Slashdot Mirror

> What about Xenographic and his troup of astroturfers, go look at his comment history a fucking liar and traitor to America.... or a hard worker for Putin.

I love how you don't actually refute anything I've said when saying this. Bad start. Yes, the same few people often comment, some even agree with me and I friended one a few days back, but if there's a "troup" or even a troupe I've never been invited.

> Or go look at the video he just quoted, where he says nothing about Wikileaks, and nothing about reading, and says its illegal to possess the emails.

I like that clip because it's short and to the point, but you can watch the longer clip here, which certainly does mention Wikileaks if you prefer. Make sure to compare the two clips so you can see that one is cut from the other. Here's the relevant quote from Chris Cuomo as best I can transcribe it out of the longer clip. I left out at least one "uhm" and added emphasis so you can see where Wikileaks is mentioned:

Here's what we know, what the Wikileaks dump makes clear is how the sausage is made in politics. And I think it's interesting on that level. Also interesting to remember, it's illegal to possess these stolen documents. It's different for the media, so everything you learn about this, you're learning from us.

Moving on, you can't read them without also possessing them, simply because that's how computers work. When you read it, you download it, when you download it, you possess it. This being a tech site, most understand that. And even if they didn't, just how would it make sense for him to say "everything you're learning about this, you're learning from us" if it was perfectly okay, in his view, for those of us outside the media to possess them? The conclusion wouldn't be logical. Am I not supposed to assume that CNN is trying to be logical? It would explain a few things about the coverage....

In the longer clip, you can also see him saying that "emails have been manipulated" but no evidence is given. And when Donna went on the air, she lied about that. I covered the DKIM earlier, as well as how it provides cryptographic non-repudiation and how that specific DKIM header covers the body and body hash and anyone can verify it themselves.

To be fair, CNN "ended" their relationship with Donna. Somehow they didn't catch any of the other people at CNN who were in on it, though. And Chris Cuomo on CNN? He has a J.D. He's a licensed attorney. He has no excuse for getting something like this wrong. Does his bar association know about this?

> You can't even tell the truth once can you Mr political astrotufing. Even when you're selling out your country.

I'm in favor of the truth, no matter who is telling it. I hate being lied to. We saw a whole lot of roaches start scurrying when Podesta's email came to light and they made me sick.

As for comments, you can go back to 2008 when I supported Obama if you like. Like most people around here, I didn't think much of Palin either.

But I thought you said you went through my comment history?

> What about Xenographic and his troup of astroturfers, go look at his comment history a fucking liar and traitor to America.... or a hard worker for Putin.

I love how you don't actually refute anything I've said when saying this. Bad start. Yes, the same few people often comment, some even agree with me and I friended one a few days back, but if there's a "troup" or even a troupe I've never been invited.

> Or go look at the video he just quoted, where he says nothing about Wikileaks, and nothing about reading, and says its illegal to possess the emails.

I like that clip because it's short and to the point, but you can watch the longer clip here, which certainly does mention Wikileaks if you prefer. Make sure to compare the two clips so you can see that one is cut from the other. Here's the relevant quote from Chris Cuomo as best I can transcribe it out of the longer clip. I left out at least one "uhm" and added emphasis so you can see where Wikileaks is mentioned:

Here's what we know, what the Wikileaks dump makes clear is how the sausage is made in politics. And I think it's interesting on that level. Also interesting to remember, it's illegal to possess these stolen documents. It's different for the media, so everything you learn about this, you're learning from us.

Moving on, you can't read them without also possessing them, simply because that's how computers work. When you read it, you download it, when you download it, you possess it. This being a tech site, most understand that. And even if they didn't, just how would it make sense for him to say "everything you're learning about this, you're learning from us" if it was perfectly okay, in his view, for those of us outside the media to possess them? The conclusion wouldn't be logical. Am I not supposed to assume that CNN is trying to be logical? It would explain a few things about the coverage....

