Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Gets XBox Name

chewy_fruit_loop writes "The humorous situation Microsoft found itself in a few months ago regarding the X-Box name already belonging to someone, has been settled. The BBC are reporting it here ,and XBox Technologies have this press release. I wonder how much that cost Microsoft ;-)" Apparently The corporation formerly known as XBox is located like a half hour from here. Congrats guys! I expect to see you in shiny ferarris sometime soon.

131 comments

  1. Another behemoth plows a good company... by StudMuffin · · Score: 2

    Same thing happened when Ford spun off Visteon, and didn't check first to see if the name was taken. The little guy (a consulting firm in Florida, I believe) had to take it in the shorts. Same thing with X-Box. Don't these people know how to use Google? (FP, btw!)

    --
    Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals... except the weasel. -
    1. Re:Another behemoth plows a good company... by chewy_fruit_loop · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they have sold the rights to the name to M$ or sold a licence to them....
      If it was me I'd ask for 1 cent per unit sold, or I'll see you in court.
      Who wouldn' want to bleed microsoft? :-))

    2. Re:Another behemoth plows a good company... by hillct · · Score: 2

      Microsoft is a behemoth. I wonder how many corporate lawyers got fired for this massive foobar...

      Here's hoping those dumbass corporate lawyers get to join all the homeless dot bomb'ers not a few of which Microsoft - through the help of these lawyers - put there.

      --CTH


      ---

      --

      --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    3. Re:Another behemoth plows a good company... by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2

      I wonder how long till MS pays of Home Depot for 'Windows' ?

    4. Re:Another behemoth plows a good company... by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

      since xbox is changing its name, and giving full rights to M$, I bet they bought the name outright. I don't feel bad for the Xbox people at all! This is probably the best thing that ever happened to them. Can you imagine what microsoft was willing to pay to ensure that they secured the name by the scheduled release date?

      -

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  2. Has anyone thought ... by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 2

    ... of registering the names Office2002 and Windows 2002 yet?

    ---
    Living is a way of life ...

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  3. I would have loved to see them hold their ground by Masem · · Score: 4
    By all accounts, XBOX the company had every right to the XBOX name, and beyond tossing as much money as they could at XBOX, MS could do nothing about it legally. I would have loved to see XBOX hold rock solid against MS, and watch the antics as the MS engine rapidly tried to pull another name from it's magical hat, probably hurting both their PR value and market value as the next generation of consoles comes out this Christmas. But even I would be daunted by having probably millions pushed in my face just to change the company name.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
  4. Hold out by KeyShark · · Score: 2

    I would have held out just for spite against M$. Well until they started flashing a lot of money. :-)

  5. Just Wait by NSupremo · · Score: 1

    Microsoft.gov

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._Election_co ntroversies_and_irregularities
    1. Re:Just Wait by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's dead as a doornail when he dies. Oh, it'll survive for awhile, but it will wither away. Several OS gens down the road it'll swap with some other OS.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  6. win/win/win situation by joq · · Score: 5


    Not only did they probably make off with a hefty payment, but after looking at their company, I can't determine what the heck XBoxTechnologies actually does, so if they were headed for FuckedCompany.com, they could use the publicity of their name to actuall do something since their page lists squat other than some broad description of nothing.

    Surprisingly no one is in an uproar type of posting mood claiming MS is bullying someone, so we all win here by not having to read the redundancies.

    1. Re:win/win/win situation by ReverendGraves · · Score: 1

      Model: So, what are you into?
      Patrick: Murders and Executions, mostly.

      XBOX Technologies, from what I can gather, was the name of a firm involved in Mergers and Acquisitions. Kudos to those who place the quote, btw.

      --
      MCH/VO S* W- N+++++ PEC+++ D(s++/r) A a+>+++ C* G++(++++) Q+ 666 Y
    2. Re:win/win/win situation by crankie · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the quote is American Psycho

      --
      If voting could really change the system, it would be against the law.
    3. Re:win/win/win situation by 3G · · Score: 1
      Well, their market cap was only about $5 million before (and sinking fast). I imagine this will do pretty damn well for their net value when they eventually get the payout.

      Predicting the name of major products before they're announced seems to be a better racket than whatever they were doing before!

      --
      Blue skies... Barthie burgers... girls.
    4. Re:win/win/win situation by terrymah · · Score: 1

      American Pyscho.

    5. Re:win/win/win situation by gughunter · · Score: 1

      Nostromo, Nostromo, Joseph Conrad, and someday soon, respectively, though I just finished rereading Heart of Darkness--but now I'm working on The Book Of Tiki. Can't avoid pop culture all the time!

  7. They probably did. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . .and I'm curious to see what will leak out on exactly how much M$ paid them for the name...

  8. The American Dream by Violet+Null · · Score: 4

    At one point, it was to work hard, earn a fair amount of money, and then retire.

    Then it was to join a rising tech company, work for a little bit, sell your shares after the IPO, and retire.

    Now, it's to trademark a name that someone with big pockets, and lawyers who can't do research, will pay you gobs of money for, and retire.

    1. Re:The American Dream by l33t+j03 · · Score: 1
      No.

      Now it's: Write code all your life. GIve it away for nothing. Die an angry, unshaven, heathen under a bridge somewhere.

    2. Re:The American Dream by $hotgun · · Score: 2
      Bullshit. The American Dream has ALLWAYS been to get rich.

      The Spaniards came to the Americas for God, Gold, and Glory. But most of all for Gold.

