encyclopediadramatica.com · Domains

Re:Ojectivity by Bushido+Hacks · 2008-01-21 13:29 · Score: 1 · on RIAA Website Hacked

The "iKnife" can actually be used for other things. So now they want you to use something less versatile, such as the "iSpoon" which means you must change your arm service or else you won't be as trendy.

The RIAA attack was more of an exploding van than truck. These guys don't really give a damn.

lolcats by tepples · 2008-01-21 05:30 · Score: 1 · on perl6 and Parrot 0.5.2 Released

If you haven't seen any of those daft kitty pictures with captions, like a cat watching a washing machine with "THIS TELLY R BORING, WHERE IZ REMOTE?" you probably won't get it. I have seen them and I STILL don't get it... perhaps you could enlighten me. They're trying to be cute, sometimes in an ironic sense. Look at these pages: Lolcat@Wikipedia, Caturday@ED, Lolcats@Uncyclopedia, About@I Can Has Cheezburger, and Cats Can Has Grammar. I'd also recommend familiarizing yourself with The Far Side or similar comic panels. (Caturday.com appears unrelated.)

Re:And yet... by Leftist+Troll · 2008-01-12 11:35 · Score: 5, Funny · on SimCity Source Code Is Now Open

Lunix is one of the most powerful contraceptives evar ....It is an operating system that was the result of really crappy reverse-engineering efforts to create a free version of UNIX. Linus Torvalds and Alan Cox are the perpetrators behind this travesty. Tons of people use it, especially hippies, and no one really likes it except the terminally uncool. Most of them use it in violation of SCO's intellectual property rights. To use Lunix legally, one must pay a $699 license fee to SCO for each processor that runs the Lunix kernel.

Re:uh oh by Anonymous Coward · 2008-01-06 03:26 · Score: 0 · on Wonder Woman Gets a Woman's Point-of-View

Read http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Biting_Beaver

There really are that much worthless humans out there. Some of them are women. Some or man. Some are caucasian. Some are black. Some are asian.

Even if you belong to a minority, you can still be worthless.

Facepalm by Anonymous Coward · 2008-01-05 00:38 · Score: 0 · on McAfee Worried Over "Ambiguous" Open Source Licenses

Not This Shit Again

cow_2001

Re:MTV itself is helping with the decline by Anonymous Coward · 2007-12-26 03:36 · Score: 0 · on MTV: 2007 Borked the Music Industry

The Encyclopedia Dramatica article on MTV sheds some light on this issue, specifically, that MTV hates music and prefers "an agenda of stupidity by making spoiled dumbass sluts into popular celebrities such as Paris Hilton." Fairly insightfully states what most of us realized but not to this extent.

Since its inception no more than 99 years ago, MTV has attempted to systematically exterminate music, and to date, they have been reasonably successful in this regard. Some argue that the key to their victory was their outright refusal to have music videos played on their channel, or even to acknowledge the existence of music in any way (as evidenced by the various award shows they host every year).

Responsible for the successful careers of such shit bands as 50 Cent, Good Charlotte, Blink 182, My Chemical Romance, Lil' Jon, Coldplay and James Blunt. Indeed, rumour has it that MTV's official policies require them to have one of the aforementioned on screen at all times. But obviously they should never actually play any of their songs. That would be severely damaging to their popularity.

Re:Sounds a bit like... by Anonymous Coward · 2007-12-18 19:35 · Score: 0 · on Penetration Testing TV Series Coming

Worse than goatse?! You decide

Re:Yes. by Hal_Porter · 2007-12-16 04:38 · Score: 1 · on Should Wikipedia Allow Mathematical Proofs?

Umm, this?

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Vandalize_Every_Equation

w00t! old by erdraug · 2007-12-15 10:22 · Score: 1 · on 'w00t' Named 2007 Word of the Year

I can't believe nobody mentioned the w00t paradox!?!

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/W00t

Also isn't this news a bit old:

http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/28/2048245&tid=133

Shouldn't there be a w00t! tag or something to link the two articles?