In the longer clip, you can also see him saying that "emails have been manipulated" but no evidence is given. And when Donna went on the air, she lied about that. I covered the DKIM earlier, as well as how it provides cryptographic non-repudiation and how that specific DKIM header covers the body and body hash and anyone can verify it themselves.

To be fair, CNN "ended" their relationship with Donna. Somehow they didn't catch any of the other people at CNN who were in on it, though. And Chris Cuomo on CNN? He has a J.D. He's a licensed attorney. He has no excuse for getting something like this wrong. Does his bar association know about this?

> You can't even tell the truth once can you Mr political astrotufing. Even when you're selling out your country.

I'm in favor of the truth, no matter who is telling it. I hate being lied to. We saw a whole lot of roaches start scurrying when Podesta's email came to light and they made me sick.

As for comments, you can go back to 2008 when I supported Obama if you like. Like most people around here, I didn't think much of Palin either.

But I thought you said you went through my comment history?

What about CNN, that was lying about it being illegal to read Wikileaks

Technically if you have a clearance it might be illegal to read wikileaks depending on the link used, since that would technically be facilitating the distribution of classified material. Make no mistake about it. Posting something classified on wikileaks does not remotely make it unclassified.

In regards to the election, well Wikileaks was anything but an unbiased source as you can tell from the drip drip and the timing of the releases. Also I recall that not all messages had authentication codes on them, and, well, simply put, even if they did, you can't really prove that they really are original messages, since if you can take over a PC to grab messages, you can likely grab any necessary signing keys to fake more messages, particularly with the resources of a nation state behind you. Were most of the messages probably true? Probably, but trusting that site blindly is still a mistake.

The main failure was the voters. Until voters make the effort to actually fact check and well not use facebook as a primary news source, or really any non accredited source as news, then we have a problem. Fox Lies are a problem, but there are so many niche crap sites that spew whatever crap people want sold. The fact that Trump flat out encourages this nonsense is fully inexcusable and proves he is totally unfit for the job.

He should put country first and quit now before he royally screws over the country. He won't do it though. Just today he said he wanted all his sons to have top secret clearance. You know the same sons that are supposedly going to run his company. They bitched about improper influence from the clinton's, but at least they helped people. The Trump's are perfectly positioning themselves to help themselves.

What they need to do is to sell all trump assets, invest the proceeds into a true blind trust, then have his kids go get jobs somewhere else. The presidency is no place for nepotism.

I am an American. and I am ashamed that Donald Jabroni Trump is the President. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I am an American. and I am ashamed that Donald Jabroni Trump is the President. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

What about CNN, that was lying about it being illegal to read Wikileaks? And yes, that was a lie, read this: https://popehat.com/2016/10/17...

Why didn't they want us to know about it? Oh, because we have emails between CNN and the DNC, they leaked the debate questions. Then they brought Donna Brazille on there to tell us they were somehow modified. Except, not so fast, Donna: they have DKIM authentication, which provides non-repudiation. And make sure you actually read the damned DKIM headers, because they include the b and bh parameters. So if you try and tell me they only protect the headers, you're going to get a lecture on the DKIM specification, because you're not just wrong, you can be mathematically proven wrong.

Anyhow, there's no great loss to the clickbait sites. Good riddance to such. However, inasmuch as they believe they can use this to control what people say and believe, I can only remind them of the Streisand Effect and laugh. Google took down the video from this story quite a few times before they started allowing it once it hit the news: http://www.usatoday.com/story/...

In case you're wondering what Snopes says about it, they say it's "mixed." You see, there was a fender bender and the guy wanted to exchange insurance info before they brutally beat him and dragged him from the back of his own car, which they stole while nearly killing him.

Hillary supports think she should walk into the Supreme Court and sue the US. Good luck try explaining to liberals sovereign immunity https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I hope they settle on this https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (Crazy Frog)

fake engine noise

Why not? It'll make those jay-walkers think twice about stepping off the curb.

