Slashdot Mirror


Lawsuit: Oracle Called $50K 'Good Money For an Indian'

jfruh writes "A former Oracle sales manager is suing the database company for what he called racially discriminatory salary-setting practices. Ian Spandow wanted to transfer a high-performing salesman from Oracle's India office to California. When he requested a salary of $60,000 a year or more for the employee, equivalent to what his white American counterparts received, he was told instead to offer $50,000, which was 'good money for an Indian.' When Spandow protested, he was himself summarily fired."

409 comments

  1. Shocking by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm shocked. Oracle has always seemed like one the more reputable companies, willing to compete fairly, not obsessed with gouging its customers, and nary an evil bone in their corporate body. I can't imagine them hiring or promoting people that would act like this.

    1. Re:Shocking by CdBee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If proven true in court, this justifies a boycott of Oracle products by all us techies until Oracle produce an open salary audit proving no racial differentials between staff at the same locations. The allegation if true is disgraceful

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:Shocking by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

      Next thing you know, they're going to be bundling adware with Java and suing open source projects.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the "/sarcasm" tag.
      LOL!!!

    4. Re:Shocking by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Umm... I don't think Boycott is what you think it is.
      You really don't need to be justified to boycott a product/company. You can do it whenever you really want.

      Besides no matter how bad Oracle gets, if your Boss says use this Oracle product or your fired, then you will probably be a little less outraged.

      Now this if proven true in court, could be justifiable for Oracle workers to unionize and strike.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Shocking by wisnoskij · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Lol. Find me one company in the entire world that pays its Indian in India employees as much as its California ones?

      Now, when someone is already working for for you for far far less, and you are paying for one of them and his family to move to America, why would you expect them to pay him as much as the other employees, already there. Assuming, this guy did not really really want to stay in India, he would obviously of accepted $50K, which is probably already a huge raise.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    6. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I gotta say, it was hilarious (in retrospect) how the open source community got ultra-paranoid about Mono and C#, and it turned out that it was Java that turned into the lawsuit fodder instead.

      Do any of the people who were beating up on de Icaza feel bad about that now, or are they incapable of shame?

    7. Re:Shocking by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suspect if Google had chosen Mono instead of Java, Microsoft would have sued the fuck out of Google exactly like Oracle did. Hell, Microsoft is shaking down Android OEMs over FAT patents.

      So that mistrust was not wrong, Oracle and Microsoft both suck and their product offerings reflect that.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    8. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      might be a huge raise, but the living expenses are very different too

    9. Re:Shocking by ausekilis · · Score: 4, Informative

      If proven true in court, this justifies a boycott of Oracle products.

      It wasn't the public shaming and mudslinging between Oracle and Google, or the dozens of lawsuits Oracle has brought on with various companies, like those providing Solaris support "illegally", or even the controversies surrounding the company and it's business tactics. No, one racial comment and termination in an at-will state is what's going to cause the boycott.

    10. Re:Shocking by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Now, when someone is already working for for you for far far less, and you are paying for one of them and his family to move to America, why would you expect them to pay him as much as the other employees, already there.

      Because that is the law. Paying someone on a H1-B or L1-B visa less than the US rate is prohibited.

      Oracle has more than enough lawyers; at least one of them should have known this.

    11. Re:Shocking by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Oh come now, corporate behavior and the behavior of a few individuals are miles apart.

      But in this instance it was an honest mistake, the Indian reference was to an old treaty with the Powhattan tribe, where that kind of wampum was damn good beads.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    12. Re:Shocking by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm shocked. Oracle has always seemed like one the more reputable companies, willing to compete fairly, not obsessed with gouging its customers, and nary an evil bone in their corporate body. I can't imagine them hiring or promoting people that would act like this.

      Honestly, I am shocked; but for totally different reasons:

      Oracle is evil, sure; but they are a major corporation, with a legal department, HR, 'Compliance' people, and so on. Try to stiff an employee and fire him if he complains? Fuck yeah, Larry can't keep himself in yachts if the peons get all the crumbs they ask for.

      Outright admit that you are engaging in discrimination based on racial/ethnic/national origin, when there are so many other ways to massage something as potentially ambiguous as salary level, 'fit with the company', and so on? Was somebody drunk on the job? Asking to get fired and sued? Got away with it so often that they got arrogant?

      That is what strikes me as shocking (though, rather convenient for the cause of justice). There are endless legal, or at least 100% unprovable, ways of fucking with somebody. What kind of utter moron would be dumb enough to tell the guy the truth to his face?

    13. Re: Shocking by FishTankX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this isn't about race more nationality.

    14. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty much this.

      It is surprising how many thinks that money by itself has a value. It doesn't, the value comes from the things you can buy from it.
      Say that I don't have any desires beyond somewhere to sleep and food for the day. My salary would still have to be significantly higher if I work in the US instead of in China.

    15. Re:Shocking by MartinSchou · · Score: 5, Informative

      So you're perfectly okay with one of the largest companies in the world engaging in salary gouging?

      We're not talking about salary in India vs salary in California - we're talking about salary in California vs salary in California. If they want to import workers from abroad, because there aren't enough qualified local workers, they need to pay the same salary to the imported workers as they would to local workers.

      That's not only decent behaviour - it's the law. People like yourself - well, you're only going to ruin the game for yourself down the road, and sadly you seem unable to understand this.

    16. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      de Icaza could have developed something better than both Java or .NET. I think he just got tired of being poor and latched on to the project that he could dominate. There were already open source implementations of Java. .NET was and still is Microsoft's baby.

    17. Re: Shocking by fatboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I think this isn't about race more nationality.

      It's a good thing for Oracle that the Civil Rights Act 1964 allows you to discriminate based on National Origin. Oh, wait! Doh!

      --
      --fatboy
    18. Re:Shocking by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, Larry Ellison has been a dick for as long as I've been aware of his existence, and probably a lot longer than that.

      I'm reminded of an exchange between F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway.

      Ellison is no different than any other Type-A asshole, he just has more money. Arguably his biggest flaw is that he loves to flaunt what he has while being a huge dick while giving interviews to the press, so we can't help but want to punch him in the face.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    19. Re:Shocking by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In contrast, in many Asian countries, it are the western ex-pats that are asked by their employer to move that get payed more than the local staff. And on top of that extra pay, they often get housing allowance, schooling allowance for their children, and other benefits local employees do not get. These salaries are not only higher than what locals get, they're also higher than what they'd get back home. The justification is that these people are exceptionally good at what they do, and are worth their money, and that the company needs this foreign talent. So they receive the extra cash and benefits as incentive to move.

      Now of course it's more common that people move from high-paying countries to low-paying countries, however it's quite reasonable for that Indian employee to not only get offered a salary at least as much as what the US locals get, but also other allowances. Indeed that $50k will be a lot more than he gets in India, though cost of living in the US are far higher as well. It may very well be that at say $20k in India he can have a higher standard of living (big house, car, various domestic staff such as a butler, gardener and a maid) than he can have at this $50k in the US.

      The guy is considered so good, they want to move him to the other side of the world. That generally means he's at least as good as, if not better than, the top performers of his US counterparts. Otherwise a company would not normally bother with the efforts of moving an employee.

    20. Re:Shocking by Barsteward · · Score: 2

      If they get away with it then they'll do it a lot more and more jobs will be lost to cheaper imports.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    21. Re:Shocking by shaitand · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, now find a company that doesn't pay them less. Companies just have to list the position somewhere, interview a few obviously unqualified people, and then when they "fail to hire" someone in the US they hire the H1-B at the reduced rate.

    22. Re:Shocking by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you suggesting that the 60k/yr Americans working at the California office are only getting H1-B or L1-B visa level salaries? No. This has nothing to do with violating visa pay rates. This has to do with discrimination: paying someone less than someone else for the same work simply because of the color of their skin. It also has to do with being spiteful, spoiled brats: to whit, firing an employee for pointing out illegal or unethical behaviour.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    23. Re:Shocking by MikeBabcock · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was on that page myself ... how on earth is this even news to people who've followed Oracle? The whole company appears to be one big jerk.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    24. Re:Shocking by shaitand · · Score: 0

      "The guy is considered so good, they want to move him to the other side of the world. That generally means he's at least as good as, if not better than, the top performers of his US counterparts."

      That's exactly why companies move a guy from the US to Asia. It is rarely why they move a guy from India to the US. The US imports staff from India so they can pay them less than US counterparts.

    25. Re:Shocking by Kjella · · Score: 2

      You're surrised that one HR person in a huge company is horribly incompetent and stupid? Even if he's let go they'll probably do no more that confirm his dates of employment and he'll soon work for another company. Most companies just want to get rid of the lemon quietly without causing a lawsuit.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    26. Re:Shocking by shaitand · · Score: 4, Informative

      They didn't tell the guy to his face. They told the hiring manager, the hiring manager refused, so they canned the hiring manager who clearly was going to be a problem going forward.

      I'm not sure why people are acting surprised. Undercutting the local market is the entire reason US tech companies import people from India just like it's the entire reason they export functions to India. You didn't actually believe there is any sort of shortage of talented labor? Only in the sense that local labor wants more money than companies like Oracle would care to be paying therefore they want a cheaper pool of labor.

    27. Re:Shocking by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that using Java leveraged all the professional Java developers already out there.

      The C# pool is substantially shallower.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    28. Re:Shocking by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that he deserves to be paid *more* than his local counterparts as well.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    29. Re:Shocking by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Which, afaik, is typically about domestic helpers and similar low-skilled jobs.

      In Hong Kong, there is a population of about 400,000 helpers (>90% female), about half Philipino, half Indonesian, and a few from other countries such as Sri Lanka and Nepal (on a population of about 7 mln total). They are paid low wages indeed, and no local would want to do the job. They have a special minimum wage that's about 1/3 of the regular minimum wage, have to live with the employer (so no housing and food expenses), and have other special rules and regulation. Salary while low for local standards is really good compared what they get back home, which is why they want to move.

      Other imported labour gets at least the same salaries as local staff. That are typically higher educated people, who are pretty well off at home already, and have not much incentive to move. They will only move if they can indeed improve their already good living conditions significantly. Also such labour can only be imported if the employer can show they have a special skill that is not available locally. No doubt the Indian this story is about falls in this upper class.

    30. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt that. Any Java developer can develop in C# too, unless they're braindead (a reasonable fear for Java developers). There's really not much C# can't do that Java can. And there's actually quite a bit that C# can do that Java can't. Case in point: UInt64 foo = 0x123456789abcdef0;

    31. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mono works on Android and, in my experience, the dev times are much faster than using the built-in APIs. Combine with Monogame, which took the place of XNA and has Microsoft's full support, and you have a really viable (though not perfect) cross-platform gaming solution. If you want to give it a try, I recommend Xamarin studio.

      http://xamarin.com/android

      Xamarin has been endorsed by Microsoft as a legal and legitimate cross-platform c# vendor for a while now. Microsoft may still be evil, but whoever is running their C# ecosystem is yet untainted. *fingers crossed*

    32. Re:Shocking by EngineeringStudent · · Score: 2

      Examine the H1b visa process. It makes HR become customized to "virtual slavery" and devaluing workers. I would be surprised if all companies who use the H1b visa as aggressively as google/microsoft/cisco/etc... are not as discriminatory. You are talking about the people who authored the engineering price fixing that is currently under class-action lawsuit. If they are going to price-fix the wages of "white American counterparts" then it is unsurprising that they also are wage fixing their Indian counterparts.

      http://www.lieffcabraser.com/Case-Center/Apple-Google-Silicon-Valley-No-Cold-Calling-Anti-Poaching-Lawsuit.shtml

    33. Re:Shocking by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You and the poster above you are very, very naive about the role of "Westerners" (really just bai ren, white people, Latinos not so much because Asians think they're like the diaosi of Westerners) in East Asian businesses, especially mainland Chinese. It's often not about talent at all, it's about the company's image. Having a 'white guy' on your staff is 'impressive', so much so that there are 'rent a white guy' services in China for business affairs where you want to impress but don't want a full time 'white guy' just hanging around on the payroll.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    34. Re:Shocking by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not about race, it's about money.

      It's about race (ethnicity really) being used as a basis to pay someone less money. The motivation might be to save money, but so what? The practice is, and ought to be, illegal.

    35. Re:Shocking by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2

      If proven true in court, this justifies a boycott of Oracle products by all us techies until Oracle produce an open salary audit proving no racial differentials between staff at the same locations. The allegation if true is disgraceful

      Hmmmm....Interesting concept. An open salary audit. Let me see. So what you are saying is that all employees for a given job description are equal. Is that correct?

      Well, I guess that you would have to make sure that there are measureable metrics to ensure that employee A is doing the same and equal job of employees D, B, F, E, T, C.

      Look, what was said, or practiced, is wrong on all fronts. As an employer and a one time employee, it sucks, but it happens all the time. I know for a fact that recruiters look to the mid-west to bring employees to the east/west coast because they have a lesser expectation for salary. Does that make them racist?

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    36. Re:Shocking by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      I live on the Gulf coast. If I were offered a job on the West coast they would need to nearly double my current salary for me to maintain my current standard of living.
      And they didn't just say no we can't offer that much...they fired the guy's boss for even suggesting he be paid that much!

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    37. Re:Shocking by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Lol. Find me one company in the entire world that pays its Indian in India employees as much as its California ones?

      Now, when someone is already working for for you for far far less, and you are paying for one of them and his family to move to America, why would you expect them to pay him as much as the other employees, already there. Assuming, this guy did not really really want to stay in India, he would obviously of accepted $50K, which is probably already a huge raise.

      I worked for a company that paid vastly different wages to its California, Detroit and Pittsburgh employees. They liked to move employees from Detroit to other offices instead of hiring locally because they would get them for cheaper. Double whammy on that as well, as the Detroit employees had much lower salaries, and I got the impression they would work for peanuts for the reward of getting the hell out of Detroit.

      But this means that the company was not hiring people locally, and was getting cheap labor from the 3rd world (Detroit), driving everyone's salaries down. When that pool dried up they started bulk off-shoring jobs, rather than hire people at fair wages. That was my cue to get the hell out of there.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    38. Re:Shocking by david672orford · · Score: 4, Informative

      This has to do with discrimination: paying someone less than someone else for the same work simply because of the color of their skin.

      I think it probably had more to do with the fact that wages are generally a lot lower in India. This improved Oracle's bargaining position in wage negotiations. If they had offered someone already in the US less then the going rate, he would likely refuse in the hope of getting a better offer. But if this employee refused their offer, he would remain in India and get much less than their lowball offer. Is this unfair, exploitive, and illegal? Of course it is. But the decision to exploit him may have had more to do with his poor bargaining position than his skin color.

    39. Re:Shocking by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      This has to do with discrimination: paying someone less than someone else for the same work simply because of the color of their skin.

      Unproved assumption. The same fallacy often occurs, when non-caucasian people are discriminated against. I bet the the same thing would have happened, if the employee would have come from a Eastern European country. It's not about race, it's about money.

      Or importing employees from Detroit. Companies always exploit when they can. Even when they are really not gaining much.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    40. Re:Shocking by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      why would you expect them to pay him as much as the other employees, already there
      Because the cost of living at the place he locating to is in no way compareable too the place he is comming from?
      Because he is doing the same work as other employees already there?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    41. Re:Shocking by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      You're surprised that one HR person in a huge company is horribly incompetent and stupid?

      I would be more surprised if one HR person in a huge company was not horribly incompetent and stupid.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    42. Re:Shocking by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's about race (ethnicity really) being used as a basis to pay someone less money.

