Slashdot Mirror


Jargon File 4.2.0 Out

Baloo Ursidae writes, "The newest version of The Jargon File, 4.2.0, is up now over here at jargon.org. For the first time, AFK made the list. " Definitely a good place for newbies, and veterans seeking a few good laughs.

94 comments

  1. First post! ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn shame ESR does that one, now I can't read it.

  2. Last Night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there an entry for the type of troll we saw last night?

  3. Finally, now I have a place to forward people to who get my "AFK" message and don't know what it means... now I can just point them to the Jargon file!

    --
    This space for sale
  4. Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who cares...the "Jargon File" is was kind of amusing a long time ago, but it's really not a big deal, and it really reminds me of those manuals people used to use to learn how to talk on the CB. "Breaker-breaker one-nine, this is Sailfish calling Horndog, you got your ears on?" A bunch of folks who don't know anything jumping on a bandwagon late, and getting the style but not the substance.

    1. Re:Big deal by dsplat · · Score: 2

      A bunch of folks who don't know anything jumping on a bandwagon late, and getting the style but not the substance.

      Yes, there are a lot of those. There are always going to be. And there are going to be candidates whose web sites are declared to be open source with no understanding of what that means. That doesn't mean that the Jargon File itself is useless. First, parts of it are hilarious. But more importantly, it gives a single resource that we can all point to for definitions of hackerly jargon and word play.

      No matter how long you've been a hacker, and we were all newbies once, there are going to be terms that are new to you. I remember reading a predecessor to the Jargon File back in the early 80's. I thought I was a programming god because I had written a few barely interesting games in BASIC. And I grew up. I've written a lot of code since then (a million or two lines of code might be a good guess). I know how naive I was then. And I use a fair number of the terms in the Jargon File.

      I'm a geek and I'm proud of it.

      --
      The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  5. Great, but... by Boilerplate · · Score: 1

    This is really great, but I kinda wish it was version 5.0, and not 4.2. Since they only publish actual books corresponding with the major revisions (4.0, 5.0, etc), I'll have to wait a while longer until I see "The Jargon" on the shelves. I know I could order it, but I buy most books on impulse, it seems like...

    --
    -- Intelligence reports are useful only to the intelligent. -RAH
    1. Re:Great, but... by cxreg · · Score: 1

      Well you know ESR is kinda fond of his leafy greens ergo the 420 ;) j/k

    2. Re:Great, but... by Wah · · Score: 1

      I wondered if anyone else would see that. Funny how that term coincides so well with Doug A's meaning of life number...coincidence? Most likely.

      --

      --
      +&x
  6. arg! by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

    Why don't they mirror this stuff first??

    1. Re:arg! by CyberDong · · Score: 1
      No kidding...
      My Jennicam window has updated twice while waiting for it to load.
      And it looks like she's waiting for it too...

      - - - -

    2. Re:arg! by dist · · Score: 2

      Here's the main site: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/

    3. Re:arg! by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      Thanks a million! I'm getting more than 12b/s now.. :)

    4. Re:arg! by Philippe · · Score: 1

      If you want the whole 2.1 MB html file, I posted it on my server

  7. Re:You don't know the POWER of the first post! by oldcity · · Score: 1

    geez, u got a -1 score.... Is this the power u speak of?

  8. Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I love the Jargon File. I really do. I remember reading it straight through when a meg of data was still something to write home about. I contributed myself, adding some phrases from the Amiga community and some 8-bit enthusiast slang. I even helped correct their heinous error that "elite" was alleged to stem from Hayes Courier Elite modem (which came much much later). One thing I don't like about The Jargon File is its insistance (and I realize it's one a fair amount of you will agree with) that there should be a distinction between "cracker" and "hacker", and that nary the 'tween shall meet. I think that the internet geek community needs to get used to the concept of context-sensitivity, and rather than calling the Diane Reim show on NPR to correct use of "hacker" like I heard today, I think we might do better to teach the difference between what we consider "good" hacking and "bad" hacking. Good hacking is key to the creation mythos of Linux itself, so I'd think many of you would have an investment in educating the media rather than imposing on them a game of semantics. --- Ask a member of the PKK if he considers himself a "terrorist".

    1. Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark by Goonie · · Score: 2
      Ask a member of the PKK if he considers himself a "terrorist".