      American immigration has always been advertised with the idea that "in America, the streets are paved with gold."

      California gold rush.

      Manifest destiny (read as: one big land grab)

      Capitalism, itself is about nothing more than individual wealth. Hell, you could define capitalism as the philosophy that we can let everyone be greedy and get rich as long as their struggle to get rich enriches others.

      Listen to Hollywood and Disney if you want, but the reality is that the American Dream is and always has been about getting rich and not having to work. ('Little' house with white picket fence my ass).

      I'm just glad to see that someone was able to realize their dream at Microsoft's expense.

    3. Re:The American Dream by jamesbulman · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this up, I laughed my ass off!

    4. Re:The American Dream by IronChef · · Score: 2


      I live near a bridge. I should probably go over there with some soup and a blanket. And some clean socks.

  9. I'm glad that was resolved... by briggsb · · Score: 4

    I had been losing sleep over it for days. However, I'm more worried about Microsoft getting control of all the .NET domain names.

    1. Re:I'm glad that was resolved... by fuzzbrain · · Score: 1

      On a serious note, why is Microsoft allowed to use the .net name? Surely some domain-registration organisation has the rights to that name?

  10. Damn! by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    That means I'll have to get my superhero pr0n somewhere else?

    Damn...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  11. Way to applaud XBox Tech for domain squatting. by dave-fu · · Score: 5

    Working for a start-up way back when (May-ish 1998), we decided that "XBox" would be the perfect name for our product (NDAs live on post-mortem, yadda yadda yadda). So I do the whois, find out they're registered, port scan them (is that legal anymore?) and find out there's not a single service up and running on their webserver.
    I get in touch with the domain contacts and ask them if they'd be willing to part with the domain, seeing as how they're not doing anything with it.
    To paraphrase, the response I got back was, "We have many exciting business opportunities planned for the near future for xbox.com, but we would be willing to part with the name for $10,000." Long story short, maybe that extra Sun box instead of that domain name wasn't the most prudent business move we could have made; thankfully, I had nothing to do with the business end, so I'm not losing any sleep over it. As for their claims, it looks like it took them a year and a half to get a single press release out; on Internet time where OpenBSD gets scolded for taking 6 f'n days to get a patch out, is that near future?
    At any rate, I'm glad to see that domain squatting's bad, except when it happens to Microsoft and open source is good, except when Microsoft uses it, etc., etc.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
    1. Re:Way to applaud XBox Tech for domain squatting. by CaseStudy · · Score: 4

      That's not domain squatting, unless you have more information than you're sharing. Buying a name nobody else is using as a trademark with the intent to use it isn't squatting, even if you later decide you want it.

    2. Re:Way to applaud XBox Tech for domain squatting. by Sabalon · · Score: 3

      find out there's not a single service up and running on their webserver.

      Yup...web is all them thar domains names are good for.

    3. Re:Way to applaud XBox Tech for domain squatting. by pardonne · · Score: 1

      IANAL but I heard that "innocent until proven guilty" doesn'y hold in a civil court and we are all civil here. On this count I too will side with Microsoft. Damn the squatters, they do no good, hoorah Microsoft, they build good mice and joysticks.

    4. Re:Way to applaud XBox Tech for domain squatting. by CaseStudy · · Score: 1

      That's not domain squatting, unless you have more information than you're sharing.

    5. Re:Way to applaud XBox Tech for domain squatting. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2
      ... hrm, you mean like those mice that MS started releasing about a year ago? The Intellimouse Optical, was it? If I recall correctly, there's a pretty severe defect with those that causes them to fail after about 3 or so months. I know of several people who have them - and have had to have them replaced several times each.

      I don't call that a high quality product. Besides that, these mice feel light and weak, as if they were made with a subgrade plastic. I'll stick with my Logitech, thanks.

      On another note, doesn't MS primarily produce an operating system or two and an office suite? I could be mistaken, but their mice and joysticks aren't the primary product of Microsoft, Inc....

      -------
      Caimlas

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  12. Terms by A+Commentor · · Score: 3

    Hopefully they were smart enough to ask for some percentage of the sales... That could help them out if the blow the big initial payout.

    Something like 1/2% would get them $2.5/box, not bad to have a nice steady income like that..

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Terms by Bug2000 · · Score: 1

      I think the same thing happened 20 years ago with an obscure band called Guns n' Roses. When Axel Rose and Slash (without the dot) made their own Guns n' Roses band, the band holding the original name negociated a deal which is actually a percentage of each record sold. Not too bad a deal...!

      --

      É que os desafinados também têm um coração
    2. Re:Terms by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      That's a much better deal than the Love and Rockets comic book got...

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    3. Re:Terms by deathscythe257 · · Score: 1

      somehow i don't know if Microsoft will be up for 1/2%, maybe 1% of 1/2%... greedy capitalist bastards...

  13. spare me by joq · · Score: 4


    It would never happen. Just because Microsoft buys companies to benefit themselves mean little, if there was a company I would be worried about it would be something more like GeneralElectric.gov who has their hands in so much shit it isn't even funny. Business is business and MS is no different from other companies who purchase others, look at CitiGroup, why not make an uproar about them?

    Posts like this may little sense.

    1. Re:spare me by MisterE · · Score: 1
      Actually, this is a valid concern (about GE that is).
      Last year, General Electric's revenue exceeded 1% of the GDP of the United States.

