Slashdot Mirror

LTE is not GSM.

It's not directly GSM and I never said it was, I said VARIANT, as in based on GSM

GSM is not 4G.

Duh, I never said that it was

Verizon dumps CDMA for GSM-based LTE in 4G networksengadget.com

In fact, there *is* no 4G, no such thing exists.

It doesn't?

Verizon had a choice of three competing 4G technologies: LTE, WiMAX, and UMB. UMB (Ultra Mobile Broadband) was formerly known as EV-DO Rev. C, and is supposed to be fully backwards-compatible with other CDMA technologies while providing a significant speed boost. The technology has had few takers so far, however, and Verizon's decision to move away from EV-DO may doom UMB to a niche.arstechnica.com

Ralph de la Vega, president and CEO for AT&T's wireless unit also his commitment to LTE, for the company's upgrade path to 4G.telecoms.com

Perhaps you should write to Verizon and AT&T and tell them they have no clue what they are talking about. They could probably use a good consultant like yourself.

Notionally there is a billion dollars at stake:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080311-judge-to-viacom-no-punitive-damages-in-youtube-case.html

The judge said that they could not get their billion dollars in punitive dollars...

Before that YouTube/Google did not take down the 100000 videos that Viacom asked them to take down.

If you think about it, the 'spooks' already know what you watch. There is no conspiracy to get you, this is beef between Viacom and Google. The latest twist is that they want to know who is uploading their shows. If you watch something that just so happens to theirs then you have only committed a small thoughtcrime, maybe unwittingly.

It is a big day on the cyber-frontier, it's getting all 4th generational though. I think it is time for the citizenry to take back the net, with a wi-fi peer to peer 'darknet' that uses no centralised infrastructure.

First Sale doctrine does not protect software, as Autodesk found out last May. So I would imagine eth 1's former professor is out there busily changing either software or book at the present time.

I don't see how this can apply to anyone doing non forensic computer repair. However, looking at section 1702.104 and the exemptions in section 1702.324 I can see a couple of interesting places this law could apply.

The obvious one, which is not a new idea, relates to companies like MediaDefender performing investigations on behalf of the RIAA and MPAA. They act like a private investigator but do not have a licence to do so (obtaining or furnishing information related to identity, habits, location, transactions, etc of a person with computer-based data not available to the public (subsections (a)(1)(B) and (b) )); MediaSentry role in RIAA lawsuit comes under scrutiny.

The non obvious one deals with anyone who works with clickstream data, e.g. NebuAd,Doubleclick, Google, etc. They all obtain information to do with a person and subsection (a)(1)(B) is a huge or statement. Since identity is one of these ors you could define a person using a unique identifier, only track habits, location, affiliations, or transactions, and still possibly be subject to this.

Is a unique identifier a person? It could be, AOL Proudly Releases Massive Amounts of Private Data

" AOL has released very private data about its users without their permission. While the AOL username has been changed to a random ID number, the abilitiy to analyze all searches by a single user will often lead people to easily determine who the user is, and what they are up to. The data includes personal names, addresses, social security numbers and everything else someone might type into a search box.

The most serious problem is the fact that many people often search on their own name, or those of their friends and family, to see what information is available about them on the net. Combine these ego searches with porn queries and you have a serious embarrassment. Combine them with "buy ecstasy" and you have evidence of a crime. Combine it with an address, social security number, etc., and you have an identity theft waiting to happen. The possibilities are endless. "

Something to think about... But then again, IANAL and not even an American so what would I know.

