Slashdot Mirror


10th Anniversary of Steve Jackson Games Raid

WhiteRabbit writes, "According to their Web site, March 1, 2000 is ten years to the day since the Secret Service raided Steve Jackson Games... for publishing a cyberpunk-style role-playing game supplement. This was one of the first cases in which the Electronic Frontier Foundation became involved. More info at this page."

163 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Cool.... but not really by Krodge · · Score: 1
    So what, the feds were caught for doing an illegal search and seizure, happens all of the time. It's cool though that they got some money out of it, just it really isn't that great of a story.

    Hey look the feds raided my home for no good reason, I sue now and I won. Yay.

    1. Re:Cool.... but not really by Anonymous+Commando · · Score: 1
      Read the story closely... there's one line that should make you stop in your tracks:
      ...Loyd Blankenship was suspect because he ran a technologically literate and politically irreverent BBS...
      Sound like anywhere you've been lately?
      ________________________
      --
      Corporate Jenga: You take a blockhead from the bottom and you put him on top...
    2. Re:Cool.... but not really by ronfar · · Score: 5
      The one bright spot in this whole affair was the creation of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. In mid-1990, Mitch Kapor, John Barlow and John Gilmore formed the EFF to address this and similar outrages. It's a nonprofit organization dedicated to preserving the Constitutional rights of computer users. (For more information, look at the EFF web site, or write them at 1550 Bryant Street, Suite 725, San Francisco, CA 94103-4832.) The EFF provided the financial backing that made it possible for SJ Games and four Illuminati users to file suit against the Secret Service. -- from the page linked above
      Do I really need to add anything to this? Ok, I will:
      It's been three months as I write this and, not only has nothing been returned to them, but, according to Steve Jackson, the Secret Service will no longer take his calls. He figures that, in the months since the raid, his little company has lost an estimated $125,000. With such a fiscal hemorrhage, he can't afford a lawyer to take after the Secret Service. Both the state and national offices of the ACLU told him to "run along" when he solicited their help. -- From Crime and Puzzlement by John Perry Barlow
      It was because the ACLU didn't understand the implication of this and similar cases that the EFF is necessary. The incident was an important part of THE HACKER CRACKDOWN by Bruce Sterling. It was the "Boston Massacre" of the Electronic Civil Liberties movement. It showed that government agencies, because of their unfathomable, deep seated ignorance of computers and everything related to them, were actually dangerous to individuals and companies who depended on computers for their livelyhood.

      This you dismiss as unimportant? Remember this is a very old case, and also remember that when someone beats the Federal government, it is a big deal, it means the courts sided with SJ Games against the SS. That the SS was in the wrong. Hopefully, it caused the SS, FBI and other organizations to act less obviously outside the law in future cases. (Though I'm not sure that's true.) At anyrate, it showed that you can beat the government when they break the law because of ignorence and incompetence related to computer equipment.

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    3. Re:Cool.... but not really by Prof_Dagoski · · Score: 1

      In and of itself, this case of improper search and seizure is not terribly interesing. What is interesting is the set of misconceptions about computer technologies the feds had on this case. I'd reccomend reading the write up on Steve Jackson Games web site. The other thing that was intersting was the apparently sincere fear of the law enforcement agencies that GURPS Cyberpunk was a how to guide for hackers. Seriously. The tragic side of this story was how the agencies involved were unable to admit their mistake and how the whole thing escalated to precedent setting case. This whole case is a must read for anyone getting into the criminal/legal issues of technology. A cautionary read.

    4. Re:Cool.... but not really by aldop · · Score: 1

      It's more interesting than yet another article regarding the GPL.

  2. $50,000 of damages? by Hasdi+Hashim · · Score: 3

    ...and $250,000 of attorney fees? (that's 5/6 of the money for litigation costs) Really, if I had to lay off half of my employee because of this, I would have ask for more compensation. They have SJ Games lose three years worth of opportunity.

    Hasdi

    1. Re:$50,000 of damages? by xkevin · · Score: 3


      there is an oversight in the article. the author neglected to mention that every employee of SJ Games at the time of the seizure was awarded an additional 50,000 *experience points.*

      when you think of that in terms of levels and new spells -- it's pretty worth it.

      --

      <3x, kevin
    2. Re:$50,000 of damages? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Of course, there are no levels in GURPS (the flagship Steve Jackson rpg)

      ;)

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    3. Re:$50,000 of damages? by AugstWest · · Score: 2

      they shut down a company for good for $50k

      The company isn't shut down. They're still making new games, still turning out high-quality stuff.

      Just vist http://www.sjgames.com/

      fnord

    4. Re:$50,000 of damages? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Heh. 50,000 points of allies would be sweet.

      (Who's going to stop you? Why, me, and _this_ army)

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    5. Re:$50,000 of damages? by SEE · · Score: 2

      Not "for good" -- I've got nearly $1,000 of Steve Jackson Games materials sitting next to me, all stuff published after 1993. And a subscription to Pyramid, an online magazine that inculdes a MOO and NNTP message boards. And there's Illuminati Online, one of Texas's largest ISPs, which was originally owned by SJ Games.

      Anyway, you can buy copies of the Cyberpunk sourcebook here, on their online store.


      Steven E. Ehrbar

  3. A displaced sense of reality by MosesJones · · Score: 3

    And we won. The judge gave the Secret Service a tongue-lashing and ruled for SJ Games on two out of the three counts, and awarded over $50,000 in damages, plus over $250,000 in attorney's fees

    This is winning ? 5 times as much goes to lawyers as to the injured parties. Something in the US legal system needs to be changed to enable real people to combat big brother, be they the goverment or big company X.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:A displaced sense of reality by Signal+11 · · Score: 1

      No offense, but the company was making more than that every few weeks... they lost on this: badly. If not just on the market capitalization..

    2. Re:A displaced sense of reality by skelly · · Score: 1

      The company may have been making money, but it was not a tightly run multimillion dollar game company like Wizards of the Coast. Steve Jackson games was an avant garde, almost open source, garage kind of company at the time. The place was rather disorganized as a company. As a result of the raid, damages, lost client files, and lost R&D into cyberpunk game, the company did allmost go under. You can thank goodness that they still did lots of things on paper.

      --
      Romanes eunt domus? People called Romanes, they go the 'ouse? It says Romans go home. No it doesn't. What's Latin fo
    3. Re:A displaced sense of reality by msaulters · · Score: 1


      This is winning ? 5 times as much goes to lawyers as to the injured parties. Something in the US legal system needs to be changed to enable real people to combat big brother, be they the goverment or big company X.

      All that aside, as I understand it, the feds have never stopped harrassing SJ Games, or at least have never stopped (in)conspicuous surveillance of them and Illuminati Online.

      A personal note from Steve Jackson can also be found here.

      --
      These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    4. Re:A displaced sense of reality by __aavonx8281 · · Score: 1

      Oh puleeeze
      you have got to be joking here! you really need to bone up on the case and rpg's in general before saying something this moronic.

      no wait, you're right, i learned how to use a shotgun from doom, oh and DnD taught me Satan worshipping. man, if it hadn't been for the R.Talsorian game Cyberpunk i never would have learned how to hack.

      ignorance is not bliss when you impose it on others!

  4. Make sure you read Bruce Sterlings Book by caolan · · Score: 5
    which he made freely available as an online text as well as a published novel.

    Its a pretty good read, covers the Jackson Games Case as well as the other ones that occured aroud that time

    C.

    --
    I sometimes write stuff
    1. Re:Make sure you read Bruce Sterlings Book by pb · · Score: 1

      Excellent. I usually offer links to "The Bible" (if you only had one book to read on the subject, this one would be a good choice) where appropriate, but obviously I haven't been reloading slashdot enough lately.

      It looks like this sort of (lame) occurence happens at least every decade or so, let's try to stop it this time!
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  5. Steve Jackson by Signal+11 · · Score: 5
    This is kind of a symbolic date. Ten years ago today the first major assault on online freedom came in the form of an unsigned search warrant, confinscation of an entire company (effectively), and putting a company that designed games (and role playing ones at that!) that just happened to be about computer hacking.

    Fast forward ten years, and the only thing that's changed is who authorizes the raids: the MPAA and RIAA are hot on the heels of so-called pirates who are giving them an estimated 1.2 billion dollar surplus of funds, the Digital Millenium Copyright Act - perhaps the worst offender since the CDA only because it's more comprehensive and dangerous. A felony to use a digital-audio converter? Reminds me of how stealing cable access is a felony, but me taking a hammer to your car (doubtless costing much more loss of property) is only a gross misdemeanor.

    "these times, they are a changin'"... it seems to underscore the one problem we seem to be missing - this isn't a fight over intellectual property or freedom of information as much as it's a fight to educate people. Sadly enough, most people get their information through the massive media organizations and evening news. People who can afford to put the word out on their wires are all the average consumer can hear. Our fight is an underground one - we're trying to save the freedom of the average consumer (both in the US and the world at large) against greedy corporations and they think we're the bad guys!

    Well.. for what's it's worth Steve, thanks for sobering us up to this reality.. even if you didn't know you'd be making history when they showed up at your doorstep.

    1. Re:Steve Jackson by dattaway · · Score: 3

      Reminds me of how stealing cable access is a felony, but me taking a hammer to your car (doubtless costing much more loss of property) is only a gross misdemeanor.

      Laws are interesting. Reminds me of an uncle of mine who is currently serving a minimum of 12 years in Leavenworth for manufacturing E. It wasn't the E that many people are glad he's away. He had a thing for taking a hammer to stereos that didn't play his kind of music, bashing people's heads into a wall when he didn't like how a discussion was going his way, exchanging merchandise at stores without telling the merchant, breaking into neighbor's houses to steal a pen . . . just a real fuck up. Everything he did was a slap on the wrist all his life until he was 40. Until he made some happy drug. The judge and state marshall wanted him away for life.

    2. Re:Steve Jackson by spiralx · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you've got to love laws which let people who drink, drive and run over small children go to jail for a month and ban them for driving for a year (a whole year - shock, horror!) and then puts people away for five years for having five pills on them. Seems to me like the goverment pays too much attention to what they think national opinion is and not enough attention to the actual effects of crimes are when working out prison sentances.

    3. Re:Steve Jackson by Ih8sG8s · · Score: 1

      Ten years ago today the first major assault on online freedom came in the form of an unsigned search warrant.....

      What is your logic here? How do you draw comparison between that event and the mythical 'fight for our online rights'? That event happened far before the 'net' was common knowledge, or a public venue for that matter.

      "Fast forward ten years, and the only thing that's changed is who authorizes the raids: the MPAA and RIAA are hot on the heels of so-called pirates..."

      How can you place software piracy raids and this event in the same philisophical boat? I don't get it.

      "Our fight is an underground one - we're trying to save the freedom of the average consumer (both in the US and the world at large) against greedy corporations and they think we're the bad guys!"

      Although I am a seething believer in free software, corporations can and will licence their products as they see fit. It's up to individuals to decide whether they accept the philosophy of bad business. We're never going to change the collective minds of those that are at the helm of big business. We have to lead by example, and they'll catch on if they're smart.

      Attraction rather than promotion.

      Current copyright laws suck. Most licence agreements suck too. Bottom line is we have a choice.. I exercise mine.

    4. Re:Steve Jackson by ronfar · · Score: 2
      Another point is that this case helped to define that the press is still the press, whether the words are contained on paper or on magnetic disks. You see, it was the refusal of the SS (Secret Service, but I love using that acronym in this case) to return the Cyberpunk book to Steven Jackson games that violated the Constitutional rights of SJ Games in a novel way. The breaking, entering and trashing of the offices weren't particularly new, corrupt cops had been doing it for ages. Not that they weren't serious violations, but they weren't new. It was the suppression of G.U.R.P.S. Cyperpunk that was the biggest problem, because SJ Games didn't have any printed backups. The SS just assumed they didn't have to return the book because it was stored on a hard drive as opposed to on paper.

