Slashdot Mirror


The Smiley Face Turns 25 :-)

klubar writes "Another milestone of online communications has been reached. The smiley turns 25, according to Carnegie Mellon University professor Scott E. Fahlman who says he was the first to use three keystrokes. 'Language experts say the smiley face and other emotional icons, known as emoticons, have given people a concise way in e-mail and other electronic messages of expressing sentiments that otherwise would be difficult to detect. Fahlman posted the emoticon in a message to an online electronic bulletin board at 11:44 a.m. on Sept. 19, 1982, during a discussion about the limits of online humor and how to denote comments meant to be taken lightly.'"

250 comments

  1. Editors... by SirJorgelOfBorgel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else see an obvious mistake here? :D

    1. Re:Editors... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Anyone else see an obvious mistake here? :D

      "...I tossed off in 10 minutes to something that has spread all around the world", Fahlman was quoted as saying in a university statement.

      Well, haven't we all?

      It's the absence of a smiley that differentiates academic discourse from the sort of things that are transmitted by chatting softwares, or leaked through editorial boardses. ;-)

    2. Re:Editors... by WwWonka · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Anyone else see an obvious mistake here? :D"

      I have NO idea what you are talking about! ;-)
      now bite me! :-P
      oh, wait, I'm sorry, that was rude :-(
      forgive me? :-|
      yes? ALRIGHT! :-)

    3. Re:Editors... by Himring · · Score: 1

      At least they accepted the story. Check my sig and journal.... I always felt like the smiley would beat ETI in a head-to-head submission....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    4. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it have come from an intelligent civilization beyond our solar system, or could it have been just an emission generated by some activity of our own civilization?

      I think that's your answer right there. It was unconfirmed and never repeated. Not that we don't discuss fringe theories from time to time, but anniversaries of fringe theories shouldn't deserve an article. Anyway, anniversaries are generally more likely to be noticed at 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, and 100.

      You were shocked and indignant about this?

    5. Re:Editors... by dld121 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is bogus... They were using "smiley" face symbols long before we used them on computers. "Teletype" - used these many many years before the 1980s.

    6. Re:Editors... by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      They were using "smiley" face symbols long before we used them on computers. "Teletype" - used these many many years before the 1980s.

      What are you wittering on about? Teletypes are computer terminals. Computers did exist before the 1980s, you know. I can assure you that, when I used Teletypes connected to minicomputers in the 1970s, nobody used the :-) smiley face. Perhaps it hadn't been invented yet...

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    7. Re:Editors... by stjobe · · Score: 1

      I'm Godwin-ing this thread right here:

      /:=)

      (oh yes, you're absolutely right, that IS a happy hitler smiley)

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    8. Re:Editors... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Another one of those examples of some asshat claiming to "invent" something that's way too vague to ever TRULY trace to any single individual. After all, girls have been writing smiley faces in messages from long before this and there are clear examples of using a typewritten "sideways" version of it too, going back long before computers. There is no reason to suppose that no one ever did the same thing on a computer before 1982.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't count how many times I've "tossed off in 10 minutes to something that has spread all around the world". Sometimes it only takes five ... wait we're talking about armature pr0n right?

    10. Re:Editors... by aevans · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the smiley face is in the King James Version of the bible, as well as the wink. That's at least 400 years old.

    11. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The frowny face is trademarked by Despair, Inc. Now pay up.

    12. Re:Editors... by Himring · · Score: 1

      Not that we don't discuss fringe theories from time to time

      Lol!

      And I question just what you mean by "deserves an article." Come'on. You know as well as I that news blurbs get posted regularly that make us go "wtf!"

      I do appreciate your numerical giving of popular anniversaries, but the fact remains that many sources on the web were celebrating the 30th anniversary of the WOW Signal ... all but /. Mind you, we are discussing the best ever example of ETI and not just some "fringe theory...."

      Lighten up alice....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  2. 2007-1982 = 25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    math error?

    1. Re:2007-1982 = 25 by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      No, humour.

      Just like, I'm 29 ;)

      (Read my comment history to find out how old I really am -- you might have to be a subscriber, though)

    2. Re:2007-1982 = 25 by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 3, Funny

      "(Read my comment history to find out how old I really am -- you might have to be a subscriber, though)"

      PROTIP: Nobody cares.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:2007-1982 = 25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9 months of gestation dumbass!

  3. Damn editors by apollosfire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ignore the headline, as the summary and article both state - it's 25!

    1. Re:Damn editors by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      I think it was a bad attempt at a joke. "See, it's a smiley so it's a joke!"

      *grabs tomato and points at Zonk* >;-)

    2. Re:Damn editors by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

      No no, your quite wrong, it appears we lost a year of our lives between the headline and the summary, something to do with quantum thingymajigs. I'd be outraged but its likely slashdot has already took few more years than that in anycase.

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    3. Re:Damn editors by josh_db · · Score: 1

      Let's start tagging "25", "!24", or both. Editors... -_- *sigh*

    4. Re:Damn editors by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Depends which time zone you're in. If you're in the "last year" time zone, it's only 25.

    5. Re:Damn editors by Garridan · · Score: 1

      ... or, 24. :)

  4. 24? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That means 1983 or so.

    I know we were using these on a message board in 1979-1980 at a community college in Michigan prior to then. I might even be able to dig some of it up as I printed off a lot of messages back then and may still have them in an old computer paper box.

    Rather odd anyone would lay a claim to inventing it. I'm certain the concept dates further back to teletypes and such.

    Ah well, anything to start a ruckus on /.

    (c:

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:24? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I know we were using these on a message board in 1979-1980 at a community college in Michigan prior to then."

      That's nothing. The authors of the Dead Sea Scrolls were using them back then!

    2. Re:24? by nelk · · Score: 1
      I know we were using these on a message board in 1979-1980 at a community college in Michigan prior to then. I might even be able to dig some of it up as I printed off a lot of messages back then and may still have them in an old computer paper box.


      Rather odd anyone would lay a claim to inventing it.

      --

      As odd as, say, someone keeping printouts of 25+ year old conversations from community college message boards? ;)

      --
      No keyboard detected. Press F1 to continue.
    3. Re:24? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As odd as, say, someone keeping printouts of 25+ year old conversations from community college message boards? ;)

      We had some great discussions. We experience flame-wars (gun control as one I recall vividly), angry crapflooders, ALL CAPS, etc. Pretty well everything you see now came about the moment you threw a VT52 terminal and message system at people through which they could chat with anonymity. Heck, we even had cyber stalkers, those who wanted to find out who was using a certain name on the system (you could hit Ctrl-T and see which terminals were which TTY numbers, and the messages included TTY numbers in their headers.)

      Strange it may have seemed, but I certainly wish I had kept more. They stuff is priceless and I have some good memories of those days. Still in touch with some of the geeks I chatted with back then.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:24? by blhack · · Score: 5, Funny

      As odd as, say, someone keeping printouts of 25+ year old conversations from community college message boards? ;) Welcome to slashdot, you must be new here. Here is your 100 sided dice, your PHD in engineering that you acquired from google University. You're unbelievable hott girlfriend that is part of the demo-scene and collects old VAX/VMS hardware for fun should come in the mail soon...OR WILL SHE COME VIA TCP_OVER CARRIER PIGEON!!!??!!

      nobody knows YOU INSENSATIVE CLOD!
      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    5. Re:24? by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Today's Headline - New Hieroglyph Discovered in Egyptian Pyramid

      And in recent new today a new Hieroglyph has been discovered with the Great Pyramid of Giza. The symbol appears to consist of two vertically adjacent circles and a single curve segment whose curvature is oriented such that the 2 circles appear to be near the center of the circle that would be formed were the curve's slope extended out. Our man on the scene has provided us with a crude sketch of this Hieroglyph, whose meaning is unknown but which is suspected to be related to one of the primary emotions humans have experienced since the dawn of time.

      : ) Note how the segment appears to be a piece of a general circle center on the 2 dots. Why a segment of a circle was chosen,
      ^ Rather than the full circle itself, and why it is centered on the dots, is currently unknown
      Also Note how the two circles are placed one directly over the other. Most other Hieroglyphs have utilized slight angles, generally sloping inwards, so this discovery may help understand a great many things that are currently unknown about Egyptian society

      This has been Faux News' Archeology Department. Stay tuned for the weather.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    6. Re:24? by khallow · · Score: 1

      It's possible then that you're the only person in the world who can prove an earlier instance of smiley-like emoticons. I think it'd be worthwhile and interesting to scan some of those conversations into wikipedia. Better move fast before the smiley cabal takes you and your secrets out! :-)

    7. Re:24? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey pal, some of us never believed that 100 siders were proper polyhedral dice. All the other stuff is true though.