For further review, I hereby submit a better link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnT1VgeXOF0

Something like this

Unless you're a Trump Protester, who thinks going onto a freeway with cars passing by at 70+ MPH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Paris is under attack - Attaque violente entre migrants Métro Stalingrad 14 avril 2016 Paris
Different negroe gangs fighting outside Stalingrad metro station Paris.

click here

President Trump: How & Why...

Jonathan Pie

You "progressives" who LOVE to label everyone who doesn't slurp your Kool-Aid as a "RAAAACIST!!!!" or "HOMOPHOBE" will HATE this!

Personally, I hope you pee your pants. If you HATE this video you're a child that needs to be wearing diapers.

That's my problem with the mainstream media. I'm fine with Breitbart. I know their bias. I'm fine with Mother Jones. I know their bias. But when CNN claims to be the serious, professional journalists and then do shit like this, well, that's how we wind up in the situation we're in.

We've got six major companies that own all the mainstream media in the country. These multinational corporations have similar interests, like mass immigration for cheap labor. So they choose this policy, and the politicians they own enact it. Then they use the media companies to propagandize the public into believing that stuff that's clearly not in their best interest is in fact moral and good and only evil people disagree with the establishment. They shilled so hard for Clinton and demonized Trump so badly that an awful lot of people now legitimately believe we've just elected Hitler and half of their friends and neighbors and family they've known their whole lives are really secret nazis who want to kill them. I've got gay friends on FaceBook who think they're going to be put in camps. WTF? This is the media's doing, and it's fucking horrifying. Psychological torture is what's been inflicted on our country by these fucks.

>In the past, that hasn't stopped Facebook or Twitter from shutting down pages of Conservatives.

In the past, that hasn't stopped Facebook or Twitter from shutting down pages of Conservatives who were posting complete bullshit masquerading as fact.

FTFY.

The butt-hurt is strong with this one!

CROOKED LIAR HILLARY! LOST!!!!!

BWAAA HAAA HAAA HAAA!!!!

Ding Dong the Witch is Dead!

BWAAAA HAAA HAAAAAA

So that's what the i stands for.

idiotPhone.

genius...

iDiot video

www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCwBkNgPZFQ 4 minutes long

IDIOTS

BLR VFX
Published on Nov 19, 2013

It's not a secret we love robots here at BLR, so we wanted them to be the heroes in our latest promo clip. Luxury cars with powerful engines to drive through roads under severe speed restrictions, cable TV that allows us to pay to watch all kind of sports, all from our comfortable sofa, and of course, hyper expensive cell phones that do almost everything but making a decent phone call.

Yes, our happiness is based on things we don't need and governed by entities we don't control, so what? Sit down and turn on the tv!

The robots were taken from real Japanese robot model kits, and they now hold a privileged position in our freak museum. The bad guy spits real smoke out of its mouth! The environment is made of cardboard houses that were integrated with the help of camera tweaks. It all serves to the purpose of creating a dumb homogeneous atmosphere in which we're defined by what we've got, that is, the same lame things.

Don't take the message too seriously. This is a promo video we've done to laugh at ourselves. We all have an i-diot inside, and it's so fun!

A tale by Big Lazy Robot VFX
Music and sound design by Full Basstards

Well, it is shit like the GP posted that is why Clinton lost. It is the stuff that is resonating around the echo chamber causing harmonic amplification. The idiots on the left not only believe that their shit doesn't stink, they think they are immune to reality and physics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

You can't fix stupid.

a true mobile-first, cloud-first development tool

There can be only one!

Alexa, release that Super Bowl commercial featuring Missy Elliott.

The general speaks with Bill Gates.

Windows x is way better than Windows (x-1) ever was...since when? the 80s? Give us a break. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

open bigotry and bigoted attacks taking a sharp rise, people scrambling to protect themselves before it all goes to shit...

