Slashdot Mirror


Penetration Testing TV Series Coming

ChazeFroy writes "CourtTV (TruTV) has a new series starting Dec. 25 at 11 pm called 'Tiger Team.' It follows a group of elite penetration testers hired to test organizations' security using social engineering, wired/wireless penetration testing, and physically defeating security mechanisms (lock picking, dumpster diving, going through air vents/windows). They do all of this while avoiding the organizations' various security defenses as well as law enforcement. The stars of the show also did a radio spot this morning in Denver." Wonder how they socially engineer away the presence of a camera team in the air vents.

209 comments

  1. Sounds a bit like... by 1zenerdiode · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...some sort of interactive pr0n... I don't want to see the set-top box.

    1. Re:Sounds a bit like... by renegadesx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Im just glad the usual trolls are not around (goatse, gay sex writer, pony lover, etc)

      They would have a field day with the title alone

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    2. Re:Sounds a bit like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Sounds a bit like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...some sort of interactive pr0n... I don't want to see the set-top box.

      Is this the kind of shit we're going to have to put up with while the real writers are on strike?

    4. Re:Sounds a bit like... by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      What's really sad is that, since one of my hobbies is urban exploration, I didn't even get the joke. I had to read 12 comments in before I went back and looked at the title second time to figure out where all the sex comments were coming from.

      *Sigh*

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    5. Re:Sounds a bit like... by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      They would have a field day with the title alone I wouldn't mind a field day with a nice pair of titles...
      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  2. OT, but... by JayTech · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's kind of off topic, but why does "dumpster diving" make me laugh every time I hear it? Like it's a sport to go rummaging through the trash... LOL

    1. Re:OT, but... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Like it's a sport to go rummaging through the trash... LOL

      There's a lot more to it than just rummaging through the trash.

      When you're going for sensitive information and not just things like parts, common sense dictates that you pick your targets carefully and have a plan for executing the dive (though most of the following would apply to diving for equipment as well):
      Knowing which dumpsters and containers are more than likely to have sensitive information.
      Knowing how to get in and out of the area without getting caught.
      Knowing how best to get out of the area if someone is after you (which may not be the same as the best way to get out undetected).
      Knowing *when* to go for the information (which would involve some recon to know when the security patrols routinely pass).
      Having a plan for getting the information (usually by the bag full) out of the area.
      Knowing how to go through it in order to find what you need.
      Sometimes even spending a great deal of time piecing together sheets that have been fed through a strip shredder.

      It's not as easy as you seem to think.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    2. Re:OT, but... by Barkmullz · · Score: 1

      Like it's a sport to go rummaging through the trash... LOL
      I think it is a sport here.

      --
      Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
    3. Re:OT, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there can be a lot involved in dumpster diving, and apparently some people consider it a hobby of sorts.
      There's no panel of judges standing by to award you points for doing triple backflips, though.
      Certainly, if we were going to arrange Nerd Olympics, dumpster diving would be an event of it's own, just as the Star Trek marathon.

    4. Re:OT, but... by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      If golf is a sport...

  3. How times have changed. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny
    (lock picking, dumpster diving, going through air vents/windows)

    Funny, when I did that they called it B&E - sigh.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:How times have changed. by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Yeah but you werent hired to try and break the security

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    2. Re:How times have changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the joke.

    3. Re:How times have changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I went through air vents it was called Mission Impossible, and it didn't work.

      Nowadays there's no social engineering/foreplay, it's all about penetration. ..etc..etc

    4. Re:How times have changed. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was!

      It just wasn't by the company I visited.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:How times have changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Well personally, I'll be watching to pick up tips. This isn't a tv show - it's a How To. :D

    6. Re:How times have changed. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The cops might not either. Recently in the news there was some movie crew shooting a bank robbery scene and the real cops showed up and shot five of the actors. I think 3 are dead, one was close to dea and the other should live.

      Not being caught by the cops is something that they shouldn't play around with. Even if they aren't using guns in their actions, there have been quite a few instances where someone thought a keychain, flashlight or a pimped out wallet was a gun and the cops opened fired Now with things like tasers, can you imagine getting shocked by one and then falling from something to hit your head while in the middle of the artificial and eclectically induced secure? This sounds like something else waiting to go bad.

    7. Re:How times have changed. by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      "(lock picking, dumpster diving, going through air vents/windows)" Funny, when I did that they called it B&E - sigh.

      Take ten thousand dollars and your a thief. Take ten billion dollars and you're a dynamic new business leader.

    8. Re:How times have changed. by sammy+baby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      BANK EMPLOYEE: (typing on a check) So, people hire you to break into their places... to see if you can break into their places?

      BISHOP: It's a living.

      BANK EMPLOYEE: (looks at check, hands it to BISHOP with sympathetic expression) Not a very good one.

    9. Re:How times have changed. by PhxBlue · · Score: 3, Funny

      Funny, when I did that they called it B&E - sigh.

      Yes, because you got caught. :)

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    10. Re:How times have changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to do that sort of stuff:

      1) Notify the cops
      2) Don't do it in Angola (where allegedly notifying the cops didn't work).

    11. Re:How times have changed. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Recently in the news there was some movie crew shooting a bank robbery scene and the real cops showed up and shot five of the actors. I think 3 are dead, one was close to dea and the other should live. Maybe the cops were familiar with the movie Shooting High (1940):

      On the day a bank robbery scene is to be filmed at Pritchard's bank, four supposed actors who have joined the troupe turn out to be bank robbers for real.

      To be clear, this is a plot summary, not trivia about the movie. The movie has a movie being filmed in it. You have actors pretending to be real bank robbers pretending to be actors pretending to be bank robbers, pretending to actually rob the pretend real bank.

      Is that clear? If not, you may qualify to be an Angola police officer.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    12. Re:How times have changed. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      BTW, this Angola bank robbery shooting story isn't coming up on Google News which should have indexed it if it came through a legitimate news source. It also appears to be too recent to have even a mention on Snopes.

      Still, real or not it shouldn't prevent finding my (parent) post Funny, Interesting, or Insightful.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    13. Re:How times have changed. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Lol.. I that's the first I have hear of that.

      And thanks for the Angola hint. It allowed me to find a relatively short news article on it.

