Slashdot Mirror

Deepfakes is using only existing footage of the actors and of the movie it is inserted in.
In your scenario, there would instead be access to a 3D-scan of the original actor's face which could be fixed up and animated based on motion capture dots on the new actor's face. With those, you could produce an even better result.

... Which is exactly what was done to Peter Cushing and Carrie Fisher in Rogue One - A Star Wars Story and to Sean Young in Blade Runner 2049 .
While Peter Cushing is not alive, life-casts of his face remain -- once made for making rubber appliances for make-up effects. The same goes for many actors.
As with any old genuine movie props, there are also people who collect nth generation life-casts of famous actors...

It isn't nearly as good as that Hoff guy in Gaurdians' Inferno

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

It almost makes me want to paint my car and install some red LEDs with a ring counter!!!

Me so solly!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

His previous work of inserting Elon Musk as Bond is even better.

Already happening. Hatsune Miku

The voice software combined with MMD or better animation software and you get "live concerts"

Or he accidentally becomes invisible.

Funny story: Richard Dean Anderson was actually in the greensuit during the scene with T'ealc.

There is no way to reduce CO2, other than by making the engine more efficient.

Not true, we can synthesize the fuels, recycling the CO2 in the air.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Synthetic fuels are the future. Synthetic fuels from nuclear power.

Chuck Norris replaced himself with a... Toyota Truck.

The next step will be digital actors, created from scratch.

It has begun.

All of this can be described as Ass Access

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

You can actually see what sunscreen does from a UV camera...

Part 1...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...


Part 2...
https://www.pbs.org/video/suns...

There was an outage on YouTube? I was too busy working on new video, False Flag Reaction to Neil Armstrong, Apollo 11 & First Man on Moon .

You mean ugly bags of mostly water.

Reminds me of the Einstein that was going to blackmail Batman

See subject & a take from guys I scored on that decade who were TRUE "world-class" & "FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT" https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

* WHICH IS WHAT THE ANONYMOUS "WEEZILS" & "ne'er-do-wells" that IMPERSONATE or STALK me can NEVER do...

(Being righteous or GOOD is NOT part of their character as whimp "not men", lol).

APK

P.S.=> "The good book says it better to give than receive, I do my best to do my part - nothing in my pockets, nothing up my sleeve & I keep MY MAGIC in my heart" (my sourcecode too)... apk

it goes like this:

Science can't explain it, therefore MAGIC!

A good place to start with a rebuttal would be this.

Next in line search for Aronra and the Genetic Skeptic if you want a more serious and complete rebuttal.

I'll note that Miracles seemed to have stopped right around the time we invented the Jet Airplane and the Camera. My personal favorite "Miracles" was a "crying tree" that turned out not to be Angel's tears but wood lice peeing on people. The people were literally being pissed on and told it was raining.

This is not to say I'm opposed to spirituality, but our decisions in life need to be based on hard facts. This being a science forum I'd like to think most of us do. I want a world based on evidence and observable phenomenon (watch some Aronra videos to get a good grasp on what that really means).

For the record I'm genuinely terrified of a world based on mysticism. I want a world without magic because I don't trust folks not to blame their problems on witchcraft and burn me at the stake...

Lil' Wayne was all about that a few years ago...

Ryan Gosling's abs will not appear even as a template in this special edition, iPad or not. clip here, may not be available in your region https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

You know, sometimes people tell me that Russian trolls aren't a thing.

Probably by the same sort of people that told you that Saddam really didn't have WMD's or planned 911. You know....people that aren't gullible fools.

Then I get someone like you, who is trying to pretend that things like budgets are the primary defining features

Budgets are a measure of capacity and intent. Stephen Hawking may have always wanted to be a professional boxer, but really wasn't in a position to be one. Putin could be evil James Bond villain that western exceptionalists pretend he is (intent) but he doesn't have the capacity, and he's not in a position to do .01% the level of planetary spying the NSA does on a daily basis.

rather than results.