    8. Re:24? by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 1

      aaah.. +6 Funny.

      gg blhack, gg.

      --
      http://www.xkcd.com/354/
    9. Re:24? by Warbothong · · Score: 1
      "Rather odd anyone would lay a claim to inventing it."

      You'd think so wouldn't you? http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/23/138228&tid=155&tid=109

    10. Re:24? by ripragged · · Score: 2, Funny

      In a related note, Microsoft was the first to commercially use an emoticon as a trademark, with Windows XP.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.
    11. Re:24? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya theres a difference the emoticon and the guy from the t-shirt...

    12. Re:24? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      (c:
      What the hell is that? It looks almost like a face, only upside-down. Please right it immediately!
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    13. Re:24? by franoculator · · Score: 2, Funny

      Very well, where should I begin? My father was a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low-grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. My mother was a fifteen-year-old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. My father would womanize, he would drink, he would make outrageous claims, like he invented the emoticon. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. A sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament.

    14. Re:24? by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      It's quite obviously a 'large heavyset gentlemen found hanging upside down and looking in from outside your window, watching everything you do' emoticon. I mean really, it's not that obscure, nothing like the 'mime laying on a ground while inside an invisible box that is shown here for dramatic effect even though it is not visible in reality' or the 'turtles all the way down' emoticons, that's one everyone should know!

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    15. Re:24? by :) · · Score: 1

      HAve a nice day...

    16. Re:24? by space_in_your_face · · Score: 1

      24? It's Gnihtyreve dna, esrevinU eht, efil ot rewsna eht.

    17. Re:24? by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Why do you think you should only have to turn your head to the left?

      This shows one of the benefits of doing it both ways. Much more possibilities.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    18. Re:24? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the classic Ctrl-T status interrupt.

      You could program one of the function keys on the terminal to be filled with Ctrl-Ts, and then hold the function key down so it repeated.

      That would cause oodles of Ctrl-T interrupts to be thrown at the machine causing the system to slow to a crawl as it had to handle them all. Those were the days!

      If you connected from one system to another and did a Ctrl-T at just the right time you could get one machine to interrupt the other and all sorts of hilarity would ensue...

      Good times for us early hackers!

  5. Graphical smilies suck by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hate how you type :) in IM or message boards now and they replace the :) with a graphic. I think that ruins it.

    I won't even get into how annoying it is when it changes part of your text that isn't a smiley into a smiley only because it detects the text. It is like how some MMORPGS do ***umption and stuff.

    1. Re:Graphical smilies suck by egotripper · · Score: 1

      I remember not just smilies but full character animations on the PLATO system circa 1976. Admittedly, PLATO wasn't limited to regular ASCII characters.

    2. Re:Graphical smilies suck by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, doesn't that make you want to ******inate someone?

    3. Re:Graphical smilies suck by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a matter of fact, Plato only used Greek characters.

      (And people don't typically capitalize all the letters in his name. Just a heads-up.)

    4. Re:Graphical smilies suck by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      I prefer text smilies over graphical smilies also. :-D

      Gchat animates text smilies which is kind of neat. If you hover over them with your mouse they reanimate. Its fun to make a bunch of them and the send them in GChat and hover over them and you see lots of animated smiles.

      I'm real glad I installed Adblock Plus extension in Firefox because I have not seen that stupid smilie AD. Some of them make noises like crying or laughing.
      :-| :-/ :-( :-O 0-| :=| ...

    5. Re:Graphical smilies suck by the+Plums+in+us · · Score: 1

      Another hater of graphical emoticons here. For awhile I even habitually reversed them when I typed so that parsers wouldn't change them into graphics (:

    6. Re:Graphical smilies suck by AnarchyAo · · Score: 1

      A lot of instant messaging clients, like AIM, allow you to disable graphic smileys! Smile on, friend Smile on :-)

    7. Re:Graphical smilies suck by jmb-d · · Score: 1

      It's not limited to just MMORPGs -- a while back I was reading a thread on the GuitarNoise forums about musical genres. Someone referenced Surf music and I almost laughed out loud when I saw the artist cited as an example: Richard Dale.

      If you've ever been to his website or seen him in concert, you'll know that Dick Dale is definitely a "Dick", not a "Richard".

      I posted a comment to that effect, only to see the references in my post ALSO listed as "Richard". Seems that the BB software in use at the time had a "kiddie filter" turned on.

      --
      In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
      -- Yun-Men
    8. Re:Graphical smilies suck by niteice · · Score: 1

      It is like how some MMORPGS do ***umption and stuff.
      You clearly have never Googled for "buttbuttinate."
      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    9. Re:Graphical smilies suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha, wow, that is the funniest post I've seen on Slashdot for awhile. or maybe I'm tired and easily amused. either way, I laughed for about half a minute.

    10. Re:Graphical smilies suck by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      I agree. That's why I've turned off emoticons in MSN, so whenever anyone sends me something all I get is sexeh ASCII goodness.

      Of course, custom emoticons become a nuisance, since all I get is strange character combinations that they type to use them...but after a while you can guess what they must mean.

      And I tend to use =) and =P over :) and :P most of the time.

      ~Jarik

    11. Re:Graphical smilies suck by vixen337 · · Score: 1

      I once got banned from a message board for posting a photo and description my caged bird (cockatiel) and I once got kicked from a chat by a bot for discussing the career of Richard Van Dyke (aka "Dick").

      Auto-subs are fun.

    12. Re:Graphical smilies suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Use backwards smilies. (:

      Advantages:

      1. They are not picked up by forums/IM programs and replaced with an annoying graphic.
      2. They look down at the sentence they apply to.
      3. There are no double chins when a smiley preceeds a closing bracket (Like this :-))
      4. Proper noses (c:

    13. Re: Graphical smilies suck by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they do, but only on your own side. Commonly, the other side's client will still transcribe your smilies to something much more sinister on their side. It could be argued that that is mostly the problem of the person on the other side, but that isn't entirely true; I often find that the stock smilies used by many IM clients look like something that far from always actually conveys the mood you're trying to set with a certain smiley. But, I digress.

    14. Re:Graphical smilies suck by langelgjm · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, doesn't that make you want to ******inate someone?

      Burninate?

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    15. Re:Graphical smilies suck by azenpunk · · Score: 1

      j/okay

    16. Re:Graphical smilies suck by superslacker87 · · Score: 1

      I don't use them either, I tend to bust out the higher-level character codes to do my smilies: = That's ALT+0222 to do that if you want. I take credit for it, but I'm releasing it under the terms of the GNU Public License.

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    17. Re:Graphical smilies suck by superslacker87 · · Score: 1

      Well, damn. It didn't even print my character code. That sucks.

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    18. Re:Graphical smilies suck by mstahl · · Score: 1

      That's actually why I started putting a space between mine. Like : D. Works okay and IM clients don't screw it up too bad. Of course now I just have Adium with smilies that I designed myself and I likes them.

    19. Re:Graphical smilies suck by DrStrangeLoop · · Score: 1
      actually it's kind of funny, especially when chatting about C code.

      for (;;) {}
      looks kinda cute in iChat but i agree with you, it's a very stupid trend, mostly because the substitution is not standardized, so you have no way of telling how your text shows up on the other side... so your innocent :-p might look insulting or suggestive on your girlfriends screen, depending on which smiley pack she downloaded for free :/ and then there's the skype emoticon avalanche... try turning the graphical smileys off and all you'll see is (dance)(dance)(dance). might be just my friends though (evilgrin)
    20. Re:Graphical smilies suck by Foole · · Score: 0

      heh. clbuttic!

      --
      This is not a turnip.
    21. Re:Graphical smilies suck by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I really don't know why it's so incredibly hard to only substitute text delimited with spaces or newlines...

      I mean, I understand people's need (or want, at least) for graphical smilies - beyond the basic few, most text smilies are quite geeky and specialized; I just don't understand why it's so incredibly difficult to parse them properly.

      Oh, another pet peeve: smilies in nicknames. For instance, as soon as the person you're talking to in MSN uses a custom smiley face, Pidgin parses every subsequent occurence of that (sub)string as that smiley - not just within other words, as I'm informed MSN does too, but within nicknames as well. Mightily annoying.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    22. Re:Graphical smilies suck by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Buttbuttinate :)

    23. Re:Graphical smilies suck by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I hate how you type :) in IM or message boards now and they replace the :) with a graphic. I think that ruins it. Indeed, particularly I sometimes like to use a smiley to close a parenthetical statement (what can I say, I like balanced parenthesis :)

      Unfortunately this is ruined entirely when the ':)' becomes a graphical smiley and my parenthetical statement is never closed.