    14. Re:How times have changed. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed, I had to drop keywords like "bank" and "robbery" and add "Angola" to finally get results out of Google News.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    15. Re:How times have changed. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm surprise this didn't get better news coverage. If nothing else, it is worth the "Make sure the cops know or use a closed set when making a movie about robbing a bank" value.

      As screwed up as the police in America is, I can see one of these dumpster divers shoots where they are looking though windows and dumpsters or try to find air vents they can get into ending up with the police on showing up and one of them mistakes the Sound Blaster 64 AWE for a gun when they turn around, and it ends both their careers.

  4. First 50 seconds on Youtube by ChazeFroy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Opening montage of the show is on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Be-ZzcXVLw

    1. Re:First 50 seconds on Youtube by Seumas · · Score: 1

      The show is going to be complete shit. As if CourtTV wasn't stupid enough (not to mention, they brought us Nancy Grace), but now that they're changing themselves to "TruTV" it's mostly just going to be a bunch of videotaped crap. So if you missed the video of the guy driving the wrong way on CCTV in the UK when it was on one of those FOX "wildest blah caught on tape" shows or REALTV or any of the other shows over the last decade, you'll be able to catch it when it airs for the 800th time on some random show on this "TruTV" thing that has been dumbed-down for the Idiocracy crowd.

    2. Re:First 50 seconds on Youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems to be original, though. Not regurgitated crap from another network (or another country). I'm curious to see how it pans out. We'll probably be able to tell from the first two episodes on Christmas eve if this will suck or float. It can't be worse than Discovery's "It Takes a Thief". Those guys are bad actors and shady individuals to boot.

    3. Re:First 50 seconds on Youtube by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
      Let's see:
      • They break in to MicroSoft: depressingly easy.
      • They break in to Apple: that could be fun, based on Job's sense of humor.
      • They break in to the US Government: giant traffic jam amongst the other break-ins, a surprising bore.
      • They break in to Theo de Raadt's network: priceless, if they can penetrate Puffy
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:First 50 seconds on Youtube by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Breaking into all those places is easier for any clever hacker or thief. If they really want to impress us here on /., they need to accept the ultimate challenge: break into a girl's pants.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:First 50 seconds on Youtube by lamona · · Score: 1

      If you have to break in you're doing it wrong.

      --
      I just read /. for the amusing .sigs
    6. Re:First 50 seconds on Youtube by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You mean getting in and out without being detected?

    7. Re:First 50 seconds on Youtube by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I do that all the time with my mad tyte psychological mind skills. The girls never even know that I'm honing my Jedi penetration skills on them, but I've been told my beady eyes and upper lip sweat could give me away some day.

    8. Re:First 50 seconds on Youtube by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Pants? It's not penetration testing if there's no penetration.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  5. The next new show... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
    They do all of this while avoiding the organizations' various security defenses as well as law enforcement.


    COPS meets Tiger Team. I see a great need.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:The next new show... by gmack · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like Sneakers the TV series.

    2. Re:The next new show... by jenilyn · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want a Winnebego.

    3. Re:The next new show... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "COPS meets Tiger Team. I see a great need."

      I kinda doubt it....not many hackers run around in wife beater t-shirts and mullets.

      :-D

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:The next new show... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      They don't?

    5. Re:The next new show... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      He means not many hackers he has seen portrayed on TV and in the movies.

      We all know they are quasi skateboard punks with the unix bible under their arm and rich kids rebelling from their daddies lack of efectione.

    6. Re:The next new show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all the hackers I know walk around with mullet beater t-shirts and a wife.

    7. Re:The next new show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...do you actually think that's how 'affection' is spelled?

    8. Re:The next new show... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well it's going to be hard getting those fat bearded hackers through air vents or windows.

      On the bright side, some of them might actually smell better after dumpster diving. ;).

      --
  6. I thought.... by pablo_max · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought it was a reality TV show about life in a condom factory.

    1. Re:I thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be titled 'Jack, the Disgruntled Condom Factory Worker with a Needle.'

    2. Re:I thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I got my first gig in this field in 1993, my title was "Controlled Penetration Engineer."

      My dad said he thought it sounded like prophylactic design.

    3. Re:I thought.... by deniable · · Score: 1

      Every unit hand tested at the factory.

    4. Re:I thought.... by bitchcraft · · Score: 1

      I thought it was ashow about artificial insemination for tigers!!!!!!

  7. Penetration testing? by deuist · · Score: 2, Funny

    On Court TV? I thought that kind of show only aired on Cinemax after midnight.

    1. Re:Penetration testing? by BunnyClaws · · Score: 1

      You are thinking of Skin-a-max (Cinemax.)

      --
      "Anything tastes good if you deep fry it."
    2. Re:Penetration testing? by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

      I think you are referring to the hit series "Just the tip baby, please?". The home version is great if i may be so bold as to recommend it.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  8. Reverse engineering? by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kudos to the first group to penetrate the series' offices and make off with their tapes.

    1. Re:Reverse engineering? by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 1

      Dammit Janet! what a great idea.. now if only i wasn't on the wrong side of the planet..

      --
      http://www.xkcd.com/354/
  9. Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, Elites Penetrate You!

  10. Season 2? by Awod · · Score: 1

    So.. I guess shows over when they get caught?

    1. Re:Season 2? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Informative

      They have signed papers indicating they are permitted to do penetration testing, by request of the organization they are testing. If they get arrested, they show the papers, the police verify them, and they get released.

    2. Re:Season 2? by Awod · · Score: 1

      Interesting.

    3. Re:Season 2? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Er, at least, that's how these sorts of things are supposedly done. IANAPenetration Tester.

    4. Re:Season 2? by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Isn't it illegal to knowingly call the cops with a false report? I realize that the specific IT person or security guard won't be in on the joke, but whoever sets up the "penetration test" knowingly is setting up an employee to call in a false report. This means the corporation as an entity is calling in a false report.

    5. Re:Season 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be more worried if I was a penetration tester that cops would possible shoot or taze (to death?) first and ask questions later. But then again that might be good for the show's ratings.

    6. Re:Season 2? by jerw134 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In one article I read about the practice of penetration testing, the firm doing the testing coordinated with the local police department, so that they would be aware of what was going on.

    7. Re:Season 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good point. One thing I like about this country is that the police, when confronted with a logical argument about why you are actually innocent, will promptly release you from custody. It makes me proud to be an American.