Re:Everyone can by Anonymous Coward · 2007-12-14 02:43 · Score: 0 · on Google's "Knol" Reinvents Wikipedia

At the risk of stating the obvious, this won't get anywhere near as popular as Wikipedia... At the risk of stating the obvious, [in the US and over the next 5 years] Mozart won't get anywhere near as popular as Britney Spears.

because everyone can't edit any article (thereby keeping the articles up-to-date and reaching decisions by consensus so ensuring accuracy) A-ha, so that's why every the various academic journals I read are so accurate - because everyone can edit any article. Of course! And in true Orwellian style, when a new fact has been decided upon, the old is no longer relevant, so rather that writing a new piece which continues on from the old, we replace the article with something up-to-date. Of course! I forget how knowledge works now. Newton saw further not because he was standing on the shoulders of giants, but because of reaching decisions by consensus with his contemporaries. Knowledge is, after all, democratic - the truth can be decided by majority vote. Uhuh.

An on-line encyclopedia model where articles are owned has been tried many times before The web comprises either original research or precisely "an on-line encyclopedia model where articles are owned". That's what a set of connected, autonomous peers inevitably creates. And note that I'm using the loose Wikipedia defintion of "encyclopedia" rather than one which includes all the usual assumptions about editorial quality, etc. Hate to break it to you, but the web is quite successful - no matter how much Wales would prefer people to write on his pages rather than their own.

You are a boorish zealot, and I would not expect you to understand how Wikipedia is harming scholarship. Fortunately, I'm yet to meet an academic who believes wikipedia.org any more reliable than any other URL pulled out of a hat, but I've met several who believe that its marketing power makes it rather dangerous at convincing impressionable minds otherwise. Wikipedia is valuable as a way for special interests to preach their message, lazy schoolboys to do their homework, and low level information workers to obtain half-assed explanations of subjects they (fortunately) don't really need to understand fully anyway. Thank you, sepluv, for contributing toward this mediocracy - so much easier than encouraging people to lift themselves higher.

Re:Amazing? by Anonymous Coward · 2007-12-13 02:29 · Score: 0 · on Cloned, Glow in the Dark Cats

Heh.

Re:Why does it need to be? by Isotopian · 2007-12-10 14:22 · Score: 1 · on Yahoo! Answers, A Librarian's Worst Nightmare

Well for memes, where better to look than The Encyclopedia Dramatica!
Sure, it's maybe a little difficult to read through a site that attacks everything, but, at least they have them there.

Re:Unsurprisingly... by Anonymous Coward · 2007-12-07 07:04 · Score: 0 · on The Register Exposes More Wikipedia Abuse

I've known one of those editors for a number of years pretty well and It scares me to think they are an official spokesman, becuase they are a rampant self serving egomaniac who has been throwing their weight around on usenet for years. they are also the most odious sleeze i've ever encountered, but that's another story.

it's obvious there is a cabal of super editors who have ultimate control of what happens or doesn't because they are drinking buddies of the guy calling the shots. I suspect they are all pretty much the same, small time geeks who want to throw their epeens about and the paranoid shoty egomaniacs tend to be the ones who rise to the surface in these 'democratic' freeforalls

ps: this is the wiki media spokesman who is referenced in the story
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/David_Gerard

This image... by TheRealZeus · 2007-12-04 07:17 · Score: 0 · on Secret Mailing List Rocks Wikipedia

...says EVERYTHING http://encyclopediadramatica.com/images/8/8f/Damn_furries_wikipedia.jpg

The WikiClique by dtobias · 2007-12-03 23:58 · Score: 4, Informative · on Secret Mailing List Rocks Wikipedia

There is a clique in Wikipedia that has tried to censor links to sites they think are "evil". Some people don't like this.

Over a million? by s.bots · 2007-11-27 04:57 · Score: 0, Offtopic · on PSP Slim Sells Over A Million in Japan

That's OVER 9000!!!!!!one!!!11!!eleven!

For the uninformed: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Over_9000

Re:I'll let Vader answer this one. by empaler · 2007-11-23 08:02 · Score: 4, Informative · on When Did Star Wars Jump the Shark?

For the mods: DO NOT WANT!!!
(Google Cache of http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/DO_NOT_WANT)

Adversus Solem Ne Loquitor by meehawl · 2007-11-20 05:54 · Score: 1 · on Apple Fixes 'Misleading' Leopard Firewall Settings

It has come to this.

