Domain: blogspot.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to blogspot.com.
Comments · 20,258
-
Re:I'm tired of the euphemisms
yeap, advertising rubbish.. take a look at some amusing blogs on the subject.. behind the ads and balls to advertising
-
Re:Be quiet everyone. Let Microsoft buy Yahoo.
I agree, this is the scenario I see playing out. If Microsoft wants to become a real Internet player then they need to drop their obsession with maintaining the OS monopoly, which is at complete odds with what it takes to be successful in the iWorld(tm).
I don't think they can let go of that, so they'll just end up turning Yahoo! into another Hotmail.
Apparently, FakeSteveJobs also agrees -
"Mr Gorbachev, Tear Down this wall!"I'd say a lot of other things would have to go very wrong first before we're there The fact that this wall is going up is proof that things are already horribly wrong and only going to get worse.
As part of the Real ID act which itself was a hitchhiker attached to a budget bill: Waiving laws that interfere with construction of physical barriers at the borders It's not just that they're trying to build 1 wall. In that bill they received authorization to build walls anywhere they want without regard to any laws to the contrary.
At this point I don't know whether we should push or pull. Should we try to prevent and slow down the loss of the American Dream or should we attempt to accelerate the decay so we can get on with scrapping the whole stinking pile sooner?
http://ajbenjaminjrbeta.blogspot.com/2008/01/defending-your-homeland-from-homeland.html -
Re:For Reps: McCain
Really? Have you read the Bible? Lots of crazy crap happened in there, much more crazy than finding gold tablets and translating them. But I digress.
McCain has a positive fiscal conservativeness? You've got to be kidding?
McCain is straight talking? Really!
/That youtube video is very enlightening!
//As Rush is always saying concerning the McCain supporters, "They just want us to shut up and fall in line." -
Re:My candidate is not allowed?
-
Re:My candidate is not allowed?
-
I predicted this and I hope I'm rightYahoo vs MSN vs Google
I hope Google does bail them out of this. I'd hate to see Microsoft ruin a few decent services. Chief among them, Flickr.
Like I said though, Google stands to gain a ton of users flocking away if MS acquires Yahoo.
-
Very True
It is very true that people don't want to stick to a carrier, because in today's market every other day one carrier is better than the other in terms of services or features they provide and moreover in India there is a big craze for iPhone and most of the people I know here have bought an unlocked iPhone in the recent times. Sachin http://qtp.blogspot.com/
-
This is not about " Internet Censorship"I have to admit, I was ignorant on this subject not so many years ago. No so much now though.
Islam Will kick your ass and kill you for thinking. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/02/islam-will-kick.html Instead, it is about "power and control".
It is about religion integrated with politics, intimidation, torture, death, rape, child sacrifice, and world domination.Islam and Democracy are incompatible. Islam and anything else are incompatible. Islam and those who claim "moderation" in Islam are incompatible. When it comes time for the 'moderates', they will have to choose conquest, or death, like the rest of us.
Is Islam a No, it is a amalgamation of political power and religion, a religion of conquest and war.
Has it ties with dictatorships of the past, integrated into its practices to this day? http://tellthechildrenthetruth.com/
Do women have a life at all under Islam? NO!
"UK: Muslim Families Who Use Rape And Violence To Enforce "Honor"" http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003964.html
Family of Muslim Teen invited men to rape her. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/02/family-of-musli.html
Or any of these: 253 posts categorized "The Truth About Islam" http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/the_truth_about_islam/index.html
Or this: "On Islamic Misogyny--Buried Alive?" http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2008/01/17/on-islamic-misogyny%E2%80%94buried-alive/
and
Michelle Malkin, Islam: http://michellemalkin.com/category/islam/
and
American Thinker: http://www.google.com/search?q=islam+site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Famericanthinker.com%2F&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-aThe point is, this is not about censorship, but about world domination, even to the point of destruction of themselves. Seems crazy, and it is to Western values and reasoning. But from birth, they have been taught differently. Oh, I guess there might be some clues here:
"At the siege of Vienna in 1683 Islam seemed poised to overrun Christian Europe. We are in a new phase of a very old war." http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/Believe it. This is about the Last Crusade, World War III, and Armageddon, IF they can find a way to make it so. We had better be aware of the dangers and take the appropriate actions.
