Domain: sunsite.dk
Stories and comments across the archive that link to sunsite.dk.
Comments · 329
-
Re:It's a plot!
I think they're just enabling MD5 on the BGP sessions. It's already specified in RFC 2385 - Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature Option. It's basically a $600k program to manage the logistics of turing this on. I do give props for Network World for making a mundane task 5 whole pages.
-
Re:They've solved their own problem
I prefer RFC 2541. The Mark 1 Air Gap is still the gold standard of security.
To be fair "physically inaccessible" shows that they sort of get it, but they wrap it up in so many buzzwords that it'll never get implemented.
-
Re:one of those people
I actually kind of split between using the xCode editor and VIM
I've always worked in Emacs (yeah, it is more an OS than an editor) using the JDEE plugin that provides full support for Ant.
Recently I thought about pulling together a flash stick with a list of tools I use but wanted to be able to run regardless of the host I plugged into. I considered various scripting languages like TCL, PERL and Python, and decided to find what Java tools were available. I figured I was likely to find a JRE installed on a machine (maybe not a JDK though).
I grabbed Netbeans as it can be installed on a thumb drive because you can define relative paths in configuration file (except for custom defined libraries which are all fixed path??) and some other tools.
I configured Ant on the drive as well.
Netbeans works fine, a reasonable tool. On the rare occasions I've needed a GUI painter it works well, though defaults to a Java 6 layout manager (Group) so you have to be careful. But the debug support is what I really liked.
I used it for a while (and tried Eclipse) but could never get the hang of it controlling everything, so I installed a Windows Emacs build and Linux Emacs (static) build on my thumb drive and configured either a
.bat or .sh file to launch that would setup the pathing to the .emacs file.Granted I can't use it on OS X unless I get a different binary, but this works for me because once you have the Emacs binary, all you need is the LISP files for your programming.
YMMV, but I found that just getting the editor I have worked with for years available on multiple hosts was worth more than a cross platform IDE.
-
Mail reflectors 1989
The way most people keep up to date on network news is through subscription to a number of mail reflectors (also known as mail exploders). Mail reflectors are special electronic mailboxes which, when they receive a message, resend it to a list of other mailboxes. This in effect creates a discussion group on a particular topic. Each subscriber sees all the mail forwarded by the reflector, and if one wants to put his "two cents" in sends a message with the comments to the reflector.
The Hitchhikers Guide to the Internet September 1989 -
Re:Change or Defy
You know, I don't see anyone following this RFC. So, as it stands, it seems these RFCs aren't always adhered to.
-
Re:No, you just don't understand the subject
No, in fact, you are missing the point. People have lots of reflexes. Having a reflex is not the same as being able to perform a task that depends on that reflex. They most certainly do not have a reflex for breastfeeding...They have a reflex for suckling, which is not the same thing at all.
As you are clearly speaking from zero experience, and just as clearly, have never breastfed anything, I'm going to treat your Wikipedia knowledge with the contempt it deserves, doubly so, because you didn't even bother to look up the correct article. Read down to the "Conditions that interfere with breastfeeding" section, then have a nice big glass of STFU on me.
I suggest you inform yourself before you talk to an actual girl. -
Linux links
-
Re:As...The point is, your posts have been almost entirely off-topic.
No one here cares about the 90's style special effects that can rival those generated by povray or Winamp's AVS visualiser, moreover they are in no way relevant to the userbase we're discussing.
Bear in mind that a good proportion of Photoshop users never even touch on multi layered images, let alone want to generate raytraced diamonds with limitless undo and over 70 layer modes, this is all entirely superfluous to the needs of the very home users you suggest could quite happily use your software.
The GIMP is also too complicated for a lot of users, however, it's far less complex than your product, is completely free and crossplatform, constantly improving and evolving. WI is, by comparison, non-free, tied to old crusty toolkits on a single platform and stagnating.