      At the time of the Secret Service raids, the game resided entirely on the hard disks they confiscated. Indeed, it was their target. They told Jackson that, based on its author's background, they had reason to believe it was a "handbook on computer crime." It was therefore inappropriate for publication, 1st Amendment or no 1st Amendment.-- CRIME AND PUZZLEMENT by John Perry Barlow
      This is important when you think about the WWW, especially in recent filtering cases. I wouldn't be surprised if it was used as a precedent in the fight against the CDA (unfortunately, I haven't studied the details of that case.)
      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  6. War against Crackers by Dead+Chicken · · Score: 2

    I would first like to ask if SJ Games, in their article, mean hackers or crackers when they say hackers.

    Secondly I would like to mention that the Gubment's Search Warrant was based on a very very flimsy affidavit. And they still HAVEN'T returned all of the items they seized ten years ago.

    This just goes to show that the gubment has actively been against all forms of irreverence. Which goes against the first amendment to the constitution.

    I don't believe in this "National Security" crap. It is more like "Governmental Security. The Feds doing something illegal to scare the genral populus against these kinds of people.

    Thank you and good night.

    --
    "A fool finds no pleasure in understanding but delights in airing his own opinions." Proverbs 18 : 2
    1. Re:War against Crackers by el_nino · · Score: 1

      While reality-checking the book, Loyd Blankenship corresponded with a variety of people, from computer security experts to self-confessed computer crackers. From his home, he ran a legal BBS which discussed the "computer underground," and he knew many of its members. That was enough to put him on a federal List of Dangerous Hoodlums! The affidavit on which SJ Games were raided was unbelievably flimsy . . . Loyd Blankenship was suspect because he ran a technologically literate and politically irreverent BBS, because he wrote about hacking, and because he received and re-posted a copy of the /Phrack newsletter. The company was raided simply because Loyd worked there and used its (entirely different) BBS!

      SJG seems to know the distinction between hackers and crackers.

      --
      %japh = (
      'name' => 'Niklas Nordebo', 'mail' => 'niklas@' . 'nordebo.com',
      'work' => 'www.sonox.com', 'phone' => '+46-708-405095'

  7. Feds good for Business? by zpengo · · Score: 4
    It sure didn't hurt SJG in terms of publicity. This more than anything else has probably spread their name around the net. I wish my company would be raided by feds! :o)

    Ewige Blumenkraft.

    ZP

    ICQ: 49636524
    snowphoton@mindspring.com

    --


    Got Rhinos?
    1. Re:Feds good for Business? by nsanit · · Score: 1

      Well, just remember - if it happens dont complain! Yo ujsut asked for a raid. I totally understand what you're saying though - there's no such thing as bad publicity.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.-Franklin
    2. Re:Feds good for Business? by waynem77 · · Score: 2

      I still have my original GURPS Cyberpunk book. (In fact, I'm looking at it right now.) I remember, as a youngster, browsing through the role-playing material and finding this book. In big letters on the front it said,

      The book that was seized by the U.S. Secret Service! (See p. 4)

      That more than anything convinced me to buy it. (Well, also the fact that Steve Jackson makes phenomenal games.)

  8. The Problem with Goon Squads by Skyshadow · · Score: 4
    The real problem with government goon squads is that they never have anything on the table. This is as good an example as any -- SJ Games lost four months of time and tons of potential revenue because some moron in the government couldn't tell the difference between fiction and reality.

    Even when the courts come out and say the Goons are wrong, all they end up doing is shoveling some taxpayer money back at the wronged party. I'll be willing to bet that no heads rolled at the Secret Service because of this particular incident -- what's the big deal about paying a fine when it's not your money in the first place? It's like when I found out that my company would pay my on-job parking tickets.

    There ought to be some system of accountability to discourage government agents from degenerating into Goons -- maybe some way of allowing the courts to directly discipline government employees. In any case, I find it a bit disturbing that my hard-earned (well, earned) tax dollars are going to pay such stupid people.

    ----

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:The Problem with Goon Squads by Dolohov · · Score: 1
      One of the documents on the page, the opinion on interception, quotes the search warrant:

      [c]omputer hardware ... and computer software ... and ... documents relating to the use of the computer system ..., and financial documents and licensing documentation relative to the computer programs and equipment at ... [SJG] ... which constitute evidence ... of federal crimes.... This warrant is for the seizure of the above described computer and computer data and for the authorization to read information stored and contained on the above described computer and computer data.

      It seems to me that the problem in the first place was the idiotic judge who issued them the search warrant. I thought the whole point behind requiring a judge's permission was to ensure from the beginning that crap like this wouldn't happen? Instead, it seems to be just another rubber stamp on the whole damned process.

      The system seems to be designed so that the cops ask for whatever they think they could get, and the legal system is supposed to rein them in. But obviously, this isn't happening. I mean, financial documents?!

      Yes, clearly education is needed -- how about educating some of these judges?

    2. Re:The Problem with Goon Squads by raibeart · · Score: 1

      Unfortunetly the only reprecussions would be that the person or persons responsible would lose their job. Then they will receive govt. money in the form of unemployment or severance pay.

      Now as a side note...

      What job will pay your on-job parking tickets?

      :>

      --
      - "Yeah man, I tell ya what, man...That dang ol' Internet, man...You just go one there and point and click...Talk about
    3. Re:The Problem with Goon Squads by kbonin · · Score: 2

      IMHO, accountability is the most serious problem in modern law enforcement. It exists across the board, from the beat cop hassling minorities, district attorneys practicing selective enforcement based on policies and media exposure, and an Attorney General who refuses to appoint Independent Counsels when clear conflicts of interest exists. (Yes, I know the Independent Counsel system is screwed up too, but thats another topic.)

      Members of law enforcement agencies simply have no significant accountability for their actions. As the poster mentioned, the worst thing is that some of the taxpayers money is returned to them. Look at a random sample of officers or supervisors responsible for heinous acts, and the majority of the time nothing happens. If one is suspended, they are quickly rehired by another office, often at a pay raise. The checks and balances (oversight committees) are underfunded, politicized, and have little real power.

      And on top of all that is a Supreme Court that is systematically eviscerating the bill of rights in the name of supporting law enforcement.

      The saddest thing is these generally only effect people with limited means (i.e. limited to nonexistent legal budgets.) It is rare that anyone who can hire a decent firm is hassled, despite the scope of crime(frauds, mostly) perpetrated by that same "white collar"/upper tax bracket segment of society.

      The list of cases that have received significant media exposure pale besides the tons of cases that are buried. Worst are the increasing number of home invasions accidental shootings (home owners who tried to defend themselves from armed thugs storming bedroom at 2am) based on the incorrect tip of a confidential informant.

      I hate politics, but knowing what a cop/fed can do and get away with makes me sick.

    4. Re:The Problem with Goon Squads by Shadowlion · · Score: 1

      What job will pay your on-job parking tickets?

      Law enforcement.

    5. Re:The Problem with Goon Squads by raibeart · · Score: 1

      Actually I always thought that with law enforcement it's more of a case of just getting rid of the Parking Ticket. Not paying it.

      --
      - "Yeah man, I tell ya what, man...That dang ol' Internet, man...You just go one there and point and click...Talk about
    6. Re:The Problem with Goon Squads by Demona · · Score: 1
      "Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or territory, or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States, or other person within the jurisdiction thereof, to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity or other proper proceedings for redress." Title 42 USC )1983

      "To maintain an action under 42 USC 1983, it is not necessary to allege or prove that the defendants intended to deprive plaintiff of his Constitutional rights or that they acted willfully, purposefully, or in a furtherance of a conspiracy. ...it is sufficient to establish that the deprivation...was the natural consequences of defendants acting under color of law..." Ethridge v. Rhodos, DC Ohio 268 F Supp 83 (1967), Whirl v. Kern CA 5 Texas 407 F 2d 781 (1968)]

      "...an...officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government." Brookfield Co. v Stuart, (1964) 234 F. Supp 94, 99 (U.S.D.C., Wash.D.C.)

      "...an officer may be held liable in damages to any person injured in consequence of a breach of any of the duties connected with his office...The liability for nonfeasance, misfeasance, and for malfeasance in office is in his 'individual', not his official capacity..." (70 AmJur2nd Sec. 50, VII Civil Liability.)

      --
      Fuck Slashdot
    7. Re:The Problem with Goon Squads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The beat cop hassles people who have decided that it's "their culture" to dress and act like thugs on the sidewalk. There are plenty of "minority" people out there in the world who act normal and don't get hassled.

      Absolute BULLSHIT! Have you been under a rock all your life, have selective memory, or are just plain ignorant? Have you ever heard of the numberous cases where a RICH black male gets pulled over for driving in his BMW or Mercedes? I have, MANY TIMES and I sure as hell don't like the fact that cops can pull you over just for that.

      It's a real dilemma, and a big part of "liberal guilt syndrome." People feel guilty for acting nervous when walking by someone dressed up and acting like a common thug on the sidewalk. Here's a revelation: You're feeling nervous because you're walking by a thug. It's not because the person's skin is black. You're not being racist. Stop feeling guilty.

      What kind of reverse-psychology is THAT? There was a study done by Stanford (or am I forgetting my Calif. Universities?) some time ago which found that white men in general experienced increased numbers of heart-beats whenever they see a black man. It's not about clothing, it's about race AND gender. Now before blaming Liberals for all society's problems, why don't you exercise that organ sitting between your ears and realize that conservatives are at least equally to blame.

    8. Re:The Problem with Goon Squads by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I've had jobs pay for parking tickets, if I got them while stuck on a customer site fixing something ... sometimes the only parking near a site is half-hour only and there's nothing you can do.

      Of course we charged those back to the customer ;)

    9. Re:The Problem with Goon Squads by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      I always wondered why construction worker's vehicles were always parked illegally... Perhaps the fine should be 10x higher for a business than an individual (like for software piracy in Oz).

  9. Ah, the glory years by Markvs · · Score: 4

    Fortunately, we all know the government these days knows it's bounds and wouldn't trample the liberties it's sworn to keep & protect.

    So, don't think about the raid. Or Project Sundevil. Or Kevin Mitnick (who deserved some jail time, but didn't deserve 5 years and absurd treatment). Heck, even Waco & Ruby Ridge. It's just the government keeping you safe from yourself.

    Oh, er, wait a second...

    --
    46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
    1. Re:Ah, the glory years by Borealis · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that Kevin is forbidden to touch a computer anytime soon. Yet if you kill somebody with a hammer you can still work construction after your 5 years in jail on a plea bargain.

      We all know that if he was able to "hack" into the "net" again, he could accidentally trigger massive acts of "cyberterrorism".

      --
      Unbreakable toys can be used to break other toys.
    2. Re:Ah, the glory years by swb · · Score: 1

      So, don't think about the raid. Or Project Sundevil. Or Kevin Mitnick (who deserved some jail time, but didn't deserve 5 years and absurd treatment). Heck, even Waco & Ruby Ridge. It's just the government keeping you safe from yourself.

      Don't shame the memory of Randy Weaver's family members assassinated at Ruby Ridge and those that died in the Waco inferno by associating them with common criminals like Kevin Mitnick.

      Randy Weaver's family and those at Waco were *completely* innocent people who were ambushed by the American Interior Ministy. Kevin Mitnick was a vandal and a thief who deserves the punishment he gets.

    3. Re:Ah, the glory years by Markvs · · Score: 2

      If the Weavers were completely innocent or not is not the topic I'm debating, it's the fact that a branch of the government acted outside the law.

      As for Mitnick, he was those things, but also a scapegoat. Either way, it doesn't make what happened to either the Weavers or Mitnick right.