Sec. 1702.104. INVESTIGATIONS COMPANY.
(a) A person acts as an investigations company for the purposes of this chapter if the person:
(1) engages in the business of obtaining or furnishing, or accepts employment to obtain or furnish, information related to:
(A) crime or wrongs done or threatened against a state or the United States;
(B) the identity, habits, business, occupation,knowledge, efficiency, loyalty, movement, location, affiliations, associations, transactions, acts, reputation, or character of a person;
(C) the location, disposition, or recovery of lost or stolen property; or
(D) the cause or responsibility for a fire, libel, loss, accident, damage, or injury to a person or to property;
(2) engages in the business of securing, or accepts employment to secure, evidence for use before a court, board, officer, or investigating committee;
(3) engages in the business of securing, or accepts employment to secure, the electronic tracking of the location of an individual or motor vehicle other than for criminal justice purposes by or on behalf of a governmental entity; or
(4) engages in the business of protecting, or accepts employment to protect, an individual from bodily harm through the use of a personal protection officer.

(b) For purposes of Subsection (a)(1), obtaining or furnishing information includes information obtained or furnished through the review and analysis of, and the investigation into the content of, computer-based data not available to the public.

First thing I do on any computer I work on in California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Idaho or New Mexico is do a search for Child Porn with keywords and a hash check. Hash check works because some of the child porn has been out there since it was just NNTP and email and the particular images are very easy to find. If you can help build a better perv trap for me and others like me, please do I am not a programmer. Over 20 lowlifes turned into the police and feds including a local bank manager, a coffee shop owner and a HS physics teacher. I hope to turn in many more. Have any of y'all done this when you found child porn working in IT, or did you turn a blind eye?

Don't be confused; you're correct - the only difference between this and PocketPC VoIP is that this is the iPhone. Skype for mobile is slightly different - it uses the regular network for calls rather than a Wifi or other data connection, so you get charged at the usual rate for regular voice calls. However, Skype then proxy the call anywhere in the world for their usual tariff. The important point is you're still paying your mobile operator for the voice call.

A while back, Ars Technica had a good piece: "Why modular Windows will suck for Microsoft and suck for you". This was the persuasive snippet that stuck with me. ...
The issue is that modularization strikes a blow against the very concept of a platform. When a software developer writes a program for Windows XP, they more or less know what they're going to get...
With a modularized Windows, that could fly right out the Window. ...

As our friend in Redmond, Steve likes to say, "developers, developers, developers, developers...".

Anyhow, the full article is a good read. If nothing else, it serves as some inoculation against the MS PR machine that got its claws into that NYT story.

http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/modular-windows-will-suck.ars

He really doesn't know anything about the internals of the Windows kernel or the Mach kernel, he's just assuming that since the NT kernel is "monolithic" and the Mach kernel is a "microkernel" then the latter must be better, and the reason it's better is it is "smaller."

If you want to know where the real problems with Windows lie, they're in the API and the shell, not the kernel. The NT kernel is perfectly fine. See this Ars write-up by someone knowlegeable:
http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/what-microsoft-could-learn-from-apple.ars

I'd like to point out that Microsoft employs one of the original authors of the Mach kernel, Rick Rashid. He runs Microsoft Research. Look it up.

I'll give you some more shit for recommending Network Solutions, if that's indeed what you mean by "netsol".

Do they pay you to spam /. ?

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080410-keeping-network-solutions-from-cashing-in-on-your-subdomains.html

Progress is slow when new medicine is constantly under attack and being made...

illegal: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071900524.html
'sinful': http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7287071.stm
and unteachable: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080627-louisiana-passes-first-antievolution-academic-freedom-law.html

Also: cracked versions of XP can't upgrade to ie7.

I thought Microsoft removed the Windows Genuine Advantage check from the Windows Internet Explorer 7 installer.

So I went back to Microsoft.com and looked at the instructions. I have to click on a folder called WindowsXP. Why should I do that? Windows Update knows I am on Windows XP.

What does it mean to have to click on that folder? So I get a bunch of confusing stuff but sure enough one of them is Moviemaker. So I do the download. The download is fast but the Install takes many minutes. Amazing how slow this thing is.