      Er, I mean, I look forward to season two, "Tiger Team: Gitmo".

    8. Re:Season 2? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In theory, nice.

      In practice... well, you get to see a lot of prisons for a night. How many bosses can be reached to verify those papers during your "work hours" (read: after the usual work hours)?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Season 2? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is the only way I'd do it in a country like the US. Else it could be quite dangerous if you happen to meet a trigger happy cop who mistakes those tapes in your hands for a machine gun.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Season 2? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      You actually think corporations are held to the law. How cute, do you still believe in Santa Claus as well?

    11. Re:Season 2? by aussie_a · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just to be on the safe side I hope all of the penetrators are white.

    12. Re:Season 2? by aproposofwhat · · Score: 3, Funny
      You should read my paper "Waterboarding as a Social Engineering Tool" .

      Great for those pesky situations when you need the CEO's password in a hurry - 35 seconds should do it in most cases.

      :P

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    13. Re:Season 2? by anticypher · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The one pen-test group I consulted for long ago had a very serious procedure in place to verify and document everything before starting the job. This was just electronic/internet/social penetration, no testing of physical security. Much of what they did was related to legal (through the courts) attacks, they would mostly have meetings with the in-house council or retained law firms to ensure they were ready to respond to lawsuits, indictments, and media accusations. The electronic pen-test was a sideline to verify legal compliance where personal and financial data was stored or processed.

      Before they would do any kind of network scanning, database testing, or even attach one of their laptops to the network, they would require a face-to-face meeting with the entire board of directors and senior management. The meetings would be video taped and documented, and all sides would sign the agreement stating the entire scope of the work, and work wouldn't start until after the video tapes and legal documents were safely stored off-site and reviewed. They required the head of legal council to affirm on video and in a signed document that the company was aware of the testing to be done, and held the pen-test firm free of any liability (I don't remember the exact British legal term they used).

      It was good they got this level of protection for us, I've heard many stories from ex-pen testers about being hired by the supposed head of IT, only to discover the CTO was unaware of the agreement. Even having a signed document from someone in the company isn't good enough in the short term if the company turns around and bites you. One friend was driven out of business by court costs despite a signed document, his company just didn't perform due-diligence on the authority of the IT director. Another friend was blamed for hacking and destroying the main database, before they had even arrived on site to plug into the network. While they were still in the IT directors office looking for a working network jack, the DBA accused them of hacking and destroying the main data base. They didn't get paid for that job, they just walked away when the IT director didn't side with them.

      I don't do security pen-testing any more, most companies who hire pen-testers do so in place of either writing a policy, or implementing it. They want pen-testers to break things so they can get more budget, and that's it. Even asking up front for the basics like a list of equipment or range of IP addresses shows most companies don't know their own inventory. Pen-testers then become scapegoats, often with associated criminal complaints.

      The video clip commercial looks downright scary. This show has the potential to turn public opinion into laws preventing any kind of security consulting, whether it's something simple like a paper audit of a security policy or a complex review of network configuration. You just know this show is edited for maximum Rambo/DieHard/IndianaJones effect because preparation and meetings are boring.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    14. Re:Season 2? by spamking · · Score: 1

      Good point, but you can't really do an honest test of your security systems if you tell your staff that it's going to happen. I really don't know how the police would look at being called out to something like this unless they were actually informed it was going to happen first. Something like the company's security chief would inform the police that they were going to run a systems test during the week of 12/12-12/19 and that they might get a phone call about responding. Who knows.

    15. Re:Season 2? by GregNorc · · Score: 1

      That sounds like the set up to a heist movie... "Hello? Oh yes officer this is Jack Smith from Security up here at Initech. We're having some penetration testers here this week to test our physical security, so you can disregard any reports of breaking and entering and the like... Yes you're welcome for the heads up, we at Initech value our close relationship with the community... you have a good day too sir." Then you move in and rob the place blind.

    16. Re:Season 2? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      They have signed papers indicating they are permitted to do penetration testing, by request of the organization they are testing. If they get arrested, they show the papers, the police verify them, and they get released. God, I hope the cops verify the papers quickly. I certainly wouldn't want to be them if they get sent to federal "penetration test" prison.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    17. Re:Season 2? by greedyturtle · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, everyone knows that Corporations are held to the law, they just have a harder time of it. That's why we've created special, more convenient laws for them!

    18. Re:Season 2? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Or.. the first thing any half decent penetration tester would try to pull.

      Aside: WTF is going on with these HP dropdown flash ads filling up half my screen when I'm trying to type?

    19. Re:Season 2? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Towing companies notify police every time they tow a car, since the owner is likely to call 911, and report their car has been stolen. I would imagine the penetration testing companies do the same thing.

      Brian

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    20. Re:Season 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, whats going to happen is that when some bad guy gets caught he is going to tell the folks that caught him he is with this TVC show. "Look over there, smile and wave for the camera. Good work on catching me."
      But, the good thing is it might just make some of the dumbwits think before they do something. "Wow, I saw something just like this on that TV show."

      I am just not sure how they are going to get Dog the Bounty Hunter up to speed on computer security in time for the season ending cliffhanger. "Yeah, this is a tough job. Call in the Dog".

    21. Re:Season 2? by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      This is easy. You tell the police in advance what's up. You don't tell the night watchman or more likely you tell the night watchman to pretend like he does not know. I mean how could he ignore a TV crew, their white carting trucks the lighting equipment actors and so on.

      People who believe that reality shows are not scripted and shot with multiple takes, likely believe pro wrestling is real too.

      Have you been following the writer's strike. One of the things the writers want is for their work on reality shows to be covered by the contract. Why would they care if reality shows did not have many writers working?

    22. Re:Season 2? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      The law is not a computer algorithm! We have judges and opposing arguments for a reason. Subjective phrases, such as "good faith" and "fair and reasonable" are used in laws for a reason.