      --
      46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
  10. Ramsey Electronics by Bob(TM) · · Score: 3

    IMHO, this bears a striking resemblence to the Ramsey Electronics raid - guilt by association.

    The more things change, the more they stay the same.

    --

    The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
  11. One of the first?? by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    Could this be one of the first times that the authorities have picked out a scapegoat to quell the paranoid industry on their security issues. It seems to happen all the time now; The authorities wade into something they seem to know little or nothing about and attempt illegal prosecutions.

    When oh when will they go out and hire some real experts?

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:One of the first?? by Sick+Boy · · Score: 1

      When oh when will they go out and hire some real experts?

      Simple. When the experts are willing to say what the gubmint wants to hear.

      --

      --
      Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
    2. Re:One of the first?? by B.+Samedi · · Score: 1

      They'll get real experts when they decide to pay for them. Have you bothered to check and see what the pay for government service is these days? It's terrible. My state (Oklahoma) has a problem where they hire IT people fresh out of school and then a year later (after they have something to put on the resume) they leave to private industry to make some decent money. It's not limited to just IT but it is the most blatant example here.

      The experts they do have are usually trying to get some project of there's funded and will say anything to get the funding. If they want good advice they'll have to shell out for it... just like everyone else.


    3. Re:One of the first?? by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling, believe me I know :)

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  12. Different Time -same mentality by _Mustang · · Score: 1

    Seems like the same people with the same attitudes sure do get around. This article amounts to a time capsule; the scariest thing is that the attitude we see through this article bears an uncanny resemblance to the attitude that Jack guy (head of MPAA or was it RIAA?) has.

  13. I disagree! This is HISTORY, people! by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    This story is worthy of /. One of the things many online personages (especially the young'uns) lack is a sense of historical perspective. This sort of thing should be dredged up once in a while, just to remind us all that the Man has been trying to f**k us for a loooong time. Can't say that the PTB don't have foresight, this was indubitably done to try and set a precedent against future users of the then-nascent "public" internet and BBS's. Unfortunately it backfired, guess the Feds got the "wrong" judge...

    Too bad Leonard Peltier can't sue the FBI the same way...

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:I disagree! This is HISTORY, people! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Amen. Geez, even at 27, I'm looking at a story that seems to be lost on the young people on /. I remember spending many hundreds of dollars on long distance modem calls to Austin TX (okay, spending my parents money:)

      Sadly, I didn't play GURPS or OGRE. Just Car Wars.

      Maybe if some of these young kids (18-19:) had had our old hand-crank, acoustic modems, they'd appreciate the current tyranny a bit more.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  14. They created a board game because of this! by MiLady · · Score: 3

    For those who didn't know about it, this from their own page:
    " Hacker is the original computer crime card game. This game was written by Steve Jackson as a satirical comment
    on the Secret Service raid and the hacker community. The hacker community liked it. There's been no visible
    reaction from the Feds. Hacker won the Origins Award for Best Modern-Day Boardgame of 1992. "

    More info, but it's sold out.

    --
    This is not a signature.
    1. Re:They created a board game because of this! by set · · Score: 1

      I *love* this game. A bunch of us used to play this game for 15-30 hours *straight*. Week after week. Never got old. It's a real shame that one can't find it for under 50 dollars anymore. Maybe this is a good occasion for a second printing of both Hacker and Hacker II (SJGames, are you reading this?).

  15. Anyone remember Ripco? by OrangeLazarus · · Score: 1

    They had the pleasure of meeting the SS too.

  16. Correction ... by Hephaestus_Lee · · Score: 2

    They were not raided because of GURPS Cyber-Punk. The reason the FBI raided them was that they had found a copy of information lifted from a phone company computer posted on their BBS. It set a lot of prescedents, and has a lot of signifigance in the field of cyber law

    --Hephaestus Lee

    --
    "[Y]our wise men don't know how it feels to be thick as a brick." -- Ian Anderson
  17. The story seems to have many versions by jd · · Score: 3
    Depends on who you believe. I seem to remember SJG's website specifically stating that the raid had nothing to do with the Cyberpunks game, but rather of alleged misuse of equiptment by an employee at his home. The raid on SJG was an attempt to gather additional evidence, which is a bit stupid.

    (Even if the guy -was- guilty, AND did something stupid at the office, at best any such evidence would be highly circumstantial, when it came to a case that was specifically about his activities at home. The chances are the Judge would throw the book at whoever ordered the raid, no matter what.)

    But let's assume that, at some point, the Secret Service decided that the Cyberpunks game was "dangerous" or "criminal" in some way. I have yet to see anything by SJG to suggest they did, but let's make the assumption anyway. What then? It's "evidence", sure, but gathered in a raid concerning a totally independent activity. I'm not sure they'd have been able to use it.

    Let's make another assumption, that they could have used it. What then? If it doesn't directly and demonstrably incite criminal activity, then it's just a book, covered by the first ammendment. That would be a tough nut for the Secret Service to crack.

    Ok, let's make Yet Another assumption, that they could somehow have done so, that they could have found a way to interpret the law so as to legally be able to use the Cyberpunks information as evidence of directly inciting crime. Could they have won the case? That would depend on where the trial was held. The Secret Service aren't supposed to be involved in domestic investigations (except maybe of counterfeiting, forgery, et al), which would be right on the fringes of the Cyberpunk genre.

    If the case was held in an area which was primarily dependent upon the Secret Service, in some way, for employment, stability or security, I can see a judge maybe giving them the benefit of the doubt in that one narrow field, and maybe requiring SJG to remove anything specifically dealing with counterfeiting or forgery from the game.

    Anywhere else, though, the Secret Service wouldn't have a hope. It would be too tangental an argument. Without a direct, primary relationship, the judge would be perfectly within their rights to have those involved in the raid locked up for contempt of court, perjury and abuse of court time.

    Although it should not be relevent, because SJG generates revenue in most States, and therefore States are earning money from SJG's business, I suspect most judges would follow SJG's tune, anyway. Most US court decisions seem to be based on financial benefit to their area, rather than the merits of the case.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:The story seems to have many versions by Earthling · · Score: 2
      The Secret Service aren't supposed to be involved in domestic investigations (except maybe of counterfeiting, forgery, et al), which would be right on the fringes of the Cyberpunk genre.

      The U.S. Secret Service mission is "To protect the President and Vice-President, their immediate families, important presidential candidates, visiting heads of state, and other dignitaries. To enforce laws against counterfeiting currency, fraud, forgery, credit card fraud, computer fraud, and electronic transfer fraud."

      So the Secret Services was very much withing its jurisdiction when they went after a few SJG employes on charges of "transport of property obtained by fraud" and "traffic of passwords or similar information through which a computer may be accessed without authorization" (as mentioned in the U.S.S. affidavit for the search warrant for SJG).

      -Earthling

      --

      -Earthling
      "I'm sorry, I had to; the irony was just too thick."
    2. Re:The story seems to have many versions by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      But let's assume that, at some point, the Secret Service decided that the Cyberpunks game was "dangerous" or "criminal" in some way. I have yet to see anything by SJG to suggest they did,

      Go to your local game store and find the book GURPS: Cyberpunk. On the front cover lower right corner it says "The book that was confiscated by the US Secret Service" and in the first few pages is a statement regarding the book being targeted. Sounds like a rather official SJG statement about the government targeting the book.

      BTW the book is pretty good.

    3. Re:The story seems to have many versions by Lx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my story was apparently way off. The one I heard had to do with their BBS posting a hacker-type document revealing something about the 911 system people didn't want known, or something like that. I guess if you read the story, though, it turns out that one of the employees had a BBS at home that had Phrack posted on it, so maybe there's some truth in it.

      -lx

  18. Another good thing that came out of this. by Lotek · · Score: 2
    One of the things that Steve Jackson did was to expand the Illuminati Online BBS into a fully fledged ISP. I signed on for telnet access years ago, mainly to get free access to the GURPS playtest files, and have stayed there because of the flexiblity that having the account has given me. It was my first brush with a unix enviroment, and I loved it. Even though I have changed ISP's more times than I can remember, I have kept the IO account live so that anyone who wants to contact me has always had the same address.

    IO is also a strong linux supporter. All the servers there are running under some free software of one type or another, and you have pretty much a free hand in what you want to run off of your website, as far as mySql, php, etc..

    Not to mention, having a nice, short domain name is a plus.

    fnord

  19. Secret Service by Kagato · · Score: 2

    The secret service holds an interesting place in law enforcement. As part of the department of tresury you'd think they'd only be going after counterfitters? Well, not really. The SS (as I like to call them) is a gun for hire. Are you a powerful company or gov't office? Well the secret service is there for you.

    In this case the SS was the lackie of Bell South. The big companies had lobbied congress for some goon-squad funding for "computer crime."

    Which, to the Bell Souths defence was the only option since the FBI won't do jack for you unless they can get a couple good press confrences out of it. And back in 1990 these types of stories weren't news worthy. And the hacker computer back then didn't have any script kiddies. Wisdom pervailed and no one took down the Bell South E911 system. All they would have had is some guy went dumpster diving and found a document and put it online...Ooooooooooo.

    So, the SS is now the lackie of Big Business, in this case Bell South. They target Kluepfel for having the document open to the public, and decide to mess with him and anyone he knows. Enter Steve Jackson Games.

    At this point you should be thinking "Gee, smear tactics to label legit businesses... Trumped up charges and a drawn out legal battle designed to force someone out of business... Can you say MPAA? I though you could."

    It's great to see the EFF pervail, but the since the case was won so long after the initial flap it's page 10 news. If anything this should be a reminder that it's been 10 years since SJG. Although things haven't gotten worse, they certainly haven't gotten better. There's a long road ahead, and we should be glad the EFF is there.

    1. Re:Secret Service by tokengeekgrrl · · Score: 1
      I, too, am thankful for the EFF; however, it's always-having-to-be-on-the-defensive stance is too disturbing. Am I the only one who is weary of the fear and ignorance that drives the government to perpetrate such absurd and egregious acts upon its citizens such as computer raids and passing speech-infringing legislation?

      I realize that fullscale revolution to overthrow the oligarchy-masquerading-as-a-democracy under which we currently live is improbable at best, but we are entering a new millenium with fewer rights than previous generations and that's just messed up.

      Thanking you in advance for tolerating my pointless ranting.

      - tokengeekgrrl
      "The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions

  20. Actually I'm surprised that it hasn't gotten worse by pngwen · · Score: 2

    When these raids were happening the main fear of hackers was from people who thought we would start a war or something like that. But the defense department said that wasn't possible (and to some extent this was true) and at the same time ordered that many of us be rounded up.

    Of course true hackers don't do blatently illegal things so they had to find some excuse to raid people's homes and businesses. This is EXACTLY like what happene before my lifetime in response to phreaks. This case is really different though. These people just made a RPG module that gives fantastic ways of hacking (or rather cracking) things that simply did not exist. (and by and large still do not) This was a direct attack on freedom of speech. If the Madison knew what the bill that he drafted would do to our society, the first ammedment to the constitution would have never happened.

    The problem now remains. The authoritative evil people want us to conform to THEIR agenda and if we differ, well the seceret service has to come and stop us.

    Ok, end ranting now

    --
    I am the penguin that codes in the night.
  21. Correction of Re:Correction ... by acroyear · · Score: 2

    No. The Phrack document never existed on any of SJGames's files, including the BBS.

    The Company was raided because the file DID show up on Lloyd Blankenship's personal underground BBS, and by coincidence, Lloyd also managed the Illuminati BBS.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  22. The real facts behind this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    It still amazes me that, ten years after the event, the real facts of this raid are obscured my half-truths, rumors, and all out lies.