      I don't know if this ever happened before but certainly not in modern times.


      #include sig.h

  14. who got fired??? by rhaig · · Score: 2

    how many people got fired over the whole xbox technologies thing?? Isn't there supposed to be a process when a name is picked? You go through trademarks, domain names, other incorportated entities in your target market...

    --
    "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
    1. Re:who got fired??? by Skynet · · Score: 1

      how many people got fired over the whole xbox technologies thing?? Isn't there supposed to be a process when a name is picked? You go through trademarks, domain names, other incorportated entities in your target market...

      You missed a step. Should be, "You go through trademarks, domain names, other incorportated entities in your target market, see if any of them can stand up to your financial and legal resources..."

      At least that's the Microsoft way. ;-)

      --
      Execute? [Y/N] _
  15. Holding their ground by laertes · · Score: 4
    How many people here said that they should have held their ground, and not sold the name? I thought so. But consider this, if they have any shareholders, and they don't take a deal like his, then they'll probably be liable for a shareholder's suit.

    But this is slashdot, and we don't like to think about business, except Sony and Nintendo.

    --

    Yes, I'm still a junky. Are you still a bitch?
    1. Re:Holding their ground by MasterOfDisaster · · Score: 1

      you cant realy hold your ground against M$. their cash supply is more or less infinite, and xbox tech. is something i doubt anyone has ever heard of (meaning they have 0 cash to spend fighting MS) They'd go down like roadkill Now if -I- had the rights to something MS wanted...I'd be selling it to the highest bidder (someone like Sony or Nintendo would have a chance fighting MS, or in the least could delay the MSxbox) this would undoubtably bring in FAR FAR more cash

      --
      The opinions in this post are ficticious. Any similarity to actual opinions, real or imagined, is purely coincidental.
  16. Yep, Next MS will have to pay US Robotics for "X2" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When MS releases the next generation of X Box, they'd better not call it X2!

  17. Changing the name may have been easier by jeffy124 · · Score: 1
    Microsoft could have avoided paying off XBOX Techs altogether in order to maintain their incredibly large assets and money. They could have easily changed the XBox name to something else without having to pay anything to XBOX Techs.

    The reason they didnt do this was to avoid embarrasments. I guess that means they werent embarrased by the following events:

    • service release to Win2k less than 6 mos. after it's original release
    • gates getting blue-screen-of-death during Win98 demo.
    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  18. Re:Ferraris by Psiren · · Score: 4

    Sorry, but selling out is not attractive to a man of principle...

    No, but it'll probably get them lots of sex. Hmm.. tough call ;)

  19. Re:I am big-time hoping by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

    Do you really think Gates cares about being set back a couple of millions (even 100) if that were the price to buy the rights to the name ? Moreover, I dont think MS would take a risk such as that, seeing how bad their PR already is. As far as I know/care, these guys got their Lamborghinis.

  20. Addendum by 3ryon · · Score: 5

    In other news, all employees of Xbox Technologies were found dead this morning. It seems that during a all-hands strategy meeting was held in a conference room which had a gas leak. Detectives are still puzzeled how the sales people who were teleconfrencing were also killed by the gas leak.

  21. Would never happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember, this is M$ we're talking about. If the boys at XBOX decided to play hardball, it would only be a matter of time before somebody fished them out of the bottom of a lake or found them dead in a single-car "accident." Do the math: mega-corporations plus a "business friendly" presidential administration equals a threatening environment for "little guy" competitors. Microsoft would have killed these guys, and the Justice Department would sweep it tidily under the rug.

  22. Re:Yep, Next MS will have to pay US Robotics for " by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4
    According to an inside source, Microsoft is considering naming the next generation game box:

    • Coca Cola
    • TiVo
    • Formica
    • Linux
    • Cowboy Neal
  23. My mom was wrong by cnkeller · · Score: 3

    Money can buy you everything....

    --

    there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    1. Re:My mom was wrong by cliffiecee · · Score: 1

      > Cheers to that! Of course I still can't seem
      > to buy myself a good girlfriend.

      Try here. She's expensive, though.

  24. Re:Ferraris by Water+Paradox · · Score: 2
    Lots of sex is not attractive to a man of principle either.

    It comes down to the quality of sex.

    --
    information is immaterial
  25. Re:Yep, Next MS will have to pay US Robotics for " by bare_naked_linux · · Score: 1
    Hope it never goes this far, but X10 is a registered trademark as well.

    --

    --

    --
    Unscrample my email, win a prize.

  26. Favourite quote by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 4
    "It was a very, very mutually satisfying agreement," said Robert Koolen for Knowledge Mechanics, a computer-based education company that is the main holder of XBOX Technologies. [my emphasis]

    Man, I hope M$ decide to call the next major product they release in the UK the Club-Foot : )

    --

  27. Interesting... by ryanw · · Score: 4

    As part of the settlement, Microsoft will have all trademark rights to "Xbox," which is the name of Microsoft's new video game console system, and XBOX Technologies has agreed, in due course, to change its corporate name.

    Interesting ... this company (XBoxTechnologies) is publicly traded on Nasdaq as "XBOX". To change the name seems like it'll take quite some doing .. I guess MS musta' paid them all a very pretty penny.