Results? Where's the Russian equivalent to the Five Eyes, where they try to not just spy on the rest of the world, but each other's own citizens to get around pesky FISA laws or the 4th Amendment. Where's the Russian equivalent to the backdoors the FBI/CIA/NSA have in communication networks, consumer electronics and operating systems. Did AT&T give Putin direct access to its hubs they way it did for the USG? Where's the history of Putin spying on the personal communications of allied heads of state?

"All things are equal, intent equals capacity derp derp"

When was the last time you remember US pulling something like Crimea?

You mean accept a democratic vote to re-join Russia? Never. Do try and explain why the US-backed junta in Ukraine would have any legitimacy, but a super-supermajority vote for self-determination has none.

And as for the rest, "illegal wars", etc irrelevant moralizing

Stomping your feet and shouting "la la la I can't hear you" does jack and shit to change the fact that the US has been a horrible ally to Europe, and Jack left town.

vae victus

vae vict i s. If you're going to be a twat throwing Big Words around like they're supposed to mean something, you might want to spell them correctly. Now, onto your equally obnoxious avoidance of ghoul's points:

The Ruble is not the international reserve currency so all trade goes through New York not Moscow hence the US has opportunity to spy on all world trade transactions. India is demanding that at least domestic trade transactions not be spied on by not having the data go through New York

That's nice. How is this relevant to what I said?

Capacity and intent. See above. If the ruble becomes the world's reserve currency and Putin uses the resulting infrastructure to spy on everyone's business, then we can talk - but not before then.

Lets talk about the outrage over the Saudis kidnapping the Lebanese PM. Who did they learn from? The US kidnapping the Panamian President.

Moralizing doesn't work in geopolitics because of its utter irrelevance. Which is why most people on the planet who haven't been completely insulated in ridiculous propaganda bubble of modernity that tries to assign geopolitical actions on a "good vs evil" dimension generally don't subscribe to this model of thinking. It's highly unnatural.

"All things are equal, intent equals capacity derp derp". Again. All this prattle about propaganda bubbles is just projection on your part, to keep ignoring the indisputable fact that the United States is not just the biggest asshole on the planet, but bigger than all other assholes combined. Putin is nothing more than the latest in a long line of boogymen used to frighten western exceptionalists like yourself into shitting the bed on command, to justify being a continent sized Sarlacc orifice with an insatiable appetite.

You know, sometimes people tell me that Russian trolls aren't a thing.

Probably by the same sort of people that told you that Saddam really didn't have WMD's or planned 911. You know....people that aren't gullible fools.

Then I get someone like you, who is trying to pretend that things like budgets are the primary defining features

Budgets are a measure of capacity and intent. Stephen Hawking may have always wanted to be a professional boxer, but really wasn't in a position to be one. Putin could be evil James Bond villain that western exceptionalists pretend he is (intent) but he doesn't have the capacity, and he's not in a position to do .01% the level of planetary spying the NSA does on a daily basis.

rather than results.

Results? Where's the Russian equivalent to the Five Eyes, where they try to not just spy on the rest of the world, but each other's own citizens to get around pesky FISA laws or the 4th Amendment. Where's the Russian equivalent to the backdoors the FBI/CIA/NSA have in communication networks, consumer electronics and operating systems. Did AT&T give Putin direct access to its hubs they way it did for the USG? Where's the history of Putin spying on the personal communications of allied heads of state?

"All things are equal, intent equals capacity derp derp"

When was the last time you remember US pulling something like Crimea?

You mean accept a democratic vote to re-join Russia? Never. Do try and explain why the US-backed junta in Ukraine would have any legitimacy, but a super-supermajority vote for self-determination has none.

And as for the rest, "illegal wars", etc irrelevant moralizing

Stomping your feet and shouting "la la la I can't hear you" does jack and shit to change the fact that the US has been a horrible ally to Europe, and Jack left town.

vae victus

vae vict i s. If you're going to be a twat throwing Big Words around like they're supposed to mean something, you might want to spell them correctly. Now, onto your equally obnoxious avoidance of ghoul's points:

The Ruble is not the international reserve currency so all trade goes through New York not Moscow hence the US has opportunity to spy on all world trade transactions. India is demanding that at least domestic trade transactions not be spied on by not having the data go through New York

That's nice. How is this relevant to what I said?

