Slashdot Mirror

...then your hiring practices suck.

Normal distributions are expected when doing random sampling. If your interview and hiring process ends up with a random sample, you're doing it wrong.

Bell-curve performance management systems are predicated on this odd idea, that hiring ends up with a random sample.

http://www.linkedin.com/today/...

Why would Apple be interested in grabbing your data? They're the only one of the major tech companies which have so far shown no interest at all in the "you're the product" business model.

iAd Workbench is the simplest way to advertise to millions of people on their Apple devices. In a few steps, you can create a campaign that drives traffic to your website, generates video views, or promotes your iTunes Store content. Choose your audience, set your budget, and run your campaign across thousands of Apple-verified and brand-safe iOS apps.

http://advertising.apple.com/t...

The Apple Data Mining Lab is looking for an outstanding data mining scientist who is interested in designing, developing, and fielding data mining solutions that have direct and measurable impact to Apple.

http://www.linkedin.com/jobs2/...

SAN FRANCISCO (CN) - The lack of specific injury dooms a massive lawsuit accusing Apple and 14 app developers of mining iPhones and iPads for data, a federal judge said.

http://www.courthousenews.com/...

So we have one out of many add net works - the only one where there are complains that Apple doesn't give data about their customers to the people paying for the adds. We have an job search for a "data mining expert" - because the data mined has to be sold to others, not used to improve local services benefitting the user like SIRI. And most damning, we have a lawsuit where Apple was one of the accused simply because they own the App Store - not because they collected data.

Why would Apple be interested in grabbing your data? They're the only one of the major tech companies which have so far shown no interest at all in the "you're the product" business model.

iAd Workbench is the simplest way to advertise to millions of people on their Apple devices. In a few steps, you can create a campaign that drives traffic to your website, generates video views, or promotes your iTunes Store content. Choose your audience, set your budget, and run your campaign across thousands of Apple-verified and brand-safe iOS apps.

http://advertising.apple.com/t...

The Apple Data Mining Lab is looking for an outstanding data mining scientist who is interested in designing, developing, and fielding data mining solutions that have direct and measurable impact to Apple.

http://www.linkedin.com/jobs2/...

SAN FRANCISCO (CN) - The lack of specific injury dooms a massive lawsuit accusing Apple and 14 app developers of mining iPhones and iPads for data, a federal judge said.

http://www.courthousenews.com/...

without a work requirement: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/ma...
http://www.basicincome.org/bie...

Yes, it is true -- we thought computers, AI, and robots would liberate us, but instead they are being used to spy on us, to micromanage us, and to force us to work like robots or else.

On depression and such, look into vitamin D deficiency, eating more fruits & vegetables, and getting more Omega 3s. Also, look into a treadmill workstation or a standing desk to help with ergonomics and joint pain.

Good luck! Hope you can find some way to make your work more meaningful -- even if just by practicing skills you can use on other projects in your spare time, like perhaps to make free software the world really needs?

Maybe contact this Dutch guy (in Toronto at the moment though) for some good ideas of stuff that really needs doing, including with Squeak:
http://nl.linkedin.com/in/cdeg...

Here are the details of the relevant parties:

The "judge": Maureen McGraw-Desmet

295 Millers Run Road Bridgeville, PA 15017 phone: 412-221-3353 fax: 412-221-0908

The "officer": http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ro...

and then there's this piece of shit: http://www.southfayette.org/si... (smilburn@southfayette.org)

If ever there was a job for Anonymous...

Nassim Nicholas Taleb talks about it in his books, "Fooled By Randomness" & "The Black Swan".

The idea is one of scalability. An athlete paid for a game or a lawyer or a doctor or a consultant are all financially similar to hookers -- i.e. you trade your skills for money for a given period assuming a given performance. No matter how great a hooker or a doctor or a lawyer or an athlete you are, there is a finite limit to how much money you can make. What more, there is a finite time during which you can monetize your performance, before you have to charm new clients. And even then, you stop because your performance stops to fall.