Indeed: the violent left has stepped up their attacks on those who support, or might support, Trump. Here's an example in which they were so certain of their righteousness that they took and uploaded the video themselves, of them beating a guy up while saying "You voted Trump!".

Meanwhile, there's a rash of reports of violence by Trump supporters ... all of it strangely undocumented. A lot of text accusations, one or two videos of someone being beaten up - without sound, and with, again, nothing but text claiming that the attacker was a Trump supporter.

The situation is looking notably asymmetric.

Trump is a traitor to the US, beyond business dealings in Russia that compromise his judgement

Are you equally critical of the Clintons and their business dealings with Russia? http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04...

he has already backed Russian interference in the democratic process that is the foundation of the US

Are you equally critical of the Obama administration's interference in the internal politics of Ukraine? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Putin will attack the US unless he is killed or overthrown first

Please describe the Operational Plan/Scheme of Maneuver that you anticipate for Putin's attack on the US. Cyber attack? Strategic bombers? Nuclear weapons?If you are going to make such an accusation, you must foresee some "End State" that Putin would expect to accomplish. What is his objective with a direct confrontation, by your estimation?

Right now Russia has its hands full with its Air Force operating in Syria and its Little Green Men operating in Novorussia/Eastern Ukraine. It's a country of ~130 million with a shaky economy and a military that is only partly through a period of modernization....a modernization that has been rudely interrupted by low oil prices and Western sanctions. They're not really in a position to go on the offensive against what remains the most powerful conventional military on the planet by far. And maybe you missed the part where Putin stated he was willing to talk about resetting/normalizing relations with the US, now that the Neocon Hillary isn't likely to be the Commander-in-Chief: http://nypost.com/2016/11/09/p...

If that were true that they were cheaper everyone would be figuratively storming the gates to use wind/solar, the wind/solar equipment makers couldn't keep the stuff on the shelves, and they'd be abandoning other generation means within a couple years because they'd make more money.

Well, no, that's not quite the case. Onshore wind is already cheaper than coal, and photovoltaic solar energy is essentially pretty much at even when it comes to the costs of a more advanced/modern coal power.

The reason the rush to these forms is not yet happening is that the the big issue with renewables is load-balancing. That is, since wind/solar generation is erratic and depends on the time of day/year, it means that a grid ran primarily using these forms cannot easily answer to increased demand. This is why at the moment with current grids, the efficient way to ditch fossil fuel's is to use a combination of renewables with nuclear, which is also on par or cheaper to coal and can be used to provide additional energy when the renewables don't produce enough.

The danger is that if the share of renewables is increased but nuclear is left out, the additional demand needs to be met with fossil fuels. This in fact is happening in places like germany where the well-intentioned but shortsighted Green party has put a ban on new nuclear power plants and they're driving the existing ones down. So despite the amount of renewable capacity going up, CO2 emissions are also going up because nuclear output is coming down and is being supplemented by coal-plants.

As an external observator it tell that if you continue to think as only a racist madman and understimate him he will win a second election. Also its disgusting your sense of moral superiority while you do things like beat Trump supporters. Who is acting like nazis?

As an external observator it tell that if you continue to think as only a racist madman and understimate him he will win a second election. Also its disgusting your sense of moral superiority while you do things like beat Trump supporters. Who is acting like nazis?

I'm glad that nature strictly adheres to health and safety guidelines.

In most places anyway.