      This is an extremely dumb analogy, IMHO. While this might be a fair comment if you were talking about, say, Jon Johansen, what Linus, Alan, Larry Wall, and the like do has *nothing* to do with circumventing security restrictions.

      You are correct in saying we're not likely to get "cracker" generally accepted, but the distinction is (usually, but not always) pretty stark. "cracker", therefore remains useful as a piece of terminology to facilitate discussion amongst ourselves.

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    2. Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

      (woo hoo, found my Slashdot ID)

      Yes, perhaps it was a poor analogy, and your comments about using the term ourselves are quite valid. I didn't intend for the PKK thing to be an analogy, more of a demonstration: Most "crackers" refer to themselves as "hackers", so putting a separate name on them confuses the issue so that we end up talking about semantics instead of what constitutes "bad" hacks vs "good" hacks.

      What I'm referring to here is when we try to force the usage on the media, or engage in a semantics debate of hacker vs cracker in forums where our time is precious (like syndicated NPR programs, magazine articles, television shows, etc).

      Personally, I have a name I'd like to apply to most destructive hackers: convicted felon.

      I love the English language, and I love the Jargon File. Both are quite humorous.

    3. Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

      I thought "elite" came from the video game "Elite", which was apparently pretty popular amongst C64 users and the like. The word "hacker" originally connoted an ability to synthesize art and science in a problem-solving context; in the domain of computers this meant looking at a problem, being able to quickly determine what you'll need to solve it, and then fine-tuning it until you have a quality piece of code that does the job. Yes, there is "good hacking" and "bad hacking". An example of good hacking would be Linux. An example of bad hacking would be the fabled Great Worm (which basically worked by downloading and recompiling itself on each new machine it encountered... talk about hack value!) or Microsoft Windows 2000. Crackers, or l33t h4x0r d00dz if you will, have a substantially different and somewhat smaller skillset. They look for vulnerabilities in a system and exploit them. That's it. Script kiddies download text files and follow the instructions, and think they're l33t and have s|1llz when they haven't learned anything beyond following simple procedures just like Microsoft Word tutorials. Some forms of the art require deeper knowledge of things like encryption and hardware/software systems and the like. As a result, you don't need to be a hacker to be halfway decent at cracking. Depending on your purposes, cracking can also be "good" or "bad". An example of the good kind would be DeCSS. ESR wasn't trying to illustrate that one was good and one was bad; he was trying to illustrate that what the media calls a "hacker" is something entirely different from the classical definition of a hacker.

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    4. Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark by odaiwai · · Score: 2

      A small point: Elite was originally written for the BBC Micro.

      It was definitely a classic hack for that machine as it had realtime, hires wireframe graphics with hidden surface elimination, two video modes on the screen at once (!), thousands of worlds to explore and it all fitted into 16k!
      Later versions of Elite were never quite as good, IMHO.
      The elite homepage is located at http://www.frontier.co.uk/elite.html
      dave

    5. Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark by odaiwai · · Score: 2

      And to follow up to myself, there's an open source recreation of the original game happening at:
      http://home.clara.net/cjpinder/elite.html
      Th ere's also a text verion (of a 3d arcade game...) at http://www.iancgbell.clara.net/clara.net/i/a/n/ian cgbell/webspace/elite/text/index.htm
      dave "mostly harmless"

    6. Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      Elite ran in 32Kbyte of RAM. The disk version used overlays so that it could have more different ship types.

      Have you played the Archimedes version of Elite (ArcElite)? It's considered by many to be better than the BBC version. I would agree that the Amiga version and the two DOS versions never quite equalled the original Elite.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    7. Re:Jargon File as Cultural Benchmark by odaiwai · · Score: 2

      The BBC Model B had 32k of ram, but some of that was taken up by the screen memory, which is why i said 16k. Reading the FAQ, Braben says 22k for the program, so I guess the hybrid screen mode[1] was economical on memory.
      Never had an Arc, although always wanted one. It was a screaming power machine when it came out first.
      Ah the good old days of the personal computer world, when compatibility was a weird concept.
      dave "now elite on the palm pilot, there's a challenge..."
      [1] Top two-thirds in a monochrome more, bottom third in colour.

  9. Oh great. by CodeShark · · Score: 1
    Just when I thought I could read and speak geek correctly, here we go again.

    *Sigh...*

    Seriously though... Nah... this is the jargon file we're talking about -- IMHO this is more about fun than being serious. 'Cause anybody that tries to speak too much geek in my office finds themselves with a one way ticket out-ta-there.