As for yur web site sukz, dude , this kind of response is not only to be expected but quite legitimate, first impressions matter a great deal and let's face it, first impressions from your website are beaten outright by those given by http://www.gimp.org/ quite why you're unable to see this for yourself is beyond me.
As much as you may feel GIMP is inadequate compared to your pet project, it's more than adequate for the thousands of people who use it for all manner of purposes. search flickr for GIMP related images or visit http://gug.sunsite.dk/ to see some of the amateur output GIMP users can create with it, the quality as expected varies greatly but a lot of it's of a higher standard than anything in your gallery. -
Re:KDE doesn't stand a chance until....Why are everyone so eager to have software run 'above' X11? 1. standardized operation for ALL applicatation. http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/dbus 2. cut and paste between ALL applications.. Lend these guys a hand. http://wiki.x.org/wiki/CutAndPaste 3. Applications must ALL be uniform in operation of common functions.. Again, http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/dbus 4. Uniform operation of input devices (mouse).. http://mms.sunsite.dk/doc/x80.html http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotp
l ug/udev.html 5. Easily customizable.. http://xwinman.org/ Window Managers are plentiful. 6. Standardized behavour on any local or remote environment.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_core_protoco l 7. Some kind of direct video support (games, etc...). http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/ -
Tuning startups in *nix systems.Hibernate is not the only possible approach - it's actually possible to speed up a regular system startup sequence.
There've been discussions here and here.
The idea is to load services in parallel, and replace the ancient Init system. Windows NT supposed does this; still, it's no match for a hand-tuned minimal init system, such as this or this. I tried this back in 2003, and had my desktop open in a maximum of 5 seconds. Bios ~1 sec, Kernel load time ~ 1 sec, Services+GUI ~3 secs. This was on a 1Ghz Celeron, with 128MB RAM. It also helped that I was running Sawfish, with no desktop widgets(no menus, toolbars, anything). Just a bunch of keyboard shortcuts to launch the apps I used. I stopped installing any new distros after that - none of them could offer a better user experience than what I had. It also helps in gaining a better understanding of your system - what are each services used for, how to do file system recovery, and esoteric details.
-
Re:A Related Question...
This might not be exactly what you are looking for, but maybe...
http://gug.sunsite.dk/tutorials/woc1/?PHPSESSID=11 cac8f0a67d00d32c3f73b81a592429 -
Re:VI?!?!
Surely you mean saves you having to write code that is required, but pretty bog standard, like the basic structure of a class definition etc...
There are CLI-based editors that can do that. For example, I do that all the time in Emacs using the JDEE plugin. -
Re: Comments from people who actually create
I'm a digital artist. I use gimp.app on a G4 Mac mini running OS X Tiger. The current download of gimp.app is universal, so it should work on an Intel Mac. Apple X11 is required. Install it from the Tiger installation DVD. Easily done.
I launch Apple X11 and then launch Gimp. This never fails.
There are tutorials and a discussion forum at the Gimp User Group. That said, I plan to buy the book.
Gimp's inscrutability is half the fun for me. I experiment with the controls. Things happen.
Gimp isn't the only art software in my toolchest. Corel Painter IX.5 is the best paint program that I use. There's also an old academic version of Photoshop 6 on the Classic layer.
It's silly to limit oneself as an artist to just one program.
-
Re:32-bits? Uhhh...
What does rfc4291 know anyway. Everybody knows that RFC 2470 is where it's at.
-
Emacs Code Browser and JDEEI'm amazed that no one has mentioned the Emacs Code Browser. This includes a whole bunch of code analysis tools, including semantic parsing for intellisense-like completion, directory views, etc. It hooks up with Speedbar to make browsing easier and can mark up and index the code to identify functions/methods. It can be found at ECB at sourceforget.net. It's built on top of the Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools.
Also worth mentioning (and related) is the Java Development Environment for Emacs, which makes analysing and traversing a large Java project a whole lot easier, with integrated class management, wizards, skeletons for creating classes and javadoc comments. You can get JDEE from its homepage.