We aren't there with automation yet and it isn't yet their major enemy. Their jobs aren't being replaced by T-1000s, they're being shipped to places like Mexico, China, and others. It's this, repeated over and over again across the rust belt for a generation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Please visit Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, or any of the other former US manufacturing powerhouses, and specifically the factory towns within those states, and tell the people there about the benefits of free trade. What's been happening for the past 30+ years is that masses of people who are second, third, even fourth generation into factory jobs, who've worked those jobs since they graduated high school, who've been raised themselves and went on to raise their families on the salaries and benefits of those jobs, who have since watches as their friends and family members have lost those jobs one after another, who've stood on the factory floor to hear about how their job is going away in 12-14 months and won't be coming back, who've had to go home to their wives/husbands/kids with the knowledge that the only job they've ever had or ever known is going away, who've had their homes foreclosed and their kids go from great lives to a welfare Christmas, who've wiped out their retirement funds just to try and keep going a little longer - those people have been told over and over by coastal elites from BOTH parties all about how great free trade is because of the cheap shit stocking the shelves of Walmart.

Despite the very obvious feeling from everyone at the top of the food chain, these people are not stupid. As they watch everyone around them - and finally themselves - lose everything they worked their entire lives to build with their blood, sweat, tears, labor, long hours, and tired backs, they're told over and over how good this is for them. They're not stupid. They're losing everything. Everyone around them is losing everything. Those who haven't already lost everything are having sleepless nights over and over because they see the writing on the wall and know they don't have a path forward. Their only hope is to somehow luck out and keep their job until their kids are out of the house and they're close enough to retirement to skate by.

Conventional economic theory isn't doing a goddamn thing for those people, their kids, their spouses, their families, their friends, or their towns. They're getting fucked every which way. And I'm getting a blender that breaks after 2 months because it's a cheap piece of shit built by someone who doesn't care halfway around the world. This isn't good for any of us. And it isn't good for the planet, either.

You want to know why Clinton lost all those "blue wall" states? Here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

It's moments like that, repeated over and over again in places all across the rust belt, driven by globalization and free trade policies that both major parties supported. Trump is the first politician in a generation to really speak to those people in a way that made sense.

Ah yes, "Never Ever Do This At Home" missed the radioactivity in all their home testing.

Well, that's certainly a matter of opinion. But regardless, Mashiki wasn't comparing Obama and Trump, he was comparing people in general (I suppose especially US citizens). Read what he said: "...were _people_ so rabidly insane" (emphasis added). He's presumably talking about the protests against the election, not about Obama or Trump themselves. (He also talks about Hilary Clinton.)

So ok, let's say DogDude got off the rails a bit, should we then go back and question Mashiki's claims a bit?

Well, Mashiki was talking about people not being so rabidly insane after Obama's election and relection. Ahem. That's a falsehood too, there's plenty of rabidly insane comments from those days. Even the Donald himself. Oh well, he deleted them. I guess they never happened.

I say many of these people were rabidly insane. Insofar as it is a figurative language, not a clinical diagnosis, but I think we know that.

It's like the Nazi comparisons which people on Fox never made. Or how there was no racism before Obama. (Then there's how she's wrong about the schools and neighborhoods shot up, and so forth.)

I'll grant the chair business wasn't entirely crazy. It raised flags with me, but ok, I'll let you just pass him off as Hollywood loony, not crazy.

And do note, I've not gone into the depths too far. This is not comprehensive, it is just enough to show that some people did go off the deep end. And if you look at the other comments, you will see, that they deny any, any craziness at all.

Of course, I'll say that the 70% who believe America is going in the wrong direction, unsourced though that is, would just as well cover people who think Trump being nominated, and winning as anything else. So they could be right. But of course, it's not sourced, so no idea what was truly being polled.

Well, that's certainly a matter of opinion. But regardless, Mashiki wasn't comparing Obama and Trump, he was comparing people in general (I suppose especially US citizens). Read what he said: "...were _people_ so rabidly insane" (emphasis added). He's presumably talking about the protests against the election, not about Obama or Trump themselves. (He also talks about Hilary Clinton.)

So ok, let's say DogDude got off the rails a bit, should we then go back and question Mashiki's claims a bit?

Well, Mashiki was talking about people not being so rabidly insane after Obama's election and relection. Ahem. That's a falsehood too, there's plenty of rabidly insane comments from those days. Even the Donald himself. Oh well, he deleted them. I guess they never happened.