    The fact of the matter is that Steve Jackson Games practially BEGGED for the raid. They publically ridiculed the Secret Service and bragged about their exploints online. Furthermore, what everyone fails to mention (and is crucial) is that SJ Games had documents stating that they were ALLOWED TO BE SEARCHED wihtout a warrent at any time, as part of a bargain due to prior exploits. They had in fact waived the right of a search warrent.

    Plus, it was well known that there were no less than 3 FULL TIME FBI agents working at SJG at the time of the raid not working in conjunction with the Secret Service but working AGAINST THEM. Two splinter groups had entirely different agendas (one was concerned with SJG and games piracy, the other with hijacking of sensitive national security data). The groups refused to work with one another and eventully destroyed not only SJG, but themselves.

    The BBS had bomb recipes, beastial porn, oirated warez, and (more over) documents about a testing facility where a prototype stealth bomber was under production! The FBI was interested in the porn, the SS in the Bomber info.

    The SS was well withing their rights to seize these documents when National Security is at risk. The FBI, on the other had, wanted to amass more evidence and didn't want to make a move on SJG until later.

    Meanwhile, SJG is flaunting the porn, the docs, and even stolen hardware in BBS, usenet, and IRC. The hardware was junk, and bulk defective hardware was sold to mafia kingpin Joeseph Capello in Wilkesbury, PA. He and his organization wanted to take out SJG in a big way, but his plans were thwarted by the FBI and SS.

    I'm really sick of all the bullshit that's flying around out there. Do some research before you post this crap. Shame on slashdot for propogating such nonsense as news.

    1. Re:The real facts behind this by spiralx · · Score: 2

      The FBI was interested in the porn ... The FBI, on the other had, wanted to amass more evidence ...

      Ha ha, I like that :)

    2. Re:The real facts behind this by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      Uh, are you the same guy who did the research for that X-Files epsiode last Sunday?

      Don't plug the HD power into the master/slave jumpers, man.

      If you've got some proof of this go ahead and show it...if you don't, then I'm not going to believe your off the wall stories of someone as high up as the SS and the FBI going after a game company because of warez, and 3l33t people. Boards I was on were running the same stuff, and they were never paid any visits.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    3. Re:The real facts behind this by molog · · Score: 1
      I'll bite on this one. Who the hell are you? If you have such evidance come out, show your evidance. We only have the word of an AC, and that doesn't count for jack shit. The post is a troll and so are you and I am stupid for even posting to this. But lets just assume for a second you are telling the truth. Lets see what you've got. If am correct, it is nothing.


      Molog

      So Linus, what are we doing tonight?

      --
      So Linus, what are we going to do tonight?
      The same thing we do every night Tux. Try to take over the world!
    4. Re:The real facts behind this by Industrial+Disease · · Score: 2

      Was this before or after the Secret Service, with the help of the Convenience Stores and the Goldfish Fanciers, attempted to take control of the Orbital Mind Control Lasers from the Semiconscious Liberation army?

      --
      Weblogging Considered Harmful:
  23. Craig Neidorf by The+Dev · · Score: 1

    Don't forget about the Craig Neidorf Search
    on January 18/19 1990. That too was a major
    event and the resultant trial a major defeat for the Secret Service.

  24. Hey... by Greyfox · · Score: 3

    Did dude ever get his stuff back?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Hey... by Borealis · · Score: 2

      I believe they did, but it wouldn't matter so many years after the fact. SJG wasn't rolling in the cash, having the equipment and games go missing for any amount of time, let alone the time it was missing, was enough to almost bankrupt them.

      Current laws on computer equipment seizure are the same. They can take your computer for "examination" and give it back to you at some indefinite time in the future. They have no limitations on the amount of time they can hold your equipment. Given that most equipment is near useless 2-3 years after initial purchase it's the same as stealing.

      --
      Unbreakable toys can be used to break other toys.
    2. Re:Hey... by Field+Marshall+Stack · · Score: 1
      Like the sig. For those not in the know. It's proof that god is a computer scientist.

      That should be godDESS. Oh, and btw you should probably do something about all those fnords in your post...
      --
      "HORSE."

      --
      "HORSE."
      -Flaming Carrot
  25. Wow. That long ago? by bons · · Score: 5
    I still have the t-shirt "Don't tell me no lies and keep your hands to yourself." and a lot of fond memories. You can still find my name if you dig up a copy of Hacker2 (the card game) [revenge is sweet] or I.O. University.

    I haven't seen most of them in years. Dana has a webcam and is currently the 13th sexiest geek the whole world. Unfortunately, I've lost track of most everyone else.

    The raid is what introduced me to io.com, Dana, and the rest of the coolest group of people I've ever had the pleasure of knowing.

    A lot of people on Slashdot seem to think that it wasn't much of a victory. I guess they don't understand what happened then. The supreme court decided that computers were printing presses. The supreme court decided that what happened was wrong. This doesn't mean that it can't and won't happen again but it does mean that it's not acceptable. When it does happen, it's a newsworthy event, not a daily fact of life. For that alone, I consider it a victory.

    There are those who think SJG should have gotten more. I don't think they understand what the fight was about in the first place. The fight was about the ability to communicate. Could we talk to people and have a right to privacy? Could we print what we wanted to in an electronic forum? Did the government have the right to harass us for doing so? These were important decisions in those days. Without that case, the Internet as we know it, may well have not come to be. The freedoms we use to post on Slashdot came from that incident.

    Yeah. It's been 10 years. Some of the stuff never was returned. Rumors said that we were killed during that whole purple Nike' sneaker suicide bit. My fanzine (Second Church of Ultimate wisdom) is gone. Dana is a sexy geek, instead of just being a brilliant sexy person. And the government is still performing illegal raids.

    But at least now they're illegal.

    -----

  26. Distribute. by korpiq · · Score: 2


    Obviously this kind of activity (remember Norway) can take place anywhere on the globe, pressed by interested parties big enough. So if you run any kind of a minuscular server (web/mail/etc) anywhere, in order to secure your information against theft by bigger players, make deals with at least two equal partners to replicate all your information and services to prevent total DoS by natural disasters or governmental intervention.

    Just 2% of my administrative paranoia.

    --

    I think, therefore thoughts exist. Ego is just an impression.
  27. The moral of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess the moral of the story is that you should keep all of your back-ups off shore.

    1. Re:The moral of the story by Shadowlion · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but I'd be inclined to say the moral of the story is if you hack a telco and gain access to illegal documents, use *very* strong cryptography to encode it.

      If they track you down, they probably know you have it - but if they can't *prove* you have it, then that's enough for reasonable doubt. I believe something similar happened in Kevin Mitnick's case - the government has encrypted data that they never got a chance to use against Mitnick at trial, because they had no idea what was in it.

      Anyways... just me speaking out of my arse.

  28. Distribute - intercontinentally by korpiq · · Score: 2

    make deals with at least two equal partners
    + as widely distributed as possible, both geologically and governmentally

    Almost missed half of my point.

    --

    I think, therefore thoughts exist. Ego is just an impression.
  29. Games? This should be filed under censorship! by WiartonWilly · · Score: 2

    CENSORSHIP of a game company

  30. Re:Who's worse the lawyers, or the SS? by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

    Isn't that creepy how the Secret Service can be abbreviated to "SS" anyway...

    Lawyers in general piss me off a whole lot. They don't produce a product, and they provide for a service that is used far too often, and in the end, both parties get screwed, and the lawyer comes out ahead...even if he loses.

    Take these Class Action Lawsuits, for example. I remember hearing a while back about them filing a class action lawsuit against Intel for the Pentium math bug. They got a list of every Pentium owner, and sued for them...without asking. The lawyers got something on the order of millions, and everyone else invovled got another Pentium...even though most of them weren't complaining about their chips malfunctioning. Who did that benefit? (Aside from AMD and Cyrix...) There needs to be a huge reworking of the legal system. Something that limits the amount of cash a lawyer can get. Price gouging, or something...sheesh...

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  31. Anyone know by el_guapo · · Score: 1

    the current status of this guy's game company? As for a comment on the story - can't we at least say the system worked, albeit after quite some time and in an admittedly sad way? I, of course, am a bit perturbed by SJ getting 50K and his lawyers getting 250K (why does this country reward victim's lawyers more than the victim?) BUT - "the judge gave them a good tongue lashing" part at least *partly* proves the system works, sort of....right?

    --
    mas cerveza, por favor politically incorrect stu
    1. Re:Anyone know by Steve+B · · Score: 3
      Anyone know the current status of this guy's game company?

      They've been releasing a steady stream of new material. While a few products had disappointing sales (e.g. INWO SubGenius was released just as the gaming distribution network melted down a few years ago, so that many gaming retailers went directly from "never heard of it" to "it's old news"), they've generally been doing well AFAIK.
      /.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    2. Re:Anyone know by Perestroika · · Score: 1

      FYI, Steve Jackson Games Incorporated is doing quite well, as far as I know. (I believe they're now the fourth or fifth highest-grossing game company in the U.S.) You can find their website here, and see for yourself. :) -Chris Anthony

  32. Bruce Sterling - Hacker Crackdown by hbruijn · · Score: 3

    The article/book by Bruce Sterling Hacker Crackdown gives a quite interesting background to the raid.
    For different printable formats, go to the EFF 's Bruce Sterling - Hacker Crackdown - Archive.

    --

    If a trainstation is the place where trains stop, what is a workstation?

  33. Where are they now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where are the Secret Service agents, the prosecutors in the case, and the Bell South people who sicced the Secret Service on SJG? It would be very informative to find out how the case affected their careers. It would also be a warning to stay away from these people in future dealing on computer security issues.

  34. Yes, Steve got it back ... in pieces! by WillAffleck · · Score: 2

    Seriously, Steve was a gaming friend of mine back in the days - I even had him as Gaming Guest of Honor for Westercon in Vancouver, BC, Canada.

    It was a real shame, because of all of us SMOGs, he had the heaviest investment in tech - and they took his computers and literally broke them in pieces, returning the broken chips and motherboards in plastic bags (at least, that's what he told me).

    Yes, they can do that. And they still can. Those laws haven't changed, and aren't likely too in the near future, except to get more drastic as we change our Nation's Enemy List from drug kingpins to hackers and crackers.

    In honor of Steve, I ask that everyone go out and have some sushi for lunch today (his favorite).

    --
    Will in Seattle
  35. 10 years from now by sstrick · · Score: 2

    In ten years time hopefully we will be looking back at the upcoming DeCSS desicion with the sense victory....

    --

    "Do you think we could wipe out world hunger forever if scientists figured out how to make AOL's Free CD's edible?"-
  36. Fond Memories... by webfiend · · Score: 1

    of the day my mistrust of the government extended to their definition and treatment of "computer crimes."

    I shared this story with just about everybody I knew after hearing about it, it was such a ridiculous case.

  37. 10 years later and things have not changed much by Ken+Williams · · Score: 2

    Check out the article below (from 2/17/2000). Although it involves a case related to criminal activities, the charges imply that *anybody* simply in possession of L0phtcrack is committing a felony.

    This is important because L0phtcrack, if you are not familiar with the software program, is widely used (legitimately!) by Network and Security Administrators, and Security Consultants for Network and System Security Audits.

    Logical extrapolation of the charges mentioned in the article implies that Microsoft is guilty of a number of felonies, and conspiracy to commit numerous additional felonies, in Minnesota, because they manufacture the NT Resource Kit, a favorite "criminal hacker tool". In fact, anybody in possession of the popular Unix "Crack" program, in the state of Minnesota, is surely also guilty.