However, a lot of other professions are not limited by this. They are much more scalable. Imagine JK Rowling or Bill Gates or Dr. Dre. You can write one book or one song that keeps on selling millions. You can have a product that's only limited by your target market, which could keep on growing. Sure, you can write more books or make more songs or update your product, but that only serves to increase your incoming revenue.

The difference is, an athlete's skills are inherently not scalable. But an engineer's skills are. However, your chances of scaling are much lower, but not any lower than that of getting picked to be an NFL quarterback.

The other aspect to consider is also the average salary of all engineers (i.e. graduated with an engineering degree) and their unemployment rate over time compared with the average salary and professional employment status of anyone who's an "athlete" (played varsity or any sport in college). Not sure how the numbers would pan out, but I have a feeling that over time, the engineers would probably do better, with some athletes doing exceptionally well (i.e. you were on the Oxford Crew team, went to grad school at Harvard, and worked in private equity - such as this guy - while the rest wouldn't do so hot).

How is this person an engineer?

Her linkedin profile shows a degree in marketing and job titles in design and marketing. Not any engineering background to be seen.

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ju...

Sorry, but no.

Checking her linkedin profile, she doesn't exactly sound like she's tearing up the development scene either.

Here's your proof:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
http://uk.linkedin.com/in/dani...

http://www.linkedin.com/in/kar...

He is.

Yes, it was http://www.linkedin.com/in/ali...

Beta is more than cosmetics or aesthetics. The new design ruins the one thing that makes /. what it is -- the commenting system. I only come here for the comments, not the 2-day old articles nor the erroneous summaries.

I do not see the changes of Beta as improvements. What is wrong with Slashdot that demands breaking its foundations? This is not change for the sake of change, but, as others have commented, an attempt to monetize /. at any any cost, and its users be damned.

Our complaints have fallen on deaf ears, and will continue to do so. Dice intends to dispose of Classic in favor of Beta, whether we like it or not. Do you know how to tell whether an executive really cares about feedback? If her CV doesn't proclaim the following "successes":

Proven track record innovating and improving iconic websites (CNET.com, Dice.com, Slashdot.org, Sourceforge.net) while protecting their voice and brand integrity

Beta is more than cosmetics or aesthetics. The new design ruins the one thing that makes /. what it is -- the commenting system. I only come here for the comments, not the 2-day old articles nor the erroneous summaries.

I do not see the changes of Beta as improvements. What is wrong with Slashdot that demands breaking its foundations? This is not change for the sake of change, but, as others have commented, an attempt to monetize /. at any any cost, and its users be damned.

Our complaints have fallen on deaf ears, and will continue to do so. Dice intends to dispose of Classic in favor of Beta, whether we like it or not. Do you know how to tell whether an executive really cares about feedback? If her CV doesn't proclaim the following "successes":

Proven track record innovating and improving iconic websites (CNET.com, Dice.com, Slashdot.org, Sourceforge.net) while protecting their voice and brand integrity

Beta is more than cosmetics or aesthetics. The new design ruins the one thing that makes /. what it is -- the commenting system. I only come here for the comments, not the 2-day old articles nor the erroneous summaries.

I do not see the changes of Beta as improvements. What is wrong with Slashdot that demands breaking its foundations? This is not change for the sake of change, but, as others have commented, an attempt to monetize /. at any any cost, and its users be damned.

Our complaints have fallen on deaf ears, and will continue to do so. Dice intends to dispose of Classic in favor of Beta, whether we like it or not. Do you know how to tell whether an executive really cares about feedback? If her CV doesn't already proclaim these changes to be a success even before fully implementing them:

Proven track record innovating and improving iconic websites (CNET.com, Dice.com, Slashdot.org, Sourceforge.net) while protecting their voice and brand integrity

Correct me if I'm wrong, but apart from an almost universally hated Beta version, how can anyone claim in good faith that /. has undergone any change at all so far?

There is nothing wrong with the new design

Beta is more than cosmetics or aesthetics. The new design ruins the one thing that makes /. what it is -- the commenting system. I only come here for the comments, not the 2-day old articles nor the erroneous summaries.

you are just scared of change

I do not see the changes of Beta as improvements. What is wrong with Slashdot that demands breaking its foundations? This is not change for the sake of change, but, as others have commented, an attempt to monetize /. at any any cost, and its users be damned.