I say many of these people were rabidly insane. Insofar as it is a figurative language, not a clinical diagnosis, but I think we know that.

It's like the Nazi comparisons which people on Fox never made. Or how there was no racism before Obama. (Then there's how she's wrong about the schools and neighborhoods shot up, and so forth.)

I'll grant the chair business wasn't entirely crazy. It raised flags with me, but ok, I'll let you just pass him off as Hollywood loony, not crazy.

And do note, I've not gone into the depths too far. This is not comprehensive, it is just enough to show that some people did go off the deep end. And if you look at the other comments, you will see, that they deny any, any craziness at all.

Of course, I'll say that the 70% who believe America is going in the wrong direction, unsourced though that is, would just as well cover people who think Trump being nominated, and winning as anything else. So they could be right. But of course, it's not sourced, so no idea what was truly being polled.

Well, that's certainly a matter of opinion. But regardless, Mashiki wasn't comparing Obama and Trump, he was comparing people in general (I suppose especially US citizens). Read what he said: "...were _people_ so rabidly insane" (emphasis added). He's presumably talking about the protests against the election, not about Obama or Trump themselves. (He also talks about Hilary Clinton.)

So ok, let's say DogDude got off the rails a bit, should we then go back and question Mashiki's claims a bit?

Well, Mashiki was talking about people not being so rabidly insane after Obama's election and relection. Ahem. That's a falsehood too, there's plenty of rabidly insane comments from those days. Even the Donald himself. Oh well, he deleted them. I guess they never happened.

I say many of these people were rabidly insane. Insofar as it is a figurative language, not a clinical diagnosis, but I think we know that.

It's like the Nazi comparisons which people on Fox never made. Or how there was no racism before Obama. (Then there's how she's wrong about the schools and neighborhoods shot up, and so forth.)

I'll grant the chair business wasn't entirely crazy. It raised flags with me, but ok, I'll let you just pass him off as Hollywood loony, not crazy.

And do note, I've not gone into the depths too far. This is not comprehensive, it is just enough to show that some people did go off the deep end. And if you look at the other comments, you will see, that they deny any, any craziness at all.

Of course, I'll say that the 70% who believe America is going in the wrong direction, unsourced though that is, would just as well cover people who think Trump being nominated, and winning as anything else. So they could be right. But of course, it's not sourced, so no idea what was truly being polled.

Well, that's certainly a matter of opinion. But regardless, Mashiki wasn't comparing Obama and Trump, he was comparing people in general (I suppose especially US citizens). Read what he said: "...were _people_ so rabidly insane" (emphasis added). He's presumably talking about the protests against the election, not about Obama or Trump themselves. (He also talks about Hilary Clinton.)

So ok, let's say DogDude got off the rails a bit, should we then go back and question Mashiki's claims a bit?

Well, Mashiki was talking about people not being so rabidly insane after Obama's election and relection. Ahem. That's a falsehood too, there's plenty of rabidly insane comments from those days. Even the Donald himself. Oh well, he deleted them. I guess they never happened.

I say many of these people were rabidly insane. Insofar as it is a figurative language, not a clinical diagnosis, but I think we know that.

It's like the Nazi comparisons which people on Fox never made. Or how there was no racism before Obama. (Then there's how she's wrong about the schools and neighborhoods shot up, and so forth.)

I'll grant the chair business wasn't entirely crazy. It raised flags with me, but ok, I'll let you just pass him off as Hollywood loony, not crazy.

And do note, I've not gone into the depths too far. This is not comprehensive, it is just enough to show that some people did go off the deep end. And if you look at the other comments, you will see, that they deny any, any craziness at all.

Of course, I'll say that the 70% who believe America is going in the wrong direction, unsourced though that is, would just as well cover people who think Trump being nominated, and winning as anything else. So they could be right. But of course, it's not sourced, so no idea what was truly being polled.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Ad hominem much?