      Penetration testing is a big industry. Lawyers on both sides of the contract OK these things before they get signed.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    23. Re:Season 2? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      They have signed papers indicating they are permitted to do penetration testing, by request of the organization they are testing. If they get arrested, they show the papers, the police verify them, and they get released.
      I was just going to post something about this in another spot of this thread. That's actually a great way to go about doing the penetration testing. If there was no police element, the pen testers wouldn't have to be quite as careful. This way it makes it more realistic. They have to perform the penetration tests the same way an illegal group of people would.
      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    24. Re:Season 2? by iacvlvs · · Score: 1

      In one article I read about the practice of penetration testing, the firm doing the testing coordinated with the local police department, so that they would be aware of what was going on.
      Wow. Isn't that just the most awesome social engineering opportunity ever?
      1. "Hey, police? I'm going to be penetration testing this place, so don't worry if they report a break-in, ok?"
      2. *steal everything*
      3. Profit!
      --
      GENERATION 25: If you haven't yet, copy this into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. (Social experiment)
  11. Sounds a bit like...Association. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They would have a field day with the title alone"

    Yeah! Like you guys are straight laced or something.

    Besides Mission Impossible did penetration testing better. Although the guys at Trojan condom might be number two.

  12. nested humor by varkatope · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was going to write something witty and mildly suggestive. like "hey, so THOSE are the guys that inspect all those condoms that say things like inspected by No.4. I could be that number 4! Look out ladies." (Score:3, Funny)

    Then I realized that this is Slashdot, and most of us couldn't get laid if it was our jobs. (badum pum. ah-thankyou) Score:2, Funny or Score:2, Insightful. ...But THEN I realized once again that this is Slashdot, and that this story contains computers and myriad potential for dick jokes! (Score:5, Super Awesomeness OMG)

    So uh.... I could totally be that Number 4 inspector! ...something something computer security!
    ????
    Profit!!

    --
    I got a fever...and the only cure is more cowbell!
    1. Re:nested humor by Erpo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Golly. It sounds like you think people play Slashdot like some kind of giant MMORPG, grinding for points. But that couldn't be true. The purpose of comment moderation is to encourage people to make posts that are useful to the community and enrich the news, and everyone knows that computer systems are only used for their intended purpose.

    2. Re:nested humor by Beastmouth · · Score: 1

      The best part is, as I read this, it is (Score:3, Funny)

    3. Re:nested humor by CensorshipDonkey · · Score: 1

      There's a joke in there somewhere about grinding for points with the wife ...

    4. Re:nested humor by realthing02 · · Score: 1

      It's probably something like the longer you're able to grind, the higher level you get to...in marriage.

      But it's not funny, so no one else should try.

    5. Re:nested humor by CensorshipDonkey · · Score: 1

      Nah, I think I'll try grinding for marriage points tonight, actually ...

  13. Next up in the cable technology space... by ravenspear · · Score: 3, Funny

    Set top boxes that give you feedback on the presence of any loose male cables dangling from their backsides through a series of audio tones.

    Sources familiar with the development of the units indicate that the cable integrity is calculated through an internal "fulfillness meter" each box has that is dynamically calibrated to the thrusting force of initial cable insertion by the owner.

    The audio tones are said to become louder as the internal weight of the portion of cable inserted decreases on a linear scale.

    New owners feel the new design could be a boon to children, who lacking a cohesive concept of proper cable pairment, had difficulty before in detecting the causes of abnormal video problems with the units.

    1. Re:Next up in the cable technology space... by bidule · · Score: 1

      The audio tones are said to become louder as the internal weight of the portion of cable inserted decreases on a linear scale. I suppose both pitch and volume modulation go hand in hand. That would result in a richer, more natural sound.

      New owners feel the new design could be a boon to children, who lacking a cohesive concept of proper cable pairment, had difficulty before in detecting the causes of abnormal video problems with the units. You know how funny noise can keep kids amused for hours? The last thing I want is a 4y old playing with home entertainment devices.

      If you're antropomorphizing, might as well go all the way. It would be more useful to have a "hey!" sound if you put it in the wrong place, but it's hard to detect before it is fully inserted.
      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    2. Re:Next up in the cable technology space... by christus_ae · · Score: 1

      Woosh!

    3. Re:Next up in the cable technology space... by bidule · · Score: 1

      Woosh! Woosh!
      May the little hamster make your wheel go "squeek! squeek!" now.<VBEG>

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    4. Re:Next up in the cable technology space... by Net_Wakker · · Score: 1

      It would be more useful to have a "hey!" sound if you put it in the wrong place, but it's hard to detect before it is fully inserted.
      You're tiny? (duck)
  14. Set-top box by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I'm sick of all this sex on the tellyvision--I MEAN, I keep falling off!"

    - Mrs. Nesbit

  15. Ssssshhh!!! by TibbonZero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't make Americans even more freaked out. Everyone's already worried about 'security'. Don't make them think that us average dumpster divers and hackers are bad people.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Ssssshhh!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, depending on how they do it, they could make those hackers the "cool people". I just hope they manage to do it without overdoing the Sneakers BS.

      I mean, this is sensationalist TV. I doubt they'll focus on a lot of puzzle work and the long hours of patient observation to find the flaws in their security setup.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Ssssshhh!!! by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, wouldn't that make for fascinating tv! Watching people, watch other, for hours on end! Astounding! You sir should be a tv producer.

    3. Re:Ssssshhh!!! by blindd0t · · Score: 1

      I guess it's a double edged sword. If, for example, my next employer was just a little more informed as a result of seeing this show, and took a little extra time to shred any documents containing any sensitive data about me prior to putting it out to the curb, then it may very well be worth while. We as consumers are also very trusting of the various entities we provide our information to as well, so the same applies to the next medical doctor I might see. I'm cautiously optimistic this will contain more content of what should be common knowledge and practice (and common sense) rather than fear mongering. We'll just have to wait and see though, won't we!

    4. Re:Ssssshhh!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that it would be exciting. Hacking is a bit like fishing (not phishing, dammit), it's really not a spectator sport.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. If my job is so fucking cool can I have a raise by gelfling · · Score: 1

    It's been like 5 years.

    1. Re:If my job is so fucking cool can I have a raise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. You can have your Slashdot ID in pennies added to your annual salary.

    2. Re:If my job is so fucking cool can I have a raise by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Sweet!

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
  17. That's not the IT-reality show *I* want to see... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, I'd like to see "I'm A CEO - Get Me Out Of Here".

    Steve Ballmer, a stack of chairs, and Larry Page. Oh, and a couple of bottles of tequila. And handguns.

    Darl McBride, twelve inches of hosepipe and a bottle of fireants - lube will be optional.

    Who else wants to see Mark Burnett or Jon de Mol pick this up and run with it?

