Domain: geekz.co.uk
Stories and comments across the archive that link to geekz.co.uk.
Comments · 195
-
Re:Richard Stallman on the word "content"using ["content"] as a noun to describe written and other works of authorship is worth avoiding. That usage adopts a specific attitude towards those works: that they are an interchangeable commodity whose purpose is to fill a box and make money. In effect, it treats the works themselves with disrespect.
I think my view is actually superior to rms on this matter. I find this significant because I usually feel his positions are thought out very thoroughly (regardless of whether I agree with them). That said, I think there should be a distinction regarding the use of "content" as a noun:
I think it's bad to use "content" like it's some abstract, general idea. For example, the headline of this article alerts me that there is some class of entities that "own" "content". When used like this, it does seem to imply that the creative works "owned" by these people are indeed similar, interchangeable, etc.
On the other hand, I don't see a problem with using this word as a noun when it refers to a part of, or element within, something. I feel these sentences illustrate OK use:- A programmer doesn't need to know the contents of a function to use it; she can usually get by just knowing its parameters and return type.
- Benito was charismatic, but the content of his arguments didn't stand up to scrutiny.
-
Re:Don't bother visiting
-
Re:Calm Down
In my recollection, lots of Linus' complaints were dressed in GPL3. GPL3 has turned into GPL2 with patent disarmament (and thus making it compatible with Apache2, whereas GPL2 is NOT compatible with Apache2) and some extra fuzz attached to make sure that you receive keys to hardware to ensure you can change and distribute modified source.
In particular, the DRM fuzz didn't make it.
It seems the reason for not migrating tends to be 1) logistics and 2) unperceived need.
Here are his comments in Git's COPYING file:
Note that the only valid version of the GPL as far as this project
is concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not
v2.2 or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated.
HOWEVER, in order to allow a migration to GPLv3 if that seems like
a good idea, I also ask that people involved with the project make
their preferences known. In particular, if you trust me to make that
decision, you might note so in your copyright message, ie something
like
This file is licensed under the GPL v2, or a later version
at the discretion of Linus.
might avoid issues. But we can also just decide to synchronize and
contact all copyright holders on record if/when the occasion arises.
Linus Torvalds
Of course, you can also reference the ELER strip, which also represents the general ambivalence on the matter:
http://geekz.co.uk/lovesraymond/archive/sandals-not-flip-flops -
Re:Schneier knows his stuff
actually thats not completely true. in the security world he might be highly regarded but in the crypto world things are... different. look at a list of his publications. Most all are at security conferences. For that matter since 2005 he has published one paper. He has only ever published 2 papers at Crypto, 1 at Eurocrypt and none at TCC. (These being the most selective conferences in the crypto community.) Nor does he have any papers at PKC, CHES, RSA, SCC, Asiacrypt, CSN, and only one paper at Fincial Cryptography which are some second and third tier conferences.
The main exception are his FSE (fast software encryption) papers but here too it's since 2000 he's only produced 1 paper and that had 6 authors. However before that (in the 90s) he did have a string of relatively interesting papers related to cryptanalysis mainly together with John Kelsey who is a much more prolific cryptanalyst even in recent years. For example he has 5 papers in Eurocrypt and Crypto. As a measure of FSE vs. Crypto also for the field of cryptanalysis, the major MD4, MD5, SHA-0 and SHA-1 breaks were all published at Crypto.
Basically what i'm saying is that he is great in security and even respectable in the most practical corner of crypto. But there are many many people out there who have a much more impressive track record as far as pure crypto is concerned.
I guess the best testament to how seriously some people out there take him would be this collection of useful facts. -
Re:Destructive mindset
Most people use passwords. Some people use passphrases. Bruce Schneier uses an epic passpoem, detailing the life and works of seven mythical Norse heroes.
Hashes collide because they're swerving to avoid Bruce Schneier.
And more:
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/facts/top -
Re:Destructive mindset
Most people use passwords. Some people use passphrases. Bruce Schneier uses an epic passpoem, detailing the life and works of seven mythical Norse heroes.
Hashes collide because they're swerving to avoid Bruce Schneier.