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  10. slashdotted by Signal+11 · · Score: 1

    Damn! I can't look up the entry for "Slashdot Effect"... the site's down. *g*

  11. I love this book, it's made me who i am today..sad by SgtPepper · · Score: 1

    I know it's kinda sad really, but i've been waiting for the new version of the jargon file for quite a while now. This book helped me get from the larva stage to...well wherever the hell i am now, it sure helped things make more sense. I actually own the book, and it always teaches, and always always always makes me laugh, a great read, and the appendices are a hoot! GO READ IT NOW! It's like an illumination, after reading it, it all makes sense.

    PS: Also, this is the book where i first heard about GEB:EGB and Illuminatus! Two of the best (IMHO) books ever written, if you haven't read them, READ THEM NOW!

    *out*

  12. 420!!! good for geeks and potheads alike!! by *DogShu* · · Score: 0

    4.2.0 man! Time to smoke!

    1. Re:420!!! good for geeks and potheads alike!! by Wah · · Score: 1

      Hi, I'm the tight-ass moderator that knocked this down. No, wait, no I'm not. But I just saw the dude, he was kinda tall, kinda shaggy, smelled like Skittles.

      You gonna pass that or what?

      --

      --
      +&x
    2. Re:420!!! good for geeks and potheads alike!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tsk tsk, 420 is not even defined in this so called "dictionary."

  13. where are the damn diffs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hwere those things?! I suppose I could worsh my clothes at the laundromat while I'm waiting...

    1. Re:where are the damn diffs? by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 2

      They don't use diffs, because the changes between revisions often contain a lot of formatting differences.. so the diff is pretty much the same size as the entire thing.

    2. Re:where are the damn diffs? by matt_s · · Score: 1
      There's a (big) change report at ESR's site. I don't know about the mirror at jargon.org though.

      How come all the fuss when 4.2.0 has been out for a couple of weeks already?

      Matt.

  14. Re:arg! -- Whoops! by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 2

    Looks like they do have a mirror.. but it's not listed on the download page. It got fully /.'d now, and I can't get to the mirror list! :(

    Anyone grab the list before it pooped out on us?

  15. 420 by mdillon · · Score: 0

    smoke a bowl

  16. True origins of the DDoS attacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of those sites must have been Slashdotted..

  17. That poor server by dsplat · · Score: 4
    I was going to ask why ESR moved it to jargon.org, but after going there the reason is obvious. The jargon.org server is suffering from a moderate case of the Slashdot Effect:

    1. Also spelled "/. effect"; what is said to have happened when a website being virtually unreachable because too many people are hitting it after the site was mentioned in an interesting article on the popular Slashdot news service. The term is quite widely used by /. readers, including variants like "That site has been slashdotted again!" 2. In a perhaps inevitable generation, the term is being used to describe any similar effect from being listed on a popular site.


    So I went looking for mirrors. None of these are official. They are just what a search on Google turned up:



    I found quite a few more, but all of them on older versions. I certainly don't want to kill either of these two sites, so please folks, if you are mirroring The Jargon File, update your mirrors and post the links.
    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
    1. Re:That poor server by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      I host a low bandwidth mirror at http://ursine.dyndns.org/jargon/, although tuxedo.org's server is the main one. I was under the understanding that jargon.org had better bandwidth.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    2. Re:That poor server by Anomie-ous+Cow-ard · · Score: 1
      http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/jargon.html

      And i always thought that one was official, since ESR is maintaining the file...

      Anyway, that's the one i've always had bookmarked (although i keep a slightly reformatted mirror on my own box... Look for "Jargon File Flattener" in the comments about v4.1.0)

      -----

      --

      --
      perl -e'$_=shift;die eval' '"$^X $0\047\$_=shift;die eval\047 \047$_\047"' at -e line 1.

    3. Re:That poor server by Steven+Pritchard · · Score: 1

      The server was surviving the Slashdot Effect just fine, but unfortunately the ISP (who I don't pay for bandwidth, so they can't really be blamed :-) wasn't.

      I've started redirecting www.jargon.org to ESR's site, so the ISP should be much happier now... ;-)

      (BTW, www.jargon.org is just another mirror. I registered the name because I'm a big fan.)

  18. Mirrors by muratic · · Score: 1

    www.tuxedo.org (ESR's homepage) also has the Jargon file 4.2.0 up ansd hasn't been Slashdotted.