Look inwards for a fix

Our complaints have fallen on deaf ears, and will continue to do so. Dice intends to dispose of Classic in favor of Beta, whether we like it or not. Do you know how to tell whether an executive really cares about feedback? If her CV doesn't already proclaim these changes to be a success even before fully implementing them:

Proven track record innovating and improving iconic websites (CNET.com, Dice.com, Slashdot.org, Sourceforge.net) while protecting their voice and brand integrity

Correct me if I'm wrong, but apart from an almost universally hated Beta version, how can anyone claim in good faith that /. has undergone any change at all so far?

Stack Ranking only works on a short term basis where you want to trim the fat.

Regarding the next performance ranking time at Dice, when someone will need to be scapegoated for the Beta Clusterfuck:

Who will Alice Hill "stack-rank" into unemployment: samzenpus, Soulskill, timothy, or Unknown Lamer?

Or all four of them?

Since slashdot is now run by marketing, why not let them know about the beta where they might listen? Slashdot Media on LinkedIn.

Fuck Slashdot Beta. Fuck it straight to oblivion.

Contact Alice Hill, honcho at Dice/Slashdot, to make yourself heard: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/al...

CowboyNeal: Governor Alice. I should have expected to find you holding Beta's leash. I recognized your foul stench when I was brought onboard.

Alice Hill: Charming to the last. You don't know how hard I found it, signing the order to terminate Slashdot.

CowboyNeal: [sarcastically] I'm surprised you had the courage to take the responsibility yourself.

Hill: CowboyNeal, before Slashdot's execution, I would like you to be my guest at a ceremony that will make the Beta shitfest operational. No tech site will dare oppose Dice now.

CowboyNeal: The more you tighten your grip, Hill, the more tech sites will slip through your fingers.

Hill: Not after we demonstrate the power of this revamp. In a way, you have determined the choice of the website that will be destroyed first. Since you are reluctant to provide us with the location of the rogue site relaunch base, I have chosen to implement Beta's destructive power on your favorite website of Slashdot.

CowboyNeal: [shocked] No! Slashdot is peaceful. We have no hot grits. You can't possibly–

Hill: You would prefer another target? Then name the system! [stepping closer to CowboyNeal and pinning him against Slashdot's editors] I grow tired of asking this, so it will be the last time. Where is the revamp based?

CowboyNeal: [looks at Slashdot for a moment, then, resigned] AltSlashdot. They're on AltSlashdot.

Hill: There. You see, editors? She can be reasonable. [to sysadmin] Continue with the operation. You may launch Beta when ready.

CowboyNeal: [panicked] What?!

Hill: You are far too trusting. AltSlashdot is too small to make an effective demonstration, but don't worry. We will deal with your revivalist friends soon enough.

CowboyNeal: No!

Fuck Beta! Everyone get in touch with Alice Hill, the person who actually runs the show at Dice - her LinkedIn.

Well, given the diversity of Slashdot audience and their nonexistent ability to organize, a boycott is unlikely to effect any real change.

On the other hand, Alice Hill - President at Slashdot Media or some of her bosses from Dice Holdings, like Michael P. Durney - President and CEO or Klavs Miller - Senior Vice President, Technology can be quite effective in stopping this madness and idiotic destruction of value, if they care to understand the problem at hand.

I don't think all of this would happen if they realized that Slashdot's value doesn't stem from it as a news site (of which there are thousands), but as a news discussion site.

Messing with the comment, moderation and social functionalities and their design over here is playing with fire.

I don't think these folks understand that people don't come to Slashdot to read carefully selected news (which are not, BTW) in a pretty-glossy presentation, but to participate in or consume/read the discussion. And the new Beta demolishes that.

If someone else better skilled in writing would make a petition on http://www.petitiononline.com/ and direct it at those guys, that would be so much more effective than ranting here in comments, which these people probably had never looked at, or trying to organize boycotts among a disorganized crowd.