    Here's the link to see the price of their stock ...

    http://quotes.nasdaq.com/Quote.dll?page=multi&mode =Stock&symbol=XBOX

  28. Re:I would have loved to see them hold their groun by miracle69 · · Score: 5

    Instead of standing rock solid and getting no cash, how about calling up Sony and asking them how much they'd pay for the trademark....

    Now that would've been cool.

    HI Mom!

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  29. What, you never seen the Simpsons? by nakaduct · · Score: 3
    Congrats guys! I expect to see you in shiny ferarris sometime soon.


    Gates: OK boys, buy 'em out!
    [wanton destruction ensues]
    Xbox: What happen?
    Gates: You don't think I got rich by writin' a lot of cheques, do ya?

    cheers,
    mike
  30. Re:Ferraris by Psiren · · Score: 2

    this man of principle is one boring arsehole then ;)

  31. But look at those prices. by Down8 · · Score: 1

    They're trading below a dollar a shoare, I don't think many people care what the ticker says, as long as it goes UP.

    -bZj
    prompt> finger Down8
    Login: Down8 In real life: I am a Viking.

    --
    .sig
    1. Re:But look at those prices. by tb3 · · Score: 1

      By my math the company is worth all of $7600, but even if I slipped a decimal point, they're still not worth much. I think Microsoft is the luckiest thing to ever happen to them.

      "What are we going to do tonight, Bill?"

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    2. Re:But look at those prices. by tb3 · · Score: 1

      Okay, my math was screwed, I was looking at oustanding shares, not total shares.
      Which explains why I don't invest :)

      "What are we going to do tonight, Bill?"

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  32. We know these guys just wanted the money by Omerna · · Score: 2

    It's kind of obvious. They waited until MS can't back off on the X-Box name. So much time has been spent on the design (or so they say, the controller testing thing) that reinventing it to match a new name (and hence the removal of the big X from the actual machine, and changing of the controllers) would kill the release date.

    These guys have also probably been planning this for a long time, considering the X-Box/ rumors of it and its name have been around for much longer then a few months.

    However I can't fault them because considering they don't make- or do- anything, and without this nice bundle of cash they'd be closing up shop soon.
    --------------------------------------

    --


    No sig for you.
  33. Re:Funny by babbage · · Score: 5
    No no no, that's not it. Microsoft, wise multi billion dollar company that they are, forgot to pay their $35 fee to renew the hotmail.com domain name, thus disabling the service all at once on Christmas Eve, 1999. A guy named Michael Chaney realized what was going on, paid the fee, and went about his business. Microsoft sent him an unsolicited check for $500, but he refused it -- putting the check they sent him up for sale on eBay and promising to give whatever proceeds from the auction (and matching up to $2000) to a charity of the winning bidder's choice.

    The links about it are still available online -- Slashdot played it's role in events.



  34. New company name? by minyard · · Score: 3

    X-X-Box

    1. Re:New company name? by Skynet · · Score: 1

      No. He means XXXBox. In other words, Pam Anderson's goonya.

      --
      Execute? [Y/N] _
    2. Re:New company name? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Well, don't forget eXBox, XBoxVille, eXBoxVille, eXBoxContentVille, eXBoxContentVilleOnline, ...

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    3. Re:New company name? by tcc · · Score: 2

      Nah... XXXbox, bundled with virtual valery :)

      --
      --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  35. Re:Ferraris by Water+Paradox · · Score: 1
    On principle, boredom is not an option. Principle takes constant vigilance, which is an adventure of its own. Gandhi was a man of principle--was he boring? Moses was a man of principle--was he boring?

    A man of principle is unable to be bored. And whether he is boring to observe or not is a decision best left in the hands of another man of principle.

    XBox shouldn't have sold out. But the past cannot be changed. Therefore, if you find yourself in the future being presented with a check from Microsoft... don't sell out. Be remembered for having standards, not for selling them to MS.

    --
    information is immaterial
  36. Another consideration by nanojath · · Score: 1

    Something that I think is worth considering, particularly for all you moral purists out there who are snootily insisting that this meaningless little business should have held the line and stood on principles, is that "X-Box" is a stupid name for a video game console and an even stupider name for a vaguely defined tech company. This is probably one of the best business decisions these people ever made...

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    1. Re:Another consideration by tb3 · · Score: 1

      an even stupider name for a vaguely defined tech company
      I don't think it's as dumb as "Zero Knowledge" from last week's /. an in-joke that just looks stupid to those who aren't crypto-geeks.
      But it is a dumb name; has nothing to do with gaming, like 'PlayStation' does.

      "What are we going to do tonight, Bill?"

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  37. XBox name by itself by ackthpt · · Score: 4
    The pity is, it's such a lame name. It reminds my of that Simpson's episode where they tried to create a hip, cool, new attitude character for Itchy and Scratchy, according to all market research it should have been a success, but predictably flopped.

    Names Microsoft could have used:

    Nintega 2600

    Sonendo Games Station

    Segtari ZX2

    Supreme Extreme Intergalactic Game Playin' Machine! With Hip Graphics, Cool WiMP Sound, New Attitude Controllers!

    Edsel

    --
    All your .sig are belong to us!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  38. Re:I would have loved to see them hold their groun by trb · · Score: 2
    I would have loved to see XBOX hold rock solid against MS
    XBOX has a market cap of $5 million, MS's market cap is over $350 billion. Do the math.
  39. I think this sums it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Name Last Change Volume

    XBOX US$0.17 -US$0.05 32,4000

    The funny thing about this was that had they not caved in to Microsoft, M$ would have been hosed big time!