    --
    circular reasoning: see reasoning, circular
  19. Nice, but... by parkrrrr · · Score: 1
    I know it's ESR's baby, for better or worse, but do we really need the standard ESR-vs-RMS bullshit in a document that's supposed to be an objective recounting of our slang? I refer to:

    Changes in the language of the version 2.0 GPL did not eliminate this problem.
    and
    (Some people object that the name `Linux' should be used to refer only to the kernel, not the entire operating system. This claim is a proxy for an underlying territorial dispute; people who insist on the term `GNU/Linux' want the the {FSF} to get most of the credit for Linux because RMS and friends wrote many of its user-level tools. Neither this theory nor the term `GNU/Linux' has gained more than minority acceptance).
  20. Suggestions for the next iteration by griffjon · · Score: 5

    CmdrTaco : Every winter, he emerges and looks in his inbox, and if he sees harassing "give us the slash code" messages, he returns to his hole and does not release the slash code for another 6 weeks

    Hemos : A hamster

    JonKatz : Producer of social commentary and rant. See Signal/Noise ratio.

    Karma : black magic performed by the slash code that follows the rule what goes up must come down.

    Troll : A vile creature that lives in the depths of -1 moderation

    Natalie Portman : Favorite topic of trolls.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    1. Re:Suggestions for the next iteration by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

      Please don't forget this one:

      Clifford Stoll: To make an end-run around the digital community, then become the darling of conservative, religious, and neo-Luddite media circles by being the one geek who's willing to go on record as hating the whole stinking lot of it.

    2. Re:Suggestions for the next iteration by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

      One other suggestion:

      Overhead Transmission: When a statement is beyond your grasp ("over your head.") Also Omega Curve.

  21. Re:arg! -- Whoops! by Nate+Eldredge · · Score: 4
    There is a decent mirror at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/. From there I've fetched the complete list of mirrors, which follows.

    List of Jargon Resources Mirror Sites USA:

    Australia:

    Austria: http://www.snafu.priv.at/jargon/

    Czechoslovakia: ttp://www.instinct.org/texts/jargon-file/

    Finland: http://zone.pspt.fi/jargon/

    Germany:

    Gret Britain: http://jargon.strugglers.net

    Greece: http://www.hack.gr/jargon

    Italy: http://beatles.cselt.stet.it/mirrors/jargon

    Japan: http://www.vacia.is.tohoku.ac.jp/jargon/

    Norway: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/misc/jargon/ Poland: http://www.uci.agh.edu.pl/jargon/

    Spain: http://www.undersec.com/jargon

    Sweden: http://ftp.sunet.se/jargon/

    U.K.:

  22. My mirror @home by pnevares · · Score: 1
    I have a mirror of the above-mentioned file (specifically the one from http://www.snafu.priv.at/jargon/jargon. html). Again, it's not "official", but if you want to take a look at it while jargon.org is tanked, go ahead.
    http://members.home.com/pnevares/jargo n.html
    (for the record, it does show version 4.2.0)

    Pablo Nevares, "the freshmaker".
    --

    Pablo Nevares, "the freshmaker".
  23. 420 BABY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't get it, ignore it If you do, you know what to do.

  24. OFF TOPIC: fortune cookie errata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why don't you fix your little problem... and light this candle? -- Alan Shepherd, the first man into space, Gemini program

    A couple errors here:

    1. Alan Shepherd was NOT the first man into space, Yuri Gagarin was. Alan was the first citizen of the US sent into space.

    He did say that, but he said it in the Mercury program. Gemini was a bit later.

    --

    Linux is Linux. GNU just HURDs itself claiming otherwise.

  25. AFK was already there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just under the entry "talk mode". This was in version 4.0.0, anyways, and I remember it in the first print edition as well.

  26. New ones by LoRez · · Score: 0

    So, how long before "slashdotted" and "first post" joins the list? ;-)
    ------

    --
    Mr. Low Resolution
    1. Re:New ones by Fat+Lenny · · Score: 1
      Sheesh, some moderator must not have any sense of humor, and/or has never read the Moderation Guidelines...

      --

      --

      --
      fat lenny's gonna lick your brain today.

  27. Re:You don't know the POWER of the first post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we need is the facility to view comments below a certain score - cut all that boring smartarse stuff out.