    -----
    http://www.channe l4000.com/news/stories/news-20000217-164727.html

    According to this article (and a Hopkins Minnesota police department), it is a felony to posess l0phtcrack. Two people were charged with
    "...two counts of possession of burglary or theft tools (specifically, a software program for extracting user IDs and passwords from a computer
    system). "

    Later, the articles explains that these two people '...accessed the VP Projects computer system and installed a software program called LOphtCrack, which is designed to extract user IDs and passwords. "

    According to the article, its also a felony to attempt to gain access using it as well as another felony when you actually gain access.
    -----

    --
    -- ken williams
  38. Feds very bad for Business by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    Actually, this was extremely bad for SJG. It crippled his production, he lost a lot of his critical data and customer info, and took away his focus (Steve's) and the momentum that he had. If you could have seen him at the WorldCon in New Orleans, where he saved the day by loaning us two of his (at the time) souped-up PCs so I could recode the dBase programs for Guest Registration and Events (basically, the panel lists for the Authors and suchlike).

    Man, what a shame!

    --
    Will in Seattle
  39. Probably making $150K+ by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    Where are the Secret Service agents, the prosecutors in the case, and the Bell South people who sicced the Secret Service on SJG?

    They're probably anti-hacker experts now, pulling down more than $150K. Probably promoted to the upper echelons of the SS, too.

    --
    Will in Seattle
  40. qualifications by Ken+Williams · · Score: 1

    a few things to keep in mind ...

    - criminal intent
    - "technologically challenged" District Attorney
    - appeals court

    --
    -- ken williams
  41. It's realy easy to spout off without facts... by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying to ignore anything. I'm giving you a legitimate chance to show whatever proff you have of your description of events, which to put it lightly, are highly unlikely at best. Who'd continue to run a company with 3 FBI agents working against them?

    Ignore the problem?! WHAT PROBLEM?! If your tale is correct, then the FBI is perfectly justified in it's actions and there is no problem, and hence no need to be outraged. Chill on the attitude pal, I'm as free as a I ever was, and I'm not taking crap away from your "indepenace", what ever the hell that may be...and if anyone's filled with hate...that'd be you, wouldn't it?

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    1. Re:It's realy easy to spout off without facts... by pyrite504 · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you have the data, post some links, if not, shut up. Let the data tell the story.

  42. WWIV BBS connection by jbc · · Score: 3

    One obscure aspect of the SJG incident that was interesting to me was the WWIV BBS that SJG was running at the time of the raid. Wayne Bell, who wrote WWIV, testified at the trial about how he was able to look at the files on the confiscated computer and tell that someone had used the sysop privilege to read through all the private email on the BBS one by one, deleting them as he/she went. Because of a peculiarity of how the BBS was written, the evidence that someone had done that was retained on the BBS until (I think, not sure now) the user actually logged in again. Since that never happened, Bell was able to provide a smoking gun that the authorities not only took the BBS, but actually read through the private communication stored on it. This was a significant factor in SJG's victory, since this sort of behavior was specifically outlawed by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (or something like that).

    I was a WWIV sysop at the time, and found this whole aspect of the case very interesting.

    Even though I've moved on, to Usenet and Web development and all that, I still think back fondly on the amazingly vibrant communities that sprang up around old 286s running WWIV off a single phone line and a 2400-baud modem. That's our history (for some of us, anyway). It's where we came from, and it's where a lot of the sensibilities we share came from. I think about that sometimes when I'm trying to explain to a marketing droid why our company shouldn't use spam as a promotional tool, or should be concerned about the privacy rights of people who submit information on our Web site.

    1. Re:WWIV BBS connection by ZarkDav · · Score: 1

      Right on!

      My nostalgia level is growing dangerously as I've been reading SJ article and some Slashdot comments. Wow, it looks to me like it was yesterday I learned about the crackdown. I'm glad to hear about other people keeping the same spirit of 10 years ago.

      Now if we could only know the truth behind "The cuckoo's nest"...

  43. Was it really wrong? by delmoi · · Score: 4

    I understand that a lot of you probably feel that what was done to Steve Jackson games was unwarranted. But, for a monument, put yourself in the position of Law enforcement. They can't be expected to know everything about the computer world. These guys were selling and distributing documents that clearly laid out plans for hacking computer systems. Yes, these were fictional systems (although, the techniques described could easily be applied to real systems running at the time), but how could we expect the FBI to know that?

    If you were distributing a filer that said "How to make LSD in your basement, for fun and profit", wouldn't you expect the cops to come and arrest you? Even if the document didn't really tell people how to make the stuff, and you were doing it as a joke. No, they should arrest you, and then let you go if it was discovered that you really didn't commit a crime. No one was permanently arrested here (in fact, no one was actually arrested. They just had their toys taken away).

    Law enforcement has a responsibility to uphold the law, mistakes are sometimes made. Better safe then sorry. (and don't get me started about this whole Diallo shooting thing)

    [ c h a d &nbsp o k e r e ]

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
    1. Re:Was it really wrong? by Gischer · · Score: 1

      If you were distributing a filer that said "How to make LSD in your basement, for fun and profit", wouldn't you expect the cops to come and arrest you?

      I think you raise a very pertinent issue. However, I think you come to the wrong conclusion. There is no such thing as "thought crime" It is not illegal to know how to do something, what is illegal is actually doing it.

      This is at the heart of so many of of these technical cases from encryption export to DVD ripping, to emulation, to nuclear bomb recipes, to Steve Jackson Games.

      I have friends who find it interesting to know how to pick locks and descramble cable signals. They don't do it in an illegal context, they are just curious. And frankly, I think there's a value to society in having them know how to do it.

      There are lots of people in this country that know how to kill other people with their bare hands or with weapons, too. That seems a lot more serious, but you don't see the government confiscating martial arts manuals or shutting down gun training websites.

      --
      "I see great things in baseball" - Walt Whitman
    2. Re:Was it really wrong? by Kagato · · Score: 1

      Had you read the judges decision you would have found that the the Gov't messed up on two points:

      One) The investigation of SJG was slim at best before the warrent. The SS connected to the SJG BBS but didn't investigate beyond the banner page. That is why the judge gave the SS agent a tounge lashing for a half assed investigation to the point of insinuating that they mislead the majistrate.

      Two) As a member of the press SJG is protected for most forms of search. Although the SS agent is not expected to know the law it was expected that Assistent Federal Attorney Cox who wrote the wrote and obtained the search warrent would. Again, tounge lashing all around for not doing thier job and misleading the judge.

      The problems with warrents is there is no burden of proof. You put an order in front of a judge stating the "facts" and he'll sign it. There is no check that the facts are correct.

    3. Re:Was it really wrong? by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      But, for a monument, put yourself in the position of Law enforcement. They can't be expected to know everything about the computer world.

      Why the hell not? They work for me, and I expect them to do their jobs competently. That means they either learn the subject matter required by a given case or consult competent experts therein.

      These guys were selling and distributing documents that clearly laid out plans for hacking computer systems. Yes, these were fictional systems (although, the techniques described could easily be applied to real systems running at the time), but how could we expect the FBI to know that?

      I await your explanation of how detailed instuctions for calculating what number you need to get at or below on a 3d6 roll can "easily be applied to real systems".

      If you were distributing a filer that said "How to make LSD in your basement, for fun and profit", wouldn't you expect the cops to come and arrest you?

      Of course not, any more than I would expect the cops to haul off the Mystery Writers of America convention en masse.

      Describing how an illegal act might be committed is not itself illegal in any civilized jurisdiction.

      No, they should arrest you, and then let you go if it was discovered that you really didn't commit a crime.

      If they arrest someone under those circumstances, they should themselves be arrested (on charges of deprivation of civil rights under color of law and kidnapping).

      Law enforcement has a responsibility to uphold the law

      Their gross failure to uphold that responsibility is the topic of the current thread.
      /.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    4. Re:Was it really wrong? by say97cat · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was really wrong. If I should ever desire to post a document entitled "How to make LSD in your basement, for fun and profit" I would hope my right of free speech would protect me. It should also be expected that our law enforcement officials understand the difference between reality and fiction as this distinction pertains directly to legality. Can you imagine the outcry if John Grisham or Aaron Spelling were to be arrested because a theme in one of their works would be criminal if not fictional.

    5. Re:Was it really wrong? by Sjsop · · Score: 4

      Chad, I just have to respond to this. You state that the Illuminati BBS was "selling and distributing documents that clearly laid out plans for hacking computer systems."

      This is not just flat, flat wrong, it's a dairty blaack LIE.

      I was in charge of the Illuminati BBS for a very long time. I was also one of the editors on the GURPS Cyberpunk project. For those who don't know, Cyberpunk was a near-future supplement for SJG's GURPS roleplaying system. The only rules for hacking into systems it contained would let you hack into systems that existed nowhere but in the gameplayers' imagination and in the rulebooks. It had about as much to do with real-world computers as Dungeons and Dragons had to do with real-world witchcraft, which is to say, absolutely nothing. We made all the stuff up.

      The Secret Service went completely ape over the manuscript and described it as "a handbook for computer crime," not even realizing it was a GAME which had NO BASIS IN REALITY any more than Monopoly might.

      We did not allow copyrighted or illegal material on Illuminati. Period. We even went so far as to delete song lyrics people posted (e.g. Queen's "I'm In Love With My Car" on the Car Wars section) because they were copyrighted. We were a publishing company, and we took copyrights very seriously because we wanted people to take ours seriously. And we most certainly were not passing around stolen credit card numbers, blueprints to the BellSouth 911 system or any of the other things we were supposed to have had on the system.

      How could you expect the FBI to know this? You could expect them to get in touch with someone who knows the difference between fact and fiction, and build a case of probable cause before raiding a publishing company.

      -- Creede Lambard
      Former sjsop, Illuminati BBS

  44. ah, shit ... by delmoi · · Score: 1

    that was ment to be an annonoymously posted troll. Please moderate it down as such (I don't really think that way :P)

    There are a lot of parallels between this and the Diallo shooting if you think about it, although that situation is much, much worse. I mean, do you really need to shoot someone 19 times to stop them? I think those cops should be fired at least.

    [ c h a d &nbsp o k e r e ]

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  45. Cryptinomicon anyone? by Crag · · Score: 1

    Does the story sound at all like the raid on the California office in the Cryptinomicon to anyone else? Small coincidence perhaps since some of the old io.com regulars are mentioned in the books credits? :)

    Hi Doug!

  46. Online Legalities by Life+Blood · · Score: 1

    Ok, this is probably off topic so sue me.

    Question: Is cyberspace governed by laws regarding speech or property?

    Case in point: A hacker breaks into a computer, looks around, downloads a few document and leaves. Is this a crime? Well he has essentially committed electronic breaking and entering. If he did that you your house and got caught he would be going to jail. But today, if he gets caught he gets charged with stealing said documents, which aren't really worth much at all no matter how sensitive the information they contain is, so he gets a slap on the wrist.

    Does there need to be an stronger electronic equivalent to B&E in the information age? Is there one since IANAL?

    --

    So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

    1. Re:Online Legalities by Prophet · · Score: 1

      This would be great - applying the conceptual acts against the real in legal context. This also means that maybe we could get other things to be thought of in context. Portscans are wrong? =You left the doors and windows open should you expect no one walks in? My box = my house. If I let you in and you can find opened rooms to wander in - isn't that my fault? If you open a locked door, I could be pissed, but is that the same as breaking and entering or just destruction of property (if you were already welcomed in)? Hmm.

  47. was in fact off-topic by god_of_the_machine · · Score: 1

    Well, I wasn't the moderator but I agree with his (her) decision. The post seemed like a "quickie" post that was meant to look like a valid post but was really just a first post in disguise. It really added nothing to any discussion, and the words "first post" clue in that the fellow was looking to post anything in order to get up front.

    If it was mis-moderated, I don't think it was severe enough to warrant meta-moderation.