      Of course this doesn't compare to pasting anything resembling source code (or worse an RE) into pidgen or something and watching your carefully crafted logic transformed into a pulsating blob of little cousin speak.
      --
      I stole this Sig
    24. Re:Graphical smilies suck by MORB · · Score: 1

      All smileys suck, even though I agree that the graphic ones turned it into suckage of epic proportions.

      When I post something meant as being humorous, if people understand it as humor then all is fine. If they fail to see it as humor, get offended and overreact, it's even funnier plus you get to mock them for lacking humor and getting angry over some post on the internets.

      Then again, it might be my inner troll speaking.

    25. Re:Graphical smilies suck by thegnu · · Score: 1

      I hate how you type :) in IM or message boards now and they replace the :) with a graphic. I think that ruins it.

      Gah, me too. I hate that people are willing to write a parser that matches various different text combos to various different smilies, but are unwilling to write code that allows you to go back and edit posts without having a million break tags in there. Plus, I love putting stuff in parentheses only to find out that "(at a rate of 2%)" has turned into "(at a rate of 2[ZOMG! smiley]"

      I do, however, like how the chat in Gmail waits a moment, then *creaaaaaak*, rotates the smiley. It's fucking cute, and I hear the noise everything it happens. :)

      *creeeeeeaaak*
      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    26. Re:Graphical smilies suck by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yup! I've been on sites where you couldn't talk about D*ck VanD***, your wris****ch, or your pet racc**n.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    27. Re:Graphical smilies suck by don.pratt · · Score: 1

      Trogdor? Is that you?

  6. Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :O!!

  7. obligatory by blhack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Smilies are lame :(...

    now bow before you evil smiley overlord >:-|
    (.)(.)
    ^emoticons, making perl regex NSFW for 24 years!

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:obligatory by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you prefer the Smilies from SmileyCentral.com. (SAY SOMETHING!)

      On the other hand those are annoying.

      --
      The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
    2. Re:obligatory by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      pff, those look lame.
      / / ( . Y . ) \ \

      bam. that's better, but the spacing needs work.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    3. Re:obligatory by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      Smilies are lame :(...

      (.)(.)
      ^emoticons, making perl regex NSFW for 24 years!

      s/24/25/; // <-- NSFW!!

      There, fixed that for you. :)

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    4. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (o(o)

      Note that the filter is really obnoxious when you have something terse to post.

    5. Re:obligatory by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Someone please post the ascii goatse already...

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    6. Re:obligatory by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I believe someone on gamedev.net once recieved a 24 hour posting ban, after a thread on ascii goatse 'implementations', for posting this:

      =0=

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    7. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you get my vote for best sig.

    8. Re:obligatory by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1
      This is from sometime in the mid 1980's

      From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
      Subject: Hassles
      Sender: FAHLMAN@C.CS.CMU.EDU
      To: bb-opinion@C.CS.CMU.EDU

      1. Stores or other buldings that have N adjacent glass doors and that
      routinely only unlock a couple of them. I used to think that the people
      responsible for opening up in the morning were just lazy, but I'm increasingly
      coming to suspect that they enjoy lurking near the door and laughing at all the
      people who guess wrong. It's particularly irritating when there are two layers
      of doors and they don't open a straight-through path.

      2. Micro-encapsulated perfume samples bound into magazines and into catalogs
      that I didn't ask for. Not only does it stink up the item in question, but
      also everything else that comes in the mail that day. It bugs me that I can't
      carry around my copy of Guns and Ammo without smelling like a cheap cathouse,
      all because some fool at Niemann-Marcus thought that I'd be irresistably drawn
      to the passionate scent of "Rutting Musk". (I don't actually read Guns and
      Ammo, but if people keep locking glass doors on me, I'm gonna start...)

      3. Idiots who think that a nifty way to send a memo through campus mail is to
      fold it in half and put a staple or two through it. Such idiots seem to be in
      the majority over in Warner Hall. So I can either lacerate myself trying to
      use one of those vampire-like "staple removers" (has anyone EVER managed to
      cleanly remove a staple with one of those things without some loss of blood?),
      or I can spend about ten minutes performing micro-surgery on the staple with my
      trusty Swiss army knife, or I can rip the thing open, try to read what's on the
      shreds, decide that it's not worth the trouble, and toss it. It's particularly
      fun when they want you to write on the memo and send it back to them in the
      enclosed envelope. I just scribble a few marks on the shreds and then put
      nineteen staples through the whole wad.

      4. Campus mail in general. Mean time in transit seems to be about ten days
      for things that actually arrive, and probability of total disappearance seems
      to be around 25%. On at least ten occasions in the past year, I've received
      notices about events that have already taken place. If you want to get
      something across campus in only a few days, send it first-class. If you want
      to get it there tomorrow, send it Federal Express, who can take the thing to
      Memphis and back in less time than it takes the CMU clowns to lose it
      altogether. I guess the Campus Mail people have a good union.

      5. The blind beggar who lurks outside the Squirrel Hill branch of PNB waiting
      for someone to use the teller machine. When he hears that, he gets up, ambles
      over to the machine, and blunders into the user on purpose, just so that you
      notice him. Next time he does that to me, he's gonna get sprayed with Rutting
      Musk.

      6. Telephone solicitations. *All* telephone solicitations, no matter how good
      the cause, ought to be against the law. I've started telling charities that if
      they ever phone me at home again, they're going on my permanent Scrooge list,
      and that the money I might have given them will now go to an organization to
      stamp out telephone solicitation. (Anybody know of one?) It doesn't help
      though -- each call is from some new volunteer who sincerely believes in the
      cause and who is terribly sorry to have bothered me. At least I can get mad at
      the jerks who call to sell me stocks, insurance, and home security systems.
      (Right! This random guy phones me and I'm going to invite him over to give my
      house and precious belongings a thorough security analysis.) Too bad you can't
      spray Rutting Musk over the phone.

      7. "News" stories about how much it would cost to buy all of the stupid things
      mentioned in the "Twelve Days of Christmas". This was cute the first time I
      heard it, at age four, but enough already. While we're a

  8. wtf ?? by Saija · · Score: 1

    Somebody else read that as "The smileys meets 24" ??
    i'm just imagine how could you make a smiley for Bauer...

    --
    Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    1. Re:wtf ?? by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 2, Funny

      >:-O Who are you working for?!
      6:45:57... 6:45:58... 6:45:59...

      --
      The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  9. can you count? by ninjapiratemonkey · · Score: 1

    Even the firehose article has the numbers right, but somehow once it's released to the public, they have to make a mistake?

    --
    01110000 01010111 01101110 00110011 01100100
    1. Re:can you count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke.

      The `:-)' was to indicate it was a joke. ;)

      You didn't get it. =p

      HAND

    2. Re:can you count? by Cctoide · · Score: 1

      They decided the ensuing flamewars would be too boring without errors, so they added some.

      --
      "Let's face it, it's a good story. Accuracy would kill it."
    3. Re:can you count? by sunami88 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its like Zonk is trying too hard to unimpress us these days. Before he just was unimpressive (see what I did there?).

      --
      Sex. Drugs, and Unix.
  10. PARTY! by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 0, Redundant

    <:^) ^_^ :-D :-* ;-)
    (.)(.) Look! We brought a stripper that pops out of the cake! LOL!

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
    1. Re:PARTY! by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

      I can't believe no one got that one. Oh, well, they all can't be winners.

      --
      The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  11. It's not "25" - it's "24 and a smiley" by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Everyone knows if you give your age and a smiley, it means the age given, plus more.

    Like people who are 29 for a long time, or 39 for a long time, etc.

    It was a joke, but I didn't smile. It was lame :-O

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  12. 25 years ago... by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 5, Funny

    And it wasn't short after that fateful day, in the next post in fact, that the 8========D came along, forever ruining the intarweb. Historians would later say it was only a matter of time.

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    1. Re:25 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it wasn't short after that fateful day, in the next post in fact, that the 8========D came along, forever running the intarweb. Historians would later say it was only a matter of time.
    2. Re:25 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8===D~~~~ O-;3 -- Your mom.

    3. Re:25 years ago... by muellerr1 · · Score: 1

      I think the day EO3 showed up was probably worse.