What it means to have to click on that folder is that you have not provided adequate leadership on programming, the primary function of your software company. Because you have established no rules to make installation convenient for your paying customers, as the filesystem hierarchy standard does for Linux users for free, your programmers just toss their junk together in whatever way is most convenient for them. After all this time, to have failed to create an analogous Windows filesystem hierarchy standard, is atrocious, negligent incompetence.

College should teach programmers how to write efficient algorithms. You should teach them how to integrate those algorithms into a larger project, with your own model of advanced object-oriented programming, which you should have developed but have not. Then, every one of your programmers would know the same convention for the entire path of any downloaded install binary. It appears from your complaints in this article that you have not even defined a directory naming standard. I wasn't planning to be so hard on you for the many failures of your products to increase my convenience or to perform their advertised functions, but after your literally monumental public displays of incompetence, you have the audacity to whine that all the good programmers are foreign.

You are not a good programmer. You have failed to demonstrate the expertise to define standards that would ensure that useful information is made available by your various product teams to the other teams, for your buzzword "interoperability" to be meaningful within your own brand. You are therefore not qualified to speak at a junior college computer science faculty barbecue about good programming, or to anybody else about any other aspect of technical aptitude, because you have demonstrated a complete lack of any. The spectacle of you speaking to Congress as a technology expert is an embarrassment to the nation. I do not believe a corporation is entitled to the individual right to Free Speech which is incorrectly asserted as defense of corporate donations to politics. I do believe that the irrational exuberance of the dot-com boom that led to unprecedented price-to-earning ratios, which necessitated the eventual correction of the dot-com bust, was a direct result of that inappropriate tolerance of corporate interference in government. Politicians who should have been neutral were instead at the very best, shading the truth to say favorable things about their information technology donors whenever the subject was raised, and investors foolish enough to believe that anything they said about that industry was said as representative of the people concluded that then-current stock prices were likely to be justified by near-future earnings, and were taken to the cleaners.

You, of course, are not a big enough fish to be single-handedly responsible for all, or even for very much of that, but you are the most willing public mouthpiece of the information technology industry's thirst for cheaper foreign laborers. I want you to shut the hell up about all immigration laws, for one thing because your software demonstrates your abject lack of qualification to make any of the statements that you have previously made, to Congress no less, about the lack of talented programmers. You don't know a good programmer from Shinola, and nobody in the Congress would help you pretend that you are, excep

An ISP in Japan will also soon be throttling their user's bandwidth.

Yes, they are creating an upload cap of 30GB per day. Not per month, per day .

I for one, welcome our Japanese ISP bandwidth capping overlords! Please?

The original story made me cringe. I would have imagined that it would have made Norvig do the same. Hope the rebuttal hits the right points.

Here's the link:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080625-why-the-cloud-cannot-obscure-the-scientific-method.html

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080625-why-the-cloud-cannot-obscure-the-scientific-method.html
I like the fact that the web and search/aggregate engines may combine vast amounts of data in ways we now
cannot imagine - it expands the field for new scientific research enormously. Replace science? No.

Why the cloud cannot obscure the scientific method by John Timmer.

If you've scrolled down this far, you might as well read it all :)

I've read several glowing reviews of Microcosm: E. Coli and the New Science of Life by Carl Zimmer (this one is from Ars Technica), and I'm deeply intrigued by what I've heard of it. Reviewers agree that Zimmer does a wonderful job of explaining the science, as well as the attendant politics (stem cells, intelligent design), rendering it understandable to the layman, while not insulting the more knowledgeable. Would anyone here who has read it care to comment?

Pretty hefty. Why do you think they're working on this?

From here;

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070508-indie-labels-revolting-against-emusics-low-prices-hardly.html?rel

"the average iTunes user spends only $12 per year at the store"

Not every iPod owner is an iTunes user. How many songs are on a typical kid's iPod? Only an average of 12 songs/year and only for those who use iTunes.

iTunes is a niche boutique next to the freeway where most don't bother to even look.