    --

    -rt-
    ** Evil Canadians are taking over the world. Learn about the conspiracy
    1. Re:was in fact off-topic by SuperCujo · · Score: 1

      Well, I wasn't the moderator but I agree with his (her) decision. The post seemed like a "quickie" post that was meant to look like a valid post but was really just a first post in disguise. It really added nothing to any discussion, and the words "first post" clue in that the fellow was looking to post anything in order to get up front.

      Damn you! You have just uncovered the secret to the stealth first post!

      BTW it was on topic though...

      --
      --- Can i borrow your Clue-Stick(tm)? I need to go beat a few people with it...
  48. Ramsey Electronics by ch-chuck · · Score: 3

    I hope a similar outcome occurs in the Ramsey Electronics raid case. Makers of electronic kits are scarce enough w/o the feds having a fit of paranoia. You can help by filling out the form if you own or would like to buy any of the small FM 'wireless mics' they used to sell. Bastards.

    <PARODY>Look! K-Mart is selling TELESCOPES!! Those can be used to spy thru people's windows!!! RAID!!!!!!!!</PARODY>

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  49. Sig11, you're full of it by aheitner · · Score: 2

    It's a shame that illegal search-and-seizure of a legitimate business must be equated with stealing the intellectual property of the music industry.

    I'm sorry.

    I don't like the MPAA or the RIAA either.

    And they're just damn wrong about DeCSS, as we all know.

    But they do own the copyright to all that music that people steal. And that's illegal, and undefendable. I don't like the big music companies any more than you do. But crime is not the answer -- if we're going to preserve our personal freedoms, we have to be above such things.

    People, if you don't like big media companies that screw artists and consumers alike, don't buy from them. You're not giving the artists a cent, we all know, by buying the CDs. Go to the concerts (on tour is how most artists make money). Buy CDs from small indie music houses that focus on the artists, and on doing what's different, instead of more of the same drivel. But don't steal. That just gives them more ammunition and reason for laws that take away privacy.

  50. Okay... by PenguinDude · · Score: 1

    You have my attention. Now, please present hard facts, documents whatever to support your claim. I'd be very interested in hearing it. You claim Slashdot should have done some research before posting this story. Okay, fair enough. Sounds like you did. Now, exactly where did you get your information?

    1. Re:Okay... by molog · · Score: 1
      My hat goes off to you. You are the best troll I have seen since the slashdot parady yesturday. I want to let you know I had a fun time laughing at your posts after I calmed down.


      Molog

      So Linus, what are we doing tonight?

      --
      So Linus, what are we going to do tonight?
      The same thing we do every night Tux. Try to take over the world!
    2. Re:Okay... by molog · · Score: 1
      I was laughing because of how much shit you are full of. I have a friend who works in the FBI. When they did his security check I was one of the people that they called. I emailed my friend the link to this thread to see what he thought about it. While he told me that he could not go back and give me specifics from FBI records, he did tell me this. The FBI does not handle porn, it is handled by US customs dept. and local law enforcement, so you make a statement that goes contrary to FBI policy.

      You refer to yourself as a freedom fighter, yet you are not forth coming about who you are and offer no evidence to support your claims and even a person who is at the FBI says you are full of shit. You claim that if you release these documents you are in danger. In another post you say that you faked your wife's death. There are Scooby Doo episodes that are easier to believe.

      A freedom fighter is one who spreads the truth and stands up for what is right by getting the information (proof) of what is going on. I don't see you doing anything except making broad claims without supporting evidence and racist comments. Bad troll bad.
      Molog

      So Linus, what are we doing tonight?

      --
      So Linus, what are we going to do tonight?
      The same thing we do every night Tux. Try to take over the world!
  51. Thanks, Secret Service! by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    My favorite piece of fallout from the Secret Service raid is this:

    By confiscating the Illuminati Online server, they effectively launched it from being an obscure BBS into being a nicely profitable Internet provider.

    Steve should send them a thank-you card every year on this date.

  52. Nice article by Stace · · Score: 1

    We should be seeing a JonKatz story on it any day, with a followup story a week later including letters from the people who worked at SJG at the time.

  53. Still active, plus a good ISP by ZikZak · · Score: 1

    Out of the original bbs grew io.com (full disclosure: my isp), and I believe it is being run by his brother. Steve Jackson games is still alive and well, and there is much overlap between them and Illuminati Online

    IMHO, io.com is probably the best overall ISP in the Austin area, so if you want a shell account w/ all the bells and whistles you should check it out. No, I'm not getting any kickbacks for this, just passing on what I consider to be useful info for the /. crowd.

  54. The Real reason... by eiPi · · Score: 1

    The real reason for the raid was not that they were worried about GURPS Cyberpunk teaching how to hack...
    ...Someone was worried about Gurps Illuminati and Warehouse 23
    --

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity- I enjoy it immensly!
  55. Re:Yeah right... by Arandir · · Score: 2

    Of course you must be right, you posted it on Slashdot, the home of the cyberconspiracists.

    The Secret Service did nothing wrong, it was all Bell South's doing. After all, SJG and Illuminati BBS was infinging on their turf!

    You can be as paranoid as you want to be about big business (aka anyone who makes more money than you), but nothing will get fixed until the real culprits are put on a tight leash.

    The real criminal in this case was the US Government. The solution isn't to break the baby bells up further, or to deny hollywood filmmakers the right of association, or to prevent anyone from making more money than you. Instead, it is to ensure that laws are applied equally to everyone, including the government.

    Let's accept, for the sake of argument, the spurious claim that Bell South approached the US Secretary of the Treasury with an offer to hire the Secret Service, for the express purpose of eliminating a BBS that wasn't obsequious enough for them. Now let's assume that the guv'ment had to follow the same laws as everyone else. In this case, Bell South might as well as hire the mafia as the Secret Service, since the raid would have been a criminal act of extortion and theft.

    If you make the laws apply to everyone equally, then lobbying by the filthy evil anti-linux megacorps will stop, since there would be no way to get exclusive legal priviledges.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  56. Going to Concerts by veldrane · · Score: 1

    Isn't Ticketmaster affiliated with the RIAA in some way?

    I'm just wondering how much, if any, the "big media" companies get from concerts?

    Excusing the fact that I'm discussing "musical talent" that I don't care for but take, for example, Britney Spears or that all-boy group, LipSync (I think that's right...I don't watch Mtv anymore). Now, Britney used to be a cheerful little mouseketeer and so did one of the LipSync'ers. When flipping past the Disney channel on my way to Sci-Fi, I see them, quite often, playing their concerts. Disney is a really powerful media corporation...after all, they control ABC.
    Who says that these "musical talents" weren't generated by Disney? That Mickey doesn't have his little fingers deep into this industry?
    They don't publicly announce that, I'll admit...but they don't exactly annouce that they fund studios in the adult entertainment industry either.

    Well, I suppose I should apologize for the rant and the FUD, since I can't substantiate my suspicions with cold, hard facts but be wary of how you support artists. Things aren't always what they seem.

    -Vel

    1. Re:Going to Concerts by Arandir · · Score: 2

      Who gives a rip that Mickey has his fingers in Britney's pie? What business is it of yours? What's the point of your rant? Are you saying Britney Spears does not have the right of freedom of association?

      So what if supporting Britney directly or indirectly supports Disney? BFD! Maybe the next artist isn't a pawn of evil mediacorp, but uses you ticket money to buy a Britney Spears CD. Are you going to start accounting for every cent that leaves your hands?

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    2. Re:Going to Concerts by veldrane · · Score: 1

      Apparently you missed the point.

      I could care less about Britney or Disney or even their relationship. I thought I made that clear at the beginning of my post...sorry. The point isn't that Britney's got a bad(or good) thing going.

      The previous post's claim was "don't support the RIAA by buying a CD, go see them in concert instead." My statement merely said that on occasion even the concerts subsidize the RIAA. If someone intends to financially boycott the RIAA or some corporate entity, that person should be fully aware of all the monetary outlets of that organization.

      Do I account for every cent that leaves my hand? Yes, I try to. You make it sound like conscious consuming is a bad and crazy thing.

      -Vel

  57. Rally cry by -ParadoX- · · Score: 1

    I get this strange urge to yell "Remeber the Alamo!"

  58. a loss by Zetschka · · Score: 1

    Before the raid they were planning to put out a new version of Triplanetary. They got distracted. I still miss it.

  59. Law agencies(was Re:The real facts behind this) by parc · · Score: 2

    It's interesting to note that the FBI doesn't generally come in to play in porn issues. It's actually the US Customs department. In a past life I had dealings with them several times for porn coming from users of an ISP I worked for.

  60. Yet another reason not to smoke crack. by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

    First you tell me everything is right there in black and white...then you tell me that you can't show me the documents. I'm not saying they don't exist because they're not in a digital format, I'm saying they don't exist because *I*, nor anyone else, can see them.

    And you, you're just some walking mass of internal conflict...first you go around saying that you're afraid of the SS...then you say they're good, I'm having the hardest time actually figuring out what you want.

    You are the biggest spaz I've seen in eons. First off, nobody "signs" a birth certificate but your parents. You talk about having freedom and crap, and then you go off and berate everyone who doesn't believe you because you don't have sufficient information. If everyone went around believing everything that was said without doing any research, we'd all be yelling that the sky was falling all the damn time.

    Now if what you're saying is the truth, I understand what you feel, you're backed into a situation where nobody believes you, and they only way you have to prove it might get you fucked. But understand everyone else's side of the story, you're trying to dissuade everyone's belief in something that's common knowledge with nothing more than your Anonymously Cowering word. I'm sorry man, I don't believe in jack shit that way.

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  61. SJG Still In Business after 10 years - not bad! by billstewart · · Score: 3
    Steve Jackson not only made his saving throw against the FBI, but also against the business environment - staying in business 10 years is an accomplishment in and of itself.


    http://www.sjgames.com/


    --- Bill, partially responsible for the One of Disks...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:SJG Still In Business after 10 years - not bad! by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

      You give Steve far too little credit. He has sailed the stormy seas of the business world (and the even rockier shoals of the hobby game industry) for somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 years now. I believe Raid on Iran and One Page Bulge came out in 1990.

      And you're right -- that's quite an accomplishment.
      --

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
  62. Re:Actually... (ot) by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    Five dead. Yeah, that's a lot. Ever hear of (forgive my spelling) the Serbs? Or Tianmen Square? Or the Hutus and the Tutsis? Hundreds of thousands dead.

    You would today take away a right that admittedly costs dozens or hundreds of lives every year. In return, will you give us the guarantee that the government will NEVER become hostile to its citizenry? Before you answer, think about how authorities in this country treat minorities. Consider how short a distance it is from their current repressive behavior to genocide.

    And for the record, I don't own a gun and probably never will. But I don't go around trying to force MY views on people that I can't protect.

  63. i agree. by aheitner · · Score: 2

    and as soon as we cross the line where we are breaking the law (even in so trivial a way as playing an mp3 file we haven't paid for the CD of), we give validity to their arguments.

    I had a conversation with Dean Paul Fowler here at CMU, about the line between protecting the University from lawsuits by the industry and academic freedom. One of the things he pointed out is that whenever an industry of that size goes to court or Congress and says, "We're losing money because of this illegal activity," you can bet there's going to be a rapid response from those with the power. And that's going to affect everyone else. We have to pick our fights, and make sure we're really on the moral high ground here.

    We have to be able to respond with an unconditional, "No laws are being broken but our rights are being violated." I can't simultaneously tell the industry to go screw itself and apologize for my cohorts who are stealing their product (however much money they make despite that theft).

    1. Re:i agree. by Zan+Thrax · · Score: 3

      And when everything except being a good little consumer drone, working 10 hour days all your life and dying in debt is the only thing still legal?

      --

      Intolerant people should be shot.
  64. Official duties vs. actionable duties by Eric+Green · · Score: 1
    When I was a teacher, I had immunity from state prosecution -- AS LONG AS I WAS ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SCHOOL DISTRICT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.