    4. Re:25 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally prefer (_))|||||||||||||D-~`'.__.

      (lol the antibot word was 'artistic')

  13. And in 1994... by porkrind · · Score: 1

    I added my own wrinkle to the smiley - witness the smiley pig: :@)

    I did it as an homage to the Arkansas Razorbacks... and so should you :@D :@D :@D

    -John Mark

    1. Re:And in 1994... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      So the Smileypig song would actually be written as follows:

      :@)...:@)...Does what ever a :@) does...

      or something like that?

      --
      The game.
    2. Re:And in 1994... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also from the 1990s: Ronald Reagan ?:-)=

    3. Re:And in 1994... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I claim prior art: :@) was posted by me (and others) as early as 1989-1990 on Detroit-area BBSes, including S*O*L*A*R*I*S and Gateway. Also seen on Fidonet that early.

    4. Re:And in 1994... by porkrind · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but my /. ID is older, so nyah nyah nyah ;)

    5. Re:And in 1994... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Well, this not my original Slashdot account. I don't use that one anymore mostly because I can't remember the password to it.

    6. Re:And in 1994... by theskunkmonkey · · Score: 1

      SMILEY PIG

      SMILEY PIG

      Does whatever a SMILEY PIG does

      Can he swing

      From a web

      No he cant

      He's a pig

      LOOK OOOUUUTTT!!!!

      He is a SMILEY PIG!!

  14. Hmmmm... by VlartBlart · · Score: 0

    :(

    I'm not happy about this.

  15. tag: !24 age==25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tag: !24 age==25

    1. Re:tag: !24 age==25 by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      I'm boggling my mind over that one.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  16. Spam will be 20 soon. I claim first use, Nov 1987. by notthepainter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    November 23, 1987 I was surprised when a total stranger told me I had first use. Best explanation is from this interview.

    http://beyond.jeannettecezanne.com/2007/08/05/the-origins-of-spam/

    Here's the original posting.

    http://groups.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/b7ce97a77276e16f?q=ken+weaverling+spam+usenet+first&hl=en&rnum=1 Paul

  17. Re:Spam will be 20 soon. I claim first use, Nov 19 by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    Dig the "Al Gore didn't invent it yet" line in YFA. Someone mod parent up.

    --
    The game.
  18. The Cheer by calebt3 · · Score: 1

    \(^o^)/

    1. Re:The Cheer by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      \(^o^)/


      KUPO!!!
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:The Cheer by Kelz · · Score: 1

      (>^_^(>O_o)>

    3. Re:The Cheer by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      What you just displayed probably came from Japan, with lots of numerous variations.

    4. Re:The Cheer by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      I think I see Kirby.

    5. Re:The Cheer by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      That is my understanding. I think it when I heard of it it was called "Banzai" or something like that.

    6. Re:The Cheer by locokamil · · Score: 1

      Fucking moogles... they took my last 2500 gil for a stupid map in FF12. I should probably get back to work.

  19. The only thing I see wrong... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is the guy is full of shit in making such a claim. ASCII Art, including the use of emoticons, have been around a lot longer than his first use of it. To claim he was the first and/or created the idea is insane.

    I'm sorry, but I grew up in the 300 baud modem, emoticon existing and using days that predate his claim by over half a decade.

    1. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us used 110 baud acoustic couplers, kid...

    2. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Well then, someone should be able to provide evidence of a prior smiley, right?

    3. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by brarrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      you grew up in a 300 baud modem? must have been both uncomfortable and incredibly noisy. it'd be like constantly trying to see through the hayes.

      --
      to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
    4. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by Jay+L · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nice ATtitude. Triple-plus.

    5. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      And I am sure someone could - but who really would care that much to do so? The smiley, such that it is, ":-)" predates the late 70's anyway - but on different hardware.

      Maybe he's bragging about the fact that he wrote an "instruction manual" for it?

    6. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by khallow · · Score: 1

      And I am sure someone could - but who really would care that much to do so? The smiley, such that it is, ":-)" predates the late 70's anyway - but on different hardware.

      It's an unusual situation. You have a culture develope within the past 30-40 years. It's archeology where the subjects are still alive and there are extensive records of who did what. Given that, it makes sense to trace how ideas evolve.

      To give another example, the standard online gaming cheer for when something good happens, is "woot!" or "w00t!". There were two 1993 rap songs titled "Whoomp, there it is" and "Whoot, there it is" (the latter being less popular and more risque). My theory is that the US football team, the New Orleans Saints took the former song and made it into a game cheer, modifying the words slightly to avoid copyright issues as "Whoot! There it is!" Then local lazer tag players adopted the cheer and used that in their online discussions. From there it escaped into the wild with the advent of Doom and similar first person shooter games.
    7. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by keeboo · · Score: 5, Funny

      AArrgh... Too many old-fart nerd jokes here! I'm gonna&#*(% NO CARRIER

    8. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by SurturZ · · Score: 1

      rofl

    9. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by Jay+L · · Score: 1

      AArrgh... Too many old-fart nerd jokes here! I'm gonna&#*(% NO CARRIER

      Which ironically brings me back to the first time I saw an emoticon - not on a BBS, but on Q-Link, in chat rooms. I'd been through hell with NYNEX to get clean phone lines (this was back when data was "unsupported" by the phone company), and they worked fine on BBS's, but the minute I connected to Q-Link I started seeing all this "line noise" at the end of each line.

      A friendly QGUIDE explained what the line noise meant.

      I wish I could remember what we used to call them before emoticons - there was another word, and "emoticon" was something I first saw in the press, not online. Anyone remember?

    10. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by burris · · Score: 1

      Sonny, when I was your age we had to tap out our trolls and flames in Morse code on a telegraph key, in the snow, with frostbitten fingers, uphill, both ways.

    11. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      As not everyone reacts kindly to modem puns, you may find your joke terminal. Sorry.

      --
      Be relentless!
    12. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by rizole · · Score: 1

      You were lucky.

    13. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by wootest · · Score: 1

      Smileys.

    14. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      When I was growing up, modems were still powered by steam.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:The only thing I see wrong... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... when I had that problem, NYNEX told me data was quite nicely supported - on a data phone line... it just cost boatloads extra for that quiet (and otherwise the same as a regular) line (of questionable noise improvement).

  20. Futurama? by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm... 0-| = I'm Leela and I'm not impressed?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Futurama? by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is I thought of Leena from futurama when I did that one. I was going to do more smilies but chose to use the continuation dots "..." :-P

  21. Zonked by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Been zonked again. Good job Zonk.

    So the original had a - nose in it. I prefer :)

    Now I would like to know who invented "hehehe"

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Zonked by fractoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seeing someone who's old enough to spell properly, and doesn't know that the original smiley face had a nose, makes me feel so, so old. :(

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    2. Re:Zonked by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've always written it as :-). I've been on the net since 93. Back since in the days when you NEVER wanted to meet anyone who actually used the internet in real life.

    3. Re:Zonked by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Back in the BBS scene people tended to use :) if they even used smileys at all.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:Zonked by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Seeing someone who's old enough to spell properly, and doesn't know that the original smiley face had a nose, makes me feel so, so old. :("

      You think YOU feel old?

      When I first read the head line, I thought they were talking about the original yellow graphic smiley face . I was thinking...that can't be right..that thing has got to be over 35+ years....and it is.

      Now "I" feel old...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Zonked by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      You must be old. I've seen the smiley face in the King James Version of the Bible.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
  22. Um, look at the article. by Higaran · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article is about how the smiley face is used for humorus purposed, so how many geeks missed that the title was actually a joke, looks like just about everyone so far. Wow I don't know if I should be happy that I got it, or terrified that I did. Well anyways. (.) (.) V

    1. Re:Um, look at the article. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      I like my ascii breasts better.

      ( . )Y( . )

      --
    2. Re:Um, look at the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      only on slashdot do the basement dwellers let it be known that they think the vagina is located somewhere between a woman's breasts.

    3. Re:Um, look at the article. by fractoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not breasts, that's a bicycle.

      (.Y.)  <-- tits

      (_._) <-- ass ;)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    4. Re:Um, look at the article. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      only on slashdot do the basement dwellers let it be known that they think the vagina is located somewhere between a woman's breasts. Only on Slashdot does someone mistake a Y for a vagina...
    5. Re:Um, look at the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (_._) (.Y.) bum, titty,

      (_._) (.Y.) bum, titty,

      (_._) (_._) (_._) bum, bum, bum

      I had to do it like this to get through the lameness filter!

  23. A weird, possibly local, BBS lingo by qdaku · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember early - mid nineties when I used to draw ascii (newschool, though I dabbled a bit in the oldschool too) for various groups / BBS in the 905/416/519 region (southern ontario and parts of quebec), that there used to be a different system instead of smileys. Smileys were frowned upon. Instead the system revolved around:

    (g) - grin

    (bg) - big grin

    (vbg) - very big grin

    I wonder if it was just a local thing, or if anyone else used to use that too.