Cheers,
Toby Haynes -
QoSFrom what I understand, most of these ISP's are looking at actually implimenting the established QoS protocols - in their own twisted way.
Most systems right now ignore the QoS state of packets --- everything get's shipped down the pipe - no priority assigned - don't care if it's a WWW GET or a VOIP call - everything goes together as 'best effort'.
QoS was developed to resolve the issue that some protocols are latency sensative and others are not. In general it has NOT been implimented.
What I see here is that the ISPs are saying they are willing to impliment QoS for people who pay extra for it. I have seen a few comments comparing the tiered/open internet to FEDEX/USPS. That works in the sense that you pay extra to have FEDEX deliver something faster. The thing is, you actually pay for the company to DO something. In this case, you are paying the company to NOT do something.
If QoS is implimented as envisioned originally (RFC2386), every protocol has a priority, some like ftp, html, email, etc are best effort - it doesn't matter if it's delayed a few mSec or not - others like Streaming video and VOIP are high priority - latency kills there. The protocols for QoS are supposed to recognize the QoS state - either through a QoS value in the packet or through protocol recognition based on packet filtering - and route accordingly.
If an ISP is going to impliment QoS, it has to impliment QoS network wide - it's not a piecemeal item due to the fact it requires some advanced knowledge of 'best route' implimentations. In order to make the tiered internet being discussed, some form of packet filtering will have to be implimented to diferentiate the corperations sending the data and determining if they have in fact paid for QoS. This can be a peer point interface where the QoS is rewritten or a 'per hop' determination at the routers.
So what exactly are you paying the company for? They have implimented the QOS protocols already, you are paying for them to not filter out your QoS. Even better, since I can't see the ISP's paying each other for the service, you will probably have to pay every ISP to not filter you. It is after all a network. Just because Qwest shoves you through at high priority because you paid them to does not mean AT&T will unless you pay them also.
Let's move on to the next stage. This is what most people are quoting the Backbone providers as saying, "if you pay us, we will mark all all of your packets as priority QoS." OK, well that's spiffy, not only are you charging me more to run things through your network with no garantee that the next network will abide by your QoS, but you have just destroyed the whole purpose of QoS because now the VOIP and HTML are running at the same QoS again. You get more money to provide exactly the same service you just had.
What doesn't work:
- Charging for QoS without making some arrangement to make sure that QoS will be honored throughout the network.
- Implimenting QoS based on Source not Protocol
- Charging more for raw bandwidth after Implimenting QoS.
- Charging more for QoS rated bandwidth based on protocol.
Basing a QoS system on Source and not Protocol is equally as doomed because it will fail to provide any advantage to the latency sensative protocols due to the high volume of non-sensative protocol trafic. Face it Bit-Torrent is not latency sensative. A dropped packet at a congested router is irrelivent in the scheme of things, it's a lot different for a VOIP call.
Remember, QoS should only come into play when there is a bottleneck at a router/peering point.
Just my .02 and I may be incorrect, so if you have more specific information, please correct me. -
Suggestions To Your Question
-
Software for "First Time Windows users"
Now that I have a chance to painlessly dip into the Windows world, what I'd like to ask you is, what Windows software amazes you?
http://osswin.sourceforge.net/
http://www.theopencd.org/
http://osscd.sunsite.dk/
http://www.winlibre.com/en/index.php
Enjoy. -
Re:Artists' OS KnowledgeIt's always like this. People charge in going "Gimp can't draw straight lines! Gimp can't draw black-and-white pixels! Gimp can't count to two!" and we patiently point out the three simple menu steps they could have used to do it if only they'd thought to look there, and without missing a beat they go on: "Yeah, but it doesn't SMELL, FEEL, TASTE, LOOK, AND SOUND EXACTLY LIKE PHOTOSHOP!"
but it still doesn't approach Photoshop's ease of use or flexibility.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Whatever. I suppose pointing out "Layers->Colors->Curves" isn't going to do any good, either, is it? I mean, what the hell is this? Are you people forced to use a computer with your hands cuffed behind your back or something? Right-click. That's what the right mouse button is for. Explore *every* submenu, in order. Open a test image and run *every* menu entry on it. You don't even need to open this free book or read any of my tutorials or read anybody else's tutorials. Everything's right there. If you don't like it, don't use it, but stop insisting that all the functions don't exist. It's dumb. You have just as much access to Google as anybody else, presuming you don't live in China. And then people wonder why we get frustrated.