Complaining in the comments is not enough! This is the person responsible for beta. Contact her, buy a LinkedIn subscription if you have to, and tell her what you think.

Note: it seems that links no longer work in beta. Here is the URL: Alice Hill

Picture a pretty young woman with curly blond hair, and then imagine she is president of Slashdot?!?! How is this possible? Where has the world gone to?

Complaining in the comments is not enough! This is the person responsible for beta. Contact her directly to lodge your complaints.

Since beta appears not to support links, here is the URL: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alicehill

This is the person responsible for beta.

Whining in the comments is not enough. Send her email. Buy a subscription on LinkedIn to do it if you have to.

Well, a receptionist is really unlikely to effect any real change.

On the other hand, Alice Hill - President at Slashdot Media or some of her bosses from Dice Holdings, like Michael P. Durney - President and CEO or Klavs Miller - Senior Vice President, Technology can be quite effective in stopping this madness and idiotic destruction of value, if they care to undersand the problem at hand.

I don't think all of this would happen if they realized that Slashdot's value doesn't stem from it as a news site (of which there are thousands), but as a news discussion site.

Messing with the comment, moderation and social functionalities and their design over here is playing with fire.

I don't think these folks understand that people don't come to Slashdot to read carefully selected news (which are not, BTW) in a pretty-glossy presentation, but to participate in or consume/read the discussion. And the new Beta demolishes that.

If someone else better skilled in writing would make a petition on http://www.petitiononline.com/ and direct it at those guys, that would be so much more effective than ranting here in comments, which these people probably had never looked at, or harassing random rank-and-file Dice employees.

A person directed the Slashdot redesign.

Who is he?

I think that either SHE (Alice Hill - President at Slashdot Media) did or she knows exactly who did. Quoting from her experience:

"10+ years experience managing large-scale consumer Web properties from conceptualization and staffing, to product innovation, large-scale redesigns and platform overhauls, mobile versions, multi-lingual content creation/production, international engineering team management, and next-stage product growth/roadmap development.".

Her or her subordinates' actions currently directly undermine the business of HER (Joyce Goh, Director, Ad Operations at Slashdot Media (Dice Holdings, Inc.)).

Of course, I might be wrong, but that's what I came up with after 30 seconds of Googling (which, apparently, noone else in this thread bothered to do).

BTW, she has a handle here on Slashdot (no activity since 2004, though - talk about eating one's own dogfood... I mean, it's almost 10 years of no activity) - you can try asking her directly...

Although, Her Twitter seems a more promising contact channel. Still active.

A person directed the Slashdot redesign.

Who is he?

I think that either SHE (Alice Hill - President at Slashdot Media) did or she knows exactly who did. Quoting from her experience:

"10+ years experience managing large-scale consumer Web properties from conceptualization and staffing, to product innovation, large-scale redesigns and platform overhauls, mobile versions, multi-lingual content creation/production, international engineering team management, and next-stage product growth/roadmap development.".

Her or her subordinates' actions currently directly undermine the business of HER (Joyce Goh, Director, Ad Operations at Slashdot Media (Dice Holdings, Inc.)).

Of course, I might be wrong, but that's what I came up with after 30 seconds of Googling (which, apparently, noone else in this thread bothered to do).

BTW, she has a handle here on Slashdot (no activity since 2004, though - talk about eating one's own dogfood... I mean, it's almost 10 years of no activity) - you can try asking her directly...

Although, Her Twitter seems a more promising contact channel. Still active.

A person directed the Slashdot redesign.

Who is he?

I think that either SHE (Alice Hill - President at Slashdot Media) did or she knows exactly who did. Quoting from her experience:

"10+ years experience managing large-scale consumer Web properties from conceptualization and staffing, to product innovation, large-scale redesigns and platform overhauls, mobile versions, multi-lingual content creation/production, international engineering team management, and next-stage product growth/roadmap development.".

Her or her subordinates' actions currently directly undermine the business of HER (Joyce Goh, Director, Ad Operations at Slashdot Media (Dice Holdings, Inc.)).