    1. Re:A weird, possibly local, BBS lingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hailing from a little farther north in Ontario (705 region), all the BBS's around there also used and whatnot instead of smilies.

      Beebs Prision and The Ravens Nest forever! And damn Xanadu (whereever you were), our mortal BRE enemies.

    2. Re:A weird, possibly local, BBS lingo by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      On my family's BBS, typing "grin" in most chatroom environments would tell others, "So-and-so is grinning widely."

      telnet:bbs.grnet.com

      Still up after all these years...

    3. Re:A weird, possibly local, BBS lingo by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      what about (bfg) - big fucking grin :D

    4. Re:A weird, possibly local, BBS lingo by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      Whoa. Blast from the past! I was a religious BBSer (my parents can confirmed the perpetually tied-up phone line), and yeah, back then, it was grins, big grins, and very big grins. Thanks for the reminder!

    5. Re:A weird, possibly local, BBS lingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the late 80s and early 90s on BBSes in the Minneapolis area (maybe longer? I left for college in 95) we used or , much like you did.

      Oh, nostalgia.

    6. Re:A weird, possibly local, BBS lingo by etherlad · · Score: 1

      Whoah! Nice post^H^H^H nostalgia generator! /was a 905 BBSer in the early-to-mid 90s //used <vbg> and smilies ///slashies

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
    7. Re:A weird, possibly local, BBS lingo by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

      In the 8-bit "underground" BBS community, or at least the Commodore-centric portion of it I was most familiar, our convention was the very similar:

      <g>

      On those venues, smilies were non-existent in my experience. I first came across the smiley, personally, in some documentation for a popular Amiga anti-virus software documentation. I kept on assuming the preponderance of ;) was some sort of strange end of line translation error or an issue related to character sets (kind of like how not converting PETSCII to ASCII would result in flipped lowercase/uppercase), similar to the whole windows/unix difference of writing linefeeds.

      Then I slowly turned my head as it dawned on me, and saw what was really going on: someone had invented a device to take the 'dry' out of 'dry humor'. Also, it took the 'humor' out of 'dry humor', and somewhere, a seahorse cried. &'

    8. Re:A weird, possibly local, BBS lingo by sootman · · Score: 1

      Smileys were frowned upon.

      There's a joke in there somewhere.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  24. Actually its 26 years old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because I was the first person to use this combination of characters:

    8`)

    See, its a smiley face! All hail me!

    Seriously though, how can any one person claim to be the first to make a face out of letters on a screen?

  25. Teletypes by Miykayl · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Yes... That "Old School" porn...

    Pinup girls printed in 80-columns of delicious Courier(ish) typeface.

    I would be stunned if smiley faces were not in use to some degree in the 70's, or even the late 60's, when teletypes (with 110-baud modems) were how most news services sent and received news...

    They had the nice pin-up girls...

    And, what work it must have been to make ACII art back in the day, before video-card drivers had ASCII-effect filters...

    Sheesh!

    1. Re:Teletypes by m0nkyman · · Score: 1
      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    2. Re:Teletypes by Cemu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it wouldn't let me post this one either. :-(

    3. Re:Teletypes by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I can attest to "ASCII-art" long pre-dating ASCII. I wish I could remember any emoticon-style smiley from the Telex/TWX days. It would surprise me greatly as well if it wasn't found in newsroom chats or even perhaps military networks from the 1940s or so.

      I know that I did this in 1976:

        Oo
      \__/

      And I represented spaceships in games I wrote with symbols like "O" and "O-["

      But I can't say I ever saw a ":-)" smiley before the mid 80s. Other old farts make such claims but can they dig up evidence?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  26. My favorite smilie by QMalcolm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    OGC

    A guy jerking it. Tell your friends!

    1. Re:My favorite smilie by ampathee · · Score: 2, Funny

      See Dinosaur Comics.

      OGC

    2. Re:My favorite smilie by ddrichardson · · Score: 1

      How in the hell is this offtopic?

      Offtopic != Don't get joke

      --
      A thistle is a fat salad for an ass's mouth...
  27. The original thread... by AdamTrace · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sef/Orig-Smiley.htm

    ---------------

    Original Bboard Thread in which :-) was proposed

    Here is the original message posted by Scott Fahlman on 19 September, 1982:

    19-Sep-82 11:44 Scott E Fahlman :-)

    From: Scott E Fahlman

    I propose that the following character sequence for joke markers: :-)

    Read it sideways. Actually, it is probably more economical to mark

    things that are NOT jokes, given current trends. For this, use :-(

    The entire thread is reproduced below. We didn't have formal newsgroup threads in those days, but these are all the messages that mention the need for a joke marker or that use the :-) symbol.

    This was retrieved from the spice vax oct-82 backup tape by Jeff Baird on September 10, 2002. The period covered is 16 September 1982 through 21 October 1982.

    Credits: Here is the account by Mike Jones describing how this ancient post was retrieved. It's an impressive piece of digital archeology, with many contributors. I am grateful to Mike, to Jeff Baird, and to all the others who played a role in this effort. It is great that we can view this bit of Internet history once again.

    Many people were involved in this computing archaeology success story. I (Mike Jones) kicked off the effort in February 2002 by looking through some old bboard program (Bags) sources, figuring out the filename that the post would likely be found under (/usr/cmu/lib/bb/general.bb), and asking Howard Wactlar, the former CMU SCS facilities director, whether the file could still be restored. Scott Fahlman provided data narrowing the probable span of time during which the post was made. Howard and Bob Cosgrove, the current director, determined that backup tapes from that period (1981-1983) still existed and asked Jeff Baird of the facilities staff to try to find and restore the post. Dave Livingston of facilities located a working 9- track tape drive and a machine to use it on. Kirk Berthold and Michael Riley in CS operations managed retrieving tapes from off-site archival storage. Grad student Dan Pelleg's FreeBSD machine was used to read the 4.1BSD dump format tapes using a compatibility mode in the restore program. (Later in the effort a NetBSD machine was used to do the same thing.) Dale Moore looked for the post on Tops-20 backup tapes from CMU-20C. But by all accounts, Jeff Baird should get most of the credit for doing the hard work of locating and retrieving the data. He kept asking for more tapes, reading those that could still be read, narrowing the date range, and sticking with it until the post was found. Thanks all for your efforts to restore this part of computing history, and especially, thanks Jeff!

    Note: There apparently were a few posts prior to 16 September (not on the tape that was retrieved) that posed various physics questions about what would happen to various objects in an elevator if you cut the cable. Given the quality of the elevators in Wean Hall (then and now), this was more than idle speculation.

    Apparently someone had posed the problem of what would happen to a helium balloon in free-fall, someone else had asked about pigeons flying around in the falling elevator, and someone had then asked what would happen if the birds were breathing the helium...

    16-Sep-82 11:51 James Wright at CMU-780D Related question

    Of equal interest is how the birds cheeping will

    sound after they have inhaled the Helium.

    =

    16-Sep-82 12:09 Neil Swartz at CMU-750R Pigeon type question

    This question does not involve pigeons, but is similar:

    There is a lit candle in an elevator mounted on a bracket attached to

    the middle of one wall (say, 2" from the wall). A drop of mercury

    is on the floor. The cable snaps and the elevator falls.

    What happens to the candle and the mercury?

    1. Re:The original thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing. I'm glad CMU has always been this geeky. A lot of those names are still around here today too, interestingly enough.

    2. Re:The original thread... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      @= for messages dealing with nuclear war

      :o

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:The original thread... by Khomar · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting how the meaning of the smiley has changed from this idea. I see it used frequently now as a way of softening a message or adding extra warmth rather than making it comical. The humorous tag has been replaced by the wink which I believe is actually a far better indicator than the original smiley.

      Emoticons are actually very beneficial in typed communication as I have come to learn in my work-from-home job where 90% of my communication with co-workers takes place either on e-mail or instant messenger. There is so much that you miss in the tone of the voice or visual facial cues that emoticons have really become invaluable to convey the tone of your conversation.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    4. Re:The original thread... by kramulous · · Score: 1

      not to be a fun-sponge or anything, but is this really the original posting ... I doubt it. Why is the email address "Fahlman at Cmu-20c"? Isn't the replacement of '@' with ' at ' a recent thing? Or is it because I'm a tech. newbie and the 'at' was used in a different manner?

      --
      .
  28. You're kidding, right? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    High school girls have been using Smiley's in passed notes since the advent of paper.