      Nationality. Not race or ethnicity. There's zero reason to think that an Indian-American would have been offered a lower salary.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    43. Re:Shocking by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      What surprizes me is that the sales guy in India needs to come to the U.S.? Also, 60K is chump change for sales. All this nonsense combined with so much drum beating has me wondering, "why?"

    44. Re:Shocking by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      They are all discriminatory. Companies do not even bother trying to hide it anymore.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    45. Re: Shocking by arth1 · · Score: 2

      I think this isn't about race more nationality.

      Nationalism isn't any better than racism.

    46. Re:Shocking by johanw · · Score: 0

      An IT company discriminating Indians! I will recommend all their products to anyone from now on. IT companies should refuse to hire Indians.

    47. Re:Shocking by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm sure they could have gotten somebody locally for $60k if they wanted to. The reason they are even bringing this guy in is because they want to pay less money.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    48. Re:Shocking by johanw · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter much now, with dot42 you can program in C# for Android. And with Delphi XE you can even do it in Pascal.

    49. Re:Shocking by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      Because that is the law. Paying someone on a H1-B or L1-B visa less than the US rate is prohibited.

      I've said this before, but apparently some people still don't get it. The employers still determine both the job title and qualifications.

      Here's how you abuse work visas. First, you decide what qualifications you want. Ask for the moon. Ask for the sun and stars. List every possible piece of software or technology the position might use. Ask for 15-20 years experience or a post graduate degree for a junior position. It works well if you vaguely copy your senior grade requirements to the junior grade position. Next, determine what you want to pay. Take the compensation of the employee position you're *actually* trying to fill and subtract the cost of the H1-B visa (typically $10,000). That's your maximum salary. Everything below that is profit. It's ideal if the difference in salary between junior and senior is greater than this amount. Now, post the position with the minimum possible wage that you can reasonably get away with. Leave the posting up for six months, or how ever long it takes to establish that nobody can meet the "requirements" in the US. You can interview anybody who applies, of course, and if anybody talented is dumb enough to accept such an offer then you save the cost of the visa, too!

      When nobody applies, you contact your foreign contractor. They're getting a slice of that salary, generally, so you can bet they'll find lots of candidates. I'm certain those contractors will supply resumes listing all the qualifications you might need... whether or not they're actually accurate!

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    50. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The guy is considered so good, they want to move him to the other side of the world. That generally means he's at least as good as, if not better than, the top performers of his US counterparts. Otherwise a company would not normally bother with the efforts of moving an employee."

      I disagree. In this case Oracle is probably hiring him for Oracle Services.. They need a warm body that they can bill at $250/hr. That he can complete the assigned project in a competent way is optional.

    51. Re:Shocking by operagost · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe that a high-performing salesperson would only be paid $50K, or even $60, especially in California. I'm sure that's his base salary, to which his commission will be added. Regardless, the fact that Oracle management openly tried to squeeze an extra dime out of the budget based on the man's country of origin is despicable.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    52. Re:Shocking by Xest · · Score: 1

      Wow, who is the ignorant one? You're implying everyone in India is of a different race which is wrong. In defending the earlier comment you're implying that anyone from India has a different skin colour to someone from America. You're implying there's no such thing as say, a white-caucasian person with Indian nationality.

      I don't think you meant to, but the person you're responding to is right and you're wrong, there's no evidence this has anything to do with race and that it is more about what they can get away with paying someone from a country with much lower average levels of wage - their race and skin colour have absolutely nothing to do with that.

      Referring to him as Indian tells us nothing about his race, his colour, or his ethnicity, it merely tells us his nationality, so anything else you've projected onto the victim in question is merely evidence of your own pre-existing bias about what it means to be Indian.

      It's still completely wrong, it's still completely unacceptable but don't try and play the racial defender whilst making grossly ignorant remarks that imply everyone from India is of a certain skin colour or whatever.

      No one is disputing that what was said was unacceptable, but whoever made this about race is making something up that simply is not present in the story.

    53. Re:Shocking by EngineeringStudent · · Score: 1

      Firing based on pointing out illegal or unethical behavior is called "retaliation" and has substantial penalties associated with the lawsuits. Being unethical to someone who calls you to be ethical - that is a higher-order unethical behavior.

    54. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be because your cost of living will be substantially different. The *reason* that the indians in india are paid less is not because they're indian, it's because they're in india, where it's cheap to live, and where with that given wage, they will have significant disposable income. By moving them to California, you raise their living costs, and have to raise their wage to match.

      You'll note that it's extremely common practice in international companies to not have a pay rate, but a pay grade. How this pay grade maps onto an actual pay rate will vary depending on the office that they're placed in.

      The thing that surprises me here is that Oracle didn't simply tell him "you're on pay grade D, that means when you move to california, you get $53,384".

    55. Re:Shocking by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So if "going rate" is 60k and I offer someone 50k, that's discriminatory? That happens All. The. Time. Except it happens with "locals" - it's called negotiating from a position of power. Employers think they've got a position of power (ie something the interviewee wants) and use it. How is this any different?

      Why would I ever offer an Indian a job, then? What I understand here is that this is a big mess because the fucking H1B worker didn't get preferential treatment?!

      That's idiotic.

      I hate Oracle on numerous grounds, but I'm on their side on this one.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    56. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Cripes! Enough with the mono pimping already!

      Microsoft hasn't gone ape over mono because mono simply hasn't gained enough traction to care. But you keep on selling mono and see how it turns out when the 'real world' comes to depend on it.

      Endorsed by Microsoft my ass...

    57. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're describing is the process for getting an already existing H1B holder a green card, not the process for getting an H1B worker in the first place. Getting H1B workers does not require that you advertise the job to americans for a minimum period, it simply requires that you pay them the same as (or more than) the other people in the same job. You may not subtract $10,000 for the green card, you instead must simply list the pay rate of your other employees at the same level in the organisation, on a legal document, and if audited prove that this is the actual correct figure. The reality is that H1B workers at tech companies actually tend to get significantly over the average rate, simply because they have to be good for the tech company to justify paying for them to get over to the US in the first place, and thus need to be compensated by a pretty large amount.

    58. Re:Shocking by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 5, Informative

      What surprizes me is that the sales guy in India needs to come to the U.S.? Also, 60K is chump change for sales. All this nonsense combined with so much drum beating has me wondering, "why?"

      The subtext not mentioned in either the summary or the article is that Oracle's overseas hiring policy is a money-saver, which goes completely against the spirit and letter of the H1B visa legislation. The policy is that visas should be granted where skilled staff fill a skills gap in the USA, not because US staff are too expensive. There have been complaints that big companies have been flouting this, and if this guy wins his case, Oracle will end up with a judgement that effectively states that they're breaking immigration laws. That's the big story....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    59. Re:Shocking by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      You're implying everyone in India is of a different race which is wrong.

      No, I pointed out that ethnicity is a better description. Another responder said nationality, which I'll modify to national origin (IIRC that's the term used in the law). It doesn't matter though, because the anti-discrimination laws cover everything that's been mentioned here.

      Moreover, "you're implying that anyone from India has a different skin colour to someone from America" makes no sense, because race is not necessarily a matter of skin color. Merriam-Webster defines race as "a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to the same stock", or "a class or kind of people unified by shared interests, habits, or characteristics", or "a category of humankind that shares certain distinctive physical traits". Nothing says that racial categories are limited to black, white, Asian, whatever. You can say "the Indian race", or the "the Slavic race" or even the "blonde haired race". The word race is very general and not limited to the handful of categories that people usually use.

    60. Re:Shocking by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm....Interesting concept. An open salary audit. Let me see. So what you are saying is that all employees for a given job description are equal. Is that correct?

      Certainly not -- wages should be on individual merit. The goal of an audit would be to identify any discriminatory practices that didn't reflect individual performance. If the majority of immigrant workers of a particular class are getting less than the majority of US-born workers of the same class, then it is likely that this is not on grounds of individual merit, but on discriminatory grounds.

      As has often been said: if these guys are good enough for you to bring over, if they deserve an H1B visa, surely they're worth paying? If they're not good enough to merit the full salary, why not hire someone who is?

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    61. Re:Shocking by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Unity is powered by Mono and is quickly becoming one of the most popular game engines available. If that's not traction, I don't know what is.

    62. Re:Shocking by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      60k may or may not be good, depending on the bonus structure.

    63. Re:Shocking by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Xamarin has been endorsed by Microsoft as a legal and legitimate cross-platform c# vendor for a while now. Microsoft may still be evil, but whoever is running their C# ecosystem is yet untainted. *fingers crossed*

      Enlightened self-interest. C# is closely bound to the .NET framework, which was (until the move to Metro) the future of the Windows architecture. It was in their interests to get guys interested in developing C# one way or the other, even though it's just "more of the same" when taken as a language outside of the native .NET framework

      .

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    64. Re:Shocking by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      The guy is considered so good, they want to move him to the other side of the world. That generally means he's at least as good as, if not better than, the top performers of his US counterparts. Otherwise a company would not normally bother with the efforts of moving an employee.

      The last time I moved for a new position, my new employer spent over $20k just in my relocation expenses, and I only moved about 300 miles.

      If this guy is so good, why would Oracle try to low-ball him like this? His boss wants to offer him a position with a $60,000 salary that would require him to relocate half-way around the world, and his bosses come back wanting to low-ball the guy by $10k? Assuming the employee has a spouse and maybe a kid or two, they would spend more than this on plane tickets and immigration paperwork, for crying out loud! Oracle, are you really that stupid? This is penny ante thinking!

    65. Re: Shocking by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      I think this isn't about race more nationality.

      Nationality is an aspect of race, at least in UK law. US may be different but we do nominally speak the same language

    66. Re:Shocking by phorm · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure it's a performance thing. A lot of countries in Asian have employees putting in some fairly insane work hours compared to their western counterparts, and you'd be hard-pressed to convince me that Samsung employees in N America are harder working than those in Korea.

      However, it seems to almost a prestige thing. Additionally, it's probably harder in many cases to move somebody from N America to Korea/China/Japan than vise-versa (comparatively more people in those countries at least speak *some* English and transition easier).

    67. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to stiff an employee and fire him if he complains? ... Outright admit that you are engaging in discrimination based on racial/ethnic/national origin, when there are so many other ways to massage something as potentially ambiguous as salary level, 'fit with the company', and so on?

      The person who "outright admitted it" was the same person that was fired. I don't see any e-mails from the higher manager who insisted on $50K instead of $60K. As you say, that was a perfectly dependable position. It was the lower manager who said that decision could only be illegal. He was wrong. He's not the legal department. And making that claim in email makes you wonder if he was drunk on his job. He's certainly not qualified for what he was doing.

      In short, there's one more guy than you think and he was the utter moron.

    68. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here.

      In all honesty, the story makes no sense. We have to keep in mind that we are hearing it from the perspective of a disgruntled employee who has been fired. This kinda sounds like that hoax of the atheist teacher who suspended a student because he wished her "Merry Christmas". It is obviously false but people simply can't resist believing in it because it touches a raw nerve.

    69. Re:Shocking by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      Oracle may be (" ...one the more reputable companies..."). Corporations are by design unaccountable, hierarchical, not democratic. So they can do whatever their structure can get away with, and everyone is supposed to sit back and allow the process of capital maximization all the room it wants. It's not even that the ends justify the means, it's that the means are justified by the unquestionable right to lean towards the end, and you have no right to even ask what that end might be. Put another way, it's evil.

    70. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I work for Microsoft on an H1. I get paid on exactly the same scale as other developers, by they white, Chinese, Indian, citizen, non-citizen, etc.. I assume it's the same at most other big name tech companies; I'd be shocked if Google or Amazon or Facebook or Apple were different. My impression was that even the IT staffing companies that are notorious for abusing H1 labour do so by making working conditions such that few US citizens want to work there, but paying them the same rate for the same work if they do. This is shocking because not only is it disgusting, it's also blatantly illegal and Oracle is big enough that you'd think they would have policies that systematically prevent this. Honestly, the only way I can imagine this going down is that the actual argument was about whether the transferred employee should get promoted to a particular level or not, with one party claiming that until they proved they could sell effectively to US customers the advance wasn't justified. But the lawsuit clearly claims that isn't what happened, but that the discrimination was much more blatant and systematic.

      (I'm not going to address issues of systematically reducing wages by importing labour, or of wages of offshore labour relative to US labour since I think they're not particularly relevant to this case.)

    71. Re:Shocking by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Xamarin has been endorsed by Microsoft as a legal and legitimate cross-platform c# vendor for a while now. Microsoft may still be evil, but whoever is running their C# ecosystem is yet untainted. *fingers crossed*

      It's the same reason Google gave away Android. Because the only way they could compete was to give it away (to take away from iOS dominance).

      C# on mobile is completely under-represented, so Microsoft would like it to be used for more than just "Windows development". Of course, their recent moves with discontinuing XNA and all that...

      Of course, an issue is what happens when it takes off - Google has this problem now where Android is dominant, and they're losing control of it, leading to have to close-source a lot of the applications that make Android, well, Android.

    72. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Sarcasm]

    73. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The H1B visa is there to fill the skill gap in the USA the skill gap is "ability to work for a lower salary and take s**t from your bosses without trying to get another job at a competitor".

      And Oracle will be able to "demonstrate" that this either didn't happen, or was an isolated instance and the responsible person was already chastised, or that this price is the "normal price" for this kind of job, and that the remark was not racist but just a statement of fact that an Indian guy getting 60K in the US is better off than he would be in India with what ever he got before (the fact that this is probably not true due to the much higher cost of living in California doesn't change anything an manager is entitled to his or her opinion even if they are false...)

      so move over, nothing to see (or more precisely nothing you really want to see....)

    74. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or interview people who may be qualified, but are falsely deemed unqualified when they state their asking salary.

    75. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      time for the old chestnut:
      Q: what does ORACLE stand for?
      A: One Raging Asshole Called Larry Ellison

    76. Re:Shocking by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Yes, no one ever talked about The Java Trap as a problem Free Software...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    77. Re:Shocking by sabri · · Score: 1

      If this guy is so good, why would Oracle try to low-ball him like this?

      You have obviously never worked for a large company. Oracle did not try to low-ball him. Some shitty middle-management idiot backed by an HR-chick who likes to stay friends with those in power low-balled him.

      If you read the article, you'll see that the Indian employee's manager tried to negotiate him a decent salary, on behalf of Oracle. It was that manager's director who decided otherwise. Had that manager gone one step higher, it might as well have turned out otherwise. Keep in mind that there are many layers of management in a company like Oracle, and that even a title like "VP" will most like be 5 or 6 steps away from the board-room.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    78. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who promote this sort of thing don't generally have that problem. Wait until we start outsourcing managers and CEOs. Then these guys would be singing a different tune.

    79. Re:Shocking by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's irrelevant. The debate here is about open-source adoption of Mono/.NET. The allegation is that, if the open-source community were to adopt it, build it into Linux, etc., then Microsoft would sue for patent infringement, exactly like they did with Android and the FAT patents (and some others I believe).

      Unity3D is irrelevant: it's a commercial, proprietary product. It can't be built into any Linux distros or other open-source product, because it's proprietary, and has licensing fees. MS can't sue anyone except the owners of Unity3D (Unity Technologies).

    80. Re:Shocking by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      In other words, the lesser of two evils is still evil.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    81. Re:Shocking by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, the sheer incompetence to admit that outright is just insane.
      You know HR is gearing up for monthly non-Discrimination training classes there after this.

    82. Re:Shocking by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      60K is probably the base salary, before commissions.

      It's nothing new - most sales positions are built that way.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    83. Re:Shocking by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      See, here is the thing you maybe haven't noticed. Only white people seem capable of building prosperous, safe, beautiful places with good public order, high trust, and relatively little corruption.