-
Re:Scathing indictment?If record labels have enough evidence to get courts to issue subpoenas (they could easily gather this much evidence), and have a court-issued subpoena, I hardly call that "hardly no evidence". Correct. What they have cannot be characterized as "hardly no evidence".
I would characterize it as "no evidence at all". They have zero evidence that the defendant infringed their copyright. They have admitted under oath that their "investigation" does not detect any individual doing anything.
The reason the judges have signed orders authorizing the subpoenas is because the proceedings are ex parte -- there is no opposition, no one even knows it is going on. I.e., the judges have been hoodwinked. Occasionally, though, some judges see through it. -
Re:Scathing indictment?If record labels have enough evidence to get courts to issue subpoenas (they could easily gather this much evidence), and have a court-issued subpoena, I hardly call that "hardly no evidence". Correct. What they have cannot be characterized as "hardly no evidence".
I would characterize it as "no evidence at all". They have zero evidence that the defendant infringed their copyright. They have admitted under oath that their "investigation" does not detect any individual doing anything.
The reason the judges have signed orders authorizing the subpoenas is because the proceedings are ex parte -- there is no opposition, no one even knows it is going on. I.e., the judges have been hoodwinked. Occasionally, though, some judges see through it. -
a "limitless" supply of cash
Microsofts cash pool of just over 21 billion may appear limitless, but when you put forward 1/2 of a 44 billion deal in cash, that pool disappears quite quickly.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/02/microsoft-panics-overpays-for-yahoo.html for slightly more technical analysis of the deal. (i am not related to that website in any way) -
Re:Third cut?
There have been three cable cuts in two incidents. The first incident was the tanker anchor that cut FLAG Telecom's Europe-Asia cable and SeaMeWe-4 in the Mediterranean off the north coast of Egypt, on the route between Palermo, Sicily and Alexandria, Egypt. Those cables run in parallel from Palermo to Alexandria in the Mediterranean, through the Suez Canal into the Red Sea, then from Djibouti to Mumbai, India.
The second incident was a cut in FLAG Telecom's FALCON cable, which connects up with the Europe-Asia cable off the coast of Mumbai and goes north into the Persian Gulf past Oman, UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain, and lands in Kuwait. In the other direction, it rounds India and connects to Sri Lanka. That one was cut between Oman and UAE.
None of these cables lands in Iran. There is a subsea cable from Kuwait to Iran; the impact to that was indirect.
Note that in December 2006 there were *nine* cable breaks in Asia as a result of earthquakes. Submarine cables (like terrestrial cables) break all the time due to natural and man-caused accidents, which is why every cable operator contracts with cable laying and repair fleets to repair breaks.
I don't think there's anything suspicious here. I've discussed this in similar detail at my blog, which includes a link to Telegeography's submarine cable map. -
got your link right hereHere ya go. Scroll down to the third group of bills - take H.R.300 for example:
We the People Act - Prohibits the Supreme Court and each federal court from adjudicating any claim or relying on judicial decisions involving: (1) state or local laws, regulations, or policies concerning the free exercise or establishment of religion; (2) the right of privacy, including issues of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction; or (3) the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation where based upon equal protection of the laws.
Say your state government mandates prayer in public schools? You're outta luck. If you have no right or means to enforce the Constitution then the Constitution is meaningless.
So I trust you're now an ex-Ron Paul supporter? -
How can I get one?
But what do I do with one of these old ones I already have? The Secret Diary of Steve Ballmer
-
Therefore, Hillary Clinton is the best candidate
Concur wholeheartedly.
She is certainly lowering her contribution footprint among tech companies, which will help the economy:
http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com/2008/02/hellary-comes-courtin.html -
Re:A Good Reference
I can't say much about the Republicans, there are still too many for me to really break this down effectively, but I have put the Democrat candidates' policies on a number of issues (technology included) on my blog. Obama clearly breaks away for general policies, although there are some areas that all (well, now both) of them could be more clear (or give any policies).
-
Re:Barack Obama
Mostly people who took out variable-rate loans when interest rates were at historic lows and housing prices at historic highs. This definitely sucks for them, but shouldn't stupidity have consequences sometimes?
I agree 100% - which is why all the candidates proposing any sort of solution that involves any "tinkering" are just making things worse by delaying the inevitable.People who are under water should realize that they bet wrong, and face the music. They treated a house as an investment, and not a home. A home is where you "hang your hat" - and that can be either owned or rented. A house, on the other hand, is a pile of wood, plasterboard, bricks, stucco, etc., on some dirt.
We're going to see a huge increase in "jingle mail". Also foreclosures and bankruptcies will continue to increase. The sooner people realize this, the sooner they can start rebuilding their lives, and the sooner banks will have to bring those toxic loans back onto their books.
Its only once everyone (including potential investors in the rest of the world) know the true numbers, that a solution can be found. Yes, there was criminal behaviour on the part of lenders, brokers, and real estate agents. However, under the legal doctrine of "unclean hands" many of the people who got "taken" were no better.
Liar's loans, ninja loans (no income, no job or assets), purposeful mis-statements - if you lied to get that loan, you have as much right to complain as someone who got ripped off because they got short-changed buying a rock of crack.
Millions of people lied. The honest ones have recourse - the dishonest ones will have to suck it up, and be happy that they're not facing criminal fraud charges (yet), rather than blaming others.
How come no politician is saying this simple truth - that if you lied to get your mortgage, you should be happy you're not in jail, and there will be NO bail-out for you.
-
Early evidence
Last summer (iirc) somebody did a review of the different candidates' web sites. Obama won by an easy margin. It seems that he truly does understand technology.
http://webcandidate.blogspot.com/2007/03/experts-rate-web-sites-of-presidential.html -
Robot law
As robots come to pervade our society, legal issues will arise. Legal agreements will be one tool for regulating robot bad behavior or unwanted spying.
-
Social Network Contract
To legally prevent an employer from using info from a social networking site, one might post terms of use that forbid such use. The idea is not legal advice, but it is something to think about.
-
OpenTouch, touchLib, TouchAPI and Google
For your curiosity, Google also has tentacules in touch screen technology through touchEarth. AFAIK, this is in Google's SoC and work is mostly open source related. (for the most interested in virtual globes touch screens, see this link)
-
Re:get ready for the flamewar...Having said that- is it just me or does KDE 4 look cartoonish?
http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2008/01/lca-and-fluffy-bunnies.html
I don't know what you are talking about.
-
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong
. . but didn't we already pay $200 billion to get 45Mb/s fiber starting in the late 90s? I seem to remember how the telecomes complained that they didn't have the money to do it. And Congress passed the Telecom Act of 1996 to allow them to charge fees to help fund an infrastructure upgrade. Ten years later we barely have fiber and that fiber is dramatically slower and more expensive than promised. And you have to pay for it to be installed.
Yeah and the $200 Billion is a conservative estimate from what I'm seeing. I've been http://comcastissue.blogspot.com/>blogging about it for some time and run into other's who have better information about it. One guy got really deep into it and even published an ebook about it. I have the link on my blog somewhere.. I'd have to check but I found him through google and he was kind enough to explain to me some of what he found. It's unbelievable!
The fiber was supposed to go to every home and business and completed by 2006 I believe.
if it was in place, companies like Concast wouldn't be terminating people's internet for using it too much (without disclosing what the hell that means) nor blocking / forging bit torrent packets. They would be fighting for your business like any other business. -
FOUR cables cut so far!
So, first there were two cables cut (Alexandria, Egypt and Marseille, France):
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/business/worldbusiness/31cable.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin
Then a third (link between UAE and Oman):
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2008/02/third-undersea-internet-cable-cut-in.html
Then a FOURTH cable (link between Suez and Sri Lanka)
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/third-undersea-cable-reportedly-cut/story.aspx?guid=%7B1AAB2A79-E983-4E0E-BC39-68A120DC16D9%7D
Coincidence my a**!
Middle East is basically cut from Internet, and we can enjoy only the officially sanctioned news from the mainstream. If something BIG is about to happen (remember, Iran is in Middle East too), then we cannot know what actually happens there (unless you believe what you are told by officials... which I don't). -
Re:They need to prove their methods.MediaSentry does have a PI license, right? Not according to this guy.
And there's nothing in the affidavits about them having licenses, which would normally be included if they had a license. -
Re:Who is the target audience?
Here is a great example of the target group..."...people have asked why I chose the name Shamino. Shamino is a character from the Ultima series of computer games..." - cracks me up
:) -
Re:About the authorNot to mention that his comment about gluttony was made Dec 13th of 2007 on his private blog
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071213-house-committee-hears-the-cons-of-the-pro-ip-act.html In other words his current job is work for weak copyright protections. From reading that blog entry, he really seems to care about how screwed up the copyright situation is with respect to the public good. -
Re:This Would End Immediately If...Then why is there virtually no judge willing to put a stop to this at the initial John Doe ex parte stage? 1. Because the cases are ex parte. I.e., there's no one there to point out to the judge what the law is.
2. This judge did. -
Re:Not really
Yes, in my opinion they have been violating the court order in Fonovisa v. Does 1-41 since November, 2004.
-
Re:RICOPerhaps Mr. Beckerman can provide us with an update on the one(s) he previously informed us of as being in the works in Oregon regarding RICO [slashdot.org] and class action. [slashdot.org] It's all on my blog.
-
Rumor is confirmed to be bullshit
Just check: http://zibree.blogspot.com/2008/01/seda-give.html
Either the guy has regretted lying so bluntly or this is just another example of the media overreacting (and in this case media means Erica Sadun, PhD in GATECH, for christ sake!!!). -
Read the fine print.
At the bottom of that flame article there's a link saying that Snopes had stopped pushing those ads, so this story was already old and obsolete before it was posted. http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/update-on-snopes-pushing-adware.html
-
Seriously? 3D?
-
Seriously? 3D?
-
Adblock
Does this Zango company make an adblocker too? I recently read that they block spam email. Would you subscribe me to your posts?
-
Re:Romney doesn't have a prayer...(pun intended)
Wow. Stereotype much? Not sure how you got modded up, but we here on the interwebz like people to cite things when they make broad sweeping statements like "Potheads are less productive in normal jobs" or "much more prone to schizophrenia with its attendant expenses". Of course this is utterly false. You'll notice that schizophrenia in the general population has not risen in the last 40 years or so, while marijuana use has increased substantially. Now tell me how that could be exactly. There is certainly a correlation between marijuana use and schizophrenia but it isn't causal. Of course, you won't hear that in the media because it "sends the wrong message". http://utteroutrage.blogspot.com/2007/05/marijuana-duck-duck-goose-same-old.html The war on drugs is a tragedy. There are few rosy alternatives but the fact remains that imprisoning drug users has done nothing to reduce demand, supply, or addiction. It has allowed for the creation of criminal organizations, proliferation of drugs that are cut with dangerous chemicals, access to drugs by minors, racial discrimination (crack cocaine, etc...), imprisonment of otherwise law abiding citizens, and blatant abuses of police power. Never mind the economic ramifications. The drug war is a HUGE waste. But I do agree with you. It's a moot point currently. No politician that is going to get elected will talk about it. The only thing Americans want for drug users is more prison cells. *sigh*
-
Re:Oota Goota, Troll Tracker?
http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2007/09/trolltracker-responds-to-ray-niros.html
This is why he wants TT's identity. To sue on another junk patent. Like he did, as TT suggested, against a resort because he could not get a tee time.
http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2008/01/global-patent-holdings-sues-boca-raton.html -
Re:Oota Goota, Troll Tracker?
http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2007/09/trolltracker-responds-to-ray-niros.html
This is why he wants TT's identity. To sue on another junk patent. Like he did, as TT suggested, against a resort because he could not get a tee time.
http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2008/01/global-patent-holdings-sues-boca-raton.html -
moral compunctionBasically the problem is that copyright is unenforceable, and a majority of the population feels no moral compunctions about violating it. (I happen to disagree with the majority, but that battle is lost, and it's time to move on.) The copyright system lost what moral authority it once claimed when it enacted the Mickey Mouse copyright extension act. I don't get how anyone is appealing to moral authority at this late stage in the square dance.
Jefferson cribbed from http://righttocreate.blogspot.com/2005/10/intellectual-property-monopoly-regime.html If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density at any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property. The natural order of things is no copyright system at all. Copyright is a social construct. Exclusivity is granted on the premise that copyright promotes creation, and that the exclusivity does not outlast its virtue.
In modern society, the impediments to creation are not terribly high. If the copyright system ended tomorrow, creativity would not cease. While certain distribution channels (big budget Hollywood movies) would cease to exist, other forms of creativity would soon spring up to fill the void.
The main function of our present copyright system is to manufacture celebrity. Instead one million people investing $300 each worth of their time and energy (the Wikipedia model), we have one person overproducing $300 million (the Peter Jackson model).
Celebrity culture is a useful political tool. Oh yes, oh yes, oh yes they both
Oh yes, they both
Oh yes, they both reached for
The gun, the gun, the gun, the gun,
Oh yes, they both reached for the gun
for the gun. While we're collectively obsessed with the spectacle of OJ escaping justice, our political elites rob church basements.
Personally, I've had enough of the glove and the gun already, and I'm not buying this old "moral compunction" canard. -
Re:Virtual PC doesn't run on Vista Home Premium
For 16bit MSDOS programs Dosbox suffices, but for 16bit Windows programs is does not.
You can run Windows 3.11 on top of DosBox, just like you run Windows 3.11 on top of real DOS. See here. -
Re:great publicity
The Anonymous Blogger has already offered (on their blog) to turn themselves over to Niro if the bounty hits $50K.
-
Re:So long as said blogger is truthful....this post has a list of what he's said and why the Blogger has a 'bounty' on him. Here's the summary:
Here is a grand summary of my posts about Ray Niro (you can click on the Niro Scavone labels to read them all):
1) I posted Fish & Richardson's allegations against him. But those were F&R's words, not my own. By the way, the judge granted expedited discovery to allow F&R to determine whether to add Ray Niro personally as a defendant. And if F&R does sue Niro, personally, I'll report about it here. Which is not disparaging him, just reporting.
2) I posted about how Niro secured a permanent injunction that was stayed in light of BMC v. Paymentech. True!
3) I dared Niro to sue the New York Yankees in Boston on the '341 patent. But I don't think he wants to litigate out of state. C'mon Ray, if you want to stay in Chicago, at least add the Detroit Lions and Minnesota Vikings as defendants, too. (They have JPEG images).
4) I reported that he represents Acacia in a bit of patent litigation. All true.
5) I speculated that he actually represents non-practicing entities as a fair amount of his overall practice. Also, true. -
Re:So long as said blogger is truthful....this post has a list of what he's said and why the Blogger has a 'bounty' on him. Here's the summary:
Here is a grand summary of my posts about Ray Niro (you can click on the Niro Scavone labels to read them all):
1) I posted Fish & Richardson's allegations against him. But those were F&R's words, not my own. By the way, the judge granted expedited discovery to allow F&R to determine whether to add Ray Niro personally as a defendant. And if F&R does sue Niro, personally, I'll report about it here. Which is not disparaging him, just reporting.
2) I posted about how Niro secured a permanent injunction that was stayed in light of BMC v. Paymentech. True!
3) I dared Niro to sue the New York Yankees in Boston on the '341 patent. But I don't think he wants to litigate out of state. C'mon Ray, if you want to stay in Chicago, at least add the Detroit Lions and Minnesota Vikings as defendants, too. (They have JPEG images).
4) I reported that he represents Acacia in a bit of patent litigation. All true.
5) I speculated that he actually represents non-practicing entities as a fair amount of his overall practice. Also, true. -
Re:So long as said blogger is truthful....Truth is a defense for libel. Yeah, but what about 'truthiness'? If Niro, Jabba, Hutt & Niro hope to pursue litigation, how do they deal with someone who has a gut feeling that what they are doing is generally wrong?
After reading his blog it's evident that this bounty is the only thing this lawyer can do. This blogger is good with what he writes and knows his limits. They won't be able to force blogspot into divulging that info without a warrant in my opinion though I am not a lawyer, I still have a soul.