    Just because it's on the computer, it must be new!

    I know I saw them in a military communications in '84 during transatlantic tests. 2 people, many hours away really,really tired tend to get punchy...I wonder this is the person I was communicating with? That would be weird!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. Oops by geekoid · · Score: 1

    thats 75 not 84. Must pay more attention to the home row.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  30. The smiley face is old. by Fuji+Kitakyusho · · Score: 1

    There is no emoticon to express what I'm feeling.

    1. Re:The smiley face is old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emo

  31. Prior Art? by darqchild · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I believe there is prior art, found in an 18th century poem. I'd bet that typesetters had been mucking about with this stuff since the invention of movable type.

    http://maul.deepsky.com/~merovech/smiley.html

    --
    What? Me? Worry?
    1. Re:Prior Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Coincidental occurrence of :) does not make a smiley, at least in the sense that we are accustomed to. Smiley might be older that 25 & could be even older than 18th century book you linked to. but the :) in that book is not a smiley.

    2. Re:Prior Art? by Anne+Honime · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought so at first too, but after a second reading, the punctuation has no sense in the context, and wouldn't have been used in a XVIIIth century book professionnaly typesetted. I side with the pun interpretation on this one. While punctuation has been more laxed in earlier centuries, proper usage was setteled and to break the line a coma or a semicolumn would have been used. ':' means 'therefore' in french (and probably in english too), it's never used as a pause or silence.

    3. Re:Prior Art? by darqchild · · Score: 1

      "Compared to Porquet's use of punctuation elsewhere in this poem, this looks like a purposeful visual pun, putting a smile on the end of the one line in his whole poem poking fun at his beloved student"

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    4. Re:Prior Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rotsky!

    5. Re:Prior Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. Also, see this timeless classic here (the text in means "Help me" in English):

      http://www.asciiartfarts.com/20011225.html

    6. Re:Prior Art? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Also note how he solved the layout problem of smileys within brackets: only a single bracket is needed, people!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  32. For Your Reference by InvisibleSoul · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is the complete list of canonical smilies:
    http://www.astro.umd.edu/~marshall/smileys.html

    1. Re:For Your Reference by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Here is the complete list of canonical smilies
      That is, they're certified compatible with Ubuntu.
    2. Re:For Your Reference by Dronak · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link to my page, but please note that since I graduated, I moved the list to http://www.geocities.com/dronak/smileys.html. I haven't made many updates for a long time though, so the two versions are probably nearly identical. Also, my note that the original "smiley" is Copyright 1984-85 by Stephen R. Cohen was included on the page because I was contacted by Mr. Cohen and told this was the case. I don't know the detailed history. I just started collecting everything I could find in undergrad, to avoid people passing around multiple emoticon dictionaries that typically had most of the same content. This was my attempt to help by reducing that duplication and combining all symbols and meanings I could find into a single file. I hope some people have found it useful, or at least fun.

  33. Re:24? So interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you post some of your conversations, maybe scans of the printouts, i would love to read them.

  34. You mean Smiley vs. Smiley Face? by Kelson · · Score: 1

    'Cause the smiley face has been tracked to 1962/1963.

    1. Re:You mean Smiley vs. Smiley Face? by wakingrufus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      that article talks about the graphical smiley face. In fact, we are talking about using the colon, dash, and close paren to make a smiley, in which case it is even OLDER!
      It's authorship was credited to the late Harvey Ball (who drew it in the 1960s). "Smiley" is in an ad in the NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE, 10 March 1953, pg. 20, cols. 4-6. See for yourself. The ad is for the film LILI, with the "delightful" Leslie Caron. The "World Premiere Today" is at the Trans-Lux 52nd on Lexington. The film opened nationwide, and this ad ran in many newspapers.

      Today
      You'll laugh :)
      You'll cry :(
      You'll love
      _Lili_

    2. Re:You mean Smiley vs. Smiley Face? by mstahl · · Score: 1

      You'll love <3

      There. Fixed that for ya ;-D

    3. Re:You mean Smiley vs. Smiley Face? by SolitaryMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'll love

      You'll love (. )( .)

      Here. Fixed that for you too ;)

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    4. Re:You mean Smiley vs. Smiley Face? by wakingrufus · · Score: 1

      actually it was supposed to be "" but i think when i previewed my post, slashcode lost it.

    5. Re:You mean Smiley vs. Smiley Face? by wakingrufus · · Score: 1

      ok well I guess slashdot can't display the heart symbol at all.....sorry for wasting your time. the original ad used the heart symbol, not "3". if it HAD used "3" it would be even more way ahead of its time!

    6. Re:You mean Smiley vs. Smiley Face? by Pope · · Score: 1

      Britney?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    7. Re:You mean Smiley vs. Smiley Face? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no... richard stallman ;-)

  35. The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by schmiddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thankfully, we no longer need to use this outdated technology of "emoticons" to denote humorous sentiments in email and online postings. Some have historically proposed the use of a "sarcasm" tag littered among ordinary text to convey the sarcastic emotion more accurately. I propose going one step further, and am proposing the Humour-XML standard, which will provide a much richer way to fully denote sentiments on the web. For instance, consider the sarcastic exprssion:

    I'll get right on that ;-)

    Even in this simple expression, the smiley face does not convey enough information to the reader to properly discern the mood of the poster. It is left ambiguous whether the poster is completely sarcastic, and will not "get right on that", or if the poster was merely in a humorous mood and implying that they will "get right on that" in a cheerful way. This failure to communicate is costing the American economy untold billions in lost productivity, rivaling that of "sick days" and movie piracy. The following is a rough draft of an XML standard I am proposing to completely eliminate our dependence on this obsolete form of communication.

    I propose a full XML schema devoted to conveying emotion in email, web postings, and Usenet "flame" messages. For instance, the previous message would be written in Humour-XML as:

    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <posting>
    <message mood="sarcastic" level="highly"> I'll get right on that <smiley deprecated="yes" symbol=";-)" />
    </message>
    </posting>

    The message now contains no ambiguities — the reader understands that the poster is "highly sarcastic" , and does not actually intend to "get right on that"

    The Humour-XML schema provides numerous benefits to users such as: enhanced text-to-speech renderings of postings (the speaker's voice could convey emotion, etc.), backwards compatibility with obsolete emoticons, UTF-8 support, building the Semantic Web from the ground up, and other benefits too numerous to enumerate here. Without extolling the virtues of this fantastic language too greatly, I'll touch on one more gold mine of usability: using XSLT to transfrom Humour-XML to other forms, such as emoticon-text or even SVG graphics. For instance, we can define an XSLT stylesheet like so:

    <?xml version="1.0" ?>
    <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0">
    <xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes"/>


    <xsl:template match="posting">
    <emoticon_text> <xsl:apply-templates/> </emoticon_text>
    </xsl:template>

    <xsl:template match="message">
    <xsl:copy> <xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:copy>
    </xsl:template>
    <xsl:template match="message">
    <xsl:text> <xsl:value-of select="symbol" /> </xsl:text>
    </xsl:template>
    </xsl:stylesheet>

    The example XSLT spreadsheet provided here should provide posters eager to try this amazing technology a head-start. I am in the process of carefully constructing a DTD for Humour-XML, as well as several more very useful XSLT stylesheets. I hereby disclaim all patents on said technology, and promise that Humour-XML is free for the world to use royalty-free, forever.

    --
    http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
    1. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by SL+Baur · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, and I've seen a draft of the 15,000 page MOHumor-XML (Microsoft Open Humor-XML) standard which includes indispensible tags like and .

      Looks like we're going to have another standards battle on our hands :(.

    2. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by internewt · · Score: 1

      <?xml version="1.0"?>
      <posting>
      <message mood="compliment" level="jovial"> .... and I thought the guy making the joke that journalists count from 1 was a geeky joke, but your post takes the biscuit <smiley deprecated="yes" symbol=";-)" />
      </message>
      </posting>

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    3. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by ticklish2day · · Score: 1

      "It has been said that XML is like violence; if a little doesn't solve the problem, use more."