    The latter clause is what allows police officers etc. to get away with murder (literally) -- as long as they are abiding by the policies and procedures regulating their job, you have recourse only against the hiring agency, not against the individual officer. If official Goon Squad policy is to get one of those bogus overly-broad search warrants for all "hacker" cases, then the Goon Squad can be held liable, but the individual offices are indemnified (except in cases of violation of the Constitition -- it doesn't matter whether said violation is official policy or not, doing it can result in you being individually sued).

    -E

    --
    Send mail here if you want to reach me.
  65. Re:Extremely off topic by Arandir · · Score: 2

    Oh yeah, murder can only occur in the presence of firearms.

    A few years ago a stupid fuck took his automobile through the chain link fence of an elementary school and ran over and killed several children. What's the difference between that and a schoolyard shooting?

    Face it, criminals do not heed the law (which is why they're criminals). They will always have guns, even if they have to import them from China via COSCO. When one of them breaks into my house armed with an illegal weapon, what do you want me to do? Call the cops and tell the thug to wait ten minutes until they arrive? Fuck that!

    If you want to place yourself at the mercy of criminals, so be it. Sure, go ahead and praise Sharon Stone for turning in her guns while she still has armed guards on the payroll. Idolize the hypocrites.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  66. Why it mattered, by someone who was there by Animats · · Score: 4
    As one of the people involved in that whole sorry episode (I was a technical expert in the Neidorf case; look me up in The Hacker Crackdown) it's worth recapitulating why this was a big deal, and what it accomplished.

    It wasn't clear back then that electronic media had full First Amendment rights in the U.S. There was a lot of talk that they'd be subject to the sort of restrictions applied to TV and radio, under FCC jurisdiction. The Steve Jackson Games and Neidorf cases settled that issue, and paved the way for the uncensored World Wide Web we have today.

    And it worked. Anybody can start a web site. All the nuts have web sites, and nobody cares. Yes, there's a lot of grousing from the right, and we have to keep watching for new censorship schemes, but censorship lost.

    John Nagle

    (Of course, that's not why the whole thing happened. The whole hacker crackdown was caused by an administrative screwup. The FBI and the Secret Service agreed by memo that the Secret Service would take over computer crime cases, the thinking being that the SS, which is part of Treasury and handles fraud-against-the-government stuff, knew something about computers. They didn't, but they were under pressure to Do Something, so they went off in the wrong direction. In a way, this worked out well, because they brought such dumb cases that the cases could be definitively won on First Amendment grounds. It would have been much worse if they'd gone after somebody who was actually doing something bad, like promoting a stock fraud and happened to be running a BBS as part of the fraud. We could have ended up with a whole regulatory structure for BBSs, and growing the Web would have been uphill all the way.)

  67. Sigh... by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

    Look, your "story" is very touching, and I'd love to believe it except:

    In your first post you say it was "well known" that there were 3 FBI agents at SJG. Now you say you were undercover.

    Second, why would you grab the evidence and bury it? If it was obvious that a bust was going to go down from the SS, why did you care what happened to SJG? It wasn't your ass. You didn't have anything to hide. You were trying to get them, the only reason you say you were working against the SS was because you wanted to amass more evidence...why didn't you just give the SS the evidence you had since you weren't going to get a chance to amass any more?

    Third, and most importantly...if you were one of the FBI agents that worked there, the SS knows who you are, and so does the FBI. And know that you've gone and told everyone that you faked your wife's death, and hid all the documents in her coffin, they can just go search her coffin for it. Because if they know who you are, and they know where you live, they know where you buried your "wife". If if they just know who you are they can just search for death certificates, and find out where you buried your wife. If you truly were as panicked as you say you were about revealing info...you wouldn't have gone ahead and revealed any of this stuff.

    You've got a great story man, and it'd be really interesting if it were true, but as it is, I see more plot holes and inconsistencies in this tale than I do in most Hollywood productions. Take care man...keep loving your wife.

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  68. What kind of people play GURPS by Jainith · · Score: 1

    What kind of people actully play gurps???

    Well most of the ones i know were geeks, nerds, or general social outcasts like myself. It would then seem obvious that people of these nature are prone to using computers. Thus they are more likey to get intrested in their high-end uses.

    I as a hacker (if you think hackers are bad you need to get with the real world, oh wait hackers build the real world....) know that playing gurps and any other rpg is nothing like real life, and enen the best versions really can't teach you jack about being a hacker (good), a cracker (bad) or any other of the sterotypes we are currently using for ourselves.

    RPGs dont teach people to hack, crack, phreak or any other thing, there just games! The Feds were way out of line attacking STG that way.

  69. Do I Get Experience Points For Slaying Trolls? by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

    I'm not nitpicking. If I wanted to, you'd see a much larger writeup. Those were major points, and you have *NO* comebacks for them. I therefore, declare you a unknowledgable, lying, hate filled little troglodyte. You have been exposed, and your only recourse so far has been to insult everyone...you little high schooler.

    I'm not trying to reconstruct any events...Any reconstruction has been done by you, and nobody but you. Everyone else sees the facts? Please, is that why you're getting laughed off this board? You go on worrying about who and how you're being watched. Make sure there aren't any peeping toms at your window, and spout meaningless hate-filled platitudes at everyone you see. I'm sure that's something that, even you can live up to.

    Oh, and as to your "hating minorities" thing, I am a "minority". But, I've wasted enough time on you, you have nothing productive to say, and only lies to spread. Go back to your chain e-mails, and remember...

    "Ey-----"

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    1. Re:Do I Get Experience Points For Slaying Trolls? by ooky · · Score: 1

      Alkaiser, I think that you should (get exp. points, that is) except I don't think that this guy considers himself either slayed or a troll in the first place.

      I'm a little embarrassed to admit that I've been reading this little back and forth, but to tell the truth, it's been the most interesting (in a Soap-serial-melrose place-type-way) that I've seen all day.

      At first I thought that the FBI agent or whatever he is was joking, but now I truly wonder. Your psycology intrigues me, An. Cow. Are you playing a role playing game? (You seem to be making stuff up as you go...) Are you schizophrenic or have other mental problems? (You do realize that nothing you say makes much sense, don't you?) Or are you actually driven to the brink of madness by agents and spies and SS people and whatnot chasing after you?

      Or are you an ex-boyfriend of mine? At first I thought that he was a truly independant thinker who saw deep into society's ills, but later realized that he had severe emotional problems and actually depended on his myriad of conspiracy theories and rants about "the average stupid asleep American" to escape from his unfavorable reality. Needless to say I dumped him, mostly because he was a prime jerk, but also because I suspected him of going off the deep end in just this manner. If it is you, do you still obsessively listen to that song about "the little box-es/on the hill-side/ and they're all made out of ticky-tacky/and they all look just the same"? (100 repetitions of that song be enough to drive anyone loony, believe me, whether or not you listened to it while reading Noam Chomsky over and over again.) In any case, I think you might feel better if you just BREATHE DEEPLY for a second. Whoever else may or may not be, us leftist Nazi slashdot robots are not out to GET YOU.

      Anyway, I guess I'll go back to taking some more of those drugs that "make me think life is one great big happy open source pile of warm crap". Actually, I seem to be running out. Do you know where to get any, Alkaiser? (wink,wink)

    2. Re:Do I Get Experience Points For Slaying Trolls? by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. This is the internet. I'm not talking to you face to face. I have no idea what you look like, nor you I. So I cannot believe that you are who you say you are, and that you did and saw what you say you did and saw with only that to back it up. If you're the witness in a trial, and you say something that's diametrically opposed to something everyone else has, your testimony usually gets thrown out of court. Furhermore, if you were a witness in a trial, I'd have the added benefits of seeing you, I'd also have the added benefit of knowing if others, who were at the event know and recognize you.

      If you were telling me you ate something for breakfast, I'd believe you. Because without anyone else but you to contradict what you ate for breakfast, I have no other soucres of information. This situation is nothing like that. This would be like you saying you were there when they murdered Christ, and telling people that Jesus was picking up swords and decapitating people before they subdued and killed him, and then you expecting me to believe you over everyone else, because you, an unknown entity in the ether, told me so.

      Listen, boy, I've been alive long enough to know that everything isn't what everyone tells you. It's been a long, long time since I was anything near gullible. I'm a hard core, dyed-in-the-wool cynic now. I've had my share of shit hitting the fan to know you can't just time shift through difficult parts of life. You suck it up and deal. I've *never* taken drugs, and I've dealt with enough people like you to know when someone's lying and when someone's telling the truth. Your story's riddled with inaccuracies.

      I drink Coke, I drink Pepsi, I watch TV, and I read slashdot. I cook my hamburger until it's done and I don't understand what the hell any of that was supposed to prove.

      Here's your final chance to prove that you're not a punk kid. email me. Alkaiser10000@yahoo.com. If you're a punk send me tons of spam. Like I care about my Yahoo account. This is what the damn thing's for. If you're not, I'll give you a chance to air out your story. But take it off of here. And I don't want to hear any crap about how you're afraid of people watching you. You've already thrown out more than enough information to track down where you are. The slashdot guys probably know who you are already. So there it is...air out your story, or once and for all, shut the fuck up.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    3. Re:Do I Get Experience Points For Slaying Trolls? by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      Ok, so maybe I don't get exp. for slaying a troll...but I should at least get the "Playing in Character" exp, and the "Avoiding unecessary violence" points. (References to Palladium RPGs, in case anyone's wondering.)

      But, seriously, I've given this guy every chance to be civil and to explain himself. Seriously, I thought like you. I thought maybe this guy ins't just talking out of his ass, and maybe the guy has something legit to say. But every time he write something new, he contradicts something old, and he contradicts himself WITHIN the post! Then he goes off an accuses me of being anything...and what was the deal with that whole "I don't even think slave owners would listen to this abolitionist crap". thing? Doesn't he realize abolition was a GOOD thing? I think that's trollworthy. I've been called a racist, a Hitler supporter, a denier of "indepenace", and a FONZIE LOVER! (I mean, I was 5 when I had that Fonz jacket...it was the last piece of fad wear I ever owned...)

      The only thing I don't get is why he's so damn perisistant...except now...he never emailed back. Maybe the FBI tracked him down and killed him...in which case...they'd be after me next...or maybe I'd get a big ol' reward...cuz I "goaded him into leaking so much information on a public forum."

      That and I'm ALL FOR keeping warm piles of crap PROPRIETARY! If someone tries to make a contribution to my proprietary source of warm crap, I WILL KILL THEM! =)

      1 Person, 1 Toilet! No Open Sourced Crap! That's the platform I'm running for President on.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  70. So are you saying by aheitner · · Score: 3

    that if we don't like laws, we can just ignore them? Even if the laws are perfectly constitutional and backed by centuries of precedent?

    The fact that it's illegal to duplicate recordings isn't anything new. And it doesn't take away any of my freedom (except where my freedom would infringe upon others' freedom, namely the owners of the copyright).

    Using DeCSS to decrypt your DVD and play it in Linux is not wrong.

    Copying mp3 files without compensating the copyright holders is wrong.

    There's a world of difference. As a community, we need to grow up and accept that.

    ...

    I'm a paranoid m********ker and I'm rabid about protecting my privacy.

    I detest consumerism.

    I avoid debt.

    I work way more than 10 hours a day.

    I vote, and I use my vote (and my voice) to protect my rights (how many of the rest of you vote? I bet more of you should).

    And theft is still wrong. You don't have to like it, and you don't have to like the industry. Theft is not the answer.

    1. Re:So are you saying by Zan+Thrax · · Score: 1

      I do vote.

      And, yes, theft is wrong. That's why I don't do it. The same reason I don't kill anyone. Not because it's illegal.