      The thing you obviously haven't noticed is that the US, run by white people, is even more corrupt than Mexico, and Russia (run by white people) is also extremely corrupt. Neither of these countries is particularly safe, and the idea of "high trust" is a joke. (I'll also add that various all-white eastern European countries, such as Romania and Greece, aren't exactly known for low corruption either, and Italy has some extreme problems with corruption too.) By contrast, South Korea and Japan are extremely prosperous, safe, beautiful, have far better public order and trust than the US and Russia, and have relatively low corruption.

      I'll grant you that certain select groups of white people definitely seem to have excelled in building very nice, prosperous societies, namely the Scandinavians. (The Germans seem to be doing quite well these days too.) But there's a lot of other groups and nationalities of white people out there, and lots of them have made a complete mess of things, and the Americans are probably at the top of that list.

    84. Re: Shocking by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      The US 1964 Civil Rights Act includes "National Origin" as a protected category.

      (...historically, we've had a bit of a problem with discrimination based on that. See also the Irish.)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    85. Re:Shocking by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Does your cost-of-living comparison analysis take into account the difference in house insurance costs? Insuring a house on the Gulf Coast (esp. MS, LA, and AL) became insanely expensive after Hurricane Katrina; it's so bad that there's been very little rebuilding in the Gulfport area near the coast, because no one will insure it. This of course has had the obvious effect of depressing house prices, as no one wants to buy a house there with such high insurance prices.

    86. Re:Shocking by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      I know for a fact that recruiters look to the mid-west to bring employees to the east/west coast because they have a lesser expectation for salary. Does that make them racist?

      If they bring in corn-fed white boyz from Nebraska and pay them bottom-tier rates, no discrimination.
      If they bring in some Sioux from Pine Ridge and pay them bottom-tier wages, no discrimination.
      But if they also say they're paying them low because Indians don't need it, then yes, _legal_ discrimination has occurred. OTOH, if they say it's because South Dakotans don't need the money, then no discrimination again.

    87. Re:Shocking by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Look, what was said, or practiced, is wrong on all fronts. As an employer and a one time employee, it sucks, but it happens all the time. I know for a fact that recruiters look to the mid-west to bring employees to the east/west coast because they have a lesser expectation for salary. Does that make them racist?

      First off, salaries should be different, even within the same job description - the more skilled and the go-getters should make more than the slackers and not-so-skilled.

      However, it's what was said and its commonly-derived meaning that came shining through as damning, not the salary itself. If the dumbass manager had followed your understanding of it and said "...the $50k salary is in line with the new guy's expectations, so that's all he gets", then he'd be in the clear HR-wise, and no one would/could say so much as 'boo' about it.

      But no... the dumbass specifically called out what is clearly a legally protected category: National Origin.

      This means Oracle might be on the hook for an EEOC lawsuit that could cost up to multiple times the Indian dude's salary, and perhaps a big enough fine to require hundreds of mid-sized RAC sales just to catch up on revenue. It also (if Oracle is smart) means that the dipshit who allegedly said it gets fired so hard that the back of his pants bear scuff-marks from being tossed onto the street.

      Because of the potential for massive lawsuits, big companies go way the hell out of their way to train their underlings about how to avoid shit like this.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    88. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is a salesman in any way fitting of the H1B program in the first place? When did salesman become a specialty occupation?

    89. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect if Google had chosen Mono instead of Java, Microsoft would have sued the fuck out of Google exactly like Oracle did. Hell, Microsoft is shaking down Android OEMs over FAT patents.

      So that mistrust was not wrong, Oracle and Microsoft both suck and their product offerings reflect that.

      From Wikipedia:

      "In August 2010, a Microsoft spokesman, Tom Hanrahan of Microsoft’s Open Source Technology Centre, stated, in reference to the lawsuit filed by Oracle against Google over Android's use of Java, that "The type of action Oracle is taking against Google over Java is not going to happen. If a .NET port to Android was through Mono it would fall under the Microsoft Community Promise Agreement.""

      So no, I don't think they would have. Actually I think they would have loved this because this would have meant a huge number of developers writing framework code that could be easily recompiled for the Windows platform be it desktop or tablet.

    90. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      long foo = 0x123456789abcdef0;

      It's not unsigned, but your example didn't go quite high enough for that to mater yet. :)

    91. Re:Shocking by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      If this guy is so good, why would Oracle try to low-ball him like this?

      You have obviously never worked for a large company. Oracle did not try to low-ball him. Some shitty middle-management idiot backed by an HR-chick who likes to stay friends with those in power low-balled him.

      If you read the article, you'll see that the Indian employee's manager tried to negotiate him a decent salary, on behalf of Oracle. It was that manager's director who decided otherwise. Had that manager gone one step higher, it might as well have turned out otherwise. Keep in mind that there are many layers of management in a company like Oracle, and that even a title like "VP" will most like be 5 or 6 steps away from the board-room.

      I understand that "Oracle" didn't try to low-ball him, it was someone with that particular mental defect who thinks that winning a negotiation means they are powerful. If you're a manager with fiscal authority (in a company of any size) and you give up a talented employee for $10k, you are a doofus. Doing it while discriminating is strike #2, and getting caught is #3.

    92. Re:Shocking by celle · · Score: 1

      "I know for a fact that recruiters look to the mid-west to bring employees to the east/west coast because they have a lesser expectation for salary. Does that make them racist?"

            That's because most people in the mid-west don't know what it costs to live on the coasts. It's just recruiters taking advantage of the naivete of mid-westerners.

    93. Re:Shocking by Xest · · Score: 1

      The person the guy you responded to spoke specifically about skin colour, he spoke specifically about race. The person you responded to pointed out correctly that there was no evidence for that, you told that person they were wrong, therefore I can only assume you're agreeing with the original post that it's about race and skin colour. If you don't agree with that then that's fine, but why did you post in defence of it?

      Fundamentally no one's disagreeing that what happened is wrong, but there's absolutely no evidence it's about race or skin colour as one guy further up the thread - a guy it appears you're agreeing with from the content and positioning of your post - claimed.

    94. Re:Shocking by celle · · Score: 1

      "I know for a fact that recruiters look to the mid-west to bring employees to the east/west coast because they have a lesser expectation for salary. Does that make them racist?"

            Mid-westerners get blinded by what looks like a good income that's triple or more than what they get locally. But still buys less on the coasts than local incomes locally(a breadbox three times the cost is still a breadbox). They find out what it's like to live on the coasts and the minute they want a family they move back to the mid-west.

    95. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a bit naive sir. The only shocking thing here is that they actually said that. My experience with salary discussions like that there aren't explanations given. Its too easy to get sued if you do.

    96. Re: Shocking by krups+gusto · · Score: 1

      Actually it is better. There are lots of rights/benefits we offer to people in the same country that we don't offer to people who aren't from this country. And in exchange for those right/benefits we do things like pay taxes, various civic duties, subject ourselves to a set of laws, or even get drafted into military service. Maybe someday there won't be borders - but we're a long way from that.

    97. Re:Shocking by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

      It's easy to avoid breaking the law when the job requires a fluent Hindi speaker. The cost savings is just a nice side effect.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    98. Re:Shocking by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      What you're describing happens primarily with Western companies. If you see an American ex-pat you can pretty much guarantee he's working for an American company. And yes, they're sickeningly generous, but these are also upper management types we're talking about. These individuals don't comprise the typical workforce who are hired locally. And a big factor in why the pay packages are so generous is because the number of people willing to do this is small.

      Asian companies, however, are not nearly as generous. It varies quite a bit by company, but generally what gets offered is somewhat higher pay and that's about it. As far as Asian companies hiring foreigners, outside of top executives and major corporations, it's extremely rare for them to do the equivalent of an H1B for Westerners. So rare I don't think it happens at all.

      Companies in Asia do hire foreigners, and often times do hire merely for the clout of having a foreigner on staff but they hire from the local work force. This means foreigners already living in the country, often times having previously worked as an English teacher. It's common that they earn a hire income than locals, but it's not a given and the difference is usually marginal.

      Some countries there do have the equivalent of work visas but they're more restrictive than what we have here although the goal is the same; to cut costs. Unskilled labor typically comes from Southeast Asia and skilled labor from India. The rules for unskilled labor tend to be incredibly limiting and at times outright exploitative. Get in trouble with the law once and you're on the first plane back home.

      Servant staff, however, has it worse than anyone conditions often being outright exploitative. People do go to jail for abuses, but even your average person does things that would make any American blush. I knew someone who employed Filipina woman registered as a nanny, but using her has a maid, who slept in what was basically a big closet.

      I'm not saying things are roses in America and I'm not justifying anything. However, I find that people most critical of conditions here haven't seen what things are really like in the rest of the world.

    99. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, this issue is about nationality, immigration, and outsourcing/insourcing.... not race. A bunch of high-tech companies are firing Americans while simultaneously pushing for more foreign workers (who will work for less, as this story illustrates).

    100. Re: Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being concerned about the interests of my fellow countrymen, regardless of their race, is always a good thing. I guess you'd call that nationalism.

    101. Re:Shocking by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      It's easy to avoid breaking the law when the job requires a fluent Hindi speaker. The cost savings is just a nice side effect.

      I'm sure that Oracle, or rather their in house counsel, will justify the offer using some "logic" very similar to this. As a useful aside, the same sort of distinction can be used any time you need to sole source a purchase - we absolutely need this workstation because it's the only one available with a red case!

      The problem that I'm sure they'll find some way to avoid in court if it even gets that far (I smell a settlement), is that the H1-B program ostensibly requires that you pay the immigrant worker at least as much as a US citizen would get paid for the same position/duties. Given the Hindi requirement in your example, that means that this sales person should get paid at least the same as any other bilingual sales rep.

    102. Re:Shocking by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      At this point the whole "this guy, that guy" thing has become such a Gordian knot, that I'm not going to even try to unravel it (I left my sword at home). The two points I will stand by is that it doesn't really matter if you call it race, nation origin, ethnicity, whatever, because anti-discrimination law covers them all. The second point I'll stand by is that in English (I don't know about legalese) race is a very general term. You can define a race almost anyway you want. The notion that there are only some conveniently predefined and unalterably categorized races like black, white, etc., isn't true.

    103. Re:Shocking by EvilAlphonso · · Score: 1

      Remember... Oracle stands for: One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison

    104. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      long foo = 0x123456789abcdef0L;

      (okay, it's not unsigned..)

    105. Re:Shocking by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Occasionally Larry Ellison needs to sleep (he's not superman, he's only batman). While he's sleeping this opens a window for evil to creep in unnoticed.

    106. Re:Shocking by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That's salary before sales commission I suspect.

    107. Re: Shocking by oreiasecaman · · Score: 1

      Discriminate someone basing on this is still as shameful as racism IMO

      --
      This is a UDP joke, I don't care if you get it or not...
    108. Re:Shocking by 3dr · · Score: 1

      Response 1: It was sales, and that's what they do.

      Response 2: Even if he got $60K in California, it still means the transplant was getting screwed.

    109. Re:Shocking by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2

      Why does it have to be a racial difference? Why can't it just be the difference between hiring a guy from India, and hiring a guy locally? Employment negotiations are full of these kinds of discrepancies. One guy negotiates more than another guy. One guy knows the market better than another guy. There are all kinds of people that do the same exact work, yet get paid differently. The "Indian" may have referred to the guy coming from India, rather than locally. They know Indian demand to transfer to the US is high, so they offer a lower salary. Rather than a guy who is already in the US, who they must offer a higher salary to attract.

    110. Re:Shocking by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      If you live less than 20 miles from the Gulf perhaps. Anyplace you have a higher than average risk of a natural disaster you will pay for it. My rates didn't increase at all and I am ~70 miles inland.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    111. Re:Shocking by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      So if "going rate" is 60k and I offer someone 50k, that's discriminatory? That happens All. The. Time.

      And that is legal. It's like right to work states. It's legal to fire a person for no reason what so ever, but it's not legal to fire somebody for a reason that is illegal. Usually, it takes a serious fuck up to catch somebody on it, or a long history of suspicious behavior. This is a case of being a serious fuck up. The hiring manager asked for more money, they should have said "No, that's all we'll offer." but instead they said "No, we illegally discriminate." He complained that they were operating illegally and got fired for it. That itself is probably illegal. From what I read here, not only is it illegal to discriminate due to race, but it is illegal to us visas to save money on salary. Again, if they had said "That's all we have the budget for" they probably would have been fine, but instead said "No, we want to break the law." So it all comes down to some corporate manager blatently admitting they are breaking the law, which happens a lot as the type of person that breaks the law often doesn't care because they feel self entitled to be able to break the law.

    112. Re:Shocking by sabri · · Score: 1

      If you're a manager with fiscal authority (in a company of any size) and you give up a talented employee for $10k, you are a doofus. Doing it while discriminating is strike #2, and getting caught is #3.

      Amen to that, I could not agree more. That director is an idiot first class.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    113. Re:Shocking by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There are two problems that Oracle has brought on itself.

      First, if the guy was brought in on an H-1B, by law he must be making at least as much as normal US salary for his position.

      Second, in the US there are certain protected classes, and you cannot legally base employment decisions on them. (You can have requirements that may conflict with potential religious obligations, such as working on Saturdays or Sundays or working with pork and beef, but you cannot ask if somebody is Jewish or Muslim or any such.)

      Usually, these laws don't come up because companies are good at avoiding them. You can't have a policy against hiring people over 50, for example, so you can just not hire them (and possibly come up with other reasons). Interviewers had better not ask certain questions, but they can infer things from appearance, volunteered information, and answers to other questions. Almost never is somebody stupid enough to admit breaking the law, particularly people in large corporations.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    114. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, Microsoft is shaking down Android OEMs over FAT patents.

      And Google is doing nothing about it, despite a trove of patents of their own. It isnt just FAT patents, Android is a trojan horse for OEMs, being based on Linux it is subject to whatever Microsoft-claimed patents Linux allegedly infringes upon. Now I know many people here will claim these patents are invalid (despite not knowing what they are, which *immediately* demonstrates a clear bias and emotional response) and claim that they are secret because they are invalid but do you *really* think companies like Samsung and Google would just bow to Microsoft if they had even the slightest inkling that these patents might be invalid? Really? The companies that have gone up against the litigious behemoth that is Apple would run in fear of the decaying corpse of Microsoft?

    115. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The allegation is that, if the open-source community were to adopt it, build it into Linux, etc., then Microsoft would sue for patent infringement, exactly like they did with Android and the FAT patents (and some others I believe).

      No it is not like that at all. Mono is covered by the legally binding and enforceable Community Promise to allow free implementation of the covered specifications. The FAT specification is *not* subject to the same Community Promise.

      MS can't sue anyone except the owners of Unity3D (Unity Technologies).

      Wrong! Unity Technologies know that the Community Promise means that they *can't* be sued over it anyway which is why they used Mono.

    116. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oracle has a very similar agreement regarding the Open Document Format, the Open Document Patent Statement. It is there to allow for conforming implementations of the specification, kind of like Google's OHA for Android, if you want to be in the game you have to conform to the specification, which makes sense for cross-platform compatibility and compliance.

    117. Re:Shocking by akozakie · · Score: 1

      Not mentioned? To me the whole summary reads as if the suit claimed the following:
      "I wanted to hire a great guy for his skills, but the management made it clear that we're only reaching for foreign nations to lower costs and if I can't hire him at less-than-normal salary, I shouldn't bother - quality is not a real advantage here."

      On the other hand, isn't this typical for any hiring in a "cost aware" company that a manager has to push very hard to make it clear that "yes I NEED an expensive hire, because I have no use for the people I can hire for cheap"?