    4. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      <posting>
      <message mood="amused" level="highly">
              Dude, you should have submitted this entry as April Fools RFC. Next year, maybe?
      </message>
      </posting>

    5. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by dkf · · Score: 1


      <?xml version="1.0"?>
      <posting>
          <message mood="sarcastic" level="highly"> I'll get right on that <smiley deprecated="yes" symbol=";-)" />
          </message>
      </posting>
      As someone who works on real XML schemas quite a bit, I can say without a shadow of a doubt that your document is still distinctly ill defined. Luckily, it's easy to fix with the aid of some namespaces and URLs, like this:

      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
      <ns0:posting xmlns:ns0="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl"
                    xmlns:ns2="urn:psychology:emotions:level2">
          <ns0:message ns1:mood="ns2:sarcastic" ns2:level="5" xmlns:ns1="urn:psychology:emotions:level1" >
              I'll get right on that <ns6:smiley ns7:deprecated="true" ns6:symbolDialect="" ns8:mustUnderstand="true" xmlns:ns6="http://schemas.xmlsoap.com/blahblah/emoticons/1983" xmlns:ns7="http://schemas.xmlsoap.com/blahblah/core/2004" xmlns:ns8="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> ;-) </ns6:smiley>
          </ns0:message>
      </ns0:posting>

      There we go, much more understandable and semantic-web-ish, and so much easier to enter!!!
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    6. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      !!

      I didn't know you were allowed to declare namespaces after you first used them in a document like that.

      Well played, but excuse me while I go drink excessively in a probably vain attempt to prevent long-term memory formation.

    7. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh-Oh XML (aka OOXML) - but that another thread is...

    8. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by revengebomber · · Score: 1

      That's so funny.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    9. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

      I propose going one step further, and am proposing the Humour-XML standard

      Why? Why only humour? What if I wanted to express an emotion other than any humourous one? Bored, terrified, horny, ...

      Make it a TextComm-XML standard ;-)

    10. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by plams · · Score: 1

      My colleague likes your idea but proposes you also make an XMPP extension to enhance the instant messaging experience. The Jabber client can then choose to support this extension in the form of a mood processor. Instead of marking text and adding e.g. "bold" as a modifier, you can mark text and mark it as "sad", "indifferent", "cough*word*cough", "sexy", and so on.

    11. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by dintech · · Score: 1

      Without proper tags, how can I be sure if you're being sarcastic or not?

    12. Re:The emoticon is dead... long live XML! by Skip666Kent · · Score: 1

      Sick days I can understand, but Pirate Movies?

      What's wrong with Pirate Movies?

      --
      **>>BELCH
  36. 25... but I'm taking away one year... by autophile · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...but I'm taking away one year for that time AOL joined the Internet. That's a year everyone wants to forget!

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  37. How to convert smiley gifs to ascii smilies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know how to convert those obnoxious yellow smiley gifs to plain ascii? I use Mark Pilgrim's 'Frownies' Greasemonkey script but it misses a lot of them.

  38. Re:Uh, how old is :-)? by kj_in_ottawa · · Score: 1

    maybe journalists start counting at 1?

  39. PLATO - the first emoticons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the link to PLATO's use of emoticons in the 1970s
    http://www.platopeople.com/emoticons.html

  40. When I read this headline... by Markos · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first thing that popped into my head was: "I wonder how old the Penis bird is?"

    Curse you slashdot.

  41. I claim the "bearded bulletin" by Michael+McClary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As long as people are claiming things, I claim the invention of the "Bearded Bulletin". This is the hardcopy bulletin-board posting with a fringe of precut tear-offs with contact information (typically a phone number and a word or two to indicate what this particular one is about). This occurred in the winter of about 1969 or 1970. (I could go through some old records and figure it out exactly.) I was in Ann Arbor at the time and needed to move to Lansing and sublet my current apartment. I first went to the University of Michigan's Student Union housing bulletin board to see if anybody was looking, before making my own posting. At that time I noticed that the contact information had been torn off from many of the postings there (rendering the remainder useless B-( ). One poster had taken this into account and defended by writing the number along the bottom of the 3x5 card four times. So I decided to turn a downside into an asset. I made up my posting, wrote the phone number repeatedly along the bottom in "landscape mode", and precut the entries into a fringe so they'd be easy to tear off without destroying the main message or the other tear-offs. It was intended to emulate printed postings with the pad of tear-off coupons, but much more cheaply. And I figured that a dozen or so tear-offs would be more than enough. (If they were all torn away at least one should produce a hit.) I made up maybe 4 of these and posted one on the student union housing board and the others in similar places. And I checked it daily to make sure the bulletin didn't get buried or taken down and lost. Next day there was another like it. Day after there were four. By the end of the week more of the new postings used the technique than didn't. And of course the meme had spread to the OTHER bulletin boards, too. Like the next one over - the "ride to other cities" board. This was just before a major holiday (Thanksgiving, I think, though it might have been Christmas.) I figure the college students hitching rides cross-country or going home on vacation spread it to other campuses across the country (and world) within a matter of weeks. (I know it was pervasive at Michigan State in Lansing by mid-January.) So I figure that, even if nothing else I ever do or did is useful or long-lasting, I've definitely done my bit to improve the technology of human communication with that one invention. B-)

    1. Re:I claim the "bearded bulletin" by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      Thank you for that one! It would be nice if you had made a latex template, though, that would have saved a lot of people the work to find out again and again how to mix the text in the two orientations. Well, you'd have to invent TeX first in those days, so I guess you're not to blame ;)

      I recently discoverd that when creating an on-line ad on some german websites for student housing they automatically use your input for the website to generate a bearded-bulletin pdf to print and hang out on your campus. It looks like the bearded bulletin is here to stay!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  42. Can't... stop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must... resist... urge... to... correct... this... post. Ah, crap, screw it.

    In the further tradition of Slashdot, please note the following corrections to your post:

    Welcome to S lashdot, you must be new here. Here is your 100 - sided dice, your P h D in engineering that you acquired from "G oogle University " . You r unbelievabl y ho t girlfriend , who is part of the demo scene and collects old VAX/VMS hardware for fun , should come in the mail soon... OR WILL SHE COME VIA TCP OVER CARRIER PIGEON!!!??!!

    N obody knows YOU INSENS I TIVE CLOD!

    Whew, what a rush! Long live the Grammar Nazi!

    1. Re:Can't... stop... by blhack · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, the obligatory grammar nazi!
      Toast to you grammar of nazi!!

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    2. Re:Can't... stop... by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow. That was the first proper /. thread I've read in a while.

  43. Re:Uh, how old is :-)? by Shellbear · · Score: 0

    Uh, they'd be starting at 0 if they thought year 25 made him 24 years old... D'oh, math! I see further down in the comments that it was meant to be a joke, probably since us techie types tend to start counting at 0. Apparently it just confused people ;-)

  44. Improved formatting: by Michael+McClary · · Score: 1

    Speaking of "doing my bit for human communication", let's try that with the formatting set to "plain old text". And preview it, too. B-b

    As long as people are claiming things, I claim the invention of the "Bearded Bulletin". This is the hardcopy bulletin-board posting with a fringe of precut tear-offs with contact information (typically a phone number and a word or two to indicate what this particular one is about).

    This occurred in the winter of about 1969 or 1970. (I could go through some old records and figure it out exactly.) I was in Ann Arbor at the time and needed to move to Lansing and sublet my current apartment.

    I first went to the University of Michigan's Student Union housing bulletin board to see if anybody was looking, before making my own posting. At that time I noticed that the contact information had been torn off from many of the postings there (rendering the remainder useless B-( ). One poster had taken this into account and defended by writing the number along the bottom of the 3x5 card four times.

    So I decided to turn a downside into an asset. I made up my posting, wrote the phone number repeatedly along the bottom in "landscape mode", and precut the entries into a fringe so they'd be easy to tear off without destroying the main message or the other tear-offs. It was intended to emulate printed postings with the pad of tear-off coupons, but much more cheaply. And I figured that a dozen or so tear-offs would be more than enough. (If they were all torn away at least one should produce a hit.)

    I made up maybe 4 of these and posted one on the student union housing board and the others in similar places. And I checked it daily to make sure the bulletin didn't get buried or taken down and lost.

    Next day there was another like it.

    Day after there were four.

    By the end of the week more of the new postings used the technique than didn't.

    And of course the meme had spread to the OTHER bulletin boards, too. Like the next one over - the "ride to other cities" board.

    This was just before a major holiday (Thanksgiving, I think, though it might have been Christmas.) I figure the college students hitching rides cross-country or going home on vacation spread it to other campuses across the country (and world) within a matter of weeks. (I know it was pervasive at Michigan State in Lansing by mid-January.)

    So I figure that, even if nothing else I ever do or did is useful or long-lasting, I've definitely done my bit to improve the technology of human communication with that one invention. B-)

  45. 5 years ago on slashdot... by chris_martin · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/articles/02/09/12/2133216.shtml

    I posted in that thread too...

    Anyone read up on Kibo?