    Wingnut

  28. Update ftp://athena-dist.mit.edu/pub/gnu/jargon/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They don't even have 4.1.0 in there! But the server can handle much more than jargon.org. Why hasn't this (former primary) jargon file site been updated since 4.0.0?


    Get it done.

  29. Re:You don't know the POWER of the first post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And which entry in the Jargon File describes the above I wonder?


    Wingnut

  30. *yawn* by redd · · Score: 1

    is jargon.org connected to the rest of the world via damp string, or what?

    Congratulations slashdot, you've just slashdotted it :)

    I'll come back tomorrow. :-|

  31. On religious wars and a plea for peace by RobertGraham · · Score: 2
    Just the other day, some user sent me e-mail about how our personal-firewall product had been "cracked". The user though this meant that somebody had found a way of penetrating the firewall, when in reality it meant somebody had found a way pirate the software.

    The confusion stems from ESR's guide. He insists that the proper word for cybercriminal is "cracker", not "hacker". This is true in the geek community, but it is not true in either the general community or the security community. In the security community, the word "crack" has specific connontations about breaking passwords and/or copyright restrictions.

    Journalists who use the word "hacker" to refer to the recent DDoS attacks gets flames from nerds insisting that they use "cracker". When they use "cracker", they get flames from security people who tell them what an idiot they are for using the wrong word since no passwords were cracked in these attacks. Most journalists I know try "cracker" a few times before they get sick of the complaints from the security other side. They also realize that their audience (the general population) just doesn't understand the word cracker as well as hacker.

    I only post this because I'm tired of religious wars on the "meaning" of words. Words don't have any particular meaning; there is only what people understand when they hear a word. By creating a dictionary that defines a word contrary to how most people use it, ESR is perpetuating a religious war.

    One might want to consider this alternate definition of "hacker".

    1. Re:On religious wars and a plea for peace by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 1


      First off, ESR didn't invent the difference between "cracker" and "hacker" -- a lot of the community also divides it that way, far more than just people who actually care what ESR says.

      Second, if security people are actually complaining to journalists about use of the word "crack", they ought to get a clue. "I cracked a password", "I cracked the copy protection on that software", and "I cracked that site" all have obvious meanings. Hint: the 3rd doesn't mean that I broke some passwords that I could use to break into the site, but didn't actually break in.

      Geez.

  32. Wrong by Ross+C.+Brackett · · Score: 1
    You are incorrect. ESR, as "Open Sourcey" as he is, has much respect for the GPL. And as much of a GPL fanatic as I am, despite the fact that I sometimes disagree with some of his opinions, I can still see that the Jargon file gives a very objective presentation of the GPL. You really need to include more context in your original quotes. Observe:

    The Jargon File has space set aside for the proper definition of the GPL (under Copyleft), but he also provides a space for the dissenting opinion, (under General Public Virus), but this entry it totally objective, even though you imply otherwise.

    Here is the latter entry in full (emphasis mine):

    Pejorative name for some versions of the GNU project copyleft or General Public License (GPL), which requires that any tools or apps incorporating copylefted code must be source-distributed on the same anti-proprietary terms as GNU stuff. Thus it is alleged that the copyleft `infects' software generated with GNU tools, which may in turn infect other software that reuses any of its code. The Free Software Foundation's official position as of January 1991 is that copyright law limits the scope of the GPL to "programs textually incorporating significant amounts of GNU code", and that the `infection' is not passed on to third parties unless actual GNU source is transmitted. Nevertheless, widespread suspicion that the copyleft language is `boobytrapped' has caused many developers to avoid using GNU tools and the GPL. Changes in the language of the version 2.0 GPL did not eliminate this problem.


    These are true statements! It is indeed alleged that the copyleft `infects' software generated with GNU tools. However, ESR knows this to be false! He licenses his own software under the GPL!

    As for your second quote, it is factually sound as well. Indeed, the term "GNU/Linux" has not gained widespread acceptance. This is merely a statement of fact. I wish GNU/Linux was used more. But it isn't. But that's reason to work to increase awareness, NOT a reason to ignore the facts in the interest of keeping the peace. You forget that "the peace" is already kept. They might not always agree, but both ESR and RMS have shown that they respect each other. I think it was Wavy Gravy who said at Woodstock, "We're all feeding each other."
  33. Has anyone thought about Everything? by Largos · · Score: 1

    Has this been ported to everything yet? Sounds like the natural thing to do ;)

    -Largos

  34. AFK therefore BAK? by bughunter · · Score: 1
    Presumably, if AFK qualifies for inclusion in the Jargon File, so should BAK, or some variant thereof, IYKWIM...