  40. Re:Press release /......... by NewbieSpaz · · Score: 1

    actually they're running Win98 or NT on IIS... how's that for irony? linkage below:
    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?mode_u=off&mod e_w=on&site=www.xboxtechnologies.com&submit=Examin e

    --
    ------
    Random, useless fact: I type in startx entirely with my left hand.
  41. Name Change.... by i_m_sane · · Score: 3

    They should call themselves the TPFKAXBOX. The programmers formally known as the X-Box.
    | - Adam Sane :-)

    --
    Adam Sane sanity is a dirty job, but somebody has to do it.
    1. Re:Name Change.... by i_m_sane · · Score: 1

      The XXX-Box might give better market share. (from a coworker sitting next to me)
      | - Adam Sane :-)

      --
      Adam Sane sanity is a dirty job, but somebody has to do it.
    2. Re:Name Change.... by pogle · · Score: 1

      Naw, TCFWXBOXDNS. The Company From When X-BOX Did Not Suck.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
  42. Re:I would have loved to see them hold their groun by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    Nobody could confuse a dishwasher with an operating system. That's why you have Netscape Navigator and Lincoln Navigator, they're completely different. I don't know what Xbox does, but they're definately a tech company. That's too close to the console Xbox for MS to use the same name.

    -B

  43. Re:I would have loved to see them hold their groun by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Not worth it, really, as Microsoft would just relabel the machine if it got too much of a hassle. Besides, I don't think Sony wants to make an enemy of Gates, Inc. as they'd suddenly find Windows doesn't seem to work very well or run very fast on Sony VAIO computers, which would hurt business and tie up courts trying to prove anything.

    --
    All your .sig are belong to us!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  44. OT Nov 8th????? by jon_c · · Score: 1


    Microsoft remains on target for a successful North American launch of its Xbox video game system on Nov. 8.

    Thats not the target I remember, just back at E3 it was going to be like late september, or pretty close to that. The big deal was how Nintendo decided they we're not only release there shiznat a WEEK earlyer, but also for a 100 bucks less.

    Anyone know what's up with them changing the date?

    -Jon

    --
    this is my sig.
  45. Re:Yep, Next MS will have to pay US Robotics for " by Tyndareos · · Score: 1

    If Cowbow Neal is an option, this should be a poll.

  46. presented with a check from Microsoft - TAKE IT! by bobalu · · Score: 1

    Not selling microsoftsucks.com, yes, that would be standing on principle. Not selling "xthingie.com", that would be what we in the business call "stupid", especially since it's a fairly generic name that has no public recognition value for their company anyway.

    Taking their money would be the best revenge. You can always give it to charity or use it to support your favorite open-source project.

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  47. MS did this before by Alien54 · · Score: 4
    They had a similar problem with the product name 'Internet Explorer"

    You can still download the original Sprynet (Non-MS) Internet Explorer at the Evolt.org browser archive, here

    I recall that MS also had to settle with Synet (not Sprynet) on the name Interner Explorer. The original company went under, but was kept alive long enough by lawyers for some sort of settlement from MS. That story you can read about here, with added info here.

    Then, these are the people who insist that "BookShelf" is not a generic term.

    Check out the Vinny the Vampire comic strip

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:MS did this before by pne · · Score: 1

      I recall that MS also had to settle with Synet (not Sprynet) on the name Interner Explorer.

      And in Germany, there's a company that claims trademark rights to the term 'Explorer' and sues people who link to the program 'FTP Expl*r*r' (my asterisks). They also claim to have settled with Microsoft over MS's rights to use the term 'Explorer' for the Windows Explorer and Internet Explorer products in Germany.

      --
      Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
  48. Re:I would have loved to see them hold their groun by gtx · · Score: 3

    as much as i would have been amused by seeing the little guy screw over the dreams of the big guy, such a tactic would only have cost the little guy. the people who owned the name xbox probably made a good bit of scratch off this deal, and something tells me that they made more by selling the rights to the name then they would have made by using the name. microsoft stood to lose nothing other than the equivalent pocket change thrown at marketing people. remember nintendo and their 'ultra 64'? and how until just a few months before it's release it was called 'ultra 64', until somebody realized they had rights to that name and called them on it? nintendo then changed the name to 'nintendo 64' and years later most people don't remember the 'ultra 64' thing at all. xbox (the company) did the right thing, and they're probably all going on vacation right now because of it :)


    "I hope I don't make a mistake and manage to remain a virgin." - Britney Spears

    --


    "I hope I don't make a mistake and manage to remain a virgin." - Britney Spears
  49. You know what happened..... by rapett0 · · Score: 2

    M$ audited them for licenses and they didn't have enough, just like every company in the world that usese M$. So they made them a deal they couldn't refuse :)

  50. Re:Ferraris by malfunct · · Score: 5
    Its funny that you worry about the XBox company selling out to MS when from the articals on the page XBox is a company thats all about asking other companies to sell out to them. XBox is an aquisitions company and you can only imagine how evil and cuthroat they are. Looks like thier purpose on life is to run around looking for floundering companies with potential and buy them up for rediculously cheap prices before they blow up and become something big.

    Getting cash from MS just to change the name of thier company just fits in to thier plan. I love how you guys berate MS no matter what they do but when another evil corporation comes into view you think they are all good stuff. Blah.