Of course, I might be wrong, but that's what I came up with after 30 seconds of Googling (which, apparently, noone else in this thread bothered to do).

A person directed the Slashdot redesign.

Who is he?

I think that either SHE (Alice Hill - President at Slashdot Media) did or she knows exactly who did. Quoting from her experience:

"10+ years experience managing large-scale consumer Web properties from conceptualization and staffing, to product innovation, large-scale redesigns and platform overhauls, mobile versions, multi-lingual content creation/production, international engineering team management, and next-stage product growth/roadmap development.".

Her or her subordinates' actions currently directly undermine the business of HER (Joyce Goh, Director, Ad Operations at Slashdot Media (Dice Holdings, Inc.)).

Of course, I might be wrong, but that's what I came up with after 30 seconds of Googling (which, apparently, noone else in this thread bothered to do).

I practice Business solutions. You can find some useful products for entrepreneurs here - https://www.instamojo.com/prac... You can also go through some articles related to entrepreneurship from the links below. Links: http://www.selfgrowth.com/expe... http://in.linkedin.com/in/sash... (Rated 'Expert' for profile strength) http://www.zintro.com/expert/s... ISSME Global SME Expert (www.issme.org) http://ezinearticles.com/?expe... Practice Website: http://sashidharanb.wix.com/bu... Products from practice: https://www.instamojo.com/prac...

I am not cherry-picking.

But you are. You cherry picked the article and blog from which you choose to read comments.

Bear in mind that the posters are referring to STANFORD UNIVERSITY which is one of the top 15 Universities in the physical sciences worldwide. Most of the posters claim that professors of climate science at Stanford University are just fucking idiots compared to them. Most claim that the professors know nothing about their OWN FIELD of expertise, but the commenters have it all figured out.

So have you actually read the article that they're commenting on? First, the author's area of expertise is not climate science nor do they have a degree from Stanford. They were hired to write positive things about Stanford University, which they did.

So it's not Stanford University, particularly not a climate researcher, but a guy writing for a newsletter for Stanford University.

Second, we have to consider whether there actually is a legitimate grievance here. For example, from the article:

But what might be even more troubling for humans, plants and animals is the speed of the change. Stanford climate scientists warn that the likely rate of change over the next century will be at least 10 times quicker than any climate shift in the past 65 million years.

If the trend continues at its current rapid pace, it will place significant stress on terrestrial ecosystems around the world, and many species will need to make behavioral, evolutionary or geographic adaptations to survive.

Although some of the changes the planet will experience in the next few decades are already "baked into the system," how different the climate looks at the end of the 21st century will depend largely on how humans respond.

Note every sentence in that stretch contains a qualifying term or what your quoted poster called "weasel words". The problem with such things is that they might happen or they might not. Such a statement as the above would be mostly factually true (aside from the "likely" qualifier in the second sentence), even if the only way it could happen was for humanity to devote its entire energies to make that come true as a prediction rather than doing what it does now.

It's also worth noting here that the Stanford article discusses a review of literature and computer models, not new research. No actual "denier" concerns are addressed by the work in question such as whether the research and computer models in question accurately reflect the state of Earth's climate. But there's another opportunity to regurgitate the usual climate change propaganda.

I am far more humble than almost anyone in the climate denier camp.

Sure, you are.

That brings us to my third point. Just because some of your ideological foes happen to exhibit rather painful intellectual flaws doesn't mean that your argument is correct. That's a variation of the straw man argument where you're attacking only a weak sideshow rather than the core legitimate concern.

Nor does it mean that you don't exhibit those same painful intellectual flaws.

The guy now works at Mongo DB

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ian-spandow/1/739/557

Good for him. Oracle seems to be such a dead-end place to work.

The guy now works at Mongo DB

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ian-spandow/1/739/557

Unfortunately, HR departments don't understand the hiring managers' actual requirements,

yep...agree...

wanted to add that there are plenty of examples of **non-HR** people being as out of touch as HR

Just look at Penny Arcade's ad for a "Web/Software Developer & Sys Admin: http://www.linkedin.com/jobs2/view/9887522?trk=feed-cmpy-fol-jobt&goback=.bzo_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_penny*5arcade*5inc*3

a sample:

We’re terrible at work-life balance. Although work is pretty much your life, we do our absolute best to make sure that work is as awesome as possible so you at least enjoy each and every day here.

the whole thing reads like that

I definitely agree HR sucks, not just in tech but across the board...when I hear "HR" I automatically think office-drone functionary who has no concept of the actual business work the company does.