    I know, RTFJF, but it's /.ed so I can't check today...

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  35. I'd like this Jargon for my Fortune Cookies by Phouk · · Score: 2

    Newbie Question: Is there any way to have the contents of the Jargon file presented one by one, as fortune cookies (a la KFortune)? If so, how? If not, why not?

    --
    Stupidity is mis-underestimated.
    1. Re:I'd like this Jargon for my Fortune Cookies by EvilGwyn · · Score: 1
      sure why not :)

      here's something I hacked up. It may do what you want. Look down the bottom for the one called "fortune.pl".

      --
      Phear my l33t homepage.
  36. Re: Religion - no, science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hacked" software is also a term used to describe software that has had its copy protection removed.

    However, "Cracked" software is the correct term, since the (intended) security truly was compromised, which is what "cracking" is all about.

    And as someone stated earlier, there is "good" hacking, and there is "bad" hacking. My addition to that is that cracking is very often a subset of hacking (since hacking is usually necessary to crack), so let's let the journalists using the word "hackers" if they please. Just like the gays (who have come a long way PR-wise) have not invented new terms to describe "bad" gays, but have used one word for all that originally had a bad connotation: gay. They took that word and made it generally accepted. It was a lot of hard work, though, and plenty of examples of the "good" gays were necessary. We can do the same.

    Let's not play the game that allows us to be divided and conquered. The line between "good" hackers and "bad" is not always clear, and I feel should not be easily defined. Otherwise it will be easy for things like the DMCA to allow a large portion of our community to be disowned as "crackers" and thieves. But they are part of us and should remain so, forever, in spite of laws, popular morality, etc.

    Pimp Daddy

  37. "Naked and petrified" is missing by ubertroll · · Score: 0

    How could they leave out such an important term?

  38. Suggestion for distribution of the JF by Oestergaard · · Score: 2

    Eric, can we please have the JF as a context diff ?

    Of course, it's not because we want to save bandwidth, it's only to make it more easily readable for those who read earlier versions :)

    1. Re:Suggestion for distribution of the JF by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      Go read the Jargon File FAQ. Eric already answered this, the ansewr is no. Its too much work for it to be made into a diff due to complications with what they use to set it.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    2. Re:Suggestion for distribution of the JF by shamus · · Score: 1

      Yup, a context diff of the full html tree grows to over 8 meg. However, doing a diff of the text file found therein seems legible enough and is only a mere 300 odd K. If you want, find it here. (this is from 4.1.4 to 4.2.0).

      --

      What's worse, ignorance or apathy? Who knows, and who cares.

  39. Need to fix entry for "Blinkenlights" by root · · Score: 2

    The entry talks about how rows of blinking lights/LEDs are a thing of the past because things happen too fast now for the lights to convey any meaning. I would counter that the lights have simply moved: to the modems and the racks of ethernet switches, hubs, and routers. There are still plenty of blinkenlights in the server rooms around the globe.

    1. Re:Need to fix entry for "Blinkenlights" by root · · Score: 1

      Original poster here. Ack. Do I feel dumb. Scroll down a little further and there's pretty much what I said appended to the Blinkenlights entry. Oops.

  40. Re:You don't know the POWER of the first post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    d00d, j00 r 31337!!!!! 1 m34n 17!!!!!!
    |\|474L13 P0R7M4|\| 4 3V3R!!!!

    d00d!

  41. Karma Whore! by PD · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not calling you a karma whore, I'm suggesting that it should be in the Jargon File. :-)

    1. Re:Karma Whore! by CdotZinger · · Score: 1

      I think I accidentally disengeekified the term last weekend when a friend of mine attempted in my presence to over-tip a heinously bad and not-even-cute waitress. It went sorta like this:

      Me, at the bar, full of Bombay, hating the ugly waitress: "Don't be a karma whore! She's not even cute!"

      Everyone-else-I-know, ever since then, whenever someone is being too nice: "Don't be a karma whore!"

      None of us really qualify as geeks (I'm pretty much a closet case). And I'm terribly sorry.

      --
      Your mouth is like Columbus Day.
    2. Re:Karma Whore! by Ayn+Rand · · Score: 1


      What's a karma whore? You people don't seriously belive in karma do you?