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  51. Re:I would have loved to see them hold their groun by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    Yes, it was a bad transition. The first sentance was a response to the Linux dishwasher post. The second sentance was my example of a browser and an SUV with the same name. I think the smart folks around here can figure out what I meant.

    -B

  52. Re:Ferraris by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

    What "principle" do you hold that says that it's wrong to sell a domain name?

    --
    I'd rather be lucky than good.
  53. M$ took it in the shorts by Sir_Dill · · Score: 1

    The reason nobody is posting anti-M$ is because M$ screwed up and had to layout some big cash to fix the problem...I wonder if the person that came up with the "brilliant" idea for the name Xbox is still employed..now if we can just find someone to port linux and a PS2 emulator to the Xbox it would be the icing on the be F-U cake.

  54. New Ferrari's eh? by Arcturax · · Score: 1

    I just hope they drive better than they manage their company! According to Yahoo Finance, their management effectiveness rating is -381.36 percent. Thats based on losses over earnings. Ouch! That and I can't believe they sold it to M$, why didn't they take it to Sony, Nintendo or even Sega instead?

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    1. Re:New Ferrari's eh? by Smegma4U · · Score: 1

      Well, they certainly wouldn't have sold the name to Sega because Sega is developing games for the XBox.

      --
      If it's supposed to move and doesn't, use WD-40. If it moves and it shouldn't, use duct tape.
  55. Those who have a clue don't name things X. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 4


    Microsoft has a difficult time hiring good marketing talent, apparently.

    X is a name you use when you mean, "I don't know what." It is a symbol for the unknown. It's use as the name of a product causes the reader momentary confusion, not something you want in a trademark.

    Besides, X-Box sounds like it is X-rated. There will be people who will think it is a porno appliance.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re: Those who have a clue don't name things X. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


      Need a marketing consultant?

      I'll help you avoid foolishness like this.

      --
      Bush's education improvements were
    2. Re:Those who have a clue don't name things X. by revelation0 · · Score: 2
      Besides, X-Box sounds like it is X-rated. There will be people who will think it is a porno appliance.
      And thats a bad thing? It's the first thing that game to my gramp's mind, and he swore on his deathbed that he'd be the first in line to get one. He is a little upset about them focusing on the T&L, but maybe thats just because he isn't much of a legs guy.

      So maybe the name wasn't such a bad decision after all?

      Revelations 0:0 - The begining of the end.
    3. Re:Those who have a clue don't name things X. by Pope · · Score: 1

      Hmm...
      DirectX (was something else originally)
      ActiveX (was OLE)
      Xbox

      At least they're not calling it "Extreme" anything. Anyone who released a product in the last 12 months with the word 'extreme' on it deserves to go down in flames.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    4. Re:Those who have a clue don't name things X. by selectspec · · Score: 3
      Actually, X does have traditional meanings:

      XML as in Extensible. Of course, I doubt the X-box is extensible.

      X-Windows, standing for Cross Windows. Symbolizing cross compatibility and remote access. Of course, I doubt Microsoft had any of these ideas in mind when they came up with the X-box.

      xinitd as in extended initd. A new version is often symbolized with x (such as PCI-X). Microsoft isn't releasing anything extended here.

      Actually, the reason Microsoft is calling it the X-box, is because the box leverages the Direct-X API's developed on the windows PC operating systems. Direct-X gets its X because it is a hardware emulation layer and the name implies Direct-[any video/sound chipset].

      --

      Someone you trust is one of us.

    5. Re:Those who have a clue don't name things X. by armb · · Score: 1

      > X-Windows, standing for Cross Windows

      No, X, standing for "we called the previous one W, and X is the next letter in the alphabet after W".
      http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/XWindow-User-HOWTO -2 .html#ss2.1

      And it's "X" or "the X Window System", not "X-Windows"

      --

      --
      rant
  56. Re:Yep, Next MS will have to pay US Robotics for " by jrp2 · · Score: 1

    Actually, as an ironic sidenote to that comment. USR had to cease marketing "x2" products in Brazil as some company down there was already producing a product by that name. It was a tape drive or something like that. It only caused a little stress as V.90 was just about out by then so they pulled the product and did special packaging for that country only that did not mention x2, just V.90. Goes to show it is hard to find a name that is not used somewhere these days.

    --
    The only athletic sport I ever mastered was backgammon - Douglas William Jerrold
  57. Re:I would have loved to see them hold their groun by Monte · · Score: 1

    I would have loved to see XBOX hold rock solid against MS,

    Hand[0]: Big fat juicy check with B. Gates' signature at the bottom.

    Hand[1]: Smug satisfaction of burning M-Soft's corporate ass.

    Err, I'll take what's on the check, Monty!

    and watch the antics as the MS engine rapidly tried to pull another name from it's magical hat,

    Like "HexBox" or "EcksBox" or X-Boss or S-Boxx or...

    But even I would be daunted by having probably millions pushed in my face just to change the company name.

    Daunted? Are you sure you didn't mean "sport major wood and drool like a baby sucking a lemon"?

    I know I would.

  58. Who do we want to take over today? by zerOnIne · · Score: 1

    kind of funny that MS is even paying off a company that makes its living buying out smaller tech companies... at least xbox tech. is up-front about it :)
    -----

    --
    09
  59. Re:OS9: Microware vs. Apple anyone? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1
    Actually, Microware sued Apple, since Microware users might not be able to determine the difference between an OS for industrial equipment and an OS for iMacs.