As I've said before, I'm *dying* to see Photoshop ported. So *Adobe* can deal with you people instead of we GNU/Linux users.
-
Sven is a bit of a jerk
Look what he had to say to the GimpShop guy - http://gug.sunsite.dk/forum/?threadid=2721 - heaven forbid somebody try and improve on his oh-so-holy project!
Yes, it is HIS project, but the second you GPL the code, it's out of your hands and flaming people for trying to do something new with your idea is petty. You aren't by any means required to provide support to the forks (I'm sure he has no love for the FilmGIMP/CinePaint devs either), but a lack of civility makes your own project, nay, OSS at large, look like a giant group of elitist pricks. -
Re:No, they're not hiring "PC" developers...
I wrote this a while back, I seem to remember something about it not working right but don't remember what.
"I will cover updating loki_update, but this should apply to updating anything from Loki.
First, download the update file.
I did this with the command: wget ftp://sunsite.dk/mirrors/lokigames/updates/loki_up date/loki_update-1.0.12-x86.run
Make it executable, and then run it with the --keep paramater. This will create a directory named loki_update-1.0.12-x86. Enter that directory.
Get the version of loki_patch that works with newer versions of glibc from here.
Make sure you are in the new loki_update directory, and then replace the loki_patch in bin/Linux/x86/ with the loki_patch you just downloaded.
Now, just run update.sh and the update should proceed normally.
This has been tested with Tribes 2 in addition to loki_update. The only difference was that to completely update Tribes 2, you must install many patches in the order they were released. I used loki_update to show what patches needed to be installed, and then simply installed then with the method described above."
Basically you just need a binary that is compatible with your current glibc version. I'm sure there's a way to install an older glibc version and make the game use that instead, but I don't know how. -
Recommended NTP clientsSince nobody has mentioned anything about clients yet, here are my suggestions:
-
A good newbie guide
This guide helped me greatly when I started out with Linux: Linux Newbie Guide. I didn't see it on your list. Ahh, I remember back when I started out and I had no idea how to install a program in Linux. I was like "WTF, what's the equivalent of a
.exe???". This guide showed me the light. :) -
Re:Not just designers that find Gimp hard to grokpointing fingers at photoshop or the user will not make UI issues disappear, so please don't do that.
My reply in length: THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE GIMP INTERFACE. What YOU, the frustrated user need to do, is go find some documentation on it http://gug.sunsite.dk/docs/Grokking-the-GIMP-v1.0
/ and perhaps join a forum or two http://gug.sunsite.dk/. If you don't see the howto or doc that addresses your problem, you need to ask about it in the forum. If the feature you ask for isn't there, ask if there's a script-fu extension that does that. If there isn't, well, somebody's just gonna have to write one, aren't they? Either learn script-fu and write it yourself, or patiently wait for somebody else to do it. Remember, in the open-source world, unless you're pretty wierd and your needs are that narrow, somebody else has already solved the problem which you are trying to solve.My reply in brief: What the hell exists in the universe that is any kind of complicated at all that teaches itself to you? When pianos have interfaces that allow you to sit down your first time and play a concerto without your knowing anything about music at all, when a camera is invented with an interface that makes you look like a glamourous fashion model in every frame without your having to even bother combing your hair, when a stove is invented whose interface is designed so that we can all cook like Emeril Lagasse even if all we've ever done before is microwave burrittos, then we'll justify criticisms of Gimp's interface, thank you very much. As my sig says from time to time: "Stealth Bombers are more difficult to operate than tricycles BECAUSE THEY CAN FLY!"