Capacity and intent. See above. If the ruble becomes the world's reserve currency and Putin uses the resulting infrastructure to spy on everyone's business, then we can talk - but not before then.

Lets talk about the outrage over the Saudis kidnapping the Lebanese PM. Who did they learn from? The US kidnapping the Panamian President.

Moralizing doesn't work in geopolitics because of its utter irrelevance. Which is why most people on the planet who haven't been completely insulated in ridiculous propaganda bubble of modernity that tries to assign geopolitical actions on a "good vs evil" dimension generally don't subscribe to this model of thinking. It's highly unnatural.

"All things are equal, intent equals capacity derp derp". Again. All this prattle about propaganda bubbles is just projection on your part, to keep ignoring the indisputable fact that the United States is not just the biggest asshole on the planet, but bigger than all other assholes combined. Putin is nothing more than the latest in a long line of boogymen used to frighten western exceptionalists like yourself into shitting the bed on command, to justify being a continent sized Sarlacc orifice with an insatiable appetite.

A woman with ten years martial arts training will beat the shit out of a man with 1 year or 3 years.

I believe that is the effect of training, is it not?

Is a woman with 10 years martial arts training equal to a man with 10 years training? In raw power likely not, in technique: yes.

And? I'm not arguing that women do not have physical skills, or are unable to master technique. In matters of dexterity, they generally excel over males, although there is some correlation with size. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p... But I'm not certain that particular experiment is applicable to all dexterity factors.

While some want to turn this into male against female, that is just silly. It refutes evolution with as much aplomb as creationism. In general, women are smaller and without as much raw strength as men. Their physiology lends itself toward reproduction in matters o pre-natal organ and skeletal adaptations and post natal food production. Males are in general larger, stronger, and their contribution to reproduction is mostly in providing a support structure. But the male is completely replaceable, if the first one dies defending the woman and children, another one can be plugged in with little problem.

The very strange thing is that females, as the most important part of humanity, seem hell bent on emulating the less important, disposable utility part of the duo.

A lot of this might be attributable to the fact that humanity is not anywhere near the brink of extinction, so reproduction isn't as critical an issue as it once was. And that's good. If a woman is interested in things other than reproduction, she's able to pursue them. But denying evolution and it's effects is silly. Perhaps the feminists who are dosing young boys with puberty inhibitors will start daily dosing of young girls with testosterone as a next step. They do seem to have an affinity for chemical intervention.

And topping this: never underestimate a woman with a dagger or a sword ... she simply slices and dices you as quickly as a man would.

Starting to entertain violent thoughts now, eh? Relax, homie. This is just conversation.

You like movies - here's my response to your violent themed reply: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

and dont forget this one Genius Bar caught ripping customer off ON CAMERA by CBC News

is out. What then are we going to eat when we run out of food? Oh, I know. Soylent Green.

An old cliche but a true one:

Only when the last tree has been cut down
When the last river been poisoned,
When the last fish been caught,
Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten.

Clearly they must rectify the problem.

That's not how Apple works.

This and this are how Apple works.

Clearly they must rectify the problem.

That's not how Apple works.

This and this are how Apple works.

is out. What then are we going to eat when we run out of food?

Oh, I know. Soylent Green.

"I believe you are 100% correct in that the DNC will shortly start asking elections to not happen because they can't be done "fairly""

Yet it was Trump saying that millions of Dem votes were cast by illegals and that Russia plans to help the Dems in the midterms

AC has apparently not paid much attention to history.

Republicans wnat as few people to vote as possible. Their ideological leader Rush Limbaught was not at all facetious when He said that "When women got the right to vot is when it all went downhill" Here is audio of that from 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Anyhow, disenfranchising more than half of the population is one of their goals.

Keeping chocolate people disenfranchise is childs play compared to what they will do if allowed. There are indeed petitions to repeal the 19th amendment. http://fathersmanifesto.net/19... https://www.change.org/p/81-ma... But AC is either a Russkie Troll, or a very useful idiot of their fifth column.

Are you making reference, perchance, to the MacBook Wheel? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

"It's just been revoked."

She didn't lie, the results are out. Shes 1/32 to 1/512 Native American. ... Depending on how you read the results.