    118. Re:Shocking by turgid · · Score: 1

      Oracle should just have engaged an outsourcing company like Infosys, HCL or TATA if they wanted to pay Indian wages. They are experts at bending the work permit/visa rules.

    119. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nationality. Not race or ethnicity. There's zero reason to think that an Indian-American would have been offered a lower salary.

      You will find that in most countries, including the US, that discrimination based on nationality is a privilege reserved for the state. That is, it is taken to be the same as racism, as it ought to be, everywhere except when the state is discriminating against you entering or being permitted to work in the country. Once you get past the barrier of immigration discrimination, the law expects you to be treated the same as anyone else who is legally permitted to work in the country.

    120. Re:Shocking by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      Wages are NEVER on individual merit, unless your HR department is incompetent (given the generally-accepted definition of competency). The company's goal with setting wages is to pay each employee the minimum amount that will keep them happy. A star performer from the midwest or India (of any race) or anywhere else with a low cost of living probably has lower salary expectations than a mediocre performer from, say, California. The HR department is perfectly justified in coming up with a number to offer that they think will meet the individual's expectations - it's up to the individual to do their own research and decide if it is a fair wage or not. If it is fair to them, great. If it's not, then it's up to them to say "hey, I know other people in this position get paid $60k; I want that much too, plus I want relocation assistance and a bonus for uprooting myself and moving to a new country." This is called negotiation.

      This is why almost nobody will publicly list all their employees' salaries; it's very demoralizing to find out that the schmuck next to you who stinks at his job did a better job at negotiating and is being paid 10% more than you are, despite your superior performance.

      There are some exceptions to this rule; the idea is that the tradeoff of paying their employees more (to match both their expectations and their performance) might buy additional loyalty or satisfaction. I have no idea if this has been proven, but I doubt it. It probably just makes some ethically-minded executive feel better about the whole process. Meanwhile, the vast majority of executives know that ethics has no place in an efficient workplace.

      (My university, which is a public state university, also published its employee salaries, as part of a state law requiring every agency to publish employee salaries for all state jobs. This was very helpful to the other universities so they could find the best and brightest, and offer a 10% raise to move.)

    121. Re:Shocking by drew_eckhardt · · Score: 1

      Sales is often half commission. IOW, a sales person with a $60K base salary is expected to make $120K On Target Earnings.

    122. Re:Shocking by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      You will find that in most countries, including the US, that discrimination based on nationality is a privilege reserved for the state. That is, it is taken to be the same as racism, as it ought to be, everywhere except when the state is discriminating against you entering or being permitted to work in the country. Once you get past the barrier of immigration discrimination, the law expects you to be treated the same as anyone else who is legally permitted to work in the country.

      Regardless of the legality, my post was in reply to someone who was making unfounded claims of racism.

      There are some pretty good reasons why so many people just stop paying attention to those who jump to racism to explain any injustice.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    123. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really don't need to be justified to boycott a product/company. You can do it whenever you really want.

      Unless the product/company is Israeli. Then it needs to be reported to the Department of Commerce.

    124. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The allegation if true is disgraceful
      The allegation if true is unlawful
      FTFY

    125. Re: Shocking by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Just so you'd know non-citizens can get drafted into military service in US (and have to register for selective service because of it). They also pay taxes etc.

      Come to think of it, about the only duty that citizens have that non-citizens do not around here is serving on a jury (and citizens tend to shy away from it even so). As far as rights & benefits, at least inside the country, the only one I can think of is the right to vote and be elected, and the right to freely enter the country.

    126. Re:Shocking by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Microsoft hasn't gone ape over mono because mono simply hasn't gained enough traction to care. But you keep on selling mono and see how it turns out when the 'real world' comes to depend on it.

      It turned out like this. So, your point was?..

    127. Re:Shocking by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The allegation is that, if the open-source community were to adopt it, build it into Linux, etc., then Microsoft would sue for patent infringement, exactly like they did with Android and the FAT patents (and some others I believe).

      Microsoft is now effectively directly sponsoring Mono by offering "special pricing" to MSDN subscribers. I think we can consider this allegation dead in the water at this point. The reasons are also fairly obvious: when it comes to tablets and phones, MS needs Xamarin more than Xamarin needs MS at this point. Xamarin in wide use means a large body of code running on iOS and Android today that can be readily ported to Win8 & WP8.

    128. Re:Shocking by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple. Probably more, these are the ones for which I have either first-hand experience, or word of mouth from people with such experience whom I trust.

    129. Re:Shocking by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      (Disclosure: I am an H1B employee)

      This is different because H1B inherently creates a power imbalance that does not exist with a local employee. In other words, given all the same qualifications, work experience etc, the very nature of H1B as a gateway to green card & citizenship is basically a bargaining chip in and of itself.

      You should not ever offer a job to a foreigner if you can hire a local that can do the same thing. The whole point of the H1B program is that you go looking for foreign labor after you have exhausted the local worker pool. If you let people hire abroad at will and for any wage they can bargain for, you're going to basically drive down the entire US job market down to Indian/Chinese salary levels.

    130. Re:Shocking by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I would be surprised if all companies who use the H1b visa as aggressively as google/microsoft/cisco/etc... are not as discriminatory.

      They are not. I can't say for Cisco as I have no contacts there, but I know from personal experience (being an H1B working for MS) that they're not, and I know from my friends in Google that they also don't skimp on salary. Nor on other things: the hiring bonuses are just as generous as for locals, too, and I can't even imagine what the bill for my relocation looked like.

      I'm actually surprised that Oracle is one of the companies who abuse this. I would expect it from Tata and their ilk, but not from a tech company. This really doesn't bode well for how they treat their employees in general.

    131. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . What kind of utter moron would be dumb enough to tell the guy the truth to his face?

      An indian?

    132. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google picked the original Java though, over mickeysofts offerings. Google went with Java because Sun was sane and there was no problem between Google and Sun. IBM *SHOULD* have bought Sun, just like they bought Rational. But IBM wasn't that interested, and the hardware competed with their own, and hell, the US gubbermint would have probably squalked about competition. So it went to Oracle, and you wind up with Oracle suing the hell out of people for using products they have used for years. I think a calculation was done, and they hypothesised that Oracle would be ass holes, but they didn't have that guesswork with Microsoft. Oracle and Microsoft, the twin turds of the American Technology Industry. Cream rises to the top, but the smelliest of turds do too.

    133. Re:Shocking by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      It is surprising how many thinks that money by itself has a value. It doesn't, the value comes from the things you can buy from it.

      Value to who? To the employee? What should the employer consider that when negotiating my salary? If all I value is caviar, Lamborghini, private jet, poker (and hookers) and I don't care about working at charity on weekends - should the employer pay me enough to satisfy my needs for stuff I consider worthy? And if all I want is meditation, he can pay me peanuts?

      I thought that the employer pays for the work delivered. Not for what is the monetary value of things that I want.

    134. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's supposed to be impressive about it? The sheer expenditure of money on unnecessary "frills"?

    135. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like "place of origin" then race. If that guy was some white american who emigrated to India and get used to their salaries it would be the same.

    136. Re:Shocking by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Too bad it isn't getting much interest from the developer community. If they wanted Mono to be popular on Android (and other platforms), maybe they should have thought about this before engaging in a patent war. Now anyone who isn't on an MS platform wants nothing to do with MS technologies, because you never know when they're going to find some way to screw you over.

    137. Re:Shocking by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if I'm supposed to be impressed that C# uses retarded names for its types or if you're just trying to point out that Java has no unsigned types (likely the latter, sadly).

      For a more complete list, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_C_Sharp_and_Java

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    138. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like one of those reactionary progressives.

      I don't think this is a troll; I think CheezburgerBrown was making a joke, as it is oxymoronic (i.e., tantamount to calling someone a "conservative liberal").

    139. Re:Shocking by jaq1an · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked. Oracle has always seemed like one the more reputable companies, willing to compete fairly, not obsessed with gouging its customers, and nary an evil bone in their corporate body. I can't imagine them hiring or promoting people that would act like this.

      you wouldnt be saying that if you ever used their software,

    140. Re:Shocking by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Slightly different. Microsoft submitted the core .NET, minus the Windows specific parts, to ECMA for use as a standard and made a patent guarantee as part of that. FAT was never declared by Microsoft to be a public standard and it's never said it would be available patent free.

      Had they gone after Android, Microsoft would have had more problems than Oracle as Oracle could at least pretend it didn't know the company it bought that owned Java had praised the introduction of Android and Dalvic and had been supportive of the overall product (as Sun did). Microsoft couldn't really have claimed "Oh, those patent promises - we totally never knew some company that made .NET made them!"

      So yeah, in some ways .NET was in a stronger position to inspire a new leading mobile technology in the mid-nineties. What's also truly ironic (in terms of Oracle's claims to be suing over "protecting" Java) is that if Oracle had succeeded in killing Android (or at least forcing Google to compensate Oracle in some way), Java would have died as developers fled for .NET. Using and developing frameworks that run over the official Java system would have become legally dubious. Nobody would recommend it for new projects.

      All of which said: at the time Miguel was busy plugging Mono, Java was owned by Sun, and Sun always was a pro-OSS open company. So it was a choice between Microsoft, who was mistrusted even if they had made all the right noises with .NET itself, and Sun, who were friends. Add to that the fact that Mono feels clumsy on GNU/Linux (dot-tla file types? Really?), and you had a general atmosphere that said "That's very nice Miguel, but we'll work on something else for now."

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    141. Re:Shocking by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      What was not mentioned was H1-B, which has been a hot topic for several years.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    142. Re:Shocking by captainlavender · · Score: 1

      True. It's quite possible racism wasn't the main motivation for the discriminatory pay. Maybe it was just a nice big layer of shit icing on top.

    143. Re:Shocking by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sure. This case is because, as happens once in a long while, a company was actually honest about breaking the law. Usually they know better.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    144. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must mean RIPEES, not dollars and it is too much indeed! THIS IS NOT SCRAMBLED EGGS. Please.... seggregate the Hindi, they just cannot, keep them apart from it, computing and mathematics, all together in India and away from the guys, like in cells and specialization? It is not just a matter of writing it, it has to be well done and they think it is very well done and we are just slack. Since when they thought they could computer and HERE? Let them do it alone and do not steal programming code. I have my case where it shows up and is Hindi and the other one and... ETC. For your own good.

    145. Re:Shocking by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Many Asians, especially Chinese, consider westerners (white people, in general) to be superior. That's why.

      And no I don't try to be denigrating Asians, just stating how they think. I'm a white guy in Hong Kong and have experienced exactly that: "You should come with me to visit that mainland company. Doesn't matter you can't talk to them, it's just for having a white face around," is what a Chinese colleague once said to me.

    146. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be joking. When I worked at Oracle, management actively discriminated against Americans no matter what your ethnicity. Indians were brought in by the truckload and given sub-par salaries all the while being told that they were needed because they were so smart. If an Indian dared say anything that was deemed unsatisfactory they were summarily fired. The software was always garbage; except after patch after patch when it might finally work. And if you've ever been involved with budgets - Oracle is way more expensive than comparable products especially after the support costs are added in. Maybe you were being sarcastic; I couldn't tell.

    147. Re:Shocking by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      You view is ignorant of the realities of living in different places. It simply costs more to live in different places in the United states, let alone the world. So, salary must compensate for this.

  2. Indians are hired for low wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is an Oracle office in India for a reason. They're cheap. Defeats the purpose if you bring them all over here on US wages, wouldn't it? Might as well hire Americans, god forbid!

    1. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Finn who has worked for american companies in their finnish subsidiaries, the same applies - finnish engineers are hired because we're WAY cheaper than our american counterparts.

    2. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by gordo3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's funny because you are a solid 10 years out of date. Top grads in India now make comparable amounts to their US equivalents. Hell, just a couple months ago Oracle was offering grands 200k+ for Mumbai based roles. The days of indians taking jobs based solely are salary are quickly coming to a close. Now it's just ability and ease of hiring.

    3. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that $50K is good money for an Indian?

    4. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Dishwasha · · Score: 2

      ...wanted to transfer a high-performing salesman from Oracle's India office to California

      Reading comprehension fail

    5. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the old management saying. "A company that will go to the ends of the Earth for its people will find it can hire them for about 10% of the cost of Americans."

    6. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by sandytaru · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, you can still hire a subcontractor in India for $30K/year. It's just that you'll get what you pay for. As you said, the top jobs there make the equivalent of their counterparts in the US and other places easily. But those jobs only go for the folks who have the critical thinking skills necessary to do programming right. The lead architect at my office was born in Mumbai, and there's a reason he makes more than any of us - the guy's a genius.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    7. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by khr · · Score: 2

      As an American who worked in the Indian office of a Finnish company, the same applies, we were way cheaper than our Finnish counterparts...

    8. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by GNious · · Score: 1

      Ease of hiring? Took our company 15 months to hire 6 phone-support guys, that we were contractually required to have in place loooong ago.

    9. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As an American sub-contractor of an American who works in a Indian office of a Finish company that was recently acquired by an American company, I feel like I've been screwed somehow.

    10. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      of course, but you can hire a low level moron in the US for the same amount. It's not that hard to find people who will go for it. But the fact 100k+ starting salaries are becoming regular offers from the IT companies in India for highly qualified new grads means the market is flattening very fast. I actually don't know any new IT grands that pull down 100k their first year but I'm sure they are out there.

    11. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by bradgoodman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes and no. There are many well-educated, foreign countries in which US companies (several I have worked for) try to hire-in, in an attempt to lower labor costs. India is one, there's also Russia, Singapore, etc. It's all about supply and demand. US companies flock to these countries and start hiring. This increases demand and decreases supply. After a while, the salary offset isn't as large, and there becomes less incentive to do so. This is starting to happen in many countries, and it's a good thing for workers everywhere. (Foreign employees get paid more, less desire to ship US jobs overeases = Good for US workers).

    12. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by gordo3000 · · Score: 2

      well, that's also why wages are converging to US levels very fast in those industries. I know friends of mine in finance there would tell me they could easily negotiate 25% salary increases YoY back in 2006.

    13. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 0

      As an [anecdote] of an [anecdote] the [anecdote] applies here. I definitely feel like I've been screwed.

    14. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS on this. Show me a single job posting or news site link that shows 200k+ or anything remotely close to it.

      I have a cousin in Mumbai who has done a post doctrate in chemical engineering in the US, works in India where his company flies him around the country in a private freakin' jet to sites because his time is that valuable and even he is nowhere close to 200k USD (not even 100k).

    15. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The "big fucking deal" is that those words ("for an Indian") were allegedly used in a context where it is positively forbidden by law. Even if demographically true, it's not something that a person can legally use to justify any kind of employment decision. Race, color, country of origin, ethnicity, or heritage are all factors that are expressly forbidden under the law prohibiting racial discrimination in the workplace. The fact that somebody at Oracle evidently actually said this out loud is going to make this colossally bad for the employee at Oracle that was stupid enough to let such a remark slip out.

      Ultimately, it's going to come down to whether it can be objectively determined that the questionable phrase was ever used.

    16. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are "Top Grads" in every race and every country. They all can command top salaries and produce top quality results.
      However, even in America, I can find a White Male American, that graduated from a university program in CS, that I wouldn't trust to plug together the simplest CRUD /WebApp, and won't be a serviceable employee after 5 years of work experience. (And I wouldn't pay him $50K either).

      "Not for an Indian" is pretty egregious. But having worked with "OffShore" I can tell you there are far far more of the later than the former. Not that I blame them at all. "Fake it till I make it" is not an uncommon strategy here in the US either.