  18. Discovery- It Takes a Thief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Similar concept, but with houses and physical security only.

  19. You mean like this movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sneakers with Robert Redford?

    1. Re:You mean like this movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is that the one where he played Babe Ruth?

  20. All I have to say is by steelfood · · Score: 4, Funny

    It better be hard or it won't be interesting.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    1. Re:All I have to say is by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's what she said...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  21. Boss is in on it by RealGrouchy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the looks of the trailer/montage, it looks like these are people who are paid by the site owners to test the security systems; the tech security equivalent of "secret shoppers".

    Not very surprising, but what does surprise me is that the site owners are letting CourtTV broadcast to the world that their facilities are insecure.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:Boss is in on it by erbbysam · · Score: 1

      Not very surprising, but what does surprise me is that the site owners are letting CourtTV broadcast to the world that their facilities are insecure.
      Wouldn't airing this on TV encourage the security staff at these companies to make themselves more secure because now not only they, but they whole world knows how insecure their company previously was?... one could hope I guess... or you could always make a cheap buck off your companies insecurities :)
    2. Re:Boss is in on it by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt that the names of the companies will be part of the show. They'll probably just say: "A electric utilitiy company based in the northeast." or somesuch.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    3. Re:Boss is in on it by deniable · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They'll go for mid-size companies and won't name them. They've probably had the film in the can long enough for the company to action anything that came up and I'm sure they'd remove anything that was still vulnerable.

    4. Re:Boss is in on it by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      This show (like all 'reality' shows) is going to be crap and set up. No drama means no ratings, so they have to create drama. First off, no CEO with any brains would allow his or her company to be placed in this spotlight along with allowing real criminals an opportunity to view their security systems up close. A company has to have customers who trust them and getting burned on a 'reality' show is not a way to earn it.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    5. Re:Boss is in on it by Kanerix · · Score: 0

      I work for a relatively high profile company that has a secure campus. We have client companies that are also high profile (household names and the like). My company pays independent auditors to see if they can get access to the building without anybody stopping them or asking for ID, and actually get ahold of any sensitive data. It's probably not that hard, and I have yet to see an auditor that I know of.

      It really wouldn't be all that hard to gain access. Just get somebody to hold doors open for you, go in at peak shift changes when the doors are rarely shut for long, walk like you know what you're doing and where you're going. People rarely stop somebody who walks confidently.

      From what I understand, this is a fairly common test of security protocols in the business sector.

    6. Re:Boss is in on it by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "First off, no CEO with any brains would allow his or her company to be placed in this spotlight along with allowing real criminals an opportunity to view their security systems up close."

      You're right, because there's absolutely no way to edit recorded footage these days. Otherwise, shows like this would be possible without a bunch of fake trickery.

  22. I can't wait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm sure the elite group won't be a bunch of skr1p7 k1dd13z. Nyuh-uh.

    Probably auditioned the Geek Squad.

    Nah, this won't be laughably pathetic at all!

    1. Re:I can't wait. by databeast · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know these guys. One of them is a Defcon Goon and has a book or three published oo, the other's a better lockpicker than you will ever dream of being, the third guy's a prtty slick business brain. I'd happily bet any single one of them against you and a team of your choice for skills.

    2. Re:I can't wait. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Ah cool. Now where are my mod points?

    3. Re:I can't wait. by sexconker · · Score: 2, Funny

      I choose the A Team.

      I win.

    4. Re:I can't wait. by Shteven · · Score: 0

      You're on. There's three of them, right? You take whichever one of them you want, I'll take myself and the other two. How much do I win?

    5. Re:I can't wait. by lothos · · Score: 1

      This reply is a little late, and I'm sure no one will even see it, but:

      Ryan Jones, one of the members of the team, is also known as Lizzie Borden (longtime member of the Ninja Strike Force) which has connections to the Cult of the Dead Cow.

  23. We Need More Penetration! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think they used the word penetration enough in the summary. Hell, with the slashdot crowd, you only need to say it once and you'll get 100% attention.

  24. The easy way in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...(lock picking, dumpster diving, going through air vents/windows)..."

    Aha! Out of that list, looks like "going through...Windows" will be the fastest, easiest way to breach security.

    1. Re:The easy way in by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Here's my +1 Funny.

  25. Re:I just finished penetration testing your mom .. by calebt3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  26. tazer the geek by mevets · · Score: 3, Funny

    will be the followup outtakes special.

  27. I liked it better by deft · · Score: 1

    when they called this red cell, marcinko was kicking butt, and it wasnt compromising fax machines, but military bases.

    seal team ftw :)

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:I liked it better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked those books too. But I hear that they were slightly "embellished." Still they were a good read.

      I especially loved the part in one of the first books where he was recounting a Vietnam experience wherein a hand grenade was thrown at some Vietcong who were fleeing. Then it sort of, kind of hit a tree, just a little bit.. and bounced back towards the thrower resulting in an "Oh shit" moment and afterwards no one would own up to throwing it. I split my sides laughing the first time I read it and it still gives me a good chuckle.

  28. TV - can it sink any lower by VonSkippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it's on TV then you know it will be staged and chock full of pseudo-science dumbed down for the unwashed hordes (like Ghost hunters only with even worse acting and cheesy special effects).

    1. Re:TV - can it sink any lower by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      If it's on TV then you know it will be staged and chock full of pseudo-science dumbed down for the unwashed hordes (like Ghost hunters only with even worse acting and cheesy special effects).
      So true. I can see it now...

      "As it turns out, this company's website uses COOKIES, which basically store all your information and hold it there for hackers."
      *Tech pressed a button and magically zooms in on the exact part of a photo that he wants. Presses another button and it becomes completely clear and non-pixelated, just like how real photos on the computer work. Each button press makes a slight beeping noise, and any text on the screen appears letter by letter, also making a slight beeping noise as each letter appears... just like real computers do..*
      "Using what's known as a proxy, and a few well known tricks, you could log in and steal everything! OMG!"

      People will love it. My mom is already scared of cookies, now she'll understand why.
      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
  29. It was setec astronomy not ctec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    acronym for "Too many secrets" remember?

    1. Re:It was setec astronomy not ctec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CTEK like the Oki-900 Cellular Telephone Experimenter's Kit?