DNA counselors sounds like a terrible idea. I don't trust them to get it right for right reasons or wrong reasons.

Bullshit.

She "consultant shopped" until she found a shill willing to pimp himself out and give her the answer she wanted.

Instead of finding a recognized geneology expert, she used a non-expert who was on the Harvard faculty with her. Why not use a real genealogist?

Why did Harvard drop mention of a Native American faculty member when Fauxcahontas's lies were exposed?

Why did Fauxcahontas herself claim that she knew she was Native American only because of her "high cheekbones" if she wasn't lying to Harvard in order to get ahead?

Why won't Fauxcahontas answer questions about whether or not she's ever used other DNA services if she didn't go "DNA shopping"?

And that explains at least one person that Mattis keeps awake at night.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=...

No, I do not expect anyone to be a criminal.

And ye, make no mistake, theft, robbery, fraud, usury, racketeering and profit, interest and "intellectual property" are all crimes, and the same kind of crime too: Taking money, and giving nothing back in return. (Every case of giving back something of non-equal value can be split into a case of a fair deal and a case of giving nothing back. E.g. in the case of a sale, the latter is called "profit".)

And if somebody *is* a criminal, I can expect me and my social group to punish him.

Of course, if the ones with the biggest sticks *are* said criminals, then they write rules (laws) that say that they are not criminals, but nice people, with happy feelings, ALL of the time, and we have no way of punishing them. At least until we manage to get the bigger stick.

Do you see the relationship between having a strong military and not being invaded?

I'm guessing you'll later define that relationship in terms that attempt to minimize the US empire (such as not pointing out that the US spends so more more than other world powers do on their militaries, and the US loses track of trillions of dollars which would have been better spent on social services that reflect majoritarian values including Medicare for All, a national jobs program, and potable water for all). The US is what Martin Luther King referred to it as, "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today". So many of the threats Americans face are reactions to American state belligerence. It's worth asking, as Glenn Greenwald did, why the people of Brazil, Chile, and other large and monied countries don't face these retaliatory attacks as Americans do. He points to a 2004 report commissioned by Donald Rumsfeld on terrorism (suggesting listeners look up those keywords online to find the report) and says you'll find that Rumsfeld was told the attackers hate America for its policies, not "hating us for our freedoms" or "hate us because we're involved in a religious war because they have this religion that hypnotizes them into committing violence" (quotes from Greenwald). Chomsky points out that this report was a repeat of a National Security Council document from 1958 commissioned by President Eisenhower when Eisenhower asked "why is there a campaign of hatred against us in the Arab world, not from the governments but from the populations?" (quoting Chomsky). Chomsky summarizes the telling answer:

There is a perception in the Arab world that the United States supports brutal and dictatorial regimes, and blocks democracy and development and we do it because we want to make sure we control their resources and their policies. And then it said these perceptions are more or less accurate but we should continue doing it because this is more or less in our interest. So the Rumsfeld report is repeating what we should know and what the victims do know. They don't have to read secret documents to find out.

We all should work for peace now, not wait for undefined others to do the heavy lifting as the thread-starting poster wrote. That overvalued post is indistinguishable from excusing empire-building, predator strikes (extrajudicial assassinations as the US does in its drone war), and endless military spending while Americans go without and die.

The AT&T Tech Channel under the AT&T Archives section has a cool video regarding AMPS service on youtube.com.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Because if the guy that did the research for this assessment is even close to being correct https://www.youtube.com/watch?... The last time anybody managed to shoot down one plane from another plane with a canon was in 1989 in the Iran/Iraq war. If that's how things are going currently then maybe you need a canon for ground attack but air to air? Not so much.

> VR is not like this. No one really uses it to solve a real problem, in any form.

Nonsense. VR is a niche learning tool.

Over fear of heights

High voltage training

> but it will never really go mainstream because it isn't solving a mainstream problem.

Yeah, I would agree with that.

> VR is not like this. No one really uses it to solve a real problem, in any form.

Nonsense. VR is a niche learning tool.

Over fear of heights

High voltage training

> but it will never really go mainstream because it isn't solving a mainstream problem.