The current tech darling Apple has a big hole in their DRM making it mostly useless. On another note, look up the number of 30 or 60 Gig players sold and then note the nubmer of DRM song sales average per player. The price and the DRM is keeping Itunes a nich market. This is especially true for those without an iPod. My MP3 player is 100% incompatable with iTunes, so my purchases have been zero. There were a few songs I would have considered, but I lack compatible hardware (actualy Apple has incompatible songs).

The iTunes Store leads the pack with 19 percent, Wal-Mart (which includes the brick-and-mortar stores as well as its online properties) is second with 15 percent, and Best Buy is third with 13 percent. Amazon is a distant fourth at 6 percent, trailed by the likes of Borders, Circuit City, and Barnes & Noble. Rhapsody is in the tenth slot with 1 percent.

Firefox 3 used less memory than Firefox 2, Internet Explorer, and Opera, and it also freed more memory than the other browsers when pages were closed... The results of this experiment, which others have been able to consistently reproduce using the same tools, represent a big victory for Firefox, which has previously faced widespread criticism for its high memory consumption.

News feeds:

IE Blog - for keeping track of what MS is up to on the browser front
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/atom.xml

Standards Blog - not as many posts now days, was very important during the height of the ooxml/odf war
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/backend/geeklog.rss

I keep OSNews for completeness, but it is pretty useless - software news
http://osnews.com/files/recent.xml

Anandtech - hardware news and reviews
http://www.anandtech.com/rss/articlefeed.aspx

Ars Technica - tech news and commentary
http://arstechnica.com/index.rssx

Phoronix - linux graphics news and info
http://www.phoronix.com/rss.php

Linux Weekly News
http://lwn.net/headlines/rss

KDE announcements
http://www.kde.org/dotkdeorg.rdf

Open Source Software Planets:

http://planet.debian.org/rss20.xml

http://planet.fedoraproject.org/atom.xml

http://planet.ubuntu.com/rss20.xml

http://planet.gnome.org/atom.xml

http://planetkde.org/rss20.xml

http://planet.freedesktop.org/rss20.xml

http://planet.mozilla.org/atom.xml

http://planet.jabber.org/atom.xml

mostly software releases and XEP updates
http://planet.jabber.org/news/atom.xml

http://maemo.org/news/planet-maemo/atom.xml

environment feeds:

Good Pacific Northwest environmental news
http://www.sightline.org/daily_score/rss

Best environmental news and discussion on the web
http://www.worldchanging.com/index.xml

I keep Treehugger for completeness, but I mark 90% of their posts as read without looking at them.
Really too "light green/consumer green" for me
http://www.treehugger.com/index.xml

other feeds:

Dive into Mark - not what once was, but good enough to keep around
http://diveintomark.org/feed/

Loooong posts on software
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/atom.xml

Bruce Scheier knows Alice and Bob's shared secret
http://www.schneier.com/blog/index.rdf

The intersection of Science (especially Evolution), Liberalism, Atheism, and Squid
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/index.xml

"Your comment has too few characters per line" - what a load of bull. Taco, I know this and the timer are supposed to cut down on spam, but I think they annoy legitimate posters more than they reduce spam. You should really reconsider these "features".

Its the govt who decide who gets "honored". The monarch is pretty much just the person who makes the announcement. So, Hawking's "slap" was fairly squarely aimed at Blair and co.

Regarding who honors actually get dished out to, y'know the Darling brothers - Codemasters founders - got honored just recently? Its really not just celebs, musicians and sporty types.

http://arstechnica.com/journals/thumbs.ars/2008/06/18/codemasters-founders-honored-by-queen-of-england