      Setec Astronomy?
      Too Many Secrets?
      My Socrates Note?
      Cootys Rat Semen?
      Taco Semen Story?
      Scary Semen Toot?
      Scrota Semen Toy?
      Sent To Sycamore?
      On Meaty Escorts?
      My Racoon Testes?
      Nosy Secret Atom?
      Messy Ocean Tort?
      Enemy To Costars?
      Notate My Scores?
      Some Ornate Cyst?
      Rosy Octet Names?
      Ancestor My Toes?
      Scooter Amnesty?
      Necessary Motto?
      Economy Tasters?
      Tycoon Steamers?
      To Ye Scat Sermon?

    2. Re:It was setec astronomy not ctec by Leebert · · Score: 1

      acronym for "Too many secrets" remember?


      Not quite, it was an anagram of "Too many secrets".

      But yes, it was SETEC Astronomy
  30. May not be too realistic... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Judging from other reality formats, this may not be too realistic. Show value over accuracy!

    Also there are numerous legal issues. For example, instructing people publicly to do this may be illegal in the first place and open you up to liability of somebody uses the methods shown to commit a crime. Also, companies will not agree to have their vulnerabilities shown in public.

    I therefore predict that this will only show well-known attack techniques against very common vulnerabilities, but nothing of real informational value.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:May not be too realistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Can you tell me next week's lottery numbers, too, Nostradamus?

    2. Re:May not be too realistic... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Quite likely, but I could see small companies wanting a free penetration test, even at the expense of having their security flaws shown. You won't benefit from them, since it's likely they will be shown how to close them, too.

      What you could lose of course is goodwill. I mean, would you trust a company that has been shown on national TV to be insecure? In other words, all those companies that we'd love to see penetrated and shown as insecure would never ever even consider participating in this.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:May not be too realistic... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      And what part of "may" do you not understand?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:May not be too realistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wasn't responding to "may" I was responding to your all-mighty premonition:

      I therefore predict that this will only show well-known attack techniques against very common vulnerabilities, but nothing of real informational value. My lotto numbers, please?
    5. Re:May not be too realistic... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      In that case the lotto numbers may be 12, 34, 63, 1, 79 and 66. Isn't it fun to talk about stuff you have no idea about?

    6. Re:May not be too realistic... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You would obviously know.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  31. This has been up for one hour and one minute... by greenguy · · Score: 1

    ...without the appropriate movie reference!

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  32. Cameras would make it easier. . . by ookabooka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wonder how they socially engineer away the presence of a camera team in the air vents.

    Ok, airvents yes, but social engineering would probably benefit from these cameras. A secretary might not stop a guy in an IT suit walking out with a computer, but you think he/she'd be more likely to stop a guy carrying out a computer while he's talking to a 3 man camera team with boom microphones etc. "Hey, where are you going with that computer?" "Oh, I'm John from tech co, is having me lead this team from around about IT in the modern world." (turns to camera) "One thing paramount to security is patching your systems, this machine here has been exhibiting bizzare behavior on the network, most likely due to spyware and that is why it has been removed from the network to undergo analysis in the IT lab." Really, I think the hardest part would be getting the crew to go along with whatever quick responses you give to anyone who really questions you. It only takes 1 guy that acts a bit suspicious and unsure to ruin the whole thing.
    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    1. Re:Cameras would make it easier. . . by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, a TV team might even help. Make it big, even show off that "you're coming on TV" and you'll see people cooperate with anything, because hey, they're getting screen time! Start interviewing them, they'll be nervous and distracted, you could even steal their computer underneath their hands without them noticing it because hey, they're on TV!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Cameras would make it easier. . . by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was thinking. I'm less likely to question someone who appears as if they're doing some tv show then I am some random slob.

    3. Re:Cameras would make it easier. . . by whoop · · Score: 1

      I heard somewhere that some people invented this system of a very tiny camera and microphone. And on top of that, they added some other magic and transmit the recordings without any wires at all!! Imagine the possibilities once this technology comes to us in the general public. We might even one day be able to use a telephone without any wires! I just hope they don't make the dialing ring on these phones any smaller, as my fingers can barely fit in the circles as it is.

  33. Damn html. . . by ookabooka · · Score: 1

    That was supposed to be: "Oh, I'm John from tech co, <boss's name> is having me lead this team from <media company> around about IT in the modern world."

    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    1. Re:Damn html. . . by johndiii · · Score: 1

      Rather than resorting to ecode, you could use < to give you < and > for >.

      --
      Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
  34. It takes a thief? by psychicsword · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am guessing this is something like "It Takes a Thief" on the Discovery Channel

    1. Re:It takes a thief? by SomeGuyTyping · · Score: 1

      that was my first thought - I bet they'll help beef up the security once they break in.

      --
      My posts are definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
  35. Setec Astronomy NOT Ctec Astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Setec Astronomy is the acronym for "Too Many Secrets" in the movie Sneakers.

  36. While I'm sure this makes for good TV and all... by edunbar93 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is one of those things where just because you *can*, doesn't mean you *should*. And putting it on TV with a CYA boilerplate of "don't try this at home kids", is an astoundingly stupid idea.

    It actually kind of reminds me of a segment in Weird Al's movie "UHF".... "Today boys and girls, we're going to learn to make PLOO-TOE-NEE-UM. Out of common, household items."

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  37. Sweet! by Comatose51 · · Score: 0

    Porn's finally going main stream?

    No, I didn't RTFM nor the summary.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  38. Wait and see by alsrsc · · Score: 1

    In case anyone happens to read this, this is my first post (longtime reader, first time caller). To the business at hand. I think all publicity is good publicity, so anything that gets the public more aware and involved with corporate security and responsibility is a good thing. It seems every two to four months there is a huge data leak, and I'm not looking forward to identity theft and the like. As far as making a good tv show goes, lets just hope this show wont have a camera crew following some "it team" around making it painfully obvious that its actors and hollywood. Also, I hope they can make good use of tiny/hidden cameras and keep them steady enough to make this show watchable, as I definitely want more tech shows to watch.