You're Doing It Wrong by meehawl · 2007-11-19 13:06 · Score: 1 · on Apple Fixes 'Misleading' Leopard Firewall Settings

Only morons claim Nintendo has a monopoly on gaming. The same applies to Apple and computers.

Where did I claim that? You're obviously having trouble understanding the difference between the set of all exemplars versus a sub-set. You know, there should be a Godwin for the first person to resort to personal abuse in a conversation as defence for lack of clue. Oh wait, there is.

You're Doing It Wrong by meehawl · 2007-11-19 13:06 · Score: 1 · on Apple Fixes 'Misleading' Leopard Firewall Settings

Only morons claim Nintendo has a monopoly on gaming. The same applies to Apple and computers.

Where did I claim that? You're obviously having trouble understanding the difference between the set of all exemplars versus a sub-set. You know, there should be a Godwin for the first person to resort to personal abuse in a conversation as defence for lack of clue. Oh wait, there is.

Nobody by meehawl · 2007-11-18 09:54 · Score: 1 · on Apple Fixes 'Misleading' Leopard Firewall Settings

Nobody claims

Nobody you know, obviously.

Naming names? by Megane · 2007-11-18 01:04 · Score: 1 · on Journalists Can't Hide News From the Internet

Hell, I first found out about it last week on the front page of Encyclopedia Dramatica. But that what was Last Thursday. Then I saw it mentioned on Drudge yesterday. Now she's just another An Hero, and I don't want to waste my time figuring out which ED page it was.

Naming names? by Megane · 2007-11-18 01:04 · Score: 1 · on Journalists Can't Hide News From the Internet

Hell, I first found out about it last week on the front page of Encyclopedia Dramatica. But that what was Last Thursday. Then I saw it mentioned on Drudge yesterday. Now she's just another An Hero, and I don't want to waste my time figuring out which ED page it was.

Naming names? by Megane · 2007-11-18 01:04 · Score: 1 · on Journalists Can't Hide News From the Internet

Hell, I first found out about it last week on the front page of Encyclopedia Dramatica. But that what was Last Thursday. Then I saw it mentioned on Drudge yesterday. Now she's just another An Hero, and I don't want to waste my time figuring out which ED page it was.

Re:Hmm... by nxsty · 2007-11-16 21:05 · Score: 1 · on Aqua Teen Art 'Terrorist' Describes His Ordeal

Indeed: http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/f/f1/Terrorist_Err.PNG

Re:Rule 45? by TheSpoom · 2007-11-02 06:28 · Score: 1 · on U.of Oregon Says No to RIAA

Ahem.

Re:Jayjg, the most wikilawyering abusive persona by Anonymous Coward · 2007-10-31 01:17 · Score: 0 · on Call For Halt To Wikipedia Webcomic Deletions

Watch out for another wikilawyering full-time paid propagandist called Ludvikus who spends all his/her working hours editing Wikipedia. He/she engages in lots of abusive edit-warring and snide trolling, although luckily lacks admin privileges.

www.encyclopediadramatica.com has some detailed exposures of some of the most notorious abusive admins at Wikipedia (but please just ignore the unpleasant partially racist trolling that also exists on the site; it's well worth persevering and reading the rest of the site for the very informative background info on abusive editors which reveals massive conflicts of interest).

Re:Jalapenos by flimflam · 2007-10-31 00:17 · Score: 0 · on Capsaicin Tested On Surgical Wounds

Well that's nothing compared to this:

http://pr0n.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/8/8a/Bscp008_-_The_Simpsons_-_Chili_Cook_Off.jpg

Re:Beatles? by value_added · 2007-10-15 15:06 · Score: 1 · on Led Zeppelin Agrees To Digital Distribution

Which means it'll cost you an arm, a leg, and a white-woman's nose.

Urban myth. There is no such thing as a a poor black child who wants to grow up to become a white woman.

It's a Dianna Ross nose.

Lightning bolt! by tepples · 2007-10-10 22:59 · Score: 1 · on The Evolution of Language

Larp no! More like LARP nooooooo! (Or "LARP do not want"?)