It is myopic materialistic leeches like yourself that want to hold society and Science hostage with paywalls, pretend you can patent math, inflict your bullshit copy protection schemes so that legitimate consumers can't backup their property meanwhile the pirates already laugh at your stupidity because they are "kracked" you nonsense, try to outlaw libraries for sharing knowledge, sue people for sharing CD's because you didn't get your precious "cut", bully and badger people for sharing numbers with frivolous lawsuits about Imaginary Property because you are too stupid too understand numbers can represent anything, try to claim ownership of DNA even thought you didn't _invent_ it, etc. all because you worship the false god of Greed.

See I can play the retarded game of ad hominems too.

Maybe if you would play more attention to some of the greatest minds this world has ever seen you might actually get a clue stick:

If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.

-- Thomas Jefferson

If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.

-- Sir Isaac Newton

But you would rather fuck everyone over to make a quick buck. Who gives a shit about my fellow man, right? They are just resources to be exploited. Who cares if I con people into buying over-priced rocks. Your false profit (sic.) is P. T. Barnum and his bible is "There's a sucker born every minute"

One day you will eventually realize that relationships are more valuable then money.

The questions is -- will you realize this before or after you die?

Because one day you WILL lose everything -- and the only thing that carries over into the next life is how well, or poorly, you treated everyone.

So spare me the anticapitalist claptrap.

When the fuck are you going to grow up?

Four tons of weight would not get "lost in the noise" if it suddenly decided to move from, e.g., the middle of the plane to the tail end of it.

> ** Cracking a password one character at a time until all the characters are filled in. Nope, passwords are an all or nothing proposition.

Many attacks against passwords/keys are character-at-a-time.

To clarify, I'm talking about scenes where a password character is *found* by some cracking algorithm, visually represented by randomly flipping characters and digits, which then lock into place one by one. It's essentially a Hollywood-invented password-cracking progress bar. Sort of like this, although they're just decoding screens of text (which is equally silly). You're talking about iteration over all possible combinations, which is of course how brute-forcing passwords works.

In contrast, I present to you, The Most Accurate Hacking Scene Ever. I guarantee you'll actually even learn a thing or two.

this video!

Well if the goddamed potus is powerless in the face of the corporatocracy, then we're all fucked anyway and may as well go down with middle fingers flying.

As Michael Moore said, electing Trump was the biggest "Fuck you" in human history.

> Its not like there were any other candidates on the ballot or anything...

Correct, there really never are. Since we have a first-past-the-post system, it is almost impossible for a candidate in any major election to win that is not one of the two-party system. Anyone that thinks that those others are actual choices are deluding themselves. All it usually does when voting for those is to just take a vote away from the major candidate most close to what you wanted, helping to ensure who gets elected is even LESS likely to be who you want.

http://fairvote.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Clinton is no angel either, but at least she's not a psychopath.

Actually, Clinton probably is a psychopath. There is lots of indications, but just her interview on Gaddafi's death speaks volumes.

As for Trump, he is rude and a loudmouth. You might even consider him a liar, a con man, and a criminal, but none of those things amount to being a psychopath.

And you can't be attacked with sticks and stones through the internet.

Peter Griffin would disagree with you.

You mean this briefing?

Things fall down. Dispute away.

Weebles wobble but they don't fall down.

Things fall down. Dispute away.

Weebles wobble but they don't fall down.

Food plants are now 15% more efficient than 30 years ago. Fewer hungry people! Widely known fact. Search youtube for "earth greening".

That's a hell of a 'citation'. Might as well direct people to Youtube for the widely known fact that Earth is flat.

Your wish my command - the world is indeed clearly flat. YouTube has definitely become the place where the majority of serious scientists (the ones who don't just accept the orthodoxy like "global warning") first publish their works.

Slashdot at my link .. It's a conspiracy. I'll put it in the text so they can't block it this time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_4Er9P7H0I