Domain: is.gd
Stories and comments across the archive that link to is.gd.
Comments · 160
-
Re:Installation vs. cache
... Data? Even home connections are getting caps now. I already warned my Comcast local they would lose me if they try it, and they haven't.
I couldn't agree more. It actually might be better to have a DSL connection than a throttled to less than DSL bandwidth cable connection! Something to consider. If you can not get FTTH, get DSL, let Cable die like FLASH!
The #1 issue for me with my next apartment/home is Fiber To The Home (FTTH). With bi-directional synchronous FTTH, the same bandwidth upstream as downstream, CAPS are literally unnecessary as the upstream bandwidth is your cap. If you need to stream more content than you are alloted...
Greater than 10Gb X 60 seconds X 60 minutes X 24 hours X 365 days a year...you just increase your plan from 10Gb/10Gb to 20Gb/20Gb or the next highest plan. Keep in mind that while 1Gb/1Gb has historically cost allot in the USA, in Japan it only costs $55 per month or less for 1Gb/1Gb and has been that low since the year 2000. Even if Google charges $75 per month in Kansas City (due first quarter 2012) it will be so much better than Cable...my guess is Cable subscribers will drop to 0 in all areas where FTTH is available. Considering their anti-American anti-consumer practices over the last 30 years I could care less about Cable companies.
So many people lost their homes through the conservative started, liberal continued redistribution of wealth over the last few years, why would you buy any house that did not offer FTTH today? I would not.
-
Re:Different issues
-
Re:Competition
-
Re:preowned
-
Re:competition
-
Re:end user innovation
-
Re:carry on
-
Re:it depends
-
Re:Attension.!!
-
Re:hmm
-
Re:Bheem
-
Re:Rajniti?
-
Re:Virus
-
Re:facebook
-
Re:Suryavansham
-
Re:Dabang
-
So this is "The freedom to be who you want to be"?
So much for Google's blog post in February, "The freedom to be who you want to be..." which extolled the "great benefits" of pseudonymity. http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2011/02/freedom-to-be-who-you-want-to-be.html
Other recent suspensions:
- * A guy who used a pseudonym on Google+ ("Thomas Monopoly") claims to have lost his entire account including "approximately 7 years of correspondence, over 4,800 photographs and videos, my Google Voice messages, over 500 articles saved to my Google Reader account for scholarship purposes all of my bookmarks, having used Google bookmarks my Docs account with shared documents and backups of inventory files my own personal calendar of doctors appointments, meetings, and various other dates collaborative calendars, of which I was the creator and of which several man hours were put into creating, community calendars my saved maps and travel history medical records and a variety of very important notes [and] My website, a blogger account for which I purchased the domain through Google and designed myself": http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/why-you-shouldnt-trust-google-or-any-cloud-service-with-your-data/13860
- * Daynah (a Senior Editor at Beatweek Magazine and a blogger at Cali Lewis' GeekBeat.TV) was suspended from Google+ on Saturday, presumably because her Google+ name was "Daynah
.net" (she never shares her last name online due to privacy and safety concerns). I believe it was just her Google+ account that got suspended, not her e-mail or access to other services. Her profile is still suspended as of when I'm posting this. - * I was suspended from Google+ on Friday, June 15th through Wednesday, June 20th, presumably because my Google+ name was "the JoshMeister" (which is how I'm known to almost all of my friends and followers online, on my podcasts which have been downloaded over a million times, including at my employment at MacTech Magazine as the Podcast Producer and Host). I tried changing my name to my first and last name with the JoshMeister in parenthesis after it, but that was also rejected, so ultimately I had to settle for using just my real first and last name. Unfortunately, my name is fairly common, and there are already several people with that name on Google+, making it significantly more difficult for people to find and recognize me or + mention me. I did not lose access to Google services other than Google+ and Google Buzz, although I did have to log in again to my e-mail and other services because Google claimed there had been "suspicious activity" (although I confirmed that nobody had accessed my account other than me). More of my story: https://plus.google.com/114936727752666468558/posts/5nHEHFsWCTx
Lists of suspensions:
- * Robert Scoble (linking to Skud's link below) inadvertently began compiling a public list of suspended Google+ accounts here, along with some good discussion of the topic and links to other lists: https://plus.google.com/111091089527727420853/posts/YnzXfbpe9Nj
- * Skud is compiling a private list of suspended Google+ accounts here: http://is.gd/nonplussed (redirects to Google Docs form)
Examples of Google's double standard and inconsistency:
- * Some people such as "Soulja Boy" (a recording artist) and "Violet Blue" (the author of the linked ZDNet article) get special treatment and have not been suspended for using their pseudonyms on Google+
- * "Die Ennomane" (die means "the" in German) was suspended but then was allowed to keep the pseudonym after German media coverage
- * Google has turned a blind ey
-
Re:Yay.
-
Re:G.one
-
Re:Subject-Verb Agreement
-
Re:Bulandi of Ethernet
-
Re:Ra.one
-
Re:E.S.UK
-
Re:if he's so concerned
-
Re: w7-faster-xp
-
Re:Of course.
-
Re:Who cares?
-
Re:Treat it like fiberglass or asbestos
I wonder if that quote representative of the quality of essays the essay writing company you are spamming for produces.
-
Re:Treat it like fiberglass or asbestos
-
Re:It's bound to happen....and again...and again..