However, I think if we aim only at HR we might miss the target...in the Tech Industry I see a greater inability to relate to other humans at all levels...kinda sociopathic...

It sure looks like Google is in charge of Waze's ads...

http://www.linkedin.com/jobs2/view/7257746?_mSplash=1

Got a source? I don't really doubt it but I want proof that he's a bald-faced liar on top of being a bigot.

Best I could find so far:

http://www.linkedin.com/company/taleswapper-entertainment

Quite interesting comment. Here upper management is looking is buying into Office 365, however a quick look at their downtimes SLAs is just enough to see they are a joke. I would be quite interested in knowing the details of your experience, have a look at email me, or be invited to join my linked.in at http://www.linkedin.com/pub/rui-ribeiro/16/ab8/434

"All communication from the Mail app to the LinkedIn Intro servers is fully encrypted. Likewise, all communication from the LinkedIn Intro servers to your email provider (e.g. Gmail or Yahoo! Mail) is fully encrypted."

And all (transient) storage of the data being communicated while they are on the LinkedIn servers?

Hmm... Didn't think so.

Also worth noting: In their 'Pledge of Privacy'(which may change from time to time, to 'clarify' things) they have an adorable little elision...

"Do you read my email?

In order to provide the Intro service, the servers use software to extract information from each message: for example, the sender's email address is extracted, so that the servers can search for their LinkedIn profile to include in the message."

Well, ok, the system obviously wouldn't work if it didn't parse the email, right?

"Do you store my email or my password?

During usage, the servers may temporarily cache your emails in order to make emails download faster. When your device starts to download a mail folder, such as your inbox, the servers will pre-emptively download and cache recent messages in that folder. A few seconds later, when your device downloads the individual messages, the servers will provide the cached messages. Your messages are only cached until your device downloads them, and never for more than 1 hour. Typically, your messages are cached for no more than a few minutes."

Well, ok, fast downloads are good, and temporary cache is temporary, so you totally aren't building a giant dossier of all my email, whew.

Now... " the servers use software to extract information from each message". Hmm... it doesn't say a thing about the storage, use, retention, or anything else of that 'extracted information'. Nor (aside from giving the one example that is architecturally necessary, and thus trivial), does it provide any detail about what information is extracted. So, in fact, the only thing I know is that they say that a literal copy of my email is not being stored (Maybe they only store my metadata, like the NSA?) Maybe they store any substrings that match a set of keywords? Who knows? Not you or me.

It is possible. Read what they say on their own web page:

Once we got the IMAP proxy working, we were faced with another problem: how do we configure a device to use the proxy? We cannot expect users to manually enter IMAP and SMTP hostnames, choose the correct TLS settings, etc — it’s too tedious and error-prone.
Fortunately, Apple provides a friendly way of setting up email accounts by using configuration profiles — a facility that is often used in enterprise deployments of iOS devices. Using this technique, we can simply ask the user for their email address and password, autodiscover the email provider settings, and send a configuration profile to the device. The user just needs to tap “ok” a few times, and then they have a new mail account.

The users have no idea why they are clicking OK, but once its done it works so they ask no questions.
After all, they are Linkedin users, so they automatically aren't too bright.

They just proxy all mail.

Normally your device connects directly to the servers of your email provider (Gmail, Yahoo, AOL, etc.), but we can configure the device to connect to the Intro proxy server instead.
The Intro proxy server speaks the IMAP protocol just like an email provider, but it doesn’t store messages itself. Instead, it forwards requests from the device to your email provider, and forwards responses from the email provider back to the device. En route, it inserts Intro information at the beginning of each message body — we call this the top bar.

http://engineering.linkedin.com/mobile/linkedin-intro-doing-impossible-ios

I wonder if he will be so smug when they perp walk him out of his office.

