's a chance that warrantless wiretaps will become a thing again as long as the general public doesn't understand how their privacy is being violated.
About a quarter of American's don't even know that radio waves make cell phones work.
Basically testing it involves shooting drones out of a cannon at airplane windshield. The mythbusters did something similar with birds. I'd argue that most drones are far less dangerous then a frozen bird shot out of a cannon.
Getting a good charger can cost almost as much as the drone, but it's worth it. Batteries are rarely the limiting factor. Capacity on the other hand is a trade-off. I'd still like to fly 30 minutes without landing. Hopefully one day those lithium air batteries become viable.
But the math does say you can build a secure phone where only the owner has the key. Ask anyone who's ever lost a bitcoin wallet. Apple chose to retain that key making it a political issues, not a technical one.
If you were 52 and making 90K a year this was either 1985, you were just not very good, or the worst negotiator on the planet. I was hired out of college in 1994 @ $40k and am now making almost 8x that.
I just hired a "Chinese Post-Doc" last week, @ 180k. Your story is either total bullshit or 20+ years old.
I'm not surprised. I've met post-docs who can't develop anything useful if their life depended on it and I know engineers who've been in industry for years who can't compete with freshman CS students I know. It's rare to get $180k as an engineer in academia unless you're doing something on the side.
You have to nurture your skills. I suggest spending at least 20% of your free time learning a new skill that is in demand.
I've met brilliant engineers and dumb engineers not worth their salt. There is definitely a spectrum and it's not correlated to the number of years of experience.
It helps if you have good networking skills and you're willing to relocate.
Just tell me the bug, so I can fix it and we can close this story. Someone else fixing a bug is considered original work. Plus I'm probably a better coder and my fix will be awesome.
Macs and PCs are pretty much interchangeable these days.
Not really. Macs require a much more current IT staff. Unfortunately many IT departments have been force fed the Microsoft dribble for so long that they don't know what real IT looks like. Adding Macs to corporate infrastructure should be done carefully.
It's not about the user or the OS. It's about the infrastructure behind it.
Something tells me Langley launched a better spy satellite and said "what the fuck are we going to do with this old piece of shit?" And then they gave the scientists a new toy. Aren't spies great?
It's funny Amazon isn't in there. They are the only ones with a good IoT api. Since they own almost all of the cloud computing market and they are basically great at selling us everything I think that's worth an invite.
Exactly, they want to confuse you. Why would they do anything that would decrease ad revenue? It's probably easier to trick folks into clicking when they aren't aware of the ads.
But new plants aren't coming online that are safer because licenses aren't available. Those plants are incredibly dangerous leading to a logical fallacy resulting in not issuing new licenses to newer safer designs.
The reason for not recommissioning power plants is a purely political one. Trends are influenced by politicians; most of which would fail an economics 101 course. Let's not put much faith in trends when it comes to science.
Nuclear can be a safe technology if you build the right plant, but we can't get those licensed.
This explains Republicans and Democrats. They both contributed to economic warfare against the middle class and no one seems to care as long as there are social programs for the rich and social programs for the poor. We all let it happen because the government said it was ok.
Slashdot Mirror
It matters how it's applied.
Let's suppose the standard will shape the qualification process for instructors, leading to instructors who spend far too much time in their own careers learning a standard instead of learning real math and how to teach it. This may lead to a circumstance where the instructor can't understand a method that the student used to solve a math problem. I fear an overall decline in teaching quality. I hope this isn't happening, but when it comes to children's education you can't blame people for speculating. Based on my pre-common core public school math experience it's always hit or miss with instructors. Common core shapes the metrics that they use to evaluate instructors as well as students. Not every instructor is great and I can imagine that the poor ones may depend on common core as a crutch.
Then again everything might work out fine. Maybe it will actually improve teaching quality. Nothing has been proven either way. It's a grand experiment that may take decades to yield any meaningful results.
That kind of capital is chump change for the Fed. For these foreign banks it's a lot of money. You'd expect that kind of money transfer to trigger some sort of alert before it goes through, but the Fed isn't in the business of bailing out foreign banks. I'm sure domestic banks is another story.
There is always some engineer or IT guy with the keys to the kingdom at these banks with potentially more power than Janet Yellen.
There ain't shit to do when you're broke. Paris Hilton is a result of what happens when you remove the incentive to work. People work hard so they can play hard, but the balance is essential.
Buy your robot from Amazon.com which will run on aws. It will put millions of service workers out of work and that will further reducing the size of the middle class which only hurts Amazon. Amazon needs to grow the middle class to grow themselves and some of their tech may cannibalize their ecomerce business by shrinking the middle class.
Just in: Amazon retrains thousands of truck drivers to be drone mechanics.