-
Re:Not just designers that find Gimp hard to grokpointing fingers at photoshop or the user will not make UI issues disappear, so please don't do that.
My reply in length: THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE GIMP INTERFACE. What YOU, the frustrated user need to do, is go find some documentation on it http://gug.sunsite.dk/docs/Grokking-the-GIMP-v1.0
/ and perhaps join a forum or two http://gug.sunsite.dk/. If you don't see the howto or doc that addresses your problem, you need to ask about it in the forum. If the feature you ask for isn't there, ask if there's a script-fu extension that does that. If there isn't, well, somebody's just gonna have to write one, aren't they? Either learn script-fu and write it yourself, or patiently wait for somebody else to do it. Remember, in the open-source world, unless you're pretty wierd and your needs are that narrow, somebody else has already solved the problem which you are trying to solve.My reply in brief: What the hell exists in the universe that is any kind of complicated at all that teaches itself to you? When pianos have interfaces that allow you to sit down your first time and play a concerto without your knowing anything about music at all, when a camera is invented with an interface that makes you look like a glamourous fashion model in every frame without your having to even bother combing your hair, when a stove is invented whose interface is designed so that we can all cook like Emeril Lagasse even if all we've ever done before is microwave burrittos, then we'll justify criticisms of Gimp's interface, thank you very much. As my sig says from time to time: "Stealth Bombers are more difficult to operate than tricycles BECAUSE THEY CAN FLY!"
-
Re:rot indeed, from the fine article:He's losing the desktop
1998 called. He wants his quippy line back.
You've got a piece of shit that has not fundamentally changed in ten years
XFree, init.d, etc. KDE and GNOME stopped innovating a few years ago and they're not trying to make themselves more relevant by adding panels and widgets to the same bloated codebase. In the meantime, installing a font on Linux is a nightmare. OS X is ahead of Microsoft and us by a mile. What's your excuse?
XFCE is innovating. There's a lot of innovation on the server side. Mono is (although a clone of a microsoft tech) extremely cool in ways Java never was. But it's not enough...
The greed heads and control freaks
http://gug.sunsite.dk/forum/?threadid=2721
Those in glass houses...
Looks like you need a vacation or something.
-
Link to the Gimp developers complaints mentioned..
Here is a link to the complaints mentioned in the article. Apparently the lead developer of the Gimp didn't agree with a fork that would lead to a "terrible waste" of resources. Near the end, though, he seems to leave a door open for those changes to be contributed back to some degree.
-
"A horrible waste of time and resources"If you want to see some of the outcry of the GIMP developers against GIMPshop, check out this thread where Scott introduced his project to the GIMP mailing list.
Some of the reactions:
- "[Y]ou aren't doing anyone a favor by doing this. I'd appreciate if you kept your changes for yourself."
- "No, I won't help you. What you are up to is a horrible waste of time and resources."
-
Re:I prefer clockspeed's taiclock
OpenNTPD is EVIL. It "connects" to the NTP servers too often.
Consider using chronyd instead.
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/pipermail/timekeepers/ 2005/000941.html
http://chrony.sunsite.dk/ -
Re:It doesn't say just IE
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Opera 7.54 [en]
The interesting part is, that if read the HTTP specification, and then interpret accordingly, this string contains three product tokens and one comment. The product tokens are "Mozilla/4.0", "Opera", and "7.54". So actually it does not identify itself as MSIE, neither does IE. The [en] part is syntactically wrong, and really should have been part of a comment. Another mistake is that "Opera" and "7.54" are given as two different product names. Adjusting according to the specification, the user agent string should have been "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Opera/7.54 (en)"
I'm sure if you count what browsers really identify themselves as, Mozilla will be a clear winner. Mozilla, IE, and FireFox all identify themselves as Mozilla.
If the article had been named "Opera to Stop Spoofing User Agent as Mozilla", it would have been technically correct. -
You've not really used Emacs then
Six characters long? It's three in Emacs (sop) with abbrevations.