    --
    -- Chris Martin, System Administrator
    1. Re:5 years ago on slashdot... by porpnorber · · Score: 1

      Read up on Kibo? It seems like just yesterday that I was chatting with him because it was New Year's Eve and there was nobody else posting on Usenet and we were lonely. I don't think you can be alone on the 'net anymore....

  46. I hate you all! Go kill yourselves!!! by Clete2 · · Score: 1

    I hate you all! Go kill yourselves!!! :D :) :) :)

  47. Maybe it was just on t-shirts? by chromozone · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I thought Forrest Gump invented the smiley face?

  48. I knew I had a feeling of deja vu by Durrok · · Score: 1
    --
    I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
  49. Found it in the Bible by mauthbaux · · Score: 1

    I got you beat on that one. Assuming that the punctuation hasn't changed between the copy I have in front of me and the original, the King James version of the Bible beats your poem by about 100 years. According to Wikipedia, the KJV was first published in 1611.

    Here's a list of a few places where it occurs:
    Matt 6:32
    Matt 24:15
    Mark 5:13 (this one's a winking smiley)
    Mark 15:41
    Acts 18:2
    Romans 2:15
    2 Corinthians 5:7
    2 Samuel 14:26
    1 Kings 8:39,42
    1 Chronicles 5:2
    1 Chronicles 6:10
    Psalms 7:4
    Ecclesiastes 8:16

    The smiley is found in many other locations in both the New and the Old Testaments. Truth be told, finding and highlighting the things was one of the only tricks that allowed me to get through the Old Testament. Without it, I wouldn't have been able to stay awake. I've tried searching for them using various Bible search engines, but the string is just too short.
    I concede that their presence in the text may be an artifact unique to the edition I have (printed in 1979). However, I can provide scans to verify my claims, (though there still is the big assumption that my text here uses the same punctuation as the original).

    --
    "Operating systems suck: you're better off using only the BIOS" --trainsaw.com
  50. Re:Math error by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps a misplaced parenthesis?

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  51. Ascii art? by FreakinSyco · · Score: 1

    ____/\______\ o /_____ - Oh noes!

  52. Wow... by mmxsaro · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've never seen so many smiley faces around here on /. Quick, someone post a story about Vista before we all get too friendly with each other.

  53. The best emoticon EVER by OGC · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:The best emoticon EVER by haihainicknameused · · Score: 1

      ftw

  54. Re:It's not "25" - it's "24 and a smiley" by Nephilium · · Score: 1

    Bah... all women are forever 21... at least when they ask me how old I think they are...

    I've learned it's the only safe age to guess...

    Guys... we get older...

    Nephilium

  55. Guys... we get older... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny
    I disagree - Personally, I become more distinguished.

    Right up until the time I drop dead.

    That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Guys... we get older... by Nephilium · · Score: 1

      Nah... distinguished people can never wave their cane at whippersnappers while shouting, "Get off my lawn you damned kids!"

      That's what I look forward to the most... :)

      Nephilium

    2. Re:Guys... we get older... by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you have to take classes in curmudgeonry or can you just claim equivalent experience and take the test?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Guys... we get older... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      If you have to ask, you automatically fail the test.

  56. I looked up where the Japanese smiley came from by KNicolson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And wrote a short article in my blog:

    http://whatjapanthinks.com/2007/09/19/turns-25-but-how-old-are-japanese-emoticons/

    So as not to link whore (but karma whore instead...), here goes:

    You may have heard the news that 25 years ago on the 19th of October 1982, there was the first recorded use of western smileys on usenet. However, that got me wondering as to how old horizontal Japanese emoticons were. With a little investigation, I came across this Japanese page on the evolution of smiley marks in Japan. I'll now present a summary translation of this history of the Japanese emoticon.

    First up is a nuclear scientist claiming to have invented (~_~) and others round about the same time as ASCII Net (a Japanese online service) started on the first of May 1985, although he says he wasn't the first, he was just following the patterns of others.

    Next up was someone claiming that when he attended Hokkaido University the first Japanese emoticon he saw was from Master Koala with (^O^) in fj.jokes, inspiring him to invent the following:

    (^.^) - laughing
    (;.;) - crying
    (-.-) - sleeping, shocked
    (_ _) - apologising, lowering one's head
    ; - sweat mark, eg (^.^;)
    * - red-faced, eg *^.^*

    These were coined between May and July of 1988 and used on JUNET, the Japanese University Network.

    Now, we get to a usenet post from January 13 1998, indirectly archived by Google Groups (but with broken encoding). In the message we can see the following marks:

    (^O^) - Master Koala smiling
    (-O-) - Master Koala sleeping
    (*O*) - Master Koala shocked
    (@O@) - Master Koala looking sideways
    (=O=) - Master Koala squinting through narrowed eyes
    (>O<) - Master Koala surprised
    (dOb) - Master Koala neutral

    Now we get a very interesting post, suggesting that the classic (^_^) was invented in Japan, but perhaps not by a Japanese. A Kim Tong Ho claims that in the first half of 1986 he signed posts to ASCII Net with the above-mentioned emoticon, with one example from 20th of June 1986. However, he doesn't have confidence to claim to be the very first person to come up with a Japanese emoticon that doesn't require head-tilting to read. Around the same time a person with the handle 'binbou' (the nuclear scientist mentioned above) used (~_~), but as to who was first, it is rather difficult to say.

    So, there we have it; the Japanese emoticon is at least 21 years and a few months old, perhaps even 22 and a bit years old.

    1. Re:I looked up where the Japanese smiley came from by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1
      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    2. Re:I looked up where the Japanese smiley came from by Reapman · · Score: 1

      That is quite interesting, as a Final Fantasy XI player, Japanese style emotes or w/e they are called are VERY popular, even in the North Am circles. Although it's interesting to see how we interpret them different. ^.^ (or just ^^) I always used as a smily type thing, and -_- as angry or kinda P.O.'ed at somethin. Not sure if that's the evolution of the smiley, or just us Westerners butchering their system :P

      Thanks for the info ^^

  57. newfound RSS by sh3l1 · · Score: 1

    the RSS feed said that the smiley face had turned 24. I was going to comment that this was not exactly a memorable occasion xD

    --
    Help Me! I'm trapped in the tubes! Oh noes! Here comes a internet!
  58. just by njko · · Score: 1

    :-) a

    --
    \n.\n
  59. Re:24? So interesting.... by JustOK · · Score: 1

    Person is probably too busy keeping kids off of the lawn.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  60. And sarcasm... by dontspitconfetti · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is still just as impossible to convey over the internet.

    1. Re:And sarcasm... by skeevy · · Score: 1

      Are you being sarcastic? I can't tell.

  61. LET'S ROCK OUT!!! by mstahl · · Score: 1, Redundant

    \m/ >_< \m/

    YEAH!

  62. Three Keystrokes?? by madbawa · · Score: 1

    Why does the article say 3 keystrokes when it takes 5 to create :-) ?

    shift + ; + - + shift + 0

  63. I'm a viking! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    3:{>

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:I'm a viking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That looks more like Ghengis Khahn.

    2. Re:I'm a viking! by fractoid · · Score: 1

      If you look at it one way it's a wizard. The other way, it's a cowboy with a goatee. :P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  64. got :---) by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've only been on the net since 94. Still only used :) but I was mainly IRCing back then and not on the newsgroups. I suspect each "scene" had their own way of doing things.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:got :---) by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      Darn straight (:

      --
      which is totally what she said
  65. use a better keyboard by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Program a macro to type :-) in one key stroke. Or if you're like me have it done in 0 keystrokes, it is just on a timer and just inserts :-) in my text.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  66. Certainly dates back to typewriter days by ribuck · · Score: 1

    > I'm certain the concept dates further back to teletypes and such.

    Certainly the smiley was known in the days of typewriters. Sometime between 1960 and 1975, I read a short piece in the Readers Digest about typewriter symbols. The one that stuck in my mind was -) which they called the "tongue-in-cheek" symbol.

  67. I should take some credit by bitsiphon · · Score: 1

    I invented the colon. I should get 1/3 of the credit.....

  68. Smiley Your Bash Prompt by meonkeys · · Score: 1
    It's useful. Really!

    Add the following to your ~/.bashrc or to /etc/bashrc or something like /etc/profile.d/bash_smiley.sh ...

    # ~ the Emotiprompt(TM) ~
    # idea came from: http://linuxgazette.net/122/lg_tips.html#tips.1
    smiley() {
      err=$?
      if [ $err == 0 ]
      then echo ':)'
      else echo ":( $err"
      fi
    }
    PS1="\$(smiley) [\u@\h \W]\\$ "
    If you like it, let me know!