My Feeds: Select: All 95 subscriptions, None, Unassigned A to Z Kids Stuff children http://www.atozkidsstuff.com/atoz.xml ABC News: Top Stories news http://my.abcnews.go.com/rsspublic/fp_rss20.xml About Computing Center technology http://z.about.com/6/g/pcworld/b/rss2.xml About.com Archaeology Archaeology http://z.about.com/6/g/archaeology/b/rss2.xml All Things Digital technology http://feeds.allthingsd.com/atd-feed/ Archaeology News Archaeology news http://www.topix.net/rss/science/archaeology.xml Ars Technica tech news http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/BAaf ArsTechnica: Security Content Security technology http://feeds.feedburner.com/arstechnica/security BBC News | News Front Page | World Edition U.K. http://newsrss.bbc.co.uk/rss/newsonline_world_edition/front_page/rss.xml BBC News | Science/Nature | World Edition Science/Nature http://newsrss.bbc.co.uk/rss/newsonline_world_edition/science/nature/rss.xml Boing Boing odd http://feeds.boingboing.net/boingboing/iBag Breaking News: CBSNews.com news http://www.cbsnews.com/feeds/rss/main.rss Breitbart.tv varied news topics http://www.breitbart.com/xml/recentvideo.xml ChannelWeb Complete Feed Computer news http://www.crn.com/cwb/globalcontent/cweball/index.xml;jsessionid=L0I1HBDQISHBCQSNDLQSKH0CJUNN2JVN Christian Science Monitor | Top Stories news http://www.csmonitor.com/rss/top.rss CNN.com - Offbeat odd http://rss.cnn.com/rss/cnn_offbeat.rss CNN.com - Politics politics http://rss.cnn.com/rss/cnn_allpolitics.rss CNN.com - U.S. U.S. news http://rss.cnn.com/rss/cnn_us.rss Computerworld Breaking News technology http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/News Cool Tools technology http://feeds.feedburner.com/CoolTools Courant.com - Connecticut News Ct. news http://feeds.courant.com/Courant/ConnecticutNews Defense Tech U.S. defense news http://www.defensetech.org/index.rdf Discovery News - Technology technology http://dsc.discovery.com/news/subjects/technology/xdb/topstories.xml Drudge Report news http://feeds.feedburner.com/FeedPalooza/lwDu Dvorak Uncensored news http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?feed=rss2 Engadget robots & gadgets http://www.engadget.com/rss.xml Extremetech technology http://rssnewsapps.ziffdavis.com/extreme.xml Fark.com news http://www.pluck.com/rss/fark.rss FileForum software http://fileforum.b

I read a whole bunch, but the best/most useful are:

Digg: Sure, the commentary here is better, but it's nice to know what the Obamanation thinks of the latest political scandals.
Ars Technica: They've got good articles on various technical issues. Relatively low-volume.
Boing Boing: Quirky news, with a slant towards privacy concerns, steampunk, and general weirdness.
Wired's Threat Level: Alerts on various privacy issues, as well as other things the government is doing that you don't want them to be.

• Trying to solve the long-term nuclear waste storage problem

• "Despite the uncertainties, the authors argue that there are very real reasons to start using Yucca Mountain: 60,000 metric tons of waste, currently stored in 72 sites, "many adjacent to metropolitan areas and all next to rivers, lakes, or the ocean." It's easy to default to inertia while waiting for greater certainty about Yucca Mountain or hoping something better comes along, but the authors argue that the current storage system creates far too much risk for this to be an acceptable path.

  The paper argues that storage in the facilities at Yucca Mountain is not irreversible; if problems arise, the waste could be temporarily removed, or adjustments to the structural properties could be made. In fact, the authors argue, experience with pilot programs may be the best way to start reducing some of the outstanding uncertainties that are making the current debate so difficult. Without this knowledge, we may never be able to refine long-term models of waste storage."