      --

      Intolerant people should be shot.
    2. Re:So are you saying by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      The trend in law right now is a horrific one.
      Tools are tools even tools to break the law...

      Humans are increadable.... they have this strange ability to make any tool they need.
      Banning a tool takes it out of the hands of Mr.GoodPerson and lets Mr.BadPerson know what tools he needs to construct.

      In the mean time.. while we make all thies tools illegal... aren't we then blaming the tool and not the criminal?
      It's ok tommy.. the nasty tool made you evil...

      Eventually it will be perfictly legal to copy anything you'd like... it's the tools fault

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    3. Re:So are you saying by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      "Copying mp3 files without compensating the copyright holders is wrong."

      Legally, yes. Morally, not always.

      If I decide I want to MP3 a song so I can put it on a Rio to listen to while jogging, I should be able to. I'm not distributing, I'm just enabling effective use of material I've already been granted a license to use.

      Or if I want to MP3 a song then stick it on my computer to give me a decent digital jukebox, I should be allowed. Same reason.

      Or, for an example I actually DO :) what's wrong with my taping my CDs so I can listen to them in the car?

      The problem here is that they're trying to restrict entirely fair and reasonable uses, with an exaggerated excuse.

      Greg

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  71. MONEY Re:Why it mattered, by someone who was there by mr · · Score: 1

    I was wondering if anyone who was involved in the Craig Neidorf case would post.

    I remember that Craig asked for donations from 'the community' to help defray his lawyer bills. I remember the amount was over 100,000 US Dollars, and he got some small amout of like $200 dollars.

    So, does anyone have the final $ figures as to what it takes to defend ones freedom and how little was donated to Craig?

    --
    If it was said on slashdot, it MUST be true!
  72. Clueless, even for a troll by adamsc · · Score: 1
    YOU GET MODERATED DOWN FOR HAVING A DIFFERING OPINION
    The SJG case is [mostly] a matter of public record at this point. It's hard to see how statements at variance with accepted fact should be treated as equally valid opinions. Even a troll can't believe that we would be obliged to respect your "opinion" if you started telling people that the sky is brown with yellow dots, right?
  73. what a load of crap... by delmoi · · Score: 1

    What, so black male teenagers need to dress up in suits and faggoty nation of islam bowties all the time?

    Whatever. People shouldn't be singled out for dressing the way they dress just beacuse a small persentage of them are gang-banging dope dealers.

    [ c h a d &nbsp o k e r e ]

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  74. Loyd Blankenship WAS a cracker! by Anonynous+Coward · · Score: 2
    And I don't just mean because he's white.

    The author of the GURPS Cyberpunk book, one Loyd Blankenship, AKA "The Mentor", was a member of the LEGION OF DOOM hacking group that was infamous in the 80s and early 90s.

    The raid had very little to do with the game he was writing and everything to do with the fact that the government had reason to believe he was involved in a number of real, illegal cracking incidents.

    Having said all of that, clearly the government overstepped its bounds in the SJGames raid and deserved to be pushed back by the EFF, et al, but SJGames is now engaging in REVISIONIST HISTORY by claiming they were raided simply because of the subject matter of the game!!!

  75. "This Game is Real" by Seher+deka+al-Kashif · · Score: 2

    There's a great filk song by Leslie Fish (the queen of filk) that refers to this incident. It's called "Gamers" nee "This Game is Real" at http://www.prometheus-music.com/eli/virtual.html

    --
    "...virtue springs from iron within, not lead without." R. Kipling
  76. Pay more attention... by adamsc · · Score: 1
    It's a shame that illegal search-and-seizure of a legitimate business must be equated with stealing the intellectual property of the music industry.
    ...
    But they do own the copyright to all that music that people steal. And that's illegal, and undefendable.
    It's almost like you've avoided reading any of the articles describing what is and is not legal in either case. I strongly doubt there would be much if any controversy had the MPAA and RIAA gone after actual pirates. The problem is that they are using piracy as an excuse to limit legitimate users, often in ways which have almost no effect against piracy.

    (And, in case you're wondering, ever single MP3 with one I have is made from CDs I own at home or work. They've all been purchased legally & are undistributed except in that I use MP3 & a fast network connection so I don't have to carry them back and forth. The one exception is a recording of the Napolean XIV "They're Coming to Take Me Away", which I was unable to buy locally. If anyone has a source, that will be remedied.)

  77. Bestiality Porn = Scooby Snax by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

    Zoinks! Scoob! Hide all the kiddie porn! It's the FBI!

    --
    Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  78. Steve Jackson guest of honour at Fastaval 2000 by Kwed · · Score: 1

    For those of you interested and/or in the vicinity, Steve Jackson will be the guest of honour at Fastaval 2000 - widely recognized as the Danish gaming convention. More info here. (All pages in Danish)

  79. This I can confirm... by bughunter · · Score: 1
    ... in a manner. I first discovered Illuminati BBS shortly after it came back up after the raid: a backup copy on a kludged-together PC with one unreliable modem that wouldn't hang up half the times callers disconnected. But it was still one of the greatest BBSes ever. [nostalgic sigh] In fact, I used the same handle there as I do here.

    Anywho, Steve's earliest explanations of the raid, and why it targeted SJG, went roughly as follows:

    - BellSouth document stolen by LoD, posted on a BBS

    - Document propagated across BBS space

    - Document wound up on Loyd's BBS

    - SJG raided since (a)Loyd had ties to LoD, and (b)Loyd was also Illuminati BBS sysop

    - SS found drafts for a "handbook of computer crime" and used that as an excuse to confiscate everything, even laser printers

    Loyd was indeed "the Mentor," but beyond his association with the LoD, I didn't know anything. I did not specifically see or hear of the document being on Illuminati BBS, but I wouldn't be surprised - it could have found its way there in any number of ways. That information was never stated by Steve, or Loyd, or SJG. Also, if I recall correctly, Loyd's own BBS at his home was siezed, too.

    SJG did later sue the Feds for (among other things) prior restraint, siezing the book before it was published. If Steve is now implying that they were raided because of the book, then that's indeed a misrepresentation. Good marketing, though.

    P.S. Since others are claiming their credit, my own 15 microseconds of fame were for the Slightly Off White Box (the existance of which the government firmly denies fnord).

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  80. Re:OT: SS == Secret Service? by ronfar · · Score: 1

    I know, I love the way that acronym works ;)

    --
    All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  81. Re:Extremely off topic by Arandir · · Score: 2

    "A handgun ... has and only one use: killing humans."

    If you want to use those terms, fine. But it would be much more accurate to say that their purpose is to meet deadly force with deadly force. You don't use guns to defend yourself against knives. You use them to defend yourself against other guns. The proper use of handguns is only for practice, hunting and dire emergencies.

    "But what about people who acquire guns legally and then go crazy and go on a killing spree?"

    If you'll recall, those assholes at Columbine also weilded pipe bombs. The reason there was no outcry to ban pipe bombs is because they were already illegal. If the guns they used were illegal, they still would have had the bombs!

    These senseless killings, particularly against children, stir at our emotions so much that many people turn off their brains and let their feelings rule. Banning guns is treating the symptom but letting disease continue to fester. Guns were just as widely available in the first half of this century as they are now. Yet no one ever heard of schoolyard shootings until a couple of decades ago. This disease has become an epidemic of death because people are too focused on the symptoms.

    "DOES A GUN IN THE HOME MAKE YOU SAFER?"

    What a stupid article. What stupid statistics. Don't you realize that people who own an automobile are 22 times more likely to die in an automobile accident than those who don't? Don't you realize that those who own a swimming pool have a 220% greater chance of their children accidentally drowning than those that don't?

    Owning a handgun and keeping it locked up in a safe in the basement won't protect anyone any better from crime. But not owning a gun while putting a sign in your window saying you do is very effective.

    "You are blinded by NRA propaganda into thinking a gun makes you safe in your home when the truth is quite the opposite."

    And you are deluded by the liberal press into believing that banning guns solves crime. Murder has been outlawed for how many millenia now? Five or six? If banning murder doesn't stop murder, you're smoking dope if you think banning guns will eliminate guns.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  82. Thats not even the SS's job by NightHwk · · Score: 1

    The Secret Service is a division of the treasury department. They are tasked with stoping counterfiet money production (and other treasury related tasks) and protecting the president.

    National secrets are the domain of the NSA, FBI, or other Intelegence beauros, not the SS.
    They had no reason to be involved in this.

    --

  83. Re:Extremely off topic by porges · · Score: 1

    >If you'll recall, those assholes at Columbine also weilded pipe bombs. The reason there was no outcry to ban pipe bombs is because they were already illegal. If the guns they used were illegal, they still would have had the bombs!

    It might be relevant that the pipe bombs did not work, because the guys didn't make them right; the guns did work.

  84. Definitely making $150K+ by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    Kleupfel was one of the defendants in the SJG suit. SAIC is a privately held defense contractor. SAIC is also heavily involved in a lot of content protection technology, snooping technology, etc. SAIC has a very carefully groomed public image, and they might not care to take the heat for employing someone involved in a civil rights violation.

    But, as I'm sure they'd tell you, they're not employing him, he's a consultant.

    Either way, he's making bucks off his escapades against Those Nasty Hackers TM.

    --
    Will in Seattle
  85. Re:Extremely off topic by Arandir · · Score: 2

    The problem is not the bombs or the guns or the knives or the sticks. The problem is that the nation is hemorrhaging to death and you want to ban bleeding.

    When someone can tell my why I was safer as a child thirty years ago when assault weapons were legal, than children are today when they are not, then I'll listen to their gun control arguments.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  86. Metarevisionism by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

    SJ Games is doing no such thing. WhiteRabbit misinterpreted something somewhere along the way. SJG has never claimed the raid happened because of the subject matter of GURPS Cyberpunk, because the government was completely unaware of Cyberpunk until they examined the hard disks after the raid. Basically, the government knew that Mentor worked for SJG, and that SJG had a bulletin board. That's all they knew. They were on a fishing expedition. They thought they found a big one with GURPS Cyberpunk. Boy, were they wrong.

    At any rate, whoever moderated this post up wasted their points. It was either a complete troll or completely uninformed, and either way it doesn't deserve a mapping into the realm of positive integers.
    --

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  87. Ha! by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    Freak the Mundanes!

  88. don't people read sub posts anymore? by delmoi · · Score: 1

    You'll notice that that was post #104 on slashdot today. You should really read post 105 where I clarified my position....

    [ c h a d &nbsp o k e r e ]

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  89. Re:Extremely off topic by Arandir · · Score: 2

    New York, Chicago, Los Angeles all existed thirty years ago, and they were just as big then as they are now. But that's begging the point. My home town had a population of 10,000. When I was growing up, it hadn't had a murder since the Dalton brothers rode through town a century earlier. Today, the town has a population of 15,000. It's still small enough that people know their neighbors. Yet it has had about five murders in ten years. Also, if you take a look at Columbine, everyone knew their neighbors. There's something else beyond 'connectedness' that's the problem.

    And I don't think there's any one single cause behind the recent random violence in society. It stems from several causes. Your supposition may work in the big city, but it is by no means the only cause, and hardly explains Columbine or the rise of gangs in Small Town, USA.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  90. 10 year old memorys... by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    I think this guy is has a really really bad memory.. After all this happend 10 years ago.
    But this guy seems to have taken all kinds of unrelated BBS raids and placed them all at SJG.
    This was a long time ago and a lot of strange things did happen. Getting tagged for software piracy becouse you tossed the manual is one example (It's how you turn a software theft case from 3 illegal copys to 50 illegal copys.. Turnning a nieve user with 3 illegal programs into a collection of illegal software)

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  91. Help! by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1
    Help! Help! Jon Katz and Signal 11 have fusioned! Help! Help!

    NB: If you don't understand it, read the above post.

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,