And more:
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/facts/top -
Bruce Schneider Facts
Bruce Schneider Facts
The last time someone tried to look into Bruce Schneider's twisted mind, the Big Bang happened -
Re:Another misuse of biometrics
Bruce Schneier can reset your fingerprints.
-
Re:hmm
No, it's Taco's fault. Everyone knows rms is case sensitive
-
Re:Irony?
Oh no! He's not with those guys anymore?
-
So I married a Kernel Programmer
-
Re:Millionaire's Problem
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/facts/top
Bruce Schneier knows Alice and Bob's secret. -
Surprised by Wealth!
-
Re:Let me guess
I really don't think you should be talking about Bruce Schneier like that when you clearly know nothing about the man. For example, did you know that Bruce Schneier once decrypted a box of Alpha Bits? Or that he knows the state of Schroedinger's cat? It's true!
-
Re:I'm sorry, but...what about the fact that in order to use python you have to taint yourself with the language created by Knuth? So you dont have this as a bumper sticker?
-
Bah
The whole idea of using the fact that you have an open network as a defense if someone commits a drive-by wireless crime is ridiculous. First off, you'll be having that argument about your guilt or innocence after all your computer equipment is seized as evidence--I don't know about you, but if all my home computer were gone I'd have a tough problem keeping my job. Also, many people around where I live have the kinds of jobs (security, finance) where the minute you're arrested for something series, you're fired, regardless of whether you ultimately are innocent or guilty.
If I were as awesome as Bruce Schneier, I wouldn't worry about such things. But since I'm not I keep my network closed. -
Watch our for Bruce Schneier
I soon see Bruce Schneier http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/ following suit (no pun intended)
-
Chuck Norris is a Wuss
Chuck can have his roundhouse kicks. Bruce Schneier is the
/. role model of choice.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/921/ -
Good choice Penguin
Had they instead tried to release a book based on the
Bruce Schneier Facts, when they tried to print it they'd have discovered the text was encrypted. -
Re:Not sure how "secure" this scheme is...
Yes but then again Bruce Schneier's password has so much entropy, that gzipping it results in a stream sixty four times as long. And yet he can type it with a single roundhouse kick to the keyboard.
-
Re:hhooppee tthheeyy ffiixx tthhiiss ssoooonn
Not in text, but in images:
http://geekz.co.uk/lovesraymond/archive/hyper-threading
Pretty funny. If ELER were updated more frequently, it would definitely be on my daily reading list. :) -
ELER comic about this: GPL killed the MPAA star
-
Re:But first, make sure you have the Bruce facts
-
Re:But first, make sure you have the Bruce facts
-
But first, make sure you have the Bruce facts
To get the most out of this interview, make sure you have the facts on Bruce Schneier. The man is not what he seems.
-
Re:that was a freebie
-
Re:Social hacking with Google
Because they know the secret passphrases. Wonder how they got 'em.
-
Re:Is that pic caption right?
Yes, the caption is wrong, or at least misleading (maybe the writer meant to say "Hans Reiser, leftmost person as viewed by a theoretical observer standing behind the two men,..."
Anyways, based on previous pictures of Hans, it's clearly the guy on the right:
http://geekz.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/hans-reiser.jpg
http://www.documentandolavida.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/hans-reiser-2006-10-10.jpg
http://scitalks.com/thumbnail/Picture%20855.jpg -
Re:Is there anything...?
-
Re:really
Come on. Bruce Schneier is like the Chuck Norris of the IT industry. He'd outlast us all!
Remember. There are no prime numbers, only numbers that Bruce Schneier doesn't want you to factor!
-
Re:These must be freshman researchers
All pictures on the internet contain Bruce Schneier's steganographic information.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/ -
Re:Just because you think it doesn't make sense...
I think it's silly. Stego is well known for not being very effective at truly obfuscating the fact that there's hidden data in a photo. Open the file in a hex editor and it's blatantly obvious there's data in the photo. Anyone with a modicum of knowledge could detect the presence of data, uh, with the possible exception of your local border security (sorry, oblig.). I'm suspicious about the study. If you wanted to hide data in a file, why would you then post that image to the web for all to see? Why not just email it to one or two
... million people all spam-like and make sure at least one goes to your target? Most people will delete your spam without even suspecting anything. Then there are the few that would be curious. So, well, not a great idea either. I just don't think stego is what it could be, or what criminals expect it should be.