Why does Anonymous hate knowledge and freedom? by Gary+W.+Longsine · 2007-10-03 02:42 · Score: 5, Insightful · on Sony BMG Says Ripping CDs is Stealing

New rule! Only logged in users are allowed to request a citation.

"Citation, please?" is a lazy rhetorical technique which in online discussion forums like Slashdot has come to imply much more about the person asking the question than about anything else. It roughly translates from moronese to English as:

I'm a moron,
I disagree with you, but
I'm too ill-informed to argue my side of the debate, and
I'm too lazy to look up the resources which are freely available which would help me construct an argument, so
I'm going to take the low road, and snidely suggest that you defend your argument, whereafter
I'll assume that you are wrong and I am right because you didn't respond by falling all over yourself by quoting chapter and verse to me,
but because I have this lingering sense that I might not know what the hell I'm talking about, I'll just post this retort as "Anonymous".

How about, instead of logged in Slashdot participants falling all over themselves to defend every other statement they make from Anonymous "show me a link" asshats, the asshats start reading a little more and learning about the world around them? Don't agree with what someone said? Look it up! You're using Slashdot, so you are already USING THE INTERNET. There are dictionaries and encyclopedias and actual laws, on the internet, mere seconds away from where you are now.

Google (fucktard)
Wikipedia (fucktard)
Urban Dictionary (fucktard) (particularly useful when somebody calls you a name you haven't heard before)
Encyclopedia Dramatica (fucktard)
United States code (aka "the law" for U.S. residents)

If you care enough to post, then please devote the five or ten minutes that it might take to research the topic and post your own link refuting the statement that you don't agree with. I'll help you get started, here: U.S. Copyright Law. You don't need a degree in law to read and understand well written laws. If you can't read and understand a law, that's a pretty big hint that it might be broken in some way. Finding relevant sections of the code can be challenging, but Google can be quite helpful with that.

Look it up!

Re:Would someone please clarify by Hal_Porter · 2007-10-02 04:28 · Score: 3, Insightful · on HD Recorder Can Use Standard DVDs

As far as I can tell from the extraordinarily sparse FA, that's all we know. The article made less sense than the summary

Isn't that the slashdot equivalent of dividing by zero?

OH SHI-

Re:touché by deftcoder · 2007-10-02 04:16 · Score: -1, Flamebait · on Valve's Gabe Newell on Apple's Gaming Failures

lol and, of course, the Valven fanboys mod me down rather than admit what they know is the truth...

It was either an intentional leak or Gaben ate the source code repository server...

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Myg0t#Half-Life_2_Source_Leak

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Steam#Fuck_Ups

After a month following the source code theft, Gabe Newell of Valve admitted to eating the server containing the code citing that he "couldn't help himself."

lol :D

Portal is going to suck, TF2 will be a shitty anime-esque mod (on the other hand, Fortress Forever blows, too), but Valve will keep getting rich off you fools even though they have the worst developers next to Blizzard.

Re:touché by deftcoder · 2007-10-02 04:16 · Score: -1, Flamebait · on Valve's Gabe Newell on Apple's Gaming Failures

lol and, of course, the Valven fanboys mod me down rather than admit what they know is the truth...

It was either an intentional leak or Gaben ate the source code repository server...

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Myg0t#Half-Life_2_Source_Leak

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Steam#Fuck_Ups

After a month following the source code theft, Gabe Newell of Valve admitted to eating the server containing the code citing that he "couldn't help himself."

lol :D

Portal is going to suck, TF2 will be a shitty anime-esque mod (on the other hand, Fortress Forever blows, too), but Valve will keep getting rich off you fools even though they have the worst developers next to Blizzard.

Re:Anonymous COWARD! by Anonymous Coward · 2007-09-28 06:05 · Score: 0 · on Replacing a Thinkpad?

lol, internet tough guy.