    1. Re:Wait and see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, this is going to rock because it can easily fall into the small world of the small person. If you listened to the radio show there were callers who were seriously concerned about their small business and personal welfare. Granted, these guys sounded pretty professional and not annoying script kiddies, but this type of breach is likely to get the attention of mom and pop and not just corporate bozos. Finally a "reality show" of modern situations that accompanies the FUD articles from mass media to make people realize that skilled attackers can easily chew on what people think is secure

      (reminds me of the fool who installs $200 locks on his front door which is basically balsa wood)

  39. Reminds me of the wonderful nature shows by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I am crawling deep into this cave - we don't know what is in there but it could be very dangerous... Followed by a head shot of the lead guy crawling toward the camera into the great danger just beyond in the cave.
    This show is so obviously faked, or it would be completely boring for the average person to watch. Who wants to watch someone forging credentials and walking around with a clipboard. No way they could do their job with a full camera crew behind them (Well, they could do it once... make fake credentials that they are CNBC camera crew to do an interview with the CEO)

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:Reminds me of the wonderful nature shows by parcel · · Score: 1

      I am crawling deep into this cave - we don't know what is in there but it could be very dangerous... Followed by a head shot of the lead guy crawling toward the camera into the great danger just beyond in the cave. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
      >
  40. Don't know how I feel about this by brit74 · · Score: 1

    Obviously, it's important for companies to become more aware of security. On the other hand, it will also provide lots of training material for criminals. I remember reading that some of the crime-detective shows have taught the criminals how they were getting caught, and criminals have started taking the exact precautions needed to avoid getting caught. (For example, using bleach to destroy their own DNA evidence, or putting a bunch of random cigarette butts in the ashtray of a car they had stolen - to create a bunch of false and confusing DNA traces.) The end result is that criminals have become a lot more savy. [sarcasm]But - you know - our entertainment and TV' companies profits outweigh any potential problems these TV programs cause.[/sarcasm]

  41. Number 2 by DreadSpoon · · Score: 1

    You can be the Number 4 Inspector, just so long as I don't have to be the Number 2 Inspector. Because, well.. ew.

  42. Re:That's not the IT-reality show *I* want to see. by deniable · · Score: 1

    Carley Fiorina and Pattie Dunne do The Simple Life, sponsored by HP.

  43. Oh No! by mqduck · · Score: 1

    (Geeks + tech info + "penetration") = chaos.

    Be more careful, Slashdot.

    --
    Property is theft.
  44. I can already see it by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 1

    Victim:'Oh, no all my accounts have been cleared, I've got no money, and someone hijacked my facebook profile, and used it to announce my pedophilia problem....and someone installed cameras in my appartment'

    Ashoton Kutcher:'Smile, you're on Penetration Testing'

    Victim:'??!!' nervous smile 'can I get my money and reputation back?'

    Ashton Kutcher:'errr...no..we're keeping your money, and you're pedophile anyway, we just browsed through your disk'

    Victim aka the pedophile:*sweating* 'hehehe'

    Ashoton Kutcher:'Smile, you're on Penetration Testing'

  45. I aleady posted a comment, now I'm posting another by mqduck · · Score: 1

    It follows a group of elite penetration testers I don't have the slightest clue what an "elite penetration tester" is, but some part of me (i think its the lower/middle part) really wants to major in this field.
    --
    Property is theft.
  46. Re:That's not the IT-reality show *I* want to see. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I could see Darl in that, but I doubt Steve will come. Remember, that kind of show is usually reserved for ex-stars. So we'd have to use ex-CEOs.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  47. Pretty standard stuff by teslatug · · Score: 4, Informative

    So from the radio interview, they explain one of their breakins into an expensive car dealership. The weak point is as usual the employees who let them video tape the place and let one of them into the data center just because he managed to get (through dumpster diving) the business card of their support company.

  48. +4, Insightful !? by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 1

    +4, Insightful !?

    Ok, it might have changed but that is what it said just now when I read it. That is funnier than the comment! ;-)

    1. Re:+4, Insightful !? by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1

      There's seldom much sense to the moderation here. I'd mod you up as insightful if I had the points... oh wait, never mind.

  49. Typical slashdot replies but by tuomoks · · Score: 1

    Take it easy, it is just a show but there is a real life also. Penetration testing wasn't new even when I hit it in an insurance company(70's). We did it and when we did need professionals hired people from an UK company for that, they were good, very good. They were impressed of our computer / systems security but much less of our physical security (heh, I was responsible of systems security). I still remember our CEO really blowing up when the penetration team presented him a couple of very sensitive business documents they had found, some big changes after that. Our own work was mostly catching insurance cheaters and also some insiders who did use our resources, let's say, not a proper way. It meant installing all kinds of loggers, keyboard / display loggers are nothing new, on their workstations, sitting there in nights watching them to access foreign accounts, normally allowed but.. So it happens.

  50. Hope this goes better... by Loibisch · · Score: 1

    Hope this goes better than when the Mythbusters tried it...they may have tested it under the cover of film myths but boy did climbing an air duct NOT work. :D

  51. TV by Tom · · Score: 1

    Wonder how they socially engineer away the presence of a camera team in the air vents. #1 rule of television: Nothing you see on television is real.

    Like any "reality show", they show at best a recreation of actual events.
    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:TV by tkid · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Anyone who thinks even reality tv is totally real probably thinks WWF Wrestling is real as well.

      My wife wanted to watch that new "Paranormal State" the other night. It's cheesy, not real and wasn't even scary. Just a bunch of bible thumpers trying to make people's lives better after they think they have ghosts or evil spirits in their home. The people they showed in this particular episode most likely still watched WWF Wrestling and probably think it's real.

  52. In medical china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tigers helps you penetrate

  53. I wonder... by gaelfx · · Score: 1

    .. which TV station they were breaking into when they got busted and claimed that the whole thing was just a pilot for a new show. I think only the people at Fox would fall for that.... /is prepared to be modded down considerably for that //promise I'm not trolling...

    1. Re:I wonder... by databeast · · Score: 1

      nope,I know these guys personally. They turned down CourtTV on three seperate occasions (CourtTV pursued them for the show, they refused because they thought most stuff like this is crap.) Eventually CourtTV offered them enough creative control that they accepted. The show's been in development for 18 months now. I've seem an early edit of the pilot, and I think you'll all be pleased with how it turned out.

  54. They will by DeeQ · · Score: 1

    Wonder how they socially engineer away the presence of a camera team in the air vents. Probably by carrying the cameras themselves like those bad haunted house shows.
  55. Wonder if this is different from what I have alrea by houghi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have already seen shows where people are hired to brak into houses and buildings and then 'steal' things. The people get a new burglarproof house, which is then also tested.