    17. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      perhaps he should Sioux ?

    18. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Shados · · Score: 1

      Yup, the issue is literally just in the words. What crossed the person's mind was the same that crosses their mind every damn time they hire anyone, including americans: "How much are they making now? Can we find out? Once we do, use that information to make the offer". Its stupid, but there's a reason every damn HR department in north america (probably elsewhere too) tries to get your previous salary out of you when they hire you.

      In this case, they had a rough estimate based on country of origin. Salary statistics for various countries are available, and often roughly known, and that dude used that information to make the offer. If it had been worded: "Offer him 50k, as compared to what he's used to getting, its pretty good", which was his intent, he'd be off the hook.

    19. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      easy:

      http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/rs-1-crore-package-for-12-iit-kanpur-students-455434

      12 students were offered north of 10 mio INR, and the top was 13.6 mio (roughly 205k, depending on the fx rate on the given day). By the way, they turned that number down.

      And this isn't just one person. This is large sets of grads from all the different IIT branches commanding these wages now. Not the top 1 or 2 people

    20. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by PRMan · · Score: 1

      While there is some truth to this gross simplification, I used to work with an Indian that WAS rote but I taught him how to think and he became a very good engineer. They're not hopeless just because their school system is inadequate.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    21. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      That's it, I'm Finnished with this discussion altogether.

    22. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, that's also why wages are converging to US levels very fast in those industries. I know friends of mine in finance there would tell me they could easily negotiate 25% salary increases YoY back in 2006.

      I remember chatting with one of our India tech team, probably around that time (2006, give or take a year), about salaries/raises, when I had just gotten a 3% raise - he basically said that would be an 'insult' over there, in fact anything under 15% or so would be insulting... Of course, their inflation was at about 15%, so yeah, anything less would be not keeping up with the cost of living (in essence a pay 'decrease', in purchasing power).

      We had an interesting chat, he was shocked at what I was paid comparatively to him, but then as I explained how $500/mo wouldn't rent you a 4x8 cardboard box for an 'apartment' around here, my electric bill was $100+/mo, phone/DSL $100+/mo, oil heating at ~80-100gal/mo in winter (I use the woodstove a lot, far cheaper these days), car insurance, etc... not to mention food prices... he was amazed at how expensive it could be.

    23. Re:Indians are hired for low wages by GNious · · Score: 1

      wow - my YoY salary increase at that time was effectively negative, due to being less than inflation :(

  3. german law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the German law regarding hiring immigrants, and that is, they have to be paid the same as your other workers.

    1. Re:german law by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the US, that's the law regarding H1-B workers as well, but it's not enforced.

    2. Re:german law by khr · · Score: 1

      In the US, that's the law regarding H1-B workers as well, but it's not enforced.

      No kidding... As an American, when I worked for a U.S. company a decade ago, the Indians brought over on H1-B visas were paid quite a bit more than I was for doing the same job.

      On the flip side, though, I guess I had better job security (being competent and underpaid...)

    3. Re:german law by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Salaries are basically a con. A business will pay you as little as they think you will accept. There are skillset supply and demand constraints, local market conditions, and whatever else is in your salary history. If a business you worked for 10 years ago wasn't doing well and hence didn't give decent raises, future employers use this as fodder for justifying paying you less than another person who managed to market themselves into a higher wage position.

      So it goes..
      d

    4. Re:german law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's "paid the same" though?

      About a year after I started my first desktop support job I was making about 7 dollars an hour. Minimum wage was 4.25 at the time, AFAIR. Being without any degree or certification I didn't mind it too much as it was a foot in the door and I was looking at my ex-coworkers who were making about 2 dollars less an hour than I was and doing less "real work" for it.

      Because of some expansion and a more complex environment we hired another desktop support person. He came in with an A+ and a 18-month tech school certificate and was hired out at 10 dollars an hour. He was perpetually late, had no real troubleshooting skills and very little interest in computers beyond what got him a paycheck. The running joke around work was that he was my secretary because he did little on his own so I tackled the technical issues and he handled the arms and legs kind of work.

      So what is it to be "paid the same"? I made 30% less than this guy and I was the one doing the real skilled labor. I wasn't going to rock the boat because I realized that if they wanted I could have been gone at the drop of a hat and without anything to back me up, my experience didn't mean a lot in a pre-y2k world with thousands of tech school graduates looking for whatever they could find.

      Maybe Germany has a law that would have handled that situation too but what if the next desktop guy they brought in would have been an immigrant and they bumped me up to 10 an hour and gave him 7? Should he have felt slighted?

    5. Re:german law by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      You just described a business transaction, not a con.

    6. Re:german law by 0123456 · · Score: 0

      You just described a business transaction, not a con.

      In Lefty-World, they're the same thing.

    7. Re:german law by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      You just described a business transaction, not a con.

      In Lefty-World, they're the same thing.

      Sure, but the con part is that they can get you to work for less than you are worth. It is what it is..

  4. B-But Muh Talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But we need that talent from overseas because Americans don't have the skills do those jobs -- ask Larry Ellison, or Mark Zuckerburg! This is why America needs amnesty and more immigration!

    -- Ethanol-fueled

    1. Re:B-But Muh Talent by oscrivellodds · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, you don't understand. Amnesty and immigration are needed to keep the social security Ponzi-scheme going. There simply aren't enough young people paying into the system to support all those retired old people. We need to make the undocumented workers legal so they can be taxed.

      What Ellison, Zuckerberg and other of their ilk want is more H1B visas. H1B visas are needed to keep salaries down by replacing relatively highly paid American tech workers with lower paid imports who will be unable to leave their awful working conditions to seek better elsewhere lest they be sent back to the countries they worked so hard to leave.

    2. Re:B-But Muh Talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      WTF.
      where I'm at the practice is even better. Employees get the salary they negotiate. PERIOD. So there are some old guys (experienced but not very experienced negotiators ) that have lower salaries than some new guys (aggressive negotiators with far less skills) .
      Moral of the story. Better get the negotiation skills ... they are worth more than tech skills.

    3. Re:B-But Muh Talent by game+kid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We need to make the undocumented workers legal so they can be taxed.

      Exactly. (If you meant that in sarcasm, you're more right than you think.) Our government (feebly attempts to) turn back lots of good taxpayers who just want a decent wage and standard of living. We can put public records (and, yes, the NSA) to good use: gather info on the immigrants before they attempt to enter, and when they try and if they are able to learn our history without posing an imminent threat to lives, make them legal in 82 minutes--not 82 YEARS (WTF?). This would encourage upstanding behavior, bring in more taxes, bring in more ideas that would give more people here and abroad a job to keep busy, and leave the law enforcers free to properly fight real enemies of the state, like banks.

      Certain 'Murican types say that Those Damn Illegals don't follow the law and Took Er Jerbs. I remind them that no one follows the law and we should update the law to conform with basic respect, common sense, and our dire budget--and maybe our new Americans can give them their next job.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    4. Re:B-But Muh Talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.. that overseas talent thing..
      Well, from what I experenced so-far it's total crap, it's only about lower pay.
      Seen first hand some of the great talent... one place I worked had to have "talent" not found local (read that cheaper pay).
      The software engineer sure had a great talent, worked on a project over a year, quit over some stupid thing, quit and went back overseas to his home the next day.
      Problem was, all files were erased, no backups to be found.
      Score 1 for the bean-counters saving money for the company.
      So what did they do?
      Let go the local talent network admin, replaced with a know-it-all college kid at half the pay.
      Two years later... major external problem took out the server room.
      No problem there were backups!
      Got new servers, go to load the tapes.. and guess what...
      All the backups were blank... the kid never checked if data was written because it took too much time!
      But he had talent !

    5. Re:B-But Muh Talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to make the undocumented workers legal so they can be taxed.

      This is exactly the opposite of the situation.
      Undocumented workers are paying taxes, lots of taxes. But since their Social Security numbers belong to someone else or are completely made up, they'll never draw on those Social Security or Medicare funds.

    6. Re:B-But Muh Talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Increase the supply of what you provide, and you have less negotiating power.

    7. Re:B-But Muh Talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but negotiation only gets you so far.

      Hard to negotiate you way out of being laid off as a "cost savings measure" and replaced by two H1B workers.

      That was my last job, then again they would not fix the broken bathrooms until someone reported them and they were fined for it. They also showed 150% profits in the annual meetings but never had any money for raises, so I am glad I was laid off and found a new position at a 70% higher salary.

    8. Re:B-But Muh Talent by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      We need to make the undocumented workers legal so they can be taxed.

      This is a myth that won't die. Most "undocumented workers" already pay the full suite of taxes.

      First, realize that most of the taxes that you pay aren't income taxes. There's a hefty gasoline tax (both state and federal), taxes on most stuff that you buy (here in TN we even pay sales tax on groceries), property taxes, etc. There are consumption taxes everywhere.

      So that leaves "income tax". Well, the IRS will give out a tax id to undocumented workers so that they can work and pay taxes. Yes, I know people who have these. Of the ones who don't, many use someone else's SSN to work. That means they're paying into social security and medicare even though they'll never be able to legally collect.

      For their income levels, there's rarely any actual federal income tax. They do pay social security and medicare. In all, 5/6 of undocumented workers pay federal income "tax" (meaning social security, medicare, and whatever tax there is). The rest are paid under the table, but they are in the minority.

      To make it simple: there's not some huge federal tax gains if we suddenly "legalize" all the undocumented workers in the country. It would have no effect at all on federal tax receipts.

    9. Re:B-But Muh Talent by sjames · · Score: 2

      People ghave every right to complain about illegals. They are often hired at less than minimum wage by employers who know they won't dare to complain to the Dept. of Labor.

      I say make them legal and make sure they know their rights.

    10. Re:B-But Muh Talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How coincidental that amnesty will bring in millions of new voters which will power a certain party to electoral success for years to come.

      And that other party is too stupid and greedy to see that this is a threat to the nation as a whole. They just want cheap workers.

    11. Re:B-But Muh Talent by strikethree · · Score: 1

      No, you don't understand. Amnesty and immigration are needed to keep the social security Ponzi-scheme going. There simply aren't enough young people paying into the system to support all those retired old people.

      NO! YOU do not understand. All of those old people have already fully paid up their social security accounts. Early in the 1980s, before I could even vote, I remember some kerfluffle in Congress about all of those billions upon billions of dollars in the Social Security fund just sitting there being unused. Sitting capital should be INVESTED was the cry...

      Essentially, the government spent all of the Social Security money and promised to pay it back through taxes. If the burden is too high, too fucking bad. That Social Security was paid for. The government stole it and promised that YOU would pay it back. Either deal with it and pay up or throw a revolution (and discard the old people).

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  5. Truth hurts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Because that is good money for an indian. Getting off the reservation and its rampant fire water problem is a plus.

    1. Re:Truth hurts by Grantbridge · · Score: 1

      Indian = someone from India.

    2. Re:Truth hurts by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indian = someone from India.

      Well, yea. That's evident by the fact they offered him money, instead of signing the contract, getting him drunk, then peeing on the contract up as they steal all his land.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Truth hurts by metlin · · Score: 0

      Well, yea. That's evident by the fact they offered him money, instead of signing the contract, getting him drunk, then peeing on the contract up as they steal all his land.

      To be fair, they *did* do that ca. 1600 to the entire Indian subcontinent, at the behest of a corporation, no less ("The British East India Company"). Took ~300 years before they could be overthrown, only to end up with a much more dangerous problem (India and Pakistan, both with nuclear capabilities).

    4. Re:Truth hurts by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, yea. That's evident by the fact they offered him money, instead of signing the contract, getting him drunk, then peeing on the contract up as they steal all his land.

      To be fair, they *did* do that ca. 1600 to the entire Indian subcontinent, at the behest of a corporation, no less ("The British East India Company"). Took ~300 years before they could be overthrown, only to end up with a much more dangerous problem (India and Pakistan, both with nuclear capabilities).

      As An American, I refuse to take credit or blame for stuff the British Empire did.

      We have plenty of fucked up behavior in our own history, thankyouverymuch.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Truth hurts by metlin · · Score: 0

      As An American, I refuse to take credit or blame for stuff the British Empire did.

      We have plenty of fucked up behavior in our own history, thankyouverymuch.

      I wasn't talking about Americans specifically -- I was talking about the fact that wasn't the first time that something like that had happened.

      But since you brought it up, as a fellow American, I disagree. After all, the Americas *were* populated by the peoples of those fine isles.

      Just because someone drew an arbitrary line around a land and declared independence doesn't mean there weren't common social and cultural elements. From the sun shall never set in Britannia to the American Manifest Destiny, the story continues.

    6. Re:Truth hurts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that because I'm racially the same as those people that I should be held responsible for their acts? That's racists - the very definition of racist

    7. Re:Truth hurts by metlin · · Score: 0

      You said that, not me. My point was to highlight the common influences behind colonialism and American imperialism.

    8. Re:Truth hurts by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I have to note that when Brits did it (or at least started to), US was still a part of the British Empire.

    9. Re:Truth hurts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you have a flag?"

  6. Oracle is not a person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oracle didn't say anything. Some dude that works there said it. The company should be charged for any discrimination their employees say, but don't make it like it was a statement from their PR or anything like it. There are people that saying stupid things like that anywhere, at any given time.

    1. Re:Oracle is not a person by tsprig · · Score: 0

      Yes, however, if this person was fired and brought this issue up to management above before going to his lawyers then it's quite possible there is a culture built around it. If that's the case then Oracle isn't quite as shiny as their PR department tries to make them out to be... which I guess is news?

    2. Re:Oracle is not a person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Oracle is a person... told Neo that there is no spoon!

    3. Re:Oracle is not a person by biodata · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If a company is not a person, how do they have any rights?

      --
      Korma: Good
    4. Re:Oracle is not a person by Argos · · Score: 2

      Quiz: who said "Corporations are people, my friend"?

    5. Re:Oracle is not a person by voss · · Score: 2

      If you want to see whats wrong with Oracle look whos running it.

      Compared with Larry Ellison...Bill Gates is Mahatma Gandhi.

      "A few months ago, a female ex-employee with whom Ellison had had an affair launched a lawsuit in which she alleged that he tempted several female employees into bed with the offer of an Acura sports car. Ellison claimed the offer was a joke but, when questioned, admitted that he had bought four Acuras in the previous year."

      http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/network-meet-larry-ellison-the-software-supremo-with-an-ego-to-match-his-income-1269887.html

    6. Re:Oracle is not a person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, at least he wasn't offering a Lexus (Lexus is a division of Toy Yoda)

    7. Re:Oracle is not a person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quiz: who said "Corporations are people, my friend"?

      Oh, now that's not fair, you can't honestly expect us to remember EVERY political failure of recent times. I don't think his own party remembers him. Did he even have a name?

    8. Re:Oracle is not a person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quiz: who said "Corporations are people, my friend"?

      William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765.

    9. Re:Oracle is not a person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poll results for "Generic Republican" were so high, but when whats-his-name tried to approximate that, it didn't work out for some reason. Oh well.

    10. Re:Oracle is not a person by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If a company is not a person, how do they have any rights?

      They have corporation rights, not people rights. We are okay with the idea of "animal rights", but we don't expect dogs to be able vote.

      It's a bogus argument on the right that corporation rights have to match that of people or else the legal system will melt into a pile of goo. If that were true, then by the same logic, dogs should vote.

    11. Re:Oracle is not a person by sjames · · Score: 1

      And this is the equivalent of when Mr. Perfect gets drunk one night, says what he actually thinks, and wakes up with no friends and a walloping headache.

    12. Re:Oracle is not a person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a company is not a person, how do they have any rights?