Yeah, I would agree with that.

The US Navy figured this out. All we have to do is scale it up and deploy it widely.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Problem solved!

The means to get to a zero carbon economy exists today, nuclear power and hydrocarbon synthesis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I keep hearing about how if we don't reduce our CO2 immediately then we will create runaway global warming. We have a technology that can provide energy that is zero carbon (or rather closer to zero than wind and solar), plentiful, inexpensive (again compared to wind and solar), reliable, domestically sourced (no matter how you define "domestic"), and exists today.

Why don't we have more nuclear power? Because some nuclear waste is "scary"? You want me to believe that some nuclear waste is a greater threat to humanity than global warming? I'm not convinced. You want me to believe that "any day now" wind and solar will displace coal, oil, and natural gas? Well, we've been trying to do that for decades now and it's not happening very quickly. For an island nation like the UK the ability to meet their energy needs from wind and solar is likely impossible. Maybe they have enough friendly neighbors across the channel to get more wind and sun. What of Japan? They don't have any friendly neighbors, what should they do?

Again, which am I to fear more, nuclear power or global warming? Pick one, because we are running out of time for wind and sun to save us.

Oh-so-responsible Google (who call themselves "the Good Censor") is about to create a panopticon search engine for China. Yes, tell us about how Saudi Arabia is the problem here. Google has tons of experience censoring search results in English and is taking that expertise abroad.

Valid links to Google's 'GOOD CENSOR'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.scribd.com/documen...

Science is about the geniuses. If your model or theory doesn't hold up to the data - then it's wrong. I would suggest watching this video by Richard Feynman about theories and proof as well.

Problem solved.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Next question?

Other than envy, why should you care that someone is making more, a lot more, than you? If you are doing better than before, for the same effort, that's awesome! Absolute poverty is dropping like a stone, even without government help, because by specialization and trade, we're all incentivized to do what works best in our own individual circumstances. Relative poverty, which is what you're railing on about, will only seem to go away in communism, which of course it won't because everyone except the leaders will be poor (think USSR, GDR, Cuba, North Korea): putting in the effort to become much more productive than others without reward gets old fast.

Your whole post reads like an uneducated screed.... perhaps you should actually know how the world works before you open your mouth. The world you talk about has never existed. AKA the rich do not simply get rich by productivity, they buy politicians and get policies to favor themselves. They have power to reshape the political and economic environment in which everyone exists. I've watched for the last 20 years as big mega corporations (aka the rich) have stolen PC games out from under us because the internet undermines the publics ability to hold companies accountable. You're not going to hold a company accountable when they are 100 miles away from you.

Our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought. Science on reasoning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Testing theories of representative government

https://scholar.princeton.edu/...

Billions in energy subsidies

https://www.imf.org/external/p...

Manufacturing consent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://vimeo.com/39566117

Other than envy, why should you care that someone is making more, a lot more, than you? If you are doing better than before, for the same effort, that's awesome! Absolute poverty is dropping like a stone, even without government help, because by specialization and trade, we're all incentivized to do what works best in our own individual circumstances. Relative poverty, which is what you're railing on about, will only seem to go away in communism, which of course it won't because everyone except the leaders will be poor (think USSR, GDR, Cuba, North Korea): putting in the effort to become much more productive than others without reward gets old fast.

Your whole post reads like an uneducated screed.... perhaps you should actually know how the world works before you open your mouth. The world you talk about has never existed. AKA the rich do not simply get rich by productivity, they buy politicians and get policies to favor themselves. They have power to reshape the political and economic environment in which everyone exists. I've watched for the last 20 years as big mega corporations (aka the rich) have stolen PC games out from under us because the internet undermines the publics ability to hold companies accountable. You're not going to hold a company accountable when they are 100 miles away from you.

Our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought. Science on reasoning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Testing theories of representative government

https://scholar.princeton.edu/...

Billions in energy subsidies

https://www.imf.org/external/p...