    Probably this will follow the same format, but include other techniques as well.

    What people do not realize is that with the world of spam, people hardly ever target one premisis and then see what the best opportunity is, but rather look for the best opportunity and then see to what premesis it is connected.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  56. Incorrect tag by Karellen · · Score: 1

    Tag should be "setec astronomy", not "ctec astronomy"

    --
    Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
    1. Re:Incorrect tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but "!porn" gave me the biggest laugh of my day so far. :o)

    2. Re:Incorrect tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're sure it shouldn't be "COOTYS RAT SEMEN"?

  57. British Police Done It Already by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

    Testing their own security.

    --
    I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
  58. Why don't by Blue6 · · Score: 1

    they just air clips of The Broken hosted by Ramzi. He will hack your Bonzi Buddy bitchez!

    --
    EGOTIST, n. A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me.
  59. PK Alert! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    GameboyRMH attacks Erpo!

    *insert sword-swinging and spell-casting here*

    GameboyRMH wins!

    Erpo dropped:
    - 2500 random monetary units
    - Strength +3 bracelet

    Moderation:
    - GameboyRMH: +5, Pwnage!
    - Erpo: +2, Good Fight

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:PK Alert! by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      Where's the +1 "Funny, but I don't want to admit it by moderating" moderation?

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    2. Re:PK Alert! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Just to the right of the grandparent post's title :P

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  60. Crocidile Hunter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I could see this being hilarious if they took a croc hunter viewpoint on the whole issue:

    Speaking to receptionist: "Hi there, my name's Jerry - I'm here from corporate regarding today's IT auditing."
    Turns and speaks to camera: "Now this here is a basic entry level receptionist, an easy barrier for our penetration testing. If they don't just give us the run of the place, we'll at least break in to the next level of security. We have to be careful to be friendly so as to not tip them off."
    Looks at receptionist: (who's calling security): "Crikey, this is a lively one!"
    Taunts receptionist with a stick: "Whoa there little fella!"

    1. Re:Crocidile Hunter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then stingray security® shows up and shoots him through the chest?

  61. Who needs a camera crew? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of posts about camera crews, but why do you need one? A whole miniature camera setup can fit into a set of thick-framed glasses (These are used often on MTV's Boiling Points) or into what looks like a pen in your shirt pocket. The quality is poor but it gets the job done.

    That said, I'm absolutely dreading this show. It's going to be a total joke, complete with cheap and cheesy "spy music" in the background.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Who needs a camera crew? by lluBdeR · · Score: 1

      You need a camera crew simply because a lot of television production includes more unions than you can shake a stick at.

      I agree with you wholly on dreading it, I have a vision in my head of something closely resembling the last 45 minutes of Hackers. *shudder*

  62. Re:While I'm sure this makes for good TV and all.. by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1
    I hate to burst your bubble, but there's no "boys and girls" in that quote. Here ya go:

    Hello, my name is Philo and welcome to Secrets of the Universe. Today we are going to learn how to make plutonium from common household items.
    (Anthony Geary as Philo, "UHF")
    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  63. Social Engineering should be tested separately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...from penetration testing against the pure technology stuff.

    Quite often the IT security guys have the technology side of things really damn secure, but they are powerless to do anything about social engineering issues since they are denied any real authority over the users/employees who are bozos highly susceptible to social engineering hacks. Still the IT security guys get the blame when social engineering tactics cause a breach via a doofus end-user while at the same time the IT guys are forbidden to have any policy control over the end-user's behaviour on the job. That's the way it works at my place of employment.

  64. Re:That's not the IT-reality show *I* want to see. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    Maybe Steve knows something we don't and will want to get ahead of the curve?

  65. Ugh, this will be a huge mess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are going to be little squads of script kiddie and less teenagers copycatting this garbage all over the place. Lots of people who know a little IT but don't know security at all talking the talk they see on TV making it hard to get a job with real skills. And for those of you who for some reason keep crying about camera crews.. I'm sure they'll have small cameras, hidden cameras, and security cameras to take footage from, followed by sit down scenes where they talk to the camera like in so many reality shows.

  66. GUI by lorg · · Score: 0

    Guess we can look forward to seeing "cool" CSI (tv) like GUIs on even the simplest things ... "want to perform penetration - yes - no"

  67. How to make a camera crew "invisible" by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    Wonder how they socially engineer away the presence of a camera team in the air vents.

    "We're filming here."

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  68. Huh huh huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said "penetration" and "coming".

  69. Re:That's not the reality show *I* want to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see "Ped Eye For The Preteen Girl". ;)

  70. Ashley Simpson by Dani+Filth · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess they can take her off the TODO list.

    1. Re:Ashley Simpson by Dani+Filth · · Score: 1

      My bad, I meant Jamie Lynn Spears. Younger sister of formerly popular pop star.

  71. I get a feeling... by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

    I get the feeling this show is going to be all social engineering and burglary and is going to have very little real computer security going on.

  72. job switch by binarybum · · Score: 1

    reading about penetration testing was really enlightening for me. I hope this show opens my eyes up to ways that I can become a professional penetration tester so that I can retire my wet suit and snorkel and move-on from being a professional muff diver.

    --
    ôó
  73. What's All the Fuss About? by rickshaf · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure I know how this team penetrates an organization's security. They just hire "Dog" the (alleged) bounty hunter to come to the town where the organization has its plant/HQ. While "Dog" is busy doing his "bull-in-a-china-shop" act, attracting the attention of every gendarme and wanted-felon in town, it's easy for the team to make their penetration into the plant!

  74. Re:While I'm sure this makes for good TV and all.. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    Burst my bubble? This is slashdot. If nothing else, it's good for useless pedantry.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  75. Re:Wait and see - Real Hackers/Experts at This by PPIII · · Score: 1

    My first post on slashdot. I've seen most of the car dealership show (I have a working relationship with the "hackers"). It is fun to watch and does reflect these guys do on a weekly basis (pen testing, risk assesments, Sarbanes Oxley Complinace, vulnerability testing, physical security, etc.) They do use head mounted cameras for most of the footage. The people on the show have been keynote speakers at Black Hat, Hackerfest, etc. Whether show will be good/entertaining/realistic remains to be seen, but the people on the show are definitley not actors