Informative summary; in case anyone cares LinkedIn's official explanation is here: http://engineering.linkedin.com/mobile/linkedin-intro-doing-impossible-ios

You have to allow their app to install a configuration profile that sets up iOS's Mail app to get your email through LinkedIn's proxy server; then LinkedIn can read your email and inject relevant code directly into the message before it hits the mail client: http://engineering.linkedin.com/mobile/linkedin-intro-doing-impossible-ios *barf*

with linkedin you choose what those not connected to you can see.

http://blog.linkedin.com/2008/02/25/a-closer-look-a/

The other link appears to be:
http://community.linkedin.com/questions/23572/stalking-on-linkedin.html?sort=oldest

Paul Rockwell Aug 20 at 04:19 PM

Hi everyone, my name is Paul Rockwell, and I head up Trust & Safety here at LinkedIn.

I'd like to start by acknowledging the ongoing demand for a block feature, and I can confirm that weâ(TM)re in the process of building one. We've heard you, and we both recognize and appreciate the need for privacy controls in this digital age, which is why we remain committed to placing the controls in your hands.

Looks like Facebook could have competition.

Won't somebody think of the data;
    Bruce Wayne;
    Father Christmas;
    Obi-Wan;
    God;
    Jim Kirk;
    Tony Stark;
    Homer Simpson;
    Lex Luthor;
    Peter Parker;
    Darth Vader;
    Kyle Broflovski.

My only hope in the rise of the machines is that they use our shit data .. the Corbomite will protect us ..

Looks like Facebook could have competition.

Won't somebody think of the data;
    Bruce Wayne;
    Father Christmas;
    Obi-Wan;
    God;
    Jim Kirk;
    Tony Stark;
    Homer Simpson;
    Lex Luthor;
    Peter Parker;
    Darth Vader;
    Kyle Broflovski.

My only hope in the rise of the machines is that they use our shit data .. the Corbomite will protect us ..

Looks like Facebook could have competition.

Won't somebody think of the data;
    Bruce Wayne;
    Father Christmas;
    Obi-Wan;
    God;
    Jim Kirk;
    Tony Stark;
    Homer Simpson;
    Lex Luthor;
    Peter Parker;
    Darth Vader;
    Kyle Broflovski.

My only hope in the rise of the machines is that they use our shit data .. the Corbomite will protect us ..

Looks like Facebook could have competition.

Won't somebody think of the data;
    Bruce Wayne;
    Father Christmas;
    Obi-Wan;
    God;
    Jim Kirk;
    Tony Stark;
    Homer Simpson;
    Lex Luthor;
    Peter Parker;
    Darth Vader;
    Kyle Broflovski.

My only hope in the rise of the machines is that they use our shit data .. the Corbomite will protect us ..

Looks like Facebook could have competition.

Won't somebody think of the data;
    Bruce Wayne;
    Father Christmas;
    Obi-Wan;
    God;
    Jim Kirk;
    Tony Stark;
    Homer Simpson;
    Lex Luthor;
    Peter Parker;
    Darth Vader;
    Kyle Broflovski.

My only hope in the rise of the machines is that they use our shit data .. the Corbomite will protect us ..

Looks like Facebook could have competition.

Won't somebody think of the data;
    Bruce Wayne;
    Father Christmas;
    Obi-Wan;
    God;
    Jim Kirk;
    Tony Stark;
    Homer Simpson;
    Lex Luthor;
    Peter Parker;
    Darth Vader;
    Kyle Broflovski.

My only hope in the rise of the machines is that they use our shit data .. the Corbomite will protect us ..

Looks like Facebook could have competition.

Won't somebody think of the data;
    Bruce Wayne;
    Father Christmas;
    Obi-Wan;
    God;
    Jim Kirk;
    Tony Stark;
    Homer Simpson;
    Lex Luthor;
    Peter Parker;
    Darth Vader;
    Kyle Broflovski.

My only hope in the rise of the machines is that they use our shit data .. the Corbomite will protect us ..