Actually, Roadrunner uses the Cell chip for the heavy lifting, not the AMD chips:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080618-game-and-pc-hardware-combo-tops-supercomputer-list.html

There have been arrests for it in the US for several years. I'm not sure how many of these were prosecuted, but I've heard of others and I believe one was prosecuted (but it may have been Michigan, which has separate laws).
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060622-7111.html
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070522-michigan-man-arrested-for-using-cafes-free-wifi-from-his-car.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/07/07/tech/main707361.shtml

There have been arrests for it in the US for several years. I'm not sure how many of these were prosecuted, but I've heard of others and I believe one was prosecuted (but it may have been Michigan, which has separate laws).
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060622-7111.html
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070522-michigan-man-arrested-for-using-cafes-free-wifi-from-his-car.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/07/07/tech/main707361.shtml

I'm using FF3, have one tab open and FF is using 94,865 K of RAM. And they were supposed to have fixed all those memory leaks?! Doesn't look like it from here. It's about:config time again, I see.

Gaping security hole? You mean this? Sounds like a dupe of this hoax.

So just don't use it.

No one's holding a gun to your head. If it's causing you such pain just use another browser.

... Firefox 3. :)

How embarrasing is that finding for the OP on this topic?

Zoink!

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070803-shocker-microsoft-combats-chinese-piracy-via-major-price-cuts.html

Guess again.

Besides if they are too poor to buy Windows, how do they afford the computer to run it on?

Out of legitimate curiosity, why do many Slashdotters think that Microsoft sees Firefox as a threat? They currently give out IE for free, so it's not like they're making money off of it, and the vast majority of Firefox installs go on Windows computers, so it's not like Firefox significantly is increasing Linux adoption...

Hell, the IE team sent them a cake:
http://arstechnica.com/journals/linux.ars/2008/06/17/the-cake-is-a-lie-ie-team-bakes-a-treat-for-mozilla
And I'd wager it makes their jobs a lot more interesting and important, so there's no resentment there.

I don't get why Microsoft would care, frankly.

Makes sense. The IE team at MS loves firefox: http://arstechnica.com/journals/linux.ars/2008/06/17/the-cake-is-a-lie-ie-team-bakes-a-treat-for-mozilla

SproutCore was built while SproutIT developed Mailroom. Mailroom was launched in February 2006 (Interview with Charles Jolley, SproutIt.com).

So the core is much older and tested rather well. The only thing that's new is the hype ...

Btw. The Ars Technica article on SproutCore is good as well SproutCore: rich web apps in JavaScript, no Flash needed

Let's get a grip on reality, dude. Slashdot isn't anywhere near as big 'n' important as you geeks want like to think it is. How many active slashdot accounts are there?

Sorry to burst your bubble, but in accounting terms, you guys would be considered a rounding error.

It's sort of like the Slashdotter's version of the Drake equation:
N = (Number of slashdotters) x (Number of active Slashdot accounts) x (Time since world record attempt was announced) x (Number of Slashdotters that even use Firefox) x (Number of slashdotters that actually give a shit if Mozilla breaks the record.)

That last one weeded me out.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know - I'll take my troll mod now. Thank you, sir. May I have another?

Maybe your eyes are better than mine, but I don't think we're even getting that.

Texture size and number of objects in a scene on Crysis would be the best examples, there is a difference. Games are moving to levels (especially for HD or 1920x1200&up players) that the texture limitations of DX9.0c can't bring the detail needed, and this is just one 'tiny' aspect of DX10.

http://www.tomsgames.com/us/2007/09/18/dx10_part3/page3.html

Bundling it into Vista is bad, for a slew of reasons, and the shit they've pulled with several 'Vista only' titles,

DX10 has specific reasons why it only runs on Vista. Go ask the people hacking the libraries for XP. They will run, but it expects the OS to be handling aspects of the GPU that XP isn't doing.

http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2007/2/14/7060

DX10 is designed around Vista because it expects GPU RAM Virtualization to be available from the OS. (Only Vista can do this) DX10 expects even 'in-game' threads/processes to be prioritized and handled by the OS, and only Vista can do this because it has a pre-emptive scheduler for the GPU, XP don't (in fact no other OS has one). To put these things in XP would be to make a full WDDM for XP, and that is not quite so easy.