      A random person employed by a company is not the company. The company is personified by the board of directors, acting on behalf of the shareholders. Everyone else is just a servant of the board, and things they say may or may not be the company's official position, depending on whether the board agrees with them.

    13. Re:Oracle is not a person by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      that's ridiculous, no one uses a dog or an animal as a legitimate way to pool resources and lobby the government. People do it all the time. Most churches are "corporations".

      And no one on the right is calling corporations legally equivalent. They are simply calling for corporations to be treated the same as a union, or other group that people get together and put money in to lobby for certain political positions. How else would you fund single issue lobbying? Should everyone have to have enough money to run their own commercial and get their own billboard or should there be a way for people to aggregate their money and lobby for a particular issue without also sharing legal risks for stupid actions by others in the group or ridiculous lawsuits?

  7. Wait...are we talking about dots or feathers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    C'mon, get your Indians right, mate!

    (yeah, we're all going to burn in hell for these comments)

    1. Re:Wait...are we talking about dots or feathers? by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 2

      Well, Columbus fucked that one up over 500 years ago, so it's a little late for that.

  8. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should be earning the same as all the Americans because they are also Americans. I mean, the Cherokees, the Apaches and all the other tribes were in America before the Europeans, right?

  9. Comedy Gold by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    An Oracle executive, sales manager and human resources manager walk into a court room...

    1. Re:Comedy Gold by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      An Oracle executive, sales manager and human resources manager walk into a court room...

      Penguin.

    2. Re:Comedy Gold by T.E.D. · · Score: 5, Funny

      An Oracle executive, sales manager and human resources manager walk into a court room...

      Oh! I know this one...

      ...suddenly a crazed gunman on trail in the next room escapes and takes them all hostage. He threatens to kill the hostages one by one over the next 10 minutes unless his demands are met.

      What kind of sandwich do you go make yourself?

    3. Re:Comedy Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Judge said: Hi John, poker at your place next Friday?

    4. Re:Comedy Gold by T.E.D. · · Score: 0

      On the internet, being primarily a written media, it is kind of tough to tell a transposition error from an actual misunderstanding.

      Note that the top answer there is actually mine. I'm rather well acquainted with this kind of error, as you have discovered. Not being able to edit Slashdot posts after submission doesn't help...

    5. Re:Comedy Gold by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      An IceCreamSandwich?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  10. Citizenship? by unixcorn · · Score: 1

    According to my employer, workers from overseas that are in the US and want to become citizens require lawyer time which isn't cheap. The article didn't mention whether the person from India was coming permanently or if the position was temporary. If it wasn't an H-1B (temporary) position then the lower wage might have been justified based on the cost of bringing the person over and the subsequent costs associated with sponsorship.

    1. Re:Citizenship? by taikedz · · Score: 3, Informative

      The salary and cost of hiring is secondary to the main issue here.

      Mr Bambling will have to explain why he issued a "stern warning" in response to the request, rather than an explanation as to his reasoning; Mr Trudeau will have to explain his contemptuous choice of words, and failure in turn to explain his reasoning; both them and probably others will have to explain why firing the sales manager was considered fair and necessary, in the light of the previous two points.

      --
      -- "Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability." --Dijkstra
    2. Re:Citizenship? by iggymanz · · Score: 0

      nonsense, it is very troublesome to immigrate a foreigner. a company is under no obligation to do so, and the salary indeed was "good money for an Indian". no one has to explain anything, and in the future maybe Oracle should just save itself the troubles and hire domestically

    3. Re:Citizenship? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      workers from overseas that are in the US and want to become citizens require lawyer time which isn't cheap

      An employer has nothing to do with an employee becoming a citizen, nor does an employer care whether an employee is a citizen or a green card holder (unless they need a security clearance). The employer can help an H-1B become a green card holder, but the effort on the company's part is a joke. Basically they're writing a recommendation regarding how essential someone's skills are, blah, blah, blah. That's it. There are no legal ramifications because it's very difficult to contest such statements, and no one even tries anyone.

      Once somebody has a green card they can live and work in this country the rest of their lives. If they choose to become a citizen after 5 years, they can. With the possible exception of a few special cases, it does not require any extensive legal help.

  11. Re:True, yet. by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That would mean law is enforced, and that is commie red soshalsism, friend.

  12. Hmm by rmdingler · · Score: 2
    There's an implication in Spandow's revelation, if it happened as it is being reported here.

    If the Indian's didn't work for less, would it disincentivize their hiring?

    Or is there also an expectation they will tolerate longer hours in a less hospitable work environment?

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  13. How is this sueable? by wisnoskij · · Score: 0

    As far as I am aware you are allowed to offer people whatever salary you choose.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:How is this sueable? by mjwalshe · · Score: 0

      But not to discriminate against protected groups.

    2. Re:How is this sueable? by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      Wage discrimination based on race, gender, ethnicity, etc is illegal. "$50K/year is good for someone with your skill set" is perfectly acceptable. Telling him to his face that he's not worth any more than that because he's got brown skin and a Mumbai accent is not.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    3. Re:How is this sueable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. And it's very difficult to enforce in practice, unless of course your HR manager is the kind of dumbass that will just write "that's good money for an Indian" right there in an internal e-mail.

    4. Re:How is this sueable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foreign nationals are not a protected group.

    5. Re:How is this sueable? by DJProtoss · · Score: 1

      From TFA, he is suing because he was (he alleges) sacked for asking to hire the Indian at a salary they would have offered one of the rest of the team and complaining when they wouldn't.

      --
      "Success is based on knowing how far to go in going too far"
    6. Re:How is this sueable? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      It's a little early to pull the old "race card" out. Is the employee an indian (citizen of India)? I can easily interpret that as "$50K/year is good for an indian national."

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    7. Re:How is this sueable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you are not allowed to discriminate on race. It doesn't really matter if he gets a different salary because of his race, or a different lavatory because of his race. If he was offered $50K because Oracle wages come from /dev/random (or any other allowed reason), there would be no problem and Oracle might just win the case.

    8. Re:How is this sueable? by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      That's still illegal.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    9. Re:How is this sueable? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Really? How?

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    10. Re:How is this sueable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When he complained that they wouldn't offer a good employee the good salary because of his race/nationality.

      Race / Creed / Nationality - you cannot discriminate on any of these basis.

      Same salary for same position, that's the law.

      There's no lee-way, no loop-holes, no escape. Have fun at the trial there Larry.

    11. Re:How is this sueable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "National origin" is a protected class.

    12. Re:How is this sueable? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      They are in the sense that discrimination on the basis of ethnicity or national origin is illegal. If you want to say "let's hire somebody (citizen or green card holder) who is already here", that's fine. Supposedly some laws even encourage that.

    13. Re:How is this sueable? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Only if the subject is a US citizen or within the US. In this case we are talking about the nationality of an Oracle employee who is a foreign citizen who does not reside in the US.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    14. Re:How is this sueable? by Anon-Admin · · Score: 1

      There is no requirement in the law, that the person be a US citizen. Only that the company be a US company and the employee is one employed in the US. It even includes potential employees who are immigrating provided they will be working in the US.

      I once got in trouble for sorting resumes into two piles. Ones where I could pronounce the last name and ones where I could not pronounce the last name. I have over 50 qualified applicants and needed a way to cut it down to a manageable number. Seems that is illegal to do.

      I ended up laying them out on the floor and throwing 10 pennies in the air then calling in the 10 resumes they landed on. Turns out that random chance is a 100% legal way to sort resumes.

    15. Re:How is this sueable? by wisnoskij · · Score: 0

      So what this person allegedly said is only illegal since he worded it: "Since he is an Indian, $50K is good enough", instead of "Since he is used to such a small salary, because he is an Indian, $50K is good enough"

      I think we have to get this straight, $50K is enough for an Indian because he is used to less, not because of his genetics.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    16. Re:How is this sueable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey you're an Indian National, so you're not quite worth a US National."

      Yep, that's illegal.

    17. Re:How is this sueable? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      What about this exception to the Equal Rights law of 1964?

      "EXEMPTION
      SEC. 702. This title shall not apply to an employer with respect to the employment of aliens outside any State, or to a religious corporation, association, or society with respect to the employment of individuals of a particular religion to perform work connected with the carrying on by such corporation, association, or society of its religious activities or to an educational institution with respect to the employment of individuals to perform work connected with the educational activities of such institution.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    18. Re:How is this sueable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only that the company be a US company and the employee is one employed in the US

    19. Re:How is this sueable? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      "EXEMPTION SEC. 702. This title shall not apply to an employer with respect to the employment of aliens outside any State,

      What part of "outside any State" do you not understand? The context here is that the person was to be brought to the USA for work, so that exemption would not apply.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    20. Re:How is this sueable? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Understood.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  14. It *is* good money for an Indian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or anyone else for that matter. I'd kill for that kind of salary and I'm Dutch.

    1. Re: It *is* good money for an Indian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also Dutch. 50kUSD is like 38kâ. A pretty sad salary for an experienced sales guy. Plus for that 38kâ you would have to work 60 hour weeks and get 10 days vacation.

      I know the Dutch are incredibly stingy with salaries but even this is pretty sad.

    2. Re: It *is* good money for an Indian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's still a far better salary than the average Dutch worker makes (32k/a). (I'll ignore the 60 hours comment; as it's obvious hyperbole.)
      So pull your head out of your arse and at least acknowledge that you're making more than you deserve.

  15. Where is "racial" discrimination? by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    $50,000, which was 'good money for an Indian.'

    It certainly is good money for someone — whatever their race — from India, where that same person was earning much less...

    When Spandow protested, he was himself summarily fired

    Unless Mr. Spandow's own dismissal was due to racism or some other illegal discrimination against him, I doubt, the suit will be found to have much merit. Bad publicity for Oracle — maybe. But nothing worse. Oh, and a much of folks in India thinking, that he is a spoiled idiot...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mjwalshe · · Score: 2

      His position is its because of his whistle blowing and racial discrimination - the guy is Irish.

    2. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      But he's not a Black Irishman...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India is a country, not a race.
          To think otherwise would be racist.

      There are geographically dependent economic factors that impact pay.

      Stupid thing to say? Yes

      Is it racist? No

    4. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mark-t · · Score: 3, Informative

      Had Oracle just said that $50k was goody money for someone, and left the issue of Spandow's race unmentioned, they'd certainly have been fine. The problem was, however, that the person didn't just say that.

    5. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      It's not racial discrimination if the employer was referring to his nationality. The context of the conversation was what would be an acceptable salary offer to bring an Indian to the US corporate office.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    6. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by taikedz · · Score: 2

      It certainly is good money for someone — whatever their race

      In which case, why was the "for an Indian" phrase even mentioned, unless to single them out as opposed to other persons?

      Unless Mr. Spandow's own dismissal was due to racism or some other illegal discrimination against him, I doubt, the suit will be found to have much merit.

      I'd be surprised if the court finds that context and lead-up is not relevant to their decision. If the senior managers are found to have been violating equal opportunities regulations, their handling of Mr Spandow, who was effectively trying to rectify their ill behaviour, could be a direct consequence of their violation, and encompass him. Possibly a grey zone to be clarified.

      --
      -- "Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability." --Dijkstra
    7. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      I don't think it matters. Companies will pay significantly less for employees in rural Georgia than they do for the same employees in Silicon Valley because rural Georgia has a much lower cost of living. This is standard business practice everywhere. Is that racial (or any other kind of) discrimination? Of course not. This is the same practice regardless of whether the manager technically said "for an Indian" (which sounds less politically correct) or "for someone living in a low-cost area like India" (which sounds more politically correct). And IMO it doesn't count as whistle-blowing to call someone out on a business practice that is neither illegal nor immoral. He's being fired for being a dumbass and making a big stink about nothing, not for being a whistle-blower.

    8. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The laws which prohibit racial discrimination clarify it to mean discrimination based on any of race, color, descent, or national or ethnic origin. They all fall under the same umbrella of "racial discrimination".

    9. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exceptional sales-person, offer him 10k less because he's from India...

      Sorry, that is illegal in the state of California - you don't get to poo-poo this one off, there's gonna be an investigation and Mr. Dumbshit's gonna have to sit in the hot-seat again.

      Declare Mr.Dumbshit=Larry E.

    10. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get to say acceptable.

      The law states equal pay for equal job. Period. Sorry but your idiotic statement doesn't equal the law.

      It's going to go to trial, a criminal case and Oracle may lose it's ability to hire H1-B visa holders entirely due to their illegal practice.

    11. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Um you know there are Irish referred to as "Black" Irish - and the late Phil Linnot was definitely black - and then you get into which tradition he is from (Fenian or Prody)

    12. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      $50k is not a "good" salary for California

    13. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mjwalshe · · Score: 2

      yes but if you move from Georgia to California you get California wages to compensate for the higher cost of living

    14. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Githaron · · Score: 2
      From TFA:

      "In September 2012, Spandow asked for permission to transfer an Oracle employee working in India to California."

      They were not talking about paying someone living in India a $50,000 salary. They were planning on transfering the employee from India to California which would have increased the employee's cost of living significantly.

    15. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retaliating against someone after they made a discrimination claim is illegal, even if their claim is wrong. In fact, lawsuits for retaliation after discrimination claims are more common, and more likely to be successful discrimination claims.

      --ANON JD

    16. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the article did you? This is a civil case of Ian Spandaw because he believes that he was wrongfully terminated. This has noting to do with H1B hiring other than an example of why Ian feels that he was wronged.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    17. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      Good point. I missed that part of it. Though in cases where the company feels they can get away with giving you a smaller increase (like if they think someone from rural Georgia won't notice and/or complain), a lot of businesses will. It's not racially biased, it's business.

    18. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discrimination based on national origin is still a crime in the United States. So you can spare yourself the hand-wringing.

    19. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      a criminal case and Oracle may lose it's ability to hire H1-B visa holders

      And then you wake up.

    20. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      that is illegal in the state of California

      It's illegal anywhere in the US.

    21. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      It certainly is good money for someone — whatever their race — from India, where that same person was earning much less...

      So basically you are saying that if a candidate is from India, it is okay to offer them $50,000....but if an equivalent candidate from California applies, they can be offered $60,000? Cause it sounds like this is exactly what happened here...

      You don't see an obvious moral and/or legal issue with this?

      When Spandow protested, he was himself summarily fired

      If Spandow was protesting an illegal act of the company, his suit may very well have merit.

    22. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      It's not racial discrimination if the employer was referring to his nationality. The context of the conversation was what would be an acceptable salary offer to bring an Indian to the US corporate office.

      And this is entirely irrelevant. Employers cannot discriminate on the basis of national origin either.

    23. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The law only applies to people actually located within the US and legally able to work. Since the person in question was neither inside the US nor had a valid work permit the law doesn't necessarily apply.

    24. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to re-read this again. Spandow was getting an Indian national in the Californian office, he's not the Indian in question. When he was told that the 50k figure was "good enough for an Indian", he protested and was fired, presumably over his protestation. He was not the one to get paid that 50k, he just protested that this Indian would be getting 50k when everyone else in his position was getting 60k, which from the looks was because the guy came from India. This is totally discrimination and there is no justification for Oracle firing him.

    25. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      It certainly is good money for someone — whatever their race — in India, where that same person was earning much less...

      FTFY. For the position in the U.S. where other residents of the U.S. are paid $60,000 per year, it is not so good. Spandow was fired because he protested the violation of the Equal Employment Opportunity laws. See, it is against the law to pay one less simply because of one's country of origin.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    26. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mmell · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're smart you do. Isn't any law says an employer has to give you a raise just because your cost of living went up. An International Business Machines manufacturer I've heard of can (and does) move guys from one place to another without changing their pay by one penny (unless local law requires it). When they come from countries where the Caste system is still in force or where indoor plumbing and electricity are still novelties, that results in real savings for this unnamed firm.