    What a surprise that their case was thrown out of court...although not as big of surprise as when Apple Records sued Apple. Their argument was: "Apple computers have a mic-in port, they must be a record company."

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  60. Re:no shiny ferarris by CDanek · · Score: 1

    And if you own the stock and don't want to sell it? Besides, if they wanna buy a flaming ship (stock price under .5 for several months) and shut it down, hey, great, cash for everyone, meetcha at Cheers in an hour.

    (And we'll pick up those ferrari's tomorrow.)

  61. We can probably find out how much $$ was involved by HEbGb · · Score: 3

    Note that Xbox is a public company; their financial reports will undoubedly have a line-item indicating how much money they made from the sale of this trademark.

    From the looks of things, they really needed the dough... they've only got $22k in the bank. Their stockholders didn't really apprciate this, however, seeing as their stock is down 13% today..

    http://biz.yahoo.com/p/x/xbox.ob.html

  62. The Original x-box by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2

    Joel Hodgeson, the creator of Mystery Science Theatre 3000, made a revolving stage setup called an "X-Box" in 1997. A group of comedians performed a single show that was aired on Comedy Central and HBO. Here's the link : Joel and Jim Hodgeson's X Box

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  63. But what does XBOX *do*!? by glindsey · · Score: 1

    From their press release:

    XBOX Technologies (Nasdaq "XBOX.OB") is a technology development company engaged in bringing innovative technologies to fruition.

    Oh... thanks. That, uh, really clears things up.

    1. Re:But what does XBOX *do*!? by ellem · · Score: 2

      "bringing innovative technologies"

      sounds like they're going to work for Microsoft
      ---

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
  64. Re:OS9: Microware vs. Apple anyone? by IronChef · · Score: 3

    Even more dumb than the Apple Records suit are the conditions under which it was settled: Apple was not allowed, for a long time, to do anything on Macs that related to music. Apple's own lawyers maintained that to be safe they couldn't even use notes from musical instruments as the system "beep" options.

    Some guy at Apple, fed up with this, put some kind of musical "toot" in the OS as a beep option. The sound file was named "Sosumi." So... sue... me... get it...?

    With iTunes and all, I guess the terms of the Apple Records settlement are long dead. If Apple didn't have to avoid music technology for so long I wonder where they would have taken it by now?

  65. Not NASDAQ by kindbud · · Score: 1
    This is an OTC stock, aka Bulletin Board stock, aka pink sheet stock, aka penny stock.

    NASDAQ requires listed companies to maintain share prices of at least a dollar. Yahoo says their symbol was changed to XBOX.OB, probably when they were de-listed from the NAS. The shares were trading at just under $5 in June of 1996, and have been on the decline since then.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  66. Re:Yep, Next MS will have to pay US Robotics for " by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    boy, talk about beating a dead horse!

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of dead horses!

  67. Mr Bean by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    I hope M$ decide to call the next major product they release in the UK the Club-Foot

    Didn't you steal it from Mr. Bean?
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
    1. Re:Mr Bean by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 2
      No, actually I couldn't abide the show and avoided it whenever possible (still been subjected to it by family members or on planes, so my dislike isn't unfounded). Rowan Atkinson was much funnier in Blackadder.

      Did the same low-quality pun get made on the show as well? I genuinely came up with the name myself, but was faintly surprised that I'd not head it done before (although since then I've heard of some bar in Chicago or somewhere with the same name).

      --

    2. Re:Mr Bean by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

      Did the same low-quality pun get made on the show as well?

      So it is a pun. I am not a native speaker of English. Can you explain it?

      From memory, Mr Bean brings his girlfriend to a disco bar (a small discotheque, I'm not certain of the current English name) named "Club Foot" or "Club Phut".
      __

      --
      __
      Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
      GW Bu
    3. Re:Mr Bean by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 2
      Well, the phrase could be interpreted as a club (disco, organisation, etc.) with the name "Foot" - hence Club Foot.

      However, Club Foot is also the common name for the disease called Talipes which causes club-like deformity of the foot.

      I've taken this one step further with my site, which I've subtitled "The Lamest Site On The Web", since lame could mean both unable to walk properly (as in someone suffering from Club Foot), or of poor quality.

      I know; it's in poor taste, but so's most of the rest of my site, so what the hell. Hope this cleared things up for you; learning a language with as many contradictions and tricks as English must suck (I'm learning Japanese at the moment, and I can see the grammar is way easier than English).

      --

  68. Who said anything about "shiny ferarris"... by CaptTrips · · Score: 1

    If anything Microsoft likely told XBOX Technologies that if they went to court
    Microsoft would most definitely win in the long run because Microsoft has WAY more
    money to spend on a lengthy court process than this company could even fathom. To
    give you an idea of how much money Microsoft has, they spent half a billion just to
    advertise their new console. I don't know about you but I think Microsoft used their
    power and basically told them to back the hell off. I can't believe Microsoft would
    give them a big fat chunk of cash other than the money they need to rename their company.
    This whole episode reminds me of another dispute only on a nastier level. See: Bleem vs. Sony.

    ----
    Capt' Trips

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
  69. GOD BLESS AMERICA! by tylerh · · Score: 2

    This is the quite of quick buck progress that makes me proud to have George W. as president and a congress that is acutioned off bienially. Take that, you euro-posers!