Manufacturing consent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://vimeo.com/39566117

Other than envy, why should you care that someone is making more, a lot more, than you? If you are doing better than before, for the same effort, that's awesome! Absolute poverty is dropping like a stone, even without government help, because by specialization and trade, we're all incentivized to do what works best in our own individual circumstances. Relative poverty, which is what you're railing on about, will only seem to go away in communism, which of course it won't because everyone except the leaders will be poor (think USSR, GDR, Cuba, North Korea): putting in the effort to become much more productive than others without reward gets old fast.

Your whole post reads like an uneducated screed.... perhaps you should actually know how the world works before you open your mouth. The world you talk about has never existed. AKA the rich do not simply get rich by productivity, they buy politicians and get policies to favor themselves. They have power to reshape the political and economic environment in which everyone exists. I've watched for the last 20 years as big mega corporations (aka the rich) have stolen PC games out from under us because the internet undermines the publics ability to hold companies accountable. You're not going to hold a company accountable when they are 100 miles away from you.

Our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought. Science on reasoning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Testing theories of representative government

https://scholar.princeton.edu/...

Billions in energy subsidies

https://www.imf.org/external/p...

Manufacturing consent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://vimeo.com/39566117

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

http://www.unesco.org/educatio...

so instead of fixing real world issue so to reduce the motivation for war, let's go kill more civilians than enemies....Why? cause if we don't do it someone else will and that would put us at a disadvantage = Military Industrial Complex Mindset.

Second Amendment does not use the word Gun or Guns but Arms as in Armaments and this includes tanks, missiles, and killer drones https://www.youtube.com/watch?... . Do you have your personal personnel killer drone yet? It'd be cheaper than sponsoring some child in another country, i.e. https://www.childfund.org/ and we can test them via the israeli occupation gaza open weapons range. You know for morale, not morals.

In 2009 Al Gore quoted scientists who claimed that there is a 75% chance that within the next 5 years all of the north pole ice will be melted sometime during a summer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Not even close.

Then we learned that the ridge pine tree ring studies involved only 48 trees out of nearly 500, a classic case of cherry picking. Trees were chosen because they "showed" late temperature increases but were next or close to trees which did not show such increases and were not included in the database. In the 2009 CRU zip file released by the whistleblower is a file called HARRY_READ_ME.txt in which the writer tells HARRY how poor is the data from which the hockey stick was generated. Just follow the profanity and it will lead you to sentences like:
"ARGH. Just went back to check on synthetic production. Apparently - I have no memory of this at all - we're not doing observed rain days! It's all synthetic from 1990 onwards. So I'm going to need conditionals in the update program to handle that. And separate gridding before 1989. And what TF happens to station counts?

OH FUCK THIS. It's Sunday evening, I've worked all weekend, and just when I thought it was done I'm hitting yet another problem that's based on the hopeless state of our databases. There is no uniform data integrity, it's just a catalogue of issues that continues to grow as they're found. ...
So, under /cru/cruts/version_3_0/fixing_ tmp_and_ precustom_ anom_comparisons, we have a 'manual' directory and an 'automatic' directory, each with twelve 1990 anomaly files. And how do they compare? NOT AT ALL!!!!!!!!!"

And the author goes on. BTW, the "synthetic" reference is to the fact that they threw out all the thermometer temperature data and replaced it with computer-generated temperatures.

The 2011 CRU zip file has even more internal information which reveals the bogus and politically orientated nature of the AGW research.

The entire reason to ever be alarmed about CO2 levels was supposed to be the Uber-scary "runaway greenhouse" effect where the Earth became Venus.

Congratulations, literally nobody except you is talking moist earths.

Well over time CO2 levels have continued to rise, and what have global temperatures done? Not increase exponentially, that's what.

Most impressive powers of observation.

In the end maybe we'll see 2-3C warming, if we are all super lucky heading off an ice age for a few hundred years more.

Attention on deck SuperKendall is making a prediction based on his vast climate modeling experience. Please go slow so we don't miss anything.

But without the runway warming

Runway pavement can get hot enough cook eggs and burn the skin.

which there is zero evidence of occurring

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

, it is madness to me as scared of global warming and CO2 as many are trying to get you to be.

Can you believe some random peoples on the Internets are saying we're all going to die of global warming? What is this world coming to? It's madness. Total madness.