Code completion, I have found, is slower than knowing what the hell you are typing. And if you DO know what the hell you are typing, then code completion actually sucks quite hard because it interrupts you while you are typing something.
Eclipse is nice for some things, I like the auto-fixes and sometimes load code into Eclipse after I've spent a while actually writing in Emacs. But for actual code creation I still find Emacs to be a lot quicker because of its overall flexibility in a task at hand, between macros and abbreviations and user-defined functions.
As for that cool trick of "show me all the places my constructor is invoked" - well that's what the JDE Cross Referencer is for:
JDE includes a facility for creating and utilizing a cross-referencing database to enable you to quickly locate all the callers of any particular function. This functionality is very useful for quickly figuring how unfamiliar code works, and useful for doing certain tasks such as renaming functions. Be advised that this only finds direct callers, and cannot detect calls via Java's reflection mechanism. The cross-reference database must be kept in sync with the project code, however the database generation is generally quick. The remainder of this section explains how to configure and use the cross-referencer.
(from the JDE Users Guide)
Of course Eclipse has the same liability about not finding callers that are really invoking a constructor dynmically which is why people don't end up using such features all that much.
Eclipse is the way of the future though, it's nice to see a really strong generic IDE platform develop. I have no doubt someday some clever person will embed a fully functional Java version of the Emacs editor (no the keybindings alone are not enough) in Eclipse and then I'll be all set.
People who use IntelliJ seem to like it a lot better though, I have to say. -
Re:NIACThis is just proof that NASA is trailing the FOSS community when it comes to acronyms. How about:
GUG - the GIMP User Group, derived from
GIMP - the GNU Image Manipulation Program, derived from
GNU - a recursive acronym for GNU's Not UNIX.
If you thought that was impressive, how about the HURD. HURD stands for "HIRD of Unix Replacing Daemons", and HIRD stands for "HURD of Interfaces Representing Depth". That's TWO MUTUALLY RECURSIVE ACRONYMS!
Yes, NASA are definitely behind the times.
-
Re:Wow there is a lot of evangelizing hereThere are already packages of Gaim, Inkscape, and AbiWord. Unfortunately if you want to test them you must download this file manually and then this one, and put it in the same directory as the
.package - the redirects we use to stay independent of sunsite have been crushed out of existance by the Slashdot effect. It's a temporary problem, don't worry.Asking how they stack up is a bit of a biased question. Autopackage isn't meant to compete directly with RPM/DPKG or replace them, it's meant as a complement. They are designed for different things. For instance, a package of gnome-terminal makes no sense because that's a core part of the OS and autopackage is meant for third party applications. Capabilities RPM needs like auto-shlib-dep discovery are done differently in autopackage and vice-versa.
-
Re:Wow there is a lot of evangelizing hereThere are already packages of Gaim, Inkscape, and AbiWord. Unfortunately if you want to test them you must download this file manually and then this one, and put it in the same directory as the
.package - the redirects we use to stay independent of sunsite have been crushed out of existance by the Slashdot effect. It's a temporary problem, don't worry.Asking how they stack up is a bit of a biased question. Autopackage isn't meant to compete directly with RPM/DPKG or replace them, it's meant as a complement. They are designed for different things. For instance, a package of gnome-terminal makes no sense because that's a core part of the OS and autopackage is meant for third party applications. Capabilities RPM needs like auto-shlib-dep discovery are done differently in autopackage and vice-versa.
-
Re:Cool
If you're trying to convince your organization to switch to open-source offerings, it's easier to bring up an integrated solution such as, "We can switch to the Mozilla Suite" than to have to sell three or four different projects like, "We can switch to K-Meleon for browsing, Trillian for IM, Thunderbird for email," etc.
In the same way that Microsoft would (in a more ideal world ;-) ) try to convince Linux desktop users to "switch to Internet Explorer for browsing, Windows Messenger for IM, Outlook for email," etc.?I see nothing wrong in offering three or four different projects -- especially since that's how it all works anyway. A GNU/Linux system is composed of thousands of little projects. Windows, too, is based on lots of smaller programs. Normally, of course, these are all included simultaneously in the same O/S "package" (by that I mean the installation CD, not an individual RPM or whatever package), but if that's the problem, I'd suggest checking out the Open CD.