    --
    "one treats others with courtesy not because they are gentlemen or gentlewomen, but because you are" --G. Henrichs
  70. Zbox by TrollMaster3000 · · Score: 1

    Or M$ could rename their thing to ZBox. :)

    --


    I'm no punk bitch !!!
  71. What's this? by basilfawlty · · Score: 1
    Details of the deal are been kept under wraps.

    I thought the Brits were real sticklers for grammar. Guess not.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who know binary, and those who do not.
  72. New Press Release by hugg · · Score: 2

    Hopefully X-Box Technologies doesn't make an operating system called QDOS :)

  73. Re:Ferraris by Ancient+Eye · · Score: 1

    So they're an 11th hour investment corporation? *gasp*
    God forbid that companies with potential, get bought or invested in when they absolutely postively need it most. If those floundering companies weren't bought, they would probably fail, and whatever "important" or "interesting" thing they were doing, wouldn't get done.

    Is that a good thing? I doubt it.

  74. Toyota, Japan is the same by misterplow · · Score: 1
    I can't remember what the previous name was, but the city of Toyota in Japan was re-named [to Toyota] after the auto giant. It's like renaming Allentown, PA to 'Lucent, PA'.

    I wonder if MS will ever get any people to change their names.

  75. Welcome to Dotcomville Pop. 31337 by Atomic+Punk · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't surprise me if we see more of that in the future, sold to us consumers, er, I mean citizens under the guise of tax relief **cough** bullshit **cough**. Look at all the public arenas, sports stadiums, and parks around the (Danger Will Robinson! US Centric terminology in effect..) country that have changed longstanding, and well known to the community names to some corporate name and cheesy logo/banner. In Indiana alone we now have the RCA Dome instead of the Hoosier Dome, and Verizon Wireless Music Center instead of Deer Creek Music Center. Granted, only the Hoosier Dome was built with tax dollars (that I know of, but it still makes even a libertarian like me want to vomit just hearing it. Have I seen my taxes lowered in any significant way? Fat chance. Not only do I not have a lower tax burden, but then the sports teams often use the threat of take-my-ball-and-play-elsewhere, essentially blackmailing us into subsidizing a bigger arena or whatever their whim-du-jour is if they don't get their way.

  76. Legal Maneuvering by Bastian227 · · Score: 1

    XBox Tech employees: They are supposed to pay us? D'oh!

  77. HOTMAIL is obviously x-rated spam. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    A woman I met here told me the same story. She bought a computer, signed up for AOL, and immediately began getting about 30 porno messages a day.

    So, the first thing she did every day was delete everything pornographic. To her, it was obvious that everything from Hotmail was x-rated spam, so she deleted it without reading it. She learned of her mistake when a friend called her and asked why she never responded to his e-mail.

    I suggest that Microsoft should go all the way and call its new product HotBox . That way Microsoft could get back the 29 cents it spent for the name X-Box.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  78. Sort 'em out boys by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Pay them money!!?

    Microsoft probably threatened to break their legs.

    My associates tell me you have a little business named XBox...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  79. isnt this like trying to trademark air? by kel-tor · · Score: 1

    I mean, a unix machines are traditionally referred to as 'boxes,' and I am running 'X' on this one, so my desktop workstation is an X-Box?

    --

    ---

  80. For whatever it's worth... by dave-fu · · Score: 1

    ...I've had an Intellimouse (the optical kind) for over a year with no problems whatsoever. Light and weak plastic? Same could be said for the Logitech mice I've gone through in the past.
    So it goes.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
  81. Re:For whatever it's worth... [OT - mice] by SpeelingChekka · · Score: 1

    Light and weak plastic

    I've indirectly "tested" the strength of both MS and Logitech mice (the "cheap" MS mice, as well as the "cheap" logitechs), as I have played Quake3 using both, and I used to have a nasty habit of bashing my mouse down on the table whenever I was losing badly. The Microsoft mouse usually can only take one single blow and they are permanently stuffed. Of the logitech mice, the first one I bashed probably between 30 and 50 times before it broke, and its still usable (it's just a little wonky when the mouse lifts off the mousepad). The second logitech has taken a couple dozen smashes and is still going strong. I've destroyed 3 MS mice in less than 5 smashes total.

  82. speaking of Xbox's... by tpun · · Score: 1

    If you had lots of money could by Visual Matrix's XBox for your MS Xbox. And then if couldn't afford the Xbox HDTV addon pack, you could convert your Xbox's RGB output to 1080p. What fun! Of course, the UBox may not be so useful.

  83. Nah, just pick an extended ASCII symbol... by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

    like Ô or or ¦ and go "Prince" on everyone...

    "Titanic was 3hr and 17min long. They could have lost 3hr and 17min from that."

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
  84. Ferraris... by GoatBoy999 · · Score: 1

    Why bother with a tempremental little italian??? prove you do the right thing and get a nasty Audi. Or perhaps a nice TVR... "A nerd in a pimp car just looks like a pimp who forgot to get dressed"

    --
    "Content thyself to be obscurely good. When vice prevails, and impious men bear sway, the post of honor is a private sta
  85. Thank you by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    I understand now. I think there's a chain of sportswear shops called "Athlete's Foot" which is another disease.

    About Japanese, I suppose that when yo go beyond the elemental you will find it can be as tricky as English (or any other fully developed language).

    (And I agree that the flying in "Crouching Dragon,..." was unbelievable. They should have acted it as very big jumps, not running on the air.)
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu