Slashdot Mirror

I think you're confused. It's brits who like to sue. E.g. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs...

That's just one example. You can google and find lots of other examples..

For another example of Brits "doing first and asking questions later" see Brexit.

She used a private email server for precisely one reason. She's old and she doesn't understand technology.

Then how did she end up with a private email server in the first place? You think a State Department employee is going to risk a sentence in federal pound-me-in-the-ass penitentiary for mishandling classified evidence of his own volition?

This excuse dog doesn't hunt. A mere two years after savaging the Bush Administration for using private email servers, she was doing the same thing herself.

So, either:

1) Hillary was a corrupt hypocritical hack full of hubris
2) Hillary displayed a level of competence such that she could be trusted only to stock the State Department Keurig machine. And frequently she would fuck up and order the decaf.

Pick one. Either way, she had no business being a Senator, much less SOS, much less POTUS.

ZERO clear evidence was given of intent, period

Intent is batshit irrelevant. The DOJ agreed that a navy man prosecuted for taking selfies on a sub had no intent to distribute them. The man got himself in more trouble after trying to destroy evidence - so Hillary Clinton could easily be serving a lengthly sentence for obstruction of justice on top of mishandling classified evidence.

All phones sold in the EU must be usb. "All mobile phones in EU to have the same charger: European Parliament votes on law in attempt to cut down electronic clutter. A single charger will have to be compatible with all mobile phones after a vote in the European Parliament".Mar 13, 2014 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Bullshit claim. Read the fucking article instead of just the headline, you dumbass. That "law" (actually just a draft) has gone nowhere since it "passed" almost 3 years ago.

All phones sold in the EU must be usb. "All mobile phones in EU to have the same charger: European Parliament votes on law in attempt to cut down electronic clutter. A single charger will have to be compatible with all mobile phones after a vote in the European Parliament".Mar 13, 2014 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

iPhone chargers are regular USB chargers with which you can recharge your Samsung phone if you feel like it. So no, all phones in the EU do not have to be USB. But they HAVE TO be able to recharge off of a USB charger, and the USB charger provided must be able to charge other devices.

And Apple fully comply to this.

All phones sold in the EU must be usb. "All mobile phones in EU to have the same charger: European Parliament votes on law in attempt to cut down electronic clutter. A single charger will have to be compatible with all mobile phones after a vote in the European Parliament".Mar 13, 2014 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

They are not safe

Because of Brahmin, India became the Most Racist Country In The World http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

That's the exact opposite of a battlefield, which is not a known environment (act like it is and the enemy will use that assumption against you), there are a very large number of possible actions, and being predictable can quickly turn into being dead.

You're delusional. The poker robots already exceed expert human players in precisely calibrating their lack of predictability.

Beyond video games: New artificial intelligence beats tactical experts in combat simulation

Fighter jet AI consistently beats "Top Gun" tactical experts

The AI 'Top Gun' that can beat the military's best: Pilots hail 'aggresive and dynamic' software after losing to it repeatedly

In early iterations, ALPHA easily beat other AI opponents. Lee repeatedly attempted to score a kill against more mature versions of ALPHA. However, the artificial intelligence combat simulator shot Lee out of the air every time during protracted engagements. ALPHA has bested Lee and other field experts.

"I was surprised at how aware and reactive it was," said Lee. "It seemed to be aware of my intentions and reacting instantly to my changes in flight and my missile deployment. It knew how to defeat the shot I was taking. It moved instantly between defensive and offensive actions as needed."

Lee has trained with thousands of U.S. Air Force pilots, flown in several fighter aircraft and graduated from the U.S. Fighter Weapons School, yet when Lee flies against ALPHA in hours-long sessions that mimic real missions, "I go home feeling washed out. I'm tired, drained and mentally exhausted. This may be artificial intelligence, but it represents a real challenge."

Presently, combat AI is a saber-toothed tribble-tigger confined to a small box. That box is heading for puberty real darn soon.

I'm really worried about Sweden

What you are, actually, is ignorant of the facts. Talk to a cop who has to deal with what's going on there. Or better yet, try living with it yourself for a week or two.

This guy caught heat for being honest about it.

But you can be honest about it without risking public backlash, so why not try it?

It was Swiss watches in a Ming Dynasty grave

Secret service is trying to shut that down. Access is being limited.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Thomas Edison
Ray Kroc
Mark Zuckerberg

The bridge has a lowered crash beam that protects it from harm, so the railway company doesn't want to spend the money; something tells me the city also doesn't want to.
Since the city added an LED sign with an automatic red light wait it has cut down on the entertaining videos.

They could always get inventive like Sydney
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix...

At least it's probably cheaper than the 120K EUR squirrel bridge near The Hague and will get used more than 5 times:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

My house would be under more than 100 feet of water if the dam fails catastrophically:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4218388/Residents-near-Oroville-Dam-evacuated-flooding-fears.html

The entire mess got worse in 2005 when the Sierra Club sued to make the dam a water storage dam instead of a flood control dam. It wasn't designed to do that. So now the DWR hoards water in this rainy season which, as is happening now, they're storing more water than it was designed to safely hold. We are now paying the price for that.

Except that Twitter actually allows super sick shit. Like literal Islamic Terrorist recruiting and PR accounts.

Over 90,000 accounts for ISIS alone, according to one source.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Apparently, Donald Trump supporters are more dangerous than actual Islamic extremist recruiters. But this is Silicon Valley we're talking about, so that's more-or-less their actual stance.

He flirts and hits on 10-15 year old girls regularly (often enough that there are multiple tapes of him doing it). He liked walked in on underage teenage girls naked changing and bragged about being the only man allowed to do it on the Howard Stern show. He had his staff try to encourage the underage teenage girls that were naked to flirt with him saying they were more likely to win the contests if they did. He talked about wanting to sleep with teenage girls on the Howard Stern show. In my opinion, that makes him a pedophile.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

http://www.rollingstone.com/po...

http://www.politifact.com/wisc...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

http://people.com/politics/don...

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_...

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/mo...

http://www.tmz.com/2016/10/12/...

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-...

She didn't delete any e-mails. That's a Trump alternative fact. I already posted once in this thread about it:

https://slashdot.org/comments....

There is zero evidence that Hillary broke any laws. None of the "classified information" in the e-mails was marked "classified" which is the big difference between those that are prosecuted and those that aren't. For unmarked information, you would have to prove that she was intentionally trying to leak classified information for it to be criminal. Should she have been more careful? Yes. Did she break the law? No.

Kellyanne Conway on the other hand broke the law on national television. President Pedophile is defending her for it. You don't see Republicans making a big deal about her breaking the law or any of the laws that President Pedophile has broken and been sued for. The media barely covered that he settled the fraud case against him. The media barely covered that he regularly hits on 10-13 year old girls and even discussed wanting to sleep with teenage girls on the Howard Stern show or that he liked to walk in on teenage girls changing and bragged about it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

http://www.rollingstone.com/po...

I have very little respect for people who vote for a pedophile for president.

The Daily Mail is the exactly opposite of what you describe. A typical story starts with several paragraphs of reaction and outrage, before right at the end on page 7 mentioning the facts.

Here's a classic example: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/hea...

Note how even in the byline they manage to sneak a lie in (the straight banana law was debunked when it first surfaced in the 90s). If you can wade through all the ranting you will find a perfectly sensible, rational explanation for the ruling.

That's why the Daily Fail has been banned. It's not a serious source of news, it's a source of outrage and vitriol. Almost entirely fact free, virtually pure opinion (so long as it's the opinion of people who are angry, or who you should be angry about not being angry).

I find the worst part of the mail, at least on their website is all the way down the right side they have other stories, which is nothing in itself but it runs about 3 miles down the page (seriously, way, way, way past the content) and 9/10 are look at what this semi-famous person is wearing.

The Mail's perpetual campaign to declare things that cause or cure cancer (or both) is a long running joke demonstrating a willful disregard for accurate reporting. More seriously their campaigns against immigrants, Europe and other things designed to push buttons in their mitte England readers are simply malign.

And that's assuming there are any facts. e.g. the Mail loves stories about snipers killing evil ISIS members who are about to slaughter innocents.

They just quote unnamed "sources" and that make shit up. Wikipedia already bans citations from certain sources, and it's understandable if that extends to certain "news" sites.

The Mail's perpetual campaign to declare things that cause or cure cancer (or both) is a long running joke demonstrating a willful disregard for accurate reporting. More seriously their campaigns against immigrants, Europe and other things designed to push buttons in their mitte England readers are simply malign.

And that's assuming there are any facts. e.g. the Mail loves stories about snipers killing evil ISIS members who are about to slaughter innocents.

They just quote unnamed "sources" and that make shit up. Wikipedia already bans citations from certain sources, and it's understandable if that extends to certain "news" sites.

The Mail's perpetual campaign to declare things that cause or cure cancer (or both) is a long running joke demonstrating a willful disregard for accurate reporting. More seriously their campaigns against immigrants, Europe and other things designed to push buttons in their mitte England readers are simply malign.

And that's assuming there are any facts. e.g. the Mail loves stories about snipers killing evil ISIS members who are about to slaughter innocents.

They just quote unnamed "sources" and that make shit up. Wikipedia already bans citations from certain sources, and it's understandable if that extends to certain "news" sites.

The Daily Mail is the exactly opposite of what you describe. A typical story starts with several paragraphs of reaction and outrage, before right at the end on page 7 mentioning the facts.

Here's a classic example: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/hea...

Note how even in the byline they manage to sneak a lie in (the straight banana law was debunked when it first surfaced in the 90s). If you can wade through all the ranting you will find a perfectly sensible, rational explanation for the ruling.

That's why the Daily Fail has been banned. It's not a serious source of news, it's a source of outrage and vitriol. Almost entirely fact free, virtually pure opinion (so long as it's the opinion of people who are angry, or who you should be angry about not being angry).

Other the years a lot of different UK publications had to face the system of D-notices.
Recall the D-notice affair https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and how hard UK publications had to work to get news out to the public?
The publication of stories about Real IRA phone intercepts, news like
German spies 'can't be trusted': Relations between the UK and Berlin intelligence chiefs hit after comments by London (16 December 2016)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...
All the work the paper did on the UK MP's expenses scandal...
A lot of really good investigative work in the UK and Ireland should be kept. Different UK publications supported some of the best whistleblowers over the decades.
How many more decades of unique investigative reporting will be hidden from people globally?
The UK had something very unique and rare for decades. Reporters and staff who could interview people and then had some freedom to publish. Why ban that ability to look back over decades of quality investigative work?
A political leader was interviewed, public or private papers sorted, the wider public was informed and educated. More information over decades is always better.
Not every UK publication had the same funding or staffing levels and could cover every story as in depth or had staff around the UK.
What has changed about giving users links with quotes and comments from real people over decades...
What other UK media will now be banned next?

Story that most likely caused the ban. A top NOAA climate scientist, Dr. Bates, whistleblew how NOAA falsifed the data before the Paris accord in order to "alarm" governments to agree to it.

Yep, a whistleblower, giving out evidence of wrong doing and a news outlet prints it and suddenly becomes "unreliable".

Funny how the truth can no longer be printed but CNN can print all the fake news they want and everyone defends them.

Terry O'Reilly, 53, was handed a four-year sentence in December 2016. He had sold more than 1,000 of the streaming boxes to pubs. They were used to stream Premier League matches for free. Will O'Leary, who worked with O'Reilly, was given a two-year suspended sentence after he pleaded guilty. Brian Thompson, 54, is being prosecuted by Middlesborough Council on suspicion of selling Kodi boxes from his shop Cut Price Tomo TVs. He will stand trial in May. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new... Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Yes, the trumped up persecution of the Muzzies is pretty much ongoing.

The rest of the country can go BOOM! like Texas a few years ago.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/04/27/article-2315751-1981B3C1000005DC-728_634x450.jpg

intolerant? You mean intolerant like the recent riot and arson by students at UC Berkeley because someone with a different opinion was threatening to use WORDS at a public speech?

Or do you mean intolerant like when a trump supporter was knocked unconscious and beaten at an airport in Portland?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Or do you mean intolerant like when a gay guy in texas was minding his own business and beaten unconscious? his only crime, having a lighter with donald trumps picture on it
http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

Or do you mean intolerant when a hispanic trump supporter was beaten on inaugration day?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Or do you mean intolerant like during the campaign thousands of Hillary supporters violently attacked and destroyed property belonging to trump supporters?
http://cbs12.com/news/local/wo...
http://www.nydailynews.com/new...
http://wtnh.com/2016/11/12/pd-...
http://www.dailywire.com/news/...

Do yourself a favor and read up on the history of the rise of the S.S. you seem to like to throw the word Nazi and fascist around. The SS or SchutzStaffel were 'bodyguards' who went around attacking other candidates and their supporters of opposing political parties. I only see violent protests showing up repeatedly in the news coming from the Hillary group, and this predated even the run-up to the election. To violently attack, condone violent attacks, or looking the other was of said violent attacks, merely because you disagree with the opinions or WORDS that another person says is the same thing the SS did. Perhaps you are calling people Nazis and Intolerant because you suffer the psychological condition called PROJECTION.

Do you want import their "uncivilized" culture with fast-track green cards? https://qz.com/889524/the-us-s... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

Think back to "Superspy in the sky could soon be patrolling over British cities to search for hidden terror cells"(April 2010)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...
"The aircraft are able to identify suspects using 'voice-prints' "
e.g. telephone traffic today can be matched to any voice on a TV interview many years ago.
Quality is never an issue, just that the voice was captured and is in use again.
The raw collection cost is low given well understood cell phone encryption.
Speech Recognition is NSA’s Best-Kept Open Secret (May 11 2015)
https://theintercept.com/2015/...
The spoken words get transcribed, any interesting terms found. A voice print is kept to find the same person again on any voice network globally and all their connected friends of friends (3 hops).
The only change is the new low cost contractor/private sector support. A city or state (with federal funding) can now add that voice print collection to their cell tower collection systems.
The real key is getting the voice print of the person the journalist talked to. Live mic from the journalist own phone or their contact had a phone on them they used later.

KATIE HOPKINS: Trump's immigration crackdown is a clear message to the Muslim world - get your own houses in order before you come to ours.

The conclusion of the article sums it up nicely:

All those desperate to get into the country, to get back to work or to their brothers or sisters in America originally from Iran, their daughter who has dual US-Yemeni nationality, or their American-Somali mother based in California — they now have 90 days to reflect.

To think about how lucky they are to have a home in the land of the free. How fortunate they are to live in a country where democracy works and laws are made by the will of the people, not religion.

Trump said, 'We only want to admit those who will support our country and love deeply our people.'

Think of it less as a Muslim ban, and more as an American invitation. If you support America and will put America first, you will be welcome.
If you cannot bring yourself to condemn the actions of those who commit terror in the name of your god, probably best stay in what's left of your home.

-----

Also from the article:

The typical response in Western Europe is a hashtag, a tea light and a leader, saying their people will not be cowed in the face of terror.

Except, they no longer speak for us. We are sick of their platitudes.

The response from the US president is far more reassuring: a ban on travellers from seven Muslim countries and a total ban on refugees and asylum seekers from Syria. Finally, a politician taking action.

Newsflash number two: They are a majority.

Then your awareness is severely lacking.

Look up:

donglegate (forking someone's repository is a sexist slur)

Ban on chanting 'USA' because it can be used as abbreviation of 'You suck ass'.

List of microaggressions according to University of Wisconsin

What about Yale students supporting repealing the 1st amendment?

Or some quotes by prominent feminist celebrities?

Also, look up feminist glaciology, sexist carbon fiber and sexist snow plowing for more absurds spewn by SJWs.

Here is one example. Iceland kicks the FBI out of the country and claims directly that they were seeking to frame Julian Assange. Granted, this is a dailymail link but it is a direct quote from a minister for Iceland: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

How, could we ever trust our government if our highest law enforcement agency was actively attempting to frame someone for a crime. How often does stuff like this occur in other countries friendlier to such practices than Iceland?

She took bribes from Russia for selling them US uranium.

False

I trust you're calling bullshit when Democrats talk about Trump's business ties to Russia then, yes?

Is someone said they knew for certain he had ties to Russia I'd call BS.

But probable ties? Probably. And he could easily disprove business ties by releasing his taxes.

She failed to follow government guidelines for record retention.

True, but very common.

Very much horseshit, to be technical. She is the only SoS to use a private email server exclusively. And starting a mere two years after she publicly blasted the Bush Administration for their private servers.

Yeah, she was hypocritical on that count. Also not unprecedented in a politician.

She also deleted tens of thousands of emails with the same authorization she had in setting up her server (none) which would have had her serving a few decades in prison for obstruction of justice, if her name was Hillary Smith.

Actually she's in the clear there. The law explicitly gives the official the right to identify official correspondence in their personal records, deliver it for retention, and then delete the rest. It was the responsibility of the law firm to properly sort the emails.

That only refers to information you know you have, she didn't realized classified info was on the server.

Pure sophistry. Hillary knew full well that the information she was dealing in was born classified. Think about it for two seconds: if the U.S. ambassador to Pakistan sends an email about the state of nuclear tensions between that country and India, does it have to be marked classified before it is treated as such?

So do you want to imprison the ambassador then?

Other people have been sent to prison for far less - just ask the Navy man serving time for taking a few selfies on an unsecured, unauthorized cell phone.

You mean the guy who was sneaking around the sub in off-hours to take photos of things he knew were classified, possibly to sell to a foreign government?

What about the guy who sent classified information with foreign governments without authorization? I don't think he got punished... in fact I think he just got a new job.

When Clinton did the same she probably thought she was telling the truth.

So, the she's-an-incompetent-moron defense used for the "smartest person in the room". Sounds like Catholic hospitals who suddenly start arguing that a fetus isn't a person the second they are sued for a preventable miscarriage.

She took bribes from Russia for selling them US uranium.

False

I trust you're calling bullshit when Democrats talk about Trump's business ties to Russia then, yes?

She failed to follow government guidelines for record retention.

True, but very common.

Very much horseshit, to be technical. She is the only SoS to use a private email server exclusively. And starting a mere two years after she publicly blasted the Bush Administration for their private servers. She also deleted tens of thousands of emails with the same authorization she had in setting up her server (none) which would have had her serving a few decades in prison for obstruction of justice, if her name was Hillary Smith.

That only refers to information you know you have, she didn't realized classified info was on the server.

Pure sophistry. Hillary knew full well that the information she was dealing in was born classified. Think about it for two seconds: if the U.S. ambassador to Pakistan sends an email about the state of nuclear tensions between that country and India, does it have to be marked classified before it is treated as such? You might not know the answer, but Hillary did as an Original Classification Authority, a high-level official who was given extensive training and responsibility over classified materials.

Hillary Clinton did not use Anthony Weiner's laptop, her aid Huma Abedin did, likely with her official State Dept email address.

Her agency, her responsibility. Ask any military base commander that's been sacked after some grunt screws something up with security or nuclear weapons.

The reason why the GOP focused so much on the private email server is because it was a legit Clinton scandal, one they didn't have to invent

FTFY. Hillary Clinton ran her own unsecured, unauthorized server and deliberately deleted evidence before an investigation. Other people have been sent to prison for far less - just ask the Navy man serving time for taking a few selfies on an unsecured, unauthorized cell phone.

Meanwhile in Russia: Now it's Putin the bird man

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2198963/Now-Putin-bird-man-Latest-animal-stunt-sees-Russian-president-skies-micro-glider-chief-crane.html

The problems with taxes are: First, governments become addicted to them as a revenue source. Second, businesses (particularly utilities) just pass the tax on to their customers. Plus, they make a profit on this pass-through as well. Third, the tax exempt businesses just end up being less efficient. And when they finally drive their non-tax exempt out of business and their tax advantage disappears, often they go out of business as well.

By far, the worst thing about taxes is the government addiction to them. You don't want to drive an electric or hybrid car in the 'progressive' states that first encouraged them. Because now, they are falling over themselves trying to squeeze a 'fair share' of revenue out of cars not paying at the pump. Taxes: GibsMeDat on a government level.

Yea. What happened before 1950?

The Second World War.

Another notable (discrimination) fact:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Is it psychologically rigged, yes. Is it mathematically rigged, no.

but it's amazing the number of times they cheat people out of big jackpots by declaring that the machine had malfunctioned...

https://newsone.com/3578167/ca...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Damage done by guns can be tremendous, it's the manufacturers that really do deserve severe penalties.

Since in the US guns are used far more often by law abiding citizens to protect themselves and others than they are used by criminals, do we then give gun makers rewards? Fair is fair, right?

Example: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Example: http://www.khou.com/news/local...

And those were just the examples that hit the news (most never do) in the last couple weeks that popped up at the top of Google results. There were many more.

We need a national program to treat the mass-hoplophobia that seems to be spreading at an alarming rate. You appear to be exhibiting some of the symptoms. Perhaps you should get yourself checked.

Strat

You can see the actors' point to a certain extent. For example, there was a 25 year old actress here in the UK who lied about her age, and managed to land a part playing a 14 year old girl in a popular soap here in the uk (here's the story). Now if she managed to get though the auditions, and convince the producers that she looked young enough for the part, then why should it matter how old she actually was? Now in this case, the counter argument is that because it's a long-running soap, and the part may last many years, she probably wouldn't be able to credibly play the part after a few years, but if it was a movie, short series or commercial, that wouldn't fly.

What happened, did the olive harvest turn out to be the harvest of the century?

No, there's actually been a shortage recently, so I guess it's more likely that you're an idiot instead:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Plus, given the fact that Italians live FOUR years longer than the americans ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ), not only you should follow this diet advice, but you might want to use the quotation marks for the word "scientists" when you refer to the american ones instead.

> I'm only one person, I don't have time to debunk all this nonsense you keep posting.

Feel free to stop.

You don't know it, because you're actually the conspiracy theorist kook on this site, but most of the fake news comes from you. Like, you know, when you tried to argue the PizzaGate scandal was real and so on, so you'll actually be solving the goal you profess to solve which is good.

What you're really saying is that you're getting worn out being the only guy willing to prop up fake news and conspiracy theories. That's really not a loss to most of us if you stop that though you know?

The only people that have killed off the tech angle are people like you that are more interested in implying political opponents are paedophiles than actually having a decent rational discussion. If it upsets you that the site isn't what it used to be then all you have to do is stop being one of the key causes of that.

We really really don't want you to keep defending fake news and the fact you call this widespread issue a conspiracy theory is astounding. What, you really think all those Moldovan and Macedonian kids who admitted they make a fortune peddling it are CGI or paid to say that or something? If they were then that would in itself mean it was fake news, hence destroying your argument of it being a mere conspiracy theory anyway:

https://www.ft.com/content/333...

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/wo...

http://en.publika.md/moldova-s...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

http://www.pri.org/stories/201...

http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11...

It doesn't matter what media left, or right, or what part of the world you look in - Serb or British, Macedonian or American, the problem is real. The fact you want to pretend fake news isn't real says all that needs to be said about you.

If you don't have time to keep trying to debunk the truth then you may want to consider that that's because the truth can't be debunked. You're fighting a battle you can't win, because you're fighting a battle against reality purely because you can't accept that you spent the last 6 months of your life riding Slashdot's ass to defend countless fake news stories and peddle them as fact. You were duped by a 16 year old Macedonian kid, so accept it and get the fuck on with your life if you can't cope with the pressure of trying to mask your own failings.

Wake the hell up. The political poles shifted. The enemy is now within, and Russia is not now a force for evil.

You wake the hell up. The Russian gangsters that ran the Soviet Union didn't leave after the Communists fell. They're still in power and Trump is their useful idiot.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3738302/Is-Trump-Russian-agent-Kremlinologist-presents-tantalising-disturbing-dossier-presidential-hopeful-closer-links-Kremlin-appear.html

The other fun part is that the US is not even trying to find out who walked out the the actual material.
"Julian Assange: 'A lot more material' coming on US elections"
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07...
""Perhaps one day the source or sources will step forward and that might be an interesting moment some people may have egg on their faces. But to exclude certain actors is to make it easier to find out who our sources are,"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new... 15 December 2016
"The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks'"
The US faced another Pentagon papers event https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and tried to make some code litter thats floating around the "net" look like it was not a very internal, domestic issue.

"I am so glad we're more concerned with some DNC emails that showed office staff being office staff, "

Yeah... that's all it was. No attempts to try and get Trump to be the nominee because the DNC didn't feel Clinton beat many of the others... no attempts to sabotage Sanders campaign in various ways. Nobody from CNN provided debate questions to Clinton... Just office staff being office staff.

"nameless faceless sources....like the director of the CIA, the head of the DIA, and the head of the NSA.
also, do you think the CIA just burns their sources in Russia so quickly?
or did you not realize that the evidence would itself reveal who those assets are?"

Except Wikileaks -- who LEADED the emails says they didn't get those from the Russians.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Marriage was created to facilitate property transfer and inheritance in a peaceful fashion. It doesn't make sense outside the species. Animals and robots are property.

However, I do have a very handsome bridge for your sister, daughter, mom...