For that matter, I would be more cautious about switching to one mega-program that replaces five or six of my current programs simultaneously, since that affects a larger part of my desktop in a shorter amount of time. Better to switch out one component at a time and get used to one at a time instead, if you ask me.
-
Re:First post
Just because you hate Sun don't diss the real contributions they make to Linux by paying for engineers to contribute significantly to Gnome, X, and all the other stuff most Linux users depend on every day.
They don't seem to be too shy about stepping up to the plate when the need arises either.
I can tolerate a little mud slinging from Sun's management as long as they put their money where their mouth is. -
Re:easy
-
Neverball / Neverputt + foobillardI see no-one suggested Neverball.
This could be appropriate, requires no clic during action .
It consists basically in letting a ball roll on a surface you control the inclination of with your mouse (in your case, with your head). Sounds a bit like Marble madness, but quite better in my opinion. And very relaxing, too.Also included is a mini-golf game using the same graphics and engine : neverputt
Find them there : http://icculus.org/neverball/#download Note you will need a DLL if running winXP without service pack, but i cant recall the name (easy to find via google)Maybe a billard game such as foobillard would be suitable ? Of course, this means you'll lack a bit of the "advanced" features such as ball spin, etc., but it could just be fine.
find it here : http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/Maybe you would be interrested, if you type with Dasher, or any other quick typing method, to try out some roleplaying forums (fora?)
Good luck, don't hesitate to send message if you want me to inform you when i find more suitable games.
-
Re:Hey I've got some ideasI for one am tired of these old outdated complaints. Nobody has to compile anything unless they want to. With the exception of gentoo no linux distrubitution requires compiling anything.
What kind of fantasy land are you living in? Sure, if you are willing to dick about all day with apt pinning and use outdated software, maybe you can avoid it. It's a bit of a mission.
But if you want to use the latest versions of things, even if you use Debian you'll have to compile sometimes. Check out the users on the Ubuntu lists bitching about how Inkscape 0.41 just missing the upstream version freeze. Check out Fyre, a cool app for generating images from de Jong maps - note the lack of a Debian package. On Fedora far more software is not in the repositories than is.
Blind fanboyism won't get us anywhere. Even if the best case scenario, which right now probably means Ubuntu, there are serious problems with desktop software installation on Linux.
There is a lot of interest in solutions from users, developers and commercial ISVs (eg LSB/OSDL member companies). There are a few projects experimenting with new approaches, check out my own: autopackage, or Thomas Leonards Zero-Install.
In particular if you want to test Fyre, try the autopackage I made of it: Fyre 0.10svn. Both Fyre and autopackage aren't quite version 1.0 yet, but both are very close.
That build needs GTK 2.4. I have a build locally I will upload soon that adapts to the GTK features available at runtime (using relaytool) and therefore only needs GTK 2.2, but can still use the new file selectors and other features if they're available at runtime.
-
Re:The IDE Issue...
emacs is highly productive for java - just see http://jdee.sunsite.dk/ -
Emacs was an IDE before the term "IDE" was invented, godammit. -
Re:What happened to.....
Won't Free applications and even entire Free operating systems continue to support machines that have Treacherous Computing turned off?
-
Linux based VPN gateways
Are cheap, easy to setup and mantain, highly flexible and very cost-effective.
Depending on what you're planning to do, you can use any of the several VPN implementations out there, just to name a few:
* PoPToP, a PPTP server, compatible with the VPN client that Windows has always has,
* vpnd, really easy to set up, ideal gw to gw VPN solution, seems a little outdated but works great over slow links,
* OpenVPN, a highly portable, flexible and multiplatform VPN solution, which supports gw to gw and gw to host style VPNs,
* etc. There is also LinVPN, FreeS/WAN / Openswan, et al
Best regards. -
Multimedia: EAC
EAC is an audio grabber for CD-ROM drives
Anything from Systernals
Anything from AnalogX
Anything from GNU Win II
Anything from TheOpenCD
-
TheOpenCd
http://theopencd.sunsite.dk/ is what you want.