Have they tried asking Mr. Troll Tracker nicely? He lists his e-mail as trolltracker@gmail.com ... -
blog link
http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/ *slashdot effect activate*
-
Re:hope for users who have compaqs with no cds?
Really? It appears Dell installs a user-mode rootkit on some of their laptops. Is this mentioned in any sales documents?
-
Re:Enough already
I agree; that's a bad idea.
Yes, because creating a PR-oriented (and quite well made) video game is EXACTLY the same as teaching your children to make REAL suicide bombs and that murdering innocent Jews is the right thing to do. EXACTLY the same. Hooray for Moral Equivalence!
Buddy, that wasn't even a GOOD strawman argument, let alone an effective one.countering fundamentalist Islam with fundamentalist Christianity
Huh. Last time I checked, we were countering Fundamentalist Islam with Freedom and Prosperity, not Fundamentalist Christianity. but hey, what do I know. I mean, it's not like the Muslim peoples of Iraq are so happy about their newfound freedom of religion that they would ask Iraqi Christian Ex-pats to come back to Iraq. It's not as though those same moderate Iraqi Muslims would say, help repair a cross on a church with Iraqi Christians to show solidarity with them. I mean, it's not as though a new day of religious freedom is dawning across Iraq. Yeah, it must be us Eeevil "Fundie Christian American Opressors(tm)" that are MAKING them do nice things like that. Yeah.... that's the ticket...
Geez. Taking your tinfoil-hatted strawman BS somewhere else. The rest of us like living in reality. -
Re:Romney doesn't have a prayer...(pun intended)and that Bush probably wasn't lying about WMDs so much as our intelligence services have sucked since the 50s. He plunged America into a war, and other nations with his warmongering ("Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.")
He justified attacking Iraq solely based on the fact that Iraq definitely had weapons of mass destruction and that they had decisive evidence. But they also couldn't show anyone the evidence because it was a "secret".
And all of their facts turned out to be incorrect, and you want to shift the blame away from his decision (And it was his alone, not congresses) to the intelligence agencies, which until Bush got his hands on them, stated that Iraq wasn't likely to be a threat.
The result leading to a huge smear on the international reputation of America, fallout with friendly nations, the souring national debt, and looming economic crisis
Right... Well if you want to let your leader off the hook for the biggest fuck up both nationally and globally in easily the last 20 years, that either makes you a bigger man then i am or irresponsible.
Now heres two quotes of yours, from two different posts in this same thread. Most voters, with the exception of the Ron Paul supporters who also are white supremacists... Idiot trolls crawl out of the woodwork to attack Romney's entire moral system for reasons utterly irrelevant, I call them on being single-issue-selfish. Lets start off with the white supremacists line...
Heres the link that i think works at it up nicely
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/11/27/011749.php
http://lippard.blogspot.com/2007/12/ron-paul-connected-to-white.html
Reading through it, the only thing the articles are able to prove, is that there are white supremacists who support Paul, but that it appears to be a one way relationship. So i consider the issue to be irrelevant.
Now i'm going to do some conjecturing here.- The white supremacists issue is irrelevant
- You've attacked the supporters of Dr Paul, but because you also loaded the sentence with "...you're going to have to try to reason with these people if you want their votes.", you've linked the attack to the candidate himself, implying that Dr Paul panders to white supremacists for their votes.
You said, "Idiot trolls crawl out of the woodwork to attack Romney's entire moral system for reasons utterly irrelevant, I call them on being single-issue-selfish."
If that applies to Romney, does that not also apply to Ron Paul?
If thats the case, can you explain why you yourself, by your own standards, is not an "Idiot Troll" that is "single-issue-selfish".
To the moderators, the later half might be a a flamebait in nature, but the fact remains that he inserted bogus, unrelated, and off-topic information in his post, but it still needs correcting. The "single-issue-selfish" is just me pointing out an obvious contradiction in his earlier post about stupid condemning people's morals for irrelevant matters. -
Re:too many custom parts.Sorry, but I call bullshit on that one.
There's been something of a renaissance in the last few years, what with the modular Cafe Corner (which has a whole blog devoted to it) and the creator houses. Not to mention lego's official 3d modeller which links in to their ordering system - design a model and they'll ship you all the parts for it in a custom box with a picture of your model on the front.