      ---
      Ayn

      --
    3. Re:Karma Whore! by chialea · · Score: 2
      karma whore (n) -- a poster on slashdot who pimps out his/her comments to the moderator majority simply to raise his/her karma (mostly the sum of moderation done to comments) and thus post by default at +2 instead of +1. these posts can be identified as follows

      "Linux is the greatest thing on the planet! It's perfect doodz! I love penguins! I hate Bill Gates and the MPAA"

      "I love MS products and you commie pinko Linux users are just not being logical and thoughtful, however I have a real view on the issue, but you aren't going to listen to me"

      "I know the moderators are going to mark me down for this, but I just have to say it..."

      Posting early in a discussion or as a reply to a high moderation comment with no real content, but including something that no one can really disagree with (except for in one of the cases above)

      many replies with the title "Karma whore"

      Lea

  42. A better interface to the jargon file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is just over here.

    esr's directory is the prime; jargon.org is a new development.

  43. Why not just use the CHANGELOG? by Smack · · Score: 2

    If you just want to see the differences, it's probably easier than a context diff.

    1. Re:Why not just use the CHANGELOG? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      But the ChangeLog isn't ordered according to versions, it's all jumbled together. You could write a Perl script to parse it and extract the newer entries if you wanted though.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    2. Re:Why not just use the CHANGELOG? by jmy · · Score: 1

      Nice idea.

      #!/usr/bin/perl

      # The path to the changelog.
      $changelog = "/home/httpd/html/jargon/jargon-upd.lst";

      open CHANGELOG, $changelog;
      @file = <CHANGELOG>;
      close CHANGELOG;

      print "Content-Type: text/plain\n\n";
      print "This is supposed to be a list of all new entries in the jargon files changelog.\n\n";

      foreach $post (reverse sort split (/\*\*\* (?=.* \*\*\*)/, "@file"))
      {
      ($type, $check ) = split (/ /m, $post);
      if ($type eq "New" && $check eq "in")
      {
      print $post;
      }
      }

  44. SOMEBODY HELP ME!!! by mr.+marbles · · Score: 1

    according to the jargon files i suffer from prolonged BASIC exposure! Curse that blasted high school and their required courses!
    please! somebody, anybody. recommend treatment to reverse the effects. I don't want to live like this!

  45. Well, I dunno, but... by pavelivanov · · Score: 1

    Who really needs the Jargon File all that bad when you've got Everything2 !?!?!

    I'm sure CowboyNeal will agree,
    Paul "Pavel" Ivanov

  46. Natalie GNU/Portman by JamesKPolk · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that naked and petrified starlets have been ready for years, it was just the emergence of Natalie Portman that solidified their presence in the slashdot trolldom.

    Therefore, all references of Natalie in the Jargon File should be listed as Natalie GNU/Portman, to give credit to the early work of the GNU Project.

    After all, it's already done with the acronym GRITS (GNU/GRITS Really Irritate The Skin)

  47. GEB:EGB... Oh! I just got it! by Kimble · · Score: 1

    I'd never seen the subtitle of "Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid" abbreviated before. If you've read the book, its significance is obvious; if not, I'll sound silly trying to explain it.

    This is kinda like when I actually visited the Empire State Building -- I finally realized it was a building in the Empire State!

    I'll go back to sleep now...
    --

    --
    ..!!in an intastella burst i am back to save the universe!!
    1. Re:GEB:EGB... Oh! I just got it! by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      or when I realized the meaning of _The_Integral_Trees_ by Larry Niven

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  48. The only way to "really" code by cvillopillil · · Score: 1

    Dear Mr Marbles...

    Despite what a lot of people say, some people still maintain that the only way to truly code is to become a Doctor of Technology. Because sure, "hacking around" might allow you to understand how the technology works, but a Doctor must also understand the why - Complexity analysis, the calculus of variables, stuff like that.

    Of course, this isn't my theory, I'm just relating what seems to be a common feeling amoung the academic community.

    They state: Who would you trust to write your app? John Q. Hacker, James P. Programmer, or Dr. James P. Private ?

    Just some thoughts.

    C.Villopillil.

    --
    no sig
    1. Re:The only way to "really" code by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      I would trust John Q Hacker for this reason: Look how many people went through all the loops and got a high degree in CS or Technology that work for Microsoft and how many go do thier own independent projects to run on various platforms. Dr. Torvalds is only such because U. Stockholm(?) thought Linux was pretty damn cool. Before that, Torvalds was basically another John Q Hacker.