I find it sad that we still write software for mission critical systems that isn't formally verifiable. You can build a software system where you can prove it won't leak. It amazes me developers forget how to write a proof after they get their degree. This isn't just for fighter jets though. If your cloud goes down your company can lose billions. It makes sense to write software you can formally prove won't fail because the stakes are high.
It's new and improved with force touch. If you hit it hard enough the information just falls right out.
Umm....maybe this isn't obvious to everyone, but to me it's clearly a bad idea to publish publicly on the internet a perfect covert entrance to a nuclear power plant.
All those cheaters who graduate from universities without getting caught care. Now they know where they can get a job.
If you own a copyright, modify your original work and then sell the derived work as something new that's shady. Maybe illegal, but I'd need to talk to a lawyer about that one.
If you don't own the copyright, modify someone else's original work and then sell it as something new then that's clearly illegal.
There's a chance that warrantless wiretaps will become a thing again as long as the general public doesn't understand how their privacy is being violated.
About a quarter of American's don't even know that radio waves make cell phones work.
I'd like to purpose a big sky small drone theory.
Basically testing it involves shooting drones out of a cannon at airplane windshield. The mythbusters did something similar with birds. I'd argue that most drones are far less dangerous then a frozen bird shot out of a cannon.
Getting a good charger can cost almost as much as the drone, but it's worth it. Batteries are rarely the limiting factor. Capacity on the other hand is a trade-off. I'd still like to fly 30 minutes without landing. Hopefully one day those lithium air batteries become viable.
Manually.
Backups should never be read by the server to ensure it has no dependency on the data.
Backup should never be overwritten by the server to protect the backup.
Backups should be independent verified for completeness because servers and engineers do unexpected things.
I just made that up, but it sounds about right.
But the math does say you can build a secure phone where only the owner has the key. Ask anyone who's ever lost a bitcoin wallet. Apple chose to retain that key making it a political issues, not a technical one.
If you were 52 and making 90K a year this was either 1985, you were just not very good, or the worst negotiator on the planet. I was hired out of college in 1994 @ $40k and am now making almost 8x that.
I just hired a "Chinese Post-Doc" last week, @ 180k. Your story is either total bullshit or 20+ years old.
I'm not surprised. I've met post-docs who can't develop anything useful if their life depended on it and I know engineers who've been in industry for years who can't compete with freshman CS students I know. It's rare to get $180k as an engineer in academia unless you're doing something on the side.
You have to nurture your skills. I suggest spending at least 20% of your free time learning a new skill that is in demand.
I've met brilliant engineers and dumb engineers not worth their salt. There is definitely a spectrum and it's not correlated to the number of years of experience.
It helps if you have good networking skills and you're willing to relocate.
Just tell me the bug, so I can fix it and we can close this story. Someone else fixing a bug is considered original work. Plus I'm probably a better coder and my fix will be awesome.
Macs and PCs are pretty much interchangeable these days.
Not really. Macs require a much more current IT staff. Unfortunately many IT departments have been force fed the Microsoft dribble for so long that they don't know what real IT looks like. Adding Macs to corporate infrastructure should be done carefully.
It's not about the user or the OS. It's about the infrastructure behind it.
It wouldn't do any good anyway. Bruce Willis is too busy shooting the next Die Hard movie.
So really it is just a global scientific test of who's is bigger.
I've got giant silicon balls.
Something tells me Langley launched a better spy satellite and said "what the fuck are we going to do with this old piece of shit?" And then they gave the scientists a new toy. Aren't spies great?
It's funny Amazon isn't in there. They are the only ones with a good IoT api. Since they own almost all of the cloud computing market and they are basically great at selling us everything I think that's worth an invite.
so they don't mix in with search results?
Exactly, they want to confuse you. Why would they do anything that would decrease ad revenue? It's probably easier to trick folks into clicking when they aren't aware of the ads.
But new plants aren't coming online that are safer because licenses aren't available. Those plants are incredibly dangerous leading to a logical fallacy resulting in not issuing new licenses to newer safer designs.
Image is everything.
The reason for not recommissioning power plants is a purely political one. Trends are influenced by politicians; most of which would fail an economics 101 course. Let's not put much faith in trends when it comes to science.
Nuclear can be a safe technology if you build the right plant, but we can't get those licensed.
This explains Republicans and Democrats. They both contributed to economic warfare against the middle class and no one seems to care as long as there are social programs for the rich and social programs for the poor. We all let it happen because the government said it was ok.
Right. Because if you don't already have the drone assembled how do you know you have all the parts?
Plus Amazon already has an Alexa api and one of the target applications for IoT is Prime air, so isn't this biased?