The DX10 stuff like this is a tie over from the XBox360 development team, and DX10 is what MS and Robbie learned to take gaming forward on the PC.

As for the 'Vista Only' titles, there were reasons for them at the time. For example Halo 2, as its online play is Games for Windows Live, and at the time used Vista's communication framework, and Live for Windows (the Gaming connection) was a Vista only technology. So the Halo 2 development went forward with these considerations, and other internal optimizations in the game just exepcted the Vista WDDM to be there, etc. Microsoft went back and wrote Live Games for Windows for XP from the ground up. (Hence some of the new networking features in XP SP3, just to support it.)

So it may have seemed nefarious, but was not a con, just a platform specific feature and optimization design, pure and simple... Sadly MS was counting on NVidia and ATI to have their WDDM drivers at XP levels at release of VIsta, and this didn't happen. When MS jumped in with NVidia and ATI and 'helped' their driver development the fruit of this was seen around June 07, as Vista was catching to XP in gaming performance, and by Sept 07, had equaled it.

I see absolutely nothing to recommend Vista over XP, at this time or in the near future.
This is where Microsoft's marketing sucks. They should do like Apple and list every tiny feature.(Remember the 300 list about Leopard?) If Microsoft did a list like this for Vista, it would be around 10,000 items in their list.

If I had time this morning, I could take your circumstances and make a very credible case for Vista. I also understand where you are coming from as Vista is a plumbing and architecture shift, they burned their time to build more features based on these changes with the iniitial dump of Longhorn. Windows 7 is basically going to be a showcase of what is already in Vista, since it doesn't have any major architecture changes planned.

Hardly a year out of date. The figures you post are one month old, and involve Vista SP1 final, vs SP3 of XP. I admit I am impressed by the evening out that Vista has managed to achieve, in those tests.

Ok, year was a bit of tongue in cheek.

A lot of people didn't realize that NVidia and ATI had to write the Vista WDDM drivers from scratch, as it is a dramatic different model than XPDM. From letting Vista do scheduling to RAM virtualization and handing over more to the OS from core driver level to even Aero Composer.

And even though I think NVidia and ATI could have done better at launch, as they didn't provide drivers to beta testers

Most people don't understand Moore's Law

http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/moore.ars

That "15 million CPU years" figure might not be entirely true.

Obviously this is because the female characters are off-balance due to their breasts shrinking.

The optical drive speed dropped 14% from 42 Mbit (PS2 4X DVD) to 36 Mbit (PS3 1x BD), but the system gained a harddrive for caching. Sorry, it's not "significantly slower".

Ya that is so cool of them to make a kludge for their design error, so it only affect 90% of the games, hoping the caching will do it part for the 10% designed to deal with it.

>>in addition the 'cell' processor that 'didn't need' a GPU
Are you a fucking retard?

Why are you looking for a date in your league?

Here are a couple links, since Google might be too hard for you. Next time just google it yourself, especialy before you post and make yourself look like an ass by being an ass.

The Sony CELL/PS3 plans were all around the web, no GPU needed, etc. It is mentioned in virtually every technical article from before the PS3, during its development, and even is noted when Sony gave up on PS3's CELL doing graphical rendering and called in NVidia late in the game.

The GPU in the PS3 (RSX) is actually slower than a vanilla off the shelf NVidia 7800 GPU, as it doesnt have the 7800 full bandwidth, and performance is between a 7600 GPU and a 7800 GPU.

But this is better than Sony sticking with trying to cut corners and suck marginal GPU performance out of the CELL as they planned all along.

http://www.xbox360fanboy.com/2007/01/11/gates-ps3-will-never-have-graphics-advantage/

http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/playstation3.ars

I have no idea where people come up with this junk. All of this discussion of theory vs. law vs. fact is depressing on a supposed 'geek' web site.

Here's the best paper I've seen on this collection of words in science: Evolution as Fact, Theory, and Path

I came across it at the ever more sane Ars Technica.