      However, I'm not saying that higher education is A Bad Thing, I'm just saying that how much education you have isn't necissarily a reflection on your programming ability or trustworthyness.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    2. Re:The only way to "really" code by mr.+marbles · · Score: 1

      yeah and the academic solution to everything is to work hard and study hard. how has that worked out? how many geniuses is produced as opposed to trained monkeys we call experts? in the recent john carmack interview posted on slashdot he summed things up pretty well. if you're going to a university just because you want to get a degree and find a job then that's probably the wrong reasond to be there.

  49. Grow Ups Kids by hoss10 · · Score: 1

    I've an idea for stopping people using this silly "write letters as numbers" business.
    If /. automagically converted d00d to dude and 31337 to "elite" etc.
    The /. operators would just need to add a new entry every time a new one is used.
    Probably not as good an idea as I think it is but it's 9am here and I should have started work ages ago.

  50. Jagon file needs more metadata by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    specifically, dates on the entries to better distingush '70s slang from new 90's slang.

    Ah, the jargon file. Back in '88, when I was a fresher, late one night I printed the entire thing out on the big old (but fast) lineprinter on that concertina-foldy paper.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  51. ESR: Please define 'warez' jargon impartially. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I realize the amount of distaste you hold for the "warez" / "phreak" subculture, but the fact remains that a large percentage of the modern hacker culture went through it (as a "larval stage").

    Please consider defining the terms impartially (or taking submissions of definitions), and perhaps summarize the distasteful views / etc in a supporting paragraph elsewhere in the file.

  52. journalists? by redd · · Score: 1

    Journalists are often described as "hacks", the word has a lot to do with the "hack"ing noise that a typewriter makes. It's a onomataphoea (sp?) This description dates almost all the way back to the invention of the typewriter. A "hacker" in those days was someone who stayed up all night typing out a report.

    I'm SURE that the current use of the word has a lot to do with the hours of "hacking away" at the keyboard, and its origin never had anything to do with competence, or programming until the MIT days (although someone who spends many hours doing something is bound to become an expert).

    1. Re:journalists? by LetterJ · · Score: 1
      Ahhh. Folk etymology at its best.


      "Hack" is a word that far predates the typewriter. It comes from the Old English word hakken: To cut irregulary, without skill or definite purpose; to notch; to mangle by repeated strokes of a cutting instrument; as, to hack a post.


      The journalistic use of the word is logical and predates computers by quite a bit. A hack writer is one who writes without skill or definite purpose.


      The definition has mutated a bit since in the computer era, to come to mean: Originally, a quick job that produces what is needed, but not well.


      Once it got that connotation, it continued to mutate to be a particularly brilliant piece of code.


      A little time spent over at Dictionary.com - term: Hack will clear up definitions and give you actual etymology for most words. Real etymology can be fun, but you've got to have more than a coincidence to create a word's history.


      Practice safe linguistics.

      LetterJ

  53. AFK? by marsvin · · Score: 1

    Far be it from me to impugn the accuracy of Slashdot articles, but AFAIK "AFK" has been in there for at least three years...

    1. Re:AFK? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to put the term AFK more about the end of the BBS era, around 1994 or so. AFK was fairly well known on the large chat BBS's here in Portland. Nirvana MUD, which was Nirvana IV LPMud at the time, had a command entitled AFK that would output Playername is away from keyboard.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
  54. Jargon hole? by JordanH · · Score: 2
    I'm wondering if there's not a hole in the coverage of the Jargon file. It merged in the old Hacker's Dictionary with Jargon from the '70s and it's full of '90s (and '00s) Jargon now, but I'm concerned that '80s, particular early to mid-80s is not well covered.

    Maybe I'm a Jargon archeologist, since I can't find this on Web searches and deja.com only has my own reference to it I made awhile back, but I distinctly remember the term ATWAV being used a lot Usenet in the 86-89 timeframe. You'd particularly see this on comp.lang.c. I know what it means, but maybe I dreamed the whole thing as you'd think that it would show up on a web page somewhere.

    I'm really surprised that it doesn't seem to be on the Web now... Does anybody else remember ATWAV and what it refers to?


    -Jordan Henderson

  55. 420 mang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once knew a man from B.C. He grew on a 7 foot tree till one day i plucked him rolled him and smoked him and now i can barely see! check out 420.com.. you won't regret it!