-
Re:Not surprising
-
Re:You gonna end prohibition?
-
Re:Thesis
-
Re:The title should be
u can use this for writing thesis their information http://is.gd/orthr1
-
Re:...and they were trying to accomplish WHAT now?
-
that's Good
-
Re:They're missing my favourite open thing...
-
Re: OKCon11 Opens In Berlin
-
Glenn Greenwald Tweeted This One Well
"A moment of silence, please, to honor the brave robot we lost today in Libya: http://is.gd/e1Oyyj "- Original Link
-
Re:They needed a research group...
Sorry, I posted a link still on my clipboard from my business transactions. Here is the the intended link.
-
Re:Pentagon whining
Wikileaks mocked this Pentagon Press Secretary tweet this morning:
I saw that, for anyone who missed it, Wikileaks response was:
How the heart bleeds: Pentagon spokesman whines about spending easter weekend spinning Gitmo Files http://is.gd/cmVVLS
-
Re:"If we litigate, we have a chance to win.'"
This is probably short enough for your sig: http://v.gd/rTh91L
http://is.gd/ and http://v.gd/ (same folk) are pretty good for the moment...
-
challenging scientific assumptions =/= fact free
popper's analysis of science is weak. It's based in the idea that their are 'facts' and that these facts are truths. If we accept certain axioms such as that we are not living in 'the matrix' etc then we can all agree that yes the sun is 'above' the earth, that planes fly, that this conversation is happening on server somewhere. Anybody who understands anything about the philosophy of science will understand and accept these things. The issue with popper is that he fails to recognise that the creation of scientific truth is a human endeavour and thus subject to human flaws, a far better analysis of the production of science is produced by Bruno Latour in Science in action - see Google books http://is.gd/07KejQ Perhaps the OP should widen their circle of scholarship before making such muddle-headed comments PS Sokal may have got a paper published in social text, but various scientific journals have accepted papers from people that show they are equally as gullible to accepting papers devoid of logic or proof. The problem with peer review is that it is peer review: ideas that are only acceptable to ones peers will be published. Challenges to the current orthodoxy typically have to be publicised through journals outside the mainstream view
-
Dislike
Ya, right. Try to be far from it. Panda Cloud Antivirus Download Free.
-
Re:Oh my
I'm sure if i looked around the numerous scientific fields I could find stupid comments made by scientists. I suspect that the author misunderstood the lesson or was so blinded by his faith in science that he misquotes Feyerabend "that there is no such thing as scientific method and that physicists have no better claim to knowledge than voodoo priests" but then again I have never been taught by Feyerabend and if Feyerabend had said something so stupid then he is deserving of ridicule
At the start of my masters programme in the history and philosophy of science and medicine we were reminded of one key thing. I will paraphrase my professors here "planes fly, humans don't" Science clearly works, we live in a world of technological innovation but that doesn't mean what scientists say they are doing is what they are actually doing.
The scientific method is all very well, the problem is that it is being performed by humans, who have a tendency to see correlation and to see that as confirmation. A better place to start with an analysis of science would be bruno latours science in action http://is.gd/myOXXC http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=sC4bk4DZXTQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=bruno+latour+science+in+action&source=bl&ots=W8mIxp89UA&sig=EUuZoalIj9J7Nh_gGckWURJq8lM&hl=en&ei=YcswTcTvIJO6hAfx3aTCCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CEAQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false
Another place to look might be at the apparent failures in the scientific method http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/12/13/101213fa_fact_lehrer?currentPage=all - where an apparently strong signal overtime falls back into background noise. The issue here is not fraud but merely that what is published, what is funded has more to do with human failings and the need to provide clear evidence in fields where given an environment where all aspects of all conditions are controlled the organism will do as it damm well pleases
-
Re:This is a Big Deal
Meryl Dorey got thrashed by radio journalist Tracey Spicer just last week
It's fantastic
-
Re:Ok, some clarification.
I'd agree were it not for the following http://twitter.com/wikileaks post yesterday: "WARNING all 637,000 @wikileaks followers are a target of US gov subpoena against Twitter, under section 2. B http://is.gd/koZIA" [redirect to PDF of the subpoena hosted on salon.com].
The linked document has no section 2. B
-
Re:So...
According to Wikileaks themselves (Slashdot breaks cut & paste in Chromium, so no link):
WARNING all 637,000 @wikileaks followers are a target of US gov subpoena against Twitter, under section 2. B http://is.gd/koZIA [pdf of subpoena].
Which would include people like me.
-
Re:Ok, some clarification.
I'd agree were it not for the following http://twitter.com/wikileaks post yesterday: "WARNING all 637,000 @wikileaks followers are a target of US gov subpoena against Twitter, under section 2. B http://is.gd/koZIA" [redirect to PDF of the subpoena hosted on salon.com].
-
Shocking. Oh Wait, No It's Not.
A Democrat congresswoman is shot, and a federal judge and 8 others are killed. This would be shocking, except that it's not. The congresswoman "beat back a tough challenge from a Tea Party-endorsed opponent."
So we have organization that promotes having its supporters brandish weapons at its rallies, has its most prominatent supporters openly talk about advocate armed rebellion, and armed secession, and other defunct 19th century extremist ideas, demonizing a duly elected political opponent, and now we have her shot, and 9 others killed.