    27. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's racist!
        - An Irishman

    28. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His position is its because of his whistle blowing and racial discrimination - the guy is Irish.

      No blacks, no dogs, no Irish.

    29. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that it's out in the open, there will be a criminal trial, I'm able to go beyond TFA, but thanks.

    30. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. His cost of living will go WAY up when he moves to the U.S.

    31. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      That doesn't matter in law in fact its worse as it shows that racism is institutional in the company

    32. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Salgat · · Score: 1

      This is how I see it. It's no different than an American being offered $80,000/year in Germany for a programming position and being told that it's good money for an American.

    33. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by Salgat · · Score: 1

      How do you know they meant race and not nationality? They are two distinct and different things. Indian, American, South African, they are all nationalities.

    34. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if they did mean nationality... the laws prohibiting racial discrimination prohibit such for any of race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin.

    35. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mi · · Score: 1

      In which case, why was the "for an Indian" phrase even mentioned, unless to single them out as opposed to other persons?

      The "Indian" was a reference to his country of origin — and its notorious poverty — rather than his race. I thought, this is perfectly clear, if, indeed, this is what really was said to begin with. You can replace "Indian" with "Nigerian", or "Russian", or "Chinese" in this context just as well.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    36. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by mi · · Score: 1

      For the position in the U.S. where other residents of the U.S. are paid $60,000 per year, it is not so good.

      If the man accepted the offer, then it was good. If he did not, then it was not — and Oracle made a mistake. There is no illegality here — and there wouldn't even have been an allegation of one, had they phrased it differently.

      There is no set price for anything — everything (including an employee's labor) costs, what people are willing to pay for it.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    37. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by taikedz · · Score: 1

      Again, where is the need to single out the nationality, if the money is good for just about anyone?

      --
      -- "Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability." --Dijkstra
    38. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      The illegality here is that management in Oracle was basing it's pay decisions on the national origin of the employee.They didn't say "We think this particular employee is only worth $50,000.00 per year." They said "We think Indians are only worth $50,000.00 per year". The law specifically states that it is illegal to base pay for someone on said someone's national origin. Management did just that.

      You may not like the law, but the law is clear. What Oracle said was clear and it was a clear violation of the law.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    39. Re:Where is "racial" discrimination? by lindseyp · · Score: 1

      Salaries are set by supply and demand, and if there are plenty of people of Indian nationality who are jumping at the chance to work in California, then the hiring company is, on average, going to get away with a lower average salary. In much the same way that trying to get a Californian to go live in Mumbai, they may have to pay more than they'd pay a local, due to a shortage of people wanting to work in a city with clearly lower standards of living.

      The problem here is that "Indian" is used English interchangeably as a nationality an an ethnicity, so there are sudden screams of "THAT's WACIST" from the overcompensating PC crowd. If they'd said "That's plenty for an English person", "that's plenty for a Minnesotan" or "That's plenty for a young unmarried guy", there wouldn't be such a problem. It's common practice for companies to end up getting away with lower salaries for people doing the same job, for a variety of reasons which are not protected in law.

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
  16. The cruelest part by Dishwasha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Was that they were only willing to offer him $50,000, not even $60,000 in CALIFORNIA. Isn't $60,000 a year under the poverty line there?

    1. Re:The cruelest part by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you joke, but for that income in the bay area, you'd have to have room mates, eat cheap food every day and maybe not even own a car. and you'll have no savings each month, it will all go to rent, food, insurance.

      $60k/yr might be ok in some areas of the country, but you will never have anything in your savings account at this kind of rate and with bay area housing prices. if you define poor as being a paycheck away from being homeless, this could count as being poor, then.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:The cruelest part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      $60k/year is quite a bit more than I make as a lead developer in the St. Louis region. I just bought a 4-bedroom, 2100 sq. ft. house three days ago. New construction. And I'm still not going to be living paycheck-to-paycheck.

      There is indeed a vast gap in the cost of living in "flyover country" vs. the coasts. This leads to a similarly vast gap in the pay scales. I'm surprised that more companies don't take advantage of it, to be honest. You'd expect more companies to relocate large numbers of jobs to areas where "high pay" isn't as high, but oddly enough, they don't.

    3. Re:The cruelest part by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      You'd expect more companies to relocate large numbers of jobs to areas where "high pay" isn't as high, but oddly enough, they don't.

      Neither the people running the companies nor their prospective employees want to live in those places. This is not only its own impediment, but it also results in a lack of available talent in those places. Since people are dirt broke now, the company would have to pay them relocation to attract them, and/or offer moving and housing which then gets them into a liability situation. There's nothing odd about it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:The cruelest part by JTsyo · · Score: 0

      And the Indian would have even less to live on since he needs to send money home to his family.

    5. Re:The cruelest part by tjb · · Score: 2

      Presumably, that's a base salary. Most sales positions have low-ish base salaries and sky-is-the-limit commission polciies. If you're really, really good at sales, you can make a boatload; if you can't hit your quota, though, it can really suck.

    6. Re:The cruelest part by as.kdjrfh+sxcjvs · · Score: 1

      Most employees are very sensibly reluctant to be relocated, because going to a one-employer town is really risky. It was a standard in the... 1980s? to move a division to a small town, fire everyone within five years, and re-hire them at half the wages -- which they had to take because they had underwater mortgages. And the mortgages were underwater *because* the company was dropping wages.

      That's before worrying about whether one's spouse can find good work, whether the schools are connected to good work, etc etc.

      Multi-employer, multi-industry towns are never as cheap to live in, even when they're unfashionable and have weather that's more... challenging... than the Bay Area's.

    7. Re:The cruelest part by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      I'm one of several hundred people who live in "those places" doing that kind of work for my employer, and we have our jobs explicitly because we're the cheapest "cost center" available. My boss's boss said that to my face once. And it's true. It's also perfectly true that my boss's boss's boss and everybody higher up the chain doesn't live here, or anywhere near here. If I lived near them, they'd have to pay me three times as much for me to maintain my standard of living, and they aren't going to do that.

    8. Re:The cruelest part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly, if your boss's boss's boss lived near you, your salary would be lower. It's the ignorance of what a dollar buys in "those places" that keeps your salary reasonable: it still seems like slave wages to them.

  17. I don't see the problem by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 0

    I don't understand what the problem is here. During salary negotiations, one usually makes an initial salary offer that's at the low end of what you think the candidate will be willing to accept. I thought it's fair game to bring all relevant information to bear when deciding what to make for an opening offer: how desperate the person is for a job, what his current salary is, etc.

    The story would be different if Oracle said "Our salary ceiling for Indians is $X, and for Americans it's $Y." But we're just talking about the opening offer, aren't we?

    1. Re:I don't see the problem by Githaron · · Score: 1

      I am fairly certain that if they fired a guy for saying $50,000 was a too low, they weren't willing to give anything more.

    2. Re:I don't see the problem by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 0

      I am fairly certain that if they fired a guy for saying $50,000 was a too low, they weren't willing to give anything more.

      But weren't they just firing him for his refusal to use $50k as his opening bid in the salary negotiation? That still sounds to me like a very different thing from Oracle imposing a race-based limit on where the salary negotiations were allowed to end up.

    3. Re:I don't see the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The law states you cannot offer/pay less than you pay another equal ability employee - period.

      There's zero wiggle room, zero negotiation - you start at the equal pay and go from there.

      since the other person was paid 60k, that's your starting point, no less. This is why it will be prosecuted as the crime it was.

    4. Re:I don't see the problem by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      But we're just talking about the opening offer, aren't we?

      We're talking about an initial offer that was lowballed because the guy was Indian. That's discrimination.

  18. $50k is absurdly low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $500k is more like it.

  19. 60K In California ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you even afford an apartment where you don't get shot at on a daily basis for 60K in California, let alone 50K ? Not to mention a salesperson will need decent clothes and a nice enough car which aren't cheap. I suppose they'd also like to eat.

  20. Boycotting Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will be boycotting anything and everything Oracle makes from any development I do from now on. Shouldn't be too hard as so much of what they offer is pure crap now anyhow this just seals the deal.

    1. Re:Boycotting Oracle by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Better yet, help make PostreSql better, create Help sites for it, etc. That's the best way to kick Oracle in the jewels.

    2. Re:Boycotting Oracle by mmell · · Score: 1

      No more JAVA, OpenOffice or MySQL for you.

  21. Re:True, yet. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    This was a person who was already working within Oracle... this was not a new hire. I'd dare say that most people in America who already work for Oracle make more than $50k.

  22. Yay! Payday! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That guy and the Indian couldn't have hoped for a better response.
    1) they get to escape oracle
    2) oracle will have to buy them off

    Must have been the greatest day of their lives.

  23. my SO's in sales there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    short version is it's a snake pit but you can make some serious $ if you can survive in it & produce!

    1. Re:my SO's in sales there by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      short version is it's a snake pit but you can make some serious $ if you can survive in it & produce!

      The anonymous coward is correct.

      I work for an enterprise software company (security space) and I'm friends with much of our sales team. Exactly the same deal.

    2. Re:my SO's in sales there by gander666 · · Score: 1

      Piling on here. In sales, and particularly in enterprise SW sales, the base salary is irrelevant. Sure, $10K seem like a big deal, but good sales people, who will eat their young to close an order, who blow away quota, can easily clear $300K or more in commissions and bonuses. Oracle will be no different.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
  24. Mr. Spandow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Mr. Spandow will find that his employment options after this lawsuit highly curtailed.

    1. Re: Mr. Spandow by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      I hope he gets enough money that he doesn't need employment.

  25. EEOC by v1x · · Score: 1

    According to http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/publications/fs-nator.cfm it seems like prohibition from workplace discrimination based on national origin extends to hiring. Unfortunately, the most likely outcome of a lawsuit like this one would be a fat settlement for this indivisual, after which, it will be business as usual at Oracle and at other companies with similar hiring practices.

    1. Re:EEOC by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      not at all relevant when someone is not legally entitled to work in the USA. A U.S. firm can certainly refuse to hire a foreigner with no right to work here

    2. Re:EEOC by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the most likely outcome of a lawsuit like this one would be a fat settlement for this indivisual, after which, it will be business as usual at Oracle and at other companies with similar hiring practices.

      I'm all for the big fat settlement, but it should be followed by something like the EEOC sniffing up Oracle's butt for the next five years, re-examining past discrimination allegations, etc., etc., etc.

  26. Re:True, yet. by DJProtoss · · Score: 1

    In this particular case, he was after transferring an employee of Oracle India who already had worked with the team (albeit remotely) and knew the systems involved, so arguably the pool of equally qualified Americans who weren't already employed by Oracle was probably pretty small.

    --
    "Success is based on knowing how far to go in going too far"
  27. yatch master by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i bet Larry has one of these: http://www.amazon.com/Rolex-Yacht-Master-Mens-Watch-116689/dp/B003KV0QSW/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1389710422&sr=8-9&keywords=yatchmaster+2+rolex

  28. Dell does this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for Dell. There was a developer from India on an L-2 visa with 5 years experience and working out of Northern Virginia. They paid him so little he could not afford a car. He had to walk to work. When it was really hot, he had to go into the bathroom and wash the sweat off when he got here. In this location a developer with 5 years experience typically makes about $80-90k. Plus if he is coming from India that is supposed to me he is top notch and you cannot find someone of his skills in the US. He was actually pretty good. They were totally ripping him off.

    I think people brought over to take tech jobs should be paid in the top 1% of tech salaries because they are supposed to be the best of the best. If they are the best, they should be paid like it. When they can be low balled, it makes it impossible to compete with those wages.

    1. Re:Dell does this too by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      You didn't say what his visa was, but the H-1B law says that you must pay someone at least as well as someone with the same skills and experience who is not an H-1B. If you believe that's ever enforced, then I've got a bridge to sell you.

    2. Re:Dell does this too by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It said L-2 visa.

    3. Re:Dell does this too by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      My bad. I don't know the rules for L-2, but L-1 is more wide open than H-1B. Whatever the rules are though, my comment about them not being enforced still stands.

  29. 50-60K? In Cali? by sharkette66 · · Score: 0

    Maybe since it is a sales position, there is a bonus structure of some kind.

    If we're talking Indian, do we mean dot-com or feather-com?

  30. Ob. Monty Python by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.

  31. Top Ramen Every Night! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And people in Oregon wonder why their Oracle-designed Obamacare exchange site failed.

    A contracting company recently slipped and sent me the going "non-green card" rate for Microsoft in Seattle. $38k/year plus $27k/year per diem puts them at $65k/year, fairly low for Puget Sound living expenses.. If you're unemployed in the Pacific Northwest, now you know what you're up against.

    1. Re:Top Ramen Every Night! by mmell · · Score: 1
      Been there, done that. Doing it now, as a matter of fact.

      All the low-priced foreign labor does to the market is make it more competitive. Sure, guys like O?a?l? and I?M are hiring cheap (non-US Citizen) labor whenever they can - it saves them huge amounts of money and they have the size and infrastructure to make effective use of personnel who may or may not be the equal of local talent (i.e., they can absorb considerable amounts of incompetency before any problems actually show). There are plenty of places which can't afford to cut those corners within their organization - and typically, they can't afford the front end expenses associated with hiring personnel on H1B visas anyhow. Let the ?r?c?e's and ?B?'s of the world do what they do best - create the standard and market mediocrity. That leaves room for the rest of the field to concentrate on products which exceed the standard, products crafted by the best personnel money can buy.

    2. Re:Top Ramen Every Night! by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      just because Indians find 50k good money doesn't mean they do bad work. It maybe so that these companies would have anyway paid them 120k and still kept almost the same amount of Indians on their payroll, but since the Indians are okay with 50k (they are not cost-cutting you, they are cost-cutting the other Indian candiates who also maybe equally good) it is like double benefit for these companies. Just because ur expensive country requires 100k to be considered even middle class, doesn't mean that if you get paid 100k then u are a better employee than an Indian who takes 50k.

  32. Visa requirements - above-average salary? by davids-world.com · · Score: 1

    That guy from India presumably needed a visa, such as an H1B. In order to get this, a company needs to demonstrate to the Dept of Labor that the person in question can command an above-average salary. How do they do this if they undercut people in comparable jobs?

    1. Re:Visa requirements - above-average salary? by Shados · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with the fine prints, but I think this is an L1 visa or something (transfering an employee from an office abroad).

      Again, don't quote me, but the idea is something along the line of, you have an office abroad, you have someone work for a set amount of time there (I think its 1 year?), then you can transfer them in the US far more easily than with an H1B

    2. Re:Visa requirements - above-average salary? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Occasionally the US enforces anti-discrimination laws (though not for age discrimination of course). They never enforce the H-1B laws. Write all the laws you want, but if they're not enforced, then they're worse than useless.

    3. Re:Visa requirements - above-average salary? by davids-world.com · · Score: 1

      I see, that makes sense, thanks!

    4. Re:Visa requirements - above-average salary? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's 6 months, actually. And yes, L1 completely lacks any "prevailing wage" provisions, which is ridiculous. I'm glad that I personally wasn't affected by this (I was originally on L1 before applying for H1B), but it is basically entirely up to the good will of your employer, and how valuable or not you are to them.

      Of course, all the attempts to enact laws to fix it were shot down in Congress.

    5. Re:Visa requirements - above-average salary? by Shados · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Everything i can look up, including on the US immigration site and in the docs they gave me when i got my green card about the other visas, says 1 year out of the last 3.