Those new laws in full - to save time by Anonymous Coward · 2007-09-27 00:02 · Score: 0 · on New Zealand Police Act Wiki Lets You Write the Law

Do not talk about /b/
DO NOT talk about /b/
We are Anonymous
Anonymous is legion
Anonymous never forgives
Anonymous can be horrible, senseless, uncaring monster
Anonymous is still able to deliver
There are no real rules about posting
There are no real rules about moderation either - enjoy your ban
If you enjoy any rival sites - DON'T
All your carefully picked arguments can easily be ignored
Anything you say can and will be used aganist you
Anything you say can and will be turned into something else - fixed
Do not argue with trolls - it means that they win
The harder you try the harder you will fail
If you fail in epic proportions, it may just become a winning failure
Every win fails eventually
Everything that can be labeled can be hated
The more you hate it the stronger it gets
Nothing is to be taken seriously
Original content is original only for a few seconds before getting old
Copypasta is made to ruin every last bit of originality
Copypasta is made to ruin every last bit of originality
Every repost is always a repost of a repost
Relation to the original topic decreases with every single post
Any topic can be easily turned into something totally unrelated
Always question a person's sexual preferences without any real reason
Always question a person's gender - just in case it's really a man
In the internet all girls are men and all kids are undercover FBI agents
There are no girls on the internet
TITS or GTFO - the choice is yours
You must have pictrues to prove your statement
Lurk more - it's never enough
There is porn of it, no exceptions
If no porn is found at the moment, it will be made
There will always be more fucked up shit than you just saw
You can not divide by zero (just because the calculator says so)
No real limits of any kind apply here - not even the sky
CAPSLOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL
EVEN WITH CRUISE CONTROL YOU STILL HAVE TO STEER
Desu isn't funny. Seriously guys. It's worse than Chuck Norris jokes
Nothing is Sacred.
The more beautiful and pure a thing is - the more satisfying it is to corrupt it
Even one positive comment about Japanese things can make you a weeaboo
When one sees a lion, one must get into the car
There is always furry porn of it
The pool is always closed
Do Not turn your back on Anonymous. Do not Betray Anonymous. Anonymous does not forget and neither should you. What Anonymous gives, Anonymous can take away. We control everything.
Tim is always behind you...ALWAYS.

The Rules

Re:What about stupid fashinista culture? by Hal_Porter · 2007-09-21 17:51 · Score: 1 · on Berners-Lee Challenges 'Stupid' Male Geek Culture

Yeah, exactly. It's actually the Tu Quoque fallacy.

Read this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

Or if you've spent a lot of time on the Internet read this.

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/NO_U

It has funny pictures and it won't give you a nasty headache in your frontal lobes.

Re:2007-1982 = 25 by Anonymous Coward · 2007-09-18 14:05 · Score: -1, Troll · on The Smiley Face Turns 25 :-)

God, I want to stand behind chin-chan, pull her body towards mine, and slowly kiss her neck and ears. I'd grab and squeeze her breasts and feel up her pussy through her clothes. After a while, I'd slip my left hand under her shirt and my right hand would unbuckle her jeans. I'd rub on her pussy through her pretty pink polka dot underwear until I could feel the warm drops of her slime on my fingers.

Obviously, I'd have a raging erection at this point, and I would make sure to press firmly it into her buttocks. I'd pull her pants and underwear off rather forcefully, and quickly unbutton my own. I would rub her ass with my left hand and erect phallus, while slowly rubbing her clit in a circular motion. I'd lick my fingers and savor her delicious warm little twat.

In an ideal world, she would turn around, kneel, and begin licking the head of my penis. Soon after, she would begin sucking on it in earnest, making quiet gasping noises as she bobs her head back and forth, and looking into my eyes with her droopy, glassy eyes. I would feel the pleasure of feeling chin-chan's soft lips and tongue sliding against my skin, and of seeing my dick plunge down her chinless mouth.

But receiving oral sex is an unnecessary pleasure I would be glad to skip, if skipping it meant giving it. I want to feel chin-chan's warmest part with my lips and tongue. I want to smell her most intimate part. I want to taste it, and I want to see it up close. I want to see her reaction when my tongue flicks across her clitoris, and I want to hear her moans as I suck on it.

chin-chan, I want to make you hot for me. So hot that you burn me when I finally plunge my cock into your pussy. I want to know the feeling of giving you pleasure, and I want to feel the pleasure of doing just that.

We should do this soon. I'll write you every day until I get a nice answer.

Love,
Reuben