___
Bruce Schneier can divide by zero -
Re:Try it out
-
I'm with those guys ...
I have no idea what this guy does or what his individual talents are (thank you, nytimes), but this seems somewhat reprehensible hobby to pursue ?
I mean, it's not that I'm not guilty of the I'm with those guys syndrome, but I've felt guilty for having gone out of my way to get a picture with Tanenbaum or Linus.
I've often wondered why I did it and can only put it down as "Celebrity by Association". And made a mental note to be in the same frame as these people by effort & hard work rather than by mere geographical coincidence.
-
Re:Security advise from Microsoft?
Well, there is a delicious irony when a practitioner of Security Theater starts complaining about Security Theater. Maybe we need a new term, "Security thru Marketing". Buy our product and feel safer than you really are. (cough*cough, Apple (note: I'm a long time Apple Koolaid drinker, and I bask in the warm glow of the RDF.))
Anyway, the most interesting and insightful guy writing about security these days is Bruce Schneier. And not only is he insightful, but he once killed a man using only linear cryptanalysis (fact). Remember - if you ever lose your password, you can still ask Bruce Schneier. -
Re:Best known.
Dude, he portrays everyone in a bad light. Look at the posts tagged "microtards". There are more posts with that tag than with any other. He calls iPhone people iTards. He really really rips on Scott McNealy, Bill and Balmer, Larry Elison, other Apple execs, the list goes on and on. If you think it's too over the top to be funny, that's fine. Some people thought the Hans Reiser joke on Everybody Loves Eric Raymond was too much and in bad taste. But the evidence, with a single exception*, shows he is an equal opportunity asshole.
*That single exception was the bit on PJ, which is clearly grudge related and has nothing to do with the FSJ character. But, hell, there's even a PJ joke on ELER. Not the same, I know, and it's more poking fun at ESR. -
Re:Best known.
Dude, he portrays everyone in a bad light. Look at the posts tagged "microtards". There are more posts with that tag than with any other. He calls iPhone people iTards. He really really rips on Scott McNealy, Bill and Balmer, Larry Elison, other Apple execs, the list goes on and on. If you think it's too over the top to be funny, that's fine. Some people thought the Hans Reiser joke on Everybody Loves Eric Raymond was too much and in bad taste. But the evidence, with a single exception*, shows he is an equal opportunity asshole.
*That single exception was the bit on PJ, which is clearly grudge related and has nothing to do with the FSJ character. But, hell, there's even a PJ joke on ELER. Not the same, I know, and it's more poking fun at ESR. -
Some background on Bruce Schneier
Since no one else has posted yet: http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/
-
Closed drivers aren't pragmatic
When it comes to drivers, closed isn't pragmatic. Closed drivers don't get audited. Closed drivers don't work if you upgrade your kernel (or need to run an old one), or want to run on an arch that the vendor didn't bother to compile for. And then worst of all, closed drivers enslave humanity!
-
Nothing is random to Bruce Schneier
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/175
or perhaps he is the generator.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/420 -
Nothing is random to Bruce Schneier
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/175
or perhaps he is the generator.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/420 -
Re:OK...
He's got many secrets http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/726
-
Re:How are they going to unveil it?
-
Re:Yeah, one is in America and on is in India...
Everybody Loves Eric Raymond covers this in a funny comic.
-
John Leach saw it coming
This reminds me of this Everybody Loves Eric S. Raymond cartoon
-
Re:Well, they quote Bruce saying it's good.
Little known Bruce Schneier fact: he cryptanalyzed this in his sleep, he just forgot the answer when he woke up.
-
dell's linux support
The latest ELER episode cover's Dell's Linux Support efforts.
-
oblig. eler reference
-
Re:Mainstream gaming
However, most of us would like to be able to play Penguin Racer or Tux Kart occasionally.
...
IMO, using binary blobs that run in the card, not in the kernel (i.e. downloadable firmware), are a reasonable way for vendors to hide trade secrets while keeping the card updateable and the kernel driver open source.Reasonable, until...
-
Do As Bruce Schneier DoesShamelessy ripped from http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/27 Most people use passwords. Some people use passphrases. Bruce Schneier uses an epic passpoem, detailing the life and works of seven mythical Norse heroes.