  33. Someone disagrees - and gets fired? by davids-world.com · · Score: 1

    Is this what corporate America is, these days? Someone disagrees in an e-mail with the head office and gets dismissed for that? Oracle would be unethical, but also downright stupid if they fired everyone who didn't share the views of their superiors. I can't believe that...

  34. Mongo DB by Frankie70 · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Mongo DB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy now works at Mongo DB

      http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ian-spandow/1/739/557

      Good for him. Oracle seems to be such a dead-end place to work.

  35. 50K good? in the USA too, you bet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a tech who is unemployed, I will work for that kind of money today!!!

    1. Re:50K good? in the USA too, you bet! by arth1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a tech who is unemployed, I will work for that kind of money today!!!

      That was the salary for a salesman already experienced with the company, for a job in California.

      Do you still qualify?

  36. In the end this hurts everyone by Direshot · · Score: 1

    Well, if Oracle or Microsoft or any company wants to find good talent at cheaper rates anywhere in the world, it's fine. However what is not fine is bringing them at cheaper than local rates to another locality/country. As one of the poster already mentioned "Its the Law". That is because it brings the cost of labor down in that locality and everyone in that industry gets hurt. In the long run, even the company who hired the person at lower price since the consumer is not stupid. In some time they will learn to negotiate the product at the lower price.

  37. '. If they want to import workers from abroad, bec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forget that Oracle ensures that by locating most all of its educational facilities ... abroad.

  38. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  39. Diplomat's maid in NYC wants 4500$ a month. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Remember the brouhaha about the Indian diplomat lady who was arrested and (allegedly) strip searched by NYPD for underpaying the maid?. The maid claimed she was offered a salary of 4500$ a month and got paid less than 1/3 of that.

    So 50K is good money for an Indian. Indian maid that is!

    Turns out Government of India pays the diplomats at that level about 4500$ a month. The maid misunderstood the line in the visa application where the employer is saying, "my salary is 4500$ a month" to prove her ability to pay the contracted wage to be the wage the maid is going to be paid. She complained she was getting only 1/3 of that money. But 1500$ a month was the contracted wage. Surprised that US Attorney who had successfully prosecuted billionaire hedge fund managers tripped up on that. 54K salary for a maid? Should have rung alarm bells.

    Well, she has been allowed to go home. India sent another diplomat back in retaliation.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Diplomat's maid in NYC wants 4500$ a month. by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      yes, India can now afford to say FU to usa the stupid bully. usa needs India more than India needs usa. I say screw them until they come begging to the Diplomat for forgiveness, close all embassies.

  40. Headline, meet Article by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Reading FTA I noticed a couple of things.

    First, it doesn't say the employee was a "high-performing salesman". Spandow was a Sales Manager, but it doesn't say what job was offered to the employee from India. My first thought was that $60K for a high performing salesman is absurdly low so I would guess that this guy is a tech of some kind.

    Second, the HR response could be taken a couple of ways. It wouldn't be unreasonable to assume someone transferring from a foreign country will be less productive at the beginning. If the HR person had phrased it as "experience has shown that a transferee like this competes with other employees earning $50K" it wouldn't have been a problem

    Third, given what was said to Spandow I'm inclined to believe there was discrimination here and that Oracle is in deep doo doo.

  41. Racism? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 0

    When he requested a salary of $60,000 a year or more for the employee, equivalent to what his white American counterparts received, he was told instead to offer $50,000, which was 'good money for an Indian.'

    Is there any evidence that non-white Americans were being paid less for the same job? Or is this just an attempt to insert race into a discussion where it probably does not belong?

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    1. Re:Racism? by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      btw Indians have all 3 races in the country - White (North+West) Black (West+South) and Yellow (Mainly in Eastern India). It maybe so that a higher proportion of the IT people in USA are from South India since a lot of Tech companies are also in South India. Just wanted to clear that up. Let's review again - Aryan/Whitish people in North India, Dravidian/Darkish people in South India and Mongoloid/Chinese-ish people in East India.

  42. India discriminates against non-Indians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try staying in a hotel in India: as a non-Indian you will get charged many times what an Indian is paid.

    This seems perfectly reasonable: salaries are dependent on your local market.

  43. How dumb can the managers be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't those managers at Oracle listen to their (In)Human Resources people when they say "don't discriminate *wink wink* and definitely don't be blatant about it *serious stare*"?

  44. Corporations are sometimes people too you insensit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Under the law corporations have the same accountab^H^H^H rights as people.

    I think Oracle definitely said something when they fired the guy who wanted to offer his Indian counterpart a proper salary.

  45. I know how to make it all better . . . by mmell · · Score: 1
    We just need to pump enough into the Indian economy so that their economy is the same size (cost, etc.) as ours. We don't need to pave one road in India, plow one field or install any plumbing or electricity there. Just make sure that a US Dollar is worth the same in India as it is in America. THEN companies can hire all the Indian workers they want for H1B - because they'll want the same $$$ I would to do the job.

    Never mind fixing the problem - fix the situation. Annex India!

  46. Salary Expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the guy had to do was to say the same thing this way: "$50K will meet his salary expectations. Don't offer $60K," and nobody would have raised a fuss. Personally, I've never been paid more than I expected to be paid. So except for a lughead who chose his words poorly, I don't see the crime here.

  47. job not filled by american? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, everyone misses the point - fill the AMERICAN job with Americans and for the record i am Canadian, importing someone from another nation to steal a job that should go local is wrong. Two wrongs don't make a right , so Oracle shame on you

  48. idiotic by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Indian = someone living in India regardless of genetic. $50,000 is good = economic scale statement based on average income in the country. Total racism = 0.

    1. Re:idiotic by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Except that this particular person would be immigrated to the USA to do their work, meaning for a top sales person at Oracle, $50k is not just an insult, but a crass injustice based on cost-of-living, let alone the rest.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  49. heads up by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Indian is not an ethnicity.

    1. Re:heads up by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make it okay.

    2. Re:heads up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what, would you rather he have said that $50,000 isn't bad for a mongoloid?

  50. How about non-whites stop FORCING themselves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... into white people's countries? How about non-whites ASK white people if they WANT to share their countries with them, and the five percent of whites who are actually insane enough to say 'yes' can be immediately deported to the worst third world shithole of OUR choice? (The 95% of white people who DON'T want to live in Brazil...)

  51. Work Outside of the Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A white American guy I know personally took an IT job in Bangalore because he could. His salary is actually almost what it would be in the US, but his apartment, utilities, and other necessities are so inexpensive he's hired a driver, cook, maid, and other people. So, he's helped himself to a good lifestyle, employs other people and treats them with dignity and gets to work in IT in a role he finds interesting. I'd like to see any of the non-executive types in Silicon Valley live the way this guy does and still have money in the bank at the end of the month. Were I single, I would seriously consider doing something like this.

  52. Oracle and everybody else by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    Oracle just got caught.

    Anybody familiar with the corporate-tech H1B propaganda knows that Oracle's view is entirely normal.

    Tech companies want the public to think that H1B are extremely highly skilled, and highly paid.

    Anybody who actually works for the tech giants knows that H1Bs are mainly a cost cutting measure.

    The US GAO even proved this in 2009.

  53. that IS *great* money for an Indian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STOP BRINGING Indians over here in the first place!! If they're lucky enough to get into the states, I think minimum wage would be sufficient if they agree to shower regularly.

  54. how much more? by schlachter · · Score: 1

    how much more should a westerner tech manager expect over their current salary if moving internationally for their company...to a location where the cost of living is higher? just curious.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  55. Don't huit mah feeweengs by chelunick · · Score: 1

    Yes, the exchage was a little crass but it is nothign new and the reaction is ridiculous. Grow a friggin pair and thiken up that hide. This hypersensitive society is doomed to .. doom us all.

  56. I always thought India was a country not a race. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    When he requested a salary of $60,000 a year or more for the employee, equivalent to what his white American counterparts received,

    Or what his Indian-American counterpart would have received.

    he was told instead to offer $50,000, which was 'good money for an Indian.'

    I realize this sounds racist, and maybe the person who said it is racist, but people living in the nation of India (i.e. Indians), do traditionally have lower incomes and might be more likely to accept a lower offer.

    Companies do this sort of thing all the time for all sorts of things. A company I worked for offered software developers that were not from the Bay Area, less money (because they thought engineers not from silicon valley would be willing to accept lower offers).

    Companies care about money more than treating people fairly. They engage in deception to maximize profits. I am pretty sure that if there was a way to offer American employees less money and get away with it, they would do that too.

    I think certainly this is a case of discrimination based on nationality. However I think it is a mischaracterization to say that this is racial discrimination with the information in the article.

    I think the dichotomy of "Indian vs. White" is a false one. It should be "Indian vs. American" and "Indian/South Asian descent vs. Europe descent". One can be of European descent with Indian nationality, south asian descent living in Europe or America. I think it is important not to conflate these to distinctions.

  57. What? by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1, Informative
    or your fired

    Your fired what?

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or your fired

      Your fired what?

      Your fired, Asshole?

  58. 50K is fair he was only TEMPORARILY in CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy was offered 50k not because of his race but because of the country of his origin and its job market and seeing that he might not spend all that money in california but back in india where it is worth 3x as much, 50k is more than enough. There is no point in paying someone more than 3x as much as they're making in their home countries if they take that kind of money home and then buy a house there from just from one year's labor. It distorts that country's markets and it is plain wrong. If only you had half a brain and used an ounce of it before you posted.

  59. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mono I doesn't work on Iphone

    Sorry pall, you've just excluded yourself from the more than half the mobile market. That's why Google really chose Java.

    1. Re:But by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      I think Google chose Java for Android because:

      1) It has the largest developer base
      2) It's popular and widely used in academia
      3) It's designed to be cross platform
      4) There were (almost) mature open source implementation and other tech available
      5) Sun was weak at the time, they wouldn't have been able to sustain much of a lawsuit against Google if they wanted to

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  60. And that is why H1-B is so popular by nobuddy · · Score: 1

    Companies complain about the lack of talent in the US. What they really mean is the lack of talent willing to work for less.

  61. Not all Americans are white by babylon93 · · Score: 0

    Don't make this a racial thing.

  62. People seem to miss the what's plainly there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. This illustrates one of the biggest and richest IT firms knowingly using foreign labor to push-down wages... something they and the politicians they buy always deny. Larry Ellison could pay Americans a bit more and sail a few fewer high-tech sailboats....

    2. This illustrated that one of the biggest and richest IT firms is VERY aware of the ethnicity/citizenship of individual workers and assumes this justifies different compensation levels.....something these firms ALWAY deny. (SOUNDS like point #1, but it's a slightly different point with additional implications)

    3. This proves there is no shortage of tech workers in the U.S. because the basic rules of a market economy say thet the price of something that is in short supply should RISE. This is contrary to the "party line" of the super-rich tech industry titans and the politicians they purchase.... and, no , it's NOT a Republican thing; most of these companies are Democrat-leaning and most of their CEOs are Democrats, though many stupid Republican politicians support them in the name of being "pro-business"

    Every time you use an Oracle product, you help Ellison and friends push-down American IT wages

    Every time you "friend" somebody or "like" something of Facebook, you help Zuckerberg fund his "Remove all H-1B limits and import unlimited number of immigrants to push down American wages" campaign

    The super-rich computer and internet firms in the U.S. are ALL pushing the politicians in Washington D.C. to eliminate all the limits on cheap imported labor.... which will not even be good for the immigrants over the long-term since the removal of limits will also enable the suppression of immigrant labor pay rates (supply and demand)

  63. Cry me a @#%$ river. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's here to make 10x what he would be paid in India... AND he's stealing an American job. All you politically correct a-holes should try looking for work during a down turn, and take note of who gets the job you applied for. If you haven't seen this, you don't know Silicon Valley... and therefore you should just stfu, because you don't even know what you're talking about... spouting MLK as if it were going to pay your rent when when the economy crashes, and a foreign worker steals your job.

  64. Had a different experince with Oracle by ehiris · · Score: 1

    I was contacted by a recruiter from Oracle for a position that I was perfectly qualified for and I never got past that interview because according to the recruiter my previous job at a major US corporation didn't pay me enough to qualify me .....

  65. Glad they fired him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem with Liberal, butt lickers like Spandow is that a Westerner will be paid far less than an Indian - in that they Will Not Be Allowed To Work There In The First Place. Asia's built around racism. There Are Little or No opportunities for Westerners. Get It?

  66. Accountants by vac65 · · Score: 1

    This what happens when accountants drive engineering companies. Remember HP?

  67. Zero-Sum by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Globalization is Zero-Sum.
    Amend your Constitution accordingly.
    Otherwise your future generations will regret.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Global_Trap

  68. National Origin by nobuddy · · Score: 1

    A lot of people seem to be forgetting the "National Origin" part of the racial discrimination law.

  69. Except he isn't living there by nobuddy · · Score: 1

    read the article, they were moving him to their location, not working from India.

  70. but it IS good money by kbx911 · · Score: 0

    even if the person saves 10-20k and sends home, it's = INR 6-12 Lakhs, which when multiplied by PPP (purchasing power parity) is equal to $30-80K for his family/parents back home.

  71. And by NewYork · · Score: 1

    It's TRUE because Indian regime is spending $1 billion/year on space research when 50% of its children are malnourished.
    http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Every-second-Indian-child-is-malnourished-Report/articleshow/25724848.cms

  72. Caste system by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Americans should be worried about creeping Caste system due to H1Bs/Immigrants from India.
    Caste is like Cancer. It cannot be cured. It has to be cut-off. Otherwise it'll destroy your middle class.
    Google "Companies ruined or almost ruined by Indians".

  73. Devyani Khobragade by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Now slavery by Indians.
    Next US will crack on wage slavery by H1B Indians.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devyani_Khobragade

  74. ($50K + Passport) $60K by mtthwbrnd · · Score: 1

    This is not "racial discrimination". Whenever anybody thinks about what to offer somebody else they will consider what is the lowest figure they can get away with. That is their job. If he does not do that then he should be sued for being an incompetent negotiator.

    In this case he thought, reasonably, that he could get away with $50K because the guy was coming from India where $50K is *a lot* of money, not to mention that he gets his foot in the door in a 1st world country and the clock starts ticking before he can bring his family and become a citizen. THAT IS EVEN MORE VALUABLE THAN THE $10k AT STAKE.

    So what we are saying here is that we expect our managers to offer everybody to same salary. Well then it cuts both ways. No more negotiation. Just set scales like in the lower ranks of government.

    You know what you will end up with? NORTH KOREA.

    What is despicable is that they are hiring foreigners rather than investing in their own people. Sowing the seeds of their own destruction.

  75. Not racism per say.... by ender89 · · Score: 1

    we need a better word for what happened, because its pretty clear that what went down had less to do with his race and more to do with his country and culture. It seems it was less "He's brown, he should expect less" and more "He's from a third-world country. $50k is a large fortune to him. he doesn't need $60k." So less racism and more classism? first-world eliteism?

  76. That's a great idea! by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    Because it worked so well for Apple selling products built by slaves at FoxxCon

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.
  77. No surprise .... that is the norm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not surprising as ORACLE has demonstrated to act with doubtful business and HR-practices. For example Rodger Smith SVP UGBU has hired Bill Devereaux who is known in the market as spying, lying and infiltrating. PG&E was fined with 390.000$ for the wrongdoing of Bill. PGE subseqently fired Bill - But ORACLE hired this expert and fired many other trustworthy and loyal employees. All of that is public and can be reviewed on google, youtube, CPUC, PGE, ORACLE, etc...

    More over ORACLE is firing people in different high cost European countries to hire in low cost countries and circumventing labor, fiscal and social laws.