A cd full of good and open source software, a must!
The cd includes
From the page:
* OpenOffice 1.1.3
* AbiWord 2.2.1
* PDFCreator 0.8
Design
* GIMP 2.0.5
* Blender 2.35a
* Dia 0.94
* TuxPaint 0.9.14
Internet/Networking
* FireFox 1.0
* Thunderbird 1.0
* Mozilla suite 1.7.3
* Gaim 1.1.0
* Filezilla 2.2.9
* TightVNC 1.3dev6
* WinHTTrack 3.32-2
Multimedia
* Audacity 1.2.3
* Celestia 1.3.2
* CDex 1.51
Utilities
* 7-zip 3.13
* Notepad2 1.0.12
* SciTE 1.62
Games
* Sokoban 1.187
* Battle for Wesnoth 0.8.8
* Lbreakout 2.4.1 -
Try these out . . .
in this order .
.
http://nonags.com/
http://www.pricelessware.org/thelist/index.htm
http://www.doom9.org/ (click on the download button on the left)
http://theopencd.sunsite.dk/
http://www.komando.com/shareware_index.asp
http://www.techsupportalert.com/best.htm
Do I need to mention sourceforge and freshmeat?
Not sure if http://skype.com/ is listed in the above lists - it is surely worth mentioning but sometimes requires a USB headset purchase to tweak it, which is well worth the expense since this software often rivals Vonage service in quality when calling pots lines (non-free) and blows away anything when calling pc to pc (free).
http://grouper.com/
http://www.ultravnc.com/ is almost always my preference over tightvnc.
Realplayer is not that bad if it is tweaked - you have to look for the setting that disables automatic ownership of filetypes.
http://kerio.com/ is my firewall preference over ZoneAlarm and Sygate, although the windows xp built-in is is usable. Kerio keeps an eye on changing files via an md5 hash.
http://grisoft.com/, in most cases, would be my recommendation for AV software.
http://www.apple.com/itunes/ is great if you have the connection for it.
And if you want more free software then download emule.
um uh . . erase that last line -
Re:Nice,Well, it's thirty-nine that this one person has found. And, really, how many daily-use applications of a general sort do you need? Web browsing, mail, file transfer, messaging, office documents, media, image viewing and manipulation
... that's a large chunk of an average user's daily needs, and an average user doesn't need, for example, Gaim and Trillian and Miranda installed to chat with friends. Not that there's anything wrong with choice or with FreeBSD's collection, but it's nice to see a simple, quick repository of trusted (with the qualification that we're trusting this guy's judgment in the absence of any certification method) applications for setting up a box. I don't want to be confronted with 12,157 choices when all I want to do is set up the basics in half an hour. If I'm setting up a special-purpose box then, sure, I'll take some more time to find the absolute best tool for the job.Personally, I've used theopencd in the past to do things like set up my sister's and father's computers to be a bit more idiot-proof, but I'll bookmark this one too.
-
Re:Good, Clean, and FreeGNU/Windows
... I carry one of these :)Seriously speaking my desktop right now looks like a Full screen X0rg-cygwin + Fluxbox running - like this. With lots of Xterms and ssh logins
:) -
Open Source for windows
Have a look at http://theopencd.sunsite.dk/
-
My list... (sort of)
firefox
putty
gimp
gvim
...Actually, just check out the openCD
That sums it up pretty well. -
Re:IE?
One thing that amuses me is sites that include the MD5 checksum on the download page. Yes, because if someone got in and changed the tarball, they sure wouldn't even bother updating that MD5 string at the same time!
;)One such site is TheOpenCD's download page. See any md5sums for their iso's on anything but the mirrors themself? While projects like OpenOffice gets things done right.